conversations
list
[ { "value": "Premise: \"A young person is engaged with their smartphone.\"\\nHypothesis: \"He dropped his phone.\"\\nIs the hypothesis entailed by the premise?\\nOptions:\\n- yes\\n- it is not possible to tell\\n- no Now, let's be accurate as possible. Some thinking first:", "from": "human" }, { "value": "If the person has dropped his smartphone he can't be engaged with it. So, the answer is no.", "from": "gpt" } ]
[ { "value": "Student: Premise: \"People are gathered around watching children with a pig.\"\\nBased on this premise, can we conclude that the hypothesis \"People are watching children play with a pig.\" is true?\\nOptions:\\n- yes\\n- it is not possible to tell\\n- no.\nTeacher: Let's think:\n", "from": "human" }, { "value": "Children with a pig does not imply they play with it. So the final answer is it is not possible to tell.", "from": "gpt" } ]
[ { "value": "Leo: Can we conclude from \"Several children pet a pig while a crowd watches.\" that \"Children are happily eating ice cream.\"?\\nOptions:\\n- yes\\n- no\\n- it is not possible to tell\nMei: OK, So, let's think first...\nMe:", "from": "human" }, { "value": "If children are eating ice cream it is logical to assume they cannot pet a pig.\nThus, the answer is no.", "from": "gpt" } ]
[ { "value": "Please answer the following question by reasoning step-by-step. Premise: \"The young children are petting a piglet.\"\\nHypothesis: \"A pig isn't being petted.\"\\nIs the hypothesis entailed by the premise?\\nOptions:\\n- yes\\n- it is not possible to tell\\n- no. Step-by-step reasoning:", "from": "human" }, { "value": "If a pig isn't being petted then the children cannot be petting a piglet. So the answer is no.", "from": "gpt" } ]
[ { "value": "Leo: Given the sentence \"A little boy in blue is pulling a toy car.\" is it true that \"A little boy is smiling and having a great time.\"?\nMei: OK, So, let's think first...\nMe:", "from": "human" }, { "value": "Pulling a car does not imply smiling and having a great time.\nThus, the answer is it is not possible to tell.", "from": "gpt" } ]
[ { "value": "Test for natural language inference.\\nPremise: \"As a man walks down the street a pigeon swoops behind him.\"\\nHypothesis: \"The man is aware of the pigeon.\"\\nIs the hypothesis entailed by the premise?\\nOptions:\\n- yes\\n- no\\n- it is not possible to tell Step by step answer:", "from": "human" }, { "value": "A man may or may not be aware of a pigeon swooping behind him. Therefore, the final answer is it is not possible to tell.", "from": "gpt" } ]
[ { "value": "Premise: \"A young man presents an unknown object to photographer.\"\\nHypothesis: \"A photographer tries to identify an unknown object.\"\\nIs the hypothesis entailed by the premise?\\nOptions:\\n- yes\\n- it is not possible to tell\\n- no Now, let's be accurate as possible. Some thinking first:", "from": "human" }, { "value": "The photographer might not want to try to identify the object. So, the answer is it is not possible to tell.", "from": "gpt" } ]
[ { "value": "Can we conclude from \"A kid is performing karate in a gymnasium.\" that \"There is a kid performing karate.\"?\\nOptions:\\n- yes\\n- no\\n- it is not possible to tell\nLet's solve step-by-step:", "from": "human" }, { "value": "There is a kid performing karate is a rephrasing of a kid is performing karate. The answer is yes.", "from": "gpt" } ]
[ { "value": "Given the sentence \"Two men work outside near a trench in the road.\" is it true that \"Two men are fixing something outside near a trench in the road.\"? Step by step answer:", "from": "human" }, { "value": "Just because men work outside near a trench in the road it does not mean they are fixing something. Therefore, the final answer is it is not possible to tell.", "from": "gpt" } ]
[ { "value": "Given the sentence \"A young boy demonstrates karate in a gymnasium.\" can we conclude that \"A boy is doing karate in preparation for his next competition.\"?\\nOptions:\\n- yes\\n- it is not possible to tell\\n- no\nLet's solve step-by-step:", "from": "human" }, { "value": "A demonstration of karate may be done for reasons other than preparation for the next competition. The answer is it is not possible to tell.", "from": "gpt" } ]
[ { "value": "Premise: \"Young children at a martial arts competition.\"\\nBased on this premise, can we conclude that the hypothesis \"At a school gymnasium.\" is true?\\nOptions:\\n- yes\\n- it is not possible to tell\\n- no Stream of thoughts:", "from": "human" }, { "value": "Children head to the gym to find out who is the winner of their karate championship.\nTherefore, the answer is it is not possible to tell.", "from": "gpt" } ]
[ { "value": "Leo: Test for natural language inference.\\nPremise: \"A man scuba diving while holding a large flashlight.\"\\nHypothesis: \"A man explores a dark place.\"\\nIs the hypothesis entailed by the premise?\\nOptions:\\n- yes\\n- no\\n- it is not possible to tell\nMei: OK, So, let's think first...\nMe:", "from": "human" }, { "value": "Holding a large flashlight does not imply explores a dark place.\nThus, the answer is it is not possible to tell.", "from": "gpt" } ]
[ { "value": "Can we conclude from \"A scuba diver poses for the camera while underwater.\" that \"Holding a large light.\"?\\nOptions:\\n- yes\\n- no\\n- it is not possible to tell Step by step answer:", "from": "human" }, { "value": "A SCUBA diver has his photo taken with rare marine life. Therefore, the final answer is it is not possible to tell.", "from": "gpt" } ]
