id
stringlengths
4
10
text
stringlengths
4
2.14M
source
stringclasses
2 values
created
timestamp[s]date
2001-05-16 21:05:09
2025-01-01 03:38:30
added
stringdate
2025-04-01 04:05:38
2025-04-01 07:14:06
metadata
dict
424385657
Fix Errors in migration.md An extra of Forgetting space after period User is capitalized mid sentence Repetitive use of “of” Enter a list of file extensions of file types of… Changed to … of file types @JoanneHendrickson Hi Joanne, changes look correct. Could you please check and merge? Thanks! @JoanneHendrickson Hi Joanne, any updates on this? Thanks!
gharchive/pull-request
2019-03-22T20:23:49
2025-04-01T04:55:21.665681
{ "authors": [ "scanum", "tdslinden" ], "repo": "MicrosoftDocs/OfficeDocs-SharePoint", "url": "https://github.com/MicrosoftDocs/OfficeDocs-SharePoint/pull/820", "license": "CC-BY-4.0", "license_type": "permissive", "license_source": "github-api" }
437074357
Federation with pure Skype for Business on-prem customers (without SfBO co-existence) Please comment/mention pure Skype for Business on-prem customers in "Federation Considerations" section. Document Details ⚠ Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking. ID: 49921e8a-55ac-f547-d4e2-d329f5089c2e Version Independent ID: 91c3433a-3684-95cd-3426-4a5877b33106 Content: Migration and interoperability guidance for organizations using Teams together with Skype for Business Content Source: Teams/migration-interop-guidance-for-teams-with-skype.md Service: msteams GitHub Login: @arachmanGitHub Microsoft Alias: MyAdvisor @officedocsbot assign @scanum @sjuratov Thank you for reaching out. Are you suggesting adding a bullet point to say "chats and calls initiated from pure Skype for Business on-prem customers?" Yes, that would be a pivot. If customer is pure on-prem SfB, what are MS Teams Federation Considerations? @sjuratov thanks for that. I work on the actual document side to improve docs, so if you have any recommendations for wording to be added/amended please be so kind to let me know and I'll have it implemented soonest. I can chat to the team if you have any other questions or suggestions with regards to the article. Thank you. I'd appreciate mentioned clarifications, so yes, please talk to the team on how best address this gap. @sjuratov Thank you for your patience. I'm still investigating with the team. Does this recently updated link perhaps help with your questions. https://docs.microsoft.com/MicrosoftTeams/coexistence-chat-calls-presence I have looked at the page below and unfortunately I still don’t see clear statement on supportability of federation with pure Skype for Business on-prem customers (without SfBO co-existence). If you feel I have missed something, please let me know where on the page I should be looking at. Best Regards, Sasa Sent from Mailhttps://go.microsoft.com/fwlink/?LinkId=550986 for Windows 10 From: Lindsay notifications@github.com Sent: Tuesday, May 21, 2019 9:00:40 AM To: MicrosoftDocs/OfficeDocs-SkypeForBusiness Cc: sjuratov; Mention Subject: Re: [MicrosoftDocs/OfficeDocs-SkypeForBusiness] Federation with pure Skype for Business on-prem customers (without SfBO co-existence) (#2114) @sjuratovhttps://nam02.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.com%2Fsjuratov&data=02|01||b1c7d2db51574c775a9c08d6ddba095e|84df9e7fe9f640afb435aaaaaaaaaaaa|1|0|636940188421506530&sdata=5aKeiL5Le4mHx%2BxnAyAFFDRkgUTQtjL9T5Z0F1p3RGQ%3D&reserved=0 Thank you for your patience. I'm still investigating with the team. Does this recently updated link perhaps help with your questions. https://docs.microsoft.com/MicrosoftTeams/coexistence-chat-calls-presencehttps://nam02.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fdocs.microsoft.com%2FMicrosoftTeams%2Fcoexistence-chat-calls-presence&data=02|01||b1c7d2db51574c775a9c08d6ddba095e|84df9e7fe9f640afb435aaaaaaaaaaaa|1|0|636940188421516536&sdata=A3OXc3%2FyA9nN744pGStdERW4JVQe61wGf13fLLZYslY%3D&reserved=0 — You are receiving this because you were mentioned. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHubhttps://nam02.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.com%2FMicrosoftDocs%2FOfficeDocs-SkypeForBusiness%2Fissues%2F2114%3Femail_source%3Dnotifications%26email_token%3DAJIKNWSST7ZRNURGOIJ3IX3PWOMZRA5CNFSM4HIK47M2YY3PNVWWK3TUL52HS4DFVREXG43VMVBW63LNMVXHJKTDN5WW2ZLOORPWSZGODV26JBY%23issuecomment-494265479&data=02|01||b1c7d2db51574c775a9c08d6ddba095e|84df9e7fe9f640afb435aaaaaaaaaaaa|1|0|636940188421526548&sdata=%2B4a3Q%2FgkmKYXbnKirBk%2FvbKarvHCGneTahS92BgS%2F1k%3D&reserved=0, or mute the threadhttps://nam02.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.com%2Fnotifications%2Funsubscribe-auth%2FAJIKNWUANARA3YFMQMQ5DLTPWOMZRANCNFSM4HIK47MQ&data=02|01||b1c7d2db51574c775a9c08d6ddba095e|84df9e7fe9f640afb435aaaaaaaaaaaa|1|0|636940188421536554&sdata=YcE5RLeVP9PUc6cz6H24XNkEO0zTUKGRN1LXlLLr9vk%3D&reserved=0. @sjuratov, everything that is not directly mentioned in this article is not supported. I have confirmed this with the team, so the document will remain as is. Thank you for reaching out and please let me know if there is anything else I can help with. @sjuratov Thank you for submitting feedback. We understand that this issue has been resolved. Please feel free to re-open this issue if there is a specific area of the docs that we can improve or make better. Thank you. @officedocsbot close
gharchive/issue
2019-04-25T08:36:27
2025-04-01T04:55:21.679038
{ "authors": [ "lindspea", "scanum", "sjuratov" ], "repo": "MicrosoftDocs/OfficeDocs-SkypeForBusiness", "url": "https://github.com/MicrosoftDocs/OfficeDocs-SkypeForBusiness/issues/2114", "license": "CC-BY-4.0", "license_type": "permissive", "license_source": "github-api" }
574577553
Missing Browser List Hi I'm not sure, but the list of mentioned browser does not seem to be complete. In our tests, Edge did not work either... Could you please create a list of supported browser instead of an incomplete one of non-supported? Would be easier for us to give clear recomendations to customers. Thanks Document Details ⚠ Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking. ID: 9ce30163-6327-899b-281d-d4ef982fce5e Version Independent ID: e61dcbb8-4877-ef6f-1987-981cdd7fc82f Content: Configure desktop sharing in Microsoft Teams - Microsoft Teams Content Source: Teams/configure-desktop-sharing.md Service: msteams GitHub Login: @LolaJacobsen Microsoft Alias: Lolaj @AlexSchwerzmann Thank you for submitting feedback and contributing to the docs. We are currently investigating this. Hi @AlexSchwerzmann Thank you for reaching out! Kindly refer to the following article for the supported browsers. https://support.microsoft.com/en-us/office/use-teams-on-the-web-33f84aa9-2e8b-47ac-8676-02033454e385?ui=en-us&rs=en-us&ad=us Thank you! @AlexSchwerzmann thank you for submitting feedback. I think the best way forward is if you open a service ticket in your tenant so this can get resolved ASAP. Based on the outcome let me know if it is something that can be called out in the docs. Please follow this link to contact support for business products:https://docs.microsoft.com/office365/admin/contact-support-for-business-products Please keep us posted here on the resolution so we can feed whatever information you discover into the content.
gharchive/issue
2020-03-03T10:46:50
2025-04-01T04:55:21.685825
{ "authors": [ "AlexSchwerzmann", "scanum", "sowjanya365" ], "repo": "MicrosoftDocs/OfficeDocs-SkypeForBusiness", "url": "https://github.com/MicrosoftDocs/OfficeDocs-SkypeForBusiness/issues/4085", "license": "CC-BY-4.0", "license_type": "permissive", "license_source": "github-api" }
878164276
Update update-windows-update-agent.md Sorry, forgot to include windows server 2008 R2 in description. @ealmonte32 : Thanks for your contribution! The author(s) have been notified to review your proposed change.
gharchive/pull-request
2021-05-06T23:05:21
2025-04-01T04:55:21.757368
{ "authors": [ "PRMerger14", "ealmonte32" ], "repo": "MicrosoftDocs/SupportArticles-docs", "url": "https://github.com/MicrosoftDocs/SupportArticles-docs/pull/128", "license": "CC-BY-4.0", "license_type": "permissive", "license_source": "github-api" }
1065397928
Update serial-console-grub-proactive-configuration.md Remove parameter rootdelay=300 @linuxelf001 : Thanks for your contribution! The author(s) have been notified to review your proposed change. #sign-off @simonxjx : Thanks for your contribution! The author(s) have been notified to review your proposed change.
gharchive/pull-request
2021-11-28T18:09:14
2025-04-01T04:55:21.759091
{ "authors": [ "PRMerger10", "PRMerger12", "linuxelf001", "mimckitt" ], "repo": "MicrosoftDocs/SupportArticles-docs", "url": "https://github.com/MicrosoftDocs/SupportArticles-docs/pull/364", "license": "CC-BY-4.0", "license_type": "permissive", "license_source": "github-api" }
639746355
Shouldn't Jumpbox in the diagram be replaced with Azure Bastion? [Enter feedback here] This diagram pre dates the release of Bastion and I think it should replace jumpboxes in the diagram since thats its purpose. Document Details ⚠ Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking. ID: be033e7f-d78f-f63f-c9b5-f08130315704 Version Independent ID: d66f5650-fffb-79a6-ee59-40eaad06cd4f Content: Multi-region N-tier application - Azure Architecture Center Content Source: docs/reference-architectures/n-tier/multi-region-sql-server.md Service: architecture-center Sub-service: reference-architecture GitHub Login: @MikeWasson Microsoft Alias: pnp Thanks for reporting - this issue is under review. This is a Microsoft Internal DevOps Bug ID AB#238107
gharchive/issue
2020-06-16T15:05:24
2025-04-01T04:55:21.763600
{ "authors": [ "absheik", "ts46235" ], "repo": "MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center", "url": "https://github.com/MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center/issues/2184", "license": "CC-BY-4.0", "license_type": "permissive", "license_source": "github-api" }
1164596668
Not All Page Appears When Export To PDF When I export to PDF some page doesn't appears for example: Circuit Breaker Pattern Claim Check Compensating Transaction Competing Consumers Compute Resource Consolidation CQRS Deployment Stamps Event Sourcing External Configuration Store Federated Identity Best regards Document Details ⚠ Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking. ID: 0a4ecd26-cb7b-4cb2-ae3a-3748ada92771 Version Independent ID: 97f96179-a22b-8401-a2f4-264a86b5d2f5 Content: Cloud design patterns - Azure Architecture Center Content Source: docs/patterns/index.md Service: architecture-center Sub-service: design-pattern GitHub Login: @EdPrice-MSFT Microsoft Alias: masashin @juandrn Thanks for reporting this. @TimShererWithAquent It looks like the downloadable PDF format of the documentation is missing these sections. Could you please review and update as required? @RohitMungi-MSFT -- Rohit, I'm looking into this. @WilliamAntonRohm - did you ever find out what was going on here? Is the issue resolved?
gharchive/issue
2022-03-10T00:34:30
2025-04-01T04:55:21.769890
{ "authors": [ "RohitMungi-MSFT", "WilliamAntonRohm", "hallihan", "juandrn" ], "repo": "MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center", "url": "https://github.com/MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center/issues/3337", "license": "CC-BY-4.0", "license_type": "permissive", "license_source": "github-api" }
1284430660
set-up-the-build-task step is unnecessary in SourceLink doc I think the set-up-the-build-task step is unnecessary in the SourceLink documentation. This step says to set the SourceLinkCreate property to true (via /p:SourceLinkCreate=true on the MSBuild command line). As far as I can tell, it has no effect on whether SourceLink is included or not in the final build. By default, once they've added the appropriate Microsoft.SourceLink NuGet package from the preceding step, users shouldn't need to control SourceLink inclusion manually. The Microsoft.SourceLink NuGet packages automatically determine whether SourceLink should be enabled. Users can override the default behavior -- perhaps to disable SourceLink completely in certain build flavors -- but it's done via a different property: EnableSourceLink Document Details ⚠ Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking. ID: bdb2bfcb-0a0c-ce90-fa49-ad2e7fbaa57a Version Independent ID: 1a295877-ff8f-f8c2-0349-76a69a0f5cfc Content: Publish symbols with Azure Pipelines - Azure Pipelines Content Source: docs/pipelines/artifacts/symbols.md Product: devops Technology: devops-cicd-artifacts GitHub Login: @ramiMSFT Microsoft Alias: rabououn @tmat can you keep me honest here? Agreed - the property shouldn't be needed. #sign-off @pharring Thank you for your feedback! I agree! Setting up the build task in not needed anymore.
gharchive/issue
2022-06-25T03:45:28
2025-04-01T04:55:21.776325
{ "authors": [ "pharring", "ramiMSFT", "tmat" ], "repo": "MicrosoftDocs/azure-devops-docs", "url": "https://github.com/MicrosoftDocs/azure-devops-docs/issues/12436", "license": "CC-BY-4.0", "license_type": "permissive", "license_source": "github-api" }
546233494
Missing Extension Points for new Test Plans Page Can we get information about extension points available on new Test Plans Page? None of Test Plans extension points seems to work on new page. Document Details ⚠ Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking. ID: 56437af3-75da-d219-5364-9b7927298ece Version Independent ID: ca01655a-9195-cf92-14b4-77ef66053dcf Content: Extension Points - Azure DevOps Content Source: docs/extend/reference/targets/overview.md Product: devops Technology: devops-ecosystem GitHub Login: @chcomley Microsoft Alias: chcomley @JanSera Thank you for the feedback, assigning this to the author for review. Hi @JanSera, Please accept my apology for losing sight of this issue. There is a more recent issue for this article, however, which I've added your feedback to so we can be sure it's properly addressed. I'm closing this issue, so please reference this issue and you can @mention me if you have any further questions or concerns. Thank you!
gharchive/issue
2020-01-07T11:31:29
2025-04-01T04:55:21.781576
{ "authors": [ "JanSera", "chcomley", "msebolt" ], "repo": "MicrosoftDocs/azure-devops-docs", "url": "https://github.com/MicrosoftDocs/azure-devops-docs/issues/6833", "license": "CC-BY-4.0", "license_type": "permissive", "license_source": "github-api" }
567375649
Overview does not show region Navigating to project/org settings/overview I cannot find what region I'm in. Where has this been moved? Document Details ⚠ Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking. ID: be194f45-05b2-8421-186f-f12700eea9aa Version Independent ID: efffdc56-fd4c-aeba-6cd3-d07aaf776d51 Content: Find or change location or region of organization - Azure DevOps Services Content Source: docs/organizations/accounts/change-organization-location.md Product: devops Technology: devops-accounts GitHub Login: @chcomley Microsoft Alias: chcomley @estensen -- Håvard, thank you for your question. You may find answers here: Azure DevOps Support Bot Azure DevOps on Stack Overflow @chcomley -- Chrystal, please look into this issue. Hi @estensen, Thanks for reaching out. Can you please whether you're on Azure DevOps Services? } tr.sh_subhead td {border-left: 1px solid # C0C0C0; } table.spec_table ul {padding-left: 11px; } ul.ul_nobull li {list-style-type: none; เยื้องข้อความ: -11px; } & # 3586; & # 3657; & # 3617; & # 3617; & # 3641; & # 3621; & # 3607; & # 3633; & # 3656; & # 3623; & # 3652; & # 3611; </ font> </ font> </ span> </ td> </ tr> < font style = "จัดเรียงแนวตั้ง: inherit;"> & # 3594; & # 3609; & # 3636; & # 3604; & # 3595; & # 3637 ; & # 3614; & # 3637; & # 3618; & # 3641; / & # 3652; & # 3617; & # 3650; & # 3588; & # 3619; & # 3650; & # 3611; & # 3619; & # 3648; & # 3695; & # 3648; & # 3648; & # 3595; & # 3629; & # 3619; & # 3660; & # 3626; & # 3656; & # 3623; & # 3609; & # 3605; # 3586; & # 3594; & # 3636; & # 3657; & # 3609; & # 3626; & # 3656; & # 3623; & # 3609; & # 3586; & # 3629; & # 3591; CPU < b style = "color: # 808080"> CL8064701552900 < font style = "จัดเรียงแนวตั้ง: inherit;"> & # 3648; & # 3611; & # 3655; & # 3609; OEM / & # 3652; & # 3617; & # 3650; & # 3588; & # 3619; & # 3650; & # 3611; & # 3619; & # 3648; & # 3626; & # 3648; & # 3595; & # 3629; & # 3619; & # 3649; & # 3614; & # 3588; & # 3685; & # 3585; & # 3592; & # 3652; & # 3617; & # 3650; & # 3588; & # 3619; FCBGA 1168 & # 3621; & # 3641; & # 3585; (FCBGA1168) & # 3648; & # 3610; & # 3657; & # 3634; BGA1168 <td valign = " # 3633; & # 3609; & # 3607; & # 3637; & # 3656; & # 3626; & # 3633; & # 3656; & # 3591; & # 3595; & # 3639; & # 3657; & # 3629 ; & # 3621; & # 3656; & # 3634; & # 3626; & # 3640; & # 3604; & # 3626; & # 3635; & # 3627; & # 3619; & # 3633; & # 3610; & # 3605; & # 3633; & # 3623; & # 3611; & # 3619; & # 3632; & # 3617; & # 3623; & # 3621; & # 3612; & # 3621; & # 3586; & # 3629 ; & # 3591; & # 3606; & # 3634; & # 3604; & # 3588; & # 3639; & # 3629; 1 & # 3585; & # 3619; & # 3585; & # 3598; & # 3634; & # 3588; & # 3617; 2016 & # 3623; & # 3633; & # 3609; & # 3607; & # 3637; & # 3656; & # 3626; & # 3656; & # 3591; & # 3621; & # 3656; & # 3634; & # 3626; & # 3640; & # 3604; & # 3626; & # 3635; & # 3627; & # 3619; & # 3633; & # 3610; & # 3605; & # 3633; & # 3623; & # 3611 ; & # 3619; & # 3632; & # 3617; & # 3623; & # 3621; & # 3612; & # 3621; & # 3586; & # 3629; & # 3591; & # 3606; & # 3634; & # 3604; & # 3588; & # 3639; & # 3629; 6 & # 3617; & # 3585; & # 3619; & # 3634; & # 3588; & # 3617; 2017 <รูปแบบตัวอักษร = "จัดเรียงแนวตั้ง: inherit;"> & # 3619; & # 3634; & # 3588; & # 3634; & # 3607; & # 3637; & # 3656; & # 3649; & # 3609; & # 3632; & # 3609; & # 3635; < font style = "จัดเรียงแนวตั้ง: inherit;"> $ 281 < font style = "จัดเรียงแนวตั้ง: inherit;"> & # 3627; & # 3617; & # 3634; & # 3618; & # 3648; & # 3621; & # 3586; S-spec <trbody = "sh_subhead"> <font style =" จัดเรียงแนวตั้ง: / font> <รูปแบบตัวอักษร = "จัดเรียงแนวตั้ง: inherit;"> CL8064701552900 + <td colspan =" 2 "คลาส = "spec_hd"> & # 3626; & # 3606; & # 3634; & # 3611; & # 3633; & # 3605; & # 3618; & # 3585; & # 3619; & # 3619; & # 3617; / & # 3626; & # 3606; & # 3634; & & # 3619 ; & # 3632; & # 3604; & # 3633; & # 3610; 1 & # 3586; & # 3609; & # 3634; & # 3604; & # 3649; & # 3588; & # 3594; & nbsp;? & nbsp; < / span> </ td> < font style = "จัดเรียงแนวตั้ง: inherit;"> & # 3649; & # 3588; & # 3594; & # 