Split (1)

train · 1k rows

Subsets and Splits

No community queries yet

The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.

prompts stringlengths 590 30k	text stringclasses 8 values
<s>[INST] <<SYS>> I am sharing an email body with you. Based on the text in the body, you need to classify the email in one of the following eight categories: 'Company Business, Strategy, etc.'; 'Purely Personal'; 'Personal but in professional context (e.g., it was good working with you)'; 'Logistic Arrangements (meeting scheduling, technical support, etc)'; 'Employment arrangements (job seeking, hiring, recommendations, etc)'; 'Document editing/checking (collaboration)'; 'Empty message (due to missing attachment)'; 'Empty message'. <</SYS>> Mail: Merger call 8004570183 506711 [/INST] Category: Logistic Arrangements(meeting scheduling, technical support, etc)	<s>[INST] [/INST] Logistic Arrangements(meeting scheduling, technical support, etc) </s>
<s>[INST] <<SYS>> I am sharing an email body with you. Based on the text in the body, you need to classify the email in one of the following eight categories: 'Company Business, Strategy, etc.'; 'Purely Personal'; 'Personal but in professional context (e.g., it was good working with you)'; 'Logistic Arrangements (meeting scheduling, technical support, etc)'; 'Employment arrangements (job seeking, hiring, recommendations, etc)'; 'Document editing/checking (collaboration)'; 'Empty message (due to missing attachment)'; 'Empty message'. <</SYS>> Mail: Since several of you will be out on the 6th we have moved the telephone interview for Marshall Yan to Tuesday the 5th at 1:00 pm. Thanks! Shirley ----------------- [/INST] Category: Employment arrangements(job seeking, hiring, recommendations, etc)	<s>[INST] [/INST] Employment arrangements(job seeking, hiring, recommendations, etc) </s>
<s>[INST] <<SYS>> I am sharing an email body with you. Based on the text in the body, you need to classify the email in one of the following eight categories: 'Company Business, Strategy, etc.'; 'Purely Personal'; 'Personal but in professional context (e.g., it was good working with you)'; 'Logistic Arrangements (meeting scheduling, technical support, etc)'; 'Employment arrangements (job seeking, hiring, recommendations, etc)'; 'Document editing/checking (collaboration)'; 'Empty message (due to missing attachment)'; 'Empty message'. <</SYS>> Mail: Have we suggested to FERC staff that they force the ISO and PX to open the blackbox to show how they determine dispatch? In addtion if you are not on the distribution list for Belden's memo on utility behavior in California this summer I will forward it to you. It suggests some other areas FERC ought to be looking into. [/INST] Category: Company Business, Strategy, etc.(elaborate in Section 3 [Topics])	<s>[INST] [/INST] Company Business, Strategy, etc.(elaborate in Section 3 [Topics]) </s>
<s>[INST] <<SYS>> I am sharing an email body with you. Based on the text in the body, you need to classify the email in one of the following eight categories: 'Company Business, Strategy, etc.'; 'Purely Personal'; 'Personal but in professional context (e.g., it was good working with you)'; 'Logistic Arrangements (meeting scheduling, technical support, etc)'; 'Employment arrangements (job seeking, hiring, recommendations, etc)'; 'Document editing/checking (collaboration)'; 'Empty message (due to missing attachment)'; 'Empty message'. <</SYS>> Mail: Here are the message points [/INST] Category: Company Business, Strategy, etc.(elaborate in Section 3 [Topics])	<s>[INST] [/INST] Company Business, Strategy, etc.(elaborate in Section 3 [Topics]) </s>
<s>[INST] <<SYS>> I am sharing an email body with you. Based on the text in the body, you need to classify the email in one of the following eight categories: 'Company Business, Strategy, etc.'; 'Purely Personal'; 'Personal but in professional context (e.g., it was good working with you)'; 'Logistic Arrangements (meeting scheduling, technical support, etc)'; 'Employment arrangements (job seeking, hiring, recommendations, etc)'; 'Document editing/checking (collaboration)'; 'Empty message (due to missing attachment)'; 'Empty message'. <</SYS>> Mail: I have advised against Ken or Jeff attending the generators meeting: Ken is still willing to make time avail on the 3d to meet with the gov. From: Susan M Landwehr on 04/29/2001 05:04 PM To: Richard Shapiro/NA/Enron@Enron Janel Guerrero/Corp/Enron@Enron Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron@Enron Maureen McVicker/NA/Enron@Enron Steven J Kean/NA/Enron@Enron Paul Kaufman/PDX/ECT@ECT cc: Subject: Re: ken lay tour All--here's some thoughts on the RGA related events. We currently have Ken scheduled to participate in an energy roundtable discussion on the afternoon of the 2nd with at least four governors attending that session--Kempthorne Hull Geringer and Ridge. (Engler and Rowland are also attending the overall event but they will be in a healthcare breakout session). Kaufman and I thought that it would be particularly helpful for Arizona Gov Hull and Idaho Gov Kempthorne to hear Ken's remarks and have a chance to talk with him. I have also been working with Rosalee to schedule an early evening (6:00-7:00pm) meeting that night with Exelon co CEO John Rowe. John Rowe will be in California for some investor meetings and well as attending some sections of the RGA events. I have told my counterpart at Rowe's office that we would confirm Ken's availability on Monday morning. If you do decide that Ken should attend the Davis meeting in Sacremento that day instead we will just reconfigure a bit. Paul and I will cover the RGA events and I will cancel the John Rowe get together. I would also want to talk about having Mr. Lay reach out to Hull and Kempthorne via phone sometime in the near future. Same with Rowe. Rosalee Fleming 04/27/2001 07:12 PM To: Janel Guerrero/Corp/Enron@Enron cc: Maureen McVicker/NA/Enron@Enron Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron@Enron Richard Shapiro/NA/Enron@Enron Paul Kaufman/PDX/ECT@ECT Steven J Kean/NA/Enron@Enron Sherri Sera/Corp/Enron@ENRON Susan M Landwehr/NA/Enron@Enron Subject: Re: ken lay tour I received a return call from Lelanie in Governor Davis' office this evening. She said the Governor wanted to invite Ken Lay and Jeff Skilling to a meeting the Governor is having at 2:00 p.m. in Sacramento on May 2 with a lot of CEOs. I still pressed for a one on one meeting on May 3 in Sacramento but she told me the Governor wanted to have the one meeting all at once and his schedule was very tight on Thursday May 3. I transferred her to Sherri and called Ken. Ken wanted me to try to get more specific information which she shared that it is with generators - Sempra Williams CalPine Duke Dynegy and Reliant. She also said since the Governor has worked with Ken she thought he might prefer that he attend. Ken said to let you all know and be thinking whether we even want to do it. He said one thought might be that he'd do that meeting and maybe Jeff could do the one in L.A. on May 2. Talk to you Monday. Rosie Janel Guerrero 04/27/2001 02:39 PM To: Rosalee Fleming/Corp/Enron@ENRON Maureen McVicker/NA/Enron@Enron Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron@Enron cc: Richard Shapiro/NA/Enron@Enron Paul Kaufman/PDX/ECT@ECT Subject: ken lay tour Just so we're all on the same page......Dasovich will arrive in Houston on Monday (mid-day) and will travel with Dr. Lay beginning on Wednesday (to Austin) and then on to LAX Sacramento etc. Steve said there really isn't time to have a pre-briefing so any questions that Ken has will have to be addressed enroute to CA. Rosalee....we're giving Steve the briefing book today so he can review over the weekend and we'll have a final copy to Ken before he departs next week. [/INST] Category: Company Business, Strategy, etc.(elaborate in Section 3 [Topics])	<s>[INST] [/INST] Company Business, Strategy, etc.(elaborate in Section 3 [Topics]) </s>
