Papers
arxiv:2510.15136

Predicting the Unpredictable: Reproducible BiLSTM Forecasting of Incident Counts in the Global Terrorism Database (GTD)

Published on Oct 16
ยท Submitted by Oluwasegun Adegoke on Oct 22

Abstract

A Bidirectional LSTM outperforms classical and deep learning baselines in forecasting weekly terrorism incidents using the Global Terrorism Database.

AI-generated summary

We study short-horizon forecasting of weekly terrorism incident counts using the Global Terrorism Database (GTD, 1970--2016). We build a reproducible pipeline with fixed time-based splits and evaluate a Bidirectional LSTM (BiLSTM) against strong classical anchors (seasonal-naive, linear/ARIMA) and a deep LSTM-Attention baseline. On the held-out test set, the BiLSTM attains RMSE 6.38, outperforming LSTM-Attention (9.19; +30.6\%) and a linear lag-regression baseline (+35.4\% RMSE gain), with parallel improvements in MAE and MAPE. Ablations varying temporal memory, training-history length, spatial grain, lookback size, and feature groups show that models trained on long historical data generalize best; a moderate lookback (20--30 weeks) provides strong context; and bidirectional encoding is critical for capturing both build-up and aftermath patterns within the window. Feature-group analysis indicates that short-horizon structure (lagged counts and rolling statistics) contributes most, with geographic and casualty features adding incremental lift. We release code, configs, and compact result tables, and provide a data/ethics statement documenting GTD licensing and research-only use. Overall, the study offers a transparent, baseline-beating reference for GTD incident forecasting.

Community

Paper author Paper submitter

๐Ÿšจ New: Bidirectional LSTM for Terrorism Forecasting (37% improvement over baselines)

Demonstrate that BiLSTM networks significantly outperform classical forecasting methods on the Global Terrorism Database (1970-2016), achieving RMSE 6.19 vs 9.89 for linear regression.

๐Ÿ”ฌ Key Contributions:
โ€ข Comprehensive ablation studies (15+ configurations tested)
โ€ข Systematic analysis of historical data requirements (5yr โ†’ 46yr)
โ€ข Feature importance quantification (rolling statistics are critical: +66% impact)
โ€ข Optimal sequence length identification (30-week lookback)

๐Ÿ“Š Main Finding: Bidirectional processing captures temporal dependencies that unidirectional LSTMs miss entirely. LSTM+Attention (RMSE 9.19) performed worse than simple BiLSTM (6.19), highlighting that architecture choice matters more than complexity.

๐Ÿ”“ Fully Reproducible:
โœ… Complete code & processed data on Zenodo (DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17409540)
โœ… All ablation experiments reproducible (~2 hrs on standard laptop)
โœ… Trained model weights included

๐Ÿ’ก Why This Matters: First systematic deep learning study on GTD with rigorous ablations, demonstrating that 20+ years of historical data is critical for reliable forecasting (5yr data โ†’ 220% performance collapse).

๐Ÿ”— Code: github.com/Davidavid45/Deep-Learning-in-Counterterrorism
๐Ÿ”— Zenodo: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.17409540

#DeepLearning #TimeSeries #LSTM #ReproducibleResearch #SecurityAnalytics

This is an automated message from the Librarian Bot. I found the following papers similar to this paper.

The following papers were recommended by the Semantic Scholar API

Please give a thumbs up to this comment if you found it helpful!

If you want recommendations for any Paper on Hugging Face checkout this Space

You can directly ask Librarian Bot for paper recommendations by tagging it in a comment: @librarian-bot recommend

Sign up or log in to comment

Models citing this paper 1

Datasets citing this paper 0

No dataset linking this paper

Cite arxiv.org/abs/2510.15136 in a dataset README.md to link it from this page.

Spaces citing this paper 0

No Space linking this paper

Cite arxiv.org/abs/2510.15136 in a Space README.md to link it from this page.

Collections including this paper 0

No Collection including this paper

Add this paper to a collection to link it from this page.