Spaces:
Running
Running
File size: 35,633 Bytes
bdedf43 1099afe bdedf43 1099afe bdedf43 1099afe bdedf43 522f7a0 bdedf43 522f7a0 bdedf43 1099afe bdedf43 1099afe bdedf43 522f7a0 bdedf43 1099afe bdedf43 1099afe bdedf43 522f7a0 bdedf43 522f7a0 bdedf43 522f7a0 bdedf43 522f7a0 bdedf43 522f7a0 bdedf43 522f7a0 bdedf43 1099afe bdedf43 1099afe 522f7a0 bdedf43 522f7a0 bdedf43 522f7a0 bdedf43 522f7a0 bdedf43 522f7a0 bdedf43 1099afe bdedf43 1099afe bdedf43 1099afe bdedf43 522f7a0 bdedf43 1099afe bdedf43 1099afe bdedf43 522f7a0 bdedf43 1099afe bdedf43 1099afe bdedf43 1099afe bdedf43 1099afe bdedf43 1099afe 522f7a0 bdedf43 522f7a0 bdedf43 522f7a0 bdedf43 522f7a0 1099afe 522f7a0 1099afe 522f7a0 bdedf43 522f7a0 bdedf43 522f7a0 bdedf43 522f7a0 bdedf43 522f7a0 bdedf43 522f7a0 bdedf43 522f7a0 bdedf43 522f7a0 bdedf43 522f7a0 bdedf43 522f7a0 bdedf43 522f7a0 bdedf43 522f7a0 bdedf43 522f7a0 bdedf43 522f7a0 bdedf43 522f7a0 bdedf43 522f7a0 bdedf43 522f7a0 bdedf43 522f7a0 bdedf43 522f7a0 bdedf43 1099afe bdedf43 522f7a0 bdedf43 522f7a0 bdedf43 522f7a0 bdedf43 522f7a0 bdedf43 522f7a0 bdedf43 522f7a0 bdedf43 522f7a0 bdedf43 522f7a0 bdedf43 1099afe bdedf43 522f7a0 bdedf43 522f7a0 bdedf43 522f7a0 bdedf43 522f7a0 bdedf43 522f7a0 bdedf43 522f7a0 bdedf43 522f7a0 bdedf43 522f7a0 bdedf43 522f7a0 bdedf43 1099afe 522f7a0 bdedf43 522f7a0 bdedf43 522f7a0 1099afe bdedf43 522f7a0 bdedf43 522f7a0 bdedf43 1099afe bdedf43 1099afe 522f7a0 bdedf43 1099afe bdedf43 1099afe bdedf43 1099afe bdedf43 1099afe bdedf43 1099afe bdedf43 1099afe 522f7a0 bdedf43 522f7a0 bdedf43 522f7a0 bdedf43 522f7a0 bdedf43 522f7a0 bdedf43 522f7a0 1099afe 522f7a0 bdedf43 522f7a0 bdedf43 522f7a0 1099afe 522f7a0 bdedf43 522f7a0 1099afe 522f7a0 bdedf43 522f7a0 bdedf43 522f7a0 1099afe 522f7a0 1099afe 522f7a0 bdedf43 522f7a0 bdedf43 522f7a0 bdedf43 522f7a0 bdedf43 522f7a0 bdedf43 522f7a0 bdedf43 522f7a0 bdedf43 522f7a0 bdedf43 522f7a0 bdedf43 522f7a0 bdedf43 522f7a0 bdedf43 |
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376 377 378 379 380 381 382 383 384 385 386 387 388 389 390 391 392 393 394 395 396 397 398 399 400 401 402 403 404 405 406 407 408 409 410 411 412 413 414 415 416 417 418 419 420 421 422 423 424 425 426 427 428 429 430 431 432 433 434 435 436 437 438 439 440 441 442 443 444 445 446 447 448 449 450 451 452 453 454 455 456 457 458 459 460 461 462 463 464 465 466 467 468 469 470 471 472 473 474 475 476 477 478 479 480 481 482 483 484 485 486 487 488 489 490 491 492 493 494 495 496 497 498 499 500 501 502 503 504 505 506 507 508 509 510 511 512 513 514 515 516 517 518 519 520 521 522 523 524 525 526 527 528 529 530 531 532 533 534 535 536 537 538 539 540 541 542 543 544 545 546 547 548 549 550 551 552 553 554 555 556 557 558 559 560 561 562 563 564 565 566 567 568 569 570 571 572 573 574 575 576 577 578 579 580 581 582 583 584 585 586 587 588 589 590 591 592 593 594 595 596 597 598 599 600 601 602 603 604 605 606 607 608 609 610 611 612 613 614 615 616 617 618 619 620 621 622 623 624 625 626 627 628 629 630 631 632 633 634 635 636 637 638 639 640 641 642 643 644 645 646 647 648 649 650 651 652 653 654 655 656 657 658 659 660 661 662 663 664 665 666 667 668 669 670 671 672 673 674 675 676 677 678 679 680 681 682 683 684 685 686 687 688 689 690 691 692 693 694 695 696 697 698 699 700 701 702 703 704 705 706 707 708 709 710 |
# DEPENDENCIES
import re
import sys
import json
from typing import Any
from typing import List
from typing import Dict
from typing import Tuple
from pathlib import Path
from typing import Optional
# Add parent directory to path for imports
sys.path.append(str(Path(__file__).parent.parent))
from utils.logger import log_info
from utils.logger import log_error
from config.risk_rules import RiskRules
from config.risk_rules import ContractType
from services.risk_analyzer import RiskScore
from utils.logger import ContractAnalyzerLogger
from model_manager.llm_manager import LLMManager
from services.data_models import UnfavorableTerm
from model_manager.llm_manager import LLMProvider