3688; & # 3649; & # 3609; & # 3632; & # 3609; & # 3635; & # 3585; & # 3634; & # 3619; & # 3648; & # 3594; & # 3639; & # 3656; & # 3629; & # 3617 ; & # 3650; & # 3618; & # 3591; & # 3594; & # 3640; & # 3604; < font style = "จัดเรียงแนวตั้ง: inherit;"> 2 x 32 KB 8 x 2 32 KB & # 3649; & # 3588; & # 3594; & # 3586; & # 3657; & # 3617; & # 3617; & # 3641; & # 3621; & # 3594; & # 3640; & # 3604; & # 3585; & # 3634; & # 3619; & # 3648; & # 3594; & # 3639; & # 3656; & # 3629 ; & # 3617; & # 3650; & # 3618; & # 3591; 8 & # 3607; & # 3634; & # 3591; < / font> & # 3586; & # 3609; & # 3634; & # 3604; & # 3649; & # 3588; & # 3594; & # 3619; & # 3632; & # 3633; & # 3633; & # 3610; 2 & nbsp; & nbsp; </ font> </ font> </ font> </ font> </ span> < / td> & # 3649; & # 3588; & # 3549; ; & # 3610; & # 3610; & # 3648; & # 3594; & # 3639; & # 3656; & # 3629; & # 3617; & # 3650; & # 3618; & # 3591; & # 3607; & # 3637; & # 3656; & # 3605; & # 3633; & # 3657; & # 3591; & # 3588; & # 3656; & # 3634; & # 3652; & # 3604; & # 3657; 8 & # 3607; & # 3634; & # 3591; 256 x 256 KB & # 3586; & # 3609; & # 3634; & # 3604; & # 3649; & # 3594; & # 3594; & # 3619; & # 3632; & # 3604; & # 3633; & # 3610; 3 & # 3649; & # 3588; & # 3594; & # 3607; & # 3637; & # 3656; & # 3649; & # 3594; & # 3619; & # 3660; & # 3585; & # 3634; & # 3619 ; & # 3648; & # 3594; & # 3639; & # 3656; & # 3629; & # 3617; & # 3650; & # 3618; & # 3591; & # 3607; & # 3637; & # 3656; & # 3585; & # 3635; & # 3627; & # 3609; & # 3604; & # 3652; & # 3623; & # 3657; & # 3607; & # 3634; & # 3591; 3 MB 12 MB & # 3627; & # 3609; & # 3656; & # 3623; tr> & # 3626; & # 3656; & # 3623; & # 3609; & # 3586; & # 3618; & # 3634; & # 3618; & # 3649; & # 3621; & # 3632; & # 3648; & # 3607; & # 3588; & # 3650; & # 3609; & # 3650; & # 3621; & # 3618; & # 3637; = "จัดเรียงแนวตั้ง: inherit;"> & # 3588; & # 3635; & # 3649; & # 3609; & # 3632; & # 3609; & # 3635; MMX & # 3626; & # 3656; & # 3623; & # 3609; & # 3586; & # 3618; & # 3634; & # 3618; SSE / & # 3626; & # 3605; & # 3619; & # 3637; & # 3617; & # 3617; & # 3636; & # 3656; & # 3591; SIMD & # 3626; & # 3656; & # 3623; & # 3609; & # 3586; & # 3618; & # 3634; & # 3618; SSE2 / & # 3626; & # 3605; & # 3619; & # 3637; & # 3617; & # 3617; & # 3636; & # 3656; & # 3591; SIMD 2 SSE3 / สตรีมมิ่งส่วนขยาย SIMD 3 < / font> SSSE3 / & # 3626; & # 3656; & # 3623; & # 3609; & # 3586; & # 3618; & # 3634; & # 3618; & # 3648; & # 3626; & # 3619; & # 3636; & # 3617; SIMD & # 3626; & # 3605; & # 3619; & # 3637; & # 3617; & # 3617; & # 3636; & # 3656; & # 3591; 3 SSE4 / SSE4.1 + SSE4 2 / & # 3626; & # 3605; & # 3619; & # 3637; & # 3617; & # 3617; & # 3636; & # 3656; & # 3591; ส่วนขยาย SIMD 4 <font style = "จัดแนวตั้ง: & # 3609; & # 3586; & # 3618; & # 3634; & # 3618; & # 3648; & # 3623; & # 3585; & # 3648; & # 3605; & # 3629; & # 3619; & # 3660; & # 3586; & # 3633; & # 3657; & # 3609; & # 3626; & # 3641; & # 3591; = " จัดเรียงแนวตั้ง: สืบทอด; "> AVX2 / ส่วนขยายเวกเตอร์ขั้นสูง 2.0 & # 3588; & # 3635; & # 3649; & # 3609; & # 3632; & # 3609; & # 3635; BMI / BMI1 + BMI2 / & # 3585; & # 3634; & # 3619; & # 3592; & # 3633; & # 3604; & # 3585; & # 3634; & # 3619; & # 3636; & # 3605; < font style = "จัดเรียงแนวตั้ง: inherit;"> & # 3588; & # 3635; & # 3649; & # 3609; & # 369; & # 3609; & # 3635; & # 3585; & # 3634; & # 3619; & # 3649; & # 3611; & # 3621; & # 3591; & # 3592; & # 3640; & # 3604; & # 3621; & # 3629 ; & # 3618; & # 3605; & # 3633; & # 3623; F16C / 16 & # 3610; & # 3636; & # 3605; = "จัดแนวตั้ง: inherit;"> & # 3588; & # 3635; & # 3649; & # 3609; & # 3632; & # 3609; & # 3635; FMA3 / 3-operand Fused Multiply- & # 3648; & # 3614; & # 3636; & # 3656; & # 3617; = "แนวตั้ง - align: inherit; "> <font style =" NX / XD / Execute & # 3611; & # 3636; & # 3604; & # 3585; & # 3634; & # 3619; & # 3651; & # 3594; & # 3691; & # 3634; & # 3634; & # 3609; & # 3610; & # 3636; & # 3605; <a href = "/ อภิธานศัพท์ / E / EVP_XD.html" class = " _link "target =" _ blank "> & nbsp;? & nbsp; </ a > & # 3648; & # 3607; & # 3588; & # 3650; & # 3609; & # 3650; & # 3621; & # 3618; & # 3637; HT / Hyper-Threading <span class = " / font> & # 3648; & # 3607; & # 3588; & # 3650; & # 3609; & # 3650; & # 3621; & # 3618; & # 3637; SpeedStep & # 3586; & # 3633; & # 3657; & # 3609; & # 3626; & # 3641; & # 3591; & nbsp; ? & nbsp; & # 3629; & # 3640; & # 3611; & # 3519; & # 3619; & # 3603; & # 3660; & # 3605; & # 3656; & # 3629; & # 3614; & # 3656; & # 3623; & # 3591; / & # 3626; & # 3656; & # 3623; & # 3609; & # 3611; & # 3619; & # 3632; & # 3585; & # 3629; & # 3610; & # 3651; & # 3609; & # 3609; & # 3605; & # 3633; & # 3623; & # 3585; & # 3619; & # 3634; & # 3615; & # 3636; & # 3585; & # 3651; & # 3609; & # 3605; & # 3633; & # 3623; <font style = " 20 & # 3588; & # 3623; & # 3634; & # 3617; & # 3606; & # 3637; & # 3656; & # 3600; & # 3634; & # 3609; (MHz): 200 & # 3588; & # 3623; & # 3634; & # 3617; & # 3606; & # 3637; & # 3656; & # 3626; & # 3641; & # 3591; & # 3626; & # 3640; & # 3604; (MHz): 1,000 & # 3592; & # 3635; & # 3609; & # 3623; & # 3609; & # 3592; & # 3629; & # 3649; & # 3626; & # 3604; & # 3591; & # 3612; & font style = "จัดเรียงแนวตั้ง: inherit;"> & # 3649; & # 3610; & # 3609; & # 3604; & # 3660; & # 3623; & # 3636; & # 3608; & # 3608; & # 3660; & # 3627; & # 3609; & # 3656; & # 3623; & # 3618; & # 3588; & # 3623; & # 3634; & # 3617; & # 3592; & # 3635; & # 3626; & # 3641; & # 3591; & # 3626; & # 3640; & # 3604; (GB / s): 25.6 <รูปแบบตัวอักษร = "จัดเรียงแนวตั้ง: inherit;"> & # 3629; & # 3640; & # 3611; & # 3585; & # 3619; & # 3603; & # 3660; & # 3605; & # 3656; & # 3629; & # 3614; & # 3656; & # 3623; & # 3591; & # 3629; & # 3639; & # 3656; & # 3609; & # 3654; </ font> </ font> </ td> < font style = "vertical-align: inherit;"> Direct Media Interface 2.0 & # 3629; & # 3636; & # 3609; & # 3648; & # 3605; & # 3619; & # 3619; & # 3660; & # 3648; & # 3615; & # 3626; PCI Express 2.0 <font style = "จัดเรียงแนวตั้ง: สืบทอดตั้ง": & # 3614; & # 3634; & # 3619; & # 3634; & # 3617; & # 3636; & # 3648; & # 3605; & # 3629; & # 3619; & # 3660; & # 3607; & # 3634; & # 3591; & # 3652; & # 3615; & # 3615; & # 3657; & # 3634; / & # 3588; & # 3623; & # 3634; & # 3617; & # 3619; & # 3657; & # 3629; & # 36029; & # 3609; > < / tr> & # 3629; & # 3640; & # 3603; & # 3627; & # 3616; & # 3641; & # 3617; & # 3636; & # 3651; & # 3594; & # 3657; & # 3591; & # 3634; & # 3609; & # 3626; & # 3641; & # 3591; & # 3626; & # 3640; & # 3604; <a href = "/ อภิธานศัพท์ / M / ขั้นต่ำ _Maximum_operating_temperatures html "class =" _ link "target =" _ blank "> < & # 3637; & # 3656; & # 3618; & # 3623; & # 3585; & # 3633; & # 3610; Intel Core i3-4030U & # 3650; & # 3611; & # 3619; & # 3695; & # 3595; & # 3626; & # 3648; & # 3595; & # 3629; & # 3619; & # 3660; & # 3617; & # 3637; & # 3588; & # 3640; & # 3603; & # 3626; & # 3617; & # 3610; & # 3633; & # 3605; & # 3636; & # 3604; & # 3657; & # 3634; & # 3609; & # 3588; & # 3623; & # 3634; & # 3617; & # 3611; & # 3621; & # 3629; & # 3604; & # 3616; & # 3633; & # 3618; & # 3585; & # 3634; & # 3619; & # 3611; & # 3657; & # 3629; & # 3591; & # 3585; & # 3633; & # 3609; & # 3586; & # 3657; & # 3629; & # 3617; & # 3641; & # 3621; & # 3649; & # 3621; & # 3632; / & # 3627; & # 3619; & # 3639; & # 3629; & # 3595; & # 3629; & # 3615; & # 3605; & # 3660; & # 3649; & # 3623; & # 3619; & # 3660; & # 3604; & # 3633; & # 3591; & # 3605; & # 3656; & # 3629; & # 3652; & # 3611; & # 3609; & # 3637; & # 3657 ;: Intel ปลอดภัย รหัส & # 3648; & # 3607; & # 3588; & # 3650; & # 3609; & # 3650; & # 3621; & # 3618; & # 3637; & # 3634; & # 3619; & # 3611; & # 3657; & # 3629; & # 3591; & # 3585; & # 3633; & # 3609; & # 3586; & # 3657; & # 3629; & # 3617; & # 3641; & # 3621; & # 3626; & # 3656; & # 3623; & # 3609; & # 3605; & # 3633; & # 3623; & # 3648; & # 3607; & # 3588; & # 3650; & # 3609; & # 3650; & # 3621; & # 3618; & # 3637; & # 3605; & # 3656; & # 3629; & # 3605; & # 3657; & # 3634; & # 3609; & # 3585; & # 3634; & # 3619; & # 3650; & # 3592; & # 3619; & # 3585; & # 3619; & # 3619; & # 3617; & # 3649; & # 3621; & # 3632; & # 3648; & # 3607; & # 3588; & # 3650; & # 3609; & # 3650; & # 3621; & # 3618; & # 3637; ที่เก็บข้อมูลอย่างรวดเร็ว CPU & # 3648; & # 3586; & # 3657; & # 3634; & # 3585; & # 3633; & # 3609; & # 3652; & # 3604; & # 3657; & # 3585; & # 3633; & # 3610; DirectX 11.2, OpenGL 4.3 & # 3649; & # 3621; & # 3632; OpenCL 1.2 API <font style = " # 3588; & # 3650; & # 3609; & # 3650; & # 3621; & # 3618; & # 3637; InTru 3D & # 3649; & # 3621; & # 3632; วงใน
gharchive/issue
2020-02-19T07:41:39
2025-04-01T04:55:21.850763
{ "authors": [ "WilliamAntonRohm", "chcomley", "estensen", "wutthichai46" ], "repo": "MicrosoftDocs/azure-devops-docs", "url": "https://github.com/MicrosoftDocs/azure-devops-docs/issues/7338", "license": "CC-BY-4.0", "license_type": "permissive", "license_source": "github-api" }
906405947
Typo "NuGet.config files"→"NuGet.Config files" https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/devops/pipelines/tasks/build/dotnet-core-cli?view=azure-devops #PingMSFTDocs @hyoshioka0128 : Thanks for your contribution! The author(s) have been notified to review your proposed change. @hyoshioka0128 - thank you for your contribution. this change doesn't seem to be necessary however. Closing the PR.
gharchive/pull-request
2021-05-29T07:19:47
2025-04-01T04:55:21.854010
{ "authors": [ "Jak-MS", "PRMerger6", "hyoshioka0128" ], "repo": "MicrosoftDocs/azure-devops-docs", "url": "https://github.com/MicrosoftDocs/azure-devops-docs/pull/10842", "license": "CC-BY-4.0", "license_type": "permissive", "license_source": "github-api" }
1492276137
broken link [Enter feedback here] The link at the bottom of this page in the Next Steps section is broken and gives a 404 error. Manage users, SSH, and check or repair disks on Azure Linux VMs using the 'VMAccess' Extension Document Details ⚠ Do not edit this section. It is required for learn.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking. ID: a3f59c6c-e3ed-e11d-7c65-1e54f1aaa3ea Version Independent ID: 4644f02a-35b4-fdee-372a-c39666c781fe Content: Use SCP to move files to and from a VM - Azure Virtual Machines Content Source: articles/virtual-machines/copy-files-to-vm-using-scp.md Service: virtual-machines GitHub Login: @mattmcinnes Microsoft Alias: mattmcinnes @cchapin-ms Thanks for your feedback! We will investigate and update as appropriate. created a pr#221250 to fix this.
gharchive/issue
2022-12-12T16:29:11
2025-04-01T04:55:21.877030
{ "authors": [ "RamanathanChinnappan-MSFT", "cchapin-ms", "ketan-chawda-msft" ], "repo": "MicrosoftDocs/azure-docs", "url": "https://github.com/MicrosoftDocs/azure-docs/issues/102610", "license": "CC-BY-4.0", "license_type": "permissive", "license_source": "github-api" }
334097107
Webapp slot instead of a new webapp If I'm not wrong, the first approach could also be implemented using webapp slots instead of creating a cloned webapp. This would also imply that the Traffic Manager is not needed because you can control the production slot by swapping between slots. Do you consider it a good option? Do you foresee any important drawback? Thanks! Document Details ⚠ Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking. ID: baa6b22d-e969-1a7b-5598-a34e0f6314a6 Version Independent ID: 2d741fa1-3fea-7f78-5074-0627b1bfa129 Content: Rolling application upgrades - Azure SQL Database Content Source: articles/sql-database/sql-database-manage-application-rolling-upgrade.md Service: sql-database GitHub Login: @anosov1960 Microsoft Alias: sashan @rogerbramon Thanks for the feedback! I have assigned the issue to the content author to evaluate and update as appropriate. @rogerbramon Sorry for a delayed response. Yes, weapp slots is the appropriate option here. Thanks for pointing this out.
gharchive/issue
2018-06-20T14:12:00
2025-04-01T04:55:21.881895
{ "authors": [ "Mike-Ubezzi-MSFT", "anosov1960", "rogerbramon" ], "repo": "MicrosoftDocs/azure-docs", "url": "https://github.com/MicrosoftDocs/azure-docs/issues/10476", "license": "CC-BY-4.0", "license_type": "permissive", "license_source": "github-api" }
1588206155
Missing instructions for deleting old / existing Azure resources after a Device Reset This process creates multiple new / duplicate Azure resources e.g. Azure Stack Edge resource associated Key vault associated Storage account Please add guidance for deleting the previous Azure Stack Edge, Key vault and Storage account resources (and any others that may have been created / associated with the old Azure Stack Edge resource). Leaving the old unused resources lying around indefinitely creates potential confusion, create unnecessary alarms / alerts, billing charges etc. However it's not necessarily obvious which resources need to be deleted (especially since the above resources are automatically created) or when it is safe to delete them, if there are any potential consequences - e.g. loss of data, billing implications etc. (Maybe not, but we need to let users know it's safe to delete these once the "Device reset" has been performed if so, or flag any implications fi there are some). This probably needs to be a new section at the end of the current article. Thanks, Rob Document Details ⚠ Do not edit this section. It is required for learn.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking. ID: 7678129e-8f6a-6007-8423-572accb0e927 Version Independent ID: 39677798-36ce-7578-64b4-eff77eae5b63 Content: Azure Stack Edge device reset and reactivation Content Source: articles/databox-online/azure-stack-edge-reset-reactivate-device.md Service: databox Sub-service: edge GitHub Login: @v-dalc Microsoft Alias: alkohli @robertstarling Thanks for your feedback! We will investigate and update as appropriate. @robertstarling Thanks for bringing this to our attention. I'm going to assign this to the document author so they can take a look at it accordingly. @alkohli Can you please check and add your comments on this doc update request as applicable.
gharchive/issue
2023-02-16T18:54:27
2025-04-01T04:55:21.888978
{ "authors": [ "Naveenommi-MSFT", "SaibabaBalapur-MSFT", "robertstarling" ], "repo": "MicrosoftDocs/azure-docs", "url": "https://github.com/MicrosoftDocs/azure-docs/issues/105346", "license": "CC-BY-4.0", "license_type": "permissive", "license_source": "github-api" }
1593515381
method is not correct POST /v1.0/verifiableCredentials/authorities/:authorityId This is probably a typo. The method must be a PATCH in order for this call to work. Document Details ⚠ Do not edit this section. It is required for learn.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking. ID: 3c965519-3e41-a8fc-1be5-f7e4bdd89c0b Version Independent ID: 55abf759-0324-2f21-83e4-f2dbaaf9a624 Content: Admin API for managing Microsoft Entra Verified ID - Microsoft Entra Verified ID Content Source: articles/active-directory/verifiable-credentials/admin-api.md Service: decentralized-identity Sub-service: verifiable-credentials GitHub Login: @barclayn Microsoft Alias: barclayn @biraq Thanks for your feedback! We will investigate and update as appropriate. @biraq Thanks for bringing this to our attention. I'm going to assign this to the document author so they can take a look at it accordingly @biraq thank you for pointing this out. The article will be updated soon. #please-close
gharchive/issue
2023-02-21T13:46:44
2025-04-01T04:55:21.894265
{ "authors": [ "ManoharLakkoju-MSFT", "YashikaTyagii", "barclayn", "biraq" ], "repo": "MicrosoftDocs/azure-docs", "url": "https://github.com/MicrosoftDocs/azure-docs/issues/105527", "license": "CC-BY-4.0", "license_type": "permissive", "license_source": "github-api" }
1631280339
Connect-AzureAD -Scopes parameter does not exist In the Azure AD PowerShell example Connect-AzureAD -Scopes "Application.ReadWrite.All", "Directory.ReadWrite.All", "DelegatedPermissionGrant.ReadWrite.All" "AppRoleAssignment.ReadWrite.All" is used. Connect-AzureAD doesn't have the -Scope parameter available and can't be used. Please update example and remove -Scopes. Thank you. Document Details ⚠ Do not edit this section. It is required for learn.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking. ID: a35d8227-9a4b-57a3-dd9b-31d577451c73 Version Independent ID: 9cb13a07-8fe0-4478-7ca0-ddbb1fa87d6c Content: Review permissions granted to applications - Microsoft Entra Content Source: articles/active-directory/manage-apps/manage-application-permissions.md Service: active-directory Sub-service: app-mgmt GitHub Login: @Jackson-Woods Microsoft Alias: jawoods @timhaintz Thanks for your feedback! We will investigate and update as appropriate. @Jackson-Woods Can you add your inputs on the above update regarding document. @timhaintz I'm going to assign this to the document author so they can take a look at it accordingly. @timhaintz, thanks for raising the issue. I've revised the article and I've confirmed that the reference to the scope parameter was recently removed. However, I have removed its reference in a related article to clean up the remaining instances. I'll go ahead and close this issue for now. Feel free to reach out in case you've any other concerns.
gharchive/issue
2023-03-20T02:45:45
2025-04-01T04:55:21.900850
{ "authors": [ "Naveenommi-MSFT", "SaibabaBalapur-MSFT", "omondiatieno", "timhaintz" ], "repo": "MicrosoftDocs/azure-docs", "url": "https://github.com/MicrosoftDocs/azure-docs/issues/106869", "license": "CC-BY-4.0", "license_type": "permissive", "license_source": "github-api" }
1664227727
Outdated link for 'Requirements File Format' In the section Use a requirements file to install libraries, the link for the file format specification is outdated and moved to a different page. The correct link for the page is now https://pip.pypa.io/en/stable/reference/requirements-file-format/. Please replace it with the correctly provided link. Thanks! Best, Adis Document Details ⚠ Do not edit this section. It is required for learn.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking. ID: 849a7f40-be8d-4e29-2c68-4b86ab7a32f6 Version Independent ID: ac4cd7f8-7f4d-fae9-a3d8-70cfd024f9c8 Content: Notebook-scoped Python libraries - Azure Databricks Content Source: databricks/libraries/notebooks-python-libraries.md Service: azure-databricks GitHub Login: @mssaperla Microsoft Alias: saperla @adisaljusi Thanks for your feedback! We will investigate and update as appropriate. @adisaljusi Thanks for reporting this! We have created a PR for this issue and the changes should go live soon.