<s>[INST] <<SYS>> I am sharing an email body with you. Based on the text in the body, you need to classify the email in one of the following eight categories: 'Company Business, Strategy, etc.'; 'Purely Personal'; 'Personal but in professional context (e.g., it was good working with you)'; 'Logistic Arrangements (meeting scheduling, technical support, etc)'; 'Employment arrangements (job seeking, hiring, recommendations, etc)'; 'Document editing/checking (collaboration)'; 'Empty message (due to missing attachment)'; 'Empty message'. <</SYS>> Mail: I'm putting in for Chairman and CEO of rationalizations and euphemisms. Richard Shapiro@EES 08/28/2000 01:59 PM To: Steven J Kean/NA/Enron@Enron cc: =20 Subject: EES Organizational Announcement With the proliferation of business units I would like to nominate myself = to=20 be President and COO of Enron Global Political Origination Services. Why t= he=20 proiferation? Only way to hand out promotions? ----------------- [/INST] Category: Company Business, Strategy, etc.(elaborate in Section 3 [Topics])	<s>[INST] [/INST] Company Business, Strategy, etc.(elaborate in Section 3 [Topics]) </s>
<s>[INST] <<SYS>> I am sharing an email body with you. Based on the text in the body, you need to classify the email in one of the following eight categories: 'Company Business, Strategy, etc.'; 'Purely Personal'; 'Personal but in professional context (e.g., it was good working with you)'; 'Logistic Arrangements (meeting scheduling, technical support, etc)'; 'Employment arrangements (job seeking, hiring, recommendations, etc)'; 'Document editing/checking (collaboration)'; 'Empty message (due to missing attachment)'; 'Empty message'. <</SYS>> Mail: To:NEMEC GERALD Email:gerald.nemec@enron.com - 7138533512 ? Enron Wholesale Services - Office of the Chairman ? From:??Mark Frevert Chairman & CEO ??????Greg Whalley President & COO ??????Mark Haedicke Managing Director & General Counsel ? Subject:??Confidential Information and Securities Trading ? Enron Wholesale Services ('EWS') maintains official Policies and Procedures Regarding Confidential Information and Securities Trading ('Policies and Procedures') which have been revised as of November 15 2000 to reflect the new EWS structure. These policies and procedures are intended to allow us simultaneously to pursue our diverse businesses and to protect confidential information our reputation for integrity and EWS and its employees from legal liability. ? You are required to become familiar with and to comply with the Policies and Procedures. The newly revised Policies and Procedures are available for your review on LegalOnline the new intranet website maintained by the Enron Wholesale Services Legal Department. Please click on the attached link to access LegalOnline: ? ? You must certify your compliance with the Policies and Procedures within two weeks of your receipt of this message. The LegalOnline site will allow you to quickly and conveniently certify your compliance on-line with your SAP Personal ID number. If you have any questions concerning the Policies or Procedures please call Lance Schuler at extension 3-5419 Mark Haedicke at extension 3-6544 Alan Aronowitz at extension 3-3214 Bob Bruce at extension 5-7780 or Donna Lowry at extension 3-1939. [/INST] Category: Company Business, Strategy, etc.(elaborate in Section 3 [Topics])	<s>[INST] [/INST] Company Business, Strategy, etc.(elaborate in Section 3 [Topics]) </s>
<s>[INST] <<SYS>> I am sharing an email body with you. Based on the text in the body, you need to classify the email in one of the following eight categories: 'Company Business, Strategy, etc.'; 'Purely Personal'; 'Personal but in professional context (e.g., it was good working with you)'; 'Logistic Arrangements (meeting scheduling, technical support, etc)'; 'Employment arrangements (job seeking, hiring, recommendations, etc)'; 'Document editing/checking (collaboration)'; 'Empty message (due to missing attachment)'; 'Empty message'. <</SYS>> Mail: Thanks. Talked to Rob. He's going to find out timing and cost to do a bigger American Ass. of Economist number on Wolak & Co. while I work the manifesto gang. Best Jeff [/INST] Category: Company Business, Strategy, etc.(elaborate in Section 3 [Topics])	<s>[INST] [/INST] Company Business, Strategy, etc.(elaborate in Section 3 [Topics]) </s>
<s>[INST] <<SYS>> I am sharing an email body with you. Based on the text in the body, you need to classify the email in one of the following eight categories: 'Company Business, Strategy, etc.'; 'Purely Personal'; 'Personal but in professional context (e.g., it was good working with you)'; 'Logistic Arrangements (meeting scheduling, technical support, etc)'; 'Employment arrangements (job seeking, hiring, recommendations, etc)'; 'Document editing/checking (collaboration)'; 'Empty message (due to missing attachment)'; 'Empty message'. <</SYS>> Mail: Anne That's great. The meeting is at 3:00 in or area on th 19th. Vince [/INST] Category: Logistic Arrangements(meeting scheduling, technical support, etc)	<s>[INST] [/INST] Logistic Arrangements(meeting scheduling, technical support, etc) </s>
<s>[INST] <<SYS>> I am sharing an email body with you. Based on the text in the body, you need to classify the email in one of the following eight categories: 'Company Business, Strategy, etc.'; 'Purely Personal'; 'Personal but in professional context (e.g., it was good working with you)'; 'Logistic Arrangements (meeting scheduling, technical support, etc)'; 'Employment arrangements (job seeking, hiring, recommendations, etc)'; 'Document editing/checking (collaboration)'; 'Empty message (due to missing attachment)'; 'Empty message'. <</SYS>> Mail: Enclosed is an article in this morning's San Diego Union written by one of their reporters that I know. As indicated it focuses on Enron. Of particular interest are the comments by Senator Dunn which are at odds with his statements to the Sacramento lobbyists that he has no idea what Enron does. The information contained in this e-mail message and any accompanying documents is subject to the attorney-client privilege and/or the attorney work product rule and is confidential business information intended only for the use of the individual or entity named above. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient or representative of the recipient you are hereby notified that any dissemination of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error please notify the Systems Administrator at admin@pkns.com and immediately delete this message from your system. Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Date: Wed 06 Jun 2001 08:53:28 -0700 From: Cindy Frederick <cfred@pkns.com> To: Michael Kirby <mlk@pkns.com> Subject: IS TRADING AN INSIDER'S GAME? Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline IS TRADING AN INSIDER'S GAME? Buying selling of electricity is a growth business but some say deck is stacked against consumers By Craig D. Rose STAFF WRITER June 6 2001 While Californians decry deregulation's failure to deliver a competitive market electricity wholesalers have quietly developed a vast and rapidly growing business of buying and selling power among themselves. The deals take place on high-tech trading floors in Houston and elsewhere around the country as well as on Internet-based trading systems. Some experts say this electricity trading is a key mechanism for raising consumer power prices yet it's largely unregulated. Electricity trading is like buying stock -- when you have ability to change the stock price said Frank Wolak a Stanford University economics professor and member of the state grid operator's market surveillance group. Energy companies say the buying and selling of contracts to deliver power provides risk management allowing plant owners to presell their electricity lock in prices and avoid fluctuations. The rough and tumble of the free market they add is the most efficient means of allocating a resource like electricity. But industry critics say trading is far from a competitive market paradigm. In their view it's a means of communication -- a way for energy insiders to collude and raise prices under the guise of competition. To be sure the trading arms of major energy companies have emerged as stars in an industry where profit surges of 300 percent or 400 percent are not uncommon. The transactions shrouded in secrecy can leave ownership of a critical commodity in unknown hands. Consider the case of power generated by AES Corp.'s California plants. In 1998 AES made a bold move. Immediately after purchasing power plants that gave it control of 10 percent of the state's electric generating capacity the company sold the output from its plants for the next 20 years to Williams Cos. Williams did not sit on this treasure trove of electrons. The Tulsa Okla. company soon sold 80 percent of what it bought. It is