from services.data_models import NegotiationPoint
from services.data_models import NegotiationTactic
from services.data_models import MissingProtection
from services.data_models import NegotiationPlaybook
from services.clause_extractor import ExtractedClause
from services.llm_interpreter import RiskInterpretation
from services.llm_interpreter import ClauseInterpretation
from services.protection_checker import MissingProtection
class NegotiationEngine:
"""
Generate intelligent negotiation strategy with LLM enhancement integrated with full analysis pipeline and RiskRules framework
"""
def __init__(self, llm_manager: LLMManager, default_provider: LLMProvider = LLMProvider.OLLAMA):
"""
Initialize negotiation engine
Arguments:
----------
llm_manager { LLMManager } : LLMManager instance
default_provider { LLMProvider } : Default LLM provider
"""
self.llm_manager = llm_manager
self.default_provider = default_provider
self.risk_rules = RiskRules()
self.logger = ContractAnalyzerLogger.get_logger()
log_info("NegotiationEngine initialized", default_provider = default_provider.value)
@ContractAnalyzerLogger.log_execution_time("generate_comprehensive_playbook")
def generate_comprehensive_playbook(self, risk_analysis: RiskScore, risk_interpretation: RiskInterpretation, unfavorable_terms: List[UnfavorableTerm], missing_protections: List[MissingProtection],
clauses: List[ExtractedClause], contract_type: ContractType, max_points: int = 10, provider: Optional[LLMProvider] = None) -> NegotiationPlaybook:
"""
Generate comprehensive negotiation playbook using all analysis results
Arguments:
----------
risk_analysis : Complete risk analysis
risk_interpretation : LLM-enhanced risk explanations
unfavorable_terms : Detected unfavorable terms
missing_protections : Missing protections
clauses : Extracted clauses with risk scores (should be risk-category based)
contract_type : Contract type for strategy
max_points : Maximum negotiation points
provider : LLM provider
Returns:
--------
{ NegotiationPlaybook } : Comprehensive NegotiationPlaybook
"""
provider = provider or self.default_provider
log_info("Starting comprehensive negotiation playbook generation", contract_type = contract_type.value, overall_risk = risk_analysis.overall_score, max_points = max_points)
# Generate prioritized negotiation points
negotiation_points = self.generate_negotiation_points(risk_analysis = risk_analysis,
unfavorable_terms = unfavorable_terms,
missing_protections = missing_protections,
clauses = clauses,
max_points = max_points,
provider = provider,
)
# Generate overall strategy using LLM
overall_strategy = self._generate_overall_strategy(risk_analysis = risk_analysis,
risk_interpretation = risk_interpretation,
contract_type = contract_type,
provider = provider,
)
# Identify walk-away items
walk_away_items = self._identify_walk_away_items(negotiation_points = negotiation_points,
risk_analysis = risk_analysis,
)
# Identify concession items
concession_items = self._identify_concession_items(negotiation_points = negotiation_points,
risk_analysis = risk_analysis,
)
# Generate timing guidance
timing_guidance = self._generate_timing_guidance(negotiation_points = negotiation_points,
contract_type = contract_type,
provider = provider,
)
# Generate risk mitigation plan
risk_mitigation_plan = self._generate_risk_mitigation_plan(risk_analysis = risk_analysis,
negotiation_points = negotiation_points,
provider = provider,
)
playbook = NegotiationPlaybook(overall_strategy = overall_strategy,
critical_points = negotiation_points,
walk_away_items = walk_away_items,
concession_items = concession_items,
timing_guidance = timing_guidance,
risk_mitigation_plan = risk_mitigation_plan,
)
log_info("Comprehensive negotiation playbook generated", critical_points = len(negotiation_points), walk_away_items = len(walk_away_items))
return playbook
@ContractAnalyzerLogger.log_execution_time("generate_negotiation_points")
def generate_negotiation_points(self, risk_analysis: RiskScore, unfavorable_terms: List[UnfavorableTerm], missing_protections: List[MissingProtection],
