url
stringlengths 36
564
| archive
stringlengths 78
537
| title
stringlengths 0
1.04k
| date
stringlengths 10
14
| text
stringlengths 0
629k
| summary
stringlengths 1
35.4k
| compression
float64 0
106k
| coverage
float64 0
1
| density
float64 0
1.14k
| compression_bin
stringclasses 3
values | coverage_bin
stringclasses 3
values | density_bin
stringclasses 3
values |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/10/26/AR2007102602452.html
|
https://web.archive.org/web/2007102819id_/http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/10/26/AR2007102602452.html
|
3 States Compete for Water From Shrinking Lake Lanier
|
2007102819
|
Wooden fishing docks tower 10 feet over dried mud that used to be squishy lake bottom. Boat ramps begin at the parking lot and end in sand. New islands emerge from shallows.
"If the water drops another foot, I don't know that anyone will be able to get a boat in," said Mike Boyle, 64, a resident who has long trolled the lake for spotted and striped bass.
The waters of Lake Lanier, funneled through federal dams along the Chattahoochee River, sustain about 2.8 million people in the Atlanta metropolitan area, a nuclear power plant that lights up much of Alabama, and the marine life in Florida's Apalachicola River and Bay.
Now, amid one of the worst droughts on record, all three places feel uncomfortably close to running dry. That has prompted a three-state fight that has simmered for years to erupt into testy exchanges over which one has the right to the lake's dwindling water supply and which one is or is not doing its share to conserve it.
The dispute, which some experts say provides a glimpse of what uncontrolled growth could mean for the future, has reached all the way to the White House as the Republican governors of Alabama, Georgia and Florida have appealed to President Bush for larger shares of the flow.
After a month of blustery news conferences and jabbing news releases from the competing governors, Bush dispatched Interior Secretary Dirk Kempthorne today to mediate an agreement.
"This was a real priority with President Bush," Kempthorne said, noting that the trip means he will be dealing with the California wildfires from the road. "If it were easy, this would have been settled 18 years ago."
The focal point of the interstate debate is Lake Lanier, a reservoir that was created in the late 1950s with the construction of the Buford Dam, which blocked the flow of the Chattahoochee River.
The Army Corps of Engineers, which operates the dam, manages the flow of water through the structure to generate electricity and to accommodate downstream users, mainly utilities, industrial plants and the fisheries of the Apalachicola River and Bay.
Every morning, sirens wail just downriver from the dam. Then 52 stainless steel gates spin open, and, in a bubbling gush, the precious waters of the lake flow out into the Chattahoochee.
Amid the drought, the Corps has released more water from Lake Lanier than has flowed in, and Atlantans have grown increasingly worried about Lanier's dwindling levels. They are down about 15 feet from normal.
|
BUFORD, Ga., Oct. 26 -- No gauges are necessary at Lake Lanier to measure the ravages of the Southeast's drought.
| 20.291667 | 0.583333 | 0.75 |
medium
|
low
|
abstractive
|
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/10/26/AR2007102600971.html
|
https://web.archive.org/web/2007102819id_/http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/10/26/AR2007102600971.html
|
Delayed Spending Bills Prompt Finger-Pointing
|
2007102819
|
"Today Congress set a record they should not be proud of: October the 26th is the latest date in 20 years that Congress has failed to get a single annual appropriations bill to the president's desk," Bush said in a White House news conference.
In response, House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) criticized the president on the cost of the Iraq war: "This Congress' record on fiscal discipline and meeting our national priorities sends the President this message: the days of the fiscally irresponsible Rubber Stamp Congress are over," she said in a statement.
The back and forth highlighted Congress's struggle this year to perform its most basic duty: funding the federal government. Democrats have been bickering among themselves over a strategy for moving the bills to the president, who has threatened to veto most of them in a dispute over domestic spending priorities.
House Appropriations Committee Chairman David R. Obey (D-Wis.), with Pelosi's backing, wants to carefully package the bills to beat a veto, but Senate Majority Leader Harry M. Reid (D-Nev.) wants to move the biggest of them to Bush quickly, and engage in political battle. In the balance hang spending initiatives that reflect the party's values: more money for police officers and veterans, cancer research and environmental science, help for children, seniors and the working poor.
The $22 billion in extra spending Democrats want is a small fraction of the $2.7 trillion budget. But the White House, eager to reclaim a reputation for fiscal responsibility, has no incentive to compromise, and congressional leaders know it.
"If the White House wants to hold their ground at all costs . . . if they don't want to make any conciliatory moves, they can win most of these. They know that," Obey said. "But we pay . . . a huge price in missed opportunities."
While the last of 12 spending bills passed through the House by early August, they have been bogged down in the Senate. Early this week, the Senate passed the Labor, Health and Human Services, and Education bill, which Reid said will be the first bill to go to the president's desk. The $600 billion bill contains nearly half of the extra domestic spending that Democrats want and Bush opposes. A veto, some Democrats say, would let them score points by comparing Bush's balk at a small bump in spending at home with the cost of a five-year war, which with his latest request would total nearly $200 billion.
"More than half of what he disagrees with is in this one bill. So it seems to me this would be a good place to start," Reid said.
But the Labor-Health bill is likely to be the last spending bill to pass the Senate this session, leaving five unfinished. Some top Senate Democrats favor sending the finished bills to the president one by one, to show progress, but they do not agree on which bills should go first. Others say Democrats would gain more leverage by combining bills Bush wants to veto with ones he won't, such as homeland security.
Obey wants to wait awhile. If Bush will not compromise, Obey said, he wants to "make it as clear as possible what we are trying to do and why it's preferable to what the president is trying to do."
Democrats are also at odds over earmarks, the pet spending projects that some voters seize on as symbols of government waste and that Democrats have pledged to reduce. The House cut earmarks in its versions of the spending bills to half of last year's levels. But the Senate has trimmed them by 20 percent. Last week, senators battled on the floor over an earmark in the Labor-Health bill for a Woodstock music festival museum. The project, sponsored by New York Democratic Sens. Hillary Rodham Clinton and Charles E. Schumer, was cut.
Such skirmishes have chewed up months, crowding out initiatives such as a gun law that would strengthen mental-health background checks in the aftermath of the Virginia Tech shooting, and one of the biggest bills of the session, the 2008 farm bill. Congress has already voted to extend its budget deadline from Oct. 1 to Nov. 16.
Another continuing resolution looks likely, and some in both parties predict the spending saga will drag into January. Delays increase the risk that in the end, Democrats will have to merge unfinished bills into a single omnibus, whose hundreds of pages would blur their domestic agenda and hand Republicans a coup.
"We're coming down to the end of this session or the end of this year where everything is going to come together in, what I presume, will be a very bloated, large appropriations spending bill, which the president will probably have to veto," said Senate Republican Whip Trent Lott (Miss.).
|
President Bush criticized congressional Democrats yesterday for failing to send him a raft of spending bills, declaring that they should "stop wasting time and get essential work done on behalf of the American people.
| 25.702703 | 0.594595 | 0.756757 |
medium
|
low
|
abstractive
|
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/10/26/AR2007102600486.html
|
https://web.archive.org/web/2007102819id_/http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/10/26/AR2007102600486.html
|
A New Accent on 'Public' From NPR
|
2007102819
|
Michel Martin has a keen ear, a taste for good stories and a knack for asking tough questions. On this day, she also has a raspy voice, a common cold's way of injecting jitters into a studio full of radio producers.
"Some of the stories we do, they would have laughed me out of the room on TV," says Martin, who spent a decade as a correspondent on ABC's "Nightline" before the network dropped the show's long-form stories in favor of a quicker pace.
On "Tell Me More," if Martin wants to devote time to news from Senegal or feature a blogger from Trinidad or interview a Burmese political dissident whose thick accent makes him difficult for some listeners to comprehend, she charges ahead, trusting that the audience will stay with her and make the extra effort. "That's not something we could do in television," she says.
But the hour-long daily show -- which started in April and airs at 2 p.m. weekdays on WAMU (88.5 FM) and on 31 other stations around the country -- is not merely a way for NPR to demonstrate its commitment to serious journalism in an age of cutbacks and lowered ambitions in broadcast news. "Tell Me More" is also about reaching out to blacks, Hispanics and others who have remained persistently underrepresented in NPR's audience.
"It's really a tricky thing," says Marie Nelson, the show's executive producer. "We want to have conversations that people of color would want to hear, but we also want to create opportunities for other people to hear about these issues. We both happen to be African American, but we live in connection with all kinds of groups."
The big white board that tracks plans for upcoming segments in the show's tight warren of cubicles at NPR's Massachusetts Avenue NW headquarters portrays a program that focuses heavily on black life in this country and African, Latin American and Asian stories from overseas. The mix includes pieces on Motown founder Berry Gordy, "Soul Train" host Don Cornelius, a Washington-based effort to create dialogue between black and Jewish teenagers, the 150th anniversary of the Supreme Court's Dred Scott decision, attitudes toward HIV on black college campuses, and a weekly discussion with NPR's correspondents in Africa.
Directly across from the schedule board, a list of pointers -- the show's Ten Commandments -- asks staffers to focus on this question as they book guests: "What story, event or idea will be compelling to all Americans?" Everything from the composition of the staff to the selection of topics and guests to the musical bumpers that frame the stories makes it clear that NPR wants to break out of its reputation as a programmer for an overwhelmingly white audience.
"We are so not wrapped in cotton," Martin says, laughing at the classic "Saturday Night Live" parody of public radio hosts as oh-so-ethereal voices of gentility.
NPR has made several attempts to reach black listeners in recent years, and not all have gone well. Talk show host Tavis Smiley left NPR last year complaining that the network had failed to give his show the marketing push it needed, in part, he said, because "everything about my personal aesthetic was antithetical to public radio. . . . This thing called public radio is a club, and they're not trying to let everybody in."
But Smiley also railed against being presented as NPR's black show. "Tell Me More" aspires to break out of the racial balkanization that has persisted throughout radio's history.
Martin's regular features include a group of mothers known as the Mocha Moms who talk about everything from relationships to politics, and a "Barbershop" segment in which a mostly black cast of men hashes out topical issues. But Martin mixes in white voices and tries to maintain an alluring intimacy while steering the show clear of the exclusive "just us" tone that dominates black commercial radio.
"We're trying to make a safe place to talk about hard things," she says. "One thing I'm more worried about than being pigeonholed as a black show is being pigeonholed as a women's show."
Toward that end, Martin spurns the confrontational style that marks much of talk radio. But this is not chick chat, either. She preps hard for interviews, and her background as a reporter for the Wall Street Journal and Washington Post comes out in her tendency to correct guests when they stray from the facts. When was the last time you heard Larry King or Glenn Beck do that?
Seeking a broad audience doesn't inhibit Martin from speaking frankly about race or other touchy topics. Interviewing Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas's longtime friend, Armstrong Williams, about the justice's new autobiography, Martin asks questions you wouldn't likely hear on TV: "Would Clarence Thomas like to be known as a race man? Is it possible he doesn't recall events from [the time before he was nominated to the court] because of his drinking?" (In his book, Thomas writes that from his college years until 1982, "I sought comfort in the bottle" and was "definitely drinking too much.")
Martin wants the show to speak to "those who are not being spoken to," something she hopes her erstwhile colleagues in television will once again find the courage to do. But the current cost-consciousness in television leaves a big opening for radio and for new media. Martin started a blog about "Tell Me More" months before the show premiered, and she still uses the blog to give listeners a peek at how decisions are made about what gets on the air -- the kind of transparency audiences increasingly demand.
|
Michel Martin has a keen ear, a taste for good stories and a knack for asking tough questions. On this day, she also has a raspy voice, a common cold's way of injecting jitters into a studio full of radio producers.
| 23.744681 | 1 | 47 |
medium
|
high
|
extractive
|
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/10/26/AR2007102600507.html
|
https://web.archive.org/web/2007102819id_/http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/10/26/AR2007102600507.html
|
In God's Image, Mysterious Ways and All
|
2007102819
|
BALTIMORE -- In the '50s, Edith Valentine Tenbrink decamped from Iowa to Los Angeles to find a more lively spiritual scene. There, she and her husband established the "Ancient Order of the Golden Precept," a kind of Ten Commandments religion with a New Age spin that fell just short of a cult.
Her husband, John, did the preaching and Tenbrink provided the visuals. With the guidance of a spirit named Obadiah, Tenbrink wrote in her diaries, she painted a series of pictures called "Dawn of a New Day." The images are populated by robed figures who look like Midwesterners dressed up as Hindu priests. One recurring female deity looks suspiciously like Tenbrink herself -- not the frumpy housewife in photos of her at the time, but a lithe, exotic angel dressed in sunset orange or purple, with serpents coiling from her arms and head and a face like Mary Pickford's.
Half of Tenbrink's 80 paintings and writings were discovered in an old suitcase in the attic of a vacant house in downtown Los Angeles. The other half were found in a dumpster in Venice and sold to a collector at a swap meet in 2003. Now some are hanging at the American Visionary Art Museum in Baltimore, in a group show called "All Faiths Beautiful." Close to half a century after her death in 1963, the paintings feel less like a historical document than a visual diary, a window into Tenbrink's peculiar vision and maybe even her fantasy life (with some paint and little imagination, even an Iowa housewife could become a smoldering goddess).
Tenbrink is what's known as an outsider artist, which means, like everyone featured at the museum, she had no formal art training. Outsider artists are presumed to create out of some pure inner vision and not in response to any trends in the art world. Their creations tend to be idiosyncratic and sometimes inscrutable, and have a long-night-of-hallucination feel.
Loring Cornish, a local Baltimore artist, overlapped hundreds of spoons and nickels into an arresting, giant sign that reads simply, PRAY, although you can make out the word only from certain angles. Howard Finster of Summerville, Ga., created an enamel-on-wood perversion of a Christmas tree that includes rantings with a vague resemblance to Revelation: "The unknown meanings beyond the light of the sun. The unknown is a sign of the end of time."
The creations seem driven by an instinct that lies somewhere between compulsion and belief. They express less a coherent faith than a desperate attempt to be seen and understood, even if the outreach ultimately fails. (Tenbrink painted idyllic communities filled with people, although in reality she and her husband never had much of a following.)
The show is at its best when it showcases the more peculiar "faiths," and then challenges you to connect. A piece of cheerful acrylic-on-wood folk art by Sister Mary Proctor of Tallahassee conveys a quirky, personal ritual anyone could relate to: "Every morning I read my Bible," says the text painted on a plaque that a cut-wood woman holds up. "Then drink a Coke. Alway's God. Alway's Coke."
"500 Nuns Donate Their Brains to Science" by Thomas Duncan, a native of Scotland who lives in Greenwich Village, is the most off-putting work. The colored pencil work is inspired by the Sisters of Notre Dame, who submitted themselves to a landmark study on aging. The nuns are presented as a repetitive, nearly identical motif, most of them topless or wearing what look like suspenders. In the center, a doctor is slicing off the top of one of their heads.
This theme of innocence defiled is a staple of visionary art. In the automatic psychobiography that accompanies such paintings, the artist is assumed to be compulsively replaying childhood abuse or neglect.
But if you think about it, it's not all that weird or foreign. The nun unzipped is the staple of lots of other, more familiar things -- porn, '60s TV, those campy boxing nuns you find in the gag aisles of gift shops, the fantasies of many a bored altar boy. Duncan's nun figures are all identical in size and position, but the effect is not at all programmatic in a proto-Warhol way. By replacing those forbidding habits with half-nude vulnerability he manages to make them more approachable.
The exhibit is ringed by dozens of anonymous postcards mailed into "Post Secret," the giant confessional art project started by Frank Warren, an artist from Germantown in Montgomery County. Warren asked people to mail him their secret heartaches and longings in anonymous, homespun form. Some samples concerning belief are displayed at the exhibit. These, too, echo the theme of taking comfort in someone else's inner demons: "I'm a committed Christian but I want to have sex with almost every woman I see," one says, or "I sit near him in church so that when the Pastor says turn and shake hands with each other I have an excuse to touch him." As Warren writes, every secret is unique but through them you may recognize your own secrets and "feel less alone."
The show is less compelling when it makes it too easy to connect. Press materials call it a celebration of the 800th birthday of the "love-filled" Persian poet Jelaluddin Rumi, and one room is dedicated to illustrations of his writing from a book by Michael Green. (A piece of Rumi's poem "Only Breath" is highlighted: "Not Christian or Jew or Muslim. Not Hindu Buddhist, Sufi or Zen . . . Only That Breath Breathing. Human Being.") Rumi is supposedly the best-selling poet in the Western world. His notion of a universal faith is simple and powerful, but also a little too trendy for the surroundings. Coupled with quotations from Mahatma Gandhi and Archbishop Desmond Tutu, it feels almost like a college manifesto.
One room includes a tribute to atheists, and a description of the Founding Fathers that skews too secular (they were all deists, not Christians, and never went to church -- which is largely true but only tells half the story. Lincoln endlessly quoted the Bible, and Thomas Jefferson, author of "separation of church and state," was comforted on his deathbed by a passage from the Gospel of Luke).
In the corner of this room is the show's most controversial piece -- a wooden infant-size mummy known as the "Stillborn Jesus," by the Rev. Richard Emmanuel, of Gloucester, Mass. "Better Jesus were stillborn than the hypocrisy of war, the hypocrisy of faith, the hypocrisy of caring for this planet that has been practiced in his Holy NAME!" reads a makeshift tombstone. Students of both the art world and the culture wars will recall Andres Serrano's "Piss Christ" from 1989.
With this piece we are solidly in trendy art world territory and no longer off the beaten path. Visionary artists are less dissenters than misfits, and by nature they resist being lumped into a mass ideology, even a countercultural one.
In any case, this take is unfair to American fundamentalists. Edith Valentine Tenbrink is more spiritual kin to Jimmy Swaggart or Jim Bakker than she is to Rumi: She is a product of a distinct American messianic fervor, not an Eastern mysticism that blots out all religious distinction.
Thankfully, even in the Rumi room, the museum, now over a decade old, remembers its roots. Across from the illustrations is a set of haunting acrylic paintings by Sermet Aslan of Charleston, S.C. They are done in a soothing spring green and cream, but they are not at all soothing. In one, the main figure has a hook through his mouth like a caught fish and his turban over his eyes. In another, he looks to be struggling out of a straitjacket. The series begins, mysteriously, with a small painting of a car that looks like an old Chevy with a birdcage on the roof.
After the room of atheists and the "Stillborn Jesus," I assumed this was a homespun protest against torture. But this isn't true. Aslan is a Sufi master. The car belonged to his neighbors. For some reason they kept a birdcage on the roof, which moved him to think about beautiful things being caged. The painting, true to the visionary spirit, is called "Struggle With Self."
All Faiths Beautiful, at the American Visionary Art Museum. Through August 2008. Tuesdays-Sundays 10 a.m. to 6 p.m. 800 Key Hwy., Baltimore. Call 410-244-1900 or visit http://www.avam.org.
|
BALTIMORE -- In the '50s, Edith Valentine Tenbrink decamped from Iowa to Los Angeles to find a more lively spiritual scene. There, she and her husband established the "Ancient Order of the Golden Precept," a kind of Ten Commandments religion with a New Age spin that fell just short of a cult.
| 28.083333 | 1 | 60 |
medium
|
high
|
extractive
|
http://newsweek.washingtonpost.com/postglobal/america/2007/10/turkish_kurd_praises_ocean_cit.html
|
https://web.archive.org/web/2007102719id_/http://newsweek.washingtonpost.com/postglobal/america/2007/10/turkish_kurd_praises_ocean_cit.html
|
PostGlobal on washingtonpost.com
|
2007102719
|
The Status of the Minorities in South East Asia: Why Canât Turkey Be Like the Philippines?
University of Texas at Dallas school of social science
The Philippine nation is a pluralistic society and culture compared to other South East Asian countries in the region. The direction the Philippines has taken since her colonial days has been toward the integration of small, more diverse tribal communities into a more developing nation with the nationâs desired goal being to bring about a cohesive society under the unifying umbrella of institutional processes. There are many tribal languages spoken in the Philippines , especially among the Muslim minority. For example, a member of the Maranao tribe speaks Maranao, and one belonging to the Tausog tribe speaks the Tausug tribal language. The Philippine government never forced minorities to speak Tagalog, the Philippine national language. Of the 175 languages, 171 are living and only 4 are extinct, making a very diversified and rich linguistic map (Ethnologue 2007). The pluralistic nature of the Philippine society is very interesting to study in the areas of ethnic, racial, and religious relations compared to Turkey, because the Turkish nation is also a pluralistic society and culture populated by many ethnic minorities, like the Kurds, Armenians, Jews, Central Asians, and those from the Balkans; however, the direction the Turkish government has taken is not toward integration into a more diverse, tolerant society or a more educated and developing nation, but rather the direction the Turkish government has taken is to continue to deny differences, a denial based on a more racist and nationalistic approach.
Like the Turkish government, the Philippine government constitutionally remains a secular state, but unlike the Turkish government, it neither supports nor discriminates against any religious group, institution, or people according to the constitutional principles. In the Philippines , most people classify themselves along sectarian lines. However, religious fanatic groups in the Philippines are trying to divide the social structure of the nation instead of trying to unify it into a common homeland under the Philippine government. They use the drug of religion to combat against governmental efforts. Instead of fighting against poverty and illiteracy and of maintaining security and building the economy, the fanatics create problems, so that investments do not go to the rural areas. As a consequence of the violence, Muslims pay the price. Even though in the past the government discriminated against minorities, now it has recognized these past mistakes and has compensated through a program of reconciliation and autonomy. However, the Turkish government has had no reconciliation programs to reconsider the taboos against the Kurds. Just recently, the head of the Turkish Historical Society, TTK, Professor Halacoglu, argued that the Kurds actually are Turkmen and that the Alevi Kurds are Armenian. Indeed, this is the history that the Turkish government teaches to young generations with misinformation about Kurdish history. The history professor lays no claims to having foresight or pre-science, and he has studied history just enough to know that he does not know enough to risk predicting what the future holds for the Kurds. He has eyes, though, and so he is in a position to ask readers to gaze in a certain direction and determine whether they also see what he sees. This kind of professor needs to wear glasses because his eyes suffer from myopia, and, therefore, it is entirely possible that his claim rests on evidence that either results from not seeing all there is to see or from being based on what he thinks he sees. Also, a few years ago Bogazici University in Istanbul held an international conference, but the TTK pulled its funding and support when it learned that a paper on the Kurds and another on the Armenians were to be presented. The Turkish government has held this kind of groundless history for decades. However, Turkey is preparing to join the world class, so I wonder if Turkey will relinquish her narrow ideas based on a nationalistic view that denies minoritiesâ right to exist or if it will follow the path of Europeans who strongly believe that respect for human rights is one of the most fundamental and universal values of our world. According to Benita Ferrero-Waldner, the European Human Rights Commissioner for External Relations in the European Neighborhood Policy, âAll of us, in our official capacity have an obligation to promote and protect the rights of our fellow members of the human family, be that at home or elsewhere in the worldâ (2005).
By contrast to Turkey with its land mass being contiguous, the territorial setting of the Philippines is comprised of more than seven thousands islands, a reality that creates problems because of isolation and communication gaps. Yet, in spite of these natural difficulties arising out of its being an archipelago, the Philippines government is committed to overcoming these complexities and to narrowing the gaps. However, it is true to say that the Philippine government in the past has neglected the southern part of country, or consistently has used assimilation and discrimination policies against the Muslim minorities in that region. Proselytizing the indigenous tribes with their religions based primarily on animism, Islam was introduced to Mindanao and the Sulu Islands in the 15th century, and affected not only the religious order but the political and social system as well, establishing sultanates and bringing the barangays or kinship groups under the control of powerful datus or chieftains.. After this period of Islamic proselytism, Muslims in the southern Philippines consider themselves native since they preceded the Spaniard colonization that began with the arrival of Ferdinand Magellan in 1521. Today, however, the Philippine government has admitted that the governmentâs past policy was wrong and unjust. The government has given a large degree of freedom in the area ranging from education to autonomous self-rule. It has created a special Muslim curriculum, Muslim institutions, and scholarship programs exclusively for the Muslim minorities. For example, Mindanao State University (MSU) is located in Marawi City , where the majority of the population is Muslim. The tuition is very inexpensive compared to other universities in the region.
When I interviewed, Dr. Tamano, a prominent Muslim, who is highly educated and enjoys a high profile, he was Secretary of the Autonomous Region in the Muslim Mindanao, Muslim advisor to the regional Department of Education, and acting Vice- President of Mindanao State University (2007). He also ran for governor but lost because of election fraud. He is now Chancellor of Mindanao State University. I asked him, âWhat is the Moro question?â If Muslims have their own autonomous region, their self rule, education, language, and culture, what do Muslims want? Why are they still fighting for? He told me that when the Spaniards came for three Gs--GOD, Glory and Gold. âThey tried to take our land from us and to force us to believe their God. Thatâs why Muslims resisted them until today. That was a just war, and thatâs why we won.â He explained the difference now, âBut today we are fighting the wrong war, because the government now recognizes her past mistake and has given us all opportunities to catch up with the rest of society, in terms of education and economics.â Muslims have a higher illiteracy rate than the Catholic Christians. There is such a disparity between the Catholic majority and the Muslim minority in terms of poverty. He continued, âThat is what Muslim leaders in the Philippines should be fighting for. They are supposed to unify to eliminate poverty, narrow the educational gaps, and create peace so that people can have jobs, but sometimes Muslims fight among themselves, especially when an election comes. Some of the leaders want the Muslim candidates to use religion as a scapegoat to gain political power for themselves.â Also, a lack of Muslim leadership among the Muslim minority perpetuates the problems. He told me to look at his university as a good example. The government has given every opportunity for Muslims to be educated and to have skills as well as good jobs. He referred to education as âthe right education,â one that teaches Islam but an Islam that is compatible with science. In his view, Muslims should learn science and skills as well as their religion.
Also, I visited the Mayor of Davao City, Mayor Rodrigo Duterte, who is well known for making the city safe and free from the corruption of drug-dealing. He has a zero tolerance against drugs and other illegal activity. Today there is only one city in the Mindanao region that is safe, and it is Davao . When I asked him, âHow did you do that?â Mayor Duterte told me that the Philippine government policy had been wrong in the past. He did not have any intention to follow the wrong policy of the government. The mayor said that the state is not a moral agent; people are, and as such, they can impose moral principles on powerful institutions. He said that he talked to everybody especially the rebels and implemented equal representation in his administration. He explained that he gave an equal voice and an equal role to every tribe to make sure each person was represented fairly and equally, and then he said he told them that there would be no more assassinations, kidnappings, or killings. That is why the city is safer today than before his coming to office. Mayor Duterte does not believe that using the military is a good solution to ethnic and religious conflict in his country. He believes we are all human beings, and as such, we all have rights inherent to that status. We all have dignity and worth that exist prior to law. That is a system in which words can change the whole structure of government, and words can prove stronger than numerous military divisions. That is why today Davao City is the safest city in the Philippines ; it is because of a good and strong mayor.
Good administration and politics emphasize rights, the superiority of law, duty, and the placement of responsible people in difficult jobs. According to the mayor, government means justice and public order. One cannot speak where those two do not exist. For Duterte, laws should be effective all the time, everywhere, and for everybody. This unity of feeling, thought, and culture are essential to the development of a strong nation because disintegration of moral unity causes that same nation to weaken.
Like more recently in the Philippines , in the 1960s America called for national integration to solve the problem of racism, and it implemented new policies to overcome the attitudes and practices that discriminated against the Blacks. Since it is hard to change what happened in the past, a society has to start at the present, so Turkey can change her attitude toward ethnic discrimination. To begin, the current leaders must realize Turkeyâs guilt, get rid of their arrogance, seed humility, and exchange love, humility, kindness, and forgiveness for hate to make the present more comfortable and the future more hopeful. Peace will begin in the Kurdish region when oppression, cruelty, injustice and hunger end.
However, today the Turkish government lags behind the Philippine government in terms of its treatment of the minorities. An inquirer must ask why the law enforcement that serve in the Kurdish region are not Kurdish or at least speak Kurdish. Why are there no educational institutions that study Kurdology or that establish Kurdish institutes? Why can the Turkish government not create some kind of program like affirmative action that will allow for a narrowing of the educational gap between Kurdish minorities and the Turkish majority because illiteracy rates among the Kurds is higher than among the Turks. Why can the Turkish government not give some incentives to encourage economic progress? Kurds should be more organized and should educate themselves to realize that they would be better off if they made education a priority because education is mightier than the sword. The Kurdish culture and history should be allowed to exist in the open and also preserved, such as Kurdish names, and the Kurdish language. Why can the Turkish government not put forth some effort to foster civic engagement about the Kurdish question? Why can the Kurdish question not be discussed in the academic community? Why can the Turkish government not have some kind of scholarship program exclusively for the Kurdish minority to give them incentives to go to school? Why can the Kurds not have the same kind of autonomy that the Muslim minorities do in the Philippines ? The problem of the Kurds being subjected to objective analysis is that it necessarily requires assessment of the governmentâs adopted measures to effectively solve such problems. If the government denies the existence of the ethnic group, how can any kind of governmental analysis occur? Good government produces opportunities for each generation to have a developed faith, innovative technology and science, and a cultivated consciousness about their identity and their cultural values. If, by contrast, the people see the government as tyrannical or oppressive, then the nation has lost its purpose to serve the common good.
Further, in Turkey the government program still uses a military solution to achieve their policy of integration rather than an academic one. For a long time the integration policy was always interpreted as assimilation or acculturation, which means that the Turkish government tries to reconcile diverse cultures with one culture and to deny the minoritiesâ culture. By contrast, in the Philippines the varied Muslim tribes have their own language, dances, crafts, and customs. Yet, when Ferdinand Magellan came to the Philippines in early 1521, he conquered the archipelago by sword and cross, and for long time the Spaniards fought with Muslims in a bloody struggle and war. However, later on, the governor as well as Catholic and other denominationsâ missionaries organized a politico âa military for the minoritiesâ group, so that they would be able to control the minoritiesâ affairs and supervise them. Dr. Tamano points out that the Spanish were successful in Luzon and Visayas, so the Spanish began to assimilate non-Christians into an already growing Christian society. In Dr. Tamanoâs view, the Spaniards made the integration policy successful in the north because the Spaniard considered that if the number of Filipinos converted to Christianity could be measured, the numbers would show a fully successful integration. However, in the southern regions like Sulu and Maguindanao, the Sultanates of the Muslims resisted the Spaniard forces and the problem of assimilating these non-Catholic and Catholics failed to bring them to work together to bring about peace. If a traveler crosses the region, he or she will see how that policy has affected peopleâs life conditions there. Now the Philippine government recognizes these differences and has implemented policies to recognize the ethnic and religious differences.
Like Magellan, the Turkish government first under the Ataturk regime and then subsequent ones used force and denial as part of its assimilation policy. âKurds are mountain Turks.â Turkey was effective with this assimilation, but they were not successful in the south; however, later on, the Turkish regimeâs generals and Agah or Sheik organized a politico âthe military for the minoritiesâ group, so that they could control the minoritiesâ affairs and supervised them through corrupt religious groups. The Agha in the south and in the eastern part of Turkey accomplished a successful integration policy because if the number of the Kurds who denied their identity or who believed that they were mountain Turks could be considered a criterion of national integration, then we could say that the Turkish government proved successful in her integration or assimilation policy. It is fair to say that the Turkish regimeâs integration policy in the east was successful, but that it failed in the south. Last week, the mayor of the Diyarbakir challenged the Islamic Justice and Development Party (AP), saying that Diyarbakir is our [the Kurdsâ] âstronghold,â and we are ready to fight. However, Mayor Osman Baydemir used this word as a illustration to mean that we will not give up our culture, we will not bow down to injustice, we will not let the military burn our villages, we live here, and we will fight you not in the sense of taking up arms but a civilized way.. In the recent case, however, a member of the Fetullahci group, Fetullah Gülenâs closest assistant wrote in the Zaman newspaper criticizing Baydemirâs comments by saying that Mayor Baydemir cannot challenge the Prime Minister and that Baydemir is creating terror. But Huseyin Gulerce and his followers put the blinders on when the Democratic Social Party (DPT) leader Ahmet Turk criticized Recep Tayyip Erdoganâs government by saying, âThere is no mention about the Kurdish problem during the parliamentary talks over the new government plan.â However, Erdogan replied to Ahmet, âYou first outlaw the Kurdish Worker Party [PKK} in the region.â Gulerce and his followers failed to see what kind of language the Prime Minister was using. What kind of leadership is it that wants to punish a majority of people because a minority of the people supports the PKK? If the Prime Minister were a mature enough leader, he would never point out differences of thought and opinion to produce conflict. It is true that no one should refuse to tolerate views that separate people into camps and destroy the community and society, but neither should they go out of their way to use them to enflame opposition. If the Prime Minister and others who think like him believe in tolerance, then why do they oppose every idea that seem contradictory to theirs and scare them off instead of seeking ways to benefit from their opinions and ideas, of trying to understand them and to build a bridge, and of beginning a dialogue with them? In other words, why do they not try to learn how to listen to what the Kurds say they really want and what they really mean? Otherwise, those who are kept at a distance and are led into dissatisfaction because they think that the government is biased will unit the masses and will resist the Turkish government. It is important that the Prime Minister and his government learn how to benefit from other peopleâs knowledge and views because that knowledge will help them understand how to approach the Kurdish problem.
Also, Erdogan still believes that there is no Kurdish problem and that there has never been one. By answering Baydemir, Erdogan was saying that people should produce projects not words. I wonder what Erdogan has been doing in southeastern Turkey . How many families have been compensated because the military forced them to leave their villages? How many families whose village has been burned have homes being rebuilt? How many new schools and new roads are being built in southeastern Turkey ? How many job has he created? How much has he reduced the size of the military instead of increasing it, as he actually has? A just government implies that there is a policy for everything: a policy for renewing a nationâs joy until the whole nation feel the joys and likewise feels the sorrow and pain of others in the same nation. Instead, now there is a new campaign that goes against Kurds, saying that Kurds are betrayers and have taken the side of the Christians like those in America . But, the government has never realized that Americans are the ones who freed the Kurds, not their fellow Muslim brothers. Also, it has failed to understand that those who have been oppressing the Kurds for centuries are neither Christians nor Americans, but they are their fellow Muslim brothers. Iran , for example, for a long time has oppressed the Kurds and is killing them even today; it is not a Christian nation but rather a Muslim nation. Turkey has oppressed, killed, tortured, raped, and burned houses and villages, not a Christian nation but a Muslim one. Syria committed genocide against the Kurds; it is not a Christen nation but a Muslim nation. Iraq âs Saddam gassed Kurds not as a Christian nation but a Muslim one. Those who study politics and see politics as a propaganda struggle for power are mistaken. Politics is like an art of management based on diverse perspectives of the contemporary world and on a future that will seek the peopleâs satisfaction and justice. Erdogan and some others should never forget that power and dominance are transitory, while justice, equality, and truth are eternal. Even if they do not exist in Turkish politics today, some day they will. Therefore, especially those who claim to be Muslims should align themselves and their policies with equality and justice; and treat everybody the same regardless of their religion, skin color, race, ethnicity, or gender. The Prime Minister and Huseyin Gulerce should never forget when they were discriminated against by the military and the Secularists, or when they were not welcome in the presidential palace or at a meeting. How did they feel in their own country? That is exactly how the Kurds feel now. If religion is truly interpreted, it can promote democracy, understanding of others, human rights, equality, as well as justice, and those values can be guaranteed via religion. Because religion should teach that all people are created equal, it should not discriminate based on race, color, age, or nationality. Religion should declare that power lies in truth; religion should teach that justice and rule of law are essential; religion should teach freedom of belief, open ideas, and the right to life, personal name, and personal property. Everyone should be able to speak her or his language and maintain culture that God-gave to them; no one should take that away, and their rights should be violated. Religion is a relationship between men and God. It results in a commitment between God and the individual as he or she submits to His divine system in which all creatures obey Him. To abuse it is very sad in that today many people try to use religion to gain power and as a method of controlling another personâs life. If a government is virtuous and the state is chosen because of their humble ideas and justice, then that government will be strong and peace as well as reconciliation are possible, but if the government is run by officials who still have prejudice in their hearts and minds, not justice and equality, and thus they lack those high qualities, sooner or later it will collapse. Erdogan and others should remember that extreme harshness causes unexpected explosions that are waiting for the spark to ignite them. As long as his government protects people from cruelty and defends them from injustice and oppression, it will be a successful government; however, if Erdoganâs government does not do so, then he will cause more hatred, more prejudice, and more turmoil.
The majority of Muslims in the southern Philippines (the Moros), like the Kurds, are not rebellious and do not want to fight or be rebellious against their government. Even though a majority of the Moros sympathize with the Morosâ struggle against, oppression, injustice, and cruelty that the rebels represent, most Muslims like the Kurds wish for nothing more than to live in peace, pursue their livelihood, have a family, raise their kids, live in dignity, and die in a bed. The Kurds seek above all their survival as a Kurdish people. They are now convinced that their survival demands freedom from the domination of Turks in those matters which most impinge on their identity and selfhood as Kurds; those are such matters as education, community organizations, non-government organizations (NGOâs), family , law and order, an end to military rule, and economic resources. This is the kind of experience that has been telling us that there can be no real freedom for Kurds until there is fundamental change in the structures of their relationship to the Turkish government. This change must give them power, that is affective reserved powers, to order their affairs in their regions. However, those objectives should be accomplished by Turkish political systems using all of the legal constitutional means available, including publication of their ideas; organizing pressure groups and lobbies, and participating in government efforts to find the right, just solution to the Kurdish problem.
The number of Moros, like the Kurds, have acted on their belief that the only way to respond to the governmentâs wrong policy is to fight even though they are a comparably small entity. However, some Kurdish leaders like Baydemir, a moderate, have often eloquently articulated the legitimate and understandable grievances the Kurdish people put forth and voice sound recommendations for the government, but presently the government and the people are not ready yet to discuss openly the Kurdish question. Mayor Baydemir speaks on behalf of his people pleading for understanding and justice. Former Senator Mamintal Tamano and former dean, Cesar Majul of the Institute of Islamic Studies at the University of Philippines systems, have sets of recommendations for the Philippine government to implement. Some of the recommendations are being implemented by the government: 1) a moratorium on new settlers should be imposed, 2) law enforcement agents in the Moros areas should be Muslims, 3) more educational institutions should be established, 4) governments should encourage economic progress, 5) Muslim Filipinos should be better Muslims, 6) important elements of Islamic law should be allowed for Muslims, and 7) the national government should enable greater Morosâ participation. These are the major recommendations that two moderate Filipino Muslims have put together for the government, and many of those recommendations have already been granted and implemented.
Now more Moros have been appointed to national services. A code of Philippine Muslimsâ personal law has been promulgated. Muslim holidays have legal status in the Moros region. The government has set up a Bank of the Philippines, Amana Bank, to capitalize on the Moro requirements for economic development. The Minister of Educational Culture has been making a conscious effort to meet the educational needs and religious feeling of the Muslims. Moreover, the Philippine government granted autonomy to the Muslims making them internally independent and externally dependent on the Manila government. According to Dr. Tamano, The Autonomous Region of Muslims Mindano (ARMM) was created in August 1989 and inaugurated in 1990 under the President, Corazon Aquino at the Cotabato City . This led to the Moro National Front laying down their arms and converting to the Philippine national army. The question is why canât Turkey be like the Philippines ?
|
America on PostGlobal; blog of politics and current events on washingtonpost.com. Visit http://newsweek.washingtonpost.com/postglobal/america/
| 329.333333 | 0.6 | 0.733333 |
high
|
low
|
abstractive
|
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/10/25/AR2007102502234.html
|
https://web.archive.org/web/2007102619id_/http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/10/25/AR2007102502234.html
|
Republican Hot Flashes
|
2007102619
|
Has America become a mean, ungenerous, cramped and crabby nation, a deeply insecure colossus -- one that just might be taking all those Viagra and Cialis commercials a bit too personally? Is the country desperate to find scapegoats for a perceived decline in, um, vigor? Or is America still a confident land of hope and promise, a place still potent with possibility?
It's watching the Republicans in Congress and on the presidential campaign trail that makes me pose those big-picture questions. I'm just suggesting a context for assessing the actions and rhetoric of a party that seems to be in the throes of andropause.
That's the popularly accepted term for "male menopause," which medical dictionaries tend to describe as a "purported" syndrome rather than an actual clinical diagnosis. I'm not qualified to offer an opinion on whether dads go through a Y-chromosome version of what used to be euphemistically called the "change of life." But I think the "Daddy party" has been presenting clear symptoms.
The latest was the Senate vote Wednesday in which Republicans, supported by a handful of red-state Democrats, narrowly scuttled the Dream Act, a bill that would have provided a path to citizenship for some young undocumented immigrants -- but only those who did everything this country once found worthy and admirable in pursuit of the American dream.
Under the proposal, men and women who fulfilled several conditions -- they had to be under 30, had to have been brought into the country illegally before they were 16, had to have been in the United States for at least five years and had to be graduates of U.S. high schools -- would have been given conditional legal status. If they went on to complete two years of college or two years of military service, they would have been eligible for permanent residency.
Let's see. Here was a way to encourage a bunch of kids to go to college rather than melt into the shadows as off-the-books day laborers -- or maybe even gang members. And here was a way to boost enlistment in our overtaxed armed forces. Aren't education and global competitiveness supposed to be vital issues? Aren't we fighting open-ended wars in Iraq and Afghanistan?
The vote against the Dream Act was so irrational, so counterproductive, that it seemed the product of some sort of hormonal imbalance.
"I do not believe we should reward illegal behavior," sniffed Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.), who led the fight to kill the measure. But the potential beneficiaries of the Dream Act didn't do anything illegal; it was their parents who made the decision to come here without papers.
The real reason for denying at least 1 million young people the opportunity to make this nation stronger is that illegal immigration is the scourge du jour. Undocumented immigrants are convenient scapegoats for perceived American decline, convenient targets for the unfocused anger that Republicans seem to believe their constituents feel -- the sense that "they," whoever they might be, are taking something away from "us."
George W. Bush's veto of the bill reauthorizing the popular State Children's Health Insurance Program -- an action backed up by loyal House Republicans -- had the same defensive, bitter sense of we'll-show-them-a-thing-or-two. The Republican Party has to be aware of the polls showing how concerned Americans are about the health insurance crisis. It has to be betting that the act of saying no -- in what looked like a fit of andropausal pique -- would play better with voters, perhaps subliminally.
And just listen to the Republican candidates' rhetoric about our great nation's place in the world. With the exception of Ron Paul, every one of them agrees that America is under siege, molested not only by dangerous bands of Islamic terrorists -- which is true -- but also by sovereign nations such as Iran, China and Russia that have had the temerity to pursue what they see as their national interests. Which is a bizarre way of looking at foreign relations.
The solution, according to the Republican presidential hopefuls, isn't give-and-take negotiation. It's chest-thumping. It's a series of declarations about what we will find "acceptable" and what we won't. Maybe this is calculated; maybe they've decided that national security is the only issue that gives any of them a chance against any Democrat in 2008.
But I think they're badly misreading the country. I think this is still fundamentally a hopeful, generous nation, aware of both its challenges and its strengths. And not yet ready to start downing Levitra by the handful.
|
Has America become a mean, ungenerous, cramped and crabby nation, a deeply insecure colossus -- one that just might be taking all those Viagra and Cialis commercials a bit too personally? Is the country desperate to find scapegoats for a perceived decline in, um, vigor? Or is America still a conf...
| 15.372881 | 0.966102 | 55.067797 |
low
|
high
|
extractive
|
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/10/25/AR2007102502215.html
|
https://web.archive.org/web/2007102619id_/http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/10/25/AR2007102502215.html
|
Clinton Builds Her Firewall
|
2007102619
|
As a result, say Democrats with long experience in state politics, Clinton has been doing everything "the New Hampshire way." She has carefully cultivated strong personal ties that go back to her husband's 1992 campaign and has built an organization with deep local roots. Although a victory by Barack Obama in Iowa could still propel him to triumph here, Clinton is setting herself up to withstand an Obama surge by using New Hampshire to become, if necessary, the second Comeback Kid.
The latest poll of likely Democratic primary voters, released yesterday by the New Hampshire Institute of Politics at Saint Anselm College, found Clinton with a commanding 42.6 percent support. Obama had 21.5 percent and John Edwards13.9 percent.
Clinton's advantage reflects the difficulties Obama has had in turning the enthusiasm he created in the early days of his campaign into enduring support. "Barack seems flat," said Arnie Arnesen, a former Democratic candidate for governor who is now a broadcaster and commentator. "The magic we experienced in December hasn't been sustained."
Obama's rock-star quality may actually be getting in his way. Gray Chynoweth, a lawyer who is president of the state's Young Democrats -- and is, like Arnesen, neutral in the contest -- said he admires Obama and was "excited to be part of his first visit to the state."
But Chynoweth adds: "There's a risk -- partly because he's always surrounded by Secret Service guys -- that some people feel that Obama might think of himself as too cool for school." But Secret Service protection, which Clinton also gets, is only part of Obama's problem. The large crowds Obama draws hinder his ability to engage in traditional campaigning. "People here don't just expect you to be on the stage," Chynoweth said. "They expect you to be out in the audience among the people."
Obama's charisma causes him other problems. Arnesen said that while Clinton's message "is very much about the voters," Obama's is "very much about himself" and his personal capacity to create change.
Cinde Warmington, who chairs the Democratic Party in the town of Gilford and supports Chris Dodd, said she likes Obama but was struck by a speech given by Michelle Obama declaring that her husband "really is special." This positive attribute, Warmington said, can also "come across as a sense of detachment," or even what some here perceive as an above-the-fray superiority.
Chynoweth said Obama tries hard to fight this perception. "He always says that 'I'm just a vehicle for this message,' " Chynoweth said. "But in a weird way, when he's saying it's not about him, that makes people think it's still about him. It's a tough box to be in."
Jim Demers, who co-chairs Obama's campaign here, believes that Obama will perform far better in the New Hampshire primary than current polling suggests because of his appeal to independents -- they are called "undeclared" here -- who can vote in either party's contest. And he notes that Obama has campaigned intensively in small groups, particularly at the house parties for which New Hampshire is famous.
But Demers points to a fascinating dynamic that -- although he doesn't say so -- may also be helping Clinton. Obama's candidacy, he argues, "sucked the energy out of the rest of the pack," hurting Edwards and others who might have emerged as major challengers to Clinton. Thus, instead of a campaign organized in opposition to Clinton, the fascination with Obama has, up to now, made her less of a target.
And Ray Buckley, the state Democratic chairman who is being so studiously neutral that he says he'll write in Jimmy Carter's name on primary day, argued that the strong reception Obama received here in December pushed Clinton "to get in much earlier" and organize the state more intensively. Several Democrats also said Clinton's claim that she can deal with the Republican "attack machine" rings truer to an angry party than Obama's call for an end to partisan polarization -- the very appeal Demers hopes will eventually draw independents to Obama.
The paradox for Obama is that catching up may require him to make Clinton -- and her views and electability -- more of an issue than he is. It may not come naturally, but "No More Mr. Nice Guy" may have to become his campaign anthem.
|
MANCHESTER, N.H. -- Quietly but systematically, Hillary Clinton is building a firewall in New Hampshire. She can afford to lose the Iowa caucuses as long as she can win here. She can't afford to lose both states.
| 20.186047 | 0.627907 | 0.813953 |
medium
|
low
|
abstractive
|
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/10/25/AR2007102502233.html
|
https://web.archive.org/web/2007102619id_/http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/10/25/AR2007102502233.html
|
Harry Potter's Secret
|
2007102619
|
There is something inherently odd about considering the sex lives of fictional characters in children's books. Just how hearty were the Hardy boys? And we will not even speculate about Heidi's reclusive grandfather.
The Dumbledore revelation was taken by many Christian conservatives as additional confirmation that Rowling is a corrupter of youth. What could be more subversive than the combination of witchcraft and homosexual rights?
Having undertaken the monumental task of reading "The Deathly Hallows" aloud to my boys each night -- the book runs 759 pages -- I am certain this critical reaction is badly mistaken.
Ruling out magic in children's literature would, of course, completely depopulate Narnia and Middle Earth, leaving just silent forest. The use of magic in fairy tales recurs for a reason; it reveals another reality -- what C.S. Lewis called the "deep magic" -- just beneath the surface of our days. Magic is usually the way that children are introduced to the idea of transcendence.
As to Dumbledore, it would have been disturbing if Rowling had used her final book to argue for some baldly political agenda -- if the Hogwarts headmaster and professor Snape had married, for example, in a touching civil ceremony. Whatever your view of homosexual rights, this would have been an abuse of parental trust, the exploitation of an unfair advantage. But this is not what happened. Dumbledore's sexual identity was an assumption Rowling brought to her writing, not explicit in the text itself. And the implicit reference is to a tragic, youthful infatuation with an evil character whom Dumbledore is later called upon to defeat in a duel. "I think a child will see a friendship," says Rowling, "and I think a sensitive adult may well understand that it was an infatuation."
That said, tolerance is one of the main themes of the Harry Potter books. In a marvelous social comparison, lycanthropy is treated as a kind of chronic disease, with werewolves subject to discrimination as if they had AIDS. The political ideology of Lord Voldemort is Nazi-like -- racist and totalitarian. "Pure-bloods" -- those with untainted magical lineage -- oppress those of mixed parentage, called "half-bloods," who are brought before show trials and carted off to Azkaban prison. As the series progresses, the body count of this ideology builds. Like much great children's literature, the series takes evil, hatred and death quite seriously.
But the really subversive element of the Harry Potter books is the answer they offer to death. Voldemort believes that death must be mastered and "eaten" -- resisted through Dark Arts that always involve exploitation and violence. Harry Potter, in contrast, is protected from death as an infant by the voluntary, courageous sacrifice of his mother's life. And Harry is called upon to repeat that sacrifice. The portion of "The Deathly Hallows" in which young Harry realizes that he is "marked for slaughter" and accepts the necessity of his own death for the sake of love is moving -- and that love becomes a kind of magic that is stronger than death itself. For every reader, this is an affirmation of friendship, loyalty and courage. For my children, it is also the symbol of a greater sacrifice.
These, of course, are central themes of religion, particularly Christian religion. And the question naturally arises: How can a book series about tolerance also be a book series about religion? This represents a misunderstanding of both tolerance and faith. For many, tolerance does not result from the absence of moral convictions but from a positive religious teaching about human dignity. Many believe -- not in spite of their faith but because of it -- that half-bloods, werewolves and others should be treated with kindness and fairness. Above all, believers are called to love, even at the highest cost.
Near the end of the series, the Hogwarts headmaster explains to Harry, "The true master does not seek to run away from Death. He accepts that he must die, and understands that there are far, far worse things in the living world than dying." That is wisdom, whatever Dumbledore's youthful inclinations.
|
There is something inherently odd about considering the sex lives of fictional characters in children's books. Just how hearty were the Hardy boys? And we will not even speculate about Heidi's reclusive grandfather.
| 21.078947 | 1 | 38 |
medium
|
high
|
extractive
|
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/10/25/AR2007102501452.html
|
https://web.archive.org/web/2007102619id_/http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/10/25/AR2007102501452.html
|
What My Daughter Taught Me
|
2007102619
|
I found this mixture of pride and shame ironic -- and sadly shallow. I compare his impressions with those of my 8th-grade daughter, Ann Elise, who has attended D.C. public schools for 10 years. She recently wrote an essay for her social studies class on the history of her school, Stuart-Hobson Middle School on E Street NE. The D.C. public schools, she acknowledged, are "in the news a lot" for their problems. And yet:
Much of my daughter's essay is devoted to describing segregation, shifting populations and the desegregation of her own middle school and other public schools in our community. Her conclusion brought tears to my eyes:
I credit Ann Elise's experience in the public schools for her ability to recognize that her school's history mirrors her city's -- and that she is part of that history now. My 13-year-old articulated better than I ever could the value of a public school education in this city. She understands, from personal experience, that she is one person among many, that building community takes time and effort.
Those lessons will serve her well as she grows to become a contributing member of our society. She has an understanding that she cannot be taught later in life: She realizes she plays a small role in a much bigger world. I could not be more proud of her, or of her education.
My daughter's gentle rebuke regarding the media portrayals of our public schools was not lost on me when I read her report. Kids -- students -- pay attention to what The Post and public officials say about our schools. My daughter, for one, doesn't seem to appreciate or believe the media portrayal that tells only part of our D.C public schools story.
Although many writers and readers may approach the issue of public education by looking at a narrow slice of history, it doesn't take much to broaden our horizons. It's doesn't take much to make the connections between where our schools are now and the development over the years of the charter/voucher/privatization movement. My daughter's 13-year-old understanding of these matters is more sophisticated than many adults will ever obtain.
I appreciate the education Ann Elise has gotten in the D.C. public schools. She and I both know that improvements must be made, and that they will take hard work. Meanwhile, I share her sentiments: I can't imagine her going to any other school.
The writer is president of the PTA at the Capitol Hill Cluster School, a D.C. public school.
|
In his article for Outlook, David Nicholson describes feeling guilty for moving to Fairfax County rather than "sacrificing his son" to an education in a D.C. public or charter school. Yet he also seems proud at having done the right thing for his son.
| 10.081633 | 0.571429 | 0.77551 |
low
|
low
|
abstractive
|
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/10/25/AR2007102502488.html
|
https://web.archive.org/web/2007102619id_/http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/10/25/AR2007102502488.html
|
FEMA Meets the Press, Which Happens to Be . . . FEMA
|
2007102619
|
Reporters were given only 15 minutes' notice of the briefing, making it unlikely many could show up at FEMA's Southwest D.C. offices.
VIDEO | White House Scolds FEMA for Fake News Conference
They were given an 800 number to call in, though it was a "listen only" line, the notice said -- no questions. Parts of the briefing were carried live on Fox News (see the Fox News video of the news conference carried on the Think Progress Web site), MSNBC and other outlets.
Johnson stood behind a lectern and began with an overview before saying he would take a few questions. The first questions were about the "commodities" being shipped to Southern California and how officials are dealing with people who refuse to evacuate. He responded eloquently.
He was apparently quite familiar with the reporters -- in one case, he appears to say "Mike" and points to a reporter -- and was asked an oddly in-house question about "what it means to have an emergency declaration as opposed to a major disaster declaration" signed by the president. He once again explained smoothly.
FEMA press secretary Aaron Walker interrupted at one point to caution he'd allow just "two more questions." Later, he called for a "last question."
"Are you happy with FEMA's response so far?" a reporter asked. Another asked about "lessons learned from Katrina."
"I'm very happy with FEMA's response so far," Johnson said, hailing "a very smoothly, very efficiently performing team."
"And so I think what you're really seeing here is the benefit of experience, the benefit of good leadership and the benefit of good partnership," Johnson said, "none of which were present in Katrina." (Wasn't Michael Chertoff DHS chief then?) Very smooth, very professional. But something didn't seem right. The reporters were lobbing too many softballs. No one asked about trailers with formaldehyde for those made homeless by the fires. And the media seemed to be giving Johnson all day to wax on and on about FEMA's greatness.
Of course, that could be because the questions were asked by FEMA staffers playing reporters. We're told the questions were asked by Cindy Taylor, FEMA's deputy director of external affairs, and by "Mike" Widomski, the deputy director of public affairs. Director of External Affairs John "Pat" Philbin asked a question, and another came, we understand, from someone who sounds like press aide Ali Kirin.
Asked about this, Widomski said: "We had been getting mobbed with phone calls from reporters, and this was thrown together at the last minute."
But the staff did not make up the questions, he said, and Johnson did not know what was going to be asked. "We pulled questions from those we had been getting from reporters earlier in the day." Despite the very short notice, "we were expecting the press to come," he said, but they didn't. So the staff played reporters for what on TV looked just like the real thing.
|
FEMA has truly learned the lessons of Katrina. Even its handling of the media has improved dramatically. For example, as the California wildfires raged Tuesday, Vice Adm. Harvey E. Johnson, the deputy administrator, had a 1 p.m. news briefing.
| 13.23913 | 0.586957 | 0.804348 |
low
|
low
|
abstractive
|
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/10/25/AR2007102502893.html
|
https://web.archive.org/web/2007102619id_/http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/10/25/AR2007102502893.html
|
Giuliani's Policy Professor
|
2007102619
|
In the happy bluster of the event (Forbes declared that a Giuliani administration would launch "an assault" on the federal tax code), the former New York mayor was asked whether he would endorse Forbes's signature policy, the flat tax. A decade earlier, when Forbes made the flat tax part of the policy discussion, Giuliani dismissed it out of hand. Now, Giuliani was amenable. "The flat tax," he said, "would make a lot of sense."
It seemed a surprisingly ideological declaration for a candidate who had been billed as the pragmatist and the moderate in the 2008 Republican presidential field. For conservatives who believe in the policy, it split the difference between a thrilling moment and a puzzling one. "I've got to tell you, I don't think he understands what the Steve Forbes flat tax proposal is," said Alan Viard, a resident scholar at the conservative American Enterprise Institute.
That Forbes and the Giuliani campaign had ever gotten together was largely the work of one man -- a longtime conservative insider and friend of Giuliani's who was once a Republican candidate for governor of California -- Bill Simon. Simon, the Giuliani campaign's policy director, had arranged a lunch at which Giuliani made the case to Forbes that he was the right kind of Republican. "What came through with both Bill and the mayor was that they really got it on the economy and on taxes," Forbes said.
Starting last fall, when Giuliani first called Simon and said he was running for president, Simon, 56, has been more responsible than anyone for Giuliani's policy education, and he has been the agent charged with managing the sometimes eager, sometimes awkward relationship between the former mayor of a liberal city and the conservative establishment.
Well before Giuliani said publicly that he would be a candidate, Simon put him through a rolling seminar that those in the campaign called Simon University, bringing in thinkers to brief Giuliani on key issues. The result is that though many of Giuliani's campaign operatives worked with him when he was mayor, his policy staffers, who have largely been assembled by Simon, come mostly from the think-tank world.
The roster of the seminars was a who's who of conservative intellectuals, and their ideas a menu of conservative thought. There were neoconservatives Norman Podhoretz, John R. Bolton and R. James Woolsey Jr. on foreign policy, as well as less ideological thinkers such as Gen. Anthony C. Zinni and Yale professor Charles Hill; the Hoover Institution's Michael Boskin on taxes and economic policy; Hoover's race scholars Shelby Steele and Thomas Sowell; and retired Gen. Jack Keane and the military scholar Frederick W. Kagan, the authors of the Iraq "surge."
"Simon is an incredible asset for the Giuliani campaign," said Grover Norquist, a conservative anti-tax activist. "He has the added advantage for Giuliani of being a serious social conservative and a pro-lifer, which gives people some assurance that social conservatives and judges will not be ignored."
Though Giuliani's natural inclination has been to talk primarily about national security and his experiences managing the city government in New York, Simon has helped coach him to express himself more prominently on positions that might resonate with the Republican Right: his conservative-leaning disposition on tax and economic policy, and his strict-constructionist views on judges.
Giuliani's senior policy advisers tend to favor some of the least popular elements of Bush administration policy. His most visible foreign policy adviser, Podhoretz, supports an armed intervention in Iran and a lengthy stay in Iraq. Giuliani's lead economic adviser, Boskin, was a prominent proponent of privatizing Social Security and remains convinced of the long-term necessity of private accounts. And Forbes, his campaign co-chairman, believes the Bush tax cuts did not go far enough in cutting marginal tax rates for the wealthy.
This has left Simon managing two ambitious, politically essential projects at once: helping to demonstrate that Giuliani is a conservative, and trying, through Giuliani, to ensure that his corner of the conservative movement is still powerful enough to pick the Republican nominee.
It is a tradition that Simon has a stake in defending. His father, William E. Simon Sr., was a wealthy Wall Street bond trader who became secretary of the Treasury under President Richard M. Nixon and, later, a legendary architect of the modern conservative movement. But he was also legendarily mean, "a mean, nasty, tough bond trader who took no BS from anyone," in the words of his old friend Ed Feulner, president of the Heritage Foundation. Simon would awaken his children on weekend mornings by dousing their heads with buckets of cold water.
|
Late in March, Rudolph W. Giuliani, who was not at the time known as a zealous supply-sider, held a news conference in Midtown Manhattan to announce that the conservative activist and former presidential candidate Steve Forbes would become his campaign co-chairman.
| 18.55102 | 0.693878 | 1.306122 |
medium
|
low
|
abstractive
|
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/10/25/AR2007102502421.html
|
https://web.archive.org/web/2007102619id_/http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/10/25/AR2007102502421.html
|
Mainstream Blogs Open Floodgates for Political Coverage
|
2007102619
|
It was the former first lady.
"Senator, why are you calling me?" the veteran political reporter asked.
"I read your blog," said Clinton, who quoted from his posting while insisting that of course she wasn't going to skip Iowa.
The mushrooming number of political blogs on newspaper and magazine Web sites has altered the terrain of the 2008 election. Campaign officials have learned to feed the bottomless pit of these constantly updated compilations, leaking favorable tidbits -- a new poll result or television ad -- and quickly disputing negative items.
In short, journalists and political strategists find themselves sparring more and more over smaller and smaller items on shorter and shorter deadlines.
When he worked for John Kerry's 2004 campaign, says Clinton spokesman Phil Singer, "we were essentially at the mercy of the so-called Old Media. You had to struggle to get something into the paper. With the advent of these blogs, it's much easier to get your message out through accredited newspaper channels."
Danny Diaz, a Republican National Committee spokesman, agrees: "They provide another vehicle for operatives like myself to get out a message. They help further a story line."
The Washington Post ("The Trail"), New York Times ("The Caucus"), Chicago Tribune ("The Swamp"), Los Angeles Times ("Top of the Ticket"), Boston Globe ("The Primary Source"), Time ("Swampland") and the cable news networks, among others, have A-team writers contributing breaking news, analysis and lighter fare to their blogs. And these journalists write with more attitude online than in tradition-bound publications.
"The campaigns really care about blogs, and I hear from them a lot more often about smaller things, not just big-picture stories," says Tribune reporter Jill Zuckman. Campaign aides also pay attention to the blogs on Politico.com and from such magazines as National Review ("The Corner") and the New Republic ("The Plank" and "The Stump").
The high-velocity approach is not without pitfalls for journalists who now must divide their time between print work and blogging. The constant pressure to update blogs, thereby drawing more Web traffic, leaves less time for reporting and reflection. Churning out items throughout the day increases the chances of errors and puts a premium on bite-size chunks fed by a single source. On the plus side, reporters writing online can file updates with comments from rival campaigns and correct any mistakes in real time.
Chris Cillizza, a washingtonpost.com reporter, says he constantly had to explain what he was doing when he launched his blog "The Fix" two years ago. Now, he says, campaign aides pitch stories to him every day.
|
Last spring, two hours after he used his Des Moines Register blog to ridicule a suggestion by a Hillary Clinton aide that she skip the Iowa caucuses, David Yepsen's phone rang.
| 15.628571 | 0.514286 | 0.571429 |
medium
|
low
|
abstractive
|
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/10/25/AR2007102502487.html
|
https://web.archive.org/web/2007102619id_/http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/10/25/AR2007102502487.html
|
Democrat Proposes Overhaul Of Taxes
|
2007102619
|
Setting the stage for a bitter election-year battle over the direction of U.S. tax policy, the House's chief tax writer yesterday unveiled a broad proposal that includes repealing the alternative minimum tax as well as reducing taxes on an estimated 91 million mostly lower- and middle-income Americans while raising them for many in the upper income brackets.
The plan would not change the amount of revenue collected, according to the staff of the Joint Tax Committee, but it would alter existing law to shift $1 trillion of the tax burden over 10 years. Described as "the mother of all reforms" by its author, House Ways and Means Chairman Charles B. Rangel (D-N.Y.), it was immediately denounced as "the mother of all tax hikes" in a statement from Republican leaders.
"This bill sets a marker and creates a controversy," said Clint Stretch, managing principal for tax policy at the accounting firm Deloitte & Touche. "The bill lays out where the Democrats have been already and where Republicans do not want to go."
Rangel's bill is unlikely to be voted on or even debated before next year. Many Democratic leaders have endorsed components of the bill, but Republicans have generally rejected it, and the debate is likely to spill into the 2008 presidential campaign.
Among the bill's most controversial elements is a surtax of four percentage points on married couples with adjusted gross income of more than $200,000 and 4.4 percentage points for couples with more than $500,000 in income.
The bill also targets the managers of hedge funds and private-equity firms. The executives' earnings would be taxed at ordinary income tax rates, which are more than double the capital gains rate they now pay. Hedge fund operators would also lose their ability to defer income taxes through the use of offshore havens.
At the other end of the spectrum, Rangel's proposal would expand the number of taxpayers who qualify for the earned income credit and would increase the size of the refundable child credit -- two major benefits for low-income families. It would also increase the standard deduction, allowing more families with low incomes to escape paying income tax.
This would have a negligible effect on tax revenue because people with extremely low incomes contribute little toward the bottom line. Overall, Stretch said, "the bill would shift income tax burdens from middle-class and upper-middle-class taxpayers to high-income individuals."
Corporations would face several tax increases, but also would receive some relief. Manufacturers, U.S. companies with foreign subsidiaries and oil companies, retailers, wholesalers, and other industries that use the last-in, first-out method of accounting would have their taxes increased. The measure would reduce the top corporate tax rate to 30.5 percent from 35 percent.
Business representatives were not happy with the plan. "There isn't much relief there," said R. Bruce Josten, executive vice president of the U.S. Chamber of Commerce. "This is going to be a problem for major corporations and also for a lot of small businesses, too."
He added: "This bill sacrifices one taxpayer for the sake of another."
House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) told the Associated Press that she expected differences of opinion even among Democrats. "In our caucus we'll have our usual exciting, dynamic give-and-take on the subject," Pelosi said.
|
Washington,DC,Virginia,Maryland business headlines,stock portfolio,markets,economy,mutual funds,personal finance,Dow Jones,S&P 500,NASDAQ quotes,company research tools. Federal Reserve,Bernanke,Securities and Exchange Commission.
| 15.068182 | 0.409091 | 0.409091 |
low
|
low
|
abstractive
|
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/10/25/AR2007102502722.html
|
https://web.archive.org/web/2007102619id_/http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/10/25/AR2007102502722.html
|
Wildfire Losses Were Budgeted
|
2007102619
|
As the wildfires that ravaged Southern California for five days lost momentum yesterday, representatives of the insurance industry said the estimated $1 billion in fire damage would have little if any impact on homeowners' rates in California or the rest of the nation.
"It's well within the range of losses we expect to see in California every few years," said economist Robert Hartwig, president of the Insurance Information Institute. "That means the rate in this area is already reflected with the risk associated with wildfires."
After Hurricane Katrina and the Florida hurricanes in 2004 and 2005, insurance premiums in the Gulf area and parts of Florida doubled over three years, according to institute records. When 2006 turned out to be relatively hurricane-free, the higher premiums contributed to record insurance-industry profits.
That history led Californians and industry observers to express concern that insurers might raise rates or make it tougher to get policies in high-risk areas susceptible to hurricanes, floods and wildfires.
"The insurance companies have always taken advantage of crises like this to increase premiums," said Les Brown, a Los Angeles lawyer who has sued insurance companies on behalf of policyholders. "I would imagine they will try to raise some, particularly in areas like Southern California."
Donald Light, a senior analyst with Celent, a Boston firm that advises financial service companies, said the industry might try to raise premiums for those in high-risk areas or offer more limited coverage in areas even beyond California such as the Gulf or the East Coast.
But industry representatives said yesterday that the damage from the California fires paled in comparison to the $41.1 billion chalked up to Katrina and would have little impact on rates.
They noted that in 2003, when fires caused more than $2 billion in damage in the San Diego area, rates did not spike.
Jason Kimbrough, a spokesman for the California insurance commissioner, concurred: "There was no spike."
In fact, Kimbrough said, several companies have moved to lower their rates this year for competitive reasons. Only one major insurer, Allstate, the nation's second-largest casualty home insurer, has asked for an increase -- 12 percent -- and that request was made before the fires.
At the time, Allstate announced that it would no longer take new customers because of earthquakes and fire. But Kimbrough said that "other insurers have told the commissioner they're happy to step in and take up the policies" that Allstate doesn't want.
At Qualcomm Stadium in San Diego, some Allstate policyholders who had been evacuated from their homes were waiting in line yesterday for checks from the company for their living expenses. In California, insurance companies generally pay for lodging for up to two weeks for a mandated evacuation.
James Barlow, 45, an evacuee from Ramona, Calif., said he would "not be surprised if because of the hurricane and fires that rates go up." But Jerry Frude, of Muth Valley, said he was confident that wouldn't happen. "Absolutely not," he said.
Jonathan Freed, a national spokesman for State Farm, the biggest home insurer in California, said he was not surprised that residents would worry about rate hikes.
"It's a very common and understandable question," he said. "The answer is no. No one event will cause a spike in rates, and people in the rest of the country don't have to worry about the rates in California. The rate we charge to costumers is based on the aggregate risk in the state. No one event is going to skew that."
Staff writer Sonya Geis contributed to this report from California.
|
As the wildfires that ravaged Southern California for five days lost momentum yesterday, representatives of the insurance industry said the estimated $1 billion in fire damage would have little if any impact on homeowners' rates in California or the rest of the nation.
| 15.212766 | 1 | 47 |
low
|
high
|
extractive
|
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/10/24/AR2007102402336.html
|
https://web.archive.org/web/2007102519id_/http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/10/24/AR2007102402336.html
|
Trying Times for the Obama Faithful
|
2007102519
|
Last weekend, I heard them tell each other that while the race started months ago, it is still the early going; that the crucial days in Iowa and New Hampshire are still ahead; and that there is time for Obama to close with a rush, as he did when he came from behind to capture the nomination for his Senate seat in 2004.
But the steady drumbeat of polls showing Clinton with more support than all the other Democrats combined -- and twice as much as Obama -- is taking a toll. In their private moments, they wonder whether even Obama, gifted as he is, can pull off this feat.
Such doubts can afflict any trailing candidate's campaign, but they are particularly pronounced -- and poignant -- in this case. Obama burst onto the national stage with such high expectations, fueled by his remarkable speech at the 2004 Democratic National Convention in Boston, that nothing, including the presidency, seemed beyond his reach.
The elevated stature he enjoyed nationally was nothing compared with the near reverence he commands among his friends here. Those who have worked closely with him through the past decade, in politics, community affairs or the antiwar movement, exhaust the list of superlatives in speaking about him and his wife, Michelle.
They see Obama as someone uniquely positioned to heal a divided nation -- and to change the image of America in the world -- simply by virtue of his history and personality. They can visualize the headlines and television coverage around the globe if he were elected to the White House.
Among the Obama faithful, Hillary Clinton is not reviled. Indeed, there is a good deal of admiration for the way she has conducted herself in the campaign.
But at every turn, Obama's people feel that he has been outmaneuvered and outsmarted by Clinton's timing and tactics. Nothing is more painful to them -- or more typical -- than what happened Oct. 2.
That date was the fifth anniversary of the speech that Obama gave to a rally outside Chicago City Hall, called to mobilize opposition to the looming war with Iraq. In the speech, which has been quoted many times, Obama, then eyeing a Senate campaign, defied public opinion and decried what he called a "dumb" war.
He has often cited his prescience on that issue as the best evidence that, despite his short tenure in Washington, he has the judgment to make the right calls on crucial questions of national security.
The Obama campaign, therefore, announced that the fifth anniversary would be a special day for them, the date of a major foreign policy address. After some debate, the campaign decided not to stage a repetition of the outdoor rally but rather to have him speak in a college auditorium, a better setting for a thoughtful address.
The speech that he delivered at DePaul University here was as serious a discussion of the lessons of Iraq and the future of American foreign policy as anyone could wish. And, as I was repeatedly reminded by the Obama people, it got next to no national press coverage. It was briefly summarized on Page A8 of The Post, Page 11 of the Boston Globe and Page 20 of the New York Times.
Why? Because the Clinton campaign, with exquisite timing, that same morning released its latest-quarter fundraising totals, which put her ahead of Obama for the first time in the money race. The Page 1 stories in the next day's Times and Post were simple: Clinton, leading all the polls, now leads in campaign finances as well.
The pessimists in the Obama camp worry that never again will they have such an opportunity to highlight his early opposition to the war -- in contrast to Clinton's vote for the resolution that President Bush used when he ordered the attack on Baghdad.
That is probably an exaggeration. Future debates, especially those coming in Iowa and New Hampshire, may provide more openings. It is also the case that the voters in those states are far less firmly attached to their current candidate preferences than polling numbers would suggest. There is, in fact, time for Obama to rally. It's just hard for his people to believe it right now.
|
CHICAGO -- These are difficult days for supporters of Barack Obama. This city is filled with people who have voted for, worked for, contributed to and, in many cases, prayed for the success of the young senator from Illinois. The struggle he has had in trying to overtake Hillary Clinton for the D...
| 13.433333 | 0.683333 | 0.95 |
low
|
low
|
abstractive
|
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/10/24/AR2007102402334.html
|
https://web.archive.org/web/2007102519id_/http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/10/24/AR2007102402334.html
|
Not Another Katrina
|
2007102519
|
IN THEIR vivid reporting yesterday on the conditions at Qualcomm Stadium in San Diego, Post reporters William Booth and Sonya Geis didn't have to mention the horror that was the Superdome two years ago for readers to draw a comparison. The 7,500 evacuees at Qualcomm have cots and tents, plenty of water and a variety of foods, arts and crafts for children, crisis counseling, meditation, yoga, acupuncture, and AA meetings for adults. In New Orleans, 24,000 people seeking refuge at the Superdome were bereft of food, water and hope.
President Bush's response to the country's worst natural disaster since the shame of New Orleans has a lesson-learned quality to it. His emergency declaration Tuesday freed up federal staff and equipment for the state. By that afternoon, Homeland Security Secretary Michael Chertoff and FEMA chief R. David Paulison were on the ground. Yesterday the president approved a disaster declaration, which opens a flow of housing, small-business and other federal assistance, and today he will tour the area.
Some will be tempted to attribute the quick action exclusively to race. After all, San Diego County, where most of the more than 800,000 wildfire evacuees live, is predominantly white (66 percent) and well-to-do (9 percent poverty rate) compared to the mostly African American (67 percent) and poor (28 percent poverty rate) victims of New Orleans. But that would be simplistic.
Because of well-organized disaster preparedness planning at the state and regional levels and drills that are continually performed, California is considered the gold standard of emergency response. After devastating fires in 2003, San Diego County invested in the automated reverse 911 system, which this week urged San Diego County residents to evacuate. And Californians have something that Louisianans, in particular those in New Orleans, didn't have when they needed it most: leadership, in this case from Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger and the San Diego mayor on down. That there have been just five fatalities in an inferno that has burned an area twice the size of New York City shows what can result from clear and coordinated leadership.
|
Wildfire response shows why California is the gold standard.
| 40.7 | 0.9 | 1.7 |
high
|
medium
|
mixed
|
http://newsweek.washingtonpost.com/onfaith/susan_jacoby/2007/10/cooperate_or_die.html
|
https://web.archive.org/web/2007102519id_/http://newsweek.washingtonpost.com/onfaith/susan_jacoby/2007/10/cooperate_or_die.html
|
OnFaith on washingtonpost.com
|
2007102519
|
Why wouldn't the world benefit from an alliance between science and those forms of religion that regard the stewardship of the earth as a moral obligation? Indeed, the preservation of the environment for future generations is both a moral and a practical necessity--something that intelligent, decent people of any faith or no faith can and must recognize. If we fail to rise to the challenge, we will cease to exist as a species.
Philosophical questions about the ultimate compatibility of science and religion are really irrelevant here. At some point, faith always accepts the supernatural in ways that evidence-based science does not, but that certainly poses no barrier to cooperation between science and religions that also embrace secular knowledge. The broadest possible participation is necessary if we are to save our planet from the dangers of global warming; the heedless use of toxins associated with rapid industrialization (China being one of the prime examples); and, above all, our own greed.
I should point out that religion, or the absence of religion, has little to do with the willingness of people around the world to face up to this global crisis. No administration in recent history has trumpeted its faith in God more strongly than the Bush administration, and no administration has authorized more disastrous policies regarding the environment. Some of the most prominent anti-environmentalists in right-wing think tanks, by contrast, are completely secular in their economic and political views, and their only interest is in maximizing corporate profits. The planet be damned.
Thus, the conflict over environmental policies has little to do with religion, or the lack of religion, per se. It has everything to do with our willingness, or unwillingness, to sacrifice a certain amount of short-term comfort and profit for long-term good. On this issue, secular, evidence-oriented American organizations like the Center for Inquiry Transnational should work with scientific groups and with religious organizations that are committed to educating the public about the sacrifices needed to save our world. (Full disclosure: I am a consultant on public programming for the Center for Inquiry's New York City branch.)
Of course all such efforts must be global, but I emphasize America's responsibility precisely because we are the world's richest nation (still). If you're willing to stop driving obscene gas-guzzling SUVs, why should I care if you believe that the Bible is literally true? (Although, come to think of it, the Bible has nothing to say about SUVs.) If I'm willing to spend money on the prevention of diseases caused by toxic environmental factors, why should you care if I don't believe that Jesus rose from the dead? If you believe in an afterlife and I don't, there's still this world to be saved. We can agree on that. We can work together toward that goal.
A final thought: war, including religious violence, is the deadly enemy of all attempts to focus on environmental challenges. When I think of the energy devoted to terrorism in countries so poor that children die for lack of clean water, and when I think of the billions that the United States has poured into the war in Iraq when the same money could be spent on health care and cleaning up the environmental mess we have created, I could weep.
If we don't all get our act together, we will surely have hell on earth. And we won't have to wait for Armageddon to experience it.
|
Susan Jacoby on OnFaith; Visit http://newsweek.washingtonpost.com/onfaith/susan_jacoby/
| 84 | 0.25 | 0.25 |
high
|
low
|
abstractive
|
http://newsweek.washingtonpost.com/postglobal/needtoknow/2007/10/deja_vu_musharraf_and_the_shah.html
|
https://web.archive.org/web/2007102519id_/http://newsweek.washingtonpost.com/postglobal/needtoknow/2007/10/deja_vu_musharraf_and_the_shah.html
|
PostGlobal: PostGlobal on washingtonpost.com
|
2007102519
|
Last Sundayâs New York Times analysis, âIn Pakistan Quandary, U.S. Reviews Stance,â fits so closely with a number of conversations that I have had over the past few weeks that it inspires a kind of déjà vu. It takes me back to the time when the Iranian revolution was brewing, when I was the desk officer for Iran on the National Security Council.
The ultimate reason for the U.S. policy failure at the time of the Iranian revolution was the fact that the U.S. had placed enormous trust and responsibility on the person of the shah of Iran. He -- and not the country or people of Iran -- was seen as the lynchpin of U.S. strategy in the Persian Gulf. Everything relied on him. There was no Plan B.
As a consequence, the U.S. strategy, endlessly mulled over, was that we had no choice except to support the shah; and this was fortified by the belief (or wishful thinking) that the shah would pull himself together and deal with the growing crisis before it was too late. By the time it became inescapably obvious that that was not going to happen, the situation was too far gone for anything to stop it.
This is a gross simplification, of course. (For more nuanced detail, see my 1985 account of the Iranian revolution and hostage crisis, âAll Fall Down.â) But in retrospect, this was the essence of the problem. We had placed all of our eggs in the shah's basket; we had no visible alternative. So policy always tended to settle on More of the Same, fear of Rocking the Boat in a way that would undercut the shah, combined with much Wringing of Hands and Wishful Thinking.