[ { "value": "Student: Premise: \"Two boats are being maneuvered down a quiet river.\"\\nHypothesis: \"The blue boats are tied together while moving along the river.\"\\nDo we know that the hypothesis entailed by the premise?.\nTeacher: Let's think:\n", "from": "human" }, { "value": "Boats being maneuvered does not imply the boats are tied together. So the final answer is it is not possible to tell.", "from": "gpt" } ]
[ { "value": "Premise: \"A emergency were paramedics and the fire department were called in to help.\"\\nHypothesis: \"No one responded to the 911 call.\"\\nDo we know that the hypothesis entailed by the premise? A step-by-step solution is:\n", "from": "human" }, { "value": "If no one responded on the 911 call then the paramedics and the fire department were not called in to help.\nThe final answer: no.", "from": "gpt" } ]
[ { "value": "Leo: Premise: \"The fire department is on the scene to assist in an accident.\"\\nBased on this premise, can we conclude that the hypothesis \"The fireman are helping at an accident scene.\" is true?\\nOptions:\\n- yes\\n- it is not possible to tell\\n- no\nMei: OK, So, let's think first...\nMe:", "from": "human" }, { "value": "Helping is an actionable word for assist in an accident scene.\nThus, the answer is yes.", "from": "gpt" } ]
[ { "value": "Leo: Premise: \"Man standing on a street with a green red and yellow flag wrapped around him and a cap on his head.\"\\nBased on this premise, can we conclude that the hypothesis \"The man is part of a protest.\" is true?\\nOptions:\\n- yes\\n- it is not possible to tell\\n- no\nMei: OK, So, let's think first...\nMe:", "from": "human" }, { "value": "Not all men on a street with a green red and yellow flag wrapped around him and a cap on his head is part of a protest.\nThus, the answer is it is not possible to tell.", "from": "gpt" } ]
[ { "value": "Please answer the following question by reasoning step-by-step. Given the sentence \"A group of rowers navigate a body of water.\" can we conclude that \"The group of rowers are asleep at home.\"?\\nOptions:\\n- yes\\n- it is not possible to tell\\n- no. Step-by-step reasoning:", "from": "human" }, { "value": "The rowers cannot navigate and be asleep at the same time. So the answer is no.", "from": "gpt" } ]
[ { "value": "Test for natural language inference.\\nPremise: \"A man in a ball cap stands in a crosswalk with a flag in a crowded city.\"\\nHypothesis: \"A man in a ball cap stands with a flag in a his apartment.\"\\nIs the hypothesis entailed by the premise?\\nOptions:\\n- yes\\n- no\\n- it is not possible to tell A step-by-step solution is:\n", "from": "human" }, { "value": "The man cannot stand in his apartment and in a crowded city at the same time.\nThe final answer: no.", "from": "gpt" } ]
[ { "value": "Premise: \"A man holding a flag is standing on a busy sidewalk.\"\\nBased on this premise, can we conclude that the hypothesis \"A man holds a flag on a sidewalk.\" is true?\\nOptions:\\n- yes\\n- it is not possible to tell\\n- no Step by step answer:", "from": "human" }, { "value": "Standing on a busy sidewalk shows that the man is on a sidewalk. Therefore, the final answer is yes.", "from": "gpt" } ]
[ { "value": "If \"A man stands in front of a vegetable display.\" does that mean that \"A man stands in front of a meat vendor.\"?\\nOptions:\\n- yes\\n- it is not possible to tell\\n- no Stream of thoughts:", "from": "human" }, { "value": "The man cannot be standing in front of a meat vendor and a vegetable display at the same time.\nTherefore, the answer is no.", "from": "gpt" } ]
[ { "value": "If \"Man in red and white striped shirt points left while standing near a display of produce.\" does that mean that \"A man is standing in the grocery store.\"?\\nOptions:\\n- yes\\n- it is not possible to tell\\n- no Stream of thoughts:", "from": "human" }, { "value": "There are other locations besides a grocery store where a man can be standing next to a display of produce.\nTherefore, the answer is it is not possible to tell.", "from": "gpt" } ]
[ { "value": "Premise: \"Two women wave flags in a tunnel.\"\\nBased on this premise, can we conclude that the hypothesis \"The women hold the flags in the tunnel were part of a roadwork crew.\" is true?\\nOptions:\\n- yes\\n- it is not possible to tell\\n- no Now, let's be accurate as possible. Some thinking first:", "from": "human" }, { "value": "Not all woman who wave flags in a tunnel are necessarily part of a roadwork crew. So, the answer is it is not possible to tell.", "from": "gpt" } ]
[ { "value": "If \"Passersby in an outdoor mall.\" does that mean that \"The mall has lots of people walking through.\"?\\nOptions:\\n- yes\\n- it is not possible to tell\\n- no A step-by-step solution is:\n", "from": "human" }, { "value": "Just because the passersby is at a mall doesn't mean it have a lot of people walking through.\nThe final answer: it is not possible to tell.", "from": "gpt" } ]
[ { "value": "Given the sentence \"Several couples dance in a plaza.\" is it true that \"The people are moving around.\"? Stream of thoughts:", "from": "human" }, { "value": "The people are several couples that are moving around and dancing.\nTherefore, the answer is yes.", "from": "gpt" } ]
[ { "value": "Given the sentence \"A man in a black shirt and jeans stands at a microphone holding a guitar.\" can we conclude that \"The building is on fire.\"?\\nOptions:\\n- yes\\n- it is not possible to tell\\n- no A step-by-step solution is:\n", "from": "human" }, { "value": "If the building was on fire the man would not be using a guitar.\nThe final answer: no.", "from": "gpt" } ]