gharchive/issue
2023-04-12T09:49:46
2025-04-01T04:55:21.906349
{ "authors": [ "AjayBathini-MSFT", "RamanathanChinnappan-MSFT", "adisaljusi" ], "repo": "MicrosoftDocs/azure-docs", "url": "https://github.com/MicrosoftDocs/azure-docs/issues/108076", "license": "CC-BY-4.0", "license_type": "permissive", "license_source": "github-api" }
1672162540
Trust bundle with private self-signed root CA. I've found two segments that appear to contradict how self-signed CA works with IoT Edge. In article Manage IoT Edge certificates, section Manage trusted root CA (trust bundle), it says the following: Using a self-signed certificate authority (CA) certificate as a root of trust with IoT Edge and modules is known as trust bundle (...) Get a publicly trusted root CA certificate from a PKI provider. I interpret this segment as implying that only publicly available CAs would work, not allowing for private CAs. Is that the case? If that is the case, can we have a warning-like banner explicitly informing that private CAs are not compatible? I can't imagine why it would have to only via a trusted public CA, can you explain why? Or, contrary, as explained in this other article Understand how Azure IoT Edge uses certificates, in section Self-signed root CA specificity: Certificate chain 0 s:/CN=edgegateway.local i:/CN=iotedged workload ca edgegateway 1 s:/CN=iotedged workload ca edgegateway i:/CN=my_optional_intermediate_CA 2 s:/CN=my_optional_intermediate_CA i:/CN=my_private_root_CA Which one is it? Only public? Private? Both? Document Details ⚠ Do not edit this section. It is required for learn.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking. ID: e275ce10-660d-4f06-9b9d-abb31940c564 Version Independent ID: de3b6527-e1fb-93d3-fdb9-3bb5f6958aa7 Content: Understand how IoT Edge uses certificates for security Content Source: articles/iot-edge/iot-edge-certs.md Service: iot-edge GitHub Login: @jlian Microsoft Alias: jlian @epomatti We are currently investigating and will update you shortly. Thanks @jlian that will clear things up
gharchive/issue
2023-04-18T00:41:14
2025-04-01T04:55:21.913193
{ "authors": [ "AshokPeddakotla-MSFT", "epomatti" ], "repo": "MicrosoftDocs/azure-docs", "url": "https://github.com/MicrosoftDocs/azure-docs/issues/108366", "license": "CC-BY-4.0", "license_type": "permissive", "license_source": "github-api" }
1692885722
Updates needed on documentation https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/web-application-firewall/afds/waf-faq#do-you-support-same-waf-features-in-all-integrated-platforms- Is outdated WAF for appgw currently supports Azwaf,crs 3.2 and #geofiltering Document Details ⚠ Do not edit this section. It is required for learn.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking. ID: 4d29386e-2da4-0f4c-d711-08b5692bc116 Version Independent ID: c3028ecd-e281-04e5-2a32-f89be60a1ecd Content: Azure Web Application Firewall on Azure Front Door Service - frequently asked questions Content Source: articles/web-application-firewall/afds/waf-faq.yml Service: web-application-firewall GitHub Login: @vhorne Microsoft Alias: victorh @ishanmicr Thank you for your feedback! We will review and update as appropriate. @ishanmicr , We have assigned this issue to the content owner/author for updating the doc accordingly. @vhorne , could you please update the FAQ with the current features? article updated #please-close
gharchive/issue
2023-05-02T18:17:58
2025-04-01T04:55:21.918647
{ "authors": [ "ChaitanyaNaykodi-MSFT", "GitaraniSharma-MSFT", "ishanmicr", "vhorne" ], "repo": "MicrosoftDocs/azure-docs", "url": "https://github.com/MicrosoftDocs/azure-docs/issues/108998", "license": "CC-BY-4.0", "license_type": "permissive", "license_source": "github-api" }
1781203820
BGP Peering from Same Peer on-prem to both Instances Hello, In this document it's mentioned that for Each Link has to have a Unique IP address and BGP Peer IP Address. It's not mentioned if a singled BGP Peer from on-prem can have a BGP Neighbor Relationship up with both Gateway Instances. Setup Example below: Link 1 with Public IP 1.1.1.1 and BGP Peer IP of 10.10.10.10 Link 2 with Public IP 2.2.2.2 and BGP Peer IP of 20.20.20.20 Instance 0 BGP peer IP- 11.11.11.11 Instance 1 BGP Peer IP - 22.22.22.22 BGP Neighbor Relationship Example: Link 1 with BGP peering 10.10.10.10 <-> 11.11.11.11 and 10.10.10.10 <-> 22.22.22.22 Link 2 with BGP peering 20.20.20.20 <-> 11.11.11.11 and 20.20.20.20 <-> 22.22.22.22 Can each link have 2 BGP Sessions? One to each Instance BGP IP? Document Details ⚠ Do not edit this section. It is required for learn.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking. ID: ea1d0acb-6306-2b6d-62ea-0e2001ff06f0 Version Independent ID: 04f84643-4214-56fc-90c4-ebeed05a947b Content: Azure path selection across multiple ISP links - Azure Virtual WAN Content Source: articles/virtual-wan/path-selection-multiple-links.md Service: virtual-wan GitHub Login: @cherylmc Microsoft Alias: cherylmc @Nott6170 Thanks for your feedback! We will investigate and update as appropriate. @Nott6170 , We have assigned this to the content owner/author for review. @cherylmc , for your review. We're taking a doc bug on this one. Thanks! #please-close #please-open #assign:wtnlee This is VPN, please assign Ayushi or Dee to this doc update. #assign:aybatra #reassign:aybatra #remove:deeharris-23 #reassign:aybatra #please-close
gharchive/issue
2023-06-29T16:58:25
2025-04-01T04:55:21.927224
{ "authors": [ "GitaraniSharma-MSFT", "Nott6170", "YashikaTyagii", "cherylmc", "wtnlee" ], "repo": "MicrosoftDocs/azure-docs", "url": "https://github.com/MicrosoftDocs/azure-docs/issues/111589", "license": "CC-BY-4.0", "license_type": "permissive", "license_source": "github-api" }
1799831060
Permanently delete soft deleted blobs [Enter feedback here] This page describes commands to restore deleted blobs. It doesn't include instructions on how to purge deleted blobs to save storage space. Document Details ⚠ Do not edit this section. It is required for learn.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking. ID: d82c6eb8-2129-8e58-b5ae-d559fa83ddd1 Version Independent ID: 4be98994-6bab-fbe6-dd48-b952f4a5d787 Content: Manage and restore soft-deleted blobs - Azure Storage Content Source: articles/storage/blobs/soft-delete-blob-manage.md Service: storage GitHub Login: @normesta Microsoft Alias: normesta @paulaustin-automutatio Thanks for your feedback! We will investigate and update as appropriate. @normesta Can you please check and add your comments on this doc update request as applicable. @paulaustin-automutatio Thanks for bringing this to our attention. I'm going to assign this to the document author so they can take a look at it accordingly. Hi @paulaustin-automutatio soft deleted blobs cannot yet be permanently deleted until the retention period expires. I added a note to the doc to make that clear. That change will appear live by tomorrow AM. Thank you for raising the gap. #sign-off #please-close
gharchive/issue
2023-07-11T22:14:34
2025-04-01T04:55:21.933393
{ "authors": [ "SaibabaBalapur-MSFT", "normesta", "paulaustin-automutatio" ], "repo": "MicrosoftDocs/azure-docs", "url": "https://github.com/MicrosoftDocs/azure-docs/issues/112041", "license": "CC-BY-4.0", "license_type": "permissive", "license_source": "github-api" }
2053760536
Support of AZ in Italy North Region Looking at the table in the page about Availability Zone support, Italy North region is missing. Can you double check and update the page? It looks like the service is present in the region and the region supports multiple AZ Thanks Edoardo Document Details ⚠ Do not edit this section. It is required for learn.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking. ID: a0c6e868-ae7b-d03b-17f9-0013fc1d3319 Version Independent ID: 3a3c24f7-0281-d6fc-a59b-def175b59fc2 Content: Reliability in Azure AI Search - Azure AI Search Content Source: articles/search/search-reliability.md Service: cognitive-search GitHub Login: @mattmsft Microsoft Alias: magottei @edschepis Thanks for your feedback! We will investigate and update as appropriate. Hello @edschepis, it looks like support for Italy North was added in October. The docs are now updated to acknowledge support for Italy North. Thanks for pointing out this omission. #please-close
gharchive/issue
2023-12-22T11:03:18
2025-04-01T04:55:21.938245
{ "authors": [ "HeidiSteen", "ManoharLakkoju-MSFT", "edschepis" ], "repo": "MicrosoftDocs/azure-docs", "url": "https://github.com/MicrosoftDocs/azure-docs/issues/118266", "license": "CC-BY-4.0", "license_type": "permissive", "license_source": "github-api" }
2093333111
Typo Typo: "with it's own SDK" should be "its" Document Details ⚠ Do not edit this section. It is required for learn.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking. ID: 3128e370-5a51-7042-524a-e58f30d8d728 Version Independent ID: 62a1b367-4df6-5f0f-5328-0fa20ead371e Content: Prompt flow in Azure AI Studio - Azure AI Studio Content Source: articles/ai-studio/how-to/prompt-flow.md Service: azure-ai-studio GitHub Login: @eric-urban Microsoft Alias: eur @AcousticYorick Thanks for your feedback! We will investigate and update as appropriate. #please-close
gharchive/issue
2024-01-22T08:15:17
2025-04-01T04:55:21.942775
{ "authors": [ "AcousticYorick", "AjayBathini-MSFT", "eric-urban" ], "repo": "MicrosoftDocs/azure-docs", "url": "https://github.com/MicrosoftDocs/azure-docs/issues/119066", "license": "CC-BY-4.0", "license_type": "permissive", "license_source": "github-api" }
345417910
Cluster AutoScaler Support in ACS The document here (https://github.com/kubernetes/autoscaler/blob/master/cluster-autoscaler/cloudprovider/azure/README.md) says that Cluster Autoscaler can be used with ACS , but in this doc under scaling consideration it says "Currently, autoscaling of agent nodes in a container service cluster is not supported" . Is this outdated or still the support does not exist? Document Details ⚠ Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking. ID: 6243611c-b658-3f88-876b-f93405988830 Version Independent ID: 6cf6ff5e-f24d-a6c2-5b58-b9b5be42a604 Content: Scale Azure Container Service cluster Content Source: articles/container-service/kubernetes/container-service-scale.md Service: container-service GitHub Login: @sauryadas Microsoft Alias: saudas @abizake Thanks for the feedback! I have assigned the issue to the content author to evaluate and update as appropriate. @abizake looks like this doc was out of date! I removed the mention that it is not supported. Once the PR merges this issue will close and the changes will go live in a few hours.
gharchive/issue
2018-07-28T04:35:49
2025-04-01T04:55:21.947430
{ "authors": [ "MicahMcKittrick-MSFT", "abizake", "vasivara-MSFT" ], "repo": "MicrosoftDocs/azure-docs", "url": "https://github.com/MicrosoftDocs/azure-docs/issues/12518", "license": "CC-BY-4.0", "license_type": "permissive", "license_source": "github-api" }
348338413
How pricing of read/second work? Hi, While estimating RUs, how pricing of read/second work? Let's say, if I need to fetch few of data elements out of many data elements per document? Does it consider the size of all of the documents on which it scans through or Just the size of data elements which are pulled (or mentioned in the select column lists in SQL Query)? e.g. Cosmos DB created with SQL API and writing SQL Query to fetch few data elements out of many and each of the document contains – x1=Total no. of documents: 2 millions x2=Average no. of data elements per document: 100 x3=Average size per document: 10KB x4= No. of data elements fetched from DB for reporting: 10 x5=Average size (considering 10 data elements fetched from DB): 1KB RUs=1000 In this case, how pricing of read/seconds works for given RUs? Which of the following ways to be applied for calculation? Way# 1 Total size of document = x1 * x2 * x3 Time to fetch data elements (In sec.) = Total size of document/RUs Pricing = More Or, Way# 2: Total size of document = x1 * x4 * x5 Time to fetch data elements (In sec.) = Total size of document/RUs Pricing = Less (As compared with way# 1) Or, Way# 3 = Way# 1 + Way# 2 Document Details ⚠ Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking. ID: abb0beaa-01ab-7031-937e-2d44c147b5d2 Version Independent ID: 742b249e-054f-a160-c2f5-7c22a796f9d0 Content: Request units and estimating throughput - Azure Cosmos DB Content Source: articles/cosmos-db/request-units.md Service: cosmos-db GitHub Login: @rimman Microsoft Alias: rimman @jpchauhan Thanks for the feedback! We are currently investigating and will update you shortly. @jpchauhan The Request units in Azure Cosmos DB documentation explains Request units and request charges and are based on multiple request unit considerations. For specific CRUD transactions, you could use the request unit calculator to estimate throughput based on your sample data. You will need to upload all sample JSON document(s), enter the number of operations per second and the calculator will give you an estimate figure of RU's you need. Further instructions on the full use of this tool is available: Use the request unit calculator Note: It is important that all document samples be included when requesting an accurate figure. For SQL queries the number of request units is going to be highly proportional to the number of query results. However Cosmos DB would also consider Query patterns like: complexity of a query, results, number of predicates, user defined functions, the size of the source data and some others. In order to calculate the RU's you could do the following: Since Cosmos DB tells you with every request how many RU's you are using and getting charged for, you could recreate the exact scenario you want to estimate, make the query in question and then check the Cosmos DB service response header that provides you the request charge information for executed query. @rimman The doc is pretty clear on how to estimate RU's for CRUD transactions, and has some very good examples. Could we improve the clarity of this doc regarding SQL queries and RU calculation? Maybe add an example of that use case? Also it would be great to include a sample JSON response that includes the service response header x-ms-request-charge? @jpchauhan in addition to Alberto's response here is some more information: When running SQL queries, throughput or RU consumption is calculated by taking number of parameters into account, all the query execution metrics documented here: https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/cosmos-db/sql-api-sql-query-metrics#query-execution-metrics account in the RU consumption. For queries that read data form Cosmos DB, the RU consumed is directly proportional to the number of results you get when you run the query. For queries that write data to cosmos DB the RU's consumed are proportional to the data written and the indexing policy used. #please-close @jpchauhan We will now proceed to close this thread. If there are further questions regarding this matter, please tag me in your reply. We will gladly continue the discussion and we will reopen the issue.
gharchive/issue
2018-08-07T14:09:32
2025-04-01T04:55:21.961254
{ "authors": [ "Alberto-Vega-MSFT", "SnehaGunda", "jpchauhan" ], "repo": "MicrosoftDocs/azure-docs", "url": "https://github.com/MicrosoftDocs/azure-docs/issues/13012", "license": "CC-BY-4.0", "license_type": "permissive", "license_source": "github-api" }
356664485
Get / Set authentication info There have been already few issues opened for this, but I still don't see any update in this article to clarify how to get and set the authentication info as they seem to be returned by the API in AAD portal. "authenticationPhoneNumber": "", "authenticationAlternativePhoneNumber": null, "authenticationEmail": ", "strongAuthenticationDetail": { "verificationDetail": { "alternativePhoneNumber": null, "email": "", "phoneNumber": "" } }, I'm looking at removing these info as part of the user offboarding script / process, I thought I would get useful info from this article. Document Details ⚠ Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking. ID: aae83fda-27b9-edca-1b59-1140de4cc3f5 Version Independent ID: c93eb84b-f04b-de03-f3f5-57d4672b0559 Content: Azure AD SSPR data requirements Content Source: articles/active-directory/authentication/howto-sspr-authenticationdata.md Service: active-directory GitHub Login: @MicrosoftGuyJFlo Microsoft Alias: joflore @mrik23 Thanks for the feedback. We are actively investigating and will get back to you soon. @mrik23 as was mentioned in the previously opened issues work is being done to create a Graph API for setting and changing security info is coming soon but no dates to share. #please-close @mrik23 We will now close this issue. If there are further questions regarding this matter, please reply to @femsulu and we will gladly continue the discussion. @femsulu, this issue is quite old, but I still can't find a corresponding method in the Graph API Is there a way to get or set the authentication info already? @azzzy Check the Graph API Beta branch: https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/graph/api/resources/phoneauthenticationmethod?view=graph-rest-beta There's a known issue where the Graph API won't return a phone number that was stored without a space after the country code: https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/answers/questions/593114/authentication-methods-not-available-at-graph-api.html
gharchive/issue
2018-09-04T06:06:03
2025-04-01T04:55:21.968727
{ "authors": [ "MicrosoftGuyJFlo", "azzzy", "deruss", "femsulu", "mrik23" ], "repo": "MicrosoftDocs/azure-docs", "url": "https://github.com/MicrosoftDocs/azure-docs/issues/14452", "license": "CC-BY-4.0", "license_type": "permissive", "license_source": "github-api" }
361627034
Sample query 'short form' is AND, not OR When I'm using AppInsights the behavior seems to be : apple banana equal to apple AND banana it isn't apple OR banana as stated in this article Document Details ⚠ Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking. ID: 3e8d2de3-73e5-857c-f87e-38ad9ed1358d Version Independent ID: 86ad9550-7a64-948e-440a-4b97bf5c812d Content: Using Search in Azure Application Insights Content Source: articles/application-insights/app-insights-diagnostic-search.md Service: application-insights GitHub Login: @mrbullwinkle Microsoft Alias: mbullwin @sgalles Thank you for the feedback! We are investigating this and will get back to you shortly. @sgalles I'm observing the same thing as well. I'll send this to the document author to make a correction. @sgalles Thank you for catching that issue in our docs. The fix addressing your issue should now be live. Thanks again for helping to improve our docs! Thank you for you quick answer and fix @mrbullwinkle and @kobulloc-MSFT Ah, actually @mrbullwinkle you didn't move the short form information : One of those days, thank you...fixing now, We locked publishing this morning for Ignite at 10 AM UTC, so I can put in a new PR, but it won't go-live for till the morning of Ignite next week. Thank you again for your diligence in confirming the change.
gharchive/issue
2018-09-19T08:04:57
2025-04-01T04:55:21.976122
{ "authors": [ "kobulloc-MSFT", "mrbullwinkle", "sgalles" ], "repo": "MicrosoftDocs/azure-docs", "url": "https://github.com/MicrosoftDocs/azure-docs/issues/15249", "license": "CC-BY-4.0", "license_type": "permissive", "license_source": "github-api" }
379610826
SQL Server 2016 SP2 Pricing? Please consider of adding price regarding the SQL Server 2016 SP2 please. https://azuremarketplace.microsoft.com/ja-jp/marketplace/apps/Microsoft.SQLServer2016SP2EnterpriseWindowsServer2016?tab=Overview Document Details ⚠ Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking. ID: 42ee49c2-4513-b07b-f921-2aa55ddf29a1 Version Independent ID: 3f281ce5-11a3-74e1-be10-12b704e61101 Content: Overview of SQL Server on Azure Windows Virtual Machines Content Source: articles/virtual-machines/windows/sql/virtual-machines-windows-sql-server-iaas-overview.md Service: virtual-machines-sql GitHub Login: @rothja Microsoft Alias: jroth Thanks for the feedback! We are currently investigating and will update you shortly. @KeiroKamioka0000 I think this is the doc you are referring to, in terms of updating with the pricing for SQL Server 2016 SP2 Thanks for the feedback! I have assigned the issue to the content author to investigate further and update the document as appropriate. @rothja Can you please take a look and update the doc as needed. Thanks :) I'm changing the links on the overview page to 2016 SP2 today. After that this issue will close. @KeiroKamioka0000 please let me know if you need anything else on this issue. Thank you!
gharchive/issue
2018-11-12T03:53:34
2025-04-01T04:55:21.982243
{ "authors": [ "Karishma-Tiwari-MSFT", "KeiroKamioka0000", "rothja" ], "repo": "MicrosoftDocs/azure-docs", "url": "https://github.com/MicrosoftDocs/azure-docs/issues/18683", "license": "CC-BY-4.0", "license_type": "permissive", "license_source": "github-api" }
394080938
Max retries exceeded for 6000+ images @YutongTie-MSFT i'm still facing the issue. I'm trying to run the API on 6000+ images. I've provided a delay of 60 seconds after every 10 images, which should ideally take care of the 20 transactions per minute quota. Input: Images (.png) Desired Output: File with extracted text only File with extracted text and their corresponding bounding boxes Error Msg: ConnectionError: HTTPSConnectionPool(host='westcentralus.api.cognitive.microsoft.com', port=443): Max retries exceeded with url: /vision/v2.0/ocr?language=unk&detectOrientation=true (Caused by NewConnectionError('<urllib3.connection.VerifiedHTTPSConnection object at 0x7f213da8b198>: Failed to establish a new connection: [Errno -2] Name or service not known',)) Code: import warnings warnings.filterwarnings("ignore") import glob import os import requests import pandas as pd import time # Replace the value of subscription_key with your subscription key. subscription_key = "{key}" assert subscription_key # Replace the value of vision_base_url (not necessary for trial version) vision_base_url = "https://westcentralus.api.cognitive.microsoft.com/vision/v2.0/" analyze_url = vision_base_url + "ocr" # Initializing Source and Output Directories source_directory = glob.glob(''folder/with/6000/images/*.png') output_directory_textFiles = 'folder/for/saving/6000/textFiles/' output_directory_JSONFiles = 'folder/for/saving/6000/JSONFiles/' if not os.path.exists(output_directory_textFiles): os.makedirs(output_directory_textFiles) if not os.path.exists(output_directory_JSONFiles): os.makedirs(output_directory_JSONFiles) # Define Function for Extracting Text def extract_text(image_path): # Read the image into a byte array image_data = open(image_path, "rb").read() headers = {'Ocp-Apim-Subscription-Key': subscription_key, 'Content-Type': 'application/octet-stream'} params = {'language': 'unk', 'detectOrientation': 'true'} response = requests.post(analyze_url, headers=headers, params=params, data=image_data) analysis = response.json() # Extract the word bounding boxes and text. line_infos = [region["lines"] for region in analysis["regions"]] word_infos = [] for line in line_infos: for word_metadata in line: for word_info in word_metadata["words"]: word_infos.append(word_info) return(word_infos) # Generating Text and JSON Files counter = 0 for image in sorted(source_directory): counter += 1 print(r'Processing %d %s' %(counter, image)) word_infos = extract_text(image) filename = image.split('/')[-1].replace('.png', '') if len(word_infos) != 0: bboxOutput = pd.DataFrame(word_infos) bboxOutput[['x','y', 'width','height']] = bboxOutput['boundingBox'].str.split(',',expand=True) bboxOutput = bboxOutput.drop(['boundingBox'], axis=1) textFile = bboxOutput['text'] textFile = textFile.to_csv(r'{}/{}.txt'.format(output_directory_textFiles, filename), header = False, index = None, sep = ',') jsonFile = bboxOutput.to_json(orient = 'records') with open(r'{}/{}.txt'.format(output_directory_JSONFiles, filename), 'w') as f: f.write(jsonFile) f.close() else: word_infos = pd.DataFrame(word_infos) textFile = word_infos.to_csv(r'{}/{}.txt'.format(output_directory_textFiles, filename), header = False, index = None, sep = ',') jsonFile = word_infos.to_json(orient = 'records') with open(r'{}/{}.txt'.format(output_directory_JSONFiles, filename), 'w') as f: f.write(jsonFile) f.close() if (counter % 10) == 0: time.sleep(60) else: pass @rajiv-kp can you please link the document that you are referring to? @AshokPeddakotla-MSFT below are the 2 documents https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/cognitive-services/computer-vision/quickstarts/python-print-text#prerequisites https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/cognitive-services/computer-vision/quickstarts/python-disk #21276 @rajiv-kp Thank you for providing the links. I see that you have created one more issue and we will now proceed to close this. Feel free to reopen if you have further questions.