Those policies were so unsuccessful that they gave rise to endless conspiracy theories among the Iranian elite (many of whom fled the country in hopes that someone else would defend their interests) that the Carter administration was in fact determined to replace the shah with Khomeini. Absurd as that appeared to those of us on the inside, it was an all too human attempt to square what they regarded as an omnipotent United States with a policy of neglect and error.
All of this comes to mind as I watch the situation in Pakistan. I am no expert on that country, but I see the U.S. locked in much the same kind of policy vise that bedeviled the U.S. in Iran. We have bet the farm on one man - in this case Pervez Musharraf -- and we have no fall back position, no alternative strategy in the event that does not work.
Pakistan is far more dangerous than Iran was. If it should be taken over by Sunni radicals of a radical Islamist Talibanesque persuasion, the dangers are not that hard to imagine, even for a non-specialist. Pakistan is a nuclear state. I suppose that a radical Sunni takeover would be seen as an imminent threat by nuclear India; I know it would be seen that way in Iran, and Iran might well be persuaded to abandon its present slow-motion nuclear development, drop out of the NPT if necessary, and go for a bomb in the shortest time possible. That would set off other ripples of proliferation and possibly military reaction.
Pakistan is already a training center for international terrorism. That would only increase. Certainly a radical Islamist Pakistan would give Al-Qaeda and the Taliban an enormous boost in their operations in Afghanistan and beyond. Pakistan would constitute the kind of imminent terrorist/nuclear threat that we falsely ascribed to Saddam Hussein.
One of the obstacles to confronting the Iranian revolution at an early stage -- regardless of whether or not that would have had any significant effect -- was that no one had any good ideas to offer about what might be done. I certainly have no magic plan to offer about Pakistan.
Still, I think that avoiding the issue or sweeping it under the rug in hopes that it will get better on its own, is worse even than admitting that we have no solution to a problem that is confronted honestly.
The worst does not always happen, but in this region we do not have to look very far to find cases where it has. The parallels worry me.
Gary Sick is a Senior Research Scholar at Columbia University and Executive Director of the Gulf/2000 Project.
|
Need to Know - PostGlobal on PostGlobal; blog of politics and current events on washingtonpost.com. Visit http://newsweek.washingtonpost.com/postglobal/needtoknow/
| 43.368421 | 0.473684 | 0.473684 |
high
|
low
|
abstractive
|
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/10/25/AR2007102501006.html
|
https://web.archive.org/web/2007102519id_/http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/10/25/AR2007102501006.html
|
U.S. Imposes New Sanctions Against Iran
|
2007102519
|
The package, announced jointly by Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice and Treasury Secretary Henry M. Paulson Jr., marks the first time that the United States has tried to isolate or punish another country's military. It is the broadest set of punitive measures imposed on Tehran since the 1979 takeover of the U.S. Embassy, and included a call for other countries and firms to stop doing business with three major Iranian banks.
VIDEO | U.S. Imposes New Sanctions on Iran
The sanctions recognize that financing for groups like the Revolutionary Guard have become closely entwined with Iran's economy, making it difficult to disrupt the one without targeting the other.
The Revolutionary Guard "is so deeply entrenched in Iran's economy, that it is increasingly likely that if you are doing business with Iran you are doing business with the IRGC," Paulson said.
The banks involved are Bank Melli, Bank Mellat and Bank Saderat. The first two are being designated for helping finance Iran's proliferation program, and Saderat is being designated for financing terrorism. In addition, the administration named five Revolutionary Guard leaders who are included under the new restrictions, as well as nine businesses and the Iranian Ministry of Defense and Armed Forces Logistics.
Rice said the United States is "committed to a diplomatic solution" to the tension between Washington and Tehran, but also wants to "increase the costs to Iran" unless it cooperates with the international community on terrorism and proliferation.
The announced measures will help protect the international financial system, she said, and provide "a powerful deterrent" to those who do or are considering doing business with Iran.
The move caps a year of growing U.S. pressure on Tehran, including billions of dollars in arms sales to Persian Gulf allies and Israel, interception of Iranian arms shipments in Iraq and Afghanistan, detention of Iranian agents in Iraq, and pressure on the United Nations and European allies to increase Iran's isolation. The dramatic U.S. steps underscore the escalating tensions between the United States and Iran.
"The policies of Iran constitute perhaps the single greatest challenge for American security interests in the Middle East, and possibly around the world, because the combination of Iranian terrorism, Iranian repression at home and the pursuit of nuclear weapons technology -- technologies that could lead to a nuclear weapon -- is a very dangerous mix," Rice said yesterday in testimony before the House Foreign Affairs Committee.
The new sanctions will empower the United States to financially isolate a large part of Iran's military and anyone inside or outside Iran who does business with it, U.S. officials said. The measures could affect hundreds of foreign companies by squeezing them to drop Iranian business or risk their ability to do business in or with the U.S.
The Revolutionary Guard Corps, which numbers at least 125,000, is the most powerful wing of Iran's military. It controls a growing sector of the economy, including construction companies, aspects of the oil industry, pharmaceutical plants, telecommunications and ordinary commerce. U.S. officials said it also operates the front companies that procure nuclear technology.
The administration will designate the entire Revolutionary Guard under Executive Order 13382, signed by President Bush in June 2005, which allows the United States to freeze the assets of any proliferator of weapons of mass destruction and its supporters. Iran is being designated for its ballistic missile program. The United States will announce a list of Iranians involved in that program -- civilians as well as military officials -- who will also be designated, U.S. officials said.
|
The Bush administration announced an unprecedented package of unilateral sanctions against Iran today, including the long-awaited designations of its Revolutionary Guard Corps as a proliferator of weapons of mass destruction and of the elite Quds Force as a supporter of terrorism.
| 14.777778 | 0.711111 | 1.911111 |
low
|
low
|
mixed
|
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/10/24/AR2007102402639.html
|
https://web.archive.org/web/2007102519id_/http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/10/24/AR2007102402639.html
|
Second Court Ruling Redacts Information About Interrogation
|
2007102519
|
The FBI interviewer allegedly gave Abdallah Higazy a choice: Admit to having a special pilot's radio in a hotel room near the World Trade Center on Sept. 11, 2001, or the security service in his native Egypt would give his family "hell." Higazy responded by confessing to a crime he didn't commit.
"I knew I couldn't prove my innocence, and I knew my family was in danger," Higazy said later. ". . . If I say this device is mine, I'm screwed and my family is going to be safe. If I say this device is not mine, I'm screwed and my family's in danger. And Agent [Michael] Templeton made it quite clear that 'cooperate' had to mean saying something else other than this device is not mine."
The new details about the FBI's allegedly aggressive tactics in the Higazy case were included in a ruling briefly issued last week by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 2nd Circuit, which reinstated a civil lawsuit brought by Higazy against the FBI and Templeton. In an unusual move, however, the appeals court withdrew the first opinion within minutes on Thursday and issued a second opinion Friday, with the details of Higazy's allegations removed.
"This opinion has been redacted because portions of the record are under seal," the new ruling reads. "For the purposes of the summary judgment motion, Templeton did not contest that Higazy's statements were coerced." Such redactions are imperfect in the Web age, and the original document remains accessible through links on sites and blogs devoted to appellate-court and legal issues.
Higazy was jailed for a month as a suspected accomplice to the World Trade Center attack, until a pilot showed up and asked for his radio back. The fresh details about his interrogation in December 2001 illustrate how an innocent man can be persuaded to confess to a crime that he did not commit, and the lengths to which the FBI was willing to go in its terrorism-related investigations after the Sept. 11 attacks.
Experts and officials have argued for the past six years about the limits of interrogation techniques and the reliability of what detainees say when they are questioned aggressively. To Higazy's attorneys and other lawyers who work on terrorism-detainee matters, his experience provides some answers.
"What would it take for an entirely innocent person to confess to participation in one of the most egregious crimes in U.S. history?" asked lawyer Jonathan Abady. "People don't do that voluntarily. . . . It's clear that there was significant coercion brought to bear here."
The Justice Department declined to comment on the case yesterday. A Justice official who asked not to be identified discussing an ongoing case said the FBI has not conceded that Higazy's allegations are true but agreed to proceed as if they were valid in order to argue the legal issues in the case.
The appellate court did not rule on the veracity of Higazy's allegations but concluded that Templeton lacked qualified immunity shielding him from the civil lawsuit.
Higazy, the son of a former Egyptian diplomat who lived for a time in Virginia with his family, arrived in New York from Cairo in August 2001 to study engineering at Polytechnic University in Brooklyn. He was sponsored by the U.S. Agency for International Development and the Institute for International Education, which arranged for him to stay at the Millenium Hilton Hotel, across the street from the World Trade Center in Lower Manhattan, court records show.
Higazy was evacuated along with other residents on Sept. 11, after the second plane hit the twin towers. He was carrying $100 in cash and his wallet.
When Higazy returned on Dec. 17 to retrieve his belongings, three FBI agents were waiting. They told him that hotel employees had found a transceiver capable of air-to-air and air-to-ground communication in his room safe, along with a Koran and his passport, records show.
|
Get Washington DC,Virginia,Maryland and national news. Get the latest/breaking news,featuring national security,science and courts. Read news headlines from the nation and from The Washington Post. Visit www.washingtonpost.com/nation today.
| 18.166667 | 0.428571 | 0.52381 |
medium
|
low
|
abstractive
|
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/10/24/AR2007102402524.html
|
https://web.archive.org/web/2007102519id_/http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/10/24/AR2007102402524.html
|
Latino Immigrants Stand Their Ground
|
2007102519
|
Radio stations and hotlines are fielding calls from immigrants asking whether it is safe to drive cars or visit public parks. Lawyers are advising parents to make emergency plans for their children and assets in case they are detained on suspicion of being in the country illegally. Volunteers are organizing meetings, and one woman, a U.S. citizen from El Salvador, has decided to launch a write-in candidacy for the Board of County Supervisors.
"I feel as if my own community is slamming the door in my face. Someone has to stand up and do something," said Araceli Paname¿o, 42, a longtime Woodbridge resident who took a leave of absence from her job in Washington last Thursday to explore the possibility of running in the election next month.
"I could sell my house and say I am fed up, but this county is my home," she said. "I want to stay and try to change the environment."
Ten miles away, Mirabel Martinez, 25, sat on her doorstep last Thursday afternoon, phoning a list of volunteers to plan a strategy meeting at a taco restaurant. She, too, is a legal immigrant and homeowner from El Salvador who lives in a quiet county neighborhood. She, too, said she had felt a new sting of hostility, even from a local church, which demanded proof of residency when she went to pick up donated food for a needy friend.
"I showed them my voter registration card, and they said it was not enough," Martinez said. "I am here legally. But I have a lot of relatives and friends who are still illegal, and I can imagine how scared they are. I want to tell them to not be afraid and try to live normally, but to be careful and not do things like drive with false licenses. We can't be defeatist. We have to stay and fight."
With confusion and misinformation swirling through the Latino community, several legal aid groups printed fliers, offered phone advice and held free public seminars last week to explain to Prince William immigrants what their rights are, even if they entered the United States illegally, and what the new county policies would and would not do.
For example, the groups said, federal law permits all children in the United States to attend public school and all sick or injured people to seek emergency medical treatment, regardless of their legal status. The Prince William measures would deny illegal immigrants only a list of relatively minor services, such as access to free drug and alcohol counseling.
Lawyers and advocacy groups are also trying to reassure the Latino community that the provisions enabling county police to detain illegal immigrants and turn them over to federal officials will not take effect until at least early next year, after a police training program. They said many immigrants are convinced that police might begin setting up checkpoints immediately.
"We are telling people: 'Don't react in haste. Don't run away and abandon your houses,' " said Ricardo Juarez, a Woodbridge resident and a leader of the Virginia group Mexicans Without Borders, which has organized numerous protests against the policies. "Let's wait and evaluate. Let's see what happens in court." Several advocacy groups have filed suit against the Prince William measures in U.S. District Court.
Lisa Johnson Firth, an immigration lawyer in Manassas, said her firm is advising callers and clients about how to prepare for the possibility of being detained and deported.
"They need to have a plan. They should have money in the bank, emergency transportation, someone who can care for their children, someone who knows where their documents are," said Firth, who was handing out legal rights fliers in a church basement last Thursday night. "Once they are detained and may be deported, everything becomes much more difficult."
|
Latino immigrants and lawyers in Prince William County are trying to calm community panic and spread accurate information, urging people to stay and defend their rights in the aftermath of new county measures aimed at keeping out illegal immigrants.
| 18.097561 | 0.756098 | 1.195122 |
medium
|
low
|
abstractive
|
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/discussion/2007/10/18/DI2007101800864.html
|
https://web.archive.org/web/2007102519id_/http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/discussion/2007/10/18/DI2007101800864.html
|
Color of Money Book Club
|
2007102519
|
She writes: "Mortgage Confidential" is like reading the Cliff's Notes for "Hamlet." You shouldn't substitute the notes for actually reading the play, but reading the notes beforehand can help you understand the language. You feel less intimidated.
Read Michelle's past Color of Money columns.
Michelle Singletary: Welcome. We have so many questions so let's get started.
Springfield, Va.: Hello Michelle and David!
My husband and I are always reminding each other, "But Michelle Singletary says..." we love your column and advice!
Here is my mortgage question: We have a fixed rate (5.875 percent) 30 year mortgage, plus an adjustable rate (currently at 8.00 percent) home equity line. Should we attempt to refinance both into one payment now, or just wait until we sell our home, hopefully within the next 6-9 months, and pay off the two with the sales proceeds, then get another fixed rate mortgage for the new house?
David Reed: I wouldn't do anything with your current mortgages...5.875% is pretty darned good and there will be fees when you refinance...I'd keep what ya got and pay them off when you sell... :)
Gainesville,Va.: What is your opinion about the current situation with the subprime loans, also who do you blame for this situation Banks or consumer, and finally can you explain how come a Bank did approved a loan that the payment will be larger thatn the person salary.
David Reed: Subprime loans have been around for decades and they have a place in the market...sometimes bad things happen to good people but that shouldn't keep them out of homeownership..subprime lending is a way to help people get back on their feet.
Subprime by itself didn't cause this problem, what caused the current situation is subprime combined with no verficiation of income, assets,etc...lenders got too greedy and came up with some goofy loan programs...
I don't know how a bank would make a loan with payments higher than the salary other than the loan probably didn't require any income to be put on the application or was a "No Documentation" loan....
Elkridge, Md.: In May of 2006 I purchased a townhouse with a 5/1 interest only arm. I would like to refinance to get out of the interest only mortgage. Is now a good time or should I wait till rates possibly go down? Is it smart to roll closing costs into the new mortgage? I would like to spend as little up front money as possible. Also, I currently have two loans, an 80/20 set up. Would it be wise to try to combine these when I refinance? I do not yet have 20 percent of the cost of my home in equity yet. Thank you, Liz
David Reed: It's a great time to refinance, rates are currently at lows not seen since last November...be prepared to have two notes once again though if you don't have twenty percent equity...you can always refiance the first and subordinate the second or if rates are lower for the second (they probably are) then refinance both notes....keep your costs low by not paying points or origination charges on a refinance...I see no reason not to roll closing costs in with your loan given sufficient equity... :)
Charlottesville, Va.: Not a question about mortgages, but about credit reports. I was able to get a credit report and summary done recently. One of the three credit bureaus had my last name spelled incorrectly. It's only one letter wrong, and the resulting incorrect spelling actually is pronounced the same way. But is this something to worry about and take steps to fix? All the credit/account info was otherwise correct.
Michelle Singletary: I don't mind taking a question off topic. You should contact that credit bureau and let it know your name is misspelled. Because the information for a consumer whose name is spelled that way could end up in your file and affect your credit score.
Alexandria, Va.: Getting married next year -- both myself and my fiance own condos and are both in 80/20 Interest only 5/1 ARM mortgages. My fiance's is resetting next year, mine will reset in 2010. We were planning on living in my condo once married and are looking at options such as renting her condo out and trying to make as much towards the payments as possible, rather than selling at a loss. Not sure if a refi on her condo or mine would make sense. Is there ever a point where you can make an informed decision that isn't going to hurt you since the housing market is so up-and-down these days?
David Reed: I would only refinance a property if I were to hold onto it...if the condo loan balance is more than the condo is worth you might not even have an opportunity to refinance it...if you do have equity and you are keeping the condo, then a fixed rate refinance looks like a good option for you....no one can predict the future but one can work to make prudent decisions for the present...
Alexandria, Va.: What is the cheapest (lowest up-front costs) reverse mortgage I can obtain? What is the recommended pay-back period?
David Reed: Right now RMs are expensive, mainly because there are so few choices...if you can wait a few more months, rumors have it that new, cheaper RMs are on the horizon...
Michelle Singletary: Also, I recommend you read everything you can about reverse mortgages. Go to HUD's Website. In particular HUD has put together a top ten things you should know about reverse mortgages tip sheet. Here's the link
Washington, D.C.: I'm in the rather enviable position of having a steady job that pays well with my only debt being my mortgage. I fully fund my Roth and 401k, but I have no idea what to do with extra money at the end of the month. Do I pay down my 200k mortgage in dribs and drabs, invest, or split it? If all my retirement savings are already in lifecycle funds, where should my other investment money be going?
Before you ask, I already have more than six months of living expenses saved up and have all the appropriate insurances. I do read personal finance books, but the ones I've read are all focused on getting out of debt, which isn't applicable in my situation. I realize that this issue seems insignificant compared to the real problems so many others suffer from, but I just don't know what to do. Any advice would be appreciated. Thank you.
Michelle Singletary: What a great problem to have. I would add one more fund to your list of things you have. A "Life Happens" Fund. This is an account (could be combined with emergency savings) that you use for the things in life that happens (car repairs, major home repairs, renovations, etc.) Fund it at whatever level you feel comfortable, anywhwere from $500 (if you are low income) to a few thousand dollars. This is so you don't have to tap your emergency fund.
Then if you don't have a car loan or don't have kids to put thu college I would pay down my mortgage. That's me.
But if you like you could pay down your mortgage (even just one extra payment a year will significantly reduce a 30-year) AND invest the rest for say paying cash for your next car or taking a major vacation, etc.
OR if you are so flushed with cash give some to a charity.
Quantico, Va.: After filing bankruptcy, is it wise to get a mortgage? If no, why?
David Reed: You get a mortgage to buy a house, regardless of a bankruptcy. the difference is in your terms...recent bankruptcy discharges of less than two years will relegate you to subprime loans...there are a zillion reasons to own a home, mortgage interest deductions vs. rent, building equity, etc...just buy when you're ready to buy and don't rush it....
Jacksonville, Fla.: Do you know of any mortgage amoritization tools that will allow you to add different additional payments over the years? For example I want to add $100 extra every month this year and continue to add an extra $50 to that every subsequent year ($150 extra a month in year 2, $200 extra a month in year 3) for the next 5 years and keep the extra payment amount steady after that. I haven't found a tool online that can handle that.
Michelle Singletary: You can also try the mortgage pay down calculator at www.bankrate.com.
D.C.: I'm a new reader, so I apologize if you've addressed this question recently.
What's your view on making charitable contributions when you have debt? Specifically, although I carry no credit card debt, I have about 100K on a home equity line of credit (which I used to pay for a kitchen and bathroom renovation). I anticipate that I will be able to pay off that HELOC by the end of next year. Should I make my normal year-end charitable contributions? I say yes; my partner says no, that I should put that money toward paying off the HELOC. M income is high (allowing me to pay off that HELOC in just one year), and I feel it is part of my social obligation to give back at least a little. Your thoughts please?
Michelle Singletary: I believe in tithing -- 10 percent of my gross income. You should tithe even if you are in debt. I know to some it sounds crazy. But if your belief system says that tithing is required, you are obligated to do it.
BUT that doesn't mean you ignore your creditors or tithe and don't pay your debts. It means you have to rework your budget, cut expenses, increase income to honor all your obligations, even to God.
As for your situation, I side with you. If giving is important to you and I think it should be for everyone, then continue to give even as you are paying off your debt.
It's about what you believe and what matters to you. Heck if everybody waited until they were completely debt free -- no car loan, no mortgage -- imagine how charities would suffer.
So again, honor your debts but also give.
D.C. suburbs: I read the other day that Countrywide is going to change a number of loans it made to people who cannot now poay them since the rates have reset.
What do you think about this?
washingtonpost.com: Countrywide To Offer To Rework 82,000 Loans (Post, Oct. 24)
David Reed: Better to rework them than foreclose on them...I don't see why more lenders don't get that concept...
Michelle Singletary: Also, please read the news stories carefully. They are only doing this for certain borrowers.
Hughesville, Md.: Hello! My husband and I purchased a home about a year ago. We have a subprime loan. (yes, I know) We have two loans, the first is 30 year fixed at 7.3% (548,118.53) and the second is an ARM that will adjust in two more years. (137,032.23) We know now that we did all the WRONG things in buying a home, and quite frankly being wise with our money. We make about $200,000 a year and we are working very heard in trying to get our debts down. The house is appraised at $866,000. We were going to refinance, but found out that our monthly mortage increased dramatically if we combined the loans. I think we should wait 6 more months,continue getting our debts down (car) and try for the re-fi again. Any opinions?
David Reed: Not sure how your mortgage increases when you combine the two loans, you still should have the same amount just split up into two notes..unless I'm missing something...I like the current 7.3% fixed rate...jumbos above $650,000 right now are around that range today...
Bethesda, Md.: Hi Michelle, I love your column and value your advice on finances tremendously.
My husband and I just purchased our first townhome with an FHA loan (30 year fixed). We received the 3 percent downpayment via a grant from the builder and also recieved alot of incentives/upgrades/all closing costs from the builder as well.
The home won't be finished until next spring so we haven't locked into a rate yet.
Right now, we're at 7.5 percent (our credit scores aren't the best) but our lender/broker is telling us to wait until December to lock in since the house won't be ready until March.
David Reed: FHA loan rates aren't risk-based. Even if your credit isn't spotless if you've been approved for an FHA loan and you're being quoted 7.50% personally I think you're getting screwed...that said however the cost to lock in that long term (6 months) isn't worth it, I wouldn't think about locking in until you're about 60 days out...find another broker, btw.
Michelle Singletary: Oh I so agree with David.
Please read the stories I've been running on Financial Independence Group, which now goes by CashFlo Strategies. It's a good lesson in getting a second opinion about the fees and interest rate you are being charged.
Aug. 26 A 400 Percent Return In 7 Days? Riiiight.
Aug. 30 A Mortgage Is for Paying Off
Sept. 9 Some Mortgage Originators Skip State Licensing
Sept. 16 Maryland Tells Unlicensed Mortgage Firm To Shut Down
Oct. 15 The Get-Rich Pitch, Then the Letdown
Midwest: Just a word of encouragement for people whose adjustable rate mortgages are about to hit--I went through a bankruptcy 6 years ago, have a modest income, and was able to get 6 3/4 percent 30 year fixed for about the same rate I have been paying for the past 2 years. I was so afraid of losing my house--my payment was about to go up considerably, and I found a broker who worked hard to find many different ways to try to solve the problem until she found one that worked for me. There IS hope, don't give up!
Michelle Singletary: Thanks for those words of encouragement!!
Washington, D.C.: When we purchased our house, we took out two loans - our primary loan and a second smaller one (home equity?). The entire process was somewhat confusing, and adding to it was the fact the loans were quickly sold to a larger lender. Here is my question: My first large loan is clear and they provided me an amortization schedule that shows how my payments are and will be divided between principle and interest. Fine. However, the second loan seems very different and a very small amount only goes to principle. And there is no schedule the company tells me that this amount is determined by the date they receive the check in the mail if they process it earlier or later than the "due date" then most ends up going towards interest. We are NEVER late on our payment, but it seems like if we are early we are penalized. Does this sound right and is there anything I can do? I am very confused why only $10, $20, or $30 goes towards principle each month, while over $300 goes to interest.
David Reed: Initial payments in a mortgage are chock-full of interest with very little going to principal. If your second mortgage is fixed, I'm not clear on the explanation your lender gives you. Interest is paid in arrears on a mortgage...when you make a Nov.1 payment you're paying for interest accrued in October...paying extra on a fixed rate loan should reduce the principal by the amount paid...
D.C.: I am a 20-something try to buy my first home. I am living at home with parents now and opened a CD to accumulate a nest egg for the next 12 months, which my parents will match. I have a pretty good idea of what I can afford (about $150K) When I met with an agent who introduced me to a lender, the lender pre-approved me for 250K. How can that be? Also, what are the chances of me finding something (I am thinking 1-2 bedroom condo) under 200K in the DC area?
David Reed: Most every first time homebuyer I've ever worked with is absolutely floored when they find out how much a lender will loan them...don't bite...only buy what you feel comfortable in paying each month...can't answer the condo thing...a good Realtor can tho...
Michelle Singletary: Please, please don't just go by what a lender says you can "afford."
Do some figuring yourself. For example in every home purchase I've made, my husband and I include all the other expenses we have -- tithing, child care, college savings, retirement savings, etc. -- in our own calcualtion of what we can afford. So that we know including ALL of that and our mortgage we get idea of what we can afford. We know we can continue saving and such even with our mortgage.
The calculations the banks use don't include expenses or savings that isn't debt. So what you can "afford" by their standards doesn't include the way you actually spend.
So count those cost too, when deciding what mortgage you can afford.
Alexandria, Va.: I'm fairly young (25 years old) and currently renting, but might be able to afford a 2-bedroom condo/townhouse if I rented out the second bedroom. Do you think this is a good idea?
David Reed: Most lenders won't allow you to use roomate rental income to qualify you...plus, what if you end up hating their guts...
Greenbelt, Md.: Other than obviously life-cycle reasons like uncertain employment future or simple lack of money to buy one, under what circumstances could someone be better off never owning a home?
David Reed: If values never increased over time, then continuing to rent would make sense. Owning carries a certain amount of overhead (repairs, upkeep) so one would need to accumulate some equity to offset those charges...but given a stable, long term market, owning makes much more sense...plus, it just feels better. :)
Gaithersburg, Md.: We have a good (not sub-prime) ARM. Since we've been in the house awhile, the balance is a lot less than $417k. Does this mean we should have no trouble refi-ing to prevailing rates when our teaser expires and our loan fully indexes?
David Reed: All other things being equal, sure. Why wait until it reaches fully indexed rate? Rates are very, very good right now.
Ashburn, Va.: Hello Michelle and David, thank you for this chat. My fiance and I are starting to talk about buying a house after we get married. We don't currently live together now, but he has already bought his first "home" (a condo). Should we have me buy the new home, so that I can qualify for the first-time buyer's rate? If so, does this mean we should wait to merge our finances until after we close on a house? Thank you very much!
David Reed: Will you want the size of your first home to be qualified only on your income or would you rather use both incomes and buy a bigger place? First time homebuyer status is overblown unless you participate in some state-sponsored bond program...you can buy together now if you want, you don't have to be married to go on a loan together...
Michelle Singletary: Oh no David.
Don't tell them to shack up!!!
Wait, buy the house together. I do agree with what he says about first-time buyer programs.
Wait, get married, buy the home together, merge your money.
But then I suspect you know that. So follow your very good instincts.
Silver Spring, Md.: People always say you should "shop around" for a mortgage, but what, exactly, does that mean? I picture going around to different banks and telling them our plans and our financial situation. But how much information do you disclose? I wouldn't want credit reports run everytime as that would make my credit score go down. Thanks.
David Reed: To find the best loan officer you should find two or three of the best Realtors in town...those Realtors keep the best loan officers on their short list...if your credit is fine and you're employed, etc., all you need to do is call those loan officers and get quotes on their rates and fees...
Alexandria, Va.: Hi, Michelle and David,
I'm trying to decide when to refinance my mortgages. I bought my townhouse in June, 2004. I have a 7/1 interest only first mortgage at 5.25 percent and a second at 7.38 percent. I have been increasing the payments on the second mortgage and should have it completely paid off by December, 2008. Should I plan on keeping the 5.25% until it expires in 2011 or should I start shopping for a new fixed-rate loan sooner? Thanks for your comments.
David Reed: Tough call. I'd keep paying down the second like you are...if rates approach 5.50% soon I would probably refinance.
Washington, D.C.: What does a 40 year fixed balloon payment actually mean? I've been told that I won't have to come up with the balloon payment until the end of the note but that I am planning on selling the home within the next 10 years so I shouldn't be worried about the balloon part of this loan. What do you think?
David Reed: The 40 year is the amortization period, the balloon part is when you must pay off all the balance or refinance...I'm guessing your balloon period is 10-15 years...from what you've told me I wouldn't worry about it either.
Silver Spring, Md.: My husband and I plan on buying our first home sometime early next spring. Are there any good, general books that we should read before doing this? We're looking specifically for information on the financing. Thanks!
David Reed: There are two books you should get...the best books on the market.
Mortgages 101 by David Reed
Mortgage Confidential by David Reed
Washington, D.C.: For a buyer, which closing costs are negotiable? All? Are there specific costs that can be negotiated away completely?
David Reed: Different parts of the country have different closing cost protocols but the best place to start negotiating is with your lender and their junk fees such as processing, underwriting, etc...third party fees normally can't be negotiated such as attorney, title, etc...
Princeton, N.J.: How and when will mortgage servicers/lenders be reeled on their practices? mortgagors have made tons of money but no interest in helping to bail out the consumer in tough times. I had an adjustable rate mortgage that jumped 4 points without warning not even after the fact.."hey you may have noticed that your rate adjusted." and in my quest to refinance they say they can only do 90% of the loan. i'm in a hard place but i'll make it but it seems like they set us-the consumer up to fail. most of us do not have millions at our finger tips. Is Washington D.C. taking notice of this?
David Reed: Actually lots of mortgage companies have been reeled in...they're bankrupt and out of business!
You might be a candidate for the new FHASecure program...find an FHA lender, not a mortgage broker, and ask them about the program. The FHASecure is a new government program that addresses your concerns and puts you into a solid, fixed government-backed rate.
understanding equity: Really basic question here, but it's something I've never understood. People seem obsessed with "building equity" when they buy a home. How exactly are you doing that? As far as I'm concerned, I'm paying back a loan from when I bought the house so I'm paying off debt, not building anything. Or is it just an assumption that the house is rising in value even though there's no way to know that until you try to sell?
David Reed: Building equity comes in appreciation as well as paying down the loan amount. The lower the loan amount, the more equity you have...
Michelle Singletary: You know this is a really great basic question. Glad you asked.
I think so people people think the "equity" is theirs when they take out a home equity loan.
That loan isn't "your" money. It's a loan. If your equity goes away -- and people it can just read the paper everyday -- then you see plainly that it's borrowed dollars when they come to put your butt on the street because you can't pay the 1st mortgage, home equity loan AND your can't refinance because the value of your home has gone down -- meaning you don't have any "equity."
Bowie, Md.: We have 1.5 years of 4.0 percent teaser left on our 5-yr ARM. We are in no way in trouble when the rate adjusts. Even if it was to hit it's lifetime cap of 10% we could make the payments just fine.
But obviously, we'd like to keep our 4% going as long as possible, while still protecting ourselves from rising rates in the future. Is there any kind of financial derivative, like a future, that we could buy that would track increases in interest rates between now and Spring 2009?
Washington, D.C.: Hi Michelle and David,
My husband and I have no debt (we rent an apt), 6 months of living expenses saved, and fund our 403(b)funds now we're thinking of buying property.
I know you don't know what the market will do any more than anyone else, but, financially, is it better (if you are a buyer) to buy in early spring (Feb), or wait for better weather?
Should we put 20 percent down automatically?
David Reed: Can't answer the weather thing but when you put a minimum of twenty percent down you'll get the best rates at the cheapest cost...there are those who say put as little down as possible and invest the rest....but by putting down as little as possible you'll have a larger loan to pay off with higher rates or mortgage insurance...
Phoenix, Ariz.: Hey Michelle, I love your chats! I need some help getting out of some stupid debt. For a few years after college, I lived way beyond my means and racked up about $15,000 in credit card debt on 4 different cards. Then earlier this year I was without a job for a month or two and made a few late payments, and now I'm paying penalty rates of around 30% on all my cards. Now I've got a great, steady job making about $60k but I can barely make the minimums. I've called to ask them to lower the interest rates and they won't. I've drawn up a really lean budget and am trying to live as cheaply as possible, but I need to get those interest rates down. Should I do debt consolidation? How can I tell whether the company is reputable or not? Thank you!
Michelle Singletary: First, great you got a better job.
Second, good for you for trying to take control and calling the card sharks.
I would recommend you go to this Web site www.debtadvice.org
It's run by the National Foundation for Credit Counseling.
NFCC members, often known as Consumer Credit Counseling Service (CCCS) or other names, can be identified by the NFCC member seal.
Go to this site and type in your zip code and you will find an agency near you. You can also call 1-800-388-2227 for 24-hour automated office listings.
Generally the agencies that are part of this group don't charge a lot and will help you negotiate with the card companies.
Now given that SO many people are in debt trouble they may not get further than you do, but at least they are skilled at talking to these companies.
Chicago, Ill.: Hi Michelle. I read somewhere (before I bought my apartment) that condo mortgages usually carry a slightly higher interest rate than single home mortgages because banks consider condos riskier. Is this true? Is so, does it vary by region? My broker told me I had the highest credit score they had ever seen and gave me a 6.625% rate in June '06 (for a 30 year fixed). I figured it was a little higher than the numbers I was seeing at places like Bankrate because I was buying a condo, but I really don't know for sure - they could have been scamming me a little. How do you ever know?
David Reed: All things being equal, you should've gotten a better rate...condos don't automatically carry higher rates...u n l e s s ....the condo was in between phases (not 100% completed) or otherwise "non-warrantable"....or perhaps you put less than 20% down...but no, banks don't charge higher rates for condos....rates are the same for a condo as they are for a single family residence.
Plainsboro, N.J.: RE: mortgage pay down calculator
If you have Microsoft Excel, there is a great Excel amortization template on Microsoft.com that is very easy to use and incredibly informative.
Washington, D.C.: My mortgage is carried by Countrywide. However, it was/is not a subprime mortgage. It's 30-year fixed at 5.5 percent(after refi). I make 13 months worth of payments per year on it.
With Countrywide in the news lately, is there any cause for me to be concerned about the health of my mortgage? Any tricks I should look out for before some huge albatross climbs around my neck through no fault of my own?
David Reed: You're fine and you've got a great rate and nothing bad will happen.
READ YOUR BOOK, RECOMMEND IT!: Mr.Reed,
I am a 24-year-old woman shopping around for my first home in Fort Worth, Texas.
Thank you for writing a candid, no-frills, to-the-point book on shopping for a mortgage.
I have recently read several other books on the mortgage shopping, and yours is at the top of my list.
I especially appreciate the information on avoiding points, the dangers of doing 100% financing (something lenders gloss over),and correspondent mortgage lenders.
Michelle Singletary: Ahem, don't I get credit for recommending it (smile).
It's why I do the Color of the Money Book Club every month. To bring to you books I think are so worth the money.
Laurel, Md.: What do you think about Money Merge Accounts as a way of paying off a home mortgage quicker? I have been hearing a lot about them recently
David Reed: Not familiar with the term....
Michelle Singletary: I'm trying to learn about this. I hope to do a column on it in the next few months.
So far what I know doesn't sound worth the thousands of dollars to set it up. Basically folks it's a system that tells you how to pay down your mortgage so you can pay if off early. Involves the use of home equity loan and very expensive software.
But as I said, still learning about it.
If you have such an account, e-mail me at singletarym@washpost.com
AND PLEASE no e-mails from people selling the software or system that goes along with this type of account. I know where you stand -- to make money.
I want to hear from users not sellers!
Denver, Colo.: I have an excellent 30 year fixed first mortgage at 5.375 and home equity line of credit at 8.5 good for $102,000 of which I have borrowed $90,000. I would like to refinance only the second. Are there lenders who will do that?
David Reed: Yes...you can begin with your current second lien lender for starters...
Chantilly, Va.: How does a 30 Years Conv Jumbo ARM work?
My current Interest Rate is 5.625 percent. I am planning on living at my current home for a couple more years, not certain if I will move. Is it a good idea to refi?
David Reed: Is this fixed? If so, stay with what you've got, if it's an ARM and you're moving soon, you may want to wait it out....
Rockville, Md.: We have an 80/20 loan with the larger at 5.2 percent however the other is at 8.25 percent. We have been paying extra $100 on the first loan but when I called the other loan company they said that I could not pay extra on it. Was wondering why this is. Thanks
David Reed: I'm not sure why you can't either unless it's got a "hard" prepayment penalty but I seriously doubt it....call again and ask for somebody else...you should be able to pay it off tomorrow if you wanted to.
College Park, Md.: I recently found out that there is a collection on my credit report that is bringing my score way down. Everything else is essentially perfect on the credit report. The collection is from an old utility bill that happened after I moved out of a house almost four years ago so I don't owe the money. How do I improve my score?
David Reed: It just might be best to do nothing at all...I've seen people get competitive financing with old collection accounts....
Atlanta, Ga.: I bought a home last year and have a (high) fixed rate for 36 months. The loan was a bank statement loan where I proved income with my bank statement. Credit score was around 620. I want to refinance the "right" way with my credit and husband's credit (score around 580) and income. We are planning to clean up his credit and my score has risen I'm sure. When do we need to apply for a loan to refinance and what would be the credit score we would need to have to get a lower interest rate? thinking of?
David Reed: Conventional loans do not have a minimum credit score requirement...some "botique" loans might but if you're wanting to refinance into a boring old conventional mortgage then I suggest applying for a mortgage now...especially if you've got some equity, it might be worth it to try....if however, you put little down, you may want to wait a few more months to let good payment patterns begin to affect your credit....
Washington, D.C.: Hi Michele and David,
What is PMI? Do I have to have it? I do plan on taking out only a primary mortgage, but if I can avoid it, I'd like to.
David Reed: PMI is Private Mortgage Insurance and is an insurance policy that covers the difference between twenty percent down and what you put down. In most cases it's tax deductible if you make less than $100,000 per year. If you put less than twenty percent down, you will either have a PMI payment each month or get two loans, the first mortgage at 80% of the sales price and the second to make up the difference
Michelle Singletary: Well folks the time went by so fast. Fast-finger Reed answered a lot of your questions. I'm so grateful, as I'm sure many of you are.
So sorry for the questions we didn't get to. But David has agreed to answer some of the leftovers. So look for the answers in my print column and/or in my weekly e-letter, which I hope you ALL subscribe to. If you don't, just go to the biz section to sign up.
Thanks to you all who joined me today. Be safe out there and keep saving!
Editor's Note: washingtonpost.com moderators retain editorial control over Discussions and choose the most relevant questions for guests and hosts; guests and hosts can decline to answer questions. washingtonpost.com is not responsible for any content posted by third parties.
|
Personal finance columnist Michelle Singletary hosts a discussion with David Reed, author of "Mortgage Confidential: What You Need to Know That Your Lender Won't Tell You"
| 232.516129 | 0.903226 | 1.806452 |
high
|
medium
|
mixed
|
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/discussion/2007/10/18/DI2007101801786.html
|
https://web.archive.org/web/2007102519id_/http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/discussion/2007/10/18/DI2007101801786.html
|
Celebritology Live - washingtonpost.com
|
2007102519
|
When stars shave their heads, couch-jump, commit a fashion faux pas and or random acts of tomfoolery, washingtonpost.com Celebritology blogger Liz Kelly shares the buzz, offers perspective and provides crucial links to juicy alternate news sources and, of course, takes your reaction in her daily blog.
Before she started blogging about celebrities, Liz ran washingtonpost.com's Discussions section, where she enjoyed talking to really interesting people -- including some Post reporters -- on the phone. She still produces both Carolyn Hax's advice discussion and Gene Weingarten's Chatological Humor.
Liz Kelly: Welcome to today's chat. Before we get started I just want to remind the "Lost"-o-philes out there that next Wednesday at Noon ET we'll be discussing the October "Lost" Book Club selection, "The Turn of the Screw." At around 200 pages, it's a quick read. So make haste. Get thee to a library, download the audiobook from iTunes for just $15.95 (the horror!) or read the entire thing online for free here. On a sadder note, I am duty-bound to share the following: TMZ.com is reporting that "Lost's" Daniel Dae Kim (Jin) was busted early Thursday morning in Honolulu on suspicion of a DUI. Kim is the fourth Lostie to face DUI charges -- he is preceded by Michelle Rodriguez, Adewale Akinnuoye-Agbaje and Cynthia Watros. Anyhow, let's get started...
Richmond, Va.: I just left you a comment about this but figured I would see if I could get you to answer on your chat.
How do you decide which items are headlines and which are gossip?
Liz Kelly: Let's see, I answered this once in the blog. Or was it here... let me see if I can locate it.
Liz Kelly: Done and done. Here's what I answered in a previous chat and I stand by myself. (Hey, wait...) -- Liz Kelly: Not too complicated. I go through about 100 or so sites each morning (and evening) (and most of the day) to see what is being buzzed about. There are ranges of what makes it to the Morning Mix, though. Despite outward appearances, that is only a small portion of what's available. Hopefully it's the good portion -- the high calorie stuff that somehow doesn't leave you feeling guilty after consumption. Back to the ranges, though. -- There are "duh" stories that are obviously big news to celeb news devotees. Keifer Sutherland getting popped for a DUI falls into this category. As does most Britney Spears news these days. -- The next category are stories that are being buzzed about all over the place. If a story is likely to generate watercooler buzz, I want you to find it in Celebritology first. Depending on how much I trust the source, the quotes and the news, though, that story could wind up in either "Headlines" (stuff we know to be true) or "Rumor Mill" (stuff that might be true, but we're not comfortable reporting it as such). Other "Rumor Mill" includes might be stuff we know is definitely not real. We'll report it as such, but let you know that the very fact that it was out there generated buzz. An example of this would be the false story earlier this week about 14-year-old Miley Cyrus (Hannah Montana) being pregnant. A rotten hoax, but best to know it was false than hear someone else pass on bogus news. -- The next category, one that is increasingly filling up the bottom of the "Headlines" area, is crime blotter stuff. Small incremental stuff -- Pamela Bach's court dates, Snoop Dogg's latest charges... that kind of stuff. Seems to be more and more every day. Maybe it should be its own category. -- Beyond that, I look for things I, and I hope you, find entertaining. Good, bad and ugly pix, YouTube videos, and pretty much anything that I think will keep the blog interesting. Needless to say, there's not been a shortage of material.
Syracuse, N.Y.: Speaking of Lost, when does the new season begin?
Liz Kelly: Early February. I've asked my co-"Lost" blogger Jen Chaney for the exact date and will post it if and when she responds. She's currently reeling from the Daniel Dae Kim news.
Kim is the fourth Lostie to face DUI charges : It's the island that's doing it. There's something strange about Oahu.
Liz Kelly: Yes, something in the water, perhaps? Like vodka.
If true, that whole David Copperfield rape charges story is pretty chilling. Any word/buzz/etc., as its truthiness?
Liz Kelly: I don't know much more than you. But, yes, pretty creepy stuff. For anyone not following this story yet, David Copperfield is being investigated by the FBI for apparently offering to pay a woman $2 million in cash to not charge him with rape.
Centreville, Va.: (Sigh) With all the driving problems they've had with the "Lost" cast (traffic and DUI), I begin to wonder why the producers haven't instituted the easy solution: don't let any of them drive.
"Hi, welcome to the cast. Here's your driver, Steve -- he'll be helping you out here. By the way, you should know that we've distributed your picture to all the rental agencies; you will not be able to get a car until your contract runs out. Have fun here in Hawaii!"
Liz Kelly: Let's hope Damon Lindelof and Carlton Cuse are having that exact brainstorm right about now.
Alexandria, Va.: I just read that "24" will be filming in D.C. this weekend...any idea where?
Liz Kelly: Well, according to this item scouts were arriving in town yesterday to start sussing out locations. The most interesting part of the story, though, is this: "But if you see Sutherland driving around town, think twice before lunging yourself at the hunk: There will also be a Sutherland look-alike on hand to do driving scenes and any other scenes in which a mere Bauer Blur will substitute for the real thing." Betsy Royall Casting is reportedly providing the extras for the two weeks of filming, but there's no information on the site yet about "24" specifically.
Washington DC 20071: Do we get to see the ink already? PLEASE?!
Liz Kelly: The tattoo is not yet complete. The outline and most of the shading is done, but I still need to go back in a couple of weeks for the color. I'd rather wait and show everyone the completed piece.
Jeff City, Misery: Okay Liz, if you show us yours, we'll show you ours. Tattoo pics, c'mon! Perhaps tiz time for someplace to host pictures of all our glorious body art.
In the meantime, a review of body art 'not' to get:
Liz Kelly: Well, as I said above, I'm not ready to show mine yet. That compilation is fab. The harpiscord accompaniment also adds to the experience. Here's another grouping a friend sent me last week.
Liz Kelly: Oh, actually, that's the wrong one (though also good). Here's the right link.
Washington, D.C.: Liz -- What is it with successful male actors and waitresses? These men (Damon, Clooney, Cage) and all date/marry women without careers. Sure waitressing/barkeeping can be good jobs done by smart people -- but in the real world people tend to be with those with similiar professional achievements. What's up with this?
Liz Kelly: Women without careers? Are you telling me there's no such thing as a professional waitron? I have several friends who would disagree. And Clooney's latest catch was also a "Fear Factor" contestant. So she's what one might term "multi-talented." And although Damon's wife, Luciana Bozan Barroso, was working as a bartender when he met her, she was actually an aspiring actress. Nicolas Cage's choices in wife and child's name (Kal-el), however, remain a mystery.
Chicago, Ill.: Liz, what do you think of the Halle Berry kerfuffle (about her joke on the Tonight Show)? I'm Jewish, as is my husband, and neither we nor any other MOTs (Members of the Tribe) with whom we have spoken took offense. We all thought it was pretty funny. Face it, my people do tend to have the largish noses. Of course, we also control the media, so it all works out.
Liz Kelly: Hmm. I'm not sure everyone would agree with those generalizations. But to speak specifically to Halle Berry's comments, I think she goofed. She put her foot in her mouth in a huge way. For anyone who isn't up to speed, Halle showed this pic of herself on the Jay Leno Show and described it as her "Jewish cousin." For what it's worth, I don't think Halle meant the comment to be malicious. Confirming my long-held belief that she's an airhead, Halle just blurted out the first stupid thing that came into her mind. But, like children who can parrot bigoted comments made by their parents or others, the words are still offensive. I'm sure she's sorry and can now call Cameron Diaz and commiserate about how much it bites to be unintentionally insensitive.
Liz Kelly: An aside: I ran home from meetings and quickly changed my clothes before logging on. I put on a zip hoodie and, although I know I washed it yesterday, it smells like old socks. Could this be some kind of Halloween haunting? The stench of gym socks past?
Washington, D.C.: No! Not DDK -- will they now be killing him off as well (which actually is making me think they could do some pretty effective public service announcements about drinking and driving = death).
Liz Kelly: Well, there does seem to be some precedent so I'd watch my back if I were Daniel. Though, it must be noted that Cynthia Watros (Libby) will be returning next season.
Halloween, Va.: Okay, so this maybe counts as a celebrity question, or at least a celebrity from the far distant past..
I have a beard, which tends to limit my Halloween costume options significantly (i.e. - I can't pull off Amy Winehouse). So I was digging around in a closet and found my dad's old VMI uniform, which looks a lot like a Civil War Confederate officer uniform. So... throw a little gray in my hair and beard, put on a little make-up and BAM!
Here's my question... I'll be partying down in Richmond, former capitol of the Confederacy. I don't find this costume idea offensive myself (c'mon.. he's a historical figure!) but I am also not looking for controversy.. I don't really want the south to rise again or anything.
What do you think? Am I worrying a bit too much?
Liz Kelly: Hmm. Prince Harry's Nazi costume was universally condemned a couple of years back. But Robert E. Lee isn't quite Hitler. You could always just be a zombie VMI cadet. It would be just as effective. Mr. Liz went through a phase where he was dressing up every year as someone with jaundice. So he'd be Jaundiced Elvis or Jaundiced Wonder Woman. I'm glad he's over that. It was kind of weird.
Springfield, Va.: Liz, What is Gene up to this week?
Liz Kelly: No good, I'm sure.
Liz Kelly: I asked himself and he said "they couldn't handle the truth." So there you have it.
Washington, D.C.: I just wanted to let you know there's no need to bother with a presidential election next year. Chuck Norris has spoken. He is voting for former Arkansas governor Mike Huckabee.
Liz Kelly: So I saw. I just talked with our tech folk today about providing a way for us to easily check on which stars are endorsing which presidential candidates. Not that anyone else's endorsement matters in light of Chuck Norris's pronouncement.
Eeeew...: The Horrible Tattoos Compilation is not for those with a weak stomach. I had to turn it off since I just wolfed down my lunch.
There was a TV news special on tattoos a few months ago. Some guy had turned himself into a lizard with tattoos, and even went so far as to have some fake bumps implanted on top of forehead for "horns." He said he no longer considered himself human. I just can't imagine walking around like that.
Liz Kelly: Oh, I've seen that guy. He's pretty gnarly. I saw a special once on National Geographic channel or somesuch that included him and other people into extreme body modification. There was also a guy who had plastic surgery and tattoos and god knows what else to basically transform himself into a lion. He even had long cat-like whiskers implanted. Eeww.
Tattoo, IN: Okay, I'm not a tattoo guy. But the person who numbered his/her digits -- sheer genius!
Liz Kelly: Ya, I'm always forgetting how many fingers I have.
Centreville, Va.: "Liz Kelly: An aside: I ran home from meetings and quickly changed my clothes before logging on. I put on a zip hoodie and, although I know I washed it yesterday, it smells like old socks.
Could this be some kind of Halloween haunting? The stench of gym socks past?"
Was the hoodie immediately dried after you washed it? If not, it might have "soured" while waiting in the washing machine. Throw it in again for another wash cycle; then toss it straight into the dryer with a fabric softener sheet. That should take care of the smell.
Liz Kelly: Thanks for the advice. I think I will have to resort to re-washing. This is too big of a stench for Febreze.
Your laundry: Did you neglect the fabric softener?
If this is a true 'sweatshirt' hoodie, sometimes forgetting the fabric softener sheet is a smelly boo boo.
Either that or you did what I sometimes do, didn't add detergent. doh!
Liz Kelly: I never use fabric softener, though I do think that Snuggle bear guy is adorable.
Philadelphia, Pa.: How bad a mother do you have to be to have the courts deny a celebrity even visitation? Shouldn't this be some kind of wake up call to Britney, who still must be in a coma if the not driving with a seltbelt fiasco failed to wake her up.
Liz Kelly: One would think. Speaking of wake up calls, did everyone see the item in this morning's Mix about the anti-narcolepsy pills spotted in Brit's purse? Why would she need those?
Stinky Hoodie: Liz -- Did you leave the hoodie in the washer for an extended period of time before putting in the dryer? Whenever I do that, my clothes stink so horribly I have to re-wash them...
Liz Kelly: Nope. And in fact I wore it yesterday and all was well. I hate to jump to conclusions, but I'm starting to wonder if Mr. Liz piled some dirty clothes on top of it for a few hours or something. Whatever the case, it is rank.
Richmond, Va.: The article about Halle's goof mentions that she said one of her Jewish staff members made the joke backstage, and so it was already in her head and she just blurted it.
Liz Kelly: Nice Halle. Pass the buck.
Charlottesville, Va.: So do you consider your ex-employee handsome or EXTREMELY handsome?
Liz Kelly: Hmmm, I believe this question may be coming from former Live Online producer and lifelong rock star Meredith Bragg, who is obviously at home sick and tied to his computer chair to be resorting to following my chat today. Let's all peek at Meredith's Web site. Looks like he has another new album out that he didn't tell me about. And, Meredith, I'd go with "boyish good looks." (Did I embarass you a little or EXTREMELY?)
Cubeland, Va.: Don't hate my job or office, but with this icky weather I'm surrounded on 3 sides by gray blechiness that is making me loopy (I know, at least my cube has windows). Is it wrong to be sitting here, wishing Daniel Craig would storm in, sweep me away...and do whatever the heck scruffy, awesome Bonds do?
Liz Kelly: I'm actually really enjoying the icky greyness. It was just so dry for so long that I'm reveling in the soup-and-grilled-cheese-and-hot-tea chill of it all. Speaking of Daniel Craig, I saw a report somewhere yesterday that indicated that early buzz about his next movie "The Golden Compass" is negative. Which is disheeartening. I loved the book and was really looking forward to the movie. So here's hoping the scuttle is wrong in this case.
Halloween costumes: The worst one I've ever seen was dead Jon Benet Ramsey. Just awful.
The best was O.J. Simpson's white bronco being chased by police and helicopter. White turtle neck, white pants, a beanie with a toy helicopter glued on, a license plate and toy police cars attached to butt, and photos of O.J. and friend's heads on chest.
Liz Kelly: Oh my. There was a piece on BestWeekEver last week listing some of the top gruesome costumes for this year and I believe the no. 1 position was held by "Dead Anna Nicole Smith." I'm going as my niece's Aunt Liz who spent all Friday making chili and cupcakes for her party.
Charlottesville, Va.: Let's talk writers strike.
Do you think this may actually help shows like "Men in Trees"?
Liz Kelly: We should talk about this. I've put it off for too long. It's out there and could be affecting the TV we watch very soon. I suppose it could help "Men in Trees" and other shows that have been hanging on below the radar so far. I also read where some networks may buy some past seasons of cable-created shows to fill a possible void. So we may end up seeing "Battlestar Galactica" on NBC. Also, I hate to say it, but another possibility is more reality TV. Speaking of which, did anyone else catch that "Idol" spinoff last Saturday night -- "The Next American Band" (or something like that). Pretty pretty bad, as Larry David would say.
Virginia: Stupid question, but when you ran home was it through the rain? Even a quick exposure to drizzle can make clean clothes smelly, fo shizzle.
Liz Kelly: Good bit of deduction, Holmes. But I changed my clothes. The sweatshirt was inside and dry the entire time.
Gyllenspoon: Actual photos have surfaced of Reese and Jake (what's with the toothpick?). On the plus side, Reese seems to be far more sensible/centered than the flakey Kristin Dunst. On the minus side, he is still a 20-something guy, and I'd hate to see either one of them hurt.
Liz Kelly: Of course no one wants to see either of these two hurt. There was a blind item in this morning's NY Daily News asking which "faux couple was heating up their fake romance to boost their recently opened tanking movie." Rendition, anyone?
Richmond, Va.: Re: Robert E. Lee question
Don't do it. There are few figures as beloved here in Richmond as Lee. If you do, don't trick-or-treat on Monument Avenue...
Liz Kelly: Word from Richmond, the seat of the South. Maybe save RE LEE for your next Halloween fest north of the Mason-Dixon line so as to avoid any unwanted attention?
New York, N.Y.: Just wondering...Do anti-narcolepsy pills = speed?
Liz Kelly: That would be my assumption, but I'm no expert on this stuff. Any docs or nurses out there in the audience care to enlighten us?
Four walls, closing in: So I'm home with a new baby for a few months, and man-oh-man, you would not believe how much nothing is on TV during the day. 300 channels, and blah blah you've heard this complaint before.
Anyway, I watched 10 minutes of an episode of Ellen yesterday -- not the talk show, the sitcom. Pre-coming-out, nonetheless. Ellen was trying to break up with a nice guy, but was having trouble, so she tried to get him to dump her. She said "I hate kittens. Yeah, I just wanna smoosh 'em." Too bad she didn't say puppies... it would've been extra timely.
Liz Kelly: Maybe we can get her to do a reshoot. I have to hand it to Ellen, though, she's managed to keep herself well clear of this pile of dog mess this week, only commenting on Monday that she hoped her Iggy experience doesn't discourage others from adopting pets. But to get to your issue -- what to watch. Do you have a DVR or OnDemand? You can record stuff that's on too late and watch the next day or scroll through tons of stuff the channels make available for free to OnDemand. Lots of good Discovery Channel stuff and, for a small fee, even movies.
D.C. all the way: Where did you get your tattoo? I'm looking for a good shop to have get my second and currently taking referral.
Liz Kelly: E-mail me at liz.kelly@washingtonpost.com and we can tawk.
Bethesda, Md.: Do you think J.Lo's baby thing is a publicity stunt? Although she looks like she's definitely pregnant, she has yet to say anything about it. And because of that, she's all over the news.
However, despite all that and the tour, her album didn't even make the top 10, and has fallen all the way down to 38! This after tons of catchy tunes and #1s.
Is this all a stunt you think? Or is the baby coming at a very convenient time where she can just bow out gracefully.
Liz Kelly: Her ex did say something about it, though. I believe it was to the effect of her being a wonderful parent, blah blah blah. I think she's preg. Just keeping it to herself. Same with Xtina who has similarly not addressed her condition publicly.
Freaked oUT: DIE, SNUGGLE BEAR! DIE!
Atlanta, Ga.: I got a tattoo of my favorite sports hero. Now what I am going to do going through life with a Michael Vick tattoo?
Liz Kelly: Have cell bars tatted on top it?
D.C. all the way: When is "Big Love" coming back? I got into it during a marathon and now I must know what is happening with the gaming company and the arrested prophet.
Liz Kelly: I was just wondering the same thing last night. I would assume next spring sometime. I believe the last season kicked off in June, so I wouldn't expect it before June 2008.
Washington, D.C.: I'm friends with Tom Hanks on MySpace -- is it wrong that I ranked him my number 1 friend and that being "friends" with him, even in this little way, makes me really excited? (FWIW I'm a 22-year-old female...)
Liz Kelly: I think this is fine. I'd be worried if you started messaging him and inviting him to barbecues or something. Or sending him nudie pix. Though it'd make a great Celebritology story, so let me know if you do. He still hasn't responded to my friend request. Maybe he read the piece.
Washington, D.C.: The Coen Brothers are scheduled to film "Burn After Reading" in D.C. this week, starting today. This movie feaures, Pitt, Clooney, Malkovich, McDormand -- anyone know if the entire cast is here to film? Any sightings?
Liz Kelly: Anyone got any scoop on these folks? I think I would actually be frightened if I happened upon John Malkovich in the stacks at Olsson's.
byool, IN: Oh, and Mojo Nixon was right about Don Henley.
Liz Kelly: I seem to have missed Mojo's assessment of Don. Care to share?
Kaneohe, HI: DUIs here in Hawaii are no joke. The scary stat I've seen is that Hawaii leads the nation in the percentage of traffic accidents caused by alcohol (something like 75 percent of all traffic accidents here have alcohol involved). That being said, I'm available on weekends to drive you around, Matthew Fox. Are you listening? Call me!
Liz Kelly: See, what I am most proud of with this community we call Celebritology is the spirit of giving and civic duty we all share. Here we have a selfless reader in Hawaii who sees a problem and is offering to be a part of the solution. I applaud you, ma'am.
Arlington, Va.: The Golden Compass:
Where is the info coming from, I really want the movie to be good but I was worried they were going to have to strip it down both for length and for density of material and all that would be left was a shell of a wonderful story. I hope what you heard turns out to be wrong.
Liz Kelly: I believe it was on the Cinematical blog (which originates in the U.K.) though I don't have time to check and I'm not 100 percent certain. I do recall, though, that the criticism centered on the amount of CGI animation involved in adding the daemons and other fantastical elements -- including the armored bear Iorek Byrnison. Me, I'm excited about those things, but the reviewer seemed to think the film was leaning too heavily on those elements and not concentrating enough on the humans and the story line.
From their Web site...: What is PROVIGIL, and what does it do?
PROVIGIL is a medication to treat excessive sleepiness caused by certain sleep disorders. These sleep disorders are narcolepsy, obstructive sleep apnea/hypopnea syndrome (OSAHS), and shift work sleep disorder (SWSD).
Perhaps if she didn't stay out all night she wouldn't have a problem. I don't believe it's "speed." But I haven't worked in a pharmacy in a while either.
Liz Kelly: Thank you thank you.
J Lo Momma?: So in that J.Lo link you posted it said that her abuelita was a big supporter of J.Lo and Marc and was so excited about the baby. I must have missed the memo. Is the baby for sure? J.Lo is preggo?
Liz Kelly: Well, as I said earlier, J.Lo hasn't confirmed it, but here are the facts: -- The girl looks preg. -- Ex Chris Judd indicated earlier this week that he had definite knowledge of her condition. -- And, perhaps most daming of all, husband Marc Anthony did a special cover of Journey's "Faithfully" at a recent concert. A song containing the line "They say that the road ain't no place to start a family." Who can argue with logic involving Steve Perry?
Smells like old socks. : I'm hoping your dog didn't pee on the hoodie. My cat peed on my shoes, and I noticed it after it was already dried, because of smell, Strangely like old socks.
Liz Kelly: Eeww. That's it. I'm taking it off.
Arlington, Va.: I actually got mistook for Tom Hanks in a restaurant. Maybe I should start making appearances in local restaurants and see what rumors I may start. Liz, want to join me and start some Liz and Tom rumors?
Liz Kelly: E-mail me at liz.kelly@washingtonpost.com. If you really are a ringer for Tom there might be some interesting video opportunities for us to play with for Celebritology.
Fairfax, Va.: Have you seen the new show "Last One Standing" on Discovery? So good! It follows six Western atheletes travel across the world and compete in tribal competitions with only days to prepare. I hate reality TV, but this is so interesting...and the guys are so fine.
Liz Kelly: Nope, but Mr. Liz is hooked.
L.A. Fires: I read that Sean Penn lost his trailors, David Justice lost his house and Courteney Cox's house was treated to avoid the fire. Any other stars affected by the these horrible fires out there?
Liz Kelly: Many have been displaced. I don't have specifics (but can by tonorrow). Also the Reliable Source this morning ran a list of stars whose homes may be in the line of fire. Maybe Rocci the producer can find a link for us...
Washington, D.C.: From Mediabistro -- Clooney is in town.
The name of one of the extras in today's George Clooney filming around town? Jim Brady.
Liz Kelly: Dismissed as coincidence. Jim Brady is the executive editor of this fine site, washingtonpost.com.
Inquests: If the Brits can have an inquest into the deaths of Princess Diana and Dodi Fayed ten years after the accident, why can't we have an inquest into the mysterious death of Marilyn Monroe?
Liz Kelly: Is you fer real? On that note, though, I spoke with a British artist earlier this week whose work is celeb-centric and she is convinced that we haven't heard all there is to hear about Diana's death. She was mysterious, but said we would someday know the complete truth. And this woman is no dingbat. She's a BAFTA-Award Winner who has done work for the BBC and Lorne Michaels.
Anti-narcolepsy pills aren't speed: I've been on Provigil, and it ain't speed. It's not an ampehetamine, it's modafinil. It dries your mouth out, and made me chatty, but there was no rush. I went off of it as soon as I got on a normal sleep schedule (I was sleeping 18 plus hours a day after a concussion). I've heard some people try it to stay up all night studying for finals, etc., but never for fun.
Liz Kelly: How, I wonder, does it keep one from falling asleep?
Hidely ho: So, James Lipton... great pimp or greatest pimp? I also wonder if he asked the customers what their favorite swear word is... probably would have gotten the same answer from each of them.
Liz Kelly: Well, I caught a little of Lipton's on "The View" yesterday (trust me, no one would've mistaken him as a pimp surrounded by his employees) and he said he actually was not a pimp, but what ze French call a "mec" -- someone who serves prostitutes rather than exploiting them.
washingtonpost.com: Reliable Source (Post, Oct. 24)
Male Celebs and Waitrons: Wow! I can't believe someone asked the question I've long wondered. It's not the service jobs (and the people that do them) don't require skills and smarts -- but no, they are not careers (needing special educational training). I think these three specific guys married/date loserish women because they can't handle a woman with real acheivements.
Liz Kelly: I think you're wrong there. So they met women who were waiting tables. It isn't as if they were working at Hooters. What's wrong with waiting tables while waiting for something else -- like school or a novel or an acting career -- to work out? And, again, I need to disagree about waiting tables not being a career. No, I wouldn't call taking orders at Applebee's a career, but there are some very highly skilled and specialized servers who make a career out of working in fine dining establishments. And it can require nuance, balance, diplomacy, encyclopedic knowledge of food and wine and an incredible tolerance for putting up with customers who look down on you.
D.C. all the way: This might be a double post. IE had some issues just now.
Why didn't you tell us that Melanie (not so scary looking now) Griffith is on a TV show, sorry musical on TV about Las Vegas? Viva something or the other and Hugh Jackman either has a role or did a guest appearance. I have got to catch at least one episode. Best Week Ever has it as the craptastic of crap.
Liz Kelly: Ah yes. You refer to the just canceled "Viva Laughlin," formerly of CBS. Hugh Jackman and his wife executive produced this "musical drama" after only two episodes. I never had a chance to watch so I can't say whether it was really so awful or if it just didn't have a chance.
Pretty Pretty Bad: Speaking of Larry David, did you catch the latest episode where Cheryl leaves Larry? A real downer of an episode overall....
Liz Kelly: Ya, it was a total downer. I'm hoping that now that they got the initial break-up overwith the show can return to being funny. Tho the ER scene was hilarious.
W and L grad: (That is, I'm a Washington and Lee University grad.) Don't claim to be Robert E. Lee and wear a VMI uniform. You can be a generic Confederate officer like that, or maybe even Jackson (although that still probably won't go over well), but don't claim to be Lee. You'll be in Richmond. You're bound to run into someone who went to VMI or W and L, or who dated someone who went to one of them. Depending on the type of party and how much drinking there is, you probably won't be beat up for it, but you'll also likely get a lot of at most polite little smiles and people edging away from you because you'll be the party idiot. And if your accent's not true Southern and you're not from the south, really don't do it. It's just mean. Someone will think you're rubbing it in.
Liz Kelly: Another opinion for you, zombie dude.
Anonymous: Does Rocci rhyme with bocce (=botchy) or like the flying squirrel? Not that it really matters, just askin'. And I'm assuming he does wear pants.
Liz Kelly: Like Rocky Raccoon or Rocky Balboa. He's wearing pants, usually flat front. Though he sometimes slips.
I found more on Prov...: From www.provigilweb.org
A Different Kind of Stimulant
Unlike caffeine and older prescription stimulants that affect the entire central nervous system which in turn leads to jitteriness, insomnia and prolonged bouts of sleep to make up for lost sleep, Provigil only seems to effect the part of the brain that keeps you awake. A person's sleep patterns will usually revert back to normal after the effects of Provigil wear off. U.S. clinical trials have also demonstrated that Provigil is less likely to cause nervousness or withdrawal-like symptoms.
This is the scary part:
Provigil is a drug that keeps you awake. It has legitimate medical uses and is used for performance enhancement by the military for pilots and soldiers in combat situations. Provigil enhances short-term memory and lets users stay awake for extended periods.
Liz Kelly: So it's a new fangled white cross, basically?
Please tell me you've watched an episode of Gossip Girl. I so see you doing voiceovers while you chat.
Liz Kelly: Not yet Alexandria, but I'll try to get in at least one episode by next Thursday and report back. That's it for today, but if you're not in the mood to return to work yet I recommend this list of Terrifyingly Inspirational '80s Songs. Good times. See you here next week and tomorrow in the blog.
|
Join Celebritology blogger Liz Kelly to gab about the latest celebrity pairings (and splittings), rising stars (and falling ones) and get the scoop on the latest gossip making waves across the Web.
| 188.684211 | 0.842105 | 1.578947 |
high
|
medium
|
mixed
|
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/10/24/AR2007102402435.html
|
https://web.archive.org/web/2007102519id_/http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/10/24/AR2007102402435.html
|
Credit Repair and the Tools of Ignorance
|
2007102519
|
Every day, consumers pay untold sums to companies that promise a quick credit fix. Most of the time, that money is wasted.
I understand why these offers might seem enticing. Good credit can get you much better rates for a car or home loan. A bad credit history can leave you stuck with loans carrying high interest rates and other onerous terms. In some cases, bad credit can even cost you a job.
But make no mistake about it: While there are some legitimate credit-repair companies, many of the claims you hear advertised are usually false and a con to get your cash.
On my XM Satellite Radio show, a couple called in recently to ask whether they had done the right thing in signing up with a company that said it could remove negative information from their credit files.
Now mind you, the information was correct. It included, among other things, a bankruptcy filing by the couple about five years ago.
In a move to clean those blemishes from their credit record, the couple hired the company, agreeing to pay a $200 upfront fee. And -- this nearly made me fall out of my chair -- they agreed to allow $100 to be withdrawn from their bank account each month for ongoing efforts to fix their credit.
I asked the couple for details of the services they were getting. I found out that the so-called credit-repair company wasn't doing anything for them that they couldn't do for themselves.
I urged them to immediately cancel the contract, telling them they were being scammed. But their response was frustrating. Despite my warnings, I could hear in their voices that they didn't believe me. They wanted -- maybe even needed -- to believe the company's claims.
"But they guaranteed they could get the bankruptcy removed," the wife argued.
"They promised they could improve our scores," the husband said.
"You know what, you might as well take a $100 bill every month and light a match to it," I said.
How could I tell that this deal was no good for the couple? There were several signs of trouble.
|
Every day, consumers pay untold sums to companies that promise a quick credit fix. Most of the time, that money is wasted.
| 16.384615 | 1 | 26 |
medium
|
high
|
extractive
|
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/10/24/AR2007102402425.html
|
https://web.archive.org/web/2007102519id_/http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/10/24/AR2007102402425.html
|
Lott Waits for Clinton's Apology and Gets One
|
2007102519
|
Lott was on the cusp of issuing a serious condemnation of the Democratic presidential front-runner for insulting the Magnolia State this week when his phone rang.
"To her credit, she called me [Tuesday] and apologized," Lott told On the Hill.
Clinton chose wisely to make the quick apology after insulting Mississippians with a comment she made in an interview with Iowa's most important political reporter, the Des Moines Register's David Yepsen. Clinton was quoted expressing complete "shock" at learning that Iowa and Mississippi were the only states that have never elected a female governor or a female member of either chamber of Congress.
"How can Iowa be ranked with Mississippi?" she asked, implying the Hawkeye State is above such distinction. "That's not the quality. That's not the communitarianism, that's not the openness I see in Iowa."
Lott was furious when aides notified him of the put-down. He said he wanted to sound off right away but instead paused and waited to read the entire context of her remarks, something he said he has learned to do the hard way because of his own various guffaw-inducing statements over the years. (Those include not just his praise of the 1948 Dixiecrat presidential candidate Strom Thurmond, but also his comments after Clinton won her Senate race in 2000 that "maybe lightning will strike" her and she would die before getting sworn into the chamber.) "I understand that we sometimes say what we don't always mean to say," Lott said.
Still, he is a little disturbed that Clinton views Mississippi as politically sexist. He noted that the last two lieutenant governors have been women and that the first female jurist was recently appointed to the state's U.S. District Court.
Plus, Lott added, who is Clinton to talk? "Having lived in Arkansas, which is something of a whipping boy, too, she knows better than that," Lott said.
Craig Watch -- RSVP Yes?
Senate Republican political operatives are biting their nails, worried that Sen. Larry E. Craig (R-Idaho) is going to crash the National Republican Senatorial Committee's upcoming fundraising retreat in Sea Island, Ga.
Sources tell On the Hill that Craig RSVP'd "yes" to the event, even though Sen. John Ensign (Nev.), chairman of the NRSC, has served as the public pit bull for GOP leaders attacking Craig for his misadventures with the law in Minnesota. NRSC staff had to telephone Craig's staff and explain that it would be best if Craig weren't at the Nov. 9-11 event, which will draw the NRSC's biggest PAC donors, according to sources.
Craig, who has been burning up his own campaign cash to pay for legal bills relating to his airport men's room escapade, is definitely not on the attendee list, an NRSC official said. But that doesn't mean Craig won't show up where he's not wanted -- he's still in the Senate, after all.
It's been a tough year for Vice President Cheney, with his former chief of staff getting a presidential commutation of his sentence and an unpopularity rating that has left him nearly invisible. ("In the Loop" helmsman Al Kamen has gone so far as to start a "Where's Cheney" feature on Wednesdays and Fridays. Any new sightings, please e-mail whereistheveep@washpost.com.) But we're told that the veep had at least one good laugh this week, when he appeared at the weekly Senate Republican luncheon on Tuesday.
|
It's a good thing she apologized, because Sen. Trent Lott (R-Miss.) was fixin' to give Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton (D-N.Y.) a piece of his mind.
| 18.052632 | 0.684211 | 1.052632 |
medium
|
low
|
abstractive
|
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/10/24/AR2007102402759.html
|
https://web.archive.org/web/2007102519id_/http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/10/24/AR2007102402759.html
|
Lifting the Veil From A Deadly Disease
|
2007102519
|
But the 50-year-old single mother insisted on telling her story in more than 30 television, magazine and newspaper interviews, trying to force a spotlight, she said, on a disease believed to be the leading cause of death among Middle Eastern women.
This week's visit to Saudi Arabia by first lady Laura Bush, who is on a regional tour to raise awareness about breast cancer, is a windfall to Amoudi's battle to bring the issue to the public, she said.
"The fact that there is a lot of media coverage of your visit, and people know you are here only for the purpose of spreading breast cancer awareness, that gives it importance and will really help our campaign," Amoudi told Bush at a "Break the Silence" coffee meeting Wednesday with other breast cancer survivors.
Bush is visiting the Persian Gulf region as part of the U.S.-Middle East Partnership for Breast Cancer Awareness and Research, launched in 2006 with Jordan and the United Arab Emirates, and this week in Saudi Arabia. She described the initiative at its launch last year as "the very best kind of public diplomacy."
The program is organized by the State Department and includes the Susan G. Komen Foundation and the MD Anderson Cancer Center in Texas.
Despite tense relations between the United States and the Arab world since the Sept. 11, 2001, attacks and the Iraq war, women in the region have been grateful for the breast cancer partnership, Amoudi said.
"This goes beyond political, cultural and religious differences," she said. "This binds women from all parts of the world."
Saudi women die of breast cancer because they seek treatment too late, said radiologist Asma al-Dabbagh, one of the first women to conduct mammograms in the country. "The breast is a sensitive part of a woman's body and they are shy to talk about it because our culture is very private and very conservative."
Women with breast cancer do not speak out, she said, for fear of losing their husbands and hurting their daughters' chances for marriage.
"We're at the stage now that American women were at 25 years ago; there's a lot of ignorance and shame surrounding breast cancer," Dabbagh said.
In her articles, and in the television and magazine interviews, Amoudi has made a point of repeating the word "cancer," considered a portent of bad luck in Saudi Arabia, where it is mainly referred to as "the bad disease."
"People here think, you have cancer, you die. They don't screen early, figuring, if I'm going to get it, that's God's will. But God told us to take care of ourselves," she said.
Seventy percent of breast cancer cases in Saudi Arabia are not reported until the late stages, compared with 30 percent or fewer in the United States. This denies Saudi women aggressive early treatment that could save their lives, Amoudi said.
In her first newspaper column, a month after she was diagnosed, Amoudi described finding a lump by chance while taking off her black abaya, or cloak. "My hand brushed my breast and I felt a lump. My doctor's instincts kicked in and in seconds I knew what I had. I circled the room, praying out loud, 'God give me strength.' "
Amoudi has used her column, which she has had since before her diagnosis, to urge women to go public with their breast cancer and to call on the health minister to provide free care for breast cancer patients.
There are signs that Amoudi's efforts are paying off. Dabbagh, the radiologist, said that recently women had started coming to her clinic asking for breast exams after seeing Amoudi on television.
As the group waited for Bush on Wednesday at the home of the U.S. consul, Somaia al-Thagafi, a 31-year-old journalist diagnosed in August, stretched out her arm and showed the other women bruises on the back of her hand from her chemotherapy treatment this week. Amoudi undid her abaya, pushed down the front of her dress and pointed to a slight bulge in her breast where doctors had implanted a catheter through which she takes her medication.
"You should try the catheter," she urged. "It's much easier and less painful."
Bush, who also visited Kuwait on Wednesday and planned a stop in Jordan on Thursday, then met with the seven breast cancer survivors and listened as each briefly told her story. "My mother and grandmother also had breast cancer," she said.
Bush told the gathering that she had overcome her own stereotypes about Saudi women, mistakenly believing it would be difficult to communicate with them. "I've found they're like women everywhere, very strong," she said.
"Thank you for caring not just about the American people but about us as well," Umm Abdul-Rahman, 45, in a black cloak and face veil revealing only her eyes, told Bush.
At the end of the meeting, Amoudi presented Bush with a gift from the group -- a black head scarf adorned with two pink ribbons stitched on the sides. Bush draped it over her hair briefly as the women beamed and moved in closer for photos.
|
JIDDAH, Saudi Arabia, Oct. 24 -- When gynecologist Samia al-Amoudi was found last year to have breast cancer, a disease that still carries an intense stigma in this conservative country where women are forced to cover in public, she decided to share the details in her newspaper column, shocking many...
| 17.724138 | 0.672414 | 1.224138 |
medium
|
low
|
abstractive
|
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/10/24/AR2007102402650.html
|
https://web.archive.org/web/2007102519id_/http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/10/24/AR2007102402650.html
|
Quarrel With College Bares Town's Chronic Resentment
|
2007102519
|
Around a 165-year-old college nestled in a 375-year-old city, discussing the latest town-gown squabble with neighbors leads fairly quickly to rehashing decades of perceived injustices.
"Well, in the '50s, my aunt's property was taken from her by eminent domain," said Linda Vallandingham, who lives a few miles from St. Mary's College of Maryland, a tiny public college near the state's southern tip. "And then there have been several problems when they wanted to build new buildings, not to mention all the labor problems."
The college, adjacent to Maryland's first capital, in St. Mary's City, is inextricably linked with the state's history, a connection its leaders have nurtured as they have molded the institution into a top public liberal arts college. But the complicated relationship between the three St. Mary's -- the college, the historic city and the county they are part of -- has often been tumultuous, most recently in a dispute over the location of a boathouse.
The boathouse, which sprang up on the banks of the picturesque St. Mary's River in August, first drew criticism because it blocks residents' view of the river as they drive north on Route 5. Since then, objections have broadened to include historical and environmental preservation concerns over the structure, which was built less than 25 feet from the river's edge.
Last week, nearly 200 people attended a town hall meeting to complain about the boathouse, and several hundred others have signed a petition demanding its removal.
"To be honest, I was a little surprised by how vociferous and angry it got," said the college's president, Maggie O'Brien.
The latest controversy has prompted a state legislator to seek more oversight for the college, which is outside the sway of the state university system.
"They get all the benefits of being a public college with none of the responsibility, and the problems have arisen over and over as long as I've been around," said state Sen. Roy P. Dyson (D-St. Mary's).
The intensity of the dispute, several longtime residents said, underscores years of pent-up anger at the college, with the boathouse serving as a flash point for frustrations over building decisions, labor relations and historical preservation. At the heart of many of the complaints is a sense of alienation from the increasingly prestigious college.
"They have operated almost in a total vacuum," said Dyson, who has represented St. Mary's County in state or federal politics for the past 30 years and who has led much of the community opposition to the boathouse. "We don't have a good relationship there. It's been a terrible history."
Dyson has emphasized similarities between the boathouse dispute and a controversy in 1989 over the placement of an academic building. After two years of work on a campus plan that would have included a $12 million science center, residents demanded that the structure be built on a different site because they said it would be destructive to an environmentally and historically significant piece of land. The school's president at the time, Edward T. Lewis, chose a new location.
