comment
stringlengths 1
9.49k
| context
listlengths 0
835
|
|---|---|
>
Lol this right here shows how much the Speaker's power is neutered under McCarthy's negotiated rules. He has to seat a sociopathic liar who fraudulently damaged McCarthy's staff personally by impersonating them to get donations, and if he doesn't seat him Santos can demand a vote to remove McCarthy day after day after day. Pathetic.
|
[
"It's been like 2 weeks and McCarthy has shown already to be such a weak speaker. \nYou are given a free win. Condemn the liar. But nope, he gets committee seats. \nShows who is really running the show.",
">\n\n\nShows who is really running the show.\n\nVladimir Putin is pleased with his investment.",
">\n\nHopefully Santos will be fed bullshit classified intel just so we can time how quickly Putin remarks about it.",
">\n\nYou're acting like Putin doesn't already own the GOPs lol. Santos is definitely not his only source.",
">\n\nOh hell no, I’m definitely not implying he’s the only one. Just that any briefing given to him specifically should have some notable discrepancies (different names, numbers, locations) that would identify him as the leak. You know, protecting confidential info slightly more securely than the screener dvds sent out for Emmy voting.",
">\n\nSantos is a symbol of the entire Republican party.\nEntirely unscrupulous and amoral, and proudly so. All is acceptable in the pursuit of power.",
">\n\n\nunscrupulous and amoral, and proudly so\n\nAnother poster some time ago described them as \"virtue signaling,\" and I had to ask what's the exact opposite of that?\nA surprising number of others couldn't seem to grasp that \"virtue\" is not what they're signaling at all.",
">\n\nVice signaling?",
">\n\nDepravity flagging?",
">\n\nWill he also be given access to classified documents?",
">\n\nIt's OK. He'll simply say he's the President and declassify them with his mind.",
">\n\nI thought he already lied that Santos is the president?",
">\n\nSo this guy's a spy right? Like now we've seen him at Trump rallies years ago using different names. Running for office under different names. Everything he's said is false, but not in a confused Herschel Walker way. It's intentional. Right? Like we can see that he's a spy right?",
">\n\nDon’t forget about the piles of money he randomly finds",
">\n\nI don't think any of that money to Santos is random. It is payment, mostly from Russia, for services rendered. He just has to cause division and disarray within the US government, as ordered by Putin.",
">\n\nEh, tough leap to make. A moderately talented conman can somewhat easily bilk the Republican rank and file for millions of dollars. Particularly when he’s willing to go the extra mile and pay people to impersonate the staff of party leadership to bilk the wealthy donor class. \nIt’s more likely this is going to wind up being Bannon’s build the wall con turned up to 11. Perhaps with some international money mixed in.",
">\n\nSo a guy who couldn't legitimately get hired to sell me an insurance policy is being trusted with actual governance.\nFFS, \"conservatives\" - do you not have anyone around to run for office that isn't a complete fucking embarrassment? Stop voting for awful fuckin people",
">\n\nI can't blame his voters on this one, he straight up lied to them. The people that are keeping him in gov't are the ones we need to worry about.",
">\n\n\n“My staff raised concerns when he had a staff member who impersonated my chief of staff, and that individual was let go when Mr. Santos found out about it,” McCarthy said Tuesday.\n\nshameless loser",
">\n\nTheoretically if he is deemed too risky to get a clearance, can Biden prevent him from getting security clearance for classified intel?",
">\n\nAs the commander in chief id say so. Congress just votes on legislation and handles the purse. Intel is much more relevant to the executive branch."
] |
>
At this point Jeffries should offer a gimme to McCarthy - we won’t call for a new speaker unless at least 1 republican does, but we get the committee post. Santos can get the boot, Kev keeps his tenuous grasp on power (but still looks like shit), dems get a slightly better footing and some good press. McCarthy won’t do it, he can’t, but the offer alone would look magnanimous.
|
[
"It's been like 2 weeks and McCarthy has shown already to be such a weak speaker. \nYou are given a free win. Condemn the liar. But nope, he gets committee seats. \nShows who is really running the show.",
">\n\n\nShows who is really running the show.\n\nVladimir Putin is pleased with his investment.",
">\n\nHopefully Santos will be fed bullshit classified intel just so we can time how quickly Putin remarks about it.",
">\n\nYou're acting like Putin doesn't already own the GOPs lol. Santos is definitely not his only source.",
">\n\nOh hell no, I’m definitely not implying he’s the only one. Just that any briefing given to him specifically should have some notable discrepancies (different names, numbers, locations) that would identify him as the leak. You know, protecting confidential info slightly more securely than the screener dvds sent out for Emmy voting.",
">\n\nSantos is a symbol of the entire Republican party.\nEntirely unscrupulous and amoral, and proudly so. All is acceptable in the pursuit of power.",
">\n\n\nunscrupulous and amoral, and proudly so\n\nAnother poster some time ago described them as \"virtue signaling,\" and I had to ask what's the exact opposite of that?\nA surprising number of others couldn't seem to grasp that \"virtue\" is not what they're signaling at all.",
">\n\nVice signaling?",
">\n\nDepravity flagging?",
">\n\nWill he also be given access to classified documents?",
">\n\nIt's OK. He'll simply say he's the President and declassify them with his mind.",
">\n\nI thought he already lied that Santos is the president?",
">\n\nSo this guy's a spy right? Like now we've seen him at Trump rallies years ago using different names. Running for office under different names. Everything he's said is false, but not in a confused Herschel Walker way. It's intentional. Right? Like we can see that he's a spy right?",
">\n\nDon’t forget about the piles of money he randomly finds",
">\n\nI don't think any of that money to Santos is random. It is payment, mostly from Russia, for services rendered. He just has to cause division and disarray within the US government, as ordered by Putin.",
">\n\nEh, tough leap to make. A moderately talented conman can somewhat easily bilk the Republican rank and file for millions of dollars. Particularly when he’s willing to go the extra mile and pay people to impersonate the staff of party leadership to bilk the wealthy donor class. \nIt’s more likely this is going to wind up being Bannon’s build the wall con turned up to 11. Perhaps with some international money mixed in.",
">\n\nSo a guy who couldn't legitimately get hired to sell me an insurance policy is being trusted with actual governance.\nFFS, \"conservatives\" - do you not have anyone around to run for office that isn't a complete fucking embarrassment? Stop voting for awful fuckin people",
">\n\nI can't blame his voters on this one, he straight up lied to them. The people that are keeping him in gov't are the ones we need to worry about.",
">\n\n\n“My staff raised concerns when he had a staff member who impersonated my chief of staff, and that individual was let go when Mr. Santos found out about it,” McCarthy said Tuesday.\n\nshameless loser",
">\n\nTheoretically if he is deemed too risky to get a clearance, can Biden prevent him from getting security clearance for classified intel?",
">\n\nAs the commander in chief id say so. Congress just votes on legislation and handles the purse. Intel is much more relevant to the executive branch.",
">\n\nLol this right here shows how much the Speaker's power is neutered under McCarthy's negotiated rules. He has to seat a sociopathic liar who fraudulently damaged McCarthy's staff personally by impersonating them to get donations, and if he doesn't seat him Santos can demand a vote to remove McCarthy day after day after day. Pathetic."
] |
>
Conservative voters really are the most easily manipulated, shameless suckers on the planet.
|
[
"It's been like 2 weeks and McCarthy has shown already to be such a weak speaker. \nYou are given a free win. Condemn the liar. But nope, he gets committee seats. \nShows who is really running the show.",
">\n\n\nShows who is really running the show.\n\nVladimir Putin is pleased with his investment.",
">\n\nHopefully Santos will be fed bullshit classified intel just so we can time how quickly Putin remarks about it.",
">\n\nYou're acting like Putin doesn't already own the GOPs lol. Santos is definitely not his only source.",
">\n\nOh hell no, I’m definitely not implying he’s the only one. Just that any briefing given to him specifically should have some notable discrepancies (different names, numbers, locations) that would identify him as the leak. You know, protecting confidential info slightly more securely than the screener dvds sent out for Emmy voting.",
">\n\nSantos is a symbol of the entire Republican party.\nEntirely unscrupulous and amoral, and proudly so. All is acceptable in the pursuit of power.",
">\n\n\nunscrupulous and amoral, and proudly so\n\nAnother poster some time ago described them as \"virtue signaling,\" and I had to ask what's the exact opposite of that?\nA surprising number of others couldn't seem to grasp that \"virtue\" is not what they're signaling at all.",
">\n\nVice signaling?",
">\n\nDepravity flagging?",
">\n\nWill he also be given access to classified documents?",
">\n\nIt's OK. He'll simply say he's the President and declassify them with his mind.",
">\n\nI thought he already lied that Santos is the president?",
">\n\nSo this guy's a spy right? Like now we've seen him at Trump rallies years ago using different names. Running for office under different names. Everything he's said is false, but not in a confused Herschel Walker way. It's intentional. Right? Like we can see that he's a spy right?",
">\n\nDon’t forget about the piles of money he randomly finds",
">\n\nI don't think any of that money to Santos is random. It is payment, mostly from Russia, for services rendered. He just has to cause division and disarray within the US government, as ordered by Putin.",
">\n\nEh, tough leap to make. A moderately talented conman can somewhat easily bilk the Republican rank and file for millions of dollars. Particularly when he’s willing to go the extra mile and pay people to impersonate the staff of party leadership to bilk the wealthy donor class. \nIt’s more likely this is going to wind up being Bannon’s build the wall con turned up to 11. Perhaps with some international money mixed in.",
">\n\nSo a guy who couldn't legitimately get hired to sell me an insurance policy is being trusted with actual governance.\nFFS, \"conservatives\" - do you not have anyone around to run for office that isn't a complete fucking embarrassment? Stop voting for awful fuckin people",
">\n\nI can't blame his voters on this one, he straight up lied to them. The people that are keeping him in gov't are the ones we need to worry about.",
">\n\n\n“My staff raised concerns when he had a staff member who impersonated my chief of staff, and that individual was let go when Mr. Santos found out about it,” McCarthy said Tuesday.\n\nshameless loser",
">\n\nTheoretically if he is deemed too risky to get a clearance, can Biden prevent him from getting security clearance for classified intel?",
">\n\nAs the commander in chief id say so. Congress just votes on legislation and handles the purse. Intel is much more relevant to the executive branch.",
">\n\nLol this right here shows how much the Speaker's power is neutered under McCarthy's negotiated rules. He has to seat a sociopathic liar who fraudulently damaged McCarthy's staff personally by impersonating them to get donations, and if he doesn't seat him Santos can demand a vote to remove McCarthy day after day after day. Pathetic.",
">\n\nAt this point Jeffries should offer a gimme to McCarthy - we won’t call for a new speaker unless at least 1 republican does, but we get the committee post. Santos can get the boot, Kev keeps his tenuous grasp on power (but still looks like shit), dems get a slightly better footing and some good press. McCarthy won’t do it, he can’t, but the offer alone would look magnanimous."
] |
>
They convince themselves democrats do the same thing so it's okay for them too. While simultaneously pretending they are held to a higher standard.
Not even a strawman, that's as synopsis of every thread about him on r/conservative.
|
[
"It's been like 2 weeks and McCarthy has shown already to be such a weak speaker. \nYou are given a free win. Condemn the liar. But nope, he gets committee seats. \nShows who is really running the show.",
">\n\n\nShows who is really running the show.\n\nVladimir Putin is pleased with his investment.",
">\n\nHopefully Santos will be fed bullshit classified intel just so we can time how quickly Putin remarks about it.",
">\n\nYou're acting like Putin doesn't already own the GOPs lol. Santos is definitely not his only source.",
">\n\nOh hell no, I’m definitely not implying he’s the only one. Just that any briefing given to him specifically should have some notable discrepancies (different names, numbers, locations) that would identify him as the leak. You know, protecting confidential info slightly more securely than the screener dvds sent out for Emmy voting.",
">\n\nSantos is a symbol of the entire Republican party.\nEntirely unscrupulous and amoral, and proudly so. All is acceptable in the pursuit of power.",
">\n\n\nunscrupulous and amoral, and proudly so\n\nAnother poster some time ago described them as \"virtue signaling,\" and I had to ask what's the exact opposite of that?\nA surprising number of others couldn't seem to grasp that \"virtue\" is not what they're signaling at all.",
">\n\nVice signaling?",
">\n\nDepravity flagging?",
">\n\nWill he also be given access to classified documents?",
">\n\nIt's OK. He'll simply say he's the President and declassify them with his mind.",
">\n\nI thought he already lied that Santos is the president?",
">\n\nSo this guy's a spy right? Like now we've seen him at Trump rallies years ago using different names. Running for office under different names. Everything he's said is false, but not in a confused Herschel Walker way. It's intentional. Right? Like we can see that he's a spy right?",
">\n\nDon’t forget about the piles of money he randomly finds",
">\n\nI don't think any of that money to Santos is random. It is payment, mostly from Russia, for services rendered. He just has to cause division and disarray within the US government, as ordered by Putin.",
">\n\nEh, tough leap to make. A moderately talented conman can somewhat easily bilk the Republican rank and file for millions of dollars. Particularly when he’s willing to go the extra mile and pay people to impersonate the staff of party leadership to bilk the wealthy donor class. \nIt’s more likely this is going to wind up being Bannon’s build the wall con turned up to 11. Perhaps with some international money mixed in.",
">\n\nSo a guy who couldn't legitimately get hired to sell me an insurance policy is being trusted with actual governance.\nFFS, \"conservatives\" - do you not have anyone around to run for office that isn't a complete fucking embarrassment? Stop voting for awful fuckin people",
">\n\nI can't blame his voters on this one, he straight up lied to them. The people that are keeping him in gov't are the ones we need to worry about.",
">\n\n\n“My staff raised concerns when he had a staff member who impersonated my chief of staff, and that individual was let go when Mr. Santos found out about it,” McCarthy said Tuesday.\n\nshameless loser",
">\n\nTheoretically if he is deemed too risky to get a clearance, can Biden prevent him from getting security clearance for classified intel?",
">\n\nAs the commander in chief id say so. Congress just votes on legislation and handles the purse. Intel is much more relevant to the executive branch.",
">\n\nLol this right here shows how much the Speaker's power is neutered under McCarthy's negotiated rules. He has to seat a sociopathic liar who fraudulently damaged McCarthy's staff personally by impersonating them to get donations, and if he doesn't seat him Santos can demand a vote to remove McCarthy day after day after day. Pathetic.",
">\n\nAt this point Jeffries should offer a gimme to McCarthy - we won’t call for a new speaker unless at least 1 republican does, but we get the committee post. Santos can get the boot, Kev keeps his tenuous grasp on power (but still looks like shit), dems get a slightly better footing and some good press. McCarthy won’t do it, he can’t, but the offer alone would look magnanimous.",
">\n\nConservative voters really are the most easily manipulated, shameless suckers on the planet."
] |
>
I was curious but didn’t want to venture over there.
|
[
"It's been like 2 weeks and McCarthy has shown already to be such a weak speaker. \nYou are given a free win. Condemn the liar. But nope, he gets committee seats. \nShows who is really running the show.",
">\n\n\nShows who is really running the show.\n\nVladimir Putin is pleased with his investment.",
">\n\nHopefully Santos will be fed bullshit classified intel just so we can time how quickly Putin remarks about it.",
">\n\nYou're acting like Putin doesn't already own the GOPs lol. Santos is definitely not his only source.",
">\n\nOh hell no, I’m definitely not implying he’s the only one. Just that any briefing given to him specifically should have some notable discrepancies (different names, numbers, locations) that would identify him as the leak. You know, protecting confidential info slightly more securely than the screener dvds sent out for Emmy voting.",
">\n\nSantos is a symbol of the entire Republican party.\nEntirely unscrupulous and amoral, and proudly so. All is acceptable in the pursuit of power.",
">\n\n\nunscrupulous and amoral, and proudly so\n\nAnother poster some time ago described them as \"virtue signaling,\" and I had to ask what's the exact opposite of that?\nA surprising number of others couldn't seem to grasp that \"virtue\" is not what they're signaling at all.",
">\n\nVice signaling?",
">\n\nDepravity flagging?",
">\n\nWill he also be given access to classified documents?",
">\n\nIt's OK. He'll simply say he's the President and declassify them with his mind.",
">\n\nI thought he already lied that Santos is the president?",
">\n\nSo this guy's a spy right? Like now we've seen him at Trump rallies years ago using different names. Running for office under different names. Everything he's said is false, but not in a confused Herschel Walker way. It's intentional. Right? Like we can see that he's a spy right?",
">\n\nDon’t forget about the piles of money he randomly finds",
">\n\nI don't think any of that money to Santos is random. It is payment, mostly from Russia, for services rendered. He just has to cause division and disarray within the US government, as ordered by Putin.",
">\n\nEh, tough leap to make. A moderately talented conman can somewhat easily bilk the Republican rank and file for millions of dollars. Particularly when he’s willing to go the extra mile and pay people to impersonate the staff of party leadership to bilk the wealthy donor class. \nIt’s more likely this is going to wind up being Bannon’s build the wall con turned up to 11. Perhaps with some international money mixed in.",
">\n\nSo a guy who couldn't legitimately get hired to sell me an insurance policy is being trusted with actual governance.\nFFS, \"conservatives\" - do you not have anyone around to run for office that isn't a complete fucking embarrassment? Stop voting for awful fuckin people",
">\n\nI can't blame his voters on this one, he straight up lied to them. The people that are keeping him in gov't are the ones we need to worry about.",
">\n\n\n“My staff raised concerns when he had a staff member who impersonated my chief of staff, and that individual was let go when Mr. Santos found out about it,” McCarthy said Tuesday.\n\nshameless loser",
">\n\nTheoretically if he is deemed too risky to get a clearance, can Biden prevent him from getting security clearance for classified intel?",
">\n\nAs the commander in chief id say so. Congress just votes on legislation and handles the purse. Intel is much more relevant to the executive branch.",
">\n\nLol this right here shows how much the Speaker's power is neutered under McCarthy's negotiated rules. He has to seat a sociopathic liar who fraudulently damaged McCarthy's staff personally by impersonating them to get donations, and if he doesn't seat him Santos can demand a vote to remove McCarthy day after day after day. Pathetic.",
">\n\nAt this point Jeffries should offer a gimme to McCarthy - we won’t call for a new speaker unless at least 1 republican does, but we get the committee post. Santos can get the boot, Kev keeps his tenuous grasp on power (but still looks like shit), dems get a slightly better footing and some good press. McCarthy won’t do it, he can’t, but the offer alone would look magnanimous.",
">\n\nConservative voters really are the most easily manipulated, shameless suckers on the planet.",
">\n\nThey convince themselves democrats do the same thing so it's okay for them too. While simultaneously pretending they are held to a higher standard.\nNot even a strawman, that's as synopsis of every thread about him on r/conservative."
] |
>
Come on Brazil let's get that extradition party started.
|
[
"It's been like 2 weeks and McCarthy has shown already to be such a weak speaker. \nYou are given a free win. Condemn the liar. But nope, he gets committee seats. \nShows who is really running the show.",
">\n\n\nShows who is really running the show.\n\nVladimir Putin is pleased with his investment.",
">\n\nHopefully Santos will be fed bullshit classified intel just so we can time how quickly Putin remarks about it.",
">\n\nYou're acting like Putin doesn't already own the GOPs lol. Santos is definitely not his only source.",
">\n\nOh hell no, I’m definitely not implying he’s the only one. Just that any briefing given to him specifically should have some notable discrepancies (different names, numbers, locations) that would identify him as the leak. You know, protecting confidential info slightly more securely than the screener dvds sent out for Emmy voting.",
">\n\nSantos is a symbol of the entire Republican party.\nEntirely unscrupulous and amoral, and proudly so. All is acceptable in the pursuit of power.",
">\n\n\nunscrupulous and amoral, and proudly so\n\nAnother poster some time ago described them as \"virtue signaling,\" and I had to ask what's the exact opposite of that?\nA surprising number of others couldn't seem to grasp that \"virtue\" is not what they're signaling at all.",
">\n\nVice signaling?",
">\n\nDepravity flagging?",
">\n\nWill he also be given access to classified documents?",
">\n\nIt's OK. He'll simply say he's the President and declassify them with his mind.",
">\n\nI thought he already lied that Santos is the president?",
">\n\nSo this guy's a spy right? Like now we've seen him at Trump rallies years ago using different names. Running for office under different names. Everything he's said is false, but not in a confused Herschel Walker way. It's intentional. Right? Like we can see that he's a spy right?",
">\n\nDon’t forget about the piles of money he randomly finds",
">\n\nI don't think any of that money to Santos is random. It is payment, mostly from Russia, for services rendered. He just has to cause division and disarray within the US government, as ordered by Putin.",
">\n\nEh, tough leap to make. A moderately talented conman can somewhat easily bilk the Republican rank and file for millions of dollars. Particularly when he’s willing to go the extra mile and pay people to impersonate the staff of party leadership to bilk the wealthy donor class. \nIt’s more likely this is going to wind up being Bannon’s build the wall con turned up to 11. Perhaps with some international money mixed in.",
">\n\nSo a guy who couldn't legitimately get hired to sell me an insurance policy is being trusted with actual governance.\nFFS, \"conservatives\" - do you not have anyone around to run for office that isn't a complete fucking embarrassment? Stop voting for awful fuckin people",
">\n\nI can't blame his voters on this one, he straight up lied to them. The people that are keeping him in gov't are the ones we need to worry about.",
">\n\n\n“My staff raised concerns when he had a staff member who impersonated my chief of staff, and that individual was let go when Mr. Santos found out about it,” McCarthy said Tuesday.\n\nshameless loser",
">\n\nTheoretically if he is deemed too risky to get a clearance, can Biden prevent him from getting security clearance for classified intel?",
">\n\nAs the commander in chief id say so. Congress just votes on legislation and handles the purse. Intel is much more relevant to the executive branch.",
">\n\nLol this right here shows how much the Speaker's power is neutered under McCarthy's negotiated rules. He has to seat a sociopathic liar who fraudulently damaged McCarthy's staff personally by impersonating them to get donations, and if he doesn't seat him Santos can demand a vote to remove McCarthy day after day after day. Pathetic.",
">\n\nAt this point Jeffries should offer a gimme to McCarthy - we won’t call for a new speaker unless at least 1 republican does, but we get the committee post. Santos can get the boot, Kev keeps his tenuous grasp on power (but still looks like shit), dems get a slightly better footing and some good press. McCarthy won’t do it, he can’t, but the offer alone would look magnanimous.",
">\n\nConservative voters really are the most easily manipulated, shameless suckers on the planet.",
">\n\nThey convince themselves democrats do the same thing so it's okay for them too. While simultaneously pretending they are held to a higher standard.\nNot even a strawman, that's as synopsis of every thread about him on r/conservative.",
">\n\nI was curious but didn’t want to venture over there."
] |
>
Just when you think they can't go any lower they find a whole new way to do it...
|
[
"It's been like 2 weeks and McCarthy has shown already to be such a weak speaker. \nYou are given a free win. Condemn the liar. But nope, he gets committee seats. \nShows who is really running the show.",
">\n\n\nShows who is really running the show.\n\nVladimir Putin is pleased with his investment.",
">\n\nHopefully Santos will be fed bullshit classified intel just so we can time how quickly Putin remarks about it.",
">\n\nYou're acting like Putin doesn't already own the GOPs lol. Santos is definitely not his only source.",
">\n\nOh hell no, I’m definitely not implying he’s the only one. Just that any briefing given to him specifically should have some notable discrepancies (different names, numbers, locations) that would identify him as the leak. You know, protecting confidential info slightly more securely than the screener dvds sent out for Emmy voting.",
">\n\nSantos is a symbol of the entire Republican party.\nEntirely unscrupulous and amoral, and proudly so. All is acceptable in the pursuit of power.",
">\n\n\nunscrupulous and amoral, and proudly so\n\nAnother poster some time ago described them as \"virtue signaling,\" and I had to ask what's the exact opposite of that?\nA surprising number of others couldn't seem to grasp that \"virtue\" is not what they're signaling at all.",
">\n\nVice signaling?",
">\n\nDepravity flagging?",
">\n\nWill he also be given access to classified documents?",
">\n\nIt's OK. He'll simply say he's the President and declassify them with his mind.",
">\n\nI thought he already lied that Santos is the president?",
">\n\nSo this guy's a spy right? Like now we've seen him at Trump rallies years ago using different names. Running for office under different names. Everything he's said is false, but not in a confused Herschel Walker way. It's intentional. Right? Like we can see that he's a spy right?",
">\n\nDon’t forget about the piles of money he randomly finds",
">\n\nI don't think any of that money to Santos is random. It is payment, mostly from Russia, for services rendered. He just has to cause division and disarray within the US government, as ordered by Putin.",
">\n\nEh, tough leap to make. A moderately talented conman can somewhat easily bilk the Republican rank and file for millions of dollars. Particularly when he’s willing to go the extra mile and pay people to impersonate the staff of party leadership to bilk the wealthy donor class. \nIt’s more likely this is going to wind up being Bannon’s build the wall con turned up to 11. Perhaps with some international money mixed in.",
">\n\nSo a guy who couldn't legitimately get hired to sell me an insurance policy is being trusted with actual governance.\nFFS, \"conservatives\" - do you not have anyone around to run for office that isn't a complete fucking embarrassment? Stop voting for awful fuckin people",
">\n\nI can't blame his voters on this one, he straight up lied to them. The people that are keeping him in gov't are the ones we need to worry about.",
">\n\n\n“My staff raised concerns when he had a staff member who impersonated my chief of staff, and that individual was let go when Mr. Santos found out about it,” McCarthy said Tuesday.\n\nshameless loser",
">\n\nTheoretically if he is deemed too risky to get a clearance, can Biden prevent him from getting security clearance for classified intel?",
">\n\nAs the commander in chief id say so. Congress just votes on legislation and handles the purse. Intel is much more relevant to the executive branch.",
">\n\nLol this right here shows how much the Speaker's power is neutered under McCarthy's negotiated rules. He has to seat a sociopathic liar who fraudulently damaged McCarthy's staff personally by impersonating them to get donations, and if he doesn't seat him Santos can demand a vote to remove McCarthy day after day after day. Pathetic.",
">\n\nAt this point Jeffries should offer a gimme to McCarthy - we won’t call for a new speaker unless at least 1 republican does, but we get the committee post. Santos can get the boot, Kev keeps his tenuous grasp on power (but still looks like shit), dems get a slightly better footing and some good press. McCarthy won’t do it, he can’t, but the offer alone would look magnanimous.",
">\n\nConservative voters really are the most easily manipulated, shameless suckers on the planet.",
">\n\nThey convince themselves democrats do the same thing so it's okay for them too. While simultaneously pretending they are held to a higher standard.\nNot even a strawman, that's as synopsis of every thread about him on r/conservative.",
">\n\nI was curious but didn’t want to venture over there.",
">\n\nCome on Brazil let's get that extradition party started."
] |
>
It's not a rabbit hole
|
[
"It's been like 2 weeks and McCarthy has shown already to be such a weak speaker. \nYou are given a free win. Condemn the liar. But nope, he gets committee seats. \nShows who is really running the show.",
">\n\n\nShows who is really running the show.\n\nVladimir Putin is pleased with his investment.",
">\n\nHopefully Santos will be fed bullshit classified intel just so we can time how quickly Putin remarks about it.",
">\n\nYou're acting like Putin doesn't already own the GOPs lol. Santos is definitely not his only source.",
">\n\nOh hell no, I’m definitely not implying he’s the only one. Just that any briefing given to him specifically should have some notable discrepancies (different names, numbers, locations) that would identify him as the leak. You know, protecting confidential info slightly more securely than the screener dvds sent out for Emmy voting.",
">\n\nSantos is a symbol of the entire Republican party.\nEntirely unscrupulous and amoral, and proudly so. All is acceptable in the pursuit of power.",
">\n\n\nunscrupulous and amoral, and proudly so\n\nAnother poster some time ago described them as \"virtue signaling,\" and I had to ask what's the exact opposite of that?\nA surprising number of others couldn't seem to grasp that \"virtue\" is not what they're signaling at all.",
">\n\nVice signaling?",
">\n\nDepravity flagging?",
">\n\nWill he also be given access to classified documents?",
">\n\nIt's OK. He'll simply say he's the President and declassify them with his mind.",
">\n\nI thought he already lied that Santos is the president?",
">\n\nSo this guy's a spy right? Like now we've seen him at Trump rallies years ago using different names. Running for office under different names. Everything he's said is false, but not in a confused Herschel Walker way. It's intentional. Right? Like we can see that he's a spy right?",
">\n\nDon’t forget about the piles of money he randomly finds",
">\n\nI don't think any of that money to Santos is random. It is payment, mostly from Russia, for services rendered. He just has to cause division and disarray within the US government, as ordered by Putin.",
">\n\nEh, tough leap to make. A moderately talented conman can somewhat easily bilk the Republican rank and file for millions of dollars. Particularly when he’s willing to go the extra mile and pay people to impersonate the staff of party leadership to bilk the wealthy donor class. \nIt’s more likely this is going to wind up being Bannon’s build the wall con turned up to 11. Perhaps with some international money mixed in.",
">\n\nSo a guy who couldn't legitimately get hired to sell me an insurance policy is being trusted with actual governance.\nFFS, \"conservatives\" - do you not have anyone around to run for office that isn't a complete fucking embarrassment? Stop voting for awful fuckin people",
">\n\nI can't blame his voters on this one, he straight up lied to them. The people that are keeping him in gov't are the ones we need to worry about.",
">\n\n\n“My staff raised concerns when he had a staff member who impersonated my chief of staff, and that individual was let go when Mr. Santos found out about it,” McCarthy said Tuesday.\n\nshameless loser",
">\n\nTheoretically if he is deemed too risky to get a clearance, can Biden prevent him from getting security clearance for classified intel?",
">\n\nAs the commander in chief id say so. Congress just votes on legislation and handles the purse. Intel is much more relevant to the executive branch.",
">\n\nLol this right here shows how much the Speaker's power is neutered under McCarthy's negotiated rules. He has to seat a sociopathic liar who fraudulently damaged McCarthy's staff personally by impersonating them to get donations, and if he doesn't seat him Santos can demand a vote to remove McCarthy day after day after day. Pathetic.",
">\n\nAt this point Jeffries should offer a gimme to McCarthy - we won’t call for a new speaker unless at least 1 republican does, but we get the committee post. Santos can get the boot, Kev keeps his tenuous grasp on power (but still looks like shit), dems get a slightly better footing and some good press. McCarthy won’t do it, he can’t, but the offer alone would look magnanimous.",
">\n\nConservative voters really are the most easily manipulated, shameless suckers on the planet.",
">\n\nThey convince themselves democrats do the same thing so it's okay for them too. While simultaneously pretending they are held to a higher standard.\nNot even a strawman, that's as synopsis of every thread about him on r/conservative.",
">\n\nI was curious but didn’t want to venture over there.",
">\n\nCome on Brazil let's get that extradition party started.",
">\n\nJust when you think they can't go any lower they find a whole new way to do it..."
] |
>
Jesus H. Fu*k. This guy needs to be in jail, and as far away from any real power as possible.
Wait, that could be any of the GOP house... ok, shit, I guess he fits right in then.
|
[
"It's been like 2 weeks and McCarthy has shown already to be such a weak speaker. \nYou are given a free win. Condemn the liar. But nope, he gets committee seats. \nShows who is really running the show.",
">\n\n\nShows who is really running the show.\n\nVladimir Putin is pleased with his investment.",
">\n\nHopefully Santos will be fed bullshit classified intel just so we can time how quickly Putin remarks about it.",
">\n\nYou're acting like Putin doesn't already own the GOPs lol. Santos is definitely not his only source.",
">\n\nOh hell no, I’m definitely not implying he’s the only one. Just that any briefing given to him specifically should have some notable discrepancies (different names, numbers, locations) that would identify him as the leak. You know, protecting confidential info slightly more securely than the screener dvds sent out for Emmy voting.",
">\n\nSantos is a symbol of the entire Republican party.\nEntirely unscrupulous and amoral, and proudly so. All is acceptable in the pursuit of power.",
">\n\n\nunscrupulous and amoral, and proudly so\n\nAnother poster some time ago described them as \"virtue signaling,\" and I had to ask what's the exact opposite of that?\nA surprising number of others couldn't seem to grasp that \"virtue\" is not what they're signaling at all.",
">\n\nVice signaling?",
">\n\nDepravity flagging?",
">\n\nWill he also be given access to classified documents?",
">\n\nIt's OK. He'll simply say he's the President and declassify them with his mind.",
">\n\nI thought he already lied that Santos is the president?",
">\n\nSo this guy's a spy right? Like now we've seen him at Trump rallies years ago using different names. Running for office under different names. Everything he's said is false, but not in a confused Herschel Walker way. It's intentional. Right? Like we can see that he's a spy right?",
">\n\nDon’t forget about the piles of money he randomly finds",
">\n\nI don't think any of that money to Santos is random. It is payment, mostly from Russia, for services rendered. He just has to cause division and disarray within the US government, as ordered by Putin.",
">\n\nEh, tough leap to make. A moderately talented conman can somewhat easily bilk the Republican rank and file for millions of dollars. Particularly when he’s willing to go the extra mile and pay people to impersonate the staff of party leadership to bilk the wealthy donor class. \nIt’s more likely this is going to wind up being Bannon’s build the wall con turned up to 11. Perhaps with some international money mixed in.",
">\n\nSo a guy who couldn't legitimately get hired to sell me an insurance policy is being trusted with actual governance.\nFFS, \"conservatives\" - do you not have anyone around to run for office that isn't a complete fucking embarrassment? Stop voting for awful fuckin people",
">\n\nI can't blame his voters on this one, he straight up lied to them. The people that are keeping him in gov't are the ones we need to worry about.",
">\n\n\n“My staff raised concerns when he had a staff member who impersonated my chief of staff, and that individual was let go when Mr. Santos found out about it,” McCarthy said Tuesday.\n\nshameless loser",
">\n\nTheoretically if he is deemed too risky to get a clearance, can Biden prevent him from getting security clearance for classified intel?",
">\n\nAs the commander in chief id say so. Congress just votes on legislation and handles the purse. Intel is much more relevant to the executive branch.",
">\n\nLol this right here shows how much the Speaker's power is neutered under McCarthy's negotiated rules. He has to seat a sociopathic liar who fraudulently damaged McCarthy's staff personally by impersonating them to get donations, and if he doesn't seat him Santos can demand a vote to remove McCarthy day after day after day. Pathetic.",
">\n\nAt this point Jeffries should offer a gimme to McCarthy - we won’t call for a new speaker unless at least 1 republican does, but we get the committee post. Santos can get the boot, Kev keeps his tenuous grasp on power (but still looks like shit), dems get a slightly better footing and some good press. McCarthy won’t do it, he can’t, but the offer alone would look magnanimous.",
">\n\nConservative voters really are the most easily manipulated, shameless suckers on the planet.",
">\n\nThey convince themselves democrats do the same thing so it's okay for them too. While simultaneously pretending they are held to a higher standard.\nNot even a strawman, that's as synopsis of every thread about him on r/conservative.",
">\n\nI was curious but didn’t want to venture over there.",
">\n\nCome on Brazil let's get that extradition party started.",
">\n\nJust when you think they can't go any lower they find a whole new way to do it...",
">\n\nIt's not a rabbit hole"
] |
>
The GOP is a criminal organization and Russia has the receipts. That means Russian assets like Santos have the receipts which means the GOP is over the barrel.
|
[
"It's been like 2 weeks and McCarthy has shown already to be such a weak speaker. \nYou are given a free win. Condemn the liar. But nope, he gets committee seats. \nShows who is really running the show.",
">\n\n\nShows who is really running the show.\n\nVladimir Putin is pleased with his investment.",
">\n\nHopefully Santos will be fed bullshit classified intel just so we can time how quickly Putin remarks about it.",
">\n\nYou're acting like Putin doesn't already own the GOPs lol. Santos is definitely not his only source.",
">\n\nOh hell no, I’m definitely not implying he’s the only one. Just that any briefing given to him specifically should have some notable discrepancies (different names, numbers, locations) that would identify him as the leak. You know, protecting confidential info slightly more securely than the screener dvds sent out for Emmy voting.",
">\n\nSantos is a symbol of the entire Republican party.\nEntirely unscrupulous and amoral, and proudly so. All is acceptable in the pursuit of power.",
">\n\n\nunscrupulous and amoral, and proudly so\n\nAnother poster some time ago described them as \"virtue signaling,\" and I had to ask what's the exact opposite of that?\nA surprising number of others couldn't seem to grasp that \"virtue\" is not what they're signaling at all.",
">\n\nVice signaling?",
">\n\nDepravity flagging?",
">\n\nWill he also be given access to classified documents?",
">\n\nIt's OK. He'll simply say he's the President and declassify them with his mind.",
">\n\nI thought he already lied that Santos is the president?",
">\n\nSo this guy's a spy right? Like now we've seen him at Trump rallies years ago using different names. Running for office under different names. Everything he's said is false, but not in a confused Herschel Walker way. It's intentional. Right? Like we can see that he's a spy right?",
">\n\nDon’t forget about the piles of money he randomly finds",
">\n\nI don't think any of that money to Santos is random. It is payment, mostly from Russia, for services rendered. He just has to cause division and disarray within the US government, as ordered by Putin.",
">\n\nEh, tough leap to make. A moderately talented conman can somewhat easily bilk the Republican rank and file for millions of dollars. Particularly when he’s willing to go the extra mile and pay people to impersonate the staff of party leadership to bilk the wealthy donor class. \nIt’s more likely this is going to wind up being Bannon’s build the wall con turned up to 11. Perhaps with some international money mixed in.",
">\n\nSo a guy who couldn't legitimately get hired to sell me an insurance policy is being trusted with actual governance.\nFFS, \"conservatives\" - do you not have anyone around to run for office that isn't a complete fucking embarrassment? Stop voting for awful fuckin people",
">\n\nI can't blame his voters on this one, he straight up lied to them. The people that are keeping him in gov't are the ones we need to worry about.",
">\n\n\n“My staff raised concerns when he had a staff member who impersonated my chief of staff, and that individual was let go when Mr. Santos found out about it,” McCarthy said Tuesday.\n\nshameless loser",
">\n\nTheoretically if he is deemed too risky to get a clearance, can Biden prevent him from getting security clearance for classified intel?",
">\n\nAs the commander in chief id say so. Congress just votes on legislation and handles the purse. Intel is much more relevant to the executive branch.",
">\n\nLol this right here shows how much the Speaker's power is neutered under McCarthy's negotiated rules. He has to seat a sociopathic liar who fraudulently damaged McCarthy's staff personally by impersonating them to get donations, and if he doesn't seat him Santos can demand a vote to remove McCarthy day after day after day. Pathetic.",
">\n\nAt this point Jeffries should offer a gimme to McCarthy - we won’t call for a new speaker unless at least 1 republican does, but we get the committee post. Santos can get the boot, Kev keeps his tenuous grasp on power (but still looks like shit), dems get a slightly better footing and some good press. McCarthy won’t do it, he can’t, but the offer alone would look magnanimous.",
">\n\nConservative voters really are the most easily manipulated, shameless suckers on the planet.",
">\n\nThey convince themselves democrats do the same thing so it's okay for them too. While simultaneously pretending they are held to a higher standard.\nNot even a strawman, that's as synopsis of every thread about him on r/conservative.",
">\n\nI was curious but didn’t want to venture over there.",
">\n\nCome on Brazil let's get that extradition party started.",
">\n\nJust when you think they can't go any lower they find a whole new way to do it...",
">\n\nIt's not a rabbit hole",
">\n\nJesus H. Fu*k. This guy needs to be in jail, and as far away from any real power as possible. \nWait, that could be any of the GOP house... ok, shit, I guess he fits right in then."
] |
>
Well the American people just elected those criminals to run the house of representatives. I think it's the 70+ million people voting for the criminals that we really need to be worried about.
|
[
"It's been like 2 weeks and McCarthy has shown already to be such a weak speaker. \nYou are given a free win. Condemn the liar. But nope, he gets committee seats. \nShows who is really running the show.",
">\n\n\nShows who is really running the show.\n\nVladimir Putin is pleased with his investment.",
">\n\nHopefully Santos will be fed bullshit classified intel just so we can time how quickly Putin remarks about it.",
">\n\nYou're acting like Putin doesn't already own the GOPs lol. Santos is definitely not his only source.",
">\n\nOh hell no, I’m definitely not implying he’s the only one. Just that any briefing given to him specifically should have some notable discrepancies (different names, numbers, locations) that would identify him as the leak. You know, protecting confidential info slightly more securely than the screener dvds sent out for Emmy voting.",
">\n\nSantos is a symbol of the entire Republican party.\nEntirely unscrupulous and amoral, and proudly so. All is acceptable in the pursuit of power.",
">\n\n\nunscrupulous and amoral, and proudly so\n\nAnother poster some time ago described them as \"virtue signaling,\" and I had to ask what's the exact opposite of that?\nA surprising number of others couldn't seem to grasp that \"virtue\" is not what they're signaling at all.",
">\n\nVice signaling?",
">\n\nDepravity flagging?",
">\n\nWill he also be given access to classified documents?",
">\n\nIt's OK. He'll simply say he's the President and declassify them with his mind.",
">\n\nI thought he already lied that Santos is the president?",
">\n\nSo this guy's a spy right? Like now we've seen him at Trump rallies years ago using different names. Running for office under different names. Everything he's said is false, but not in a confused Herschel Walker way. It's intentional. Right? Like we can see that he's a spy right?",
">\n\nDon’t forget about the piles of money he randomly finds",
">\n\nI don't think any of that money to Santos is random. It is payment, mostly from Russia, for services rendered. He just has to cause division and disarray within the US government, as ordered by Putin.",
">\n\nEh, tough leap to make. A moderately talented conman can somewhat easily bilk the Republican rank and file for millions of dollars. Particularly when he’s willing to go the extra mile and pay people to impersonate the staff of party leadership to bilk the wealthy donor class. \nIt’s more likely this is going to wind up being Bannon’s build the wall con turned up to 11. Perhaps with some international money mixed in.",
">\n\nSo a guy who couldn't legitimately get hired to sell me an insurance policy is being trusted with actual governance.\nFFS, \"conservatives\" - do you not have anyone around to run for office that isn't a complete fucking embarrassment? Stop voting for awful fuckin people",
">\n\nI can't blame his voters on this one, he straight up lied to them. The people that are keeping him in gov't are the ones we need to worry about.",
">\n\n\n“My staff raised concerns when he had a staff member who impersonated my chief of staff, and that individual was let go when Mr. Santos found out about it,” McCarthy said Tuesday.\n\nshameless loser",
">\n\nTheoretically if he is deemed too risky to get a clearance, can Biden prevent him from getting security clearance for classified intel?",
">\n\nAs the commander in chief id say so. Congress just votes on legislation and handles the purse. Intel is much more relevant to the executive branch.",
">\n\nLol this right here shows how much the Speaker's power is neutered under McCarthy's negotiated rules. He has to seat a sociopathic liar who fraudulently damaged McCarthy's staff personally by impersonating them to get donations, and if he doesn't seat him Santos can demand a vote to remove McCarthy day after day after day. Pathetic.",
">\n\nAt this point Jeffries should offer a gimme to McCarthy - we won’t call for a new speaker unless at least 1 republican does, but we get the committee post. Santos can get the boot, Kev keeps his tenuous grasp on power (but still looks like shit), dems get a slightly better footing and some good press. McCarthy won’t do it, he can’t, but the offer alone would look magnanimous.",
">\n\nConservative voters really are the most easily manipulated, shameless suckers on the planet.",
">\n\nThey convince themselves democrats do the same thing so it's okay for them too. While simultaneously pretending they are held to a higher standard.\nNot even a strawman, that's as synopsis of every thread about him on r/conservative.",
">\n\nI was curious but didn’t want to venture over there.",
">\n\nCome on Brazil let's get that extradition party started.",
">\n\nJust when you think they can't go any lower they find a whole new way to do it...",
">\n\nIt's not a rabbit hole",
">\n\nJesus H. Fu*k. This guy needs to be in jail, and as far away from any real power as possible. \nWait, that could be any of the GOP house... ok, shit, I guess he fits right in then.",
">\n\nThe GOP is a criminal organization and Russia has the receipts. That means Russian assets like Santos have the receipts which means the GOP is over the barrel."
] |
>
So you can be a lying sack of shit, and suffer no consequences. Wonder if that will work for me on my next job search?🤔
|
[
"It's been like 2 weeks and McCarthy has shown already to be such a weak speaker. \nYou are given a free win. Condemn the liar. But nope, he gets committee seats. \nShows who is really running the show.",
">\n\n\nShows who is really running the show.\n\nVladimir Putin is pleased with his investment.",
">\n\nHopefully Santos will be fed bullshit classified intel just so we can time how quickly Putin remarks about it.",
">\n\nYou're acting like Putin doesn't already own the GOPs lol. Santos is definitely not his only source.",
">\n\nOh hell no, I’m definitely not implying he’s the only one. Just that any briefing given to him specifically should have some notable discrepancies (different names, numbers, locations) that would identify him as the leak. You know, protecting confidential info slightly more securely than the screener dvds sent out for Emmy voting.",
">\n\nSantos is a symbol of the entire Republican party.\nEntirely unscrupulous and amoral, and proudly so. All is acceptable in the pursuit of power.",
">\n\n\nunscrupulous and amoral, and proudly so\n\nAnother poster some time ago described them as \"virtue signaling,\" and I had to ask what's the exact opposite of that?\nA surprising number of others couldn't seem to grasp that \"virtue\" is not what they're signaling at all.",
">\n\nVice signaling?",
">\n\nDepravity flagging?",
">\n\nWill he also be given access to classified documents?",
">\n\nIt's OK. He'll simply say he's the President and declassify them with his mind.",
">\n\nI thought he already lied that Santos is the president?",
">\n\nSo this guy's a spy right? Like now we've seen him at Trump rallies years ago using different names. Running for office under different names. Everything he's said is false, but not in a confused Herschel Walker way. It's intentional. Right? Like we can see that he's a spy right?",
">\n\nDon’t forget about the piles of money he randomly finds",
">\n\nI don't think any of that money to Santos is random. It is payment, mostly from Russia, for services rendered. He just has to cause division and disarray within the US government, as ordered by Putin.",
">\n\nEh, tough leap to make. A moderately talented conman can somewhat easily bilk the Republican rank and file for millions of dollars. Particularly when he’s willing to go the extra mile and pay people to impersonate the staff of party leadership to bilk the wealthy donor class. \nIt’s more likely this is going to wind up being Bannon’s build the wall con turned up to 11. Perhaps with some international money mixed in.",
">\n\nSo a guy who couldn't legitimately get hired to sell me an insurance policy is being trusted with actual governance.\nFFS, \"conservatives\" - do you not have anyone around to run for office that isn't a complete fucking embarrassment? Stop voting for awful fuckin people",
">\n\nI can't blame his voters on this one, he straight up lied to them. The people that are keeping him in gov't are the ones we need to worry about.",
">\n\n\n“My staff raised concerns when he had a staff member who impersonated my chief of staff, and that individual was let go when Mr. Santos found out about it,” McCarthy said Tuesday.\n\nshameless loser",
">\n\nTheoretically if he is deemed too risky to get a clearance, can Biden prevent him from getting security clearance for classified intel?",
">\n\nAs the commander in chief id say so. Congress just votes on legislation and handles the purse. Intel is much more relevant to the executive branch.",
">\n\nLol this right here shows how much the Speaker's power is neutered under McCarthy's negotiated rules. He has to seat a sociopathic liar who fraudulently damaged McCarthy's staff personally by impersonating them to get donations, and if he doesn't seat him Santos can demand a vote to remove McCarthy day after day after day. Pathetic.",
">\n\nAt this point Jeffries should offer a gimme to McCarthy - we won’t call for a new speaker unless at least 1 republican does, but we get the committee post. Santos can get the boot, Kev keeps his tenuous grasp on power (but still looks like shit), dems get a slightly better footing and some good press. McCarthy won’t do it, he can’t, but the offer alone would look magnanimous.",
">\n\nConservative voters really are the most easily manipulated, shameless suckers on the planet.",
">\n\nThey convince themselves democrats do the same thing so it's okay for them too. While simultaneously pretending they are held to a higher standard.\nNot even a strawman, that's as synopsis of every thread about him on r/conservative.",
">\n\nI was curious but didn’t want to venture over there.",
">\n\nCome on Brazil let's get that extradition party started.",
">\n\nJust when you think they can't go any lower they find a whole new way to do it...",
">\n\nIt's not a rabbit hole",
">\n\nJesus H. Fu*k. This guy needs to be in jail, and as far away from any real power as possible. \nWait, that could be any of the GOP house... ok, shit, I guess he fits right in then.",
">\n\nThe GOP is a criminal organization and Russia has the receipts. That means Russian assets like Santos have the receipts which means the GOP is over the barrel.",
">\n\nWell the American people just elected those criminals to run the house of representatives. I think it's the 70+ million people voting for the criminals that we really need to be worried about."