[ { "value": "Can we conclude from \"Two young men and a woman play guitars and a drum in a dimly-lit room.\" that \"People are playing music.\"?\\nOptions:\\n- yes\\n- no\\n- it is not possible to tell\nLet's solve step-by-step:", "from": "human" }, { "value": "Two young men and a woman can play music by playing guitars and a drum. The answer is yes.", "from": "gpt" } ]
[ { "value": "Please answer the following question by reasoning step-by-step. Given the sentence \"Two men with guitars and a woman are performing a song live.\" is it true that \"A band is playing live.\"?. Step-by-step reasoning:", "from": "human" }, { "value": "Men and a woman can perform live by playing guitars; they can be considered a band. So the answer is yes.", "from": "gpt" } ]
[ { "value": "Can we conclude from \"A woman in checkered knee-highs and jean shorts walks down a city sidewalk street while smoking a cigarette.\" that \"The woman in knee-highs and jean shorts is walking down the sidewalk smoking.\"?\\nOptions:\\n- yes\\n- no\\n- it is not possible to tell Let's be accurate as possible and think first.", "from": "human" }, { "value": "Walking down a sidewalk means that they are in the city where many sidewalks are. Final answer: yes.", "from": "gpt" } ]
[ { "value": "Leo: Given the sentence \"A man repairs a glider on a sunny day.\" can we conclude that \"The sunny day is also very hot.\"?\\nOptions:\\n- yes\\n- it is not possible to tell\\n- no\nMei: OK, So, let's think first...\nMe:", "from": "human" }, { "value": "Just because a day is sunny does not mean the day is very hot.\nThus, the answer is it is not possible to tell.", "from": "gpt" } ]
[ { "value": "Test for natural language inference.\\nPremise: \"The woman is squeezing juice to make drinks.\"\\nHypothesis: \"A woman squeezing oranges to make juice.\"\\nIs the hypothesis entailed by the premise?\\nOptions:\\n- yes\\n- no\\n- it is not possible to tell Now, let's be accurate as possible. Some thinking first:", "from": "human" }, { "value": "A woman squeezing juice to make drinks does not imply she is squeezing oranges to make juice. So, the answer is it is not possible to tell.", "from": "gpt" } ]
[ { "value": "Please answer the following question by reasoning step-by-step. If \"A woman wearing a floral necklace makes a drink and smiles.\" does that mean that \"The woman knows how to make a drink.\"?\\nOptions:\\n- yes\\n- it is not possible to tell\\n- no. Step-by-step reasoning:", "from": "human" }, { "value": "A woman that knows how to make a drink will eventually smile and make a drink. So the answer is yes.", "from": "gpt" } ]
[ { "value": "Premise: \"A vendor in all pink and red clothing is preparing her wears while looking forward.\"\\nHypothesis: \"A person is selling things.\"\\nIs the hypothesis entailed by the premise?\\nOptions:\\n- yes\\n- it is not possible to tell\\n- no Step by step answer:", "from": "human" }, { "value": "Just because a vendor is preparing her wears does not mean she is selling her things. Therefore, the final answer is it is not possible to tell.", "from": "gpt" } ]
[ { "value": "Leo: If \"Indian people are walking through a village.\" does that mean that \"Now villages are no more in india.\"?\\nOptions:\\n- yes\\n- it is not possible to tell\\n- no\nMei: OK, So, let's think first...\nMe:", "from": "human" }, { "value": "People cannot walk through a village if villages are no more already.\nThus, the answer is no.", "from": "gpt" } ]
[ { "value": "Given the sentence \"Bike riding in the square.\" is it true that \"People are inside playing video games.\"? Step by step answer:", "from": "human" }, { "value": "People are either outside riding bikes in a square or inside playing games. They cannot do both simultaneously. Therefore, the final answer is no.", "from": "gpt" } ]
[ { "value": "Premise: \"The two people are coming out of grill shop.\"\\nHypothesis: \"The people bought a grill.\"\\nIs the hypothesis entailed by the premise?\\nOptions:\\n- yes\\n- it is not possible to tell\\n- no Stream of thoughts:", "from": "human" }, { "value": "Not everyone coming out of a grill shop has bought a grill.\nTherefore, the answer is it is not possible to tell.", "from": "gpt" } ]
[ { "value": "Can we conclude from \"A white man with black clothing stands near the edge of a sidewalk with a bunch of people standing or walking around behind him.\" that \"A guy waits for a bus while people walk past.\"?\\nOptions:\\n- yes\\n- no\\n- it is not possible to tell Stream of thoughts:", "from": "human" }, { "value": "Someone standing near the edge of a sidewalk is not necessarily waiting for a bus.\nTherefore, the answer is it is not possible to tell.", "from": "gpt" } ]
[ { "value": "If \"A young woman on a bike and three men cross a courtyard.\" does that mean that \"The men are talking.\"?\\nOptions:\\n- yes\\n- it is not possible to tell\\n- no Stream of thoughts:", "from": "human" }, { "value": "The three men are talking to eachother not the girl on the bike.\nTherefore, the answer is yes.", "from": "gpt" } ]
[ { "value": "Please answer the following question by reasoning step-by-step. Premise: \"A girl in a black tank top and gray capri pants rides a bicycle past a pedestrian in a green shirt.\"\\nHypothesis: \"A girl rode a bike past a pedestrian.\"\\nDo we know that the hypothesis entailed by the premise?. Step-by-step reasoning:", "from": "human" }, { "value": "The girl riding a bike and wearing a tank top and capri pants indicates the weather was most likely nice. So the answer is yes.", "from": "gpt" } ]
