jezadahlgren commited on
Commit
835052f
·
verified ·
1 Parent(s): fb3829c

Update README.md

Browse files
Files changed (1) hide show
  1. README.md +8 -5
README.md CHANGED
@@ -62,14 +62,17 @@ Model Selection and Evaluation:
62
  - Understand the strengths and limitations of each model in different conversational contexts.
63
 
64
  Fine-tuning:
65
- - speed, translations were truncated so we needed to split the amount of text, only certain languages were available
 
 
66
 
67
  Hugging Face:
68
- - have to have a requirements doc
69
- - must be py not our jupiter
70
 
71
- Streamlit VS Gradio
72
- - heheh
 
73
 
74
 
75
  ## Opportunities and Next Steps
 
62
  - Understand the strengths and limitations of each model in different conversational contexts.
63
 
64
  Fine-tuning:
65
+ - Address issues such as speed and translation accuracy by fine-tuning model parameters and configurations.
66
+ - Implement strategies to mitigate challenges such as text truncation and limited language support to enhance overall user experience.
67
+ - Iterate on model architecture, hyperparameters, and data preprocessing techniques to achieve desired outcomes and user satisfaction.
68
 
69
  Hugging Face:
70
+ - Emphasize the necessity of creating a comprehensive requirements document outlining dependencies, libraries, and configurations required for Hugging Face model integration.
71
+ - Avoid reliance on Jupyter notebooks for production-level deployment due to limitations in scalability, version control, and reproducibility.
72
 
73
+ Streamlit VS Gradio:
74
+ - Recognized Streamlit's appeal for deployment purposes, particularly for its visually appealing characteristics and user interface elements.
75
+ - However, prioritized Gradio for deployment due to its compatibility with the core functionality and focus of our model, prioritizing model performance and functionality over visualization aesthetics.
76
 
77
 
78
  ## Opportunities and Next Steps