] |
>
McCarthy is pandering to people like my cousin who was and is all in on Santos in that district and genuinely thinks that all the evidence against Santos is nonsense, that it's just "embellishing your resume- everyone does it!" and it's not a big deal so long as he, "does what we want and helps stick it to the dirty cheater democrats."
McCarthy knows what he's doing... the group of diehards made up of people like my cousin could make or break things going forward in elections the same way the people opposing him in his bid for speaker for the first 14 rounds mucked his "It's my turn!" coronation up for him. McCarthy is concerned with holding his holding his title and nothing else right now.
|
[
"It's been like 2 weeks and McCarthy has shown already to be such a weak speaker. \nYou are given a free win. Condemn the liar. But nope, he gets committee seats. \nShows who is really running the show.",
">\n\n\nShows who is really running the show.\n\nVladimir Putin is pleased with his investment.",
">\n\nHopefully Santos will be fed bullshit classified intel just so we can time how quickly Putin remarks about it.",
">\n\nYou're acting like Putin doesn't already own the GOPs lol. Santos is definitely not his only source.",
">\n\nOh hell no, I’m definitely not implying he’s the only one. Just that any briefing given to him specifically should have some notable discrepancies (different names, numbers, locations) that would identify him as the leak. You know, protecting confidential info slightly more securely than the screener dvds sent out for Emmy voting.",
">\n\nSantos is a symbol of the entire Republican party.\nEntirely unscrupulous and amoral, and proudly so. All is acceptable in the pursuit of power.",
">\n\n\nunscrupulous and amoral, and proudly so\n\nAnother poster some time ago described them as \"virtue signaling,\" and I had to ask what's the exact opposite of that?\nA surprising number of others couldn't seem to grasp that \"virtue\" is not what they're signaling at all.",
">\n\nVice signaling?",
">\n\nDepravity flagging?",
">\n\nWill he also be given access to classified documents?",
">\n\nIt's OK. He'll simply say he's the President and declassify them with his mind.",
">\n\nI thought he already lied that Santos is the president?",
">\n\nSo this guy's a spy right? Like now we've seen him at Trump rallies years ago using different names. Running for office under different names. Everything he's said is false, but not in a confused Herschel Walker way. It's intentional. Right? Like we can see that he's a spy right?",
">\n\nDon’t forget about the piles of money he randomly finds",
">\n\nI don't think any of that money to Santos is random. It is payment, mostly from Russia, for services rendered. He just has to cause division and disarray within the US government, as ordered by Putin.",
">\n\nEh, tough leap to make. A moderately talented conman can somewhat easily bilk the Republican rank and file for millions of dollars. Particularly when he’s willing to go the extra mile and pay people to impersonate the staff of party leadership to bilk the wealthy donor class. \nIt’s more likely this is going to wind up being Bannon’s build the wall con turned up to 11. Perhaps with some international money mixed in.",
">\n\nSo a guy who couldn't legitimately get hired to sell me an insurance policy is being trusted with actual governance.\nFFS, \"conservatives\" - do you not have anyone around to run for office that isn't a complete fucking embarrassment? Stop voting for awful fuckin people",
">\n\nI can't blame his voters on this one, he straight up lied to them. The people that are keeping him in gov't are the ones we need to worry about.",
">\n\n\n“My staff raised concerns when he had a staff member who impersonated my chief of staff, and that individual was let go when Mr. Santos found out about it,” McCarthy said Tuesday.\n\nshameless loser",
">\n\nTheoretically if he is deemed too risky to get a clearance, can Biden prevent him from getting security clearance for classified intel?",
">\n\nAs the commander in chief id say so. Congress just votes on legislation and handles the purse. Intel is much more relevant to the executive branch.",
">\n\nLol this right here shows how much the Speaker's power is neutered under McCarthy's negotiated rules. He has to seat a sociopathic liar who fraudulently damaged McCarthy's staff personally by impersonating them to get donations, and if he doesn't seat him Santos can demand a vote to remove McCarthy day after day after day. Pathetic.",
">\n\nAt this point Jeffries should offer a gimme to McCarthy - we won’t call for a new speaker unless at least 1 republican does, but we get the committee post. Santos can get the boot, Kev keeps his tenuous grasp on power (but still looks like shit), dems get a slightly better footing and some good press. McCarthy won’t do it, he can’t, but the offer alone would look magnanimous.",
">\n\nConservative voters really are the most easily manipulated, shameless suckers on the planet.",
">\n\nThey convince themselves democrats do the same thing so it's okay for them too. While simultaneously pretending they are held to a higher standard.\nNot even a strawman, that's as synopsis of every thread about him on r/conservative.",
">\n\nI was curious but didn’t want to venture over there.",
">\n\nCome on Brazil let's get that extradition party started.",
">\n\nJust when you think they can't go any lower they find a whole new way to do it...",
">\n\nIt's not a rabbit hole",
">\n\nJesus H. Fu*k. This guy needs to be in jail, and as far away from any real power as possible. \nWait, that could be any of the GOP house... ok, shit, I guess he fits right in then.",
">\n\nThe GOP is a criminal organization and Russia has the receipts. That means Russian assets like Santos have the receipts which means the GOP is over the barrel.",
">\n\nWell the American people just elected those criminals to run the house of representatives. I think it's the 70+ million people voting for the criminals that we really need to be worried about.",
">\n\nSo you can be a lying sack of shit, and suffer no consequences. Wonder if that will work for me on my next job search?🤔"
] |
>
Time for a motion to vacate from literally anybody. All it takes is one house member.
|
[
"It's been like 2 weeks and McCarthy has shown already to be such a weak speaker. \nYou are given a free win. Condemn the liar. But nope, he gets committee seats. \nShows who is really running the show.",
">\n\n\nShows who is really running the show.\n\nVladimir Putin is pleased with his investment.",
">\n\nHopefully Santos will be fed bullshit classified intel just so we can time how quickly Putin remarks about it.",
">\n\nYou're acting like Putin doesn't already own the GOPs lol. Santos is definitely not his only source.",
">\n\nOh hell no, I’m definitely not implying he’s the only one. Just that any briefing given to him specifically should have some notable discrepancies (different names, numbers, locations) that would identify him as the leak. You know, protecting confidential info slightly more securely than the screener dvds sent out for Emmy voting.",
">\n\nSantos is a symbol of the entire Republican party.\nEntirely unscrupulous and amoral, and proudly so. All is acceptable in the pursuit of power.",
">\n\n\nunscrupulous and amoral, and proudly so\n\nAnother poster some time ago described them as \"virtue signaling,\" and I had to ask what's the exact opposite of that?\nA surprising number of others couldn't seem to grasp that \"virtue\" is not what they're signaling at all.",
">\n\nVice signaling?",
">\n\nDepravity flagging?",
">\n\nWill he also be given access to classified documents?",
">\n\nIt's OK. He'll simply say he's the President and declassify them with his mind.",
">\n\nI thought he already lied that Santos is the president?",
">\n\nSo this guy's a spy right? Like now we've seen him at Trump rallies years ago using different names. Running for office under different names. Everything he's said is false, but not in a confused Herschel Walker way. It's intentional. Right? Like we can see that he's a spy right?",
">\n\nDon’t forget about the piles of money he randomly finds",
">\n\nI don't think any of that money to Santos is random. It is payment, mostly from Russia, for services rendered. He just has to cause division and disarray within the US government, as ordered by Putin.",
">\n\nEh, tough leap to make. A moderately talented conman can somewhat easily bilk the Republican rank and file for millions of dollars. Particularly when he’s willing to go the extra mile and pay people to impersonate the staff of party leadership to bilk the wealthy donor class. \nIt’s more likely this is going to wind up being Bannon’s build the wall con turned up to 11. Perhaps with some international money mixed in.",
">\n\nSo a guy who couldn't legitimately get hired to sell me an insurance policy is being trusted with actual governance.\nFFS, \"conservatives\" - do you not have anyone around to run for office that isn't a complete fucking embarrassment? Stop voting for awful fuckin people",
">\n\nI can't blame his voters on this one, he straight up lied to them. The people that are keeping him in gov't are the ones we need to worry about.",
">\n\n\n“My staff raised concerns when he had a staff member who impersonated my chief of staff, and that individual was let go when Mr. Santos found out about it,” McCarthy said Tuesday.\n\nshameless loser",
">\n\nTheoretically if he is deemed too risky to get a clearance, can Biden prevent him from getting security clearance for classified intel?",
">\n\nAs the commander in chief id say so. Congress just votes on legislation and handles the purse. Intel is much more relevant to the executive branch.",
">\n\nLol this right here shows how much the Speaker's power is neutered under McCarthy's negotiated rules. He has to seat a sociopathic liar who fraudulently damaged McCarthy's staff personally by impersonating them to get donations, and if he doesn't seat him Santos can demand a vote to remove McCarthy day after day after day. Pathetic.",
">\n\nAt this point Jeffries should offer a gimme to McCarthy - we won’t call for a new speaker unless at least 1 republican does, but we get the committee post. Santos can get the boot, Kev keeps his tenuous grasp on power (but still looks like shit), dems get a slightly better footing and some good press. McCarthy won’t do it, he can’t, but the offer alone would look magnanimous.",
">\n\nConservative voters really are the most easily manipulated, shameless suckers on the planet.",
">\n\nThey convince themselves democrats do the same thing so it's okay for them too. While simultaneously pretending they are held to a higher standard.\nNot even a strawman, that's as synopsis of every thread about him on r/conservative.",
">\n\nI was curious but didn’t want to venture over there.",
">\n\nCome on Brazil let's get that extradition party started.",
">\n\nJust when you think they can't go any lower they find a whole new way to do it...",
">\n\nIt's not a rabbit hole",
">\n\nJesus H. Fu*k. This guy needs to be in jail, and as far away from any real power as possible. \nWait, that could be any of the GOP house... ok, shit, I guess he fits right in then.",
">\n\nThe GOP is a criminal organization and Russia has the receipts. That means Russian assets like Santos have the receipts which means the GOP is over the barrel.",
">\n\nWell the American people just elected those criminals to run the house of representatives. I think it's the 70+ million people voting for the criminals that we really need to be worried about.",
">\n\nSo you can be a lying sack of shit, and suffer no consequences. Wonder if that will work for me on my next job search?🤔",
">\n\nMcCarthy is pandering to people like my cousin who was and is all in on Santos in that district and genuinely thinks that all the evidence against Santos is nonsense, that it's just \"embellishing your resume- everyone does it!\" and it's not a big deal so long as he, \"does what we want and helps stick it to the dirty cheater democrats.\"\nMcCarthy knows what he's doing... the group of diehards made up of people like my cousin could make or break things going forward in elections the same way the people opposing him in his bid for speaker for the first 14 rounds mucked his \"It's my turn!\" coronation up for him. McCarthy is concerned with holding his holding his title and nothing else right now."
] |
>
Of course.
|
[
"It's been like 2 weeks and McCarthy has shown already to be such a weak speaker. \nYou are given a free win. Condemn the liar. But nope, he gets committee seats. \nShows who is really running the show.",
">\n\n\nShows who is really running the show.\n\nVladimir Putin is pleased with his investment.",
">\n\nHopefully Santos will be fed bullshit classified intel just so we can time how quickly Putin remarks about it.",
">\n\nYou're acting like Putin doesn't already own the GOPs lol. Santos is definitely not his only source.",
">\n\nOh hell no, I’m definitely not implying he’s the only one. Just that any briefing given to him specifically should have some notable discrepancies (different names, numbers, locations) that would identify him as the leak. You know, protecting confidential info slightly more securely than the screener dvds sent out for Emmy voting.",
">\n\nSantos is a symbol of the entire Republican party.\nEntirely unscrupulous and amoral, and proudly so. All is acceptable in the pursuit of power.",
">\n\n\nunscrupulous and amoral, and proudly so\n\nAnother poster some time ago described them as \"virtue signaling,\" and I had to ask what's the exact opposite of that?\nA surprising number of others couldn't seem to grasp that \"virtue\" is not what they're signaling at all.",
">\n\nVice signaling?",
">\n\nDepravity flagging?",
">\n\nWill he also be given access to classified documents?",
">\n\nIt's OK. He'll simply say he's the President and declassify them with his mind.",
">\n\nI thought he already lied that Santos is the president?",
">\n\nSo this guy's a spy right? Like now we've seen him at Trump rallies years ago using different names. Running for office under different names. Everything he's said is false, but not in a confused Herschel Walker way. It's intentional. Right? Like we can see that he's a spy right?",
">\n\nDon’t forget about the piles of money he randomly finds",
">\n\nI don't think any of that money to Santos is random. It is payment, mostly from Russia, for services rendered. He just has to cause division and disarray within the US government, as ordered by Putin.",
">\n\nEh, tough leap to make. A moderately talented conman can somewhat easily bilk the Republican rank and file for millions of dollars. Particularly when he’s willing to go the extra mile and pay people to impersonate the staff of party leadership to bilk the wealthy donor class. \nIt’s more likely this is going to wind up being Bannon’s build the wall con turned up to 11. Perhaps with some international money mixed in.",
">\n\nSo a guy who couldn't legitimately get hired to sell me an insurance policy is being trusted with actual governance.\nFFS, \"conservatives\" - do you not have anyone around to run for office that isn't a complete fucking embarrassment? Stop voting for awful fuckin people",
">\n\nI can't blame his voters on this one, he straight up lied to them. The people that are keeping him in gov't are the ones we need to worry about.",
">\n\n\n“My staff raised concerns when he had a staff member who impersonated my chief of staff, and that individual was let go when Mr. Santos found out about it,” McCarthy said Tuesday.\n\nshameless loser",
">\n\nTheoretically if he is deemed too risky to get a clearance, can Biden prevent him from getting security clearance for classified intel?",
">\n\nAs the commander in chief id say so. Congress just votes on legislation and handles the purse. Intel is much more relevant to the executive branch.",
">\n\nLol this right here shows how much the Speaker's power is neutered under McCarthy's negotiated rules. He has to seat a sociopathic liar who fraudulently damaged McCarthy's staff personally by impersonating them to get donations, and if he doesn't seat him Santos can demand a vote to remove McCarthy day after day after day. Pathetic.",
">\n\nAt this point Jeffries should offer a gimme to McCarthy - we won’t call for a new speaker unless at least 1 republican does, but we get the committee post. Santos can get the boot, Kev keeps his tenuous grasp on power (but still looks like shit), dems get a slightly better footing and some good press. McCarthy won’t do it, he can’t, but the offer alone would look magnanimous.",
">\n\nConservative voters really are the most easily manipulated, shameless suckers on the planet.",
">\n\nThey convince themselves democrats do the same thing so it's okay for them too. While simultaneously pretending they are held to a higher standard.\nNot even a strawman, that's as synopsis of every thread about him on r/conservative.",
">\n\nI was curious but didn’t want to venture over there.",
">\n\nCome on Brazil let's get that extradition party started.",
">\n\nJust when you think they can't go any lower they find a whole new way to do it...",
">\n\nIt's not a rabbit hole",
">\n\nJesus H. Fu*k. This guy needs to be in jail, and as far away from any real power as possible. \nWait, that could be any of the GOP house... ok, shit, I guess he fits right in then.",
">\n\nThe GOP is a criminal organization and Russia has the receipts. That means Russian assets like Santos have the receipts which means the GOP is over the barrel.",
">\n\nWell the American people just elected those criminals to run the house of representatives. I think it's the 70+ million people voting for the criminals that we really need to be worried about.",
">\n\nSo you can be a lying sack of shit, and suffer no consequences. Wonder if that will work for me on my next job search?🤔",
">\n\nMcCarthy is pandering to people like my cousin who was and is all in on Santos in that district and genuinely thinks that all the evidence against Santos is nonsense, that it's just \"embellishing your resume- everyone does it!\" and it's not a big deal so long as he, \"does what we want and helps stick it to the dirty cheater democrats.\"\nMcCarthy knows what he's doing... the group of diehards made up of people like my cousin could make or break things going forward in elections the same way the people opposing him in his bid for speaker for the first 14 rounds mucked his \"It's my turn!\" coronation up for him. McCarthy is concerned with holding his holding his title and nothing else right now.",
">\n\nTime for a motion to vacate from literally anybody. All it takes is one house member."
] |
>
Well he’s a reflection of the current party so who’s really surprised by this?
|
[
"It's been like 2 weeks and McCarthy has shown already to be such a weak speaker. \nYou are given a free win. Condemn the liar. But nope, he gets committee seats. \nShows who is really running the show.",
">\n\n\nShows who is really running the show.\n\nVladimir Putin is pleased with his investment.",
">\n\nHopefully Santos will be fed bullshit classified intel just so we can time how quickly Putin remarks about it.",
">\n\nYou're acting like Putin doesn't already own the GOPs lol. Santos is definitely not his only source.",
">\n\nOh hell no, I’m definitely not implying he’s the only one. Just that any briefing given to him specifically should have some notable discrepancies (different names, numbers, locations) that would identify him as the leak. You know, protecting confidential info slightly more securely than the screener dvds sent out for Emmy voting.",
">\n\nSantos is a symbol of the entire Republican party.\nEntirely unscrupulous and amoral, and proudly so. All is acceptable in the pursuit of power.",
">\n\n\nunscrupulous and amoral, and proudly so\n\nAnother poster some time ago described them as \"virtue signaling,\" and I had to ask what's the exact opposite of that?\nA surprising number of others couldn't seem to grasp that \"virtue\" is not what they're signaling at all.",
">\n\nVice signaling?",
">\n\nDepravity flagging?",
">\n\nWill he also be given access to classified documents?",
">\n\nIt's OK. He'll simply say he's the President and declassify them with his mind.",
">\n\nI thought he already lied that Santos is the president?",
">\n\nSo this guy's a spy right? Like now we've seen him at Trump rallies years ago using different names. Running for office under different names. Everything he's said is false, but not in a confused Herschel Walker way. It's intentional. Right? Like we can see that he's a spy right?",
">\n\nDon’t forget about the piles of money he randomly finds",
">\n\nI don't think any of that money to Santos is random. It is payment, mostly from Russia, for services rendered. He just has to cause division and disarray within the US government, as ordered by Putin.",
">\n\nEh, tough leap to make. A moderately talented conman can somewhat easily bilk the Republican rank and file for millions of dollars. Particularly when he’s willing to go the extra mile and pay people to impersonate the staff of party leadership to bilk the wealthy donor class. \nIt’s more likely this is going to wind up being Bannon’s build the wall con turned up to 11. Perhaps with some international money mixed in.",
">\n\nSo a guy who couldn't legitimately get hired to sell me an insurance policy is being trusted with actual governance.\nFFS, \"conservatives\" - do you not have anyone around to run for office that isn't a complete fucking embarrassment? Stop voting for awful fuckin people",
">\n\nI can't blame his voters on this one, he straight up lied to them. The people that are keeping him in gov't are the ones we need to worry about.",
">\n\n\n“My staff raised concerns when he had a staff member who impersonated my chief of staff, and that individual was let go when Mr. Santos found out about it,” McCarthy said Tuesday.\n\nshameless loser",
">\n\nTheoretically if he is deemed too risky to get a clearance, can Biden prevent him from getting security clearance for classified intel?",
">\n\nAs the commander in chief id say so. Congress just votes on legislation and handles the purse. Intel is much more relevant to the executive branch.",
">\n\nLol this right here shows how much the Speaker's power is neutered under McCarthy's negotiated rules. He has to seat a sociopathic liar who fraudulently damaged McCarthy's staff personally by impersonating them to get donations, and if he doesn't seat him Santos can demand a vote to remove McCarthy day after day after day. Pathetic.",
">\n\nAt this point Jeffries should offer a gimme to McCarthy - we won’t call for a new speaker unless at least 1 republican does, but we get the committee post. Santos can get the boot, Kev keeps his tenuous grasp on power (but still looks like shit), dems get a slightly better footing and some good press. McCarthy won’t do it, he can’t, but the offer alone would look magnanimous.",
">\n\nConservative voters really are the most easily manipulated, shameless suckers on the planet.",
">\n\nThey convince themselves democrats do the same thing so it's okay for them too. While simultaneously pretending they are held to a higher standard.\nNot even a strawman, that's as synopsis of every thread about him on r/conservative.",
">\n\nI was curious but didn’t want to venture over there.",
">\n\nCome on Brazil let's get that extradition party started.",
">\n\nJust when you think they can't go any lower they find a whole new way to do it...",
">\n\nIt's not a rabbit hole",
">\n\nJesus H. Fu*k. This guy needs to be in jail, and as far away from any real power as possible. \nWait, that could be any of the GOP house... ok, shit, I guess he fits right in then.",
">\n\nThe GOP is a criminal organization and Russia has the receipts. That means Russian assets like Santos have the receipts which means the GOP is over the barrel.",
">\n\nWell the American people just elected those criminals to run the house of representatives. I think it's the 70+ million people voting for the criminals that we really need to be worried about.",
">\n\nSo you can be a lying sack of shit, and suffer no consequences. Wonder if that will work for me on my next job search?🤔",
">\n\nMcCarthy is pandering to people like my cousin who was and is all in on Santos in that district and genuinely thinks that all the evidence against Santos is nonsense, that it's just \"embellishing your resume- everyone does it!\" and it's not a big deal so long as he, \"does what we want and helps stick it to the dirty cheater democrats.\"\nMcCarthy knows what he's doing... the group of diehards made up of people like my cousin could make or break things going forward in elections the same way the people opposing him in his bid for speaker for the first 14 rounds mucked his \"It's my turn!\" coronation up for him. McCarthy is concerned with holding his holding his title and nothing else right now.",
">\n\nTime for a motion to vacate from literally anybody. All it takes is one house member.",
">\n\nOf course."
] |
>
The GOP don’t mind Liars and conmen as long as they lie and con for the GOP
|
[
"It's been like 2 weeks and McCarthy has shown already to be such a weak speaker. \nYou are given a free win. Condemn the liar. But nope, he gets committee seats. \nShows who is really running the show.",
">\n\n\nShows who is really running the show.\n\nVladimir Putin is pleased with his investment.",
">\n\nHopefully Santos will be fed bullshit classified intel just so we can time how quickly Putin remarks about it.",
">\n\nYou're acting like Putin doesn't already own the GOPs lol. Santos is definitely not his only source.",
">\n\nOh hell no, I’m definitely not implying he’s the only one. Just that any briefing given to him specifically should have some notable discrepancies (different names, numbers, locations) that would identify him as the leak. You know, protecting confidential info slightly more securely than the screener dvds sent out for Emmy voting.",
">\n\nSantos is a symbol of the entire Republican party.\nEntirely unscrupulous and amoral, and proudly so. All is acceptable in the pursuit of power.",
">\n\n\nunscrupulous and amoral, and proudly so\n\nAnother poster some time ago described them as \"virtue signaling,\" and I had to ask what's the exact opposite of that?\nA surprising number of others couldn't seem to grasp that \"virtue\" is not what they're signaling at all.",
">\n\nVice signaling?",
">\n\nDepravity flagging?",
">\n\nWill he also be given access to classified documents?",
">\n\nIt's OK. He'll simply say he's the President and declassify them with his mind.",
">\n\nI thought he already lied that Santos is the president?",
">\n\nSo this guy's a spy right? Like now we've seen him at Trump rallies years ago using different names. Running for office under different names. Everything he's said is false, but not in a confused Herschel Walker way. It's intentional. Right? Like we can see that he's a spy right?",
">\n\nDon’t forget about the piles of money he randomly finds",
">\n\nI don't think any of that money to Santos is random. It is payment, mostly from Russia, for services rendered. He just has to cause division and disarray within the US government, as ordered by Putin.",
">\n\nEh, tough leap to make. A moderately talented conman can somewhat easily bilk the Republican rank and file for millions of dollars. Particularly when he’s willing to go the extra mile and pay people to impersonate the staff of party leadership to bilk the wealthy donor class. \nIt’s more likely this is going to wind up being Bannon’s build the wall con turned up to 11. Perhaps with some international money mixed in.",
">\n\nSo a guy who couldn't legitimately get hired to sell me an insurance policy is being trusted with actual governance.\nFFS, \"conservatives\" - do you not have anyone around to run for office that isn't a complete fucking embarrassment? Stop voting for awful fuckin people",
">\n\nI can't blame his voters on this one, he straight up lied to them. The people that are keeping him in gov't are the ones we need to worry about.",
">\n\n\n“My staff raised concerns when he had a staff member who impersonated my chief of staff, and that individual was let go when Mr. Santos found out about it,” McCarthy said Tuesday.\n\nshameless loser",
">\n\nTheoretically if he is deemed too risky to get a clearance, can Biden prevent him from getting security clearance for classified intel?",
">\n\nAs the commander in chief id say so. Congress just votes on legislation and handles the purse. Intel is much more relevant to the executive branch.",
">\n\nLol this right here shows how much the Speaker's power is neutered under McCarthy's negotiated rules. He has to seat a sociopathic liar who fraudulently damaged McCarthy's staff personally by impersonating them to get donations, and if he doesn't seat him Santos can demand a vote to remove McCarthy day after day after day. Pathetic.",
">\n\nAt this point Jeffries should offer a gimme to McCarthy - we won’t call for a new speaker unless at least 1 republican does, but we get the committee post. Santos can get the boot, Kev keeps his tenuous grasp on power (but still looks like shit), dems get a slightly better footing and some good press. McCarthy won’t do it, he can’t, but the offer alone would look magnanimous.",
">\n\nConservative voters really are the most easily manipulated, shameless suckers on the planet.",
">\n\nThey convince themselves democrats do the same thing so it's okay for them too. While simultaneously pretending they are held to a higher standard.\nNot even a strawman, that's as synopsis of every thread about him on r/conservative.",
">\n\nI was curious but didn’t want to venture over there.",
">\n\nCome on Brazil let's get that extradition party started.",
">\n\nJust when you think they can't go any lower they find a whole new way to do it...",
">\n\nIt's not a rabbit hole",
">\n\nJesus H. Fu*k. This guy needs to be in jail, and as far away from any real power as possible. \nWait, that could be any of the GOP house... ok, shit, I guess he fits right in then.",
">\n\nThe GOP is a criminal organization and Russia has the receipts. That means Russian assets like Santos have the receipts which means the GOP is over the barrel.",
">\n\nWell the American people just elected those criminals to run the house of representatives. I think it's the 70+ million people voting for the criminals that we really need to be worried about.",
">\n\nSo you can be a lying sack of shit, and suffer no consequences. Wonder if that will work for me on my next job search?🤔",
">\n\nMcCarthy is pandering to people like my cousin who was and is all in on Santos in that district and genuinely thinks that all the evidence against Santos is nonsense, that it's just \"embellishing your resume- everyone does it!\" and it's not a big deal so long as he, \"does what we want and helps stick it to the dirty cheater democrats.\"\nMcCarthy knows what he's doing... the group of diehards made up of people like my cousin could make or break things going forward in elections the same way the people opposing him in his bid for speaker for the first 14 rounds mucked his \"It's my turn!\" coronation up for him. McCarthy is concerned with holding his holding his title and nothing else right now.",
">\n\nTime for a motion to vacate from literally anybody. All it takes is one house member.",
">\n\nOf course.",
">\n\nWell he’s a reflection of the current party so who’s really surprised by this?"
] |
>
The thing trump did was show that the narcissists, sociopaths, abusers, and other general empathy-deficient grifters that they don't have to keep pretending to be decent members of society, that they can just relax and openly be their worst selves because reasonable people aren't going to enforce any punishment against them.
|
[
"It's been like 2 weeks and McCarthy has shown already to be such a weak speaker. \nYou are given a free win. Condemn the liar. But nope, he gets committee seats. \nShows who is really running the show.",
">\n\n\nShows who is really running the show.\n\nVladimir Putin is pleased with his investment.",
">\n\nHopefully Santos will be fed bullshit classified intel just so we can time how quickly Putin remarks about it.",
">\n\nYou're acting like Putin doesn't already own the GOPs lol. Santos is definitely not his only source.",
">\n\nOh hell no, I’m definitely not implying he’s the only one. Just that any briefing given to him specifically should have some notable discrepancies (different names, numbers, locations) that would identify him as the leak. You know, protecting confidential info slightly more securely than the screener dvds sent out for Emmy voting.",
">\n\nSantos is a symbol of the entire Republican party.\nEntirely unscrupulous and amoral, and proudly so. All is acceptable in the pursuit of power.",
">\n\n\nunscrupulous and amoral, and proudly so\n\nAnother poster some time ago described them as \"virtue signaling,\" and I had to ask what's the exact opposite of that?\nA surprising number of others couldn't seem to grasp that \"virtue\" is not what they're signaling at all.",
">\n\nVice signaling?",
">\n\nDepravity flagging?",
">\n\nWill he also be given access to classified documents?",
">\n\nIt's OK. He'll simply say he's the President and declassify them with his mind.",
">\n\nI thought he already lied that Santos is the president?",
">\n\nSo this guy's a spy right? Like now we've seen him at Trump rallies years ago using different names. Running for office under different names. Everything he's said is false, but not in a confused Herschel Walker way. It's intentional. Right? Like we can see that he's a spy right?",
">\n\nDon’t forget about the piles of money he randomly finds",
">\n\nI don't think any of that money to Santos is random. It is payment, mostly from Russia, for services rendered. He just has to cause division and disarray within the US government, as ordered by Putin.",
">\n\nEh, tough leap to make. A moderately talented conman can somewhat easily bilk the Republican rank and file for millions of dollars. Particularly when he’s willing to go the extra mile and pay people to impersonate the staff of party leadership to bilk the wealthy donor class. \nIt’s more likely this is going to wind up being Bannon’s build the wall con turned up to 11. Perhaps with some international money mixed in.",
">\n\nSo a guy who couldn't legitimately get hired to sell me an insurance policy is being trusted with actual governance.\nFFS, \"conservatives\" - do you not have anyone around to run for office that isn't a complete fucking embarrassment? Stop voting for awful fuckin people",
">\n\nI can't blame his voters on this one, he straight up lied to them. The people that are keeping him in gov't are the ones we need to worry about.",
">\n\n\n“My staff raised concerns when he had a staff member who impersonated my chief of staff, and that individual was let go when Mr. Santos found out about it,” McCarthy said Tuesday.\n\nshameless loser",
">\n\nTheoretically if he is deemed too risky to get a clearance, can Biden prevent him from getting security clearance for classified intel?",
">\n\nAs the commander in chief id say so. Congress just votes on legislation and handles the purse. Intel is much more relevant to the executive branch.",
">\n\nLol this right here shows how much the Speaker's power is neutered under McCarthy's negotiated rules. He has to seat a sociopathic liar who fraudulently damaged McCarthy's staff personally by impersonating them to get donations, and if he doesn't seat him Santos can demand a vote to remove McCarthy day after day after day. Pathetic.",
">\n\nAt this point Jeffries should offer a gimme to McCarthy - we won’t call for a new speaker unless at least 1 republican does, but we get the committee post. Santos can get the boot, Kev keeps his tenuous grasp on power (but still looks like shit), dems get a slightly better footing and some good press. McCarthy won’t do it, he can’t, but the offer alone would look magnanimous.",
">\n\nConservative voters really are the most easily manipulated, shameless suckers on the planet.",
">\n\nThey convince themselves democrats do the same thing so it's okay for them too. While simultaneously pretending they are held to a higher standard.\nNot even a strawman, that's as synopsis of every thread about him on r/conservative.",
">\n\nI was curious but didn’t want to venture over there.",
">\n\nCome on Brazil let's get that extradition party started.",
">\n\nJust when you think they can't go any lower they find a whole new way to do it...",
">\n\nIt's not a rabbit hole",
">\n\nJesus H. Fu*k. This guy needs to be in jail, and as far away from any real power as possible. \nWait, that could be any of the GOP house... ok, shit, I guess he fits right in then.",
">\n\nThe GOP is a criminal organization and Russia has the receipts. That means Russian assets like Santos have the receipts which means the GOP is over the barrel.",
">\n\nWell the American people just elected those criminals to run the house of representatives. I think it's the 70+ million people voting for the criminals that we really need to be worried about.",
">\n\nSo you can be a lying sack of shit, and suffer no consequences. Wonder if that will work for me on my next job search?🤔",
">\n\nMcCarthy is pandering to people like my cousin who was and is all in on Santos in that district and genuinely thinks that all the evidence against Santos is nonsense, that it's just \"embellishing your resume- everyone does it!\" and it's not a big deal so long as he, \"does what we want and helps stick it to the dirty cheater democrats.\"\nMcCarthy knows what he's doing... the group of diehards made up of people like my cousin could make or break things going forward in elections the same way the people opposing him in his bid for speaker for the first 14 rounds mucked his \"It's my turn!\" coronation up for him. McCarthy is concerned with holding his holding his title and nothing else right now.",
">\n\nTime for a motion to vacate from literally anybody. All it takes is one house member.",
">\n\nOf course.",
">\n\nWell he’s a reflection of the current party so who’s really surprised by this?",
">\n\nThe GOP don’t mind Liars and conmen as long as they lie and con for the GOP"
] |
>
I didn't think McCarthy could have LESS credibility, but there it is.
|
[
"It's been like 2 weeks and McCarthy has shown already to be such a weak speaker. \nYou are given a free win. Condemn the liar. But nope, he gets committee seats. \nShows who is really running the show.",
">\n\n\nShows who is really running the show.\n\nVladimir Putin is pleased with his investment.",
">\n\nHopefully Santos will be fed bullshit classified intel just so we can time how quickly Putin remarks about it.",
">\n\nYou're acting like Putin doesn't already own the GOPs lol. Santos is definitely not his only source.",
">\n\nOh hell no, I’m definitely not implying he’s the only one. Just that any briefing given to him specifically should have some notable discrepancies (different names, numbers, locations) that would identify him as the leak. You know, protecting confidential info slightly more securely than the screener dvds sent out for Emmy voting.",
">\n\nSantos is a symbol of the entire Republican party.\nEntirely unscrupulous and amoral, and proudly so. All is acceptable in the pursuit of power.",
">\n\n\nunscrupulous and amoral, and proudly so\n\nAnother poster some time ago described them as \"virtue signaling,\" and I had to ask what's the exact opposite of that?\nA surprising number of others couldn't seem to grasp that \"virtue\" is not what they're signaling at all.",
">\n\nVice signaling?",
">\n\nDepravity flagging?",
">\n\nWill he also be given access to classified documents?",
">\n\nIt's OK. He'll simply say he's the President and declassify them with his mind.",
">\n\nI thought he already lied that Santos is the president?",
">\n\nSo this guy's a spy right? Like now we've seen him at Trump rallies years ago using different names. Running for office under different names. Everything he's said is false, but not in a confused Herschel Walker way. It's intentional. Right? Like we can see that he's a spy right?",
">\n\nDon’t forget about the piles of money he randomly finds",
">\n\nI don't think any of that money to Santos is random. It is payment, mostly from Russia, for services rendered. He just has to cause division and disarray within the US government, as ordered by Putin.",
">\n\nEh, tough leap to make. A moderately talented conman can somewhat easily bilk the Republican rank and file for millions of dollars. Particularly when he’s willing to go the extra mile and pay people to impersonate the staff of party leadership to bilk the wealthy donor class. \nIt’s more likely this is going to wind up being Bannon’s build the wall con turned up to 11. Perhaps with some international money mixed in.",
">\n\nSo a guy who couldn't legitimately get hired to sell me an insurance policy is being trusted with actual governance.\nFFS, \"conservatives\" - do you not have anyone around to run for office that isn't a complete fucking embarrassment? Stop voting for awful fuckin people",
">\n\nI can't blame his voters on this one, he straight up lied to them. The people that are keeping him in gov't are the ones we need to worry about.",
">\n\n\n“My staff raised concerns when he had a staff member who impersonated my chief of staff, and that individual was let go when Mr. Santos found out about it,” McCarthy said Tuesday.\n\nshameless loser",
">\n\nTheoretically if he is deemed too risky to get a clearance, can Biden prevent him from getting security clearance for classified intel?",
">\n\nAs the commander in chief id say so. Congress just votes on legislation and handles the purse. Intel is much more relevant to the executive branch.",
">\n\nLol this right here shows how much the Speaker's power is neutered under McCarthy's negotiated rules. He has to seat a sociopathic liar who fraudulently damaged McCarthy's staff personally by impersonating them to get donations, and if he doesn't seat him Santos can demand a vote to remove McCarthy day after day after day. Pathetic.",
">\n\nAt this point Jeffries should offer a gimme to McCarthy - we won’t call for a new speaker unless at least 1 republican does, but we get the committee post. Santos can get the boot, Kev keeps his tenuous grasp on power (but still looks like shit), dems get a slightly better footing and some good press. McCarthy won’t do it, he can’t, but the offer alone would look magnanimous.",
">\n\nConservative voters really are the most easily manipulated, shameless suckers on the planet.",
">\n\nThey convince themselves democrats do the same thing so it's okay for them too. While simultaneously pretending they are held to a higher standard.\nNot even a strawman, that's as synopsis of every thread about him on r/conservative.",
">\n\nI was curious but didn’t want to venture over there.",
">\n\nCome on Brazil let's get that extradition party started.",
">\n\nJust when you think they can't go any lower they find a whole new way to do it...",
">\n\nIt's not a rabbit hole",
">\n\nJesus H. Fu*k. This guy needs to be in jail, and as far away from any real power as possible. \nWait, that could be any of the GOP house... ok, shit, I guess he fits right in then.",
">\n\nThe GOP is a criminal organization and Russia has the receipts. That means Russian assets like Santos have the receipts which means the GOP is over the barrel.",
">\n\nWell the American people just elected those criminals to run the house of representatives. I think it's the 70+ million people voting for the criminals that we really need to be worried about.",
">\n\nSo you can be a lying sack of shit, and suffer no consequences. Wonder if that will work for me on my next job search?🤔",
">\n\nMcCarthy is pandering to people like my cousin who was and is all in on Santos in that district and genuinely thinks that all the evidence against Santos is nonsense, that it's just \"embellishing your resume- everyone does it!\" and it's not a big deal so long as he, \"does what we want and helps stick it to the dirty cheater democrats.\"\nMcCarthy knows what he's doing... the group of diehards made up of people like my cousin could make or break things going forward in elections the same way the people opposing him in his bid for speaker for the first 14 rounds mucked his \"It's my turn!\" coronation up for him. McCarthy is concerned with holding his holding his title and nothing else right now.",
">\n\nTime for a motion to vacate from literally anybody. All it takes is one house member.",
">\n\nOf course.",
">\n\nWell he’s a reflection of the current party so who’s really surprised by this?",
">\n\nThe GOP don’t mind Liars and conmen as long as they lie and con for the GOP",
">\n\nThe thing trump did was show that the narcissists, sociopaths, abusers, and other general empathy-deficient grifters that they don't have to keep pretending to be decent members of society, that they can just relax and openly be their worst selves because reasonable people aren't going to enforce any punishment against them."
] |
>
My inner conspiracy theorist is nagging at me.
I feel like Santos is the patsy. Not sure for what yet, but he's the guy they happily get to pin it on.
|
[
"It's been like 2 weeks and McCarthy has shown already to be such a weak speaker. \nYou are given a free win. Condemn the liar. But nope, he gets committee seats. \nShows who is really running the show.",
">\n\n\nShows who is really running the show.\n\nVladimir Putin is pleased with his investment.",
">\n\nHopefully Santos will be fed bullshit classified intel just so we can time how quickly Putin remarks about it.",
">\n\nYou're acting like Putin doesn't already own the GOPs lol. Santos is definitely not his only source.",
">\n\nOh hell no, I’m definitely not implying he’s the only one. Just that any briefing given to him specifically should have some notable discrepancies (different names, numbers, locations) that would identify him as the leak. You know, protecting confidential info slightly more securely than the screener dvds sent out for Emmy voting.",
">\n\nSantos is a symbol of the entire Republican party.\nEntirely unscrupulous and amoral, and proudly so. All is acceptable in the pursuit of power.",
">\n\n\nunscrupulous and amoral, and proudly so\n\nAnother poster some time ago described them as \"virtue signaling,\" and I had to ask what's the exact opposite of that?\nA surprising number of others couldn't seem to grasp that \"virtue\" is not what they're signaling at all.",
">\n\nVice signaling?",
">\n\nDepravity flagging?",
">\n\nWill he also be given access to classified documents?",
">\n\nIt's OK. He'll simply say he's the President and declassify them with his mind.",
">\n\nI thought he already lied that Santos is the president?",
">\n\nSo this guy's a spy right? Like now we've seen him at Trump rallies years ago using different names. Running for office under different names. Everything he's said is false, but not in a confused Herschel Walker way. It's intentional. Right? Like we can see that he's a spy right?",
">\n\nDon’t forget about the piles of money he randomly finds",
">\n\nI don't think any of that money to Santos is random. It is payment, mostly from Russia, for services rendered. He just has to cause division and disarray within the US government, as ordered by Putin.",
">\n\nEh, tough leap to make. A moderately talented conman can somewhat easily bilk the Republican rank and file for millions of dollars. Particularly when he’s willing to go the extra mile and pay people to impersonate the staff of party leadership to bilk the wealthy donor class. \nIt’s more likely this is going to wind up being Bannon’s build the wall con turned up to 11. Perhaps with some international money mixed in.",
">\n\nSo a guy who couldn't legitimately get hired to sell me an insurance policy is being trusted with actual governance.\nFFS, \"conservatives\" - do you not have anyone around to run for office that isn't a complete fucking embarrassment? Stop voting for awful fuckin people",
">\n\nI can't blame his voters on this one, he straight up lied to them. The people that are keeping him in gov't are the ones we need to worry about.",
">\n\n\n“My staff raised concerns when he had a staff member who impersonated my chief of staff, and that individual was let go when Mr. Santos found out about it,” McCarthy said Tuesday.\n\nshameless loser",
">\n\nTheoretically if he is deemed too risky to get a clearance, can Biden prevent him from getting security clearance for classified intel?",
">\n\nAs the commander in chief id say so. Congress just votes on legislation and handles the purse. Intel is much more relevant to the executive branch.",
">\n\nLol this right here shows how much the Speaker's power is neutered under McCarthy's negotiated rules. He has to seat a sociopathic liar who fraudulently damaged McCarthy's staff personally by impersonating them to get donations, and if he doesn't seat him Santos can demand a vote to remove McCarthy day after day after day. Pathetic.",
">\n\nAt this point Jeffries should offer a gimme to McCarthy - we won’t call for a new speaker unless at least 1 republican does, but we get the committee post. Santos can get the boot, Kev keeps his tenuous grasp on power (but still looks like shit), dems get a slightly better footing and some good press. McCarthy won’t do it, he can’t, but the offer alone would look magnanimous.",
">\n\nConservative voters really are the most easily manipulated, shameless suckers on the planet.",
">\n\nThey convince themselves democrats do the same thing so it's okay for them too. While simultaneously pretending they are held to a higher standard.\nNot even a strawman, that's as synopsis of every thread about him on r/conservative.",
">\n\nI was curious but didn’t want to venture over there.",
">\n\nCome on Brazil let's get that extradition party started.",
">\n\nJust when you think they can't go any lower they find a whole new way to do it...",
">\n\nIt's not a rabbit hole",
">\n\nJesus H. Fu*k. This guy needs to be in jail, and as far away from any real power as possible. \nWait, that could be any of the GOP house... ok, shit, I guess he fits right in then.",
">\n\nThe GOP is a criminal organization and Russia has the receipts. That means Russian assets like Santos have the receipts which means the GOP is over the barrel.",
">\n\nWell the American people just elected those criminals to run the house of representatives. I think it's the 70+ million people voting for the criminals that we really need to be worried about.",
">\n\nSo you can be a lying sack of shit, and suffer no consequences. Wonder if that will work for me on my next job search?🤔",
">\n\nMcCarthy is pandering to people like my cousin who was and is all in on Santos in that district and genuinely thinks that all the evidence against Santos is nonsense, that it's just \"embellishing your resume- everyone does it!\" and it's not a big deal so long as he, \"does what we want and helps stick it to the dirty cheater democrats.\"\nMcCarthy knows what he's doing... the group of diehards made up of people like my cousin could make or break things going forward in elections the same way the people opposing him in his bid for speaker for the first 14 rounds mucked his \"It's my turn!\" coronation up for him. McCarthy is concerned with holding his holding his title and nothing else right now.",
">\n\nTime for a motion to vacate from literally anybody. All it takes is one house member.",
">\n\nOf course.",
">\n\nWell he’s a reflection of the current party so who’s really surprised by this?",
">\n\nThe GOP don’t mind Liars and conmen as long as they lie and con for the GOP",
">\n\nThe thing trump did was show that the narcissists, sociopaths, abusers, and other general empathy-deficient grifters that they don't have to keep pretending to be decent members of society, that they can just relax and openly be their worst selves because reasonable people aren't going to enforce any punishment against them.",
">\n\nI didn't think McCarthy could have LESS credibility, but there it is."