[ { "value": "Test for natural language inference.\\nPremise: \"This fruit market is not busy yet.\"\\nHypothesis: \"The fruit market isn't busy.\"\\nIs the hypothesis entailed by the premise?\\nOptions:\\n- yes\\n- no\\n- it is not possible to tell A step-by-step solution is:\n", "from": "human" }, { "value": "Isn't is a contraction for is not and means the same thing.\nThe final answer: yes.", "from": "gpt" } ]
[ { "value": "Leo: Premise: \"A picture of pigeons taking off with a young girl in the distant background.\"\\nHypothesis: \"The pigeons took off because of the girl.\"\\nIs the hypothesis entailed by the premise?\\nOptions:\\n- yes\\n- it is not possible to tell\\n- no\nMei: OK, So, let's think first...\nMe:", "from": "human" }, { "value": "They may not be taking off because of the girl .\nThus, the answer is it is not possible to tell.", "from": "gpt" } ]
[ { "value": "Premise: \"A bicyclist in sponsored gear and expensive white helmet rides a carbon alloy bicycle while four spectators look on in the background behind a protective railing.\"\\nBased on this premise, can we conclude that the hypothesis \"The bicyclist is wearing sponsored gear.\" is true?\\nOptions:\\n- yes\\n- it is not possible to tell\\n- no A step-by-step solution is:\n", "from": "human" }, { "value": "A bicyclist wearing sponsored gear with spectators implies a bike race is happening.\nThe final answer: yes.", "from": "gpt" } ]
[ { "value": "Premise: \"A man is racing his bike in a race with spectators watching.\"\\nHypothesis: \"A girl is riding her scooter alone.\"\\nDo we know that the hypothesis entailed by the premise? Step by step answer:", "from": "human" }, { "value": "Man and girl are different people. Racing a bike is not the same as riding a scooter. Therefore, the final answer is no.", "from": "gpt" } ]
[ { "value": "Leo: Premise: \"A cyclist going the distance.\"\\nHypothesis: \"The cyclist went the distance.\"\\nIs the hypothesis entailed by the premise?\\nOptions:\\n- yes\\n- it is not possible to tell\\n- no\nMei: OK, So, let's think first...\nMe:", "from": "human" }, { "value": "A cyclist must be going the distance in order for a cyclist to have went the distance.\nThus, the answer is yes.", "from": "gpt" } ]
[ { "value": "Student: Can we conclude from \"A woman sees what a striped shirt would look like on a boy in yellow.\" that \"A woman and a boy wearing clothes.\"?\\nOptions:\\n- yes\\n- no\\n- it is not possible to tell.\nTeacher: Let's think:\n", "from": "human" }, { "value": "A boy in yellow implies that there's a boy wearing clothes. So the final answer is yes.", "from": "gpt" } ]
[ { "value": "Premise: \"A couple takes in the view at the water at dusk.\"\\nHypothesis: \"A couple is watching reality tv.\"\\nDo we know that the hypothesis entailed by the premise? Step by step answer:", "from": "human" }, { "value": "A couple cannot take in a view of water at the same time as they watch reality tv because they can only have one focus and because televisions are not typically outdoors where a view of water is. Therefore, the final answer is no.", "from": "gpt" } ]
[ { "value": "Given the sentence \"A child is wearing a red shirt and raising their arms.\" can we conclude that \"The child would like to be picked up.\"?\\nOptions:\\n- yes\\n- it is not possible to tell\\n- no Now, let's be accurate as possible. Some thinking first:", "from": "human" }, { "value": "Raising their arms is not necessarily like to be picked up. So, the answer is it is not possible to tell.", "from": "gpt" } ]
[ { "value": "If \"Two people stand against the railing above the water and watch the sunset.\" does that mean that \"The men went to sleep.\"?\\nOptions:\\n- yes\\n- it is not possible to tell\\n- no Let's be accurate as possible and think first.", "from": "human" }, { "value": "Men either went to sleep or still stand to watch sunset. Final answer: no.", "from": "gpt" } ]
[ { "value": "Test for natural language inference.\\nPremise: \"A couple is standing against a railing looking at a beautiful lake and sunset.\"\\nHypothesis: \"The couple is in love.\"\\nIs the hypothesis entailed by the premise?\\nOptions:\\n- yes\\n- no\\n- it is not possible to tell Let's be accurate as possible and think first.", "from": "human" }, { "value": "Not all couple standing against a railing looking at a beautiful lake and sunset is in love. Final answer: it is not possible to tell.", "from": "gpt" } ]
[ { "value": "Premise: \"Three people stand next to the tail of an airplane that is decorated with tribal designs.\"\\nHypothesis: \"The people are riding in a bus.\"\\nIs the hypothesis entailed by the premise?\\nOptions:\\n- yes\\n- it is not possible to tell\\n- no Now, let's be accurate as possible. Some thinking first:", "from": "human" }, { "value": "People are either riding in a bus or on a airplane tail. So, the answer is no.", "from": "gpt" } ]
[ { "value": "Denny asked: Can we conclude from \"A man dressed as a woman sitting behind a sewing machine.\" that \"A man with feminine attire sits with a sewing machine.\"?\\nOptions:\\n- yes\\n- no\\n- it is not possible to tell.\nLe: OK, so how can I answer with some explanation?\n", "from": "human" }, { "value": "Being dressed as a woman means having feminine attire on. Being behind a sewing machine is where you sit when using it. So one who's with a sewing machine would be behind a sewing machine.\nThe answer: yes.", "from": "gpt" } ]
