Spaces:
Sleeping
Sleeping
Update README.md
Browse files
README.md
CHANGED
@@ -62,14 +62,17 @@ Model Selection and Evaluation:
|
|
62 |
- Understand the strengths and limitations of each model in different conversational contexts.
|
63 |
|
64 |
Fine-tuning:
|
65 |
-
|
|
|
|
|
66 |
|
67 |
Hugging Face:
|
68 |
-
-
|
69 |
-
-
|
70 |
|
71 |
-
Streamlit VS Gradio
|
72 |
-
|
|
|
73 |
|
74 |
|
75 |
## Opportunities and Next Steps
|
|
|
62 |
- Understand the strengths and limitations of each model in different conversational contexts.
|
63 |
|
64 |
Fine-tuning:
|
65 |
+
- Address issues such as speed and translation accuracy by fine-tuning model parameters and configurations.
|
66 |
+
- Implement strategies to mitigate challenges such as text truncation and limited language support to enhance overall user experience.
|
67 |
+
- Iterate on model architecture, hyperparameters, and data preprocessing techniques to achieve desired outcomes and user satisfaction.
|
68 |
|
69 |
Hugging Face:
|
70 |
+
- Emphasize the necessity of creating a comprehensive requirements document outlining dependencies, libraries, and configurations required for Hugging Face model integration.
|
71 |
+
- Avoid reliance on Jupyter notebooks for production-level deployment due to limitations in scalability, version control, and reproducibility.
|
72 |
|
73 |
+
Streamlit VS Gradio:
|
74 |
+
- Recognized Streamlit's appeal for deployment purposes, particularly for its visually appealing characteristics and user interface elements.
|
75 |
+
- However, prioritized Gradio for deployment due to its compatibility with the core functionality and focus of our model, prioritizing model performance and functionality over visualization aesthetics.
|
76 |
|
77 |
|
78 |
## Opportunities and Next Steps
|