] |
>
Just shameful. Willfully corrupted.
|
[
"It's been like 2 weeks and McCarthy has shown already to be such a weak speaker. \nYou are given a free win. Condemn the liar. But nope, he gets committee seats. \nShows who is really running the show.",
">\n\n\nShows who is really running the show.\n\nVladimir Putin is pleased with his investment.",
">\n\nHopefully Santos will be fed bullshit classified intel just so we can time how quickly Putin remarks about it.",
">\n\nYou're acting like Putin doesn't already own the GOPs lol. Santos is definitely not his only source.",
">\n\nOh hell no, I’m definitely not implying he’s the only one. Just that any briefing given to him specifically should have some notable discrepancies (different names, numbers, locations) that would identify him as the leak. You know, protecting confidential info slightly more securely than the screener dvds sent out for Emmy voting.",
">\n\nSantos is a symbol of the entire Republican party.\nEntirely unscrupulous and amoral, and proudly so. All is acceptable in the pursuit of power.",
">\n\n\nunscrupulous and amoral, and proudly so\n\nAnother poster some time ago described them as \"virtue signaling,\" and I had to ask what's the exact opposite of that?\nA surprising number of others couldn't seem to grasp that \"virtue\" is not what they're signaling at all.",
">\n\nVice signaling?",
">\n\nDepravity flagging?",
">\n\nWill he also be given access to classified documents?",
">\n\nIt's OK. He'll simply say he's the President and declassify them with his mind.",
">\n\nI thought he already lied that Santos is the president?",
">\n\nSo this guy's a spy right? Like now we've seen him at Trump rallies years ago using different names. Running for office under different names. Everything he's said is false, but not in a confused Herschel Walker way. It's intentional. Right? Like we can see that he's a spy right?",
">\n\nDon’t forget about the piles of money he randomly finds",
">\n\nI don't think any of that money to Santos is random. It is payment, mostly from Russia, for services rendered. He just has to cause division and disarray within the US government, as ordered by Putin.",
">\n\nEh, tough leap to make. A moderately talented conman can somewhat easily bilk the Republican rank and file for millions of dollars. Particularly when he’s willing to go the extra mile and pay people to impersonate the staff of party leadership to bilk the wealthy donor class. \nIt’s more likely this is going to wind up being Bannon’s build the wall con turned up to 11. Perhaps with some international money mixed in.",
">\n\nSo a guy who couldn't legitimately get hired to sell me an insurance policy is being trusted with actual governance.\nFFS, \"conservatives\" - do you not have anyone around to run for office that isn't a complete fucking embarrassment? Stop voting for awful fuckin people",
">\n\nI can't blame his voters on this one, he straight up lied to them. The people that are keeping him in gov't are the ones we need to worry about.",
">\n\n\n“My staff raised concerns when he had a staff member who impersonated my chief of staff, and that individual was let go when Mr. Santos found out about it,” McCarthy said Tuesday.\n\nshameless loser",
">\n\nTheoretically if he is deemed too risky to get a clearance, can Biden prevent him from getting security clearance for classified intel?",
">\n\nAs the commander in chief id say so. Congress just votes on legislation and handles the purse. Intel is much more relevant to the executive branch.",
">\n\nLol this right here shows how much the Speaker's power is neutered under McCarthy's negotiated rules. He has to seat a sociopathic liar who fraudulently damaged McCarthy's staff personally by impersonating them to get donations, and if he doesn't seat him Santos can demand a vote to remove McCarthy day after day after day. Pathetic.",
">\n\nAt this point Jeffries should offer a gimme to McCarthy - we won’t call for a new speaker unless at least 1 republican does, but we get the committee post. Santos can get the boot, Kev keeps his tenuous grasp on power (but still looks like shit), dems get a slightly better footing and some good press. McCarthy won’t do it, he can’t, but the offer alone would look magnanimous.",
">\n\nConservative voters really are the most easily manipulated, shameless suckers on the planet.",
">\n\nThey convince themselves democrats do the same thing so it's okay for them too. While simultaneously pretending they are held to a higher standard.\nNot even a strawman, that's as synopsis of every thread about him on r/conservative.",
">\n\nI was curious but didn’t want to venture over there.",
">\n\nCome on Brazil let's get that extradition party started.",
">\n\nJust when you think they can't go any lower they find a whole new way to do it...",
">\n\nIt's not a rabbit hole",
">\n\nJesus H. Fu*k. This guy needs to be in jail, and as far away from any real power as possible. \nWait, that could be any of the GOP house... ok, shit, I guess he fits right in then.",
">\n\nThe GOP is a criminal organization and Russia has the receipts. That means Russian assets like Santos have the receipts which means the GOP is over the barrel.",
">\n\nWell the American people just elected those criminals to run the house of representatives. I think it's the 70+ million people voting for the criminals that we really need to be worried about.",
">\n\nSo you can be a lying sack of shit, and suffer no consequences. Wonder if that will work for me on my next job search?🤔",
">\n\nMcCarthy is pandering to people like my cousin who was and is all in on Santos in that district and genuinely thinks that all the evidence against Santos is nonsense, that it's just \"embellishing your resume- everyone does it!\" and it's not a big deal so long as he, \"does what we want and helps stick it to the dirty cheater democrats.\"\nMcCarthy knows what he's doing... the group of diehards made up of people like my cousin could make or break things going forward in elections the same way the people opposing him in his bid for speaker for the first 14 rounds mucked his \"It's my turn!\" coronation up for him. McCarthy is concerned with holding his holding his title and nothing else right now.",
">\n\nTime for a motion to vacate from literally anybody. All it takes is one house member.",
">\n\nOf course.",
">\n\nWell he’s a reflection of the current party so who’s really surprised by this?",
">\n\nThe GOP don’t mind Liars and conmen as long as they lie and con for the GOP",
">\n\nThe thing trump did was show that the narcissists, sociopaths, abusers, and other general empathy-deficient grifters that they don't have to keep pretending to be decent members of society, that they can just relax and openly be their worst selves because reasonable people aren't going to enforce any punishment against them.",
">\n\nI didn't think McCarthy could have LESS credibility, but there it is.",
">\n\nMy inner conspiracy theorist is nagging at me. \nI feel like Santos is the patsy. Not sure for what yet, but he's the guy they happily get to pin it on."
] |
>
i would say this is a joke but still waiting for the funny part of the absolute lack of repercussions for people lying to get into / maintain office.
|
[
"It's been like 2 weeks and McCarthy has shown already to be such a weak speaker. \nYou are given a free win. Condemn the liar. But nope, he gets committee seats. \nShows who is really running the show.",
">\n\n\nShows who is really running the show.\n\nVladimir Putin is pleased with his investment.",
">\n\nHopefully Santos will be fed bullshit classified intel just so we can time how quickly Putin remarks about it.",
">\n\nYou're acting like Putin doesn't already own the GOPs lol. Santos is definitely not his only source.",
">\n\nOh hell no, I’m definitely not implying he’s the only one. Just that any briefing given to him specifically should have some notable discrepancies (different names, numbers, locations) that would identify him as the leak. You know, protecting confidential info slightly more securely than the screener dvds sent out for Emmy voting.",
">\n\nSantos is a symbol of the entire Republican party.\nEntirely unscrupulous and amoral, and proudly so. All is acceptable in the pursuit of power.",
">\n\n\nunscrupulous and amoral, and proudly so\n\nAnother poster some time ago described them as \"virtue signaling,\" and I had to ask what's the exact opposite of that?\nA surprising number of others couldn't seem to grasp that \"virtue\" is not what they're signaling at all.",
">\n\nVice signaling?",
">\n\nDepravity flagging?",
">\n\nWill he also be given access to classified documents?",
">\n\nIt's OK. He'll simply say he's the President and declassify them with his mind.",
">\n\nI thought he already lied that Santos is the president?",
">\n\nSo this guy's a spy right? Like now we've seen him at Trump rallies years ago using different names. Running for office under different names. Everything he's said is false, but not in a confused Herschel Walker way. It's intentional. Right? Like we can see that he's a spy right?",
">\n\nDon’t forget about the piles of money he randomly finds",
">\n\nI don't think any of that money to Santos is random. It is payment, mostly from Russia, for services rendered. He just has to cause division and disarray within the US government, as ordered by Putin.",
">\n\nEh, tough leap to make. A moderately talented conman can somewhat easily bilk the Republican rank and file for millions of dollars. Particularly when he’s willing to go the extra mile and pay people to impersonate the staff of party leadership to bilk the wealthy donor class. \nIt’s more likely this is going to wind up being Bannon’s build the wall con turned up to 11. Perhaps with some international money mixed in.",
">\n\nSo a guy who couldn't legitimately get hired to sell me an insurance policy is being trusted with actual governance.\nFFS, \"conservatives\" - do you not have anyone around to run for office that isn't a complete fucking embarrassment? Stop voting for awful fuckin people",
">\n\nI can't blame his voters on this one, he straight up lied to them. The people that are keeping him in gov't are the ones we need to worry about.",
">\n\n\n“My staff raised concerns when he had a staff member who impersonated my chief of staff, and that individual was let go when Mr. Santos found out about it,” McCarthy said Tuesday.\n\nshameless loser",
">\n\nTheoretically if he is deemed too risky to get a clearance, can Biden prevent him from getting security clearance for classified intel?",
">\n\nAs the commander in chief id say so. Congress just votes on legislation and handles the purse. Intel is much more relevant to the executive branch.",
">\n\nLol this right here shows how much the Speaker's power is neutered under McCarthy's negotiated rules. He has to seat a sociopathic liar who fraudulently damaged McCarthy's staff personally by impersonating them to get donations, and if he doesn't seat him Santos can demand a vote to remove McCarthy day after day after day. Pathetic.",
">\n\nAt this point Jeffries should offer a gimme to McCarthy - we won’t call for a new speaker unless at least 1 republican does, but we get the committee post. Santos can get the boot, Kev keeps his tenuous grasp on power (but still looks like shit), dems get a slightly better footing and some good press. McCarthy won’t do it, he can’t, but the offer alone would look magnanimous.",
">\n\nConservative voters really are the most easily manipulated, shameless suckers on the planet.",
">\n\nThey convince themselves democrats do the same thing so it's okay for them too. While simultaneously pretending they are held to a higher standard.\nNot even a strawman, that's as synopsis of every thread about him on r/conservative.",
">\n\nI was curious but didn’t want to venture over there.",
">\n\nCome on Brazil let's get that extradition party started.",
">\n\nJust when you think they can't go any lower they find a whole new way to do it...",
">\n\nIt's not a rabbit hole",
">\n\nJesus H. Fu*k. This guy needs to be in jail, and as far away from any real power as possible. \nWait, that could be any of the GOP house... ok, shit, I guess he fits right in then.",
">\n\nThe GOP is a criminal organization and Russia has the receipts. That means Russian assets like Santos have the receipts which means the GOP is over the barrel.",
">\n\nWell the American people just elected those criminals to run the house of representatives. I think it's the 70+ million people voting for the criminals that we really need to be worried about.",
">\n\nSo you can be a lying sack of shit, and suffer no consequences. Wonder if that will work for me on my next job search?🤔",
">\n\nMcCarthy is pandering to people like my cousin who was and is all in on Santos in that district and genuinely thinks that all the evidence against Santos is nonsense, that it's just \"embellishing your resume- everyone does it!\" and it's not a big deal so long as he, \"does what we want and helps stick it to the dirty cheater democrats.\"\nMcCarthy knows what he's doing... the group of diehards made up of people like my cousin could make or break things going forward in elections the same way the people opposing him in his bid for speaker for the first 14 rounds mucked his \"It's my turn!\" coronation up for him. McCarthy is concerned with holding his holding his title and nothing else right now.",
">\n\nTime for a motion to vacate from literally anybody. All it takes is one house member.",
">\n\nOf course.",
">\n\nWell he’s a reflection of the current party so who’s really surprised by this?",
">\n\nThe GOP don’t mind Liars and conmen as long as they lie and con for the GOP",
">\n\nThe thing trump did was show that the narcissists, sociopaths, abusers, and other general empathy-deficient grifters that they don't have to keep pretending to be decent members of society, that they can just relax and openly be their worst selves because reasonable people aren't going to enforce any punishment against them.",
">\n\nI didn't think McCarthy could have LESS credibility, but there it is.",
">\n\nMy inner conspiracy theorist is nagging at me. \nI feel like Santos is the patsy. Not sure for what yet, but he's the guy they happily get to pin it on.",
">\n\nJust shameful. Willfully corrupted."
] |
>
A party of crooks, traitors, and sociopaths
|
[
"It's been like 2 weeks and McCarthy has shown already to be such a weak speaker. \nYou are given a free win. Condemn the liar. But nope, he gets committee seats. \nShows who is really running the show.",
">\n\n\nShows who is really running the show.\n\nVladimir Putin is pleased with his investment.",
">\n\nHopefully Santos will be fed bullshit classified intel just so we can time how quickly Putin remarks about it.",
">\n\nYou're acting like Putin doesn't already own the GOPs lol. Santos is definitely not his only source.",
">\n\nOh hell no, I’m definitely not implying he’s the only one. Just that any briefing given to him specifically should have some notable discrepancies (different names, numbers, locations) that would identify him as the leak. You know, protecting confidential info slightly more securely than the screener dvds sent out for Emmy voting.",
">\n\nSantos is a symbol of the entire Republican party.\nEntirely unscrupulous and amoral, and proudly so. All is acceptable in the pursuit of power.",
">\n\n\nunscrupulous and amoral, and proudly so\n\nAnother poster some time ago described them as \"virtue signaling,\" and I had to ask what's the exact opposite of that?\nA surprising number of others couldn't seem to grasp that \"virtue\" is not what they're signaling at all.",
">\n\nVice signaling?",
">\n\nDepravity flagging?",
">\n\nWill he also be given access to classified documents?",
">\n\nIt's OK. He'll simply say he's the President and declassify them with his mind.",
">\n\nI thought he already lied that Santos is the president?",
">\n\nSo this guy's a spy right? Like now we've seen him at Trump rallies years ago using different names. Running for office under different names. Everything he's said is false, but not in a confused Herschel Walker way. It's intentional. Right? Like we can see that he's a spy right?",
">\n\nDon’t forget about the piles of money he randomly finds",
">\n\nI don't think any of that money to Santos is random. It is payment, mostly from Russia, for services rendered. He just has to cause division and disarray within the US government, as ordered by Putin.",
">\n\nEh, tough leap to make. A moderately talented conman can somewhat easily bilk the Republican rank and file for millions of dollars. Particularly when he’s willing to go the extra mile and pay people to impersonate the staff of party leadership to bilk the wealthy donor class. \nIt’s more likely this is going to wind up being Bannon’s build the wall con turned up to 11. Perhaps with some international money mixed in.",
">\n\nSo a guy who couldn't legitimately get hired to sell me an insurance policy is being trusted with actual governance.\nFFS, \"conservatives\" - do you not have anyone around to run for office that isn't a complete fucking embarrassment? Stop voting for awful fuckin people",
">\n\nI can't blame his voters on this one, he straight up lied to them. The people that are keeping him in gov't are the ones we need to worry about.",
">\n\n\n“My staff raised concerns when he had a staff member who impersonated my chief of staff, and that individual was let go when Mr. Santos found out about it,” McCarthy said Tuesday.\n\nshameless loser",
">\n\nTheoretically if he is deemed too risky to get a clearance, can Biden prevent him from getting security clearance for classified intel?",
">\n\nAs the commander in chief id say so. Congress just votes on legislation and handles the purse. Intel is much more relevant to the executive branch.",
">\n\nLol this right here shows how much the Speaker's power is neutered under McCarthy's negotiated rules. He has to seat a sociopathic liar who fraudulently damaged McCarthy's staff personally by impersonating them to get donations, and if he doesn't seat him Santos can demand a vote to remove McCarthy day after day after day. Pathetic.",
">\n\nAt this point Jeffries should offer a gimme to McCarthy - we won’t call for a new speaker unless at least 1 republican does, but we get the committee post. Santos can get the boot, Kev keeps his tenuous grasp on power (but still looks like shit), dems get a slightly better footing and some good press. McCarthy won’t do it, he can’t, but the offer alone would look magnanimous.",
">\n\nConservative voters really are the most easily manipulated, shameless suckers on the planet.",
">\n\nThey convince themselves democrats do the same thing so it's okay for them too. While simultaneously pretending they are held to a higher standard.\nNot even a strawman, that's as synopsis of every thread about him on r/conservative.",
">\n\nI was curious but didn’t want to venture over there.",
">\n\nCome on Brazil let's get that extradition party started.",
">\n\nJust when you think they can't go any lower they find a whole new way to do it...",
">\n\nIt's not a rabbit hole",
">\n\nJesus H. Fu*k. This guy needs to be in jail, and as far away from any real power as possible. \nWait, that could be any of the GOP house... ok, shit, I guess he fits right in then.",
">\n\nThe GOP is a criminal organization and Russia has the receipts. That means Russian assets like Santos have the receipts which means the GOP is over the barrel.",
">\n\nWell the American people just elected those criminals to run the house of representatives. I think it's the 70+ million people voting for the criminals that we really need to be worried about.",
">\n\nSo you can be a lying sack of shit, and suffer no consequences. Wonder if that will work for me on my next job search?🤔",
">\n\nMcCarthy is pandering to people like my cousin who was and is all in on Santos in that district and genuinely thinks that all the evidence against Santos is nonsense, that it's just \"embellishing your resume- everyone does it!\" and it's not a big deal so long as he, \"does what we want and helps stick it to the dirty cheater democrats.\"\nMcCarthy knows what he's doing... the group of diehards made up of people like my cousin could make or break things going forward in elections the same way the people opposing him in his bid for speaker for the first 14 rounds mucked his \"It's my turn!\" coronation up for him. McCarthy is concerned with holding his holding his title and nothing else right now.",
">\n\nTime for a motion to vacate from literally anybody. All it takes is one house member.",
">\n\nOf course.",
">\n\nWell he’s a reflection of the current party so who’s really surprised by this?",
">\n\nThe GOP don’t mind Liars and conmen as long as they lie and con for the GOP",
">\n\nThe thing trump did was show that the narcissists, sociopaths, abusers, and other general empathy-deficient grifters that they don't have to keep pretending to be decent members of society, that they can just relax and openly be their worst selves because reasonable people aren't going to enforce any punishment against them.",
">\n\nI didn't think McCarthy could have LESS credibility, but there it is.",
">\n\nMy inner conspiracy theorist is nagging at me. \nI feel like Santos is the patsy. Not sure for what yet, but he's the guy they happily get to pin it on.",
">\n\nJust shameful. Willfully corrupted.",
">\n\ni would say this is a joke but still waiting for the funny part of the absolute lack of repercussions for people lying to get into / maintain office."
] |
>
Given how corrupt he is, I'm surprised he is not chairing a committee.
|
[
"It's been like 2 weeks and McCarthy has shown already to be such a weak speaker. \nYou are given a free win. Condemn the liar. But nope, he gets committee seats. \nShows who is really running the show.",
">\n\n\nShows who is really running the show.\n\nVladimir Putin is pleased with his investment.",
">\n\nHopefully Santos will be fed bullshit classified intel just so we can time how quickly Putin remarks about it.",
">\n\nYou're acting like Putin doesn't already own the GOPs lol. Santos is definitely not his only source.",
">\n\nOh hell no, I’m definitely not implying he’s the only one. Just that any briefing given to him specifically should have some notable discrepancies (different names, numbers, locations) that would identify him as the leak. You know, protecting confidential info slightly more securely than the screener dvds sent out for Emmy voting.",
">\n\nSantos is a symbol of the entire Republican party.\nEntirely unscrupulous and amoral, and proudly so. All is acceptable in the pursuit of power.",
">\n\n\nunscrupulous and amoral, and proudly so\n\nAnother poster some time ago described them as \"virtue signaling,\" and I had to ask what's the exact opposite of that?\nA surprising number of others couldn't seem to grasp that \"virtue\" is not what they're signaling at all.",
">\n\nVice signaling?",
">\n\nDepravity flagging?",
">\n\nWill he also be given access to classified documents?",
">\n\nIt's OK. He'll simply say he's the President and declassify them with his mind.",
">\n\nI thought he already lied that Santos is the president?",
">\n\nSo this guy's a spy right? Like now we've seen him at Trump rallies years ago using different names. Running for office under different names. Everything he's said is false, but not in a confused Herschel Walker way. It's intentional. Right? Like we can see that he's a spy right?",
">\n\nDon’t forget about the piles of money he randomly finds",
">\n\nI don't think any of that money to Santos is random. It is payment, mostly from Russia, for services rendered. He just has to cause division and disarray within the US government, as ordered by Putin.",
">\n\nEh, tough leap to make. A moderately talented conman can somewhat easily bilk the Republican rank and file for millions of dollars. Particularly when he’s willing to go the extra mile and pay people to impersonate the staff of party leadership to bilk the wealthy donor class. \nIt’s more likely this is going to wind up being Bannon’s build the wall con turned up to 11. Perhaps with some international money mixed in.",
">\n\nSo a guy who couldn't legitimately get hired to sell me an insurance policy is being trusted with actual governance.\nFFS, \"conservatives\" - do you not have anyone around to run for office that isn't a complete fucking embarrassment? Stop voting for awful fuckin people",
">\n\nI can't blame his voters on this one, he straight up lied to them. The people that are keeping him in gov't are the ones we need to worry about.",
">\n\n\n“My staff raised concerns when he had a staff member who impersonated my chief of staff, and that individual was let go when Mr. Santos found out about it,” McCarthy said Tuesday.\n\nshameless loser",
">\n\nTheoretically if he is deemed too risky to get a clearance, can Biden prevent him from getting security clearance for classified intel?",
">\n\nAs the commander in chief id say so. Congress just votes on legislation and handles the purse. Intel is much more relevant to the executive branch.",
">\n\nLol this right here shows how much the Speaker's power is neutered under McCarthy's negotiated rules. He has to seat a sociopathic liar who fraudulently damaged McCarthy's staff personally by impersonating them to get donations, and if he doesn't seat him Santos can demand a vote to remove McCarthy day after day after day. Pathetic.",
">\n\nAt this point Jeffries should offer a gimme to McCarthy - we won’t call for a new speaker unless at least 1 republican does, but we get the committee post. Santos can get the boot, Kev keeps his tenuous grasp on power (but still looks like shit), dems get a slightly better footing and some good press. McCarthy won’t do it, he can’t, but the offer alone would look magnanimous.",
">\n\nConservative voters really are the most easily manipulated, shameless suckers on the planet.",
">\n\nThey convince themselves democrats do the same thing so it's okay for them too. While simultaneously pretending they are held to a higher standard.\nNot even a strawman, that's as synopsis of every thread about him on r/conservative.",
">\n\nI was curious but didn’t want to venture over there.",
">\n\nCome on Brazil let's get that extradition party started.",
">\n\nJust when you think they can't go any lower they find a whole new way to do it...",
">\n\nIt's not a rabbit hole",
">\n\nJesus H. Fu*k. This guy needs to be in jail, and as far away from any real power as possible. \nWait, that could be any of the GOP house... ok, shit, I guess he fits right in then.",
">\n\nThe GOP is a criminal organization and Russia has the receipts. That means Russian assets like Santos have the receipts which means the GOP is over the barrel.",
">\n\nWell the American people just elected those criminals to run the house of representatives. I think it's the 70+ million people voting for the criminals that we really need to be worried about.",
">\n\nSo you can be a lying sack of shit, and suffer no consequences. Wonder if that will work for me on my next job search?🤔",
">\n\nMcCarthy is pandering to people like my cousin who was and is all in on Santos in that district and genuinely thinks that all the evidence against Santos is nonsense, that it's just \"embellishing your resume- everyone does it!\" and it's not a big deal so long as he, \"does what we want and helps stick it to the dirty cheater democrats.\"\nMcCarthy knows what he's doing... the group of diehards made up of people like my cousin could make or break things going forward in elections the same way the people opposing him in his bid for speaker for the first 14 rounds mucked his \"It's my turn!\" coronation up for him. McCarthy is concerned with holding his holding his title and nothing else right now.",
">\n\nTime for a motion to vacate from literally anybody. All it takes is one house member.",
">\n\nOf course.",
">\n\nWell he’s a reflection of the current party so who’s really surprised by this?",
">\n\nThe GOP don’t mind Liars and conmen as long as they lie and con for the GOP",
">\n\nThe thing trump did was show that the narcissists, sociopaths, abusers, and other general empathy-deficient grifters that they don't have to keep pretending to be decent members of society, that they can just relax and openly be their worst selves because reasonable people aren't going to enforce any punishment against them.",
">\n\nI didn't think McCarthy could have LESS credibility, but there it is.",
">\n\nMy inner conspiracy theorist is nagging at me. \nI feel like Santos is the patsy. Not sure for what yet, but he's the guy they happily get to pin it on.",
">\n\nJust shameful. Willfully corrupted.",
">\n\ni would say this is a joke but still waiting for the funny part of the absolute lack of repercussions for people lying to get into / maintain office.",
">\n\nA party of crooks, traitors, and sociopaths"
] |
>
There is no bottom. So glad I left the GOP years ago!
|
[
"It's been like 2 weeks and McCarthy has shown already to be such a weak speaker. \nYou are given a free win. Condemn the liar. But nope, he gets committee seats. \nShows who is really running the show.",
">\n\n\nShows who is really running the show.\n\nVladimir Putin is pleased with his investment.",
">\n\nHopefully Santos will be fed bullshit classified intel just so we can time how quickly Putin remarks about it.",
">\n\nYou're acting like Putin doesn't already own the GOPs lol. Santos is definitely not his only source.",
">\n\nOh hell no, I’m definitely not implying he’s the only one. Just that any briefing given to him specifically should have some notable discrepancies (different names, numbers, locations) that would identify him as the leak. You know, protecting confidential info slightly more securely than the screener dvds sent out for Emmy voting.",
">\n\nSantos is a symbol of the entire Republican party.\nEntirely unscrupulous and amoral, and proudly so. All is acceptable in the pursuit of power.",
">\n\n\nunscrupulous and amoral, and proudly so\n\nAnother poster some time ago described them as \"virtue signaling,\" and I had to ask what's the exact opposite of that?\nA surprising number of others couldn't seem to grasp that \"virtue\" is not what they're signaling at all.",
">\n\nVice signaling?",
">\n\nDepravity flagging?",
">\n\nWill he also be given access to classified documents?",
">\n\nIt's OK. He'll simply say he's the President and declassify them with his mind.",
">\n\nI thought he already lied that Santos is the president?",
">\n\nSo this guy's a spy right? Like now we've seen him at Trump rallies years ago using different names. Running for office under different names. Everything he's said is false, but not in a confused Herschel Walker way. It's intentional. Right? Like we can see that he's a spy right?",
">\n\nDon’t forget about the piles of money he randomly finds",
">\n\nI don't think any of that money to Santos is random. It is payment, mostly from Russia, for services rendered. He just has to cause division and disarray within the US government, as ordered by Putin.",
">\n\nEh, tough leap to make. A moderately talented conman can somewhat easily bilk the Republican rank and file for millions of dollars. Particularly when he’s willing to go the extra mile and pay people to impersonate the staff of party leadership to bilk the wealthy donor class. \nIt’s more likely this is going to wind up being Bannon’s build the wall con turned up to 11. Perhaps with some international money mixed in.",
">\n\nSo a guy who couldn't legitimately get hired to sell me an insurance policy is being trusted with actual governance.\nFFS, \"conservatives\" - do you not have anyone around to run for office that isn't a complete fucking embarrassment? Stop voting for awful fuckin people",
">\n\nI can't blame his voters on this one, he straight up lied to them. The people that are keeping him in gov't are the ones we need to worry about.",
">\n\n\n“My staff raised concerns when he had a staff member who impersonated my chief of staff, and that individual was let go when Mr. Santos found out about it,” McCarthy said Tuesday.\n\nshameless loser",
">\n\nTheoretically if he is deemed too risky to get a clearance, can Biden prevent him from getting security clearance for classified intel?",
">\n\nAs the commander in chief id say so. Congress just votes on legislation and handles the purse. Intel is much more relevant to the executive branch.",
">\n\nLol this right here shows how much the Speaker's power is neutered under McCarthy's negotiated rules. He has to seat a sociopathic liar who fraudulently damaged McCarthy's staff personally by impersonating them to get donations, and if he doesn't seat him Santos can demand a vote to remove McCarthy day after day after day. Pathetic.",
">\n\nAt this point Jeffries should offer a gimme to McCarthy - we won’t call for a new speaker unless at least 1 republican does, but we get the committee post. Santos can get the boot, Kev keeps his tenuous grasp on power (but still looks like shit), dems get a slightly better footing and some good press. McCarthy won’t do it, he can’t, but the offer alone would look magnanimous.",
">\n\nConservative voters really are the most easily manipulated, shameless suckers on the planet.",
">\n\nThey convince themselves democrats do the same thing so it's okay for them too. While simultaneously pretending they are held to a higher standard.\nNot even a strawman, that's as synopsis of every thread about him on r/conservative.",
">\n\nI was curious but didn’t want to venture over there.",
">\n\nCome on Brazil let's get that extradition party started.",
">\n\nJust when you think they can't go any lower they find a whole new way to do it...",
">\n\nIt's not a rabbit hole",
">\n\nJesus H. Fu*k. This guy needs to be in jail, and as far away from any real power as possible. \nWait, that could be any of the GOP house... ok, shit, I guess he fits right in then.",
">\n\nThe GOP is a criminal organization and Russia has the receipts. That means Russian assets like Santos have the receipts which means the GOP is over the barrel.",
">\n\nWell the American people just elected those criminals to run the house of representatives. I think it's the 70+ million people voting for the criminals that we really need to be worried about.",
">\n\nSo you can be a lying sack of shit, and suffer no consequences. Wonder if that will work for me on my next job search?🤔",
">\n\nMcCarthy is pandering to people like my cousin who was and is all in on Santos in that district and genuinely thinks that all the evidence against Santos is nonsense, that it's just \"embellishing your resume- everyone does it!\" and it's not a big deal so long as he, \"does what we want and helps stick it to the dirty cheater democrats.\"\nMcCarthy knows what he's doing... the group of diehards made up of people like my cousin could make or break things going forward in elections the same way the people opposing him in his bid for speaker for the first 14 rounds mucked his \"It's my turn!\" coronation up for him. McCarthy is concerned with holding his holding his title and nothing else right now.",
">\n\nTime for a motion to vacate from literally anybody. All it takes is one house member.",
">\n\nOf course.",
">\n\nWell he’s a reflection of the current party so who’s really surprised by this?",
">\n\nThe GOP don’t mind Liars and conmen as long as they lie and con for the GOP",
">\n\nThe thing trump did was show that the narcissists, sociopaths, abusers, and other general empathy-deficient grifters that they don't have to keep pretending to be decent members of society, that they can just relax and openly be their worst selves because reasonable people aren't going to enforce any punishment against them.",
">\n\nI didn't think McCarthy could have LESS credibility, but there it is.",
">\n\nMy inner conspiracy theorist is nagging at me. \nI feel like Santos is the patsy. Not sure for what yet, but he's the guy they happily get to pin it on.",
">\n\nJust shameful. Willfully corrupted.",
">\n\ni would say this is a joke but still waiting for the funny part of the absolute lack of repercussions for people lying to get into / maintain office.",
">\n\nA party of crooks, traitors, and sociopaths",
">\n\nGiven how corrupt he is, I'm surprised he is not chairing a committee."
] |
>
If you ever wanted evidence that nothing matters but what party you're a member of - this is it.
It doesn't matter what you stand for, believe, did or didn't do in your life. The only thing that matters is the letter next to your name.
If your company hired someone only to find out their resume was completely and laughably fradulent, could you work with them on your team? Could you share an office with them? Would you feel like your workplace had integrity if they kept him around?
|
[
"It's been like 2 weeks and McCarthy has shown already to be such a weak speaker. \nYou are given a free win. Condemn the liar. But nope, he gets committee seats. \nShows who is really running the show.",
">\n\n\nShows who is really running the show.\n\nVladimir Putin is pleased with his investment.",
">\n\nHopefully Santos will be fed bullshit classified intel just so we can time how quickly Putin remarks about it.",
">\n\nYou're acting like Putin doesn't already own the GOPs lol. Santos is definitely not his only source.",
">\n\nOh hell no, I’m definitely not implying he’s the only one. Just that any briefing given to him specifically should have some notable discrepancies (different names, numbers, locations) that would identify him as the leak. You know, protecting confidential info slightly more securely than the screener dvds sent out for Emmy voting.",
">\n\nSantos is a symbol of the entire Republican party.\nEntirely unscrupulous and amoral, and proudly so. All is acceptable in the pursuit of power.",
">\n\n\nunscrupulous and amoral, and proudly so\n\nAnother poster some time ago described them as \"virtue signaling,\" and I had to ask what's the exact opposite of that?\nA surprising number of others couldn't seem to grasp that \"virtue\" is not what they're signaling at all.",
">\n\nVice signaling?",
">\n\nDepravity flagging?",
">\n\nWill he also be given access to classified documents?",
">\n\nIt's OK. He'll simply say he's the President and declassify them with his mind.",
">\n\nI thought he already lied that Santos is the president?",
">\n\nSo this guy's a spy right? Like now we've seen him at Trump rallies years ago using different names. Running for office under different names. Everything he's said is false, but not in a confused Herschel Walker way. It's intentional. Right? Like we can see that he's a spy right?",
">\n\nDon’t forget about the piles of money he randomly finds",
">\n\nI don't think any of that money to Santos is random. It is payment, mostly from Russia, for services rendered. He just has to cause division and disarray within the US government, as ordered by Putin.",
">\n\nEh, tough leap to make. A moderately talented conman can somewhat easily bilk the Republican rank and file for millions of dollars. Particularly when he’s willing to go the extra mile and pay people to impersonate the staff of party leadership to bilk the wealthy donor class. \nIt’s more likely this is going to wind up being Bannon’s build the wall con turned up to 11. Perhaps with some international money mixed in.",
">\n\nSo a guy who couldn't legitimately get hired to sell me an insurance policy is being trusted with actual governance.\nFFS, \"conservatives\" - do you not have anyone around to run for office that isn't a complete fucking embarrassment? Stop voting for awful fuckin people",
">\n\nI can't blame his voters on this one, he straight up lied to them. The people that are keeping him in gov't are the ones we need to worry about.",
">\n\n\n“My staff raised concerns when he had a staff member who impersonated my chief of staff, and that individual was let go when Mr. Santos found out about it,” McCarthy said Tuesday.\n\nshameless loser",
">\n\nTheoretically if he is deemed too risky to get a clearance, can Biden prevent him from getting security clearance for classified intel?",
">\n\nAs the commander in chief id say so. Congress just votes on legislation and handles the purse. Intel is much more relevant to the executive branch.",
">\n\nLol this right here shows how much the Speaker's power is neutered under McCarthy's negotiated rules. He has to seat a sociopathic liar who fraudulently damaged McCarthy's staff personally by impersonating them to get donations, and if he doesn't seat him Santos can demand a vote to remove McCarthy day after day after day. Pathetic.",
">\n\nAt this point Jeffries should offer a gimme to McCarthy - we won’t call for a new speaker unless at least 1 republican does, but we get the committee post. Santos can get the boot, Kev keeps his tenuous grasp on power (but still looks like shit), dems get a slightly better footing and some good press. McCarthy won’t do it, he can’t, but the offer alone would look magnanimous.",
">\n\nConservative voters really are the most easily manipulated, shameless suckers on the planet.",
">\n\nThey convince themselves democrats do the same thing so it's okay for them too. While simultaneously pretending they are held to a higher standard.\nNot even a strawman, that's as synopsis of every thread about him on r/conservative.",
">\n\nI was curious but didn’t want to venture over there.",
">\n\nCome on Brazil let's get that extradition party started.",
">\n\nJust when you think they can't go any lower they find a whole new way to do it...",
">\n\nIt's not a rabbit hole",
">\n\nJesus H. Fu*k. This guy needs to be in jail, and as far away from any real power as possible. \nWait, that could be any of the GOP house... ok, shit, I guess he fits right in then.",
">\n\nThe GOP is a criminal organization and Russia has the receipts. That means Russian assets like Santos have the receipts which means the GOP is over the barrel.",
">\n\nWell the American people just elected those criminals to run the house of representatives. I think it's the 70+ million people voting for the criminals that we really need to be worried about.",
">\n\nSo you can be a lying sack of shit, and suffer no consequences. Wonder if that will work for me on my next job search?🤔",
">\n\nMcCarthy is pandering to people like my cousin who was and is all in on Santos in that district and genuinely thinks that all the evidence against Santos is nonsense, that it's just \"embellishing your resume- everyone does it!\" and it's not a big deal so long as he, \"does what we want and helps stick it to the dirty cheater democrats.\"\nMcCarthy knows what he's doing... the group of diehards made up of people like my cousin could make or break things going forward in elections the same way the people opposing him in his bid for speaker for the first 14 rounds mucked his \"It's my turn!\" coronation up for him. McCarthy is concerned with holding his holding his title and nothing else right now.",
">\n\nTime for a motion to vacate from literally anybody. All it takes is one house member.",
">\n\nOf course.",
">\n\nWell he’s a reflection of the current party so who’s really surprised by this?",
">\n\nThe GOP don’t mind Liars and conmen as long as they lie and con for the GOP",
">\n\nThe thing trump did was show that the narcissists, sociopaths, abusers, and other general empathy-deficient grifters that they don't have to keep pretending to be decent members of society, that they can just relax and openly be their worst selves because reasonable people aren't going to enforce any punishment against them.",
">\n\nI didn't think McCarthy could have LESS credibility, but there it is.",
">\n\nMy inner conspiracy theorist is nagging at me. \nI feel like Santos is the patsy. Not sure for what yet, but he's the guy they happily get to pin it on.",
">\n\nJust shameful. Willfully corrupted.",
">\n\ni would say this is a joke but still waiting for the funny part of the absolute lack of repercussions for people lying to get into / maintain office.",
">\n\nA party of crooks, traitors, and sociopaths",
">\n\nGiven how corrupt he is, I'm surprised he is not chairing a committee.",
">\n\nThere is no bottom. So glad I left the GOP years ago!"
] |
>
Look everyone! The both sides guy!!
|
[
"It's been like 2 weeks and McCarthy has shown already to be such a weak speaker. \nYou are given a free win. Condemn the liar. But nope, he gets committee seats. \nShows who is really running the show.",
">\n\n\nShows who is really running the show.\n\nVladimir Putin is pleased with his investment.",
">\n\nHopefully Santos will be fed bullshit classified intel just so we can time how quickly Putin remarks about it.",
">\n\nYou're acting like Putin doesn't already own the GOPs lol. Santos is definitely not his only source.",
">\n\nOh hell no, I’m definitely not implying he’s the only one. Just that any briefing given to him specifically should have some notable discrepancies (different names, numbers, locations) that would identify him as the leak. You know, protecting confidential info slightly more securely than the screener dvds sent out for Emmy voting.",
">\n\nSantos is a symbol of the entire Republican party.\nEntirely unscrupulous and amoral, and proudly so. All is acceptable in the pursuit of power.",
">\n\n\nunscrupulous and amoral, and proudly so\n\nAnother poster some time ago described them as \"virtue signaling,\" and I had to ask what's the exact opposite of that?\nA surprising number of others couldn't seem to grasp that \"virtue\" is not what they're signaling at all.",
">\n\nVice signaling?",
">\n\nDepravity flagging?",
">\n\nWill he also be given access to classified documents?",
">\n\nIt's OK. He'll simply say he's the President and declassify them with his mind.",
">\n\nI thought he already lied that Santos is the president?",
">\n\nSo this guy's a spy right? Like now we've seen him at Trump rallies years ago using different names. Running for office under different names. Everything he's said is false, but not in a confused Herschel Walker way. It's intentional. Right? Like we can see that he's a spy right?",
">\n\nDon’t forget about the piles of money he randomly finds",
">\n\nI don't think any of that money to Santos is random. It is payment, mostly from Russia, for services rendered. He just has to cause division and disarray within the US government, as ordered by Putin.",
">\n\nEh, tough leap to make. A moderately talented conman can somewhat easily bilk the Republican rank and file for millions of dollars. Particularly when he’s willing to go the extra mile and pay people to impersonate the staff of party leadership to bilk the wealthy donor class. \nIt’s more likely this is going to wind up being Bannon’s build the wall con turned up to 11. Perhaps with some international money mixed in.",
">\n\nSo a guy who couldn't legitimately get hired to sell me an insurance policy is being trusted with actual governance.\nFFS, \"conservatives\" - do you not have anyone around to run for office that isn't a complete fucking embarrassment? Stop voting for awful fuckin people",
">\n\nI can't blame his voters on this one, he straight up lied to them. The people that are keeping him in gov't are the ones we need to worry about.",
">\n\n\n“My staff raised concerns when he had a staff member who impersonated my chief of staff, and that individual was let go when Mr. Santos found out about it,” McCarthy said Tuesday.\n\nshameless loser",
">\n\nTheoretically if he is deemed too risky to get a clearance, can Biden prevent him from getting security clearance for classified intel?",
">\n\nAs the commander in chief id say so. Congress just votes on legislation and handles the purse. Intel is much more relevant to the executive branch.",
">\n\nLol this right here shows how much the Speaker's power is neutered under McCarthy's negotiated rules. He has to seat a sociopathic liar who fraudulently damaged McCarthy's staff personally by impersonating them to get donations, and if he doesn't seat him Santos can demand a vote to remove McCarthy day after day after day. Pathetic.",
">\n\nAt this point Jeffries should offer a gimme to McCarthy - we won’t call for a new speaker unless at least 1 republican does, but we get the committee post. Santos can get the boot, Kev keeps his tenuous grasp on power (but still looks like shit), dems get a slightly better footing and some good press. McCarthy won’t do it, he can’t, but the offer alone would look magnanimous.",
">\n\nConservative voters really are the most easily manipulated, shameless suckers on the planet.",
">\n\nThey convince themselves democrats do the same thing so it's okay for them too. While simultaneously pretending they are held to a higher standard.\nNot even a strawman, that's as synopsis of every thread about him on r/conservative.",
">\n\nI was curious but didn’t want to venture over there.",
">\n\nCome on Brazil let's get that extradition party started.",
">\n\nJust when you think they can't go any lower they find a whole new way to do it...",
">\n\nIt's not a rabbit hole",
">\n\nJesus H. Fu*k. This guy needs to be in jail, and as far away from any real power as possible. \nWait, that could be any of the GOP house... ok, shit, I guess he fits right in then.",
">\n\nThe GOP is a criminal organization and Russia has the receipts. That means Russian assets like Santos have the receipts which means the GOP is over the barrel.",
">\n\nWell the American people just elected those criminals to run the house of representatives. I think it's the 70+ million people voting for the criminals that we really need to be worried about.",
">\n\nSo you can be a lying sack of shit, and suffer no consequences. Wonder if that will work for me on my next job search?🤔",
">\n\nMcCarthy is pandering to people like my cousin who was and is all in on Santos in that district and genuinely thinks that all the evidence against Santos is nonsense, that it's just \"embellishing your resume- everyone does it!\" and it's not a big deal so long as he, \"does what we want and helps stick it to the dirty cheater democrats.\"\nMcCarthy knows what he's doing... the group of diehards made up of people like my cousin could make or break things going forward in elections the same way the people opposing him in his bid for speaker for the first 14 rounds mucked his \"It's my turn!\" coronation up for him. McCarthy is concerned with holding his holding his title and nothing else right now.",
">\n\nTime for a motion to vacate from literally anybody. All it takes is one house member.",
">\n\nOf course.",
">\n\nWell he’s a reflection of the current party so who’s really surprised by this?",
">\n\nThe GOP don’t mind Liars and conmen as long as they lie and con for the GOP",
">\n\nThe thing trump did was show that the narcissists, sociopaths, abusers, and other general empathy-deficient grifters that they don't have to keep pretending to be decent members of society, that they can just relax and openly be their worst selves because reasonable people aren't going to enforce any punishment against them.",
">\n\nI didn't think McCarthy could have LESS credibility, but there it is.",
">\n\nMy inner conspiracy theorist is nagging at me. \nI feel like Santos is the patsy. Not sure for what yet, but he's the guy they happily get to pin it on.",
">\n\nJust shameful. Willfully corrupted.",
">\n\ni would say this is a joke but still waiting for the funny part of the absolute lack of repercussions for people lying to get into / maintain office.",
">\n\nA party of crooks, traitors, and sociopaths",
">\n\nGiven how corrupt he is, I'm surprised he is not chairing a committee.",
">\n\nThere is no bottom. So glad I left the GOP years ago!",
">\n\nIf you ever wanted evidence that nothing matters but what party you're a member of - this is it. \nIt doesn't matter what you stand for, believe, did or didn't do in your life. The only thing that matters is the letter next to your name.\nIf your company hired someone only to find out their resume was completely and laughably fradulent, could you work with them on your team? Could you share an office with them? Would you feel like your workplace had integrity if they kept him around?"