[ { "value": "Premise: \"Two women standing by a door behind another individual seated in a red chair.\"\\nBased on this premise, can we conclude that the hypothesis \"Two women and a seated man.\" is true?\\nOptions:\\n- yes\\n- it is not possible to tell\\n- no Now, let's be accurate as possible. Some thinking first:", "from": "human" }, { "value": "An individual seated in a red chair can be a man. So, the answer is yes.", "from": "gpt" } ]
[ { "value": "Premise: \"Men working at night on railroad tracks with a lit up construction vehicle on the tracks behind them.\"\\nBased on this premise, can we conclude that the hypothesis \"The man are working the late night shift.\" is true?\\nOptions:\\n- yes\\n- it is not possible to tell\\n- no\nLet's solve step-by-step:", "from": "human" }, { "value": "Working at night implies that one is working a late night shift. The answer is yes.", "from": "gpt" } ]
[ { "value": "Denny asked: Given the sentence \"A person's head is in the foreground while two women embrace in the background and look at the camera.\" can we conclude that \"Two women hug.\"?\\nOptions:\\n- yes\\n- it is not possible to tell\\n- no.\nLe: OK, so how can I answer with some explanation?\n", "from": "human" }, { "value": "Two women embracing means they are showing affection and hugging as part of the total description of them looking at the camera.\nThe answer: yes.", "from": "gpt" } ]
[ { "value": "Can we conclude from \"A bird flying pass the walkway.\" that \"A natural creature walking.\"?\\nOptions:\\n- yes\\n- no\\n- it is not possible to tell Step by step answer:", "from": "human" }, { "value": "The bird can not fly pass the walkway and be walking at the same time. Therefore, the final answer is it is not possible to tell.", "from": "gpt" } ]
[ { "value": "If \"A man enters a tiny shack in the desert while another man exits.\" does that mean that \"One man goes in a room while another man leaves.\"?\\nOptions:\\n- yes\\n- it is not possible to tell\\n- no Stream of thoughts:", "from": "human" }, { "value": "Entering something is the same as being one who goes in. A tiny shack is a room. One who exits can also be said to leave.\nTherefore, the answer is yes.", "from": "gpt" } ]
[ { "value": "Premise: \"One man leaves a four-door blue building while another man enters it.\"\\nHypothesis: \"A man leaves his work building as his boss goes in.\"\\nIs the hypothesis entailed by the premise?\\nOptions:\\n- yes\\n- it is not possible to tell\\n- no Stream of thoughts:", "from": "human" }, { "value": "No evidence a four-door blue building is this man's work building. It might be his gym. Also no reason to believe the man that enters when a man leaves the building is his boss.\nTherefore, the answer is it is not possible to tell.", "from": "gpt" } ]
[ { "value": "Student: Given the sentence \"One man enters and one man leaves a pale blue building with a tin roof and red flooring.\" can we conclude that \"People are walking.\"?\\nOptions:\\n- yes\\n- it is not possible to tell\\n- no.\nTeacher: Let's think:\n", "from": "human" }, { "value": "The man who enters the building and the man who leaves the building are both walking. So the final answer is yes.", "from": "gpt" } ]
[ { "value": "Premise: \"People in bright indian attire are walking outside.\"\\nHypothesis: \"People wearing feathers were running outside.\"\\nDo we know that the hypothesis entailed by the premise? Now, let's be accurate as possible. Some thinking first:", "from": "human" }, { "value": "You can not assume Indian attire includes feathers and there is a difference between walking and running. You can not do both at the same tie. So, the answer is it is not possible to tell.", "from": "gpt" } ]
[ { "value": "Student: Premise: \"Two people walking in front of a building.\"\\nHypothesis: \"The people are walking.\"\\nIs the hypothesis entailed by the premise?\\nOptions:\\n- yes\\n- it is not possible to tell\\n- no.\nTeacher: Let's think:\n", "from": "human" }, { "value": "Walking in front of a building is generalized by the phrase the people are walking. So the final answer is yes.", "from": "gpt" } ]
[ { "value": "Premise: \"A homeless man being observed by a man in business attire.\"\\nHypothesis: \"The business man wants to give the homeless man a job.\"\\nDo we know that the hypothesis entailed by the premise? Step by step answer:", "from": "human" }, { "value": "A man in business attire is not necessarily a business man who wants to give someone a job. NO evidence the man in business attire has a job to offer the homeless man. Therefore, the final answer is it is not possible to tell.", "from": "gpt" } ]
[ { "value": "Can we conclude from \"A woman in a blue plaid shirt and white apron cooks food in a pot next to vegetables and rice.\" that \"A woman cooks food for her husband.\"?\\nOptions:\\n- yes\\n- no\\n- it is not possible to tell Step by step answer:", "from": "human" }, { "value": "Just because this woman is cooking does not mean she is cooking for her husband. She may be cooking for her neighbors. Therefore, the final answer is it is not possible to tell.", "from": "gpt" } ]
[ { "value": "Given the sentence \"A man sorts tropical fruit.\" can we conclude that \"A man is separating pineapples from mangoes.\"?\\nOptions:\\n- yes\\n- it is not possible to tell\\n- no A step-by-step solution is:\n", "from": "human" }, { "value": "There is more food in the tropical fruit category than just pineapples and mangoes. The man would be separating more than pineapples from mangoes.\nThe final answer: it is not possible to tell.", "from": "gpt" } ]