difficult to say who owns that power now. Some might be owned by Sempra Trading a sister company of SDG&E. Or some could be owned by Enron Corp. the nation's biggest electricity trader. A spokeswoman for Williams conceded that Williams itself may have repurchased some of the electricity it sold earlier. But trading companies closely guard their positions. This much can be said with certainty: Electricity that AES sold for less than 5 cents per kilowatt-hour to Williams changed hands perhaps 10 times in the wholesale market and emerged at times in recent months with a price tag for consumers that was 300 percent higher. Williams' trading profits increased by 523 percent in the first quarter this year. Advance sales All this buying and selling creates curious confluences. In their attempt to deflect criticism over high prices generating companies such as Duke Energy -- operator of the South Bay Power Plant in Chula and others in the state -- frequently note that they sell most of their electricity far in advance. But they acknowledge less often that their trading units may also be buying power which could boost the company's electricity inventory. Duke was the fourth biggest electricity trader last year and cited its trading activity as a prime contributor to its wholesale business profits which soared 324 percent in the first quarter to $348 million. It is a company's power traders who frequently direct plant operators to increase or decrease the generation of power in response to market conditions. Energy companies have little option but to turn to trading for profits. One of the better kept secrets of electrical deregulation and its promise of competition is that there is remarkably little competition in the production side of the business. For one thing electricity is a commodity power from one company is indistinguishable from that generated by others. More important nearly all modern plants generate power from turbines built by a handful of manufacturers. The result? Modern plants owned by different companies produce power at nearly identical cost. The cost of power produced by modern plants is all within a mil (one-thousandth of a dollar) said Michael Peevey an adviser to Gov. Gray Davis and former president of Southern California Edison. So the extraction of profit in the electricity business relies much more on trading. Traders' profits rise when prices are volatile -- plunging or even better rising sharply. Little regulation But despite the obvious temptation to manipulate the market the burgeoning electricity trading business has remained largely unregulated. The Federal Energy Regulatory Commission does require quarterly filings from energy traders but these often provide incomplete information or at least little that has been of concern to FERC. In fact although the trading of electricity grew more than a hundredfold from 1996 to 2000 FERC has taken no major enforcement action against a trader. After the onset of the California crisis last year FERC has acted once. That was against Williams which agreed to pay $8 million without admitting guilt to resolve an allegation that it withheld supply to pump up prices. FERC's record of enforcement in the area of power trading stands in contrast to a long list of enforcement actions within other markets taken by the Securities Exchange Commission and the Commodity Futures Trading Commission. FERC has recently added staff to its market oversight operations. But William Massey a FERC commissioner says the agency's effort is still inadequate. Electricity can be flipped stripped and chopped up Massey said. It's an extraordinarily complicated market. The sophisticated marketers and traders have simply moved past us. We're kind of horse and buggy in our approach and they're out there in rocket ships flying around ... The problem is that sophisticated traders don't necessarily produce reasonable prices. They produce profits. Before deregulation electricity trading was a low-key affair. Regulated utilities dealt power back and forth on a reciprocal basis to fill electricity shortfalls in their control areas. There was little trading for profit until the mid-1990s after federal legislation and FERC rulings opened the market. Major traders include large energy companies sister companies of California's major utilities and Wall Street firms. Market volatility In many ways the trading of power is similar to that of other commodities. But there are important differences. Because it cannot be stored and its use is so fundamental the price of electricity is the most volatile of all. When supplies are tight a single supplier can rapidly raise prices to budget-busting levels as evidenced by Duke Energy's recent admission that it charged California nearly $4000 for a megawatt-hour of power a quantity that probably sold hours earlier for one-tenth of that sum or less. Wolak the Stanford economist and state Sen. Joseph Dunn D-Garden Grove who is investigating the state power market say trading allows companies to collude under the guise of competition. Instead of wringing out lowest costs the wholesale trading market serves to raise prices they say. As I trade to you and you trade to me we communicate to each other what price we would like to get said Wolak. It's not collusive. It's just communicating price. Mark Palmer a spokesman for Enron the nation's biggest power trader said California's problem is not the result of trading. It's a result of shortages Palmer said. Underscoring its emphasis on trading Enron's new headquarters tower in downtown Houston rises from a six-story block of new trading floors including expanded space for electricity trading. Enron also pioneered trading in cyberspace and its Enron Online site claims to be the most active computer-based trading market. The Houston company argues that consumers won't fully benefit from power trading and deregulation until they have greater choice in choosing their power supplier. And the company says FERC has not done enough to open access to transmission lines which would allow traders to move power around the country. To that end Enron has lobbied hard for President Bush's plan for a national electricity grid. Palmer says the notion that the price of electricity rises each time it is traded is mistaken. The market is always looking for the real price of a commodity Palmer said. Dunn the California state senator says his investigation found a different function for trading. At a time when supply barely meets or falls short of demand he noted companies with electricity to sell have to worry only about how high to set their price. The trader is a pawn in the generator's game to drive up prices said Dunn. Trading develops a level of trust. You my alleged competitor will bid in the same patterns and I will respond not in a competitive pattern but in a complimentary pattern. The state senator said his investigation found evidence that on several days energy companies appeared to test their ability to drive prices up without being undercut by competitors. This ability to drive up prices without competitive consequence is a key test of market power the technical term for manipulation or price fixing. But Dunn also conceded that antitrust violations can be hard to prove in court. He suggested that even if the trading behavior falls short of antitrust violations it remains anti-competitive and devastating for the California economy. To Harry Trebing a utility industry expert and professor emeritus at Michigan State University wholesale electricity trading is reminiscent of what took place in the 1920s and early '30s. Back then utility companies created complex networks of holding companies that traded stock among themselves driving up prices in the process. Undoing that scheme was a focus of President Franklin Roosevelt's administration. Congress ended up barring national power companies and tightening regulation of utilities in an effort to counteract their tendency to create markets that work only for insiders. The broad goals of trading are the same Trebing said. The goal is to maximize profits through raising prices. [/INST] Category: Company Business, Strategy, etc.(elaborate in Section 3 [Topics])	<s>[INST] [/INST] Company Business, Strategy, etc.(elaborate in Section 3 [Topics]) </s>