] |
>
McCarthy did not have the speaker votes without Santos' vote.
|
[
"It's been like 2 weeks and McCarthy has shown already to be such a weak speaker. \nYou are given a free win. Condemn the liar. But nope, he gets committee seats. \nShows who is really running the show.",
">\n\n\nShows who is really running the show.\n\nVladimir Putin is pleased with his investment.",
">\n\nHopefully Santos will be fed bullshit classified intel just so we can time how quickly Putin remarks about it.",
">\n\nYou're acting like Putin doesn't already own the GOPs lol. Santos is definitely not his only source.",
">\n\nOh hell no, I’m definitely not implying he’s the only one. Just that any briefing given to him specifically should have some notable discrepancies (different names, numbers, locations) that would identify him as the leak. You know, protecting confidential info slightly more securely than the screener dvds sent out for Emmy voting.",
">\n\nSantos is a symbol of the entire Republican party.\nEntirely unscrupulous and amoral, and proudly so. All is acceptable in the pursuit of power.",
">\n\n\nunscrupulous and amoral, and proudly so\n\nAnother poster some time ago described them as \"virtue signaling,\" and I had to ask what's the exact opposite of that?\nA surprising number of others couldn't seem to grasp that \"virtue\" is not what they're signaling at all.",
">\n\nVice signaling?",
">\n\nDepravity flagging?",
">\n\nWill he also be given access to classified documents?",
">\n\nIt's OK. He'll simply say he's the President and declassify them with his mind.",
">\n\nI thought he already lied that Santos is the president?",
">\n\nSo this guy's a spy right? Like now we've seen him at Trump rallies years ago using different names. Running for office under different names. Everything he's said is false, but not in a confused Herschel Walker way. It's intentional. Right? Like we can see that he's a spy right?",
">\n\nDon’t forget about the piles of money he randomly finds",
">\n\nI don't think any of that money to Santos is random. It is payment, mostly from Russia, for services rendered. He just has to cause division and disarray within the US government, as ordered by Putin.",
">\n\nEh, tough leap to make. A moderately talented conman can somewhat easily bilk the Republican rank and file for millions of dollars. Particularly when he’s willing to go the extra mile and pay people to impersonate the staff of party leadership to bilk the wealthy donor class. \nIt’s more likely this is going to wind up being Bannon’s build the wall con turned up to 11. Perhaps with some international money mixed in.",
">\n\nSo a guy who couldn't legitimately get hired to sell me an insurance policy is being trusted with actual governance.\nFFS, \"conservatives\" - do you not have anyone around to run for office that isn't a complete fucking embarrassment? Stop voting for awful fuckin people",
">\n\nI can't blame his voters on this one, he straight up lied to them. The people that are keeping him in gov't are the ones we need to worry about.",
">\n\n\n“My staff raised concerns when he had a staff member who impersonated my chief of staff, and that individual was let go when Mr. Santos found out about it,” McCarthy said Tuesday.\n\nshameless loser",
">\n\nTheoretically if he is deemed too risky to get a clearance, can Biden prevent him from getting security clearance for classified intel?",
">\n\nAs the commander in chief id say so. Congress just votes on legislation and handles the purse. Intel is much more relevant to the executive branch.",
">\n\nLol this right here shows how much the Speaker's power is neutered under McCarthy's negotiated rules. He has to seat a sociopathic liar who fraudulently damaged McCarthy's staff personally by impersonating them to get donations, and if he doesn't seat him Santos can demand a vote to remove McCarthy day after day after day. Pathetic.",
">\n\nAt this point Jeffries should offer a gimme to McCarthy - we won’t call for a new speaker unless at least 1 republican does, but we get the committee post. Santos can get the boot, Kev keeps his tenuous grasp on power (but still looks like shit), dems get a slightly better footing and some good press. McCarthy won’t do it, he can’t, but the offer alone would look magnanimous.",
">\n\nConservative voters really are the most easily manipulated, shameless suckers on the planet.",
">\n\nThey convince themselves democrats do the same thing so it's okay for them too. While simultaneously pretending they are held to a higher standard.\nNot even a strawman, that's as synopsis of every thread about him on r/conservative.",
">\n\nI was curious but didn’t want to venture over there.",
">\n\nCome on Brazil let's get that extradition party started.",
">\n\nJust when you think they can't go any lower they find a whole new way to do it...",
">\n\nIt's not a rabbit hole",
">\n\nJesus H. Fu*k. This guy needs to be in jail, and as far away from any real power as possible. \nWait, that could be any of the GOP house... ok, shit, I guess he fits right in then.",
">\n\nThe GOP is a criminal organization and Russia has the receipts. That means Russian assets like Santos have the receipts which means the GOP is over the barrel.",
">\n\nWell the American people just elected those criminals to run the house of representatives. I think it's the 70+ million people voting for the criminals that we really need to be worried about.",
">\n\nSo you can be a lying sack of shit, and suffer no consequences. Wonder if that will work for me on my next job search?🤔",
">\n\nMcCarthy is pandering to people like my cousin who was and is all in on Santos in that district and genuinely thinks that all the evidence against Santos is nonsense, that it's just \"embellishing your resume- everyone does it!\" and it's not a big deal so long as he, \"does what we want and helps stick it to the dirty cheater democrats.\"\nMcCarthy knows what he's doing... the group of diehards made up of people like my cousin could make or break things going forward in elections the same way the people opposing him in his bid for speaker for the first 14 rounds mucked his \"It's my turn!\" coronation up for him. McCarthy is concerned with holding his holding his title and nothing else right now.",
">\n\nTime for a motion to vacate from literally anybody. All it takes is one house member.",
">\n\nOf course.",
">\n\nWell he’s a reflection of the current party so who’s really surprised by this?",
">\n\nThe GOP don’t mind Liars and conmen as long as they lie and con for the GOP",
">\n\nThe thing trump did was show that the narcissists, sociopaths, abusers, and other general empathy-deficient grifters that they don't have to keep pretending to be decent members of society, that they can just relax and openly be their worst selves because reasonable people aren't going to enforce any punishment against them.",
">\n\nI didn't think McCarthy could have LESS credibility, but there it is.",
">\n\nMy inner conspiracy theorist is nagging at me. \nI feel like Santos is the patsy. Not sure for what yet, but he's the guy they happily get to pin it on.",
">\n\nJust shameful. Willfully corrupted.",
">\n\ni would say this is a joke but still waiting for the funny part of the absolute lack of repercussions for people lying to get into / maintain office.",
">\n\nA party of crooks, traitors, and sociopaths",
">\n\nGiven how corrupt he is, I'm surprised he is not chairing a committee.",
">\n\nThere is no bottom. So glad I left the GOP years ago!",
">\n\nIf you ever wanted evidence that nothing matters but what party you're a member of - this is it. \nIt doesn't matter what you stand for, believe, did or didn't do in your life. The only thing that matters is the letter next to your name.\nIf your company hired someone only to find out their resume was completely and laughably fradulent, could you work with them on your team? Could you share an office with them? Would you feel like your workplace had integrity if they kept him around?",
">\n\nLook everyone! The both sides guy!!"
] |
>
Guy looks like he's cosplaying pepe the frog. Big 'ol DSLs.
|
[
"It's been like 2 weeks and McCarthy has shown already to be such a weak speaker. \nYou are given a free win. Condemn the liar. But nope, he gets committee seats. \nShows who is really running the show.",
">\n\n\nShows who is really running the show.\n\nVladimir Putin is pleased with his investment.",
">\n\nHopefully Santos will be fed bullshit classified intel just so we can time how quickly Putin remarks about it.",
">\n\nYou're acting like Putin doesn't already own the GOPs lol. Santos is definitely not his only source.",
">\n\nOh hell no, I’m definitely not implying he’s the only one. Just that any briefing given to him specifically should have some notable discrepancies (different names, numbers, locations) that would identify him as the leak. You know, protecting confidential info slightly more securely than the screener dvds sent out for Emmy voting.",
">\n\nSantos is a symbol of the entire Republican party.\nEntirely unscrupulous and amoral, and proudly so. All is acceptable in the pursuit of power.",
">\n\n\nunscrupulous and amoral, and proudly so\n\nAnother poster some time ago described them as \"virtue signaling,\" and I had to ask what's the exact opposite of that?\nA surprising number of others couldn't seem to grasp that \"virtue\" is not what they're signaling at all.",
">\n\nVice signaling?",
">\n\nDepravity flagging?",
">\n\nWill he also be given access to classified documents?",
">\n\nIt's OK. He'll simply say he's the President and declassify them with his mind.",
">\n\nI thought he already lied that Santos is the president?",
">\n\nSo this guy's a spy right? Like now we've seen him at Trump rallies years ago using different names. Running for office under different names. Everything he's said is false, but not in a confused Herschel Walker way. It's intentional. Right? Like we can see that he's a spy right?",
">\n\nDon’t forget about the piles of money he randomly finds",
">\n\nI don't think any of that money to Santos is random. It is payment, mostly from Russia, for services rendered. He just has to cause division and disarray within the US government, as ordered by Putin.",
">\n\nEh, tough leap to make. A moderately talented conman can somewhat easily bilk the Republican rank and file for millions of dollars. Particularly when he’s willing to go the extra mile and pay people to impersonate the staff of party leadership to bilk the wealthy donor class. \nIt’s more likely this is going to wind up being Bannon’s build the wall con turned up to 11. Perhaps with some international money mixed in.",
">\n\nSo a guy who couldn't legitimately get hired to sell me an insurance policy is being trusted with actual governance.\nFFS, \"conservatives\" - do you not have anyone around to run for office that isn't a complete fucking embarrassment? Stop voting for awful fuckin people",
">\n\nI can't blame his voters on this one, he straight up lied to them. The people that are keeping him in gov't are the ones we need to worry about.",
">\n\n\n“My staff raised concerns when he had a staff member who impersonated my chief of staff, and that individual was let go when Mr. Santos found out about it,” McCarthy said Tuesday.\n\nshameless loser",
">\n\nTheoretically if he is deemed too risky to get a clearance, can Biden prevent him from getting security clearance for classified intel?",
">\n\nAs the commander in chief id say so. Congress just votes on legislation and handles the purse. Intel is much more relevant to the executive branch.",
">\n\nLol this right here shows how much the Speaker's power is neutered under McCarthy's negotiated rules. He has to seat a sociopathic liar who fraudulently damaged McCarthy's staff personally by impersonating them to get donations, and if he doesn't seat him Santos can demand a vote to remove McCarthy day after day after day. Pathetic.",
">\n\nAt this point Jeffries should offer a gimme to McCarthy - we won’t call for a new speaker unless at least 1 republican does, but we get the committee post. Santos can get the boot, Kev keeps his tenuous grasp on power (but still looks like shit), dems get a slightly better footing and some good press. McCarthy won’t do it, he can’t, but the offer alone would look magnanimous.",
">\n\nConservative voters really are the most easily manipulated, shameless suckers on the planet.",
">\n\nThey convince themselves democrats do the same thing so it's okay for them too. While simultaneously pretending they are held to a higher standard.\nNot even a strawman, that's as synopsis of every thread about him on r/conservative.",
">\n\nI was curious but didn’t want to venture over there.",
">\n\nCome on Brazil let's get that extradition party started.",
">\n\nJust when you think they can't go any lower they find a whole new way to do it...",
">\n\nIt's not a rabbit hole",
">\n\nJesus H. Fu*k. This guy needs to be in jail, and as far away from any real power as possible. \nWait, that could be any of the GOP house... ok, shit, I guess he fits right in then.",
">\n\nThe GOP is a criminal organization and Russia has the receipts. That means Russian assets like Santos have the receipts which means the GOP is over the barrel.",
">\n\nWell the American people just elected those criminals to run the house of representatives. I think it's the 70+ million people voting for the criminals that we really need to be worried about.",
">\n\nSo you can be a lying sack of shit, and suffer no consequences. Wonder if that will work for me on my next job search?🤔",
">\n\nMcCarthy is pandering to people like my cousin who was and is all in on Santos in that district and genuinely thinks that all the evidence against Santos is nonsense, that it's just \"embellishing your resume- everyone does it!\" and it's not a big deal so long as he, \"does what we want and helps stick it to the dirty cheater democrats.\"\nMcCarthy knows what he's doing... the group of diehards made up of people like my cousin could make or break things going forward in elections the same way the people opposing him in his bid for speaker for the first 14 rounds mucked his \"It's my turn!\" coronation up for him. McCarthy is concerned with holding his holding his title and nothing else right now.",
">\n\nTime for a motion to vacate from literally anybody. All it takes is one house member.",
">\n\nOf course.",
">\n\nWell he’s a reflection of the current party so who’s really surprised by this?",
">\n\nThe GOP don’t mind Liars and conmen as long as they lie and con for the GOP",
">\n\nThe thing trump did was show that the narcissists, sociopaths, abusers, and other general empathy-deficient grifters that they don't have to keep pretending to be decent members of society, that they can just relax and openly be their worst selves because reasonable people aren't going to enforce any punishment against them.",
">\n\nI didn't think McCarthy could have LESS credibility, but there it is.",
">\n\nMy inner conspiracy theorist is nagging at me. \nI feel like Santos is the patsy. Not sure for what yet, but he's the guy they happily get to pin it on.",
">\n\nJust shameful. Willfully corrupted.",
">\n\ni would say this is a joke but still waiting for the funny part of the absolute lack of repercussions for people lying to get into / maintain office.",
">\n\nA party of crooks, traitors, and sociopaths",
">\n\nGiven how corrupt he is, I'm surprised he is not chairing a committee.",
">\n\nThere is no bottom. So glad I left the GOP years ago!",
">\n\nIf you ever wanted evidence that nothing matters but what party you're a member of - this is it. \nIt doesn't matter what you stand for, believe, did or didn't do in your life. The only thing that matters is the letter next to your name.\nIf your company hired someone only to find out their resume was completely and laughably fradulent, could you work with them on your team? Could you share an office with them? Would you feel like your workplace had integrity if they kept him around?",
">\n\nLook everyone! The both sides guy!!",
">\n\nMcCarthy did not have the speaker votes without Santos' vote."
] |
>
I feel bad for the writers or Veep who had some of their ideas thrown out for being too outlandish. In 20 years the show will be considered a drama because reality will be so much more ridiculous than the show.
|
[
"It's been like 2 weeks and McCarthy has shown already to be such a weak speaker. \nYou are given a free win. Condemn the liar. But nope, he gets committee seats. \nShows who is really running the show.",
">\n\n\nShows who is really running the show.\n\nVladimir Putin is pleased with his investment.",
">\n\nHopefully Santos will be fed bullshit classified intel just so we can time how quickly Putin remarks about it.",
">\n\nYou're acting like Putin doesn't already own the GOPs lol. Santos is definitely not his only source.",
">\n\nOh hell no, I’m definitely not implying he’s the only one. Just that any briefing given to him specifically should have some notable discrepancies (different names, numbers, locations) that would identify him as the leak. You know, protecting confidential info slightly more securely than the screener dvds sent out for Emmy voting.",
">\n\nSantos is a symbol of the entire Republican party.\nEntirely unscrupulous and amoral, and proudly so. All is acceptable in the pursuit of power.",
">\n\n\nunscrupulous and amoral, and proudly so\n\nAnother poster some time ago described them as \"virtue signaling,\" and I had to ask what's the exact opposite of that?\nA surprising number of others couldn't seem to grasp that \"virtue\" is not what they're signaling at all.",
">\n\nVice signaling?",
">\n\nDepravity flagging?",
">\n\nWill he also be given access to classified documents?",
">\n\nIt's OK. He'll simply say he's the President and declassify them with his mind.",
">\n\nI thought he already lied that Santos is the president?",
">\n\nSo this guy's a spy right? Like now we've seen him at Trump rallies years ago using different names. Running for office under different names. Everything he's said is false, but not in a confused Herschel Walker way. It's intentional. Right? Like we can see that he's a spy right?",
">\n\nDon’t forget about the piles of money he randomly finds",
">\n\nI don't think any of that money to Santos is random. It is payment, mostly from Russia, for services rendered. He just has to cause division and disarray within the US government, as ordered by Putin.",
">\n\nEh, tough leap to make. A moderately talented conman can somewhat easily bilk the Republican rank and file for millions of dollars. Particularly when he’s willing to go the extra mile and pay people to impersonate the staff of party leadership to bilk the wealthy donor class. \nIt’s more likely this is going to wind up being Bannon’s build the wall con turned up to 11. Perhaps with some international money mixed in.",
">\n\nSo a guy who couldn't legitimately get hired to sell me an insurance policy is being trusted with actual governance.\nFFS, \"conservatives\" - do you not have anyone around to run for office that isn't a complete fucking embarrassment? Stop voting for awful fuckin people",
">\n\nI can't blame his voters on this one, he straight up lied to them. The people that are keeping him in gov't are the ones we need to worry about.",
">\n\n\n“My staff raised concerns when he had a staff member who impersonated my chief of staff, and that individual was let go when Mr. Santos found out about it,” McCarthy said Tuesday.\n\nshameless loser",
">\n\nTheoretically if he is deemed too risky to get a clearance, can Biden prevent him from getting security clearance for classified intel?",
">\n\nAs the commander in chief id say so. Congress just votes on legislation and handles the purse. Intel is much more relevant to the executive branch.",
">\n\nLol this right here shows how much the Speaker's power is neutered under McCarthy's negotiated rules. He has to seat a sociopathic liar who fraudulently damaged McCarthy's staff personally by impersonating them to get donations, and if he doesn't seat him Santos can demand a vote to remove McCarthy day after day after day. Pathetic.",
">\n\nAt this point Jeffries should offer a gimme to McCarthy - we won’t call for a new speaker unless at least 1 republican does, but we get the committee post. Santos can get the boot, Kev keeps his tenuous grasp on power (but still looks like shit), dems get a slightly better footing and some good press. McCarthy won’t do it, he can’t, but the offer alone would look magnanimous.",
">\n\nConservative voters really are the most easily manipulated, shameless suckers on the planet.",
">\n\nThey convince themselves democrats do the same thing so it's okay for them too. While simultaneously pretending they are held to a higher standard.\nNot even a strawman, that's as synopsis of every thread about him on r/conservative.",
">\n\nI was curious but didn’t want to venture over there.",
">\n\nCome on Brazil let's get that extradition party started.",
">\n\nJust when you think they can't go any lower they find a whole new way to do it...",
">\n\nIt's not a rabbit hole",
">\n\nJesus H. Fu*k. This guy needs to be in jail, and as far away from any real power as possible. \nWait, that could be any of the GOP house... ok, shit, I guess he fits right in then.",
">\n\nThe GOP is a criminal organization and Russia has the receipts. That means Russian assets like Santos have the receipts which means the GOP is over the barrel.",
">\n\nWell the American people just elected those criminals to run the house of representatives. I think it's the 70+ million people voting for the criminals that we really need to be worried about.",
">\n\nSo you can be a lying sack of shit, and suffer no consequences. Wonder if that will work for me on my next job search?🤔",
">\n\nMcCarthy is pandering to people like my cousin who was and is all in on Santos in that district and genuinely thinks that all the evidence against Santos is nonsense, that it's just \"embellishing your resume- everyone does it!\" and it's not a big deal so long as he, \"does what we want and helps stick it to the dirty cheater democrats.\"\nMcCarthy knows what he's doing... the group of diehards made up of people like my cousin could make or break things going forward in elections the same way the people opposing him in his bid for speaker for the first 14 rounds mucked his \"It's my turn!\" coronation up for him. McCarthy is concerned with holding his holding his title and nothing else right now.",
">\n\nTime for a motion to vacate from literally anybody. All it takes is one house member.",
">\n\nOf course.",
">\n\nWell he’s a reflection of the current party so who’s really surprised by this?",
">\n\nThe GOP don’t mind Liars and conmen as long as they lie and con for the GOP",
">\n\nThe thing trump did was show that the narcissists, sociopaths, abusers, and other general empathy-deficient grifters that they don't have to keep pretending to be decent members of society, that they can just relax and openly be their worst selves because reasonable people aren't going to enforce any punishment against them.",
">\n\nI didn't think McCarthy could have LESS credibility, but there it is.",
">\n\nMy inner conspiracy theorist is nagging at me. \nI feel like Santos is the patsy. Not sure for what yet, but he's the guy they happily get to pin it on.",
">\n\nJust shameful. Willfully corrupted.",
">\n\ni would say this is a joke but still waiting for the funny part of the absolute lack of repercussions for people lying to get into / maintain office.",
">\n\nA party of crooks, traitors, and sociopaths",
">\n\nGiven how corrupt he is, I'm surprised he is not chairing a committee.",
">\n\nThere is no bottom. So glad I left the GOP years ago!",
">\n\nIf you ever wanted evidence that nothing matters but what party you're a member of - this is it. \nIt doesn't matter what you stand for, believe, did or didn't do in your life. The only thing that matters is the letter next to your name.\nIf your company hired someone only to find out their resume was completely and laughably fradulent, could you work with them on your team? Could you share an office with them? Would you feel like your workplace had integrity if they kept him around?",
">\n\nLook everyone! The both sides guy!!",
">\n\nMcCarthy did not have the speaker votes without Santos' vote.",
">\n\nGuy looks like he's cosplaying pepe the frog. Big 'ol DSLs."
] |
>
Under what name?
|
[
"It's been like 2 weeks and McCarthy has shown already to be such a weak speaker. \nYou are given a free win. Condemn the liar. But nope, he gets committee seats. \nShows who is really running the show.",
">\n\n\nShows who is really running the show.\n\nVladimir Putin is pleased with his investment.",
">\n\nHopefully Santos will be fed bullshit classified intel just so we can time how quickly Putin remarks about it.",
">\n\nYou're acting like Putin doesn't already own the GOPs lol. Santos is definitely not his only source.",
">\n\nOh hell no, I’m definitely not implying he’s the only one. Just that any briefing given to him specifically should have some notable discrepancies (different names, numbers, locations) that would identify him as the leak. You know, protecting confidential info slightly more securely than the screener dvds sent out for Emmy voting.",
">\n\nSantos is a symbol of the entire Republican party.\nEntirely unscrupulous and amoral, and proudly so. All is acceptable in the pursuit of power.",
">\n\n\nunscrupulous and amoral, and proudly so\n\nAnother poster some time ago described them as \"virtue signaling,\" and I had to ask what's the exact opposite of that?\nA surprising number of others couldn't seem to grasp that \"virtue\" is not what they're signaling at all.",
">\n\nVice signaling?",
">\n\nDepravity flagging?",
">\n\nWill he also be given access to classified documents?",
">\n\nIt's OK. He'll simply say he's the President and declassify them with his mind.",
">\n\nI thought he already lied that Santos is the president?",
">\n\nSo this guy's a spy right? Like now we've seen him at Trump rallies years ago using different names. Running for office under different names. Everything he's said is false, but not in a confused Herschel Walker way. It's intentional. Right? Like we can see that he's a spy right?",
">\n\nDon’t forget about the piles of money he randomly finds",
">\n\nI don't think any of that money to Santos is random. It is payment, mostly from Russia, for services rendered. He just has to cause division and disarray within the US government, as ordered by Putin.",
">\n\nEh, tough leap to make. A moderately talented conman can somewhat easily bilk the Republican rank and file for millions of dollars. Particularly when he’s willing to go the extra mile and pay people to impersonate the staff of party leadership to bilk the wealthy donor class. \nIt’s more likely this is going to wind up being Bannon’s build the wall con turned up to 11. Perhaps with some international money mixed in.",
">\n\nSo a guy who couldn't legitimately get hired to sell me an insurance policy is being trusted with actual governance.\nFFS, \"conservatives\" - do you not have anyone around to run for office that isn't a complete fucking embarrassment? Stop voting for awful fuckin people",
">\n\nI can't blame his voters on this one, he straight up lied to them. The people that are keeping him in gov't are the ones we need to worry about.",
">\n\n\n“My staff raised concerns when he had a staff member who impersonated my chief of staff, and that individual was let go when Mr. Santos found out about it,” McCarthy said Tuesday.\n\nshameless loser",
">\n\nTheoretically if he is deemed too risky to get a clearance, can Biden prevent him from getting security clearance for classified intel?",
">\n\nAs the commander in chief id say so. Congress just votes on legislation and handles the purse. Intel is much more relevant to the executive branch.",
">\n\nLol this right here shows how much the Speaker's power is neutered under McCarthy's negotiated rules. He has to seat a sociopathic liar who fraudulently damaged McCarthy's staff personally by impersonating them to get donations, and if he doesn't seat him Santos can demand a vote to remove McCarthy day after day after day. Pathetic.",
">\n\nAt this point Jeffries should offer a gimme to McCarthy - we won’t call for a new speaker unless at least 1 republican does, but we get the committee post. Santos can get the boot, Kev keeps his tenuous grasp on power (but still looks like shit), dems get a slightly better footing and some good press. McCarthy won’t do it, he can’t, but the offer alone would look magnanimous.",
">\n\nConservative voters really are the most easily manipulated, shameless suckers on the planet.",
">\n\nThey convince themselves democrats do the same thing so it's okay for them too. While simultaneously pretending they are held to a higher standard.\nNot even a strawman, that's as synopsis of every thread about him on r/conservative.",
">\n\nI was curious but didn’t want to venture over there.",
">\n\nCome on Brazil let's get that extradition party started.",
">\n\nJust when you think they can't go any lower they find a whole new way to do it...",
">\n\nIt's not a rabbit hole",
">\n\nJesus H. Fu*k. This guy needs to be in jail, and as far away from any real power as possible. \nWait, that could be any of the GOP house... ok, shit, I guess he fits right in then.",
">\n\nThe GOP is a criminal organization and Russia has the receipts. That means Russian assets like Santos have the receipts which means the GOP is over the barrel.",
">\n\nWell the American people just elected those criminals to run the house of representatives. I think it's the 70+ million people voting for the criminals that we really need to be worried about.",
">\n\nSo you can be a lying sack of shit, and suffer no consequences. Wonder if that will work for me on my next job search?🤔",
">\n\nMcCarthy is pandering to people like my cousin who was and is all in on Santos in that district and genuinely thinks that all the evidence against Santos is nonsense, that it's just \"embellishing your resume- everyone does it!\" and it's not a big deal so long as he, \"does what we want and helps stick it to the dirty cheater democrats.\"\nMcCarthy knows what he's doing... the group of diehards made up of people like my cousin could make or break things going forward in elections the same way the people opposing him in his bid for speaker for the first 14 rounds mucked his \"It's my turn!\" coronation up for him. McCarthy is concerned with holding his holding his title and nothing else right now.",
">\n\nTime for a motion to vacate from literally anybody. All it takes is one house member.",
">\n\nOf course.",
">\n\nWell he’s a reflection of the current party so who’s really surprised by this?",
">\n\nThe GOP don’t mind Liars and conmen as long as they lie and con for the GOP",
">\n\nThe thing trump did was show that the narcissists, sociopaths, abusers, and other general empathy-deficient grifters that they don't have to keep pretending to be decent members of society, that they can just relax and openly be their worst selves because reasonable people aren't going to enforce any punishment against them.",
">\n\nI didn't think McCarthy could have LESS credibility, but there it is.",
">\n\nMy inner conspiracy theorist is nagging at me. \nI feel like Santos is the patsy. Not sure for what yet, but he's the guy they happily get to pin it on.",
">\n\nJust shameful. Willfully corrupted.",
">\n\ni would say this is a joke but still waiting for the funny part of the absolute lack of repercussions for people lying to get into / maintain office.",
">\n\nA party of crooks, traitors, and sociopaths",
">\n\nGiven how corrupt he is, I'm surprised he is not chairing a committee.",
">\n\nThere is no bottom. So glad I left the GOP years ago!",
">\n\nIf you ever wanted evidence that nothing matters but what party you're a member of - this is it. \nIt doesn't matter what you stand for, believe, did or didn't do in your life. The only thing that matters is the letter next to your name.\nIf your company hired someone only to find out their resume was completely and laughably fradulent, could you work with them on your team? Could you share an office with them? Would you feel like your workplace had integrity if they kept him around?",
">\n\nLook everyone! The both sides guy!!",
">\n\nMcCarthy did not have the speaker votes without Santos' vote.",
">\n\nGuy looks like he's cosplaying pepe the frog. Big 'ol DSLs.",
">\n\nI feel bad for the writers or Veep who had some of their ideas thrown out for being too outlandish. In 20 years the show will be considered a drama because reality will be so much more ridiculous than the show."
] |
>
Would it be normal for a rookie congressman to be appointed to committees within the first few weeks/months of being sworn in?
I always assumed committee membership was something that would come after having proven yourself to be competent and to have some degree of expertise in the area the committee covers
|
[
"It's been like 2 weeks and McCarthy has shown already to be such a weak speaker. \nYou are given a free win. Condemn the liar. But nope, he gets committee seats. \nShows who is really running the show.",
">\n\n\nShows who is really running the show.\n\nVladimir Putin is pleased with his investment.",
">\n\nHopefully Santos will be fed bullshit classified intel just so we can time how quickly Putin remarks about it.",
">\n\nYou're acting like Putin doesn't already own the GOPs lol. Santos is definitely not his only source.",
">\n\nOh hell no, I’m definitely not implying he’s the only one. Just that any briefing given to him specifically should have some notable discrepancies (different names, numbers, locations) that would identify him as the leak. You know, protecting confidential info slightly more securely than the screener dvds sent out for Emmy voting.",
">\n\nSantos is a symbol of the entire Republican party.\nEntirely unscrupulous and amoral, and proudly so. All is acceptable in the pursuit of power.",
">\n\n\nunscrupulous and amoral, and proudly so\n\nAnother poster some time ago described them as \"virtue signaling,\" and I had to ask what's the exact opposite of that?\nA surprising number of others couldn't seem to grasp that \"virtue\" is not what they're signaling at all.",
">\n\nVice signaling?",
">\n\nDepravity flagging?",
">\n\nWill he also be given access to classified documents?",
">\n\nIt's OK. He'll simply say he's the President and declassify them with his mind.",
">\n\nI thought he already lied that Santos is the president?",
">\n\nSo this guy's a spy right? Like now we've seen him at Trump rallies years ago using different names. Running for office under different names. Everything he's said is false, but not in a confused Herschel Walker way. It's intentional. Right? Like we can see that he's a spy right?",
">\n\nDon’t forget about the piles of money he randomly finds",
">\n\nI don't think any of that money to Santos is random. It is payment, mostly from Russia, for services rendered. He just has to cause division and disarray within the US government, as ordered by Putin.",
">\n\nEh, tough leap to make. A moderately talented conman can somewhat easily bilk the Republican rank and file for millions of dollars. Particularly when he’s willing to go the extra mile and pay people to impersonate the staff of party leadership to bilk the wealthy donor class. \nIt’s more likely this is going to wind up being Bannon’s build the wall con turned up to 11. Perhaps with some international money mixed in.",
">\n\nSo a guy who couldn't legitimately get hired to sell me an insurance policy is being trusted with actual governance.\nFFS, \"conservatives\" - do you not have anyone around to run for office that isn't a complete fucking embarrassment? Stop voting for awful fuckin people",
">\n\nI can't blame his voters on this one, he straight up lied to them. The people that are keeping him in gov't are the ones we need to worry about.",
">\n\n\n“My staff raised concerns when he had a staff member who impersonated my chief of staff, and that individual was let go when Mr. Santos found out about it,” McCarthy said Tuesday.\n\nshameless loser",
">\n\nTheoretically if he is deemed too risky to get a clearance, can Biden prevent him from getting security clearance for classified intel?",
">\n\nAs the commander in chief id say so. Congress just votes on legislation and handles the purse. Intel is much more relevant to the executive branch.",
">\n\nLol this right here shows how much the Speaker's power is neutered under McCarthy's negotiated rules. He has to seat a sociopathic liar who fraudulently damaged McCarthy's staff personally by impersonating them to get donations, and if he doesn't seat him Santos can demand a vote to remove McCarthy day after day after day. Pathetic.",
">\n\nAt this point Jeffries should offer a gimme to McCarthy - we won’t call for a new speaker unless at least 1 republican does, but we get the committee post. Santos can get the boot, Kev keeps his tenuous grasp on power (but still looks like shit), dems get a slightly better footing and some good press. McCarthy won’t do it, he can’t, but the offer alone would look magnanimous.",
">\n\nConservative voters really are the most easily manipulated, shameless suckers on the planet.",
">\n\nThey convince themselves democrats do the same thing so it's okay for them too. While simultaneously pretending they are held to a higher standard.\nNot even a strawman, that's as synopsis of every thread about him on r/conservative.",
">\n\nI was curious but didn’t want to venture over there.",
">\n\nCome on Brazil let's get that extradition party started.",
">\n\nJust when you think they can't go any lower they find a whole new way to do it...",
">\n\nIt's not a rabbit hole",
">\n\nJesus H. Fu*k. This guy needs to be in jail, and as far away from any real power as possible. \nWait, that could be any of the GOP house... ok, shit, I guess he fits right in then.",
">\n\nThe GOP is a criminal organization and Russia has the receipts. That means Russian assets like Santos have the receipts which means the GOP is over the barrel.",
">\n\nWell the American people just elected those criminals to run the house of representatives. I think it's the 70+ million people voting for the criminals that we really need to be worried about.",
">\n\nSo you can be a lying sack of shit, and suffer no consequences. Wonder if that will work for me on my next job search?🤔",
">\n\nMcCarthy is pandering to people like my cousin who was and is all in on Santos in that district and genuinely thinks that all the evidence against Santos is nonsense, that it's just \"embellishing your resume- everyone does it!\" and it's not a big deal so long as he, \"does what we want and helps stick it to the dirty cheater democrats.\"\nMcCarthy knows what he's doing... the group of diehards made up of people like my cousin could make or break things going forward in elections the same way the people opposing him in his bid for speaker for the first 14 rounds mucked his \"It's my turn!\" coronation up for him. McCarthy is concerned with holding his holding his title and nothing else right now.",
">\n\nTime for a motion to vacate from literally anybody. All it takes is one house member.",
">\n\nOf course.",
">\n\nWell he’s a reflection of the current party so who’s really surprised by this?",
">\n\nThe GOP don’t mind Liars and conmen as long as they lie and con for the GOP",
">\n\nThe thing trump did was show that the narcissists, sociopaths, abusers, and other general empathy-deficient grifters that they don't have to keep pretending to be decent members of society, that they can just relax and openly be their worst selves because reasonable people aren't going to enforce any punishment against them.",
">\n\nI didn't think McCarthy could have LESS credibility, but there it is.",
">\n\nMy inner conspiracy theorist is nagging at me. \nI feel like Santos is the patsy. Not sure for what yet, but he's the guy they happily get to pin it on.",
">\n\nJust shameful. Willfully corrupted.",
">\n\ni would say this is a joke but still waiting for the funny part of the absolute lack of repercussions for people lying to get into / maintain office.",
">\n\nA party of crooks, traitors, and sociopaths",
">\n\nGiven how corrupt he is, I'm surprised he is not chairing a committee.",
">\n\nThere is no bottom. So glad I left the GOP years ago!",
">\n\nIf you ever wanted evidence that nothing matters but what party you're a member of - this is it. \nIt doesn't matter what you stand for, believe, did or didn't do in your life. The only thing that matters is the letter next to your name.\nIf your company hired someone only to find out their resume was completely and laughably fradulent, could you work with them on your team? Could you share an office with them? Would you feel like your workplace had integrity if they kept him around?",
">\n\nLook everyone! The both sides guy!!",
">\n\nMcCarthy did not have the speaker votes without Santos' vote.",
">\n\nGuy looks like he's cosplaying pepe the frog. Big 'ol DSLs.",
">\n\nI feel bad for the writers or Veep who had some of their ideas thrown out for being too outlandish. In 20 years the show will be considered a drama because reality will be so much more ridiculous than the show.",
">\n\nUnder what name?"
] |
>
All members are assigned committees regardless if you’re a first year or 22nd year. Committee spots for more prestigious and powerful committees are the ones reserved to those more senior and proven
|
[
"It's been like 2 weeks and McCarthy has shown already to be such a weak speaker. \nYou are given a free win. Condemn the liar. But nope, he gets committee seats. \nShows who is really running the show.",
">\n\n\nShows who is really running the show.\n\nVladimir Putin is pleased with his investment.",
">\n\nHopefully Santos will be fed bullshit classified intel just so we can time how quickly Putin remarks about it.",
">\n\nYou're acting like Putin doesn't already own the GOPs lol. Santos is definitely not his only source.",
">\n\nOh hell no, I’m definitely not implying he’s the only one. Just that any briefing given to him specifically should have some notable discrepancies (different names, numbers, locations) that would identify him as the leak. You know, protecting confidential info slightly more securely than the screener dvds sent out for Emmy voting.",
">\n\nSantos is a symbol of the entire Republican party.\nEntirely unscrupulous and amoral, and proudly so. All is acceptable in the pursuit of power.",
">\n\n\nunscrupulous and amoral, and proudly so\n\nAnother poster some time ago described them as \"virtue signaling,\" and I had to ask what's the exact opposite of that?\nA surprising number of others couldn't seem to grasp that \"virtue\" is not what they're signaling at all.",
">\n\nVice signaling?",
">\n\nDepravity flagging?",
">\n\nWill he also be given access to classified documents?",
">\n\nIt's OK. He'll simply say he's the President and declassify them with his mind.",
">\n\nI thought he already lied that Santos is the president?",
">\n\nSo this guy's a spy right? Like now we've seen him at Trump rallies years ago using different names. Running for office under different names. Everything he's said is false, but not in a confused Herschel Walker way. It's intentional. Right? Like we can see that he's a spy right?",
">\n\nDon’t forget about the piles of money he randomly finds",
">\n\nI don't think any of that money to Santos is random. It is payment, mostly from Russia, for services rendered. He just has to cause division and disarray within the US government, as ordered by Putin.",
">\n\nEh, tough leap to make. A moderately talented conman can somewhat easily bilk the Republican rank and file for millions of dollars. Particularly when he’s willing to go the extra mile and pay people to impersonate the staff of party leadership to bilk the wealthy donor class. \nIt’s more likely this is going to wind up being Bannon’s build the wall con turned up to 11. Perhaps with some international money mixed in.",
">\n\nSo a guy who couldn't legitimately get hired to sell me an insurance policy is being trusted with actual governance.\nFFS, \"conservatives\" - do you not have anyone around to run for office that isn't a complete fucking embarrassment? Stop voting for awful fuckin people",
">\n\nI can't blame his voters on this one, he straight up lied to them. The people that are keeping him in gov't are the ones we need to worry about.",
">\n\n\n“My staff raised concerns when he had a staff member who impersonated my chief of staff, and that individual was let go when Mr. Santos found out about it,” McCarthy said Tuesday.\n\nshameless loser",
">\n\nTheoretically if he is deemed too risky to get a clearance, can Biden prevent him from getting security clearance for classified intel?",
">\n\nAs the commander in chief id say so. Congress just votes on legislation and handles the purse. Intel is much more relevant to the executive branch.",
">\n\nLol this right here shows how much the Speaker's power is neutered under McCarthy's negotiated rules. He has to seat a sociopathic liar who fraudulently damaged McCarthy's staff personally by impersonating them to get donations, and if he doesn't seat him Santos can demand a vote to remove McCarthy day after day after day. Pathetic.",
">\n\nAt this point Jeffries should offer a gimme to McCarthy - we won’t call for a new speaker unless at least 1 republican does, but we get the committee post. Santos can get the boot, Kev keeps his tenuous grasp on power (but still looks like shit), dems get a slightly better footing and some good press. McCarthy won’t do it, he can’t, but the offer alone would look magnanimous.",
">\n\nConservative voters really are the most easily manipulated, shameless suckers on the planet.",
">\n\nThey convince themselves democrats do the same thing so it's okay for them too. While simultaneously pretending they are held to a higher standard.\nNot even a strawman, that's as synopsis of every thread about him on r/conservative.",
">\n\nI was curious but didn’t want to venture over there.",
">\n\nCome on Brazil let's get that extradition party started.",
">\n\nJust when you think they can't go any lower they find a whole new way to do it...",
">\n\nIt's not a rabbit hole",
">\n\nJesus H. Fu*k. This guy needs to be in jail, and as far away from any real power as possible. \nWait, that could be any of the GOP house... ok, shit, I guess he fits right in then.",
">\n\nThe GOP is a criminal organization and Russia has the receipts. That means Russian assets like Santos have the receipts which means the GOP is over the barrel.",
">\n\nWell the American people just elected those criminals to run the house of representatives. I think it's the 70+ million people voting for the criminals that we really need to be worried about.",
">\n\nSo you can be a lying sack of shit, and suffer no consequences. Wonder if that will work for me on my next job search?🤔",
">\n\nMcCarthy is pandering to people like my cousin who was and is all in on Santos in that district and genuinely thinks that all the evidence against Santos is nonsense, that it's just \"embellishing your resume- everyone does it!\" and it's not a big deal so long as he, \"does what we want and helps stick it to the dirty cheater democrats.\"\nMcCarthy knows what he's doing... the group of diehards made up of people like my cousin could make or break things going forward in elections the same way the people opposing him in his bid for speaker for the first 14 rounds mucked his \"It's my turn!\" coronation up for him. McCarthy is concerned with holding his holding his title and nothing else right now.",
">\n\nTime for a motion to vacate from literally anybody. All it takes is one house member.",
">\n\nOf course.",
">\n\nWell he’s a reflection of the current party so who’s really surprised by this?",
">\n\nThe GOP don’t mind Liars and conmen as long as they lie and con for the GOP",
">\n\nThe thing trump did was show that the narcissists, sociopaths, abusers, and other general empathy-deficient grifters that they don't have to keep pretending to be decent members of society, that they can just relax and openly be their worst selves because reasonable people aren't going to enforce any punishment against them.",
">\n\nI didn't think McCarthy could have LESS credibility, but there it is.",
">\n\nMy inner conspiracy theorist is nagging at me. \nI feel like Santos is the patsy. Not sure for what yet, but he's the guy they happily get to pin it on.",
">\n\nJust shameful. Willfully corrupted.",
">\n\ni would say this is a joke but still waiting for the funny part of the absolute lack of repercussions for people lying to get into / maintain office.",
">\n\nA party of crooks, traitors, and sociopaths",
">\n\nGiven how corrupt he is, I'm surprised he is not chairing a committee.",
">\n\nThere is no bottom. So glad I left the GOP years ago!",
">\n\nIf you ever wanted evidence that nothing matters but what party you're a member of - this is it. \nIt doesn't matter what you stand for, believe, did or didn't do in your life. The only thing that matters is the letter next to your name.\nIf your company hired someone only to find out their resume was completely and laughably fradulent, could you work with them on your team? Could you share an office with them? Would you feel like your workplace had integrity if they kept him around?",
">\n\nLook everyone! The both sides guy!!",
">\n\nMcCarthy did not have the speaker votes without Santos' vote.",
">\n\nGuy looks like he's cosplaying pepe the frog. Big 'ol DSLs.",
">\n\nI feel bad for the writers or Veep who had some of their ideas thrown out for being too outlandish. In 20 years the show will be considered a drama because reality will be so much more ridiculous than the show.",
">\n\nUnder what name?",
">\n\nWould it be normal for a rookie congressman to be appointed to committees within the first few weeks/months of being sworn in?\nI always assumed committee membership was something that would come after having proven yourself to be competent and to have some degree of expertise in the area the committee covers"
] |
>
Good to see pathological liars given representation in government.
|
[
"It's been like 2 weeks and McCarthy has shown already to be such a weak speaker. \nYou are given a free win. Condemn the liar. But nope, he gets committee seats. \nShows who is really running the show.",
">\n\n\nShows who is really running the show.\n\nVladimir Putin is pleased with his investment.",
">\n\nHopefully Santos will be fed bullshit classified intel just so we can time how quickly Putin remarks about it.",
">\n\nYou're acting like Putin doesn't already own the GOPs lol. Santos is definitely not his only source.",
">\n\nOh hell no, I’m definitely not implying he’s the only one. Just that any briefing given to him specifically should have some notable discrepancies (different names, numbers, locations) that would identify him as the leak. You know, protecting confidential info slightly more securely than the screener dvds sent out for Emmy voting.",
">\n\nSantos is a symbol of the entire Republican party.\nEntirely unscrupulous and amoral, and proudly so. All is acceptable in the pursuit of power.",
">\n\n\nunscrupulous and amoral, and proudly so\n\nAnother poster some time ago described them as \"virtue signaling,\" and I had to ask what's the exact opposite of that?\nA surprising number of others couldn't seem to grasp that \"virtue\" is not what they're signaling at all.",
">\n\nVice signaling?",
">\n\nDepravity flagging?",
">\n\nWill he also be given access to classified documents?",
">\n\nIt's OK. He'll simply say he's the President and declassify them with his mind.",
">\n\nI thought he already lied that Santos is the president?",
">\n\nSo this guy's a spy right? Like now we've seen him at Trump rallies years ago using different names. Running for office under different names. Everything he's said is false, but not in a confused Herschel Walker way. It's intentional. Right? Like we can see that he's a spy right?",
">\n\nDon’t forget about the piles of money he randomly finds",
">\n\nI don't think any of that money to Santos is random. It is payment, mostly from Russia, for services rendered. He just has to cause division and disarray within the US government, as ordered by Putin.",
">\n\nEh, tough leap to make. A moderately talented conman can somewhat easily bilk the Republican rank and file for millions of dollars. Particularly when he’s willing to go the extra mile and pay people to impersonate the staff of party leadership to bilk the wealthy donor class. \nIt’s more likely this is going to wind up being Bannon’s build the wall con turned up to 11. Perhaps with some international money mixed in.",
">\n\nSo a guy who couldn't legitimately get hired to sell me an insurance policy is being trusted with actual governance.\nFFS, \"conservatives\" - do you not have anyone around to run for office that isn't a complete fucking embarrassment? Stop voting for awful fuckin people",
">\n\nI can't blame his voters on this one, he straight up lied to them. The people that are keeping him in gov't are the ones we need to worry about.",
">\n\n\n“My staff raised concerns when he had a staff member who impersonated my chief of staff, and that individual was let go when Mr. Santos found out about it,” McCarthy said Tuesday.\n\nshameless loser",
">\n\nTheoretically if he is deemed too risky to get a clearance, can Biden prevent him from getting security clearance for classified intel?",
">\n\nAs the commander in chief id say so. Congress just votes on legislation and handles the purse. Intel is much more relevant to the executive branch.",
">\n\nLol this right here shows how much the Speaker's power is neutered under McCarthy's negotiated rules. He has to seat a sociopathic liar who fraudulently damaged McCarthy's staff personally by impersonating them to get donations, and if he doesn't seat him Santos can demand a vote to remove McCarthy day after day after day. Pathetic.",
">\n\nAt this point Jeffries should offer a gimme to McCarthy - we won’t call for a new speaker unless at least 1 republican does, but we get the committee post. Santos can get the boot, Kev keeps his tenuous grasp on power (but still looks like shit), dems get a slightly better footing and some good press. McCarthy won’t do it, he can’t, but the offer alone would look magnanimous.",
">\n\nConservative voters really are the most easily manipulated, shameless suckers on the planet.",
">\n\nThey convince themselves democrats do the same thing so it's okay for them too. While simultaneously pretending they are held to a higher standard.\nNot even a strawman, that's as synopsis of every thread about him on r/conservative.",
">\n\nI was curious but didn’t want to venture over there.",
">\n\nCome on Brazil let's get that extradition party started.",
">\n\nJust when you think they can't go any lower they find a whole new way to do it...",
">\n\nIt's not a rabbit hole",
">\n\nJesus H. Fu*k. This guy needs to be in jail, and as far away from any real power as possible. \nWait, that could be any of the GOP house... ok, shit, I guess he fits right in then.",
">\n\nThe GOP is a criminal organization and Russia has the receipts. That means Russian assets like Santos have the receipts which means the GOP is over the barrel.",
">\n\nWell the American people just elected those criminals to run the house of representatives. I think it's the 70+ million people voting for the criminals that we really need to be worried about.",
">\n\nSo you can be a lying sack of shit, and suffer no consequences. Wonder if that will work for me on my next job search?🤔",
">\n\nMcCarthy is pandering to people like my cousin who was and is all in on Santos in that district and genuinely thinks that all the evidence against Santos is nonsense, that it's just \"embellishing your resume- everyone does it!\" and it's not a big deal so long as he, \"does what we want and helps stick it to the dirty cheater democrats.\"\nMcCarthy knows what he's doing... the group of diehards made up of people like my cousin could make or break things going forward in elections the same way the people opposing him in his bid for speaker for the first 14 rounds mucked his \"It's my turn!\" coronation up for him. McCarthy is concerned with holding his holding his title and nothing else right now.",
">\n\nTime for a motion to vacate from literally anybody. All it takes is one house member.",
">\n\nOf course.",
">\n\nWell he’s a reflection of the current party so who’s really surprised by this?",
">\n\nThe GOP don’t mind Liars and conmen as long as they lie and con for the GOP",
">\n\nThe thing trump did was show that the narcissists, sociopaths, abusers, and other general empathy-deficient grifters that they don't have to keep pretending to be decent members of society, that they can just relax and openly be their worst selves because reasonable people aren't going to enforce any punishment against them.",
">\n\nI didn't think McCarthy could have LESS credibility, but there it is.",
">\n\nMy inner conspiracy theorist is nagging at me. \nI feel like Santos is the patsy. Not sure for what yet, but he's the guy they happily get to pin it on.",
">\n\nJust shameful. Willfully corrupted.",
">\n\ni would say this is a joke but still waiting for the funny part of the absolute lack of repercussions for people lying to get into / maintain office.",
">\n\nA party of crooks, traitors, and sociopaths",
">\n\nGiven how corrupt he is, I'm surprised he is not chairing a committee.",
">\n\nThere is no bottom. So glad I left the GOP years ago!",
">\n\nIf you ever wanted evidence that nothing matters but what party you're a member of - this is it. \nIt doesn't matter what you stand for, believe, did or didn't do in your life. The only thing that matters is the letter next to your name.\nIf your company hired someone only to find out their resume was completely and laughably fradulent, could you work with them on your team? Could you share an office with them? Would you feel like your workplace had integrity if they kept him around?",
">\n\nLook everyone! The both sides guy!!",
">\n\nMcCarthy did not have the speaker votes without Santos' vote.",
">\n\nGuy looks like he's cosplaying pepe the frog. Big 'ol DSLs.",
">\n\nI feel bad for the writers or Veep who had some of their ideas thrown out for being too outlandish. In 20 years the show will be considered a drama because reality will be so much more ridiculous than the show.",
">\n\nUnder what name?",
">\n\nWould it be normal for a rookie congressman to be appointed to committees within the first few weeks/months of being sworn in?\nI always assumed committee membership was something that would come after having proven yourself to be competent and to have some degree of expertise in the area the committee covers",
">\n\nAll members are assigned committees regardless if you’re a first year or 22nd year. Committee spots for more prestigious and powerful committees are the ones reserved to those more senior and proven"
] |
>
He's going lie about being on them regardless.