[ { "value": "Please answer the following question by reasoning step-by-step. Premise: \"A person is cooking food.\"\\nHypothesis: \"Someone makes a meal.\"\\nDo we know that the hypothesis entailed by the premise?. Step-by-step reasoning:", "from": "human" }, { "value": "A person cooking food implies that person is making a meal. So the answer is yes.", "from": "gpt" } ]
[ { "value": "Denny asked: Premise: \"A girl and guy dressed up in costumes.\"\\nHypothesis: \"Two siblings are wearing tube sock costumes.\"\\nIs the hypothesis entailed by the premise?\\nOptions:\\n- yes\\n- it is not possible to tell\\n- no.\nLe: OK, so how can I answer with some explanation?\n", "from": "human" }, { "value": "Not every girl and guy are siblings. Not all costumes are tube sock costumes.\nThe answer: it is not possible to tell.", "from": "gpt" } ]
[ { "value": "Premise: \"A man preparing fruit below a tree.\"\\nBased on this premise, can we conclude that the hypothesis \"A man preparing fruit handling fruit.\" is true?\\nOptions:\\n- yes\\n- it is not possible to tell\\n- no Now, let's be accurate as possible. Some thinking first:", "from": "human" }, { "value": "One must be handling fruit in order to be preparing it. So, the answer is yes.", "from": "gpt" } ]
[ { "value": "Given the sentence \"A train drives through town.\" can we conclude that \"The train blows its whistle as it travels through town.\"?\\nOptions:\\n- yes\\n- it is not possible to tell\\n- no Now, let's be accurate as possible. Some thinking first:", "from": "human" }, { "value": "Just because A train drives through town does not mean it blows its whistle going through. So, the answer is it is not possible to tell.", "from": "gpt" } ]
[ { "value": "Denny asked: Premise: \"A girl is brushing her teeth next to an infant on a white couch.\"\\nBased on this premise, can we conclude that the hypothesis \"The girl is learning to brush her teeth.\" is true?\\nOptions:\\n- yes\\n- it is not possible to tell\\n- no.\nLe: OK, so how can I answer with some explanation?\n", "from": "human" }, { "value": "Just because A girl is brushing her teeth next to an infant on a white couch does not mean she is learning how to brush her teeth.\nThe answer: it is not possible to tell.", "from": "gpt" } ]
[ { "value": "Premise: \"A little girl in bright green is walking on pavement while carrying a bag or box.\"\\nHypothesis: \"The girl is walking on a street.\"\\nIs the hypothesis entailed by the premise?\\nOptions:\\n- yes\\n- it is not possible to tell\\n- no Step by step answer:", "from": "human" }, { "value": "Just because A little girl in bright green is walking on pavement while carrying a bag or box does not mean she is on a street. Therefore, the final answer is it is not possible to tell.", "from": "gpt" } ]
[ { "value": "Premise: \"A little girl in a green dress with blue dots is carrying a box with a handle.\"\\nHypothesis: \"A little girl wearing a green dress with blue dots drops a box by its handle.\"\\nDo we know that the hypothesis entailed by the premise? Let's be accurate as possible and think first.", "from": "human" }, { "value": "One cannot drop a box by its handle and be carrying a box with a handle at the same time. Final answer: no.", "from": "gpt" } ]
[ { "value": "Please answer the following question by reasoning step-by-step. Can we conclude from \"A blond baby girl in green is walking and holding a box.\" that \"The baby is asleep.\"?\\nOptions:\\n- yes\\n- no\\n- it is not possible to tell. Step-by-step reasoning:", "from": "human" }, { "value": "The baby cannot be asleep and walking and holding a box at the same time. So the answer is no.", "from": "gpt" } ]
[ { "value": "Premise: \"An excited supporter of the obama ticket for the 2008 presidential election.\"\\nBased on this premise, can we conclude that the hypothesis \"An obama hater.\" is true?\\nOptions:\\n- yes\\n- it is not possible to tell\\n- no Now, let's be accurate as possible. Some thinking first:", "from": "human" }, { "value": "One cannot be a hater and supporter at the same time. So, the answer is no.", "from": "gpt" } ]
[ { "value": "Test for natural language inference.\\nPremise: \"City traffic passes by a man riding his bicycle through the streets.\"\\nHypothesis: \"The man is riding down a country road.\"\\nIs the hypothesis entailed by the premise?\\nOptions:\\n- yes\\n- no\\n- it is not possible to tell A step-by-step solution is:\n", "from": "human" }, { "value": "A man cannot ride his bicycle through city streets and a country road at the same time.\nThe final answer: no.", "from": "gpt" } ]
[ { "value": "Premise: \"A man wearing black is riding a three-wheeled bicycle down a busy city street.\"\\nBased on this premise, can we conclude that the hypothesis \"A man is riding a bike outside.\" is true?\\nOptions:\\n- yes\\n- it is not possible to tell\\n- no Step by step answer:", "from": "human" }, { "value": "The man is riding because he is riding a three-wheeled bicycle. Therefore, the final answer is yes.", "from": "gpt" } ]
[ { "value": "Test for natural language inference.\\nPremise: \"A girl wearing colored striped pants brushing her teeth next to a white couch.\"\\nHypothesis: \"There is a girl brushing her teeth with a red tooth brush.\"\\nIs the hypothesis entailed by the premise?\\nOptions:\\n- yes\\n- no\\n- it is not possible to tell Stream of thoughts:", "from": "human" }, { "value": "Not all girl wearing colored striped pants brushing her teeth with a red tooth brush.\nTherefore, the answer is it is not possible to tell.", "from": "gpt" } ]