clauses: List[ExtractedClause], max_points: int = 10, provider: Optional[LLMProvider] = None) -> List[NegotiationPoint]:
"""
Generate prioritized negotiation strategy
Arguments:
----------
risk_analysis { RiskScore } : Risk analysis results
unfavorable_terms { list } : Detected unfavorable terms
missing_protections { list } : Missing protections
clauses { list } : Extracted clauses (ideally with risk categories)
max_points { int } : Maximum negotiation points to generate
provider { LLMProvider } : LLM provider
Returns:
--------
{ list } : List of NegotiationPoint objects sorted by priority
"""
provider = provider or self.default_provider
# Convert dictionaries to objects if needed
unfavorable_terms, missing_protections = self._ensure_objects(unfavorable_terms, missing_protections)
log_info("Starting negotiation points generation", max_points = max_points, unfavorable_terms = len(unfavorable_terms), missing_protections = len(missing_protections))
negotiation_points = list()
# Critical unfavorable terms (walk-away level)
critical_terms = [t for t in unfavorable_terms if (t.severity == "critical")]
# Top-10 critical terms
for term in critical_terms[:10]:
point = self._create_enhanced_point_from_term(term, clauses, priority = 1)
if point:
negotiation_points.append(point)
# Critical missing protections
critical_protections = [p for p in missing_protections if (p.importance == "critical")]
for protection in critical_protections[:10]:
point = self._create_enhanced_point_from_protection(protection, priority = 2)
negotiation_points.append(point)
# High unfavorable terms
high_terms = [t for t in unfavorable_terms if (t.severity == "high")]
for term in high_terms[:10]:
point = self._create_enhanced_point_from_term(term, clauses, priority = 3)
if point:
negotiation_points.append(point)
# High-risk categories from risk analysis
high_risk_categories = self._get_high_risk_categories(risk_analysis)
for category in high_risk_categories[:10]:
point = self._create_category_strategy_point(category, risk_analysis, clauses, priority = 4)
if point:
negotiation_points.append(point)
# Medium unfavorable terms and missing protections
medium_terms = [t for t in unfavorable_terms if (t.severity == "medium")]
for term in medium_terms[:10]:
point = self._create_enhanced_point_from_term(term, clauses, priority=5)
if point:
negotiation_points.append(point)
medium_protections = [p for p in missing_protections if (p.importance == "medium")]
for protection in medium_protections[:10]:
point = self._create_enhanced_point_from_protection(protection, priority = 5)
negotiation_points.append(point)
# Enhance with LLM for sophisticated language and strategy
enhanced_points = self._enhance_with_llm_strategy(negotiation_points[:max_points],
risk_analysis,
provider,
)
log_info(f"Negotiation points generation complete", total_points = len(enhanced_points))
return enhanced_points[:max_points]
def _create_enhanced_point_from_term(self, term: UnfavorableTerm, clauses: List[ExtractedClause], priority: int) -> Optional[NegotiationPoint]:
"""
Create enhanced negotiation point from unfavorable term from the clauses that are extracted by from RiskClauseExtractor having risk categories
"""
# Find clause by reference
clause = next((c for c in clauses if (c.reference == term.clause_reference)), None)
# If not found by reference, try finding by matching risk category (if term.category is a risk category)
if not clause:
clause = next((c for c in clauses if (c.category == term.category)), None) # term.category should be a risk category from TermAnalyzer
if not clause:
log_info(f"Could not find clause for term: {term.term} in category: {term.category}", clause_reference=term.clause_reference)
return None
current = clause.text
# Determine negotiation tactic
tactic = self._determine_negotiation_tactic(term, clause)
# Generate sophisticated proposed language
proposed = self._generate_enhanced_proposed_language(term, clause, tactic)