|
[
"It's been like 2 weeks and McCarthy has shown already to be such a weak speaker. \nYou are given a free win. Condemn the liar. But nope, he gets committee seats. \nShows who is really running the show.",
">\n\n\nShows who is really running the show.\n\nVladimir Putin is pleased with his investment.",
">\n\nHopefully Santos will be fed bullshit classified intel just so we can time how quickly Putin remarks about it.",
">\n\nYou're acting like Putin doesn't already own the GOPs lol. Santos is definitely not his only source.",
">\n\nOh hell no, I’m definitely not implying he’s the only one. Just that any briefing given to him specifically should have some notable discrepancies (different names, numbers, locations) that would identify him as the leak. You know, protecting confidential info slightly more securely than the screener dvds sent out for Emmy voting.",
">\n\nSantos is a symbol of the entire Republican party.\nEntirely unscrupulous and amoral, and proudly so. All is acceptable in the pursuit of power.",
">\n\n\nunscrupulous and amoral, and proudly so\n\nAnother poster some time ago described them as \"virtue signaling,\" and I had to ask what's the exact opposite of that?\nA surprising number of others couldn't seem to grasp that \"virtue\" is not what they're signaling at all.",
">\n\nVice signaling?",
">\n\nDepravity flagging?",
">\n\nWill he also be given access to classified documents?",
">\n\nIt's OK. He'll simply say he's the President and declassify them with his mind.",
">\n\nI thought he already lied that Santos is the president?",
">\n\nSo this guy's a spy right? Like now we've seen him at Trump rallies years ago using different names. Running for office under different names. Everything he's said is false, but not in a confused Herschel Walker way. It's intentional. Right? Like we can see that he's a spy right?",
">\n\nDon’t forget about the piles of money he randomly finds",
">\n\nI don't think any of that money to Santos is random. It is payment, mostly from Russia, for services rendered. He just has to cause division and disarray within the US government, as ordered by Putin.",
">\n\nEh, tough leap to make. A moderately talented conman can somewhat easily bilk the Republican rank and file for millions of dollars. Particularly when he’s willing to go the extra mile and pay people to impersonate the staff of party leadership to bilk the wealthy donor class. \nIt’s more likely this is going to wind up being Bannon’s build the wall con turned up to 11. Perhaps with some international money mixed in.",
">\n\nSo a guy who couldn't legitimately get hired to sell me an insurance policy is being trusted with actual governance.\nFFS, \"conservatives\" - do you not have anyone around to run for office that isn't a complete fucking embarrassment? Stop voting for awful fuckin people",
">\n\nI can't blame his voters on this one, he straight up lied to them. The people that are keeping him in gov't are the ones we need to worry about.",
">\n\n\n“My staff raised concerns when he had a staff member who impersonated my chief of staff, and that individual was let go when Mr. Santos found out about it,” McCarthy said Tuesday.\n\nshameless loser",
">\n\nTheoretically if he is deemed too risky to get a clearance, can Biden prevent him from getting security clearance for classified intel?",
">\n\nAs the commander in chief id say so. Congress just votes on legislation and handles the purse. Intel is much more relevant to the executive branch.",
">\n\nLol this right here shows how much the Speaker's power is neutered under McCarthy's negotiated rules. He has to seat a sociopathic liar who fraudulently damaged McCarthy's staff personally by impersonating them to get donations, and if he doesn't seat him Santos can demand a vote to remove McCarthy day after day after day. Pathetic.",
">\n\nAt this point Jeffries should offer a gimme to McCarthy - we won’t call for a new speaker unless at least 1 republican does, but we get the committee post. Santos can get the boot, Kev keeps his tenuous grasp on power (but still looks like shit), dems get a slightly better footing and some good press. McCarthy won’t do it, he can’t, but the offer alone would look magnanimous.",
">\n\nConservative voters really are the most easily manipulated, shameless suckers on the planet.",
">\n\nThey convince themselves democrats do the same thing so it's okay for them too. While simultaneously pretending they are held to a higher standard.\nNot even a strawman, that's as synopsis of every thread about him on r/conservative.",
">\n\nI was curious but didn’t want to venture over there.",
">\n\nCome on Brazil let's get that extradition party started.",
">\n\nJust when you think they can't go any lower they find a whole new way to do it...",
">\n\nIt's not a rabbit hole",
">\n\nJesus H. Fu*k. This guy needs to be in jail, and as far away from any real power as possible. \nWait, that could be any of the GOP house... ok, shit, I guess he fits right in then.",
">\n\nThe GOP is a criminal organization and Russia has the receipts. That means Russian assets like Santos have the receipts which means the GOP is over the barrel.",
">\n\nWell the American people just elected those criminals to run the house of representatives. I think it's the 70+ million people voting for the criminals that we really need to be worried about.",
">\n\nSo you can be a lying sack of shit, and suffer no consequences. Wonder if that will work for me on my next job search?🤔",
">\n\nMcCarthy is pandering to people like my cousin who was and is all in on Santos in that district and genuinely thinks that all the evidence against Santos is nonsense, that it's just \"embellishing your resume- everyone does it!\" and it's not a big deal so long as he, \"does what we want and helps stick it to the dirty cheater democrats.\"\nMcCarthy knows what he's doing... the group of diehards made up of people like my cousin could make or break things going forward in elections the same way the people opposing him in his bid for speaker for the first 14 rounds mucked his \"It's my turn!\" coronation up for him. McCarthy is concerned with holding his holding his title and nothing else right now.",
">\n\nTime for a motion to vacate from literally anybody. All it takes is one house member.",
">\n\nOf course.",
">\n\nWell he’s a reflection of the current party so who’s really surprised by this?",
">\n\nThe GOP don’t mind Liars and conmen as long as they lie and con for the GOP",
">\n\nThe thing trump did was show that the narcissists, sociopaths, abusers, and other general empathy-deficient grifters that they don't have to keep pretending to be decent members of society, that they can just relax and openly be their worst selves because reasonable people aren't going to enforce any punishment against them.",
">\n\nI didn't think McCarthy could have LESS credibility, but there it is.",
">\n\nMy inner conspiracy theorist is nagging at me. \nI feel like Santos is the patsy. Not sure for what yet, but he's the guy they happily get to pin it on.",
">\n\nJust shameful. Willfully corrupted.",
">\n\ni would say this is a joke but still waiting for the funny part of the absolute lack of repercussions for people lying to get into / maintain office.",
">\n\nA party of crooks, traitors, and sociopaths",
">\n\nGiven how corrupt he is, I'm surprised he is not chairing a committee.",
">\n\nThere is no bottom. So glad I left the GOP years ago!",
">\n\nIf you ever wanted evidence that nothing matters but what party you're a member of - this is it. \nIt doesn't matter what you stand for, believe, did or didn't do in your life. The only thing that matters is the letter next to your name.\nIf your company hired someone only to find out their resume was completely and laughably fradulent, could you work with them on your team? Could you share an office with them? Would you feel like your workplace had integrity if they kept him around?",
">\n\nLook everyone! The both sides guy!!",
">\n\nMcCarthy did not have the speaker votes without Santos' vote.",
">\n\nGuy looks like he's cosplaying pepe the frog. Big 'ol DSLs.",
">\n\nI feel bad for the writers or Veep who had some of their ideas thrown out for being too outlandish. In 20 years the show will be considered a drama because reality will be so much more ridiculous than the show.",
">\n\nUnder what name?",
">\n\nWould it be normal for a rookie congressman to be appointed to committees within the first few weeks/months of being sworn in?\nI always assumed committee membership was something that would come after having proven yourself to be competent and to have some degree of expertise in the area the committee covers",
">\n\nAll members are assigned committees regardless if you’re a first year or 22nd year. Committee spots for more prestigious and powerful committees are the ones reserved to those more senior and proven",
">\n\nGood to see pathological liars given representation in government."
] |
>
McCarthy is the spineless twit the GOP deserves.
|
[
"It's been like 2 weeks and McCarthy has shown already to be such a weak speaker. \nYou are given a free win. Condemn the liar. But nope, he gets committee seats. \nShows who is really running the show.",
">\n\n\nShows who is really running the show.\n\nVladimir Putin is pleased with his investment.",
">\n\nHopefully Santos will be fed bullshit classified intel just so we can time how quickly Putin remarks about it.",
">\n\nYou're acting like Putin doesn't already own the GOPs lol. Santos is definitely not his only source.",
">\n\nOh hell no, I’m definitely not implying he’s the only one. Just that any briefing given to him specifically should have some notable discrepancies (different names, numbers, locations) that would identify him as the leak. You know, protecting confidential info slightly more securely than the screener dvds sent out for Emmy voting.",
">\n\nSantos is a symbol of the entire Republican party.\nEntirely unscrupulous and amoral, and proudly so. All is acceptable in the pursuit of power.",
">\n\n\nunscrupulous and amoral, and proudly so\n\nAnother poster some time ago described them as \"virtue signaling,\" and I had to ask what's the exact opposite of that?\nA surprising number of others couldn't seem to grasp that \"virtue\" is not what they're signaling at all.",
">\n\nVice signaling?",
">\n\nDepravity flagging?",
">\n\nWill he also be given access to classified documents?",
">\n\nIt's OK. He'll simply say he's the President and declassify them with his mind.",
">\n\nI thought he already lied that Santos is the president?",
">\n\nSo this guy's a spy right? Like now we've seen him at Trump rallies years ago using different names. Running for office under different names. Everything he's said is false, but not in a confused Herschel Walker way. It's intentional. Right? Like we can see that he's a spy right?",
">\n\nDon’t forget about the piles of money he randomly finds",
">\n\nI don't think any of that money to Santos is random. It is payment, mostly from Russia, for services rendered. He just has to cause division and disarray within the US government, as ordered by Putin.",
">\n\nEh, tough leap to make. A moderately talented conman can somewhat easily bilk the Republican rank and file for millions of dollars. Particularly when he’s willing to go the extra mile and pay people to impersonate the staff of party leadership to bilk the wealthy donor class. \nIt’s more likely this is going to wind up being Bannon’s build the wall con turned up to 11. Perhaps with some international money mixed in.",
">\n\nSo a guy who couldn't legitimately get hired to sell me an insurance policy is being trusted with actual governance.\nFFS, \"conservatives\" - do you not have anyone around to run for office that isn't a complete fucking embarrassment? Stop voting for awful fuckin people",
">\n\nI can't blame his voters on this one, he straight up lied to them. The people that are keeping him in gov't are the ones we need to worry about.",
">\n\n\n“My staff raised concerns when he had a staff member who impersonated my chief of staff, and that individual was let go when Mr. Santos found out about it,” McCarthy said Tuesday.\n\nshameless loser",
">\n\nTheoretically if he is deemed too risky to get a clearance, can Biden prevent him from getting security clearance for classified intel?",
">\n\nAs the commander in chief id say so. Congress just votes on legislation and handles the purse. Intel is much more relevant to the executive branch.",
">\n\nLol this right here shows how much the Speaker's power is neutered under McCarthy's negotiated rules. He has to seat a sociopathic liar who fraudulently damaged McCarthy's staff personally by impersonating them to get donations, and if he doesn't seat him Santos can demand a vote to remove McCarthy day after day after day. Pathetic.",
">\n\nAt this point Jeffries should offer a gimme to McCarthy - we won’t call for a new speaker unless at least 1 republican does, but we get the committee post. Santos can get the boot, Kev keeps his tenuous grasp on power (but still looks like shit), dems get a slightly better footing and some good press. McCarthy won’t do it, he can’t, but the offer alone would look magnanimous.",
">\n\nConservative voters really are the most easily manipulated, shameless suckers on the planet.",
">\n\nThey convince themselves democrats do the same thing so it's okay for them too. While simultaneously pretending they are held to a higher standard.\nNot even a strawman, that's as synopsis of every thread about him on r/conservative.",
">\n\nI was curious but didn’t want to venture over there.",
">\n\nCome on Brazil let's get that extradition party started.",
">\n\nJust when you think they can't go any lower they find a whole new way to do it...",
">\n\nIt's not a rabbit hole",
">\n\nJesus H. Fu*k. This guy needs to be in jail, and as far away from any real power as possible. \nWait, that could be any of the GOP house... ok, shit, I guess he fits right in then.",
">\n\nThe GOP is a criminal organization and Russia has the receipts. That means Russian assets like Santos have the receipts which means the GOP is over the barrel.",
">\n\nWell the American people just elected those criminals to run the house of representatives. I think it's the 70+ million people voting for the criminals that we really need to be worried about.",
">\n\nSo you can be a lying sack of shit, and suffer no consequences. Wonder if that will work for me on my next job search?🤔",
">\n\nMcCarthy is pandering to people like my cousin who was and is all in on Santos in that district and genuinely thinks that all the evidence against Santos is nonsense, that it's just \"embellishing your resume- everyone does it!\" and it's not a big deal so long as he, \"does what we want and helps stick it to the dirty cheater democrats.\"\nMcCarthy knows what he's doing... the group of diehards made up of people like my cousin could make or break things going forward in elections the same way the people opposing him in his bid for speaker for the first 14 rounds mucked his \"It's my turn!\" coronation up for him. McCarthy is concerned with holding his holding his title and nothing else right now.",
">\n\nTime for a motion to vacate from literally anybody. All it takes is one house member.",
">\n\nOf course.",
">\n\nWell he’s a reflection of the current party so who’s really surprised by this?",
">\n\nThe GOP don’t mind Liars and conmen as long as they lie and con for the GOP",
">\n\nThe thing trump did was show that the narcissists, sociopaths, abusers, and other general empathy-deficient grifters that they don't have to keep pretending to be decent members of society, that they can just relax and openly be their worst selves because reasonable people aren't going to enforce any punishment against them.",
">\n\nI didn't think McCarthy could have LESS credibility, but there it is.",
">\n\nMy inner conspiracy theorist is nagging at me. \nI feel like Santos is the patsy. Not sure for what yet, but he's the guy they happily get to pin it on.",
">\n\nJust shameful. Willfully corrupted.",
">\n\ni would say this is a joke but still waiting for the funny part of the absolute lack of repercussions for people lying to get into / maintain office.",
">\n\nA party of crooks, traitors, and sociopaths",
">\n\nGiven how corrupt he is, I'm surprised he is not chairing a committee.",
">\n\nThere is no bottom. So glad I left the GOP years ago!",
">\n\nIf you ever wanted evidence that nothing matters but what party you're a member of - this is it. \nIt doesn't matter what you stand for, believe, did or didn't do in your life. The only thing that matters is the letter next to your name.\nIf your company hired someone only to find out their resume was completely and laughably fradulent, could you work with them on your team? Could you share an office with them? Would you feel like your workplace had integrity if they kept him around?",
">\n\nLook everyone! The both sides guy!!",
">\n\nMcCarthy did not have the speaker votes without Santos' vote.",
">\n\nGuy looks like he's cosplaying pepe the frog. Big 'ol DSLs.",
">\n\nI feel bad for the writers or Veep who had some of their ideas thrown out for being too outlandish. In 20 years the show will be considered a drama because reality will be so much more ridiculous than the show.",
">\n\nUnder what name?",
">\n\nWould it be normal for a rookie congressman to be appointed to committees within the first few weeks/months of being sworn in?\nI always assumed committee membership was something that would come after having proven yourself to be competent and to have some degree of expertise in the area the committee covers",
">\n\nAll members are assigned committees regardless if you’re a first year or 22nd year. Committee spots for more prestigious and powerful committees are the ones reserved to those more senior and proven",
">\n\nGood to see pathological liars given representation in government.",
">\n\nHe's going lie about being on them regardless."
] |
>
Republicans have no shame. They are evil.
|
[
"It's been like 2 weeks and McCarthy has shown already to be such a weak speaker. \nYou are given a free win. Condemn the liar. But nope, he gets committee seats. \nShows who is really running the show.",
">\n\n\nShows who is really running the show.\n\nVladimir Putin is pleased with his investment.",
">\n\nHopefully Santos will be fed bullshit classified intel just so we can time how quickly Putin remarks about it.",
">\n\nYou're acting like Putin doesn't already own the GOPs lol. Santos is definitely not his only source.",
">\n\nOh hell no, I’m definitely not implying he’s the only one. Just that any briefing given to him specifically should have some notable discrepancies (different names, numbers, locations) that would identify him as the leak. You know, protecting confidential info slightly more securely than the screener dvds sent out for Emmy voting.",
">\n\nSantos is a symbol of the entire Republican party.\nEntirely unscrupulous and amoral, and proudly so. All is acceptable in the pursuit of power.",
">\n\n\nunscrupulous and amoral, and proudly so\n\nAnother poster some time ago described them as \"virtue signaling,\" and I had to ask what's the exact opposite of that?\nA surprising number of others couldn't seem to grasp that \"virtue\" is not what they're signaling at all.",
">\n\nVice signaling?",
">\n\nDepravity flagging?",
">\n\nWill he also be given access to classified documents?",
">\n\nIt's OK. He'll simply say he's the President and declassify them with his mind.",
">\n\nI thought he already lied that Santos is the president?",
">\n\nSo this guy's a spy right? Like now we've seen him at Trump rallies years ago using different names. Running for office under different names. Everything he's said is false, but not in a confused Herschel Walker way. It's intentional. Right? Like we can see that he's a spy right?",
">\n\nDon’t forget about the piles of money he randomly finds",
">\n\nI don't think any of that money to Santos is random. It is payment, mostly from Russia, for services rendered. He just has to cause division and disarray within the US government, as ordered by Putin.",
">\n\nEh, tough leap to make. A moderately talented conman can somewhat easily bilk the Republican rank and file for millions of dollars. Particularly when he’s willing to go the extra mile and pay people to impersonate the staff of party leadership to bilk the wealthy donor class. \nIt’s more likely this is going to wind up being Bannon’s build the wall con turned up to 11. Perhaps with some international money mixed in.",
">\n\nSo a guy who couldn't legitimately get hired to sell me an insurance policy is being trusted with actual governance.\nFFS, \"conservatives\" - do you not have anyone around to run for office that isn't a complete fucking embarrassment? Stop voting for awful fuckin people",
">\n\nI can't blame his voters on this one, he straight up lied to them. The people that are keeping him in gov't are the ones we need to worry about.",
">\n\n\n“My staff raised concerns when he had a staff member who impersonated my chief of staff, and that individual was let go when Mr. Santos found out about it,” McCarthy said Tuesday.\n\nshameless loser",
">\n\nTheoretically if he is deemed too risky to get a clearance, can Biden prevent him from getting security clearance for classified intel?",
">\n\nAs the commander in chief id say so. Congress just votes on legislation and handles the purse. Intel is much more relevant to the executive branch.",
">\n\nLol this right here shows how much the Speaker's power is neutered under McCarthy's negotiated rules. He has to seat a sociopathic liar who fraudulently damaged McCarthy's staff personally by impersonating them to get donations, and if he doesn't seat him Santos can demand a vote to remove McCarthy day after day after day. Pathetic.",
">\n\nAt this point Jeffries should offer a gimme to McCarthy - we won’t call for a new speaker unless at least 1 republican does, but we get the committee post. Santos can get the boot, Kev keeps his tenuous grasp on power (but still looks like shit), dems get a slightly better footing and some good press. McCarthy won’t do it, he can’t, but the offer alone would look magnanimous.",
">\n\nConservative voters really are the most easily manipulated, shameless suckers on the planet.",
">\n\nThey convince themselves democrats do the same thing so it's okay for them too. While simultaneously pretending they are held to a higher standard.\nNot even a strawman, that's as synopsis of every thread about him on r/conservative.",
">\n\nI was curious but didn’t want to venture over there.",
">\n\nCome on Brazil let's get that extradition party started.",
">\n\nJust when you think they can't go any lower they find a whole new way to do it...",
">\n\nIt's not a rabbit hole",
">\n\nJesus H. Fu*k. This guy needs to be in jail, and as far away from any real power as possible. \nWait, that could be any of the GOP house... ok, shit, I guess he fits right in then.",
">\n\nThe GOP is a criminal organization and Russia has the receipts. That means Russian assets like Santos have the receipts which means the GOP is over the barrel.",
">\n\nWell the American people just elected those criminals to run the house of representatives. I think it's the 70+ million people voting for the criminals that we really need to be worried about.",
">\n\nSo you can be a lying sack of shit, and suffer no consequences. Wonder if that will work for me on my next job search?🤔",
">\n\nMcCarthy is pandering to people like my cousin who was and is all in on Santos in that district and genuinely thinks that all the evidence against Santos is nonsense, that it's just \"embellishing your resume- everyone does it!\" and it's not a big deal so long as he, \"does what we want and helps stick it to the dirty cheater democrats.\"\nMcCarthy knows what he's doing... the group of diehards made up of people like my cousin could make or break things going forward in elections the same way the people opposing him in his bid for speaker for the first 14 rounds mucked his \"It's my turn!\" coronation up for him. McCarthy is concerned with holding his holding his title and nothing else right now.",
">\n\nTime for a motion to vacate from literally anybody. All it takes is one house member.",
">\n\nOf course.",
">\n\nWell he’s a reflection of the current party so who’s really surprised by this?",
">\n\nThe GOP don’t mind Liars and conmen as long as they lie and con for the GOP",
">\n\nThe thing trump did was show that the narcissists, sociopaths, abusers, and other general empathy-deficient grifters that they don't have to keep pretending to be decent members of society, that they can just relax and openly be their worst selves because reasonable people aren't going to enforce any punishment against them.",
">\n\nI didn't think McCarthy could have LESS credibility, but there it is.",
">\n\nMy inner conspiracy theorist is nagging at me. \nI feel like Santos is the patsy. Not sure for what yet, but he's the guy they happily get to pin it on.",
">\n\nJust shameful. Willfully corrupted.",
">\n\ni would say this is a joke but still waiting for the funny part of the absolute lack of repercussions for people lying to get into / maintain office.",
">\n\nA party of crooks, traitors, and sociopaths",
">\n\nGiven how corrupt he is, I'm surprised he is not chairing a committee.",
">\n\nThere is no bottom. So glad I left the GOP years ago!",
">\n\nIf you ever wanted evidence that nothing matters but what party you're a member of - this is it. \nIt doesn't matter what you stand for, believe, did or didn't do in your life. The only thing that matters is the letter next to your name.\nIf your company hired someone only to find out their resume was completely and laughably fradulent, could you work with them on your team? Could you share an office with them? Would you feel like your workplace had integrity if they kept him around?",
">\n\nLook everyone! The both sides guy!!",
">\n\nMcCarthy did not have the speaker votes without Santos' vote.",
">\n\nGuy looks like he's cosplaying pepe the frog. Big 'ol DSLs.",
">\n\nI feel bad for the writers or Veep who had some of their ideas thrown out for being too outlandish. In 20 years the show will be considered a drama because reality will be so much more ridiculous than the show.",
">\n\nUnder what name?",
">\n\nWould it be normal for a rookie congressman to be appointed to committees within the first few weeks/months of being sworn in?\nI always assumed committee membership was something that would come after having proven yourself to be competent and to have some degree of expertise in the area the committee covers",
">\n\nAll members are assigned committees regardless if you’re a first year or 22nd year. Committee spots for more prestigious and powerful committees are the ones reserved to those more senior and proven",
">\n\nGood to see pathological liars given representation in government.",
">\n\nHe's going lie about being on them regardless.",
">\n\nMcCarthy is the spineless twit the GOP deserves."
] |
>
McCarthy is such a pussy
|
[
"It's been like 2 weeks and McCarthy has shown already to be such a weak speaker. \nYou are given a free win. Condemn the liar. But nope, he gets committee seats. \nShows who is really running the show.",
">\n\n\nShows who is really running the show.\n\nVladimir Putin is pleased with his investment.",
">\n\nHopefully Santos will be fed bullshit classified intel just so we can time how quickly Putin remarks about it.",
">\n\nYou're acting like Putin doesn't already own the GOPs lol. Santos is definitely not his only source.",
">\n\nOh hell no, I’m definitely not implying he’s the only one. Just that any briefing given to him specifically should have some notable discrepancies (different names, numbers, locations) that would identify him as the leak. You know, protecting confidential info slightly more securely than the screener dvds sent out for Emmy voting.",
">\n\nSantos is a symbol of the entire Republican party.\nEntirely unscrupulous and amoral, and proudly so. All is acceptable in the pursuit of power.",
">\n\n\nunscrupulous and amoral, and proudly so\n\nAnother poster some time ago described them as \"virtue signaling,\" and I had to ask what's the exact opposite of that?\nA surprising number of others couldn't seem to grasp that \"virtue\" is not what they're signaling at all.",
">\n\nVice signaling?",
">\n\nDepravity flagging?",
">\n\nWill he also be given access to classified documents?",
">\n\nIt's OK. He'll simply say he's the President and declassify them with his mind.",
">\n\nI thought he already lied that Santos is the president?",
">\n\nSo this guy's a spy right? Like now we've seen him at Trump rallies years ago using different names. Running for office under different names. Everything he's said is false, but not in a confused Herschel Walker way. It's intentional. Right? Like we can see that he's a spy right?",
">\n\nDon’t forget about the piles of money he randomly finds",
">\n\nI don't think any of that money to Santos is random. It is payment, mostly from Russia, for services rendered. He just has to cause division and disarray within the US government, as ordered by Putin.",
">\n\nEh, tough leap to make. A moderately talented conman can somewhat easily bilk the Republican rank and file for millions of dollars. Particularly when he’s willing to go the extra mile and pay people to impersonate the staff of party leadership to bilk the wealthy donor class. \nIt’s more likely this is going to wind up being Bannon’s build the wall con turned up to 11. Perhaps with some international money mixed in.",
">\n\nSo a guy who couldn't legitimately get hired to sell me an insurance policy is being trusted with actual governance.\nFFS, \"conservatives\" - do you not have anyone around to run for office that isn't a complete fucking embarrassment? Stop voting for awful fuckin people",
">\n\nI can't blame his voters on this one, he straight up lied to them. The people that are keeping him in gov't are the ones we need to worry about.",
">\n\n\n“My staff raised concerns when he had a staff member who impersonated my chief of staff, and that individual was let go when Mr. Santos found out about it,” McCarthy said Tuesday.\n\nshameless loser",
">\n\nTheoretically if he is deemed too risky to get a clearance, can Biden prevent him from getting security clearance for classified intel?",
">\n\nAs the commander in chief id say so. Congress just votes on legislation and handles the purse. Intel is much more relevant to the executive branch.",
">\n\nLol this right here shows how much the Speaker's power is neutered under McCarthy's negotiated rules. He has to seat a sociopathic liar who fraudulently damaged McCarthy's staff personally by impersonating them to get donations, and if he doesn't seat him Santos can demand a vote to remove McCarthy day after day after day. Pathetic.",
">\n\nAt this point Jeffries should offer a gimme to McCarthy - we won’t call for a new speaker unless at least 1 republican does, but we get the committee post. Santos can get the boot, Kev keeps his tenuous grasp on power (but still looks like shit), dems get a slightly better footing and some good press. McCarthy won’t do it, he can’t, but the offer alone would look magnanimous.",
">\n\nConservative voters really are the most easily manipulated, shameless suckers on the planet.",
">\n\nThey convince themselves democrats do the same thing so it's okay for them too. While simultaneously pretending they are held to a higher standard.\nNot even a strawman, that's as synopsis of every thread about him on r/conservative.",
">\n\nI was curious but didn’t want to venture over there.",
">\n\nCome on Brazil let's get that extradition party started.",
">\n\nJust when you think they can't go any lower they find a whole new way to do it...",
">\n\nIt's not a rabbit hole",
">\n\nJesus H. Fu*k. This guy needs to be in jail, and as far away from any real power as possible. \nWait, that could be any of the GOP house... ok, shit, I guess he fits right in then.",
">\n\nThe GOP is a criminal organization and Russia has the receipts. That means Russian assets like Santos have the receipts which means the GOP is over the barrel.",
">\n\nWell the American people just elected those criminals to run the house of representatives. I think it's the 70+ million people voting for the criminals that we really need to be worried about.",
">\n\nSo you can be a lying sack of shit, and suffer no consequences. Wonder if that will work for me on my next job search?🤔",
">\n\nMcCarthy is pandering to people like my cousin who was and is all in on Santos in that district and genuinely thinks that all the evidence against Santos is nonsense, that it's just \"embellishing your resume- everyone does it!\" and it's not a big deal so long as he, \"does what we want and helps stick it to the dirty cheater democrats.\"\nMcCarthy knows what he's doing... the group of diehards made up of people like my cousin could make or break things going forward in elections the same way the people opposing him in his bid for speaker for the first 14 rounds mucked his \"It's my turn!\" coronation up for him. McCarthy is concerned with holding his holding his title and nothing else right now.",
">\n\nTime for a motion to vacate from literally anybody. All it takes is one house member.",
">\n\nOf course.",
">\n\nWell he’s a reflection of the current party so who’s really surprised by this?",
">\n\nThe GOP don’t mind Liars and conmen as long as they lie and con for the GOP",
">\n\nThe thing trump did was show that the narcissists, sociopaths, abusers, and other general empathy-deficient grifters that they don't have to keep pretending to be decent members of society, that they can just relax and openly be their worst selves because reasonable people aren't going to enforce any punishment against them.",
">\n\nI didn't think McCarthy could have LESS credibility, but there it is.",
">\n\nMy inner conspiracy theorist is nagging at me. \nI feel like Santos is the patsy. Not sure for what yet, but he's the guy they happily get to pin it on.",
">\n\nJust shameful. Willfully corrupted.",
">\n\ni would say this is a joke but still waiting for the funny part of the absolute lack of repercussions for people lying to get into / maintain office.",
">\n\nA party of crooks, traitors, and sociopaths",
">\n\nGiven how corrupt he is, I'm surprised he is not chairing a committee.",
">\n\nThere is no bottom. So glad I left the GOP years ago!",
">\n\nIf you ever wanted evidence that nothing matters but what party you're a member of - this is it. \nIt doesn't matter what you stand for, believe, did or didn't do in your life. The only thing that matters is the letter next to your name.\nIf your company hired someone only to find out their resume was completely and laughably fradulent, could you work with them on your team? Could you share an office with them? Would you feel like your workplace had integrity if they kept him around?",
">\n\nLook everyone! The both sides guy!!",
">\n\nMcCarthy did not have the speaker votes without Santos' vote.",
">\n\nGuy looks like he's cosplaying pepe the frog. Big 'ol DSLs.",
">\n\nI feel bad for the writers or Veep who had some of their ideas thrown out for being too outlandish. In 20 years the show will be considered a drama because reality will be so much more ridiculous than the show.",
">\n\nUnder what name?",
">\n\nWould it be normal for a rookie congressman to be appointed to committees within the first few weeks/months of being sworn in?\nI always assumed committee membership was something that would come after having proven yourself to be competent and to have some degree of expertise in the area the committee covers",
">\n\nAll members are assigned committees regardless if you’re a first year or 22nd year. Committee spots for more prestigious and powerful committees are the ones reserved to those more senior and proven",
">\n\nGood to see pathological liars given representation in government.",
">\n\nHe's going lie about being on them regardless.",
">\n\nMcCarthy is the spineless twit the GOP deserves.",
">\n\nRepublicans have no shame. They are evil."
] |
>
First, why? Secondly, on which committees would his expertise be applicable? The Ethics Committee?
|
[
"It's been like 2 weeks and McCarthy has shown already to be such a weak speaker. \nYou are given a free win. Condemn the liar. But nope, he gets committee seats. \nShows who is really running the show.",
">\n\n\nShows who is really running the show.\n\nVladimir Putin is pleased with his investment.",
">\n\nHopefully Santos will be fed bullshit classified intel just so we can time how quickly Putin remarks about it.",
">\n\nYou're acting like Putin doesn't already own the GOPs lol. Santos is definitely not his only source.",
">\n\nOh hell no, I’m definitely not implying he’s the only one. Just that any briefing given to him specifically should have some notable discrepancies (different names, numbers, locations) that would identify him as the leak. You know, protecting confidential info slightly more securely than the screener dvds sent out for Emmy voting.",
">\n\nSantos is a symbol of the entire Republican party.\nEntirely unscrupulous and amoral, and proudly so. All is acceptable in the pursuit of power.",
">\n\n\nunscrupulous and amoral, and proudly so\n\nAnother poster some time ago described them as \"virtue signaling,\" and I had to ask what's the exact opposite of that?\nA surprising number of others couldn't seem to grasp that \"virtue\" is not what they're signaling at all.",
">\n\nVice signaling?",
">\n\nDepravity flagging?",
">\n\nWill he also be given access to classified documents?",
">\n\nIt's OK. He'll simply say he's the President and declassify them with his mind.",
">\n\nI thought he already lied that Santos is the president?",
">\n\nSo this guy's a spy right? Like now we've seen him at Trump rallies years ago using different names. Running for office under different names. Everything he's said is false, but not in a confused Herschel Walker way. It's intentional. Right? Like we can see that he's a spy right?",
">\n\nDon’t forget about the piles of money he randomly finds",
">\n\nI don't think any of that money to Santos is random. It is payment, mostly from Russia, for services rendered. He just has to cause division and disarray within the US government, as ordered by Putin.",
">\n\nEh, tough leap to make. A moderately talented conman can somewhat easily bilk the Republican rank and file for millions of dollars. Particularly when he’s willing to go the extra mile and pay people to impersonate the staff of party leadership to bilk the wealthy donor class. \nIt’s more likely this is going to wind up being Bannon’s build the wall con turned up to 11. Perhaps with some international money mixed in.",
">\n\nSo a guy who couldn't legitimately get hired to sell me an insurance policy is being trusted with actual governance.\nFFS, \"conservatives\" - do you not have anyone around to run for office that isn't a complete fucking embarrassment? Stop voting for awful fuckin people",
">\n\nI can't blame his voters on this one, he straight up lied to them. The people that are keeping him in gov't are the ones we need to worry about.",
">\n\n\n“My staff raised concerns when he had a staff member who impersonated my chief of staff, and that individual was let go when Mr. Santos found out about it,” McCarthy said Tuesday.\n\nshameless loser",
">\n\nTheoretically if he is deemed too risky to get a clearance, can Biden prevent him from getting security clearance for classified intel?",
">\n\nAs the commander in chief id say so. Congress just votes on legislation and handles the purse. Intel is much more relevant to the executive branch.",
">\n\nLol this right here shows how much the Speaker's power is neutered under McCarthy's negotiated rules. He has to seat a sociopathic liar who fraudulently damaged McCarthy's staff personally by impersonating them to get donations, and if he doesn't seat him Santos can demand a vote to remove McCarthy day after day after day. Pathetic.",
">\n\nAt this point Jeffries should offer a gimme to McCarthy - we won’t call for a new speaker unless at least 1 republican does, but we get the committee post. Santos can get the boot, Kev keeps his tenuous grasp on power (but still looks like shit), dems get a slightly better footing and some good press. McCarthy won’t do it, he can’t, but the offer alone would look magnanimous.",
">\n\nConservative voters really are the most easily manipulated, shameless suckers on the planet.",
">\n\nThey convince themselves democrats do the same thing so it's okay for them too. While simultaneously pretending they are held to a higher standard.\nNot even a strawman, that's as synopsis of every thread about him on r/conservative.",
">\n\nI was curious but didn’t want to venture over there.",
">\n\nCome on Brazil let's get that extradition party started.",
">\n\nJust when you think they can't go any lower they find a whole new way to do it...",
">\n\nIt's not a rabbit hole",
">\n\nJesus H. Fu*k. This guy needs to be in jail, and as far away from any real power as possible. \nWait, that could be any of the GOP house... ok, shit, I guess he fits right in then.",
">\n\nThe GOP is a criminal organization and Russia has the receipts. That means Russian assets like Santos have the receipts which means the GOP is over the barrel.",
">\n\nWell the American people just elected those criminals to run the house of representatives. I think it's the 70+ million people voting for the criminals that we really need to be worried about.",
">\n\nSo you can be a lying sack of shit, and suffer no consequences. Wonder if that will work for me on my next job search?🤔",
">\n\nMcCarthy is pandering to people like my cousin who was and is all in on Santos in that district and genuinely thinks that all the evidence against Santos is nonsense, that it's just \"embellishing your resume- everyone does it!\" and it's not a big deal so long as he, \"does what we want and helps stick it to the dirty cheater democrats.\"\nMcCarthy knows what he's doing... the group of diehards made up of people like my cousin could make or break things going forward in elections the same way the people opposing him in his bid for speaker for the first 14 rounds mucked his \"It's my turn!\" coronation up for him. McCarthy is concerned with holding his holding his title and nothing else right now.",
">\n\nTime for a motion to vacate from literally anybody. All it takes is one house member.",
">\n\nOf course.",
">\n\nWell he’s a reflection of the current party so who’s really surprised by this?",
">\n\nThe GOP don’t mind Liars and conmen as long as they lie and con for the GOP",
">\n\nThe thing trump did was show that the narcissists, sociopaths, abusers, and other general empathy-deficient grifters that they don't have to keep pretending to be decent members of society, that they can just relax and openly be their worst selves because reasonable people aren't going to enforce any punishment against them.",
">\n\nI didn't think McCarthy could have LESS credibility, but there it is.",
">\n\nMy inner conspiracy theorist is nagging at me. \nI feel like Santos is the patsy. Not sure for what yet, but he's the guy they happily get to pin it on.",
">\n\nJust shameful. Willfully corrupted.",
">\n\ni would say this is a joke but still waiting for the funny part of the absolute lack of repercussions for people lying to get into / maintain office.",
">\n\nA party of crooks, traitors, and sociopaths",
">\n\nGiven how corrupt he is, I'm surprised he is not chairing a committee.",
">\n\nThere is no bottom. So glad I left the GOP years ago!",
">\n\nIf you ever wanted evidence that nothing matters but what party you're a member of - this is it. \nIt doesn't matter what you stand for, believe, did or didn't do in your life. The only thing that matters is the letter next to your name.\nIf your company hired someone only to find out their resume was completely and laughably fradulent, could you work with them on your team? Could you share an office with them? Would you feel like your workplace had integrity if they kept him around?",
">\n\nLook everyone! The both sides guy!!",
">\n\nMcCarthy did not have the speaker votes without Santos' vote.",
">\n\nGuy looks like he's cosplaying pepe the frog. Big 'ol DSLs.",
">\n\nI feel bad for the writers or Veep who had some of their ideas thrown out for being too outlandish. In 20 years the show will be considered a drama because reality will be so much more ridiculous than the show.",
">\n\nUnder what name?",
">\n\nWould it be normal for a rookie congressman to be appointed to committees within the first few weeks/months of being sworn in?\nI always assumed committee membership was something that would come after having proven yourself to be competent and to have some degree of expertise in the area the committee covers",
">\n\nAll members are assigned committees regardless if you’re a first year or 22nd year. Committee spots for more prestigious and powerful committees are the ones reserved to those more senior and proven",
">\n\nGood to see pathological liars given representation in government.",
">\n\nHe's going lie about being on them regardless.",
">\n\nMcCarthy is the spineless twit the GOP deserves.",
">\n\nRepublicans have no shame. They are evil.",
">\n\nMcCarthy is such a pussy"
] |
>
How can we as a country stand for this behavior? What is this blind allegiance to party over country? This man is a liar. More than a liar. And his own party refuses to condemn him or do anything about it.
It’s an absolute disgrace.
|
[
"It's been like 2 weeks and McCarthy has shown already to be such a weak speaker. \nYou are given a free win. Condemn the liar. But nope, he gets committee seats. \nShows who is really running the show.",
">\n\n\nShows who is really running the show.\n\nVladimir Putin is pleased with his investment.",
">\n\nHopefully Santos will be fed bullshit classified intel just so we can time how quickly Putin remarks about it.",
">\n\nYou're acting like Putin doesn't already own the GOPs lol. Santos is definitely not his only source.",
">\n\nOh hell no, I’m definitely not implying he’s the only one. Just that any briefing given to him specifically should have some notable discrepancies (different names, numbers, locations) that would identify him as the leak. You know, protecting confidential info slightly more securely than the screener dvds sent out for Emmy voting.",
">\n\nSantos is a symbol of the entire Republican party.\nEntirely unscrupulous and amoral, and proudly so. All is acceptable in the pursuit of power.",
">\n\n\nunscrupulous and amoral, and proudly so\n\nAnother poster some time ago described them as \"virtue signaling,\" and I had to ask what's the exact opposite of that?\nA surprising number of others couldn't seem to grasp that \"virtue\" is not what they're signaling at all.",
">\n\nVice signaling?",
">\n\nDepravity flagging?",
">\n\nWill he also be given access to classified documents?",
">\n\nIt's OK. He'll simply say he's the President and declassify them with his mind.",
">\n\nI thought he already lied that Santos is the president?",
">\n\nSo this guy's a spy right? Like now we've seen him at Trump rallies years ago using different names. Running for office under different names. Everything he's said is false, but not in a confused Herschel Walker way. It's intentional. Right? Like we can see that he's a spy right?",
">\n\nDon’t forget about the piles of money he randomly finds",
">\n\nI don't think any of that money to Santos is random. It is payment, mostly from Russia, for services rendered. He just has to cause division and disarray within the US government, as ordered by Putin.",
">\n\nEh, tough leap to make. A moderately talented conman can somewhat easily bilk the Republican rank and file for millions of dollars. Particularly when he’s willing to go the extra mile and pay people to impersonate the staff of party leadership to bilk the wealthy donor class. \nIt’s more likely this is going to wind up being Bannon’s build the wall con turned up to 11. Perhaps with some international money mixed in.",
">\n\nSo a guy who couldn't legitimately get hired to sell me an insurance policy is being trusted with actual governance.\nFFS, \"conservatives\" - do you not have anyone around to run for office that isn't a complete fucking embarrassment? Stop voting for awful fuckin people",
">\n\nI can't blame his voters on this one, he straight up lied to them. The people that are keeping him in gov't are the ones we need to worry about.",
">\n\n\n“My staff raised concerns when he had a staff member who impersonated my chief of staff, and that individual was let go when Mr. Santos found out about it,” McCarthy said Tuesday.\n\nshameless loser",
">\n\nTheoretically if he is deemed too risky to get a clearance, can Biden prevent him from getting security clearance for classified intel?",
">\n\nAs the commander in chief id say so. Congress just votes on legislation and handles the purse. Intel is much more relevant to the executive branch.",
">\n\nLol this right here shows how much the Speaker's power is neutered under McCarthy's negotiated rules. He has to seat a sociopathic liar who fraudulently damaged McCarthy's staff personally by impersonating them to get donations, and if he doesn't seat him Santos can demand a vote to remove McCarthy day after day after day. Pathetic.",
">\n\nAt this point Jeffries should offer a gimme to McCarthy - we won’t call for a new speaker unless at least 1 republican does, but we get the committee post. Santos can get the boot, Kev keeps his tenuous grasp on power (but still looks like shit), dems get a slightly better footing and some good press. McCarthy won’t do it, he can’t, but the offer alone would look magnanimous.",
">\n\nConservative voters really are the most easily manipulated, shameless suckers on the planet.",
">\n\nThey convince themselves democrats do the same thing so it's okay for them too. While simultaneously pretending they are held to a higher standard.\nNot even a strawman, that's as synopsis of every thread about him on r/conservative.",
">\n\nI was curious but didn’t want to venture over there.",
">\n\nCome on Brazil let's get that extradition party started.",
">\n\nJust when you think they can't go any lower they find a whole new way to do it...",
">\n\nIt's not a rabbit hole",
">\n\nJesus H. Fu*k. This guy needs to be in jail, and as far away from any real power as possible. \nWait, that could be any of the GOP house... ok, shit, I guess he fits right in then.",
">\n\nThe GOP is a criminal organization and Russia has the receipts. That means Russian assets like Santos have the receipts which means the GOP is over the barrel.",
">\n\nWell the American people just elected those criminals to run the house of representatives. I think it's the 70+ million people voting for the criminals that we really need to be worried about.",
">\n\nSo you can be a lying sack of shit, and suffer no consequences. Wonder if that will work for me on my next job search?🤔",
">\n\nMcCarthy is pandering to people like my cousin who was and is all in on Santos in that district and genuinely thinks that all the evidence against Santos is nonsense, that it's just \"embellishing your resume- everyone does it!\" and it's not a big deal so long as he, \"does what we want and helps stick it to the dirty cheater democrats.\"\nMcCarthy knows what he's doing... the group of diehards made up of people like my cousin could make or break things going forward in elections the same way the people opposing him in his bid for speaker for the first 14 rounds mucked his \"It's my turn!\" coronation up for him. McCarthy is concerned with holding his holding his title and nothing else right now.",
">\n\nTime for a motion to vacate from literally anybody. All it takes is one house member.",
">\n\nOf course.",
">\n\nWell he’s a reflection of the current party so who’s really surprised by this?",
">\n\nThe GOP don’t mind Liars and conmen as long as they lie and con for the GOP",
">\n\nThe thing trump did was show that the narcissists, sociopaths, abusers, and other general empathy-deficient grifters that they don't have to keep pretending to be decent members of society, that they can just relax and openly be their worst selves because reasonable people aren't going to enforce any punishment against them.",
">\n\nI didn't think McCarthy could have LESS credibility, but there it is.",
">\n\nMy inner conspiracy theorist is nagging at me. \nI feel like Santos is the patsy. Not sure for what yet, but he's the guy they happily get to pin it on.",
">\n\nJust shameful. Willfully corrupted.",
">\n\ni would say this is a joke but still waiting for the funny part of the absolute lack of repercussions for people lying to get into / maintain office.",
">\n\nA party of crooks, traitors, and sociopaths",
">\n\nGiven how corrupt he is, I'm surprised he is not chairing a committee.",
">\n\nThere is no bottom. So glad I left the GOP years ago!",
">\n\nIf you ever wanted evidence that nothing matters but what party you're a member of - this is it. \nIt doesn't matter what you stand for, believe, did or didn't do in your life. The only thing that matters is the letter next to your name.\nIf your company hired someone only to find out their resume was completely and laughably fradulent, could you work with them on your team? Could you share an office with them? Would you feel like your workplace had integrity if they kept him around?",
">\n\nLook everyone! The both sides guy!!",
">\n\nMcCarthy did not have the speaker votes without Santos' vote.",
">\n\nGuy looks like he's cosplaying pepe the frog. Big 'ol DSLs.",
">\n\nI feel bad for the writers or Veep who had some of their ideas thrown out for being too outlandish. In 20 years the show will be considered a drama because reality will be so much more ridiculous than the show.",
">\n\nUnder what name?",
">\n\nWould it be normal for a rookie congressman to be appointed to committees within the first few weeks/months of being sworn in?\nI always assumed committee membership was something that would come after having proven yourself to be competent and to have some degree of expertise in the area the committee covers",
">\n\nAll members are assigned committees regardless if you’re a first year or 22nd year. Committee spots for more prestigious and powerful committees are the ones reserved to those more senior and proven",
">\n\nGood to see pathological liars given representation in government.",
">\n\nHe's going lie about being on them regardless.",
">\n\nMcCarthy is the spineless twit the GOP deserves.",
">\n\nRepublicans have no shame. They are evil.",
">\n\nMcCarthy is such a pussy",
">\n\nFirst, why? Secondly, on which committees would his expertise be applicable? The Ethics Committee?"