[ { "value": "Denny asked: Given the sentence \"A man bikes in a busy street during the day.\" is it true that \"A man is walking in the middle of the busy street.\"?.\nLe: OK, so how can I answer with some explanation?\n", "from": "human" }, { "value": "One is not able to be walking and biking at the same time.\nThe answer: no.", "from": "gpt" } ]
[ { "value": "Premise: \"Two men standing on ice with a score board behind them.\"\\nHypothesis: \"The men are getting ready to fish through the ice.\"\\nIs the hypothesis entailed by the premise?\\nOptions:\\n- yes\\n- it is not possible to tell\\n- no Let's be accurate as possible and think first.", "from": "human" }, { "value": "One cannot fish through the ice when just standing on ice in front of a score board. Final answer: no.", "from": "gpt" } ]
[ { "value": "Premise: \"This young goggle-eyed kid is enjoying a dip in the lake.\"\\nBased on this premise, can we conclude that the hypothesis \"A human in a lake.\" is true?\\nOptions:\\n- yes\\n- it is not possible to tell\\n- no Stream of thoughts:", "from": "human" }, { "value": "A human in a lake implies a dip in the lake.\nTherefore, the answer is yes.", "from": "gpt" } ]
[ { "value": "Can we conclude from \"Two people sit a restaurant table talking.\" that \"Two people sit a restaurant table talking and laughing.\"?\\nOptions:\\n- yes\\n- no\\n- it is not possible to tell Stream of thoughts:", "from": "human" }, { "value": "Not all people can be talking and laughing at the same time.\nTherefore, the answer is it is not possible to tell.", "from": "gpt" } ]
[ { "value": "Test for natural language inference.\\nPremise: \"A man in a suit walking down the sidewalk with his arm in a sling.\"\\nHypothesis: \"A man is recovering from a boxing match.\"\\nIs the hypothesis entailed by the premise?\\nOptions:\\n- yes\\n- no\\n- it is not possible to tell Let's be accurate as possible and think first.", "from": "human" }, { "value": "Having his arm in a sling doesn't imply he was in a boxing match. Final answer: it is not possible to tell.", "from": "gpt" } ]
[ { "value": "Given the sentence \"A man with a his arm in a sling and a business suit walks past two woman talking.\" is it true that \"A man with an injured arm and wearing a suit walking down the road oblivious to two women talking.\"? Stream of thoughts:", "from": "human" }, { "value": "Walking past people talking doesn't mean that you are oblivious to them.\nTherefore, the answer is it is not possible to tell.", "from": "gpt" } ]
[ { "value": "Denny asked: Given the sentence \"A middle-aged man with a broken left arm wearing a suit.\" is it true that \"Who is walking by a couple of women on a sidewalk.\"?.\nLe: OK, so how can I answer with some explanation?\n", "from": "human" }, { "value": "A man passes two women on his way home from work.\nThe answer: it is not possible to tell.", "from": "gpt" } ]
[ { "value": "Please answer the following question by reasoning step-by-step. Premise: \"A man in a suit with his arm in a blue sling is walking down the sidewalk in front of a pink building while two women are standing there together.\"\\nHypothesis: \"A man walks by two women.\"\\nIs the hypothesis entailed by the premise?\\nOptions:\\n- yes\\n- it is not possible to tell\\n- no. Step-by-step reasoning:", "from": "human" }, { "value": "A man could be wearing a suit and have his arm in a blue sling. So the answer is yes.", "from": "gpt" } ]
[ { "value": "Given the sentence \"Three chinese ladies cooking chinese food in a restaurant.\" can we conclude that \"The ladies own the restaurant.\"?\\nOptions:\\n- yes\\n- it is not possible to tell\\n- no Stream of thoughts:", "from": "human" }, { "value": "Just because ladies are cooking in the restaurant doesn't mean that they own the restaurant.\nTherefore, the answer is it is not possible to tell.", "from": "gpt" } ]
[ { "value": "Given the sentence \"A man in a construction hat is prying a piece of the side of a bridge off.\" is it true that \"The man is middle aged.\"? A step-by-step solution is:\n", "from": "human" }, { "value": "It would be hard for a middle aged ma to pry open anything on a construction site.\nThe final answer: it is not possible to tell.", "from": "gpt" } ]
[ { "value": "Premise: \"Two dogs play in the grass.\"\\nHypothesis: \"The dogs are floating in the air.\"\\nIs the hypothesis entailed by the premise?\\nOptions:\\n- yes\\n- it is not possible to tell\\n- no Step by step answer:", "from": "human" }, { "value": "You need to be on the ground to play in the grass so you cannot be floating in the air at the same time. Therefore, the final answer is no.", "from": "gpt" } ]
[ { "value": "Premise: \"A construction worker is working on the side of a bridge.\"\\nHypothesis: \"A construction worker is working at a computer.\"\\nIs the hypothesis entailed by the premise?\\nOptions:\\n- yes\\n- it is not possible to tell\\n- no Stream of thoughts:", "from": "human" }, { "value": "He could not be on a computer if he were on the side of a bridge because there are not computers in that location.\nTherefore, the answer is no.", "from": "gpt" } ]
[ { "value": "Student: Can we conclude from \"Both women are wearing glasses and long-sleeved shirts.\" that \"Both women are wearing glasses and long-sleeved shirts and have vision issues.\"?\\nOptions:\\n- yes\\n- no\\n- it is not possible to tell.\nTeacher: Let's think:\n", "from": "human" }, { "value": "Both women have vision issues and are wearing glasses and long-sleeved shirts. So the final answer is it is not possible to tell.", "from": "gpt" } ]