# Calculate difficulty
difficulty = self._calculate_negotiation_difficulty(term, tactic)
# Generate strategic context
business_impact = self._generate_business_impact(term, clause)
counterparty_concerns = self._generate_counterparty_concerns(term, tactic)
timing = self._suggest_timing(priority, tactic)
return NegotiationPoint(priority = priority,
category = term.category,
issue = term.term,
current_language = current,
proposed_language = proposed,
rationale = term.explanation,
tactic = tactic,
fallback_position = self._generate_strategic_fallback(term, tactic),
estimated_difficulty = difficulty,
legal_basis = term.legal_basis,
business_impact = business_impact,
counterparty_concerns = counterparty_concerns,
timing_suggestion = timing,
bargaining_chips = self._suggest_bargaining_chips(term, tactic),
)
def _create_enhanced_point_from_protection(self, protection: MissingProtection, priority: int) -> NegotiationPoint:
"""
Create enhanced negotiation point from missing protection
"""
difficulty = "medium" if (protection.importance == "critical") else "easy"
return NegotiationPoint(priority = priority,
category = protection.categories[0] if protection.categories else "general",
issue = f"Add {protection.protection}",
current_language = "[NOT PRESENT IN CONTRACT]",
proposed_language = protection.suggested_language or protection.recommendation,
rationale = protection.explanation,
tactic = NegotiationTactic.ADDITION,
fallback_position = self._generate_protection_fallback(protection),
estimated_difficulty = difficulty,
legal_basis = protection.legal_basis,
business_impact = f"Missing this protection creates {protection.risk_score}/100 risk exposure",
timing_suggestion = "Early in negotiations - establishes baseline protections",
bargaining_chips = ["Offer to review their standard protections in return"],
)
def _create_category_strategy_point(self, category: str, risk_analysis: RiskScore, clauses: List[ExtractedClause], priority: int) -> Optional[NegotiationPoint]:
"""
Create strategic negotiation point for high-risk category, where clauses are from RiskClauseExtractor and have risk categories
"""
# Find clauses that belong to this *risk* category
category_clauses = [c for c in clauses if c.category == category] # Direct match on risk category
if not category_clauses:
log_info(f"No clauses found for high-risk category: {category}", available_categories=[c.category for c in clauses])
return None
score = risk_analysis.category_scores.get(category, 0)
# Use high description as default for high-risk
description = self.risk_rules.CATEGORY_DESCRIPTIONS.get(category, {}).get("high", "")
return NegotiationPoint(priority = priority,
category = category,
issue = f"Address {category.replace('_', ' ')} risks (score: {score}/100)",
current_language = f"Multiple clauses in {category} category present elevated risk (e.g., {category_clauses[0].reference}).",
proposed_language = f"Request balanced, market-standard terms for {category.replace('_', ' ')} provisions",
rationale = description,
tactic = NegotiationTactic.MODIFICATION,
estimated_difficulty = "medium",
business_impact = f"High risk category affecting multiple contract areas",
timing_suggestion = "Mid-negotiations after establishing rapport",
)
def _determine_negotiation_tactic(self, term: UnfavorableTerm, clause: ExtractedClause) -> NegotiationTactic:
"""
Determine the best negotiation tactic for this term
"""
text_lower = clause.text.lower()
if (("unlimited" in text_lower) or ("sole discretion" in text_lower)):
return NegotiationTactic.LIMITATION
elif (("indemnify" in text_lower) and ("mutual" not in text_lower)):
return NegotiationTactic.MUTUALIZATION
elif (any(word in text_lower for word in ["forfeit", "penalty", "liquidated damages"])):
return NegotiationTactic.REMOVAL
elif (("vague" in term.explanation.lower()) or ("ambiguous" in term.explanation.lower())):
return NegotiationTactic.CLARIFICATION
else:
return NegotiationTactic.MODIFICATION
def _generate_enhanced_proposed_language(self, term: UnfavorableTerm, clause: ExtractedClause, tactic: NegotiationTactic) -> str:
"""
Generate sophisticated proposed language based on tactic
"""
language_templates = {NegotiationTactic.REMOVAL : "Remove the following language: '[EXTRACT PROBLEMATIC PHRASE]'",
NegotiationTactic.LIMITATION : "Add limitation: 'Not to exceed [REASONABLE LIMIT]' or 'Subject to [REASONABLE STANDARD]'",
NegotiationTactic.MUTUALIZATION : "Make mutual: 'Each party shall [APPLY TO BOTH PARTIES]'",
NegotiationTactic.CLARIFICATION : "Clarify: 'For purposes of this section, [TERM] means [CLEAR DEFINITION]'",
NegotiationTactic.MODIFICATION : "Modify to: '[BALANCED, MARKET-STANDARD LANGUAGE]'",
}
base_template = language_templates.get(tactic, term.suggested_fix or "[Request balanced language]")
# Enhance with specific examples based on term type
if ("non-compete" in term.term.lower()):
return "Limit to: (a) 6-12 month duration, (b) direct competitors only, (c) reasonable geographic scope"
elif ("liability" in term.term.lower()):
return "Add: 'Total liability capped at the greater of $[AMOUNT] or fees paid in preceding 12 months'"
elif ("termination" in term.term.lower()):
return "Modify to provide mutual [30-60] day notice period and clear 'for cause' definition"
return base_template
def _calculate_negotiation_difficulty(self, term: UnfavorableTerm, tactic: NegotiationTactic) -> str:
"""
Calculate negotiation difficulty
"""
if ((term.severity == "critical") and (tactic == NegotiationTactic.REMOVAL)):
return "hard"
elif ((term.severity == "high") or (tactic == NegotiationTactic.MUTUALIZATION)):
return "medium"
else:
return "easy"
def _generate_business_impact(self, term: UnfavorableTerm, clause: ExtractedClause) -> str:
"""
Generate business impact analysis
"""
if (term.severity == "critical"):
return "Could result in significant financial exposure or business restrictions"
elif (term.severity == "high"):
return "Creates substantial operational risk or compliance burden"
else:
return "Standard business risk that should be managed"
def _generate_counterparty_concerns(self, term: UnfavorableTerm, tactic: NegotiationTactic) -> str:
"""
Anticipate counterparty concerns
"""
concerns = {NegotiationTactic.REMOVAL : "They may view this as essential protection",
NegotiationTactic.LIMITATION : "They may argue this undermines the provision's purpose",
NegotiationTactic.MUTUALIZATION : "They may prefer one-sided advantage",
NegotiationTactic.CLARIFICATION : "They may prefer ambiguity for flexibility",
}
return concerns.get(tactic, "Standard negotiation resistance expected")
def _suggest_timing(self, priority: int, tactic: NegotiationTactic) -> str:
"""
Suggest negotiation timing
"""
if (priority <= 2):
return "Address early - these are deal-breakers"
elif (tactic == NegotiationTactic.ADDITION):
return "Early in negotiations - establishes baseline"
else:
return "Mid-negotiations - after establishing key terms"
def _suggest_bargaining_chips(self, term: UnfavorableTerm, tactic: NegotiationTactic) -> List[str]:
"""
Suggest bargaining chips
"""
chips = list()
if (tactic == NegotiationTactic.REMOVAL):
chips.append("Offer alternative protection that addresses their underlying concern")
elif (tactic == NegotiationTactic.LIMITATION):
chips.append("Accept their position with reasonable cap or standard")
elif (tactic == NegotiationTactic.MUTUALIZATION):
chips.append("Frame as fairness principle benefiting both parties")
chips.append("Trade for lower priority item they care about")
return chips
def _generate_strategic_fallback(self, term: UnfavorableTerm, tactic: NegotiationTactic) -> str:
"""
Generate strategic fallback position
"""
if (term.severity == "critical"):
return "If no compromise, seriously consider walking away - this creates unacceptable risk"
elif (term.severity == "high"):
return "If they refuse, document objection and consider risk mitigation strategies"
else:
return "If they won't budge, assess if other favorable terms compensate for this risk"
def _ensure_objects(self, unfavorable_terms, missing_protections):
"""