gharchive/issue
2018-12-26T04:45:06
2025-04-01T04:55:21.988501
{ "authors": [ "AshokPeddakotla-MSFT", "rajiv-kp" ], "repo": "MicrosoftDocs/azure-docs", "url": "https://github.com/MicrosoftDocs/azure-docs/issues/21265", "license": "CC-BY-4.0", "license_type": "permissive", "license_source": "github-api" }
423026735
First line mentions Adobe HDInsight Cluster instead of Azure HDInsight Cluster. A typo in the docs. First line reads "Hadoop-based Adobe HDInsight clusters" while it should read "Hadoop-based Azure HDInsight clusters" Document Details ⚠ Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking. ID: 1d392710-4a96-9ef4-45d3-08da93c56acf Version Independent ID: ceaeac12-07ed-d50f-c5de-58cc66832675 Content: Install Presto on Azure HDInsight Linux clusters Content Source: articles/hdinsight/hdinsight-hadoop-install-presto.md Service: hdinsight GitHub Login: @hrasheed-msft Microsoft Alias: hrasheed @ameetkonnur Thanks for your contribution. Fixed in https://github.com/MicrosoftDocs/azure-docs-pr/pull/70180 @ameetkonnur Thanks for pointing out the issue. This issue has been addressed in the following PR: https://github.com/MicrosoftDocs/azure-docs-pr/pull/70180 . The changes should be live EOD or tomorrow. We will now close this issue. In future, if you see any minor bug fixes in the doc, feel free to click on the edit button and submit a PR to update. we love to take community contributions.
gharchive/issue
2019-03-20T01:38:18
2025-04-01T04:55:21.994139
{ "authors": [ "CHEEKATLAPRADEEP-MSFT", "ameetkonnur", "hrasheed-msft" ], "repo": "MicrosoftDocs/azure-docs", "url": "https://github.com/MicrosoftDocs/azure-docs/issues/27568", "license": "CC-BY-4.0", "license_type": "permissive", "license_source": "github-api" }
427686251
No PowerShell support Run Command for Linux Unlike the CLI, it seems that the PowerShell Invoke-AzVMRunCommand cannot be used to run scripts inside Linux VMs. The script must be present on the calling machine, which is not practical. The problem is that Azure Automation runbooks only support PowerShell and not CLI. Is there any solution to this catch-22? Document Details ⚠ Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking. ID: 792f4871-0d07-624f-7daf-02de97121e13 Version Independent ID: b70d481f-b351-bb38-cb49-1cda63422968 Content: Run shell scripts in an Linux VM on Azure Content Source: articles/virtual-machines/linux/run-command.md Service: automation GitHub Login: @georgewallace Microsoft Alias: gwallace @dohughes-msft Thanks for the Comment. We are actively investigating and will get back to you soon. @dohughes-msft Run command does not require an Automation account to work. Is there somewhere you are seeing states this? As for running the scripts, az cli is only used for Linux machines and PowerShell is only used for Windows machines. Can you please clarify what it is you are having issues with? @georgewallace yes that's correct, I want to execute a script inside a Linux VM from an automation runbook. CLI is not available for that. @dohughes-msft So that is a problem, there are two ways to solve that. Run it from a hybrid runbook worker where you can install whatever you need locally. Or use the REST API endpoint for run command... You can call it with PowerShell with the example below replacing the values in the uri with your valid values. I just used an example of running ps aux.. you can do whatever you want though. $azContext = Get-AzContext $azProfile = [Microsoft.Azure.Commands.Common.Authentication.Abstractions.AzureRmProfileProvider]::Instance.Profile $profileClient = New-Object -TypeName Microsoft.Azure.Commands.ResourceManager.Common.RMProfileClient -ArgumentList ($azProfile) $token = $profileClient.AcquireAccessToken($azContext.Subscription.TenantId) $authHeader = @{ 'Content-Type'='application/json' 'Authorization'='Bearer ' + $token.AccessToken } # Invoke the REST API $restUri = 'https://management.azure.com/subscriptions/{subscriptionId}/resourceGroups/{resourceGroupName}/providers/Microsoft.Compute/virtualMachines/{vmName}/runCommand?api-version=2017-03-30' $body = @{ 'commandId' = 'RunShellScript' 'script' = @('ps aux') } $response = Invoke-webrequest -Uri $restUri -Method Post -Headers $authHeader -Body $($body | ConvertTo-Json) $asyncstatus = $($response.headers.'Azure-AsyncOperation') $status = "InProgress" While($status -eq "InProgress")` { Write-Output "Status: $status" $response = invoke-webrequest -uri $asyncstatus -Headers $authHeader $status = $($response.Content | ConvertFrom-Json).status -eq "InProgress" sleep 5 } Write-Output $($response.Content | ConvertFrom-Json).properties.output.message @dohughes-msft We will now close this issue. If there are further questions regarding this matter, please reply and we will gladly continue the discussion. save your block-script to file and reference the file. tested on automation account sandbox. The script like "mkdir test" works for me where it creates folder inside the VM. However, iam not able to invoke a .sh file that is present in the VM. Tried doing the below, but no luck. Any help is appreciated. $body = @{ 'commandId' = 'RunShellScript' 'script' = @('sh /home/azureuser/test.sh') }
gharchive/issue
2019-04-01T12:49:03
2025-04-01T04:55:22.002123
{ "authors": [ "dohughes-msft", "femsulu", "georgewallace", "petr-stupka", "vinayakshenoy91" ], "repo": "MicrosoftDocs/azure-docs", "url": "https://github.com/MicrosoftDocs/azure-docs/issues/28451", "license": "CC-BY-4.0", "license_type": "permissive", "license_source": "github-api" }
430015878
Security between control and data/application plane. Hello, I found it difficult to understand the security controls available at the data / application plane. If I am following Azure recomendations then I need to rotate keys every so often, it would be good if this was spelled out. Document details ⚠ Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking. ID: cffc5753-1125-f6ee-de76-8ea460144c10 Version Independent ID: af3b7535-e78b-abb6-4a54-cdc55b6641bf Content: Security and data privacy - Azure Search Content Source: articles/search/search-security-overview.md Service: search GitHub Login: @HeidiSteen Microsoft Alias: heidist Thanks for the feedback! We are currently investigating and will update you shortly. @awws, Just to confirm, are you referring to the 'Azure Advisor' recommendations or something else for rotating keys? Could you please provide any specific requirement you’re working on for better assistance? Thanks again for sharing your valuable feedback, we really appreciate your comments on this. @awws @AjayKumar-MSFT Thanks for Ajay for asking about the Azure Advisor angle. It hadn't occurred to me. I did update the docs in the following ways. Anthony, if you can let me know whether this is sufficient, that would be great, or you can just close the issue if you are happy with the outcome. https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/search/search-security-overview#service-access-and-authentication ** this article has a section called "Service access and authentication". I added a reference to regenerating admin keys per Azure security practices. It's a small text change, but the link gives it some visibility. https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/search/search-security-api-keys#regenerate-admin-keys ** this article has steps on regenerating keys. What I added is info on what happens if you regenerate both at the same time and reassurance about recovery. Requests fail, but content exists and admins still have access. Please reply back on this thread if you have something else in mind @awws, Just checking in to see if you have had a chance to see the previous response. Kindly let us know if you need further assistance on this issue. Hi Ajay, I was referring to Azure recommendations on key rotation. The ideal would be integration with Managed Service Identity (like in Azure SQL service). Kind regards. Alex On Mon, 8 Apr 2019, 10:07 AjayKumar-MSFT, notifications@github.com wrote: @awws https://github.com/awws, Just to confirm, are you referring to the 'Azure Advisor https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/advisor/advisor-security-recommendations' recommendations or something else for rotating keys? Could you please provide any specific requirement you’re working on for better assistance? Thanks again for sharing your valuable feedback, we really appreciate your comments on this. — You are receiving this because you were mentioned. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/MicrosoftDocs/azure-docs/issues/28892#issuecomment-480728845, or mute the thread https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/APoGq8sHXwbs8dYBb1J9_qYaxMwvZgIQks5vevi-gaJpZM4cgG4i . Alex, Thank you for the clarification and your suggestions. Could you please elaborate the specific requirement for better clarity and focused assistance We have a similar feedback raised on Uservoice -https://feedback.azure.com/forums/263029-azure-search/suggestions/35898856-managed-service-identity-support, you may wish to up-vote the post. @HeidiSteen, Requesting for further review on this feedback. @awws, Alex, Since we have not heard back from you we will now proceed to close this thread. If there are further questions regarding this matter, please tag me in your reply. We will gladly reopen the issue and continue the discussion. HI Ajay, You asked for the key rotation reference - it was here https://blogs.msdn.microsoft.com/azuresecurity/2015/07/13/certificate-management-in-azure-dos-and-donts/ Kind regards Alex On Thu, 11 Apr 2019 at 20:45, AjayKumar-MSFT notifications@github.com wrote: @awws https://github.com/awws, Alex, Since we have not heard back from you we will now proceed to close this thread. If there are further questions regarding this matter, please tag me in your reply. We will gladly reopen the issue and continue the discussion. — You are receiving this because you were mentioned. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/MicrosoftDocs/azure-docs/issues/28892#issuecomment-482278435, or mute the thread https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/APoGqwqCA1T-odf_7y_6OeTKkIT33lxZks5vf5DKgaJpZM4cgG4i .
gharchive/issue
2019-04-06T09:25:54
2025-04-01T04:55:22.018914
{ "authors": [ "AjayKumar-MSFT", "HeidiSteen", "awws", "jakaruna-MSFT" ], "repo": "MicrosoftDocs/azure-docs", "url": "https://github.com/MicrosoftDocs/azure-docs/issues/28892", "license": "CC-BY-4.0", "license_type": "permissive", "license_source": "github-api" }
443117229
This article needs to be updated! In the text below: "Site Recovery can manage replication for: Azure VMs replicating between Azure regions. On-premises VMs, Azure Stack VMs and physical servers." There is a need to add: AWS, etc. Document Details ⚠ Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking. ID: e4f0f99b-031b-b8a5-a24f-4e110cae39da Version Independent ID: 0ea013c4-504a-735f-2c54-c9af7a320806 Content: About Azure Site Recovery Content Source: articles/site-recovery/site-recovery-overview.md Service: site-recovery GitHub Login: @rayne-wiselman Microsoft Alias: raynew @cloudysingh Thanks for the feedback. We are currently investigating into the issue and will update you shortly. @rayne-wiselman - FYI Updated. #please-close
gharchive/issue
2019-05-12T15:34:21
2025-04-01T04:55:22.024313
{ "authors": [ "ChiragMishra-MSFT", "cloudysingh", "femsulu", "rayne-wiselman" ], "repo": "MicrosoftDocs/azure-docs", "url": "https://github.com/MicrosoftDocs/azure-docs/issues/31067", "license": "CC-BY-4.0", "license_type": "permissive", "license_source": "github-api" }
449429369
Publisher revocation is not available in .Net Core SDK (only via REST API) This is related to the EventHub article: https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/event-hubs/event-hubs-programming-guide Is there a plan to implement publisher revocation in the new .NET Standard compliant library? Anyway, "Publisher revocation" section needs updates and links to the REST API related to Publisher revocation/restore. Document Details ⚠ Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking. ID: b109d8b1-4a76-6c2c-b7a1-f473c3723a68 Version Independent ID: 2ffb9a42-52e2-8aa1-86cc-d1033c42ec49 Content: Programming guide - Azure Event Hubs Content Source: articles/event-hubs/event-hubs-programming-guide.md Service: event-hubs GitHub Login: @ShubhaVijayasarathy Microsoft Alias: shvija @bychkov Thanks for the feedback! We are currently investigating and will update you shortly. @bychkov Thank you for the feedback! We have assigned the issue to the content author to investigate this and update the document as appropriate. @ShubhaVijayasarathy Could you please take a look at feedback from @bychkov. Seems like a note was added about the limitation (REST only). #please-close Seems like a note was added about the limitation (REST only). #please-close
gharchive/issue
2019-05-28T19:06:10
2025-04-01T04:55:22.030469
{ "authors": [ "BryanTrach-MSFT", "KranthiPakala-MSFT", "bychkov", "spelluru" ], "repo": "MicrosoftDocs/azure-docs", "url": "https://github.com/MicrosoftDocs/azure-docs/issues/32281", "license": "CC-BY-4.0", "license_type": "permissive", "license_source": "github-api" }
473425561
Extension is missing in the Az command The documentation is missing the extension in the Az command, it should be: az network front-door waf-policy instead of az network waf-policy This az command is also wrong: az network waf-policy custom-rule should be az network front-door waf-policy rule In the az network front-door waf-policy rule create command we also have the issue that --match-condiction is an unrecognized argument Document Details ⚠ Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking. ID: 335de4dc-ee21-8fdd-3b11-b32a0027f16e Version Independent ID: de448dd6-5a47-c9b8-7fc5-92e898f53274 Content: Configure an IP restriction rule with a web application firewall rule for Azure Front Door Service Content Source: articles/frontdoor/waf-front-door-configure-ip-restriction.md Service: frontdoor GitHub Login: @KumudD Microsoft Alias: kumud @stuycks Thanks for the feedback! I have assigned the issue to the content author to evaluate and update as appropriate. @KumudD it looks like several of the commands and the format of the commands have changed. @stuycks Thanks for bringing this to our attention. The az commands in the article have been updated. #please-close
gharchive/issue
2019-07-26T15:52:21
2025-04-01T04:55:22.035794
{ "authors": [ "KumudD", "TravisCragg-MSFT", "stuycks" ], "repo": "MicrosoftDocs/azure-docs", "url": "https://github.com/MicrosoftDocs/azure-docs/issues/35940", "license": "CC-BY-4.0", "license_type": "permissive", "license_source": "github-api" }
518045455
Script errors encountered in Automation Account I'm attempting to use the script to enable custom automation account. This is running from inside the automation account itself. I receive the following error: Get-BearerToken: failed with [Exception: System.Management.Automation.PSArgumentException: Cannot find type [Microsoft.IdentityModel.Clients.ActiveDirectory.ClientAssertionCertificate]: verify that the assembly containing this type is loaded. at System.Management.Automation.MshCommandRuntime.ThrowTerminatingError(ErrorRecord errorRecord)]. Has anyone been able to get this script to work properly? Document Details ⚠ Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking. ID: 0c11ae82-7254-7494-1401-ce2c116eb1b6 Version Independent ID: 6e45cb37-357e-14fc-5a98-82f03358985d Content: Automatic update of the Mobility service in Azure to Azure disaster recovery Content Source: articles/site-recovery/azure-to-azure-autoupdate.md Service: site-recovery GitHub Login: @Rajani-Janaki-Ram Microsoft Alias: rajanaki FYI, I was able to get the runbook to work by replacing line 199: Get-Header ([ref]$Header) $AadAudience $AadAuthority $RunAsConnectionName with the following code: $connection = Get-AutomationConnection -Name AzureRunAsConnection $loginresults = Login-AzureRmAccount -ServicePrincipal -Tenant $connection.TenantID -ApplicationId $connection.ApplicationID -CertificateThumbprint $connection.CertificateThumbprint $context = Get-AzureRmContext $SubscriptionId = $context.Subscription $cache = $context.TokenCache $cacheItem = $cache.ReadItems() $AccessToken = ($cacheItem | Where-Object { $_.Resource -eq "https://management.core.windows.net/" })[0].AccessToken Write-Output -InputObject @{AccessToken = $AccessToken; SubscriptionId = $SubscriptionId } $header = @{‘Authorization’ = ”Bearer $AccessToken” }` Thanks @jeffwmiles. @Rajani-Janaki-Ram - looks like we may need to update the script in the doc. @innosam to look into this. Submitted a work item for the document owner to review this issue. @jeffwmiles - this capability is now available on UI too. You should use that capability rather than this script. Closing this since this functionality is now more easier available in the portal UI. Thanks! #please-close
gharchive/issue
2019-11-05T21:24:16
2025-04-01T04:55:22.044532
{ "authors": [ "Rajani-Janaki-Ram", "Sharmistha-Rai", "davidsmatlak", "femsulu", "jeffwmiles", "rayne-wiselman" ], "repo": "MicrosoftDocs/azure-docs", "url": "https://github.com/MicrosoftDocs/azure-docs/issues/42148", "license": "CC-BY-4.0", "license_type": "permissive", "license_source": "github-api" }
518533680
Microsoft.SystemForCrossDomainIdentityManagement does not have enough documentation The only documentation you can find for the nuget package is this page and it did not describe how to do more complicated things like implementing custom schemas. Document Details ⚠ Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking. ID: 45cb3eec-7693-4e22-bcde-3f85d5a4be14 Version Independent ID: 506c3302-e823-8f1e-d547-083ef0b664df Content: SCIM user provisioning with Azure Active Directory Content Source: articles/active-directory/manage-apps/use-scim-to-provision-users-and-groups.md Service: active-directory Sub-service: app-mgmt GitHub Login: @msmimart Microsoft Alias: mimart @ashkansirous Thanks for your feedback! We will investigate and update as appropriate. Hi we are working on replacing the existing package with a new reference code that you can use please stay tuned. @ashkansirous thanks for your patience; the new reference code is in the works and will be available soon. We'll close this issue for now but please watch for updates. #please-close
gharchive/issue
2019-11-06T15:09:48
2025-04-01T04:55:22.050074
{ "authors": [ "ArvindHarinder1", "MarileeTurscak-MSFT", "ashkansirous", "msmimart" ], "repo": "MicrosoftDocs/azure-docs", "url": "https://github.com/MicrosoftDocs/azure-docs/issues/42230", "license": "CC-BY-4.0", "license_type": "permissive", "license_source": "github-api" }
562731899
clear statement on ML enterprise security and Azure AD b2b authentication is required as we have found there are unique challenges and limits of running Azure b2b with ML access; MS needs to test this further. Document Details ⚠ Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking. ID: e5c3bce1-2494-6caf-728c-53127ae85329 Version Independent ID: acdd8494-76aa-d47b-9735-7aea72613a95 Content: Enterprise security - Azure Machine Learning Content Source: articles/machine-learning/concept-enterprise-security.md Service: machine-learning Sub-service: core GitHub Login: @aashishb Microsoft Alias: aashishb @bakerm00 Thanks for the feedback! I have assigned the issue to the content author to investigate further and update the document as appropriate. FYI - @trevorbye @Blackmist @nishankgu - undocumented limits. Hi @bakerm00 thanks for reporting this and sorry for the delay in getting a response. I've verified with the development team that Azure AD B2B was not specifically tested with Azure Machine Learning, so it's currently unsupported. I'll update the documentation to state this today. The engineering team has taken a work item to test this scenario and make sure it works as expected for Azure Machine Learning. I do not have any ETA on when this will happen. A warning has been added to this document about Azure Active Directory B2B being unsupported. It will go live later today. #please-close
gharchive/issue
2020-02-10T18:04:10
2025-04-01T04:55:22.056041
{ "authors": [ "Blackmist", "YutongTie-MSFT", "bakerm00", "j-martens" ], "repo": "MicrosoftDocs/azure-docs", "url": "https://github.com/MicrosoftDocs/azure-docs/issues/47789", "license": "CC-BY-4.0", "license_type": "permissive", "license_source": "github-api" }
586844485
Missing Authentication Administrator Role May be missing Authentication Administrator Role - Atleast according to Microsoft own Secure Score best practices "Require MFA for administrative roles" Document Details ⚠ Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking. ID: ca2fb784-f7e9-6fad-9889-2dc6639bc0e1 Version Independent ID: 8b90e35e-6918-1073-85f6-ad47786033c6 Content: Conditional Access - Require MFA for administrators - Azure Active Directory Content Source: articles/active-directory/conditional-access/howto-conditional-access-policy-admin-mfa.md Service: active-directory Sub-service: conditional-access GitHub Login: @MicrosoftGuyJFlo Microsoft Alias: joflore @hostmatic Thank you for your feedback. We will have this reviewed and update the thread accordingly. Adding to an existing PR @hostmatic Thanks for the catch! They updated the guidance on me. #please-close #assign @MicrosoftGuyJFlo #unassign @shashishailaj
gharchive/issue
2020-03-24T10:13:46
2025-04-01T04:55:22.061698
{ "authors": [ "MicrosoftGuyJFlo", "hostmatic", "shashishailaj" ], "repo": "MicrosoftDocs/azure-docs", "url": "https://github.com/MicrosoftDocs/azure-docs/issues/50779", "license": "CC-BY-4.0", "license_type": "permissive", "license_source": "github-api" }
586912026
AuditIfNotExists example lacks name The example policy for AuditIfNotExists checks if the ResourceGroup containing the VM you are check has a VM that has a proper extension. It should check if the specific VM has an extension… This example is extremely misleading and trivial to fix. Just add: "name": "[concat(field('name'), '/IaaSAntimalware')]" Of course assuming this is the IaaSAntimalware is the correct extension name Alternatively add check that extension belongs to proper VM using: { "field": "name", "like": "[concat(field('name'), '/*')]" } Document Details ⚠ Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking. ID: d52df521-f6fb-6b7c-11de-7eef01d60ecd Version Independent ID: 947c0c04-1e48-7e6f-40a3-9517294740c8 Content: Understand how effects work - Azure Policy Content Source: articles/governance/policy/concepts/effects.md Service: azure-policy GitHub Login: @DCtheGeek Microsoft Alias: dacoulte Nevermind, found the special rule: Doesn't apply if type is a resource that would be underneath the if condition resource. @mkosieradzki Glad to know that you have self resolved and hence closed the issue. Thanks for the update. :+1:
gharchive/issue
2020-03-24T12:07:34
2025-04-01T04:55:22.067164
{ "authors": [ "KrishnaG-MSFT", "mkosieradzki" ], "repo": "MicrosoftDocs/azure-docs", "url": "https://github.com/MicrosoftDocs/azure-docs/issues/50784", "license": "CC-BY-4.0", "license_type": "permissive", "license_source": "github-api" }
605896261