] |
>
Honest question: How many House members typically do NOT get seated on committees?
This looks to me like a move McCarthy's making simply to stick it to the criticism and media swarm around Santos's con.
|
[
"It's been like 2 weeks and McCarthy has shown already to be such a weak speaker. \nYou are given a free win. Condemn the liar. But nope, he gets committee seats. \nShows who is really running the show.",
">\n\n\nShows who is really running the show.\n\nVladimir Putin is pleased with his investment.",
">\n\nHopefully Santos will be fed bullshit classified intel just so we can time how quickly Putin remarks about it.",
">\n\nYou're acting like Putin doesn't already own the GOPs lol. Santos is definitely not his only source.",
">\n\nOh hell no, I’m definitely not implying he’s the only one. Just that any briefing given to him specifically should have some notable discrepancies (different names, numbers, locations) that would identify him as the leak. You know, protecting confidential info slightly more securely than the screener dvds sent out for Emmy voting.",
">\n\nSantos is a symbol of the entire Republican party.\nEntirely unscrupulous and amoral, and proudly so. All is acceptable in the pursuit of power.",
">\n\n\nunscrupulous and amoral, and proudly so\n\nAnother poster some time ago described them as \"virtue signaling,\" and I had to ask what's the exact opposite of that?\nA surprising number of others couldn't seem to grasp that \"virtue\" is not what they're signaling at all.",
">\n\nVice signaling?",
">\n\nDepravity flagging?",
">\n\nWill he also be given access to classified documents?",
">\n\nIt's OK. He'll simply say he's the President and declassify them with his mind.",
">\n\nI thought he already lied that Santos is the president?",
">\n\nSo this guy's a spy right? Like now we've seen him at Trump rallies years ago using different names. Running for office under different names. Everything he's said is false, but not in a confused Herschel Walker way. It's intentional. Right? Like we can see that he's a spy right?",
">\n\nDon’t forget about the piles of money he randomly finds",
">\n\nI don't think any of that money to Santos is random. It is payment, mostly from Russia, for services rendered. He just has to cause division and disarray within the US government, as ordered by Putin.",
">\n\nEh, tough leap to make. A moderately talented conman can somewhat easily bilk the Republican rank and file for millions of dollars. Particularly when he’s willing to go the extra mile and pay people to impersonate the staff of party leadership to bilk the wealthy donor class. \nIt’s more likely this is going to wind up being Bannon’s build the wall con turned up to 11. Perhaps with some international money mixed in.",
">\n\nSo a guy who couldn't legitimately get hired to sell me an insurance policy is being trusted with actual governance.\nFFS, \"conservatives\" - do you not have anyone around to run for office that isn't a complete fucking embarrassment? Stop voting for awful fuckin people",
">\n\nI can't blame his voters on this one, he straight up lied to them. The people that are keeping him in gov't are the ones we need to worry about.",
">\n\n\n“My staff raised concerns when he had a staff member who impersonated my chief of staff, and that individual was let go when Mr. Santos found out about it,” McCarthy said Tuesday.\n\nshameless loser",
">\n\nTheoretically if he is deemed too risky to get a clearance, can Biden prevent him from getting security clearance for classified intel?",
">\n\nAs the commander in chief id say so. Congress just votes on legislation and handles the purse. Intel is much more relevant to the executive branch.",
">\n\nLol this right here shows how much the Speaker's power is neutered under McCarthy's negotiated rules. He has to seat a sociopathic liar who fraudulently damaged McCarthy's staff personally by impersonating them to get donations, and if he doesn't seat him Santos can demand a vote to remove McCarthy day after day after day. Pathetic.",
">\n\nAt this point Jeffries should offer a gimme to McCarthy - we won’t call for a new speaker unless at least 1 republican does, but we get the committee post. Santos can get the boot, Kev keeps his tenuous grasp on power (but still looks like shit), dems get a slightly better footing and some good press. McCarthy won’t do it, he can’t, but the offer alone would look magnanimous.",
">\n\nConservative voters really are the most easily manipulated, shameless suckers on the planet.",
">\n\nThey convince themselves democrats do the same thing so it's okay for them too. While simultaneously pretending they are held to a higher standard.\nNot even a strawman, that's as synopsis of every thread about him on r/conservative.",
">\n\nI was curious but didn’t want to venture over there.",
">\n\nCome on Brazil let's get that extradition party started.",
">\n\nJust when you think they can't go any lower they find a whole new way to do it...",
">\n\nIt's not a rabbit hole",
">\n\nJesus H. Fu*k. This guy needs to be in jail, and as far away from any real power as possible. \nWait, that could be any of the GOP house... ok, shit, I guess he fits right in then.",
">\n\nThe GOP is a criminal organization and Russia has the receipts. That means Russian assets like Santos have the receipts which means the GOP is over the barrel.",
">\n\nWell the American people just elected those criminals to run the house of representatives. I think it's the 70+ million people voting for the criminals that we really need to be worried about.",
">\n\nSo you can be a lying sack of shit, and suffer no consequences. Wonder if that will work for me on my next job search?🤔",
">\n\nMcCarthy is pandering to people like my cousin who was and is all in on Santos in that district and genuinely thinks that all the evidence against Santos is nonsense, that it's just \"embellishing your resume- everyone does it!\" and it's not a big deal so long as he, \"does what we want and helps stick it to the dirty cheater democrats.\"\nMcCarthy knows what he's doing... the group of diehards made up of people like my cousin could make or break things going forward in elections the same way the people opposing him in his bid for speaker for the first 14 rounds mucked his \"It's my turn!\" coronation up for him. McCarthy is concerned with holding his holding his title and nothing else right now.",
">\n\nTime for a motion to vacate from literally anybody. All it takes is one house member.",
">\n\nOf course.",
">\n\nWell he’s a reflection of the current party so who’s really surprised by this?",
">\n\nThe GOP don’t mind Liars and conmen as long as they lie and con for the GOP",
">\n\nThe thing trump did was show that the narcissists, sociopaths, abusers, and other general empathy-deficient grifters that they don't have to keep pretending to be decent members of society, that they can just relax and openly be their worst selves because reasonable people aren't going to enforce any punishment against them.",
">\n\nI didn't think McCarthy could have LESS credibility, but there it is.",
">\n\nMy inner conspiracy theorist is nagging at me. \nI feel like Santos is the patsy. Not sure for what yet, but he's the guy they happily get to pin it on.",
">\n\nJust shameful. Willfully corrupted.",
">\n\ni would say this is a joke but still waiting for the funny part of the absolute lack of repercussions for people lying to get into / maintain office.",
">\n\nA party of crooks, traitors, and sociopaths",
">\n\nGiven how corrupt he is, I'm surprised he is not chairing a committee.",
">\n\nThere is no bottom. So glad I left the GOP years ago!",
">\n\nIf you ever wanted evidence that nothing matters but what party you're a member of - this is it. \nIt doesn't matter what you stand for, believe, did or didn't do in your life. The only thing that matters is the letter next to your name.\nIf your company hired someone only to find out their resume was completely and laughably fradulent, could you work with them on your team? Could you share an office with them? Would you feel like your workplace had integrity if they kept him around?",
">\n\nLook everyone! The both sides guy!!",
">\n\nMcCarthy did not have the speaker votes without Santos' vote.",
">\n\nGuy looks like he's cosplaying pepe the frog. Big 'ol DSLs.",
">\n\nI feel bad for the writers or Veep who had some of their ideas thrown out for being too outlandish. In 20 years the show will be considered a drama because reality will be so much more ridiculous than the show.",
">\n\nUnder what name?",
">\n\nWould it be normal for a rookie congressman to be appointed to committees within the first few weeks/months of being sworn in?\nI always assumed committee membership was something that would come after having proven yourself to be competent and to have some degree of expertise in the area the committee covers",
">\n\nAll members are assigned committees regardless if you’re a first year or 22nd year. Committee spots for more prestigious and powerful committees are the ones reserved to those more senior and proven",
">\n\nGood to see pathological liars given representation in government.",
">\n\nHe's going lie about being on them regardless.",
">\n\nMcCarthy is the spineless twit the GOP deserves.",
">\n\nRepublicans have no shame. They are evil.",
">\n\nMcCarthy is such a pussy",
">\n\nFirst, why? Secondly, on which committees would his expertise be applicable? The Ethics Committee?",
">\n\nHow can we as a country stand for this behavior? What is this blind allegiance to party over country? This man is a liar. More than a liar. And his own party refuses to condemn him or do anything about it. \nIt’s an absolute disgrace."
] |
>
If he's nothing else he's an (R) vote. And right now, McCarthy knows he/they basically need to take them literally however he/they can get them.
There's a bonus to this in that it will "trigger dems" so I'm sure that's a big component of it. the absence of any shame is pretty stunning though. I mean I'm not surprised but its still very distasteful.
|
[
"It's been like 2 weeks and McCarthy has shown already to be such a weak speaker. \nYou are given a free win. Condemn the liar. But nope, he gets committee seats. \nShows who is really running the show.",
">\n\n\nShows who is really running the show.\n\nVladimir Putin is pleased with his investment.",
">\n\nHopefully Santos will be fed bullshit classified intel just so we can time how quickly Putin remarks about it.",
">\n\nYou're acting like Putin doesn't already own the GOPs lol. Santos is definitely not his only source.",
">\n\nOh hell no, I’m definitely not implying he’s the only one. Just that any briefing given to him specifically should have some notable discrepancies (different names, numbers, locations) that would identify him as the leak. You know, protecting confidential info slightly more securely than the screener dvds sent out for Emmy voting.",
">\n\nSantos is a symbol of the entire Republican party.\nEntirely unscrupulous and amoral, and proudly so. All is acceptable in the pursuit of power.",
">\n\n\nunscrupulous and amoral, and proudly so\n\nAnother poster some time ago described them as \"virtue signaling,\" and I had to ask what's the exact opposite of that?\nA surprising number of others couldn't seem to grasp that \"virtue\" is not what they're signaling at all.",
">\n\nVice signaling?",
">\n\nDepravity flagging?",
">\n\nWill he also be given access to classified documents?",
">\n\nIt's OK. He'll simply say he's the President and declassify them with his mind.",
">\n\nI thought he already lied that Santos is the president?",
">\n\nSo this guy's a spy right? Like now we've seen him at Trump rallies years ago using different names. Running for office under different names. Everything he's said is false, but not in a confused Herschel Walker way. It's intentional. Right? Like we can see that he's a spy right?",
">\n\nDon’t forget about the piles of money he randomly finds",
">\n\nI don't think any of that money to Santos is random. It is payment, mostly from Russia, for services rendered. He just has to cause division and disarray within the US government, as ordered by Putin.",
">\n\nEh, tough leap to make. A moderately talented conman can somewhat easily bilk the Republican rank and file for millions of dollars. Particularly when he’s willing to go the extra mile and pay people to impersonate the staff of party leadership to bilk the wealthy donor class. \nIt’s more likely this is going to wind up being Bannon’s build the wall con turned up to 11. Perhaps with some international money mixed in.",
">\n\nSo a guy who couldn't legitimately get hired to sell me an insurance policy is being trusted with actual governance.\nFFS, \"conservatives\" - do you not have anyone around to run for office that isn't a complete fucking embarrassment? Stop voting for awful fuckin people",
">\n\nI can't blame his voters on this one, he straight up lied to them. The people that are keeping him in gov't are the ones we need to worry about.",
">\n\n\n“My staff raised concerns when he had a staff member who impersonated my chief of staff, and that individual was let go when Mr. Santos found out about it,” McCarthy said Tuesday.\n\nshameless loser",
">\n\nTheoretically if he is deemed too risky to get a clearance, can Biden prevent him from getting security clearance for classified intel?",
">\n\nAs the commander in chief id say so. Congress just votes on legislation and handles the purse. Intel is much more relevant to the executive branch.",
">\n\nLol this right here shows how much the Speaker's power is neutered under McCarthy's negotiated rules. He has to seat a sociopathic liar who fraudulently damaged McCarthy's staff personally by impersonating them to get donations, and if he doesn't seat him Santos can demand a vote to remove McCarthy day after day after day. Pathetic.",
">\n\nAt this point Jeffries should offer a gimme to McCarthy - we won’t call for a new speaker unless at least 1 republican does, but we get the committee post. Santos can get the boot, Kev keeps his tenuous grasp on power (but still looks like shit), dems get a slightly better footing and some good press. McCarthy won’t do it, he can’t, but the offer alone would look magnanimous.",
">\n\nConservative voters really are the most easily manipulated, shameless suckers on the planet.",
">\n\nThey convince themselves democrats do the same thing so it's okay for them too. While simultaneously pretending they are held to a higher standard.\nNot even a strawman, that's as synopsis of every thread about him on r/conservative.",
">\n\nI was curious but didn’t want to venture over there.",
">\n\nCome on Brazil let's get that extradition party started.",
">\n\nJust when you think they can't go any lower they find a whole new way to do it...",
">\n\nIt's not a rabbit hole",
">\n\nJesus H. Fu*k. This guy needs to be in jail, and as far away from any real power as possible. \nWait, that could be any of the GOP house... ok, shit, I guess he fits right in then.",
">\n\nThe GOP is a criminal organization and Russia has the receipts. That means Russian assets like Santos have the receipts which means the GOP is over the barrel.",
">\n\nWell the American people just elected those criminals to run the house of representatives. I think it's the 70+ million people voting for the criminals that we really need to be worried about.",
">\n\nSo you can be a lying sack of shit, and suffer no consequences. Wonder if that will work for me on my next job search?🤔",
">\n\nMcCarthy is pandering to people like my cousin who was and is all in on Santos in that district and genuinely thinks that all the evidence against Santos is nonsense, that it's just \"embellishing your resume- everyone does it!\" and it's not a big deal so long as he, \"does what we want and helps stick it to the dirty cheater democrats.\"\nMcCarthy knows what he's doing... the group of diehards made up of people like my cousin could make or break things going forward in elections the same way the people opposing him in his bid for speaker for the first 14 rounds mucked his \"It's my turn!\" coronation up for him. McCarthy is concerned with holding his holding his title and nothing else right now.",
">\n\nTime for a motion to vacate from literally anybody. All it takes is one house member.",
">\n\nOf course.",
">\n\nWell he’s a reflection of the current party so who’s really surprised by this?",
">\n\nThe GOP don’t mind Liars and conmen as long as they lie and con for the GOP",
">\n\nThe thing trump did was show that the narcissists, sociopaths, abusers, and other general empathy-deficient grifters that they don't have to keep pretending to be decent members of society, that they can just relax and openly be their worst selves because reasonable people aren't going to enforce any punishment against them.",
">\n\nI didn't think McCarthy could have LESS credibility, but there it is.",
">\n\nMy inner conspiracy theorist is nagging at me. \nI feel like Santos is the patsy. Not sure for what yet, but he's the guy they happily get to pin it on.",
">\n\nJust shameful. Willfully corrupted.",
">\n\ni would say this is a joke but still waiting for the funny part of the absolute lack of repercussions for people lying to get into / maintain office.",
">\n\nA party of crooks, traitors, and sociopaths",
">\n\nGiven how corrupt he is, I'm surprised he is not chairing a committee.",
">\n\nThere is no bottom. So glad I left the GOP years ago!",
">\n\nIf you ever wanted evidence that nothing matters but what party you're a member of - this is it. \nIt doesn't matter what you stand for, believe, did or didn't do in your life. The only thing that matters is the letter next to your name.\nIf your company hired someone only to find out their resume was completely and laughably fradulent, could you work with them on your team? Could you share an office with them? Would you feel like your workplace had integrity if they kept him around?",
">\n\nLook everyone! The both sides guy!!",
">\n\nMcCarthy did not have the speaker votes without Santos' vote.",
">\n\nGuy looks like he's cosplaying pepe the frog. Big 'ol DSLs.",
">\n\nI feel bad for the writers or Veep who had some of their ideas thrown out for being too outlandish. In 20 years the show will be considered a drama because reality will be so much more ridiculous than the show.",
">\n\nUnder what name?",
">\n\nWould it be normal for a rookie congressman to be appointed to committees within the first few weeks/months of being sworn in?\nI always assumed committee membership was something that would come after having proven yourself to be competent and to have some degree of expertise in the area the committee covers",
">\n\nAll members are assigned committees regardless if you’re a first year or 22nd year. Committee spots for more prestigious and powerful committees are the ones reserved to those more senior and proven",
">\n\nGood to see pathological liars given representation in government.",
">\n\nHe's going lie about being on them regardless.",
">\n\nMcCarthy is the spineless twit the GOP deserves.",
">\n\nRepublicans have no shame. They are evil.",
">\n\nMcCarthy is such a pussy",
">\n\nFirst, why? Secondly, on which committees would his expertise be applicable? The Ethics Committee?",
">\n\nHow can we as a country stand for this behavior? What is this blind allegiance to party over country? This man is a liar. More than a liar. And his own party refuses to condemn him or do anything about it. \nIt’s an absolute disgrace.",
">\n\nHonest question: How many House members typically do NOT get seated on committees?\nThis looks to me like a move McCarthy's making simply to stick it to the criticism and media swarm around Santos's con."
] |
>
McCarthy says I will be seated on committees.
|
[
"It's been like 2 weeks and McCarthy has shown already to be such a weak speaker. \nYou are given a free win. Condemn the liar. But nope, he gets committee seats. \nShows who is really running the show.",
">\n\n\nShows who is really running the show.\n\nVladimir Putin is pleased with his investment.",
">\n\nHopefully Santos will be fed bullshit classified intel just so we can time how quickly Putin remarks about it.",
">\n\nYou're acting like Putin doesn't already own the GOPs lol. Santos is definitely not his only source.",
">\n\nOh hell no, I’m definitely not implying he’s the only one. Just that any briefing given to him specifically should have some notable discrepancies (different names, numbers, locations) that would identify him as the leak. You know, protecting confidential info slightly more securely than the screener dvds sent out for Emmy voting.",
">\n\nSantos is a symbol of the entire Republican party.\nEntirely unscrupulous and amoral, and proudly so. All is acceptable in the pursuit of power.",
">\n\n\nunscrupulous and amoral, and proudly so\n\nAnother poster some time ago described them as \"virtue signaling,\" and I had to ask what's the exact opposite of that?\nA surprising number of others couldn't seem to grasp that \"virtue\" is not what they're signaling at all.",
">\n\nVice signaling?",
">\n\nDepravity flagging?",
">\n\nWill he also be given access to classified documents?",
">\n\nIt's OK. He'll simply say he's the President and declassify them with his mind.",
">\n\nI thought he already lied that Santos is the president?",
">\n\nSo this guy's a spy right? Like now we've seen him at Trump rallies years ago using different names. Running for office under different names. Everything he's said is false, but not in a confused Herschel Walker way. It's intentional. Right? Like we can see that he's a spy right?",
">\n\nDon’t forget about the piles of money he randomly finds",
">\n\nI don't think any of that money to Santos is random. It is payment, mostly from Russia, for services rendered. He just has to cause division and disarray within the US government, as ordered by Putin.",
">\n\nEh, tough leap to make. A moderately talented conman can somewhat easily bilk the Republican rank and file for millions of dollars. Particularly when he’s willing to go the extra mile and pay people to impersonate the staff of party leadership to bilk the wealthy donor class. \nIt’s more likely this is going to wind up being Bannon’s build the wall con turned up to 11. Perhaps with some international money mixed in.",
">\n\nSo a guy who couldn't legitimately get hired to sell me an insurance policy is being trusted with actual governance.\nFFS, \"conservatives\" - do you not have anyone around to run for office that isn't a complete fucking embarrassment? Stop voting for awful fuckin people",
">\n\nI can't blame his voters on this one, he straight up lied to them. The people that are keeping him in gov't are the ones we need to worry about.",
">\n\n\n“My staff raised concerns when he had a staff member who impersonated my chief of staff, and that individual was let go when Mr. Santos found out about it,” McCarthy said Tuesday.\n\nshameless loser",
">\n\nTheoretically if he is deemed too risky to get a clearance, can Biden prevent him from getting security clearance for classified intel?",
">\n\nAs the commander in chief id say so. Congress just votes on legislation and handles the purse. Intel is much more relevant to the executive branch.",
">\n\nLol this right here shows how much the Speaker's power is neutered under McCarthy's negotiated rules. He has to seat a sociopathic liar who fraudulently damaged McCarthy's staff personally by impersonating them to get donations, and if he doesn't seat him Santos can demand a vote to remove McCarthy day after day after day. Pathetic.",
">\n\nAt this point Jeffries should offer a gimme to McCarthy - we won’t call for a new speaker unless at least 1 republican does, but we get the committee post. Santos can get the boot, Kev keeps his tenuous grasp on power (but still looks like shit), dems get a slightly better footing and some good press. McCarthy won’t do it, he can’t, but the offer alone would look magnanimous.",
">\n\nConservative voters really are the most easily manipulated, shameless suckers on the planet.",
">\n\nThey convince themselves democrats do the same thing so it's okay for them too. While simultaneously pretending they are held to a higher standard.\nNot even a strawman, that's as synopsis of every thread about him on r/conservative.",
">\n\nI was curious but didn’t want to venture over there.",
">\n\nCome on Brazil let's get that extradition party started.",
">\n\nJust when you think they can't go any lower they find a whole new way to do it...",
">\n\nIt's not a rabbit hole",
">\n\nJesus H. Fu*k. This guy needs to be in jail, and as far away from any real power as possible. \nWait, that could be any of the GOP house... ok, shit, I guess he fits right in then.",
">\n\nThe GOP is a criminal organization and Russia has the receipts. That means Russian assets like Santos have the receipts which means the GOP is over the barrel.",
">\n\nWell the American people just elected those criminals to run the house of representatives. I think it's the 70+ million people voting for the criminals that we really need to be worried about.",
">\n\nSo you can be a lying sack of shit, and suffer no consequences. Wonder if that will work for me on my next job search?🤔",
">\n\nMcCarthy is pandering to people like my cousin who was and is all in on Santos in that district and genuinely thinks that all the evidence against Santos is nonsense, that it's just \"embellishing your resume- everyone does it!\" and it's not a big deal so long as he, \"does what we want and helps stick it to the dirty cheater democrats.\"\nMcCarthy knows what he's doing... the group of diehards made up of people like my cousin could make or break things going forward in elections the same way the people opposing him in his bid for speaker for the first 14 rounds mucked his \"It's my turn!\" coronation up for him. McCarthy is concerned with holding his holding his title and nothing else right now.",
">\n\nTime for a motion to vacate from literally anybody. All it takes is one house member.",
">\n\nOf course.",
">\n\nWell he’s a reflection of the current party so who’s really surprised by this?",
">\n\nThe GOP don’t mind Liars and conmen as long as they lie and con for the GOP",
">\n\nThe thing trump did was show that the narcissists, sociopaths, abusers, and other general empathy-deficient grifters that they don't have to keep pretending to be decent members of society, that they can just relax and openly be their worst selves because reasonable people aren't going to enforce any punishment against them.",
">\n\nI didn't think McCarthy could have LESS credibility, but there it is.",
">\n\nMy inner conspiracy theorist is nagging at me. \nI feel like Santos is the patsy. Not sure for what yet, but he's the guy they happily get to pin it on.",
">\n\nJust shameful. Willfully corrupted.",
">\n\ni would say this is a joke but still waiting for the funny part of the absolute lack of repercussions for people lying to get into / maintain office.",
">\n\nA party of crooks, traitors, and sociopaths",
">\n\nGiven how corrupt he is, I'm surprised he is not chairing a committee.",
">\n\nThere is no bottom. So glad I left the GOP years ago!",
">\n\nIf you ever wanted evidence that nothing matters but what party you're a member of - this is it. \nIt doesn't matter what you stand for, believe, did or didn't do in your life. The only thing that matters is the letter next to your name.\nIf your company hired someone only to find out their resume was completely and laughably fradulent, could you work with them on your team? Could you share an office with them? Would you feel like your workplace had integrity if they kept him around?",
">\n\nLook everyone! The both sides guy!!",
">\n\nMcCarthy did not have the speaker votes without Santos' vote.",
">\n\nGuy looks like he's cosplaying pepe the frog. Big 'ol DSLs.",
">\n\nI feel bad for the writers or Veep who had some of their ideas thrown out for being too outlandish. In 20 years the show will be considered a drama because reality will be so much more ridiculous than the show.",
">\n\nUnder what name?",
">\n\nWould it be normal for a rookie congressman to be appointed to committees within the first few weeks/months of being sworn in?\nI always assumed committee membership was something that would come after having proven yourself to be competent and to have some degree of expertise in the area the committee covers",
">\n\nAll members are assigned committees regardless if you’re a first year or 22nd year. Committee spots for more prestigious and powerful committees are the ones reserved to those more senior and proven",
">\n\nGood to see pathological liars given representation in government.",
">\n\nHe's going lie about being on them regardless.",
">\n\nMcCarthy is the spineless twit the GOP deserves.",
">\n\nRepublicans have no shame. They are evil.",
">\n\nMcCarthy is such a pussy",
">\n\nFirst, why? Secondly, on which committees would his expertise be applicable? The Ethics Committee?",
">\n\nHow can we as a country stand for this behavior? What is this blind allegiance to party over country? This man is a liar. More than a liar. And his own party refuses to condemn him or do anything about it. \nIt’s an absolute disgrace.",
">\n\nHonest question: How many House members typically do NOT get seated on committees?\nThis looks to me like a move McCarthy's making simply to stick it to the criticism and media swarm around Santos's con.",
">\n\nIf he's nothing else he's an (R) vote. And right now, McCarthy knows he/they basically need to take them literally however he/they can get them. \nThere's a bonus to this in that it will \"trigger dems\" so I'm sure that's a big component of it. the absence of any shame is pretty stunning though. I mean I'm not surprised but its still very distasteful."
] |
>
Better nail down the seats.
|
[
"It's been like 2 weeks and McCarthy has shown already to be such a weak speaker. \nYou are given a free win. Condemn the liar. But nope, he gets committee seats. \nShows who is really running the show.",
">\n\n\nShows who is really running the show.\n\nVladimir Putin is pleased with his investment.",
">\n\nHopefully Santos will be fed bullshit classified intel just so we can time how quickly Putin remarks about it.",
">\n\nYou're acting like Putin doesn't already own the GOPs lol. Santos is definitely not his only source.",
">\n\nOh hell no, I’m definitely not implying he’s the only one. Just that any briefing given to him specifically should have some notable discrepancies (different names, numbers, locations) that would identify him as the leak. You know, protecting confidential info slightly more securely than the screener dvds sent out for Emmy voting.",
">\n\nSantos is a symbol of the entire Republican party.\nEntirely unscrupulous and amoral, and proudly so. All is acceptable in the pursuit of power.",
">\n\n\nunscrupulous and amoral, and proudly so\n\nAnother poster some time ago described them as \"virtue signaling,\" and I had to ask what's the exact opposite of that?\nA surprising number of others couldn't seem to grasp that \"virtue\" is not what they're signaling at all.",
">\n\nVice signaling?",
">\n\nDepravity flagging?",
">\n\nWill he also be given access to classified documents?",
">\n\nIt's OK. He'll simply say he's the President and declassify them with his mind.",
">\n\nI thought he already lied that Santos is the president?",
">\n\nSo this guy's a spy right? Like now we've seen him at Trump rallies years ago using different names. Running for office under different names. Everything he's said is false, but not in a confused Herschel Walker way. It's intentional. Right? Like we can see that he's a spy right?",
">\n\nDon’t forget about the piles of money he randomly finds",
">\n\nI don't think any of that money to Santos is random. It is payment, mostly from Russia, for services rendered. He just has to cause division and disarray within the US government, as ordered by Putin.",
">\n\nEh, tough leap to make. A moderately talented conman can somewhat easily bilk the Republican rank and file for millions of dollars. Particularly when he’s willing to go the extra mile and pay people to impersonate the staff of party leadership to bilk the wealthy donor class. \nIt’s more likely this is going to wind up being Bannon’s build the wall con turned up to 11. Perhaps with some international money mixed in.",
">\n\nSo a guy who couldn't legitimately get hired to sell me an insurance policy is being trusted with actual governance.\nFFS, \"conservatives\" - do you not have anyone around to run for office that isn't a complete fucking embarrassment? Stop voting for awful fuckin people",
">\n\nI can't blame his voters on this one, he straight up lied to them. The people that are keeping him in gov't are the ones we need to worry about.",
">\n\n\n“My staff raised concerns when he had a staff member who impersonated my chief of staff, and that individual was let go when Mr. Santos found out about it,” McCarthy said Tuesday.\n\nshameless loser",
">\n\nTheoretically if he is deemed too risky to get a clearance, can Biden prevent him from getting security clearance for classified intel?",
">\n\nAs the commander in chief id say so. Congress just votes on legislation and handles the purse. Intel is much more relevant to the executive branch.",
">\n\nLol this right here shows how much the Speaker's power is neutered under McCarthy's negotiated rules. He has to seat a sociopathic liar who fraudulently damaged McCarthy's staff personally by impersonating them to get donations, and if he doesn't seat him Santos can demand a vote to remove McCarthy day after day after day. Pathetic.",
">\n\nAt this point Jeffries should offer a gimme to McCarthy - we won’t call for a new speaker unless at least 1 republican does, but we get the committee post. Santos can get the boot, Kev keeps his tenuous grasp on power (but still looks like shit), dems get a slightly better footing and some good press. McCarthy won’t do it, he can’t, but the offer alone would look magnanimous.",
">\n\nConservative voters really are the most easily manipulated, shameless suckers on the planet.",
">\n\nThey convince themselves democrats do the same thing so it's okay for them too. While simultaneously pretending they are held to a higher standard.\nNot even a strawman, that's as synopsis of every thread about him on r/conservative.",
">\n\nI was curious but didn’t want to venture over there.",
">\n\nCome on Brazil let's get that extradition party started.",
">\n\nJust when you think they can't go any lower they find a whole new way to do it...",
">\n\nIt's not a rabbit hole",
">\n\nJesus H. Fu*k. This guy needs to be in jail, and as far away from any real power as possible. \nWait, that could be any of the GOP house... ok, shit, I guess he fits right in then.",
">\n\nThe GOP is a criminal organization and Russia has the receipts. That means Russian assets like Santos have the receipts which means the GOP is over the barrel.",
">\n\nWell the American people just elected those criminals to run the house of representatives. I think it's the 70+ million people voting for the criminals that we really need to be worried about.",
">\n\nSo you can be a lying sack of shit, and suffer no consequences. Wonder if that will work for me on my next job search?🤔",
">\n\nMcCarthy is pandering to people like my cousin who was and is all in on Santos in that district and genuinely thinks that all the evidence against Santos is nonsense, that it's just \"embellishing your resume- everyone does it!\" and it's not a big deal so long as he, \"does what we want and helps stick it to the dirty cheater democrats.\"\nMcCarthy knows what he's doing... the group of diehards made up of people like my cousin could make or break things going forward in elections the same way the people opposing him in his bid for speaker for the first 14 rounds mucked his \"It's my turn!\" coronation up for him. McCarthy is concerned with holding his holding his title and nothing else right now.",
">\n\nTime for a motion to vacate from literally anybody. All it takes is one house member.",
">\n\nOf course.",
">\n\nWell he’s a reflection of the current party so who’s really surprised by this?",
">\n\nThe GOP don’t mind Liars and conmen as long as they lie and con for the GOP",
">\n\nThe thing trump did was show that the narcissists, sociopaths, abusers, and other general empathy-deficient grifters that they don't have to keep pretending to be decent members of society, that they can just relax and openly be their worst selves because reasonable people aren't going to enforce any punishment against them.",
">\n\nI didn't think McCarthy could have LESS credibility, but there it is.",
">\n\nMy inner conspiracy theorist is nagging at me. \nI feel like Santos is the patsy. Not sure for what yet, but he's the guy they happily get to pin it on.",
">\n\nJust shameful. Willfully corrupted.",
">\n\ni would say this is a joke but still waiting for the funny part of the absolute lack of repercussions for people lying to get into / maintain office.",
">\n\nA party of crooks, traitors, and sociopaths",
">\n\nGiven how corrupt he is, I'm surprised he is not chairing a committee.",
">\n\nThere is no bottom. So glad I left the GOP years ago!",
">\n\nIf you ever wanted evidence that nothing matters but what party you're a member of - this is it. \nIt doesn't matter what you stand for, believe, did or didn't do in your life. The only thing that matters is the letter next to your name.\nIf your company hired someone only to find out their resume was completely and laughably fradulent, could you work with them on your team? Could you share an office with them? Would you feel like your workplace had integrity if they kept him around?",
">\n\nLook everyone! The both sides guy!!",
">\n\nMcCarthy did not have the speaker votes without Santos' vote.",
">\n\nGuy looks like he's cosplaying pepe the frog. Big 'ol DSLs.",
">\n\nI feel bad for the writers or Veep who had some of their ideas thrown out for being too outlandish. In 20 years the show will be considered a drama because reality will be so much more ridiculous than the show.",
">\n\nUnder what name?",
">\n\nWould it be normal for a rookie congressman to be appointed to committees within the first few weeks/months of being sworn in?\nI always assumed committee membership was something that would come after having proven yourself to be competent and to have some degree of expertise in the area the committee covers",
">\n\nAll members are assigned committees regardless if you’re a first year or 22nd year. Committee spots for more prestigious and powerful committees are the ones reserved to those more senior and proven",
">\n\nGood to see pathological liars given representation in government.",
">\n\nHe's going lie about being on them regardless.",
">\n\nMcCarthy is the spineless twit the GOP deserves.",
">\n\nRepublicans have no shame. They are evil.",
">\n\nMcCarthy is such a pussy",
">\n\nFirst, why? Secondly, on which committees would his expertise be applicable? The Ethics Committee?",
">\n\nHow can we as a country stand for this behavior? What is this blind allegiance to party over country? This man is a liar. More than a liar. And his own party refuses to condemn him or do anything about it. \nIt’s an absolute disgrace.",
">\n\nHonest question: How many House members typically do NOT get seated on committees?\nThis looks to me like a move McCarthy's making simply to stick it to the criticism and media swarm around Santos's con.",
">\n\nIf he's nothing else he's an (R) vote. And right now, McCarthy knows he/they basically need to take them literally however he/they can get them. \nThere's a bonus to this in that it will \"trigger dems\" so I'm sure that's a big component of it. the absence of any shame is pretty stunning though. I mean I'm not surprised but its still very distasteful.",
">\n\nMcCarthy says I will be seated on committees."
] |
>
Santos says McCarthy will step down and he will be elected Speaker. He also opines that Biden will step down after Vice President Harris steps down and he will be President in late 2023. It must be true, you heard it on the internet.
|
[
"It's been like 2 weeks and McCarthy has shown already to be such a weak speaker. \nYou are given a free win. Condemn the liar. But nope, he gets committee seats. \nShows who is really running the show.",
">\n\n\nShows who is really running the show.\n\nVladimir Putin is pleased with his investment.",
">\n\nHopefully Santos will be fed bullshit classified intel just so we can time how quickly Putin remarks about it.",
">\n\nYou're acting like Putin doesn't already own the GOPs lol. Santos is definitely not his only source.",
">\n\nOh hell no, I’m definitely not implying he’s the only one. Just that any briefing given to him specifically should have some notable discrepancies (different names, numbers, locations) that would identify him as the leak. You know, protecting confidential info slightly more securely than the screener dvds sent out for Emmy voting.",
">\n\nSantos is a symbol of the entire Republican party.\nEntirely unscrupulous and amoral, and proudly so. All is acceptable in the pursuit of power.",
">\n\n\nunscrupulous and amoral, and proudly so\n\nAnother poster some time ago described them as \"virtue signaling,\" and I had to ask what's the exact opposite of that?\nA surprising number of others couldn't seem to grasp that \"virtue\" is not what they're signaling at all.",
">\n\nVice signaling?",
">\n\nDepravity flagging?",
">\n\nWill he also be given access to classified documents?",
">\n\nIt's OK. He'll simply say he's the President and declassify them with his mind.",
">\n\nI thought he already lied that Santos is the president?",
">\n\nSo this guy's a spy right? Like now we've seen him at Trump rallies years ago using different names. Running for office under different names. Everything he's said is false, but not in a confused Herschel Walker way. It's intentional. Right? Like we can see that he's a spy right?",
">\n\nDon’t forget about the piles of money he randomly finds",
">\n\nI don't think any of that money to Santos is random. It is payment, mostly from Russia, for services rendered. He just has to cause division and disarray within the US government, as ordered by Putin.",
">\n\nEh, tough leap to make. A moderately talented conman can somewhat easily bilk the Republican rank and file for millions of dollars. Particularly when he’s willing to go the extra mile and pay people to impersonate the staff of party leadership to bilk the wealthy donor class. \nIt’s more likely this is going to wind up being Bannon’s build the wall con turned up to 11. Perhaps with some international money mixed in.",
">\n\nSo a guy who couldn't legitimately get hired to sell me an insurance policy is being trusted with actual governance.\nFFS, \"conservatives\" - do you not have anyone around to run for office that isn't a complete fucking embarrassment? Stop voting for awful fuckin people",
">\n\nI can't blame his voters on this one, he straight up lied to them. The people that are keeping him in gov't are the ones we need to worry about.",
">\n\n\n“My staff raised concerns when he had a staff member who impersonated my chief of staff, and that individual was let go when Mr. Santos found out about it,” McCarthy said Tuesday.\n\nshameless loser",
">\n\nTheoretically if he is deemed too risky to get a clearance, can Biden prevent him from getting security clearance for classified intel?",
">\n\nAs the commander in chief id say so. Congress just votes on legislation and handles the purse. Intel is much more relevant to the executive branch.",
">\n\nLol this right here shows how much the Speaker's power is neutered under McCarthy's negotiated rules. He has to seat a sociopathic liar who fraudulently damaged McCarthy's staff personally by impersonating them to get donations, and if he doesn't seat him Santos can demand a vote to remove McCarthy day after day after day. Pathetic.",
">\n\nAt this point Jeffries should offer a gimme to McCarthy - we won’t call for a new speaker unless at least 1 republican does, but we get the committee post. Santos can get the boot, Kev keeps his tenuous grasp on power (but still looks like shit), dems get a slightly better footing and some good press. McCarthy won’t do it, he can’t, but the offer alone would look magnanimous.",
">\n\nConservative voters really are the most easily manipulated, shameless suckers on the planet.",
">\n\nThey convince themselves democrats do the same thing so it's okay for them too. While simultaneously pretending they are held to a higher standard.\nNot even a strawman, that's as synopsis of every thread about him on r/conservative.",
">\n\nI was curious but didn’t want to venture over there.",
">\n\nCome on Brazil let's get that extradition party started.",
">\n\nJust when you think they can't go any lower they find a whole new way to do it...",
">\n\nIt's not a rabbit hole",
">\n\nJesus H. Fu*k. This guy needs to be in jail, and as far away from any real power as possible. \nWait, that could be any of the GOP house... ok, shit, I guess he fits right in then.",
">\n\nThe GOP is a criminal organization and Russia has the receipts. That means Russian assets like Santos have the receipts which means the GOP is over the barrel.",
">\n\nWell the American people just elected those criminals to run the house of representatives. I think it's the 70+ million people voting for the criminals that we really need to be worried about.",
">\n\nSo you can be a lying sack of shit, and suffer no consequences. Wonder if that will work for me on my next job search?🤔",
">\n\nMcCarthy is pandering to people like my cousin who was and is all in on Santos in that district and genuinely thinks that all the evidence against Santos is nonsense, that it's just \"embellishing your resume- everyone does it!\" and it's not a big deal so long as he, \"does what we want and helps stick it to the dirty cheater democrats.\"\nMcCarthy knows what he's doing... the group of diehards made up of people like my cousin could make or break things going forward in elections the same way the people opposing him in his bid for speaker for the first 14 rounds mucked his \"It's my turn!\" coronation up for him. McCarthy is concerned with holding his holding his title and nothing else right now.",
">\n\nTime for a motion to vacate from literally anybody. All it takes is one house member.",
">\n\nOf course.",
">\n\nWell he’s a reflection of the current party so who’s really surprised by this?",
">\n\nThe GOP don’t mind Liars and conmen as long as they lie and con for the GOP",
">\n\nThe thing trump did was show that the narcissists, sociopaths, abusers, and other general empathy-deficient grifters that they don't have to keep pretending to be decent members of society, that they can just relax and openly be their worst selves because reasonable people aren't going to enforce any punishment against them.",
">\n\nI didn't think McCarthy could have LESS credibility, but there it is.",
">\n\nMy inner conspiracy theorist is nagging at me. \nI feel like Santos is the patsy. Not sure for what yet, but he's the guy they happily get to pin it on.",
">\n\nJust shameful. Willfully corrupted.",
">\n\ni would say this is a joke but still waiting for the funny part of the absolute lack of repercussions for people lying to get into / maintain office.",
">\n\nA party of crooks, traitors, and sociopaths",
">\n\nGiven how corrupt he is, I'm surprised he is not chairing a committee.",
">\n\nThere is no bottom. So glad I left the GOP years ago!",
">\n\nIf you ever wanted evidence that nothing matters but what party you're a member of - this is it. \nIt doesn't matter what you stand for, believe, did or didn't do in your life. The only thing that matters is the letter next to your name.\nIf your company hired someone only to find out their resume was completely and laughably fradulent, could you work with them on your team? Could you share an office with them? Would you feel like your workplace had integrity if they kept him around?",
">\n\nLook everyone! The both sides guy!!",
">\n\nMcCarthy did not have the speaker votes without Santos' vote.",
">\n\nGuy looks like he's cosplaying pepe the frog. Big 'ol DSLs.",
">\n\nI feel bad for the writers or Veep who had some of their ideas thrown out for being too outlandish. In 20 years the show will be considered a drama because reality will be so much more ridiculous than the show.",
">\n\nUnder what name?",
">\n\nWould it be normal for a rookie congressman to be appointed to committees within the first few weeks/months of being sworn in?\nI always assumed committee membership was something that would come after having proven yourself to be competent and to have some degree of expertise in the area the committee covers",
">\n\nAll members are assigned committees regardless if you’re a first year or 22nd year. Committee spots for more prestigious and powerful committees are the ones reserved to those more senior and proven",
">\n\nGood to see pathological liars given representation in government.",
">\n\nHe's going lie about being on them regardless.",
">\n\nMcCarthy is the spineless twit the GOP deserves.",
">\n\nRepublicans have no shame. They are evil.",
">\n\nMcCarthy is such a pussy",
">\n\nFirst, why? Secondly, on which committees would his expertise be applicable? The Ethics Committee?",
">\n\nHow can we as a country stand for this behavior? What is this blind allegiance to party over country? This man is a liar. More than a liar. And his own party refuses to condemn him or do anything about it. \nIt’s an absolute disgrace.",
">\n\nHonest question: How many House members typically do NOT get seated on committees?\nThis looks to me like a move McCarthy's making simply to stick it to the criticism and media swarm around Santos's con.",
">\n\nIf he's nothing else he's an (R) vote. And right now, McCarthy knows he/they basically need to take them literally however he/they can get them. \nThere's a bonus to this in that it will \"trigger dems\" so I'm sure that's a big component of it. the absence of any shame is pretty stunning though. I mean I'm not surprised but its still very distasteful.",
">\n\nMcCarthy says I will be seated on committees.",
">\n\nBetter nail down the seats."