Convert dictionaries back to proper objects if needed
"""
if (unfavorable_terms and isinstance(unfavorable_terms[0], dict)):
unfavorable_terms = [UnfavorableTerm(**term_dict) for term_dict in unfavorable_terms]
if missing_protections and isinstance(missing_protections[0], dict):
missing_protections = [MissingProtection(**prot_dict) for prot_dict in missing_protections]
return unfavorable_terms, missing_protections
def _generate_protection_fallback(self, protection: MissingProtection) -> str:
"""
Generate fallback for missing protections
"""
if (protection.importance == "critical"):
return "If they refuse, document this material gap and assess deal viability"
else:
return "If they refuse, note the gap and consider if other protections compensate"
def _get_high_risk_categories(self, risk_analysis: RiskScore) -> List[str]:
"""
Get high-risk categories from risk analysis
"""
# Use the risk thresholds defined in RiskRules
high_threshold = self.risk_rules.RISK_THRESHOLDS.get("high", 60)
return [cat for cat, score in risk_analysis.category_scores.items() if (score >= high_threshold)]
def _enhance_with_llm_strategy(self, points: List[NegotiationPoint], risk_analysis: RiskScore, provider: LLMProvider) -> List[NegotiationPoint]:
"""
Use LLM to enhance negotiation points with sophisticated strategy
"""
if not points:
return points
log_info(f"Enhancing {len(points)} negotiation points with LLM strategy")
try:
prompt = self._create_strategic_enhancement_prompt(points, risk_analysis)
response = self.llm_manager.complete(prompt = prompt,
provider = provider,
temperature = 0.3,
max_tokens = 2000,
fallback_providers = [LLMProvider.OPENAI],
retry_on_error = True,
)
if response.success:
enhanced = self._parse_strategic_enhancements(response.text, points)
log_info("LLM strategic enhancement successful")
return enhanced
else:
log_info("LLM strategic enhancement failed, using original points")
return points
except Exception as e:
log_error(e, context = {"component": "NegotiationEngine", "operation": "enhance_with_llm_strategy"})
return points
def _create_strategic_enhancement_prompt(self, points: List[NegotiationPoint], risk_analysis: RiskScore) -> str:
"""
Create prompt for strategic LLM enhancement
"""
context = {"overall_risk" : risk_analysis.overall_score,
"risk_level" : risk_analysis.risk_level,
"points" : [{"priority" : p.priority,
"issue" : p.issue,
"category" : p.category,
"current" : p.current_language,
"proposed" : p.proposed_language,
"tactic" : p.tactic.value,
"difficulty" : p.estimated_difficulty
}
for p in points
],
}
prompt = f"""
As an expert negotiation strategist, enhance these negotiation points with sophisticated strategy.
CONTRACT RISK: {context['overall_risk']}/100 ({context['risk_level']})
NEGOTIATION POINTS (format: [{{'priority': int, 'issue': str, 'category': str, 'current': str, 'proposed': str, 'tactic': str, 'difficulty': str}}]):
{json.dumps(context['points'], indent=2)}
For EACH point (match the order and priority), provide:
1. ENHANCED_PROPOSAL: More specific, legally sound alternative language (only return the enhanced text).
2. STRATEGIC_RATIONALE: Business-focused reasoning emphasizing mutual benefit (only return the rationale).
3. COUNTERPARTY_PERSPECTIVE: Their likely concerns and how to address them (only return the perspective).
4. TIMING_STRATEGY: When and how to raise this issue (only return the timing).
5. BARGAINING_CHIPS: Specific trade-offs or concessions (only return the chips, as a comma-separated string).
Focus on creating win-win solutions and practical negotiation tactics. Respond in the exact format below for each point:
Point 1:
ENHANCED_PROPOSAL: [text]
STRATEGIC_RATIONALE: [text]
COUNTERPARTY_PERSPECTIVE: [text]
TIMING_STRATEGY: [text]
BARGAINING_CHIPS: [chip1, chip2, ...]
Point 2:
ENHANCED_PROPOSAL: [text]
...
"""
return prompt
def _parse_strategic_enhancements(self, llm_text: str, original_points: List[NegotiationPoint]) -> List[NegotiationPoint]:
"""
Parse LLM strategic enhancements, assuming a structured format.