Documentation unclear for running cspack on both web and worker roles The documentation for packaging both web/worker roles is a bit unclear. I am running the following command: cspack C:\dev\MonoRepo\src\Lens.Exchange.Services\src\Cloud\Lens.Exchange.Cloud.Orchestrator\ServiceDefinition.csdef /out:"C:\Users\amod\Downloads\cloud.cspkg" /role:Lens.Exchange.Services.Auditor;C:\dev\MonoRepo\src\Lens.Exchange.Services\src\Services\Lens.Exchange.Services.Auditor\bin\Release /role:Lens.Exchange.Services.ContainerManager;C:\dev\MonoRepo\src\Lens.Exchange.Services\src\Services\Lens.Exchange.Services.ContainerManager\bin\Release /role:Lens.Exchange.Services.FileManager;C:\dev\MonoRepo\src\Lens.Exchange.Services\src\Services\Lens.Exchange.Services.FileManager\bin\Release /role:Lens.Exchange.Services.O365AccountManager;C:\dev\MonoRepo\src\Lens.Exchange.Services\src\Services\Lens.Exchange.Services.O365AccountManager\bin\Release /role:Lens.Exchange.Services.Orchestrator;C:\dev\MonoRepo\src\Lens.Exchange.Services\src\Services\Lens.Exchange.Services.Orchestrator\bin\Release /role:Lens.Exchange.Services.Preservation;C:\dev\MonoRepo\src\Lens.Exchange.Services\src\Services\Lens.Exchange.Services.Preservation\bin\Release /role:Lens.Exchange.Services.Search;C:\dev\MonoRepo\src\Lens.Exchange.Services\src\Services\Lens.Exchange.Services.Search\bin\Release /sites:Lens.Exchange.Services.Api;Web;C:\dev\MonoRepo\src\Lens.Exchange.Services\src\Services\Lens.Exchange.Services.Api It fails with the following error: cspack.exe: Error : Could not find a part of the path 'C:\dev\MonoRepo\src\Lens.Exchange.Services\src\Cloud\Lens.Exchange.Services.Api'. This is not a valid path. I don't see a solution in the docs here, any suggestions? Document Details ⚠ Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking. ID: 9ab3a72c-f408-2bdc-55f6-c12c220cace2 Version Independent ID: f9d36f07-723c-6354-383b-6b227a9648e9 Content: What is a Cloud Service model and package Content Source: articles/cloud-services/cloud-services-model-and-package.md Service: cloud-services GitHub Login: @tanmaygore Microsoft Alias: tagore @adammodlin Thanks for the feedback! I have assigned the issue to content author to check and update the document as appropriate. @tanmaygore Can you please check and add your comments on this doc update request as applicable. We are currently cleaning up old issues and closing out items that are greater than 90 days old. If an issue is still present, please open a new feedback item on the document so we can prioritize correctly. #please-close
gharchive/issue
2020-04-23T21:48:14
2025-04-01T04:55:22.073926
{ "authors": [ "VikasPullagura-MSFT", "adammodlin", "mimckitt" ], "repo": "MicrosoftDocs/azure-docs", "url": "https://github.com/MicrosoftDocs/azure-docs/issues/53185", "license": "CC-BY-4.0", "license_type": "permissive", "license_source": "github-api" }
652009665
java.lang.NoClassDefFoundError: scala/Product$class When running this scala code on databricks version 7.0 (Scala 2.12, Spark 3.0.0) import com.microsoft.azure.sqldb.spark.config.Config import com.microsoft.azure.sqldb.spark.connect._ import org.apache.spark.sql.SaveMode var m = Map( "url" -> "sqlswerver.database.windows.net", "databaseName" -> "MyDB", "dbTable" -> "MyTable", "user" -> "TestUser", "password" -> "TestPWD", "tableLock" -> "true", "connectTimeout" -> "5", //seconds "queryTimeout" -> "5" //seconds ) var config = Config(m); The following error is generated: java.lang.NoClassDefFoundError: scala/Product$class at com.microsoft.azure.sqldb.spark.config.SqlDBConfigBuilder.(SqlDBConfigBuilder.scala:31) .... ... It works fine in databricks 6.5 This appears to be a Scala versioning issue. Document Details ⚠ Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking. ID: 3a43d656-dbdf-ae04-f88d-488aa1dc78c5 Version Independent ID: 155c9eb2-92df-1619-4284-17c46a419f1f Content: Use the Spark connector with Microsoft Azure SQL and SQL Server - Azure SQL Database Content Source: articles/azure-sql/database/spark-connector.md Service: sql-db-mi Sub-service: development GitHub Login: @denzilribeiro Microsoft Alias: denzilr @ElectricLlama Thank you for the detailed feedback. We are actively investigating and will get back to you soon. @ElectricLlama Thanks for bringing this to our attention. Currently we are working with the product team to fix this issue as soon as possible. @ElectricLlama The issue is because the SQL connector for Spark is not currently supported for Spark 3.0. We are in the process of getting this prioritized for the roadmap but the current recommendation would be to either use JDBC with Spark 3.0 (instead of the native connector) or use the compatible Spark runtime. Could you please do let us know your name, organization and how big of an issue (in terms of pain) for you? @ElectricLlama Since we have not heard back from you we will now proceed to close this thread. If there are further questions regarding this matter, please tag me in your reply. We will gladly reopen the issue and continue the discussion. Thanks sorry I missed the notification email. It's no longer a huge pain. I realise now that this is an older connector. I see that the new connector does not appear support direct SQL (i.e. TRUNCATE TABLE) You do need to update the doco to reflect the version correctly, It currently says Apache Spark | 2.0.2 or later Scala | 2.10 or later Which is incorrect since it doesn't work under Spark 3.0 @ElectricLlama Thanks for the feedback! Your feedback has been shared with the content owner for further review. @mamccrea Could you please update the document to reflect version which supported Spark/Scala the Spark Connector? This is our current roadblock to Spark 3.0 / Azure Databricks 7.3 - since this is the only really fast BULK INSERT Option with Azure SQL DB. This is our current roadblock to Spark 3.0 / Azure Databricks 7.3 - since this is the only really fast BULK INSERT Option with Azure SQL DB. Also a roadblock for enterprise projects: @CHEEKATLAPRADEEP-MSFT please advise on the latest. Unable to perform a bulkinsert from a dataframe: Running several libraries, but notable are: com.microsoft.azure:azure-sqldb-spark:1.0.2 Scala 2.12 Apache Spark 3.0.1 Please advise
gharchive/issue
2020-07-07T05:21:21
2025-04-01T04:55:22.085204
{ "authors": [ "AnuragSharma-MSFT", "CHEEKATLAPRADEEP-MSFT", "CyCodeDev", "ElectricLlama", "hmayer1980" ], "repo": "MicrosoftDocs/azure-docs", "url": "https://github.com/MicrosoftDocs/azure-docs/issues/58527", "license": "CC-BY-4.0", "license_type": "permissive", "license_source": "github-api" }
653968366
Empty Double Quots Cause PS Error by IP and NSG When Creating New VM az vm create --resource-group myRGNetwork --name myBackendVM --vnet-name myVNet --subnet myBackendSubnet --public-ip-address "" --nsg "" --image UbuntuLTS --generate-ssh-keys This command does not work. It causes the following error: az vm create: error: argument --public-ip-address: expected one argument Document Details ⚠ Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking. ID: 14645eee-2f14-9a75-4b3b-8227e5afe341 Version Independent ID: 0eaf7f1c-a3ae-cb75-6102-35cc9d395bb5 Content: Tutorial - Create and manage Azure virtual networks for Linux VMs - Azure Linux Virtual Machines Content Source: articles/virtual-machines/linux/tutorial-virtual-network.md Service: virtual-machines-linux GitHub Login: @cynthn Microsoft Alias: cynthn @yazido As mentioned in the tutorial, the commands are to be executed on the bash shell (Azure CLI) in CloudShell. If you try it in Bash in Cloud Shell or cmd prompt if you have configured CLI locally then you will not see any issue. See below for reference. You are facing issue because you are running the commands on Powershell. Here for the backend VM creation the intent is not to have a public IP and NSG (as NSG is associated to subnet in previous step), you can remove these both optional arguments and try to avoid the error. If you want to run on powershell without any issue, then use the appropriate powershell cmdlets. Below is just a reference, you may need to add/remove required parameters. @yazido Hope the provided information is helpful. We will now close this issue. If there are further questions regarding this, please tag me in a comment. I will reopen it and we will continue the discussion.
gharchive/issue
2020-07-09T10:57:03
2025-04-01T04:55:22.092803
{ "authors": [ "VikasPullagura-MSFT", "yazido" ], "repo": "MicrosoftDocs/azure-docs", "url": "https://github.com/MicrosoftDocs/azure-docs/issues/58710", "license": "CC-BY-4.0", "license_type": "permissive", "license_source": "github-api" }
696226490
"True" value doesn't work, needs to be "true" Hi, in the page the Booleen value is invalid. See screenshot below. When its set to "True" the portal returns an error. When its set to "true" it works. The documentation on this page says to set it to "True" with an uppercase T, which is incorrect. Document Details ⚠ Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking. ID: a007c4e9-6ec1-4be0-9cfb-a31e62013039 Version Independent ID: 3aab65db-895f-2f1f-3ffe-2e4f718bca56 Content: Shared device mode for iOS devices - Microsoft identity platform | Azure Content Source: articles/active-directory/develop/msal-ios-shared-devices.md Service: active-directory Sub-service: develop GitHub Login: @brandwe Microsoft Alias: brandwe @bubbletroubles Thanks for your feedback! We will investigate and update as appropriate. @bubbletroubles I have created a PR to update the documentation and will now close out this issue. Please allow some time for the changes to reflect and if you don't see the document update, please let me know. I will be more than happy to re-open this issue and look into what happened. Thank you for your time and patience!
gharchive/issue
2020-09-08T22:34:51
2025-04-01T04:55:22.098843
{ "authors": [ "JamesTran-MSFT", "bubbletroubles" ], "repo": "MicrosoftDocs/azure-docs", "url": "https://github.com/MicrosoftDocs/azure-docs/issues/62285", "license": "CC-BY-4.0", "license_type": "permissive", "license_source": "github-api" }
709016651
web front-end port ambiguous The article says: Take note of the port for the web front-end listed in Endpoint. There is only one Port setting in the ServiceManifest.xml file. Mine looks like this: How would anyone be sure that port is for the web front-end? Is it? If so, maybe the text should be changed to something like: Take note of the port for the web front end listed in Endpoint with the name FabrikamFiber.WebTypeEndpoint. Or even better: The port number for the web front end is declared as: where XXX is the port number. Take note of that port number because you will need it later. [Enter feedback here] Document Details ⚠ Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking. ID: 57882c35-3894-f871-bea2-470e74f63c57 Version Independent ID: 75dada9d-a6a5-c343-e3af-8dab59ad00cb Content: Deploy a .NET app in a container to Azure Service Fabric - Azure Service Fabric Content Source: articles/service-fabric/service-fabric-host-app-in-a-container.md Service: service-fabric GitHub Login: @athinanthny Microsoft Alias: atsenthi Hi @writex, thanks for the feedback. I've assigned this to the doc author to improve. Thanks for your dedication to our documentation. Unfortunately, at this time we have been unable to review your issue in a timely manner and we sincerely apologize for the delayed response. Though the scope of our feedback channel here on GitHub covers specific documentation fixes, we can help redirect you to the right support channel to get an answer to your question: [reference to alternative product/service or community endpoint]. Because this issue does not relate to documentation, we are closing this issue. #please-close
gharchive/issue
2020-09-25T15:12:52
2025-04-01T04:55:22.105613
{ "authors": [ "WinstonHoward-MSFT", "tomvcassidy", "writex" ], "repo": "MicrosoftDocs/azure-docs", "url": "https://github.com/MicrosoftDocs/azure-docs/issues/63297", "license": "CC-BY-4.0", "license_type": "permissive", "license_source": "github-api" }
738090434
SAML using Azure Active Directory Authentication in Java We based Application Is there a sample solution for Saml implementation? I want to use Microsoft Azure AD authentication for the SAML implementation in my Single java based web application Reference : https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/active-directory/develop/single-sign-on-saml-protocol @Irfansh20 Thanks for your feedback! We will investigate and update as appropriate. There does not appear to be a Microsoft sample for this, but we have passed your feedback along to the content authors to create one. https://stackoverflow.com/questions/52004423/read-saml-response-received-from-azure-active-directory-using-java https://github.com/Azure/azure-docs-sdk-java/blob/master/docs-ref-services/activedirectory.md https://github.com/Azure-Samples/ms-identity-java-webapp https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/java/api/overview/azure/activedirectory?view=azure-java-stable CC @kenwith
gharchive/issue
2020-11-06T22:59:45
2025-04-01T04:55:22.109113
{ "authors": [ "Irfansh20", "MarileeTurscak-MSFT" ], "repo": "MicrosoftDocs/azure-docs", "url": "https://github.com/MicrosoftDocs/azure-docs/issues/65692", "license": "CC-BY-4.0", "license_type": "permissive", "license_source": "github-api" }
759782430
The "note" text doesn't work when configuring Front Door The note Automatic rotation of certificates to the latest version, when a newer version of the certificate is available in your Key Vault. doesn't seem to apply, since you cannot configure azure front door to have a blank version when hooking up the cert. This is either out of date or something is wrong in the azure portal UI. Document Details ⚠ Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking. ID: 105783bc-d51e-c199-7c51-1475bc9fbaa0 Version Independent ID: 114c01b8-8b95-ff91-98c5-fd44b12ac6fc Content: Tutorial - Configure HTTPS on a custom domain for Azure Front Door Content Source: articles/frontdoor/front-door-custom-domain-https.md Service: frontdoor GitHub Login: @duongau Microsoft Alias: duau @brphelps We are checking this and will get back to you. Thanks for the feedback! I have checked the issue to be true and assigned the content author to this issue for updating the same. @brphelps: Thanks for providing feedback that helps improve our documentation. This issue has been resolved and we are closing the issue. #please-close
gharchive/issue
2020-12-08T21:07:53
2025-04-01T04:55:22.113861
{ "authors": [ "NavtejSaini-MSFT", "SaiKishor-MSFT", "brphelps", "duongau" ], "repo": "MicrosoftDocs/azure-docs", "url": "https://github.com/MicrosoftDocs/azure-docs/issues/67350", "license": "CC-BY-4.0", "license_type": "permissive", "license_source": "github-api" }
312261882
"This example has been developed for the .NET Framework using Visual Studio 2015, Community Edition." This is really putting an out-of-date version of Visual Studio on some of our most interesting and forward looking services. It's fine and great even if VS compatibility for these examples goes back to previous VS versions but this sample should be created and available for people using VS 2017. Document Details ⚠ Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking. ID: 30bf4241-72f9-3227-d8f8-855da83e4da1 Version Independent ID: c8787c68-f4c9-6689-5c7f-0c6bfc3d1797 Content: Custom Vision API C# tutorial Content Source: articles/cognitive-services/Custom-Vision-Service/csharp-tutorial.md Service: cognitive-services GitHub Login: @anrothMSFT Microsoft Alias: anroth @LyalinDotCom Thanks for bringing this to our attention. Your feedback has been shared with the content owner for further review. iteration.Status == "Completed" should be "Training", no ? @ @LyalinDotCom how could I use this API in ionic framework it uses typescript for the backend. #please-close
gharchive/issue
2018-04-08T01:55:09
2025-04-01T04:55:22.119231
{ "authors": [ "LyalinDotCom", "femsulu", "ksujanpaul", "pheemery2", "tchristiani" ], "repo": "MicrosoftDocs/azure-docs", "url": "https://github.com/MicrosoftDocs/azure-docs/issues/6881", "license": "CC-BY-4.0", "license_type": "permissive", "license_source": "github-api" }
786778150
Set-AzResource : Cannot convert 'System.Object[]' to the type 'System.Collections.Hashtable' required by parameter 'Tag' The title describes the issue. $tags += @{ResourceType="VM"} results in a System.Object resource, checked via $tags.GetType() While Set-AzResource ... -Tag x -Force expects x to be a Hashtable. When I first create an empty Hashtable it seems to be ok, but when I run the below command, the name changes. $tags = (Get-AzResource -ResourceGroupName $rg -Name $vm.Name).Tags On an Azure subscription where it doesn't work, this is how it looks: (first is empty hashTable, 2nd is "filled" (Get-AzResource...). Further investigation shows that $tags = (Get-AzResource -ResourceGroupName $rg -Name $vm.Name).Tags returns an 'Object[]' in some subscriptions and in other subscriptions it returns 'Directory`2'. Not sure why, but when it returns 'Object[] - System.Array' it causes problems when trying to add a tag. Document Details ⚠ Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking. ID: 51b8967d-d023-899c-1418-bccabcd36314 Version Independent ID: 9bbf8516-4d1f-87f4-9af9-8715e5c9ec62 Content: How to tag a VM using PowerShell - Azure Virtual Machines Content Source: articles/virtual-machines/tag-powershell.md Service: virtual-machines GitHub Login: @cynthn Microsoft Alias: cynthn @DiSae we'll review your feedback and get back to you shortly. Thanks. @DiSae we'll review your feedback and get back to you shortly. Thanks. @DiSae You can also update the tags using the Get-AzVm and Update-AzVm cmdlets. For Example: Get-AzVm -ResourceGroupName myResourceGroup -Name myVM $Vm.tags.Add("testtag","testtag") Update-AzVm -vm $vm -ResourceGroupName myResourceGroup @DiSae You can also update the tags using the Get-AzVm and Update-AzVm cmdlets. For Example: Get-AzVm -ResourceGroupName myResourceGroup -Name myVM $Vm.tags.Add("testtag","testtag") Update-AzVm -vm $vm -ResourceGroupName myResourceGroup #please-close It looks like this issue was resolved. If it isn't, please feel free to reopen this issue or create a new one. Thank you!
gharchive/issue
2021-01-15T10:19:22
2025-04-01T04:55:22.127815
{ "authors": [ "DiSae", "GiftA-MSFT", "TravisCragg-MSFT", "cynthn" ], "repo": "MicrosoftDocs/azure-docs", "url": "https://github.com/MicrosoftDocs/azure-docs/issues/68965", "license": "CC-BY-4.0", "license_type": "permissive", "license_source": "github-api" }
799040818
How to obtain auth token ? Hello, Where can i get auth token to communicate speech service ? I already have an azure account with speech service endpoint and key available, which work well but i hope to learn how to use token to work the same purpose. There are token related api in api reference doc for SpeechConfig and SpeechRecognizer, all of which seem requiring an token to work with. But token seems not available on my azure account of speech service: Only keys and endpoints are there. Thank you. Document Details ⚠ Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking. ID: e4b55e56-55a1-d635-6bea-271dc361d676 Version Independent ID: 8e9cb28f-c133-f310-3c7d-3a3b7e85f69d Content: Speech-to-text quickstart - Speech service - Azure Cognitive Services Content Source: articles/cognitive-services/Speech-Service/get-started-speech-to-text.md Service: cognitive-services Sub-service: speech-service GitHub Login: @trevorbye Microsoft Alias: trbye Thanks for the feedback! We are currently investigating and will update you shortly. @wukun2015 Hello Wuk, please follow the guidance to create your auth token: https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/cognitive-services/speech-service/rest-speech-to-text#how-to-get-an-access-token To get an access token, you'll need to make a request to the issueToken endpoint using the Ocp-Apim-Subscription-Key and your subscription key. The issueToken endpoint has this format: https://<REGION_IDENTIFIER>.api.cognitive.microsoft.com/sts/v1.0/issueToken We will now proceed to close this thread. If there are further questions regarding this matter, please respond here and @YutongTie-MSFT and we will gladly continue the discussion. Thanks, Yutong
gharchive/issue
2021-02-02T08:10:15
2025-04-01T04:55:22.134886
{ "authors": [ "YutongTie-MSFT", "wukun2015" ], "repo": "MicrosoftDocs/azure-docs", "url": "https://github.com/MicrosoftDocs/azure-docs/issues/69873", "license": "CC-BY-4.0", "license_type": "permissive", "license_source": "github-api" }
842674500
Clarify Scope requirements In https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/active-directory-b2c/authorization-code-flow#1-get-an-authorization-code scope is described as required, i.e one scope is sufficient. However the other page https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/active-directory-b2c/access-tokens tells that “If the response_type parameter in an /authorize request includes token, the scope parameter must include at least one resource scope other than openid and offline_access that will be granted. Otherwise, the /authorize request fails.” Should it be mentioned in the scope description as well? The section https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/active-directory-b2c/authorization-code-flow#2-get-an-access-token tells that scope is Recommended. It’s not clear, what would be if I will not pass the scope. Document Details ⚠ Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking. ID: f3e20651-5b2b-bd0b-dc92-a4a3643776ef Version Independent ID: c9e25d10-4298-c95d-d24a-25a45c47e9ac Content: Authorization code flow - Azure Active Directory B2C Content Source: articles/active-directory-b2c/authorization-code-flow.md Service: active-directory Sub-service: b2c GitHub Login: @msmimart Microsoft Alias: mimart Thanks for the feedback! I have assigned the issue to the content author to investigate further and update the document as appropriate. @msmimart Could you please check on this issue? Thanks. Thanks for the feedback. The scope is required only for OAuth 2.0 authorization code flow. Not for OpenId connect flow. I have updated the OAuth 2.0 authorization code flow article. The fix will be published later today. This GitHub issue is automatically close. I'll fix the overview doc soon. Thanks again. Yoel
gharchive/issue
2021-03-28T06:27:42
2025-04-01T04:55:22.141462
{ "authors": [ "MNF", "YutongTie-MSFT", "yoelhor" ], "repo": "MicrosoftDocs/azure-docs", "url": "https://github.com/MicrosoftDocs/azure-docs/issues/72891", "license": "CC-BY-4.0", "license_type": "permissive", "license_source": "github-api" }
857727078
MPN registration was not required for third party consent with same domain. Consider this hint from the AAD: "Starting November 9th, 2020 end users will no longer be able to grant consent to newly registered multitenant apps without verified publishers." I wanted to test the behaviour of a multi-tenant app integrated into Teams when launched through a different organisation than the registration one. To to so, I did the following: Registered the app through a personal MS account with the @business.com domain; installed the app for the organisation that also uses the @business.com domain for their users, but otherwise has no affiliation with the registrating account other than the domain (i.e. it has a different tenant ID). On launching the app I was indeed asked for additional consent, unlike when launching an app registered in the same tenant. However, I could consent successfully despite never verifying the personal account with the MPN (check the attachment). My question: Is this possible only because the personal account and the business accounts are using the same domain? and if not Why was this possible in the first place despite not being registered in the MPN? Attachment: Document Details ⚠ Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking. ID: f83478f0-0faa-2e10-37f2-819ad2351445 Version Independent ID: 3ffd5b35-a3d7-5dca-dc8b-acec1d85ec3c Content: Publisher verification overview - Microsoft identity platform Content Source: articles/active-directory/develop/publisher-verification-overview.md Service: active-directory Sub-service: develop GitHub Login: @rwike77 Microsoft Alias: ryanwi @ssivas Thank you for your query . We will investigate and update the thread. #reassign:rwike77 @marwalsch Sorry for the super slow reply, this didn't come to my attention until recently. I will investigate with the engineering team and get back to you. @marwalsch Actually, since this is more of a product question instead a of a doc question I suggest you post a question to Microsoft Q&A where engineers and MVPs can answer. Again, apologies for such a delayed response. I'll close this now, but feel free to reopen if need be. #please-close This scenario is possible when the app is asking for only ultra-low risk permissions (sign in, read user profile, open id, offline access) that are exempt from publisher verification. It just happens that the app does not ask for any other permissions. Additional information can be found here.
