Abstract
Agentic confidence calibration addresses limitations of static calibration methods by introducing a trajectory-based diagnostic framework that improves reliability across diverse AI agent systems.
AI agents are rapidly advancing from passive language models to autonomous systems executing complex, multi-step tasks. Yet their overconfidence in failure remains a fundamental barrier to deployment in high-stakes settings. Existing calibration methods, built for static single-turn outputs, cannot address the unique challenges of agentic systems, such as compounding errors along trajectories, uncertainty from external tools, and opaque failure modes. To address these challenges, we introduce, for the first time, the problem of Agentic Confidence Calibration and propose Holistic Trajectory Calibration (HTC), a novel diagnostic framework that extracts rich process-level features ranging from macro dynamics to micro stability across an agent's entire trajectory. Powered by a simple, interpretable model, HTC consistently surpasses strong baselines in both calibration and discrimination, across eight benchmarks, multiple LLMs, and diverse agent frameworks. Beyond performance, HTC delivers three essential advances: it provides interpretability by revealing the signals behind failure, enables transferability by applying across domains without retraining, and achieves generalization through a General Agent Calibrator (GAC) that achieves the best calibration (lowest ECE) on the out-of-domain GAIA benchmark. Together, these contributions establish a new process-centric paradigm for confidence calibration, providing a framework for diagnosing and enhancing the reliability of AI agents.
Community
🎯 Don't let your Agents be "Confidently Wrong"!
Traditional calibration works for static text, but Autonomous Agents fail differently—errors compound over long trajectories. We introduce Holistic Trajectory Calibration (HTC), a new paradigm to diagnose the entire execution process.
Why it matters:
- 🔍 Process-Centric: Extracts rich features (Dynamics, Stability) from the agent's thinking process, not just the final output.
- 📈 SOTA Calibration: Consistently outperforms baselines across 8 benchmarks (SimpleQA, Math500, etc.).
- 🌍 Generalization: We release the General Agent Calibrator (GAC), which achieves the best zero-shot calibration on the challenging GAIA benchmark.
Achieve Interpretability, Transferability, and Trust in your AI Agents. 🛡️
This is an automated message from the Librarian Bot. I found the following papers similar to this paper.
The following papers were recommended by the Semantic Scholar API
- The Confidence Dichotomy: Analyzing and Mitigating Miscalibration in Tool-Use Agents (2026)
- Towards a Science of Scaling Agent Systems (2025)
- IDRBench: Interactive Deep Research Benchmark (2026)
- Calibrating LLM Judges: Linear Probes for Fast and Reliable Uncertainty Estimation (2025)
- From Failure to Mastery: Generating Hard Samples for Tool-use Agents (2026)
- ET-Agent: Incentivizing Effective Tool-Integrated Reasoning Agent via Behavior Calibration (2026)
- MagicGUI-RMS: A Multi-Agent Reward Model System for Self-Evolving GUI Agents via Automated Feedback Reflux (2026)
Please give a thumbs up to this comment if you found it helpful!
If you want recommendations for any Paper on Hugging Face checkout this Space
You can directly ask Librarian Bot for paper recommendations by tagging it in a comment:
@librarian-bot
recommend
Models citing this paper 0
No model linking this paper
Datasets citing this paper 0
No dataset linking this paper
Spaces citing this paper 0
No Space linking this paper