"This was the original capital city of Maryland, and we think that's very special," said Ken Heikkinen, who has lived two miles south of the college for 21 years. "When they start messing around with that, it upsets me a great deal."
|
Around a 165-year-old college nestled in a 375-year-old city, discussing the latest town-gown squabble with neighbors leads fairly quickly to rehashing decades of perceived injustices.
| 20.272727 | 1 | 33 |
medium
|
high
|
extractive
|
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/10/24/AR2007102400785.html
|
https://web.archive.org/web/2007102519id_/http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/10/24/AR2007102400785.html
|
Law Punishes Truancy by Taking Away Teens' Keys
|
2007102519
|
The measure, which took effect Oct. 1, denies a learner's permit to students younger than 16 who have more than 10 unexcused absences during the prior school semester.
Whether they are in public or private school or are home-schooled, teens must submit a certified, sealed school attendance form as part of their application. The Motor Vehicle Administration will not accept forms from students if there is evidence of tampering or alteration, agency spokesman Buel Young said. The law probably will affect thousands of teenagers: In the last budget year, more than 14,500 16-year-olds earned provisional driver's licenses.
A teenager must be at least 15 years, 9 months old before applying for a Maryland learner's permit, and the driver must hold that learner's permit for at least six months, Young said.
The measure, which borrows a strategy adopted in other states, was pushed during the past General Assembly session by a Prince George's County delegate.
Habitually truant students "face no repercussions under the law, and I thought that was a big gap," said Del. Gerron S. Levi (D), the lead sponsor of House Bill 571. "This is one way to hold students accountable."
Truancy is a major issue for a few school systems in Maryland. More than 10 percent of Baltimore students were habitually absent in the 2005-06 school year, according to a state report.
In the Washington region, Prince George's contends with a truancy rate of 4.39 percent, the report said. For other school districts, such as Montgomery and Howard, the percentages of truants are smaller, but the problem persists among subgroups of students.
Under Maryland law, parents can face criminal charges if their children are habitually truant, but those cases are rare, educators say.
School officials who work directly with students and families say truancy is a tough knot to unravel.
"Truancy is always, in my opinion, a symptom of underlying issues, not a disorder in itself," said Howard pupil personnel worker Bob D'Angelis. "It's such a range: financial issues, mental health issues, logistical issues, substance abuse issues. It's very, very complicated."
Levi said she's concerned about what truancy can encourage.
|
At schools across Maryland, educators and motor vehicle officials have teamed up to enforce a new state law that is the latest strategy to deter habitual truancy.
| 15.103448 | 0.689655 | 0.827586 |
low
|
low
|
abstractive
|
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/10/24/AR2007102402389.html
|
https://web.archive.org/web/2007102519id_/http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/10/24/AR2007102402389.html
|
Gerald A. Renner; Religion Journalist
|
2007102519
|
Gerald A. Renner, 75, a religion journalist who helped uncover sex abuse allegations against the founder of a secretive Catholic order -- the Legionaries of Christ -- and whose work was credited with halting the leader's priestly career, died Oct. 24 at Norwalk Hospital in Connecticut. He had abdominal cancer.
Mr. Renner, a veteran editor and reporter, had also done public relations work for the National Conference of Catholic Bishops and had been a vice president of the National Conference of Christians and Jews.
He was a religion writer at the Hartford Courant when he teamed in 1996 with freelance investigative reporter Jason Berry, who had written about sex abuse in the Catholic clergy.
They worked on several high-profile articles for the Courant about the Legionaries of Christ, which has its U.S. headquarters in Connecticut. Their reportage culminated in the book "Vows of Silence: The Abuse of Power in the Papacy of John Paul II" (2004).
The authors highlighted decades worth of allegations by former Legionaries of Christ seminarians who accused the founder, the Rev. Marcial Maciel Degollado, of sexual abuse and were frustrated by the church's silence on the matter.
Maciel, who was born in Mexico, had ingratiated himself with many in the church hierarchy, especially Pope John Paul II, who once praised his "paternal affection and his experience."
Maciel was regarded as a master fundraiser and recruiter for the church, and he shared with the pope a deep conservatism. Yet criticism persisted that he ran a cult-like organization that cut its members off from their families. The order now claims to have 700 priests and 2,500 seminarians in 20 countries.
Maciel was the subject of periodic church investigations into abuse, but no explanation or findings were ever publicly disclosed.
David Gibson, an award-winning religion reporter and author, said the book was "the real trigger" that led Pope Benedict XVI to discipline Maciel in May 2006. The pope asked Maciel, who was then 86 and who had founded his order in 1941, to relinquish his public ministry and devote himself to "a reserved life of penitence and prayer."
In their book, Berry and Mr. Renner explored what they considered a coverup of Maciel's alleged sex abuses as well as the punishment of one priest who tried to expose wrongdoing.
Writing in the New York Times, journalist Christopher Caldwell said the book was effective in conveying the emotional and legal struggles of alleged abuse victims.
Gerald Anthony Renner was born June 5, 1932, in Philadelphia. He served in the Navy in the early 1950s and was a 1959 graduate of Georgetown University.
After graduation, Mr. Renner spent seven years at the Reading Eagle in Pennsylvania and specialized in coverage of organized crime.
He left in 1965 for the National Conference of Catholic Bishops in Washington and later worked for the New York-based Religion News Service. He held the position of editor and director when he joined the Hartford Courant in 1984. He became a freelance religion writer after retiring from the Courant in 2000.
Mr. Renner went to parochial schools and, after a career covering religion, he became an agnostic in his later years. He was working on a memoir he planned to call "My Journey to Apostasy."
Survivors include his wife of 50 years, Jacquelyn Breen Renner of Norwalk; five children, Margaret Lidz of Landenberg, Pa., Anne Victoria Canevari of Stratford, Conn., Mary Yordon of Norwalk, Andrea Ipaktchi of Paris and Jack Renner of Manhattan, N.Y.; a brother, Richard Renner of Lutherville, Md.; and 10 grandchildren.
|
Washington D.C., Maryland and Virginia obituaries, appreciations and death notices.
| 53.076923 | 0.461538 | 0.461538 |
high
|
low
|
abstractive
|
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/10/24/AR2007102402757.html
|
https://web.archive.org/web/2007102419id_/http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/10/24/AR2007102402757.html
|
White House Feels Waxman's Oversight Gaze
|
2007102419
|
Today, Rice will finally appear. But Waxman (D-Calif.) has not spent the week on a victory lap. He has found time to produce evidence accusing State Department security contractor Blackwater Worldwide of tax evasion, to fire off a letter to Rice demanding information about alleged mismanagement of a $1 billion contract to train Iraqi police, and to hold a hearing on uranium poisoning on Navajo land.
Waxman has become the Bush administration's worst nightmare: a Democrat in the majority with subpoena power and the inclination to overturn rocks. But in Waxman the White House also faces an indefatigable capital veteran -- with a staff renowned for its depth and experience -- who has been waiting for this for 14 years.
These days, the 16-term congressman is always ready with a hearing, a fresh crop of internal administration e-mails or a new explosive report. And he has more than two dozen investigations underway, on such issues as the politicization of the entire federal government, formaldehyde in Federal Emergency Management Agency trailers, global warming, and safety concerns about the diabetes drug Avandia.
"We have to let people know they have someone watching them after six years with no oversight at all," said Waxman, 68. "And we've got a lot of low-hanging fruit to pick."
Republicans have their share of complaints. They say that Waxman's staff cuts corners, plays "gotcha" with witnesses and committee Republicans, bypasses GOP staff members by interviewing witnesses rather than depositioning them, and would rather investigate than legislate. But even some of them speak with grudging admiration.
"For the administration, and for a lot of others, people need to be careful now," said Rep. Thomas M. Davis III (Va.), the ranking Republican on the committee. "Someone is looking over their shoulder."
Republicans and Democrats say that Waxman has marshaled three ingredients from his staff -- tenacity, experience and loyalty -- to make it one of the brightest spots on the new Congress's otherwise mixed record. The number of Democratic staff members has doubled, to about 75, since the party took control. About 25 investigators make up the core of Waxman's team.
Philip M. Schiliro, his committee chief of staff and the strategic brains of the operation, has been with Waxman since 1982. The congressman's staff director, Phil Barnett, has been with him since 1989. Karen Nelson, the committee's health policy director, has been with Waxman since 1978.
"The best way for Congress to work is if you have a leadership-driven program that the party is trying to push, but that has to be leavened by the knowledge that people have from spending 10 or 15 years on a committee," said House Appropriations Committee Chairman David R. Obey (D-Wis.). "Do you think the leadership alone could design everything he's been doing? The leadership knows what they want investigated, but Henry also has some fabulous years of expertise and experience that lets him do something that virtually nobody else in this body could do."
The committee's style can be brash. To depose witnesses, Democratic staff members must notify Republicans, explain exhaustive legal rights and release transcripts only by committee agreement, said David Marin, the Republican staff director. So Schiliro and company favor less formal interviews, knowing that the penalty for perjury can be just as stiff. Word is out among government contractors to demand depositions whenever possible when the oversight panel comes to call.
Committee rules also require the majority staff to send a memo to the minority three days in advance, detailing the subject of an upcoming hearing and the issues that will be raised. Marin said advance memos tend to be milquetoast previews. Supplemental memos, which may reach Republicans just hours before the curtain rises, deliver the goods on just what Waxman is about to spring. With no time to formulate a rebuttal, Republicans can only watch the show.
|
Follow 2008 Elections & Campaigns at washingtonpost.com Politics Information on Democrats,Republicans,political cartoons,opinions,government policies,political analysis and reports." elections,campaigns,Democrats,Republicans,political cartoons,opinions from The Washington Post. Features government policy,government tech,political analysis and reports.
| 13.385965 | 0.54386 | 0.649123 |
low
|
low
|
abstractive
|
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/discussion/2007/10/01/DI2007100101475.html
|
https://web.archive.org/web/2007102019id_/http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/discussion/2007/10/01/DI2007100101475.html
|
The Candidates: Sen. Mike Gravel
|
2007102019
|
Submit your questions and comments before or during today's discussion.
Submit questions to one of the other primary candidates
Gravel is a former two-term U.S. senator from Alaska, from 1969 to 1981. Prior to his election he was a two-term Alaska state legislator. Between his Senate career and his current presidential run, Gravel was a businessman and an activist working on direct democracy initiatives.
washingtonpost.com: This discussion will be rescheduled.
washingtonpost.com: This discussion has been rescheduled for Tuesday, Oct. 16 at 12:15 p.m. ET.
Sen. Mike Gravel: Hope you vote for me. I think I'll be a great president, and I think I can bring about fundamental change, which I don't think is in the offing with any of the other candidates, hwo only offer politics as usual. That won't get us out of the mess that we're in -- representative government is broken. The American people should be able to vote on all the policy issues that affect their lives and be in partnership with their elected officials in the American government.
Harrisburg, Pa.: You were under consideration for vice president in 1972 and received a lot of support to be vice president. I am wondering if you have spoken to George McGovern about your current race, and if so what advice he provided?
Sen. Mike Gravel: No, I have not spoken to George about my current race.
Bozeman, Mont.: Given the recent relevations into the rampant corruption in the Alaskan Political Network, how do you expect non-Alaskans to trust you?
Sen. Mike Gravel: First off, I've not been a representative for Alaska since 1980, so why would you think the present corruption would have anything to do with me or carry over to me. I haven't been a resident of Alaska since the mid-1980s -- 30 years ago? And you're worried about a Republican corruption scandal? I'm an American, and because there's been corruption in American politics, would that mean you couldn't vote for me.
Arlington, Va.: I have heard you speak about the total failure of the war on drugs. If elected President, how would you convince the American public that legalizing drugs is really in our best interests?
Sen. Mike Gravel: The parallel of that is of course, how would FDR have convinced the American people to do away with Prohibition? We all know that was a social failure in the '20s. Studies show overwhelmingly that marijuana is not addictive -- moreover it has healing properties. Why would we arrest people -- 800,000 last year -- for that. For hard drugs, we should allow users to get a prescription, get the drugs they feel they need, and that would allow us to identify them and prostheletize to them. This is a public health problem, not a criminal problem. We spend $50 billion to $100 billion a year on the war on drugs, ravages our inner cities and destabalizing foreign governments. It puts drug dealers in command. I just don't understand why the other people seeking public office don't have the guts to stand up and state the obvious -- that the war on drugs is a failure.
Atlanta: Sen. Gravel, in the most recent federal elections of 2006, approximately 88 percent of candidates who outraised their opponents ended up winning their races. This could be the first presidential campaign with more than $100 million raised for candidates. In light of this, do you think that the current interpretation of money as a Constitutional right to free speech, as set by Buckley v. Valeo, is legitimate? And with this in mind, what should be done about our current election system?
Sen. Mike Gravel: First off what I would do is I think we ought to have public funding for elections -- and free speech is a problem in this regard -- but at this point in time it has been so abused, and almost everyone knows that the corrupting influence in government is money. Here we take the American media that anoints people to high office because they raise the most money, when intuitively we also know they're the most corrupt. Right now what the people have is not working, and it's not fair, and it's not going to improve the country, which is really in great difficulty. Representative government is broken, and the money is going to corrupt good people who run for office. That's the conundrum we're in. The only way is to empower the people to make laws, you cannot do it under the existing system.
Austin, Texas: Actuaries tell us that if you or Sen. McCain were each nominated for President, the selection of the vice presidential running mates would be very, very important. Who would you select as your running mate?
Sen. Mike Gravel: I'm not prepared to release that information -- and you're quite right, but the actuaries are very much in my favor right now. I've got a better chance of living to 90 than you do. That's the way the actuaries work -- because I'm from French Canadian stock, I'll live in my 90s unless I get sick. I only intend to serve four years anyway. I won't use the office of the president to make money, I'll use it to help the American people become accostomed to their new role in making laws. It's unfortunate from a political point of view that we're unlike many other cultures in not revering experience and wisdom. At this point in life I'm not motivated by ambition or greed, I'm motivated to help the American people become partners in their government.
New Haven, Conn.: Mr. Gravel, if you were elected president how would you go about enacting your national initiative? Is there a constitutional means for you to do so, or would it depend on the will of the Congress?
Sen. Mike Gravel: Excellent question, and I wouldn't depend on the Congress because they wouldn't do it -- they would not dilute their power. Also, the Constitution does not have the procedures for this. The closest is Article Seven, which says if X number of states ratify the Constituion it becomes the law of the United States. The framers never put those procedures in Article Seven because they didn't want people to vote down slavery. The standard the Democracy Corporation has established the standard, based on Article Seven, that if 60 million people vote in favor of a national initiative, it becomes the law of the land, unreviewable by the Supreme Court and with no duties by Congress other than funding the national initiative. If they refuse to do so, it becomes a Constitutional problem and the Congress will be fighting the will of 60 million constituents. Go to the Web site www.nationalinitiative.us and you can register and vote for it.
Pittsburgh: How would you lead the federal government -- the executive branch? I feel federal employees do not get enough credit for the services they provide to citizens.
Sen. Mike Gravel: I think that's accurate, but that's at the level below, by and large, the appointed politicians. There are various studies that suggest we could much better train the bureaucracy of the country. Look at West Point and Annapolis, which trains military bureaucrats. We should have professional schools to train the elements of the bureaucracy, an elite school funded entirely by the government, that people could go to without paying for it. That would change the culture of bureaucracy and would reduce the need for political appointees. It's much closer to the British system, and I think there's a lot of merit in that. I think by and large the bureaucracy gets a bad rap of incompetence when they're led by the unbelieveably incompetent political appointees, who then get into the permanent civil service, worsening the political corruption. Good government bureaucrats are good professionals and should be treated as such with all the attendent educational opportunities.
Acworth, Ga.: Many Americans now feel that the war in Iraq and the implied threats to Iran comprise an endless disaster for our contry's ultimate relationship with the Middle East. What do you think our long-term strategic view should be, and what is the best "next step" for achieving it?
Sen. Mike Gravel: That is a perceptive question, and they're quite right about the conclusion. We did not need to invade Iraq -- even Gen. Abizaid admits it was for oil. We do not need to invade Iran -- they are not a threat to the U.S., and wouldn't be a threat to the troops if we'd pull them out. 80 percent of Iraqis don't want us there. Get the troops out, admit we made a mistake, and develop a working relationship with Iran, Syria and Saudi Arabia and really really work on a lasting peace for Israel and the Palestinians. We need to begin to treat other countries like we treat ourselves. We're not any better for they are. Being the imperialist of the world hasn't worked for any other empire and it won't work for us. This planet has the resources to provide for all of us, we just need a better system of management. The beginning of that is empowering the people to make laws.
Chapel Hill, N.C.: Why are you so angry all of the time?
Sen. Mike Gravel: (laughs). Well, the reason why I'm angry, first, is that your tax dollars are being used to kill people. I hope taht would make you angry too, because it's tragic. I'm also very human and I hope you recognize at these debates where you see me that I"m getting an unfair proportion of time. If you didn't get treated fairly, you might get angry too. I'm trying to control my anger because it works against me, because I don't look presidential. When I become president, I will be presidential, but I will be angry when I see injustice.
Silver Spring, Md.: Hello Sen. Gravel. I'm a high school student at Montgomery Blair High School writing a piece about the upcoming presidential primaries for our school newspaper, Silver Chips. I was wondering what you would do as president (if anything) to change or amend President Bush's No Child Left Behind Act. Also, what steps would you take to provide students with more affordable college tuition? Thanks.
Sen. Mike Gravel: A very good question, and I can answer it this way. No Child Left Behind is a failure. Our whole system of education is in trouble. All of the stakeholders are all at fault -- a third of our children don't graduate from high school. That is appalling. The way to change that is to look at countries like Finland, Spain, Norway and others. Those countries educate children from start to Ph.D. with no charge to the children. If we're so powerful and rich, we should be able to do as well as them. I think it's an abomination that you have to pay for your higher education and I'll change the direction of this country to make the cost of higher education borne by society, meaning the government, at all levels.
Westcliffe, Colo.: What do you think about the decision of the commissars in the Democratic party to disenfranchise the delegates of voters from Florida and Michigan simply because those citizens want to hold their party conventions when and where they choose to do so? Shades of Uncle Joe Stalin! Not very Democratic, is it comrade?
Sen. Mike Gravel: Well, I think there's some truth to that, and I know representations have been made that I signed papers -- I didn't. I'll be going to Florida and to Michigan later this week. I share this view. This is a very confusing electoral process. I don't know what's going on more than anyone else in this election. What does it mean with $100 million spent on one candidate. What does it mean when I'm one of the top three most-viewed candidates in the primary on the Internet but at the bottom of the polls? If the American people want fundamental change, they have to move away from politics as usual. The solution is to empower the people.
New York City: Why haven't you submitted your FEC form yet?
Sen. Mike Gravel: We've already submitted it. It was submitted on time, on the 15th of the month, yesterday, by my accountant. We're raising money, but not in the millions.
Reading, MA: Which of the other Democratic canidates are you most friendly with offstage?
Sen. Mike Gravel: Probably Joe Biden, because I served with him, and Chris Dodd because I served with his father and I knew him as a kid, and probably John Edwards and Dennis Kucinich -- I like both of them personally.
Newport Richey, Fla.: You promise income tax reform -- will you go so far as to remove the federal reserve system and start giving us complete control of our finances and our wealth?
Sen. Mike Gravel: I don't know what I would do there, and he's quite right, I promised tax reform, but that doesn't necessarily mean federal reserve reform. I know what they're driving at -- there's a lot of people with no confidence in the reserve system, and I understand that. You've really got a conundrum when you don't trust either the politicians or the bureaucrats. I don't have a magic solution to convince you to vote for me. I will get rid of the corrupt income tax system, but only after you've been empowered with the right to make laws, which means you're going to have to vote for the national initiative.
Newark, DE: I loved your opinion piece in the Huffington Post on Hilary Clinton, especially the last paragraph in which you said you would open all secret files related to the war in Iraq. If elected, would you consider doing the same for your files during the presidency? I feel that a huge issue is government (all levels) is a lack of transparency and this would help.
Sen. Mike Gravel: Oh, totally, totally, totally. I will reverse a lot of these practices. That doesn't mean I'll take the people inside detailed personnel negotiations -- there's some things that need to be private. But 90 percent of what the government holds secret needs to be made public -- in my or any other administration. This will help the people better understand their government and better make laws under the national initiative process.
Reading, Mass.: Senator, you seemed flippant in a recent debate about your past history of bankruptcy. Why do credit card companies deserve to get stuck with your debt? You have lost my vote, senator.
Sen. Mike Gravel: Well, that's fine. I probably will lose a lot of votes. These credit cards are predators -- I received more credit card offers after I went bankrupt than before. I went bankrupt because I had a very bad year healthwise. You know, Harry Truman was bankrupt. So was Thomas Jefferson. I used the money not to buy a television set. I've never used my personal credit irresponsibly, I used it to keep the National Initiative alive, and when I fell ill I couldn't keep up with the payments and had to declare bankruptcy. If that irks you, don't vote for me and don't vote for the national initiatitive, because that's what that money was used for.
Fort Worth, TX: Given that money breeds corruption in Washington, why do you want to put more money in Washington's hands through Universal Healthcare?
Sen. Mike Gravel: First off, you don't know my health care plan -- that's not it. Go to my Web site and look up the Healthcare Security System. You've got me confused with Dennis Kucinich.
Vader, WA: Could your proposed health care vouchers be used for alternative medical treatments, such as naturopathy, homeopathy, acupuncture, or other treatments not recognized by the mainstream medical establishment?
Sen. Mike Gravel: Totally, totally. And preventive medicine. I'm very very much in favor of holistic health care.
Washington: What steps would you take to prevent nuclear proliferation and encourage disarmament?
Sen. Mike Gravel: I would could lead by example, cut back unilaterally and encouarage others to do the same. We have more than we need to defend ourselves and can't identify any enemies we need to defend ourselves against.
I'm out of time, but thank you all for participating in the discussion today.
Editor's Note: washingtonpost.com moderators retain editorial control over Discussions and choose the most relevant questions for guests and hosts; guests and hosts can decline to answer questions. washingtonpost.com is not responsible for any content posted by third parties.
|
In January voters in Iowa and New Hampshire will choose candidates in historic presidential primaries, the first in 80 years that don't feature an incumbent president or vice president. Sen. Mike Gravel will take your questions on the campaign and his vision for the United States.
| 65.36 | 0.86 | 1.54 |
high
|
medium
|
mixed
|
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/10/16/AR2007101601540.html
|
https://web.archive.org/web/2007102019id_/http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/10/16/AR2007101601540.html
|
Ruth Marcus - Son of SCHIP
|
2007102019
|
Tomorrow, if all goes as expected, House Democrats will fail in their attempt to override President Bush's veto of the bill to expand the State Children's Health Insurance Program.
As a political matter, that's the good news for Democrats.
The next legislative battles, on spending measures and terrorism surveillance, find the Democrats in much more treacherous political territory -- at a time when Congress has its last clear chance to sell itself to voters before presidential politics entirely dominate the discussion.
"The first veto is the defining veto," House Democratic Caucus Chairman Rahm Emanuel (Ill.) told me, and Democrats were smart to play their strongest card first. Now, though, instead of arguments about health care for children that feed voters' preconceived notions of miserly Republicans, the fights are apt to feed voters' preconceived notions about spendthrift, terrorist-coddling Democrats.
The calendar necessitates a two-front war: Fiscal 2008 started Oct. 1, with no spending bills completed. Meanwhile, the subtly titled Protect America Act expires in February, and Democrats want to get the surveillance bill done in time to avoid a replay of the law's steamroller passage this summer.
In the spending fight, Democrats believe that the lesson of the 1995 government shutdown is that fallout from launching this nuclear weapon hurts the side (Congress) that deploys it. That conclusion is right, but it limits their maneuvering room in arguing for the $22 billion they want to spend over the president's announced $933 billion ceiling.
"You're fixing to see . . . a fiscal showdown in Washington," Bush said Monday, pistols twirling.
In the short term, some Democratic leaders are using a "Son of SCHIP" strategy: leading with the spending measure most attractive to voters and daring Bush, once again, to veto. Their vehicle of choice is the $153 billion Labor- Health and Human Services bill, which includes all sorts of mom-and-apple-pie spending -- for disadvantaged public schools, special education, cancer research, Pell grants for college students -- and is lean on pork. Their message: It's not just poor kids' health care that Bush is gunning for.
After that, the going gets tougher. Lawmakers feel pressure to finish the bills funding the Defense Department ($459 billion, up from $420 billion last year, not including war spending) and military construction ($65 billion, with a big boost for veterans' health care). Having obtained nearly all of the huge increase he sought for defense, Bush won't have much reason to negotiate on the remaining bills.
After he went years without vetoing a single spending bill, Bush's newfound commitment to fiscal discipline is suspect. Meanwhile, Democrats have reinstated pay-as-you-go budgeting rules requiring that increases in mandatory spending be offset by spending cuts or tax hikes. Of the disputed $22 billion in discretionary spending, just $5 billion reflects funding beyond what's needed to keep pace with inflation, the Center on Budget and Policy Priorities calculates.
Still, House Majority Leader Steny Hoyer (D-Md.) acknowledges, "The image clearly is the Democrats are the spenders. . . . It's a tough message" to sell to voters.
One argument you can expect: The administration is balking at $22 billion for needs at home while it fritters away that much in little over two months in Iraq. This isn't especially persuasive -- like the war or not, the money it's consuming argues for tighter domestic budgets, not looser -- but it polls well.
Meanwhile, the politics of the terrorism surveillance fight makes the spending battle look simple. The same "pass this bill or people will die" rhetoric that spooked lawmakers into acceding to administration demands shortly before the August recess will come into play again. The House has a liberal bloc demanding individual warrants for any eavesdropping that involves Americans but also a corps of skittish conservative Democrats and vulnerable freshmen. The Senate has, as always, the problem of needing to round up 60 votes.
In that difficult environment, the House has produced an impressively balanced measure that gives intelligence agencies the flexibility they say they need to monitor foreign communications without having to obtain a new warrant in each instance. At the same time, the measure would give the special court that oversees the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act a stronger role in protecting Americans' privacy. The problem is that this measure constitutes the high-water mark for civil liberties in this debate; it could quickly become irrelevant -- overtaken by a Senate bill that is shaping up to be more permissive but still may not meet administration demands.
Republicans saw the power of the weak-on-security message in the 2002 campaign -- just ask Max Cleland. There's every political incentive for them to run the same play now.
You can hear nervous Democrats asking: Haven't we seen this movie before? Can't we start talking about health care for children again?
|
The SCHIP veto was just the first bet in the White House's high stakes poker game with Congress.
| 48.45 | 0.7 | 0.9 |
high
|
low
|
abstractive
|
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/10/16/AR2007101601537.html
|
https://web.archive.org/web/2007102019id_/http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/10/16/AR2007101601537.html
|
The Unforgotten Man
|
2007102019
|
Explaining a simple proposal to help people squirrel away gold for their golden years, Hillary Clinton said that a person "should not require a PhD to save for retirement." But can even PhDs understand liberalism's arithmetic and logic?
Consider the controversy over the State Children's Health Insurance Program, which is up for renewal. Most Republicans favor extending it. Almost all Democrats, and some Republicans, favor expanding it in a way that transforms it.
SCHIP is described as serving "poor children" or children of "the working poor." Everyone agrees that it is for "low-income" people. Under the bill that Democrats hope to pass over the president's veto tomorrow, states could extend eligibility to households earning $61,950. But America's median household income is $48,201. How can people above the median income be eligible for a program serving lower-income people?
Politics often operates on the Humpty Dumpty Rule (in "Through the Looking Glass," he says, "When I use a word, it means just what I choose it to mean -- neither more nor less"). But the people currently preening about their compassion should have some for the English language.
Clinton's idea for helping Americans save for retirement is this: Any family that earns less than $60,000 and puts $1,000 into a new 401(k)-type plan would receive a matching $1,000 tax cut. For those earning between $60,000 and $100,000 the government would match half of the first $1,000. She proposes to pay for this by taxing people who will be stoical about this -- dead people -- by freezing the estate tax exemption at its 2009 level.
A conservative case can be made for something like Clinton's proposal. It is a case for reducing the supply of government by reducing demand for it, and doing so by giving people ownership of enlarged private assets as a basis for their security. It is a case for raising the nation's deplorable saving rate and simultaneously encouraging the nation's economic literacy and temperance by giving more people a stake in equities markets.
George W. Bush made this case in his advocacy of personal accounts financed by a portion of individuals' Social Security taxes and invested in funds based on equities and bonds. When he proposed this, Clinton stridently opposed him, and not just because she thought it would undermine Social Security's solvency and political support. She also said it was a dangerous gamble that would make retirement insecure by linking retirement savings to the stock market. Echoing a trope from Al Gore's 2000 presidential campaign, she said investing retirement funds in the stock market was a "risky scheme."
Today her Web site calls her proposal a way to save for "a secure retirement." After an undisclosed epiphany, she belatedly recognizes that 401(k) funds invested in equities are a foundation for security.
John Edwards, too, has puzzling ideas. For the entertainment of Iowans, he has reinvented himself as a 19th-century Kansan -- Mary Elizabeth Lease, the prairie populist who urged farmers to "raise less corn and more hell." In August, Edwards urged an Iowa audience to throw off Washington's yoke: "We need to take the power out of the hands of these insiders that are rigging the system against you."
To measure how much Iowans are suffering from the rigging, Stephen Slivinski of the libertarian Cato Institute was asked to mine the most recent Census Bureau data. He concluded that Iowans paid $15.6 billion in revenue to the federal government and got $19.4 billion back, a gain of $1,286.53 per Iowan.
But that is not all. Washington has rigged the system to inundate corn-growing Iowa with subsidies for corn-based ethanol. Slivinski says it is difficult to pin down the Iowa corn farmers' harvest of dollars because the subsidies come from exemptions from excise taxes and tariffs (54 cents per imported gallon) that stifle competition from cheap ethanol imports. It is, however, reasonable to add $2 billion to Iowa's gain from Washington's rigging of the system, so the average Iowan's gain is at least $1,963.65.
Suppose Iowa did not have crucial presidential nominating caucuses. Or suppose it had them but its crucial crop were, say, broccoli rather than corn. Would the federal government still be, well, rigging the system to create a phony "market" to satisfy a specious "demand" for mandatory and subsidized ethanol? No, but it probably would be mandating broccoli at every meal.
Many politicians pander, as Edwards does with gusto, to Americans' current penchant for self-pity. Hence the incessant talk about "the forgotten middle class." Because such talk is incessant, it of course refutes itself.
|
Can you remember a time when you weren't hearing about the 'the forgotten middle class'?
| 48.263158 | 0.789474 | 1.421053 |
high
|
medium
|
abstractive
|
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/10/16/AR2007101601519.html
|
https://web.archive.org/web/2007102019id_/http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/10/16/AR2007101601519.html
|
Republicans at a Loss
|
2007102019
|
My conservative brethren in the op-ed commentariat have made a disquieting discovery: The Republican candidates for president are saying nothing that addresses the economic anxieties of the American middle class. Both David Brooks and Michael Gerson, writing last Friday in the New York Times and The Post, respectively, expressed a mixture of amazement and horror at the disdain that the candidates display toward broadly centrist proposals to bolster Americans' economic security, and at the candidates' apparent indifference to their need to craft such proposals of their own.
"The Democrats propose something" such as expanding health-care coverage for children or providing federal matching funds for 401(k) accounts for families of modest means, bemoaned Brooks, "and the Republicans have no alternative." Gerson grumbled that the candidates were taking gleeful potshots at the "baby bonds" notion -- providing newborns with small savings accounts -- that Hillary Clinton briefly floated, despite the fact that the idea has won support from the right as well as the left.
In fact, with the honorable exception of long-shot candidate Mike Huckabee, the Republican field seems content with an economic program that comes down to opposing whatever Hillary Clinton proposes. Rudy Giuliani, campaigning hard to convince the Republican base to overlook his heresies on such cultural hot buttons as abortion rights, seeks to win over the faithful by claiming the mantle of Hillary-Basher Club Champion. A tax credit for parents struggling to pay their children's college tuition? Matching funds for 401(k)s? Baby bonds? Crazy notions all, not because of their substance -- Rudy can't be bothered with their substance -- but because they were proposed by -- get this -- Hillary! The GOP crowds roar.
As a road map to governance, this is both dim and skimpy. President Giuliani, Romney, McCain or Thompson can reliably be counted on to be against whatever Clinton is for. Beyond that, if we total up their domestic and economic policy proposals, they intend to do almost nothing at all.
Romney will punt to the states the problem of the decreasing willingness of employers to provide health insurance. Giuliani says everybody should just buy their own policies -- and if the insurance companies don't want to sell to the sick or middle-aged, that's just too bad. John McCain focuses on the rising costs of treating chronic diseases rather than the declining level of coverage. Fred Thompson wants to take a whack at Medicare.
What unites these positions is more than just a common opposition to Hillary's (or John Edwards's or Barack Obama's) proposals for universal coverage. They also adhere to the fundamental Republican laws handed down by Goldwater and Reagan: All government interventions on behalf of the people are inherently wrong. They erode freedom. The market can do a better job of whatever it is that needs doing.
What the Republican field fails to realize is that the America that Goldwater and Reagan defended against the presumed predations of government no longer exists. When Barry and Ronnie walked the earth, most Americans had enduring relations with their employers (ensured, in many cases, by a union contract), and their employers often provided them with health benefits and a pension. Most banks and corporations had not yet traded in their American citizenship for a new global identity that places millions of Americans' jobs and pay levels in competition with those of billions of workers in distant climes.
Clearly, the private sector that Barry and Ron extolled while denouncing government ain't what it used to be, and Americans know it.
By the evidence of all polls, Americans are now looking more to government to provide, at least in health care, some of the security that employers used to offer. A recent Wall Street Journal-NBC News poll even showed that 59 percent of Republicans believe that foreign trade is bad for the U.S. economy, vs. just 32 percent who think it's good.
Somehow, news of this transformation has not reached the Republican candidates, who still rail against government assistance to help Americans pay for college and health care and offer glowing affirmations of free trade. Nor has it reached the Republican Party or the conservative movement more generally. The serious postmortems for President Bush's ultra-Reaganite and uber-Goldwateristic plan to privatize Social Security -- the questioning of the sanity of such a proposal at a time when employer-provided pension plans were dropping like flies -- have yet to be conducted in conservative circles. Indeed, Fred Thompson is still mumbling about cutting Social Security. Ol' Fred may have slept through 2005 -- the year of privatization's protracted stillbirth -- but did the entire party?
The Republicans' problem isn't just the silence of their candidates. It's the silence of their ideology, which has neglected to notice that the world has changed.
|
Note to the GOP field: 'Anything But Clinton' is not an economic policy.
| 53.882353 | 0.882353 | 1.117647 |
high
|
medium
|
abstractive
|
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/10/16/AR2007101601536.html
|
https://web.archive.org/web/2007102019id_/http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/10/16/AR2007101601536.html
|
Can You Hear Us Now?
|
2007102019
|
Free speech shouldn't stop when you turn on your computer or pick up your cellphone. But recent actions by the nation's biggest communications corporations should be of grave concern to all who care about public participation in our democracy, particularly our leaders in Congress.
Last month, Verizon Wireless refused to approve NARAL Pro-Choice America's application for a text-messaging "short code," a program that enables people to voluntarily sign up to receive updates by texting a five-digit code. When NARAL Pro-Choice America protested, the nation's second-largest wireless carrier initially claimed the right to block any content "that, in its discretion, may be seen as controversial or unsavory."
After news of Verizon's censorship hit the front page of the New York Times, and sparked a public outcry, the company quickly backpedaled. Verizon issued an apology and blamed the blocking on a "dusty internal policy," while still reserving the right to block text messages in the future at its discretion.
When it comes to censoring free speech, sorry just isn't good enough. Whatever your political views -- conservative or liberal, Republican or Democrat, pro-choice or pro-life -- it shouldn't be up to Verizon to determine whether you receive the information you requested. Why should any company decide what you choose to say or do over your phone, your computer or your BlackBerry? Technologies are converging in our communications system, but the principles of free expression and the rights of all Americans to speak without intervention should remain paramount.
This issue is broader than one organization, one company or one topic. The issue is how communications companies can believe they have the authority to block content in the first place.
Both of our groups, with other organizations across the political spectrum, are working to raise our members' awareness of the potential for discrimination in communications and of the impact it could have on how we engage in political advocacy in an ever-evolving technological world.
We're asking Congress to convene hearings on whether existing law is sufficient to guarantee the free flow of information and to protect against corporate censorship. The public deserves an open and fair conversation about this important issue.
If corporations can't tell Americans what to say on a phone call, they shouldn't be able to control content or tell us what to say in a text message, an e-mail or anywhere else.
That's something all Americans -- regardless of their political views -- can agree on.
Nancy Keenan is president ofNARAL Pro-Choice America. Roberta Combs is president of theChristian Coalition of America.
|
Attention communications companies: Free speech shouldn't stop when you turn on your computer or pick up your cellphone.
| 24.095238 | 0.904762 | 13.952381 |
medium
|
medium
|
extractive
|
http://newsweek.washingtonpost.com/onfaith/guestvoices/2007/10/a_white_on_white_whiteness.html
|
https://web.archive.org/web/2007102019id_/http://newsweek.washingtonpost.com/onfaith/guestvoices/2007/10/a_white_on_white_whiteness.html
|
A White on White Whiteness
|
2007102019
|
When I was a 23 year old Lieutenant in the Army, I free fell 70 feet from a cliff during field maneuvers. That day I had an extraordinary experience. I nearly died. In the years that have since passed, my impressions of what occurred that day have swung from one extreme to another. At times I have felt as if I encountered God that day in a particular and intimate way. After undergoing training as a physician, I have wondered whether socialization, psychological conditioning, or simple low blood pressure influenced or skewed my memory of the event. The following describes what I remember of my own near-death experience. Attempting to understand it has been part of the mystery and gift of my existence.
One late winter day, in a state park somewhere in northern Kentucky, our company of about 120 men was training on rappelling and mountaineering skills. While supervising from the tree covered top of a rocky cliff, I failed to tie in the appropriate personal safety line. In my young arrogance and eagerness to train others, I had ignored my own training. The job assigned me was to hold a rope which a soldier below had tied about his waist. From this "belay" position I could catch men if they slipped ascending the rocks. For stability, I did find an excellent seated position where I could prop my feet against the trunks of two substantial pines and safely arrested the falls of several soldiers from that post. The arrangement worked well, until one of the soldiers reached a point still low upon the cliff face from which he could climb no higher.
In what was certainly poor judgment, I left the belay position and walked to the edge of the precipice to inquire as to the situation. Suddenly the 150 foot climbing rope began to snake out rapidly through my hand, I assessed that the man on the running end was falling. Although in no position to arrest his decent, I gripped the rope thinking, "Here we go." In an instant I was snatched off the summit and had a brief moment in which to think, "I am going to die." Crashing through some tree branches I entertained for a millisecond a fantastic idea, "Maybe I will get caught in these branches like Rambo." It was a ludicrous âlast thought,â straight out of Hollywood. The branches did not catch me, and I thudded to the ground flat on my back in some soft mud amidst a field of rocks at the foot of the cliff. The other climber was not hurt. I later learned that the speedy feeding out of rope I had felt atop the cliff was the result of his having jumped safely some 10 feet to the ground.
My buddy (then) 2LT John Landgraf was immediately upon the scene. Years later he told me, "I saw you twitching there on the ground." He had thought, "Thatâs just his nerves firing, like a bug after you squish it." Thanks John. Happily, I was not squished. My helmet kept my brain intact; our great Army medics did the rest. A group gathered around me. I remember trying to move my legs and asking "Did I move my feet?" The soldiers did not understand the question. I was in great pain and terrified of being paralyzed. I asked again and they answered in the affirmative. I resolved not to move at all until in hospital where they could assess my spine.
Is there life after death? As I lay dying, and that is what happened to me for at least a moment, I thought, "I should be praying." However, there was so much pain and shouting for ambulances and medics that all I could do was say, "God, help me." Not a particularly sophisticated prayer. I do remember looking up into the faces of a circle of frightened medics and suddenly feeling as if I were looking down from above them all. I wondered what they were so excited about and whether I would go up to heaven through a tunnel while seeing the faces of departed loved ones. I did not.
What follows I sometimes remember with great clarity, and sometimes with incredulity. I found myself in a place I had never been before. The only way I can describe it is to say that it was white. It was whiter than white and there was someone there that I could not see. I had the impression that this person was very nice and I liked being there with him. The person communicated to me, not in words, but in a way that I can not explain, that it was not my time and I was to "go back." I did not want to âgo back,â I wanted to stay in this new white place, but that was not permitted me. So back I came.
When I woke up the Battalion Commander, âBig Edâ Fitzsimmons, was yelling in my face, "Ranger, you are not going to die on me." I heard someone shout, âWeâre losing him.â Another said, âI canât get an IV.â Cliché as it sounds, I felt as if I was in a movie. Again, I wondered what all the excitement was about, but then the pain of three fractured vertebrae, a broken rib a lacerated elbow supervened. The medevac flight, strapped to a backboard and in a cervical collar aboard a UH- 60 Blackhawk, was one of the most painful and terrifying hours in my life. All I could think of was being a quadriplegic. As it was, I suffered no permanent neurological damage.
I never liked to talk about that day, but years later told the story to a woman who had written a book about near-death experiences. I was surprised to hear myself describe the âwhite on white whiteness.â On first telling I was certain it had happened. In later telling I have been less sure. Years afterwards, during a screening test, I was shown a blank piece of paper and asked to say what I saw in it. My guard was down and I immediately responded, âThat is the white on white of a near death experience.â Again, I was certain. Weeks later the doubts as to my memory returned. The physician-scientist within me likes to conjecture that my near-death thoughts were influenced by psychological, sociological, physiological and religious factors. The man of faith within me prefers to believe that the memories are real. As I am a physician of faith, perhaps both assessments are true.
I cannot say for a fact whether my experience was imagined or not. Whatever the case, since that day, I have always accounted my life as "extra" or "a second chance." I do not always remember to live it that way, but some days I do. Those days are the best. Do I believe in life after death? I am living it now, but I certainly would like to get back to that white place. It was nice there. I want to talk to whomever it was that sent me back.
William Blazek, SJ, MD is an Adjunct Assistant Professor of Medicine at Georgetown University in Washington, DC.
|
A conversation on religion with Jon Meacham and Sally Quinn. Visit http://newsweek.washingtonpost.com/onfaith/guestvoices/
| 99.357143 | 0.357143 | 0.357143 |
high
|
low
|
abstractive
|
http://newsweek.washingtonpost.com/postglobal/needtoknow/2007/10/kurds_armenians_win_we_pay_the.html
|
https://web.archive.org/web/2007102019id_/http://newsweek.washingtonpost.com/postglobal/needtoknow/2007/10/kurds_armenians_win_we_pay_the.html
|
PostGlobal: PostGlobal on washingtonpost.com
|
2007102019
|
More observations about the mind of the criminal Turlish junts that wants to destroy Kurdistan under the pretext of PKK presence in Southren Kurdistan...
Those Who Can't Bully USA, Bully Kurds
The real danger is not separation of the country, not secession of the Kurds from Turkey. It is rather secession of those who rule the country, its military force, its social-political and economic control mechanisms from realism and objectiveness.
BIA News Center 29/03/2005 Ertugrul KURKCU
BÄ°A (Istanbul) - The 7th article of the Flag Law reads "(...) the flag cannot be torn, burnt, thrown on the ground (...) those acting against this law and statute will be prevented and investigated by the authorities ..."
According to the 8th article, those who are found guilty at the end of the investigation "will be sentenced according to the article 526 of the Turkish Criminal Law unless their crime warrants a heavier sentence." According to that article: "(...) unless the action results in another crime, the sentence will be 3 to 6 months imprisonment in a minimum-security prison and a light fine"
This is the argument the "law of the state" would use to frame the "flag tearing three kids" incident on March 20th Newroz celebrations in Mersin.
Looking at the news media there is nothing to suggest a disfunction in the process of the investigation. As the demonstration was ending an armed police officer took the flag being torn from the grips of the kids, the kids ran away but "14 year old V.S. and 12 year old C.S. were identified from video footage" and were detained last week.
Why is a âcrimeâ committed by children and which has a legal consequence of "minimum-security imprisonment and a light fine" attracting such a barrage of reaction leaving one speechless, exaggerated favors; 2 years worth bonus pay to the police officer who took the flag from the children, audacious remarks, media driven condemnation campaigns and fascist demonstrations of nationalism.
Ultimately, at the âscene of the crimeâ the flag was prevented from being ripped: there isn't a "negligence of duty", the "suspects", kids, even if we assume that they are "criminals", have been detained and finally arrested: there isn't a "security" issue. Those who organized the rally say "that is our flag also, we wont let it be torn": there is no provocation or open defiance.
So what is the big deal? Why is an issue that legally and by mere common sense should be the responsibility of the "juvenile court", being blown out of proportion? Why are those who should be responsible for warning people who usher civil turmoil and make sure that all is turned back to normal, exploiting this to create a climate of nationalist Armageddon? Why are countless state institutions who are "claiming responsibility", specifically the army, the president, the parliament, the government, the political parties acting so immaturely?
If not grave, very serious...
In a society divided by deep inequalities, wrongfulness and injustices; shouldn't those rulers take a sigh of relief when 3 day long demonstrations accross the country attended by over one million people asserting their identity and culture aren't marred by any significant violence and the only thing that passes for an "incident" is a "light crime" committed by children,
Don't those who rule Turkey know that since 1999, if not before, the leaders of the hundreds of thousands who attend the Newroz demonstrations shape their politics and actions to conform with Turkey's "indivisible land integrity", that this was accepted not because of a "particular choice" but out of " strategical necessity"? Aren't all of these political decisions observed during "weekly meetings" of jailed PKK leader Abdullah Ocalan with his lawyers and monitored in the field by the security forces.?
Then, in contrast to the arguments of those, who are fanning the fire albeit knowing all these facts, the real danger is not separation of the country, not secession of the Kurds from Turkey.
The real "big danger" is the disconnection of those who rule the Republic of Turkey, its military force, its social-political and economic control mechanisms from reality and objectiveness. The real "big danger" is their lack of political determinedness and insight to champion policies based on reality and objectiveness vis-Ã -vis their ultra-nationalist, fascist adversaries and subordinates.
If this wasn't the case would the Military Chief of Staff , who directs an armed force of approximately 1 million and who holds Abdullah Ocalan prisoner, who "reports" the most insignificant intelligence, who are at the head of the most sophisticated state force in Turkey, sink to the level of children and pledge to "protect the country and it's flag to fight even for the price of the very last drop of their blood."
If that wasn't the case would the Military Chief of Staff issue a statement pointing to one sixth of the population by labelling them as "so-called citizens."?
Doesn't this expression strongly imply that their rights as such, their right to free expression and legal equality are also "so-called" rights for the "so-called citizens"?
Doesn't this statement issued by the Military Chief of Staff encourage those who have been hesitant towards trampling the rights of equal citizens that from now on that they have the "army behind them"?
The only reason why there havenât been serious strife among the peoples of diverse ethnic origins is the common sense of citizens. But nobody can guarantee that the same situation will persist if this campaign would continue in similar intensity on all fronts for another year...
The relationship amongst citizens hasn't reached a level of serious tension yet, but it certainly is grave between leaders and society. Ultimately the end result of labelling part of the citizenry as "so-called citizens" and a media sanctioned advertising of this to society with or without "foreseeing " the consequences leads to the same outcome: The state is as such feeds a serious confrontation among the public.
The most important issue today is that those with social and political responsibilities understand the gravity of the situation and act accordingly. Yet for the past three days everyone who holds political powers, from the president to extra-parliamentary opposition groups, have behaved overtly fragile and inept with an almost reflexive reaction to one-up those to the right of them. Consequently âfascismâ sets the standard for the actions and comprehension of our leaders.
The media, whose public duty is to check, criticize and warn those in power "fans the fire" and leads to increased public fermentation instead of airing programs to address the seriousness of the situation and help enlighten people.
Those who can't bully the US, bully the Kurds
Let's face up to reality, anyone who is encouraging hatred, enimity, hostility and resentment against the Kurds of Turkey is indeed trying to transfer the price of their incompetence in the international arena on to the shoulders of a "domestic enemy".
*Was the failure of the ridiculous supra-governmental foreign policy strategy of becoming a "regional power" regardless of the economic and cultural poverty due to the Kurds or because of those who foolishly thought they could challenge US interests with military power provided by the US?
*Who is responsible for Turkey being cornered in Cyprus after 30 years. The champions of false assumptions that international law could be disregarded and ambitions of gaining territorial influence outside of the âAnatolian peninsula" who claim ownership of the whole island od the Kurds?
*Who is hurting national pride? The Kurds or a European Union candidate Turkey who has accepted to conform itself with EU standards and agreements yet cannot move a finger unless clubbed by Brussels.
*Who is responsible for the ineffectiveness of âregional powerâ claims despite 300 billion dollars in internal and external debt? Th Kurds or those who have been drawing "red lines" within the territories of other countries?
The rulers of Turkey are paying their inability to replace the cold war status-quo after the fall of the United Soviet Republic of Russia (USSR) with anything but fluff by watching the direct US takeover of the region. The old days of cross-border assertions and practices of regional domination with the direct or indirect approval of Washington are over now.
The rulers of Turkey are paying the price of not implementing a democratic process that respects the multicultural nature of the society and instead subscribing to the "authoritarian democracy" notion what had been approved during the existence of the USSR.
Attacking the Kurds, the poor and the women every time when Ankaraâs rulers come to loggerheads with crucial allies, international powers and institutions, Washington and Brussels, in the game of global power will never give back the regional influence lost by the rulers of Turkey for their lack of correct policies and foresight.
But it will "legitimize" the revanchism of those who are enraged of the slight tipping of the political balance in the last decade in favor of the poor, oppressed, neglected and excluded, under ultra-nationalism.
Those who feel themselves responsible of the good of Turkey need to see the prevention of such prospects as their number one priority, that is, if they wish not to remain mute before the readers of "Mein Kampf", whose numbers are reported to increase recently. (EK/AT/EK/YE)
|
Need to Know - PostGlobal on PostGlobal; blog of politics and current events on washingtonpost.com. Visit http://newsweek.washingtonpost.com/postglobal/needtoknow/
| 96.631579 | 0.578947 | 0.789474 |
high
|
low
|
abstractive
|
http://newsweek.washingtonpost.com/postglobal/nikos_konstandaras/2007/10/turkeys_past_victories_spawn_t.html
|
https://web.archive.org/web/2007102019id_/http://newsweek.washingtonpost.com/postglobal/nikos_konstandaras/2007/10/turkeys_past_victories_spawn_t.html
|
Nikos Konstandaras
|
2007102019
|
Athens - It should be the obligation of every individual, every country and every transnational organization to try to prevent - or, failing that, to condemn - a crime of such magnitude as the organized extermination of Turkeyâs Armenian population. You are either on the side of right or you are not. So, on the face of it, this should be a simple issue for the United States and for every other country. Reflecting this, the House Committee on Foreign Affairs Resolution 106 claims, âDespite the international recognition and affirmation of the Armenian Genocide, the failure of the domestic and international authorities to punish those responsible for the Armenian Genocide is a reason why similar genocides have recurred and may recur in the future.â It concludes that, âa just resolution will help prevent future genocides.â (That remains to be seen: The Holocaust, though it was officially recognized and its perpetrators were punished, was followed by genocide in Cambodia and Rwanda and âethnic cleansing,â genocideâs little brother, in several other instances.)
The complications in condemning genocide begin when countries begin to consider their own present interests and when we try to untangle the web of grievances, victories and defeats that constitute nationsâ conflicting histories. And all this is complicated further by the great length of time that has passed since that dreadful time in the Middle East, whose aftershocks are still at the center of dramatic, historical events.
There is no doubt that there was a concerted military effort at the end of the Ottoman Empire to remove the Armenians from Anatolia. Whether this was prompted by Armenian collusion with the Russian enemies of the Turks or the execution of an old wish to rid eastern Turkey of the Armenians is for historians to decide. What actually happened - the massacre of an ancient nation and its extermination from its ancestral homeland - is not up for debate.
The massacres and deportations were not unprecedented, as it was general practice throughout human conflict for conquerors to remove unruly subject peoples or defeated neighbors from their homes through deportation or extermination, or both. An obvious instance is the removal of the Jews to Babylon. The Armenians were the victims of massacres as recently as 1894, 1895, 1896 and 1909. So when Russia attacked the Ottoman Empire, the Armenians were more likely to side with the invaders than with the Turks. Thatâs where the Turkish authorities base their argument that there was no genocide: that the deaths resulted from the general turmoil in the Ottoman Empireâs dying days, and that there were many victims on both sides.
The problem for the Turks is that they were executing a tried and true method of solving historical problems in an era when, for the first time, there were enough foreign witnesses and international interests involved to seize on the slaughter and portray it for what it was in terms of modern sensibilities: a crime of monumental proportions.
The Turks of the time got away with it, even though the crimes hardly went undetected, because most of the Western World was already chin-deep in blood shed in the Great War. Since then, Turkey, always of great strategic importance, has, through judicious alliances, sharp business acumen and wily neutrality, managed to keep friends and enemies by tiptoeing around its past. For the Turks, their countryâs modern history begins with the establishment of a secular, Westward-looking republic in 1923, after Kemal Ataturkâs forces defeated an ill-judged Greek military campaign in Asia Minor. The years before that, during which the Ottoman Empire collapsed, are seen as a glorious struggle to save the Turksâ honor from the ignominious defeats that the Empire suffered at the hands of foreign invaders, and to create a nation out of many disparate parts. This is the mythic underpinning of the Turksâ identity, which, like all nations, arises out of a benevolent reading of great victories and unjust defeats. Demanding that the Turks acknowledge that their forefathers were the perpetrators of genocide, in effect, demands that they undermine their very identity. After denying the Armenian genocide for so long, which government (indeed, which individual?) can accept accountability for such a crime without putting up stiff resistance?
But this is where the Turks, who have never seemed to accept the fact that military might is not the automatic answer to every problem, have met their match. Yesterdayâs victory spawned todayâs defeat. The remnants of the crushed Armenia spread out all over the world, reliving the horror of slaughter and dispossession in their collective memory without respite. They raised their children to demand recognition of the horror that removed the Armenians from their ancestral homeland. The genocide drove them to America, to Canada, to France, to other great democracies. And as their wealth and influence grew, so did their political power. They have proved themselves implacable foes. This, too, is part of the genocideâs legacy: the Armenians have had nothing to lose and everything to gain from their demand for historical restitution.
Today Turkey finds itself in a position where its value as an ally is countered by the political clout of Armenians within its allies. So time has run out. Turkey will, eventually, have to come to terms with its history or face the prospect of turning its back on the world that it set out to join in 1923. The only way that this can be achieved is if the Armenians and their backers make clear that the matter is moral and not political - because the issue is to honor the victims of the past, and not to undermine the common future of Turks, Armenians, Azeris and all the other nations of this troubled region.
As for Turkeyâs allies, including the United States, they need only consider the simple part of the question: are you on the side of right, whatever the cost - or are you not?
ADDENDUM, October 16, 2007 5:00pm
I have been following the discussion with great interest over the past 24 hours and I must say that many of the points raised are a very valuable contribution to the issue. I am gratified by the effort put into the debate by most respondents and the good will expressed by many on an issue that is by its nature most sensitive and divisive. As I noted in my post, the issue has to do with the very identity of those involved and with clashing interpretations of a very tangled past. Of course, the issue of identity should have made me think to add that my being Greek would raise questions as to my objectivity. Perhaps my years as a professional journalist whose aim it is to make honest sense out of complicated situations have made me insensitive to the fact that not everyone expects objectivity to be pursued by âthe other side.â I was lulled into this omission by the fact that whenever I worked in Turkey no Turkish colleague questioned my integrity. Nevertheless, I should have noted the fact that I am Greek.
It is interesting to see how many comments there are regarding the moral equivalence of the situation as well as of those commenting upon it: as if massacres or genocides by other nations can excuse one more slaughter. Predictably, many nationalist sentiments seem to swing between pride in past victories and self-pity over defeats - as if everyone can be excused for excesses because he or his nation has been a victim too. For example, Turkish claims of Greek atrocities are countered by Greek claims of Turkish atrocities in countless clashes in the two nationsâ long common history. Each side has its own version of events, and it will be a bright day when we can all put these horrors behind us without resurrecting them about in every argument. That day, for Greeks and Turks, will come when the Cyprus issue is solved. Other issues among other nations will be solved in other ways.
But an incident of the magnitude of the Armenian genocide cannot be forgotten. Of course, Turkey cannot be forced by any external forces to do anything it does not want to do. Things will change only when Turkish citizens are free to discuss such issues and make their own decisions.
This brings us to the notorious Article 301. One does not need to be an âenemyâ of Turkey to see that a state that needs to place such restrictions on its citizens is a state that fears not only its past but its present and future as well. And the point of getting into such discussions, such as the one on PostGlobal, is to reach the understanding that what matters in our complicated world is to find a way for a more productive and peaceful future. This may sound trite, but the simple truth is that we are all in this together.
|
Nikos Konstandaras at PostGlobal on PostGlobal; blog of politics and current events on washingtonpost.com. Visit http://newsweek.washingtonpost.com/postglobal/nikos_konstandaras/
| 91.388889 | 0.5 | 0.611111 |
high
|
low
|
abstractive
|
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/10/16/AR2007101600251.html
|
https://web.archive.org/web/2007102019id_/http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/10/16/AR2007101600251.html
|
Neighbors Join Call Against Attack on Iran
|
2007102019
|
No Caspian Sea country should let its territory be used by other countries "for aggressive or military operations against another Caspian state," said Putin, who is attending a meeting in Tehran of the leaders of the five countries that border the inland sea.
The leaders jointly made a similar statement, signaling the opposition of Iran's neighbors to any military action by the United States or its allies.
None of the adjacent countries had indicated willingness to support such a strike. But as tensions rise over Iran's uranium enrichment program, which Washington and some of its allies contend masks a weapons program, there has been speculation in the region that the United States might want to use bases in Azerbaijan to attack Iran.
Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad said, "The Caspian Sea is an inland sea and it only belongs to the Caspian states, therefore only they are entitled to have their ships and military forces here."
Western officials are watching Putin's visit, the first by a Kremlin leader to Tehran since 1943, to see if the Russian leader extracts any concessions from the Iranians concerning their nuclear program. The officials complain that Russia, together with China, has been blocking imposition of stronger U.N. sanctions against the Islamic republic.
There were no apparent breakthroughs during Putin's visit. Public statements from the gathering were instead indirectly critical of Iran's foreign opponents.
The five countries -- Russia, Iran, Azerbaijan, Kazakhstan and Turkmenistan -- declared that any country that is a signatory to the nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty can "carry out research and can use nuclear energy for peaceful means without discrimination." That is essentially the position of Iran, a signatory, which says all of its work is peaceful and intended to diversify its electricity sources.
Before the visit, Putin brushed aside a reported assassination plot against him by suicide bombers. He is the first leader from Moscow to visit Iran since Soviet dictator Joseph Stalin met with Franklin D. Roosevelt and Winston Churchill at a World War II summit in 1943.
Tuesday's meeting was designed to continue the process of working out disputes over allocating the Caspian Sea's rich resources of oil and natural gas. But it was overshadowed by the growing standoff over the intentions behind Iran's nuclear program.
Putin met one-on-one with Ahmadinejad and was scheduled to have dinner with Iran's supreme leader, Ayatollah Ali Khamenei.
Although Russia has signed on to two rounds of mild economic sanctions at the United Nations, Putin is skeptical of stronger sanctions, contending they will fail and insulate Iran from further diplomatic pressure, according to Kremlin officials.
"Threatening someone, in this case the Iranian leadership and Iranian people, will lead nowhere," Putin said in Germany on Monday before leaving for Iran. "They are not afraid, believe me."
Both the United States and the European Union support a further round of sanctions unless Iran stops its accelerated enrichment of uranium and completely opens up its program to U.N. inspections.
Putin has said there is no evidence that Iran's nuclear program has a military dimension, but the Kremlin nonetheless has delayed construction of a nuclear power plant in Iran, ostensibly because of a financial dispute. Many analysts here say the Kremlin was angered by Iran's unwillingness to accept a Russian proposal to enrich uranium, on Russian soil, for Iran's needs.
Putin refused to say if the plant could begin operation before he leaves office next year.
"I only gave promises to my mom when I was a small boy," Putin told Iranian reporters. "At the same time, we are not going to renounce our obligations."
|
MOSCOW, Oct. 16 -- Visiting Iran on Tuesday, Russian President Vladimir Putin reiterated his opposition to any military attack on the country in response to its controversial nuclear program.
| 21.84375 | 0.75 | 1.125 |
medium
|
low
|
abstractive
|
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/10/16/AR2007101602267.html
|
https://web.archive.org/web/2007102019id_/http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/10/16/AR2007101602267.html
|
Does Obama's Message Match the Moment?
|
2007102019
|
"We're going to win an election, but more importantly, we're going to change the country," the Illinois Democrat said. Nothing will get done in Washington "unless we not only change political parties in the White House, but also change our politics."
The audience of Iowa Democrats seemed receptive. But when it came time for questions, it was clear that at least some members of the crowd had not escaped the partisan mind-set that Obama said he wanted to overcome. What did he think about President Bush's veto of a children's health insurance bill? What, another person asked, did he make of the Bush administration's alleged denigration of science? What would he do to prevent Republicans from taking advantage of election flaws like the one in Florida in 2000, in which the questioner said "it's not over till your brother counts the votes"?
As Obama positions himself for the stretch run for the Democratic presidential nomination, his call for a "new kind of politics" faces a broad test in his own party, and not just of whether it makes any criticism of his chief rival, Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton (N.Y.), seem hypocritical. As the pointed questions he received here suggest, it may be that his summons to "turn the page" past the country's red-blue polarization is not what many Democrats want to hear after seven years of mounting anger at Bush and the Republican-dominated government.
Obama faults a broken system in Washington for failures that many Democratic voters attribute simply to having the other side in power. By contrast, Clinton more directly exploits Democrats' feelings of resentment. She argues that the troubles of the past seven years -- the Iraq war, Hurricane Katrina, the widening income gap -- are the result not of broken politics in Washington but of poor Republican governance, and she says that she would offer competent leadership to fix what has gone awry since her husband left the White House.
Obama accentuated the basic differences yesterday in Iowa. Reminded by a shop owner in Vinton that Clinton is proposing a universal health-care plan just as he is, Obama countered that electing Clinton president would not be enough to get health-care reform passed. "It can't be the same kind of partisan battling we had in the '90s," he said, according to the Associated Press. "I think I can do better than Hillary Clinton, and that's why I'm running."
Nationally, Clinton's more straightforward appeal for a Democratic restoration seems to be working. Polls show her well ahead of Obama and the rest of the Democratic field, and for the first time she is beating him on the fundraising front -- prompting him to acknowledge his underdog status yesterday on his Web site.
But the Obama campaign hopes that in New Hampshire his post-partisan message will play well among independent voters, who can vote in the primary. And in Iowa, where polls indicate Obama is running better than in New Hampshire, voters in the past have been receptive to more conciliatory appeals.
"I'm looking for someone in the middle who can bring people together and tackle things head on," Ryan Flannery, a family doctor in Washington County, said after the fairgrounds event during Obama's Iowa tour in the first week of this month. Added Susan Barnett, an Iowa City secretary who saw the senator speak in Coralville: "We can't survive the divisiveness that's been going on. We need to build bridges."
But Gary Frost, a library conservator at the University of Iowa who was also in Coralville, noted the challenge Obama faces in running on a platform of national reconciliation at a time when Democrats are so angry. "It's a big reach, and I give him credit for that because it's risky," Frost said.
The risks are on particular display now that Obama is putting more emphasis on his early opposition to the Iraq war and seeking to draw a contrast with Clinton's support for the resolution authorizing it. Because Obama has mostly resisted attacking her by name, his critique extends to the entire Democratic establishment for not opposing the war.
In effect, this seems to lift some of the blame for the war from the Bush administration and place it on the backs of Democrats, an unlikely tack in a Democratic primary. "There are those who offer up easy answers. They will assert that Iraq is George Bush's war, it's all his fault. Or that Iraq was botched by the arrogance and incompetence of Donald Rumsfeld and Dick Cheney," Obama said in Coralville. "The hard truth is that the war in Iraq is not about a catalogue of many mistakes -- it is about one big mistake. The war in Iraq should never have been fought."
|
Follow 2008 Elections & Campaigns at washingtonpost.com Politics Information on Democrats,Republicans,political cartoons,opinions,government policies,political analysis and reports." elections,campaigns,Democrats,Republicans,political cartoons,opinions from The Washington Post. Features government policy,government tech,political analysis and reports.
| 16.315789 | 0.631579 | 0.77193 |
medium
|
low
|
abstractive
|
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/10/16/AR2007101600998.html
|
https://web.archive.org/web/2007102019id_/http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/10/16/AR2007101600998.html
|
Rice Draws on 'Spiritual Passion' in Push for Peace
|
2007102019
|
JERUSALEM, Oct. 16 -- U.S. Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice broke away from her diplomatic meetings here to sit down with the top religious leaders -- Christian, Jewish and Muslim -- of this holy city Monday night. According to people present, she heard about the failure of Israeli authorities to recognize the Greek Orthodox patriarch, a top Muslim cleric's lack of access to Jerusalem's al-Aqsa Mosque and other complaints.
Rice responded by recalling her upbringing in segregated Birmingham, Ala. "She spoke with a spiritual passion about the need for peace and overcoming pain and grievance," Rabbi David Rosen said. "She said to us, 'You all have your legitimate grievances, but there's a moment in history for an inexorable change.' And she believes this is the time for the Israeli and Palestinian conflict to end."
In its final months, the Bush administration has pushed Middle East peace to the top of the White House agenda, with President Bush and his close confidante seeking to improve a foreign policy legacy that will otherwise center on the Iraq war.
"She realizes that her legacy right now is really very poor," said Zbigniew Brzezinski, President Jimmy Carter's national security adviser and a strong critic of the Bush administration. "If she can pull this off, she will be seen as a real historical figure."
In addition to meeting with the usual round of top officials this week, Rice has been reaching out to what she calls leaders of civil society in hopes of overcoming doubts about the sincerity of the new U.S. effort.
Talking with reporters, Rice said that for the process to succeed, the Palestinian and Israeli publics must have more confidence in the United States. "In the final analysis, this is about them," she said. "It's about Israeli citizens and Palestinian citizens living without fear and living with a certain dignity. It's about understanding that the United States sees . . . the human side of this."
Rice's visit to the region is part of a stepped-up U.S. diplomatic effort aimed at preparing the way for a Middle East peace conference that Bush wants to convene in Annapolis, Md., this fall. Rice is trying to persuade the Israelis and Palestinians to agree to an as-yet-undefined document that could launch final negotiations toward a settlement of the long-festering dispute and create a new Palestinian state.
The Palestinian side and supporters in the Arab world are pushing Rice to lean on the Israelis to be as specific as possible in writing this document. Egyptian Foreign Minister Ahmed Aboul Gheit urged Rice on Tuesday to insist on a firm deadline. "We cannot negotiate and carry on negotiating until the end of history," he said after Rice met with him and Egyptian President Hosni Mubarak in Cairo.
Israeli Prime Minister Ehud Olmert, by contrast, is resisting such timetables and details, nervous that making too many compromises at this point could bring down his shaky government. The suggestion recently that he might be willing to turn over to the Palestinians some Arab-majority neighborhoods of East Jerusalem, occupied by Israel in the 1967 Middle East war, triggered protest from some of the most hawkish and religious parties in the governing coalition.
Senior Bush administration officials contend that conditions are more propitious for more progress than they thought possible even six months ago, noting warming relations between Olmert and Palestinian Authority President Mahmoud Abbas.
Yet the officials reveal little of how they plan to get around huge obstacles, such as control of the Gaza Strip by Hamas, which has been designated a terrorist group by Israel and the United States. Bush and Rice are also facing deep skepticism among Palestinians and in the Arab world that they will press Israel to make necessary compromises.
Still, some who have met with Rice in recent weeks have come away impressed with her seriousness, and her brief trip to Cairo on Tuesday resulted in both the Egyptian government and the secretary general of the Arab League saying they felt reassured after voicing previous doubts. Rice "says that she is determined, and the president of the United States is determined, to have a breakthrough during the remaining year of this administration," Aboul Gheit said. "I cannot doubt them."
Saeb Erekat, the chief Palestinian negotiator, said in an interview that Rice's diplomacy "is completely different" in tone and timing than that of the four previous secretaries of state with whom he has worked. "There has also been a realization by the administration that the Israeli-Palestinian conflict is the core of many of their problems in the Middle East," he said. "I think she realizes that American interests in the region can no longer be served by backing Israel alone."
But Ali Jarbawi, a Palestinian political science professor at Bir Zeit University near the West Bank city of Ramallah, said that "if Rice is bringing anything new, some kind of a fresh approach, we'd like to see it, because we haven't so far.
"American presidents start these efforts in their last year because they are not serious about resolving the conflict," Jarbawi said. "They don't want to solve the issue, just manage a current crisis they are facing."
If anything, the Israeli public appears equally pessimistic about Rice's efforts. According to the Peace Index, a monthly tracking poll conducted by Tel Aviv University, a "large majority" of the Israeli population "does not believe the Annapolis conference will significantly advance the chances of reaching a permanent Israeli-Palestinian peace or even achieve a basic clarification of the differences between the two sides."
"It cannot work if the United States wants a peace arrangement more than the parties themselves," said Dore Gold, a former Israeli ambassador to the United Nations who was to attend a dinner Tuesday evening with Rice. "Right now, the diplomatic issues facing the two sides are unbridgeable."
|
JERUSALEM, Oct. 16 -- U.S. Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice broke away from her diplomatic meetings here to sit down with the top religious leaders -- Christian, Jewish and Muslim -- of this holy city Monday night. According to people present, she heard about the failure of Israeli authorities to...
| 20.8 | 0.981818 | 53.018182 |
medium
|
high
|
extractive
|
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/10/16/AR2007101600200.html
|
https://web.archive.org/web/2007102019id_/http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/10/16/AR2007101600200.html
|
U.S. Attorney Calls Noose Display 'Hate Crime,' Explains Lack of Charges
|
2007102019
|
The explanation by Donald Washington, the U.S. attorney for the Western District of Louisiana, came early in an emotionally charged hearing. It was the first congressional session to address year-long racial tension in the rural town that led to fistfights and other interracial confrontations, the prosecution of six black high school students in the beating of a white student and a large civil rights march on the defendants' behalf.
VIDEO | Democratic lawmakers said Tuesday the Jena Six case shows the government needs to do more to combat racism far beyond a small Louisiana town where charges filed after a school fight garnered national attention.
Washington, who is black, faced sharp questioning from black committee members about why he did not intervene as racial strife in the small town grew after the nooses, a historic symbol of racial lynching, were hung in a tree outside the high school, and why he did not engage the white prosecutor who charged the black juveniles as adults.
One student, Mychal Bell, was convicted of aggravated battery by an all-white jury and faced as much as 22 years in prison. A state appeals court dismissed the verdict, ruling that Bell should not have been tried in an adult court. Bell was released from prison after nine months but was recently re-incarcerated on a probation violation.
The white students who hung the nooses were suspended and forced to attend disciplinary courses. Jena High School's principal, who is white, sought to expel them, but was overruled by the school superintendent, who is also white and called the nooses a schoolboy prank.
Thousands of people marched in Jena last month to protest what they called the overzealous prosecution of the six black students, who originally were charged with attempted murder and conspiracy to commit murder.
Washington told the committee he could not stop the LaSalle Parish prosecutor, Reed Walters, from proceeding with the charges because the federal government's authority in the case is limited. "I want to assure this committee that the Department of Justice was engaged," he said.
Rep. Sheila Jackson-Lee (D-Tex.) criticized that response. "I want you to tell me why you, the first black [Western District of Louisiana] U.S. district attorney, did not do more, and I want to know what you're going to do to get Mychal Bell out of jail!"
"I did intervene," Washington said. "I will tell you that, just like you were offended [by the charges], I was offended."
Washington said for the first time publicly that the department is gathering evidence to determine whether there are racial disparities in Louisiana's judicial system and in its application of justice.
|
Under a barrage of questions from House Judiciary Committee members, a federal prosecutor said yesterday that the hanging of nooses at a high school in Jena, La., constituted a hate crime but that charges were not brought because the students allegedly responsible were juveniles.
| 10.833333 | 0.6875 | 0.9375 |
low
|
low
|
abstractive
|
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/10/16/AR2007101602460.html
|
https://web.archive.org/web/2007102019id_/http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/10/16/AR2007101602460.html
|
Cleveland Bursts to the Brink
|
2007102019
|
CLEVELAND, Oct. 16 -- For a few fleeting moments Tuesday night, there seemed to be two games going on at Jacobs Field. There was Game 4 of the American League Championship Series between 49 players representing the Cleveland Indians and Boston Red Sox. And there was the one going on inside Manny Ramirez's head.
In the former, the one that truly matters, the Indians exploded for a seven-run fifth inning to power to a 7-3 victory that put them one victory from a trip to the World Series. In the latter, only Ramirez, the Red Sox' famously goofy left fielder, knows the score. Because he doesn't speak to reporters, one can only assume his team won.
A towel-waving crowd of 44,008 at the stadium known as the Jake willed Paul Byrd, the Indians' crafty veteran pitcher, to an effective five-inning start. It exploded just as the Indians' offense did, turning home runs by Casey Blake and Jhonny Peralta into a seven-run inning. And it jeered and hissed at Ramirez -- once a beloved member of the Indians, now a hated enemy -- for a gross violation of baseball decorum following a sixth-inning homer.
And finally, the crowd roared as reliever Rafael Betancourt closed out the Indians' victory, giving them a three-games-to-one lead in the best-of-seven series and a chance to clinch the pennant at home Thursday night in Game 5 -- after an oddly timed off-day on Wednesday -- with ace C.C. Sabathia facing Red Sox counterpart Josh Beckett.
"We have a chance to close it out at home," reliever Jensen Lewis said. "You have to feel excited about that, more than anything. There are a lot of people in here who have never been to the World Series."
Even after the Indians broke open a scoreless game with seven runs off starter Tim Wakefield and reliever Manny Delcarmen -- the Indians' second seven-run inning in the series -- there would be serious work left to do, because in the top of the sixth, Kevin Youkilis, David Ortiz and Ramirez hit back-to-back-to-back solo home runs. The first two came against Byrd, while the last -- a majestic, 451-foot blast -- was off Lewis.
Incongruously, Ramirez thrust his arms in the air -- walk-off style -- and watched his homer sail over the wall before starting his run around the bases, throwing in a couple of finger-points toward the stands on his way around the bases, the glaring eyes of several Indians following him around.
"I didn't see it," Lewis said of Ramirez's reaction. "I was told what happened. I don't know -- it was Manny being Manny, I guess."
When Ramirez came up again in the eighth, with bloodthirsty fans perhaps craving a heater at his head, the Indians instead played it smart, and Betancourt retired him on an easy fly to left to end the inning.
"In a game like that, I don't care what another player does," Indians first baseman Victor Martinez said of Ramirez. "We don't pay attention to the other team."
It is one of the wonderful mysteries of baseball: Why a collection of expert hitters like the Red Sox' can pound some of the more purely talented pitchers in the game -- like John Lackey, Kelvim Escobar, Francisco Rodriguez, C.C. Sabathia and Fausto Carmona -- yet do virtually nothing these last two nights against Jake Westbrook and Byrd, more pedestrian throwers.
Byrd, the most accurate pitcher in the AL this season (1.31 walks per nine innings), scattered a few singles, but did not walk a batter and held the Red Sox scoreless until the home run binge in the sixth.
|
The Indians use a seven-run rampage in the fifth inning to beat the Red Sox, 7-3, for a 3-1 lead in the American League Championship Series.
| 21.257143 | 0.885714 | 2.428571 |
medium
|
medium
|
mixed
|
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/10/16/AR2007101601840.html
|
https://web.archive.org/web/2007102019id_/http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/10/16/AR2007101601840.html
|
Craig Says He Was Entrapped in Sex Sting
|
2007102019
|
"Were you prior?" Lauer asked.
"Not at all," Craig responded. "I go to bathrooms to use bathrooms."
Craig said it was a "tough call" when he decided not to tell his wife or children about the arrest.
"I didn't want to embarrass my wife, my kids, Idaho and my friends," Craig said. "I should have told my wife. I should have told my kids. And most importantly, I should have told counsel."
Suzanne Craig said that when her husband told her the story was about to break, "I felt like the floor was falling out from under me. And I felt almost like I was going down a drain for a few moments."
Craig, a three-term Republican, pleaded guilty to disorderly conduct in August after he was accused of soliciting sex in a bathroom at the Minneapolis-St. Paul International Airport in June.
After the matter became public, Craig tried to withdraw his plea. But a judge in Minnesota refused, saying Craig's plea "was accurate, voluntary and intelligent, and ... supported by the evidence." On Monday, Craig appealed that ruling to the Minnesota Court of Appeals.
"I hoped it would go away," Craig said of his decision to plead guilty. "I wanted to avoid a media storm."
Craig, 62, says he is not gay, and in the NBC interview, he and his wife said their marriage was based on love. Asked by Lauer whether theirs was a marriage of convenience to cover "a gay lifestyle," Suzanne Craig responded, "I would never do that. ... That's almost like selling your soul for something."
Suzanne Craig says she believes her husband is not gay. "I honestly believe my husband has always been faithful to me in every way," she said.
"I love this woman very, very much," Craig said in the interview, taped at the couple's home in suburban Eagle, Idaho. "And the day I found her I fell in love, deeply in love. And that's lasted _ we're heading toward our 25th anniversary."
Craig also discussed his relationship with Republican presidential candidate Mitt Romney. Craig was Senate liaison for Romney's campaign, a post he abandoned when the scandal became known. Romney called Craig's conduct "disappointing and disgraceful" and immediately dropped Craig when the guilty plea was revealed.
"I was very proud of my association with Mitt Romney," Craig said. "And he not only threw me under his campaign bus, he backed up and ran over me again."
Craig, who had initially said he planned to resign, reiterated that he will not leave his Senate seat until his term expires in January 2009. He has said he will not seek re-election.
Craig said he will continue to pursue his legal options.
|
WASHINGTON -- Idaho Sen. Larry Craig said he was entrapped in a sex sting at an airport men's room and was not aware of the bathroom's reputation as a spot to cruise for gay sex. "Well, I certainly am now," Craig told NBC's Matt Lauer in an interview aired Tuesday night.
| 9.616667 | 0.616667 | 0.916667 |
low
|
low
|
abstractive
|
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/10/16/AR2007101600860.html
|
https://web.archive.org/web/2007102019id_/http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/10/16/AR2007101600860.html
|
Anne Enright Wins Booker Prize
|
2007102019
|
LONDON -- Irish writer Anne Enright won the Man Booker fiction prize Tuesday for "The Gathering," an uncompromising portrait of a troubled family.
She is the second Irish writer to win the prize in the past three years, after John Banville's "The Sea" in 2005.
Enright had been considered a long-shot to take Britain's most prestigious, and contentious, literary trophy. The award, which carries a prize of $100,000, was bestowed during a ceremony at London's medieval Guildhall.
