|
|
In article <1993Apr22.011720.28958@midway.uchicago.edu>, dgf1@quads.uchicago.edu (David Farley) writes: |
|
|
|> In article <C5uHIM.JFq@rot.qc.ca> beaver@rot.qc.ca (Andre Boivert) writes: |
|
|
|> >I am looking for comments from people who have used/heard about PhotoShop |
|
|
|> >for Windows. Is it good? How does it compare to the Mac version? Is there |
|
|
|> >a lot of bugs (I heard the Windows version needs "fine-tuning)? |
|
|
|> >Any comments would be greatly appreciated.. |
|
|
|> >Thank you. |
|
|
|> >Andre Boisvert |
|
|
|> >beaver@rot.qc.ca |
|
|
|> An review of both the Mac and Windows versions in either PC Week or Info |
|
|
|> World this week, said that the Windows version was considerably slower |
|
|
|> than the Mac. A more useful comparison would have been between PhotoStyler |
|
|
|> and PhotoShop for Windows. David |
|
|
I don't know about that...I've used Photoshop 2.5 on both a 486dx-50 and a Quadra |
|
|
950...I'd say they are roughly equal. If anything the 486 was faster. |
|
|
Both systems were running in 24 bit color and had the same amount of RAM (16 megs) |
|
|
I also believe the quadra had one of those photoshop accelerators. |
|
|
|