] |
>
While McCarthy holds the rug sweeping this under it.
|
[
"It's been like 2 weeks and McCarthy has shown already to be such a weak speaker. \nYou are given a free win. Condemn the liar. But nope, he gets committee seats. \nShows who is really running the show.",
">\n\n\nShows who is really running the show.\n\nVladimir Putin is pleased with his investment.",
">\n\nHopefully Santos will be fed bullshit classified intel just so we can time how quickly Putin remarks about it.",
">\n\nYou're acting like Putin doesn't already own the GOPs lol. Santos is definitely not his only source.",
">\n\nOh hell no, I’m definitely not implying he’s the only one. Just that any briefing given to him specifically should have some notable discrepancies (different names, numbers, locations) that would identify him as the leak. You know, protecting confidential info slightly more securely than the screener dvds sent out for Emmy voting.",
">\n\nSantos is a symbol of the entire Republican party.\nEntirely unscrupulous and amoral, and proudly so. All is acceptable in the pursuit of power.",
">\n\n\nunscrupulous and amoral, and proudly so\n\nAnother poster some time ago described them as \"virtue signaling,\" and I had to ask what's the exact opposite of that?\nA surprising number of others couldn't seem to grasp that \"virtue\" is not what they're signaling at all.",
">\n\nVice signaling?",
">\n\nDepravity flagging?",
">\n\nWill he also be given access to classified documents?",
">\n\nIt's OK. He'll simply say he's the President and declassify them with his mind.",
">\n\nI thought he already lied that Santos is the president?",
">\n\nSo this guy's a spy right? Like now we've seen him at Trump rallies years ago using different names. Running for office under different names. Everything he's said is false, but not in a confused Herschel Walker way. It's intentional. Right? Like we can see that he's a spy right?",
">\n\nDon’t forget about the piles of money he randomly finds",
">\n\nI don't think any of that money to Santos is random. It is payment, mostly from Russia, for services rendered. He just has to cause division and disarray within the US government, as ordered by Putin.",
">\n\nEh, tough leap to make. A moderately talented conman can somewhat easily bilk the Republican rank and file for millions of dollars. Particularly when he’s willing to go the extra mile and pay people to impersonate the staff of party leadership to bilk the wealthy donor class. \nIt’s more likely this is going to wind up being Bannon’s build the wall con turned up to 11. Perhaps with some international money mixed in.",
">\n\nSo a guy who couldn't legitimately get hired to sell me an insurance policy is being trusted with actual governance.\nFFS, \"conservatives\" - do you not have anyone around to run for office that isn't a complete fucking embarrassment? Stop voting for awful fuckin people",
">\n\nI can't blame his voters on this one, he straight up lied to them. The people that are keeping him in gov't are the ones we need to worry about.",
">\n\n\n“My staff raised concerns when he had a staff member who impersonated my chief of staff, and that individual was let go when Mr. Santos found out about it,” McCarthy said Tuesday.\n\nshameless loser",
">\n\nTheoretically if he is deemed too risky to get a clearance, can Biden prevent him from getting security clearance for classified intel?",
">\n\nAs the commander in chief id say so. Congress just votes on legislation and handles the purse. Intel is much more relevant to the executive branch.",
">\n\nLol this right here shows how much the Speaker's power is neutered under McCarthy's negotiated rules. He has to seat a sociopathic liar who fraudulently damaged McCarthy's staff personally by impersonating them to get donations, and if he doesn't seat him Santos can demand a vote to remove McCarthy day after day after day. Pathetic.",
">\n\nAt this point Jeffries should offer a gimme to McCarthy - we won’t call for a new speaker unless at least 1 republican does, but we get the committee post. Santos can get the boot, Kev keeps his tenuous grasp on power (but still looks like shit), dems get a slightly better footing and some good press. McCarthy won’t do it, he can’t, but the offer alone would look magnanimous.",
">\n\nConservative voters really are the most easily manipulated, shameless suckers on the planet.",
">\n\nThey convince themselves democrats do the same thing so it's okay for them too. While simultaneously pretending they are held to a higher standard.\nNot even a strawman, that's as synopsis of every thread about him on r/conservative.",
">\n\nI was curious but didn’t want to venture over there.",
">\n\nCome on Brazil let's get that extradition party started.",
">\n\nJust when you think they can't go any lower they find a whole new way to do it...",
">\n\nIt's not a rabbit hole",
">\n\nJesus H. Fu*k. This guy needs to be in jail, and as far away from any real power as possible. \nWait, that could be any of the GOP house... ok, shit, I guess he fits right in then.",
">\n\nThe GOP is a criminal organization and Russia has the receipts. That means Russian assets like Santos have the receipts which means the GOP is over the barrel.",
">\n\nWell the American people just elected those criminals to run the house of representatives. I think it's the 70+ million people voting for the criminals that we really need to be worried about.",
">\n\nSo you can be a lying sack of shit, and suffer no consequences. Wonder if that will work for me on my next job search?🤔",
">\n\nMcCarthy is pandering to people like my cousin who was and is all in on Santos in that district and genuinely thinks that all the evidence against Santos is nonsense, that it's just \"embellishing your resume- everyone does it!\" and it's not a big deal so long as he, \"does what we want and helps stick it to the dirty cheater democrats.\"\nMcCarthy knows what he's doing... the group of diehards made up of people like my cousin could make or break things going forward in elections the same way the people opposing him in his bid for speaker for the first 14 rounds mucked his \"It's my turn!\" coronation up for him. McCarthy is concerned with holding his holding his title and nothing else right now.",
">\n\nTime for a motion to vacate from literally anybody. All it takes is one house member.",
">\n\nOf course.",
">\n\nWell he’s a reflection of the current party so who’s really surprised by this?",
">\n\nThe GOP don’t mind Liars and conmen as long as they lie and con for the GOP",
">\n\nThe thing trump did was show that the narcissists, sociopaths, abusers, and other general empathy-deficient grifters that they don't have to keep pretending to be decent members of society, that they can just relax and openly be their worst selves because reasonable people aren't going to enforce any punishment against them.",
">\n\nI didn't think McCarthy could have LESS credibility, but there it is.",
">\n\nMy inner conspiracy theorist is nagging at me. \nI feel like Santos is the patsy. Not sure for what yet, but he's the guy they happily get to pin it on.",
">\n\nJust shameful. Willfully corrupted.",
">\n\ni would say this is a joke but still waiting for the funny part of the absolute lack of repercussions for people lying to get into / maintain office.",
">\n\nA party of crooks, traitors, and sociopaths",
">\n\nGiven how corrupt he is, I'm surprised he is not chairing a committee.",
">\n\nThere is no bottom. So glad I left the GOP years ago!",
">\n\nIf you ever wanted evidence that nothing matters but what party you're a member of - this is it. \nIt doesn't matter what you stand for, believe, did or didn't do in your life. The only thing that matters is the letter next to your name.\nIf your company hired someone only to find out their resume was completely and laughably fradulent, could you work with them on your team? Could you share an office with them? Would you feel like your workplace had integrity if they kept him around?",
">\n\nLook everyone! The both sides guy!!",
">\n\nMcCarthy did not have the speaker votes without Santos' vote.",
">\n\nGuy looks like he's cosplaying pepe the frog. Big 'ol DSLs.",
">\n\nI feel bad for the writers or Veep who had some of their ideas thrown out for being too outlandish. In 20 years the show will be considered a drama because reality will be so much more ridiculous than the show.",
">\n\nUnder what name?",
">\n\nWould it be normal for a rookie congressman to be appointed to committees within the first few weeks/months of being sworn in?\nI always assumed committee membership was something that would come after having proven yourself to be competent and to have some degree of expertise in the area the committee covers",
">\n\nAll members are assigned committees regardless if you’re a first year or 22nd year. Committee spots for more prestigious and powerful committees are the ones reserved to those more senior and proven",
">\n\nGood to see pathological liars given representation in government.",
">\n\nHe's going lie about being on them regardless.",
">\n\nMcCarthy is the spineless twit the GOP deserves.",
">\n\nRepublicans have no shame. They are evil.",
">\n\nMcCarthy is such a pussy",
">\n\nFirst, why? Secondly, on which committees would his expertise be applicable? The Ethics Committee?",
">\n\nHow can we as a country stand for this behavior? What is this blind allegiance to party over country? This man is a liar. More than a liar. And his own party refuses to condemn him or do anything about it. \nIt’s an absolute disgrace.",
">\n\nHonest question: How many House members typically do NOT get seated on committees?\nThis looks to me like a move McCarthy's making simply to stick it to the criticism and media swarm around Santos's con.",
">\n\nIf he's nothing else he's an (R) vote. And right now, McCarthy knows he/they basically need to take them literally however he/they can get them. \nThere's a bonus to this in that it will \"trigger dems\" so I'm sure that's a big component of it. the absence of any shame is pretty stunning though. I mean I'm not surprised but its still very distasteful.",
">\n\nMcCarthy says I will be seated on committees.",
">\n\nBetter nail down the seats.",
">\n\nSantos says McCarthy will step down and he will be elected Speaker. He also opines that Biden will step down after Vice President Harris steps down and he will be President in late 2023. It must be true, you heard it on the internet."
] |
>
SMH only in the party of shameless trumphumping Repugnicans. They don't even try to hide it anymore. CRIMINALS and SOCIOPATHS are running our country.
|
[
"It's been like 2 weeks and McCarthy has shown already to be such a weak speaker. \nYou are given a free win. Condemn the liar. But nope, he gets committee seats. \nShows who is really running the show.",
">\n\n\nShows who is really running the show.\n\nVladimir Putin is pleased with his investment.",
">\n\nHopefully Santos will be fed bullshit classified intel just so we can time how quickly Putin remarks about it.",
">\n\nYou're acting like Putin doesn't already own the GOPs lol. Santos is definitely not his only source.",
">\n\nOh hell no, I’m definitely not implying he’s the only one. Just that any briefing given to him specifically should have some notable discrepancies (different names, numbers, locations) that would identify him as the leak. You know, protecting confidential info slightly more securely than the screener dvds sent out for Emmy voting.",
">\n\nSantos is a symbol of the entire Republican party.\nEntirely unscrupulous and amoral, and proudly so. All is acceptable in the pursuit of power.",
">\n\n\nunscrupulous and amoral, and proudly so\n\nAnother poster some time ago described them as \"virtue signaling,\" and I had to ask what's the exact opposite of that?\nA surprising number of others couldn't seem to grasp that \"virtue\" is not what they're signaling at all.",
">\n\nVice signaling?",
">\n\nDepravity flagging?",
">\n\nWill he also be given access to classified documents?",
">\n\nIt's OK. He'll simply say he's the President and declassify them with his mind.",
">\n\nI thought he already lied that Santos is the president?",
">\n\nSo this guy's a spy right? Like now we've seen him at Trump rallies years ago using different names. Running for office under different names. Everything he's said is false, but not in a confused Herschel Walker way. It's intentional. Right? Like we can see that he's a spy right?",
">\n\nDon’t forget about the piles of money he randomly finds",
">\n\nI don't think any of that money to Santos is random. It is payment, mostly from Russia, for services rendered. He just has to cause division and disarray within the US government, as ordered by Putin.",
">\n\nEh, tough leap to make. A moderately talented conman can somewhat easily bilk the Republican rank and file for millions of dollars. Particularly when he’s willing to go the extra mile and pay people to impersonate the staff of party leadership to bilk the wealthy donor class. \nIt’s more likely this is going to wind up being Bannon’s build the wall con turned up to 11. Perhaps with some international money mixed in.",
">\n\nSo a guy who couldn't legitimately get hired to sell me an insurance policy is being trusted with actual governance.\nFFS, \"conservatives\" - do you not have anyone around to run for office that isn't a complete fucking embarrassment? Stop voting for awful fuckin people",
">\n\nI can't blame his voters on this one, he straight up lied to them. The people that are keeping him in gov't are the ones we need to worry about.",
">\n\n\n“My staff raised concerns when he had a staff member who impersonated my chief of staff, and that individual was let go when Mr. Santos found out about it,” McCarthy said Tuesday.\n\nshameless loser",
">\n\nTheoretically if he is deemed too risky to get a clearance, can Biden prevent him from getting security clearance for classified intel?",
">\n\nAs the commander in chief id say so. Congress just votes on legislation and handles the purse. Intel is much more relevant to the executive branch.",
">\n\nLol this right here shows how much the Speaker's power is neutered under McCarthy's negotiated rules. He has to seat a sociopathic liar who fraudulently damaged McCarthy's staff personally by impersonating them to get donations, and if he doesn't seat him Santos can demand a vote to remove McCarthy day after day after day. Pathetic.",
">\n\nAt this point Jeffries should offer a gimme to McCarthy - we won’t call for a new speaker unless at least 1 republican does, but we get the committee post. Santos can get the boot, Kev keeps his tenuous grasp on power (but still looks like shit), dems get a slightly better footing and some good press. McCarthy won’t do it, he can’t, but the offer alone would look magnanimous.",
">\n\nConservative voters really are the most easily manipulated, shameless suckers on the planet.",
">\n\nThey convince themselves democrats do the same thing so it's okay for them too. While simultaneously pretending they are held to a higher standard.\nNot even a strawman, that's as synopsis of every thread about him on r/conservative.",
">\n\nI was curious but didn’t want to venture over there.",
">\n\nCome on Brazil let's get that extradition party started.",
">\n\nJust when you think they can't go any lower they find a whole new way to do it...",
">\n\nIt's not a rabbit hole",
">\n\nJesus H. Fu*k. This guy needs to be in jail, and as far away from any real power as possible. \nWait, that could be any of the GOP house... ok, shit, I guess he fits right in then.",
">\n\nThe GOP is a criminal organization and Russia has the receipts. That means Russian assets like Santos have the receipts which means the GOP is over the barrel.",
">\n\nWell the American people just elected those criminals to run the house of representatives. I think it's the 70+ million people voting for the criminals that we really need to be worried about.",
">\n\nSo you can be a lying sack of shit, and suffer no consequences. Wonder if that will work for me on my next job search?🤔",
">\n\nMcCarthy is pandering to people like my cousin who was and is all in on Santos in that district and genuinely thinks that all the evidence against Santos is nonsense, that it's just \"embellishing your resume- everyone does it!\" and it's not a big deal so long as he, \"does what we want and helps stick it to the dirty cheater democrats.\"\nMcCarthy knows what he's doing... the group of diehards made up of people like my cousin could make or break things going forward in elections the same way the people opposing him in his bid for speaker for the first 14 rounds mucked his \"It's my turn!\" coronation up for him. McCarthy is concerned with holding his holding his title and nothing else right now.",
">\n\nTime for a motion to vacate from literally anybody. All it takes is one house member.",
">\n\nOf course.",
">\n\nWell he’s a reflection of the current party so who’s really surprised by this?",
">\n\nThe GOP don’t mind Liars and conmen as long as they lie and con for the GOP",
">\n\nThe thing trump did was show that the narcissists, sociopaths, abusers, and other general empathy-deficient grifters that they don't have to keep pretending to be decent members of society, that they can just relax and openly be their worst selves because reasonable people aren't going to enforce any punishment against them.",
">\n\nI didn't think McCarthy could have LESS credibility, but there it is.",
">\n\nMy inner conspiracy theorist is nagging at me. \nI feel like Santos is the patsy. Not sure for what yet, but he's the guy they happily get to pin it on.",
">\n\nJust shameful. Willfully corrupted.",
">\n\ni would say this is a joke but still waiting for the funny part of the absolute lack of repercussions for people lying to get into / maintain office.",
">\n\nA party of crooks, traitors, and sociopaths",
">\n\nGiven how corrupt he is, I'm surprised he is not chairing a committee.",
">\n\nThere is no bottom. So glad I left the GOP years ago!",
">\n\nIf you ever wanted evidence that nothing matters but what party you're a member of - this is it. \nIt doesn't matter what you stand for, believe, did or didn't do in your life. The only thing that matters is the letter next to your name.\nIf your company hired someone only to find out their resume was completely and laughably fradulent, could you work with them on your team? Could you share an office with them? Would you feel like your workplace had integrity if they kept him around?",
">\n\nLook everyone! The both sides guy!!",
">\n\nMcCarthy did not have the speaker votes without Santos' vote.",
">\n\nGuy looks like he's cosplaying pepe the frog. Big 'ol DSLs.",
">\n\nI feel bad for the writers or Veep who had some of their ideas thrown out for being too outlandish. In 20 years the show will be considered a drama because reality will be so much more ridiculous than the show.",
">\n\nUnder what name?",
">\n\nWould it be normal for a rookie congressman to be appointed to committees within the first few weeks/months of being sworn in?\nI always assumed committee membership was something that would come after having proven yourself to be competent and to have some degree of expertise in the area the committee covers",
">\n\nAll members are assigned committees regardless if you’re a first year or 22nd year. Committee spots for more prestigious and powerful committees are the ones reserved to those more senior and proven",
">\n\nGood to see pathological liars given representation in government.",
">\n\nHe's going lie about being on them regardless.",
">\n\nMcCarthy is the spineless twit the GOP deserves.",
">\n\nRepublicans have no shame. They are evil.",
">\n\nMcCarthy is such a pussy",
">\n\nFirst, why? Secondly, on which committees would his expertise be applicable? The Ethics Committee?",
">\n\nHow can we as a country stand for this behavior? What is this blind allegiance to party over country? This man is a liar. More than a liar. And his own party refuses to condemn him or do anything about it. \nIt’s an absolute disgrace.",
">\n\nHonest question: How many House members typically do NOT get seated on committees?\nThis looks to me like a move McCarthy's making simply to stick it to the criticism and media swarm around Santos's con.",
">\n\nIf he's nothing else he's an (R) vote. And right now, McCarthy knows he/they basically need to take them literally however he/they can get them. \nThere's a bonus to this in that it will \"trigger dems\" so I'm sure that's a big component of it. the absence of any shame is pretty stunning though. I mean I'm not surprised but its still very distasteful.",
">\n\nMcCarthy says I will be seated on committees.",
">\n\nBetter nail down the seats.",
">\n\nSantos says McCarthy will step down and he will be elected Speaker. He also opines that Biden will step down after Vice President Harris steps down and he will be President in late 2023. It must be true, you heard it on the internet.",
">\n\nWhile McCarthy holds the rug sweeping this under it."
] |
>
Will he be the one reporting what the committees do?
|
[
"It's been like 2 weeks and McCarthy has shown already to be such a weak speaker. \nYou are given a free win. Condemn the liar. But nope, he gets committee seats. \nShows who is really running the show.",
">\n\n\nShows who is really running the show.\n\nVladimir Putin is pleased with his investment.",
">\n\nHopefully Santos will be fed bullshit classified intel just so we can time how quickly Putin remarks about it.",
">\n\nYou're acting like Putin doesn't already own the GOPs lol. Santos is definitely not his only source.",
">\n\nOh hell no, I’m definitely not implying he’s the only one. Just that any briefing given to him specifically should have some notable discrepancies (different names, numbers, locations) that would identify him as the leak. You know, protecting confidential info slightly more securely than the screener dvds sent out for Emmy voting.",
">\n\nSantos is a symbol of the entire Republican party.\nEntirely unscrupulous and amoral, and proudly so. All is acceptable in the pursuit of power.",
">\n\n\nunscrupulous and amoral, and proudly so\n\nAnother poster some time ago described them as \"virtue signaling,\" and I had to ask what's the exact opposite of that?\nA surprising number of others couldn't seem to grasp that \"virtue\" is not what they're signaling at all.",
">\n\nVice signaling?",
">\n\nDepravity flagging?",
">\n\nWill he also be given access to classified documents?",
">\n\nIt's OK. He'll simply say he's the President and declassify them with his mind.",
">\n\nI thought he already lied that Santos is the president?",
">\n\nSo this guy's a spy right? Like now we've seen him at Trump rallies years ago using different names. Running for office under different names. Everything he's said is false, but not in a confused Herschel Walker way. It's intentional. Right? Like we can see that he's a spy right?",
">\n\nDon’t forget about the piles of money he randomly finds",
">\n\nI don't think any of that money to Santos is random. It is payment, mostly from Russia, for services rendered. He just has to cause division and disarray within the US government, as ordered by Putin.",
">\n\nEh, tough leap to make. A moderately talented conman can somewhat easily bilk the Republican rank and file for millions of dollars. Particularly when he’s willing to go the extra mile and pay people to impersonate the staff of party leadership to bilk the wealthy donor class. \nIt’s more likely this is going to wind up being Bannon’s build the wall con turned up to 11. Perhaps with some international money mixed in.",
">\n\nSo a guy who couldn't legitimately get hired to sell me an insurance policy is being trusted with actual governance.\nFFS, \"conservatives\" - do you not have anyone around to run for office that isn't a complete fucking embarrassment? Stop voting for awful fuckin people",
">\n\nI can't blame his voters on this one, he straight up lied to them. The people that are keeping him in gov't are the ones we need to worry about.",
">\n\n\n“My staff raised concerns when he had a staff member who impersonated my chief of staff, and that individual was let go when Mr. Santos found out about it,” McCarthy said Tuesday.\n\nshameless loser",
">\n\nTheoretically if he is deemed too risky to get a clearance, can Biden prevent him from getting security clearance for classified intel?",
">\n\nAs the commander in chief id say so. Congress just votes on legislation and handles the purse. Intel is much more relevant to the executive branch.",
">\n\nLol this right here shows how much the Speaker's power is neutered under McCarthy's negotiated rules. He has to seat a sociopathic liar who fraudulently damaged McCarthy's staff personally by impersonating them to get donations, and if he doesn't seat him Santos can demand a vote to remove McCarthy day after day after day. Pathetic.",
">\n\nAt this point Jeffries should offer a gimme to McCarthy - we won’t call for a new speaker unless at least 1 republican does, but we get the committee post. Santos can get the boot, Kev keeps his tenuous grasp on power (but still looks like shit), dems get a slightly better footing and some good press. McCarthy won’t do it, he can’t, but the offer alone would look magnanimous.",
">\n\nConservative voters really are the most easily manipulated, shameless suckers on the planet.",
">\n\nThey convince themselves democrats do the same thing so it's okay for them too. While simultaneously pretending they are held to a higher standard.\nNot even a strawman, that's as synopsis of every thread about him on r/conservative.",
">\n\nI was curious but didn’t want to venture over there.",
">\n\nCome on Brazil let's get that extradition party started.",
">\n\nJust when you think they can't go any lower they find a whole new way to do it...",
">\n\nIt's not a rabbit hole",
">\n\nJesus H. Fu*k. This guy needs to be in jail, and as far away from any real power as possible. \nWait, that could be any of the GOP house... ok, shit, I guess he fits right in then.",
">\n\nThe GOP is a criminal organization and Russia has the receipts. That means Russian assets like Santos have the receipts which means the GOP is over the barrel.",
">\n\nWell the American people just elected those criminals to run the house of representatives. I think it's the 70+ million people voting for the criminals that we really need to be worried about.",
">\n\nSo you can be a lying sack of shit, and suffer no consequences. Wonder if that will work for me on my next job search?🤔",
">\n\nMcCarthy is pandering to people like my cousin who was and is all in on Santos in that district and genuinely thinks that all the evidence against Santos is nonsense, that it's just \"embellishing your resume- everyone does it!\" and it's not a big deal so long as he, \"does what we want and helps stick it to the dirty cheater democrats.\"\nMcCarthy knows what he's doing... the group of diehards made up of people like my cousin could make or break things going forward in elections the same way the people opposing him in his bid for speaker for the first 14 rounds mucked his \"It's my turn!\" coronation up for him. McCarthy is concerned with holding his holding his title and nothing else right now.",
">\n\nTime for a motion to vacate from literally anybody. All it takes is one house member.",
">\n\nOf course.",
">\n\nWell he’s a reflection of the current party so who’s really surprised by this?",
">\n\nThe GOP don’t mind Liars and conmen as long as they lie and con for the GOP",
">\n\nThe thing trump did was show that the narcissists, sociopaths, abusers, and other general empathy-deficient grifters that they don't have to keep pretending to be decent members of society, that they can just relax and openly be their worst selves because reasonable people aren't going to enforce any punishment against them.",
">\n\nI didn't think McCarthy could have LESS credibility, but there it is.",
">\n\nMy inner conspiracy theorist is nagging at me. \nI feel like Santos is the patsy. Not sure for what yet, but he's the guy they happily get to pin it on.",
">\n\nJust shameful. Willfully corrupted.",
">\n\ni would say this is a joke but still waiting for the funny part of the absolute lack of repercussions for people lying to get into / maintain office.",
">\n\nA party of crooks, traitors, and sociopaths",
">\n\nGiven how corrupt he is, I'm surprised he is not chairing a committee.",
">\n\nThere is no bottom. So glad I left the GOP years ago!",
">\n\nIf you ever wanted evidence that nothing matters but what party you're a member of - this is it. \nIt doesn't matter what you stand for, believe, did or didn't do in your life. The only thing that matters is the letter next to your name.\nIf your company hired someone only to find out their resume was completely and laughably fradulent, could you work with them on your team? Could you share an office with them? Would you feel like your workplace had integrity if they kept him around?",
">\n\nLook everyone! The both sides guy!!",
">\n\nMcCarthy did not have the speaker votes without Santos' vote.",
">\n\nGuy looks like he's cosplaying pepe the frog. Big 'ol DSLs.",
">\n\nI feel bad for the writers or Veep who had some of their ideas thrown out for being too outlandish. In 20 years the show will be considered a drama because reality will be so much more ridiculous than the show.",
">\n\nUnder what name?",
">\n\nWould it be normal for a rookie congressman to be appointed to committees within the first few weeks/months of being sworn in?\nI always assumed committee membership was something that would come after having proven yourself to be competent and to have some degree of expertise in the area the committee covers",
">\n\nAll members are assigned committees regardless if you’re a first year or 22nd year. Committee spots for more prestigious and powerful committees are the ones reserved to those more senior and proven",
">\n\nGood to see pathological liars given representation in government.",
">\n\nHe's going lie about being on them regardless.",
">\n\nMcCarthy is the spineless twit the GOP deserves.",
">\n\nRepublicans have no shame. They are evil.",
">\n\nMcCarthy is such a pussy",
">\n\nFirst, why? Secondly, on which committees would his expertise be applicable? The Ethics Committee?",
">\n\nHow can we as a country stand for this behavior? What is this blind allegiance to party over country? This man is a liar. More than a liar. And his own party refuses to condemn him or do anything about it. \nIt’s an absolute disgrace.",
">\n\nHonest question: How many House members typically do NOT get seated on committees?\nThis looks to me like a move McCarthy's making simply to stick it to the criticism and media swarm around Santos's con.",
">\n\nIf he's nothing else he's an (R) vote. And right now, McCarthy knows he/they basically need to take them literally however he/they can get them. \nThere's a bonus to this in that it will \"trigger dems\" so I'm sure that's a big component of it. the absence of any shame is pretty stunning though. I mean I'm not surprised but its still very distasteful.",
">\n\nMcCarthy says I will be seated on committees.",
">\n\nBetter nail down the seats.",
">\n\nSantos says McCarthy will step down and he will be elected Speaker. He also opines that Biden will step down after Vice President Harris steps down and he will be President in late 2023. It must be true, you heard it on the internet.",
">\n\nWhile McCarthy holds the rug sweeping this under it.",
">\n\nSMH only in the party of shameless trumphumping Repugnicans. They don't even try to hide it anymore. CRIMINALS and SOCIOPATHS are running our country."
] |
>
What if he votes with Democrats? Would his lies be ok with the GOP then?
|
[
"It's been like 2 weeks and McCarthy has shown already to be such a weak speaker. \nYou are given a free win. Condemn the liar. But nope, he gets committee seats. \nShows who is really running the show.",
">\n\n\nShows who is really running the show.\n\nVladimir Putin is pleased with his investment.",
">\n\nHopefully Santos will be fed bullshit classified intel just so we can time how quickly Putin remarks about it.",
">\n\nYou're acting like Putin doesn't already own the GOPs lol. Santos is definitely not his only source.",
">\n\nOh hell no, I’m definitely not implying he’s the only one. Just that any briefing given to him specifically should have some notable discrepancies (different names, numbers, locations) that would identify him as the leak. You know, protecting confidential info slightly more securely than the screener dvds sent out for Emmy voting.",
">\n\nSantos is a symbol of the entire Republican party.\nEntirely unscrupulous and amoral, and proudly so. All is acceptable in the pursuit of power.",
">\n\n\nunscrupulous and amoral, and proudly so\n\nAnother poster some time ago described them as \"virtue signaling,\" and I had to ask what's the exact opposite of that?\nA surprising number of others couldn't seem to grasp that \"virtue\" is not what they're signaling at all.",
">\n\nVice signaling?",
">\n\nDepravity flagging?",
">\n\nWill he also be given access to classified documents?",
">\n\nIt's OK. He'll simply say he's the President and declassify them with his mind.",
">\n\nI thought he already lied that Santos is the president?",
">\n\nSo this guy's a spy right? Like now we've seen him at Trump rallies years ago using different names. Running for office under different names. Everything he's said is false, but not in a confused Herschel Walker way. It's intentional. Right? Like we can see that he's a spy right?",
">\n\nDon’t forget about the piles of money he randomly finds",
">\n\nI don't think any of that money to Santos is random. It is payment, mostly from Russia, for services rendered. He just has to cause division and disarray within the US government, as ordered by Putin.",
">\n\nEh, tough leap to make. A moderately talented conman can somewhat easily bilk the Republican rank and file for millions of dollars. Particularly when he’s willing to go the extra mile and pay people to impersonate the staff of party leadership to bilk the wealthy donor class. \nIt’s more likely this is going to wind up being Bannon’s build the wall con turned up to 11. Perhaps with some international money mixed in.",
">\n\nSo a guy who couldn't legitimately get hired to sell me an insurance policy is being trusted with actual governance.\nFFS, \"conservatives\" - do you not have anyone around to run for office that isn't a complete fucking embarrassment? Stop voting for awful fuckin people",
">\n\nI can't blame his voters on this one, he straight up lied to them. The people that are keeping him in gov't are the ones we need to worry about.",
">\n\n\n“My staff raised concerns when he had a staff member who impersonated my chief of staff, and that individual was let go when Mr. Santos found out about it,” McCarthy said Tuesday.\n\nshameless loser",
">\n\nTheoretically if he is deemed too risky to get a clearance, can Biden prevent him from getting security clearance for classified intel?",
">\n\nAs the commander in chief id say so. Congress just votes on legislation and handles the purse. Intel is much more relevant to the executive branch.",
">\n\nLol this right here shows how much the Speaker's power is neutered under McCarthy's negotiated rules. He has to seat a sociopathic liar who fraudulently damaged McCarthy's staff personally by impersonating them to get donations, and if he doesn't seat him Santos can demand a vote to remove McCarthy day after day after day. Pathetic.",
">\n\nAt this point Jeffries should offer a gimme to McCarthy - we won’t call for a new speaker unless at least 1 republican does, but we get the committee post. Santos can get the boot, Kev keeps his tenuous grasp on power (but still looks like shit), dems get a slightly better footing and some good press. McCarthy won’t do it, he can’t, but the offer alone would look magnanimous.",
">\n\nConservative voters really are the most easily manipulated, shameless suckers on the planet.",
">\n\nThey convince themselves democrats do the same thing so it's okay for them too. While simultaneously pretending they are held to a higher standard.\nNot even a strawman, that's as synopsis of every thread about him on r/conservative.",
">\n\nI was curious but didn’t want to venture over there.",
">\n\nCome on Brazil let's get that extradition party started.",
">\n\nJust when you think they can't go any lower they find a whole new way to do it...",
">\n\nIt's not a rabbit hole",
">\n\nJesus H. Fu*k. This guy needs to be in jail, and as far away from any real power as possible. \nWait, that could be any of the GOP house... ok, shit, I guess he fits right in then.",
">\n\nThe GOP is a criminal organization and Russia has the receipts. That means Russian assets like Santos have the receipts which means the GOP is over the barrel.",
">\n\nWell the American people just elected those criminals to run the house of representatives. I think it's the 70+ million people voting for the criminals that we really need to be worried about.",
">\n\nSo you can be a lying sack of shit, and suffer no consequences. Wonder if that will work for me on my next job search?🤔",
">\n\nMcCarthy is pandering to people like my cousin who was and is all in on Santos in that district and genuinely thinks that all the evidence against Santos is nonsense, that it's just \"embellishing your resume- everyone does it!\" and it's not a big deal so long as he, \"does what we want and helps stick it to the dirty cheater democrats.\"\nMcCarthy knows what he's doing... the group of diehards made up of people like my cousin could make or break things going forward in elections the same way the people opposing him in his bid for speaker for the first 14 rounds mucked his \"It's my turn!\" coronation up for him. McCarthy is concerned with holding his holding his title and nothing else right now.",
">\n\nTime for a motion to vacate from literally anybody. All it takes is one house member.",
">\n\nOf course.",
">\n\nWell he’s a reflection of the current party so who’s really surprised by this?",
">\n\nThe GOP don’t mind Liars and conmen as long as they lie and con for the GOP",
">\n\nThe thing trump did was show that the narcissists, sociopaths, abusers, and other general empathy-deficient grifters that they don't have to keep pretending to be decent members of society, that they can just relax and openly be their worst selves because reasonable people aren't going to enforce any punishment against them.",
">\n\nI didn't think McCarthy could have LESS credibility, but there it is.",
">\n\nMy inner conspiracy theorist is nagging at me. \nI feel like Santos is the patsy. Not sure for what yet, but he's the guy they happily get to pin it on.",
">\n\nJust shameful. Willfully corrupted.",
">\n\ni would say this is a joke but still waiting for the funny part of the absolute lack of repercussions for people lying to get into / maintain office.",
">\n\nA party of crooks, traitors, and sociopaths",
">\n\nGiven how corrupt he is, I'm surprised he is not chairing a committee.",
">\n\nThere is no bottom. So glad I left the GOP years ago!",
">\n\nIf you ever wanted evidence that nothing matters but what party you're a member of - this is it. \nIt doesn't matter what you stand for, believe, did or didn't do in your life. The only thing that matters is the letter next to your name.\nIf your company hired someone only to find out their resume was completely and laughably fradulent, could you work with them on your team? Could you share an office with them? Would you feel like your workplace had integrity if they kept him around?",
">\n\nLook everyone! The both sides guy!!",
">\n\nMcCarthy did not have the speaker votes without Santos' vote.",
">\n\nGuy looks like he's cosplaying pepe the frog. Big 'ol DSLs.",
">\n\nI feel bad for the writers or Veep who had some of their ideas thrown out for being too outlandish. In 20 years the show will be considered a drama because reality will be so much more ridiculous than the show.",
">\n\nUnder what name?",
">\n\nWould it be normal for a rookie congressman to be appointed to committees within the first few weeks/months of being sworn in?\nI always assumed committee membership was something that would come after having proven yourself to be competent and to have some degree of expertise in the area the committee covers",
">\n\nAll members are assigned committees regardless if you’re a first year or 22nd year. Committee spots for more prestigious and powerful committees are the ones reserved to those more senior and proven",
">\n\nGood to see pathological liars given representation in government.",
">\n\nHe's going lie about being on them regardless.",
">\n\nMcCarthy is the spineless twit the GOP deserves.",
">\n\nRepublicans have no shame. They are evil.",
">\n\nMcCarthy is such a pussy",
">\n\nFirst, why? Secondly, on which committees would his expertise be applicable? The Ethics Committee?",
">\n\nHow can we as a country stand for this behavior? What is this blind allegiance to party over country? This man is a liar. More than a liar. And his own party refuses to condemn him or do anything about it. \nIt’s an absolute disgrace.",
">\n\nHonest question: How many House members typically do NOT get seated on committees?\nThis looks to me like a move McCarthy's making simply to stick it to the criticism and media swarm around Santos's con.",
">\n\nIf he's nothing else he's an (R) vote. And right now, McCarthy knows he/they basically need to take them literally however he/they can get them. \nThere's a bonus to this in that it will \"trigger dems\" so I'm sure that's a big component of it. the absence of any shame is pretty stunning though. I mean I'm not surprised but its still very distasteful.",
">\n\nMcCarthy says I will be seated on committees.",
">\n\nBetter nail down the seats.",
">\n\nSantos says McCarthy will step down and he will be elected Speaker. He also opines that Biden will step down after Vice President Harris steps down and he will be President in late 2023. It must be true, you heard it on the internet.",
">\n\nWhile McCarthy holds the rug sweeping this under it.",
">\n\nSMH only in the party of shameless trumphumping Repugnicans. They don't even try to hide it anymore. CRIMINALS and SOCIOPATHS are running our country.",
">\n\nWill he be the one reporting what the committees do?"
] |
>
Santos? You mean Antony? The guy who took Russian money after saying he didnt?
|
[
"It's been like 2 weeks and McCarthy has shown already to be such a weak speaker. \nYou are given a free win. Condemn the liar. But nope, he gets committee seats. \nShows who is really running the show.",
">\n\n\nShows who is really running the show.\n\nVladimir Putin is pleased with his investment.",
">\n\nHopefully Santos will be fed bullshit classified intel just so we can time how quickly Putin remarks about it.",
">\n\nYou're acting like Putin doesn't already own the GOPs lol. Santos is definitely not his only source.",
">\n\nOh hell no, I’m definitely not implying he’s the only one. Just that any briefing given to him specifically should have some notable discrepancies (different names, numbers, locations) that would identify him as the leak. You know, protecting confidential info slightly more securely than the screener dvds sent out for Emmy voting.",
">\n\nSantos is a symbol of the entire Republican party.\nEntirely unscrupulous and amoral, and proudly so. All is acceptable in the pursuit of power.",
">\n\n\nunscrupulous and amoral, and proudly so\n\nAnother poster some time ago described them as \"virtue signaling,\" and I had to ask what's the exact opposite of that?\nA surprising number of others couldn't seem to grasp that \"virtue\" is not what they're signaling at all.",
">\n\nVice signaling?",
">\n\nDepravity flagging?",
">\n\nWill he also be given access to classified documents?",
">\n\nIt's OK. He'll simply say he's the President and declassify them with his mind.",
">\n\nI thought he already lied that Santos is the president?",
">\n\nSo this guy's a spy right? Like now we've seen him at Trump rallies years ago using different names. Running for office under different names. Everything he's said is false, but not in a confused Herschel Walker way. It's intentional. Right? Like we can see that he's a spy right?",
">\n\nDon’t forget about the piles of money he randomly finds",
">\n\nI don't think any of that money to Santos is random. It is payment, mostly from Russia, for services rendered. He just has to cause division and disarray within the US government, as ordered by Putin.",
">\n\nEh, tough leap to make. A moderately talented conman can somewhat easily bilk the Republican rank and file for millions of dollars. Particularly when he’s willing to go the extra mile and pay people to impersonate the staff of party leadership to bilk the wealthy donor class. \nIt’s more likely this is going to wind up being Bannon’s build the wall con turned up to 11. Perhaps with some international money mixed in.",
">\n\nSo a guy who couldn't legitimately get hired to sell me an insurance policy is being trusted with actual governance.\nFFS, \"conservatives\" - do you not have anyone around to run for office that isn't a complete fucking embarrassment? Stop voting for awful fuckin people",
">\n\nI can't blame his voters on this one, he straight up lied to them. The people that are keeping him in gov't are the ones we need to worry about.",
">\n\n\n“My staff raised concerns when he had a staff member who impersonated my chief of staff, and that individual was let go when Mr. Santos found out about it,” McCarthy said Tuesday.\n\nshameless loser",
">\n\nTheoretically if he is deemed too risky to get a clearance, can Biden prevent him from getting security clearance for classified intel?",
">\n\nAs the commander in chief id say so. Congress just votes on legislation and handles the purse. Intel is much more relevant to the executive branch.",
">\n\nLol this right here shows how much the Speaker's power is neutered under McCarthy's negotiated rules. He has to seat a sociopathic liar who fraudulently damaged McCarthy's staff personally by impersonating them to get donations, and if he doesn't seat him Santos can demand a vote to remove McCarthy day after day after day. Pathetic.",
">\n\nAt this point Jeffries should offer a gimme to McCarthy - we won’t call for a new speaker unless at least 1 republican does, but we get the committee post. Santos can get the boot, Kev keeps his tenuous grasp on power (but still looks like shit), dems get a slightly better footing and some good press. McCarthy won’t do it, he can’t, but the offer alone would look magnanimous.",
">\n\nConservative voters really are the most easily manipulated, shameless suckers on the planet.",
">\n\nThey convince themselves democrats do the same thing so it's okay for them too. While simultaneously pretending they are held to a higher standard.\nNot even a strawman, that's as synopsis of every thread about him on r/conservative.",
">\n\nI was curious but didn’t want to venture over there.",
">\n\nCome on Brazil let's get that extradition party started.",
">\n\nJust when you think they can't go any lower they find a whole new way to do it...",
">\n\nIt's not a rabbit hole",
">\n\nJesus H. Fu*k. This guy needs to be in jail, and as far away from any real power as possible. \nWait, that could be any of the GOP house... ok, shit, I guess he fits right in then.",
">\n\nThe GOP is a criminal organization and Russia has the receipts. That means Russian assets like Santos have the receipts which means the GOP is over the barrel.",
">\n\nWell the American people just elected those criminals to run the house of representatives. I think it's the 70+ million people voting for the criminals that we really need to be worried about.",
">\n\nSo you can be a lying sack of shit, and suffer no consequences. Wonder if that will work for me on my next job search?🤔",
">\n\nMcCarthy is pandering to people like my cousin who was and is all in on Santos in that district and genuinely thinks that all the evidence against Santos is nonsense, that it's just \"embellishing your resume- everyone does it!\" and it's not a big deal so long as he, \"does what we want and helps stick it to the dirty cheater democrats.\"\nMcCarthy knows what he's doing... the group of diehards made up of people like my cousin could make or break things going forward in elections the same way the people opposing him in his bid for speaker for the first 14 rounds mucked his \"It's my turn!\" coronation up for him. McCarthy is concerned with holding his holding his title and nothing else right now.",
">\n\nTime for a motion to vacate from literally anybody. All it takes is one house member.",
">\n\nOf course.",
">\n\nWell he’s a reflection of the current party so who’s really surprised by this?",
">\n\nThe GOP don’t mind Liars and conmen as long as they lie and con for the GOP",
">\n\nThe thing trump did was show that the narcissists, sociopaths, abusers, and other general empathy-deficient grifters that they don't have to keep pretending to be decent members of society, that they can just relax and openly be their worst selves because reasonable people aren't going to enforce any punishment against them.",
">\n\nI didn't think McCarthy could have LESS credibility, but there it is.",
">\n\nMy inner conspiracy theorist is nagging at me. \nI feel like Santos is the patsy. Not sure for what yet, but he's the guy they happily get to pin it on.",
">\n\nJust shameful. Willfully corrupted.",
">\n\ni would say this is a joke but still waiting for the funny part of the absolute lack of repercussions for people lying to get into / maintain office.",
">\n\nA party of crooks, traitors, and sociopaths",
">\n\nGiven how corrupt he is, I'm surprised he is not chairing a committee.",
">\n\nThere is no bottom. So glad I left the GOP years ago!",
">\n\nIf you ever wanted evidence that nothing matters but what party you're a member of - this is it. \nIt doesn't matter what you stand for, believe, did or didn't do in your life. The only thing that matters is the letter next to your name.\nIf your company hired someone only to find out their resume was completely and laughably fradulent, could you work with them on your team? Could you share an office with them? Would you feel like your workplace had integrity if they kept him around?",
">\n\nLook everyone! The both sides guy!!",
">\n\nMcCarthy did not have the speaker votes without Santos' vote.",
">\n\nGuy looks like he's cosplaying pepe the frog. Big 'ol DSLs.",
">\n\nI feel bad for the writers or Veep who had some of their ideas thrown out for being too outlandish. In 20 years the show will be considered a drama because reality will be so much more ridiculous than the show.",
">\n\nUnder what name?",
">\n\nWould it be normal for a rookie congressman to be appointed to committees within the first few weeks/months of being sworn in?\nI always assumed committee membership was something that would come after having proven yourself to be competent and to have some degree of expertise in the area the committee covers",
">\n\nAll members are assigned committees regardless if you’re a first year or 22nd year. Committee spots for more prestigious and powerful committees are the ones reserved to those more senior and proven",
">\n\nGood to see pathological liars given representation in government.",
">\n\nHe's going lie about being on them regardless.",
">\n\nMcCarthy is the spineless twit the GOP deserves.",
">\n\nRepublicans have no shame. They are evil.",
">\n\nMcCarthy is such a pussy",
">\n\nFirst, why? Secondly, on which committees would his expertise be applicable? The Ethics Committee?",
">\n\nHow can we as a country stand for this behavior? What is this blind allegiance to party over country? This man is a liar. More than a liar. And his own party refuses to condemn him or do anything about it. \nIt’s an absolute disgrace.",
">\n\nHonest question: How many House members typically do NOT get seated on committees?\nThis looks to me like a move McCarthy's making simply to stick it to the criticism and media swarm around Santos's con.",
">\n\nIf he's nothing else he's an (R) vote. And right now, McCarthy knows he/they basically need to take them literally however he/they can get them. \nThere's a bonus to this in that it will \"trigger dems\" so I'm sure that's a big component of it. the absence of any shame is pretty stunning though. I mean I'm not surprised but its still very distasteful.",
">\n\nMcCarthy says I will be seated on committees.",
">\n\nBetter nail down the seats.",
">\n\nSantos says McCarthy will step down and he will be elected Speaker. He also opines that Biden will step down after Vice President Harris steps down and he will be President in late 2023. It must be true, you heard it on the internet.",
">\n\nWhile McCarthy holds the rug sweeping this under it.",
">\n\nSMH only in the party of shameless trumphumping Repugnicans. They don't even try to hide it anymore. CRIMINALS and SOCIOPATHS are running our country.",
">\n\nWill he be the one reporting what the committees do?",
">\n\nWhat if he votes with Democrats? Would his lies be ok with the GOP then?"