"The Gathering" is a family epic set in England and Ireland, in which a brother's suicide prompts 39-year-old Veronica Hegarty to probe her family's troubled, tangled history. The judges praised it as "a very accomplished and dramatic novel of family relationships and personal breakdown."
Enright said people looking for a cheery read should not pick up her book. "It is the intellectual equivalent of a Hollywood weepy," she said.
Howard Davies, the chairman of the judging panel, acknowledged the book was "a little bleak" in places, but praised it as "a very readable novel."
"Anne Enright has written a powerful, uncomfortable and, at times, angry book. 'The Gathering' is an unflinching look at a grieving family in tough and striking language," he said.
Enright said the book's focus on family was a classically Irish theme.
"I think family is a hugely interesting place, it's a place where stories happen. ... And it's also a central Irish institution," said Enright, who acknowledged feeling a bit "trembly" when she heard she had won.
Jonathan Ruppin of British bookstore Foyles called the judges' choice "a welcome boost for serious literature."
"Not everyone will be comfortable with this bleak account of conflict and despair, but the writing is undeniably exquisite," he said.
Dublin-born Enright, 45, has published three previous novels, two short-story collections and the nonfiction book "Making Babies: Stumbling Into Motherhood."
Her victory was another surprise from an award renowned for unpredictable results. Bookmakers had made Enright the rank outsider to win, with bookies William Hill giving her 20-1 odds.
Betting on literary prizes _ as well as on television reality shows, election results and potential royal weddings _ is a long-standing tradition in Britain. "Mister Pip" by New Zealand's Lloyd Jones and British novelist Ian McEwan's "On Chesil Beach" had been strongly favored.
But the Booker judges have a history of defying the odds when awarding the prize, which usually brings a huge sales boost for the winner. The favorite has not won since 2002, when Yann Martel's "Life of Pi" took the prize.
Another popular choice that lost out was Mohsin Hamid's "The Reluctant Fundamentalist," the story of a middle-class Pakistani in New York whose relationship with his adopted home changes radically after the Sept. 11, 2001, attacks.
The other nominees were English writer Nicola Barker's "Darkmans," a sprawling supernatural saga set in the town of Ashford in southern England, hailed by the panel as "an ambitious and energetic contemporary ghost story"; "and "Animal's People," a novel about the Bhopal chemical disaster by India's Indra Sinha.
The prize, which is open to writers from Britain, Ireland and the Commonwealth of former British colonies, was founded in 1969 and was long known as the Booker Prize. It was renamed when the financial services conglomerate Man Group PLC began sponsoring it five years ago.
|
LONDON -- Irish writer Anne Enright won the Man Booker fiction prize Tuesday for "The Gathering," an uncompromising portrait of a troubled family.
| 26.111111 | 1 | 27 |
medium
|
high
|
extractive
|
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/10/16/AR2007101602040.html
|
https://web.archive.org/web/2007102019id_/http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/10/16/AR2007101602040.html
|
NTSB Cites Lax Safety Controls, Pilot Error in Ariz. Drone Crash
|
2007102019
|
Sophisticated computer systems on a 10,000-pound unmanned drone were no match for its pilot's failure to follow a checklist when confronted with a computer glitch.
The mistake set off a chain of events that led the $6.5 million Predator-B to smash into the Arizona desert near Nogales, Ariz., the National Transportation Safety Board concluded yesterday. The NTSB also cited poor oversight by Customs and Border Protection officials as a factor in the April 2006 crash.
It was the first accident involving an unmanned vehicle that the NTSB investigated, and board members said they hoped their findings would prod government officials and the industry to regulate the growing use of drones in civil airspace.
"This is historic," said Mark V. Rosenker, NTSB chairman. "We want to get it early before we, in fact, have a critical mass of these devices flying in the nation's airspace. We are just learning how to regulate them."
He called the safety and oversight lapses in the crash "disturbing."
The crash occurred when the Predator-B was flying along the Mexican border, with its sophisticated cameras and electronics equipment scanning for illegal immigrants. The drone was built and operated by General Atomics under a contract with the federal government.
The pilot, an employee of General Atomics, was flying the drone Libby Airfield in Sierra Vista, Ariz., about 60 miles away, when the problems started about 3:30 a.m., NTSB investigators said.
The pilot's computer console locked up, investigators said. He started to transfer control to a backup console used by Customs agents to operate the drone's cameras but did not follow a checklist that required him to make sure the engine controls on the second console matched the ones he had been using.
Because the second console's controls were in the fuel shut-off position, investigators said, the Predator-B's engine quit when control was switched.
The pilot, who did not understand why his plane kept descending, turned off ground communication with the drone to trigger its automatic emergency responses, according to investigators. Under such conditions, the plane should have climbed to 15,000 feet and circled above a designated spot until communication was reestablished. But without engine power, the plane crashed.
The pilot told investigators that he didn't follow the checklist because he was in a hurry, said Pam Sullivan, an NTSB investigator.
Under Customs guidelines, the pilot did not have enough hours on the Predator-B to fly the plane without an instructor in the room, and the instructor was in another building, Sullivan said.
Board members found that Customs officials did not do a proper job of overseeing operations of the drone by General Atomics. They also found that General Atomics and Customs did not do enough to investigate past computer lockups.
Customs officials did not reply to e-mails and phone messages seeking comment. General Atomics also did not respond to inquiries.
The Federal Aviation Administration grants government agencies and companies the right to operate drones on a case-by-case basis. Through last month, the FAA had granted 55 such certificates this year and had a backlog of 35.
Steven R. Chealander, a board member and former Air Force pilot, said that regulators and operators need to ensure that proper procedures are followed in drone operations because pilots may not realize the consequences of their actions if they are not in a cockpit. "You have to change the mind-set from someone operating a computer Game Boy to being the pilot of an aircraft," Chealander said.
|
Sophisticated computer systems on a 10,000-pound unmanned drone were no match for its pilot's failure to follow a checklist when confronted with a computer glitch.
| 25.259259 | 1 | 27 |
medium
|
high
|
extractive
|
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/10/16/AR2007101602078.html
|
https://web.archive.org/web/2007102019id_/http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/10/16/AR2007101602078.html
|
After Guantanamo, An Empty Freedom
|
2007102019
|
TIRANA, Albania -- For 16 months, they have shared a clutch of tidy rooms in a small refugee camp in this city, living alongside a few dozen others whose lives were unraveled by war or persecution or both.
But apart from their new home, the five men from the Uighur ethnic group of western China, whose most recent address was the U.S. detention facility at Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, have little in common with the camp's other residents, most of whom come from one of Albania's neighbors and blend easily into the crowd on Tirana's busy streets.
The Uighurs, all Muslims, said in recent interviews that for a while they embraced their new life in Albania. A majority-Muslim country, it was the only one willing to accept them when U.S. officials ruled that, after three years of incarceration, they posed no security risk.
But the desire to start new lives here has been thwarted by what they described as a string of broken promises. They say they are unable to work or reunite with family members, whom they haven't seen since before they were seized in 2001.
"We have requested an independent life here, to bring our families here, to be trained and have some work to do, to live in our own apartments," said Abu Qadder Basim, who at 38 is the oldest of the five. "Obviously you can't compare this life to Guantanamo, which is a prison."
He spoke in his spartan room, adorned only with a wall calendar, a few worn Korans, a small fan and a paperback copy of "Albanian for Foreigners."
"But even after we were released and they said we did nothing wrong," he said, "we have no hope for the future."
The five men all deny involvement with the Taliban, the extremist group that ruled most of Afghanistan and sheltered al-Qaeda before the attacks of Sept. 11, 2001. They variously say they went to Afghanistan to escape Chinese oppression or in hopes of going on to third countries where they could improve their livelihoods. China regards them as terrorists involved in a fight against Chinese authority at home.
According to Jason Pinney, an attorney for some of the men, they were scooped up by bounty hunters in Pakistan in the days after the Sept. 11 attacks, then sold to U.S. forces for $5,000 a head. Later they were sent to Guantanamo Bay.
The five were initially classified as "enemy combatants," but after being evaluated by a military body called a Combatant Status Review Tribunal, that status was revoked, making them eligible for release. As with more than 100 other inmates, that was contingent on a suitable country being found to receive them.
Because their native China considers them outlaws and has a spotty human rights record, U.S. officials began shopping around.
Unaware this was going on, the Uighurs' attorneys filed a habeas corpus petition in U.S. federal court, which could have brought their release. But on the Friday before the Monday on which an appeal was to be heard, the lawyers got a message from the court. The proceedings were deemed moot because the men had been transferred. To Albania.
|
TIRANA, Albania -- For 16 months, they have shared a clutch of tidy rooms in a small refugee camp in this city, living alongside a few dozen others whose lives were unraveled by war or persecution or both.
| 14.761905 | 1 | 42 |
low
|
high
|
extractive
|
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/10/16/AR2007101602462.html
|
https://web.archive.org/web/2007102019id_/http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/10/16/AR2007101602462.html
|
Primary-Time TV With Colbert the Candidate
|
2007102019
|
It has become something of a television cliche: politicians launching their electoral campaigns on late-night talk shows, in a calculated attempt at hipness.
But a late-night comic announcing his presidential candidacy on a late-night talk show--now that is a hall-of-mirrors maneuver worthy of Stephen Colbert. The man known to viewers for his portrayal of a fulminating right-wing blowhard said on Comedy Central last night that he will be a favorite-son candidate in his native South Carolina.
Asked in a world-exclusive interview if he plans to give up his show, Colbert said: "Do you think I'm a fool? Now that I'm a candidate, you people are going to be gunning for me, like you do for everybody." Not only will the program enable him to bite back at the press, he pointed out, but "you know what it pays to be a presidential candidate? Not well."
As for the inconvenient truth that he hasn't lived in the Palmetto State for years, the host of "The Colbert Report" went negative, daring the other candidates to match his appeal back home: "John Edwards left South Carolina when he was 1 year old. He had his chance. Saying his parents moved him -- that's the easy answer."
Colbert's chances may be less than slim, but in today's infotainment culture, he could draw precious media attention from the second-tier contenders. And he has a nightly platform to milk the spectacle for jokes, if not votes.
Colbert told Jon Stewart on "The Daily Show" that he planned to announce soon on a more prestigious program -- and minutes later, on his own 11:30 p.m. show, said he was taking the plunge, triggering a big balloon drop.
Colbert told The Washington Post that he would file papers to run in both parties' primaries.
Fred Thompson's "Law & Order" reruns were yanked by NBC after he announced his White House bid on Jay Leno's couch because of concerns about equal-time rules. But those restrictions apparently do not apply to cable television.
Colbert is, in real life, a Democrat. And while he plays a Bill O'Reilly-style bloviator on the air, Colbert has a devoted following on the left. When he performed at the White House Correspondents Dinner last year, he skewered President Bush in the guise of praising him, saying the administration was "rearranging the deck chairs on the Hindenburg" and that while the reality was that Bush had a 32 percent approval rating, "reality has a well-known bias."
In his role as bombastic buffoon, Colbert sticks it to the press just as often, saying what matters is not some boring adherence to the facts but a matter's essential "truthiness."
It would be just like an annoying reporter to point out that Colbert happens to be pushing a new book called "I Am America (And So Can You!)." He solemnly insists he isn't trying to boost book sales, "though I certainly wouldn't refuse the money if it came my way."
What, exactly, is Colbert's platform? He's ticked that Georgia is known as the Peach State even though, he contends, South Carolina grows more peaches. He's worried about Chinese shrimp imports hurting his home-state fishermen. And, he adds out of nowhere, "we shouldn't fall prey to the homosexual agenda."
He seems to have an unorthodox fundraising strategy in mind: "I'd really like to get some corporate sponsorship. Some sort of salty snack."
The first television comic to run for president was Pat Paulsen in 1968, but the opportunities for self-promotion are infinitely greater in the blogging age.
Colbert was a smirking correspondent for Stewart's fake-news broadcast until the fall of 2005, when Comedy Central gave him an eight-week tryout for the spinoff show. The program -- built around a host whom Colbert (that is, the off-screen Colbert) describes as "a well-intentioned, poorly informed, high-status idiot" -- was an instant hit.
He has been raising his media profile, taking over Maureen Dowd's New York Times column on Sunday to tease his possible candidacy and needle potential rivals. In the interview, though, he was quick to lower expectations: "It will be a success for me if at the Republican or Democratic convention, someone stands up and says, 'The great state of South Carolina, home of the finest peaches, home of the finest shrimp, casts one delegate for Stephen Colbert.' "
One delegate? Isn't that a pretty low bar? And what if his anticipated groundswell fails to materialize?
In that case, says Colbert, he would have to consider "the nuclear option" -- dropping out.
|
It has become something of a television cliche: politicians launching their electoral campaigns on late-night talk shows, in a calculated attempt at hipness.
| 34 | 1 | 28 |
medium
|
high
|
extractive
|
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/discussion/2007/10/16/DI2007101601709.html
|
https://web.archive.org/web/2007102019id_/http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/discussion/2007/10/16/DI2007101601709.html
|
The Meerkats
|
2007102019
|
"Meerkat Manor" airs on Fridays at 8:30 p.m. ET on Animal Planet.
Mick Kaczorowski: I'm glad to be here today and look forward to answering all your questions about "Meerkat Manor" and the new season.
Eagle, Idaho: Mick, how many days does it take to shoot a single episode and how many hours of tape will the photographers shoot before it's edited into the final product?
Mick Kaczorowski: Good question. Because we actually have no idea what's taking place out in the Kalahari on a day to day basis, there's not a single answer I can give. Sometimes we get an episode in a matter of a couple weeks; sometimes a story doesn't appear because nothing really happens for days on end. But in the end we really shoot four weeks of footage before we send it back to begin editing.
Alexandria, Va.: How long have you been following or gathering information on the Whiskers family?
Mick Kaczorowski: The Whiskers are part of a 13-year study that was originally started by Cambridge University and they are the longest studied mammal on the planet. So we've only been filming them for the last three years but the study has been going on over 13 years.
Dupont Circle, Washington, D.C.: I was skeptical at first but man the show is great! My question is: what is the disparity between time of filming and airing on television? Or did Flower die like, two years ago and we're only just finding out now?
Mick Kaczorowski: We begin filming in the springtime in the Kalahari and we wrap filming for a season around April. So about seven to eight months of filming take place. Flower actually died in January 2007 so she actually died in the season that you're seeing.
Vero Beach, Fla.: How many total seasons are being planned and will the filming extend past just the Whiskers and nearby mobs to some of the other study mobs?
Mick Kaczorowski: We've already started filming season four in the Kalahari and, because this research area is so large, we have to focus on only one or two groups that interact with the Whiskers. So for now, most likely it will be the one or two groups that interact with the Whiskers.
NW D.C.: How do the photographers/researchers tell the Meerkats apart? I always take the word of the narrator to know who I'm looking at, but sometimes I wonder if, with nearly 30 of them in the Whiskers at one point, they got confused as well.
I love the show, and often use it to procrastinate from studying. Keep up the good work.
Mick Kaczorowski: Thanks. The researchers put a little marking of hair dye on the meerkats, strategically placed so they can recognize them. Obviously, as the meerkats get older they're much more recognizable to the researchers and the cameramen.
Huron, S.D.: Our family loves your show! My question is: After being so closely associated with the Whiskers for much time, does your crew find it hard to not become involved in the group dynamic or to maybe have prevented the death of Flower?
Mick Kaczorowski: Because we're part of a research study, although the natural instinct of any human being like the cameraman would want to intercede, but these are completely wild animals and it's our obligation to let nature take its course, so the scientists can learn the most information from their daily lives.
Atlanta, Ga.: My wife and I love Meerkat Manor! We have noticed that this season has gotten especially dark -- and the advertising for the show seems to play this up. Is there a deliberate attempt to insert more drama into the series, and focus more on deaths and tragedies -- or is this really a particularly tough year for the meerkats?
Mick Kaczorowski: The short answswer is yes, it's a particularly tough years for the meerkats. When you think of the lifespan of meerkats being between six and seven years in the Kalahari, much longer in a zoo they can live to 10 or 11, you're seeing what goes on, really, after three years of following the meerkats that we're focusing on. So you're seeing what's happening naturally in the wild and our cameras are just capturing it.
Laurel, Md.: When is the movie about Flower coming out and what will it show? Will it comprise of clips of her up until her death?
Mick Kaczorowski: The movie about the life of Flower is coming out next year. Everything in the movie is original -- originally shot. It is the prequel to the series, "Meerkat Manor," and it will tell the story of Flower from her birth to how she rose to be queen of the Kalahari.
NW, D.C.: My boyfriend was CRUSHED when Flower died protecting her family. Why do you think everyone took such a liking to her?
Mick Kaczorowski: Because she was a strong leader and a caring mother.
Washington, D.C.: I see that the Zappa Family is the new Commando Gang. But what happened to the Commandos?
Mick Kaczorowski: The Commandos just didn't interact this season as much with the Whiskers. We have no control, really, when they decide to interact so it's sort of just what happened this season basically.
Mick Kaczorowski: It doesn't mean that we won't see more of the Commandos.
Harrisburg, Pa.: What is the greatest surprise you learning from your filming? Thank you for your work and letting us learn about these fascinating animals.
Mick Kaczorowski: I would say how much personality they exhibit that reminds us of our own family relationships. Because they live in groups and their leader is a dominant female it's wonderful to see how people relate to them, that's very different from other animals that we make movies about at Animal Planet.
Richmond, Va.: Love the show--it's very addictive! Who names the meerkats? Are there guidelines that they follow? There seem to be many herbal and floral names (Rose, Basil), as well as historical figures (Mozart, Shakespeare).
Mick Kaczorowski: The researchers in the field have to keep track of hundreds of meerkats with all the 15 different groups that they're studying. So instead of giving them numbers they just come up with names and so the names, when they start, they'll call them spices, for example, such as Salt, Pepper, Paprika, etc., but we can't make a whole show with meerkats named after spices or condiments. So we pick some of the characters' names that feel appropriate but we also have to make sure that you can follow the storyline so we have to bring in other names that we add to the families.
This year we've changed some names to honor some people, like Flower's last pup we named after Elizabeth Taylor; we've named a meerkat after Denis Leary who's a big fan of the show and coming up on Friday's episode one of the early fans of "Meerkat Manor" was Whoopi Goldberg and we've named a meerkat after her.
I have a pet guinea pig who seems to react and 'talk' to the meerkats when she sees them. I wonder if you have heard of any other animals,such as cats, who are as fascinated by these critters as we all are.
Mick Kaczorowski: No, I haven't heard of anything. You're the first one.
Mick Kaczorowski: But if you want to go and communicate with other Meerkat Manor fans and ask that question, you can go to one of the chat boards on animalplanet.com where there's always a discussion about the episodes.
Starkville, Miss.: What are the collars that the meerkats wear during the show. Are they used for identification.
Mick Kaczorowski: The collar is put around the dominant female of each group and they are radio collars and they help the researcher track the movements of the different meerkat groups.
Silver Spring, Md.: Did you ever learn more on what happened to Shakespeare?
Vero Beach, Fla.: Did you at Animal Planet have any idea how popular and big Meerkat Manor was going to be?
Mick Kaczorowski: I think there's always a hope that we'll make a program that connects with our audience but I think we are truly surprised by the positive reaction and we're really excited to be making something that's not only popular but educational as well.
Olney, Md.: How large can a meerkat family grow before it really needs to split apart?
Mick Kaczorowski: Between 40 and 50.
U St., D.C.: I really love this show - thank you for doing something so different and exciting. Much better than the semi-standard "this is what animals are like..." kind of shows.
My question relates to how the meerkats and humans interact. How aware of the presence of the cameramen are the animals? Are they skeptical? Curious? Scared? And how does the film crew get close enough to tag/dye them, without really interrupting the way these animals naturally act?
Mick Kaczorowski: The animals are completely habituated to the cameras and the researchers and that's what allows us to get so close to them to film them. But it's all part of the research study and the meerkats, although they see us, basically are only followed by the camera people but in order to film them and get close to them we still have to move slowly so they're not frightened by us with our equipment. But because they've been studied by human beings for so long, seeing cameramen and people around their burrows is very natural to them.
Washington, D.C.: How does the show support the scientific research on Meerkats? Does the show give money directly to the project or give research grants? How much input do the researchers have into the information presented in the show?
Mick Kaczorowski: The science in the series and the scripts and the stories are completely vetted by the scientific team in the Kalahari and professor Tim Clutton-Brock, who is the head of the research study.
Baltimore, Md.: Great show! How did Sean Astin come to narrate the series?
Mick Kaczorowski: We were looking for someone young, talented and could bring a new voice to the "Meerkat Manor" and I think Sean was a great addition to the series.
Silver Spring, Md.: In a recent episode, when it was talking about Zaphod leaving the group to start his own group, it mentioned that eventually Mitch may have to do that same. At what age, do male meerkats normally leave their group? Does that always occur or do some males stay with their family group for their whole lives?
Mick Kaczorowski: Yes, Mitch will eventually have to leave the group to find a partner to try and start his own family. It depends what age -- it's roughly a couple of years -- and Mitch will have to leave because all the Whisker females are his sisters and Zaphod has to leave because the Whisker females are his daughters.
Olney, Md.: How many cameras do your researchers have access to at any given time?
Mick Kaczorowski: It's between one and two cameras but most of the time it's one camera just beause you can't have more than one cameraman and one sound person interacting with a group of meerkats. The researchers allow only certain amount of people to get close to the meerkats.
SW D.C.: First off, I want to say that our family is a big fan of the series. My eight year old daughter particularly loves the show and watches it whenever she can.
Now for my question - are there are any books or other programs that you would recommend for a 3rd grader who is interested in learning more about these wonderful creatures.
Thank you and keep up the great work.
Mick Kaczorowski: Go to our Web site: animalplanet.com for some suggestions.
Crystal City, Va.: How can someone who loves animals, particularly meerkats, get into your line of work? As in research, and film, etc?
Mick Kaczorowski: First, it's imporant to go to school and take classes in filmmaking or media so you can understand about the process that we go through in making a television program or a movie. Secondly, if you're interested in making natural history programs or becoming a researcher, a lot of the researchers who study the meerkats in the Kalahari are volunteers that come from all over the world. So it's just good to go to a Web site and find something you're really interested in and volunteer, and that will get your foot in the door.
Silver Spring, Md.: How many of the burrows have cameras in them?
Mick Kaczorowski: We move the cameras around the burrows when we decide we think something like a birth or an attack is going to happen.
Mick Kaczorowski: I want to thank everbody for the wonderful questions and I'm sorry I didn't get the opportunity to answer more of them. Thank you for supporting "Meerkat Manor" and I hope you enjoy the rest of the season. Thanks very much.
Editor's Note: washingtonpost.com moderators retain editorial control over Discussions and choose the most relevant questions for guests and hosts; guests and hosts can decline to answer questions. washingtonpost.com is not responsible for any content posted by third parties.
|
Join live discussions from the Washington Post. Feature topics include national, world and DC area news, politics, elections, campaigns, government policy, tech regulation, travel, entertainment, cars, and real estate.
| 63.853659 | 0.512195 | 0.560976 |
high
|
low
|
abstractive
|
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/discussion/2007/10/02/DI2007100202229.html
|
https://web.archive.org/web/2007102019id_/http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/discussion/2007/10/02/DI2007100202229.html
|
PBS Frontline: 'Cheney's Law'
|
2007102019
|
Kirk has produced more than two hundred national television programs. A former Nieman Fellow in Journalism at Harvard University, Kirk was the senior producer of Frontline from the series' inception in 1983 until the fall of 1987. His most recent Frontline productions include "Endgame," "The Lost Year in Iraq," "Rumsfeld's War," "The Torture Question," and "The Dark Side," which give an in-depth assessment of the war on terror and the state of the nation's military establishment, and "The War Behind Closed Doors," an analysis of the political infighting that led to the war with Iraq.
Michael Kirk: Hello everyone. ... I'm on board, there are lots of questions waiting and I'll get to them as fast as I can...
Los Angeles: A very interesting show sir, but a bit rushed. There's so much ground to cover that many aspects that ended up as passing details deserve "Frontline" shows of their own -- David Addington for example. I do hope you'll return to Cheney, specifically as regards Halliburton, his bizarre family and his service to Bush I.
Michael Kirk: I agree. Every time we think we've finished telling these stories (this is our tenth documentary since Sept. 11) we find more to let you all know about. I'm sure we're not finished quite yet.
Washington: I liked your program, although I think it's possible that Mr. Goldsmith is not exactly the white knight as portrayed and that Mr. Yoo is perhaps not Darth Vader, as he does work at Berkeley -- but no matter, I think your documentary showed that anytime you find a lawyer who agrees with you all the time, that's not a good lawyer by definition. Now if you could only figure out why Dick Cheney's limo has tinted windows you can see through? Seems to defeat the purpose.
Michael Kirk: If I've learned one thing it is that nothing is as simple as it seems.
Mt. Lebanon, Pa.: Thanks for the "Frontline" piece. What did Addington do before he discovered "public service"? Like Addington, how many other top White House officials declined to be interviewed? Can you tell us who they are and what they do? Is this Trappist -- busy hands, quiet mouths -- aspect to government employment just a recent Bush administration requirement or do you expect this is a trend that will carry over to his successor's regime? Even though Addington wouldn't come forward and discuss his work, do you have any idea what he intends to do once he leaves the service of Cheney? Thanks much.
Michael Kirk: Michael Kirk: I sincerely wish Addington, the vice president and many other members of the administration would talk to us. We have spent years accumulating serious, in-depth questions for them and obviously we believe the American people would be well served if they agreed to talk to us. I'm not sure what David Addington intends to do after his service in the Bush administration.
Anonymous: Does the expansion of powers of the executive branch appeal to politicians on both sides of the aisle? I haven't heard this issue brought up by any of the Democrats running for president.
Michael Kirk: Asking the Democratic candidates what their position is about this matter is an important question. Asking them which of the powers the current president is exercising they would keep is even one step better. And today, Congress could ask the new attorney general designee the same kind of questions. Will they?
Daytona Beach, Fla.: Because enough information was available to discount the tubes, the yellow-cake and the mobile chemical labs before the war, and in February Powell had said that Saddam did not have WMDs, and the inspectors said he did not have WMDs, how much responsibility rests on the media's shoulders for dropping the ball on the Watergate of their era?
Michael Kirk: Between the Office of the Vice President, the Office of Special Plans, the Central Intelligence Agency, a host of office holders and the media -- there's plenty of blame to go around
Columbia, S.C.: I respect Cheney for working within the system to advocate and get what he wants, but where do you feel the line is drawn -- or is it? Is that his aim? Where does the greater benefit to the people of the country come into the equation, and not just what the executive branch desires?
Michael Kirk: These are all good questions. Presumably it's what we have the courts and congress for...
Washington: Why do you think John Yoo still advocates his position on plenary power of the president when others have backtracked? Does he truly believe in his legal arguments (specious at best) or is he simply too stubborn and proud to concede?
Michael Kirk: John Yoo has told "Frontline" he stands firmly by his positions.
Dorchester, Mass.: I watched your program last night. It was interesting but held nothing new for readers of newspapers and news magazines. Why was the topic chosen? I always expect new ground and exceptional reporting from "Frontline." While I cannot fault the reporting I surely missed the new ground. It was good, though, to see Charlie Savage -- Pulitzer Prize winner of the Boston Globe -- in the show discussing the effect of "signing statements." What is the next topic for "Frontline"?
Michael Kirk: My sense is that people value an in-depth examination of a topic that "connects-the-dots". Newspapers "break" news and print magazines often go into some depth, but television rarely does. Every time we do the audience responds quite positively because we offer context.
Alexandria, Va.: While the President clearly is a strong believer in the executive approach to the "war on terror," is there any evidence that he or his staff actually have initiated any of these approaches, or is it clearly all the work of the Vice President and his people?
Michael Kirk: Many in Washington spend a great deal of time trying to figure out the power equation between the President and Dick Cheney. Clearly there is a division of labor but my sense is that George W. Bush is still the president.
Boodletown, Md.: Great show last night. I think some people might say there wasn't much in it that was "new," but I think that's beside the point. Most of the info has dripped out piecemeal over time; the great thing about a documentary like yours is that it summarizes and encapsulates events and shows the "landscape" and pattern. My question is, do you think there was anything in what Cheney and his gang did that was outright illegal and therefore "actionable" and prosecutable under law? (There's no doubt in my mind he ought to be strung up by the heels, but proving a case in a court of law or the court of public opinion is a different matter.)
Michael Kirk: I am not aware of any credible allegations of illegal behavior by the vice president or his staff.
Seattle: Is it fair to assume that, should control of the White House shift to the Democrats, the powers put in place by this administration would not be rescinded?
Michael Kirk: Historically (take a look back at FDR and Harry Truman) interest in expanded executive power is not the exclusive realm of one party.
Menomonie, Wis.: It's surprising and reassuring to know that there are decent Republican lawyers who opposed Cheney's power grab. I'm especially impressed with Ashcroft, Goldsmith and Comey. On the other hand, Cheney's legal hit squad of Addington and Yoo is positively frightening. These guys are intellectual thugs who represent a true threat to democracy. Is their power waning, and is there any way to excise them from the body politic?
Michael Kirk: There is a very real political struggle underway between some in Congress and the White House over these matters, but as we mentioned in our program last night the administration continues to prevail.
Minneapolis: Thanks for taking questions. My wife had an interesting question: She caught the last few minutes of "Cheney's Law" and asked me "is 'Frontline' always so liberal?" I tried to explain that while the tone might appear anti-Republican, it's a pretty factual telling of reality, not a partisan hack job on the administration. What are your thoughts?
Michael Kirk: The people who were taking the hardest positions on our broadcast last night were hardly liberal -- John Ashcroft, James Comey, Jack Goldsmith, Brad Berenson, FBI Director Mueller. We were reporting the details of an intense behind-closed-doors struggle inside the Republican administration of George W. Bush.
Riverdale, N.Y.: What should Congress do under the next president -- as they obviously lack the guts to confront this one -- to roll back the damage done to their power and to individual rights?
Michael Kirk: My sense is that the struggle with Congress will continue. There is a bit of an ebb and flow quality to this issue, but that said...many people we talked to told us the inroads made by the vice president and his lawyer David Addington will be the last legacy of this administration.
Alexandria, Va.: Once again "Frontline" hits the mark. I can't help but think that the Senate Judiciary Committee was glued to its collective screen last night. My only question is, who does the voiceovers for the "Frontline" series?
Michael Kirk: Will Lyman has been the voice of "Frontline" for 26 years.
Washington: Thank you, Mr. Kirk, for another interesting installment in a series that seriously has eroded any confidence I still may have had in our federal government. What do you think about the revelation from the Nacchio (Qwest) case in California that the Bush administration had approached the telecoms before Sept. 11? It certainly seems that these efforts to circumvent the law started almost the minute Cheney and Addington could get them moving.
Michael Kirk: I read that story (in The Washington Post). It bears close examination and raises important questions. I have a feeling we haven't heard the last of this matter.
washingtonpost.com: Verizon Says It Turned Over Data Without Court Orders (Post, Oct. 16)
Austin, Texas: Thank you, Mr. Kirk, for your work and the special that aired last night. Did any of the people you interviewed for this piece think that the legal contortions used for the warrantless surveillance program, or anything else for that matter, rise to the level of "high crimes and misdemeanors"?
Michael Kirk: I didn't go there with people I interviewed. We were really trying to pull together what has happened and to place it in a context that established a new way of looking at events that we have all heard bits and pieces about. I'm never really comfortably talking prospectively about these matters. I'll leave that to pundits, lawyers and academics.
Boston: You said in this session that there is no evidence that Cheney has done anything illegal. Your program made quite clear that he and the president disregard valid laws that they dislike. Is this not illegal? And if it is illegal, does it constitute grounds for impeachment?
Michael Kirk: I didn't say they haven't done anything illegal -- I said I had not heard of any credible allegations that they had. That doesn't mean that someone somewhere right now isn't assembling a case.
Crestwood, N.Y.: Mr. Kirk, do you think Cheney and the other architects of this radical expansion of executive power are readers of history? Do they see the conventional American belief that we live in a Republic as "quaint," with our traditional balance of powers being as outdated as the quill pen? Is most of this power grab permanent, no matter who gets elected in 2008? Could you just imagine a Sen. Richard Russell or Sam Rayburn sitting still while a president took away all their powers? What's wrong with these people?
Michael Kirk: People I have talked to about this matter say the vice president and David Addington read a great deal of history. By all accounts the lessons they draw from past events may be different from yours. As to Rayburn and Russell, who knows what would have happened if they had come up against the formidable skills of Dick Cheney and David Addington. I would like a front row seat for that one...
Jamestown, N.D.: How are presidential signing statements (similar to the one profiled on "Frontline") different from a line-item veto (which I understand to be unconstitutional)? And is the president's signature valid apart from the signing statement, or is the statement considered part of the signature? In other words, can the signing statement be negated without reconsidering the bill? Thank you for an excellent program.
Michael Kirk: Charlie Savage of the Boston Globe has written extensively about this subject. I bet he knows the answer.
Re: Your answer to Columbia, S.C.: With all due respect, Cheney has advocated for, and received, much power towards eliminating the authority of the courts and Congress. I for one do not feel that there are many checks and balances left in the system. It is hard to see anyone standing up to Cheney to define where the line might have been crossed. He has achieved the perfect storm of a compliant OLC, a conservative Supreme Court and a spineless Congress.
Michael Kirk: Take this up with your Sen. Graham -- he's taken on the Office of the Vice President over these matters. He's also complained about Congress's lack of spine.
Washington: The key really does seem to be, what was the change that was made to accommodate Ashcroft? The program indicated that that could not be divulged.
Michael Kirk: Whatever President Bush did to make the program acceptable to the Justice Department is a secret. As far as I know only a handful of people know what the change was.
Westcliffe, Colo.: You had Suskind on the show but not the Treasury Secretary O'Neill? Why not. The gentleman from Alcoa must have known a lot about working with his pal, Dick Cheney.
Michael Kirk: Ron Suskind, as an author, has a much broader view of these matters than the former Treasury Secretary.
Orlando, Fla.: You have served your country well. What will be your next investigation, and do you think the money is a good thing to investigate -- like "deep throat" said?
Michael Kirk: The oldest adage -- "follow the money" is always useful. I'm starting a new film now ... I can't say what it is ... but I'm hopeful you all will find it useful as you make decisions about who our next president should be.
Brooklyn, N.Y.: Its curious to me why other presidents haven't flexed the muscle of there office in this way; or have they? Or is it just that this administration has proven so adroit at confounding the Congress and usurping more power? In the end, the tactic really hasn't worked out for this administration as Goldsmith wrote in a New York Times magazine piece -- but it seems to me it can't be that other presidents haven't tried because they were perceptive enough to predict a backlash. I'd like to leave the blundering Nixon administration out of this as an easy example of another administration. Please name another. Thanks much. I'm a big fan.
Michael Kirk: Well, you can't really leave the Nixon Administration out of it. But if we must...there are examples in every administration of an effort to flex this muscle...and sometimes the president has been successful (Truman, FDR), but not in the directed, and long-lasting way that seems to be the intent and result of Dick Cheney and David Addington. Most of the knowledgeable observers we talked with say this administration has been much more successful (and directed) than any other. I think ... of course ... that Sept. 11 had/has an awful lot to do with their success.
San Antonio: Based on your report one assumes that as the 2006 elections unfolded so did hearings targeting those that left Justice Department at the end of the first term of the presidency. Those people portrayed part of the story presented. In a way one view of the report is that a few within the administration have hijacked the government and taken action as if they own the truth, making all of us and the rest of all the government irrelevant. Why have the check and balances failed, and why is "Frontline" the only organization providing this view (apparently)?
Michael Kirk: It remains to be seen if the checks and balances have failed ... some tell us a necessary correction is inevitable (they believe the vice president has overreached and his actions will actually result in a setback for the cause of enhancing executive power). As to your statement that "Frontline" is the only organization providing this view -- let's give credit to The Washington Post team that wrote a very strong series of stories in this area; and Charlie Savage at the Boston Globe; and Michael Isikoff and Evan Thomas at Newsweek; Jane Mayer at the New Yorker; and James Risen and Scott Shane and the New York Times -- their reports throughout the years have kept the spotlight focused on this important subject.
St. Louis: I had to step out of the room for a little bit, but I believe you never mentioned Karl Rove and his influence on "selling" all of the moves of the administration. I think he, sadly enough, did a magnificent job of convincing our citizens to accept our loss of human rights and the Iraq War. His mastermind made these heinous acts more palatable to the public, and therefore we saw unbelievably misguided "patriotic" calls to support this lawless administration. Will we see you follow that path, too? Though ... I must admit, as a 25-year journalism veteran, you did a masterful job on this installment of "Frontline." My hat goes off to you sir!
Michael Kirk: Thank you. My time is up. It has been a real pleasure reading your questions. I'm sorry if I didn't get to yours ... perhaps next time.
Editor's Note: washingtonpost.com moderators retain editorial control over Discussions and choose the most relevant questions for guests and hosts; guests and hosts can decline to answer questions. washingtonpost.com is not responsible for any content posted by third parties.
|
Frontline producer Michael Kirk will discuss his film "Cheney's Law," which examine's the legal strategy adopted by the Office of the Vice President to expand the executive branch's war time powers.
| 95.263158 | 0.894737 | 2.315789 |
high
|
medium
|
mixed
|
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/discussion/2007/10/10/DI2007101001476.html
|
https://web.archive.org/web/2007102019id_/http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/discussion/2007/10/10/DI2007101001476.html
|
Ask Tom
|
2007102019
|
In a city loaded with diverse restaurants, from New American chic and upscale Italian to sandwich shops and burritos on the run, finding the best places to eat can be a real puzzle. Where's the best restaurant for a first date or an anniversary? Father's Day? What's the best burger joint? Who has the best service?
Ask Tom. Tom Sietsema, The Washington Post's food critic, is on hand Wednesdays at 11 a.m. ET to answer your questions, listen to your suggestions and even entertain your complaints about Washington dining. Sietsema, a veteran food writer, has sampled the wares and worked as a critic in Washington, Seattle, San Francisco and Milwaukee, and can talk restaurants with the best of 'em. You can access his Postcards from Tom to read his recommendations for other cities, read his dining column, First Bite and the Dish or read transcripts of previous "Ask Tom" chats. Tom's Sunday magazine reviews, as well as his "Ask Tom" column, are available early on the Web.
Chantilly, Va.: Tom, I look forward to annual reviews of the best restaurants the Washington DC metropolitan area has to offer, as included in this Sunday's Washington Post magazine. However, I am a little surprised that more attention is not directed to the outstanding eating establishments outside the beltway. I have been a Fairfax County resident for 40 years. True, the historic epicenter of our area was DC proper and the closest suburbs across the bridge. Things have changed. Fairfax and Loudoun counties have big businesses and terrific restaurants to support our discriminating population. I can think of fantastic Thai and Indian restaurants in Chantilly alone. May I suggest a little more focus on the suburbs, in future reviews and best-of listings? Thanks.
Tom Sietsema: For this year's dining guide, the theme was National Treasures, hence the focus on restaurants in or very near the city. But I agree with you, that suburban restaurants can be every bit as delicious as what's to be found in the District. If you look at a year's worth of my reviews in the Magazine, I think you'll find that I don't ignore that fact.
Good morning, everyone. Thanks for being here today. Lots and lots and lots of questions today, so let's get started.
Potomac, Md.: Tom, have you heard anything about the Pomegranate Cafe planned for opening in Potomac soon?
Tom Sietsema: News to me. Maybe a chatter can shed some light?
Falls Church, Va.: Good morning, Tom -- great job on the dining guide! If a couple wanted to celebrate a special occasion and had $200 to spend, including a glass or two of wine, to which restaurant would you send them? I have it narrowed down to Komi, Central, Palena, Corduroy, Restaurant Eve, and Blue Duck Tavern. Which would be our best bet? Thanks for the advice, and for the always-entertaining chats!
Tom Sietsema: Right this moment? Central would probably be my first choice. (Some of the other places are going to cost more than $200 per couple, figuring in tax and tip.)
washingtonpost.com: Review of Central Michel Richard.
Alexandria, Va.: Tom...loved the restaurant guide and video last week. Are you heading back to the Eastern Shore of MD anytime soon to review other gems like Scossa, Inn at Easton, etc? I'm from that area and would like your opinion on who has the best crabcakes in the DC area. Thanks!
Tom Sietsema: Thanks for the kind words. I don't want to reveal my dining appointments with the crowd here, but let's just say I look forward to returning to the Eastern Shore. (Anything new we should know about?)
Crab cakes. Let's start a list here.
Arlington, Va.: Tom, Love your chats!!!
I am so excited because I just purchased tickets to go see Anthony Bourdain in Lisner Auditorium in November. What's a good place for a quick dinner next to Foggy Bottom metro? Thank you!
Tom Sietsema: Dish? The bar at Nectar?
Dallas, Tex.: When you dress in your disguises, do you experience what Ruth Reichl describes in "Garlic and Sapphires"? I mean, do you feel that you "become" your character, as an actor does?
Tom Sietsema: Honestly? No. All I want to do is get OUT of the costume.
Jaleo earning 3 slots on the list: Hi Tom,
I asked this on Monday, but didn't get through. I like Jaleo, but find it hard to imagine it being worthy of taking 3 slots on your 50-best list, rather than just listing it once, and then its other locations. They're all so excellent in their own way to merit 3 spots??
Tom Sietsema: Huh? I wrote a single review for Jaleo (which has three locations).
Union Station, D.C.: Apologies for what is probably an obvious question since the dining guide just came out. What place in town would you reccomend for the best seafood in town? And by "town" I mean from DC to Baltimore to Anapolis. Trying to figure out where I want to go for my birthday dinner tomorrow. Many thanks.
Tom Sietsema: Gosh, there are many contenders for what you hope to catch: Blacksalt, Kinkead's, Oceanaire Seafood Room ...
Bethesda, Md.: Hi Tom - love the chats, thanks for taking the time. We're hoping you can resolve a little dispute we're having re: tipping. We both agree that 15% for avg/good service and 20% plus for more is about right. The question is this - do you tip on the amount BEFORE tax, or on the total bill? One of us may be overgenerous, while the other may be accidentally undertipping! Thanks for your help.
Tom Sietsema: Here's how I tend to reward good service: Tip 20 percent on the sub-total.
Potomac, Md.: Pomegranate Cafe in Cabin John mall will be a kosher restaurant.
Tom Sietsema: Now THAT'S news! I hope it's true, I hope it's good and I hope it sticks around. Kosher restaurants tend not to stick aroiund here.
Here's another news flashlette: There's a new chef at Urbana in Dupont Circle, Claudio Urciuoli, a veteran of the Il Fornaio restaurant chain. The part of his resume that sounds most promising is his time at Le Brea Bakery in Los Angeles.
It is 1106: Put down the chulupa!
Tom Sietsema: It's down! It's down!
Eastern Market, D.C.: Hi Tom -
I thoroughly enjoyed the dining guide, and with it I've convinced my husband our next date is to Komi; so of course I have to extend a big thanks for that!
One restaurant I noticed was missing was BLT Steak. I've always enjoyed the meals I've had and thought the service was pretty good too. Although it does help it was not myself paying for the meal! How does it fall short in your mind?
Tom Sietsema: I checked out BLT steak for the guide, as I did many other restaurants that didn't make the cut. Great service and nice scene, I agree. But the steaks and a few sides weren't up to par on my last visit; throw in a high tab, and I couldn't justify putting BLT in this season.
Oakton, Va. 22124: Dear Tom,
Upon reading your review of The Iron Bridge Wine Company in the Annual Dining Guide we decided to drive to Warrenton on Saturday. What a disappointment! The restaurant is certainly attractive, but the service is terrible! We arrived at 2:20 p.m. and were told that lunch was served until 2:00 p.m. No problem, we could order appetizers. There was a group of people around the hostess stand when we got there, waiting for service. The hostess finally seated us and gave us menus. There were two guys (obviously waiters or managers) working in the room setting up tables for dinner, but the hostess was rushing about trying to take care of everything herself. One of the guys, a particularly grumpy looking individual, set up the table next to us, but never looked our way to see if we needed anything. The hostess continued to seat people and to sell retail wine to customers waiting. She never came back to our table, so after twenty minutes of being ignored we got up and left, finally finding lunch at the Irish bar across the street. The Iron Bridge Wine Company is one of the most disorganized restaurants we've ever been to, and I doubt that we'll make the long drive again. Thank you for your time.
Tom Sietsema: I'm so sorry to hear that, because there's some good food and drink behind the quirky (in my case) service. I had a hyper-intrusive waiter -- the opposite of your experience, obviously.
What are the three best cheap eats on your list?
Tom Sietsema: You mean from my guide? Etete, Ruan Thai and Oegadgib certainly qualify.
Nectar??: Um, it's been closed for at least 2 years. I miss it too, but perhaps you meant to recommend Notti Bianche?
Tom Sietsema: Oops! Yes, yes, I mean Notti Bianche. Nectar has been closed for awhile now.
Sushi-Ko: Tom, I know you answer these questions on the spot, but PLEASE stop referring to Sushi-Ko as a Georgetown restaurant. It's firmly in Glover Park -- not "north Georgetown," not "upper Georgetown," etc. The dining guide got it right, but in your discussions you frequently say Georgetown.
Tom Sietsema: Duly noted. As a former resident of Glover Park, I should know better.
Great dining guide--I'm looking forward to consulting it throughout the year.
That said, I want to tell you about a bad experience at Majestic in Old Town. I wasn't going to write in, but since the restaurant made it into your top picks, I thought I should relate this visit to you.
My husband and I had a reservation on a Friday evening this past summer. We got there a couple of minutes early and were asked to sit at the bar. We ordered from the drink menu. The bartender then painstakingly concocted the drinks--it was so odd. Each drink took about five minutes--she measured each ingredient. I had the impression she was following someone else's recipes to the letter. Needless to say, as I watched her mix other drinks, the orders backed up quickly.
We were called to sit about 15 minutes after our reservation time. You know the bar area is small. We had checked in with the host and hostess. Yet, the host shouted out our name repeatedly as if we were in a chain restaurant. There was no recollection of who we were. It was weird and definitely a sign of indifferent service.
After we sat, we ordered drinks--I had wine and my husband ordered a bottle of beer. My wine came out after five minutes. My husband's beer came out only after repeated requests (about 15 minutes)--I was almost done with my wine.
Our waitress poured my husband's beer into a glass. There were several ounces left in the bottle that didn't make it into the glass. She hesitated, and then took the bottle away. It was so strange, that we didn't realize what she'd done until she was gone--taken about 1/4 of the contents of the bottle away.
The wait for the food was indefinite. My husband ordered the table-side Ceasar. Nothing arrived.
The waitress was apologetic and insisted upon bringing us more bread, even though we really just wanted our dinners. The bread never showed, though.
One hour after our reservation, no food (including the Ceasar) had arrived. We told the waitress we were leaving.
A manager came over and apologized. She was very nice, and said the drinks were on the house. She asked that we return another day for a better experience.
There is no way that I will return. The evening was such a disaster, it was surreal. I know you like this place, but I would never recommend it. I thought you should know!
Tom Sietsema: Wow. That sounds so unlike the restaurant I've visited at least six times. Do you recall the date you were in?
Arlington, Va.: In reading the responses to the Dining Guide, I felt I had to weigh in on the Restaurant Week query. While I understand that it's unfair to judge a restaurant solely on that particular experience, many of us are forced to do so because we can't afford to visit these places on a regular night. My friends and I use those promotions to decide if we want to return to a restaurant and pay full price to eat somewhere in the future. So, when a restaurant does a poor job, they lose potential future paying customers.
It's a budgeting fact of life. I only have a certain amount of money to spend on meals out, and when push comes to shove, I'd rather go somewhere I've been lucky enough to try before and enjoy.
Tom Sietsema: I didn't mean to dis Restaurant Week. In theory, the promotion is a great idea; in reality, diners aren't necessarily getting the restaurant as it typically is. The menu is sometimes abbreviated, the service can be a little rushed, etc. But I understand where you're coming from and I appreciate the chance to remind restaurants that RW is a chance to win new customers (or not).
Former Silver Spring Resident: For the two posters last week who were of the opinion that other restaurants would love to take their money and if they get any attitude from the server then they will just leave and go somewhere else.
As someone who has been a host, server, bartender, busperson, and manager of a restaurant I do agree that no member of the waitstaff should give attitude to a guest for ANY reason (I mean come on, your paycheck does depend on your treatment of the guests and everyone knows that) I do disagree with the first poster about it not being an equal two way street.
If you give an attitude to someone, anyone, in life you are probably going to get it back. Snapping, waving, yelling, and being dismissive, rude, snotty, etc to a server will surely weaken their resolve in being pleasant with you. It is a two way street, you be nice, and they will be nice.
Tom Sietsema: Amen! Nice sermon. Let's hope people take it to heart.
Oh sage one: How do I make enough money to support the dining habit that I would like to have?
Tom Sietsema: Tell me this: What kind of dining habit do you dream of?
Washington, D.C. : Re: Monday's query on PG Co. restaurants you missed, Jerry's Seafood in Lanham/Seabrook (?) has consistently good food and universally outstanding service. Two drawbacks: no place to wait for your table (and you will wait, an awfully long time) and a less-than-alluring interior. Hopefully, both of those problems will be fixed when Jerry's moves into its new space sometime soon. The beer battered shrimp and crab bombs are worth the trip out there, though!
Tom Sietsema: I've included Jerry's Seafood in an earlier dining guide and agree with your findings.
Washington, D.C.: Have you considered going the Frank Bruni route and simply becoming a public figure? Surely more industry folks recognize you than you realize. (They do, of course, have an incentive to make you think you have not been recognized.)
Tom Sietsema: I know Frank Bruni and he is definitely NOT a "public figure." Or at least he tries to dine anonymously. As I do.
Warrenton, Va.: Tom, I have always wondered...when you make your series of visits to a restaurant for an upcoming review, do you stick to menu items, or do you make a point of trying specials, as well? Follow-up question...if you do try a special and find it to be distasteful, would that weigh as heavily on your review as if one of their "standards" failed to please? Thanks...great work on the Dining Guide!
Tom Sietsema: I almost always try a mix of menu items, including specials. In the rare instances I don't try specials, it's because (for example) it's August and I know the review won't appear until fall and corn, tomatoes and soft-shell crabs might not be around at the time of publication. To answer your second question, I don't give standing items more import than specials, and vice versa.
Washington, D.C.: I'm annoyed. Last week, we took a friend out for dinner. There were 5 of us, and we went to the Grill from Ipanema for the first time in about 8 months. Dinner was fine (although not as good as it used to be). Service was fine (not great, but better than it used to be.)
The annoyance - they added an 18% tip to the bill without telling us. Luckily, I caught it, so we did not double tip, because the service wasn't worth 38%! I was annoyed enough that I didn't want to talk to them, just to leave. So we did.
But I do need to gripe in general - restaurants, when you add the tip, especially if you don't tell me in advance, you ensure that I will leave exactly what the bill says, down to the penny, and that I will not return. There are too many good places in the world to put up with pettiness.
I tip well. Add in the tip, and you are certainly shorting yourself. Don't warn me about and lose business forever.
Tom Sietsema: Yep, it's always nice when staff points out any additions to the tab.
(As for adding on gratuities for "large" parties, five must be the new six.)
Re: Seafood Recommendations: If you're willing to cross the bridge, The Narrows on Kent Island has great seafood, especially crab cakes!
Boston traveler: I was in Boston last week, and tried out Neptune Oyster on your recommendation. What a meal! Really excellent. And this after one of your postcards steered us to another superb meal in San Francisco about 5 years ago (Sorry, can't remember the name of the place.) So pay close attention to Tom, everyone. He knows whereof he speaks.
Tom Sietsema: I endeavor to write about places on the road that I think will stand the test of time. Thanks for the feedback.
Washington, D.C.: It takes alot for me to go to the effort to complain about a restaurant experience, but Saturday night at Il Mulino was almost unbearable with no apologies. No bread withoutasking, no filling of our wine glasses, no table side Caesar salad making (salad arrived late late late.. pre-made and soggy)... overpriced fish special that also arrived late late late.. no attention whatsoever..The meal overall took so long that we didnt even consider desert. Such a pity since my mother had had just the opposite experience during the week... then the service was almost "hovering".... what a nightmare...
Tom Sietsema: You obviously ignored my take on the subject!
Va.: I'm taking my girlfriend to see a play around Penn Quarter for her bday and am looking for recommendations for pre show eats. Price isn't a huge factor (although nothing too crazy) and something more upscale is preferred. Thanks alot. Your chats are a wealth of information for anyone looking to dine around our city.
Tom Sietsema: Two of your best bets in that part of town are Oyamel, for its spirited scene and delicious Mexican cooking, and the more elegant 701, which offers a very good pre-theater menu.
washingtonpost.com: Review of Oyamel and the Food's the Thing.
Washington, D.C.: Hi Tom. What's your editorial opinion on the Source? Does it scoop all its competitors on the beat? Is Puck just a byline or is he pounding the pavement in the kitchen? Any good ledes on the appetizer menu?
Tom Sietsema: All I can say about Puck's new place is what I reported in an earlier DISH column. It just opened (and I have yet to check it out).
washingtonpost.com: The Dish on the Source.
Washington, D.C.: Nice Dining Guide....any good restaurants in Chevy Chase ?...or all the good restaurants is in Bethesda!...
Tom Sietsema: I like the Portugese cooking at Tavira a lot ....
Washington, D.C.: Thank you for your recommendation of Cordouroy. I wrote in about a month ago about a birthday dinner for my boyfriend and his parents. The experience was perfect. The waiter was attentive and knowledgeable without being overbearing or pretentious. When my boyfriend's step-mother was hesitant about ordering the steak (fearing she would be mocked for liking her steak well done) I was able to assure her that I "had it on good authority" that she would have no problems. Sure enough, she ordered the steak, and was delighted with it's doneness. Everything we ordered was cooked perfectly and was everything we could have hoped for. I believe you specifically recommened the oysters, and boy howdy were they ever delicious! So thank you. Thank you. Thank you.
ps. Mr. Powell is receiving a similar thank you note.
Tom Sietsema: Chefs need some lovin' too. Nice of you to share your compliments with the restaurant itself.
Washington, D.C.: Are specials really "special" or are they just dumping last night's seafood and the meat pork they couldn't seel during the rest of the week?
Tom Sietsema: I've seen both. In the best case, specials highlight a seasonal ingredient or a particular interest of the chef or his staff -- say, an Asian dish on an otherwise non-Asian menu.
Washington, D.C.: So, Tom- sounds like you and I have the same reason for not opening a dining establishment -- being early birds! Your ideal place (as articulated in the Sunday magazine) sounds wonderful!
Do you ever find that your desire to get up early ruins dinner plans the night before? Or vice-versa?
Tom Sietsema: (The chatter is referring to a Q & A I did with Magazine editor Tom Shroeder.)
Do my early morning hours conflict with my dinners? Not really. I find I'm usually happy to be in a restaurant once I'm seated -- whenever that happens to be.
Taxicab Zone 2B: Tom - Went to Beck the other night. What's the fuss? The mussels were good but not something I couldn't have done myself, and the "beefsteak" was pretty underwhelming and seemed to either be missing "green peppercorn cognac sauce" or should have been labeled "cold flavored butter sauce." On the other hand, the braised pork belly was tasty and my beefsteak had good flavor even if it was a boring cut. Add on bringing the wrong beer, and the experience certainly wasn't stellar.
Tom Sietsema: All of which pretty much supports my reasons for leaving Beck out of my dining guide ...
Do you or any of the chatters have advice on where to eat in Boston? I will be there for one night and just want great food and a decent wine list. Thanks for your help.
"Check out the Postcard from Tom archives, linked in this chat's introduction!"
With all the fine dining you do, what do you do to stay in shape and keep your body healthy?
Tom Sietsema: I work out with a trainer three days a week. That sounds like a yuppie affectation, but I call it "health insurance."
Washington, D.C.: I was shocked to find Montmartre on your top 50 list. My recent experience there was completely forgettable, if not unpleasant -- mediocre food, loud, tables too close to each other. I would think you were just trying to include a Capitol Hill place, except that you gave it 2.5 stars, more than the much more enjoyable Hank's, and only half a star behind Vidalia and Palena (which, BTW, should get an extra half star for the bar and cocktails). The are restaurants all over town I would go back to before going to Montmartre again.
Tom Sietsema: Please keep in mind that I've been to all the restaurants on my list several times. Maybe you hit Montmartre on an off day?
By the way: I wouldn't refrain from going to a restaurant that was loud or had tables close together -- a description that applies to many good restaurants, I'm afraid.
What happened to perennial favorite high star restaurants like 2941 and L'Auberage Chez Francois in this years Washington Post Restaurant Guide ?
Tom Sietsema: As I mentioned in Monday's chat, 2941 is a restaurant in transition. As for L'Auberge Chez Francois, it's never garnered more than two stars (a "good" rating) from this critic.
College Park, Md.: While no person should be mocked for liking well done steak, why bother ordering steak? Well done cooking decreases juiciness, decreases flavor and increases toughness.
Tom Sietsema: You're singing my song ...
Bethesda, Md.: What's this you say about Michel Richard opening a branch of Central in Bethesda? Please, tell more!!!
Tom Sietsema: I mentioned in the introduction to my dining guide only that the chef is LOOKING for a location in Bethesda. I hope he gets his wish. Bethesda could use some of his magic.
I agree with your decision to exclude BLT from the guide. My wife and I dined there last week, and thought the popovers, appetizers, wine/bar offerings and desert were quite good, but we were non-plussed by the steak. We ordered one of their Wagjyu beef steaks, but were disappointed when the steak came out with a thick, carboned char that ruined the taste (we asked for it to be medium rare).
One question on a different subject -- did I miss something, or did Maestro not make the guide, and if not, why not?
Tom Sietsema: I could make a meal of those popovers!
Maestro lost its top chef -- and just about everyone under him -- when Fabio Trabocchi decamped for Fiamma in New York recently.
Your wallet: Why do you have to pay out of your own pocket for some of the meals at restaurants you review for the Post? It doesn't seem right, and I hope you are paid handsomely to make up for (some of) it.
Tom Sietsema: Because my job is also my hobby?
When it comes to money, the powers that be are probably more inclined to put resources in Baghdad or on the campaign trail -- politics being the newspaper's stock in trade -- than in sending me to Paris or Shanghai.
Bethesda, Md.: Tom, I read the Dining Guide with much anticipation for the climbers, the fallers, and the newcomers. The only place that elicited a "HUH???" was the two star rating of Cuba de Ayer in Burtonsville. I ate there once in July and it was abysmal. Everything was overcooked and (maybe for the first time in my life) oversalted, which included the pork, rice and plantains, which had the flavor and consistency of slightly damp paper. The service didn't help either since the four of us, who were 1/3 of the customers, ended our meal 2 hours after our arrival (luckily friends were visiting from Switzerland and gave us a lot to fill the time with). Can you please share with us your highs so I can see why I should consider returning? I love, however, that you're willing to go out to a place like Burtonsville and try to find a hidden gem. The burbs need the encouragement or push to help them improve. Keep putting the miles on your car.
Tom Sietsema: I didn't leave anything out of my mini-review of Cuba de Ayer, and I've been multiple times since it opened. It deserves another chance. My Cuban friends really like it.
washingtonpost.com: Review of Cuba de Ayer.
Alexandria, Va.: Obviously you have readers who are on a tight budget but hope to dine at such superb restaurants you frequent on a daily basis. Oh to be a food critic
In your opinion, what, if any, chain restaurants are worth your trip? Chain restaurants?!?! Spare me the gasps of horror. I know already, but I'm just curious if you like any.
Tom Sietsema: Who says I don't like chains? One of the best local groups is Great American, known for good food and service at Sweetwater Tavern, Artie's, Carlyle, etc.
Washington, D.C.: I'm somewhat astounded that service accounts for 25% of your ratings and, maybe not coincidentally, so much of this chat focus on service rather than food. In 15 years of dining at hundreds of restaurants, I have scores of fond memories about particular dishes and wine, but I have only 2 dining experiences where the service was so good or bad that I remember it -- on the positive side, a waiter at Obelisk providing great advice on Italian wine, on the negative side, a lost order at Otto Enoteca in NY. Otherwise, the service was irrelevant for whether I enjoyed a restaurant or was willing to return.
Tom Sietsema: Believe it or not, some people wish I wrote MORE about service, which for them is as important a factor in deciding where to eat as the quality of the food.
Arlington, Va.: Tom you are amazing. Can you help me find some polish food in arlington??
Tom Sietsema: Obviously, I'm not THAT amazing or I'd have something to offer you. Chatters?
I place no blame on you for the following complaint as I am sure you had no say in the matter. I opened the Magazine the other day to peruse your dining guide when I discovered the "Best of Capital Cuisine". I thought "What a great idea!" A handy pullout of the Dining Guide that I can shove in my bag and always have handy. After a couple quick page turns it was blatantly obvious that the joke was on me. Stupid ad insert. This seems somewhat disingenous to me. Feel free to pass along to your boss.
Tom Sietsema: Consider your rant passed along. (But if you look at the top of each page, surely you saw "Advertisement" stamped on it?)
So last minute!: Tom - You have become a large part of my life. Well, because I love to eat and you are my go-to man to fulfill my gastronomic desires! I will be going to Richmond this weekend to race in the World Championship Duathlon. I'm suppose to carb-load the night before. Do you have any suggestions? Aside from carb-loading, I would LOVE to have some seafood along with it!
Tom Sietsema: Richmond. Carbs. Can anyone help out our runner?
Just wanted to pass along a disappointing waiter experience at Merkado Kitchen. Our group of four arrived at the start of brunch this past Sunday, when the restaurant and its patio were almost empty. When the server arrived to take our orders, we started going around the table clockwise with our orders, then reversed direction because we wanted to let the female guests order first. When one of the guests noted the change in direction, the server fixed her with an unsimiling stare and said, "Well, am I in charge or are you?" We were flabbergasted. It was clear the comment was made in irritation, not to be funny. However, when it was pointed out to the waiter that the comment was rude -- and therefore, that his ultimate tip was likely in jeopardy -- he returned later to insist he was trying to be funny, and that he was sorry. None of us believed him. Tom, it's brunch, not the Improv. We did not seek a manager, because we made our displeasure known via the tip. On the plus side, the food was excellent.
Tom Sietsema: The waiter shouldn't have said what he said, but he DID return to apologize. If he was an otherwise attentive server, I would have forgiven the slight and tipped appropriately. (What did you have, by the way? It's been ages since I've dined at Merkado.)
Former D.C./now Columbus: No postcards from columbus?
I admit that moving from a place like DC to columbus seemed like it would be disappointing from the restaurant standpoint, but its actually pretty good.
Tom Sietsema: So share some dining tips! I'm all ears (er, EYES).
Post card from...: So Tom, if you were going to write a Post Card from DC, who would you include?
Tom Sietsema: Great question! A hard one, too, because my Postcards have just three reviews.
In the interest of variety (price/cooking style/location), I'd probably feature Rasika, Two Amys and Palena.
Anywhere, USA: Hi Tom, I adore your chats and can't believe I am writing in with a complaint or public service announcement. I work as a host at a restaurant. It is a fairly nice establishment and as a result, I dress up for my job. Many people mistake me for the manager and/or owner and while that's flattering...I'm one of the lowest paid people there.
Of course, I don't go to work expecting tips, but there are times when I wished people understood the extra strain they put on my job. The other night we'd already given last call and someone came in to buy wine--we sell wine retail--and food to go. I convinced the sous chef to make them a plate and got their wine. As I was ringing them up, they asked about dessert. I ran back to the kitchen, flagged down the pastry chef who was getting ready to leave and got them an additional dish.
After all that, they decided they wanted coffee...In the end, this ordeal took about 20 minutes and it was a $75 tab and they didn't tip.
Am I out of line for being annoyed by this? It happens fairly regularly although not usually this extreme.
Tom Sietsema: No tip? Unbelievable. Where (and how) did the offender think all the treats were coming from?
At Home, Va.: I didn't get to your online chart about the dining guide until it was over, but I want to offer a suggestion to all the folks that have commented about the advertising supplements (there were actually 2 in that edition of the magazine.) Send your complaints to the Washington Post Ombudsman (ombudsman@washpost.com). I would think that would be the perfect place for such comments.
Tom Sietsema: Brilliant idea! Now why didn't I think of that?
3 Spots for Jaleo?: Maybe the chatter was really wondering why you gave three stars to Jaleo. I like Jaleo all right, but putting it on the same level as places like Palena and Vidalia certainly doesn't mesh with my experience there.
Tom Sietsema: But why shouldn't a restaurant that aspires to greatness (in this case, excellent Spanish flavors) be rewarded with a high rating?
University Park, Md.: I just saw one of your pet phrases, "top toques," used in an article in the AARP magazine, of all places. Maybe it's time to spruce up your writing style....
Tom Sietsema: Aw, come on! I don't use it THAT much ...
Richmond: For the runner, they should try La Grotta, an Italian restaurant (Shockoe Slip, Cary St. at 13th). Great pasta, and seafood too I believe. Richmond isn't exactly known for its seafood, though, so sailor be warned...
Tom Sietsema: In the nick of time. Thanks.
Herndon, Va.: For your poster who inquired about how to earn the money to afford their dining desires:
Expand your horizons. There is fantastic food in this area available at almost any budget point. You'll do particularly well in our region if you learn to appreciate Thai, Vietnamese, Korean, and real Chinese. Local food boards abound with listings of prizes in the $10 and under category.
Some of my personal favorites:
Lemongrass pork bahn mi at Ba Le in Rockville --under $4.
Pan-fried pork dumplings at A&J in Rockville or Annandale--about $6 for 8 of them
Ground beef and pickled long bean at A&J--about $4
Mikes Mexolina tacos at Teocalli Tamale in Herndon--about $7
Yum Grilled Eggplant appetizer at Neisha--about $7
Roast pig (not pork) at Cho Cu Saigon in Eden Center (Falls Church)--about $6
Tom Sietsema: Good point -- and your list makes me hungry.
Time to run, kids. See you next Wednesday. Thanks for your time and eyeballs.
Editor's Note: washingtonpost.com moderators retain editorial control over Discussions and choose the most relevant questions for guests and hosts; guests and hosts can decline to answer questions. washingtonpost.com is not responsible for any content posted by third parties.
|
Join live discussions from the Washington Post. Feature topics include national, world and DC area news, politics, elections, campaigns, government policy, tech regulation, travel, entertainment, cars, and real estate.
| 182 | 0.682927 | 0.97561 |
high
|
low
|
abstractive
|
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/discussion/2007/10/12/DI2007101201592.html
|
https://web.archive.org/web/2007102019id_/http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/discussion/2007/10/12/DI2007101201592.html
|
Book World Live - washingtonpost.com
|
2007102019
|
Join Book World Live each Tuesday for a discussion based on a story or review in each Sunday's Book World or in the weekday Style Section.
Andrew Davidson: Hi everyone, my name is Andrew Davidson, and I've written a novel called The Gargoyle which is being released... today! Thanks for dropping in and I look forward to your questions, so let's get this chat started!
Ron Charles, Book World: When most of us think of being "burned by love," we think of somebody betraying us or dumping us when we least expected it. But you use the phrase for something far more positive: burned by the intensity of passion. I see you're asking people to leave their own stories on your website (burnedbylove.com). Can you give us a hint here about your "burned" experience?
Andrew Davidson: Well, I've never been burned in a physical sense, nor has any of my close family or friends. So when I think about being "burned by love" it is in a figurative sense - and I think that you have summed it up with a nice phrase: "burned by the intensity of passion." I'm thirty-nine years old, and so of course I've had a few relationships. Some have been more intense than others. I won't go into specifics on any of them - would you, if you were me? - but I will say this: I really don't see much point in loving someone, unless there is an "intensity of passion." Why would we love indifferently? And, more to the point, can we, and still call it love?
Chicago, Illinois: Will this be another Twilight knock-off? The book seems interesting and very intriguing but it sounds something slightly similar to Twilight. I'll buy the book anyway to find out for myself
Andrew Davidson: Hi Chicago, Well, if it is a Twilight knock-off, it'll be completely unintentional, because I've never read any of the books in the series. (Although I am looking forward to giving them a try.) And The Gargoyle will not be the first book in a series, it is a stand-alone work. There will be no Gargoyle 2: The Quickening.
Ron Charles, Book World: This thoroughly modern novel alludes to so many much older stories and legends from around the world. Give us a sense of the range of your reading and research for "The Gargoyle."
Andrew Davidson: Ron again! Thanks, and that's a great question. The reading doesn't just include what I did specifically for The Gargoyle, it also included everything right up until the point that I started the novel. I've always loved legends and myths, so I can say that I was influenced by everything from Grimm's fairy tales to Stan Lee's marvel comics. I mean, they do have Thor, right? I was also influenced by film a great deal, I think. For example, there are at least two versions of The Beauty and The Beast that I love: the Disney version (honestly!) and La Belle et la Bete, by Jean Cocteau. As far as specific readings for The Gargoyle, I read everything from encyclopedia on medieval German life, to modern medical journals on burn treatment, to books on the construction of Icelandic buildings in the ninth century, to the sermons of Meister Eckhart and Heinrich Seuse.... I love the research stage: I love discovering that I need to know something that I never thought I would ever need to know. It makes me a better, more fully rounded person to learn these things.
Gargoyle The Movie?: I heard the book has already been sold for movie rights - true? How soon will it be made if so? Who would be in your ideal cast?
Andrew Davidson: If The Gargoyle has been sold for movie rights, I haven't been told yet. (And I'm sure they would have run it by me....) It's an interesting thing, thinking about actors who might play the roles. I can honestly say that I have never put together a cast, because I have these characters in my head and already know what they look like for me. But this is often asked of me in conversation, and everyone has an opinion... The thing about a movie is that it's a separate entity. There is the book, and there is the movie, and - while related - in my mind, they are completely different things. We'll see what happens in the future....
Little Compton, R.I.: Does Stripe, the pet turtle that you had when you were seven years old, make an appearance of any sort in THE GARGOYLE?
Andrew Davidson: Nope... No turtles in The Gargoyle. But maybe that could be my next book: The Adventures of Stripe. I really did have a turtle named Stripe when I was seven years old. He was a wild turtle that I caught one day, kept for a while, and then released back into the water. Before putting him in, I wrote my name with marker on the bottom of his shell. So my first autograph might still be swimming around in the Winnipeg River, near my hometown.
Arlington, Va.: New authors have a lot of tools available to them now to promote the book - I see that besides your website you have a Facebook page, a page on GoodReads, probably lots more I haven't seen. How useful do you think these are in helping spread the word? When did you start working on all these? What else is out there I don't know about yet?
Andrew Davidson: Hi Arlington, Va On the one hand, yes, things like Facebook and Goodreads are promotional tools. As far as how "effective" they are, in terms of real life book sales, is something that I really can't know or guess. But for me, that's only a small part of the equation. What I really like about these sites is they allow for some interaction with people who have read the book. It's a very nice thing to open my email in the morning and get emails from people that I don't know, who have no vested interest in the project, saying: "Hey, I like your work." And besides, I also get book recommendations, and I'm always up for that. You can also check out" www.burnedbylove.com" to read, and see, stories of people discussing their most intense relationships...
Freising, Germany: I laughed when I read about Marianne's announcement that the main character and her were lovers in 14th-century Germany in a past life.
I'd once been invited to participate in a channeling session with a psychic medium by a good friend, and to my amazement, I discovered that my good friend and I had spent many previous lifetimes together. We'd often been man and wife (to my dismay, I'd been the wife of my male friend) and once we'd even been famous North American horse thieves that could communicate without speaking (Hugh!). Later, while having a beer with the psychic medium, he confessed to me that most of what he said had been spontaneously contrived, since he'd not received much information from the spirits or guardian angels (I was relieved that I wasn't the wife).
Where did you get the idea to incorporate the concept of "Past Lives" into your story?
Also, I liked your description of love being more like "a tiny, jittery primate with eyes that are permanently peeled open in fear", compared to the guise of a sturdy dog that would always chase down the stick, with his ears flopping around happily, completely loyal and completely unconditional.
It reminds me of a movie about Jesse James, where one of the gang is asked by a prostitute if he's ever been in love and he replies, "Ya, it was awful".
Andrew Davidson: Well, I can't let this chat go by without taking at least one question from Germany now, can ? How I ended up in medieval Germany is a bit of a strange story. The book began with the character of Marianne Engel, and I had been working on the modern-day story for about a year when I came across, in completely unrelated reading, mention of a medieval German monastery named Engelthal. The name meant "Valley of the Angels" and I thought it was so charming that I wanted to include it in the novel. And because my brain apparently doesn't work quite properly, I started to wonder: "Hmmm... how can I get Marianne Engel into this monastery, seven centuries ago, without incorporating time travel....?" And I took it from there.
Boynton Beach, Fla.: This novel is unquestionably dark. What drove you in that direction?
Minneapolis, Minnesota: Although you must be terribly busy with the release of "The Gargoyle," I just have to ask if you are working on something else.
I have the feeling that when people finish reading "The Gargoyle," they'll soon be wondering the same thing.
Andrew Davidson: At the moment, it is true that I am quite busy. Hard to write a follow-up book and answers to a Washington Post online chat at the same time.... But I am deep in the research stages on the next book. I have several hundreds of pages of notes already written, and about three to five pages of prose. The prose, of course, will be thrown out. And having so many notes ensures that I have absolutely no idea what the book will be about. I'm as curious as you are. Probably more.
Minneapolis, Minn.: Do you have personal connections to any of the stories that Marianne tells?
Andrew Davidson: It's all personal, of course, but I must admit that I have a special affection for the story of Sei in Japan. I lived in Japan for about five years (1999-2004) and the bulk of the novel was written there. Although I am a Canadian by birth, I consider Japan to be my second country - I always enjoy going back, and am looking forward to my next opportunity. And the story of Sigurdr, the Viking, was influenced by the fact that I have an Icelandic heritage, which is quite common in Manitoba (where I grew up). Manitoba actually has the largest population of Icelanders, outside of Iceland itself.
Burned by Love: I was just looking at the Burned by Love site. Do you read all the posted stories there? Are any your own?
Andrew Davidson: I haven't read all the posted stories on the burnedbylove site, but I have read most of them, and I have watched most of the videos too. I find them very interesting, and some are painfully honest.... None of the stories on burnedbylove.com are my own. That forum exists as a place for other people to express themselves. I got my say in The Gargoyle.
Berlin, Germany: does Marianne Engel lives through all the centuries or is she coming back to him? what did she do in the meantime?
Andrew Davidson: Back to Germany.... That is an excellent question. I have no answer for you. Some things are better left for the reader to imagine, and decide.
Ron Charles, Book World: I understand you did some of your research about burn injuries by corresponding with a burn victim. How did you go about finding such a person, and what was his reaction to your questions?
Andrew Davidson: I did a few years of intensive research on burns, reading basically everything that I could. Once I felt that I had explored the topic as thoroughly as I could through reading, I found that I still had some questions that interested me, and that I was unable to answer. These were things that were incredibly specific, or that related less to medicine and science and more to a patient's relationship with his/her burn. At this point, I went onto the internet and found a burn survivor who had posted writing about the experience of being burned, and about the recovery process. I found the writer to be thoughtful and open, so I sent this person an email introducing myself and asking if I might ask a few questions. The incredibly kind reply was, basically, "yes." I would not have approached this person if I had not done so much research beforehand. It would have been rude to make contact and say: "Hey! Tell me about burns!" But I was okay with sending questions that began with the preface "I have looked everywhere for this one specific fact, but it doesn't seem to be in any book..."
Minneapolis, Minn.: I thought both those stories were particularly intense.
Iceland is full of great folklore. (I visited last year and am still trying to wrap my head around all those santas or yulelads!)
How can a writer such as yourself, who takes the time to do intense research, secure the next contract without compromising due to time constraints? In other words, is the publisher willing to wait seven years?
Andrew Davidson: I guess I'll find out. Perhaps in about six years you'll read a story about how I have retreated to the Icelandic lava fields, hiding out from angry, impatient publishers.
State College, Pa.: Congratulations on getting your novel published; I look forward to reading it. (I myself have a novel languishing on my computer. Sigh.)
I am very drawn to the cover art on the dust jacket of your book. It's a very beautiful and compelling image. Did you have any input on it?
Andrew Davidson: I tend to leave things such as graphic design to the experts. My opinion is always solicited and my publishers have been happy to hear my feedback, but I don't consider myself a graphic designer. So they do their thing, and I do mine: writing. And I love the cover too. Very striking! I have time for one final question....
Pittsburgh, Pa.: How does it feel to have such an outpouring even before the book is released?
Andrew Davidson: It makes me feel like a very lucky man, and I am thankful to everyone who has come by this chat today.
Andrew Davidson: This has been a wonderful experience, answering real-time questions for readers of the book. As I mentioned above, thank you all so much for dropping by with your questions and comments. I truly appreciate it, and all the best. Andrew Davidson The Gargoyle
Editor's Note: washingtonpost.com moderators retain editorial control over Discussions and choose the most relevant questions for guests and hosts; guests and hosts can decline to answer questions. washingtonpost.com is not responsible for any content posted by third parties.
|
Rick Atkinson fields questions and comments about "The Day of Battle: The War in Sicily and Italy, 1943-1944," his new book on World War II.
| 88.757576 | 0.69697 | 1.060606 |
high
|
low
|
abstractive
|
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/discussion/2007/10/14/DI2007101401126.html
|
https://web.archive.org/web/2007102019id_/http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/discussion/2007/10/14/DI2007101401126.html
|
White House Watch
|
2007102019
|
Dan is also deputy editor of Niemanwatchdog.org.
Dan Froomkin: Hi everyone and welcome to another White House Watch chat. Busy morning, what with President Bush giving a (typically last-minute) news conference, among other things.
I was taken aback at Bush's defensiveness on the issue of his continued relevance. He was also very bitter about the Democratic Congress. There was a lot of ground covered, from the Dalai Lama to Vladimir Putin (and that's a long way.) One headline, for sure, was that Bush warned of the risk of "World War III" if Iran gets nuclear weapons. He also, notably, refused once again to define the word "torture."
I'll let you know when my column is published. In the meantime ... what's on your mind?
Minneapolis: Dan, thanks for the tip to last night's "Frontline" piece -- it was a great recap of many of the stories you've covered in the past couple years. Has the White House responded to "Cheney's Law" at all, or are they waiting to see if anyone is paying attention first?
washingtonpost.com: Discussion Transcript: 'Cheney's Law' (washingtonpost.com, Oct. 17)
Dan Froomkin: I wouldn't count on it. The White House happily will ignore it -- and the press corps, which probably thinks of it all as "old news," will happily enable them.
For those who missed it, the show is now available online, along with some fascinating supporting material.
Dan Froomkin: Here's a news flash: Matt Apuzzo of the Associated Press got his hands on Valerie Plame's new book, which is to be released on Tuesday.
"She offers harsh words for President Bush, whom she assails for administration 'arrogance and intolerance.' She also said criticism of her husband, former Ambassador Joseph Wilson, was a 'dress rehearsal' for the Swift Boat Veterans for Truth effort that impugned Sen. John Kerry's war record during his unsuccessful quest for the presidency in 2004.
"Plame has kind words for Special Prosecutor Patrick Fitzgerald, who led the leak investigation and forced several journalists to testify about their sources. She said she didn't understand why 'well-meaning but self-righteous talking heads' decried that effort.