gharchive/issue
2021-04-14T09:51:07
2025-04-01T04:55:22.150888
{ "authors": [ "ckithika-msft", "marwalsch", "mmacy", "rwike77", "shashishailaj" ], "repo": "MicrosoftDocs/azure-docs", "url": "https://github.com/MicrosoftDocs/azure-docs/issues/73737", "license": "CC-BY-4.0", "license_type": "permissive", "license_source": "github-api" }
877071111
Simply Doesn't work. Cloned deployed, just get errors in azure. Error occurred prerendering page "/project/[path]". Read more: https://err.sh/next.js/prerender-error TypeError: Cannot read property 'path' of undefined at Function.module.exports.9V4V.Project.getInitialProps (/github/workspace/.next/server/pages/project/[path].js:187:30) at loadGetInitialProps (/github/workspace/node_modules/next/dist/next-server/lib/utils.js:5:101) at loadGetInitialProps (/github/workspace/node_modules/next/dist/next-server/lib/utils.js:5:24) at renderToHTML (/github/workspace/node_modules/next/dist/next-server/server/render.js:25:1519) at async /github/workspace/node_modules/next/dist/export/worker.js:26:6 at async /github/workspace/node_modules/next/dist/build/tracer.js:3:470 info - Exporting (3/3) Error: Export encountered errors on following paths: /project/[path] at /github/workspace/node_modules/next/dist/export/index.js:30:1103 at async /github/workspace/node_modules/next/dist/build/tracer.js:3:470 npm ERR! code ELIFECYCLE npm ERR! errno 1 npm ERR! nextjs-static-website@0.1.0 build: next build && next export npm ERR! Exit status 1 npm ERR! npm ERR! Failed at the nextjs-static-website@0.1.0 build script. npm ERR! This is probably not a problem with npm. There is likely additional logging output above. npm ERR! A complete log of this run can be found in: npm ERR! /github/home/.npm/_logs/2021-05-06T04_47_43_200Z-debug.log Document Details ⚠ Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking. ID: 32207331-764e-7954-b175-53928cf39a1e Version Independent ID: 3b4dada0-3b79-774e-7e25-2732e5c7a8ae Content: Tutorial: Deploy static-rendered Next.js websites on Azure Static Web Apps Content Source: articles/static-web-apps/deploy-nextjs.md Service: static-web-apps GitHub Login: @christiannwamba Microsoft Alias: chnwamba @TheDev6, Thanks for the feedback! We are taking a look into this and will get back to you soon. Your feedback has been shared with the content owner for further review. Thanks for bringing this to our attention.
gharchive/issue
2021-05-06T04:50:41
2025-04-01T04:55:22.159490
{ "authors": [ "AjayKumar-MSFT", "TheDev6" ], "repo": "MicrosoftDocs/azure-docs", "url": "https://github.com/MicrosoftDocs/azure-docs/issues/74880", "license": "CC-BY-4.0", "license_type": "permissive", "license_source": "github-api" }
317141722
Please sort Table 1 There appears to be a duplicate for Japan in Table 1. Perhaps sorting Table 1 by Geography may spot other duplicates. Document Details ⚠ Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking. ID: 09a788e4-0130-73f2-d985-6fc3aec77974 Version Independent ID: a9f4ec3f-f0a3-b050-020b-f487c74c5179 Content: Business continuity and disaster recovery (BCDR): Azure Paired Regions Content Source: articles/best-practices-availability-paired-regions.md Service: multiple GitHub Login: @rayne-wiselman Microsoft Alias: raynew Removed duplicate in this PR - https://github.com/MicrosoftDocs/azure-docs-pr/pull/40701 #please-close It's too bad the list can't be sorted by geography. I'm not sure why this doesn't make sense. It's now sorted alphabetically From: jucchytil notifications@github.com Sent: Wednesday, May 9, 2018 2:50 PM To: MicrosoftDocs/azure-docs azure-docs@noreply.github.com Cc: Rayne Wiselman raynew@microsoft.com; Assign assign@noreply.github.com Subject: Re: [MicrosoftDocs/azure-docs] Please sort Table 1 (#7627) It's too bad the list can't be sorted by geography. I'm not sure why this doesn't make sense. — You are receiving this because you were assigned. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHubhttps://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.com%2FMicrosoftDocs%2Fazure-docs%2Fissues%2F7627%23issuecomment-387713299&data=02|01|raynew%40microsoft.com|61064ae9eae84be2c98b08d5b5a2f6ae|72f988bf86f141af91ab2d7cd011db47|1|0|636614633882090839&sdata=ijHRB3bp9dIXhxpUGMhKQdCKjTai4ba1flwa5sn3YJ4%3D&reserved=0, or mute the threadhttps://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.com%2Fnotifications%2Funsubscribe-auth%2FAD2-iLPIS29Pj8RERjmK4XPuVQVk3ydBks5twtfZgaJpZM4ThT5F&data=02|01|raynew%40microsoft.com|61064ae9eae84be2c98b08d5b5a2f6ae|72f988bf86f141af91ab2d7cd011db47|1|0|636614633882090839&sdata=o4k6qphYGZEqQlZC98lBHq3uqzBAAFYNSRPU4SfzIZs%3D&reserved=0.It’s Are we looking at different docs? Not sorted Two Japan’s [image1.jpeg] Sent from my iPhone On May 9, 2018, at 6:50 AM, Rayne Wiselman <notifications@github.commailto:notifications@github.com> wrote: It's now sorted alphabetically From: jucchytil <notifications@github.commailto:notifications@github.com> Sent: Wednesday, May 9, 2018 2:50 PM To: MicrosoftDocs/azure-docs <azure-docs@noreply.github.commailto:azure-docs@noreply.github.com> Cc: Rayne Wiselman <raynew@microsoft.commailto:raynew@microsoft.com>; Assign <assign@noreply.github.commailto:assign@noreply.github.com> Subject: Re: [MicrosoftDocs/azure-docs] Please sort Table 1 (#7627) It's too bad the list can't be sorted by geography. I'm not sure why this doesn't make sense. — You are receiving this because you were assigned. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHubhttps://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.com%2FMicrosoftDocs%2Fazure-docs%2Fissues%2F7627%23issuecomment-387713299&data=02|01|raynew%40microsoft.com|61064ae9eae84be2c98b08d5b5a2f6ae|72f988bf86f141af91ab2d7cd011db47|1|0|636614633882090839&sdata=ijHRB3bp9dIXhxpUGMhKQdCKjTai4ba1flwa5sn3YJ4%3D&reserved=0, or mute the threadhttps://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.com%2Fnotifications%2Funsubscribe-auth%2FAD2-iLPIS29Pj8RERjmK4XPuVQVk3ydBks5twtfZgaJpZM4ThT5F&data=02|01|raynew%40microsoft.com|61064ae9eae84be2c98b08d5b5a2f6ae|72f988bf86f141af91ab2d7cd011db47|1|0|636614633882090839&sdata=o4k6qphYGZEqQlZC98lBHq3uqzBAAFYNSRPU4SfzIZs%3D&reserved=0.It’s — You are receiving this because you were mentioned. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHubhttps://eur01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.com%2FMicrosoftDocs%2Fazure-docs%2Fissues%2F7627%23issuecomment-387713496&data=02|01||b9e772229b454212153108d5b5a317de|84df9e7fe9f640afb435aaaaaaaaaaaa|1|0|636614634433902898&sdata=KAVdN8j8Oj7D%2F96XQ%2F7sTuYmLrSdrHzC%2FeW1eHQRw3c%3D&reserved=0, or mute the threadhttps://eur01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.com%2Fnotifications%2Funsubscribe-auth%2FAQOIkxpTQ5Jf5X73tkfy9t_z9yxsLgYXks5twtgRgaJpZM4ThT5F&data=02|01||b9e772229b454212153108d5b5a317de|84df9e7fe9f640afb435aaaaaaaaaaaa|1|0|636614634433902898&sdata=7R5btb%2B355TGeSj00Ny2mcRSyHgwC1fiKzEydmGwgfs%3D&reserved=0. @jucchytil We will now proceed to close this thread. If there are further questions regarding this matter, please reopen it and we will gladly continue the discussion.
gharchive/issue
2018-04-24T09:24:19
2025-04-01T04:55:22.175105
{ "authors": [ "Mike-Ubezzi-MSFT", "jucchytil", "rayne-wiselman" ], "repo": "MicrosoftDocs/azure-docs", "url": "https://github.com/MicrosoftDocs/azure-docs/issues/7627", "license": "CC-BY-4.0", "license_type": "permissive", "license_source": "github-api" }
911228034
Data Flow activity in Azure Data Factory [Enter feedback here] Document Details ⚠ Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking. ID: 5d60ca6a-bd64-a782-5c9a-4c2652a6d9a5 Version Independent ID: 7239ee59-25fa-04cf-1423-f324fb429cdc Content: Data Flow activity - Azure Data Factory Content Source: articles/data-factory/control-flow-execute-data-flow-activity.md Service: data-factory GitHub Login: @kromerm Microsoft Alias: makromer @Saurabh666666 Since we have not heard back from you we will now proceed to close this thread. If there are further questions regarding this matter, please tag me in your reply. We will gladly continue the discussion and we will reopen the issue.
gharchive/issue
2021-06-04T07:46:09
2025-04-01T04:55:22.179314
{ "authors": [ "Saurabh666666", "ShaikMaheer-MSFT" ], "repo": "MicrosoftDocs/azure-docs", "url": "https://github.com/MicrosoftDocs/azure-docs/issues/76398", "license": "CC-BY-4.0", "license_type": "permissive", "license_source": "github-api" }
931630879
Japanese document is not updated. [Enter feedback here] I noticed the RP operations of "Microsoft.Advisor" had been decreased at this time. However, there are many RP operations left in the Japanese document. It seems to be not updated. I've confirmed that the old operations are no longer available for RBAC. I hope the Japanese document is also updated ASAP. Document Details ⚠ Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking. ID: 33219707-3b9f-cc6b-541e-a806dc82622a Version Independent ID: b4e96391-bcf9-1f30-cb44-ed339469da4f Content: Azure resource provider operations Content Source: articles/role-based-access-control/resource-provider-operations.md Service: role-based-access-control GitHub Login: @rolyon Microsoft Alias: rolyon @aykitaya Thanks for your feedback! We will investigate and update as appropriate. @rolyon I tried to update but do not have write access to this. Are you able to confirm and add this? Let us know if you have any additional feedback. thanks #please-close
gharchive/issue
2021-06-28T14:24:06
2025-04-01T04:55:22.185287
{ "authors": [ "JamesTran-MSFT", "MarileeTurscak-MSFT", "aykitaya", "rolyon" ], "repo": "MicrosoftDocs/azure-docs", "url": "https://github.com/MicrosoftDocs/azure-docs/issues/77554", "license": "CC-BY-4.0", "license_type": "permissive", "license_source": "github-api" }
1055585766
Update request for "Services that can be deployed into a virtual network" One of customer requested the list of "Services that can be deployed into a virtual network" but it looks not updated yet. Azure database for MySQL Flexible server also can be deployed in to a virtual network and dedicated delegation is necessary. I think Azure database for MySQL Flexible server has to be included on this list. I would appreciate if you check this feedback as soon as possible. [Ref.] Manage virtual networks - Azure portal - Azure Database for MySQL - Flexible Server | Microsoft Docs Only virtual networks and subnets in the same region and subscription will be listed in the drop down. The chosen subnet will be delegated to Microsoft.DBforMySQL/flexibleServers. It means that only Azure Database for MySQL Flexible Servers can use that subnet. Document Details ⚠ Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking. ID: 2422f8ec-802e-7f92-c499-9181f3fe8d8b Version Independent ID: eb2b0e2c-8fb5-573c-ef0d-50073d053c3d Content: Virtual network for Azure services Content Source: articles/virtual-network/virtual-network-for-azure-services.md Service: virtual-network GitHub Login: @mohnader Microsoft Alias: kumud The customer has a concern about the list. They want to make sure what service is needed to delegate before consider using the service. It is different between "Services that can be deployed into a virtual network" list on this documentation and Azure portal "Delegate subnet to a service" list. Is it possible to sync both lists? Azure Portal> Virtual Network > Subnets > Delegate subnet to a service Thanks for the feedback! We are currently investigating and will update you shortly. @hyparki , We have assigned this issue to the respective product owner for review. @mohnader , Could you please provide your insights here? Article appears to have been updated with requested services. #please-close
gharchive/issue
2021-11-17T00:45:52
2025-04-01T04:55:22.193048
{ "authors": [ "GitaraniSharma-MSFT", "SaiKishor-MSFT", "asudbring", "hyparki" ], "repo": "MicrosoftDocs/azure-docs", "url": "https://github.com/MicrosoftDocs/azure-docs/issues/83960", "license": "CC-BY-4.0", "license_type": "permissive", "license_source": "github-api" }
1080044345
Azure AD B2C client credentials flow and MAU pricing impact In the documentation at https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/active-directory-b2c/application-types#current-limitations it mentions that we can leverage Azure AD features in Azure AD B2C for implementing the client credentials flow (i.e. the client credentials flow is not available through B2C user flows or custom policies but we can use Azure AD features in the same tenant for implementing the client credentials flow). Unfortunately the documentation does not mention the impact of the client credentials flow on Azure AD B2C pricing which is based on Monthly Active Users (a single Monthly Active User can have multiple authentications in the month and only counts as 1 MAU against the 50,000 quota). How does usage of the client credentials flow in the Azure AD B2C tenant count in the MAU pricing model? i.e. each individual call to get an access token via the client credentials flow counts as 1 MAU? Or does each application registration in the Azure AD B2C tenant that uses the client credentials flow count as 1 MAU and can obtain unlimited access tokens per month? (similar to how a single active user can have multiple authentications in a month and only count as 1 MAU) Some guidance on this would be helpful. Document Details ⚠ Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking. ID: b05da885-25ac-99ff-890d-97e9c670f1d7 Version Independent ID: 0673a2a2-e408-8ed4-83c8-1acc461d2c74 Content: Application types supported by Azure AD B2C - Azure AD B2C Content Source: articles/active-directory-b2c/application-types.md Service: active-directory Sub-service: b2c GitHub Login: @kengaderdus Microsoft Alias: kengaderdus Closing because I did not use the correct link from the documentation for creating the issue. mvisosky, No worries. Thanks for leveraging Azure docs feedback channel to raise this question and follow-up to share the update.
gharchive/issue
2021-12-14T17:44:25
2025-04-01T04:55:22.199327
{ "authors": [ "AjayKumar-MSFT", "mvisosky" ], "repo": "MicrosoftDocs/azure-docs", "url": "https://github.com/MicrosoftDocs/azure-docs/issues/85258", "license": "CC-BY-4.0", "license_type": "permissive", "license_source": "github-api" }
1138627589
How do I actually do anything with the custom details I've added to my alert? Preferably I'd like them to just appear together with the entity mappings. For example: Together with user and security group entity mappings I would like to at a glance see which reason they've given for requesting a permission through PIM instead of having to dive down in the security alert inside log analytics and look at what is in the ExtendedProperties > Custom Details key. Document Details ⚠ Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking. ID: 6f81a2b4-771c-e9f3-e930-8ac9e2a65d9b Version Independent ID: 41e8a437-7bf9-3319-ef2b-79b1358ccb02 Content: Surface custom details in Microsoft Sentinel alerts Content Source: articles/sentinel/surface-custom-details-in-alerts.md Service: microsoft-sentinel Sub-service: microsoft-sentinel GitHub Login: @yelevin Microsoft Alias: yelevin @okand Thank you for your feedback . We will investigate and update the thread. @okand Thanks for your question! I will bring it to the product team and try to get you an answer. This has been added to our backlog so I will go ahead and close this issue. @okand Functionality such as you describe is on the development roadmap. I don't have any more specific information on that at this time. However, you can already get a fair bit of benefit out of custom details through the use of playbooks. For example, you can automatically extract information from custom details and include that information in emails, reports, etc. See this article, and specifically the "Work with custom details" section, for more information.
gharchive/issue
2022-02-15T12:30:29
2025-04-01T04:55:22.205072
{ "authors": [ "okand", "shashishailaj", "yelevin" ], "repo": "MicrosoftDocs/azure-docs", "url": "https://github.com/MicrosoftDocs/azure-docs/issues/88087", "license": "CC-BY-4.0", "license_type": "permissive", "license_source": "github-api" }
1165638745
Permissions issue After following the steps mentioned here I ran into this permissions issues. Do you know which service requires my ownership role for my service principal? Screenshot attached. [Enter feedback here] Document Details ⚠ Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking. ID: 7537fd89-fd10-1fa2-a721-5260896cfa8a Version Independent ID: 8bacaf52-5b8b-d118-2bda-7dfc3861aaba Content: Set lifetimes for tokens - Microsoft identity platform Content Source: articles/active-directory/develop/configure-token-lifetimes.md Service: active-directory Sub-service: develop GitHub Login: @rwike77 Microsoft Alias: ryanwi Thank you for your feedback. We are reviewing it and will update you shortly. Best, James The following information may be relevant: My work domain Service Principal is of type user Hi James, any update? Hi @omar-nav , sorry for the delay in response. Are you a global admin? In this doc: https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/powershell/azure/create-azure-service-principal-azureps?view=azps-7.3.2 it details your error. You just need to make sure you have the proper role/permissions to do this. Also, you'll most likely need to update your Graph permissions to User.Read.All.
gharchive/issue
2022-03-10T19:35:11
2025-04-01T04:55:22.212398
{ "authors": [ "James-Hamil-MSFT", "omar-nav" ], "repo": "MicrosoftDocs/azure-docs", "url": "https://github.com/MicrosoftDocs/azure-docs/issues/89600", "license": "CC-BY-4.0", "license_type": "permissive", "license_source": "github-api" }
1170588200
IBM Qradar link If you click on the IBM Qradar link-under Access data from your event hub-> it gives you this: 'Product version no longer published', can this be updated please. Document Details ⚠ Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking. ID: 2064767f-5304-275a-df9b-e74199b53408 Version Independent ID: 57dcf6b8-7125-1e0b-c446-34a0a1366a92 Content: Tutorial - Stream logs to an Azure event hub Content Source: articles/active-directory/reports-monitoring/tutorial-azure-monitor-stream-logs-to-event-hub.md Service: active-directory Sub-service: report-monitor GitHub Login: @MarkusVi Microsoft Alias: markvi @henrypi73 Thank you for your feedback . We will investigate and update the thread. We have initiated a change request for this. It will be updated once the content team approves the same. For your reference you can check the article https://www.ibm.com/docs/en/dsm?topic=microsoft-azure-platform and https://www.ibm.com/docs/en/qsip/7.3.3?topic=quick-start-guide for help with Qradar. Thank you .
gharchive/issue
2022-03-16T06:11:55
2025-04-01T04:55:22.218203
{ "authors": [ "henrypi73", "shashishailaj" ], "repo": "MicrosoftDocs/azure-docs", "url": "https://github.com/MicrosoftDocs/azure-docs/issues/89915", "license": "CC-BY-4.0", "license_type": "permissive", "license_source": "github-api" }
1170861026
Update links for NuGet package reference for BlobStorage Trigger for Azure Functions Isolated process Current references for both tabs (Extension 5.x and higher & Functions 2.x and higher ) are : https://www.nuget.org/packages//dotnet/api/microsoft.azure.webjobs.blobattribute when it should be https://www.nuget.org/packages/Microsoft.Azure.Functions.Worker.Extensions.Storage.Blobs See image for further visual reference: Document Details ⚠ Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking. ID: fff7ae2f-4f02-7ed9-c2ed-a2715e407975 Version Independent ID: 542016c1-3c25-f6af-cc83-0c5b6218e0ce Content: Azure Blob storage trigger and bindings for Azure Functions Content Source: articles/azure-functions/functions-bindings-storage-blob.md Service: azure-functions GitHub Login: @ggailey777 Microsoft Alias: glenga @BlackPhlox Thank you for your feedback! We will review and update as appropriate. @BlackPhlox Thanks for reporting this item! I have updated the doc and it will be published soon. We appreciate the feedback!
gharchive/issue
2022-03-16T10:58:22
2025-04-01T04:55:22.223582
{ "authors": [ "BlackPhlox", "MayankBargali-MSFT" ], "repo": "MicrosoftDocs/azure-docs", "url": "https://github.com/MicrosoftDocs/azure-docs/issues/89926", "license": "CC-BY-4.0", "license_type": "permissive", "license_source": "github-api" }
1394692726
Mistake in Upgrade an Azure Kubernetes Service (AKS) cluster Under Customize node surge upgrade, the doc says: If the max surge value is lower than the current node count at the time of upgrade, the current node count is used for the max surge value. but I think it should be: If the max surge value is greater than the current node count at the time of upgrade, the current node count is used for the max surge value. Document Details ⚠ Do not edit this section. It is required for learn.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking. ID: 7010bd58-42b1-5c90-3253-05deed855be8 Version Independent ID: c890efb2-cdaf-a3eb-d54f-0e7ccbd4314d Content: Upgrade an Azure Kubernetes Service (AKS) cluster - Azure Kubernetes Service Content Source: articles/aks/upgrade-cluster.md Service: container-service GitHub Login: @MGoedtel Microsoft Alias: magoedte @ctessier Thanks for feedback, we will check and update the document as appropriate. @ctessier Thanks for reporting this! We have created a PR for this issue and the changes should go live soon.