<s>[INST] <<SYS>> I am sharing an email body with you. Based on the text in the body, you need to classify the email in one of the following eight categories: 'Company Business, Strategy, etc.'; 'Purely Personal'; 'Personal but in professional context (e.g., it was good working with you)'; 'Logistic Arrangements (meeting scheduling, technical support, etc)'; 'Employment arrangements (job seeking, hiring, recommendations, etc)'; 'Document editing/checking (collaboration)'; 'Empty message (due to missing attachment)'; 'Empty message'. <</SYS>> Mail: I love you. Call me. [/INST] Category: Purely Personal	<s>[INST] [/INST] Purely Personal </s>
<s>[INST] <<SYS>> I am sharing an email body with you. Based on the text in the body, you need to classify the email in one of the following eight categories: 'Company Business, Strategy, etc.'; 'Purely Personal'; 'Personal but in professional context (e.g., it was good working with you)'; 'Logistic Arrangements (meeting scheduling, technical support, etc)'; 'Employment arrangements (job seeking, hiring, recommendations, etc)'; 'Document editing/checking (collaboration)'; 'Empty message (due to missing attachment)'; 'Empty message'. <</SYS>> Mail: ----------------- [/INST] Category: Logistic Arrangements(meeting scheduling, technical support, etc)	<s>[INST] [/INST] Logistic Arrangements(meeting scheduling, technical support, etc) </s>
<s>[INST] <<SYS>> I am sharing an email body with you. Based on the text in the body, you need to classify the email in one of the following eight categories: 'Company Business, Strategy, etc.'; 'Purely Personal'; 'Personal but in professional context (e.g., it was good working with you)'; 'Logistic Arrangements (meeting scheduling, technical support, etc)'; 'Employment arrangements (job seeking, hiring, recommendations, etc)'; 'Document editing/checking (collaboration)'; 'Empty message (due to missing attachment)'; 'Empty message'. <</SYS>> Mail: Skilling will be speaking at the National Press Club next week. He'll give an overview of Enron's business talk about what's going on in power markets and what should be done to fix the current problems. California will get covered as well. Other than what we have already discussed is there anything Jeff should know or address in his remarks? [/INST] Category: Company Business, Strategy, etc.(elaborate in Section 3 [Topics])	<s>[INST] [/INST] Company Business, Strategy, etc.(elaborate in Section 3 [Topics]) </s>
<s>[INST] <<SYS>> I am sharing an email body with you. Based on the text in the body, you need to classify the email in one of the following eight categories: 'Company Business, Strategy, etc.'; 'Purely Personal'; 'Personal but in professional context (e.g., it was good working with you)'; 'Logistic Arrangements (meeting scheduling, technical support, etc)'; 'Employment arrangements (job seeking, hiring, recommendations, etc)'; 'Document editing/checking (collaboration)'; 'Empty message (due to missing attachment)'; 'Empty message'. <</SYS>> Mail: Thanks. Please keep me on the list for the more detailed management report as well. Leonardo Pacheco 09/21/2000 05:36 PM To: Steven J Kean/NA/Enron@Enron cc: Subject: Public Report 09-20 ----------------- [/INST] Category: Company Business, Strategy, etc.(elaborate in Section 3 [Topics])	<s>[INST] [/INST] Company Business, Strategy, etc.(elaborate in Section 3 [Topics]) </s>
<s>[INST] <<SYS>> I am sharing an email body with you. Based on the text in the body, you need to classify the email in one of the following eight categories: 'Company Business, Strategy, etc.'; 'Purely Personal'; 'Personal but in professional context (e.g., it was good working with you)'; 'Logistic Arrangements (meeting scheduling, technical support, etc)'; 'Employment arrangements (job seeking, hiring, recommendations, etc)'; 'Document editing/checking (collaboration)'; 'Empty message (due to missing attachment)'; 'Empty message'. <</SYS>> Mail: ----------------- [/INST] Category: Company Business, Strategy, etc.(elaborate in Section 3 [Topics])	<s>[INST] [/INST] Company Business, Strategy, etc.(elaborate in Section 3 [Topics]) </s>
<s>[INST] <<SYS>> I am sharing an email body with you. Based on the text in the body, you need to classify the email in one of the following eight categories: 'Company Business, Strategy, etc.'; 'Purely Personal'; 'Personal but in professional context (e.g., it was good working with you)'; 'Logistic Arrangements (meeting scheduling, technical support, etc)'; 'Employment arrangements (job seeking, hiring, recommendations, etc)'; 'Document editing/checking (collaboration)'; 'Empty message (due to missing attachment)'; 'Empty message'. <</SYS>> Mail: I think a rebuttal would be in order if others agree. [/INST] Category: Company Business, Strategy, etc.(elaborate in Section 3 [Topics])	<s>[INST] [/INST] Company Business, Strategy, etc.(elaborate in Section 3 [Topics]) </s>
<s>[INST] <<SYS>> I am sharing an email body with you. Based on the text in the body, you need to classify the email in one of the following eight categories: 'Company Business, Strategy, etc.'; 'Purely Personal'; 'Personal but in professional context (e.g., it was good working with you)'; 'Logistic Arrangements (meeting scheduling, technical support, etc)'; 'Employment arrangements (job seeking, hiring, recommendations, etc)'; 'Document editing/checking (collaboration)'; 'Empty message (due to missing attachment)'; 'Empty message'. <</SYS>> Mail: ----------------- [/INST] Category: Empty message(due to missing attachment)	<s>[INST] [/INST] Empty message(due to missing attachment) </s>
<s>[INST] <<SYS>> I am sharing an email body with you. Based on the text in the body, you need to classify the email in one of the following eight categories: 'Company Business, Strategy, etc.'; 'Purely Personal'; 'Personal but in professional context (e.g., it was good working with you)'; 'Logistic Arrangements (meeting scheduling, technical support, etc)'; 'Employment arrangements (job seeking, hiring, recommendations, etc)'; 'Document editing/checking (collaboration)'; 'Empty message (due to missing attachment)'; 'Empty message'. <</SYS>> Mail: I attended the U.C. Berkeley POWER (Program on Workable Energy Regulation) Conference on March 16. Here is a brief report on the relevant parts. Notably the Lieff Cabreser duo of Bill Bernstein and Barry Himmelstein were there listening carefully. The program consisted of the presentation of 8 economic studies followed by comments from two discussants followed by audience questions/comments. The following is a list of the papers and the discussants who presented with slides taken from the website of the U.C. Energy Institute You can click on this to see the slides in PDF format. The papers in green are not particularly relevant for our purposes and I won't say more about them beyond the note in brackets. The presenter's name is in bold. Bidding Asymmetries in Multi-Unit Auctions: Implications of Bid Function Equilibria in the British Spot Market for Electricity by Greg Crawford Duke University Joe Crespo NERA and Helen Tauchen University of North Carolina Pricing and Firm Conduct in California's Deregulated Electricity Market by Steve Puller UC Berkeley Discussion by Anjali Sheffrin California Independent System Operator Identification and Estimation of Cost Functions Using Observed Bid Data: An Application to Electricity Markets by Frank Wolak Stanford University [A paper about economic tools to study power markets.] Forward Contracts and the Curse of Market Power by Jeffrey Lien University of Maryland The Impact of Retail Rate Deregulation on Electricity Consumption in San Diego by James Bushnell and Erin Mansur UC Berkeley [This looks at whether consumption declined with price increases. Not much.] Consumption and Home Energy Costs: How Prevalent is the 'Heat or Eat' Decision? by Julie Berry Cullen University of Michigan Leora Friedberg University of Virginia and Catherin Wolfram UC Berkeley [A macro study on how consumers change overall spending patterns when they have to shell out more $$ for power.] A Quantitative Analysis of Pricing Behavior in California's Wholesale Electricity Market During Summer 2000 by Paul Joskow MIT and Edward Kahn Analysis Group Electricity Restructuring and the Cost of Pollution Reduction by Dallas Burtraw Karen Palmer Ranjit Bharvirkar and Anthony Paul Resources for the Future Before I discuss the specific papers and presenters one big picture point needs to be made. There was an unchallenged consensus at this conference that