"'It was the Pentagon Papers or Watergate turned on its head,' she writes, adding, 'These reporters were allowing themselves to be exploited by the administration and were obstructing the investigation. It didn't make much ethical sense to me.'"
Boston: David Addington seems too egotistical not to write a score-settling memoir about his efforts to solidify the unitary executive. Would you be curious to see what he was up to from the date of the initial inauguration to Sept. 11? Because I'll bet he wrote a few executive orders, signing statements and OLC drafts. If the administration was asking the telecoms to turn over American's telephone records without a warrant pre-Sept. 11, what else were they doing?
Dan Froomkin: Even though we now know a lot more about Addington than we used to, we still know very little. I like your idea of focusing on pre-Sept. 11, particularly in light of the disclosure that those telecoms were being asked to do fishy things as early as February 2001.
Incidentally, I find it incredibly galling that we still don't know what sort of evidently illegal warrantless activity the administration up to until the revolt at Justice led them to stop. If they're not doing it anymore, why is it a national security secret?
Boston: I saw the "Frontline" special "Cheney's Law" last night which seemed more of a review of previous reporters' work on the subject. One question I have is, why hasn't Congress or some other entity challenged in court the Constitutionality of one or all of Bush's signing statements? If the legislative branch doesn't challenge this, doesn't it defer almost all power to the executive branch to decide which laws it wishes to enforce?
Dan Froomkin: You know, I had the same question to while watching it. Whatever happened to the idea of Congress granting itself the authority to sue Bush over his signing statements? Where's the oversight?
Germantown, Md.: Do you expect to see congressional Republicans start to back away from their stand favoring warrantless wiretapping authority, hedging their bets on which party next controls the executive branch?
Dan Froomkin: Interesting question. You appear to be assuming that the next administration, if Democratic, would not just cease the program but would expose it? Wouldn't that be something.
Dan Froomkin: Here's today's column: Bush: 'I Am Relevant'.
Hollidaysburg, Pa.: Dan, I caught "Frontline" last night. Not too surprised because I read you regularly. But I still wonder -- why is Cheney so obsessed with presidential power, particularly when he apparently will not run for the office himself? He is highly unlikely to be elected anyway, but that is another issue. So the overriding puzzle is, why is he unrelenting in ignoring/distorting the Constitution in this pursuit of the unitary executive?
Dan Froomkin: My take: It's not personal -- its more theological. I think Cheney (and Addington) sincerely believe that the American people are better off (particularly safer) with an unfettered executive. They think the legislative and judicial branches are not equipped to protect the American people and American interests with sufficient muscularity.
That view, however, minimizes the value of checks and balances -- and civil liberties. Things that tend to be pretty important to a lot of Americans, thank goodness.
Re: "Cheney's Law": Dan, I think the thing that scares me the most -- and that is saying a lot -- is what we will find the Bush administration has been doing after they have left office. My question is this: Will we ever hear about it? Will the next (hopefully Democratic) president let the American people know what their predecessors were doing?
Dan Froomkin: That's a really interesting question, and much along the lines of the one above.
I don't know. I think it might be worth asking candidates to commit to full disclosure if they win office -- as the tendency once there might well be to avoid ugliness. (They might also decide they like having that kind of power for themselves.)
Baltimore: Re: Your response to Germantown's question regarding wiretapping, I don't believe the next president -- regardless of party -- is going to cede one iota of the new executive power grabbed by Bush. I expect secrecy, signing statements and the blame game to continue.
Dan Froomkin: Interesting. See the next question.
Kensington, Md.: I was glad to read in your column of the joint venture between the liberal and conservative groups to ask the candidates to "just say no" to the dictatorial powers assumed by the current administration. Have any of them signed this pledge yet? (I can't believe I'm even asking this question in the U.S.)
Dan Froomkin: You could have clicked on Bob Egelko's story to find out! Here's what he wrote: "None of the nine Republican candidates has responded. The pledge has been signed by five Democratic hopefuls: Sens. Barack Obama and Chris Dodd, Rep. Dennis Kucinich, New Mexico Gov. Bill Richardson and former Sen. Mike Gravel.
"The other three Democratic candidates, Sens. Hillary Rodham Clinton and Joseph Biden and former Sen. John Edwards, have not signed, but issued promises covering roughly the same ground. Letters from all three included renunciations of torture, wiretapping of U.S. citizens without court approval and imprisonment without judicial review.
"The conservative campaign has asked candidates of both parties to endorse its detailed 10-point platform. Only one, Rep. Ron Paul, a Texas Republican with libertarian leanings, has signed it, although Edwards has posted the document on one of his campaign Web sites."
Silver Spring, Md.: On signing statements: Legalistically it is not that easy to challenge the signing statements themselves -- there are issues of "standing," "showing harm," etc. Even the idea of Congress passing a law that would allow them to sue the administration runs into a legal morass that few congressmen would want to try to explain to their constituencies. I think you'll have to think of signing statements like Iraq and Guantanamo -- just another mess that some future administration either will improve on or make worse. Oh well, I guess you can lose them all.
Dan Froomkin: Interesting point. Well, I certainly think they're still fertile ground for reporters. See my (unfortunately) still relevant NiemanWatchdog.org piece on signing statements and what we don't know about them -- from June 2006.
Westwood, Mass.: Does Bush's use of the term "World War III" reflect a troubling adherence to the views of neocon Podhoretz (author of "World War IV") and a signal to where U.S. policy is headed militarily?
Dan Froomkin: Well, I can't think of any rhetorical device that's more terrifying. Can you? Interestingly enough, it's not the first time Bush has talked about World War III -- it's just a new venue. Ever since June 2005, Bush has frequently cited Osama bin Laden to make the argument that the "war on terror" is World War III. Bloomberg and AFP are both out with news-conference stories that lead with the World War III comment.
Columbus, Ga.: Hi Dan, love your column. It seems to me that Iraq has been put on the back burner since the Petraeus report. Prior to that there was a real sense of urgency, but that seems to have dissipated. Would you agree, and if so, to what would you attribute this?
Dan Froomkin: Retired Lt. Gen. Ricardo Sanchez made a bit of a stir about Iraq over the weekend. But I largely agree.
I was shocked -- shocked! -- for instance at how few questions there were about Iraq at today's news conference. I mean, the Dalai Lama is a cute one-day story and all ... but we're at war, people. And it's not going so well.
The lack of coverage, in fact, may even let Bush get away unscathed saying, as he did today: "I'm pleased with the progress we're making." I can't explain it.
And by the way, the transcript of the press conference is now up on the White House Web site.
Carlisle, Pa.: Dan I was struck while watching the President's news conference today by what I took to be a completely different style. He was energetic and seemed to be much more able than usual in public to put long sentences together. I am not commenting on the substance of what he said, but the style. Do you agree with this observation, and if so, how do you explain the sudden change? (He seemed "presidential.")
Dan Froomkin: Interesting observation. I didn't see much change -- except that there was considerably less towel-snapping than usual. But what did others out there see?
Mt. Laurel, N.J.: Don't you suspect that Cheney and Addington secretly wish they could run the U.S. like Putin runs Russia? There are some folks that have a lot in common!
Dan Froomkin: I don't know. But I thought Peter Baker's question today was an absolute scream. He asked "what it would mean for Russian democracy if, when you leave power -- assuming you do in January 2009 -- (laughter) -- that Vladimir Putin is still in power?"
Charleston, W.Va.: Your column yesterday: "I'd love to know how many taxpayer dollars went into creating the two giant banners declaring 'Fiscal Responsibility' that White House staffers hung behind the president." You're the reporter -- how about a FOIA request?
Dan Froomkin: You can't FOIA the White House. See: http://www.whitehouse.gov/government/eop-foia.html.
Knoxville, Tenn.: Dan -- any comment from the administration on the Turkish authorization to invade Northern Iraq? I am worried about our diplomacy being insufficient to the task, to say the least.
Dan Froomkin: That happened right as Bush was giving his news conference, where he said about Turkey: "What I'm telling you is, is that there's a lot of dialogue going on, and that's positive." Nothing since then.
Fairfax, Va.: Little of MSM coverage seems to focus on the merits of what someone is saying. For example, The Post article on Saturday reporting Sanchez's comments did not explore whether Sanchez's disturbing assertions about strategic military planning incompetence was accurate or not. But the article did find space to mention a few negatives about Sanchez himself, thereby attempting to undercut his claims without actually addressing their merits. Kind of sneaky, huh? Is reporting on the merits or truthfulness of what someone asserts part of a reporter's job, or does that all belong to Seymour Hersh and others who write for magazines, as Howard Kurtz probably would say?
washingtonpost.com: Ex-Commander In Iraq Faults War Strategy (Post, Oct. 13)
Dan Froomkin: Excellent point. We do way too much horse-race and beauty-contest coverage -- and too little substance. That's in part because it's easier. But no, it's not OK. Glad you pointed this out. I don't fault the initial story so much as I wish there had been a follow up.
Fairfax, Va.: Your comments on General Sanchez yesterday remind me again how valuable your perspectives are to our understanding of the news. Thank you! My question is, if The Post can't spare an editorial line or a next day follow-up article about the very serious charges Sanchez made and rather would consign him to the memory hole, what would it take for The Post to decide a story had "legs" and was worthy of more than its one-day coverage (which, by the way, included gratuitous reminders of Sanchez's supposed defects rather than any discussion of the merits of his assertions)?
Dan Froomkin: Thanks, and see the last question. It should not have been a "one-day story". Like the reader above wrote, the public deserves a continued analysis of the merits of his argument.
Portland, Ore.: Dan: The president and his administration continually start the employment number at 2003, citing 9 million jobs created. President Clinton added 22 million jobs, period, without ignoring the economy at the beginning of his term. I was wondering what Bush's real stat is? It drives me crazy when reporters let Bush use a selective framing of the time clock just to try to make him look better.
Dan Froomkin: You know, I was looking for that figure the other day and couldn't find it. I'll try to dig it up.
Chicago: Wolfe's question was good but he missed the follow-up: "Isn't the law that defines torture the same one you said in a signing statement does not need to be obeyed?" (From "Cheney's Law" last night, which was terrific.)
Dan Froomkin: That would have been a good one, yes.
Seattle: If Bush is complaining about the Democrats not negotiating with him, why doesn't someone ask him what compromises he has made with them? The whole Kennedy thing of "ask not..."
Dan Froomkin: Sheryl Gay Stolberg kind of asked him that today. I thought it was very telling that his idea of "common ground" was two examples of the Democrats completely caving. That said, I think there many be some compromises in the near future ... we'll see.
Anonymous: Kinda ironic ... the president giving the Dalai Lama a medal on the same day that he once again had to deny that the U.S. tortures prisoners. Just an observation.
Dan Froomkin: There's definitely a potentially enormous Karma gap at the Capitol today.
Dan Froomkin: Okay, thanks everyone for another great chat. See you again here in two weeks, and every weekday afternoon on the home page (except not tomorrow and Friday, because I'm off).
Editor's Note: washingtonpost.com moderators retain editorial control over Discussions and choose the most relevant questions for guests and hosts; guests and hosts can decline to answer questions. washingtonpost.com is not responsible for any content posted by third parties.
|
Join live discussions from the Washington Post. Feature topics include national, world and DC area news, politics, elections, campaigns, government policy, tech regulation, travel, entertainment, cars, and real estate.
| 79.073171 | 0.560976 | 0.707317 |
high
|
low
|
abstractive
|
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/discussion/2007/10/10/DI2007101001827.html
|
https://web.archive.org/web/2007102019id_/http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/discussion/2007/10/10/DI2007101001827.html
|
Free Range on Food
|
2007102019
|
A chat with the Food section staff is a chance for you to ask questions, offer suggestions and share information with other cooks and food lovers. It is a forum for discussion of food trends, ingredients, menus, gadgets and anything else food-related.
[an error occurred while processing this directive] [an error occurred while processing this directive]
Each chat, we will focus on topics from the day's Food section. You can also read the transcripts of past chats. Do you have a question about a particular recipe or a food-related anecdote to share? The Food section staff goes Free Range on Food every Wednesday at 1 p.m. ET. Read about the staff of the Food section.
Bonnie: Good afternoon to all, and thanks for tuning in. Editor Joe has escaped the daily grind (off to Japan for fun and cooking sessions), but Jane Black and Walter are on hand to answer your grass-fed beef and venison queries; Leigh, Jane Touzalin and I will chime in on other matters.
What'd you think of our first Tool Test, a new monthly feature in Food? We've already heard from readers with suggestions for what to try next.
Best poster honors today will get you "Roast Chicken and Other Stories," by Simon Hopkinson with Lindsey Bareham -- or perhaps a slightly used Garlic Pro E-Zee-Dice? Let's roll.
Oak Hill, Va.: Hi. Some questions about venison. Just how much fat does a 4-ounce portion of venison have as compared to beef? The article says it's lower, but by how much? Also, how does venison compare, fat-wise, with buffalo? I've been using buffalo as a low-fat beef alternative--does it have a similar flavor to venison?
Walter: Considering the cuts available for comparison, and at four ounces, beef tenderloin has 20 grams of fat, venison 2 and buffalo has 1 gram. In taste, buffalo has a notable sweet flavor. Farm-raised venison has a rich, lean, meaty flavor.
Community Garden: I made a big batch of pesto with the basil from our little plot. But I have lots left. Can it be frozen? How else can pesto be used, other than with pasta?
Jane Black: Pesto freezes better without cheese but you can certainly freeze it with it. It usually lasts for six months. My advice is to freeze it in an ice cube tray, then store the cubes in a Ziploc bag so you have individual serving sizes.
As for other things to do with it:
--Use it instead of mayo on a turkey sandwich. --Toss with boiled potatoes
--Stir a little into a vinaigrette or a vegetable soup
Washington, D.C.: Hello all! I really enjoyed today's articles on grass-fed beef and farm-raised deer. Do you know where I could purchase the deer produced by Gail Rose? Does she contract only with the national stores mentioned in the break-out box?
Walter: Deer farmer Gail Rose sells frozen venison at a shop on her Deauville Fallow Deer Farm in Basye, Va. (540-856-2130). She does not sell to stores.
Reston, Va.: Great section today. My question is about the apricot muffin recipe. It calls for pecans, but my husband is allergic to them. Could almonds be substituted?
Bonnie: Sure, try using toasted/slivered almonds...you need something that will kinda blend in with the batter.
Bethesda, Md.: Hi Rangers - I was lucky enough to be in the Southwest of France a few weeks ago and fell in love with the markets. Other than the market in Dupont, are there others on the weekends in DC/MD/VA? Thanks!
Jane Black: There's a small market on U Street at 14th on Saturdays and the Bloomingdale Farmers Market at 1st and R on Sundays. The market in Arlington on Saturdays is also large and fantastic. Here's a full list of markets that we ran on our site last year
McLean, Va.: I made Joe's 12 hour tomatoes last night, I'd love some ideas on using them. What about sauce?
Bonnie: Good for you! He tosses them with hot pasta,which makes a kind of instant sauce (at least that's what he wrote in the recipe headnote) -- in addition to using them on crostini, as part of an antipasto platter with olives and smoked fish. I'm sure they'd be great wrapped up in a parchment packet of fish or boneless chicken breast for the grill, too.
Washington, D.C.: I have been looking through a number of Thai cookbooks from the library, trying to get an idea of how to make a better pad thai. I noticed that several of them put pad thai under the "street food" section and catsup is used in place of tamarind. Is this accurate? Is ketchup used instead of tamarind in authentic pad thai? Is this because it is cheaper for street vendors?
Walter: Put down that ketchup bottle. Tom Sarobon, manager of Simply Home, a Thai-inspired restautant in the U Street corridor, says he has never heard of a tomato product in pad Thai. Go with a tamarind-based sauce.
Washington, D.C.: I've really gotten into baking, but I only know how to bake banana bread, brownies, and cookies; and I do eat what I bake. Could you give me some suggestions for more savory foods that I can bake, particularly for dinner (no meat please).
Leigh: I'm not sure it will give you the same satisfaction as baking brownies, or exactly what you mean, but a roasted vegetable casserole with a biscuit top can be a good cold weather dinner. You can vary the flavors to change things up; curry or herbs or garlic and tomato paste can each give different moods to essentially the same dish. Root vegetables and potatoes will stand up better to this treatment than leafy greens or delicates.
Rockville, Md.: I like the new gadget column, but personally, I just like using my knife to chop garlic. I have a small kitchen and I just don't have room for a bunch of stuff.
Bonnie: Gotcha. When you have a lot of it to chop, how do you keep it corralled?
Jane Touzalin: I have some old business to dispense with. Last week I posted a recipe for a lemon-tahini dressing from the '70s-'80s-era Golden Temple of Conscious Cookery restaurant that called for a cup of sesame oil. A chatter wondered whether that wasn't an awful lot of such a strong-tasting oil. Since then, I've gotten a clarification via e-mail. The oil called for in the recipe is NOT the toasted sesame oil familiar in Asian foods but cold-pressed sesame oil, a relatively mild, neutral oil. Big difference!
Washington, D.C.: Someone posted on Tom's column that Anthony Bourdain would be speaking at GWU. Do you have the details?
Leigh: Anthony Bourdain will be speaking as part of the Smithsonian Associates program at 7 p.m. at the Lisner auditorium on Nov. 7.
Lothian, Md.: "Garlic in the Chop Shop" -- I think you missed the greatest "chopper" for garlic. I have a Garlic Alligator purchased from Williams-Sonoma several years ago. It makes a perfect 1/8 inch dice of garlic and is wonderful for soups and sauces where I need to chop two or three bulbs (I LOVE garlic!). I bought one for my sister's birthday this year (it's now called a mini vegetable chopper and slices as well as dices and is easier to clean than the original) and she loves it as well. They are $18 and you can get them at the stores or online.
Bonnie: I wish we had, too, Lothian. Can you use it for more than 1 thing?
for the baker: There are lots of savory things to bake. Check out Anissa Helou's newish Savory Breads from the Mediterranean (not the exact title, but that's her name and it has Savory in the title). Really good stuff.
Cooking with Buffalo: While we're talking about red meats, what are your comments/tips/suggestions for cooking with buffalo?
What should I do differently than when cooking with beef or venison?
Walter: The most important thing to remember when cooking venison and buffalo is speed. These lean meats cook far quicker than beef. Don't dry them out.
Bonnie: That's why Venison Rack Chops is a good recipe to try -- chops are marinated in yogurt, which helps keep them moist.
Reston, Va.: Ha ha.. i like Wolfgang's comments on current food tv shows. i have a $10 off coupon for a push up bra from VS, maybe I'll try out for the next food network star!
I love your new tool column, as I am a horrible gadget-impulse buyer. this will help curb my buying habits.
Jane Black: Yes, I thought it was funny (and true) that Puck said that. He was a surprisingly down-to-earth guy.
Tysons Corner, Va.: Hi - love the chats. I made some delicious mashed potatoes last night with carmelized onions and gruyere cheese. Have quite a lot leftover. Do you have any creative ways to use leftover mashed potatoes?
Jane Black: Here's one idea: spread them on top of some ground, seasoned beef with carrots and celery and you've got shepherd's pie.
Lothian, Md.: RE: Pesto -- Also great in scrambled eggs (think green eggs & ham) and a cube or two in any tomato based pasta sauce. I just made my annual batch of pesto -- I have always made with cheese and frozen that way (in ice cube trays, then zip lock bags). The color may be different than fresh, but the taste is the same. I also use mine beyond 6 months -- it tastes fine, but is there a real time limit?
Jane Black: Yum. Great idea with the eggs. Yes, it probably lasts more than six months but that's what most books I've seen say for a limit for how long you should keep it.
Oh deer...: The venison my father would bring home from hunting always had to be marinated, he said, or it would taste too gamey. Is store-bought venison milder in flavor?
Walter: Dad was, more than likely, bringing home the common whitetail deer which tends to be gamy in flavor. The venison sold in most stores and restaurants is red deer which is far milder.
Fairfax, Va.: Loved Elinor Klivans' story about nuts. In our house, nut allergies mean the only nuts I can use in baking are almonds, cashews or peanuts. Does Elinor have a baking recipe that uses one of those varieties?
Bonnie: I'm sure she does. Send an e-mail to food@washpost.com and we'll try to help you out.
Washington, D.C.: This is a weird question, but here goes:
I know you can make an approximation of sun-dried tomatoes by drying your tomatoes in the oven. Does the same process work for grapes/raisins? Or other dried fruit?
Bonnie: Oh man, wish Joe were here to answer this himself. He's been experimenting with oven-drying lots of things, mostly in the fruit and veg range so far. I know you can certainly use the oven, but it's perhaps not the most energy-efficient (12 to 14 hours in a 175-degree oven), and there's some tending/turning to do during that time. Still, it's preferable to outdoor drying trays and bugs and...
Rockville, Md.: Savory baker: During Rammadan, we make savory puff pastries. Basically stuff puff pastry triangles with curried beef and then bake.
Leigh: Great idea! Puff pastry is hugely versatile.
i hate chopping garlic: it's messy, it gets all over the cutting board, counter and floor, and makes my fingers smell for a long long time... i love the taste of freshly minced garlic, but i am willing to sacrifice it for jarred minced garlic just because it's so much less painful.
Bonnie: Some of the tools are designed with you in mind, but we found there was more close contact with the garlic than advertised. I guess it depends on how much you really love that fresh flavor. Tom Lachman, a News Service editor here, was just telling me about the garlic he's been growing. I'd like to give that a try next year.
Choosing Beef: Would you please talk about choosing beef? What are the primary choices to make, and how does one ensure getting quality meat?
I'm no longer in a major city, so am not looking for vendors so much as general guidance.
Jane Black: That's a really tough question. And I'm afraid the only answer I have is to try to buy it from someone you trust. It's not easy these days when there are so few butchers and most meat comes prepackaged in supermarkets. But I'd ask around and find out if there's a small shop selling organic or high-quality beef and get to know the folks who work there.
Austin, Tex.: I tried the lowfat soul baked mac and cheese (http://projects.washingtonpost.com/recipes/2007/10/10/low-fat-baked-mac-and-cheese/)
last night, and I have to admit that I was disappointed. Maybe I did something wrong? It was sort of gritty/lumpy and not very creamy. Also, kind of bland. Maybe I didn't cook the flour enough before adding the milk? Maybe I am expecting too much from lowfat mac and cheese? I still look forward to trying the corn pudding recipe!
Bonnie: That's a shame. Hard for me to say what might have gone awry, but the tester's family was quite pleased with the results, and the sample she brought in was tasty enough even at room temperature. Send an e-mail to food@washpost.com with your contact info and I'll try to investigate further. Keep in mind, it's tough to compare it with the real thing.
chopping garlic: When mincing garlic I toss a little salt over the cloves after peeling. It seems to help "anchor" the stuff to the board and helps with the process. Not sure why.
Leigh: The grit gives it a little extra traction.
Bonnie: Maybe the salt draws out some moisture, too.
Cast iron cooking: Hi there,
Just got a new Lodge 12" cast iron pan, but don't know what to cook in it! Went to Spago recently, and the chef came out & told me he had done our fish in cast iron, so I ran out & got one. But what else can I do in it, and do you have recipes? It is preseasoned, although it does say to wash with water, dry, then oil before 1st use.
Jane Touzalin: There are very few things you CAN'T cook in it. For my mom, for example, a cast-iron skillet was her pretty much her only frying pan. She fried eggs in it in the morning and made upside-down cake in it for the evening dessert. But there are some traditional/common uses for it: corn bread, for instance, and fried chicken, and searing fish and meats. It's great for foods that need to go straight from stovetop to oven or broiler. But if you want special recipes, go to the Lodge Web site, www.lodgemfg.com. They have a sort of club you can sign up for that involves recipes e-mailed monthly. The Web site also has great tips on care of your new pan.
pesto use: What about on pizza? Use it instead of red sauce and add chicken with tomatoes. YUM.
Jane Black: Another very good idea!
ketchup vs. tamarind : I suspect "ketchup" was substituted because in many parts of the country you can't get stuff like tamarind paste. Lots of items you can easily get in NYC or DC you can't get when you are in the middle of the country or in a rural area - even in rural areas around here.
Walter: No matter where you live, ingredients such as tamarind paste are always available by mail. That's why we have Google.
Washington, D.C.: My dad took my son and I out for lunch today, as he was in town on business. We ordered a bunch of stuff and the only thing my 19 month old would eat was the vegetable lo mein. And he ate it with relish! Any mom knows that when you find something that a toddler will you eat, you better learn how to make it. Do you have a recipe for vegetable lo mein? It was such a pleasure to see him nibbling at the veggies. And yes, please let it be a recipe that is an Americanized Chinese version with the thick brown sauce over the noodles. He just loved it!
Bonnie: Sure, and this one's kid-friendly: Saucy Lo Mein
Falls Church, Va.: When German Gourmet opens the new store, will the old one shut down? It's such a great neighborhood place, I'd hate to lose it.
Walter: Not to worry. The new, larger German Gourmet is open, and with a big parking lot. The original location is going strong and will not close.
Washington, D.C.: Wow, I loved the cooking section today. I am definitely a gadget person and loved the article on the garlic gadgets. All we now need is the recipe for 40 clove garlic chicken. I've had it, never made it and it is delicious! At least I know I can use my Cuisinart for garlic chopping.
Bonnie: Be advised that in the larger Cuisinarts, the blade sits up off the floor of the bowl so that you may not get the same chopping results as we did with the Mini-Prep Processor.
Thanksgiving planning...: I found a recipe (I think in one of the Frugal Gourmet's books) for baking a custard inside a whole pumpkin, and want to try it as an interesting variation for Thanksgiving dinner. (Apparently you serve a scoop of custard with the surrounding pumpkin flesh to each person - so you kind of get custard-topped pumpkin pieces.) However, quite a lot of people discussing a similar recipe online have had problems getting the custard to set inside the pumpkin. Do you have any tips for dealing with that? Or should I just bake the custard and the pumpkin separately and pour one into the other (seems like cheating, really)?
Bonnie: I think the pumpkin needs to be hollowed out and baked separately (with foil on top), then bake the custard in it. Pumpkin baking and cooking's on the Food horizon in the next few weeks.
Burke, Va.: My son (20 months) loves squash and sweet potato, so I figure he'll love pumpkin too. I can and have cooked with the canned stuff, but I have little experience cooking with actual pumpkins - do I have to chunk and peel them first, or can I roast them as I do butternut squash and THEN scoop the flesh out of the shell, when it's easy?
And does anyone have a recipe for that lovely Afghan dish with pumpkin in yogurt sauce? Marvelous stuff- I really would like to make that at home.
Jane Black: I'll chime in on the first part: Yes, you can cook them just like you do butternut squash. Try the sugar pumpkins; they're naturally sweet, which is why they're often used for pies.
Reston, Va.: Hello, Free Rangers! I have some leftover stale French bread and thought I'd try making a savory bread pudding for the first time. I also have some fresh spinach - could I use that in there? What else do I add? Thanks for the advice and for these weekly chats, which are very informative!
Jane Touzalin: Just find a savory bread pudding recipe you like and improvise. The spinach is a good idea. Mushrooms and spinach are natural companions. Then in addition to the usual egg-and-milk bread-pudding base, how about adding some soft goat cheese. Also, sauteed red onion and a little sauteed garlic. Nutmeg always goes great with spinach. Some grated Parmesan on top. Go wild!
Mushroom substitution for fat in baked goods: On the bbc.co.uk website today, one of the major bakers (Kipling's Cakes) is reported to be experimenting with mushroom cells to replace fat in anything that uses fat for texture and flavor. This scares the heck out of me--I'm seriously, Epi pen carryingly, allergic to mushrooms. How do I find out if these changes take place? What do I look for on the label? It took forever for me to learn that Quorn is mushroom based (luckily, I hadn't tried it).
Jane Black: That's really interesting -- I've never heard about it. It's not clear to me what you'd have to look for on the label but, I imagine, if it does become popular, there will be some indication that there are mushrooms in there. (The same way that lots of things now tell you they have nuts whereas they didn't used to.) We can look into this though. For other interested readers, here's the story
Lothian, Md.: Much as I love garlic and the smell of anything simmering with it, I HATE the smell on my hands so I always use surgical gloves when dealing with onions or garlic. I buy them at the warehouse club (packs of 200) and use them for anything messy or smelly in the kitchen then toss.
Bonnie: Yeah, that's an issue. We used one of those stainless steel "bars" and it worked for a while, but then the smell sort of returned to our hands. Not that we minded.
Bethesda, Md.: You're so right about the comparative danger of venison drying out. Try this with venison tenderloin steaks on the grill: marinate for 15 minutes per side in worcestershire sauce, then wrap in bacon. Grill for about the same time you would for comparably thick beef.
Walter: Everything is better with bacon. Thanks for added fat.
roasted vegetable casserole: Do you have a recipe for that roasted veggie casserole mentioned earlier? Does it need a crust?
Leigh: I don't have a specific recipe for that. I was concocting it in my head and it can be morphed to suit whatever veggies you have on hand. If you make a biscuit topping you don't need a crust and can make sure it doesn't get soggy.
Rockville, Md.: I would like to buy a reasonably priced soda siphon and was wondering if your drinks consultant has a preference between ISI and Liss which are the only brands I've found in my price range. thank you
Bonnie: Jason's got an Isi, which he bought at Target. It's working fine for him, he says -- but he doesn't use it that often, and hasn't done performance comparisons with the Liss models, which I see are also at Target (online).
Maryland: What in the heck is Quorn?
Jane Black: It's a protein made from processed mushrooms. (Actually, Quorn is a brand name.) It's popular in England where it's a standard add to vegetarian dishes. In other words, it's their answer to tofu.
Washington, D.C.: I would love a salad dressing that uses my bottle of tarragon vinegar. Any recipes or suggestions I can look up?
Jane Touzalin: Really, you don't need a special recipe for it; you can substitute tarragon vinegar for the regular vinegar in your standard vinaigrette recipe. Or make a remoulade sauce/dressing with it, or use it in coleslaw. Or marinate cucumber slices in it. That should take care of your bottle.
Deer farms?: I never really thought much about eating deer (guess it's because of watching Bambi when i was little), so i never thought about where deer meat came from -- i just assumed venison came from a deer living in the wild who was then hunted and turned into meat. But I recently came across this article about an undercover investigation inside a deer farm in NY and was horrified by the cruelty: http://outdoornewsdaily.com/index.php/archives/891
Just thought others might want to know about this. I had no idea deer farms even existed.
Walter: There are more than 7,800 deer farms in this country. But most are hunting preserves. Only 20 percent produce venison for sale. The article would indicate that the industry needs tighter regulations.
Richmond, Va.: I have been making a lot of soup lately (from that NE Soup Factory book - excellent!) and am looking for some good suggestions for side dishes to serve with it besides the ubiquitous salad. I always make some rolls or cornbread but it doesn't usually seem like enough for dinner.
I also have a Lodge skillet and I love it. It makes the best cornbread, crispy and cooks a lot faster than in the Pyrex because I preheat the skillet first to get that crunchy crust.
Jane Black: Maybe you need to beef up the salads? Toss apple, walnuts, goat's cheese into salad with a butternut squash soup; grilled chicken, pecans and blue cheese to go with a black bean soup. Basically, balance what's in the salad between protein, crunch and something a little sweet or salty and you'll have more of a "real" meal.
Silver Spring, Md.: Some of the KitchenAid food processors have an internal mini-bowl that will probably give similar results to the cuisinart mini-prep.
By the way, I had a mini-prep. It lasted about three weeks before dying a horrid grinding death...and we had NOT overloaded or misused it.
Bonnie: Heavens! Did the store or the company make good on a new one?
Washington, D.C.: So I recently saw instructions for curing your own olives, and I'm intrigued. Has anyone there ever tried this? Is there anywhere around here to get the uncured olives? I saw a mail order source, but I always prefer going and getting them myself. I was disappointed to see that they take 6 months to cure - there goes my Christmas idea.
Bonnie: You'd find them in Middle Eastern markets, but I think I just saw green ones in the produce section at Balducci's.
Leftover French Bread: You can also make the wonderful Papa Al Pomodoro, a soup that consists mainly of leftover bread, tomatoes, olive oil and some seasoning.
Lots of recipes on the Internet. And there are three separate books I know of about using up stale artisan bread. Cooking with Artisan Bread is the name of the best one.
Jane Black: Love that book.
If a cold pressed sesame seed oil is used, couldn't EVOO be a great substitute?
Jane Touzalin: Maybe not in this case; the recipe also called for a cup of olive oil, PLUS the cup of sesame or safflower oil.
Woodley Park, Washington, D.C.: Thanks for the Kerala Jewish Fish recipe. I'm a fan of Andreas Viestad; enjoyed his PBS show on Scandinavian cooking.
I'm intrigued by these cebub peppercorns. Never heard of them before. Can you tell us more about them. Are they widely used in Indian cooking?
Bonnie: Indonesian, I think, but related to the black peppercorns that are native to India. Andreas is a cool guy who knows a lot about food. Cubeb is perhaps more pungent.
Upstate, NY: I made a variation on Joe's 12 hour tomatoes last weekend. I had a bunch of cherry tomatoes that had split on the vine due to a heavy rain. I picked them quickly after the rain but didn't have anything to use them in immediately, so I decided to try Joe's recipe. I did them in the toaster oven on a piece of foil, but since they were so small they only took about 4 hours. They're really delicious and were a good use of tomatoes that might have otherwise gone to waste.
Bonnie: Joe will read this from Tokyo in the next few days, and smile, and bow.
Bethesda, Md.: For Walter --
You're spot on that everything is better with bacon. That's perhaps the only good thing about the current weather: there are still local vine-grown tomatoes for BLTs!
Walter: Grab them while you can.
Re sides for soup: Two of my favorite combos:
Tomato soup with a grilled cheese sandwich (using the Lodge pan!) and mushroom soup with goat cheese toasts (use slices of a baguette).
Jane Touzalin: Great way to combine two topics! You're right about the grilled cheese sandwich -- a classic use of a cast-iron pan.
Jane Black: And I will tell you my favorite add to grilled cheese -- mango chutney. Adds a surprising sweetness that goes really well with cheese.
Bonnie: The oven timer's just gone off, so we'll be on our way. The Lothian chatter who mentioned the Garlic Alligator (and followed up!) wins the book. Remember to send your contact info to food@washpost.com. Next week, there's dim sum expertise, Chef on Call and more...c'mon back!
Editor's Note: washingtonpost.com moderators retain editorial control over Discussions and choose the most relevant questions for guests and hosts; guests and hosts can decline to answer questions. washingtonpost.com is not responsible for any content posted by third parties.
|
Join live discussions from the Washington Post. Feature topics include national, world and DC area news, politics, elections, campaigns, government policy, tech regulation, travel, entertainment, cars, and real estate.
| 143.268293 | 0.634146 | 0.731707 |
high
|
low
|
abstractive
|
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/10/16/AR2007101601943.html
|
https://web.archive.org/web/2007102019id_/http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/10/16/AR2007101601943.html
|
Electricity Overseer Says Grid Must Grow
|
2007102019
|
The electric-power industry in the mid-Atlantic region and other parts of the nation is not keeping up with long-term demand, the industry's reliability organization warned yesterday in its annual assessment.
The increasing use of wind and solar electricity sources, the eventual output of nuclear power plants being planned, and limits on greenhouse gas emissions will put new strains on the electricity transmission grid unless it can be strengthened, officials of the North American Electric Reliability Corp. said. Continued resistance to building high-voltage transmission lines threatens to increase the chance of power shortages, the organization said.
The amount of reserve electricity generation capacity available for emergency shortages will fall below a 15 percent safety margin by 2012 in the mid-Atlantic and Midwest and by 2009 in New England, requiring some combination of new power plants, more transmission lines and electricity conservation by consumers and business.
NERC, based in Princeton, N.J., has been assigned under federal law to enforce the reliability of the U.S. power grids -- a response to the Northeast power blackout in 2003. David R. Nevius, a NERC senior vice president, said at a news conference yesterday that the long-term reliability outlook this year is somewhat better than a year ago. But, he added, "Electricity peak demand in the United States is still projected to grow faster than the resources needed to serve it."
The demand for power in summer is expected to increase more than 135,000 megawatts nationally in the next 10 years, an 18 percent overall increase.
The construction of new power plants that are committed to deliver power at such peak times is projected to add 77,000 megawatts, a gain of 8 percent, NERC said. An additional 46,000 megawatts of "uncommitted" generating plant capacity might be available but cannot be counted on, NERC said. Those plants aren't required to run during shortages, are mothballed or cannot deliver power where it is needed.
In some parts of the country, including the Great Plains, the eastern Rocky Mountain states and Florida, utilities remain under state "obligation to serve" regulations and can be ordered to build power plants to maintain adequate reserve capacity.
That isn't the case in New England and the mid-Atlantic and Great Lakes regions, where electricity markets, not regulation, determine wholesale power prices, NERC said. There, grid operators rely on complex pricing formulas to create incentives for generators to build more plants. The Washington area's grid operator, the PJM Interconnection, has such a pricing strategy. Some state officials criticize the plan, saying it may raise power prices without assuring necessary plant construction.
NERC said those strategies "look promising." NERC President Richard P. Sergel added: "Obviously, they haven't been proven yet. We will track them very carefully."
About 2,000 miles of high-voltage lines were built in the past year, about a 1 percent increase. "The pace of proposed transmission projects in the U.S. appears to be accelerating," NERC said.
Maryland and Virginia bring in more than a quarter of their electricity supplies from other states, and the District imports 98 percent of its needs, according to the federal Energy Information Administration.
But proposals for new lines into the Washington area have been opposed by residents and public officials.
The Energy Department this month designated the mid-Atlantic, including the Washington metropolitan area, as a National Interest Electricity Transmission Corridor, because of persistent transmission congestion. The 2005 Energy Policy Act permits federal regulators to override states and approve construction of a line through a national corridor if states do not act within a year.
|
The electric-power industry in the mid-Atlantic region and other parts of the nation is not keeping up with long-term demand, the industry's reliability organization warned yesterday in its annual assessment.
| 17.897436 | 1 | 39 |
medium
|
high
|
extractive
|
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/10/16/AR2007101601899.html
|
https://web.archive.org/web/2007102019id_/http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/10/16/AR2007101601899.html
|
Redskins Fall Short On Follow-Through
|
2007102019
|
The story line of the Washington Redskins' loss in Green Bay was a typical one for the team. The Redskins arrived in Green Bay riding a 34-3 thrashing of Detroit and dominated the Packers in the first half. Then, on a misty day and a slick field, the offense failed in the second half and the Redskins lost, 17-14.
Twice this season, the Redskins (3-2) have made statements of intent with victories over NFC opponents, only to blow second-half leads the following week and lose games they might have won.
Since Coach Joe Gibbs and his staff took over in 2004, the Redskins have just two stretches of three wins or more -- a three-game run to open the 2005 season and a five-game streak to close out 2005. They seemed poised for a third such streak last month, opening 2-0 and leading the then-winless New York Giants, 17-3, at home at the half. But they were outscored 21-0 in the second half. The Redskins rebounded against Detroit, then relapsed at Green Bay.
For players and coaches, the outcomes have become far too familiar, but there is no simple solution to the pattern, they say. Gibbs and the coaches continue to emphasize the importance of each game -- Sunday's game against the wounded Arizona Cardinals being no exception -- and attempt to steel the team against letdowns. Still, the tendency to falter after each triumph persists.
"We can't afford to give games away and not make plays in crucial situations like we did Sunday," said tailback Ladell Betts, a 2002 draft pick. "We're just not at that level where we can afford to do that, and until we learn that, we're going to continue to go up and down. There's a fine line between being good and being great, and I think right now we're a good team that's trying to learn how to be great."
During Gibbs's second tenure, the Redskins are 24-29 in 53 regular season games, with eight victories coming during two winning streaks in 2005. In the other 45 games, the Redskins have won back-to-back games just twice (the first two games of 2007 and in the third and fourth weeks of the 2006 season). Frequently, the loss came because the team let leads slip away: The Redskins have lost 12 games despite having a halftime lead since 2004, most in the NFL. They have lost six of the last nine games they led at halftime, dating from last October.
"In general, we all knew what was at stake [Sunday], just like this coming week," Gibbs said. "This is what we try to do. We say, 'Hey, this is how important this is,' and I think our guys knew it. And you always look at it, 'Hey, you have a big win one week,' and that's always my concern: Everybody brags on you for a week and everything, how does that affect you? But going into Green Bay, I don't think there's any way we could have said" any more.
In Gibbs's first game in his return to the team, the Redskins beat Tampa Bay, 16-10, in September 2004. The next week, the Redskins committed seven turnovers and lost, 20-14, at Giants Stadium. That December, the Redskins pounded those same Giants, 31-7, at FedEx Field, a victory that marked the first time the Redskins topped 20 points that season. They dominated Philadelphia statistically the following week but lost, 17-14, committing 12 penalties.
In October 2005, the Redskins hammered San Francisco, 52-17, then lost, 36-0, to New York the following week. That November, the Redskins topped Philadelphia, 17-10, and seemed ready to start a playoff march, then fell 36-35 at Tampa Bay the next week, losing on a two-point conversion despite holding the ball for nearly 34 minutes and amassing nearly 400 yards of offense.
"The finishing aspect is the most frustrating thing," said linebacker Khary Campbell, who has been with the team since 2004. "When you're close to feeling a victory and then it doesn't happen, I think that's the most frustrating part about it. Everyone is working hard and trying to take our team to the next level -- and I think the whole team has that intention of wining games and being a contender in the league -- but we're not finishing it all the way to the end. You know you can do it, but then again it's just not getting done."
In 2006, the Redskins beat a strong Jacksonville team to pull to 2-2, then fell, 19-3, to the reeling Giants, who had given up 92 points in their previous three games and seemed on the verge of mutiny. That November, the Redskins beat Dallas, 22-19, to remain in the playoff hunt at 3-5, then were blown out the next week by a Philadelphia team that had lost three straight games. On Nov. 26, the Redskins' pass defense shut down Steve Smith, Carolina's star wide receiver, and quarterback Jason Campbell earned his first NFL win in a 17-13 victory over the Panthers; seven days later, the Redskins wasted a halftime lead at home against sputtering Atlanta, and the Falcons snapped a four-game losing streak at Washington's expense.
Last December, the Redskins earned their biggest victory of the season at New Orleans, derailing a surging Saints team that would go on to the NFC championship game. A week later, they blew a halftime lead at St. Louis, gave up 398 yards after the half and fell, 37-31, in overtime.
"Whenever we decide that we want to finish guys off, and actually do it in a professional manner and not kill ourselves, we'll be good," injured guard Randy Thomas said. "We need to get over that hump. We've got to put a streak together, no matter what it takes."
|
Info on Washington Redskins including the 2005 NFL Preview. Get the latest game schedule and statistics for the Redskins. Follow the Washington Redskins under the direction of Coach Joe Gibbs.
| 34.685714 | 0.685714 | 1.2 |
medium
|
low
|
abstractive
|
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/10/15/AR2007101500663.html
|
https://web.archive.org/web/2007102019id_/http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/10/15/AR2007101500663.html
|
Edwards Gets Most SEIU State Support
|
2007102019
|
IOWA CITY, Iowa -- Democrat John Edwards was endorsed Monday by 10 state chapters of the Service Employees International Union, representing nearly 1 million members and including the crucial state of Iowa, union leaders said.
"John Edwards earned our support by taking a strong stand on health care and because he offers our members the greatest hope for restoring the American dream," said Cathy Glasson, head of the union's Iowa affiliate.
SEIU decided last week not to make a national endorsement in the Democratic presidential primaries, a blow to Edwards who had vigorously sought the support. The union freed its state chapters to make their own endorsements, and on Monday Iowa and nine other states representing 930,000 workers _ half the union's membership _ went with the 2004 vice presidential nominee.
The other chapters backing Edwards are California, Washington, Michigan, Idaho, Montana, Minnesota, Ohio, West Virginia and Oregon. The endorsements were announced at a news conference Monday evening.
Illinois Sen. Barack Obama won endorsements from the Illinois and Indiana chapters, which have about 170,000 members.
"I have proudly stood with them on the front lines of the fight for working Americans for years and I am honored to earn their support in each of these states," Edwards said. "I've been out there in the trenches with them in the cause. Their cause is my cause."
Edwards vowed to make health care a top priority.
Tom Balanoff, president of the SEIU Illinois State Council, cited Obama's commitment to expanding access to affordable health care and to protecting workers' rights as among reasons for the union's endorsement. He also cited Obama's early opposition to the Iraq War.
Edwards aides contended the endorsement in Iowa could make the difference in a low-turnout contest such as the state's precinct caucuses, which open the presidential nominating process and are likely to be decided by about 100,000 activists. SEIU has 2,000 members in Iowa.
"There is nothing more important than organizing on the ground," said Jennifer O'Malley Dillon, who runs Edwards' campaign in Iowa. "All of these members have a network across the state."
An official for the Illinois SEIU said the union would urge its members to campaign for Obama in neighboring Iowa. But union officials later acknowledged that would violate its national rules.
Under those rules, individual state chapters may endorse presidential candidates, but campaigning must be limited to that state or states where other chapters have endorsed the same candidate.
Associated Press writers Christopher Wills in Springfield, Ill., and Nedra Pickler in Washington contributed to this report.
Service Employees International Union: http://www.seiu.org
|
IOWA CITY, Iowa -- Democrat John Edwards was endorsed Monday by 10 state chapters of the Service Employees International Union, representing nearly 1 million members and including the crucial state of Iowa, union leaders said.
| 13.076923 | 1 | 39 |
low
|
high
|
extractive
|
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/10/15/AR2007101501712.html
|
https://web.archive.org/web/2007102019id_/http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/10/15/AR2007101501712.html
|
Envoy Is the Lobbying Force Behind Dalai Lama's Medal
|
2007102019
|
When President Bush hands the Congressional Gold Medal to the Dalai Lama tomorrow, Lodi Gyaltsen Gyari will remember how different it was to be the Tibetan leader's "man in Washington" back when he started 17 years ago.
Gyari, the Dalai Lama's special envoy, wasn't even allowed into the State Department then. At the time, American officials were largely unfamiliar with the movement led by the Buddhist monk.
"Some junior officials would meet me in some coffee shop that was as far away as possible from Foggy Bottom," Gyari, 58, said last week as he prepared for the Dalai Lama's five-day trip to Washington, which began yesterday.
For Gyari, the medal ceremony in the Capitol Rotunda is the fruit of nearly two decades of lobbying Congress, the White House and the World Bank for more autonomy for Tibet. But Gyari is no typical advocate. Like the Dalai Lama, he is believed by Tibetan Buddhists to be the reincarnation of an important lama, or guru, and lived in a monastery as a boy.
But Gyari left that life long ago to serve Tibetan liberty and today looks, with his suit and briefcase, like the suburban dad he is.
Gyari also brings some complex family baggage. He is the progeny of legendary Tibetan freedom fighters: an aunt (who raised him and whom he calls his second mother) was one of the first Tibetans to take up arms against the Chinese in the 1950s, and her mother-in-law, who was executed and later the subject of Tibetan revolutionary folk songs.
"When the Chinese sit at a table and engage with him, they know who he is," said Kate Saunders, spokeswoman for the International Campaign for Tibet, a D.C.-based advocacy group, whose board of directors is chaired by actor Richard Gere, a longtime Tibet activist. Gyari also sits on the board.
Although his ancestors fought for Tibetan independence from China, Gyari is a modern diplomat facing a rising superpower. As the lead negotiator with China, he makes the case for autonomy of Tibetans within China -- the rights to govern their own religious institutions, maintain their language and oversee public education, among other things.
Gyari, a former journalist and chairman of the Tibetan parliament in exile, knows there are many Tibetans -- including some in his family -- who still want to separate from China. He remembers his aunt's reaction in 1988, when the Dalai Lama proposed limiting, but not eliminating, China's oversight of Tibet: "She was furious with me." She told Gyari, who was a high-ranking official in the exile government at the time, that if she had known he was carrying the document laying out the proposal, " 'I would have torn it to shreds,' " he recalls her saying.
The original impetus for awarding the Dalai Lama the medal came from several members of Congress who have long championed him, particularly Sen. Dianne Feinstein and Rep. Tom Lantos, both California Democrats. But legislation bestowing the medal on a recipient must be co-sponsored by two thirds of the membership of both the House of Representatives and the Senate before their respective committees will consider it. Gyari went from one legislator's office to another, trying to explain to them what the Dalai Lama does and to convince them that he is not trying to break Tibet away from China.
Chinese diplomats, Hill staffers said, pressed hard against the Dalai Lama getting the medal, and were particularly upset when Bush announced last week that he would personally present it to him. In doing so, Bush will become the first U.S. president to meet the Dalai Lama in public.
"China resolutely opposes the U.S. Congress awarding the Dalai its so-called Congressional Gold Medal, and firmly opposes any country or any person using the Dalai issue to interfere in China's internal affairs," the Associated Press quoted Chinese Foreign Ministry spokesman Liu Jianchao as saying at a news conference Thursday.
|
When President Bush hands the Congressional Gold Medal to the Dalai Lama tomorrow, Lodi Gyaltsen Gyari will remember how different it was to be the Tibetan leader's "man in Washington" back when he started 17 years ago.
| 18.285714 | 1 | 42 |
medium
|
high
|
extractive
|
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/10/13/AR2007101301274.html
|
https://web.archive.org/web/2007101419id_/http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/10/13/AR2007101301274.html
|
Encouraged by Women's Response, Clinton Stresses Female Side
|
2007101419
|
AMES, Iowa -- The candidate was running late. But at the crossroads of Main Street and Kellogg Avenue here after dusk one night recently, a girl power rally was underway, even before Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton pulled up to the event site.
Raining Jane, an all-female band, played a Joan Jett cover. White-haired women packed onto a riser. Ruth Harkin, wife of Iowa Sen. Tom Harkin, took the microphone and roused the audience, saying the "first woman president of the United States" was on her way.
When Clinton finally appeared -- introduced by a seventh-grade girl who precociously described the gender gap in American presidential politics -- the New York senator launched into her standard stump speech, wrapping up with what has become a familiar discourse about the demographics of the campaign trail. Clinton said she is "often struck at two groups of people" who come to shake her hand -- women in their 90s who want to make history and parents of young daughters.
"As I go by, shaking hands and meeting people," Clinton said, building up to the apex of her speech, "I often hear a dad or a mom lean over to a little girl, and say, 'See, honey, you can be anything you want to be.' "
In the early days of the 2008 presidential race, the question was often asked: Is the country ready to elect a female president? And Clinton seemed to be bracing to confront the doubters.
But as the primary campaign has evolved, giving Clinton a substantial lead in national polls in the race for the Democratic nomination, her public approach to the gender issue has shifted with it. Far from running away from the so-called woman question, she has taken to openly embracing it.
The result is a campaign that is much more overtly feminist than her own advisers had anticipated -- more House Speaker Nancy Pelosi than former British prime minister Margaret Thatcher, more focused on reaching out to women than neutralizing worries about a woman candidate.
This week, Clinton is holding a series of events designed to underscore her strength among women. After a speech in New York on Monday, Clinton will unveil in New Hampshire on Tuesday a domestic policy initiative that aides say has implications for women, followed by a women's fundraiser on Wednesday.
In the latest Washington Post-ABC News survey, conducted in late September, 57 percent of women said they would support Clinton in a Democratic primary, compared with 15 percent for Sen. Barack Obama and 13 percent for former senator John Edwards. Of those who support Clinton, 31 percent said that her chance to make history was a factor in their decision.
At the same time, in a theoretical general election test against Republican front-runner Rudolph W. Giuliani, Clinton has a lead that is almost entirely attributable to women. She also has a gaping lead among self-described feminists, according to the same poll. Men and women who call themselves feminists preferred Clinton 64 to 30 percent, while those who did not were evenly divided between Clinton and Giuliani, 48 to 46 percent.
The flip side of her strong support from women is the potential for a backlash among men -- especially in a state such as Iowa, the first caucus state, which has never elected a woman to Congress. Mark Penn, her chief strategist, said the "level of emotional attachment" between female voters and Clinton is strong enough to help carry her through the Iowa caucuses, which he said he expected to be 55 to 60 percent women. Fifty-four percent of Democratic caucusgoers in 2004 were women.
"It may be true that statewide they haven't elected a woman, but that's very different from a Democratic primary or caucus," Penn said. He also pointed out that Clinton is faring better among men in recent surveys than she did earlier this year.
|
Follow 2008 Elections & Campaigns at washingtonpost.com Politics Information on Democrats,Republicans,political cartoons,opinions,government policies,political analysis and reports." elections,campaigns,Democrats,Republicans,political cartoons,opinions from The Washington Post. Features government policy,government tech,political analysis and reports.
| 13.245614 | 0.473684 | 0.54386 |
low
|
low
|
abstractive
|
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/10/12/AR2007101202147.html
|
https://web.archive.org/web/2007101419id_/http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/10/12/AR2007101202147.html
|
The Dignity Agenda
|
2007101419
|
"We talk about democracy and human rights. Iraqis talk about justice and honor." That comment from Lt. Col. David Kilcullen, made at a seminar last month on counterinsurgency, is the beginning of wisdom for an America that is trying to repair the damage of recent years. It applies not simply to Iraq but to the range of problems in a world tired of listening to an American megaphone.
Dignity is the issue that vexes billions of people around the world, not democracy. Indeed, when people hear President Bush preaching about democratic values, it often comes across as a veiled assertion of American power. The implicit message is that other countries should be more like us -- replacing their institutions, values and traditions with ours. We mean well, but people feel disrespected. The bromides and exhortations are a further assault on their dignity.
That's the difficulty when the U.S. House of Representatives pressures Turkey to admit that it committed genocide against the Armenians 92 years ago. It's not that this demand is wrong. I'm an Armenian American, and some of my own relatives perished in that genocidal slaughter. I agree with the congressional resolution, but I know that this is a problem that Turks must resolve. They are imprisoned in a past that they have not yet been able to accept. Our hectoring makes it easier for them to retreat deeper into denial.
The most articulate champion of what the administration likes to call the "democracy agenda" has been Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice. When she talks about the universality of American values, she carries the special resonance of an African American girl from Birmingham, Ala., who witnessed the struggle for democracy in a segregated America. But she also conveys an American arrogance, a message that when it comes to good governance, it's our way or the highway.
That's why it's encouraging to hear that Rice is taking policy advice from Kilcullen, a brilliant Australian military officer who helped reshape U.S. strategy in Iraq toward the bottom-up precepts of counterinsurgency. Sources tell me Kilcullen will soon be joining the State Department as a part-time consultant. For a taste of his thinking, check out his Sept. 26 presentation to a Marine Corps seminar (available at http://www.wargaming.quantico.usmc.mil).
As we think about a "dignity agenda," there are some other useful readings. A starting point is Zbigniew Brzezinski's new book, "Second Chance," which argues that America's best hope is to align itself with what he calls a "global political awakening." The former national security adviser explains: "In today's restless world, America needs to identify with the quest for universal human dignity, a dignity that embodies both freedom and democracy but also implies respect for cultural diversity."
After I mentioned Brzezinski's ideas about dignity in a previous column, a reader sent me a 1961 essay by the philosopher Isaiah Berlin, which made essentially the same point. A deeply skeptical man who resisted the "isms" of partisan thought, Berlin was trying to understand the surge of nationalism despite two world wars. "Nationalism springs, as often as not, from a wounded or outraged sense of human dignity, the desire for recognition," he wrote.
"The craving for recognition has grown to be more powerful than any other force abroad today," Berlin continued. "It is no longer economic insecurity or political impotence that oppresses the imaginations of many young people in the West today, but a sense of the ambivalence of their social status -- doubts about where they belong, and where they wish or deserve to belong."
A final item on my dignity reading list is "Violent Politics," a new book by the iconoclastic historian William R. Polk. He examines 10 insurgencies through history -- from the American Revolution to the Irish struggle for independence to the Afghan resistance to Soviet occupation -- to make a stunningly simple point, which we managed to forget in Iraq: People don't like to be told what to do by outsiders. "The very presence of foreigners, indeed, stimulates the sense first of apartness and ultimately of group cohesion." Foreign intervention offends people's dignity, Polk reminds us. That's why insurgencies are so hard to defeat.
People will fight to protect their honor even -- and perhaps, especially -- when they have nothing else left. That has been a painful lesson for the Israelis, who hoped for the past 30 years they could squeeze the Palestinians into a rational peace deal. It's excruciating now for Armenian Americans like me, when we see Turkey refusing to make a rational accounting of its history. But if foreign governments try to make people do the right thing, it won't work. They have to do it for themselves.
The writer is co-host ofPostGlobal, an online discussion of international issues. His e-mail address isdavidignatius@washpost.com.
|
Dignity is the issue that vexes billions of people around the world, not democracy.
| 58.6875 | 1 | 16 |
high
|
high
|
extractive
|
http://newsweek.washingtonpost.com/onfaith/eboo_patel/2007/10/ayaann_hirsi_ali_attacks_the_w.html
|
https://web.archive.org/web/2007101419id_/http://newsweek.washingtonpost.com/onfaith/eboo_patel/2007/10/ayaann_hirsi_ali_attacks_the_w.html
|
OnFaith on washingtonpost.com
|
2007101419
|
The only reason we pay attention to Ayaan Hirsi Ali is because of the maniacal Muslims who want to murder her. Her superficial insights are made infinitely more interesting by the fact that there are nut jobs out there who would do her in for making them.
Ms. Ali, often and ludicrously called a âdefender of the Westâ, has certainly mastered one of its central elements: capitalism. She has learned to make a living from the fact that her life is threatened. It is a lucrative though precarious path, as recent events make clear.
I think the people who want Ayaan Hirsi Aliâs head are cretins. They are dangerous to all of us. They would have my head and the heads of all the progressive Muslims I know in an instant.
But to make a hero of Ayaan Hirsi Ali because we deplore her would-be killers - to call her books âluminousâ as Salman Rushdie and Sam Harris do in a recent International Herald Tribune OpEd - violates some of the central principles of the Enlightenment that these people laughably claim Ali is championing.
Aliâs book Infidel essentially tells a story of a womanâs escape from oppression into freedom, and from the life of a refugee cleaning lady in the Netherlands to a writer and politician. It is a genuinely inspiring tale (even a lyrical one, although reports have surfaced that Ali had a ghost writer), until Ali gets to the point where she says that the entire religion of Islam was not only the cause of her oppression, but is the central cause of oppression in the world, and moreover, it has never been, and can never be, anything but oppressive. Letâs apply the Enlightenment principle of reason to this narrative, and letâs do it through a story. Letâs say that Ayaan Hirsi Ali, instead of incriminating Islam at the end of her book, blamed another entity whose cultural traditions had more than a little to do with her painful childhood. Letâs say she went after Africa. And letâs say she did it with the same venom and hyperbole.
What if Ali said that all of Africa was benighted and evil? Look at its civil wars, its history of corrupt leaders, its diseases. There is only one solution: we must eradicate its traditions and immediately initiate its hundreds of millions of people into other cultures lest they spread their poison all over the world. In fact, she may well add, the cultural invasion has begun - do you know how many Africans are migrating to Europe?
There would, of course, be an outcry â probably led by the likes of Bono and Angelina Jolie -- that would go something like this: "It is a violation of reason and dignity for one person to universalize her experience and say that an entire continent with thousands of years of history is to blame for it."
Nobody would fete her for âleaving Africaâ as they have for her renouncing Islam. They would simply call her an ignoramus and be done with it.
Instead of the talk show circuit, Ayaan Hirsi Ali would be writing bitter articles for xenophobic journals.
Just to continue with our embrace of the Enlightenment, letâs consider a story a little closer to home, a story that focuses on our beloved nation - the one that took Enlightenment principles seriously enough to enshrine them in its founding documents and political institutions.
In Infidel, Ali quotes passages of the Qurâan that are violent, and because she is targeting an audience that either doesnât know better or doesnât want to know better, she suggests that those passages represent the whole text, the whole 1400 year history of Islam, its billion plus current adherents.
Letâs say that Ms. Ali was flipping through the U.S. Constitution and the first passage she read was the one that said people of her skin color counted as three-fifths of a person. Letâs say that Ms. Ali opened an American history book and read only the chapter on the slave trade. Letâs say the first Americans she met were the racists who drove around Jena during the protests with nooses hanging off their pick up trucks. Letâs say she connects these dots into a story â the story of Americaâs inevitable, oppressive racism.
But wait a minute you say ⦠thatâs not all the Constitution says. Thatâs not the entirety of American history, nor the whole of the American population.
But sheâs got her story, and sheâs taking it to the bank.
If youâre going to buy into the universal principles of the Enlightenment, then you should apply them in a universal and enlightened way.
To all those who claim Ayaan Hirsi Ali is the new face of the West:
If your ulterior motive is to deepen a narrative intended to make Muslims in North America and Europe seem and feel forever foreign - to write an entire religion out of entire continents for the foreseeable future - I suggest you reflect deeply on your bedrock principles and your core identity.
If you think the West is about marginalizing large groups of people and maligning their traditions, then Ayaan Hirsi Ali is defending it. If you believe, as I do, that the West is characterized by reason and pluralism, then Ayaan Hirsi Ali is attacking its essence. Finally, and for the record, if Ayaan Hirsi Ali applied for refugee status in America and requested protection from the government, I would support her application and offer my tax dollars to ensure her safety.
She is repulsive to my Muslim faith and my Enlightenment sensibilities, but those same traditions cause me to wish her no harm.
|
Eboo Patel on OnFaith; Visit http://newsweek.washingtonpost.com/onfaith/eboo_patel/
| 132 | 0.125 | 0.125 |
high
|
low
|
abstractive
|
http://newsweek.washingtonpost.com/onfaith/starhawk/2007/10/a_pagan_view_of_death.html
|
https://web.archive.org/web/2007101419id_/http://newsweek.washingtonpost.com/onfaith/starhawk/2007/10/a_pagan_view_of_death.html
|
OnFaith on washingtonpost.com
|
2007101419
|
One of my earliest memories is watching a Sunday morning religious show when I was about four years old. When they talked about people dying and going to heaven, I remember clearly thinking, âThatâs stupid, everyone know when you die you come back as another person.â Learning that neither my parents, relatives or Hebrew school teachers shared this belief didnât shake it in the least, so I was delighted, when I grew older, to discover other religions that did, including Paganism.
Our understanding, however, is a bit more complex than my childhood certainty. In The Pagan Book of Living and Dying, I wrote: âThe heart of the Pagan understanding of death is the insight that birth, growth, death and rebirth are a cycle that forms the underlying order of the universe. We can see that cycle manifest around us in every aspect of the natural world, from the decay of falling leaves that feed the roots of growing plants, to the moonâs waning and waxing. Hard as it is for us to die, or to accept the death of someone we love, we know that death is a part of the natural process of life.
âTherefore we can trust that death, like every other phase of life, offers us opportunities for growth in wisdom and love.â (1)
Our metaphor for death is of a journey . When we die, the soul voyages across a dark sea to the Shining Isle, the Isle of Apples. There, we walk beneath the apple trees of the Goddess, trees which are in bud, blossom, fruit, and decay all at the same time, reviewing our life and its lessons, and growing ever younger, until we are at last young enough to be reborn.
While some Pagans believe this story literally, others of us see it as a poetic expression of the cyclical nature of birth and death. Pagans are not trying to escape the wheel of birth and death. We see birth and life as a great gift, and the reward of a good life is to be reborn again among those we have loved before, so we can know and love them again.
At this time of year, as we move toward Samhain or Halloween, the ancient festival of the ancestors, we say âthe veil is thinâ that divides the world of the living from the realm of the dead. The ancestors return to visit usâand that is the origin of our Halloween customs of setting candles out in jack-o-lanterns to light their way to our doors, of giving offerings (once harvest offerings, now candy) to children, who are the ancestors returning. In our Samhain rituals, like the large, public Spiral Dance ritual that Reclaiming creates every year right before Halloween, (2) we often take an imaginative journey to the Isle, to meet and talk with our beloved dead, to receive help and guidance, to finish what is unfinished, to offer our love. I have many times had visions and a deep sense of connection with my loved ones who have passed on. The meaning is often very personal, a message of hope or approval or advice.
My mother was a meticulous, well-organized person. When she was dying, one of her great worries was what would happen to all of her files. On her deathbed, she wanted to go through her Rolodex, instructing my brother about whom to invite to the funeral. (He got through the âEâs, and then balked.) My brother and I tend to be messy and disorganized, our desks piled high with papers and our shelves crammed with books out of order. A month after our mother died, we were both separately struck with an overwhelming urge to clean up our offices, reorganize our files, and generally straighten up. Living on opposite coasts, it was only after days of dusty filing that we compared notes, and realized that Mom might be gone, but death had not deterred her from her mission to finally get us to clean up our rooms!
Iâve had many similar experiences. If there is a theological meaning, it is that the community continues to hold us, even beyond death. And death itself teaches us to value and embrace the fleeting, fragile gift of life.
(1) Starhawk, M.Macha Nightmare and the Reclaiming Collective. The Pagan Book of Living and Dying, San Francisco, HarperSanFrancisco, 1997, p. 58 (2) This year Reclaimingâs Spiral Dance ritual will be held on October 27 in Kezar Pavilion, San Francisco.
|
Starhawk on OnFaith; Visit http://newsweek.washingtonpost.com/onfaith/starhawk/
| 124 | 0.428571 | 0.428571 |
high
|
low
|
abstractive
|
http://newsweek.washingtonpost.com/onfaith/guestvoices/2007/10/another_southern_baptist_for_p.html
|
https://web.archive.org/web/2007101419id_/http://newsweek.washingtonpost.com/onfaith/guestvoices/2007/10/another_southern_baptist_for_p.html
|
Another Bible Belt Baptist for Peace
|
2007101419
|
Al Gore became the third Baptist to win the Nobel Peace Prize, joining Jimmy Carter in 2002 and Martin Luther King in 1964.
How is it that three sons of the Bible belt have each won the worldâs most prestigious award for their advancement of human rights, peacemaking and now earth care?
The Bible is surely part of the answer, the role Scripture has played in shaping their moral vision and values.
In a June 2006 interview before the Nashville premier of the documentary âAn Inconvenient Truth,â Gore told me that his Christian faith shaped his moral convictions about the environment.
"I was taught in Sunday school about the purpose of life," he said. "I didn't ever get a single lesson about the purpose of life at Harvard University or prep school I went to. But I learned about the purpose of life in Sunday school. And I was taught that the purpose of life is to glorify God.
"How can you glorify God while heaping contempt and destruction on God's creation? The answer is that you cannot, you cannot.
"If you believe in the teaching 'Whatever you do to the least of these you do unto me,' the least of these include those who are powerless to defend themselves against harmful actions at our hands motivated by careless greed," he said.
Within the Baptist tradition, Sunday school takes place before the main morning worship service. From preschoolers to senior adults, members gather every Sunday in small groups to read a pre-selected passage of Scripture, interpreting it freely one to another and exploring what it means for their lives. Dissent of interpretation is common, but reverence for the Bibleâs authority is unchallenged.
No one is better known worldwide as a Sunday school teacher than Jimmy Carter. His home church, Maranatha Baptist Church, in Plains, Ga., even posts Carterâs Bible study schedule and gives instructions about when visitors should arrive.
King, the son of a Baptist preacher, no doubt attended Sunday school every week. And as a preacher, himself, the Bible was central to his message.
Baptists hold the Bible with such high regard that they often say, âThe Bible says it. I believe it. That settles it.â
Yet the simplicity of that statement covers the complexity of disagreement among Baptists over the Bible and how the Bible shapes their moral agenda.
Drum majors for justice too often share a common biblical score with those in the church band, even though band members refuse to play it. And few moral leaders have faced the rejection of their own moral communities more than King, Carter and Gore.
Kingâs Nobel Peace Prize came a year after his âLetter from a Birmingham Jailâ addressed to eight, white Birmingham clergymen who said his actions for civil rights were âunwise and untimely.â One of the signing clergymen was the pastor of the First Baptist Church of Birmingham, a congregation that later split over integration.
The history of that church is a metaphor for the Baptist split over the Bible with some reading a progressive moral vision and others hearing a conservative, reactionary message in a changing culture. First Baptist became a bastion of fundamentalism and fled to the suburbs. The Baptist Church of the Covenant in Birmingham became a progressive downtown congregation.
While a few Southern Baptist fundamentalists will now quote King respectfully, when it counted their spiritual ancestors damned him as a troublemaker, a race mixer, a liberal. Most white Baptist leaders refused to honor him for his prestigious award and offered little lament at his assassination.
Ironically, the Southern Baptist Conventionâs news service, Baptist Press, did not even carry a news article about Carter winning the Nobel Prize. That failure was accompanied by a thundering silence across the editorial pages of Baptist state newspapers. Since then, SBC leaders and their news service never pass up an opportunity to criticize Carter.
Gore, too, has experienced his share of rejection from his fellow white Baptists. One SBC agency head called Goreâs global warming documentary a âcrocumentary.â
In a none too veiled resolution, the SBC slapped Gore and his campaign against climate change. The resolution urged caution about accepting the idea of âhuman-induced global warming debate in light of conflicting scientific researchâ and opposed government-mandated reductions in greenhouse gasses.
The Norwegian Nobel Committee, on the other hand, gave the award to Gore and the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, a prestigious body of worldwide scientists who âhas created an ever-broader informed consensus about the connection between human activities and global warming.â
News stories in prominent newspapers today about the Nobel Peace Prize have omitted references to the moral foundation for Goreâs commitment, focusing instead on his 2000 presidential loss to George Bush, speculation about another presidential race in 2008 and the science related to global warming.
That picture is an incomplete one about the man, the text that shaped his moral trajectory and the context of rejection to a progressive moral vision within his own faith community.
As the Good Book says, âNo prophet is accepted in his own country.â Indeed, three Baptists of the south have received greater honor in their time from others than their own.
Robert Parham is executive director of the Baptist Center for Ethics in Nashville.
|
A conversation on religion with Jon Meacham and Sally Quinn. Visit http://newsweek.washingtonpost.com/onfaith/guestvoices/
| 71.5 | 0.357143 | 0.357143 |
high
|
low
|
abstractive
|
http://newsweek.washingtonpost.com/postglobal/miriam_leitao/2007/10/boycott_plans_naive_and_unreal.html
|
https://web.archive.org/web/2007101419id_/http://newsweek.washingtonpost.com/postglobal/miriam_leitao/2007/10/boycott_plans_naive_and_unreal.html
|
PostGlobal on washingtonpost.com
|
2007101419
|
Yes, countries should tell China that they will boycott Beijing Olympics if China does not pressure Burma to open up! That's the easy choice, but it's also the naïve one. In the first place, China is a dictatorship and faces many of Burmaâs same problems: human rights, civil liberties, freedom of the press and internet. Realistically, what kind of help can we expect from China?
Letâs think about the Chinese methods of pressure. Will China use diplomatic or economic methods to pressure Burma? Or will it use force and violence, the conventional methods of an authoritarian regime? If China decides to invade Burma as a form of âpressureâ, are we supposed to applaud it? Do we also expect or even trust China to eventually offer protection to refugees? Could China, with its current political structure, support the ideal of freedom in another country? I donât think so. Most likely, the Communist Partyâs strategists will fear that the process could spread dangerous ideas of liberty among their own population.
Itâs clear that the international community must do something for Burmaâs monks and freedom fighters. During Brazilâs military dictatorship of the 1970s, international pressure from many fronts helped undermine the strength of the military government. But that pressure came from democratic governments and organizations committed to freedom, such as Amnesty International.
That wonât happen in China for one single reason: China is an authoritarian regime, and as such it doesnât share in other governmentsâ and organizationsâ belief in democratic principles. Pressure to liberate non-democratic countries to liberalize is completely contradictory to the nature of a dictatorship. So we cannot transfer this responsibility onto China.
Please e-mail PostGlobal if you'd like to receive an email notification when PostGlobal sends out a new question.
More Posts About: Burma , China , Olympics
|
Miriam Leitao at PostGlobal on PostGlobal; blog of politics and current events on washingtonpost.com. Visit http://newsweek.washingtonpost.com/postglobal/miriam_leitao/
| 19.277778 | 0.333333 | 0.333333 |
medium
|
low
|
abstractive
|
http://newsweek.washingtonpost.com/postglobal/needtoknow/2007/10/burmese_protests_transcend_pol.html
|
https://web.archive.org/web/2007101419id_/http://newsweek.washingtonpost.com/postglobal/needtoknow/2007/10/burmese_protests_transcend_pol.html
|
PostGlobal: PostGlobal on washingtonpost.com
|
2007101419
|
The monk-led protests in Burma are about spiritual authority as much as they are about raw political power. They are deeply rooted in Burmaâs religious culture. Nothing illustrates this so well as the chants of the protesting monks and their overturned begging bowls. Everyone in Burma understands the message: the military rulers are evil spirits who have lost their authority.
The monks are chanting the Metta Sutta, a verse that embodies the Buddhaâs counsel on the power and meaning of loving kindness. Part of it runs: âLet them be able and upright, straightforward and gentle in speech. Humble and not conceited⦠Peaceful and calm, and wise and skillful, not proud and demanding in nature.â
The story of the Metta Sutta goes back to the 6th century B.C. A group of monks, sent by the Buddha to meditate, found a beautiful grove, but were disturbed by wicked tree spirits who resented their presence. When they returned to complain to the Buddha, he told them to go back and show true loving kindness to the tree spirits. They did so and the demons were indeed won over.
The monksâ overturned begging bowls give another powerful message. They reject alms from the countryâs rulers, alms that the rulers want to give, to assure their own salvation.
Buddhism often wears a meditative face, especially in the west. But Buddhism and social/political action have often been tied throughout history. Buddhism in Thailand and in Sri Lanka, as well as Burma, enters the realm of politics especially when times are bad. The Buddhaâs teachings are full of advice about social action, like the Metta Sutta.
Burmaâs military leaders are taking the view that Buddhism is about other worlds, not the present. The monks have a different and powerful message: that they care for the people in the here and now.
In Buddhism, as in other faiths, the relationship of politics and religion is interpreted very differently at different times and places. The military tell the monks should leave governance and power to others. Their violent crackdown rejects the right of Buddhist leaders to participate in the public square. The monks, in turn, are saying âenough is enoughâ, that whatever shreds of authority the military had are lost. They are reclaiming their voice and right to action.
Events in Burma (renamed Myanmar by its current military rulers) have deep religious currents and the thousands of courageous Buddhist monks who are challenging the countryâs iron leadership are leading what will surely be known as a âbronze revolutionâ (after the rusty red robes Burmaâs monks wear). What will happen next remains to be seen. But whatever the turn of events, religion will be a key to the next chapter.
Katherine Marshall has worked for over three decades on international development, with a focus on issues facing the worldâs poorest countries. She is a senior fellow at Georgetown University's Berkley Center for Religion, Peace and World Affairs and Visiting Professor. She is also a senior adviser for the World Bank. Her long career there (1971-2006) involved a wide range of leadership assignments, many focused on Africa.
|
Need to Know - PostGlobal on PostGlobal; blog of politics and current events on washingtonpost.com. Visit http://newsweek.washingtonpost.com/postglobal/needtoknow/
| 31.263158 | 0.526316 | 0.842105 |
medium
|
low
|
abstractive
|
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/10/13/AR2007101301181.html
|
https://web.archive.org/web/2007101419id_/http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/10/13/AR2007101301181.html
|
Lowly Species Gets Some Help Against Entombment in Florida
|
2007101419
|
MIAMI -- Gopher tortoises are made for digging burrows. Their front feet are shovel-like, their back limbs elephantine and perfect for bracing. Fatally, however, they cannot pierce asphalt and concrete.
Over the past 16 years, thousands of the animals have essentially been buried alive by Florida developers who were given permits under a little-noticed state program to build on top of the creatures' subterranean homes.
Once the tortoises were trapped in the process known as "entombment," their slow metabolism meant it might take weeks or months before they died of thirst or starvation.
"Trying to dig out, day after day, but not being able to, it's got to be pretty horrible," said Matthew J. Aresco, a biologist at a 50,000-acre conservation area in Florida who helped bring the tortoises' cause to light. "It's truly appalling."
Now Florida is moving toward a ban on the practice, though whether the state is moving urgently enough to help the species is a matter of debate.
The state no longer issues permits allowing entombment, and developers are now required to relocate gopher tortoises to areas where they might thrive. As part of a plan adopted last month, the state aims to buy or protect thousands of acres of habitat.
But scores of permits issued before July 30 for what was known as "incidental take" are being honored, essentially allowing entombment of gopher tortoises to continue. Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission officials could not say how many of those permits might still be used. In the two months before the cutoff date, more than 90 such permits were issued, officials said.
Thousands more gopher tortoises could be entombed, Aresco said, because of the previously issued permits.
"I don't think anyone wanted to entomb tortoises," said Joy Hill, a spokeswoman for the conservation commission. "But we can't stop development, and this was the best option at the time."
Gopher tortoises are found elsewhere in the Southeastern United States, but Florida has the largest portion of their range, with an estimated 750,000 in the state. Florida recently reclassified the species as "threatened."
Their tan, oblong shells grow to about 10 or 11 inches, and the animals are known for digging tunnels, sometimes as deep as 10 feet, for protection.
For years, the gentle, slow-moving tortoises have been a fixture of old Florida culture.
|
MIAMI -- Gopher tortoises are made for digging burrows. Their front feet are shovel-like, their back limbs elephantine and perfect for bracing. Fatally, however, they cannot pierce asphalt and concrete.
| 12.153846 | 1 | 39 |
low
|
high
|
extractive
|
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/10/13/AR2007101301276.html
|
https://web.archive.org/web/2007101419id_/http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/10/13/AR2007101301276.html
|
Pakistan's Embattled Mosque Reopens With Fresh Momentum
|
2007101419
|
At prayers this month, calls for Islamic revolution once again echoed from the minarets. Worshipers talked of overthrowing the Pakistani president, Gen. Pervez Musharraf, in favor of a Taliban-style government. Many wore the red knit prayer caps long favored by Abdul Rashid Ghazi, the firebrand cleric who was killed in the last hours of a nine-day standoff that transfixed Pakistan and seemed to embody the country's struggle with religious extremism.
But here's what was different at the Red Mosque: The crowd that turned out for prayers, relatively modest in size before the siege, spilled out of the mosque and into the courtyard. It continued down the street and filled an adjacent park. Afterward, impassioned worshipers talked about how they had come to honor the "thousands" who had died. (Government estimates put the number of dead at 103.) They walked the adjacent grounds where the girls' madrassa, or religious school, once stood, sifting the rubble for bits of bloodstained masonry. And they said a special prayer for the Red Mosque martyrs, at which point almost everyone began to weep.
The government had hoped that raiding the Red Mosque would strike a powerful blow against radical religious groups in Pakistan.
Instead, the mosque has become a memorial, a rallying cry and a propaganda tool for those groups, giving them more recruits and fresh momentum to unleash vicious attacks. Al-Qaeda leaders Osama bin Laden and Ayman al-Zawahiri have both dwelt on the Red Mosque in recordings that call for jihad against Musharraf. Their pleas have been answered in a surge of violence that has claimed more than 1,000 lives and has turned even more Pakistani territory into hostile terrain for the country's army.
Until a couple of weeks ago, the government could at least boast about the tactical victory of retaining control over the mosque itself. But after an aborted reopening in July that ended with the government-appointed cleric fleeing an angry mob, the mosque was returned to the group that operated it before the raid.