gharchive/issue
2022-10-03T12:59:28
2025-04-01T04:55:22.228741
{ "authors": [ "SaibabaBalapur-MSFT", "VikasPullagura-MSFT", "ctessier" ], "repo": "MicrosoftDocs/azure-docs", "url": "https://github.com/MicrosoftDocs/azure-docs/issues/99381", "license": "CC-BY-4.0", "license_type": "permissive", "license_source": "github-api" }
1407455198
Kensho web hook lacks info Kensho2 (Anomaly detector) send very different info in the web hook than stated in the page. the body of the request is very narrow with almost no info and certainly no callBackUrl, example: "body": { "timestamp": "2022-10-02T00:00:00Z", "alertSettingGuid": "***********************" } Please help me getting the right body or fix this as this is needed for our product. Document Details ⚠ Do not edit this section. It is required for learn.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking. ID: ad86463f-baff-a804-0aa2-f87fc4356041 Version Independent ID: 1a4c5b6d-9f45-83fe-439f-7436b0d669dd Content: Configure Metrics Advisor alerts - Azure Cognitive Services Content Source: articles/applied-ai-services/metrics-advisor/how-tos/alerts.md Service: applied-ai-services Sub-service: metrics-advisor GitHub Login: @mrbullwinkle Microsoft Alias: mbullwin Adding @jr-MS from the PG for comment on web hook support in Anomaly Detector @michaelyaaa Thanks for your feedback! I've assigned this issue to the author who will investigate and update as appropriate. Hi @mrbullwinkle Thanks for your response. please add your comments and update as appropriate. #unassign:@mrbullwinkle #assign:@jr-MS Hi @Naveenommi-MSFT, thank you so much for your feedback, for this issue. Could you please write an email to our DRI channel for better and faster support: anomalydetector@microsoft.com? Thanks! #please-close
gharchive/issue
2022-10-13T09:24:33
2025-04-01T04:55:22.236276
{ "authors": [ "Naveenommi-MSFT", "jr-MS", "michaelyaaa", "mrbullwinkle" ], "repo": "MicrosoftDocs/azure-docs", "url": "https://github.com/MicrosoftDocs/azure-docs/issues/99892", "license": "CC-BY-4.0", "license_type": "permissive", "license_source": "github-api" }
1499030269
Update overview.md SEV-SNP CVMs are now GA and also offer encryption of data while in use @msmbaldwin, Can you review the proposed changes? IMPORTANT: When the changes are ready for publication, add a #sign-off comment to signal that the PR is ready for the review team to merge. #label:"aq-pr-triaged" @MicrosoftDocs/public-repo-pr-review-team #sign-off
gharchive/pull-request
2022-12-15T20:16:39
2025-04-01T04:55:22.238629
{ "authors": [ "AlecFernandez", "jborsecnik", "msmbaldwin" ], "repo": "MicrosoftDocs/azure-docs", "url": "https://github.com/MicrosoftDocs/azure-docs/pull/102811", "license": "CC-BY-4.0", "license_type": "permissive", "license_source": "github-api" }
333014129
Update faq.md AKS is now available in 10 regions not 5. @theheatDK : Thanks for your contribution! The author, @neilpeterson, has been notified to review your proposed change. @theheatDK thanks. #sign-off
gharchive/pull-request
2018-06-16T20:49:23
2025-04-01T04:55:22.240105
{ "authors": [ "PRMerger19", "neilpeterson", "theheatDK" ], "repo": "MicrosoftDocs/azure-docs", "url": "https://github.com/MicrosoftDocs/azure-docs/pull/10312", "license": "CC-BY-4.0", "license_type": "permissive", "license_source": "github-api" }
1628365119
Update bastion-faq.md Corrected Line 218### My privatelinke.azure.com cannot resolve to management.privatelink.azure.com to :### My privatelink.azure.com cannot resolve to management.privatelink.azure.com @asukumar22 Thanks for the typo fix!
gharchive/pull-request
2023-03-16T22:07:15
2025-04-01T04:55:22.242252
{ "authors": [ "Court72", "asukumar22" ], "repo": "MicrosoftDocs/azure-docs", "url": "https://github.com/MicrosoftDocs/azure-docs/pull/106768", "license": "CC-BY-4.0", "license_type": "permissive", "license_source": "github-api" }
1692450538
Update functions-dotnet-dependency-injection.md Adding note about ASP.NET authentication We've had support issues with this: https://github.com/Azure/azure-functions-host/issues/6805. This is not likely to be something we add support for in-proc as we're moving towards dotnet-isolated in the future. We should start calling this out to help prevent support issues. @fabiocav / @mattchenderson -- would like your eyes on this as well @ggailey777 Can you review the proposed changes? When the changes are ready for publication, add a #sign-off comment to signal that the PR is ready for the review team to merge. #label:"aq-pr-triaged" @MicrosoftDocs/public-repo-pr-review-team emailed GG emailed author @mattchenderson can you just grab BrettSam's commit into your fork with the other DI work? Sadly, he doesn't often return to these github issues (and you know where to find him 😉). @mattchenderson - Can you address this issue so we can advance this public-repo PR? sent reminder to ggailey777 sent reminder to ggailey777 emailed author @mattchenderson - Can you address https://github.com/MicrosoftDocs/azure-docs/pull/108984#issuecomment-1676127808 that's addressed to you? Alternatively, should this PR be closed, @ggailey777? Thanks @Stacyrch140 for the reminder. I do have the commits on my own private PR now so #please-close.
gharchive/pull-request
2023-05-02T13:41:24
2025-04-01T04:55:22.248239
{ "authors": [ "American-Dipper", "Court72", "Stacyrch140", "brettsam", "denrea", "ggailey777" ], "repo": "MicrosoftDocs/azure-docs", "url": "https://github.com/MicrosoftDocs/azure-docs/pull/108984", "license": "CC-BY-4.0", "license_type": "permissive", "license_source": "github-api" }
2597150963
Update event-schema-blob-storage.md Added information for accessTier and previousTier fields in Cloud Event and Event Grid schemas, as these properties are available in SetBlobTier changed event. Sample json messages showing availability of these fields: Event grid schema based event data showing both the new fields: Event grid schema based event data showing accessTier field as the blob had inferred data: Cloud event schema based event data showing both the new fields: Cloud event schema based event data showing accessTier field as the blob had inferred data: The StorageBlobTierChangedEventData class in EventGrid .Net SDK already contains properties for these two fields: https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/dotnet/api/azure.messaging.eventgrid.systemevents.storageblobtierchangedeventdata?view=azure-dotnet#properties @spelluru Can you review the proposed changes? IMPORTANT: When the changes are ready for publication, adding a #sign-off comment is the best way to signal that the PR is ready for the review team to merge. #label:"aq-pr-triaged" @MicrosoftDocs/public-repo-pr-review-team
gharchive/pull-request
2024-10-18T10:32:53
2025-04-01T04:55:22.253492
{ "authors": [ "Ankit-MSFT", "ShannonLeavitt" ], "repo": "MicrosoftDocs/azure-docs", "url": "https://github.com/MicrosoftDocs/azure-docs/pull/124675", "license": "CC-BY-4.0", "license_type": "permissive", "license_source": "github-api" }
355299314
Fix a header Remove an unwanted character. Thanks @alexandair! #sign-off
gharchive/pull-request
2018-08-29T19:25:10
2025-04-01T04:55:22.254568
{ "authors": [ "alexandair", "cynthn" ], "repo": "MicrosoftDocs/azure-docs", "url": "https://github.com/MicrosoftDocs/azure-docs/pull/14224", "license": "CC-BY-4.0", "license_type": "permissive", "license_source": "github-api" }
371087947
fix typo/missing char "Deployent" should be "Deployment" @SitecoreDave : Thanks for your contribution! The author, @minewiskan, has been notified to review your proposed change. #sign-off
gharchive/pull-request
2018-10-17T13:53:13
2025-04-01T04:55:22.255618
{ "authors": [ "Minewiskan", "PRMerger19", "SitecoreDave" ], "repo": "MicrosoftDocs/azure-docs", "url": "https://github.com/MicrosoftDocs/azure-docs/pull/17052", "license": "CC-BY-4.0", "license_type": "permissive", "license_source": "github-api" }
473345448
Update param name According to the documentation, it is now called custom_docker_image Fixes #35911 @Potapy4 : Thanks for your contribution! The author(s) have been notified to review your proposed change. @maxluk Could you please review the same so the issue can be closed? @blackmist - can you confirm? #sign-off @j-martens: I'm sorry - only the author of this article, @maxluk, can sign off on your changes. But we do have an exception process - if you are on the Microsoft content or product team for this product area, you can ask the PR review team to review and merge it by sending mail to the techdocprs alias. @j-martens confirmed via SDK reference. Change looks ok.
gharchive/pull-request
2019-07-26T12:57:26
2025-04-01T04:55:22.258487
{ "authors": [ "Blackmist", "PRMerger17", "PRMerger20", "Potapy4", "RohitMungi-MSFT", "j-martens" ], "repo": "MicrosoftDocs/azure-docs", "url": "https://github.com/MicrosoftDocs/azure-docs/pull/35927", "license": "CC-BY-4.0", "license_type": "permissive", "license_source": "github-api" }
558244092
Fix template file extensions typo Change extension from .html to .cshtml in template filename link text where the referred file is .cshtml. Good catch on these, @vuorinem, thanks for the contribution! #sign-off
gharchive/pull-request
2020-01-31T16:47:47
2025-04-01T04:55:22.259944
{ "authors": [ "mmacy", "vuorinem" ], "repo": "MicrosoftDocs/azure-docs", "url": "https://github.com/MicrosoftDocs/azure-docs/pull/47212", "license": "CC-BY-4.0", "license_type": "permissive", "license_source": "github-api" }
589073929
Update acronym expansion for ACR to correct value Fixes: #51087 Signed-off-by: Graham Hayes gr@ham.ie @grahamhayes : Thanks for your contribution! The author(s) have been notified to review your proposed change. @saudas @saudas please review this PR. @sauryadas - Could you review the PR, and also update the article's author metadata attribute to sauryadas so GitHub notifications go to the correct GitHub user? Thanks. author = sauryadas (GitHub user name) ms.author = saudas (Microsoft alias) #sign-off @mlearned how did this ACR expand to access control records ? @sauryadas: I'm sorry - only the author of this article, @saudas, can sign off on your changes. But we do have an exception process - if you are on the Microsoft content or product team for this product area, you can ask the PR review team to review and merge it by sending mail to the techdocprs alias. @ktoliver can you update the doc author to @mlearned @sauryadas - Metadata updates need to be initiated by the content team in the private repository--I'm sorry I'm not able to help in this instance.
gharchive/pull-request
2020-03-27T11:39:23
2025-04-01T04:55:22.263593
{ "authors": [ "PRMerger16", "PRMerger7", "VikasPullagura-MSFT", "grahamhayes", "ktoliver", "sauryadas" ], "repo": "MicrosoftDocs/azure-docs", "url": "https://github.com/MicrosoftDocs/azure-docs/pull/51088", "license": "CC-BY-4.0", "license_type": "permissive", "license_source": "github-api" }
309071698
Further clarifying supported ca requirements Further clarifying supported ca requirements @ppacent : Thanks for your contribution! The author, @jeffgilb, has been notified to review your proposed change. #sign-off
gharchive/pull-request
2018-03-27T17:55:08
2025-04-01T04:55:22.264771
{ "authors": [ "PRMerger9", "jeffgilb", "ppacent" ], "repo": "MicrosoftDocs/azure-docs", "url": "https://github.com/MicrosoftDocs/azure-docs/pull/6362", "license": "CC-BY-4.0", "license_type": "permissive", "license_source": "github-api" }
773803535
Update luis-reference-regions.md adding North UAE prediction region @magrefaat : Thanks for your contribution! The author(s) have been notified to review your proposed change. #sign-off #sign-off
gharchive/pull-request
2020-12-23T14:01:46
2025-04-01T04:55:22.266267
{ "authors": [ "PRMerger6", "aahill", "magrefaat" ], "repo": "MicrosoftDocs/azure-docs", "url": "https://github.com/MicrosoftDocs/azure-docs/pull/68054", "license": "CC-BY-4.0", "license_type": "permissive", "license_source": "github-api" }
857841179
Update code sample on how to switch back to ACR ws.update(image_build_compute = None) doesn't change the imageBuildCompute property of the AzureML Workspace. Passing an empty string did the trick. @andreasbotsikas : Thanks for your contribution! The author(s) have been notified to review your proposed change. #sign-off
gharchive/pull-request
2021-04-14T12:19:10
2025-04-01T04:55:22.268102
{ "authors": [ "PRMerger10", "PeterCLu", "andreasbotsikas" ], "repo": "MicrosoftDocs/azure-docs", "url": "https://github.com/MicrosoftDocs/azure-docs/pull/73745", "license": "CC-BY-4.0", "license_type": "permissive", "license_source": "github-api" }
1270351511
Update Kantega SSO guides The guides no longer reflects the current state of the Kantega SSO app for Bamboo, Bitbucket, Confluence and Fisheye/Crucible. This is similar update as Jira guide was given in PR #90677. @jeevansd - Can you review the proposed changes? IMPORTANT: When the changes are ready for publication, add a #sign-off comment to signal that the PR is ready for the review team to merge. #label:"aq-pr-triaged" #assign:@MicrosoftDocs/public-repo-pr-review-team The following users don't have valid GitHub IDs, or are not collaborators on this repo: microsoftdocs/public-repo-pr-review-team #sign-off Invalid command: '#sign-off'. Only the assigned author of one or more file in this PR can sign off. @jeevansd @CelesteDG - can you take a look? thanks! #reassign:v-hgampala Hamsika, reassigning this to you to review. Per the note, the changes are supposed to be similar to https://github.com/MicrosoftDocs/azure-docs/pull/90677. Please take a look at the original request. Thank you. @CelesteDG, Jeevan is suggesting as adding the app side config screenshots is better instead of providing links to the configuration. So, waiting for the @steinarline to update the images. Hello @v-hgampala and @steinarline - Any updates on this PR? Do we have the updated images? Thank you. We have looked through the current versions of these guides and they are sufficiently correct now.
gharchive/pull-request
2022-06-14T07:05:17
2025-04-01T04:55:22.272711
{ "authors": [ "CelesteDG", "Jak-MS", "PRMerger18", "PRMerger7", "ShannonLeavitt", "steinarline", "v-hgampala" ], "repo": "MicrosoftDocs/azure-docs", "url": "https://github.com/MicrosoftDocs/azure-docs/pull/94347", "license": "CC-BY-4.0", "license_type": "permissive", "license_source": "github-api" }
1357682709
we need to give domain name with tenant. We need to mention tenant name with domain otherwise it will not work. @kengaderdus Can you review the proposed changes? IMPORTANT: When the changes are ready for publication, add a #sign-off comment to signal that the PR is ready for the review team to merge. #label:"aq-pr-triaged" @MicrosoftDocs/public-repo-pr-review-team @kengaderdus It looks good now. I commit it. Now merge it please #sign-off
gharchive/pull-request
2022-08-31T18:07:07
2025-04-01T04:55:22.274930
{ "authors": [ "Court72", "Jamal8548", "kengaderdus" ], "repo": "MicrosoftDocs/azure-docs", "url": "https://github.com/MicrosoftDocs/azure-docs/pull/97830", "license": "CC-BY-4.0", "license_type": "permissive", "license_source": "github-api" }
1407971982
Update how-to-connect-modify-group-writeback.md There were white-spaces after each ` char what prohibits the script to behave as a script. This is tested and confirmed. Learn Build status updates of commit d274b3e: :bulb: Validation status: suggestions File Status Preview URL Details articles/active-directory/hybrid/how-to-connect-modify-group-writeback.md :bulb:Suggestion Details articles/active-directory/hybrid/how-to-connect-modify-group-writeback.md Line 46, Column 28: [Suggestion: preserve-view-not-set - See documentation] You've pinned this link to a specific version of content with the view parameter. It's recommended not to pin a version unless that version is A) not the default view and B) the context is about that version specifically. To proceed with pinning a version add the &preserve-view=true to the URL. Otherwise, remove the view parameter. URL: /graph/api/resources/directorysetting?view=graph-rest-beta Line 54, Column 26: [Suggestion: preserve-view-not-set - See documentation] You've pinned this link to a specific version of content with the view parameter. It's recommended not to pin a version unless that version is A) not the default view and B) the context is about that version specifically. To proceed with pinning a version add the &preserve-view=true to the URL. Otherwise, remove the view parameter. URL: /graph/api/group-update?tabs=http&view=graph-rest-beta For more details, please refer to the build report. Note: Broken links written as relative paths are included in the above build report. For broken links written as absolute paths or external URLs, see the broken link report. Note: Your PR may contain errors or warnings or suggestions unrelated to the files you changed. This happens when external dependencies like GitHub alias, Microsoft alias, cross repo links are updated. Please use these instructions to resolve them. For any questions, please:Try searching the learn.microsoft.com contributor guidesPost your question in the Learn support channel @billmath Can you review the proposed changes? IMPORTANT: When the changes are ready for publication, add a #sign-off comment to signal that the PR is ready for the review team to merge. #label:"aq-pr-triaged" @MicrosoftDocs/public-repo-pr-review-team
gharchive/pull-request
2022-10-13T15:06:44
2025-04-01T04:55:22.285208
{ "authors": [ "Court72", "akosre", "opbld31" ], "repo": "MicrosoftDocs/azure-docs", "url": "https://github.com/MicrosoftDocs/azure-docs/pull/99912", "license": "CC-BY-4.0", "license_type": "permissive", "license_source": "github-api" }
2475921215
Update defender-for-storage-azure-portal-enablement.md Add a missing step to Edit settings on Storage plan @miguel-s-ferreira Thanks for your contribution, but this PR was opened in the public repo, instead of the private one. I'm going to close it. If you'd like to make changes to the documentation, please use the Microsoft Learn Editor to ensure the PR opens in the public repo. #please-close
gharchive/pull-request
2024-08-20T15:19:19
2025-04-01T04:55:22.287428
{ "authors": [ "dcurwin", "miguel-s-ferreira" ], "repo": "MicrosoftDocs/azure-security-docs", "url": "https://github.com/MicrosoftDocs/azure-security-docs/pull/9", "license": "CC-BY-4.0", "license_type": "permissive", "license_source": "github-api" }
910370556
Wrapper class extension method "CastTo" is showing error I have followed the steps mentioned in the documentation and created a "BookingDialogWrapper" class with the code provided in the documentation. The issue is that the extension method which is used for casting options.CastTo() is giving an compile time error as follows: 'object' does not contain a definition for 'CastTo' and no accessible extension method 'CastTo' accepting a first argument of type 'object' could be found (are you missing a using directive or an assembly reference?) Also the documentation says we only need the three files Dialogs\BookingDialog.cs, Dialogs\DateResolverDialog.cs and FlightBookingRecognizer.cs but I see a dependency for BookingDetails.cs class as well. Even after adding this class I get the above mentioned error. Am I doing something wrong here as I have followed all the instructions given in the documentation but fail to compile the code? Please help. Thanks Document Details ⚠ Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking. ID: 6fb946c7-8e39-c64c-667d-a4edd7892c16 Version Independent ID: 06fdee5b-6fe7-212a-d604-f97efce088f7 Content: Migrating an v4 SDK bot to Composer - Bot Composer Content Source: composer-docs/how-to-migrate-a-bot-to-composer.md Service: bot-composer GitHub Login: @garypretty Microsoft Alias: gapretty Hello, May I know by when can this issue will be assigned and looked into? Thanks for raising this @sanketdixit2013. The doc is missing a step, which is adding an extension class with the CastTo method. Please add a file to your project called Extensions.cs and use the following code (altering the namespace appropriately). You're also right that you need the model file BookingDetails.cs, we will amend the doc for these two points. using System; using System.Collections.Generic; using System.Linq; using System.Threading.Tasks; using Newtonsoft.Json.Linq; namespace YourNamespace { public static class Extensions { public static T CastTo<T>(this object obj) { if (obj is T asT) { return asT; } else if (obj is JObject asJobject) { // If types are not used by storage serialization, and Newtonsoft is the serializer // the item found can be a JObject. return asJobject.ToObject<T>(); } else if (obj is JArray asJarray) { // If types are not used by storage serialization, and Newtonsoft is the serializer // the item found can be a JArray. return asJarray.ToObject<T>(); } else if (obj == null) { return default(T); } else { throw new InvalidOperationException("Data is not in the correct format for casting."); } } } } Thanks @garypretty the sample is working now. @garypretty - Is there any reason not to just change the CastTo extension method from internal to public? Doc issue resolved. Should be live soon.
gharchive/issue
2021-06-03T10:51:07
2025-04-01T04:55:22.295492
{ "authors": [ "JonathanFingold", "garypretty", "sanketdixit2013" ], "repo": "MicrosoftDocs/composer-docs", "url": "https://github.com/MicrosoftDocs/composer-docs/issues/134", "license": "CC-BY-4.0", "license_type": "permissive", "license_source": "github-api" }
459612246
Syntax definition missing end-of-line non-terminal .ERR2 [[message]] ;; ;; ::= (;[\x00-\xFF^\x10]*)?\x10 Document details ⚠ Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking. ID: a753870d-9ae1-bffb-e36a-245bf7f6b49d Version Independent ID: c63282c2-f140-86d5-168b-7a520a7d06b0 Content: .ERR2 Content Source: docs/assembler/masm/dot-err2.md Product: visual-cpp Technology: cpp-masm GitHub Login: @corob-msft Microsoft Alias: corob Incorporated into Incomplete Syntax definition issue.
gharchive/issue
2019-06-23T20:04:14
2025-04-01T04:55:22.300357
{ "authors": [ "Player1UK" ], "repo": "MicrosoftDocs/cpp-docs", "url": "https://github.com/MicrosoftDocs/cpp-docs/issues/1204", "license": "CC-BY-4.0", "license_type": "permissive", "license_source": "github-api" }
459615813
Remarks missing entry (non-Terminal argument not valid in 64-bit MASM) Non-Terminal langtype argument is not valid in 64-bit MASM (ml64.exe). Document details ⚠ Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking. ID: db0e7772-b297-bd94-7156-4d4c49bfc2c6 Version Independent ID: 5c13b61f-4960-7377-c7eb-cceb51bc15c6 Content: EXTERNDEF Content Source: docs/assembler/masm/externdef.md Product: visual-cpp Technology: cpp-masm GitHub Login: @corob-msft Microsoft Alias: corob Thanks @Player1UK! Fix should appear in a day or so.