the generators have exercised market power to the tune of billions of dollars. The focus was on how and how much not whether. The good news is that I heard no evidence supporting any collusion theory the thought was that generators are making independent output and pricing decisions knowing they could influence the market price given the auction rules and the completely inelastic demand. On the other hand I would have to say that the economic work on the tacit collusion hypothesis in incomplete at best. The bad news is that the scale of potential overcharges is pretty staggering -- >$5 billion. The plaintiffs will be able to put together quite a damage study. Crespo Bidding Asymmetries in UK: This is a marginally relevant paper examining whether bidders in the UK electricity auction markets behaved in a leader-follower mode i.e. asymmetrically. Crespo's model shows that in a uniform price-setting auction with clearing price rules a price setter will emerge and take all prices above marginal cost. Thus above marginal cost pricing does not require coordination. Crespo (from NERA) appeared knowledgeable but is not an inspiring speaker. His paper also got roughed up a bit in the audience questioning segment. Puller Pricing and Firm Conduct in California's Deregulated Electricity Market: This is a very relevant paper as it tries to determine whether market power (presumably) exercised in California was static or dynamic meaning the product of individual firm decisionmaking (static) or tacit collusion (dynamic). The period studied was 4/98 to 12/99. Puller found evidence of static market power consistent with so-called Cournot pricing. This theory posits that in an oligopoly firms will take their rivals' observed price/output decisions as a given and decide how to maximize profitability given that behavior. He then tried to determine whether any dynamic games were occurring meaning a game where firms recognize their interdependence and try to follow a supergame trigger strategy in which firms try to induce favorable responses from rivals. It's quite complicated how he goes about this but fundamentally he tries to correlate observed output decisions with how a firm at that time might have expected a change in its behavior to affect its future share of the market. With this methodology Puller finds what he called weak evidence of forward-looking dynamic pricing for a brief time in 1998 but not otherwise. My impression was that the evidence for 1998 was very weak and the logic used to arrive at this conclusion was also weak. Puller then went at this a second time with a theory that attempts to determine what a firm's supply function would look like if it was exercising static and dynamic market power and then comparing this to an estimate of that firm's actual supply function. I found this even more speculative than the first theory. Nonetheless the results are basically the same: evidence of static but not dynamic market power. Puller took a lot of heat for the methodology of this paper during the questioning segment. He's not a dynamic speaker and does not appear to me to be a strong expert candidate. Anjali Sheffrin's commentary was very important. She is the Director of Market Analysis for CAISO. After general comments on Crespo and Puller she launched in to a discussion of whether their models explained the California experience. This turned out to be a preview of the CAISO FERC filing of last week in which they allege $5.5 billion in market power-related overcharges from May 200 to Feb. 2001. That filing and Sheffrin's report follow. They are essential reading. Sheffrin maintains that it was the absence of imports during this period that left the market power of the California generators unchecked. This permitted the in-state generators to engage in either economic or physical withholding of power. (Economic withholding is bidding a higher-than-needed supply curve physical withholding is cutting output at the plant.) Her study was intended to (1) Identify individual firms engaging in market power activity and (2) Analyze how each firms' actions set market clearing prices. She utilized full bidding data in CA ISO real time market for each hour between May and Nov 2000 defined and categorized bidding patterns and identified economic or physical withholding and then calculated bid-cost mark-up and a monopoly rent. She found what she claimed was strong evidence of both types of withholding but that economic withholding is the dominant bidding pattern used by the five large California generators. While Sheffrin's study does not name names it claims that most of the five in-state suppliers and many of the [16] large importers displayed bidding patterns which were consistent with the exercise of market power. Bernstein and Himmelstein were positively gleeful during this presentation. On the question of collusion Sheffrin's study is not terribly illuminating. She maintains that the dominant bidding pattern is consistent with two characteristics of a supply function equilibrium model of oligopolist pricing. I take that to mean Cournot which is a static non-collusive model. However when you read her study you'll see the picture is not entirely clear. Lien The Curse of Market Power: This is only marginally relevant for us as its thesis is that forward-looking supply contracts are better for both producers and society. Everyone seemed to agree -- and were confused why we needed a paper to prove it. Lien (U. Md.) is young and not expert material. Joskow and Kahn: (paper) (Kahn's slides). I'm sure many of you have already read this everyone should. Prepared for SoCal Edison it contends that 4 in-state generators (Reliant Dynegy AES/Williams and Southern/Mirant) exercised market power by withholding capacity during the summer or 2000. J&K use publicly available data on loads market prices and generation to (a) quantify combined effects of market fundamentals on market prices (b) calculate price gap (difference between actual prices and competitive market benchmarks) (c) account for quantify effects of ISO's ancillary services requirements and forced outages and then (d) calculate the output gap for high priced hours meaning the difference between observed and maximum profitable levels of generation. They conclude that prices were far in excess of the competitive benchmark and that the 4 in-state generators could have produced more power at competitive prices but chose not to. Hence market power was exercised. Kahn the Analysis Group economist who presented is a very colorful and rather undisciplined advocate of his position. He threw around allegations of conspiracy rather casually but mostly to be funny. I couldn't tell whether he believed his study proved that I don't think it even speaks to it. But Bernstein and Himmelstein applauded him when he finished grinning ear to ear. Severin Borenstein UC Berkeley and the conference director was supposed to comment on J&K but hardly did. He said that the generators would have been stupid not to exercise market power given the supply/demand conditions and the market rules and argued that permitting long term contracts and requiring real-time residential pricing were the solutions to all of this. Borenstein was the best expert material I saw at this conference and the fact he took a pass on the details of the J&K paper is puzzling to me. It made me wonder whether he already has a horse in this race or perhaps is trying to stay above it all. Hope this is useful. Regards Dan Daniel M. Wall Latham & Watkins 505 Montgomery Street Suite 1900 San Francisco CA 94111-2562 Direct: (415) 395-8240 Main: (415) 391-0600 Fax: (415) 395-8095 dan.wall@lw.com This email may contain material that is confidential privileged and/or attorney work product for the sole use of the intended recipient. Any review reliance or distribution by others or forwarding without express permission is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient please contact the sender and delete all copies. - 2001032214541122276.pdf.pdf - 2001032214585222924.pdf.pdf [/INST] Category: Company Business, Strategy, etc.(elaborate in Section 3 [Topics])	<s>[INST] [/INST] Company Business, Strategy, etc.(elaborate in Section 3 [Topics]) </s>