On Oct. 3, policemen peeled back layers of barbed wire, and forklifts hoisted away the roadblocks that had encircled the mosque for months. Hundreds of followers of Ghazi and his brother, the imprisoned Maulana Abdul Aziz, streamed in, many flashing victory signs.
"Inshallah" -- God willing -- "this mosque will be exactly the same as it was before. If it is not the same, then we will make it the same," said Abdullah Rahman, 20, an electrical engineering student with a scraggly beard and a red knit cap. "Ghazi was martyred because of the truth. Jihad is the truth. So if the same situation comes again, we will be ready to face it. Even more ready than before."
Syed Ali Hussain, also a student, agreed. Two years ago, he said, he believed "Islam was a religion of terrorists." But after listening to leaders such as Ghazi, he came around to their point of view. The United States and Musharraf, he said, are like burglars who break into a house and then are surprised when they are met with violence. "If the owner of that house defends himself, he should not be called a terrorist," said Hussain, 23, who spent the first two days of the siege in the mosque but was then sent home because there were not enough weapons. "Newton once said that for every action, there is an equal and opposite reaction."
While the faithful said their prayers, vendors set up shop in the mosque's courtyard, selling a pamphlet written by Umme Hassan, Aziz's wife. The cover features an elaborately doctored image of the mosque under fire from attack helicopters and tanks. The mosque burns, blood drips down the page, and the headline reminds readers, "The martyrs say to you: Don't forget our sacrifice."
Within the pamphlet, Hassan, who ran the girls' school, offers her version of events. She tells how the government provoked the standoff and how her girls suffered once it began. They ran out of food and water after just two days, she writes, and anyone who ventured out into the open to find new supplies was instantly shot.
The government has told a much different story. The confrontation, the government says, was instigated entirely by the mosque's clerics, who were abducting prostitutes and police officers as part of their campaign to enforce Islamic law. Security forces were only reluctantly sent in to keep the peace, and once they laid their siege, they did everything possible to spare innocent lives while they battled heavily armed radical fighters. The clerics were well prepared for a fight they knew was coming and had stocked up on food and water, as well as weapons, officials have said.
|
World news headlines from the Washington Post,including international news and opinion from Africa,North/South America,Asia,Europe and Middle East. Features include world weather,news in Spanish,interactive maps,daily Yomiuri and Iraq coverage.
| 20.130435 | 0.369565 | 0.413043 |
medium
|
low
|
abstractive
|
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/story/2007/10/12/ST2007101202550.html
|
https://web.archive.org/web/2007101419id_/http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/story/2007/10/12/ST2007101202550.html
|
Building Blackwater
|
2007101419
|
MOYOCK, N.C. Erik Prince bounded up the stairs of a sand-colored building and paused on the flat roof, a high point of the 7,000-acre facility in North Carolina known as Blackwater Lodge and Training Center.
As owner of Blackwater, he has been the focus of intense scrutiny recently by Congress and critics because the company's private security forces have at times operated with impunity in Iraq, including allegations that they murdered innocent civilians. But on a steamy afternoon this week, just days after testifying on Capitol Hill, Prince seemed like a king surveying his domain.
Below him was a complex he calls Little Baghdad, a collection of drab structures used to prepare security forces for urban warfare in Iraq and elsewhere. In the distance, a half-dozen battered cars raced around a track in a high-speed motorcade, kicking up dust as they practiced tactics with a role-playing assailant in pursuit.
Blackwater has an airstrip and hangar filled with gleaming helicopters, a manufacturing plant for assembling armored cars, a pound filled with bomb-sniffing dogs and a lake with mock ships for training sailors. An armory is stacked to the ceiling with rifles. Throughout the place are outdoor ranges where military, intelligence and law enforcement authorities from around the country practice shooting handguns and assault rifles at automated metal targets made by the firm. An incessant pop, pop, pop fills the air.
There's no other place quite like Blackwater, at least not in private hands. The complex anchors a global training and security operation that is one of the government's fastest-growing contractors and both a fixture and a flashpoint of the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan.
In a decade, Blackwater's revenue from federal government contracts has grown exponentially, from less than $100,000 to almost $600 million last year. In August, the company won its biggest deal ever, a five-year counternarcotics training contract worth up to $15 billion shared with four other companies.
Blackwater's extraordinary rise would not have been possible without a swirl of historic forces, including sharp cuts in military and security staffing in the 1990s, the Bush administration's drive to outsource government services to the private sector and the sudden demand for improved security in response to the threat of terrorism.
Some law enforcement officials trained by Blackwater consider the firm a resounding success.
"They're the Cadillac of training services," said J. Adler, national executive vice president of the Federal Law Enforcement Officers Association. "You've got the best of the best teaching close-quarter-combat tactics."
But critics focused more on Blackwater's role in Iraq, where nearly a thousand of the firm's heavily armed contractors provide security, describe the firm as a private army and Prince as a war profiteer. During a recent hearing, Rep. Elijah E. Cummings (D-Md.) questioned whether Blackwater has "created a shadow military of mercenary forces that are not accountable to the United States government or to anyone else."
Prince seemed incredulous that anyone would suggest such a thing.
"The idea we have a private army is ridiculous," he said, as a group of sheriff's department deputies cleaned their weapons nearby. "This idea of a private mercenary army is nonsense. These guys have sworn the oath as military or law enforcement persons. These are guys who served voluntarily. They are all Americans, working for Americans, protecting Americans."
|
Follow 2008 Elections & Campaigns at washingtonpost.com Politics Information on Democrats,Republicans,political cartoons,opinions,government policies,political analysis and reports." elections,campaigns,Democrats,Republicans,political cartoons,opinions from The Washington Post. Features government policy,government tech,political analysis and reports.
| 11.596491 | 0.438596 | 0.473684 |
low
|
low
|
abstractive
|
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/discussion/2007/10/12/DI2007101201582.html
|
https://web.archive.org/web/2007101419id_/http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/discussion/2007/10/12/DI2007101201582.html
|
Critiquing the Press
|
2007101419
|
Blue Bell, Pa.: Hi. How does it work that you or Woodward can write books that have revelations that you haven't put in your regular writings for The Washington Post? Don't you ethically owe The Post all your scoops. etc.? This is not a criticism, just curious.
washingtonpost.com: As War Dragged On, Coverage Tone Weighed Heavily on Anchors (Post, Oct. 8)
Howard Kurtz: Here's the deal: I simply would not have been able to unearth the scoops that I did in two years of work on "Reality Show" had the network people I interviewed thought that they were speaking for the next day's paper. It's only through the development of sources over a two-year period that people were willing to be candid for a substantive narrative that would put any revelations into context rather than throw some nugget into the paper for a quick headline. I got permission in advance from The Post's executive editor, Len Downie, and the paper had first shot at an excerpt, which ran last Monday, on the anchors' views of covering Iraq. Downie has been quoted as saying that writing books (and there are a number of Post staffers who have done that beyond Woodward and myself) helps them become better beat reporters. I hope that I understand network news better now than when I embarked on this project.
Austin, Texas: Howard, I'm not sure what I expected from your discussion yesterday on Reliable Sources in regard to the Graeme Frost debate, but I really left feeling you didn't do it much justice. "The consensus seems to be that the questions were fair, but certainly the tone can be mean-spirited in a lot of these controversies and it is really striking when a 12-year-old boy is involved."
Let's concede the questions were fair and the tone wrong -- but the whole point was that people ran with inaccurate answers to those questions. Kudos to you for half-mentioning it earlier in the segment, but it really seemed like the main point and you guys really didn't discuss it.
Howard Kurtz: But every guest was offered the opportunity to weigh in. Was it fair to question a family's qualifications for the S-CHIP insurance program after Democrats had made the 12-year-old boy a symbol by having him deliver its weekly radio address? My feeling is yes; you can't say one party can trot out such a symbol and no one can criticize. I also recited instances in which I felt the criticism was misleading: yes, the kid attends a private school, but on scholarship. Yes, the dad owns a home but bought it for $55,000 in a rundown neighborhood in 1990. In short, I tried to put the debate into perspective.
Germantown, Md.: Peter Baker's story from last Sunday about the turnover among White House staff seems like a pro forma story for years six and/or seven of an administration, but did you or the newsroom get a sense of irony about such a profile this time -- what with the White House staff complaints about the lack of sleep, grueling schedules and loss of family time, as compared to our troops in Iraq?
Do they realize how spoiled they all sound during a time of war (of which they endlessly remind us)? Unlike our soldiers enduring a stop loss order, White House staffers can return to a normal life any time they want, by quitting. I thought I detected a note of irony by Baker in including the "it's a killer job" quote. Will future de rigueur articles have a better sense of the new world in which we live?
washingtonpost.com: An Exit Toward Soul-Searching (Post, Oct. 7)
Howard Kurtz: I certainly don't think we've under-covered the enormous strains on soldiers and their families of these extended tours of duty in Iraq. Peter Baker's piece was more about the rapid turnover in the White House's original, Texas-heavy team, and if those who have left want to reflect on the high burnout factor of such jobs, I don't think that's unreasonable.
Weston, Fla.: My sympathy for the loss of your colleague. What is the latest on the Imus contract situation?
washingtonpost.com: Don Imus Close To Deal for Return To Airwaves Dec. 1 (Post, Oct. 6)
Howard Kurtz: Thank you for that. Iraqi journalists working with western news organizations are really among the unsung heroes of this war, taking enormous risks but getting little credit for helping us to understand the conflict and going places that Americans simply cannot go.
Drudge is touting this morning that the Imus deal with Citadel Broadcasting that I said was close is now final. I don't have independent confirmation of that, but I was expected it would probably get done this week, since the two sides had already agreed on financial terms.
Albuquerque: On yesterday's Reliable Sources you discussed Ann Coulter and whether or not she should be given the airtime she gets. I have wondered that since she made the comments on the Sept. 11 widows. To me, she promotes hatred of certain groups of people, and I don't understand MSM decision to help her promote that hate. The MSM also seems to focus on one part of her hate message at the expense of even more critical issues. What she said about Jews and Judaism was reprehensible -- but when she proposed that the right to vote be taken away from women so there would be a Republican majority seems to be directed at the Constitution and amendments. Taking away the voting rights of more than half of the population seems to be an issue that should be addressed. If the right has denounced her on this, I have not read it. To me, this statement is as abhorrent as her hate speech against Jews.
Howard Kurtz: I will repeat what I said on the air: TV programs race to book her and then act shocked at some of the inflammatory comments she makes, all the while milking her appearances for publicity. Coulter has perfected the art of selling books through incendiary rhetoric. She's entitled to say whatever she wants, but I wonder when television programs will tire of the act.
Laurel, Md.: From the first paragraph of the story about the death of Salih Saif Aldin: "He was the latest in a long line of reporters, most of them Iraqis, to be killed while covering the Iraq war. He was the first for The Washington Post." A few paragraphs later: "Michael Kelly, a columnist for The Post, was killed in April 2003 in Iraq when a Humvee he was traveling in drove into a canal."
I know you answer at least one question a week with "there's a big difference between a reporter and a columnist," but when reporting deaths in a war zone doesn't that become a hair-splitting distinction?
washingtonpost.com: Reporter For Post Is Fatally Shot In Baghdad (Post, Oct. 15)
Howard Kurtz: Without in any way taking away from Michael Kelly's accomplishments, he did not work for The Washington Post. He worked for the Atlantic and National Journal, and his column was carried by The Post's op-ed page and I believe syndicated by the Post Writers Group. In other words, he was not a full-time columnist here like Richard Cohen or Gene Robinson. I remember his tragic death all too well, having come in on that Sunday to write a piece recalling his career, and then having to do the same when NBC's David Bloom died during the war.
Jacksonville, Fla.: Have fun on Diane Rehm this morning? And does she know everybody in Washington?
Howard Kurtz: Yes, and yes.
New York: Howard: Enjoyed you on "The Daily Show" the other night. Here's my question: Several news outlets, CNN and ABC among them, while reporting on Al Gore's receipt of the Nobel Peace Prize, also added "complementary" stories about "inaccuracies" in his film, as well as about how how the award has "divided" public opinion. It seems that that the extreme right-wing of the Republican Party and the environmental know-nothings have got the mainstream media running scared. They can't run a story about Al Gore and Global Warming without somehow trying to appease these lunatics. Don't you feel that this is a case not of "balanced reporting" but of trying to avoid attacks from an extremist faction?
Howard Kurtz: Glad you caught my sit-down with Jon Stewart. I don't think it's appeasing lunatics to report that not everyone is cheering the Nobel Prize awarded to Gore. While there is certainly a scientific consensus that global warming exists, a day earlier The Post and other news organizations reported that a British judge had ruled there were nine factual errors in "An Inconvenient Truth." I congratulate Gore on winning the prestigious prize, but that doesn't mean he or his movie are above criticism.
Kettering, Ohio: In the discussion earlier today, Shailagh Murray was taken to task for the media's failure to follow up on the Dems use of the young boy in the SCHIP debate. The use of the kid was shrewd, as attacking the message would be problematic -- which didn't seem to deter the Republican answer to the the Democratic answer. Did anyone dig into the kid's family and its apparently less-than-pristine story before the Republican attack machine revved up?
Howard Kurtz: I don't know, but the conservative criticism of the Frost family happened pretty quickly.
Ashland, Mo.: Given that on any given day, 90 percent of the country is not watching network news, is it really a subject of interest to anyone but members of the increasing irrelevant mainstream media?
Howard Kurtz: Twenty-five million Americans watch the ABC, CBS and NBC newscasts every night. That remains the biggest megaphone in the media world. As I lay out in my book, these broadcasts have to find a way to appeal to younger viewers before their core audience goes to the great television-watching couch in the sky. We live in a world of a million media choices, and not everyone is going to choose to watch a half-hour news summary at 6:30. But they remain important, and their coverage of war and politics helps drive the news agenda.
Tattooed: Do you agree with people who think that The Washington Post was being deliberately inflammatory, if not prejudicial, in opening its Saturday article on Loudoun County sheriff candidate Greg Ahlemann with the following description of his tattoo? Is any tattoo relevant to a political race, or does it depend on the office and the content, size or conspicuousness of the tattoo? Do you know whether any of the current crop of presidential candidates sports a tattoo?
"A pastor's son and former motorcycle cop who wants to be the next sheriff of Loudoun County wears a large, colorful tattoo on his left forearm: an affirmation, he says, of his moral, political and religious convictions.
"One side of Gregory J. Ahlemann's tattoo shows a Colonial flag. 'It's there to show our nation was founded on Christian values but that as a nation, we are moving away from this,' he said, citing divorce, abortion and premarital sex as prime culprits."
washingtonpost.com: Candidate Ignites Race For Sheriff In Loudoun (Post, Oct. 13)
Howard Kurtz: I know nothing about the race, but how can the mention of the tattoo be inflammatory when the candidate who wears it is immediately quoted about what he sees as its significance?
Boston: Next time you read a story about an IPO you'll have a greater appreciation for the grind a CEO/CFO goes through as part of their "road show." Did you get any questions from Fox about why they weren't part of your analysis, or did they just assume that the problems were with the other networks?
washingtonpost.com: Fox Puts Its Money on 'Fun' Business Channel (Post, Oct. )
Howard Kurtz: Not sure I follow your question. Fox Business Network is not a new company or an IPO, obviously, but a spin-off channel by the same Murdoch folks who bring you Fox News. The financial questions -- can they attract enough of an audience to compete with CNBC and turn a profit -- are threaded throughout the piece. Even Fox executives say they face an uphill climb, especially since the channel debuts today in 30 million homes, one-third of those reached by CNBC.
Washington: I'm all for giving credit where it's due -- congratulations to The Post and Christopher Lee for Saturday's story on SCHIP, it really put into perspective what's at stake in the political battle.
washingtonpost.com: Vote Nearing in Battle Over Kids' Health Care (Post, Oct. 14)
Howard Kurtz: A positive comment! That's a rarity these days.
Rockville Md.: I have a question that has been bugging me for some time and I hope you can address it. I have followed the recent stories about Graeme Frost, the child who gave the Democratic response about SCHIP, and what some commentators are calling the "Swift Boating" of Frost by right-wing groups. Realizing that the jury may still be out about Frost: It is one thing when politicians slam each other, but when someone goes after a private citizen, don't libel and slander laws ever come into play?
Howard Kurtz: Libel and slander laws only come into play when you say something that is both inaccurate and damaging about someone. Whether or not the Frost family should be considered too well-off to qualify for federal health benefits doesn't seem to fall in that category. When the parents agreed to make their son available to the Democratic Party as a spokesman for the program, surely they must have expected that their financial situation would become part of the debate. I am not, for the record, in favor of beating up on 12-year-old boys, but the family did willingly step into the political arena.
Helena, Mont.: I think there is a difference between criticizing one party's symbol for an issue and the level of venom that was directed at the Frosts -- they were criticized for not going bankrupt in order to pay their medical bills, for Pete's sake. Michelle Malkin published their address and telephone number on her blog so more people could harass them. At what point do you say to criticize and at what point do you make the point that someone has gone too far in their criticism?
Howard Kurtz: The Baltimore Sun also published a picture of the Maryland family's house and asked for their tax returns, which the Frosts declined to provide. Is that a mean-spirited attack or plain old reporting?
Washington: To follow up on the earlier Gore-Nobel Prize media coverage question: Are you aware of any media source running any story raising questions about or criticizing any other 2007 Nobel winner when announcing his or her prize?
Howard Kurtz: No, but the selection of a former vice president who has become an evangelist on the issue of climate change is obviously going to spark more publicity and debate than, say, Doris Lessing winning the Nobel for literature. And I must say, the overwhelming tone of the coverage was praiseworthy toward Gore as a man who came within a few hanging chads of the presidency, picking himself off the canvas and becoming a force for social change as a private citizen.
Do you know whether any of the current crop of presidential candidates sports a tattoo?: Has the U.S. ever had a presidential candidate with a tattoo?
Howard Kurtz: If there has been such a president, the tattoo must have been well-hidden.
New York: I wanted to write a congrats to your colleague Josh White on his story about Ricardo Sanchez's comments. For a speech that was more than half devoted to criticizing the absolutely awful job the media has done in Iraq, Josh White was able to write two sentences on the topic -- in the 17th paragraph of a 17-paragraph story. (Which is two sentences more than your competition at the New York Times was able to write.) Let me just say that I completely agree with Gen. Sanchez when he said in his speech:
"This is the worst display of journalism imaginable by those of us that are bound by a strict value system of selfless service, honor and integrity. Almost invariably, my perception is that the sensationalistic value of these assessments is what provided the edge that you seek for self aggrandizement or to advance your individual quest for getting on the front page with your stories. ... The media's unwillingness to accurately and prominently correct your mistakes and your agenda driven biases contribute to this corrosive environment. All of these challenges combined create a media environment that does a tremendous disservice to America."
Howard Kurtz: I would like to see more coverage of Sanchez's criticism of the media and also more detail from him on what he finds so objectionable.
Chicago: Your wrote: "Twenty-five million Americans watch the ABC, CBS and NBC newscasts every night. That remains the biggest megaphone in the media world." Out of curiosity, about how many people check out The Post online every day? Do you know the numbers for the main newspaper Web sites, and for online news generally? Thanks.
Howard Kurtz: I don't have the online figures at my fingertips, but the top newspaper sites, including The Post, draw between 1 million and 4 million visitors. For us, it's a much wider reach than the print edition, which of course circulates almost exclusively in the Washington area, but it's still not in the category of network newscasts.
Glen Burnie, Md.: Howard, your interview in "The Daily Show" seemed a bit abrupt at the end. Was it edited from its original length?
Howard Kurtz: Some really good stuff! Jon Stewart was so engaged in debating the role of network news with me that he went on for another six or seven minutes beyond our allotted time, telling me that it would be edited out. He was arguing that network news people need to dig harder for the truth and not be dissuaded by pressure from those in power. The crowd seemed to enjoy it, but unfortunately it was relegated to the cutting room floor.
Baltimore: I agree Gore should be subject to criticism and I would also point out that he has been responding to attacks on his environmental record for decades. However, the previous poster has a point. When I heard on the radio that Gore had won the Nobel, WTOP immediately followed that story by talking to people in Texas, who were quoted as saying the Nobel Peace Prize is a political way of attacking Bush. Wow. That took all of five seconds before the award was spun by the mainstream media. I immediately thought the way the story was reported was a gratuitous cheap shot.
Howard Kurtz: The view of many conservatives is that with awards to Arafat, Jimmy Carter and now Gore, the Nobel has indeed become politicized. I don't think that criticism should overshadow Al Gore's accomplishment in winning the award, but it's a legitimate part of the debate.
Albuquerque, N.M.: When I read about the family used to explain who SCHIP benefits I keep feel like I am missing something. If this family sells their home and business to pay for health care, where do people think they are going to live in the future? How much does it cost us for families with children with special health care needs if they are not in their own home? It seems the critics would be happier if this family were destitute, homeless and on Medicaid rather than try to make it with assistance on health insurance for their children.
Howard Kurtz: It seems to me the burden is on those who don't favor the Democrats' $35-billion expansion of S-CHIP to say what they would do about the millions of children who lack health insurance, or whether they think anything needs to be done at all. But it's a legitimate debate as to how costly such an expansion would be and at what income levels taxpayers should be expected to pick up the tab.
St Louis: Howard, I'm glad you mentioned that "The Post and other news organizations reported that a British judge had ruled there were nine factual errors in 'An Inconvenient Truth' " -- Because that simply is not true. Yes, The Post reported what you claim, but that report was incorrect. The judge determined that there was no general scientific consensus on nine points, and took great pains to state that he was not determining the accuracy of those statements. Here's the judge's opinion, which I imagine you haven't read yet. And here's an analysis from someone who has read the opinion. The truth is indeed inconvenient for The Post.
Howard Kurtz: This is what The Post reported last week:
A British judge has ruled that Al Gore's Oscar-winning film on global warming, "An Inconvenient Truth," contains "nine errors."
High Court Judge Michael Burton, deciding a lawsuit that questioned the film's suitability for showing in British classrooms, said Wednesday that the movie builds a "powerful" case that global warming is caused by humans and that urgent means are needed to counter it.
But he also said Gore makes nine statements in the film that are not supported by current mainstream scientific consensus. Teachers, Burton concluded, could show the film but must alert students to what the judge called errors.
Washington: Former Secretary of State George Schultz apparently admitted in public that he has a tattoo of the Princeton Tiger on his backside. Talk about pride in your alma mater.
Howard Kurtz: I missed that stunning revelation.
Chicago: You were quoted as saying the network news broadcasts are the main reason public opinion turned against the war. Don't you believe that the rising casualty rate, the "Mission Accomplished" banner, no WMD, the vice president's "last throes" comment, and a lack of political reconciliation are the real reasons public opinion turned against the war? And what about the broadcast news role in promoting the war to begin with?
Howard Kurtz: Well, I don't buy the notion that the networks "promoted" the war. I have said, and written, that major news organizations, including the networks and including The Post, were not aggressive or skeptical enough in challenging the administration during the runup to war. Of course rising casualties and other facts on the ground contributed to the souring of public opinion. But I argue in my book that the newscasts played a key role in 2005 and 2006, during a period when the administration was accusing the media of painting an overly negative picture, of making clear that things were not going well in Iraq. This is not just a question of showing the bombings but in the way the anchors framed the stories and the debate and tried to cut through the depressing sameness of the body counts.
Bethesda, Md.: Just wanted to pass along that I loved Washington Post radio and looked forward to the drive-time blurb from you. 3WT or whatever the new station is unlistenable. We hardly needed more airtime for these partisan call-in shows. I'm back to "Mike and Mike" and not particularly happy about it.
Howard Kurtz: I enjoyed being on Washington Post Radio and wished we'd had more time to prove that we could attract a larger audience. But it's a tough marketplace out there.
Arlington, Va.: Regarding Ann Coulter, I don't believe the television programs will ever tire of her. The more outlandish her speech, the better her television ratings. They need each other. She needs the press to cover her crazy rants to sell more books, and they need her to fill up some of the 24 hours in each day. That being said, do you think she's a clever promoter who probably doesn't believe half of what she says, but says it to sell books? Or do you think she genuinely believes everything she says (Jews should convert to Christianity, Sept. 11 widows are terrorist sympathizers, we should invade all Middle Eastern countries, kill their leaders and convert them to Christianity)?
Howard Kurtz: I don't want to attempt to read her mind. I do know that a decade ago, Coulter was a smart lawyer who was very aggressively anti-Clinton and dabbled in outrage and satire, but nothing like the inflammatory figure that she has become. And obviously the more recent approach is keeping her on the best-seller lists.
Baltimore: I know that you go on Keith Olbermann's show. I was just curious if you could ask him if he ever will have on someone who opposes his own view. That is something both O'Reilly and Hannity always have.
Howard Kurtz: I do think that Countdown would be stronger if Olbermann occasionally fenced with conservatives. He certainly has the broadcasting skills to go toe to toe with anyone.
Greenbelt, Md.: At first, I thought WaPo radio sounded like a good idea too. But after reading an article in the paper in the morning and participating in the web chat at lunch, I didn't really feel like listening to the same person on the same subject again while driving home.
Howard Kurtz: Well, the challenge was to go beyond what was in the paper and provide insight and color in an entertaining way. Sometimes we did that, and sometimes we fell short. Many people here had little experience with radio so it was a work in progress, and we ran out of time.
Thanks for the chat, folks.
Editor's Note: washingtonpost.com moderators retain editorial control over Discussions and choose the most relevant questions for guests and hosts; guests and hosts can decline to answer questions. washingtonpost.com is not responsible for any content posted by third parties.
|
Join live discussions from the Washington Post. Feature topics include national, world and DC area news, politics, elections, campaigns, government policy, tech regulation, travel, entertainment, cars, and real estate.
| 123.439024 | 0.634146 | 0.926829 |
high
|
low
|
abstractive
|
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/discussion/2007/10/09/DI2007100900671.html
|
https://web.archive.org/web/2007101419id_/http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/discussion/2007/10/09/DI2007100900671.html
|
Dr. Gridlock
|
2007101419
|
He was online Monday, Oct. 15 at 1 p.m. ET to address all your traffic and transit issues.
The Dr. Gridlock column receives hundreds of letters each month from motorists and transit riders throughout the Washington region. They ask questions and make complaints about getting around a region plagued with some of the worst traffic in the nation. The doctor diagnoses problems and tries to bring relief.
Dr. Gridlock appears in The Post's Metro section on Sunday and in the Extra section on Thursday. His comments also appear on the Web site's Get There blog. You can send e-mails for the newspaper column to drgridlock@washpost.com or write to Dr. Gridlock at 1150 15th St. NW, Washington, D.C. 20071.
Dr. Gridlock: Hello, travelers. Just got back from a week's vacation in Maine, so I missed out on some of the heat and traffic around here. But you, obviously, did not, because there are plenty of questions about driving and riding. I can see we'll be discussing some highway issues, transit matters and rules of the road.
Roanoke, Va.: Can anyone give me an approximate commuting time and route from Cheverly in Maryland to Edsall Road at 395 in Virginia? Public transportation is not an option to my destination. If I wanted to get to work in Virginia by 8:00 a.m. (8:30 at the latest) what time would I need to hit the road? Is 295 to the Wilson Bridge the best bet, or South Capitol Street to the SE-SW Freeway and down 395? Thanks for your help.
Dr. Gridlock: I thought I'd start with a couple of questions that tap into your traveling expertise. People considering moves to the Washington area often write to me and ask what it's like to commute from a certain area. I answer as best I can, but always note that experience can vary from day to day in this heavily congested area and it's good to have alternatives. (And it's good to do test drivers on weekdays before starting the commute for real.)
Odenton, Md.: Hi Dr. Gridlock. I have a new commute coming up -- Odenton to Alexandria in the a.m., and then reverse in the evenings. It's about one mile shorter to go BW Parkway over Route 3/Route 50, but in terms of traffic, any suggestions on which is better?
Dr. Gridlock: So this is another question along the same lines, and I invite reader coment. This one seems like a toss up, from my limited experience on those two routes. I've been in jam ups at different points along both.
California, Md.: In answering a letter concerning slow drivers in the left lanes you quoted several statutes or rules that require slow cars to move to the right in Maryland. What good are these rules if they are never enforced? There is no lane discipline whatsoever in Maryland or Virginia -- drivers hog the left lane if they contemplate a left turn 27 miles down the road!
Drivers in West Coast states generally leave the left lanes for passing. We won't even talk about European countries, where lane usage is very strictly adhered to.
washingtonpost.com: Not All Interstate 95 Traffic Controls Are Local ( Post, Oct. 11)
Dr. Gridlock: First, thanks for reading the column. It contained a letter on a topic that's among the most popular in the mail I get: How people should drive on highways around here.
Maryland and Virginia have somewhat different laws, and their driver's manuals read somewhat differently, but in both states, slower traffic is supposed to keep to the right. The laws and manuals also maintain that you're not supposed to speed. (I find it difficult to think of one rule without the other.)
Readers who are unhappy about driver behavior in this region often cite better conditions in places like California and New Jersey. I don't see it. I spend one week every year driving in the San Francisco Bay area and frequently travel on the New Jersey Turnpike and the Garden State Parkway. I don't see drivers performing any better in those places than they do around here.
My theory: You don't have to be a rocket scientist to get a driver's license. And traffic congestion seems to bring out the worst in everyone.
Washington, D.C.:"Roanoke, Va.: Can anyone give me an approximate commuting time and route from Cheverly in Maryland to Edsall Road at 395 in Virginia?"
Ouch, tough commute. Stick with the Beltway over the Wilson Bridge then Telegraph Road to Duke Street. Duke Street west to Landmark Mall and Edsall is the next exit over on 395 N. I would never take 295 south into the city at rush hour and 50 west is not an option at anytime! Hope this helps!
Dr. Gridlock: Thanks for that advice to our new commuter.
(Formerly) Sanford, Maine: Good morning, good Doctor. I grew up in Maine near the southern coast (Kennebunkport, Wells, Ogunquit), and as a teen our summers revolved around exploring the back roads in an attempt to avoid the tourist traffic on I-95 and Route 1. I was wondering, obviously the high summer season is over, but what where in Maine did you visit? And was your impression of Maine traffic?
Dr. Gridlock: I always tell people that I don't commute. As soon as I turn the ignition, I'm at work. I practice that on vacations and try to return with some perspective on traffic issues in other places.
On the Friday of Columbus Day weekend, we drove to Portland, Maine. Ugh. I-95 through Delaware wasn't as bad as last year, when the turnpike had several lanes shut. This year's roadwork is in the median. Friday afternoon traffic around Boston was as bad as anything we see around here. We continued north to Bar Harbor, mostly along Route 1, through areas where there have been debates about highway widenings because of the heavy congestion. (Sound familiar?)
One strong impression: Pedestrian safety is a matter of growing concern in other states, as well as in MD and VA. The biggest improvements I've seen in recent years have to do with pedestrian safety.
Washington, D.C.: Can you tell me which parking lots on the Orange Line in Virginia fill up first, and which have spaces available after rush hour? I have a speaking engagement in Herndon Wednesday morning, and will head back I-66 to drive to a Metro stop about 9:30 or so. Question is, which one should I go to in order to have a realistic chance of getting a spot?
Dr. Gridlock: Does anyone know of a parking area along VA's Orange Line that doesn't fill up by the end of rush hour? Metro is the biggest provider of parking in the region, but I've received so many complaints about the lack of spaces that I've come to think that we need to develop a better plan than just building more garages. Communities just won't tolerate the amount of garage construction needed to handle the growing demand.
Silver Spring, Md.: Hi Dr. Gridlock. My husband and I are planning on buying a home early next year. We're considering homes in Catonsville or Sykesville. If our destination is Glenmont Metro, do you have a feel for which would be the easier commute? Thanks!
Dr. Gridlock: I think "Silver Spring" is illustrating how big our region is getting and how far people are willing to commute. Some of you will warn out commenter against moving farther away. But many people are willing to make those time trade offs for the sake of getting a place to live that they really like. No stopping that.
I think Catonsville and Sykesville are a toss up as far as the commute to Glenmont Metro is concerned. My hope, Silver Spring, is that you could reach a MARC station or an MTA commuter bus park and ride lot for your trip, so you won't have too long to spend in a car on the very limited north-south roads between there and here.
Woodley Park, Washington, D.C>: To the person looking for Metro parking at 9:30: wait half an hour. At 10:00 a.m., the reserved spots open up to anyone, so you should be able to find a spot. Just remember to have your car out by 2:00 a.m.
Dr. Gridlock: Thanks, Woodley. Good thought on the reserved spaces. I think I should pass that advice along to the many retirees who tell me they'd like to travel to the District's cultural attractions by Metro, but are frustrated by the lack of midday parking along the Orange Line. They might have better luck if they time their arrivals at the parking facilities for the 10 a.m. lifting of the reserved parking restrictions.
To Edsall Road commuter! URGENT: I would 'not' get off on Telegraph, then get on Duke past Landmark. Lights, lights and more lights.
I'd stay on Beltway a few miles longer (once over WW bridge) and take 395N exit to Washington. The 'first' exits are Edsall Road.
If WTOP or other traffic station says Beltway is bad news, then try those secondary streets, but otherwise ....
Dr. Gridlock: Sounds like real life experience. And I like the note about listening to WTOP for traffic on the eights.
Odenton, Md.: I also commute to Alexandria, and 295 the whole way is the better option. However, the MARC Penn line to the Metro Yellow Line takes an hour and fifteen minutes from Odenton, which is comparable to the driving time.
Dr. Gridlock: And Maryland is talking about a long term plan to send trains past Union Station to Virginia. (Real long term, I think.)
Fairfax, Va. -- re: Metro Parking Lots in Virginia: I can say that the Vienna Metro stop (off of Nutley) is full by around 8:00 a.m. By around 9:30 a.m. you can sometimes find a random spot if someone happens to be pulling out around that time -- but I wouldn't count on it!
Dr. Gridlock: For many commuters, the reserved parking would be a good idea. Metro is considering a proposal to expand the number of reserved spots. But that's controversial among riders. One reason is that they think reserved parkers don't necessarily park in the reserved spaces if they see one closer. That takes a space that could be used by someone else.
Washington, D.C.: I have a question/complaint/rant about the circle near the GWU hospital. I usually enter it from 23rd St. As I'm going around the circle, cars from Penn Ave drive right into the circle -- no pausing, no yielding, no looking. Isn't there a rule about yielding to cars in the circle? I am always amazed at the drivers merging from Penn Ave and purposely avoid this circle for this one reason. It's unbelievably dangerous.
Dr. Gridlock: Yes, rule is the same everywhere I know of: Drivers in the circle have the right of way. We don't perform too well in that regard.
Washington, D.C.:"Metro is the biggest provider of parking in the region, but I've received so many complaints about the lack of spaces that I've come to think that we need to develop a better plan than just building more garages."
How about making buses more affordable? And yes, that includes the "express" buses where we pay twice to three times as much for the privilege of making stop after stop on every street corner.
Dr. Gridlock: I do think expanding and improving bus service is an important part of the solution to the growing parking problem at the Metrorail stations. We need more express services, like the MetroExtra along Georgia Avenue. But we also need more services that will draw people from the neighborhoods to the nearest Metrorail station, allowing them to leave their cars at home.
Alexandria, Va.: Who's job is it to patrol Metro Kiss and Rides? Is it Metro or local police? Every time I pick my husband up at Springfield Metro the pick-up area is a MESS because someone decided just to stop in the travel lanes and wait for their person. It once took me 3 cycles of the light at Franconia/Springfield Parkway to get into the Metro area Kiss and Ride area all because someone just stopped and threw on their hazard lights! There is a cutout for quick drop off/pick up AND there is an area of the garage dedicated for waiting. Who is responsible for this mess? I would like to bring this situation to their attention.
Dr. Gridlock: I see the same thing at the Silver Spring Station, which is the nearest to where I live. Occasionally, I do see Metro transit police there to enforce the rules. There's just not enough of them to go around in a transit system as large as ours.
I am in the process of making plans to take the train up to Hartford over the Christmas holidays and going to take the Metro into Union Station. My question to you or your readers is, would I be better off trying to park at Reagan Airport or at the Springfield Metro parking starting on Saturday morning the 22 and coming back on the 26.
Dr. Gridlock: Metro has longterm parking at three stations:
1. Level 1J at Franconia-Springfield
2. The South Lot at Huntington station (This is the lot, not the garage off N. Kings Hwy)
3. Cherrywood Lane side at Greenbelt station
(I pulled that right off Metro's Web site.)
Reagan National, as I recall, issues warnings every holiday season about the likelihood that the parking areas will be filled up. Space is that limited. You can look for reports on the airport Web site about current parking conditions.
Washington, D.C.: Can you shed some light on the impending Foxhall Road closure? The sign says it will last from 10/17 to 10/26 -- will this be all day or at night? There's nothing on the D.C. DOT site about it at all, just about a weekend closure from 10/6.
This is the best way into work for me, by about an hour a day. If it will really be closed altogether for two weeks, I need to make alternate plans (like shifting my commute so I can take Rock Creek Parkway or telecommuting).
Dr. Gridlock: Erik Linden, spokesman for the District Department of Transportation, issued a statement today about the upcoming work:
DDOT will close Foxhall Road to through traffic from Reservoir Road to Nebraska Avenue from Wednesday, October 17 following morning rush hour through Thursday, October 25.
Northbound traffic on Foxhall Road toward Nebraska Avenue will be detoured via Reservoir Road and MacArthur Boulevard and Arizona Avenue.
Southbound traffic on Foxhall Road toward Reservoir Road will be detoured via Nebraska Avenue and Arizona Avenue and Macarthur Boulevard.
Detour signs will be placed along the roadsides advising motorists of the detour route. If all the work is not completed by October 25, DDOT will continue this operation for the next seven work days or until completion.
Arlington, Va.: Glad to see the advance warning over the weekend (using mobile message boards) along the SW Freeway warning that the 3rd St. tunnel will be closed every evening this week. What will they be doing?
Dr. Gridlock: Tunnel is off peak maintenance work - lane closures only - not a full closure, says DDOT's Erik Linden.
Rock Creek Parkway: How long is the construction on Rock Creek Parkway supposed to last? During rush hour, trying to get on from 66 is miserable!
Dr. Gridlock: Yes, I've heard about this and have been meaning to check it out myself. (Mark Berman, a Post staffer who helps me organize your incoming mail, was getting stuck in this on his commute from our Alexandria Bureau back to his home in the District.) The parkway project started this spring and is scheduled to be done next spring. The problem on I-66 arose last month when work shifted from the southbound lanes of the parkway to the northbound lanes.
Arlington, Va.: Traffic over Key Bridge and through Georgetown seems to get worse and worse every day. Can't D.C. do something to stop people from attempting to turn left from M St onto Banks St (between 34th and 33rd)? The idiots who can't drive the extra half block to the left turn arrow at 33rd St block the left lane and really disrupt the flow.
Dr. Gridlock: That's a very difficult area for commuters, and I've seen various forms of trick driving that must really annoy those of you stuck in the mess. For example, I've seen some drivers coming in on Canal Road hold up traffic while they wait to make left turns into the gas station near Georgetown University.
I'm hoping we'll see some improvement when the District is completely done with the Canal Road widening project, but that can't be a total solution. Traffic volume on Key Bridge and Canal Road is so high, and M Street so narrow.
Silver Spring, Md.: Some time ago, someone wrote in saying that people in D.C. are entirely too impatient (true). They gave an example of a driver behind them at a stop light who honked their horn just a few seconds after the light turned green. The person that wrote in suggested that those few seconds have no impact on people getting through the light and that folks should be more patient. I'm curious as to what you think about this. I think it is imperative that the car in the front of the line at the green light should pay attention, I pay attention. I think that those precious few seconds trickle down the line of cars and that a car that should have been able to get through the light was now rejected that possibility and has to wait again, slowing down traffic even more. If I'm at the front of the line, I look at the lights that are perpendicular to my light to gauge as to when my light will be turning green and accelerate accordingly, hopefully allowing as many cars to get through as possible. Anyway, just wanted to let that person know that those few seconds do matter. And yes, I realize I may just be trying to justify my own impatience.
Dr. Gridlock: I agree with you that drivers need to pay attention at lights and know how annoying it can be when you're in a hurry. But just to broaden the thought, rather than disagree with it, I know that in my three decades of driving, I've occasionally failed to notice when the light changed, or alternatively, wondered if the honking driver behind me thought my stick shift was wired to the traffic light.
Arlington, Va.: Love your column.
For the "inadvertently funny road sign" department, here's a sign posted on Fairfax Drive near Ballston.
How kind of the county to alert us to obese walkers crossing...
Dr. Gridlock: Having written plenty of newspaper headlines over the years, I'm a bit sympathetic to the highway sign writers. It's tough to cram a lot of information into a couple of words. (But then, I always loved "SLOW CHILDREN".)
RE: Lane Usage CA/NJ vs. VA/MD/DC: I agree that California or New Jersey drivers are no better than drivers in our area. I recently went to San Francisco and Los Angeles this past weekend and I did a lot of driving in both. In both northern and southern California I encountered the same things that happen here: major delays for looking at simple incidents, not leaving the left lane for passing and improper merging. The only difference was the nice weather. As for the roads themselves I liked that the speed limit was 65 on most highways and the left lane was a shoulder that was transformed into a lane. They don't use asphalt on most interstates, so it must be really cheap to maintain. I don't understand why we don't do that in this region, seems like a quick solution to lower cost and get extra capacity quickly.
Dr. Gridlock: You're thinking about roads where they use concrete rather than asphalt? We do that in some stretches here and you see it a lot on bridges. You engineers can correct me, but I think concrete lasts longer but is more expensive than asphalt as a construction material.
By the way, I'm never comfortable with turning breakdown lanes into travel lanes. I understand the desperation behind it -- providing more road capacity -- but think it can be a significant safety hazard.
Potomac, Md.: Hello Good Doctor,
We're trying to figure out our Thanksgiving travel plans -- ugh. We'll be driving from Potomac to northern N.J. We usually drive up through Harrisburgh, Pa., and into N.J. on Rt. 78. Based on AAA or NHA stats, is it better to travel Wednesday morning (the day right before Thanksgiving) or Thanksgiving morning itself?
Dr. Gridlock: I'll have to do this from memory rather than stats: Anything is better than traveling on Wednesday afternoon before Thanksgiving. More and more drivers are realizing that and launching their trips on Wednesday morning, Wednesday night or Thursday morning.
My own experience and comments from readers suggest that they're all about the same. Sunday afternoon, of course, is the worst of times to be on the road after Thanksgiving.
By the way, the topic of holiday getaways is so popular, I'll be doing more about them in Dr. Gridlock in the weeks ahead. Also, I'll be seeking your travel advice again on the Get There blog.
Re impatient DC drivers: You also need to wait at a green light for all the red light runners to pass. Saw a police car run a red light last night. Pays to pause a second or two.
Dr. Gridlock: Just generally, I wouldn't let the driver behind me force me out into traffic. The driver behind can't necessarily see the hazard that you see.
Former Mainer: I hope you had a wonderful time in Maine. It is beautiful this time of year. I grew up in Maine and was shocked when I moved to the D.C. area with regards to traffic and congestion. In Maine, it's nice to know that if something is 20 minutes away, it'll take you 20 minutes any time of day!
Dr. Gridlock: Around here, people are as frustrated by the unreliability of their trips as they are by the time it takes. It's becoming more and more difficult to plan, so people leave big buffers of time when they absolutely have to be somewhere.
Woodley Park, Washington, D.C.: Concrete is cheaper in the long run, as it lasts much longer than asphalt, but laying the concrete requires shutting the travel lane for several weeks. This is why it is very difficult to lay concrete on roads like the Beltway, where taking a lane out for a month is out of the question.
Federal Highway Administration is not thrilled with the idea of converting shoulders to lanes. They granted VDOT a special waiver for I-66 under the condition that it was only "temporary" and that the road would be reconstructed with 4 real lanes when funding was available. Thus far, almost 2 decades have passed and VDOT has not lived up to its end of the bargain, so FHWA is not likely to grant VDOT another waiver to do this anytime soon.
Dr. Gridlock: Thanks again, Woodley.
Hyattsville, Md.: On the Cheverly to Edsall Road commute: the Beltway to the Wilson Bridge takes you about 15 miles out of your way. Take Kenilworth to 295, get off at Howard Road. Take a left at the bottom of the ramp and then another immediate left onto 295 northbound. Stay to the right and take the exit for the 11th Street bridge to 395 which will take you over the 14th street bridge and on to Edsall Road. A little convoluted and, yes, 295 can be horrible during rush hour, but if you leave at 7:00 a.m. you should be at work by 7:45 without any issue.
Dr. Gridlock: Normally, there are a great many interesting comments and questions for this chat, but today it's just huge. I'll try to get out a few more, but I apologize in advance for not getting to all.
Rockville, Md.:"You engineers can correct me, but I think concrete lasts longer but is more expensive than asphalt as a construction material."
And road salt (et al) eats concrete but it doesn't eat asphalt. In parts of Calif., no problem. Around here, big problem.
Dr. Gridlock: I often hear the engineers and transpo leaders around hear warning about the growing cost of maintaining our highways. We're not that far away from having to rebuild the Beltway, for example.
Greenbelt, Md.: I know I'm late here, but there are only about 17 long-term parking spaces at Greenbelt Metro and there are NEVER ENOUGH on holiday weekends. What are you supposed to do when those spaces are filled?
Dr. Gridlock: Metro doesn't recommend parking in other spots -- and I don't either, for security reasons. But that said, you probably could park elsewhere in the Metro lots without getting either ticketed or towed over a holiday weekend.
I've said in the column that the total number of longterm parking spaces should be expanded.
Washington, D.C.: So what, if anything, can we do if stuck behind a slow driver in the left lane? This happens a lot on the GW Parkway and, since it's only two lanes, there's often nowhere else to go.
Dr. Gridlock: Around here, you can pass on the right if you can do so safely. Otherwise, I'd just be patient. And I know that doesn't sound satisfying, or help you get where you're going on time. Slower traffic should stay to the right, but I don't recommend any form of self-deputizing behavior to correct a situation.
Tyson's Corner, Va.: Must we continue to make excuses for Metro's problems? If we do, nothing will get done. It's easier to pass the buck than spend it on a solution. I'm tired of people saying things like, "It's a complex system." Great, you know that going in, now make do with what you have an improve it where you can. It really shouldn't have taken over a year over sending e-mails to Metro to have a simple change made. I still get excuses about other problems I've seen on the system (simple logisitical problems that can be solved easily). Why do people continue to make excuses for Metro when they're doing such a great job themselves?
Dr. Gridlock: Tysons, I hope I didn't say anything here, or on the Get There blog or in the Gridlock column that led you to think I'm making excuses for Metro. Today on the blog, I refered everyone to a good story in The Post about Metro's troubles communicating with passengers during a breakdown.
Some politicians use Metro's problems as an excuse for saying that Metro can't be trusted with more money to operate the trains and buses. So I think it's useful to remember that the system is a great asset to our region and a lot of us depend on it.
But Metro's problems in communicating with its passengers are great examples of things that can and should be improved. No excuses.
Balston, Va.:"I'm hoping we'll see some improvement when the District is completely done with the Canal Road widening project, but that can't be a total solution. Traffic volume on Key Bridge and Canal Road is so high, and M Street so narrow."
Then please explain to my why D.C. is considering removing the Whitehurst Freeway. It doesn't take a Ph.D. in traffic engineering to know what would happen to Gerogetown and Rosslyn traffic if that road was torn down.
Dr. Gridlock: I don't believe that tearing down the Whitehurst would benefit anyone -- not commuters and not the people who live in Georgetown.
Just another point. I was the "lead driver" at an intersection recently and usually wait for the red light runners. It just so happened this time a red light runner hit a pedestrian who thought it was safe to cross.
We all need to be somewhere, but let's all do it safely.
Dr. Gridlock: I think that's a good note to end on today. Again, I'm sorry I couldn't get to all your questions. There are quite a few still asking for guidance on various commutes or travels. I'm thinking I could collect them into a "Get There" blog item and ask you all to comment and advise the questioners.
And I hope to talk with all of you again in two weeks, so stay safe out there.
Editor's Note: washingtonpost.com moderators retain editorial control over Discussions and choose the most relevant questions for guests and hosts; guests and hosts can decline to answer questions. washingtonpost.com is not responsible for any content posted by third parties.
|
Join live discussions from the Washington Post. Feature topics include national, world and DC area news, politics, elections, campaigns, government policy, tech regulation, travel, entertainment, cars, and real estate.
| 138.682927 | 0.658537 | 0.902439 |
high
|
low
|
abstractive
|
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/discussion/2007/10/09/DI2007100900670.html
|
https://web.archive.org/web/2007101419id_/http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/discussion/2007/10/09/DI2007100900670.html
|
The Chat House
|
2007101419
|
Poolesville, Md., formerly: Hey Mike -- I have been wondering -- who picks the topics for "Around the Horn" and "PTI"? Very repetitious. All I can figure out is that ESPN picks topics they want to keep in the news. After I've heard Woody Paige, Mariotti et al discuss Marion Jones, Tony Romo or A-Rod, what makes anyone think I want to hear all about it again in 10-20 minutes? I thought you and Tony had priority, because haven't you been on the air longer? Anyway, it's too predictable. I can't be the first to pull you aside and tell you this ... correct?
Michael Wilbon: Hi everybody ... what a sports weekend. My God. I didn't go to sleep last night until I'd watched Boise State beat Nevada in 4 overtimes. The best two college football games of the week were WAC games, Hawaii in three OTs over San Jose State and BSU in four OTs. ... Phenomenal.
Anyway, we'll start with some "inside baseball" because this question was high in the queue.
Don't know it all. The question reveals you know very little if you're presuming that ESPN picks the topics. ESPN picks one topic ... the one that Tony and I discuss about 11 minutes into SportsCenter that doesn't even appear in the 5:30 p.m.-6 p.m. "PTI" block...
The topics, by and large, pick themselves. Of course "Around The Horn" and "PTI" are going to discuss Marion Jones; what did you think we'd discuss, the Capitals loss to the Rangers? Every sports show in America today is talking about the Patriots manhandling of the Cowboys, Adrian Peterson running through the Bears to top another Devin Hester show ... the NLCS and ALCS, the BCS...
What's different, hopefully, is how they're discussed. We're not doing European rugby today, okay?
New Orleans: What did you think about Sally Jenkins' article about the possible legalization of performance-enhancing drugs? I think the best point she made was that it at least needs to be discussed.
washingtonpost.com: There's a Legal Remedy To the Doping Issue (Post, Oct. 12)
Michael Wilbon: Anybody who visits this space knows how much I love Sally Jenkins, and she made a lot of great points in that column, but I need to ask her why it took Marion Jones to fall before she got religion. She killed Barry Bonds and other guys for 10 years on this topic; now we need to take a second look? Yeah, sportswriters keep score. Just like people keep score on me. It's fine to change your mind, but you'd better explain why you did to the Nth degree. Sally has been defending Miss Jones for years and years, if my memory serves me correctly...Why does her guilt trigger a change in philosophy?
Washington: Is there any rule in sports that belittles and cheapens a moment like the NFL's last-millisecond timeout rule? Shouldn't the NFL get rid of this abomination like the NBA did with the Jason-Kidd-flying out-of-bounds timeout rule?
Michael Wilbon: The timeout-before-the-field-goal rule is a thousand times worse than calling TO while flying out of bounds. And yes, that should be and will be changed in this upcoming off season.
Off the wall: But that is one reason I love these chats, you are so knowledgeable about so many aspects of sports and culture. I played a little rugby growing up but never had the size or speed and got tired of a whooping every Saturday. But have you been able to catch any of the World Cup action? The U.S. team had a got shot at England in the first round, looked okay, but the highlights so far are the early exit of Australia and New Zealand. The England/France match was very exciting.
Michael Wilbon: I've caught a few highlights, yes, but I have no idea what I'm watching ... I've tried to understand rugby but get very little of it. ... Thanks for appreciating the diverse discussion we have. But this is a small audience that comes to this place for specific reasons ... TV is very different.
Maryland: Wilbon, will Brady break Peyton's touchdown record this season? Is this the greatest team you've ever seen through six games?
Michael Wilbon: My thinking is that when defenses start to try to take away Moss/Welker/Stallworth, the Patriots will load up on the run until defenses adjust to that ... I don't see Brady breaking that record, not that it's important anyway. Are the Patriots the best team I've seen through six games? Since the '85 Bears, yes. But people were physically afraid of those Bears, who went 18-1, and said so openly ... the Patriots are more precise than that '85 team, and have better offense by 1,000 miles. ... But There's a long way from 6 to 19...
Columbia, Md.: Thanks for these chats, they make a great Monday. What's with the reading glasses on "PTI"? I thought you got laser correction a few years ago, your eyes going bad already? You can't do that, you need to keep looking younger than Mr. Tony.
Michael Wilbon: Laser surgery corrected my vision from about four feet out. Dr. Whitten told me up front I would need reading glasses. But it's a wonderful trade, to be able to wake up and see the TV or the clock or anything else without glasses ... or play golf, or just exist. I read, what, 10-15 percent of the time. ... I don't even need them to read most of the time. ... It was a no-brainer.
The Zoo: Hey Mr. Wilbon, love your work. Do you think that race played any part in the media's reaction against Travis Johnson following Trent Green's concussion last weekend? Olbermann dubbed Johnson the NFL's "worst person of the week," but was that just the initial, emotional reaction of seeing a big, strong black man taunting a concussed white quarterback? Because on further review, it seems that most are starting to see that Jackson had a legit complaint about Green's legal-but-dirty block.
Michael Wilbon: I don't know. It's a fair question and a good one, but I just don't know. Keith is about the least likely guy to jump to such a conclusion, rooted in bias. ... I think Johnson had every right to be upset about having his knees taken out, but once he realized Green was seriously hurt he should have shut up.
New Orleans: You wouldn't rate the LSU-Kentucky game one of the best of the weekend?
Michael Wilbon: Damn good game -- really, really good -- but it had company. Hawaii-San Jose State, Boise State-Nevada ... even Northwestern over Minnesota. They all had one thing in common: overtimes. LSU-Kentucky had the most at stake, perhaps because all the teams had BCS games in the balance (except my Northwestern Wildcats, who just happen to be 7-0 in OT games since the NCAA adopted this format, 2-0 the last two weeks. ... It was as exciting a college football weekend as I can imagine...
Charlotte, N.C.: Hey Mike, thanks so much for doing these chats. I, for one, am not a big "where are recruits ranked" guy, but how about some love for Jon Thompson III getting a commitment from the consensus No. 1 player in the class of 2008, Greg Monroe -- beating out Duke, UConn, LSU, and Texas? John is a great coach and recruiter, and a classy man who does things the right away (unlike Kelvin Sampson, for example).
Michael Wilbon: JTIII is a terrific coach, period. And he and his wife are wonderful people. ... Will you read me waxing poetically about a recruit because of some perhaps bogus rating service? Nope. I could care less. Michael Jordan wasn't on any of those recruiting lists, neither was Larry Bird, nor David Robinson, nor Steve Nash ... that's about 10 NBA MVPs, right?
Seattle: Hi Mr Wilbon, Thanks for chatting. After the "My God's" of Adrian Peterson, Tom Brady, and the Rockies ... this was, if there ever is such a thing, an okay loss by the 'Skins. The line was pretty beat up, the receivers had the dropsies, but Jason Campbell didn't get flustered except for a couple of rushed passes, kept working the field and again showed why he is going to be, hopefully, a pretty darn good NFL QB. What is your opinion, sir? (Also, how could you not run Sellers on 4th and 2, or involve him more like last week?)
Michael Wilbon: Clearly, as it involved Mike Sellers, coaches are human, too, and either tie themselves to their own agendas or simply have brain cramp...I think this is about dumb agendas ... since Mr. 700-page playbook told the analysts doing the game that Sellers is "first a blocker, second a receiver, and third a runner." If I owned that team I'd fire that coach. Period. Anyway, I think I said in this space last week that Packers-Redskins was pick-'em and I couldn't see more than a field goal difference between the two, and look how it turned out. The fans in every city agonize every week over what their team could have done to win the game, which is why the NFL is so incredibly popular. Contrary to what so many of the Redskins, and Dan Snyder, seemed to think yesterday, they weren't better than the Packers for the 60 minutes that counted, or they would have won the game. The Redskins have no reason to be down about the loss, are still a pretty good team at 3-2 with the beat up Cardinals coming in. ... They'll be 4-2 going into New England ... how bad is that?
Last night's deluge: Mike: Is the TV schedule so sacrosanct they can't rain-out in a playoff game? Playing in those conditions last night was ridiculous.
Michael Wilbon: There are scheduled off days...too many of them in the ALCS. But they hate to do it. ... The conditions weren't great, but we've seen worse in October...
Arlington, Va.: After the skins lost their backup, backup tackle and center, I was wondering what would have happened if Wade was unable to go. Has any team ever had to use a tight end or defensive tackle as an offensive lineman because of injury? Would have been an interesting thing to watch.
Michael Wilbon: Yep, teams have had to move guards to tackle and put the TE at guard ... or tackle. ... Doesn't happen every week but it's not the rarest thing in the world either.
Dulles Airport, Va.: Do you think South Florida will play for the National Championship if they stay undefeated, or will a one-loss team jump them for the No. 2 spot?
Michael Wilbon: Great question. Yes, if South Florida, with victories at Auburn and over West Virginia (in a rout) win out, they'll play for the title because the top teams are going to continue to lose. Cal and USC will have at least one more loss. I think LSU could lose again. (By the way, what's with LSU being ranked ahead of Kentucky, after losing at Kentucky? How do the voters justify that?) Oregon is a great team but that's not reflected in the BCS poll just yet. ... I think South Florida is great for college football in the same way Miami was great for college football back in 1983, when the Hurricanes came out of nowhere to play and beat Nebraska in the Orange Bowl for the national championship, a game which ushered in the modern era of college football.
D.C. born and bred: What's up, Mike -- thanks for doing these chats. I've gotta call out your boy Mike Sellers - he's had two crucial drops in the 'Skins two losses. You act as if it's a mortal sin that he is not more involved in the offense, yet his iron hands continue to doom the Redskins on third down. How can we continue to have confidence in him?
Michael Wilbon: He shouldn't be catching passes. He should be running people over as he did last week. How hard is this? Why throw to him when you can stick it in his belly? I believe the defensive players I talk to who tell me they love it when the Redskins coaches run Betts in goal line situations instead of Sellers.
Southern California: How many people tune in to a Rockies-Indians World Series?
Michael Wilbon: Don't know and don't care. You one of those people who has to have the Yankees or Red Sox and somebody or you don't care? I watch because they're the two best teams. I don't need the Dodgers or Giants, Yanks or Sawx, to appreciate the World Series. I'd love to see the Indians in there ... If you want a popularity contest, tune into "American Idol," where they vote.
Cincinnati: Off the top of my head, I can't think of any World Series-title-less managers going to their third teams who have succeeded. Dusty Baker is a great pick by the Reds in my book, but what are the chances he can make it work here? Fans are surprisingly negative about this hire so far, so much so that local columnists already are asking for patience. Your take?
Michael Wilbon: I'm not a Dusty Baker guy because I believe he ruined the Cubs, both with his mishandling of the pitching (Wood and Prior) and because he's a whiner who blames others before looking inward. He let that club whine its way out of contention in 2004. But ... it's also true he's got a pretty darn good track record and has earned this chance to manage the Reds. I don't see why he'd want to, really, other than these jobs are precious and few ... but the Reds never hires from outside, until now. ... Like anything else, if he wins they'll get amnesia; if he loses they'll run him out of town.
San Jose, Cal if.: No. 2 Cal loses with a backup QB, a redshirt freshman. My question is, how much should the rankings/BCS put into a game played with a backup player at the most important position? Not just for Cal, but for any team that loses a top QB for game, should that really impact their BCS rating?
Michael Wilbon: A lot. It's the coaching staff's job to get backups ready. What, Cal should get favorable treatment because a kid goofed? So what would you do when a true freshman leads his team to victory? Why reward big Division I factories who play 8 games out of 12 at home and never go on the road to play anybody of consequence? The whole thing is subjective anyway, which is why I want a playoff.
Washington: Okay, so the first BCS rankings came out, and if the season ended today we'd end up with Ohio State vs. USF in the National Championship game. I know the season is a long way from over, but considering this "nightmare" scenario, doesn't publishing rankings that determine the title matchup just lure voters to push another team up a peg to change the final matchup? I love all the attention USF is getting this year, but something tells me that they could be the only undefeated team left at the end of the season and they still wouldn't be in that title game. Kill the BCS!
Michael Wilbon: Why would that be a "nightmare" scenario? Because you (apparently) don't know the USF program or its coaches or players? So, get to know them. Was it a "nightmare" scenario when Miami was matched with Nebraska on New Year's Day 1984? Nobody know them, or their coach Howard Schnellenberger? Or their QB Vinny Testaverde? Kill the BCS, yes, but don't tell me that upstart teams are the reason the BCS should die. Upstart teams are the reason college football needs a playoff...because the big powers don't want to play them (see Oklahoma vs. Boise State in last year's Fiesta Bowl.)
Washington: How insane is that Colts/Pats game going to look in a few weeks?
Michael Wilbon: It looks insane now ... don't know how it will appear then, depending on results, health of the two teams. But from where we stand now it looks like the best game of the year by a million miles. It will probably determine home field advantage for the AFC Championship...
Crystal City, Va.: Mike, is it me or are Redskin fans remarkably hard on this team. Yes, I know they have been below average in the past 10 years. And yes, I know they lost yet another game that they should have won (which is the theme of recent years), but the season is young and the Packers are not the Saints or the Rams. What's up?
Michael Wilbon: Why should the Redskins have won? Because they fumbled. Using that illogic, the Bears should have won because they should have tackled Adrian Peterson? Or, the Cowboys should have won because they should have covered Randy Moss and Wes Welker and Donte Stallworth better? Come on. The Redskins weren't quite as good as Green Bay up in Wisconsin -- no shame -- but I don't want to hear they should have won. ... And yes, to answer your original question, fans seem to have out-of-line expectations about this team, which has been nothing for the better part of the last 15 years.
Rockies vs. Indians: Yeah, who'd want to watch two teams loaded with some of the best young players in the game today (Sizemore, Sabathia, Carmona, Holliday, Tulowitzki, Francis) plus a best-kept-secret type in Todd Helton? What fun would that be if we can't spend two more weeks worshipping the Yankees and Red Sox?
Normal, Ill.: How good do you think Adrian Peterson is? His performance was stunning and frustrating for Bears fans; was it greatness on his part or bad Bears defense?
Michael Wilbon: The Bears defense, on a scale from 1-10, was a 3. And Peterson, on a scale of 1-10, was a 10. He's the best runner to come into the league since LaDainian Tomlinson...
Chevy Chase, Md.: So the Wizards hardly have changed their starting lineup. I do think that the bench has improved and should help a bit more defensively, but not much has changed for Agent Zero and his boys. If everyone stays healthy (apart from Etan Thomas obviously) how far do you see them going?
Michael Wilbon: Second round, if everybody stays healthy. ... Now, that could change if they're really committed to play better defense. But we've heard that promise and seen it go unfulfilled. The Celtics, Bulls, Pistons and Heat (only with Shaq and Wade 100 percent, though) are better. But let me say this, the Wizards have a nice squad. There's nobody in the East the Wizards simply cannot beat, like they couldn't beat the Heat three and four years ago. Nobody in the east, as we enter the season, seems that formidable. I don't know how Cleveland can be as good, with Pavlovic and the big Brazilian kid unsigned. ... How did Cleveland get better? I think they're worse. The Pistons might have one more run in them, or they might look very old. I love Joe Dumars's last two drafts, but it takes awhile for kids to work their way in...What if the Bulls trade for Kobe, as is being rumored? The Bulls might be the best team in the conference anyway. The Knicks are better, but not a contender. I've got the Wizards finishing fifth, sixth or seventh, but if they can sneak ahead of Miami and get one of the top three spots, perhaps a post-season run is possible.
Miami: I hate to go stat boy on you, but Bernie Kosar was the quarterback for Miami against Nebraska in the '84 Orange Bowl. Bernie had some rotten luck in Cleveland that kept him out of the Super Bowl on multiple occasions, but has never shown any bitterness.
Michael Wilbon: Didn't I say Kosar? My goodness, what did I say? I know it wasn't Testaverde ... I knew it was Kosar, who had some really good moments in Cleveland before he ran into John Elway in January a few times. I covered the Nebraska-Miami title game ... one of the great memories of my professional life.
Washington: If you were hired as Michelle Wie's agent right now, what you do to get her back on track?
Michael Wilbon: Advise her to stay in school at Stanford, stop playing men's events entirely, concentrate on her health for the next six to eight months, then play selected events on the LPGA Tour. It ain't that hard. Oh, and listen to her coaches when it comes to golf, not her daddy.
Laurel, Md.: "If you want a popularity contest, tune into 'American Idol,' where they vote." Or watch boxing. Is there any way to reorganize that sport so that the best fighters get into the best fights, as opposed to big names who bring in the big money?
Michael Wilbon: No, it's done. I'm so sad to say that. I love boxing so much, I can't even tell you. But the mixed martial arts things are more popular. Kids aren't growing up wanting to be boxers anymore (which is almost certainly a good thing)...I just don't see it happening. Boxing is going the way of horse racing, which was king from 1920 to the 1950s, then slipped away in popularity. Taking boxing off over-the-air TV and going almost exclusively with pay-per-view for the biggest fights killed the sport. Killed it.
Baltimore: Eric Metcalf, Desmond Howard, Billy "White Shoes" Johnson ... have we seen the likes of Devin Hester before, or is he breaking the mold?
Michael Wilbon: Oh, he's breaking the mold. He's got the same number of return-touchdowns as Gale Sayers? Are you kidding me? Every time he touches the ball, even with kick-coverage units loaded up to stop him, he's a threat to score...He's unreal.
Burke, Va.: I realize Michigan has won four straight games, but how memory-challenged are voters to think that they're one of the best 25 teams in the country? Did voters selectively block out one of the biggest upsets of the year followed by a total cremation the following week, both at home? To think we use these morons to tell us who is the best team in the country is ludicrous. Anyone who gave Michigan votes should lose their votes for the rest of the season!
Michael Wilbon: Thank you...Thank you.
Annapolis, Md.: Re: World Series -- Mike, you might not care who plays in the World Series, but Major League Baseball and FOX sure do.
Michael Wilbon: And while that's true, it's too bad. And since I don't work for either entity, I'm happy to see whoever advances.
Rockville, Md.:"Michael Jordan wasn't on any of those recruiting lists, neither was Larry Bird, nor David Robinson, nor Steve Nash..." Don't forget about Juan Dixon. You don't think all 312 D-I basketball teams wouldn't have wanted him on their roster?
Michael Wilbon: I love Juan Dixon. But you really want to include Juan Dixon in that company? Lemme guess where you attended college?
Arlington, Va.: So which weekend in October is your best choice for Sports Junkies? Was it this past one, what with NLCS/ALCS, college football madness, Midnight Madness, NFL, NHL, MLS, and NBA preseason all going on at the same time?
Michael Wilbon: Midnight madness is of no consequence to me. There's no excitement in that. It's about the NFL, college football, baseball playoffs ... period.
New Orleans: Well the Saints finally got a W. Do you believe there is a chance of them making it to the playoffs?
Michael Wilbon: The NFC is so, so bad ... I'm not going to rule them out. It'll be hard but Tampa is already 4-1 in that division ... it's going to be tough to catch them...
Washington: How does the Patriots organization field such a competitive team year after year? What can the Redskins learn from observing them?
Michael Wilbon: Hire the best people, let them do their jobs, and don't be delusional. That about covers it.
"Working" in Washington: You mentioned all the great overtime games this weekend, and while college overtime games are fun to watch, isn't the "must go for two" rule beginning with the third OT too gimmicky? You had the No. 1 team in the nation playing in one. Should a team's national title hopes be pinned on an arbitrary decision that they must go for two?
Michael Wilbon: You raise a very worthy point -- it is gimmicky. ... But it's nonetheless exciting. ... Thrilling, even.
Cleveland: Thank you for sticking up for the Indians! We here in Cleveland are sick of the Boston Bias, and of course hate the Yankees like everyone else (except LeBron, but that's another topic). I mean, the Indians and Red Sox had the same record! If I hear someone say that we're a "Cinderella" team one more time, I might seriously lose it.
Michael Wilbon: Thanks for the feedback.
Arlington, Va.: I happen to be a "Sawx" fan, but anyone who wouldn't want to watch the Indians versus the Rockies in the World Series is an idiot. Those are two great and exciting teams. Now, the Diamondbacks are another matter -- they are just not that good.
Michael Wilbon: Glad to see some of you weighing in on this.
Alexandria, Va.: I know you never shy away about voicing your opinions about race issues in society, but do you get tired of people in this discussion asking if some situation that happened was racial issue? As an African-American, it seems like it's a situation where you're the only African American in a classroom and the teacher asks you a question about slavery or the civil rights era and everyone is looking at you to see what answer or reaction you give.
Michael Wilbon: You make a very, very good observation, and I hope one day we're in a place in this culture where it disappears. But for now and the foreseeable future, it's part of the territory and I accept it. It's why I jumped all over Vince Young a few weeks ago, for apparently not knowing the modern history of the black NFL quarterback. I do have a responsibility to look at these issues that, say, Kornheiser and Boswell don't have. It's reality. And hardly a burden. But again, you raise a very good point.
Boston: Great job picking the Cowboys against the Pats yesterday, Wilbon. Nice to see you didn't let your Midwestern Bias influence you at all.
Michael Wilbon: Good to see you didn't let your geographical bias influence you at all. I know many of you in the east are geographically challenged, but when you put Dallas the Midwest, you open yourself to laughter from the rest of the country...as should be the case.
Okay everybody, gotta run and meet Tony at the Georgia Dome for "PTI" and prep for tonight's halftime segment of "Monday Night Football." ... Thanks for chatting, everybody ... see you next week, from Jacksonville where the Patriots will play the Jaguars -- wonder what region of the country our friend from Boston will place Jacksonville? Have a great week everybody.
Editor's Note: washingtonpost.com moderators retain editorial control over Discussions and choose the most relevant questions for guests and hosts; guests and hosts can decline to answer questions. washingtonpost.com is not responsible for any content posted by third parties.
|
Join live discussions from the Washington Post. Feature topics include national, world and DC area news, politics, elections, campaigns, government policy, tech regulation, travel, entertainment, cars, and real estate.
| 138.463415 | 0.585366 | 0.682927 |
high
|
low
|
abstractive
|
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/discussion/2007/10/12/DI2007101201409.html
|
https://web.archive.org/web/2007101419id_/http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/discussion/2007/10/12/DI2007101201409.html
|
Talk About Travel - washingtonpost.com
|
2007101419
|
The Post's Travel Section Flight Crew will take your comments, questions, suspicions, warnings, gripes, sad tales and happy endings springing from the world of ... the world. Of course, the Flight Crew will be happy to answer your travel questions -- but the best thing about this forum, we insist, is that it lets travelers exchange information with other travelers who've been there, done that or otherwise have insights, ideas and information to share. Different members of the Crew will rotate through the captain's chair every week, but the one constant is you, our valued passengers.
We know you have a choice in online travel forums, and speaking for the entire Flight Crew, we want to thank you for flying with us.
You may also browse an archive of previous live travel discussions. For daily dispatches, check out Travel Log, the Travel section's new blog.
Andrea Sachs: Welcome back to another hour of "You Ask, We Answer--Now Let's Travel." Today, Elissa Leibowitz Poma is joining us to discuss the Seven Wonders story that ran in Sunday's section. So, toss your questions to her and likely she will have seven answers for you.
Also, for today's question: Who has made their Thanksgiving plans already? Tell us how far in advance you booked, or how long you plan to procrastinate for.
re: German Village in Columbus, OH : Following up on a letter to the editor in Sunday's Travel section.
When I was in Columbus, OH, last year for a few days for work, some of us went to Schmidt's, which has been serving wursts, schnitzel, beer (of course) and other classic Bavarian fare since 1886. The highlight was the accordianist and drummer playing "Beer Barrel Polka" and "Pennsylvania Polka," in authentic costume -- as were the servers/beer wenches -- and the decor.
If they weren't speaking English, I would have thought I was in Munich!
Andrea Sachs: I had only a short time in Columbus and only drove through German Village. But I did hear that it was pretty authentic. For my next trip . . .
Arlington, VA: Does anyone on the Crew have experience obtaining a tourist visa for Vietnam? I've read the requirements and looked at the application online, but I can't seem to find the cost of the application fee on the embassy's web site. I am still waiting to hear back from the embassy staff via the email address their site provides. Some friends have said, just wait and get it either in Bangkok where I will be for some time prior, or at the border crossing (in my case at the airport in Hanoi), but others have said border purchase is not possible. I am fairly certain the latter is correct--it cannot be obtained just prior to entry. I plan on getting it here in DC first, but just wanted to know the cost.
Cindy Loose: I got one several years ago and seem to remember it was about $60, but it might have gone up. As to the current cost: I went on the Vietnam Embassy site (www.vietnamembassy-usa.org) and where it explains how to get the visa their are the words "visa cost" in red. If you click on those words, up pops an email address, so I guess that's how they want to handle the info. Email: consular@vietnamembassy.us
The U.S. State Dept. site (www.travel.state.gov) says that entry visas are not available on entry. Even if the site didn't mention the issue, I'd still want my visa in hand before I got there, to avoid dissapointment. I, so I'd turstlbe on they you strat.Stchecked
Washington, DC: Morning Crew! Excellent piece last week about non-fly Cruise Terminals. I'm sailing from Manhattan in two weeks. By necessity, we will be Driving to the terminal. The article stated that there are "limited" parking spaces available at the terminal and that one cannot Reserve one. Now I'm in total panic mode. What on Earth are we to do if we get to NY and there are NO Parking Spaces? Unlike DC, I don't expect there to be much street parking. Do curise lines (We're sailing New Holland) have shuttle services from other points? Thanks!
Scott Vogel: Don't panic yet! The first thing you should do is call the parking office at the terminal -- 212-641-4453. They'll no doubt be able to give you updated information regarding the dates you'll be sailing. Also, ask about additional parking lots that are not onsite. Apparently the terminal also has access to one or more lots on 59th Street.
Charlottesville, Va.: Hey Crew --
I suspect I know the answer, but I'd love your thoughts. Looked today at flights home to Milwaukee for the holidays (no more than 4 full days of family fun -- it's really all anyone can take), and found one for around $365. Particularly from our tiny C-Ville airport, where everything's about $100 more expensive at least, it seems like a steal (nothing really saved looking at the Richmond fares). Am I crazy or should I go with the little voice in my head that says book now because it won't get lower? Or should I wait a couple of weeks and see?
Cindy Loose: If I saw a price now I thought was good, especially over the Christmas holidays, I'd grab it before it disappeared--if it hasn't already. Can't guarantee prices couldn't come down, but I wouldn't bet they would.
Baton Rouge, LA: Does anyone have experience with the Rick Steves' tours? I'm looking at one of their European trips this spring. I like that the groups are smaller and they use the public transportation available in the larger cities. I'm not looking for 4-star accomodations. Is this a good choice?
Andrea Sachs: He is a dependable, reliable, long-time name in the business, but I have never taken a tour with him. Anyone out there with a Rick Steves stamp on their travel log?
Alexandria, VA: Here's a challenge for you all. I'm completely stumped. My college roommates and I (six girls total) would like to get together for a 4-night trip to celebrate our 30th birthdays. We have decided on President's Day weekend, but that's about as far as we can get. We'd like to go someplace "warmish" with a selection of activities, but mostly, we'd like a great place we can all be together, catch up and chill. The catch is we'd like to do it for about $1,000 each and we're coming from all over -- DC, Chicago, Phoenix and Little Rock. The group as a whole seems to be over Vegas. We've looked at the Caribbean but can't seem to find anything within out budget. Any other ideas?
Andrea Sachs: Here are some thoughts for a girls' weekend:
Miami, Key West, San Diego, Bahamas (look for an all-inclusive package).
My wife and I will be going on an in -depth Bible hiking tour ( 9- 10 miles per day) of certain parts of Israel (see below) in May 2008. We leave May 28 and return to the U.S. on 10 June. The tour seems very well organized and all expenses (airfare, transportation, lodging, 3 meals per day, taxes, fees, tips, etc.) are included in the per peson price of $3900. We'll be staying at the Novotel Thalassa Dead Sea Resort - Dead Sea , the Kibbutz Nof Ginosar - Sea of Galillee, and the Grand Court - Jerusalem. A couple of questions. First, is the cost reasonable for what will be provided, and 2nd, anything we should be aware of (dos/don'ts) having never visited Israel? Thank you.
Tel Bet Shemesh Tel Azekah, Elah Valley, Tel Lakhish
Tel Arad, Bedouin's, Avdat, Zin
Mt. Arbel Chorazin, Capernaum, Bethsaida, Mt. Of Beatitudes
Susita, Gamla, Qatzrin, Jordan River
Hatzor, Omrit, Caesarea Philippi, Dan, Zefat
Caesarea, Mt. Carmel, Megiddo, Zippori
Andrea Sachs: What an amazing trip! We are quiet envious, since we have never been there. So, to keep you safe and well-advised, does anyone out there have any suggestions for our Israel-bound traveler?
Teachers Tour: End of October going to Valletta, Malta for 5 days after Mediterranean cruise port stop. Staying at LeMeridien St. Julian Hotel on Balluta Bay and have 3 1/2 days of tours scheduled for city, Mdina, and Gozo island. Any special restaurants, shopping areas, or beaches are your favorites?
John Deiner: Sounds great, TT. First, it's not a good beach destination, so don't expect Caribbean-like expanses of sand, alas. But it's been a while since I've been there, so I'm not quite if my picks would still be viable. One thing I really liked was the crafts market in the town of Fontana on Gozo -- everything I found elsewhere, like Maltese wine, lace and art glass seemed to be cheaper there. One of my favorite places to eat was at It-Tmun, a cafe in Xlendi on Gozo's southern coast. I just looked at its Web site, and it seems to be doing quite well.
But, again, I was there some time ago (2003). Honestly, though, I wasn't disappointed anywhere.
Anyone out there with some good suggestions?
Portland, Ore: This is in response to some issues raised in last weeks chat ..Vegas: Some options are exploring the surrounding area. A 2 hr one way drive is Zion Nation Park. Another, much closer option is Red Rock Canyon NRA. In January weather can vary. You could have 70+ days or the high could be in the 40s. The winter months you get more moisture. A couple of years ago in January Death Valley had an unusually heavy rainy season which resulted in flowers blooming. Death valley is about a 2-3 hour drive away.
With the weather in the West: If you plan on traveling in the interior west where the elevation is generally higher than 6000 feet even though there are no mountains near you, you can have unusual weather. The months of May-June and September- October you can end up with unexpected snow. About every year in mid September-mid October you will have a chance of running into snow. Snow would be more common in the higher elevations. Albuquerque is around 6500 ft and Santa Fe is around 8500 feet. Most of the area north of I-40 and South of I-70, East of I-15 and west of I-25 in the 4-corner states is above 6500 feet.
For example where I live in Portland, A few weeks ago there was snow through the Cascade mountain passes there was snow at the level of the mountain passes.
Before you go look at the weather forecast of what it will be plus what the norms are for that time of the year. San Francisco can be cold in the spring because of the ocean effects. Its warmest time of year is now because the water temps are the warmest. Alaska in the months of June, July, and August can get normal summertime warmth that many are used to in the lower 40 with temps in the 80s and 90s in the interior parts of the state.