gharchive/issue
2019-06-23T20:44:10
2025-04-01T04:55:22.304424
{ "authors": [ "Player1UK", "mikeblome" ], "repo": "MicrosoftDocs/cpp-docs", "url": "https://github.com/MicrosoftDocs/cpp-docs/issues/1231", "license": "CC-BY-4.0", "license_type": "permissive", "license_source": "github-api" }
1320011174
Walkthrough: Using the New MFC Shell Controls [Enter feedback here] Document Details ⚠ Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking. ID: e42d62b6-ccf2-e5e6-fb25-25100c70fe38 Version Independent ID: 51ede8ba-a8b3-0868-bee1-e2635309afb6 Content: Walkthrough: Using the New MFC Shell Controls Content Source: docs/mfc/walkthrough-using-the-new-mfc-shell-controls.md Product: visual-cpp Technology: cpp-mfc GitHub Login: @TylerMSFT Microsoft Alias: twhitney Closing, as I assume this was an attempt to create what became issue #4067.
gharchive/issue
2022-07-27T19:02:44
2025-04-01T04:55:22.308742
{ "authors": [ "corob-msft", "makelyblakley" ], "repo": "MicrosoftDocs/cpp-docs", "url": "https://github.com/MicrosoftDocs/cpp-docs/issues/4066", "license": "CC-BY-4.0", "license_type": "permissive", "license_source": "github-api" }
1376942330
Fix Supported SSH algorithms Supported SSH algorithms > Encryption Two aes128-cbc and no aes128-ctr. Supported SSH algorithms > HMAC Two hmac-sha2-256 and no hmac-sha2-512. We have not been able to verify the operation, so we apologize if this is an incorrect correction. ℹ️ As for hmac-sha2-512, it is described in HMAC example. I think there is no problem. Docs Build status updates of commit 2377001: :white_check_mark: Validation status: passed File Status Preview URL Details docs/linux/connect-to-your-remote-linux-computer.md :white_check_mark:Succeeded For more details, please refer to the build report. Note: Broken links written as relative paths are included in the above build report. For broken links written as absolute paths or external URLs, see the broken link report. For any questions, please:Try searching the docs.microsoft.com contributor guidesPost your question in the Docs support channel @TylerMSFT Can you review the proposed changes? IMPORTANT: When the changes are ready for publication, add a #sign-off comment to signal that the PR is ready for the review team to merge. #label:"aq-pr-triaged" @MicrosoftDocs/public-repo-pr-review-team
gharchive/pull-request
2022-09-18T04:31:31
2025-04-01T04:55:22.317239
{ "authors": [ "Court72", "opbld31", "ragingo" ], "repo": "MicrosoftDocs/cpp-docs", "url": "https://github.com/MicrosoftDocs/cpp-docs/pull/4171", "license": "CC-BY-4.0", "license_type": "permissive", "license_source": "github-api" }
1445824622
Add missing url Relates to #4286 Learn Build status updates of commit 48bc0c7: :white_check_mark: Validation status: passed File Status Preview URL Details docs/cpp/exceptions-and-stack-unwinding-in-cpp.md :white_check_mark:Succeeded For more details, please refer to the build report. Note: Broken links written as relative paths are included in the above build report. For broken links written as absolute paths or external URLs, see the broken link report. For any questions, please:Try searching the learn.microsoft.com contributor guidesPost your question in the Learn support channel
gharchive/pull-request
2022-11-11T17:59:14
2025-04-01T04:55:22.322272
{ "authors": [ "jeanchristopheruel", "opbld32" ], "repo": "MicrosoftDocs/cpp-docs", "url": "https://github.com/MicrosoftDocs/cpp-docs/pull/4287", "license": "CC-BY-4.0", "license_type": "permissive", "license_source": "github-api" }
721455629
Example that better shows regex usage It would be great to have an example where the content of the field that's parsed using regex is more like: 10.242.21.13 [14/Oct/2020:12:48:32 +0000] "GET / HTTP/1.1" instead of value01=10.242.21.13 value02=[14/Oct/2020:12:48:32 +0000] value03="GET / HTTP/1.1" The 2nd example is trivial and can be solved easily with the text parse alone. Extracting values without column names using regex does not seem to be so straight forward. I wasn't able to transform a (working) regex into a working expression Document Details ⚠ Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking. ID: db18f5b0-f08d-56f6-1045-3fae5577e2f9 Version Independent ID: a1a2fbbe-12a3-b6bf-b087-9d5c6eb27e4f Content: parse-where operator - Azure Data Explorer Content Source: data-explorer/kusto/query/parsewhereoperator.md Service: data-explorer GitHub Login: @orspod Microsoft Alias: orspodek nevermind, I think I'm using it wrong and use extract() instead @michael-niemand Hope you have self resolved and hence closed the issue. Thanks for the update.
gharchive/issue
2020-10-14T13:23:38
2025-04-01T04:55:22.327127
{ "authors": [ "CHEEKATLAPRADEEP-MSFT", "michael-niemand" ], "repo": "MicrosoftDocs/dataexplorer-docs", "url": "https://github.com/MicrosoftDocs/dataexplorer-docs/issues/391", "license": "CC-BY-4.0", "license_type": "permissive", "license_source": "github-api" }
1371781718
Correct TSI instructions Final step for the Azure Time Series Insights connection is incorrect. The updateRecord method (https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/power-apps/developer/model-driven-apps/clientapi/reference/xrm-webapi/updaterecord) must use the row GUID (msdyn_iotproviderinstanceid), not the name of the IoT Hub (msdyn_providerinstanceid). Of course you'll need to find the GUID - not sure if there is an easy out-of-the-box way to do so. Hello Daniel, thank you for sharing you feedback. @lmasieri please take a look to see if we can refine the instructions in the docs. Thanks, Michael The GUID can be found without using external tools by visiting the https://.crm.dynamics.com/api/data/v9.2/msdyn_iotproviderinstances endpoint Thanks Daniel, the team confirmed this is all good. Very much appreciate your contributions. Please keep them coming!
gharchive/pull-request
2022-09-13T17:31:20
2025-04-01T04:55:22.330148
{ "authors": [ "daniel-fahey", "m-hartmann" ], "repo": "MicrosoftDocs/dynamics-365-customer-engagement", "url": "https://github.com/MicrosoftDocs/dynamics-365-customer-engagement/pull/2730", "license": "CC-BY-4.0", "license_type": "permissive", "license_source": "github-api" }
729073481
By moving to ADLS, is the embed through AOT and LCS still supported ? [Enter feedback here] Document Details ⚠ Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking. ID: a344a5de-68fa-e9cf-28eb-51269c33b9b3 Version Independent ID: 1b3ede62-3954-574b-5778-8cdee0ededfe Content: Make Entity store available as a Data Lake - Finance & Operations | Dynamics 365 Content Source: articles/fin-ops-core/dev-itpro/data-entities/entity-store-data-lake.md Service: dynamics-ax-platform Product: **** Technology: **** GitHub Login: @MilindaV2 Microsoft Alias: milindav @MilindaV2 - Can you take a look? Thanks. In the current public preview of Entity store in Data lake, the data gets staged in the lake - we currently don't support moving PowerBI reports to Data lake. This will be enabled in the future. You can see the an overview below - more details will come in the future https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/dynamics365/fin-ops-core/dev-itpro/data-entities/azure-data-lake-overview#how-you-can-use-data-lake-later-if-youre-currently-using-analytical-workspaces Hi Millinda, Thanks for your email, So having said that it will be enabled in the future, and having said that the built-in report for analytics will later be automatically re-directed to Data Lake, if we already have data in Data Lake as of now and create our own Power BI report on it, can we still embed it as AX Resources and create our own Analytics Workspace coding wise, not by "pin" Power BI report from F&O frontend. What is your suggestion ? Thanks On Tue, Oct 27, 2020 at 5:31 AM Milinda Vitharana notifications@github.com wrote: In the current public preview of Entity store in Data lake, the data gets staged in the lake - we currently don't support moving PowerBI reports to Data lake. This will be enabled in the future. You can see the an overview below - more details will come in the future https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/dynamics365/fin-ops-core/dev-itpro/data-entities/azure-data-lake-overview#how-you-can-use-data-lake-later-if-youre-currently-using-analytical-workspaces — You are receiving this because you authored the thread. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/MicrosoftDocs/dynamics-365-unified-operations-public/issues/2885#issuecomment-716835432, or unsubscribe https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AMRFCRKXMMQA6OEUFWWZVY3SMXTDPANCNFSM4S6PKQVQ . You can "pin" a powerBI report authored with data in the lake as an Analytical workspace. We have not (yet) enabled the ability to create Analytical workspaces with data in the lake. they currently work with entity store. Hi Millinda, Thanks for your prompt reply. Highly anticipated for Analytical workspaces in datta lake. Thanks again. On Fri, Oct 30, 2020 at 9:35 PM Milinda Vitharana notifications@github.com wrote: You can "pin" a powerBI report authored with data in the lake as an Analytical workspace. We have not (yet) enabled the ability to create Analytical workspaces with data in the lake. they currently work with entity store. — You are receiving this because you authored the thread. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/MicrosoftDocs/dynamics-365-unified-operations-public/issues/2885#issuecomment-719555933, or unsubscribe https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AMRFCRJCAHYQ45VBH52NEMLSNK6LBANCNFSM4S6PKQVQ .
gharchive/issue
2020-10-25T17:46:19
2025-04-01T04:55:22.342584
{ "authors": [ "MilindaV2", "RobinARH", "axaeffect" ], "repo": "MicrosoftDocs/dynamics-365-unified-operations-public", "url": "https://github.com/MicrosoftDocs/dynamics-365-unified-operations-public/issues/2885", "license": "CC-BY-4.0", "license_type": "permissive", "license_source": "github-api" }
1108517331
Installing SSIS 2016, not any higher version Our experience is to install SSIS 2016, and not any higher version. Step 10. “Set up SSIS” should recommend SSIS 2016. Our environment is D365FO version 10.0.22, with a higher version of SSIS: When trying to import data using Data Management, we got this error: «Could not load file or assembly 'Microsoft.SqlServer.ManagedDTS, Version=13.0.0.0, Culture=neutral, PublicKeyToken=89845dcd8080cc91' or one of its dependencies. The system cannot find the file specified. Solution: We had to uninstall SSIS and install SSIS 2016 Document Details ⚠ Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking. ID: 14409653-d5a8-bf1b-8772-97832acfe6af Version Independent ID: 331d5d92-1601-ed2e-0dd9-4d68beddebff Content: Set up and deploy on-premises environments (Platform update 41 and later) - Finance & Operations | Dynamics 365 Content Source: articles/fin-ops-core/dev-itpro/deployment/setup-deploy-on-premises-pu41.md Service: dynamics-365-cross-app Product: **** Technology: **** GitHub Login: @faix Microsoft Alias: osfaixat Hello @Sigvelli , SSIS 2019 is supported starting with 10.0.21. Did you try configuring the localagent for deploying with the appropriate SQL server version? https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/dynamics365/fin-ops-core/dev-itpro/deployment/onprem-localagent-options Hi Thanks for the information. This is exactly the information that I would have liked to have in the "Setup and deploy ..." guide. We will follow your suggestion when installing the Prod environment. No problem. I have added a reference to that document on the setup deploy page. Changes will be live soon.
gharchive/issue
2022-01-19T20:18:26
2025-04-01T04:55:22.350198
{ "authors": [ "Sigvelli", "faix" ], "repo": "MicrosoftDocs/dynamics-365-unified-operations-public", "url": "https://github.com/MicrosoftDocs/dynamics-365-unified-operations-public/issues/3771", "license": "CC-BY-4.0", "license_type": "permissive", "license_source": "github-api" }
1717759880
missing space in creating of guid object in xpp-data-primitive.md Missing space between newGuid() :white_check_mark: Organization membership check passed Requester is not a member of the MicrosoftDocs organization.
gharchive/pull-request
2023-05-19T20:03:30
2025-04-01T04:55:22.352171
{ "authors": [ "buck1ey", "chIsmaeel" ], "repo": "MicrosoftDocs/dynamics-365-unified-operations-public", "url": "https://github.com/MicrosoftDocs/dynamics-365-unified-operations-public/pull/4553", "license": "CC-BY-4.0", "license_type": "permissive", "license_source": "github-api" }
1349945710
[API v2.0 - trialBalance] Correct to match EntitySetName Error: "BadRequest_NotFound" => "No HTTP resource was found that matches the request URI ... ." Correct to trialBalances Docs Build status updates of commit b64239e: :white_check_mark: Validation status: passed File Status Preview URL Details dev-itpro/api-reference/v2.0/api/dynamics_trialbalance_get.md :white_check_mark:Succeeded For more details, please refer to the build report. Note: Broken links written as relative paths are included in the above build report. For broken links written as absolute paths or external URLs, see the broken link report. For any questions, please:Try searching the docs.microsoft.com contributor guidesPost your question in the Docs support channel Docs Build status updates of commit 6087cf4: :white_check_mark: Validation status: passed File Status Preview URL Details dev-itpro/api-reference/v2.0/api/dynamics_trialbalance_get.md :white_check_mark:Succeeded For more details, please refer to the build report. Note: Broken links written as relative paths are included in the above build report. For broken links written as absolute paths or external URLs, see the broken link report. For any questions, please:Try searching the docs.microsoft.com contributor guidesPost your question in the Docs support channel Thanks for your contribution!
gharchive/pull-request
2022-08-24T19:45:27
2025-04-01T04:55:22.362631
{ "authors": [ "SusanneWindfeldPedersen", "christianbraeunlich", "opbld30", "opbld32" ], "repo": "MicrosoftDocs/dynamics365smb-devitpro-pb", "url": "https://github.com/MicrosoftDocs/dynamics365smb-devitpro-pb/pull/2520", "license": "CC-BY-4.0", "license_type": "permissive", "license_source": "github-api" }
2080325692
There is a spelling error. See the word combination "performedusing" Document Details ⚠ Do not edit this section. It is required for learn.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking. ID: 62f978ec-9661-d804-bcc5-d4af11287414 Version Independent ID: beba2bc9-c45b-1d0f-7bbe-bcb7c0f5d8e7 Content: Microsoft Graph PowerShell examples for group licensing - Microsoft Entra ID Content Source: docs/identity/users/licensing-powershell-graph-examples.md Service: active-directory Sub-service: enterprise-users GitHub Login: @barclayn Microsoft Alias: barclayn @Jmartinez589 Thanks for your feedback! We will investigate and update as appropriate. @Jmartinez589 Thanks for reporting this! We have created a PR for this issue and the changes should go live soon.
gharchive/issue
2024-01-13T14:35:28
2025-04-01T04:55:22.367563
{ "authors": [ "Jmartinez589", "ManoharLakkoju-MSFT", "RamanathanChinnappan-MSFT" ], "repo": "MicrosoftDocs/entra-docs", "url": "https://github.com/MicrosoftDocs/entra-docs/issues/197", "license": "MIT", "license_type": "permissive", "license_source": "github-api" }
302899010
WMI MSFT_Disk Location returns strange/undocumented value Described here https://social.technet.microsoft.com/Forums/en-US/90ecb9da-0d94-4f16-a2ef-fe6270a78fe7/wmi-msftdisk-location-returns-strange-value?forum=ITCG ⚠ Idea migrated from UserVoice Created By: Alex P Created On: 2018/03/01 18:22:25 +0000 Votes at Migration: 1 Supporters at Migration: 1 This channel is for docs site feedback instead of solving general windows hardware issue. Please try to ask the question in MSDN forum.
gharchive/issue
2018-03-06T22:52:13
2025-04-01T04:55:22.370148
{ "authors": [ "Powerhelmsman", "botcrane" ], "repo": "MicrosoftDocs/feedback", "url": "https://github.com/MicrosoftDocs/feedback/issues/13", "license": "CC-BY-4.0", "license_type": "permissive", "license_source": "github-api" }
460403250
Get-PartitionSupportedSize Command Misspelling 🛑 IMPORTANT: You can get your feedback addressed faster if you use the comment section for the article in which you encountered a problem. Link to article: https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/powershell/module/storage/get-partitionsupportedsize?view=win10-ps#examples Problem: Get-PartitionSupportedSizes Command must be without "S" at the end, and as refering to images I've attached to this issue MinimumSize and MaxmimumSize must be SizeMin and SizeMax. Regards Hamid Sadeghpour Saleh https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/powershell/module/storage/get-partitionsupportedsize?view=win10-ps#examples @sdwheeler Can you please take a look at this issue? That content is owned by @AndreaBarr. It's still not updated! Hello, @h-sadeghpour The issue has been acknowledged and you'll be notified with relevant updates as content gets updated. Thank you for providing feedback. @officedocsbot assign @e0i @h-sadeghpour The content has been updated with relevant changes accordingly. Thank you for taking the time to provide feedback. @AndreaBarr Recommended closure. Closing then. I also recommend you to use the feedback button on the bottom of the article when available @h-sadeghpour: That comment goes directly to the right repository and the author gets notified.
gharchive/issue
2019-06-25T12:46:42
2025-04-01T04:55:22.376294
{ "authors": [ "e0i", "h-sadeghpour", "mairaw", "ryanmajidi", "sdwheeler" ], "repo": "MicrosoftDocs/feedback", "url": "https://github.com/MicrosoftDocs/feedback/issues/1655", "license": "CC-BY-4.0", "license_type": "permissive", "license_source": "github-api" }
302899523
Offer offline documentation in more formats While the offline viewing option is great, PDF's "baked in" page format makes reading on mobile devices very cumbersome. I suggest offering downloads in open ePub format for easy reading on mobile devices -- allowing for text reflow, text and margin adjustment, color themes, etc. ⚠ Idea migrated from UserVoice Created By: Craig Forrester Created On: 2016/11/21 19:55:39 +0000 Votes at Migration: 31 Supporters at Migration: 29 Assigning to @dastaffo as the PM helping drive offline documentation. @cillroy FYI We are assessing what formats we need to support for offline documentation. In the short-term, we do not plan to implement any additional formats beyond PDF and Offline Help.
gharchive/issue
2018-03-06T22:53:33
2025-04-01T04:55:22.379729
{ "authors": [ "dastaffo", "dend", "docs-product" ], "repo": "MicrosoftDocs/feedback", "url": "https://github.com/MicrosoftDocs/feedback/issues/186", "license": "CC-BY-4.0", "license_type": "permissive", "license_source": "github-api" }
543678836
[LOC] Back-Translation "新規-SPClaimTypeMapping"→"New-SPClaimTypeMapping" 🛑 IMPORTANT: You can get your feedback addressed faster if you use the comment section for the article in which you encountered a problem (if available). Link to article: Tell us where exactly a problem occurs. "https://docs.microsoft.com/ja-jp/powershell/module/sharepoint-server/new-spclaimtypemapping?view=sharepoint-ps" Problem: What's wrong with the article? [LOC] Back-Translation "新規-SPClaimTypeMapping"→"New-SPClaimTypeMapping" @OfficeGlobal, please uplift this topic to human translation. @Soran-M FYI this is an MT overlocalization issue in PowerShell content. Working on a fix @hyoshioka0128 , @TinaMcN the article was HumanTranslated and published live @OfficeGlobal , @TinaMcN - Fixed. Closed #2318. Thanks.
gharchive/issue
2019-12-30T02:11:41
2025-04-01T04:55:22.383712
{ "authors": [ "OfficeGlobal", "TinaMcN", "hyoshioka0128" ], "repo": "MicrosoftDocs/feedback", "url": "https://github.com/MicrosoftDocs/feedback/issues/2318", "license": "CC-BY-4.0", "license_type": "permissive", "license_source": "github-api" }
624948018
Have you started to hide open issues? Hi there, Earlier the latest open issues has been shown on the pages in docs.microsoft.com. But now those are not visible anymore. Has this been done by purpose (hide issues) or is this a known issue? Yes, open issues are visible behind linke: "view all page feedback". regards Petri-X @alligreubel FYI Yes, this was intentional. Alli has more context if needed. #please-close Would you @alligreubel share some thoughts why Microsoft does not want to give an easy view how many issues in certain pages have? In my mind this might increase a risk of having duplicate issues. Previously it was much more simple for comment these when we could see the topics of open/closed issues on the same page from where you start writing feedback.
gharchive/issue
2020-05-26T14:55:49
2025-04-01T04:55:22.387200
{ "authors": [ "JasonWHowell", "Petri-X" ], "repo": "MicrosoftDocs/feedback", "url": "https://github.com/MicrosoftDocs/feedback/issues/2791", "license": "CC-BY-4.0", "license_type": "permissive", "license_source": "github-api" }
422684504
Visual Studio Live Share was unable to download needed dependencies to finish installation. Ensure you have network connectivity and restart VS Code to retry. Issue Type: Bug Visual Studio Live Share was unable to download needed dependencies to finish installation. Ensure you have network connectivity and restart VS Code to retry. Extension version: 0.3.1326 VS Code version: Code 1.32.3 (a3db5be9b5c6ba46bb7555ec5d60178ecc2eaae4, 2019-03-14T23:43:35.476Z) OS version: Windows_NT x64 6.1.7601 System Info Item Value CPUs Intel(R) Core(TM) i5-6200U CPU @ 2.30GHz (4 x 2400) GPU Status 2d_canvas: enabledchecker_imaging: disabled_offflash_3d: enabledflash_stage3d: enabledflash_stage3d_baseline: enabledgpu_compositing: enabledmultiple_raster_threads: enabled_onnative_gpu_memory_buffers: disabled_softwarerasterization: enabledsurface_synchronization: enabled_onvideo_decode: enabledwebgl: enabledwebgl2: enabled Memory (System) 7.68GB (2.32GB free) Process Argv Screen Reader no VM 0% @HOLO3344 Are you behind a proxy? If so, this issue is probably a duplicate of https://github.com/MicrosoftDocs/live-share/issues/591. There are some ideas in the discussion thread there that might help you.
gharchive/issue
2019-03-19T11:38:39
2025-04-01T04:55:22.393319
{ "authors": [ "HOLO3344", "cait1inhennessy" ], "repo": "MicrosoftDocs/live-share", "url": "https://github.com/MicrosoftDocs/live-share/issues/1830", "license": "CC-BY-4.0", "license_type": "permissive", "license_source": "github-api" }