<s>[INST] <<SYS>> I am sharing an email body with you. Based on the text in the body, you need to classify the email in one of the following eight categories: 'Company Business, Strategy, etc.'; 'Purely Personal'; 'Personal but in professional context (e.g., it was good working with you)'; 'Logistic Arrangements (meeting scheduling, technical support, etc)'; 'Employment arrangements (job seeking, hiring, recommendations, etc)'; 'Document editing/checking (collaboration)'; 'Empty message (due to missing attachment)'; 'Empty message'. <</SYS>> Mail: ----------------- [/INST] Category: Empty message	<s>[INST] [/INST] Empty message </s>
<s>[INST] <<SYS>> I am sharing an email body with you. Based on the text in the body, you need to classify the email in one of the following eight categories: 'Company Business, Strategy, etc.'; 'Purely Personal'; 'Personal but in professional context (e.g., it was good working with you)'; 'Logistic Arrangements (meeting scheduling, technical support, etc)'; 'Employment arrangements (job seeking, hiring, recommendations, etc)'; 'Document editing/checking (collaboration)'; 'Empty message (due to missing attachment)'; 'Empty message'. <</SYS>> Mail: ----------------- [/INST] Category: Personal but in professional context(e.g., it was good working with you)	<s>[INST] [/INST] Personal but in professional context(e.g., it was good working with you) </s>
<s>[INST] <<SYS>> I am sharing an email body with you. Based on the text in the body, you need to classify the email in one of the following eight categories: 'Company Business, Strategy, etc.'; 'Purely Personal'; 'Personal but in professional context (e.g., it was good working with you)'; 'Logistic Arrangements (meeting scheduling, technical support, etc)'; 'Employment arrangements (job seeking, hiring, recommendations, etc)'; 'Document editing/checking (collaboration)'; 'Empty message (due to missing attachment)'; 'Empty message'. <</SYS>> Mail: And another..... [/INST] Category: Company Business, Strategy, etc.(elaborate in Section 3 [Topics])	<s>[INST] [/INST] Company Business, Strategy, etc.(elaborate in Section 3 [Topics]) </s>
<s>[INST] <<SYS>> I am sharing an email body with you. Based on the text in the body, you need to classify the email in one of the following eight categories: 'Company Business, Strategy, etc.'; 'Purely Personal'; 'Personal but in professional context (e.g., it was good working with you)'; 'Logistic Arrangements (meeting scheduling, technical support, etc)'; 'Employment arrangements (job seeking, hiring, recommendations, etc)'; 'Document editing/checking (collaboration)'; 'Empty message (due to missing attachment)'; 'Empty message'. <</SYS>> Mail: The Barton discussion draft says that FERC's hands would be tied and that they would have to approve a proposed RTO as to size and scope if the proposed RTO owns or has operational control over transmission facilities that serve at least 40000 MW of load. Southern's CEO testified in Congress recently that their load is over 35000. I assume the 40000 MW minimum would permit the SeTrans proposal to meet the proposed statutory minimum since it is Southern plus a few munis as I understand it. Is this correct? Who would know how many RTOs there would be if each were just over the 40000 MW minimum? I assume it is much more than 4-5 RTOs -- if so this is a good contrast to use in our Hill efforts. Thanks. [/INST] Category: Company Business, Strategy, etc.(elaborate in Section 3 [Topics])	<s>[INST] [/INST] Company Business, Strategy, etc.(elaborate in Section 3 [Topics]) </s>
<s>[INST] <<SYS>> I am sharing an email body with you. Based on the text in the body, you need to classify the email in one of the following eight categories: 'Company Business, Strategy, etc.'; 'Purely Personal'; 'Personal but in professional context (e.g., it was good working with you)'; 'Logistic Arrangements (meeting scheduling, technical support, etc)'; 'Employment arrangements (job seeking, hiring, recommendations, etc)'; 'Document editing/checking (collaboration)'; 'Empty message (due to missing attachment)'; 'Empty message'. <</SYS>> Mail: calendar ----------------- [/INST] Category: Logistic Arrangements(meeting scheduling, technical support, etc)	<s>[INST] [/INST] Logistic Arrangements(meeting scheduling, technical support, etc) </s>
<s>[INST] <<SYS>> I am sharing an email body with you. Based on the text in the body, you need to classify the email in one of the following eight categories: 'Company Business, Strategy, etc.'; 'Purely Personal'; 'Personal but in professional context (e.g., it was good working with you)'; 'Logistic Arrangements (meeting scheduling, technical support, etc)'; 'Employment arrangements (job seeking, hiring, recommendations, etc)'; 'Document editing/checking (collaboration)'; 'Empty message (due to missing attachment)'; 'Empty message'. <</SYS>> Mail: Jeff and Steve ? As you requested I have prepared a list of my preferred public policy contacts?for California.? It is composed of professionals from an array of public private and non-profit backgrounds.? I have worked in some capacity with?each of these people?and most I know quite well.? ? Please call me for further background. ? Kevin 213-926-2626 ? Attachment - Kevin Scott - Preferred Contacts - 6-20-01.doc [/INST] Category: Company Business, Strategy, etc.(elaborate in Section 3 [Topics])	<s>[INST] [/INST] Company Business, Strategy, etc.(elaborate in Section 3 [Topics]) </s>
<s>[INST] <<SYS>> I am sharing an email body with you. Based on the text in the body, you need to classify the email in one of the following eight categories: 'Company Business, Strategy, etc.'; 'Purely Personal'; 'Personal but in professional context (e.g., it was good working with you)'; 'Logistic Arrangements (meeting scheduling, technical support, etc)'; 'Employment arrangements (job seeking, hiring, recommendations, etc)'; 'Document editing/checking (collaboration)'; 'Empty message (due to missing attachment)'; 'Empty message'. <</SYS>> Mail: Elizabeth Jeff forwarded me your questions about capacity options. I've answered them to the extent they involve legal/regulatory issues. If you need anything further please don't hesitate to call. ? Can a new shipper who enters into an FTS-1 contract with zero MDQ in order to purchase a shipper call option or sell a transporter put option be allowed prior to the exercise date to transfer the underlying option rights by permanently releasing this contract? YES. ? Will we be required to report these contracts with zero MDQ on the Index of Customers and/or the Transactional Report? YES. ? Can the releasing shipper permanently release a portion of his existing MDQ and choose to keep or transfer the option rights? YES. The shipper could even release all of its MDQ (reducing it to zero) and keep its option rights. ? How is it determined whether a contract with an option amendment is within the min/max tariff rate or needs to be filed as a negotiated rate? The option fee is converted to a per-Dth per day rate and added to the transport rate. If the total exceeds the maximum tariff rate it's negotiated. Otherwise our position is that it's not negotiated. We are not 100% positive that FERC will agree with us on this issue. [/INST] Category: Company Business, Strategy, etc.(elaborate in Section 3 [Topics])	<s>[INST] [/INST] Company Business, Strategy, etc.(elaborate in Section 3 [Topics]) </s>
<s>[INST] <<SYS>> I am sharing an email body with you. Based on the text in the body, you need to classify the email in one of the following eight categories: 'Company Business, Strategy, etc.'; 'Purely Personal'; 'Personal but in professional context (e.g., it was good working with you)'; 'Logistic Arrangements (meeting scheduling, technical support, etc)'; 'Employment arrangements (job seeking, hiring, recommendations, etc)'; 'Document editing/checking (collaboration)'; 'Empty message (due to missing attachment)'; 'Empty message'. <</SYS>> Mail: I am in London this week and will be meeting with David Best on Thurs to discuss. Thanks for your inquiry. I'll let you know after the meeting. Gail Brownfeld@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT 01/30/2000 10:45 AM To: Richard B Sanders@ECT cc: Robert C Subject: Havamann Litigation PRIVILEGED AND CONFIDENTIAL ATTORNEY CLIENT COMMUNICATION Richard Did your office get everything it needed from David Best to do the wire transfer of the settlement funds? Is there anything you need us to do on the remaining bit of the claim against the underwriters? I believe you all have retrieved the whole file however let me know if there is anything we can do to help. I will be in the UK during the week of February 14 if there is something I can do while I'm there let me know. Thanks. GAIL [/INST] Category: Logistic Arrangements(meeting scheduling, technical support, etc)	<s>[INST] [/INST] Logistic Arrangements(meeting scheduling, technical support, etc) </s>