Yellowstone travelers: When in September were you planning on traveling and were you planning on camping or staying in a hotel. Weather can get pretty cold in later September in Yellowstone. Jackson flight scheduling varies with the seasons. Given how reliable flight schedules are, I would suggest flying into a little larger airport and enjoy the drive. If you are planning on spending a week there then its very easy to fly into Salt Lake City or Idaho Falls and drive to the parks.
Christina Talcott: Wow, thanks for your suggestions and tips about the weather and flying to larger airports when going to Yellowstone. That sounds like a sound plan to me!
Washington, DC: Hi, Crew! I'll be in Bratislava, Slovakia for 3 days in about two weeks from now. Most guidebooks, etc. tend to cover this city very briefly. Any suggestions for must-sees, must-dos or parts of town I should stay in? Any local customs I could partake in that might not be mentioned in the books? Thanks!
Gary Lee: While it is not the spectacular jewel that Prague is, Bratislava has lots going for it. Above all, it has one of the best operas in Europe. Even if you're not an opera fan, grab a ticket and go if you can.
As for hotels, if you don't mind paying a couple of hundred bucks a night, Marrol's is a great hotel. The Danube is also good. And for those on a budget, Color is a nice new property although it's a bit far afield from the center.
For daytime pursuits, go to the city tourism office and arrange an architectural tour. It will be worth it. There are also a few small interesting museums, all located nearby one another. They include the Clock Museum, Arts and Crafts Museum, Wine Making Museum, and so on. During my stay in Bratislava a couple of years back, I found them more interesting than a tour of the Castle.
Gaithersburg, MD: My heart goes out to the Gotbaum family, to the husband who now has to raise motherless children alone. People will try to judge them but this could just as easily have happened to any one of us. This sorry episode should be a big wake up call for the airline industry and how it treats travelers. Even when all goes as planned, travel is stressful; add in illness and nearly overwhelming stress and even healthy, stable people get pushed beyond their ability to cope. I've had enough nightmare experiences in airports that I fly only when I need desperately to be someplace very quickly and even then the arrival time/day is a crapshoot. It is clear that something needs to be done to help travelers. I didn't know the Gotbaum family but this has been bothering me a lot. Thanks for letting me vent.
KC Summers: Thanks for posting. I blogged about this piece this morning -- it was a terrible tragedy and one that could have been completely avoided, as it resulted by overbooking on US Airways' part.
For those who haven't seen the story, we'll post a link, but here are the basics: A woman who was flying from JFK to Tucson died while shackled to a bench in the Phoenix airport. She was connecting in Phoenix and was on time, plus had confirmed her reservations through to Tucson at JFK, yet was denied boarding because her seat had been given to another passenger. She became distraught, airline personnel called police, and they took her to a holding cell where they shackled her to a bench. She somehow became entangled in her handcuffs and died.
As the story pointed out, much has been made of the fact that she was on her way to an alcohol treatment program, but no one observed her drunk that day. And since flying can drive a normal person insane, imagine what it does to an emotionally fragile person.
Thoughts on this? Have any of the chatters been denied boarding, and how did you handle it? How did the airline handle it?
Congrats on the 7 (local) wonders -- that page is a keeper! And thanks for printing it all on one page, and not dividing it across parts of several pages.
Having been to 6 out of 7, I now want to try to visit #7, Fallingwater. But as I don't have a car, and don't want to rent a car just to see it, are there any alternative ways to get there?
By the way, you need a new group photo at the top of this page.
Cindy Loose: Funny you should mention the picture--We had a new one shot last week.
As to Fallingwater: No way to get there or get around once you get there by public transporation. Unless you can organize a bus tour, you're going to need to drive, I'm sorry to say. It is in a rather rural area. By the way, as I mentioned in CoGo recently, there is a third house designed by Frank in the area, and you can rent the whole house for something like $385 a night.
Philadelphia, Pa: I made my Thanksgiving plans for this year around Dec 1st last year! We're doing a repeat of what we did last year. My husband and I, and a friend from Belfast living in Philly for two years, will drive from Philly to Fairfax on Thanksgiving morning at 6am. We hit zero traffic last year. We'll do dinner at my parents house with the entire family. We're adopting two labradors this weekend - so the house will be extra chaotic! Hopefully all the dogs will get along. Black Friday - hit Tysons when it opens, home by 9am, and then we caravan out to Christmas Tree farm to cut down the tree for my parents house. We'll decorate it that night, and eat leftovers. Then the three of us, (and the two new dogs) will drive back to Philly sometime on Saturday. Can't wait already!
washingtonpost.com: Why Flying Now Can Kill, (Oct. 14, 2007)
KC Summers: Here's the link to the piece on the woman who died at the Phoenix airport. Thanks, Kim.
For the Dallas hotel seeker from last week: The W Hotel is across the street from American Airlines Center. There's a hotel in the West End area that is walkable, although you have to take the sidewalk under the freeway. (not scenic) There are also cheaper options along Stemmons Freeway (Courtyard, for example). I wouldn't recommend walking to AAC from there, but you could get a cab for less than $10.
Andrea Sachs: Thanks for the tip, and for remembering from last week. Much appreciated.
Hawaii Bound: Anyone hiked Diamondhead in Hawaii? I'm trying to figure out if it is suitable for small children (elementary school age).
Is it 100 continuous steps or is it a series of steps-uphill path-steps-uphill path?
Any other must sees off the beaten path in Oahu?
Scott Vogel: I remember trying it with a 2-year-old and almost passing out at the top after having carried him most of the way. As anyone could have told me, 2 is too young, but hardy children from about age 8 and up should be able to handle the climb. The most difficult part is those last 100 steps, which are continuous but quite steep. If that proves too challenging, there is a lookout area further down that makes for a nice consolation prize.
The beaches at Kailua aren't exactly off the beaten path, but the water is beautiful and the surf more placid than on the south shore -- i.e., great for kids. It sounds like this is a winter trip, so by all means take an excursion to the North Shore to watch the world-class surfing. On the way, there should be plenty of chances to see "old" Hawaii, towns and areas that remain, even now, untouched by Honolulu glitz.
Washington, DC: I pretty much agree with the seven regional wonders that were chosen, although I personally would have had the C&O canal on the list instead of the Lincoln Memorial. The C&O canal is an incredible feat of engineering, even more amazing when you consider that it was completed in the ninteeenth century. The Paw Paw tunnel in Western Maryland is simply an incredible feat of engineering itself. The tunnel is 3118' in length and was completed using black powder blasting and hand tools. Digging began in 1836 and the engineers believed that the tunnel could be completed in two years; it was finally finished FOURTEEN years later in 1850, thereby dooming the canal to irrelevancy due to the earlier completion of the B&O railroad.
KC Summers: Hi Wash, I agree that the C&O Canal is an amazing mid-Atlantic resource. I biked the whole thing more years ago than I care to admit -- what a great trip, tree roots and all. Going through the Paw Paw tunnel was indeed a highlight -- it was terrifying in a fun way. You literally could not see your hands in front of your face. Still, it's pretty hard to compete with the Lincoln Memorial...
Bowie, MD: Regarding the 7 local wonders, I guess I'm being disloyal to my hometown, but I really think that the "mid-atlantic" region doesn't/shouldn't include NYC. Should have been more "mid" - From Baltimore to the Carolinas. How can incredible structures like the Washington Monument or even Monticello be left out? I know, debates are the inevitable end results of "lists".....
John Deiner: Hey, Bowie. Good points, but we were also going after a four-hour driving range from D.C. in all directions -- and NYC, a super-popular destination for our readers, is just in that range. And four hours from DC barely gets you into North Carolina. As far as what got in and what didn't, all depended on the voters. I was a little surprised by Monticello's exclusion myself, but I think our readers did a great job.
Arlington, VA: The person going to Malta should be sure to see the ancient temple sites. The Hypogeum require tickets in advance and I arranged mine via email when I went a couple of years ago. Other temples are open air and do not require advance tickets. Most can be reached via public bus.
I think St. Julian's is not especially convenient to Valletta and the sites in the old town.
I bought lots of Maltese glass and had it shipped home.
John Deiner: Hey, Arl. Good stuff. As far as I remember, St. Julian's is actually pretty convenient to Valleta -- just a quick bus ride, and we walked it a couple of times (beautiful if lengthy stroll along the water). And I'm still ticked I never saw the Hypogeum . . . next time, I guess!
Malaga vs. Santiago: Look forward to these discussions every Monday! My husband and I have friends in both Malaga, Spain and Santiago, Chile. We want to visit one set of them sometime late next spring. Problem is deciding which place to choose. In both places our accommodations will be taken care of. Our Malaga friends will likely be more available to take us around, whereas the Santiago couple may be a bit busier, leaving us to be on our own for a larger portion of the trip. What else should we be considering, pros and cons, etc.? Budget is definitely an issue. Thanks!
Gary Lee: Lucky You. What a choice. For starters, if budget is an issue, be aware that it's tough to get tickets to Chile for under $800 and that American citizens are required to get a visa to visit Chile at $100 each. That said, Santiago is colorful and interesting. (And once you get there, quite cheap.)
I would start a visit with a tour of the Pablo Neruda Museum, then fan out into the surrounding neighborhood which is full of interesting boutiques, bars and restaurants.
I do not know Malaga (can anyone give advice about it). Getting there is likely to be cheaper than getting to Chile, especially if you go in the off season. But the euro is really beating the hell out of the dollar and is not likely to get much better by next Spring.
We're a family of 3 (one 14 year old girl) thinking of spending Thanksgiving in the Carribean. None of us has ever been there before and don't have a clue where we should go. Our daughter is taking Spanish in school and we'd like to go where she could use her language skills (and show up Mom and Dad a bit.) We like outdoors activities, the beach, good food and history. None of us has any interest in shopping or casinos. Would you recommend Puerto Rico? Any recommendations for a hotel with activities for a teenager?
Andrea Sachs: Puerto Rico would be perfect and will keep your teenage so busy she won't even miss mom's pumpkin pie. I would recommend staying in Old San Juan or near the beach in Condado (try the Marriott, a lovely property with lots of activities). For outings, go to El Yunque rain forest, kayak in the Bioluminescent Bay, visit San Juan's fort and simply sit on the beach and let your daughter eavesdrop in Spanish.
Chevy Chase MD: For the 4 30 something girls weekend - don't forget Fort Lauderdale, reachable by Jet Blue. Accessible to Miami, and very laid back, pretty affordable. More $ for them to use shopping.
Glad to hear someone's over Vegas. Personally, it's my most unfav place in the US.
Andrea Sachs: Good suggestion. Really, anyplace in Florida would be good: St. Petersburg, Tampa, Palm Beach.
Philadelphia, PA: I hope it isn't too late to post this - I'm going to Tucson for a meeting, and was thinking of going the day before to visit Sedona and the Grand Canyon. Will one day be enough time to visit both? I don't think I can go two days before - that would be pushing it.
John Deiner: Hey, Phil. Seeing both in one day is pushing it (so much to see and do at both pl, but if you just want to get a glimpse and say you've been there, you can definitely do both in one day. That's a lot of driving, though.I 'd opt to spend more time at the Grand Canyon and take a more leisurely drive around than to rush to both.
Washington, DC (but right now, Centurion, SA): Help! I am currently in South Africa and am scheduled to fly air France out to Paris at 11:40 Wednesday, connecting to an Air France flight to London on Thursday. I then return from LHR to IAD via Paris on Air France on Sunday.
I heard that Air France may be joining the strike in France scheduled for Thursday. Should I worry? Have you seen any news on this? I can't seem to find any confirmation or not.
Cindy Loose: Just spoke with Air France and they said while they weren't expecting Air France employees to join the strike, the airline and airports in Paris "may be affected." Given that the strike includes workers in the rail,bus, power companies and gas companies, I'd guess it would have broad impact.
Washington, DC: My travel plans for Thanksgiving: drive five miles to my parents' house in Silver Spring. Woo!
Andrea Sachs: You lucky, pilgrim. Is there an extra seat at your table this year?
7 Natural Wonders: Did Longwood Gardens in Penn. get any votes??? Even if you aren't a flower lover this estate is worth the drive. The magnitude and the beauty is something to behold in the gardens and the 5 acre hothouse.
Elissa Leibowitz Poma: Longwood Gardens did receive votes in the first round, but not enough to put it on par with engineering marvels like the Brooklyn Bridge and Empire State Building. Having grown up in the Philly area, I've been to Longwood many times and can attest to its beauty. Christmas is a particularly lovely time.
Austin, Tex: I'm going to Japan for a week or so in early April, to visit friends who just moved to Tokyo. Any suggestions for not to be missed activities to keep me busy during the weekdays while my friends are at work? I'm considering taking the bullet train down to Kyoto for a couple of days mid-week, but am happy to hear anyone else's thoughts on how to spend my time in Japan. FYI, my command of the Japanese language is limited to a few basic phrases, so any suggestions of museums/sites that have English-speaking guides or signage would be appreciated. Hopefully I'll be there while the cherry blossoms are out, but, as you DC residents know, that can't be predicted too far in advance!
Christina Talcott: I would highly recommend taking the train to Kyoto. You can find English-language maps and bus info at the train station, and the trains are wonderfully fast and smooth. I had a fabulous time visiting the temples throughout Kyoto, exploring the Gion district, walking along a canal and getting lost, then finding my way again. I can't speak to places in Tokyo with good English signage, but maybe someone else can.
Arlington, VA: In yesterday's Outlook section, there was a story about the lousy customer service provided by USAir and Mesa Air. This was in reaction to the woman who accidently choked to death at the Phoenix Airport after not being allowed to board a plane due to being bumped. How bad is USAir? And do you recommend that passengers who do get bumped start filing suits in small claims court (the writer did file suit and settled with them). I've only been bumped once in my life, but I got on another flight in less than an hour.
KC Summers: That was interesting, wasn't it, that the author and her husband got even by taking the airline to Small Claims Court. I think that's a terrific recourse -- seems like the way to get airlines to pay attention is to get them where it hurts, in the pocketbook. To be honest, I haven't noticed that US Airways stands out as a worse offender than any other airline in this regard -- they all overbook, although the author of this piece claims US Air is the worst.
One proactive thing you can do is to pay attention to connecting flight times when booking. Don't trust a Web site or booking agent that the connection is doable -- make sure you build in time for the inevitable delays, etc. Also, know your rights. Read the airline's contract of carriage (available on airlines' Web sites) ahead of time. For example, you're entitled to cash if you're involuntarily bumped, so don't necessarily accept the offer of a voucher for a future free flight. They can be very hard to use due to blackout dates and other restrictions.
Other suggestions on how to cope with overbooking?
Stevensville, MD: I was interested in reading the Coming and Going column in yesterday's Post because I had a very similar experience with Delta at JFK on Tues. Oct 9th. We spent 5 hours sitting on the plane when the flight was cancelled. The pilot told us he had been cleared to fly to Dulles but that due to the long delay, he didn't have enough fuel and the crew was finished with its shift. The staff on the ground however claimed the cancellation was due to "Weather" and we spent the night in a cold terminal with no food available. I finally flew out to BWI the next morning, but Delta would not provide transportation to Dulles to pick up my car because ... you guessed it ... the cancellation was "weather related".
Cindy Loose: Hmmmm. Come to think of it, I assume that there's always stormy or windy weather somewhere in the world. The question is how did that weather in Timbuktu effect your flight in Cleveland. It's always possible there was some connection.
Alexandria, VA: Loved the article on Albuquerque yesterday. True story - when I was 15 yrs old (almost 40 yrs ago), my dad was working at White Sands in NM, so my sister (then 12) and I flew out to Albuquerque to see him that July. The 3 of us did a looping tour of the SW US that started and ended in Albuquerque. At the end of our trip, we took the tram to the top of Sandia. While in the Visitor's Center, a woman came over to my dad and asked if he was Bob Caruso. He said yes. The woman was my mom's cousin Joanie, who lived in Albuquerque and happened to be up at the top of Sandia w/her 4 kids (my second cousins). Hadn't seen them in years, and had forgotten they lived there, so neither of us had any idea the other would be there! We ended up over at their home that evening for an impromptu family reunion.
It was a "small world" trip. A week or so earlier, we passed thru Las Vegas and I ran into a classmate of mine at Circus Circus (I lived and went to school in St. Louis, MO). Circus Circus was the only casino that let kids in (though only into the arcade area). Weird but memorable trip...
Andrea Sachs: Thanks, so glad you enjoyed the piece. You are like the Kevin Bacon of the travel world.
Silver Spring, Md.: We made our Thanksgiving plans in June--we are flying to San Fran to see family. We bought our tickets in mid-August during a United sale. Because we are flying out Tuesday and coming back on Saturday, the flight out was covered under the sale. We spent about $500 per person.
Andrea Sachs: Not bad at all. Interesting how one or two days out makes such a difference in price.
Union Station area: Hey there flight crew, We are wanting to plan a trip to the Georgia Aquarium for the long February weekend, but have heard mixed reviews, is it worth seeing or should I be content with the Balt. Aquarium? You all are always so helpful and so are the other chatters!
John Deiner: Hey, Union Station. I've generally heard really good things about the aquarium (except for the price, which I believe is considerable!). We asked Ben Brazil, a natural-born skeptic, to tour the place when it opened a few years back, and he really enjoyed it. I'll post a link to the piece after this. If you do go, let us know!
Anyone familiar with the Georgia Aquarium?
washingtonpost.com: Atlanta Takes the Plunge, (Dec. 12, 2005)
John Deiner: And here's that link.
Washington: Of the three NY Wonders, which is your personal favorite? I vote for the Empire State -- been there countless times and never get tired of going to the top.
Elissa Leibowitz Poma: Well, personally? I dig the Chrysler Building much more than the Empire State Building. Just personal preference as to its style. Love the aerial views of it on CSI: New York.
Fear of heights keeps me from actually crossing the Brooklyn Bridge, but I love to admire its style. And I had no idea until researching the article how many of the workers suffered from The Bends just to build it. Hope that will win me some moolah on Jeopardy! one day.
Going to St Petersburg: Hi Flight Crew,
Have any of you ever been to St Petersburg, Russia?
We're considering a trip there to see the Winter Palace etc. When would be the best time to go, and do any of you all have personal experience/recommendations?
I studied Russian in St. Petersburg as a student and have visited it a good 20 times over the years.
And, as luck would have it, I was just there last week.
1. To get the best out of it, go between April and October, when the weather is more welcoming.
2. Count on spending a day in the Hermitage.
3. Take some time to see the Russian Museum. Although dwarfed by the Hermitage, has the best collection of art from Russian artists in the world.
4. The city's architecture is its crown jewel. If you can get a good tour of buildings in English, do it.
5. Take a day to tour the palaces around the city. A guided bus tour is the way to go.
I could go on -- this is one of the grandest cities in the world -- but that's good for a start.
Anyone else with St. Petersburg ideas?
Alexandria, VA: The Manhattan cruiser really should consider Amtrak or a bus. A whole lot more environmentally friendly and less stressful than finding and paying for parking (and driving that awful drive--ugh, 95N).
Scott Vogel: I'll second that suggestion. Penn Station (train) and Port Authority (bus) are both less than 2 miles from the terminal, and though a taxi from the station isn't cheap, that plus train/bus fare might be less than a week's worth of parking.
Silver Spring, MD: I just won a bareboat cruise to my choice of several locals:
I'm definitely more of the outdoors-type rather than the "ooh, let's go shopping" type, and we are experienced sailors, but have never done the caribbean charter thing. What's your recommendation, since I get to pick one of them as home-port for a week?
Cindy Loose: You lucky, lucky person.
First off, you can't make a bad choice here.
However, if airfare is included or if money is no object, I'd pick the British Virgin Islands. There are so cool little islands that are very upscale and you wouldn't have to worry about the fact the hotels are expensive.
It would be much cheaper to fly to St. Martin, and that's a very nice place too.
St. Vincent is quite small, best known for cool little critters you can see when diving. I guess my question would be whether the cruise would also take you to other islands in that chain. If not, I'd stick with a bigger island.
Again, I don't see how you can go wrong.
Cville to MKE: That price ($365 I think it was) is not going to get any better! Buy it now! (My sister routinely pays close to $500 to get from Boston to Milwaukee over the holidays.) I once paid $350 from DC to MKE for Christmas...
Cindy Loose: Thanks---and tell your sister to check out this fare.
Re Rick Steves: Haven't been on one of the tours, but ran into one in Dublin a few weeks ago. They seemed to having great fun, and there were a bunch of people who were repeat RS tour-takers. BTW, we were using the Rick Steves guide for our self-guided trip around IRE and found it invaluable.
Andrea Sachs: Good endorsement: happy people.
Vietnam Visa: I have gotten several Vietnamese visas in the past year. Best suggestion is to send an email to the link on the visa website, consular@vietnamembassy.us. They usually get back to you within two business days. I have found the requirements change pretty frequently, so you should not rely on other people's information. Also do not send your visa in, go to the office and submit it. You should get it back in three business days, it you pay extra for rush ($85). Finally, make sure you have all the required documents. I have been one of the unfortunate people that have waited in line, only to be turned away because I did not have the right forms or did not have a money order. Make sure to read the requirement's email very carefully, they are not very helpful at the visa office.
Cindy Loose: First hand, recent info always good. Thanks.
Arlington, VA: Hi, Flight Crew,
I'm going to Rome in late November/early December, and I will have 7 full days there. I'm planning on day trips to Tivoli and Ostia Antica, as well as hopefully a soccer game (AS Roma) one afternoon, and an opera and a classical concert on a couple of evenings. Am I budgeting my time well in terms of doing Rome itself justice, since I will have 4 1/2 days of sightseeing in the city?
Christina Talcott: That sounds like plenty of time to get a sense of Rome - it's such an atmospheric place, it practially sinks into your bones from the minute you arrive. As far as what to see, I wouldn't miss the Forum, the Colosseum and the Vatican, but if you like walking tours, going on one early on in your stay could help you decide where you want to spend more time exploring.
Kensington, Md.: I have a week (9 days) to spend in South America in March. I know I want to see Machu Picchu but where else is a "can't miss" destination? I would like to see as much as possible throughout the continent but I only have a short amount of time.
Scott Vogel: Hi. As it happens, we answered this question briefly in our Chat Plus feature in yesterday's paper (where we try to get to a query we couldn't answer during the chat.) Here's what we wrote. Hope it helps...
"Wendy Trouwborst of Peru Expeditions (011-51-1-447-2057, www.peru-expeditions.com), a tour company based in that country, says, 'The best way to plan a trip to Peru is to keep in mind that there is a great difference in altitude, so it is best to start low and end high.' For that reason, she notes, consider putting Machu Picchu and Cuzco at the end of your trip. You should also have time for a side excursion to the Peruvian Amazon ¿¿" to visit the rain forests along the Madre de Dios River, say, or canoe on Lake Sandoval ¿¿" or to the urban vibrancy of Lima. With regard to the Peruvian earthquake in August, Trouwborst says that the coastal cities of Ica and Paracas were particularly hard hit but that 'the roads are repaired and public transport is running as normal.'"
Harrisburg, PA (re: Japan): In Tokyo, the Edo Tokyo Museum has volunteer English language docents, as does the Shitamachi Museum (in Ueno Park, near the zoo and Tokyo National Museum). The Tokyo National Museum has good English signage and guide books. The JR Yamanote line (which circles Tokyo), has English language announcements and video displays on all the trains, so getting around is easy. The subways are a bit more confusing.
Christina Talcott: Great suggestions! Thanks!
Rochester, NY: In the "Seven Wonders" article, the architectural history of the US Capitol is deceiving and incomplete. Thornton designed only the original portion of the building, to the North of the central block. The dome and the House and Senate wings were designed by Thomas U. Walter and were built in the 1860s at the height of the Civil War.
As for the Lincoln Memorial, the statue is not "nearly 20 feet tall." That would be true only if Lincoln were standing.
Elissa Leibowitz Poma: Thanks for your note. According to the National Park Service, a standing Lincoln would be 28 feet tall. The seated statue, as it is right now, is 19 feet 6 inches tall and 19 feet wide. And good points about the Capitol: It was a huge collaborative effort.
Washington Grove, MD: We are planning to go to Lourdes and Paris between Christmas and New Years. The best airline fare I can find, from Dulles to Lourdes, then to Paris, and back to Dulles, is about $1200, which seems awfully high. Does that sound reasonable for that time of year or would you suggest I keep looking? Thanks!
Carol Sottili: Yup, it's high. But you have several things working against a lower fare. You're traveling in the busiest time of the year, when demand is way up. You're flying into a small airport that is not served by a discount carrier. You might save money by flying out on Christmas Day and returning New Years Day. Or you may consider taking the train from Paris to Lourdes, although it is a six hour journey each way and it doesn't sound as if you have much time. I'd just buy the ticket.
Arlington, VA: A.L. Bardach had a depressing story about USAir/Meas airlines habit of overbooking to the extreme. Are some airlines worse about this than others? Are there any statistics on being bumped and do you have any tips on how to avoid being bumped. Air travel just seems to get worse and worse.
KC Summers: See previous answer re tips on being bumped. Anyone else have tips to pass along? Or if it happened to you, how you coped?
For stats by airline, go to the Air Travel Consumer Report section (airconsumer.ost.dot.gov) of the Department of Transportation's Web site. US Airways is not the worst -- in the last stats I saw, Delta and Continental were worse. JetBlue is usually one of the best for non-bumping.
Hotel Tipping Protocol?: Am I supposed to tip the maid, and how much? I'm staying in New York City for business and really don't know what I'm supposed to do. Do I also tip everytime someone comes to the room, like to bring room service, and then to take it away? Thanks!
Gary Lee: Having worked, fleetingly, in the housekeeping department of the Ritz Carlton, I would say by all means tip the housekeeper. The amount should be $2- $5 a day, depending on how happy you are with the service and the level of the property.
As for room service, there is usually a pretty hefty service fee included in the rate.
Whether to tip every other person who comes into the room is up to your discretion.
Flight Changes: I booked a round-trip flight to Europe a couple weeks ago for a trip in the spring. I booked directly through the airline. I received an email from them yesterday saying that the schedule had been changed... no big deal, I thought, I get those occasionally and usually one of the flight times has been moved by an hour or so. This time I found that the return trip has been moved ahead two days! I've already made my hotel arrangements (actually a private villa), and they're for 8 nights, not 10 (and work schedules, etc, wouldn't permit me to stay 10 nights anyway). I'm planning to call up the airline, but what can I expect from them? What can I reasonably ask for?
Cindy Loose: Airlines are allowed by law to make changes, but if the change is "significant," which is usually interpreted to mean a change involving more than a couple hours, then the airline is required to give back your money if you so desire. Beyond that, anything they do is voluntary.
I'm wondering what could have occured to make them change a date by two days. If this is a major airline and not a small charter company, I'm thinking they overbooked and want to shove you onto a plane more convenient to them. I'd be very nice and calm but ask why, and can't they do something to accommodate you. But first, come to think of it, I'd go online to see what other flights they have that might work for you, and specifically ask about those flights. I'd also shop around before calling to see if there happens to be another flight that will get you where you're going for less money. That way, if your airline won't accommodate, then getting your money back would be a best bet. If that's the scenario that plays out, then deally, hold a booking on another flight for 24 hours, if possible, while making sure your current airline will give you back your money--as they are required to do.
Good luck--and by the way, it's a good idea to have asked what to expect before calling. Info is power at least sometimes.
Annapolis, MD: Your Albuquerque artice was good timing for me. I'm trying to plan a NM trip, most likely fly into Albuquerque and then go to Santa Fe, sometime next year, what is the best time to go? I don't want really hot conditions, nor really cold and will have a 3 yr. old with me. Is there really enough to do for a week or so? Or should I wait and go in ski season and take advantage of the snow? What is the skiing really like in NM? Thanks.
Andrea Sachs: Summer is hot and you will fry like an egg (I did). Spring and fall are perfect temps, though ABQ is almost always sunny year-round. You can definitely keep busy for a week if you visit both cities. I have only skied in Taos, which was steep and quad-burning. Sandia Peak has skiing (season starts Dec. 15), though don't expect super challenging conditions; the mountain has child care facilities in town.
Vienna for Bratislava: I can second the Flight Crew's recommendation for the Hotel Color in Bratislava. My spouse goes to Bratislava fairly often on business and has recently been staying there. It's slightly off of the beaten path and the furnishings aren't so nice but it's safe, clean, and comfortable and rather inexpensive.
Bratislava isn't a Vienna or Budapest but it's still nice. The old town is beautiful and the prices inexpensive-- 2 coffees cost less than a coffee in a Viennese cafe.
My only beef were the loud British lager louts that come in on the ultra-cheap flights just because it's cheaper for them to have their stag weekends in central Europe than at home! They were rather loud on my last trip there in the sidewalk cafes.
Gary Lee: Thanks for the thoughts. A walking tour of the old town is quite a good idea, too.
I know what you mean about the drinking crowd. They're starting to invade much of the former East Bloc.
For Malaga/Chile bound: Malaga is an OK city but its best feature is proximity to Granada and beach towns on the Costa del Sol. Late spring would be the perfect time to visit in terms of fewer crowds than mid-summer but with warm weather.
Gary Lee: Thanks for the thought.
Rick Steves: I've always considered Rick a bit nerdy, but all people who are experts in some field are somewhat nerdy. He definitely knows his stuff!
Andrea Sachs: I will take a knowledgable nerd over a clueless Adonis anytime.
US Air overbooking: Just want to comment on my experience - my husband and I were flying from DC to Venice Italy on USAir by way of Philadelphia. They bumped us from the DC to Philly portion of our trip (and were we told the Philly/Venice flight was overbooked as well). After watching a number of people attempt to offer their seats to bumped passengers get turned away by the USAir staff, we got in line to get rebooked for the same trip the next day. After waiting 2 hours, we were told that we would only get domestic vouchers, even though we were forced to miss an International flight. We had actually asked for our seat assignments for the Venice flight because we were willing to drive to Philadephia to make the flight, but they wouldn't give them to us....So, after many complaints, we now have a number of vouchers towards flights that I'm sure we will never get to actually use due to restrictions...I was the most frustrating travel experience we have had. We had paid a lot of money for travel on specific days, which made it even more annoying. As you reported, the staff also told us they always overbook flights.
KC Summers: That's really outrageous. And you're so right about the vouchers. Ordinarily this sort of thing happens when you book two separate connecting flights, and I would've advised you to book one airline all the way through in the future -- but you did that! Did you ever make it to Venice??
Arlington, VA: re: the Georgia Aquarium
I was there in March 2006 and enjoyed it. Took about an hour to see... would obviously take more time if you're going with little kids.
Great location, right next to the Coca-Cola museum's new building (a definite must-see in Atlanta) and Olympic Centennial Park, and a short walk from CNN Center, where you can go on a tour of the news studios.
John Deiner: Hey, Arl, thanks for chiming in. Only took an hour though, huh? And we sent Ben to the Coca-Cola thing as well -- and he really enjoyed that as well.
We're heading to Grand Cayman for the holidays and have a seven hour layover in Kingston, Jamaica airport coming back to the U.S.
Is there anything we should try and check out while there as opposed to sitting in the airport bar?
Andrea Sachs: Stay at the bar, order some Red Stripes and listen to some Marley on your iPod. In other words, it's safest to see Kingston from the air.
Plans for New Years eve: Hi Flight Crew,
Please help! Me and a group of friends are tired of the expensive parties and crowded bars on New years eve. We would like to rent a place within 3 driving hours (4 max) of the DC area for a few days. Or if there's an easy and cheap flight somewhere that would be an option as well but considering the time frame we figured driving somewhere is our best bet. If you could go anywhere where would you go? Or do any of the chatters have recommendations? Please help. We only have a few months and we know we are behind. Thank you!!!
Carol Sottili: I'd have to know a little bit more about you and your friends to give you a good answer. If you're the outdoorsy types who like snowshoeing/skiing, perhaps you'd have fun in the Canaan Valley or Snowshoe (both in West Virginia). If you like restaurants/bars, Ocean City has become a big New Years destination (plus the Winterfest of Lights there is pretty cool). Anyone else have good ideas based on past experience?
Reston, VA: My Thanksgiving plans are, sadly, to join the masses heading north on the NJ Turnpike. Airfare between here and the NY metro area are astronomical except on JetBlue into JFK. And they'd have to pay ME to fly into Kennedy the day before Thanksgiving. . . .
I started looking up flights in June. I still check every week or so to see if some major deal has arisen, but nope.
John Deiner: Hey, Reston. Ack! But at least you won't be alone. I find it's not so bad IF you leave at the right time, and that's not at 2 p.m. the day before Thanksgiving. I'd rather get somewhere realllll late and bleary-eyed than to be stuck in traffic for hours. Best of luck!
Pittsburgh, Pa: A friend is coming to the US on business, and one day will have 3 free hours between a business lunch and a business dinner, in a town not even remotely noted as a tourist attraction (in another state, so I'm not familiar with it except for what I could Google). He's asked how he should try to spend the time, and the only idea I could think of was to have a cab-driver take him to a mountain on the edge of town, where he could walk around a bit (he'll be dressed for business, but could bring along a pair of walking shoes) and snap some photos overlooking the town.
What generic suggestions do the Flight Crew and chatters have for passing 3 hours in an unfamiliar town, that don't involve eating or drinking?
Christina Talcott: I'd bet that the town has a chamber of commerce, if not a visitors bureau, that's staffed with at least one person who thinks the town is absolutely FASCINATING. And it shouldn't be too hard to find that person: If you do a search on the town and "visitors," you might come across a tourist bureau, or you could find the local newspaper's website and poke around there for ideas. Every town's got hidden gems, whether it's a quirky independent bookstore, a walking tour of historic houses or a town museum. If he wants to wing it, tell him to talk to the restaurant staff and find out what they think is the town's can't-miss site. Only the surliest of teenagers will claim there's nothing to do there, no matter where he is.
Today's themes: Enjoyed the Albuquerque alrticle yesterday. My wife and I are interested in that area for retirement, though we haven't had the chance to go there yet. While there, did you visit any small towns witin a short drive from the city, such as the "artist colony" of Mountainaire?
Andrea Sachs: Sadly I did not have time to explore outside the city limits. But even the neighborhoods near the foothills were gorgeous--like a desert Malibu.
My thoughts on the woman's death: I think it's really terrible that someone volunteered to give up their seat for her, and the airline said no.
KC Summers: Yeah, I have an email in to the author about that question. I just assumed it was evidence of that "kick the dog" phenomenon where overworked, stressed-out airline employees just take it out on the passengers. But maybe there's more to the story. Will try to find out.
takoma park - AMTRAK roomette?: Has anyone taken one of those Amtrak roomettes for an overnight trip? We are about to bite, since it costs about the same or less than two airplane tickets plus a hotel room for the night, and HAS to be lower hassle.
Scott Vogel: Not sure where you're traveling to so it's difficult to give specific tips. I can tell you that I rented one of the roomettes for a trip from Washington to Orlando last year (traveling with a little one encouraged me to take the leap). The room itself was fine and the privacy alone was worth the money. In the end, my problems had to do with the train itself, and the freight tracks that Amtrak is forced to share with orange growers et al. The trip can be very slow-going and noisy (don't expect an unfettered night of slumber). But you know what? There was something wonderful about arriving in Orlando by train, and I'd do the whole thing again, which tells you something either about the mysterious appeal of Amtrak or my own (low) standards.
Philadelphia, PA: Will be driving the garden route from Port Elizabeth to Cape Town next month and just realized I may need an international drivers license. Yes? How do I get one?
Andrea Sachs: You can get one at the American Automobile Association or the American Automobile Touring Alliance. According to the State Department: To apply for an international driving permit, you must be at least age 18, and you will need to present two passport-size photographs and your valid U.S. license. The cost of an international driving permit from these U.S. State Department-authorized organizations is under $20.00.
Columbia, MD: I am starting to plan my honeymoon to be taken next July. My fiance and I would both LOVE to go to the South Pacific, however, while out budget is not small, we don't have a fortune to spend as well (approx 8k). Our travel agent brought up the Club Med on Bora Bora, but the reviews I have read on line are not spectacular. Have any of you ever been there or heard anything about it? We are looking for an all-inclusive if possible so other suggestions are more than welcome.
Andrea Sachs: Never stayed there. Any former Club Medders out there willing to review the property?
It's been a LONG time since I was there (summer of 1987), but here are some suggestions.
Go snorkeling in the Gulf of Aqaba when in Eilat. The beach and water are perfect and the fish are as colorful as ones you would see in the Caribbean. Also check out the aquarium, which is underwater.
Try "haggling" with some merchants in the Arab Quarter of Jerusalem.
Don't forget to get some falafel, hummus, and other good Middle Eastern fare. As good as some places in Paris, London, and Boston are, it's just not the same as when getting it in Israel.
Do NOT get any Dead Sea salt water in your eyes, and also beware if you have any open cuts. They sell some Dead Sea beauty products (Ahava?) if you have any female friends/relatives.
Make sure to go to Yad Vashem, Israel's Holocaust memorial.
Go on a pre-dawn hike up to Masada, so that you can watch the sunrise. Most spectacular sunrise I've ever seen, in part because of the setting.
The Temple Mount and Dome of the Rock were open for tourists when I was there. Very impressive, seeing the dome, the rock, the top of the Temple Mount, and walking around the complex.
If you're Christian (or if you're not but are intersted in history), you will want to visit the Church of the Holy Sepulchre and Via Dolorossa.
There's some excavation of a 3,000 year old street in Jerusalem... I forget exactly where, but maybe it's listed in your favorite guidebook.
Most of Jerusalem (and much of Israel) closes down on Friday nights.
The opera and symphony, both based in Tel Aviv, are top notch.
That's off the top of my head...
Andrea Sachs: Thanks for the suggestions!
Bethesda, MD: That was an absolutely appalling article about US Airways and Mesa Airlines overbooking practices. Other than wide publicity that will hopefully lead to no one's ever booking them again, can't anything be done about this? This isn't any way to run an airline!
KC Summers: I think it's as you say, that the outrage that will result from all the bad publicity may result in some positive changes for airline passengers -- like when all those JetBlue passengers were stuck on the tarmac.
re: Malaga: Malaga and the area from there to Gibraltar is a very built up tourist destination - lots of high rise apartments and hotel complexes - some newer and more attractive than others. You can make easy flight connections into Malaga from Madrid. I'm sure your friends will know the local secrets, but be sure to spend at least a day touring the white towns (Arcos, Heuleva, etc...) that are only a couple hours away.
Gary Lee: Much thanks for the valuable tip.
Oakton, VA: My wife, friends, and I are headed to Thailand for Thanksgiving for an 11-day trip. Round-trip business-class airfare on United for $1100 using upgrades, and we using points for our hotel room. We will be loooking for Turkey Pad Thai on November 22.
Andrea Sachs: Nice--turkey with peanut sauce. That should be delicious.
Traveler going to Rome: I studied abroad in Rome years ago and when my parents came for the week we went to Florence for the day and spent the rest of the time touring Rome. Literally, once they got off the plane and we met up I had them touring the city and seeing all the big sites (don't forget the Colisseum and the Pantheon is one of the most underrated monuments). I also took them to see my favorite church, go to my favorite restaurant, etc so they got to see the lesser known sites. You can do it in 4.5 days but it would be a rush. Have fun and I am so jealous!
Christina Talcott: Your parents must have been so happy to have you be their tour guide, and it must have been a blast to show them all your favorites. Any off-the-beaten-track recommendations for the Rome-in-4.5-days traveler?
re: Thanksgiving: Call me crazy, but I do the peak Wednesday afternoon/Sunday return (but only because it's a 1 1/2 hour nonstop flight). Plans have been in the works since last Thanksgiving - that's because I make it my mission to accumulate enough bump voucher money over the course of the year to underwrite the steep ticket price. Did the actual booking this go-around in June or July, I think.
Andrea Sachs: Yes you are crazy, but we are in awe of your courage.
Washington, DC: i'm confused on code share flights, if the flights are two separate flight numbers so that it's operated by two airlines, but the one airline where you get frequent flyer miles gives you no credit since they say they don't keep track of mileage flown on other carriers. But isn't that why they gave it their flight number? Same when your name on the reservation doesn't exactly match the name in the frequent flyer system, for instance, if the name on your passport doesn't read exactly like it does in their system, here again, get no miles.
Carol Sottili: Frequent flyer miles and code shares are tricky. There are so many different types of relationships between airlines, that it's almost impossible for me to comment on your particular situation. As for names not matching, that's simple enough to remedy.
Bareboot Cruiser: I've sailed around much of the Caribbean and hands down, the best place for sailing is the BVI. Just wholeheartedly seconding your recommendation.
Andrea Sachs: And I third it. We sailed there in April and it was spectacular.
Alexandria, VA: For the New Year's Eve poster - I know you said you're sick of crowded bars, but have you considered Dewey Beach? My husband and I did New Year's at the Rusty Rudder 2 months after we got married. Went with some friends from my beach house. Our favorite band was playing and it wasn't too, too crowded or too cold, and we had a blast! I hear some of the other local bars (Starboard?) have New Year's parties too.
FWIW, we were in our mid-30's at the time.
Carol Sottili: Dewey Beach is a great place for young couples and singles. I wouldn't go there if I were much past my mid-30's, but it's a fun party town.
Washington, DC: I just returned from a week divided between Montreal and Toronto. Loved both cities--the older, European feel of Montreal and the modern, busy vibe of Toronto. Great shopping and eating in both, particularly Beer Bistro in Toronto. Everyone we met was very friendly.
One warning: I set off the metal detector at the Montreal airport, and I think it might have been my new passport.
Andrea Sachs: Never heard that one before. You sure it wasn't your belt buckle or metal fillings?
Ashburn, VA: My best friend is moving back to his homeland of Venezuela. Ideally, I'd love to go visit him next year. The State Dept site basically says if I go, everything bad in the world will happen to me. Is this really true? It is a beautiful country and I don't want to be scared to go.
Cindy Loose: You're right that the site's warning about violent crime is a bit disconcerting, but the State Department is cautious about warning about possible problems overseas. I take their info very seriously, but compare the Venzuela warnings about violent crime to other countries. Here's what I'd say: If there the State Department has a travel warning up on a given destination, I wouldn't choose htat country for a vacation without some extremely compelling reason. There is no travel warning about Venezuela. (Understand the State Dept. might give warnings about traveling to a place, but a "travel warning" is a specific designation.) The second designation of "public announcement," in which the State Department singles out either a country or a part of a country for special warnins--again, justa warning, not a "travel warning." I'd think twice about those places for vacation. Again, there is not "public announcement" for Venezuela. If the State Department thinks an American shouldn't go somewhere, they come right out and say it: "Defer all travel," etc.
Bottom line: I'd go to Venezuela, and follow the advice to be careful about crime.
Alexandria, VA : Re: the Vietnam visa, we contacted the embassy and they emailed us the most current forms. It's a bit of a process, but if you follow the instructions to the letter it's not a problem. You need to mail (certified mail)your application along with a money order, your passport and a self-addressed envelope stamped envelope. I went ahead and paid for a priority mail envelope for the return. took about 2 weeks to get our passports back.
Cindy Loose: Thanks for Vietnam advice. Great place to visit in my book, by the way
Washington, DC: Dear Flight Crew,
I am planning a trip for late February to ski at Whistler, BC. I believe that one of you has been there and was looking for any tips or recommendations you could make. We are hoping to book our lodging this month so that we can keep our spending to a reasonable level. Do you or the chatters have suggestions for food and lodging options that are not really expensive? Thanks for your help!
Andrea Sachs: Since the dollar here and up there is so close, deals could be hard to come by. Unfortunately, we don't have any suggestions, but would love some feedback from the chatsters.
State of Indecision: I'm considering taking a weekend trip next month to celebrate a big birthday. My first choice is Seattle -- I've always wanted to visit there, although I can't figure out exactly why (maybe because "Frasier" was one of my favourite shows?). Anyway, is this a good choice for a weekend in November? And what are your top picks for things not to be missed there? Thanks a lot for your always helpful advice!
Gary Lee: Even though November is likely to be a bit wet, I suggest that you go for it. It's a cool city with an upbeat, youthful vibe.
Here are a few things you should try to squeeze in.
1. The Space Needle. It's a bit touristy but worth the thrill.
2. Take a free tour of the historic and colorful 5th Avenue Museum.
3. Hang out in some of the music clubs. The bands are really funky and the beer is great.
4. If you can get out of town, hope over to Snoqualmie Falls, a 25 miles down the road.
Vero Beach, Fla.: Austin, Tex. should have a fine time in Kyoto. The Teramachi arcaded shopping street is wonderful in the evening, and has a superb Japanese print shop and a nice contemporary art collective toward its north end.
There is no great need in Kyoto to visit the "best" temples. If an appointment to one of the Imperial Villas can be wangled, it's a real privilege.
The Economist magazine has a nice short list of things to see in Tokyo. Kateigaho magazine often has useful stories on what to see, albeit from a sort of upscale, feminine perspective. For history, I'd suggest "Edo, the City That Became Tokyo", a wonderful illustrated book that explains the old city upon which the new is built.
Christina Talcott: Great suggestions! Thanks!
For the Columbia honeymooners:: Have you considered taking a South Pacific cruise? Princess operates the Tahitian Princess on itineraries in French Polynesia -- I'm not positive they'll be going in July, but I'm pretty sure the fares are less than $4K per person. There is also a ship called the Paul Gaugain (not a Princess ship) that sails in that area, but I believe their fares are higher than the Tahitian Princess.
Andrea Sachs: Good idea. Thanks!
Washington, DC: Your discussion of the Gotbaum tragedy and overbooking accepts overbooking as a given. Why? How do the airlines get away with selling a seat twice? If I pay for a concert ticket my seat belongs to me. The hall can lock me out if I show up late, but they can't sell my seat to someone else. If I have paid for my airline ticket, on what basis can the airline sell my seat to someone else and turn me away? And if they do sell it, why aren't the required to give me back the money I paid? Why isn't this whole thing an outright fraud?
KC Summers: Well, they are required to put you on another flight within a certain amount of time, and if not, to pay you in cash (not just vouchers for free flights) This is the one case where airlines are required by law to give you monetary compensation. They are also required to ask for volunteers. And as they get more and more desperate, you can negotiate for more perks. Theoretically this al works out, but because of all the cutbacks and consolidated flights, it clearly isn't working anymore.
DC to NY at Thanksgiving: I've been taking Amtrak from NY to DC a lot and would recommend it for the person going from DC to NY at Thanksgiving. I'm with you - you can't pay me enough to fly the Wed before Turkey Day but Amtrak has been pretty convenient. And with the problems at the airport, even the 3 hour 20 min regional service isn't really that much longer than a flight. Plus I usually use a dicount code from Flyer Talk to make it less expensive.
John Deiner: Good point -- that's a great suggestion. I'm wondering if the person just wanted to have a car handy, but he/she was willing to fly up there. So . . . how could I forget Amtrak? Thanks for the nudge.
Washington, DC: Re Atlanta Aquarium - sadly not an educational experience whatsoever. Stick with Baltimore
Re Israel - they take security very seriously. if you live in DC you're used to metal detectors and random bag checks. same rules apply there
Re Thanksgiving - got tickets to Atlanta a few weeks ago. Not great prices but direct!
Washington, DC: Hello. I'm thinking of traveling to Barcelona and Seville during Christmas week. I realize that many stores and tourist sites will be closed during that time, but was wondering how much of an effect it would have. Are December 24-26 going to be relegated to walking around and looking at museums, restaurants, etc. from the outside? In a worst case scenario, will it be difficult to find open restaurants (even casual) on Christmas Eve and Day?
Gary Lee: You won't be able to find many if any shops open during the 24-26 days. Restaurants should be open though, especially those located in hotels. I think those days would be excellent for touring churches and cathedrals. There are some excellent ones in both cities.
Silver Spring, Md: I've seen
|
Post travel editors and writers field questions and comments every Monday at 2 p.m. ET.
| 934.75 | 0.875 | 1.375 |
high
|
medium
|
abstractive
|
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/10/12/AR2007101202298.html
|
https://web.archive.org/web/2007101419id_/http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/10/12/AR2007101202298.html
|
Penalties Kill Caps In Loss to Rangers
|
2007101419
|
NEW YORK, Oct. 12 -- Any hope the Washington Capitals had of building on their impressive first week and improving to 4-0 for the first time in 10 years had vanished by the time they trudged off the ice for the first intermission Friday night at Madison Square Garden.
The New York Rangers had struck three times on the power play, with Jaromir Jagr assisting on each of the goals. The situation improved only marginally the rest of the way for the Capitals, who went down quietly, 3-1, before a raucous sellout crowd. The goals were the Rangers' first with the man advantage this season and first yielded by the Capitals' penalty-kill unit.
"The numbers weren't favoring us," said goaltender Olie Kolzig, whose performance was the lone bright spot for Washington. "We were 100 percent on the penalty kill [12 for 12] and they were zero on the play [0 for 15] coming in. Something was going to give. And we cracked."
The Capitals were undone almost from the outset. Alex Ovechkin, who scored the 100th goal of his career, was sent to the penalty box after drawing a tripping penalty on the opening faceoff. Rangers center Scott Gomez made them pay on the ensuing advantage, scoring his first goal since coming to New York as a free agent this summer.
After being relatively disciplined in the first three games, Ovechkin and his teammates were whistled for four more infractions in the first period, including a double minor handed to defenseman John Erskine for high-sticking. The Rangers took full advantage, outshooting their guests 20-7 and adding two more power-play tallies, one by Martin Straka and the other by defenseman Michal Rozsival, in the opening 20 minutes.
Those early strikes, as it turned out, were all New York (2-2-0) needed.
Although the loss was the Capitals' first, it marked their second straight shaky performance. On Monday, they squeezed past the Islanders, 2-1, despite being badly outplayed early at Nassau Coliseum and being outshot 31-12. They weren't so fortunate against the Rangers, who spent $87 million on Gomez and Chris Drury this summer and, as a result, are a popular pick to win the Eastern Conference.
"My penalty was terrible," Ovechkin said. "It was a big mistake for me. They score on the first shift and it was not good for us."
By the end of two periods, the Capitals, who were playing without checking-line center Boyd Gordon (back spasms) and 38-goal scorer Alexander Semin (sprained right ankle), had been outshot 37-14 and virtually run out of the Garden. Kolzig's stellar 38-save effort kept it from getting any worse.
Coach Glen Hanlon said, "It is one thing to control the puck and make plays, but eventually when you are in the guts of the ice, you've got to get some pucks directed toward the net."
But when they did get shots through, they were turned aside by Rangers' goaltender Henrik Lundqvist. His best save might have come on Ovechkin late in the first period, when, on the rush, the Capitals' all-star stuck his stick between his legs and flicked a shot on net. Lundqvist, though, didn't bite.
Still, the Capitals didn't lose because of a hot goalie. They lost because they couldn't stay out of the penalty box early on.
"That's ultimately what killed us," defenseman Tom Poti said. "You can't take that many penalties against a team with such a good power play and expect to win."
Gomez's goal capped a spectacular string of passes and put New York ahead 1-0 at 1 minute 33 seconds. Jagr, from the corner, threw the puck in front to Brendan Shanahan, who flipped it to Gomez, who was standing on Kolzig's doorstep.
Ovechkin's game-tying goal at 7:46 was nearly as slick, but his was because of an impressive individual effort. The powerful left wing turned Rangers defenseman Paul Mara inside out on the power play, blasted around him and beat Lundqvist over the shoulder.
Straka restored the Rangers' lead, 2-1, at 13:26, aided by an apparent goalie interference infraction that went uncalled. Kolzig protested to no avail. Rozsival made it 3-1 at 17:59 when he pinched in from the point and fired in a perfectly placed pass from Jagr.
That's how it remained for the next two periods.
|
Alex Ovechkin scores his 100th career goal, but New York's Jaromir Jagr assists on three power-play goals in the first period to help the Rangers hand the Capitals their first loss of the season, 3-1.
| 20.790698 | 0.906977 | 1.930233 |
medium
|
medium
|
mixed
|
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/10/12/AR2007101202466.html
|
https://web.archive.org/web/2007101419id_/http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/10/12/AR2007101202466.html
|
Giuliani Outlines Message: Fiscal Caution, Beat Clinton
|
2007101419
|
"When people around the country tell me I'm not conservative enough, will you please go back and read the New York Times editorials?" he told a crowd Thursday night in this town near the North Carolina border, drawing loud applause as he noted the criticism he took for trying to reduce the welfare rolls in New York.
While the presidential primary calendar is still in flux, South Carolina's GOP primary will likely be scheduled for Jan 19, making it the first state to vote after balloting in Iowa, New Hampshire and Michigan. And because it will be the first primary in the South, it will serve as an early test for Giuliani. Can an abortion-rights supporter from the Northeast succeed in a party that is increasingly based in the South, where abortion continues to be a big issue with many Republican voters? Exit polls during the 2000 South Carolina primary showed one-third of the state's Republicans considered themselves part of the "religious right" and 58 percent said abortion should be illegal in most cases.
And when former Wisconsin governor Tommy G. Thompson, who briefly ran for the nomination, endorsed his former rival at an event in Charleston on Friday, he directly addressed the issue.
"People say, 'Well, he's not conservative enough,' " Thompson said. "I say . . . he transformed the city of New York. He reduced taxes. He cut spending."
Giuliani aides plan to compete aggressively in Iowa and New Hampshire but say their first must-win state will be Florida, whose primary is scheduled for Jan 29.
A win in the Sunshine State, in turn could create momentum heading into Feb. 5, when a mega-primary featuring delegate-rich states such as New York, New Jersey and California vote and the ex-mayor's nationwide fame gained in the aftermath of Sept. 11, 2001, could be a huge asset.
Campaigning in the South, Giuliani routinely jokes about the scarcity of Republicans in New York City, depicting it as crime-ridden before he took office, part of his argument that while some GOP voters may disagree with his ideas, it is hard to argue with his results.
At a crowded ice cream parlor in conservative Greenville, Giuliani told reporters he is polling stronger among conservatives than any of the other candidates and marveled at the "big surprise" his performance in the state is providing. Several surveys in the state have shown the former mayor first or just behind former Tennessee senator Fred Thompson.
In Rock Hill, Giuliani skipped discussion of moral issues, instead stressing that "from California to New York . . . the things that hold us together as a party are a strong national defense and a strong national economy."
Giuliani also gleefully took up one of his favorite tactics on the campaign trail: Hillary Clinton-bashing, which he has essentially made the third plank of his brand of conservatism in lieu of orthodoxy on social issues.
In the middle of his speech, Giuliani reached into his pocket, declaring to the crowd "I have been keeping a list: this is my Hillary list."
Without actually consulting the sheet, Giuliani eagerly reeled off and ridiculed proposals the Democratic front-runner offered this week as she sought to focus on the middle class, including a tax credit for parents paying college tuition and matching the first $1,000 Americans put in 401(k) plans.
He then turned to a proposal Clinton had floated late last month, modeled on a program in Britain, in which children would be given $5,000 at birth that they could spend when they are older, which some advocates tout as a anti-poverty program.
"Remember the Hillary baby bonds," Giuliani said, laughing at the notion. "We pointed out in strong terms how irresponsible this was. . . . She gave them up in three or four days."
Clinton has said the bonds were not a specific proposal she was offering. But while all the Republican contenders use Clinton as a punching bag, Giuliani is unmatched in his focus on his home-state rival.
Giuliani also trotted out another stump tactic that seemed to thrill the audience of Republicans, using a dream he said he has had "at least five times" to mock the Democratic White House contenders. In the dream, he said, the three leading Democratic candidates, Clinton, Sen. Barack Obama (D-Ill.) and former North Carolina senator John Edwards are flying on a plane together to France, where they planned to get "failed" ideas on public policy that the ex-mayor said would transform America into a socialist country. At the same time, he says, new French President Nicolas Sarkozy is flying to the United States to bring "our quintessential American principles" back to his nation.
And while he avoids social issues discussions whenever possible, he goes further than many of the other Republican contenders in embracing other conservative touchstones.
President Bush, even when he had a higher standing with the public, quickly gave up touting private school vouchers; Giuliani mentions them frequently on the stump, to applause. Giuliani proudly talks about his work on issues that unite economic and social conservatives, such as reducing crime and the number of people on welfare, both of which saw huge drops when he was New York's mayor. Giuliani's critics dispute whether that was a result of Giuliani's efforts, President Bill Clinton's work in Washington or economic growth that neither had much control over.
On the Iraq war, Giuliani often sounds more hawkish than Bush, a fact likely to play well in the South. At the ice cream shop, Giuliani gave a five-minute address blasting Hillary Clinton and then spent more than 30 minutes shaking hands, one woman shouted repeatedly "how will you get the troops home?" Giuliani, who has gone through something of a personality transformation from the tempestuous mayor in the 1990s to sunny candidate this year, at first tried to ignore the woman. Then without turning toward her, he smiled and said his goal is to get the troops out of Iraq, but after "success."
"How about the goal of the United States of America in Iraq is victory," he said later, to loud applause in the Rock Hill speech. "How about success defined as an Iraq that is stable and will act as an ally for us . . . then we withdraw the troops. . . . The president used this expression and I wish he would use it more: 'return on success.' They should be brought home on success."
Giuliani still has some work to do. Some social conservatives are still wary of the party's front-runner.
"From a fiscal perspective, he's done fine, but from the social side I have problems with him," said Randy Page, a GOP activist who is on the board of the Palmetto Family Council, a major conservative group in South Carolina. "I would be very uncomfortable with him" as the nominee.
|
ROCK HILL, S.C., Oct. 12 -- Speaking to a Republican club here, former New York mayor Rudolph W. Giuliani offered his own version of what the party should stand for: strong national security, fiscal conservatism and beating Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton (D-N.Y.). He never mentioned abortion or same...
| 23.135593 | 0.661017 | 1.033898 |
medium
|
low
|
abstractive
|
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/10/12/AR2007101202217.html
|
https://web.archive.org/web/2007101419id_/http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/10/12/AR2007101202217.html
|
Jefferson Seeks to Dismiss Bribery Charges
|
2007101419
|
Jefferson's attorneys made no admission that he engaged in improper conduct, but one, Amy Jackson, argued that even if the government's allegations are true, they do not constitute bribery under federal law.
"We think using influence is not a bribe," Jackson told U.S. District Judge T.S. Ellis III in seeking to have some of the charges dismissed.
Prosecutors scoffed at the argument, and Ellis seemed skeptical. He offered several hypothetical situations that he likened to the conduct alleged in Jefferson's case and questioned whether such situations do not amount to bribery.
Jackson maintained that federal law defines bribery as receiving payment for an official act. Congress spells out influence-peddling as improper in its ethics rules but neglects to do so specifically under the bribery statute, she said.
If Jefferson had taken money in exchange for sponsoring legislation or voting a particular way on a specific bill, it would have constituted a bribe, Jackson said. But she contended that the misdeeds prosecutors allege -- helping to broker business deals in Africa in exchange for hundreds of thousands of dollars in payments -- fall outside that definition.
"We must apply the law as it is written, not as the Department of Justice wants it to be read or . . . not even as a common-sense interpretation of right or wrong might think it should be read," she said.
Prosecutor Mark Lytle cited several legal precedents that he said differ with the defense's interpretation, and he said Jefferson's efforts to secure business deals qualify as abuse of his official duties because they helped only those constituents who paid him money.
The 16-count indictment alleges 11 separate schemes in which Jefferson is said to have used his influence as co-chairman of the Africa Investment and Trade Caucus to broker deals in Nigeria, Ghana, Cameroon and other African nations.
Ellis did not rule on the defense motion to dismiss some of the counts in the indictment, which alleges that Jefferson received more than $500,000 in bribes and demanded millions more between 2000 and 2005.
Defense lawyers are challenging much of the evidence against Jefferson, but they have not sought to suppress the most notorious piece: the videotape of Jefferson taking a $100,000 cash payment from a cooperating witness. During a raid on the congressman's Washington home, $90,000 of the money was recovered from his freezer.
The nine-term congressman attended yesterday's hearing but did not speak, and he did not comment afterward.
|
The bribery charges against Rep. William J. Jefferson (D-La.), who was videotaped accepting $100,000 in cash, should be dismissed because such an act is technically closer to influence-peddling, defense argued yesterday in an Alexandria courtroom.
| 10.06383 | 0.723404 | 0.978723 |
low
|
low
|
abstractive
|
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/10/12/AR2007101200496.html
|
https://web.archive.org/web/2007101419id_/http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/10/12/AR2007101200496.html
|
How to Calculate Musical Sellouts
|
2007101419
|
As the happy family leaves the store, Dad hands her a new cellphone and says, smiling, "You can take a study break with Fall Out Boy!"
The kid is tickled pink.
Right after that came a Nissan commercial, which wanted consumers to understand that, if you owned an SUV, you could drive places. To underline the point, the commercial broke into the Ramones, who sang, "Hey! Ho! Let's go!" That's the famous break from the punk rockers' "Blitzkrieg Bop," a heartfelt ode to pogoing to the beat of a Nazi military assault.
Well, at least it wasn't a Volkswagen ad.
It seems as if every commercial these days has a rock band in it. What was once the mark of utter uncoolness, a veritable byword of selling out, has become the norm. More than a decade ago we became inured to the most unlikely parings. Led Zeppelin in a Cadillac ad. The Clash shilling for Jaguar. Bob Dylan warbling for an accounting firm, or Victoria's Secret. An Iggy Pop song about a heroin-soaked demimonde accompanying scenes of blissful vacationers on a Caribbean cruise ship.
There is no longer even a debate, let alone a stigma. "If you did an advert, you were a sellout," notes Billboard Executive Editor Tamara Conniff. "The Rolling Stones broke that when they allowed the use of 'Start Me Up' for the Windows campaign. Though there was an initial backlash, it suddenly made it okay for bands of integrity to do commercials. Now, it's almost as if as an artist you don't have a corporate partner [or] commercial, you've not really arrived."
Indeed, in the late 1990s, the techno artist Moby, as hip as they come, openly boasted of having sold every track of his breakthrough album "Play" to an advertiser, or to a film or TV soundtrack. The album should perhaps have been called "Pay."
So we submit: The battle has been lost. But that doesn't make it right. There are even some who disagree.
"People say making money is making money, but there's a difference," says Bill Brown, a onetime rock critic who now works in the New York publishing world. He examines the implications of this new age in rock commercialism at great length and no little erudition on his Web site, Notbored.org. "If you're in a band, you want to be paid, definitely, but the music is for people to use and enjoy. The problem with branding yourself and selling your songs to commercials is the music is no longer for the listener.
"Instead, the ad is signaling that, 'This company is cool, and we've gotten this band to sell us some of their music.' It's the difference between selling to me, and something else: Pete Townshend sold a song to Hummer!"
Clearly, what we need is an objective formula for determining just how offensive a particular rock-based advertisement is. I am proud to announce that this lack has been righted.
|
Acommercial during "The Colbert Report" recently featured a happy family shopping in Circuit City for back-to-school technology for their comely daughter. She's a big fan of the bubblegum punk group Fall Out Boy, and while the band's fabulous song "Thnks fr th Mmrs" plays, she imagines all the ex...
| 9.730159 | 0.507937 | 0.730159 |
low
|
low
|
abstractive
|
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/10/12/AR2007101201640.html
|
https://web.archive.org/web/2007101219id_/http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/10/12/AR2007101201640.html
|
Immigrants and Laureates
|
2007101219
|
Capecchi, who endured a heart-wrenching early childhood in wartime Italy, immigrated with his mother to the United States after World War II, who survived the Dachau concentration camp. Today, he leads research teams at the University of Utah. Smithies, a native of Britain, came to the United States in the 1950s to work at the University of Wisconsin and has spent the last 19 years at the University of North Carolina. Both are now U.S. citizens.
Foreign-born researchers are common in the U.S. academic and scientific communities. In fact, more than a third of American Nobel laureates in the sciences over the last 15 years were born outside the U.S. These scientists are conducting research with extraordinary promise for improving lives, as well as great potential to produce commercialized therapies and technologies that drive U.S. innovation and economic growth.
The U.S. should welcome these highly skilled researchers and innovators. Unfortunately, recent trends in immigration policy are making it more difficult for foreign-born scientists and engineers to put their skills to work in this country -- and that could have profoundly negative implications for the U.S. economy.
Recent studies by Duke, Harvard and New York universities find that far more skilled scientists and workers are waiting for U.S. visas than can be admitted under current law. More than one million skilled workers await permanent resident status. Yet only about 120,000 permanent resident visas are available each year for skilled workers and their family members in the three main employment visa categories.
To be sure, visa difficulties are nothing new for would-be immigrants trying to work in America. Early in his career, Smithies himself spent seven years working in Toronto because visa snags prevented him from getting back to his job in Wisconsin.
But the difficulties are getting worse. The U.S. has responded to an increased demand for entry -- driven by the fact that it is a global leader in science, technology and innovation -- by capping the number of visas available to immigrants from any one country. As a result, the wait time for visa processing for countries with the largest populations, such as India and China, is close to six years. Anecdotal evidence suggests that increasing numbers of skilled workers from India and China have begun to return home, where the economies are booming.
Furthermore, tightened immigration screening in the U.S. following the terrorist attacks of 9/11 has lengthened processing delays. Of course, national security must always be our top priority. But policymakers must come to grips with the potential damage to the U.S. economy and scientific community if many of the world's brightest people decide it is too difficult to work in the United States and take their skills elsewhere.
The pressure is on for U.S. leaders to develop an efficient way to safely welcome the world's top innovators -- including potential Nobel laureates. Scientists like Capecchi and Smithies are a resource we can't afford to be without.
Fortunately, there is evidence that federal officials can change course when convinced they're wrong. The National Institutes of Health rejected Capecchi's initial application for funding to support work that ultimately led to his Nobel Prize because NIH deemed the proposal "not worthy of pursuit." NIH approved his grant four years later.
Carl Schramm is president and chief executive and Robert Litan is vice president for research and policy at the Kauffman Foundation.
|
Al Gore's Nobel Peace Prize is getting almost all the attention, but America's two other new Nobel laureates also have interesting stories. Geneticists Mario Capecchi and Oliver Smithies won the Nobel Prize in medicine for their work in gene targeting. And while their honor highlights the quality...
| 11.924528 | 0.566038 | 0.716981 |
low
|
low
|
abstractive
|
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/10/12/AR2007101200827.html
|
https://web.archive.org/web/2007101219id_/http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/10/12/AR2007101200827.html
|
Earth's Fate Is the No. 1 National Security Issue
|
2007101219
|
HOW CAN WE possibly explain the mistakes and false starts President Bush has been making on environmental policy? His administration's decision to censor scientific testimony on the seriousness of the greenhouse effect -- and initially to oppose an international convention to begin working out a solution to it -- may well mean that the president himself does not yet see the threat clearly. Apparently he does not hear the alarms that are awakening so many other leaders from Margaret Thatcher to Mikhail Gorbachev.
Humankind has suddenly entered into a brand new relationship with the planet Earth. The world's forests are being destroyed; an enormous hole is opening in the ozone layer. Living species are dying at an unprecedented rate. Chemical wastes, in growing volumes, are seeping downward to poison groundwater while huge quantities of carbon dioxide, methane and chlorofluo-rocarbons are trapping heat in the atmosphere and raising global temperatures.
How much information is needed by the human mind to recognize a pattern? How much more is needed by the body politic to justify action in response?
If an individual or a nation is accustomed to looking at the future one year at a time, and the past in terms of a single lifetime, then many large patterns are concealed. But seen in historical perspective, it is clear that dozens of destructive effects have followed the same pattern of unprecedented acceleration in the latter half of the 20th century. It took 10,000 human lifetimes for the population to reach 2 billion. Now in the course of one lifetime, yours and mine, it is rocketing from 2 billion to 10 billion, and is already halfway there.
Yet, the pattern of our politics remains remarkably unchanged. That indifference must end. As a nation and a government, we must see that America's future is inextricably tied to the fate of the globe. In effect, the environment is becoming a matter of national security -- an issue that directly and imminently menaces the interests of the state or the welfare of the people.
To date, the national-security agenda has been dominated by issues of military security, embedded in the context of global struggle between the United States and the Soviet Union -- a struggle often waged through distant surrogates, but which has always harbored the risk of direct confrontation and nuclear war. Given the recent changes in Soviet behavior, there is growing optimism that this long, dark period may be passing. This may in turn open the international agenda for other urgent matters and for the release of enormous resources, now committed to war, toward other objectives. Many of us hope that the global environment will be the new dominant concern.
Of course, this national-security analogy must be used very cautiously. The U.S.-Soviet rivalry has lasted almost half a century, consumed several trillions of dollars, cost close to 100,000 American lives in Korea and Vietnam and profoundly shaped our psychological and social consciousness. Much the same could be said of the Soviets. Nothing relieves us of our present responsibilities for defense or of the need to conduct painstaking negotiations to limit arms and reduce the risk of war. And yet, there is strong evidence the new enemy is at least as real as the old. For the general public, the shocking images of last year's drought, or of beaches covered with medical garbage, inspired a sense of peril once sparked only by Soviet behavior. The U2 spy plane now is used to monitor not missile silos but ozone depletion. Every day in parts of southern Iowa, where it hasn't rained for more than a year, National Guard troops are being used to distribute drinking water. In the not too distant future, policies that enable the rescue of the global environment will join, perhaps even supplant, our concern with preventing nuclear war as the principal test of statecraft.
However, it is important to distinguish what would -- in military jargon -- be called the level of threat. Certain environmental problems may be important but are essentially local; others cross borders, and in effect represent theaters of operations; still others are global and strategic. On this scale, the slow suffocation of Mexico City, the deaths of forests in America and Europe or even the desertification of large areas of Africa might not not be regarded as full-scale national-security issues. But the greenhouse effect and stratospheric ozone depletion do fit the profile of strategic national-security issues.
When nations perceive that they are threatened at the strategic level, they may be induced to think of drastic responses, involving sharp discontinuities from everyday approaches to policy. In military terms, this is the point when the United States begins to think of invoking nuclear weapons. The global environment crisis may demand responses that are comparatively radical.
At present, despite some progress made toward limiting some sources of the problem, such as CFCs, we have barely scratched the surface. Even if all other elements of the problem are solved, a major threat is still posed by emissions of carbon dioxide, the exhaling breath of the industrial culture upon which our civilization rests. The implications of the latest and best studies on this matter are staggering. Essentially, they tell us that with our current pattern of technology and production, we face a choice between economic growth in the near term and massive environmental disorder as the subsequent penalty.
This central fact suggests that the notion of environmentally sustainable development at present may be an oxymoron, rather than a realistic objective. It declares war, in effect, on routine life in the advanced industrial societies. And -- central to the outcome of the entire struggle to restore global environmental balance -- it declares war on the Third World.
|
Editor's note: The following article appeared in the Post's Outlook section on May 14, 1989.
| 53.85 | 0.45 | 0.55 |
high
|
low
|
abstractive
|
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/10/12/AR2007101202459.html
|
https://web.archive.org/web/2007101219id_/http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/10/12/AR2007101202459.html
|
Ex-Commander In Iraq Faults War Strategy
|
2007101219
|
Sanchez also bluntly criticized the current troop increase in Iraq, describing it as "a desperate attempt by the administration that has not accepted the political and economic realities of this war."
"The administration, Congress and the entire interagency, especially the State Department, must shoulder the responsibility for this catastrophic failure, and the American people must hold them accountable," Sanchez told military reporters and editors. "There has been a glaring unfortunate display of incompetent strategic leadership within our national leaders."
Sanchez lashed out specifically at the National Security Council, calling officials there negligent and incompetent, without offering details. He also assailed war policies over the past four years, which he said had stripped senior military officers of responsibility and thus thrust the armed services into an "intractable position" in Iraq.
"The best we can do with this flawed approach is stave off defeat," Sanchez said in a speech to the Military Reporters and Editors' annual conference in Crystal City. "Without bipartisan cooperation, we are destined to fail. There is nothing going on in Washington that would give us hope."
He faulted the administration for failing to "communicate effectively that reality to the American people."
But Sanchez offered little advice about fixing military problems in Iraq, instead saying that current efforts generally need more resources and skill. "From a catastrophically flawed, unrealistically optimistic war plan to the administration's latest surge strategy, this administration has failed to employ and synchronize its political, economic and military power," Sanchez said.
Sanchez led Combined Joint Task Force 7 in Iraq beginning on June 15, 2003. Under his command, an insurgency erupted in Iraq and he and other top officers were slow to respond to it, in part because of the reluctance of then-Defense Secretary Donald H. Rumsfeld and other Bush administration officials to recognize its existence.
Some officials thought the anti-U.S. attacks would fade away after Saddam Hussein was captured in December 2003, but instead the insurgency intensified, with pitched battles the next spring in Najaf and Fallujah. Some analysts have argued that Sanchez had little feel for strategy and permitted commanders to use tactics that were counterproductive and helped intensify opposition to the U.S. presence in the country.
But Sanchez may be best remembered for being the top U.S. general in Iraq during the period when the abuse of prisoners at the Abu Ghraib prison occurred and was later revealed. Photographs of Iraqi detainees being humiliated shocked many and provoked a reevaluation of the U.S. presence in Iraq. After those disclosures, some enlisted troops and Army Reserve officers were charged, but in legal proceedings and official reviews no top commanders were deemed responsible for the scandal.
Sanchez retired after more senior defense officials, fearing that a public confirmation hearing would go badly in light of the abuse allegations, decided not to give him a fourth star. He is now a senior mentor at the military's Joint Warfighting Center.
Although he would not address the Abu Ghraib abuse directly, Sanchez said after his speech that Abu Ghraib was a "difficult issue," and that it is important to generally address the way the United States treats its detainees. He declined to say whether he thinks he was scapegoated by the Army and refused to name senior leaders he believes failed at developing war strategy, saying several times: "More to follow later."
|
Retired Lt. Gen. Ricardo S. Sanchez, who led U.S. forces in Iraq for a year after the March 2003 invasion, accused the Bush administration yesterday of going to war with a "catastrophically flawed" plan and said the United States is "living a nightmare with no end in sight."
| 11.464286 | 0.732143 | 1.017857 |
low
|
low
|
abstractive
|
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/10/12/AR2007101200590.html
|
https://web.archive.org/web/2007101219id_/http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/10/12/AR2007101200590.html
|
Iraqis Decry U.S. Airstrike That Killed Civilians
|
2007101219
|
The bombing occurred Thursday evening after U.S. troops raided a suspected leadership meeting of the Sunni insurgent group al-Qaeda in Iraq that was taking place south of Lake Tharthar, near the city of Samarra in western Iraq. The U.S. military's account of the violence said troops were shot at during the raid and called in an airstrike in self-defense. In addition to the civilians killed, the U.S. military estimated that 19 suspected insurgents died.
"This could have been done through the infantry," said Ibrahim al-Khamas, a Samarra city council member. "But the American Army prefers the easiest solution, which is the air bombardment."
The bombing came just before Eid al-Fitr, the religious celebration that concludes the Muslim holy month of Ramadan.
"This airstrike was excessive, as usual, which led to the fall of civilians," Khamas added. "People here are now carrying great hatred against the Americans after the raid. This airstrike turned their Eid to grief."
The U.S. military provided little further information Friday but said it was investigating the incident with local officials and tribal leaders. A U.S. military spokesman, Maj. Winfield S. Danielson III, said the initial death tolls of combatants and civilians were estimates. Of the 15 civilians initially reported killed, all were women and children, and it was unclear whether the U.S. military considered all the males killed to be insurgents.
An elder in the town of Tharthar, Mohammed Mukhlis al-Darraji, said the bombing took place in an area called al-Samacha, Arabic for "fishermen," the occupation of many people living around the lake. Darraji said the victims included infants, but acknowledged that "this area is one of al-Qaeda's favorites."
Mohammed al-Samarrae, 34, said his pregnant cousin was killed in the bombing. He expressed a mix of dismay at her death and the weariness of life after more than four years of war.
"Where can anybody be safe from Bush's democracy?" he asked. "Whenever we want to open a new chapter with the Americans, to forget the past and try all over again, they drag us into violence, weapons and fighting again. And to sympathize with al-Qaeda against them. All because of their inconsideration for our blood."
Some Iraqis called the U.S. airstrike a success. Amar Abdul Kareem, a member of a group of tribal leaders in Salahuddin province who are collaborating with the U.S. military against al-Qaeda, said the important aspect of the raid was killing the suspected insurgents. As for the civilians, he said, "God have mercy on them."
"If they did not die in the raid, the terrorists would have killed them with car bombs," he said. "I am confident that the American military did not deliberately want to harm any of the Iraqis, and did not intend to spoil the joy of Eid."
Violence continued in the capital on Friday, when a car bomb exploded near a popular market in central Baghdad. The blast near Tahrir Square killed five people, including two policemen, and wounded 10, Iraqi police said.
Also, in Tuz Khurmatu, near Kirkuk in northern Iraq, a bomb hidden amid toys in a carriage exploded on a playground, killing two people and wounding 12, police said.
Other Washington Post staff in Iraq contributed to this report.
|
BAGHDAD, Oct. 12 -- Iraqis voiced outrage Friday over a U.S. military airstrike that killed an estimated 15 civilians -- nine children and six women, one of the highest reported civilian death tolls from an American bombing in months.
| 15.761905 | 0.761905 | 1.047619 |
medium
|
low
|
abstractive
|
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/10/12/AR2007101202260.html
|
https://web.archive.org/web/2007101219id_/http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/10/12/AR2007101202260.html
|
Premier Says Turkey Is Ready For Split With U.S. Over Kurds
|
2007101219
|
"If such an option is chosen, whatever its price, it will be paid," Erdogan said to reporters Friday after meeting with party leaders. "There could be pros and cons of such a decision, but what is important is our country's interests."
Erdogan criticized the United States for warning against a Turkish attack in one of the few relatively stable regions of war-ravaged Iraq.
"Did they seek permission from anyone when they came from a distance of 10,000 kilometers and hit Iraq?" Erdogan asked. "We do not need anyone else's advice."
U.S.-Turkish tensions over separatist rebels from the Kurdistan Workers' Party (PKK) have been exacerbated by a congressional committee's approval Wednesday of a resolution labeling the mass killings of Armenians nearly a century ago genocide. Turkey acknowledges the deaths of tens of thousands of Armenians but argues that they occurred in fighting after the Armenians allied themselves with Russian forces invading the Ottoman Empire.
"Democrats are harming the future of the United States and are encouraging anti-American sentiments," Erdogan said Friday, referring to Democratic Party leaders who supported the measure. President Bush had lobbied hard against the resolution. On Thursday, Turkey summoned its ambassador from Washington for emergency consultations.
Erdogan and his advisers are expected to seek -- and win -- parliamentary authorization next week to launch strikes in northern Iraq in the aftermath of Kurdish rebel attacks that have killed 30 soldiers, police officers and civilians in the past two weeks. On Thursday, a soldier was killed in an explosion in a mountainous border region where the Turkish army has been conducting operations against separatists, the Anatolian news agency reported Friday.
The Kurdish guerrillas issued a statement Friday saying their fighters were preparing to carry out attacks against Turkey's main political parties in response to Erdogan's warnings of a possible military incursion in northern Iraq. The statement, carried by the pro-Kurdish Firat news agency, quoted Bahoz Erdal, a senior PKK commander, as saying fighters were moving deeper into Turkey and taking new "positions."
Turkey has complained that since the U.S.-led invasion of Iraq, Kurdish guerrilla leaders have operated freely in the Kurdish northern region of the country. Turkish officials have criticized the United States and Iraq for not taking action against the separatists.
