Papers
arxiv:2604.19667

Chat2Workflow: A Benchmark for Generating Executable Visual Workflows with Natural Language

Published on Apr 21
· Submitted by
Ningyu Zhang
on Apr 22
Authors:
,
,
,
,
,
,

Abstract

Chat2Workflow presents a benchmark and agentic framework for automating executable visual workflow generation from natural language, revealing significant challenges in achieving industrial-grade automation despite advances in language models.

AI-generated summary

At present, executable visual workflows have emerged as a mainstream paradigm in real-world industrial deployments, offering strong reliability and controllability. However, in current practice, such workflows are almost entirely constructed through manual engineering: developers must carefully design workflows, write prompts for each step, and repeatedly revise the logic as requirements evolve-making development costly, time-consuming, and error-prone. To study whether large language models can automate this multi-round interaction process, we introduce Chat2Workflow, a benchmark for generating executable visual workflows directly from natural language, and propose a robust agentic framework to mitigate recurrent execution errors. Chat2Workflow is built from a large collection of real-world business workflows, with each instance designed so that the generated workflow can be transformed and directly deployed to practical workflow platforms such as Dify and Coze. Experimental results show that while state-of-the-art language models can often capture high-level intent, they struggle to generate correct, stable, and executable workflows, especially under complex or changing requirements. Although our agentic framework yields up to 5.34% resolve rate gains, the remaining real-world gap positions Chat2Workflow as a foundation for advancing industrial-grade automation. Code is available at https://github.com/zjunlp/Chat2Workflow.

Community

Paper submitter

Chat2Workflow is a benchmark and agent framework that aims to automatically generate deployable visual workflows from natural language, but current LLMs still struggle to produce correct and stable executable pipelines in real-world scenarios.

Sign up or log in to comment

Get this paper in your agent:

hf papers read 2604.19667
Don't have the latest CLI?
curl -LsSf https://hf.co/cli/install.sh | bash

Models citing this paper 0

No model linking this paper

Cite arxiv.org/abs/2604.19667 in a model README.md to link it from this page.

Datasets citing this paper 0

No dataset linking this paper

Cite arxiv.org/abs/2604.19667 in a dataset README.md to link it from this page.

Spaces citing this paper 0

No Space linking this paper

Cite arxiv.org/abs/2604.19667 in a Space README.md to link it from this page.

Collections including this paper 0

No Collection including this paper

Add this paper to a collection to link it from this page.