"""
enhanced = list()
for i, point in enumerate(original_points):
point_identifier = f"Point {i+1}:"
start_idx = llm_text.find(point_identifier)
if (start_idx == -1):
log_info(f"LLM response did not contain expected identifier for Point {i+1}. Keeping original.")
enhanced.append(point)
continue
# Find the start of the next point or end of string
next_point_idx = llm_text.find(f"Point {i+2}:", start_idx)
if next_point_idx == -1:
section_text = llm_text[start_idx:]
else:
section_text = llm_text[start_idx:next_point_idx]
# Extract fields using regex within the section_text
proposal_match = re.search(r"ENHANCED_PROPOSAL:\s*(.*?)(?:\n|$)", section_text, re.DOTALL)
if proposal_match:
new_proposal = proposal_match.group(1).strip()
# Basic sanity check
if (new_proposal and (len(new_proposal) > 10)):
point.proposed_language = new_proposal
# TIMING_STRATEGY
timing_match = re.search(r"TIMING_STRATEGY:\s*(.*?)(?:\n|$)", section_text, re.DOTALL)
if timing_match:
new_timing = timing_match.group(1).strip()
if (new_timing and (len(new_timing) > 5)):
point.timing_suggestion = new_timing
# BARGAINING_CHIPS
chips_match = re.search(r"BARGAINING_CHIPS:\s*\[(.*?)\]", section_text, re.DOTALL)
if chips_match:
chips_str = chips_match.group(1).strip()
if chips_str:
# Split by comma and strip whitespace
chips_list = [chip.strip().strip('"\'') for chip in chips_str.split(',') if chip.strip()]
# Keep top 3
point.bargaining_chips = chips_list[:3]
enhanced.append(point)
return enhanced
def _generate_overall_strategy(self, risk_analysis: RiskScore, risk_interpretation: RiskInterpretation, contract_type: ContractType, provider: LLMProvider) -> str:
"""
Generate overall negotiation strategy using LLM
"""
prompt = f"""
As a negotiation expert, provide overall strategy for this contract.
CONTRACT TYPE: {contract_type.value}
RISK LEVEL: {risk_analysis.overall_score}/100 ({risk_analysis.risk_level})
KEY CONCERNS: {risk_interpretation.key_concerns}
Provide a concise 3-4 sentence negotiation strategy focusing on:
- Overall approach (collaborative vs. firm)
- Key priorities
- Risk management
- Success metrics
Strategy:
"""
try:
response = self.llm_manager.complete(prompt = prompt,
provider = provider,
temperature = 0.3,
max_tokens = 400,
)
return response.text.strip() if response.success else "Focus on addressing critical risks while maintaining collaborative negotiation tone."
except Exception as e:
log_error(e, context = {"operation": "generate_overall_strategy"})
return "Prioritize critical risk items while seeking balanced, market-standard terms."
def _identify_walk_away_items(self, negotiation_points: List[NegotiationPoint], risk_analysis: RiskScore) -> List[str]:
"""
Identify non-negotiable walk-away items
"""
walk_away = list()
critical_points = [p for p in negotiation_points if (p.priority == 1)]
for point in critical_points:
if ((point.estimated_difficulty == "hard") and (risk_analysis.overall_score >= 70)):
walk_away.append(f"{point.issue} - critical risk that cannot be mitigated")
# Max 5 walk-away items
return walk_away[:5]
def _identify_concession_items(self, negotiation_points: List[NegotiationPoint], risk_analysis: RiskScore) -> List[str]:
"""
Identify items that can be conceded
"""
concessions = list()
low_priority = [p for p in negotiation_points if (p.priority >= 4)]
for point in low_priority[:2]:
if (point.estimated_difficulty == "hard"):
concessions.append(f"{point.issue} - lower priority, high difficulty")
return concessions
def _generate_timing_guidance(self, negotiation_points: List[NegotiationPoint], contract_type: ContractType, provider: LLMProvider) -> str:
"""
Generate timing guidance for negotiations
"""
critical_count = len([p for p in negotiation_points if p.priority <= 2])
if (critical_count >= 3):
return "Start with critical items early - multiple deal-breakers need immediate attention"
elif (critical_count >= 1):
return "Address 1-2 critical items first, then move to high-priority items"
else:
return "Progressive approach: start with easier wins to build momentum"
def _generate_risk_mitigation_plan(self, risk_analysis: RiskScore, negotiation_points: List[NegotiationPoint], provider: LLMProvider) -> str:
"""
Generate risk mitigation plan for unresolved issues
"""
if (risk_analysis.overall_score >= 70):
return "High risk level - focus on critical term resolution. Have fallback positions ready."
elif (risk_analysis.overall_score >= 50):
return "Moderate risk - prioritize 2-3 key improvements. Document remaining risks."
else:
return "Manageable risk level - focus on most impactful improvements."
|