Before the U.S.-led invasion, the Turkish military regularly launched cross-border incursions targeting Kurdish rebel strongholds. In recent months, the Turkish military has frequently fired artillery across the border and has launched a major aerial bombardment of a mountainous region straddling the border.
R. Nicholas Burns, the U.S. undersecretary of state for political affairs, said in an interview taped by CNN Turk on Wednesday: "There has to be more effective cooperation among Iraq, Turkey and the United States to prevent" guerrillas from using northern Iraq as a base to attack Turkey.
"I think the rest of us need to do more to help the Turkish government to deal with the threat," he added.
Erdogan is under pressure from both the Turkish military, which for months has wanted him to seek approval for launching an attack, and the Turkish public, which has expressed outrage at the recent PKK attacks.
Iraqi Defense Minister Abdul Qadir Muhammed Jassim met with Turkish Ambassador Derya Kanbay in Baghdad on Friday to discuss the crisis. The Iraqi minister released a terse statement after the meeting saying the two discussed "means of developing relations between the two friendly countries in the field of combating terror and exchange of information."
Last month, Turkey and Iraq signed an agreement for greater cooperation in cracking down on Kurdish rebels in Iraq, but Erdogan said Friday that the accord had not yet been implemented. During negotiations, the Iraqis denied a request by Turkey to conduct cross-border raids into northern Iraq.
Staff writer Robin Wright in Washington contributed to this report.
|
ISTANBUL, Oct. 12 -- Turkish Prime Minister Recep Tayyip Erdogan said Friday that he is prepared for a rupture in relations with the United States if his government launches an incursion into northern Iraq in search of Kurdish rebels.
| 18.097561 | 0.756098 | 1.341463 |
medium
|
low
|
abstractive
|
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/10/12/AR2007101202296.html
|
https://web.archive.org/web/2007101219id_/http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/10/12/AR2007101202296.html
|
Feats Divide Pair Linked by Election
|
2007101219
|
What a difference seven years makes. The winner of that struggle went on to capture the White House and to become a wartime leader now heading toward the final year of a struggling presidency. The loser went on to reinvent himself from cautious politician to hero of the activist left now honored as a man of peace.
For the Gore camp, it was a day of resurrection, a day to salve the wounds of history and to write another narrative that they hope will be as enduring as Florida. "We finally have their respective legacies," said Rep. Rahm Emanuel (Ill.), chairman of the House Democratic Caucus and a veteran of the Clinton-Gore White House. "Bush earned the Iraq war, and Al Gore earned the Nobel Prize. Who knew Al Gore would one day thank the Supreme Court for their judgment?"
The White House stuck to polite, if restrained, congratulations. "Obviously, it's an important recognition, and we're sure the vice president is thrilled," spokesman Tony Fratto told reporters aboard Air Force One heading here Friday. Another senior official, commenting on the condition of anonymity to speak less diplomatically, said the Nobel Prize is nice, but the presidency is still better. "We're happy for him," the aide said, "but suspect he'd trade places before we would."
The paths traveled by these two men in the years since the recount battle of 2000 have taken them in surprising directions. They have both become crusaders in ways that might have been unimaginable during the 35 days they fought over hanging chads and butterfly ballots. Two candidates who presented themselves as safe stewards of a prosperous country have instead become evangelists for changing the world, albeit with drastically different visions.
They have spent those seven years shadowboxing, never reconciling. Gore has been one of Bush's most vociferous critics, while the White House has always looked on the former vice president with derision. Their dispute was implicitly on display, even on Friday. Just half an hour after Gore appeared before cameras to acknowledge the Nobel and to promote the cause of fighting climate change, Bush took the stage here for a speech on free trade -- the yin and yang of the global warming argument, protecting the environment or protecting the economy.
In fact, both men have argued that the world can do both, but they represent opposite sides on which priority to value more highly. In his speech here, Bush made no mention of the environment, instead pressing Congress to pass free trade agreements with Peru, Panama, Colombia and South Korea. "It's important for our country to understand trade yields prosperity, and prosperity means people will more likely be able to find work," he told business leaders.
Still, after investing little capital on global warming, Bush lately has tried to assert a new leadership role. Last month, he convened a conference in a bid to begin laying out a framework for an international pact to follow the 2012 expiration of the Kyoto Protocol, which Gore helped negotiate and which Bush renounced. But Bush offered no concrete proposal of his own.
"For a long time, he was trying to keep a low profile on climate change in hopes that the issue would move on," said Samuel Thernstrom, a former Bush environmental aide. "These days, he's showing more interest. . . . It's puzzling to me, though, that he made the effort to put it on the table but didn't put a proposal on the table that would change the discussion."
White House aides said Gore's Nobel would no more influence Bush on global warming than Jimmy Carter's 2002 prize did on the Iraq war. "I'm sure the president, and many Republicans, roll their eyes about how political the Nobel Peace Prize is becoming," said former Bush press secretary Ari Fleischer. "For Al Gore, it's a high honor. But for what's probably a growing group of Americans, the Nobel Peace Prize comes coated with some strong political veneer."
Still, presidents through history have secretly yearned for the validation of the Nobel Peace Prize. The only one to win it in office was Theodore Roosevelt, and his medal remains on display at the White House. Interviewed by al-Arabiya television last week, Bush seemed to rue the idea that he is not seen as a man of peace, bristling when asked if, in fact, he is a "man of war."
"Oh, no, no," he said. "I believe the actions we have taken will make it more likely peace happens. I dream it will be -- the last thing I want to be is a president during war." Referring to his vision for spreading democracy, he said that "peace will succeed as more and more people become free."
Yet, if Bush ever dwells on what might have been, so, too, does the Gore team. "It's hard to look at the disaster of the past seven years and not believe that America would be better off if he had been president," said Ron Klain, Gore's former chief of staff. "Perhaps he has done more for climate change as a private citizen than he could have done as president, but I firmly believe that if Al Gore were president, America would not be at war, our standing in the world would be higher, our economy stronger and our civil liberties more secure."
No one will ever know.
|
MIAMI, Oct. 12 -- Somehow, it seemed only fitting that at the moment of Al Gore's triumph, George W. Bush would spend the day in Florida, scene of the fateful clash that propelled one to the presidency and the other to the Nobel Prize.
| 21.34 | 0.7 | 1.18 |
medium
|
low
|
abstractive
|
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/10/12/AR2007101200364.html
|
https://web.archive.org/web/2007101219id_/http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/10/12/AR2007101200364.html
|
Gore and U.N. Panel Share Peace Prize
|
2007101219
|
For Gore, the award was a measure of vindication for his passionate commitment to the issue of climate change in the face of occasional ridicule and pointed political criticism dating back two decades. Coming seven years after a bitter defeat in his bid to win the White House, it also rekindled speculation about a possible 2008 presidential run, which his aides quickly sought to squelch.
VIDEO | Gore Responds to Nobel Prize Win
In a statement issued shortly after the award was announced in Norway, Gore said he was deeply honored to be cited for his work and to share the prize with the United Nations' Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), a Geneva-based committee of scientists established in 1988.
"The climate crisis is not a political issue, it is a moral and spiritual challenge to all of humanity," Gore said. "It is also our greatest opportunity to lift global consciousness to a higher level."
Later, in a brief appearance in Palo Alto, Calif., with his wife, Tipper, at his side, he told reporters, "We have to quickly find a way to change the world's consciousness about exactly what we're facing." He declined to answer questions.
The decision by the Norwegian Nobel Committee drew widespread praise among Democrats and environmentalists, a more measured response from the White House, and outright scorn from some conservatives.
The awarding of the prize to Gore and the IPCC highlights the extent to which climate change now occupies a central place in the public debate over the world's economic and environmental future.
John Ashton, Britain's special representative for climate change, said the award signals that the international community has "crossed a threshold" when it comes to global warming. "The international community now understands this is not only an environmental challenge like other environmental challenges, it is a fundamental challenge to international peace and security," he said in an interview.
Reaction in Europe, where the Bush administration has been seen as resistant to addressing the warming issue, was strongly positive among politicians across the ideological spectrum.
British Prime Minister Gordon Brown called Gore "inspirational." French President Nicolas Sarkozy said he was happy that "a great American used his position to set an example." European Commission President Jos¿ Manuel Barroso said he hoped Gore's honor would encourage world leaders to "approach this challenge even more swiftly and decisively."
In winning the Nobel Peace Prize, Gore completed an unusual trifecta of awards for the year. The movie "An Inconvenient Truth," which highlighted his crusade, won Oscars for best documentary and best original song. Gore also won an Emmy for the interactive work of Current TV, a cable channel he helped found.
The Nobel committee described Gore as "probably the single individual who has done most to create greater worldwide understanding of the measures that need to be adopted."
|
Former vice president Al Gore, who wrapped up a remarkable year of honors yesterday by sharing the 2007 Nobel Peace Prize with a U.N. scientific panel, said he will use the award to heighten awareness of "a true planetary emergency" from global warming and press the world's nations to combat its...
| 9.77193 | 0.596491 | 0.982456 |
low
|
low
|
abstractive
|
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/10/12/AR2007101202295.html
|
https://web.archive.org/web/2007101219id_/http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/10/12/AR2007101202295.html
|
The Little Film That Became a Hot Property
|
2007101219
|
As cinematic productions go, it wasn't much -- essentially just a man, a message and a scary slide show. Yet, "An Inconvenient Truth," Al Gore's filmed lecture about global climate change, became a milestone, easily the most famous and memorable aspect of Gore's quarter-century of environmental activism.
The 2006 documentary alone certainly didn't win Gore the Nobel Peace Prize yesterday -- such prizes tend to be lifetime achievement awards, rarely dependent on the whims of reviews and box office receipts -- but it surely helped. The film remade Gore's image, transforming him from presidential loser into Saint Al, the earnest, impassioned, pointer-wielding Cassandra of the environmental movement. It also helped push global warming into something more than just a debate among climatologists; it made the issue a water-cooler phenomenon, sparking conversation throughout the Oprah-sphere.
The 100-minute film received glowing notices ("In 39 years, I have never written these words in a movie review . . .: You owe it to yourself to see this film," said Roger Ebert in his column). It was a modest commercial success by Hollywood's usual yardstick, but it was a smash hit by the poverty-stricken standards of documentary filmmaking. The movie generated nearly $50 million worldwide (roughly half of that in the United States), making it the fourth-highest-grossing documentary ever, according to Boxofficemojo.com, which tracks the industry. (The highest grossing is Michael Moore's "Fahrenheit 9/11," which made more than $220 million.)
The figure suggests that about 6 million people have seen "Truth," which was released in May last year.
Such numbers, though, grossly understate its impact. The film's release and subject matter were the pegs for thousands of print and broadcast news stories. "An Inconvenient Truth" became the rallying point for countless environmental groups -- and the flash point for opponents who attacked Gore's science and his conclusion that the burning of fossil fuels is pushing the Earth toward an environmental disaster. The debate got a second life in February, when the film won the Academy Award for Best Documentary.
"Truth" was still generating waves even before yesterday's Nobel announcement. A judge in London this week ruled that British teachers who show the film must alert students that it contains nine "errors" -- such as Gore's claim that residents of low-lying atolls in the Pacific have been evacuated as a result of rising sea levels. There's no evidence of that, said Judge Michael Burton, but he also seemed to endorse Gore's basic thesis, saying the movie builds a "powerful" case that global warming is man-made and must be reversed.
Laurie David, who co-produced "An Inconvenient Truth," said yesterday she wasn't surprised that it has had such an extensive impact, or that it helped draw the attention of the Nobel committee to Gore.
"I just thought the movie was going to be a big deal," she said in an interview, adding that when she saw Gore give a five-minute version of his slide show in conjunction with the opening of the 2004 film "The Day After Tomorrow," she decided to press for the documentary. "I realized this is the best way to explain to people what's happening. Gore had it."
The former vice president initially questioned whether people would even attend a film version of his slide show, but, "not for one second did I doubt the film would have an enormous impact," David said. ". . . It's the craziest story -- this wonky film about this complicated subject became something people had to see."
The film was really a distillation of a talk that Gore had given since the 1980s. The presentation evolved over the years, but only somewhat. In the beginning, volunteers held up poster boards with information about climate change as Gore spoke. That became a slide show in the 1990s, and in recent years evolved into a computer-aided presentation.
After losing the 2000 presidential election to George W. Bush, Gore traveled around the world, giving the talk. At one stop in Los Angeles, Lawrence Bender, producer of Quentin Tarantino's films, and David suggested making it into a documentary.
"It certainly helped spread the word" in a way that a traveling slide show could not, Kalee Kreider, Gore's spokeswoman, said yesterday.
The film, directed by Davis Guggenheim (son of the late Washington documentarian Charles Guggenheim), includes personal passages about Gore's life, including his musings about losing the election. Many critics noted that Gore displays an energy and compassion in the film that rarely emerged during the 2000 campaign.
Sandra Ruch, executive director of the International Documentary Association, said yesterday that "Truth" is "an incredibly important film" because it not only spurred debate and boosted the environmental movement, it also demonstrated that a complicated, nonfiction subject could be made into a compelling film.
"Documentaries used to be something for schools," she said from Los Angeles. "They had a different cachet. Theater owners didn't want them. It wasn't because of politics -- it was because of money. When they see that films like this can attract an audience, the pathway is much more open."
Staff writers Leonard Bernstein and Juliet Eilperin contributed to this report.
|
As cinematic productions go, it wasn't much -- essentially just a man, a message and a scary slide show. Yet, "An Inconvenient Truth," Al Gore's filmed lecture about global climate change, became a milestone, easily the most famous and memorable aspect of Gore's quarter-century of environmental a...
| 17.016129 | 0.983871 | 58.080645 |
medium
|
high
|
extractive
|
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/10/12/AR2007101201541.html
|
https://web.archive.org/web/2007101219id_/http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/10/12/AR2007101201541.html
|
Despite Big Honor for Gore, Climate Not Top Issue in U.S.
|
2007101219
|
While an array of activists, politicians and business leaders have all called in recent years for more stringent limits on greenhouse gases linked to climate change, no one more than Gore has reshaped public perception of what was once a wonkish scientific debate. But for all that, the issue remains far down the priority list for Americans.
Through his tireless travel and slide-show presentations, captured on screen in the 2006 film "An Inconvenient Truth," Gore has inserted himself into the policy debate at home and in other countries across the globe.
"It's difficult for Americans to comprehend how Gore is one of the most influential global leaders of our time," said Icelandic President Olafur Ragnar Grimsson, who met Gore more than two decades ago. "He is influential not only for his views, but for how he is mobilizing action and awareness in all countries, on all continents."
Polls show that Gore's efforts have helped raise the profile of global warming among Americans -- an April Washington Post-ABC News survey found that the percentage of respondents identifying climate change as their top environmental concern had doubled from a year earlier, to 33 percent -- but in the public's mind, it still lags far behind such issues as the war in Iraq and health care in importance.
In a September Washington Post-ABC News poll, less than 1 percent identified global warming as their top issue for the 2008 presidential campaign, and a January poll by the Pew Research Center ranked it fourth-lowest out of 23 policy priorities that Americans want the president and Congress to address.
Susan Solomon, a senior scientist at the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration who co-chaired the international scientific study this year that called the evidence of global warming "unequivocal," said she was not surprised that the U.S. public does not rank global warming as a higher priority.
"The world has many problems, and just like every person, we tend to put on the back burner the ones we don't think will erupt tomorrow morning," Solomon said in an interview. "The key thing is that people understand the problem, and I have a lot of faith in humanity's ability to solve the problem it understands."
Rep. Jay Inslee (D-Wash.), who had dinner with Gore and a few friends in Seattle two weeks ago, said he jokingly chided Gore for not being "sufficiently alarmist" about the possible consequences of climate change in his movie and public appearances.
"I said, 'You really dropped the ball. You really undersold this global warming thing,' " Inslee said, adding that new scientific results consistently show that the climate is changing more rapidly than researchers had anticipated. "He said, 'I agree. Virtually everything you see is going faster, and in a more negative direction, than I described.' "
Regardless of its immediate policy impact, the Norwegian Nobel Committee's decision to honor Gore -- along with the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change -- speaks to the emerging political and scientific consensus on the need to make more dramatic cuts in the carbon dioxide emissions generated by human activity.
John P. Holdren, a Harvard University scientist who chairs the board of the American Association for the Advancement of Science, said the award establishes that "climate change is the most challenging of all environmental problems that threaten peace and prosperity. It's a recognition that he has done more as an individual, and the IPCC has done more than any organization, to bring the reality and the urgency of that danger to the rest of the world."
Hollywood producer and environmentalist Laurie David recalled that, when she first proposed making the documentary in 2004, Gore was skeptical that people would watch it.
"That was the hardest part, to convince him to make the movie," David said. She added that though she initially had to beg friends in Los Angeles and New York to attend Gore's climate lecture, she remained confident that his message would resonate with the public.
Some skeptics, such as Myron Ebell, who directs energy and global warming policy at the libertarian Competitive Enterprise Institute, said they now fear that Gore's heightened fame would lead to a carbon cap that they and many Bush administration officials oppose. "Clearly, the momentum in this country is for mandatory energy rationing policies," Ebell said.
Polling director Jon Cohen contributed to this report.
|
Former vice president Al Gore's Nobel Peace Prize meant the same thing yesterday to both his supporters and detractors: He ranks as the world's most effective advocate for curbing global warming.
| 24.371429 | 0.571429 | 0.742857 |
medium
|
low
|
abstractive
|
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/10/12/AR2007101202261.html
|
https://web.archive.org/web/2007101219id_/http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/10/12/AR2007101202261.html
|
The O.C. Mortgage Bust
|
2007101219
|
IRVINE, Calif. -- After more than two decades in the mortgage business, Tony Ventimiglio got his big break in 2001 when he accepted a managerial job with a lender here in the heart of Orange County for $225,000 a year -- more than double what he had made in each of the previous four years.
Ventimiglio nearly doubled his salary again two years later, this time at the now-defunct Homefield Financial, where he supervised 100 workers, including salespeople who routinely made $25,000 a month in commission.
"When I started working there in 2003, I was embarrassed because I was driving a Cadillac and the young office clerks were all driving Mercedes and BMWs," said Ventimiglio, 49. "There were a lot of people who knew nothing about mortgages. They were simply in the right place at the right time."
The good times are over for the get-rich-quick industry that grew up in Orange County and thrived in the first half of the decade, when interest rates hit record lows and home prices surged. Four of the six largest and boldest lenders of risky mortgages were based in this Southern California county back then, and all cashed in on what seemed an insatiable appetite for home loans.
When the housing market soured, those lenders and dozens of others nationwide shut down or scaled back, leaving workers like Ventimiglio in the lurch and contributing to an abrupt drop in mortgage-related jobs. The sector has lost at least 76,000 jobs nationwide since peaking at 500,000 a year ago, according to federal data released this month. And more cuts have been announced.
If the industry's numbers fall back to 2002 levels, when home sales were similar to what they are today, 137,000 jobs would vanish, rivaling the 146,000 jobs lost in the airline industry in the four years following the Sept. 11, 2001, terrorist attacks, said Mark Zandi, chief economist at Moody's Economy.com.
Most of the jobs are not in traditional banks. They are tied to mortgage companies that made loans to subprime borrowers -- people with spotty credit -- using money from Wall Street. During the boom years, these companies prospered by hiring salespeople to aggressively push their loans to potential borrowers, either directly or through mortgage brokers, who match home buyers with lenders.
It is those salespeople, the brokers they worked with and the support staff in their offices -- from financial compliance officers to software engineers -- who were displaced as the mortgage industry's troubles deepened. The fallout has been geographically diffuse because most of the major lenders affected have offices throughout the nation.
"It's going to be a tough transition," Zandi said. "It will take a long time, if ever, for these workers to get the compensation they had in the housing boom. It was a unique period, with the frenzied lending that was going on."
Orange County, just south of Los Angeles, was a center for much of that frenzy. The county is economically diverse, with several blue-collar communities in the north and ultra-affluent coastal communities in the south made famous by the TV hits "Laguna Beach" and "The O.C."
In the middle is Irvine, the location of Ameriquest Mortgage and New Century Financial, two of the six largest subprime lenders in 2005, according to National Mortgage News. Two others, Option One Mortgage and Fremont Investment & Loan, were nearby.
For these lenders, part of Irvine's appeal was cheap and plentiful office space compared with Los Angeles, and an Orange County address that was posh enough to support the high-flying image these lenders cultivated, said Jack Kyser, chief economist at the Los Angeles County Economic Development Corp., who has studied Orange County.
|
IRVINE, Calif. -- After more than two decades in the mortgage business, Tony Ventimiglio got his big break in 2001 when he accepted a managerial job with a lender here in the heart of Orange County for $225,000 a year -- more than double what he had made in each of the previous four years.
| 12.20339 | 1 | 59 |
low
|
high
|
extractive
|
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/10/12/AR2007101200585.html
|
https://web.archive.org/web/2007101219id_/http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/10/12/AR2007101200585.html
|
Putin Publicly Rebukes Rice, Gates on Foreign Policy Goals
|
2007101219
|
MOSCOW, Oct. 12 -- Two of President Bush's most senior Cabinet members pitched an unusual new missile defense partnership Friday to Russian President Vladimir Putin, but they received a firm public rebuke as the Kremlin made clear it remains deeply skeptical of the administration's foreign policy goals.
Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice and Defense Secretary Robert M. Gates spent the day in talks with Putin and their counterparts trying to forge common ground on issues that have divided the two countries and led to the coolest relations since the Cold War. U.S. officials said that as part of their private presentation, they laid out new details of a plan to cooperate with Russia in jointly developing a missile defense system that could protect Europe against possible nuclear-tipped missiles from Iran.
But from the time they arrived Friday at Putin's dacha in the suburbs of Moscow, the two Cabinet secretaries seemed on the defensive. Putin kept Gates and Rice waiting for more than a half-hour, then greeted them warmly before launching into a harangue about U.S. plans to set up key facilities for the missile defense system in Poland and the Czech Republic.
The Russian president, who likes to keep opponents guessing, also introduced an issue that American officials had indicated would not be on the agenda: Putin threatened to pull out of a long-standing treaty, known as INF, eliminating intermediate- and short-range nuclear weapons because it covers only Russia and the United States.
Putin seemed to mock the U.S. missile defense plan with biting language. "We may decide someday to put missile defense systems on the moon, but before we get to that we may lose a chance for agreement because of you implementing your own plans," he told Rice and Gates, according to an Associated Press translation of his remarks in Russian. Putin also warned the United States against "forcing forward your previous agreements with Eastern European countries."
Rice and Gates sat impassively through the monologue for about eight minutes, with Rice in particular looking annoyed. When it was their turn to speak, though, both sought to accentuate agreement. Gates, raising the specter of a threat he said faces both Russia and the United States, told Putin, "We have an ambitious agenda of security issues that concern both of us, including, as you suggest, development of missile systems by others in the neighborhood -- I would say in particular, Iran."
U.S. officials said afterward that the private meeting with Putin was much more businesslike and friendly and that they are aware of his concerns about the INF (Intermediate-Range Nuclear Forces) Treaty. They said the idea of abrogating the treaty did not come up in their private sessions.
One official said the Russian president seemed intrigued by the new U.S. ideas on missile defense, which include steps aimed at allaying Kremlin concerns that the system seeks to undermine Russia's nuclear deterrent. Gates said one idea presented would be to allow Russian personnel to in some way monitor the activity at new missile defense facilities. He and other officials offered few details.
Still, the more testy public sessions underscored how U.S.-Russian relations have taken a turn for the worse in recent years. Russian distrust of American intentions seems to have grown along with U.S. anger over Putin's steps to curb democratic institutions and possibly extend his hold on power beyond the end of his term next year. Friday's sessions were an effort to repair that breach, but it was uncertain how much they succeeded.
The differences were on display when Gates and Rice met reporters later in the day, after the private session with Putin and a separate meeting with Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov and Defense Minister Anatoly Serdyukov. Lavrov suggested that the Russians don't see the threat from Iran the same way the United States does and said he considers American efforts to impose unilateral sanctions to be unproductive.
Rice, for her part, said the United States has no intention of halting its efforts to pressure Iran by squeezing its financial system. U.S. officials also rebuffed Russian proposals to freeze the negotiations with former Soviet satellites over plans to put a radar system in the Czech Republic and 10 interceptors in Poland.
The only major point of agreement Friday was for the two sides' defense ministers and foreign ministers to meet jointly in six months in Washington, part of the so-called two-on-two process set up by Bush and Putin when they met in July in Kennebunkport, Maine.
Nonetheless, senior U.S. officials declared they were pleased with the sessions, saying that the two sides had narrowed their differences on some issues and indicating that they had not expected major breakthroughs Friday. They said they were particularly hopeful of establishing a new joint "architecture" for missile defense to protect against the possibility of Iran gaining a nuclear weapon. Putin has suggested that the United States use facilities in southern Russia and Azerbaijan instead of Poland and the Czech Republic; the Americans see such facilities as a possible addition to a new system.
"I think it's clear the Russians are thinking very hard about what our side brought to the table," said a senior administration official, speaking anonymously under terms of a briefing organized by the U.S. government.
But Dmitri Trenin, deputy director of the Carnegie Moscow Center and author of the recently published book "Getting Russia Right," said he saw "only a bleak assessment of any prospect for progress."
"I think that the Russians, of course, would want the U.S. to change its plans on missile defense deployments in Europe . . . change the plan, scaling down, pushing back the timing of deployment," he said. "I don't think they're likely to see that. And it does not bode well for cooperation. And the damage has already been done."
Correspondent Peter Finn in Moscow contributed to this report.
|
MOSCOW, Oct. 12 -- Two of President Bush's most senior Cabinet members pitched an unusual new missile defense partnership Friday to Russian President Vladimir Putin, but they received a firm public rebuke as the Kremlin made clear it remains deeply skeptical of the administration's foreign policy...
| 21.960784 | 0.980392 | 49.019608 |
medium
|
high
|
extractive
|
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/10/13/AR2007101300248.html
|
https://web.archive.org/web/2007101219id_/http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/10/13/AR2007101300248.html
|
Rockies Keep Rolling, Take 2-0 Lead
|
2007101219
|
PHOENIX, Oct. 12 -- By now we must all believe that, regardless of the circumstances or the time of night or the fashion, a truism in baseball is that if the Colorado Rockies take to a field, they will win. Doesn't matter who they play, where it's staged, what the stakes are. We know now that they can, as they did Friday night, blow a ninth-inning lead on the road and win anyway.
Consider the absurdity of how the Rockies won for the 19th time in 20 games. They fashioned a winning "rally" in the 11th inning with a spinning infield single that didn't pass the pitcher's mound and three walks, the last with the bases loaded. In the playoffs, however, style means little, and the substance was there on the scoreboard at Chase Field: Rockies 3, Arizona Diamondbacks 2, and a commanding two-games-to-none lead for Colorado in the National League Championship Series.
"We just got to keep it going," first baseman Todd Helton said. "And ride it a little longer."
Two more wins in this series, and then -- gulp -- four in the World Series? Right now, it all appears possible to the Rockies, who got the key four-pitch walk from center fielder Willy Taveras to take the lead in the 11th. Thus, they have won eight straight, including all five of their playoff games. If you listen to them, though, it's almost by happenstance.
"We didn't draw it up to win the first five," Manager Clint Hurdle said.
But they did, and they head back to Denver -- which will host an NLCS game for the first time ever -- with clear control of this series. The Diamondbacks must win two of three in Colorado to ensure the series returns to Arizona next week. The Rockies, meantime, can win mundane, grind-it-out decisions such as the 5-1 victory in Game 1, or they can handle events such as Friday's 4-hour, 26-minute fiasco that ended at 11:47 p.m. local time -- nearly 3 a.m. on the East Coast, where the key components in the winning rally, Arizona closer Jose Valverde and Taveras, are scarcely known.
Yet they were the characters who decided this outcome, with a clear assist from Arizona Manager Bob Melvin. Perhaps the leading candidate for the NL's manager of the year award, Melvin stuck with Valverde in the 11th until he had thrown his 42nd and final, fateful pitch.
But first, rewind a bit. The Rockies entered the late innings with a 2-1 lead, and it appeared as if it would hold up -- particularly when Taveras, who had been inactive since Sept. 8 because of a strained leg muscle, made a spectacular, parallel-to-the-ground catch of Tony Clark's shot to right-center with two outs in the seventh. The ball looked as if it would be a double off the bat, one that would have easily scored Eric Byrnes with the tying run. But Taveras's grab had reliever LaTroy Hawkins thrusting both hands into the air, and with the way the Rockies have been going, who could blame them for thinking the game had been saved?
"That's his game," Hawkins said. "That's what he brings to the table, just that speed."
After Brian Fuentes worked a scoreless eighth, it was up to closer Manny Corpas to get the final three outs. But with one out in the ninth, he hit Young with a 1-2 pitch, a mistake that started a rally. Stephen Drew followed with a single to center, and Young took third.
Throughout the game, the Diamondbacks had come up with poor at-bats in such situations, and they were 1 for 6 with runners in scoring position at that point. As it turned out, however, they didn't need a hit to tie it.
Byrnes, the third-place hitter, was next, and he skidded a grounder to second. Colorado's Kazuo Matsui hastily shoveled the ball to shortstop Troy Tulowitzki, but the rushed exchange was high. Even with a perfect toss, it's doubtful Tulowitzki could have gotten the ball to first in time for a game-ending double play. But the high toss meant Tulowitzki hung onto the ball, and Young scored to tie the game.
The strange part: Drew assumed he had been retired, but Matsui's throw had actually pulled Tulowitzki off the bag. Drew was safe -- but he didn't realize it. He started heading back to the dugout, and was easily tagged out in between second and third, a play that would have stood out for its embarrassing qualities had the Diamondbacks not, somehow, tied the game.
So they trudged to the 11th. Valverde had already worked a perfect 10th, striking out the final two men. But after pinch hitter Ryan Spilborghs reached on the infield single -- one that looked like a bunt but wasn't -- things started to unravel. Valverde got Tulowitzki to fly out, then walked Brad Hawpe, and then got a pop-up from Yorvit Torrealba.
"He had thrown a lot of pitches," said Jamey Carroll, the next hitter, "and he was kind of losing his command a little bit."
Valverde got two strikes on Carroll, but Carroll waited him out, drawing the walk that loaded the bases. No one was up in the Arizona bullpen even though Valverde had thrown 38 pitches, when his high for the year was 32.
"You gotta keep him in there," Melvin said. "He's the closer. ... You gotta at least go with your best until they get a run."
Well, they got a run -- because Valverde couldn't find the plate. "I wanted to be patient," Taveras said, and he never saw a strike. The four-pitch walk drove in Spilborghs. When Ryan Speier worked a perfect bottom half of the inning, the Rockies had found yet another way to win -- and found themselves halfway to the World Series because of it.
|
Willy Taveras makes a game-saving catch in center field then draws a bases-loaded walk in the 11th inning to give the Colorado Rockies a 3-2 win over the Arizona Diamondbacks and a 2-0 NLCS lead.
| 27.363636 | 0.863636 | 1.636364 |
medium
|
medium
|
mixed
|
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/10/12/AR2007101202206.html
|
https://web.archive.org/web/2007101219id_/http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/10/12/AR2007101202206.html
|
8 Staffers Acquitted in Death at Boot Camp
|
2007101219
|
MIAMI, Oct. 12 -- If the problem is a lack of discipline, then boot camps such as the one 14-year-old Martin Lee Anderson was enrolled in might seem like the answer.
The setting in Florida's Panhandle was spartan. Push-ups, running laps and "sir, yes sir" were mandatory. And for the slackers, there were "control techniques" -- punches, pressure grips and kneeings from drill instructors.
On the teenager's first day at camp, seven guards beat him, dragged him and subjected him to ammonia fumes after they thought he was shirking assigned laps. Martin, who is black, died shortly afterward, but on Friday, an all-white jury, after deliberating 90 minutes, found the guards, who are white, black and Asian, and a camp nurse not guilty of manslaughter.
"You kill a dog, you go to jail. You kill a little black boy, nothing happens," Benjamin Crump, an attorney for Martin's parents, said after the verdict.
The notion that offenders could be reformed by military drills and training led to a wave of boot camps across the nation in the 1990s, and many states, including Florida, established programs based on the model.
But even with Friday's acquittal, the fad seems destined for a slow fade. Repeated allegations of brutality, as in the Anderson case, along with repeated research showing that graduates of correctional boot camps are no less likely to get into trouble again, have increasingly led prison officials to drop the controversial concept.
"People seemed to have a gut feeling that they would work," said Doris L. MacKenzie, a criminology professor at the University of Maryland who has studied the boot camps for the U.S. Justice Department and found little effect on recidivism. "People thought, 'Oh, this changed me when I was in the military.' They didn't seem to want to use science in making their decisions."
When boot camps were proliferating in the late '80s and early '90s, their regimens were seen as a way of being tough on criminals while also alleviating prison crowding.
The first such camp opened in 1983, and by 1995 state agencies ran 75 boot camps for adults, while state and local agencies operated 30 of the camps for juveniles.
Francis Cullen, a distinguished research professor in criminal justice at the University of Cincinnati, says their popularity was based on "conventional quackery." In the absence of scientific proof, the boot camps just seemed like a good idea.
"What was special about the boot-camp idea is that liberals and conservatives liked it -- though for different reasons," he said. "Liberals liked it because they meant less incarceration. Conservatives liked it because they meant harshness and discipline and discomfort. It was like the perfect storm."
The trouble is, he added, is that "they don't work."
|
Get style news headlines from The Washington Post, including entertainment news, comics, horoscopes, crossword, TV, Dear Abby. arts/theater, Sunday Source and weekend section. Washington Post columnists, movie/book reviews, Carolyn Hax, Tom Shales.
| 11.137255 | 0.352941 | 0.392157 |
low
|
low
|
abstractive
|
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/10/12/AR2007101202272.html
|
https://web.archive.org/web/2007101219id_/http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/10/12/AR2007101202272.html
|
China, U.S. Near Deal on Safe Food
|
2007101219
|
"They are as concerned about confidence in the quality and safety of food and drugs, as we are in the United States," von Eschenbach said. "They are anxious to collaborate with us."
Negotiations will continue when Chinese officials come to the United States this month.
"I hope this announcement results in a legally binding agreement that implements effective practices that would establish equivalency standards for food safety between the U.S. and China," Rep. Rosa DeLauro (D-Conn.), a frequent critic of FDA's oversight of food safety, said in a written statement.
She said she hopes the agreement will allow FDA inspectors to enter the country without delays like those encountered this year after pet food in the United States was found to contain tainted ingredients from China.
FDA officials have acknowledged that the current safety system has not kept up with the increasing volume of imports. The FDA inspects less than 1 percent of imported seafood, fruits and vegetables.
Officials have said that rather than increase inspections, the agency is likely to propose the greater use of technology to track and identify risky imports, or to test food at ports of entry rather than sending it to labs.
During a House subcommittee hearing Thursday, lawmakers said their investigators had found that China does not meet international safety standards and lacks sufficient internal regulations. Lawmakers also criticized the FDA for not aggressively pursuing ways to reform the current system, especially compared with countries like Japan, which inspects more of its imports than the United States and limits the number of Chinese companies allowed to export to the country.
"I think this is an emergency response to an emergency situation," said Sen. Richard J. Durbin (D-Ill.), who has been pushing for food safety reform. Before consumer confidence can be restored, the "Chinese have to prove they're going to change their system," he said.
China has said it has cracked down on problematic exporters and was increasing inspections of its exports.
|
Food and Drug Administration officials held high-level meetings with their counterparts in China this week and said yesterday that they expect an agreement by December on improving the safety of food exports.
| 11 | 0.628571 | 0.914286 |
low
|
low
|
abstractive
|
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/10/12/AR2007101202332.html
|
https://web.archive.org/web/2007101219id_/http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/10/12/AR2007101202332.html
|
Lawmakers Criticize CIA Director's Review Order
|
2007101219
|
A decision by the CIA director, Gen. Michael V. Hayden, to order a special review of efforts by CIA Inspector General John L. Helgerson to probe the agency's past interrogations and imprisonment of terrorism suspects evoked concern yesterday among congressional staff members and lawmakers.
The review is the latest reflection of disagreement within the CIA about the legality and appropriateness of the agency's treatment of suspects since 2001, including its decision to hold nearly 100 in secret prisons, to subject more than a dozen to extraordinarily harsh interrogation techniques, and to fly others to countries where torture is frequently practiced.
The agency's leadership, including its lawyers, has been sparring with the inspector general's office for several years about those practices, and since 2004 has been questioned by Helgerson about allegations that CIA officers engaged in criminal activities in Iraq.
A secret report completed by Helgerson in 2004 concluded that some CIA interrogation practices might violate international law, a conclusion that jarred the agency officials who had relied on Justice Department assurances that such practices were legal.
Rep. Silvestre Reyes (D-Tex.), chairman of the House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence, said in a statement yesterday that the review of the agency's inspector general that Hayden ordered is "troubling" because of its possible impact on the official's independence, "which Congress established and will very aggressively preserve."
Sen. Christopher S. Bond (R-Mo.), vice chairman of the Senate intelligence committee, warned in a statement that Congress depends heavily on the inspector general's help to oversee the CIA's activities. He promised to "be watching carefully to make sure that nothing is done to restrain or diminish that important office."
Helgerson informed staff members of the Senate committee last week, during a routine briefing on his investigations, that he is the subject of a review ordered by Hayden. The Los Angeles Times and the New York Times disclosed the existence of the review in yesterday's editions.
The review is being conducted by Hayden's senior counselor, Robert L. Deitz, and has raised concerns among Helgerson's staff, said officials familiar with it. "Some people complained, and they were loud enough that we wanted to see if there was a problem," a Senate staff member said, requesting anonymity because he was not authorized to discuss the subject. "There is no judgment. We just asked him [Helgerson] about it."
Deitz is to meet with the staffs of both House and Senate committees on Tuesday, a senior intelligence officer said. In December, Deitz told an American Bar Association conference that "we need to give more credit to people in these positions of authority, heads of NSA, CIA, DIA. These are not a bunch of corrupt politicians who are making decisions to cover their careers. These are well-intentioned people who are deeply concerned about keeping America safe."
Deitz's review of Helgerson began in April when Hayden started getting reports that Helgerson's staff was carrying on its investigations with "a prosecutorial mentality and the director could not ignore them," a senior intelligence official said.
Summing up the views of the agency's clandestine operators, the senior intelligence official said, "They find the CIA general counsel says a technique is okay, the IG months or years later says no." That situation, he added, "leads first to job anxiety, then to a drop in morale and, finally, to risk aversion."
Another intelligence official said there had been other complaints about the work of the IG's office, including the length of time that investigations went on and claims of bias in the IG's approach to fact-finding.
|
Follow 2008 Elections & Campaigns at washingtonpost.com Politics Information on Democrats,Republicans,political cartoons,opinions,government policies,political analysis and reports." elections,campaigns,Democrats,Republicans,political cartoons,opinions from The Washington Post. Features government policy,government tech,political analysis and reports.
| 12.421053 | 0.385965 | 0.421053 |
low
|
low
|
abstractive
|
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/10/12/AR2007101202225.html
|
https://web.archive.org/web/2007101219id_/http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/10/12/AR2007101202225.html
|
Mexican 'Dirty War' Case Nears Court
|
2007101219
|
He led rallies and built schools. He also composed and sang corridos, or ballads, crooning in a nasal, unpolished voice at community meetings and forums during troubled times in the state of Guerrero.
His followers heard him sing for the last time in 1974. One day in August of that year, witnesses say, soldiers arrested Radilla, then 60, and took him to a military prison without formally charging him. There, other witnesses say, he was tortured. After a month or so, he disappeared and has not been seen since.
More than 33 years later, Mexican human rights experts say Radilla's case is likely to be the first from Mexico's "dirty war" to go before an international human rights court. Attorneys involved in the case say it will be submitted next week to the Inter-American Court of Human Rights, which is composed of judges elected by member nations of the Organization of American States.
The Radilla case could be a watershed for a Mexican human rights movement plagued by setbacks. In July, a Mexican court decided not to charge former president Luis Echeverr¿a with genocide in a 1968 student massacre. Current President Felipe Calder¿n has closed a government office that was investigating the dirty war, which lasted from the 1960s to the 1980s.
"The Mexican government has never recognized what happened during the dirty war," said Fabi¿n S¿nchez, director of the Commission for the Defense and Promotion of Human Rights, a private advocacy group that represents Radilla's family. "Calder¿n is not interested in the theme of human rights."
A spokesman for Calder¿n's Foreign Ministry, which is responsible for defending the Mexican government in the Radilla case, did not respond to interview requests.
During the dirty war, Radilla was one of 470 people who disappeared from Atoyac de Alvarez, a Pacific coast city of 61,000 northwest of Acapulco. That's more than disappeared from any other city in Mexico, which registered more than 1,200 disappearances nationwide.
Human rights groups call the 1960s and '70s the period of Mexico's dirty war because, they say, the Mexican government systematically squelched dissent by killing members of activist groups, including students and indigenous leaders. Radilla was in the forefront of social activism in Guerrero, where he and others were calling for an end to one-party rule, demanding equal rights for all Mexicans and pressing for economic changes to diminish the huge gap between rich and poor.
S¿nchez and other rights advocates hope Radilla's case will set a precedent and spark legal action on behalf of other families seeking apologies from the Mexican government, judicial reforms and reparations. But the cases are complex and the process can be labyrinthine, testing the resolve of even the most persistent.
Radilla's daughter, Tita Radilla, has been filing complaints with various Mexican government human rights bodies since 1990 but says she has never gotten a fair hearing. Her father's case was recently heard by the Inter-American Commission of Human Rights, an autonomous body of the Organization of American States that investigates rights abuse claims. The commission's report in the Radilla case is confidential, but S¿nchez's group has said that it "establishes a degree of state responsibility."
The commission also established requirements for the Mexican government, saying that it must initiate a formal investigation and prosecute those responsible for the disappearance, S¿nchez said. The deadline to comply is Monday, and because it appears that deadline will not be met, the case will go immediately to the human rights court.
Tita Radilla said in an interview that she is pleased that it appears her father's case will get an international airing, but disgusted that she has to seek answers about her father's fate by filing legal papers outside Mexico.
"We know that here in our country we do not have access to justice," she said. "The government of Mexico has always tried to give the impression to the outside world that it respects human rights, but the reality is that it doesn't."
Tita Radilla was 20 years old and pregnant when she last saw her father. At the time, he was a member of the Emiliano Zapata Revolutionary Brigade of the South, a civic group named for the flamboyant leader of peasant armies during the Mexican Revolution.
Rosendo Radilla, who was mayor of Atoyac de Alvarez from 1955 to 1956, came to her house the night before he disappeared, his daughter said. He was worried. He told her that he was going to take a bus to the nearby city of Chilpancingo because his activism was making him a target in Atoyac de Alvarez.
"He looked at me," Tita Radilla recalled, "and said, 'I won't be coming back for a long time.' "
|
MEXICO CITY -- Rosendo Radilla was the Renaissance man of Mexico's 1960s and '70s social justice movement.
| 45.75 | 0.85 | 1.85 |
high
|
medium
|
mixed
|
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/discussion/2007/10/01/DI2007100101446.html
|
https://web.archive.org/web/2007101119id_/http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/discussion/2007/10/01/DI2007100101446.html
|
The Candidates: Rep. Tom Tancredo
|
2007101119
|
Submit questions to one of the other primary candidates or read the transcript of their discussion
Tancredo is a five-term U.S. representative from Colorado. Prior to that he spent five years in the Colorado State Legislature and was a regional Department of Education representative.
Rep. Tom Tancredo: Let's chat.
Mesa, Ariz.: Please share your thoughts regarding the recent ruling by a federal judge to stop the U. S. government from using mismatched Social Security numbers to determine illegal immigrants in the workplace. I think millions of American citizens are upset that our federal, state and local judges are taking it upon themselves to interfere with illegal immigration laws and ordinances.
washingtonpost.com: Effort to Curb Illegal Workers' Hiring Blocked (Post, Oct. 11)
Rep. Tom Tancredo: Well, what do you expect from a San Francisco judge, first of all? On top of that we have mayors of several cities in Texas who are trying to stop the fence from being built, you've got cities declaring themselves sanctuary cities -- it's a mess. And it's all because the federal government hasn't been enforcing immigration laws for the past 30 years.
Nashua, N.H.: Dear President-to-Be Tom, in 100 words or less, please lay out for me and the rest of like-minded Americans just what it takes to finish the southern border. Second,as president what would you say to ex-president of Mexico Fox. and to the current one -- this can be a bit longer and please do no delete the expletives. Can you have them explain (and I mean answer the question) of why they think it is okay to have a military-protected border on their south but we can't?
Rep. Tom Tancredo: We absolutely must construct a barrier across the Southern border. It's a three-layer defense barrier that is a 15-foot fence, a road used by the border patrol, and then another fence about 50 yards out. All of this could be sensored to detect a breach.
Regarding Fox: Chutzpah. I don't know how you say that in Spanish, but that's what he's got!
What's even more infuriating than his comments is the total silence from the White House.
The President and the State Department should condemn the comments by President Calderon when he said that Mexico extends to wherever there are Mexicans. They should also send an atlas!
Phoenix: Tom -- this family appreciates your relentless fight to stop illegal immigration. We thank you for that commitment! Here in the Phoenix area we are seeing more and more businesses with Spanish names. The same is happening on a smaller scale in many Iowa towns and throughout the nation. We are wondering how these people can afford to own businesses, when my son can't secure a loan to start his own business.
Rep. Tom Tancredo: I don't know the answer to your question about how these businesses are securing loans, but I can tell you that I believe a significant part of the subprime mortgage debacle is a result of hundreds of thousands of fraudulent loans being made to illegal immigrants. In Jefferson County, Colo., the district attorney prosecuted three realtors and six mortgage brokers for falsifying documents and selling 270 homes to people who were here illegally. Multiply that out across the country and you can see potential for a crisis.
Cedar Rapids, Iowa: How can we depoliticize the Supreme Court?
Rep. Tom Tancredo: We can't. Regardless of the protestations of nominees that they come to a court without a political bias, that is not within the realm of possibility. Every president submits nominees based on the hope that if appointed, the judge will vote the "right" way.
From my point of view, the right way is a recognition that the Constitution is a limiting, not living, document.
Cedar Rapids, Iowa: Mr. Tancredo, based on the latest court ruling in San Francisco concerning illegal immigrants and trying to use social security numbers to identify them, why isn't the Department of Homeland Security spending more effort on terrorism than on people trying to support themselves and their families? Shouldn't the Department of Homeland Security really be focused on terrorism and the real threats to our national security?
Rep. Tom Tancredo: I believe that a major part of the responsibility of the Department of Homeland Security is to reduce the number of people coming into this country without our knowledge or permission. It is likewise its duty to try and reduce the number of people who are here in that category. In doing so, it is tasked with identifying those who pose serious threats to the nation so that they find it difficult to remain undiscovered.
We know that people with terrorist connections have entered this country illegally. They then immediately are provided with the "cover" of a job, a residence and all the necessary documentation that allows them to stay under the radar.
Merrimack, N.H.: Sir, what is your position on global warming, and what would you do as president to lower global temperatures?
Rep. Tom Tancredo: We very well may be experiencing the phenomenon known as global warming. Whether it is natural or man-made is disputed. However, I believe we can accomplish the goal of reducing carbon emissions by aggressively seeking alternative energy sources, especially nuclear. I think we must do so for national security reasons. In a way, it makes the debate about global warming and its cause moot.
By the way, it is interesting to note that the single greatest cause of the imbalance in our trade account is the importation of oil -- not toys from China decorated with lead paint.
North Dighton, Mass.: Will you repeal the unfair tax on social security that was imposed by President Reagan in 1983 and then increased by President Clinton in 1994?
Rep. Tom Tancredo: Of course as president, I couldn't "repeal" anything. What I could do is push for a complete overhaul of our tax system. I support a consumption tax to replace the present income tax -- that certainly would solve the problem to which you are referring.
Boston: As an opponent of additional taxation, why do you support additional tariffs, which are consumer-borne sales taxes based upon country of origin? Tariffs aren't paid by foreign countries, they are paid by American importers and passed on to American consumers.
Rep. Tom Tancredo: There are trade agreements that reduced tariffs that I have supported. There are others I have opposed. My opposition is based on the fact that many of these agreements contain far more than trade-related issues. CAFTA (Central America Free Trade Agreement) was supposed to simply eliminate tariffs on goods produced and exported within six Central American countries and the United States. That bill could have been two pages long. In reality, it was more than a thousand! Much of it dealt with immigration-related issues. There's no reason why we can't have mutually beneficial trade arrangements that do not compromise national sovereignty.
By the way, it is much easier to construct such an agreement on a bilateral, rather than multilateral, basis.
An interesting little factoid: These agreements used to be called treaties, and are more properly identified as such. We stopped calling them that because they would need to be ratified by two-thirds of the Senate. Now all it takes is 50 percent plus one of both Houses.
Madrid, Iowa: Can you share a few adjectives that describe your feelings toward the No Child Left Behind act?
Rep. Tom Tancredo: Intrusive. Unconstitutional.
Concord, N.H.: Could you please detail what you mean by "consumption" tax. Thank you.
Rep. Tom Tancredo: A consumption tax is a sales tax. There's a great book on it written, called "The Fair Tax Book: Saying Goodbye to the Income Tax and the IRS," by Rep. John Linder and Neal Boortz.
Miami: As a proud citizen of Miami, I was extremely hurt when you called my city a "Third-World country." Were you misquoted? If not, could you please explain?
Rep. Tom Tancredo: I'm running short on time, so I'll make this quick. I was referring to an attitude expressed by a Cuban immigrant who was quoted in a Time Magazine article as saying: "In Miami there is no pressure to be American."
Rep. Tom Tancredo: I've run out of time everyone, but I've enjoyed answering the questions I could get to. God bless.
Editor's Note: washingtonpost.com moderators retain editorial control over Discussions and choose the most relevant questions for guests and hosts; guests and hosts can decline to answer questions. washingtonpost.com is not responsible for any content posted by third parties.
|
In January voters in Iowa and New Hampshire will choose candidates in historic presidential primaries, the first in 80 years that don't feature an incumbent president or vice president. Rep. Tom Tancredo will take your questions on the campaign and his vision for the United States.
| 33.98 | 0.72 | 1.12 |
medium
|
low
|
abstractive
|
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/10/10/AR2007101002123.html
|
https://web.archive.org/web/2007101119id_/http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/10/10/AR2007101002123.html
|
Another Voice in the Choir
|
2007101119
|
At least three others -- John McCain, Rudy Giuliani and Mitt Romney-- registered with policy specifics and personal anecdotes more often and more strongly.
Giuliani seized every opportunity to whack Hillary Clinton, and he held his ground in a spirited debate with Romney on their respective economic records and on the issue of the presidential line-item veto -- Romney praising it and Giuliani defending his view that it is unconstitutional. Their claims and counterclaims on spending and tax cuts are indecipherable to a layman, and it's questionable how many voters will be swayed by the issue.
But both men got to set their strong jaws in place -- and thereby assume the posture of leadership. Romney got to utter the word "baloney!" to dismiss his rival, but Giuliani topped it by noting that he "took President Clinton to court, and I beat him" when the Supreme Court ruled against Clinton on the line-item veto. "And I don't think it's a bad idea to have a Republican presidential candidate who actually has beat President Clinton at something."
McCain was challenged only by such gadfly candidates as Tom Tancredo and Ron Paul, and he used the opportunity to effectively drill home two big themes. As president, he said, he would crack down on "wasteful" spending, wielding the veto pen, and he would attack the health-care inflation that he said has made Detroit's cars uncompetitive in the world market.
But what was striking about the performance of the leading Republicans was the absence of fresh policy ideas. A listener satisfied with President Bush's economic policies would be safe to assume their continuation -- if any of them wins. But given the economic travail in Michigan, such complacency seemed more than a little odd.
Thompson was treated respectfully by his rivals and his positions differed little from theirs: support for free trade, tax cuts, spending restraint and regulatory relief. He was specific -- and politically courageous -- on one point, recommending a change that would index future Social Security benefits to prices, rather than wages, a change that over time would modestly reduce monthly benefits and help keep the system solvent. That is a change that opponents can criticize easily, even though it's good policy. But Thompson's frowning expression conveys less optimism than Romney's or McCain's, and his slow drawl has little of the urgency of Giuliani's message.
Only at the very end of the two hours on MSNBC did Thompson relax enough to show a little humor. Asked how he liked his first debate, he said, "I've enjoyed watching these fellows. I've got to admit it was getting a little boring without me. But I'm glad to be here now."
It was hard for the leading candidates to acknowledge any serious blemishes in the current economic scene. That was left to others -- most notably former Arkansas governor Mike Huckabee, a populist preacher who has been gaining traction among religious conservatives and disaffected working people. He admonished his colleagues that people "hear Republicans on this stage talk about how great the economy is, and frankly when they hear that, they're going to probably reach for the dial."
He went on to say that "the people who handle the bags and make the beds at our hotels and serve the food, many of them are having to work two jobs" and still cannot afford college costs for their kids or health insurance for themselves. While the leading candidates preached the virtues of free trade, Huckabee said that Republicans have to address the dislocations caused by imports or "we're going to get our britches beat next year."
When the topic turned to unions, it was Huckabee who suggested that they are likely to grow in size and influence because the gap between top executives' and workers' pay will "create a huge appetite" for protection of wages.
And when confronted with the question of Bush's veto of the children's health insurance bill, a veto that was supported by all the leading candidates, Huckabee demurred. After squirming a bit, he finally said, "I'm not absolutely certain that that's going to be the right way. . . . The political loss of that is going to be enormous."
That kind of candor -- and understanding -- would be welcome among others in the field.
|
Fred Thompson did not disgrace himself in his first formal debate as a Republican presidential candidate, but he also did not dominate the stage full of White House hopefuls in Dearborn, Mich., on Tuesday.
| 22 | 0.657895 | 1.078947 |
medium
|
low
|
abstractive
|
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/10/10/AR2007101002157.html
|
https://web.archive.org/web/2007101119id_/http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/10/10/AR2007101002157.html
|
Cooler Heads and Climate Change
|
2007101119
|
In this debate, Lomborg has positioned himself squarely in the skeptics' camp. But he has some of his facts wrong -- and he fails to appreciate the risks that global warming bring to us all.
On the facts, Lomborg writes that the Kangerlussuaq glacier in Greenland is "inconveniently growing," somehow undercutting the argument that the world is getting warmer. But NASA research shows that Greenland's Kangerlussuaq glacier is not growing; it is simply spilling into the sea.
Lomborg also misrepresents some conclusions of the U.N.'s Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. He is skeptical about the claim that polar bears "will be decimated by global warming as their icy habitat melts." But the report shows that, even under the best-case scenario, about two-thirds of the current polar bear population will be lost by 2050.
Lomborg's attitude toward risk is also troubling. He focuses only on the middle range of the panel's projections, dismissing the risk from the higher end of the range. But if the risk is great, then it may be worth acting against even if its probability is small. Think of risk as the product of consequences and likelihood: what can happen and the odds of it happening. A 10-degree rise in global temperatures by 2100 is not likely; the panel gives it a 3 percent probability. Such low-probability, high-impact risks are routinely factored into any analysis and management strategy, whether on Wall Street or at the Pentagon.
The rationale for reducing emissions of carbon dioxide is to reduce the risk of the possibility of catastrophic outcomes. Making the transition to cleaner fuels has the added benefit of reducing the impact on public health and ecosystems and improving energy security -- providing benefits even if the risk is eventually reduced.
In his cost-benefit analysis, Lomborg considers only one policy option for reducing carbon emissions -- the Kyoto Protocol -- and says its worldwide cost would be about $180 billion per year. But the debate over the economics of global warming is more wide-ranging than Lomborg would have it. More than a dozen different studies have examined the economic impact of Kyoto-level controls. Some have concluded that it could have relatively small negative effects, such as those cited by Lomborg. Others have predicted small positive effects. Moreover, by focusing only on the Kyoto Protocol, Lomborg ignores potentially better policies that could cost far less than Kyoto and deliver higher economic growth worldwide.
Lomborg gets it right when he calls for an ambitious public investment program in clean-energy technologies. But he mistakenly assumes that existing technologies and strategies can't make a big dent in carbon emissions at an affordable price. We're developing hybrid and electric cars, building wind farms and ocean wave energy stations. New batteries, fuel cells and solar panels are smaller, better and cheaper than they were just a few years ago. I am in awe of the new technologies that I see being developed at Georgia Tech, and such research is happening at the nation's major research universities and in the private sector.
As scientists continue to challenge and improve the quality and understanding of climate records and models, skepticism by scientists conducting such research is alive and well. But oversimplifying the situation, using misleading information and presenting false choices is not useful in the public debate over global warming.
Lomborg seems to have missed it, but a sensible debate has begun on how to best respond to global warming -- in national and local governments, universities and the private sector -- in the U.S. and around the world. There is no easy solution to this problem; the challenge is how best to develop options that are feasible, efficient, viable and scalable. Lomborg is correct to be concerned about the possibility of bad policy choices. But I have yet to see any option that is worse than ignoring the risk of global warming and doing nothing.
Judith Curry is chair of the School of Earth and Atmospheric Sciences at the Georgia Institute of Technology.
|
In his Outlook essay "Chill Out," Bjorn Lomborg rightly notes that skepticism about climate change is no longer focused on whether it the earth is getting warmer (it is) or whether humans are contributing to it (we are). The current debate is about whether warming matters, and whether we can affo...
| 12.52459 | 0.704918 | 1.032787 |
low
|
low
|
abstractive
|
http://newsweek.washingtonpost.com/onfaith/guestvoices/2007/10/now_i_know_the_dead_stay_with.html
|
https://web.archive.org/web/2007101119id_/http://newsweek.washingtonpost.com/onfaith/guestvoices/2007/10/now_i_know_the_dead_stay_with.html
|
Now I Know the Dead Stay With Us
|
2007101119
|
By Georgianna Bloom After Justinâs death, I intensely wanted to die. If I didnât have my grandkids, I would have killed myself. My remaining two sons had no power at all to make me think twice about it. Neither did my boyfriend, or my relatives or friends.
But my sweet little granddaughters made me understand that I could not do something so selfish. I could not deliberately take my life. That would be unconscionable. The innocents who need me would be permanently scarred.
Still, I fervently wished for my death. I passionately prayed for a heart attack or stroke. My sons would get my life insurance proceeds, and everyone would get over me. And I would be with Justin.
I just wanted to be with Justin.
And then I began to intuit that I should see a medium. Those people the dead speak through. I felt absolutely driven.
Now I know that Justin was leading me there.
Justinâs friend told me that psychics approached him who didnât know Justin was dead, who said they were dreaming of a young handsome guy, blond with intense blue eyes, who was trying to speak to them.
A woman who lives near my son Adam went running to his house after leaving a âPsychic Fair.â She declared that a psychic there had grabbed her and said, âYou have a neighbor named Adam, and heâs just had a big loss.â
Justinâs friend and I went online to locate reputable mediums. We learned of Bob Olson, a private investigator who exposes the phonies and recommends the trustworthy. Through Bob, we discovered a very well-regarded medium in New York.
We saw Glenn Klausner on Sept. 5. And this I declare, on my granddaughters' souls: in just one hour with that medium (and Justin!!!), I went from desperately wanting to die---for months--- to wanting to live again.
And I still want to live.
Glenn taped the session, and gave me the tape.
It was the most transformational experience of my life. Now I know the dead donât leave us. Theyâre here all the time. They adore us and help us. We just canât usually see them.
From books on the subject of afterlife encounters, Iâm learning that crossed-over people unanimously convey these truths: Itâs much better where they are. They now have a lot of peace. Hell is on Earth and nowhere else. Theyâre closer to us than ever. They have a lot of soul work to do where they are. They work at it while they help us. We will be with them whenever we cross. Our lives here are just a big test.
My religious upbringing was mixed Protestant. It was mixed because, after my mother died when I was six, various people raised me. I went to a Presbyterian Sunday School, and also Christian Science. Then one relative exposed me to Unitarian-Universalism. That was great. Patriarchal religious dogmatism had never taken hold with me, not even when I was a needy and impressionable child. I I felt that the open U-U view was much closer to the truth. When in my teens and early twenties, I studied the basic tenets of Buddhism. I was thrilled! And lately I've been learning a lot about the first true world religion, primordial, matriarchal, erotic Goddess worship. I was always open to afterlife encounters. (I lost my mother at six and my father at 21; how could I not be? I really had no choice.) At 20 I attended a Spiritualist Church meeting. A medium was tuning into the spirits behind every person there. It was amazing. It opened me up, at a very young age, to that reality. Little did I know how much I'd need it, decades later on... I lost my mother as a small child, and now I've lost my child as a mother. I don't think a lot of people experience all that. At first it felt like an unbearably cruel cosmic joke. I thought, now I should commit suicide. I thought, that's what's EXPECTED of me. Death has defined my whole existence; shouldn't I give in to Death, now? And then, as I've told you, I realized I couldn't do that. For myself, absolutely; nothing would be sweeter. But for others, no no no, you can't do that to them. Then I knew I'd either die from all this, or learn to be very strong. Nietzsche said there can be no middle ground, no gray area. Either die, or get emotionally as sturdy as an ox. Afterlife encounters will give you that strength.
The authors declare that afterlife encounters are the greatest comfort from grief. How true. Iâm surely a case in point. They state that even the skeptical grief counselors are starting to concede it.
I was dying inside. Now Iâm not.
And Iâve just had a visit from Justin.
Dawn has been called a mystical time. Now I know that's true. I was in that shallow sleep state, unconscious but close to awake...and then suddenly, there he was. He was laying right beneath me as if he were on his bed, and as if I were leaning over him. I only saw his face and his torso, but that was more than enough; it was what you see of someone when you hug. His expression was like a new baby's, a baby who has just learned to smile. And yet he was a man, he was Justin. And I could see the love of a son who of course is no longer a baby, but he's somewhere that's made him as glowing as a baby who has just had a good night's sleep. I saw innocence and wisdom and joy and peace. It made him look so...angelic. Now I know what people are looking for in drugs, alcohol, sex. Justin has most definitely found it. And I saw just a little bit of mirth in his eyes, too. When he said "Hi, Mom," it was like, yeah it's really me, no you're not dreaming this. I said, "My beautiful, beautiful baby boy." I don't know why I said "baby"; he certainly wasn't being Justin as a baby. But he is my baby, of course. And when we hugged we melted into each other, and I felt him go through me like a beautiful song. I woke up feeling wonderful. I felt wonderful and peaceful all day.
|
A conversation on religion with Jon Meacham and Sally Quinn. Visit http://newsweek.washingtonpost.com/onfaith/guestvoices/
| 92.214286 | 0.5 | 0.5 |
high
|
low
|
abstractive
|
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/10/10/AR2007101001536.html
|
https://web.archive.org/web/2007101119id_/http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/10/10/AR2007101001536.html
|
Effort to Curb Illegal Workers' Hiring Blocked
|
2007101119
|
A federal judge barred the Bush administration yesterday from launching a planned crackdown on U.S. companies that employ illegal immigrants, warning of its potentially "staggering" impact on law-abiding workers and companies.
In a firm rebuke of the White House, U.S. District Judge Charles R. Breyer of San Francisco granted a preliminary injunction against the president's plan to press employers to fire as many as 8.7 million workers with suspect Social Security numbers, starting this fall.
President Bush made the effort the centerpiece of a re-energized enforcement drive against illegal immigration in August after the Senate rejected his proposal to overhaul immigration laws. But the court ruling -- sought by major American labor, business and farm organizations -- highlighted the chasm that the issue has opened between the Republican Party and its traditional business allies.
The case also called attention to the gulf between Washington rhetoric about the need to curtail illegal immigration and the economic reality that many U.S. employers rely on illegal labor, as well as to the government's inability for nearly three decades to develop adequate tools for identifying undocumented workers.
In a 22-page ruling, Breyer said the plaintiffs -- an unusual coalition that included the AFL-CIO, the American Civil Liberties Union and the U.S. Chamber of Commerce -- had raised serious questions about the legality of the administration's plan to mail Social Security "no-match" letters to 140,000 U.S. employers.
"There can be no doubt that the effects of the rule's implementation will be severe," Breyer wrote, resulting in "irreparable harm to innocent workers and employers."
The government letters are intended to warn employers for the first time that they must resolve questions about their employees' identities or fire them within 90 days. If they do not, employers could face "stiff penalties," including fines and even criminal prosecution, for violating a federal law that bars knowingly employing illegal workers, Homeland Security Secretary Michael Chertoff said when he announced the plan Aug. 10.
The plaintiffs convinced the judge that the Social Security Administration database includes so many errors -- incorporated in the records of about 9.5 million people in 2003 alone -- that its use in firings would unfairly discriminate against tens of thousands of legal workers, including native-born and naturalized U.S. citizens, and cause major workforce disruptions that would burden companies.
"The government's proposal to disseminate no-match letters affecting more than eight million workers will, under the mandated time line, result in the termination of employment to lawfully employed workers," the judge wrote. "Moreover the threat of criminal prosecution . . . reflects a major change in DHS policy."
Breyer also said that the government may have ignored a 1980 law, the Regulatory Flexibility Act, that requires it to weigh the cost of imposing new regulations that would significantly burden small-business owners. Randel K. Johnson, a vice president of the Chamber of Commerce, said the ruling shows that "the government cannot do anything it wants simply in the name of enforcement. They've got to be careful about building their record and complying with the law."
In a statement, AFL-CIO President John J. Sweeney said: "This is a significant step towards overturning this unlawful rule, which would give employers an even stronger way to keep workers from freely forming unions. . . . More than 70% of SSA discrepancies refer to U.S. citizens."
Chertoff expressed disappointment with the decision and said the administration will continue to aggressively enforce immigration laws while considering an appeal, which plaintiffs' attorneys said could take at least nine months.
"Today's ruling is yet another reminder of why we need Congress to enact comprehensive immigration reform," Chertoff said. "The American people have been loud and clear about their desire to see our nation's immigration laws enforced."
Several analysts said the Bush administration's plan appeared to be designed to push business interests back into the debate by demonstrating that the failure of legislative reform efforts would carry costs, and to reassure conservative lawmakers who oppose illegal immigration that the White House is able and willing to crack down on offenders.
Doris Meissner, former commissioner of the U.S. Immigration and Naturalization Service and now a senior fellow at the nonpartisan Migration Policy Institute in Washington, said the ruling "shows how ineffective the current laws are."
"It reinforces the opinion that many of us hold that until you have a better legal framework -- which requires new legislation -- we're stuck very much with the status quo," Meissner said.
In a statement, Rep. Brian P. Bilbray (R-Calif.), an opponent of Bush's approach who won election to the House last year on the issue, criticized the court. "What part of 'illegal' does Judge Breyer not understand?" he said. "At a time when the federal government is finally trying to enforce current immigration law, we cannot have activist judges stand in the way of doing what is right."
The scope of the problem is uncontested. A three-year government audit ending in 2001 found "widespread" misuse of Social Security numbers by illegal immigrants, who often present fake or fraudulent documents to obtain jobs. Overall, 7.2 million illegal immigrants account for at least 10 percent of low-skilled U.S. workers and 5 percent of the total U.S. workforce, according to a Pew Hispanic Center analysis of 2005 census data.
Illegal immigrants make up even greater portions of workers in specific industries, including 24 percent in farming, 17 percent in cleaning, 14 percent in construction and 12 percent in food preparation. But the government's record in developing tools to screen such workers is spotty, largely because of successful efforts by employers, labor unions and civil rights groups to water them down.
A government program to verify the validity of new hires' Social Security numbers, proposed in concept in 1981 and launched in 1996, remains voluntary and covers only about 23,000 of 8 million U.S. employers. It is also hampered by a high false-alarm rate and the limited ability to detect identity theft involving stolen or fraudulent numbers. Between June 2004 and May 2006, it erroneously rejected 11 percent of foreign-born U.S. citizens and 1.3 percent of authorized foreign-born noncitizens, according to a report provided to Congress.
In protest, Illinois Gov. Rod Blagojevich (D) signed legislation in August that bars companies in his state from participating in the program until it is 99 percent accurate.
The federal government has mailed Social Security no-match letters to employers since 1994, but such notices were generally silent about workers' immigration status and employers did not face liability. In June 2006, the Department of Homeland Security proposed using the letters to combat immigration fraud involving existing employees, and it finalized its plans this summer. The AFL-CIO and the ACLU filed suit to halt the Sept. 4 start of the mailings, and they were joined by the U.S. Chamber of Commerce and the trade associations for the agriculture, restaurant and construction industries.
On Aug. 31, U.S. District Judge Maxine M. Chesney issued a temporary restraining order pending an Oct. 1 hearing before Breyer, who was appointed by President Bill Clinton in 1997 and is the brother of Supreme Court Justice Stephen G. Breyer.
|
A federal judge barred the Bush administration yesterday from launching a planned crackdown on U.S. companies that employ illegal immigrants, warning of its potentially "staggering" impact on law-abiding workers and companies.
| 37.567568 | 1 | 37 |
high
|
high
|
extractive
|
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/10/10/AR2007101002528.html
|
https://web.archive.org/web/2007101119id_/http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/10/10/AR2007101002528.html
|
Attorney General Nominee Made His Name With Terror Cases
|
2007101119
|
Early in the Bush administration, Michael B. Mukasey's position at the intersection of terrorism and the justice system may have cost him a promotion.
Mukasey, then chief judge of the main federal court in New York City, caught the eye of the White House for elevation to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 2nd Circuit. A conservative intellectual whose admirers cut across party lines, he was running the nation's busiest courthouse just a mile from Ground Zero -- one that had handled trials of Islamic radicals for nearly a decade.
Mukasey was invited to Washington in the spring of 2002 and impressed lawyers from the White House and the Justice Department, several people familiar with the interview recalled.
But that June, "dirty bomb" suspect Jose Padilla was declared an enemy combatant by President Bush. When Padilla's lawyers challenged the government's action, Mukasey drew the case. White House lawyers decided they could not offer Mukasey the appellate post without seeming to undermine his impartiality in a case important to the administration, those familiar with the issue said.
Now, Mukasey's experiences in the Padilla case and other terrorism prosecutions undergird his credentials for nomination to become attorney general. If confirmed by the Senate after hearings next week, the 66-year-old Bronx native will take over an embattled Justice Department. He will deal with Congress on national security issues that remain to be sorted out in the final year of the Bush administration -- including rules for interrogating suspects and gathering evidence in terrorism cases.
Mukasey recently argued in an opinion article for the Wall Street Journal that Congress should find new ways to relieve "a strained and mismatched legal system" that cannot adequately stop terrorist plots while guarding the rights of those suspected of hatching them. He has advocated creating national security courts for terrorism cases, where classified information could be presented to judges in secret.
"If there is anybody who has a handle on the debate on terrorism issues, it's him," said David N. Kelley, who served as U.S. attorney in New York from 2003 to 2005. "He is one of the only people who has sufficient practical experience together with the intellectual ability."
Mukasey is described by people who have worked with him as a serious-minded law-and-order judge, a reserved man whose work and life were shaped by terrorism cases and by the tightknit clan of prosecutors and lawyers who orbit the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York.
Especially long-lasting has been Mukasey's relationship with the more outgoing Rudolph W. Giuliani, a fellow federal prosecutor in the 1970s who went on to become mayor and is now a candidate for the Republican presidential nomination.
In the late 1970s and '80s, Mukasey and Giuliani were among a group of high-powered former prosecutors who revitalized the litigation practice at the law firm of Patterson, Belknap, Webb and Tyler. Mukasey is now on the Giuliani campaign's judicial advisory board, and his son works for Giuliani's law firm.
"It's almost like a fraternity. Everybody thinks they are wearing a white hat doing good working for the government," said Robert G. Morvillo, former chief prosecutor of the Southern District's criminal division and former boss of both Mukasey and Giuliani. Those two men "have grown up in the profession together," he said.
As a judge, Mukasey occasionally regaled his clerks with war stories from the old days. "He loved being an assistant U.S. attorney. I think that's what defined him," said a former colleague who agreed to share private recollections of Mukasey's days on the federal bench.
|
Follow 2008 Elections & Campaigns at washingtonpost.com Politics Information on Democrats,Republicans,political cartoons,opinions,government policies,political analysis and reports." elections,campaigns,Democrats,Republicans,political cartoons,opinions from The Washington Post. Features government policy,government tech,political analysis and reports.
| 12.210526 | 0.491228 | 0.561404 |
low
|
low
|
abstractive
|
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/10/10/AR2007101002642.html
|
https://web.archive.org/web/2007101119id_/http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/10/10/AR2007101002642.html
|
A Script for Every Surfer
|
2007101119
|
Is the World Wide Web truly worldwide? Depends on whom you ask.
Since the Internet came into widespread use, those among the 70 percent of the world that doesn't speak English have argued that the Web is inaccessible. So next week the nonprofit group contracted by the U.S. government to run the Internet will begin testing domain names in other alphabets.
On Monday, the Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN) will conduct a test to see whether domains written entirely in foreign scripts can work without crashing the Net. For several years, the company has allowed domains that are half in foreign characters, such as [Chinese text].com or [Arabic text].org. For the test, domain names will look like [Korean text].[Korean text].
The long road to this stage, which comes nearly a decade after the technology for creating multilingual domains was invented, has left many in the non-English-speaking world impatient and angry. Questions of political and linguistic sovereignty, alongside accusations of American "digital colonialism," have motivated some countries to create their own Internets, effectively mounting a challenge to the World Wide Web.
Experts say the difficulties of typing in a foreign script have probably held back development of online economies abroad.
"Think of what it would be like if every time you typed out an e-mail address or visited a Web site you had to use Chinese characters or Sanskrit," said Michael Geist, who teaches Internet and e-commerce law at the University of Ottawa. "That's exactly like what people in other countries have to do."
Even the hybrid script names that ICANN allows haven't made things much easier. With this model, speakers of Hebrew, Arabic and any other language written from right to left must type half of the URL in one direction and the other half -- the .com, .net or .org postscript -- the opposite way.
Some advocates of internationalizing the Internet have accused ICANN of ignoring the needs of the developing world.
"Almost 10 years ago we went to the CEO of ICANN with the technology to make [multilingual domains] work," said S. Subbiah, co-inventor of the first multilingual domain technology, who estimates that 2 million of the 138 million domains registered worldwide contain non-English characters. "The response was basically, 'I'm too busy. Go learn English.' "
"There's . . . a little anti-American rock-throwing in that description," said Mike Roberts, the first president and chief executive of ICANN. "The engineers thought that trying to do the non-Roman alphabet thing with all this growth would destabilize the Internet and cause crashes."
The politically sensitive business of standardizing languages has also held up the process.
Countries with slightly different versions of the same script have fought over spelling. Debates have also raged over which corporate, sovereign and ethnic interests should control which domains. VeriSign, for example, is the U.S. registry that manages all the domains that end in .com, which represent half of all the domains in the world. Should it also be given control over multilingual domains that end in some translated version of .com? Or should countries have the right to control all domains in their own national languages? What about languages that cross borders, such as Arabic?
|
Is the World Wide Web truly worldwide? Depends on whom you ask.
| 45.928571 | 1 | 14 |
high
|
high
|
extractive
|
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/10/10/AR2007101002389.html
|
https://web.archive.org/web/2007101119id_/http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/10/10/AR2007101002389.html
|
EPA Joins Settlement of Lawsuit but Adds a Waiver
|
2007101119
|
The language of the settlement indicates that the administration has not wavered in its distaste for a Clinton-era policy of using the law to force power plants to upgrade their pollution controls whenever they significantly update or expand a plant. That marks a significant victory for the power industry, which has strenuously opposed the "New Source Review," saying that it penalizes them for efficiency improvements that ultimately benefit consumers and the environment.
"That is something that we fought to get in the settlement that was very important to us," said American Electric Power spokesman Pat D. Hemlepp, whose company settled with the EPA and other groups on Tuesday. "There are a lot of things we can do . . . to improve the efficiency of our plants."
Buried in paragraph 133 of the consent decree, in which the utility agreed to install $4.6 billion in pollution-control measures at 16 existing plants and pay $75 million in penalties, is a section that assures AEP that the government will not pursue any action stemming from the "modification" of these plants between now and Dec. 31, 2018. The EPA has inserted similar language in other settlements.
That section addresses the most controversial element in the administration's air policy: determining when utilities must install new pollution controls. The AEP case -- which started in 1999 -- centers on whether the utility had adequately updated its aging plants with new pollution-control technology when it modified them, an issue that falls under the New Source Review rule. Under Tuesday's settlement, the utility has agreed to install controls on the 16 plants it has expanded over the years, which will effectively remove 1.6 million tons of pollution from the air annually by 2018.
The administration has repeatedly questioned the value of enforcing the current rules, and the settlement guarantees that AEP will not face federal prosecution if its activities over the next decade trigger this sort of federal review.
Although the nine state attorneys general and 13 environmental advocacy groups that are party to the lawsuit praised the administration for Tuesday's settlement, they explicitly rejected this prosecutorial amnesty in the consent decree: Paragraph 140 says these parties "do not release any claims under the Clean Air Act and its implementing regulations." That means they could again sue the utility over violations of the law.
By inserting the amnesty clause, federal officials "have written in the ability for AEP to violate [the law] in those plants for the next 10 years," said Natural Resources Defense Council senior attorney John Walke, whose group is part of the lawsuit. "It just shows the Bush administration is of two minds when it comes to enforcing the Clean Air Act."
The battle over the New Source Review is not over: About half a dozen similar cases are still pending in court, and the administration is preparing to finalize a rule that will exempt plants from installing new pollution controls as long as their hourly rate of emissions does not increase as a result of any plant upgrade.
That follows an Oct. 5, 2005, memo in which EPA Deputy Administrator Marcus C. Peacock said that, because the administration had adopted newer regulations that would reduce utility emissions by nearly 70 percent in the eastern part of the United States, the agency would pursue only cases involving violations of regulations it had proposed as a replacement for the New Source Review, which is still on the books. Some of the administration's proposals have been overturned in court, and others have not been implemented.
"These rulemakings, particularly CAIR, will reduce power plant emissions deeper, faster, and more efficiently than would be achieved by continuing costly and uncertain litigation in case-by-case enforcement actions of existing . . . regulations," Peacock wrote, referring to the Clean Air Interstate Rule.
In an interview, William Harnett, director of the EPA's air quality policy division, said the agency still wants utilities to "live by the rules." But he added: "At the same time, we want to improve the program and make these operations better to get the environmental benefits everyone wants from them."
Since the October 2005 memo, the administration has pursued three lawsuits against utilities over what would be violations of its still pending proposal.
And both Scott H. Segal, a lobbyist for utility and coal companies, and Frank O'Donnell, who heads the advocacy group Clean Air Watch, said in interviews that this week's court deal does not mean that the legal fight over air policy is over.
"Seven or eight years ago, the U.S. electric industry was frantically on the run because federal enforcers were going after them at every turn," O'Donnell said. "Then the Bush administration called off the dogs."
Staff writer Steven Mufson contributed to this report.
|
Although the Environmental Protection Agency joined in a legal settlement this week to force the largest power-plant pollution cleanup in U.S. history, the Bush administration signaled in the agreement that it has no intention of taking enforcement actions against the utility for the same kind of...
| 18.34 | 0.76 | 1.16 |
medium
|
low
|
abstractive
|
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.