<s>[INST] <<SYS>> I am sharing an email body with you. Based on the text in the body, you need to classify the email in one of the following eight categories: 'Company Business, Strategy, etc.'; 'Purely Personal'; 'Personal but in professional context (e.g., it was good working with you)'; 'Logistic Arrangements (meeting scheduling, technical support, etc)'; 'Employment arrangements (job seeking, hiring, recommendations, etc)'; 'Document editing/checking (collaboration)'; 'Empty message (due to missing attachment)'; 'Empty message'. <</SYS>> Mail: I need to get the form to show compliance but I cannot get it online--I cannot remember all my passwords. Can you get this form for me? Thx. [/INST] Category: Logistic Arrangements(meeting scheduling, technical support, etc)	<s>[INST] [/INST] Logistic Arrangements(meeting scheduling, technical support, etc) </s>
<s>[INST] <<SYS>> I am sharing an email body with you. Based on the text in the body, you need to classify the email in one of the following eight categories: 'Company Business, Strategy, etc.'; 'Purely Personal'; 'Personal but in professional context (e.g., it was good working with you)'; 'Logistic Arrangements (meeting scheduling, technical support, etc)'; 'Employment arrangements (job seeking, hiring, recommendations, etc)'; 'Document editing/checking (collaboration)'; 'Empty message (due to missing attachment)'; 'Empty message'. <</SYS>> Mail: Joe - there is no announcement today. I tried to leave you a voicemail but apparently the system is down there. Before we can offer an outside person a VP position the Executive Committee must sign off. We are going to be going through that process in a few minutes. Then we begin the offer extension and negotiations. The person we are recommending is Linda Robertson one of the two people I mentioned to you before. Please guard the information carefully. Last time we talked when the list had been narrowed to two DeLay's office called with the exact two names and started pushing us to hire a Republican. As you know we interviewed candidates of both political affiliations and just settled on the best person. Ken told DeLay's office that's how we do things and Ken is comfortable (actually enthused) about the choice. When some external announcement is done you will be involved and your considerable contributions will be prominently mentioned. [/INST] Category: Company Business, Strategy, etc.(elaborate in Section 3 [Topics])	<s>[INST] [/INST] Company Business, Strategy, etc.(elaborate in Section 3 [Topics]) </s>
<s>[INST] <<SYS>> I am sharing an email body with you. Based on the text in the body, you need to classify the email in one of the following eight categories: 'Company Business, Strategy, etc.'; 'Purely Personal'; 'Personal but in professional context (e.g., it was good working with you)'; 'Logistic Arrangements (meeting scheduling, technical support, etc)'; 'Employment arrangements (job seeking, hiring, recommendations, etc)'; 'Document editing/checking (collaboration)'; 'Empty message (due to missing attachment)'; 'Empty message'. <</SYS>> Mail: New West is proposing these amendments to the bad bill AB XX 82. Its view is that it wants to start getting Some interest in the PX credit issue to see if they can get it into a bill. They acknowledge that AB XX 82 is a bad bill. We will be having a teleconf on this tomorrow with all the ESP consolidated billers. So far I've told New West that it would likely be better for them if Enron stays away from formally supporting this given the target on our face in the Legislature. More important I need to know if EES would like to see some PX credit language in legislation. I have some questions about the approach New West took in modifying the legislation so I have a call into them. Sue Mara Enron Corp. Tel: (415) 782-7802 Fax:(415) 782-7854 [/INST] Category: Company Business, Strategy, etc.(elaborate in Section 3 [Topics])	<s>[INST] [/INST] Company Business, Strategy, etc.(elaborate in Section 3 [Topics]) </s>
<s>[INST] <<SYS>> I am sharing an email body with you. Based on the text in the body, you need to classify the email in one of the following eight categories: 'Company Business, Strategy, etc.'; 'Purely Personal'; 'Personal but in professional context (e.g., it was good working with you)'; 'Logistic Arrangements (meeting scheduling, technical support, etc)'; 'Employment arrangements (job seeking, hiring, recommendations, etc)'; 'Document editing/checking (collaboration)'; 'Empty message (due to missing attachment)'; 'Empty message'. <</SYS>> Mail: Here is the answer regarding the approvals in South Korea. You will see Mike is concerned about shareholder agreements which I have not raised with you before as that seems beyond the scope of what you asked for and I assume that we encounter this in many deals but he has elaborated his concerns below whcih are there for you to reach your own views on. Let me know if you need more. mcs ----------------- [/INST] Category: Company Business, Strategy, etc.(elaborate in Section 3 [Topics])	<s>[INST] [/INST] Company Business, Strategy, etc.(elaborate in Section 3 [Topics]) </s>
<s>[INST] <<SYS>> I am sharing an email body with you. Based on the text in the body, you need to classify the email in one of the following eight categories: 'Company Business, Strategy, etc.'; 'Purely Personal'; 'Personal but in professional context (e.g., it was good working with you)'; 'Logistic Arrangements (meeting scheduling, technical support, etc)'; 'Employment arrangements (job seeking, hiring, recommendations, etc)'; 'Document editing/checking (collaboration)'; 'Empty message (due to missing attachment)'; 'Empty message'. <</SYS>> Mail: Hello Darrell I am in London this week looking among other things at our CreditDesk.com operation. I was trying to access your expert report from your web site but it's password protected. Can you send me a copy? Vince [/INST] Category: Logistic Arrangements(meeting scheduling, technical support, etc)	<s>[INST] [/INST] Logistic Arrangements(meeting scheduling, technical support, etc) </s>
<s>[INST] <<SYS>> I am sharing an email body with you. Based on the text in the body, you need to classify the email in one of the following eight categories: 'Company Business, Strategy, etc.'; 'Purely Personal'; 'Personal but in professional context (e.g., it was good working with you)'; 'Logistic Arrangements (meeting scheduling, technical support, etc)'; 'Employment arrangements (job seeking, hiring, recommendations, etc)'; 'Document editing/checking (collaboration)'; 'Empty message (due to missing attachment)'; 'Empty message'. <</SYS>> Mail: Portland General called. They have heard that Defazio is going to propose in a press release that the state of Oregon should buy PGE. [/INST] Category: Company Business, Strategy, etc.(elaborate in Section 3 [Topics])	<s>[INST] [/INST] Company Business, Strategy, etc.(elaborate in Section 3 [Topics]) </s>
<s>[INST] <<SYS>> I am sharing an email body with you. Based on the text in the body, you need to classify the email in one of the following eight categories: 'Company Business, Strategy, etc.'; 'Purely Personal'; 'Personal but in professional context (e.g., it was good working with you)'; 'Logistic Arrangements (meeting scheduling, technical support, etc)'; 'Employment arrangements (job seeking, hiring, recommendations, etc)'; 'Document editing/checking (collaboration)'; 'Empty message (due to missing attachment)'; 'Empty message'. <</SYS>> Mail: See if she wants to meet with me when I get back. [/INST] Category: Logistic Arrangements(meeting scheduling, technical support, etc)	<s>[INST] [/INST] Logistic Arrangements(meeting scheduling, technical support, etc) </s>