[ { "value": "Premise: \"A white and brown dog with his mouth open and tongue out facing a second.\"\\nHypothesis: \"Almost off-camera dog.\"\\nIs the hypothesis entailed by the premise?\\nOptions:\\n- yes\\n- it is not possible to tell\\n- no Stream of thoughts:", "from": "human" }, { "value": "A dog looking at another dog because it has a bone.\nTherefore, the answer is it is not possible to tell.", "from": "gpt" } ]
[ { "value": "Can we conclude from \"A female jumps with arms and legs spread near a dwelling.\" that \"A woman leaps into the air.\"?\\nOptions:\\n- yes\\n- no\\n- it is not possible to tell Now, let's be accurate as possible. Some thinking first:", "from": "human" }, { "value": "A women is a female. Leaps into the air implies jump. So, the answer is yes.", "from": "gpt" } ]
[ { "value": "Premise: \"Two yong men are performing in a gym.\"\\nHypothesis: \"Two men on a boat are fishing.\"\\nIs the hypothesis entailed by the premise?\\nOptions:\\n- yes\\n- it is not possible to tell\\n- no\nLet's solve step-by-step:", "from": "human" }, { "value": "Two men cannot be on a boat while performing in a gym. The answer is no.", "from": "gpt" } ]
[ { "value": "Can we conclude from \"Two men wearing silly outfits are dancing.\" that \"Two men are dancing in a club.\"?\\nOptions:\\n- yes\\n- no\\n- it is not possible to tell Let's be accurate as possible and think first.", "from": "human" }, { "value": "The men may not be dressed in silly outfits and they could be somewhere else besides a club. Final answer: it is not possible to tell.", "from": "gpt" } ]
[ { "value": "Please answer the following question by reasoning step-by-step. Given the sentence \"Two men dressed in odd clothing are jumping on a basketball court.\" is it true that \"Two men dressed in strange clothing are jumping.\"?. Step-by-step reasoning:", "from": "human" }, { "value": "The men could be jumping anywhere. It does not have to be on a basketball court. So the answer is it is not possible to tell.", "from": "gpt" } ]
[ { "value": "Please answer the following question by reasoning step-by-step. Test for natural language inference.\\nPremise: \"Young football players hurtle down the field.\"\\nHypothesis: \"The football players are winning the game.\"\\nIs the hypothesis entailed by the premise?\\nOptions:\\n- yes\\n- no\\n- it is not possible to tell. Step-by-step reasoning:", "from": "human" }, { "value": "There is not evidence that the players are winning the football game. So the answer is it is not possible to tell.", "from": "gpt" } ]
[ { "value": "Please answer the following question by reasoning step-by-step. If \"Three people play instruments in front of a crowd of people.\" does that mean that \"A group of people enjoys listening to a live performance of instrumental music.\"?\\nOptions:\\n- yes\\n- it is not possible to tell\\n- no. Step-by-step reasoning:", "from": "human" }, { "value": "A group can be made of more than three people or less than three. So the answer is it is not possible to tell.", "from": "gpt" } ]
[ { "value": "Student: Premise: \"A band playing in front of a crowd outside.\"\\nHypothesis: \"A band plays in the enclosed auditorium.\"\\nDo we know that the hypothesis entailed by the premise?.\nTeacher: Let's think:\n", "from": "human" }, { "value": "The band cannot be outside and in an enclosed auditorium simultaneously. So the final answer is no.", "from": "gpt" } ]
[ { "value": "Premise: \"3 little kids are playing football.\"\\nHypothesis: \"The kids are on a team.\"\\nDo we know that the hypothesis entailed by the premise? Step by step answer:", "from": "human" }, { "value": "The kids may or may not be on a team. They could just be tossing a football. Therefore, the final answer is it is not possible to tell.", "from": "gpt" } ]
[ { "value": "Test for natural language inference.\\nPremise: \"Two children in red coats and hats looking at a red train in the winter time.\"\\nHypothesis: \"Two children in red coats and hats looking at a red train in the snow.\"\\nIs the hypothesis entailed by the premise?\\nOptions:\\n- yes\\n- no\\n- it is not possible to tell Let's be accurate as possible and think first.", "from": "human" }, { "value": "Just because it is winter time does not mean there is snow on the ground. Lots of places get no snow in the winter. Final answer: it is not possible to tell.", "from": "gpt" } ]
[ { "value": "Leo: Premise: \"A rock band in a small club performing and sweating.\"\\nBased on this premise, can we conclude that the hypothesis \"A group of young women are performing.\" is true?\\nOptions:\\n- yes\\n- it is not possible to tell\\n- no\nMei: OK, So, let's think first...\nMe:", "from": "human" }, { "value": "The rock band that is performing may not be made up of young women.\nThus, the answer is it is not possible to tell.", "from": "gpt" } ]
[ { "value": "Test for natural language inference.\\nPremise: \"A man with an ear-piece opens his mouth wide as he sings into a microphone.\"\\nHypothesis: \"A man performs a rendition of bohemian rhapsody at karaoke.\"\\nIs the hypothesis entailed by the premise?\\nOptions:\\n- yes\\n- no\\n- it is not possible to tell Step by step answer:", "from": "human" }, { "value": "A man singing into a microphone is not assumed to be a man who performs a rendition of Bohemian Rhapsody at karaoke. Therefore, the final answer is it is not possible to tell.", "from": "gpt" } ]