File size: 2,971 Bytes
9d5b280 |
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 |
# MATH
ℹ️ This is the 4-shot variant!
## Paper
Measuring Mathematical Problem Solving With the MATH Dataset
https://arxiv.org/abs/2103.03874
Many intellectual endeavors require mathematical problem solving, but this skill remains beyond the capabilities of computers. To measure this ability in machine learning models, we introduce MATH, a new dataset of 12,500 challenging competition mathematics problems. Each problem in MATH has a full step-by-step solution which can be used to teach models to generate answer derivations and explanations.
NOTE: The few-shot and the generated answer extraction is based on the [Minerva](https://arxiv.org/abs/2206.14858) and exact match equivalence is calculated using the `sympy` library. This requires additional dependencies, which can be installed via the `lm-eval[math]` extra.
Homepage: https://github.com/hendrycks/math
## Citation
```
@article{hendrycksmath2021,
title={Measuring Mathematical Problem Solving With the MATH Dataset},
author={Dan Hendrycks and Collin Burns and Saurav Kadavath and Akul Arora and Steven Basart and Eric Tang and Dawn Song and Jacob Steinhardt},
journal={NeurIPS},
year={2021}
}
@misc{2206.14858,
Author = {Aitor Lewkowycz and Anders Andreassen and David Dohan and Ethan Dyer and Henryk Michalewski and Vinay Ramasesh and Ambrose Slone and Cem Anil and Imanol Schlag and Theo Gutman-Solo and Yuhuai Wu and Behnam Neyshabur and Guy Gur-Ari and Vedant Misra},
Title = {Solving Quantitative Reasoning Problems with Language Models},
Year = {2022},
Eprint = {arXiv:2206.14858},
}
```
### Groups and Tasks
#### Groups
- `minerva_math`
#### Tasks
- `minerva_math_algebra`
- `minerva_math_counting_and_prob`
- `minerva_math_geometry`
- `minerva_math_intermediate_algebra`
- `minerva_math_num_theory`
- `minerva_math_prealgebra`
- `minerva_math_precalc`
### Checklist
The checklist is the following:
For adding novel benchmarks/datasets to the library:
* [x] Is the task an existing benchmark in the literature?
* [x] Have you referenced the original paper that introduced the task?
* [x] If yes, does the original paper provide a reference implementation? If so, have you checked against the reference implementation and documented how to run such a test?
* The implementation in the original paper is one where the model is first fine-tuned on the data. They do have a few-shot evaluation for GPT-3, however the few-shot context used here is sourced from [Lewkowycz et al](https://arxiv.org/abs/2206.14858). The achieved accuracy on Llama-2 models is comparable to that provided in the paper, though not identical.
If other tasks on this dataset are already supported:
* [x] Is the "Main" variant of this task clearly denoted?
* [x] Have you provided a short sentence in a README on what each new variant adds / evaluates?
* [x] Have you noted which, if any, published evaluation setups are matched by this variant?
### Variant Wishlist
- [ ] zero-shot variant
|