<s>[INST] <<SYS>> I am sharing an email body with you. Based on the text in the body, you need to classify the email in one of the following eight categories: 'Company Business, Strategy, etc.'; 'Purely Personal'; 'Personal but in professional context (e.g., it was good working with you)'; 'Logistic Arrangements (meeting scheduling, technical support, etc)'; 'Employment arrangements (job seeking, hiring, recommendations, etc)'; 'Document editing/checking (collaboration)'; 'Empty message (due to missing attachment)'; 'Empty message'. <</SYS>> Mail: thanks for your help in preparing for the Texas hearing. I think Texas legislators are viewing the California experience in the proper context and I think I was at least marginally articulate on the emissions issues as well. thanks again. [/INST] Category: Personal but in professional context(e.g., it was good working with you)	<s>[INST] [/INST] Personal but in professional context(e.g., it was good working with you) </s>
<s>[INST] <<SYS>> I am sharing an email body with you. Based on the text in the body, you need to classify the email in one of the following eight categories: 'Company Business, Strategy, etc.'; 'Purely Personal'; 'Personal but in professional context (e.g., it was good working with you)'; 'Logistic Arrangements (meeting scheduling, technical support, etc)'; 'Employment arrangements (job seeking, hiring, recommendations, etc)'; 'Document editing/checking (collaboration)'; 'Empty message (due to missing attachment)'; 'Empty message'. <</SYS>> Mail: To:KITCHEN LOUISE - +1 713 853 3488 Enron Wholesale Services - Office of the Chairman From: Mark Frevert Chairman & CEO Mark Haedicke Managing Director & General Counsel Subject: Confidential Information and Securities Trading To keep pace with the fluid and fast-changing demands of our equity trading activities Enron Wholesale Services (EWS) has recently revised its official Policies and Procedures Regarding Confidential Information and Securities Trading (Policies and Procedures). These revisions reflect two major developments: (1) our equity trading activities have been extended into the United Kingdom and (2) in an effort to streamline the information flow process the Review Team will play a more centralized role so that the role of the Resource Group is no longer necessary.You are required to become familiar with and to comply with the Policies and Procedures. The newly revised Policies and Procedures are available for your review on LegalOnline the new intranet website maintained by the Enron Wholesale Services Legal Department. Please click on the attached link to access LegalOnline: If you have already certified compliance with the Policies and Procedures during the 2001 calendar year you need not re-certify at this time although you are still required to to review and become familiar with the revised Policies and Procedures. If you have not certified compliance with the Policies and Procedures during the 2001 calendar year then you must do so within two weeks of your receipt of this message. The LegalOnline site will allow you to quickly and conveniently certify your compliance on-line with your SAP Personal ID number. If you have any questions concerning the Policies or Procedures please call Bob Bruce at extension 5-7780 or Donna Lowry at extension 3-1939. [/INST] Category: Company Business, Strategy, etc.(elaborate in Section 3 [Topics])	<s>[INST] [/INST] Company Business, Strategy, etc.(elaborate in Section 3 [Topics]) </s>
<s>[INST] <<SYS>> I am sharing an email body with you. Based on the text in the body, you need to classify the email in one of the following eight categories: 'Company Business, Strategy, etc.'; 'Purely Personal'; 'Personal but in professional context (e.g., it was good working with you)'; 'Logistic Arrangements (meeting scheduling, technical support, etc)'; 'Employment arrangements (job seeking, hiring, recommendations, etc)'; 'Document editing/checking (collaboration)'; 'Empty message (due to missing attachment)'; 'Empty message'. <</SYS>> Mail: ----------------- [/INST] Category: Company Business, Strategy, etc.(elaborate in Section 3 [Topics])	<s>[INST] [/INST] Company Business, Strategy, etc.(elaborate in Section 3 [Topics]) </s>
<s>[INST] <<SYS>> I am sharing an email body with you. Based on the text in the body, you need to classify the email in one of the following eight categories: 'Company Business, Strategy, etc.'; 'Purely Personal'; 'Personal but in professional context (e.g., it was good working with you)'; 'Logistic Arrangements (meeting scheduling, technical support, etc)'; 'Employment arrangements (job seeking, hiring, recommendations, etc)'; 'Document editing/checking (collaboration)'; 'Empty message (due to missing attachment)'; 'Empty message'. <</SYS>> Mail: Can you circulate the link to Cal TV again? Scott Govenar <sgovenar@govadv.com> on 07/16/2001 01:58:41 PM Please respond to <sgovenar@govadv.com> To: Ban Sharma <ban.sharma@enron.com> David Leboe <David.Leboe@ENRON.com> Eric Letke <eletke@enron.com> Jennifer Thome <Jennifer.Thome@enron.com> Ken Smith <ken@kdscommunications.com> Bev Hansen <bhansen@lhom.com> Hedy Govenar <hgovenar@govadv.com> Miyung Buster <Miyung.Buster@enron.com> Janel Guerrero <Janel.Guerrero@enron.com> Robert Frank <rfrank@enron.com> Mike Day <MDay@GMSSR.com> Leslie Lawner <Leslie.Lawner@enron.com> Harry. Kingerski@enron. com <Harry.Kingerski@enron.com> Karen Denne <kdenne@enron.com> Steven Kean <Steven.J.Kean@enron.com> Alan Comnes <acomnes@enron.com> Susan J Mara <smara@enron.com> Paul Kaufman <paul.kaufman@enron.com> Jeff Dasovich <jdasovic@enron.com> Jim Steffes <james.d.steffes@enron.com> Rick Shapiro <rshapiro@enron.com> cc: Subject: Senator Dunn Hearing THE SELECT COMMITTEE TO INVESTIGATE PRICE MANIPULATION OF THE WHOLESALE ENERGY MARKET WILL MEET ON WEDNESDAY JULY 18 AT 9:30 A.M. IN ROOM 3191 TO REVIEW COMPLIANCE WITH SUBPOENAS FOR DUKE DYNEGY RELIANT AES NRG AND WILLIAMS. [/INST] Category: Company Business, Strategy, etc.(elaborate in Section 3 [Topics])	<s>[INST] [/INST] Company Business, Strategy, etc.(elaborate in Section 3 [Topics]) </s>
<s>[INST] <<SYS>> I am sharing an email body with you. Based on the text in the body, you need to classify the email in one of the following eight categories: 'Company Business, Strategy, etc.'; 'Purely Personal'; 'Personal but in professional context (e.g., it was good working with you)'; 'Logistic Arrangements (meeting scheduling, technical support, etc)'; 'Employment arrangements (job seeking, hiring, recommendations, etc)'; 'Document editing/checking (collaboration)'; 'Empty message (due to missing attachment)'; 'Empty message'. <</SYS>> Mail: ----------------- [/INST] Category: Document editing/checking(collaboration)	<s>[INST] [/INST] Document editing/checking(collaboration) </s>
<s>[INST] <<SYS>> I am sharing an email body with you. Based on the text in the body, you need to classify the email in one of the following eight categories: 'Company Business, Strategy, etc.'; 'Purely Personal'; 'Personal but in professional context (e.g., it was good working with you)'; 'Logistic Arrangements (meeting scheduling, technical support, etc)'; 'Employment arrangements (job seeking, hiring, recommendations, etc)'; 'Document editing/checking (collaboration)'; 'Empty message (due to missing attachment)'; 'Empty message'. <</SYS>> Mail: Thanks for the analysis. We understand that McKinsey may be helping the Governor develop a demand buy down program. Is this true? [/INST] Category: Company Business, Strategy, etc.(elaborate in Section 3 [Topics])	<s>[INST] [/INST] Company Business, Strategy, etc.(elaborate in Section 3 [Topics]) </s>
<s>[INST] <<SYS>> I am sharing an email body with you. Based on the text in the body, you need to classify the email in one of the following eight categories: 'Company Business, Strategy, etc.'; 'Purely Personal'; 'Personal but in professional context (e.g., it was good working with you)'; 'Logistic Arrangements (meeting scheduling, technical support, etc)'; 'Employment arrangements (job seeking, hiring, recommendations, etc)'; 'Document editing/checking (collaboration)'; 'Empty message (due to missing attachment)'; 'Empty message'. <</SYS>> Mail: [Dan Sponseller 412 355 8650 -- called Brian Barrington] Laura Houston x3366 is contact 9:30 - 10:00 Regulatory Update gas and electricity positions that we've taken initiatives and events that they should be aware of retail perspective if there is something they should know about Audience is Amanda's team approx. 100 people. Can use overheads or slides. We need to let Sheila Hatten know what you'll use. [/INST] Category: Logistic Arrangements(meeting scheduling, technical support, etc)	<s>[INST] [/INST] Logistic Arrangements(meeting scheduling, technical support, etc) </s>