] |
>
McCarthy, you pig. NO!
|
[
"It's been like 2 weeks and McCarthy has shown already to be such a weak speaker. \nYou are given a free win. Condemn the liar. But nope, he gets committee seats. \nShows who is really running the show.",
">\n\n\nShows who is really running the show.\n\nVladimir Putin is pleased with his investment.",
">\n\nHopefully Santos will be fed bullshit classified intel just so we can time how quickly Putin remarks about it.",
">\n\nYou're acting like Putin doesn't already own the GOPs lol. Santos is definitely not his only source.",
">\n\nOh hell no, I’m definitely not implying he’s the only one. Just that any briefing given to him specifically should have some notable discrepancies (different names, numbers, locations) that would identify him as the leak. You know, protecting confidential info slightly more securely than the screener dvds sent out for Emmy voting.",
">\n\nSantos is a symbol of the entire Republican party.\nEntirely unscrupulous and amoral, and proudly so. All is acceptable in the pursuit of power.",
">\n\n\nunscrupulous and amoral, and proudly so\n\nAnother poster some time ago described them as \"virtue signaling,\" and I had to ask what's the exact opposite of that?\nA surprising number of others couldn't seem to grasp that \"virtue\" is not what they're signaling at all.",
">\n\nVice signaling?",
">\n\nDepravity flagging?",
">\n\nWill he also be given access to classified documents?",
">\n\nIt's OK. He'll simply say he's the President and declassify them with his mind.",
">\n\nI thought he already lied that Santos is the president?",
">\n\nSo this guy's a spy right? Like now we've seen him at Trump rallies years ago using different names. Running for office under different names. Everything he's said is false, but not in a confused Herschel Walker way. It's intentional. Right? Like we can see that he's a spy right?",
">\n\nDon’t forget about the piles of money he randomly finds",
">\n\nI don't think any of that money to Santos is random. It is payment, mostly from Russia, for services rendered. He just has to cause division and disarray within the US government, as ordered by Putin.",
">\n\nEh, tough leap to make. A moderately talented conman can somewhat easily bilk the Republican rank and file for millions of dollars. Particularly when he’s willing to go the extra mile and pay people to impersonate the staff of party leadership to bilk the wealthy donor class. \nIt’s more likely this is going to wind up being Bannon’s build the wall con turned up to 11. Perhaps with some international money mixed in.",
">\n\nSo a guy who couldn't legitimately get hired to sell me an insurance policy is being trusted with actual governance.\nFFS, \"conservatives\" - do you not have anyone around to run for office that isn't a complete fucking embarrassment? Stop voting for awful fuckin people",
">\n\nI can't blame his voters on this one, he straight up lied to them. The people that are keeping him in gov't are the ones we need to worry about.",
">\n\n\n“My staff raised concerns when he had a staff member who impersonated my chief of staff, and that individual was let go when Mr. Santos found out about it,” McCarthy said Tuesday.\n\nshameless loser",
">\n\nTheoretically if he is deemed too risky to get a clearance, can Biden prevent him from getting security clearance for classified intel?",
">\n\nAs the commander in chief id say so. Congress just votes on legislation and handles the purse. Intel is much more relevant to the executive branch.",
">\n\nLol this right here shows how much the Speaker's power is neutered under McCarthy's negotiated rules. He has to seat a sociopathic liar who fraudulently damaged McCarthy's staff personally by impersonating them to get donations, and if he doesn't seat him Santos can demand a vote to remove McCarthy day after day after day. Pathetic.",
">\n\nAt this point Jeffries should offer a gimme to McCarthy - we won’t call for a new speaker unless at least 1 republican does, but we get the committee post. Santos can get the boot, Kev keeps his tenuous grasp on power (but still looks like shit), dems get a slightly better footing and some good press. McCarthy won’t do it, he can’t, but the offer alone would look magnanimous.",
">\n\nConservative voters really are the most easily manipulated, shameless suckers on the planet.",
">\n\nThey convince themselves democrats do the same thing so it's okay for them too. While simultaneously pretending they are held to a higher standard.\nNot even a strawman, that's as synopsis of every thread about him on r/conservative.",
">\n\nI was curious but didn’t want to venture over there.",
">\n\nCome on Brazil let's get that extradition party started.",
">\n\nJust when you think they can't go any lower they find a whole new way to do it...",
">\n\nIt's not a rabbit hole",
">\n\nJesus H. Fu*k. This guy needs to be in jail, and as far away from any real power as possible. \nWait, that could be any of the GOP house... ok, shit, I guess he fits right in then.",
">\n\nThe GOP is a criminal organization and Russia has the receipts. That means Russian assets like Santos have the receipts which means the GOP is over the barrel.",
">\n\nWell the American people just elected those criminals to run the house of representatives. I think it's the 70+ million people voting for the criminals that we really need to be worried about.",
">\n\nSo you can be a lying sack of shit, and suffer no consequences. Wonder if that will work for me on my next job search?🤔",
">\n\nMcCarthy is pandering to people like my cousin who was and is all in on Santos in that district and genuinely thinks that all the evidence against Santos is nonsense, that it's just \"embellishing your resume- everyone does it!\" and it's not a big deal so long as he, \"does what we want and helps stick it to the dirty cheater democrats.\"\nMcCarthy knows what he's doing... the group of diehards made up of people like my cousin could make or break things going forward in elections the same way the people opposing him in his bid for speaker for the first 14 rounds mucked his \"It's my turn!\" coronation up for him. McCarthy is concerned with holding his holding his title and nothing else right now.",
">\n\nTime for a motion to vacate from literally anybody. All it takes is one house member.",
">\n\nOf course.",
">\n\nWell he’s a reflection of the current party so who’s really surprised by this?",
">\n\nThe GOP don’t mind Liars and conmen as long as they lie and con for the GOP",
">\n\nThe thing trump did was show that the narcissists, sociopaths, abusers, and other general empathy-deficient grifters that they don't have to keep pretending to be decent members of society, that they can just relax and openly be their worst selves because reasonable people aren't going to enforce any punishment against them.",
">\n\nI didn't think McCarthy could have LESS credibility, but there it is.",
">\n\nMy inner conspiracy theorist is nagging at me. \nI feel like Santos is the patsy. Not sure for what yet, but he's the guy they happily get to pin it on.",
">\n\nJust shameful. Willfully corrupted.",
">\n\ni would say this is a joke but still waiting for the funny part of the absolute lack of repercussions for people lying to get into / maintain office.",
">\n\nA party of crooks, traitors, and sociopaths",
">\n\nGiven how corrupt he is, I'm surprised he is not chairing a committee.",
">\n\nThere is no bottom. So glad I left the GOP years ago!",
">\n\nIf you ever wanted evidence that nothing matters but what party you're a member of - this is it. \nIt doesn't matter what you stand for, believe, did or didn't do in your life. The only thing that matters is the letter next to your name.\nIf your company hired someone only to find out their resume was completely and laughably fradulent, could you work with them on your team? Could you share an office with them? Would you feel like your workplace had integrity if they kept him around?",
">\n\nLook everyone! The both sides guy!!",
">\n\nMcCarthy did not have the speaker votes without Santos' vote.",
">\n\nGuy looks like he's cosplaying pepe the frog. Big 'ol DSLs.",
">\n\nI feel bad for the writers or Veep who had some of their ideas thrown out for being too outlandish. In 20 years the show will be considered a drama because reality will be so much more ridiculous than the show.",
">\n\nUnder what name?",
">\n\nWould it be normal for a rookie congressman to be appointed to committees within the first few weeks/months of being sworn in?\nI always assumed committee membership was something that would come after having proven yourself to be competent and to have some degree of expertise in the area the committee covers",
">\n\nAll members are assigned committees regardless if you’re a first year or 22nd year. Committee spots for more prestigious and powerful committees are the ones reserved to those more senior and proven",
">\n\nGood to see pathological liars given representation in government.",
">\n\nHe's going lie about being on them regardless.",
">\n\nMcCarthy is the spineless twit the GOP deserves.",
">\n\nRepublicans have no shame. They are evil.",
">\n\nMcCarthy is such a pussy",
">\n\nFirst, why? Secondly, on which committees would his expertise be applicable? The Ethics Committee?",
">\n\nHow can we as a country stand for this behavior? What is this blind allegiance to party over country? This man is a liar. More than a liar. And his own party refuses to condemn him or do anything about it. \nIt’s an absolute disgrace.",
">\n\nHonest question: How many House members typically do NOT get seated on committees?\nThis looks to me like a move McCarthy's making simply to stick it to the criticism and media swarm around Santos's con.",
">\n\nIf he's nothing else he's an (R) vote. And right now, McCarthy knows he/they basically need to take them literally however he/they can get them. \nThere's a bonus to this in that it will \"trigger dems\" so I'm sure that's a big component of it. the absence of any shame is pretty stunning though. I mean I'm not surprised but its still very distasteful.",
">\n\nMcCarthy says I will be seated on committees.",
">\n\nBetter nail down the seats.",
">\n\nSantos says McCarthy will step down and he will be elected Speaker. He also opines that Biden will step down after Vice President Harris steps down and he will be President in late 2023. It must be true, you heard it on the internet.",
">\n\nWhile McCarthy holds the rug sweeping this under it.",
">\n\nSMH only in the party of shameless trumphumping Repugnicans. They don't even try to hide it anymore. CRIMINALS and SOCIOPATHS are running our country.",
">\n\nWill he be the one reporting what the committees do?",
">\n\nWhat if he votes with Democrats? Would his lies be ok with the GOP then?",
">\n\nSantos? You mean Antony? The guy who took Russian money after saying he didnt?"
] |
>
hey gqp made trump president...surely they can seat santos on some committees. perhaps banking or ethics...
|
[
"It's been like 2 weeks and McCarthy has shown already to be such a weak speaker. \nYou are given a free win. Condemn the liar. But nope, he gets committee seats. \nShows who is really running the show.",
">\n\n\nShows who is really running the show.\n\nVladimir Putin is pleased with his investment.",
">\n\nHopefully Santos will be fed bullshit classified intel just so we can time how quickly Putin remarks about it.",
">\n\nYou're acting like Putin doesn't already own the GOPs lol. Santos is definitely not his only source.",
">\n\nOh hell no, I’m definitely not implying he’s the only one. Just that any briefing given to him specifically should have some notable discrepancies (different names, numbers, locations) that would identify him as the leak. You know, protecting confidential info slightly more securely than the screener dvds sent out for Emmy voting.",
">\n\nSantos is a symbol of the entire Republican party.\nEntirely unscrupulous and amoral, and proudly so. All is acceptable in the pursuit of power.",
">\n\n\nunscrupulous and amoral, and proudly so\n\nAnother poster some time ago described them as \"virtue signaling,\" and I had to ask what's the exact opposite of that?\nA surprising number of others couldn't seem to grasp that \"virtue\" is not what they're signaling at all.",
">\n\nVice signaling?",
">\n\nDepravity flagging?",
">\n\nWill he also be given access to classified documents?",
">\n\nIt's OK. He'll simply say he's the President and declassify them with his mind.",
">\n\nI thought he already lied that Santos is the president?",
">\n\nSo this guy's a spy right? Like now we've seen him at Trump rallies years ago using different names. Running for office under different names. Everything he's said is false, but not in a confused Herschel Walker way. It's intentional. Right? Like we can see that he's a spy right?",
">\n\nDon’t forget about the piles of money he randomly finds",
">\n\nI don't think any of that money to Santos is random. It is payment, mostly from Russia, for services rendered. He just has to cause division and disarray within the US government, as ordered by Putin.",
">\n\nEh, tough leap to make. A moderately talented conman can somewhat easily bilk the Republican rank and file for millions of dollars. Particularly when he’s willing to go the extra mile and pay people to impersonate the staff of party leadership to bilk the wealthy donor class. \nIt’s more likely this is going to wind up being Bannon’s build the wall con turned up to 11. Perhaps with some international money mixed in.",
">\n\nSo a guy who couldn't legitimately get hired to sell me an insurance policy is being trusted with actual governance.\nFFS, \"conservatives\" - do you not have anyone around to run for office that isn't a complete fucking embarrassment? Stop voting for awful fuckin people",
">\n\nI can't blame his voters on this one, he straight up lied to them. The people that are keeping him in gov't are the ones we need to worry about.",
">\n\n\n“My staff raised concerns when he had a staff member who impersonated my chief of staff, and that individual was let go when Mr. Santos found out about it,” McCarthy said Tuesday.\n\nshameless loser",
">\n\nTheoretically if he is deemed too risky to get a clearance, can Biden prevent him from getting security clearance for classified intel?",
">\n\nAs the commander in chief id say so. Congress just votes on legislation and handles the purse. Intel is much more relevant to the executive branch.",
">\n\nLol this right here shows how much the Speaker's power is neutered under McCarthy's negotiated rules. He has to seat a sociopathic liar who fraudulently damaged McCarthy's staff personally by impersonating them to get donations, and if he doesn't seat him Santos can demand a vote to remove McCarthy day after day after day. Pathetic.",
">\n\nAt this point Jeffries should offer a gimme to McCarthy - we won’t call for a new speaker unless at least 1 republican does, but we get the committee post. Santos can get the boot, Kev keeps his tenuous grasp on power (but still looks like shit), dems get a slightly better footing and some good press. McCarthy won’t do it, he can’t, but the offer alone would look magnanimous.",
">\n\nConservative voters really are the most easily manipulated, shameless suckers on the planet.",
">\n\nThey convince themselves democrats do the same thing so it's okay for them too. While simultaneously pretending they are held to a higher standard.\nNot even a strawman, that's as synopsis of every thread about him on r/conservative.",
">\n\nI was curious but didn’t want to venture over there.",
">\n\nCome on Brazil let's get that extradition party started.",
">\n\nJust when you think they can't go any lower they find a whole new way to do it...",
">\n\nIt's not a rabbit hole",
">\n\nJesus H. Fu*k. This guy needs to be in jail, and as far away from any real power as possible. \nWait, that could be any of the GOP house... ok, shit, I guess he fits right in then.",
">\n\nThe GOP is a criminal organization and Russia has the receipts. That means Russian assets like Santos have the receipts which means the GOP is over the barrel.",
">\n\nWell the American people just elected those criminals to run the house of representatives. I think it's the 70+ million people voting for the criminals that we really need to be worried about.",
">\n\nSo you can be a lying sack of shit, and suffer no consequences. Wonder if that will work for me on my next job search?🤔",
">\n\nMcCarthy is pandering to people like my cousin who was and is all in on Santos in that district and genuinely thinks that all the evidence against Santos is nonsense, that it's just \"embellishing your resume- everyone does it!\" and it's not a big deal so long as he, \"does what we want and helps stick it to the dirty cheater democrats.\"\nMcCarthy knows what he's doing... the group of diehards made up of people like my cousin could make or break things going forward in elections the same way the people opposing him in his bid for speaker for the first 14 rounds mucked his \"It's my turn!\" coronation up for him. McCarthy is concerned with holding his holding his title and nothing else right now.",
">\n\nTime for a motion to vacate from literally anybody. All it takes is one house member.",
">\n\nOf course.",
">\n\nWell he’s a reflection of the current party so who’s really surprised by this?",
">\n\nThe GOP don’t mind Liars and conmen as long as they lie and con for the GOP",
">\n\nThe thing trump did was show that the narcissists, sociopaths, abusers, and other general empathy-deficient grifters that they don't have to keep pretending to be decent members of society, that they can just relax and openly be their worst selves because reasonable people aren't going to enforce any punishment against them.",
">\n\nI didn't think McCarthy could have LESS credibility, but there it is.",
">\n\nMy inner conspiracy theorist is nagging at me. \nI feel like Santos is the patsy. Not sure for what yet, but he's the guy they happily get to pin it on.",
">\n\nJust shameful. Willfully corrupted.",
">\n\ni would say this is a joke but still waiting for the funny part of the absolute lack of repercussions for people lying to get into / maintain office.",
">\n\nA party of crooks, traitors, and sociopaths",
">\n\nGiven how corrupt he is, I'm surprised he is not chairing a committee.",
">\n\nThere is no bottom. So glad I left the GOP years ago!",
">\n\nIf you ever wanted evidence that nothing matters but what party you're a member of - this is it. \nIt doesn't matter what you stand for, believe, did or didn't do in your life. The only thing that matters is the letter next to your name.\nIf your company hired someone only to find out their resume was completely and laughably fradulent, could you work with them on your team? Could you share an office with them? Would you feel like your workplace had integrity if they kept him around?",
">\n\nLook everyone! The both sides guy!!",
">\n\nMcCarthy did not have the speaker votes without Santos' vote.",
">\n\nGuy looks like he's cosplaying pepe the frog. Big 'ol DSLs.",
">\n\nI feel bad for the writers or Veep who had some of their ideas thrown out for being too outlandish. In 20 years the show will be considered a drama because reality will be so much more ridiculous than the show.",
">\n\nUnder what name?",
">\n\nWould it be normal for a rookie congressman to be appointed to committees within the first few weeks/months of being sworn in?\nI always assumed committee membership was something that would come after having proven yourself to be competent and to have some degree of expertise in the area the committee covers",
">\n\nAll members are assigned committees regardless if you’re a first year or 22nd year. Committee spots for more prestigious and powerful committees are the ones reserved to those more senior and proven",
">\n\nGood to see pathological liars given representation in government.",
">\n\nHe's going lie about being on them regardless.",
">\n\nMcCarthy is the spineless twit the GOP deserves.",
">\n\nRepublicans have no shame. They are evil.",
">\n\nMcCarthy is such a pussy",
">\n\nFirst, why? Secondly, on which committees would his expertise be applicable? The Ethics Committee?",
">\n\nHow can we as a country stand for this behavior? What is this blind allegiance to party over country? This man is a liar. More than a liar. And his own party refuses to condemn him or do anything about it. \nIt’s an absolute disgrace.",
">\n\nHonest question: How many House members typically do NOT get seated on committees?\nThis looks to me like a move McCarthy's making simply to stick it to the criticism and media swarm around Santos's con.",
">\n\nIf he's nothing else he's an (R) vote. And right now, McCarthy knows he/they basically need to take them literally however he/they can get them. \nThere's a bonus to this in that it will \"trigger dems\" so I'm sure that's a big component of it. the absence of any shame is pretty stunning though. I mean I'm not surprised but its still very distasteful.",
">\n\nMcCarthy says I will be seated on committees.",
">\n\nBetter nail down the seats.",
">\n\nSantos says McCarthy will step down and he will be elected Speaker. He also opines that Biden will step down after Vice President Harris steps down and he will be President in late 2023. It must be true, you heard it on the internet.",
">\n\nWhile McCarthy holds the rug sweeping this under it.",
">\n\nSMH only in the party of shameless trumphumping Repugnicans. They don't even try to hide it anymore. CRIMINALS and SOCIOPATHS are running our country.",
">\n\nWill he be the one reporting what the committees do?",
">\n\nWhat if he votes with Democrats? Would his lies be ok with the GOP then?",
">\n\nSantos? You mean Antony? The guy who took Russian money after saying he didnt?",
">\n\nMcCarthy, you pig. NO!"
] |
>
Well, or course. Republicans have no shame and this should surprise nobody.
|
[
"It's been like 2 weeks and McCarthy has shown already to be such a weak speaker. \nYou are given a free win. Condemn the liar. But nope, he gets committee seats. \nShows who is really running the show.",
">\n\n\nShows who is really running the show.\n\nVladimir Putin is pleased with his investment.",
">\n\nHopefully Santos will be fed bullshit classified intel just so we can time how quickly Putin remarks about it.",
">\n\nYou're acting like Putin doesn't already own the GOPs lol. Santos is definitely not his only source.",
">\n\nOh hell no, I’m definitely not implying he’s the only one. Just that any briefing given to him specifically should have some notable discrepancies (different names, numbers, locations) that would identify him as the leak. You know, protecting confidential info slightly more securely than the screener dvds sent out for Emmy voting.",
">\n\nSantos is a symbol of the entire Republican party.\nEntirely unscrupulous and amoral, and proudly so. All is acceptable in the pursuit of power.",
">\n\n\nunscrupulous and amoral, and proudly so\n\nAnother poster some time ago described them as \"virtue signaling,\" and I had to ask what's the exact opposite of that?\nA surprising number of others couldn't seem to grasp that \"virtue\" is not what they're signaling at all.",
">\n\nVice signaling?",
">\n\nDepravity flagging?",
">\n\nWill he also be given access to classified documents?",
">\n\nIt's OK. He'll simply say he's the President and declassify them with his mind.",
">\n\nI thought he already lied that Santos is the president?",
">\n\nSo this guy's a spy right? Like now we've seen him at Trump rallies years ago using different names. Running for office under different names. Everything he's said is false, but not in a confused Herschel Walker way. It's intentional. Right? Like we can see that he's a spy right?",
">\n\nDon’t forget about the piles of money he randomly finds",
">\n\nI don't think any of that money to Santos is random. It is payment, mostly from Russia, for services rendered. He just has to cause division and disarray within the US government, as ordered by Putin.",
">\n\nEh, tough leap to make. A moderately talented conman can somewhat easily bilk the Republican rank and file for millions of dollars. Particularly when he’s willing to go the extra mile and pay people to impersonate the staff of party leadership to bilk the wealthy donor class. \nIt’s more likely this is going to wind up being Bannon’s build the wall con turned up to 11. Perhaps with some international money mixed in.",
">\n\nSo a guy who couldn't legitimately get hired to sell me an insurance policy is being trusted with actual governance.\nFFS, \"conservatives\" - do you not have anyone around to run for office that isn't a complete fucking embarrassment? Stop voting for awful fuckin people",
">\n\nI can't blame his voters on this one, he straight up lied to them. The people that are keeping him in gov't are the ones we need to worry about.",
">\n\n\n“My staff raised concerns when he had a staff member who impersonated my chief of staff, and that individual was let go when Mr. Santos found out about it,” McCarthy said Tuesday.\n\nshameless loser",
">\n\nTheoretically if he is deemed too risky to get a clearance, can Biden prevent him from getting security clearance for classified intel?",
">\n\nAs the commander in chief id say so. Congress just votes on legislation and handles the purse. Intel is much more relevant to the executive branch.",
">\n\nLol this right here shows how much the Speaker's power is neutered under McCarthy's negotiated rules. He has to seat a sociopathic liar who fraudulently damaged McCarthy's staff personally by impersonating them to get donations, and if he doesn't seat him Santos can demand a vote to remove McCarthy day after day after day. Pathetic.",
">\n\nAt this point Jeffries should offer a gimme to McCarthy - we won’t call for a new speaker unless at least 1 republican does, but we get the committee post. Santos can get the boot, Kev keeps his tenuous grasp on power (but still looks like shit), dems get a slightly better footing and some good press. McCarthy won’t do it, he can’t, but the offer alone would look magnanimous.",
">\n\nConservative voters really are the most easily manipulated, shameless suckers on the planet.",
">\n\nThey convince themselves democrats do the same thing so it's okay for them too. While simultaneously pretending they are held to a higher standard.\nNot even a strawman, that's as synopsis of every thread about him on r/conservative.",
">\n\nI was curious but didn’t want to venture over there.",
">\n\nCome on Brazil let's get that extradition party started.",
">\n\nJust when you think they can't go any lower they find a whole new way to do it...",
">\n\nIt's not a rabbit hole",
">\n\nJesus H. Fu*k. This guy needs to be in jail, and as far away from any real power as possible. \nWait, that could be any of the GOP house... ok, shit, I guess he fits right in then.",
">\n\nThe GOP is a criminal organization and Russia has the receipts. That means Russian assets like Santos have the receipts which means the GOP is over the barrel.",
">\n\nWell the American people just elected those criminals to run the house of representatives. I think it's the 70+ million people voting for the criminals that we really need to be worried about.",
">\n\nSo you can be a lying sack of shit, and suffer no consequences. Wonder if that will work for me on my next job search?🤔",
">\n\nMcCarthy is pandering to people like my cousin who was and is all in on Santos in that district and genuinely thinks that all the evidence against Santos is nonsense, that it's just \"embellishing your resume- everyone does it!\" and it's not a big deal so long as he, \"does what we want and helps stick it to the dirty cheater democrats.\"\nMcCarthy knows what he's doing... the group of diehards made up of people like my cousin could make or break things going forward in elections the same way the people opposing him in his bid for speaker for the first 14 rounds mucked his \"It's my turn!\" coronation up for him. McCarthy is concerned with holding his holding his title and nothing else right now.",
">\n\nTime for a motion to vacate from literally anybody. All it takes is one house member.",
">\n\nOf course.",
">\n\nWell he’s a reflection of the current party so who’s really surprised by this?",
">\n\nThe GOP don’t mind Liars and conmen as long as they lie and con for the GOP",
">\n\nThe thing trump did was show that the narcissists, sociopaths, abusers, and other general empathy-deficient grifters that they don't have to keep pretending to be decent members of society, that they can just relax and openly be their worst selves because reasonable people aren't going to enforce any punishment against them.",
">\n\nI didn't think McCarthy could have LESS credibility, but there it is.",
">\n\nMy inner conspiracy theorist is nagging at me. \nI feel like Santos is the patsy. Not sure for what yet, but he's the guy they happily get to pin it on.",
">\n\nJust shameful. Willfully corrupted.",
">\n\ni would say this is a joke but still waiting for the funny part of the absolute lack of repercussions for people lying to get into / maintain office.",
">\n\nA party of crooks, traitors, and sociopaths",
">\n\nGiven how corrupt he is, I'm surprised he is not chairing a committee.",
">\n\nThere is no bottom. So glad I left the GOP years ago!",
">\n\nIf you ever wanted evidence that nothing matters but what party you're a member of - this is it. \nIt doesn't matter what you stand for, believe, did or didn't do in your life. The only thing that matters is the letter next to your name.\nIf your company hired someone only to find out their resume was completely and laughably fradulent, could you work with them on your team? Could you share an office with them? Would you feel like your workplace had integrity if they kept him around?",
">\n\nLook everyone! The both sides guy!!",
">\n\nMcCarthy did not have the speaker votes without Santos' vote.",
">\n\nGuy looks like he's cosplaying pepe the frog. Big 'ol DSLs.",
">\n\nI feel bad for the writers or Veep who had some of their ideas thrown out for being too outlandish. In 20 years the show will be considered a drama because reality will be so much more ridiculous than the show.",
">\n\nUnder what name?",
">\n\nWould it be normal for a rookie congressman to be appointed to committees within the first few weeks/months of being sworn in?\nI always assumed committee membership was something that would come after having proven yourself to be competent and to have some degree of expertise in the area the committee covers",
">\n\nAll members are assigned committees regardless if you’re a first year or 22nd year. Committee spots for more prestigious and powerful committees are the ones reserved to those more senior and proven",
">\n\nGood to see pathological liars given representation in government.",
">\n\nHe's going lie about being on them regardless.",
">\n\nMcCarthy is the spineless twit the GOP deserves.",
">\n\nRepublicans have no shame. They are evil.",
">\n\nMcCarthy is such a pussy",
">\n\nFirst, why? Secondly, on which committees would his expertise be applicable? The Ethics Committee?",
">\n\nHow can we as a country stand for this behavior? What is this blind allegiance to party over country? This man is a liar. More than a liar. And his own party refuses to condemn him or do anything about it. \nIt’s an absolute disgrace.",
">\n\nHonest question: How many House members typically do NOT get seated on committees?\nThis looks to me like a move McCarthy's making simply to stick it to the criticism and media swarm around Santos's con.",
">\n\nIf he's nothing else he's an (R) vote. And right now, McCarthy knows he/they basically need to take them literally however he/they can get them. \nThere's a bonus to this in that it will \"trigger dems\" so I'm sure that's a big component of it. the absence of any shame is pretty stunning though. I mean I'm not surprised but its still very distasteful.",
">\n\nMcCarthy says I will be seated on committees.",
">\n\nBetter nail down the seats.",
">\n\nSantos says McCarthy will step down and he will be elected Speaker. He also opines that Biden will step down after Vice President Harris steps down and he will be President in late 2023. It must be true, you heard it on the internet.",
">\n\nWhile McCarthy holds the rug sweeping this under it.",
">\n\nSMH only in the party of shameless trumphumping Repugnicans. They don't even try to hide it anymore. CRIMINALS and SOCIOPATHS are running our country.",
">\n\nWill he be the one reporting what the committees do?",
">\n\nWhat if he votes with Democrats? Would his lies be ok with the GOP then?",
">\n\nSantos? You mean Antony? The guy who took Russian money after saying he didnt?",
">\n\nMcCarthy, you pig. NO!",
">\n\nhey gqp made trump president...surely they can seat santos on some committees. perhaps banking or ethics..."
] |
>
Speaker Kevin McCarthy (R-Calif.) on Tuesday said Rep. George Santos (R-N.Y.) will be seated on committees, after the embattled freshman lawmaker …….”admitted to embellishing parts of his résumé.”
Sick of seeing this headline!
So if a drunk driver killed somebody, their headline would be “ possibly impaired man may have been involved in traffic incident.”
|
[
"It's been like 2 weeks and McCarthy has shown already to be such a weak speaker. \nYou are given a free win. Condemn the liar. But nope, he gets committee seats. \nShows who is really running the show.",
">\n\n\nShows who is really running the show.\n\nVladimir Putin is pleased with his investment.",
">\n\nHopefully Santos will be fed bullshit classified intel just so we can time how quickly Putin remarks about it.",
">\n\nYou're acting like Putin doesn't already own the GOPs lol. Santos is definitely not his only source.",
">\n\nOh hell no, I’m definitely not implying he’s the only one. Just that any briefing given to him specifically should have some notable discrepancies (different names, numbers, locations) that would identify him as the leak. You know, protecting confidential info slightly more securely than the screener dvds sent out for Emmy voting.",
">\n\nSantos is a symbol of the entire Republican party.\nEntirely unscrupulous and amoral, and proudly so. All is acceptable in the pursuit of power.",
">\n\n\nunscrupulous and amoral, and proudly so\n\nAnother poster some time ago described them as \"virtue signaling,\" and I had to ask what's the exact opposite of that?\nA surprising number of others couldn't seem to grasp that \"virtue\" is not what they're signaling at all.",
">\n\nVice signaling?",
">\n\nDepravity flagging?",
">\n\nWill he also be given access to classified documents?",
">\n\nIt's OK. He'll simply say he's the President and declassify them with his mind.",
">\n\nI thought he already lied that Santos is the president?",
">\n\nSo this guy's a spy right? Like now we've seen him at Trump rallies years ago using different names. Running for office under different names. Everything he's said is false, but not in a confused Herschel Walker way. It's intentional. Right? Like we can see that he's a spy right?",
">\n\nDon’t forget about the piles of money he randomly finds",
">\n\nI don't think any of that money to Santos is random. It is payment, mostly from Russia, for services rendered. He just has to cause division and disarray within the US government, as ordered by Putin.",
">\n\nEh, tough leap to make. A moderately talented conman can somewhat easily bilk the Republican rank and file for millions of dollars. Particularly when he’s willing to go the extra mile and pay people to impersonate the staff of party leadership to bilk the wealthy donor class. \nIt’s more likely this is going to wind up being Bannon’s build the wall con turned up to 11. Perhaps with some international money mixed in.",
">\n\nSo a guy who couldn't legitimately get hired to sell me an insurance policy is being trusted with actual governance.\nFFS, \"conservatives\" - do you not have anyone around to run for office that isn't a complete fucking embarrassment? Stop voting for awful fuckin people",
">\n\nI can't blame his voters on this one, he straight up lied to them. The people that are keeping him in gov't are the ones we need to worry about.",
">\n\n\n“My staff raised concerns when he had a staff member who impersonated my chief of staff, and that individual was let go when Mr. Santos found out about it,” McCarthy said Tuesday.\n\nshameless loser",
">\n\nTheoretically if he is deemed too risky to get a clearance, can Biden prevent him from getting security clearance for classified intel?",
">\n\nAs the commander in chief id say so. Congress just votes on legislation and handles the purse. Intel is much more relevant to the executive branch.",
">\n\nLol this right here shows how much the Speaker's power is neutered under McCarthy's negotiated rules. He has to seat a sociopathic liar who fraudulently damaged McCarthy's staff personally by impersonating them to get donations, and if he doesn't seat him Santos can demand a vote to remove McCarthy day after day after day. Pathetic.",
">\n\nAt this point Jeffries should offer a gimme to McCarthy - we won’t call for a new speaker unless at least 1 republican does, but we get the committee post. Santos can get the boot, Kev keeps his tenuous grasp on power (but still looks like shit), dems get a slightly better footing and some good press. McCarthy won’t do it, he can’t, but the offer alone would look magnanimous.",
">\n\nConservative voters really are the most easily manipulated, shameless suckers on the planet.",
">\n\nThey convince themselves democrats do the same thing so it's okay for them too. While simultaneously pretending they are held to a higher standard.\nNot even a strawman, that's as synopsis of every thread about him on r/conservative.",
">\n\nI was curious but didn’t want to venture over there.",
">\n\nCome on Brazil let's get that extradition party started.",
">\n\nJust when you think they can't go any lower they find a whole new way to do it...",
">\n\nIt's not a rabbit hole",
">\n\nJesus H. Fu*k. This guy needs to be in jail, and as far away from any real power as possible. \nWait, that could be any of the GOP house... ok, shit, I guess he fits right in then.",
">\n\nThe GOP is a criminal organization and Russia has the receipts. That means Russian assets like Santos have the receipts which means the GOP is over the barrel.",
">\n\nWell the American people just elected those criminals to run the house of representatives. I think it's the 70+ million people voting for the criminals that we really need to be worried about.",
">\n\nSo you can be a lying sack of shit, and suffer no consequences. Wonder if that will work for me on my next job search?🤔",
">\n\nMcCarthy is pandering to people like my cousin who was and is all in on Santos in that district and genuinely thinks that all the evidence against Santos is nonsense, that it's just \"embellishing your resume- everyone does it!\" and it's not a big deal so long as he, \"does what we want and helps stick it to the dirty cheater democrats.\"\nMcCarthy knows what he's doing... the group of diehards made up of people like my cousin could make or break things going forward in elections the same way the people opposing him in his bid for speaker for the first 14 rounds mucked his \"It's my turn!\" coronation up for him. McCarthy is concerned with holding his holding his title and nothing else right now.",
">\n\nTime for a motion to vacate from literally anybody. All it takes is one house member.",
">\n\nOf course.",
">\n\nWell he’s a reflection of the current party so who’s really surprised by this?",
">\n\nThe GOP don’t mind Liars and conmen as long as they lie and con for the GOP",
">\n\nThe thing trump did was show that the narcissists, sociopaths, abusers, and other general empathy-deficient grifters that they don't have to keep pretending to be decent members of society, that they can just relax and openly be their worst selves because reasonable people aren't going to enforce any punishment against them.",
">\n\nI didn't think McCarthy could have LESS credibility, but there it is.",
">\n\nMy inner conspiracy theorist is nagging at me. \nI feel like Santos is the patsy. Not sure for what yet, but he's the guy they happily get to pin it on.",
">\n\nJust shameful. Willfully corrupted.",
">\n\ni would say this is a joke but still waiting for the funny part of the absolute lack of repercussions for people lying to get into / maintain office.",
">\n\nA party of crooks, traitors, and sociopaths",
">\n\nGiven how corrupt he is, I'm surprised he is not chairing a committee.",
">\n\nThere is no bottom. So glad I left the GOP years ago!",
">\n\nIf you ever wanted evidence that nothing matters but what party you're a member of - this is it. \nIt doesn't matter what you stand for, believe, did or didn't do in your life. The only thing that matters is the letter next to your name.\nIf your company hired someone only to find out their resume was completely and laughably fradulent, could you work with them on your team? Could you share an office with them? Would you feel like your workplace had integrity if they kept him around?",
">\n\nLook everyone! The both sides guy!!",
">\n\nMcCarthy did not have the speaker votes without Santos' vote.",
">\n\nGuy looks like he's cosplaying pepe the frog. Big 'ol DSLs.",
">\n\nI feel bad for the writers or Veep who had some of their ideas thrown out for being too outlandish. In 20 years the show will be considered a drama because reality will be so much more ridiculous than the show.",
">\n\nUnder what name?",
">\n\nWould it be normal for a rookie congressman to be appointed to committees within the first few weeks/months of being sworn in?\nI always assumed committee membership was something that would come after having proven yourself to be competent and to have some degree of expertise in the area the committee covers",
">\n\nAll members are assigned committees regardless if you’re a first year or 22nd year. Committee spots for more prestigious and powerful committees are the ones reserved to those more senior and proven",
">\n\nGood to see pathological liars given representation in government.",
">\n\nHe's going lie about being on them regardless.",
">\n\nMcCarthy is the spineless twit the GOP deserves.",
">\n\nRepublicans have no shame. They are evil.",
">\n\nMcCarthy is such a pussy",
">\n\nFirst, why? Secondly, on which committees would his expertise be applicable? The Ethics Committee?",
">\n\nHow can we as a country stand for this behavior? What is this blind allegiance to party over country? This man is a liar. More than a liar. And his own party refuses to condemn him or do anything about it. \nIt’s an absolute disgrace.",
">\n\nHonest question: How many House members typically do NOT get seated on committees?\nThis looks to me like a move McCarthy's making simply to stick it to the criticism and media swarm around Santos's con.",
">\n\nIf he's nothing else he's an (R) vote. And right now, McCarthy knows he/they basically need to take them literally however he/they can get them. \nThere's a bonus to this in that it will \"trigger dems\" so I'm sure that's a big component of it. the absence of any shame is pretty stunning though. I mean I'm not surprised but its still very distasteful.",
">\n\nMcCarthy says I will be seated on committees.",
">\n\nBetter nail down the seats.",
">\n\nSantos says McCarthy will step down and he will be elected Speaker. He also opines that Biden will step down after Vice President Harris steps down and he will be President in late 2023. It must be true, you heard it on the internet.",
">\n\nWhile McCarthy holds the rug sweeping this under it.",
">\n\nSMH only in the party of shameless trumphumping Repugnicans. They don't even try to hide it anymore. CRIMINALS and SOCIOPATHS are running our country.",
">\n\nWill he be the one reporting what the committees do?",
">\n\nWhat if he votes with Democrats? Would his lies be ok with the GOP then?",
">\n\nSantos? You mean Antony? The guy who took Russian money after saying he didnt?",
">\n\nMcCarthy, you pig. NO!",
">\n\nhey gqp made trump president...surely they can seat santos on some committees. perhaps banking or ethics...",
">\n\nWell, or course. Republicans have no shame and this should surprise nobody."
] |
>
And here we see the fatal spread of griftrot starting to take hold of its host.
|
[
"It's been like 2 weeks and McCarthy has shown already to be such a weak speaker. \nYou are given a free win. Condemn the liar. But nope, he gets committee seats. \nShows who is really running the show.",
">\n\n\nShows who is really running the show.\n\nVladimir Putin is pleased with his investment.",
">\n\nHopefully Santos will be fed bullshit classified intel just so we can time how quickly Putin remarks about it.",
">\n\nYou're acting like Putin doesn't already own the GOPs lol. Santos is definitely not his only source.",
">\n\nOh hell no, I’m definitely not implying he’s the only one. Just that any briefing given to him specifically should have some notable discrepancies (different names, numbers, locations) that would identify him as the leak. You know, protecting confidential info slightly more securely than the screener dvds sent out for Emmy voting.",
">\n\nSantos is a symbol of the entire Republican party.\nEntirely unscrupulous and amoral, and proudly so. All is acceptable in the pursuit of power.",
">\n\n\nunscrupulous and amoral, and proudly so\n\nAnother poster some time ago described them as \"virtue signaling,\" and I had to ask what's the exact opposite of that?\nA surprising number of others couldn't seem to grasp that \"virtue\" is not what they're signaling at all.",
">\n\nVice signaling?",
">\n\nDepravity flagging?",
">\n\nWill he also be given access to classified documents?",
">\n\nIt's OK. He'll simply say he's the President and declassify them with his mind.",
">\n\nI thought he already lied that Santos is the president?",
">\n\nSo this guy's a spy right? Like now we've seen him at Trump rallies years ago using different names. Running for office under different names. Everything he's said is false, but not in a confused Herschel Walker way. It's intentional. Right? Like we can see that he's a spy right?",
">\n\nDon’t forget about the piles of money he randomly finds",
">\n\nI don't think any of that money to Santos is random. It is payment, mostly from Russia, for services rendered. He just has to cause division and disarray within the US government, as ordered by Putin.",
">\n\nEh, tough leap to make. A moderately talented conman can somewhat easily bilk the Republican rank and file for millions of dollars. Particularly when he’s willing to go the extra mile and pay people to impersonate the staff of party leadership to bilk the wealthy donor class. \nIt’s more likely this is going to wind up being Bannon’s build the wall con turned up to 11. Perhaps with some international money mixed in.",
">\n\nSo a guy who couldn't legitimately get hired to sell me an insurance policy is being trusted with actual governance.\nFFS, \"conservatives\" - do you not have anyone around to run for office that isn't a complete fucking embarrassment? Stop voting for awful fuckin people",
">\n\nI can't blame his voters on this one, he straight up lied to them. The people that are keeping him in gov't are the ones we need to worry about.",
">\n\n\n“My staff raised concerns when he had a staff member who impersonated my chief of staff, and that individual was let go when Mr. Santos found out about it,” McCarthy said Tuesday.\n\nshameless loser",
">\n\nTheoretically if he is deemed too risky to get a clearance, can Biden prevent him from getting security clearance for classified intel?",
">\n\nAs the commander in chief id say so. Congress just votes on legislation and handles the purse. Intel is much more relevant to the executive branch.",
">\n\nLol this right here shows how much the Speaker's power is neutered under McCarthy's negotiated rules. He has to seat a sociopathic liar who fraudulently damaged McCarthy's staff personally by impersonating them to get donations, and if he doesn't seat him Santos can demand a vote to remove McCarthy day after day after day. Pathetic.",
">\n\nAt this point Jeffries should offer a gimme to McCarthy - we won’t call for a new speaker unless at least 1 republican does, but we get the committee post. Santos can get the boot, Kev keeps his tenuous grasp on power (but still looks like shit), dems get a slightly better footing and some good press. McCarthy won’t do it, he can’t, but the offer alone would look magnanimous.",
">\n\nConservative voters really are the most easily manipulated, shameless suckers on the planet.",
">\n\nThey convince themselves democrats do the same thing so it's okay for them too. While simultaneously pretending they are held to a higher standard.\nNot even a strawman, that's as synopsis of every thread about him on r/conservative.",
">\n\nI was curious but didn’t want to venture over there.",
">\n\nCome on Brazil let's get that extradition party started.",
">\n\nJust when you think they can't go any lower they find a whole new way to do it...",
">\n\nIt's not a rabbit hole",
">\n\nJesus H. Fu*k. This guy needs to be in jail, and as far away from any real power as possible. \nWait, that could be any of the GOP house... ok, shit, I guess he fits right in then.",
">\n\nThe GOP is a criminal organization and Russia has the receipts. That means Russian assets like Santos have the receipts which means the GOP is over the barrel.",
">\n\nWell the American people just elected those criminals to run the house of representatives. I think it's the 70+ million people voting for the criminals that we really need to be worried about.",
">\n\nSo you can be a lying sack of shit, and suffer no consequences. Wonder if that will work for me on my next job search?🤔",
">\n\nMcCarthy is pandering to people like my cousin who was and is all in on Santos in that district and genuinely thinks that all the evidence against Santos is nonsense, that it's just \"embellishing your resume- everyone does it!\" and it's not a big deal so long as he, \"does what we want and helps stick it to the dirty cheater democrats.\"\nMcCarthy knows what he's doing... the group of diehards made up of people like my cousin could make or break things going forward in elections the same way the people opposing him in his bid for speaker for the first 14 rounds mucked his \"It's my turn!\" coronation up for him. McCarthy is concerned with holding his holding his title and nothing else right now.",
">\n\nTime for a motion to vacate from literally anybody. All it takes is one house member.",
">\n\nOf course.",
">\n\nWell he’s a reflection of the current party so who’s really surprised by this?",
">\n\nThe GOP don’t mind Liars and conmen as long as they lie and con for the GOP",
">\n\nThe thing trump did was show that the narcissists, sociopaths, abusers, and other general empathy-deficient grifters that they don't have to keep pretending to be decent members of society, that they can just relax and openly be their worst selves because reasonable people aren't going to enforce any punishment against them.",
">\n\nI didn't think McCarthy could have LESS credibility, but there it is.",
">\n\nMy inner conspiracy theorist is nagging at me. \nI feel like Santos is the patsy. Not sure for what yet, but he's the guy they happily get to pin it on.",
">\n\nJust shameful. Willfully corrupted.",
">\n\ni would say this is a joke but still waiting for the funny part of the absolute lack of repercussions for people lying to get into / maintain office.",
">\n\nA party of crooks, traitors, and sociopaths",
">\n\nGiven how corrupt he is, I'm surprised he is not chairing a committee.",
">\n\nThere is no bottom. So glad I left the GOP years ago!",
">\n\nIf you ever wanted evidence that nothing matters but what party you're a member of - this is it. \nIt doesn't matter what you stand for, believe, did or didn't do in your life. The only thing that matters is the letter next to your name.\nIf your company hired someone only to find out their resume was completely and laughably fradulent, could you work with them on your team? Could you share an office with them? Would you feel like your workplace had integrity if they kept him around?",
">\n\nLook everyone! The both sides guy!!",
">\n\nMcCarthy did not have the speaker votes without Santos' vote.",
">\n\nGuy looks like he's cosplaying pepe the frog. Big 'ol DSLs.",
">\n\nI feel bad for the writers or Veep who had some of their ideas thrown out for being too outlandish. In 20 years the show will be considered a drama because reality will be so much more ridiculous than the show.",
">\n\nUnder what name?",
">\n\nWould it be normal for a rookie congressman to be appointed to committees within the first few weeks/months of being sworn in?\nI always assumed committee membership was something that would come after having proven yourself to be competent and to have some degree of expertise in the area the committee covers",
">\n\nAll members are assigned committees regardless if you’re a first year or 22nd year. Committee spots for more prestigious and powerful committees are the ones reserved to those more senior and proven",
">\n\nGood to see pathological liars given representation in government.",
">\n\nHe's going lie about being on them regardless.",
">\n\nMcCarthy is the spineless twit the GOP deserves.",
">\n\nRepublicans have no shame. They are evil.",
">\n\nMcCarthy is such a pussy",
">\n\nFirst, why? Secondly, on which committees would his expertise be applicable? The Ethics Committee?",
">\n\nHow can we as a country stand for this behavior? What is this blind allegiance to party over country? This man is a liar. More than a liar. And his own party refuses to condemn him or do anything about it. \nIt’s an absolute disgrace.",
">\n\nHonest question: How many House members typically do NOT get seated on committees?\nThis looks to me like a move McCarthy's making simply to stick it to the criticism and media swarm around Santos's con.",
">\n\nIf he's nothing else he's an (R) vote. And right now, McCarthy knows he/they basically need to take them literally however he/they can get them. \nThere's a bonus to this in that it will \"trigger dems\" so I'm sure that's a big component of it. the absence of any shame is pretty stunning though. I mean I'm not surprised but its still very distasteful.",
">\n\nMcCarthy says I will be seated on committees.",
">\n\nBetter nail down the seats.",
">\n\nSantos says McCarthy will step down and he will be elected Speaker. He also opines that Biden will step down after Vice President Harris steps down and he will be President in late 2023. It must be true, you heard it on the internet.",
">\n\nWhile McCarthy holds the rug sweeping this under it.",
">\n\nSMH only in the party of shameless trumphumping Repugnicans. They don't even try to hide it anymore. CRIMINALS and SOCIOPATHS are running our country.",
">\n\nWill he be the one reporting what the committees do?",
">\n\nWhat if he votes with Democrats? Would his lies be ok with the GOP then?",
">\n\nSantos? You mean Antony? The guy who took Russian money after saying he didnt?",
">\n\nMcCarthy, you pig. NO!",
">\n\nhey gqp made trump president...surely they can seat santos on some committees. perhaps banking or ethics...",
">\n\nWell, or course. Republicans have no shame and this should surprise nobody.",
">\n\nSpeaker Kevin McCarthy (R-Calif.) on Tuesday said Rep. George Santos (R-N.Y.) will be seated on committees, after the embattled freshman lawmaker …….”admitted to embellishing parts of his résumé.”\nSick of seeing this headline!\nSo if a drunk driver killed somebody, their headline would be “ possibly impaired man may have been involved in traffic incident.”"
] |
>
Well at lest he’s not on a national security committee
|
[
"It's been like 2 weeks and McCarthy has shown already to be such a weak speaker. \nYou are given a free win. Condemn the liar. But nope, he gets committee seats. \nShows who is really running the show.",
">\n\n\nShows who is really running the show.\n\nVladimir Putin is pleased with his investment.",
">\n\nHopefully Santos will be fed bullshit classified intel just so we can time how quickly Putin remarks about it.",
">\n\nYou're acting like Putin doesn't already own the GOPs lol. Santos is definitely not his only source.",
">\n\nOh hell no, I’m definitely not implying he’s the only one. Just that any briefing given to him specifically should have some notable discrepancies (different names, numbers, locations) that would identify him as the leak. You know, protecting confidential info slightly more securely than the screener dvds sent out for Emmy voting.",
">\n\nSantos is a symbol of the entire Republican party.\nEntirely unscrupulous and amoral, and proudly so. All is acceptable in the pursuit of power.",
">\n\n\nunscrupulous and amoral, and proudly so\n\nAnother poster some time ago described them as \"virtue signaling,\" and I had to ask what's the exact opposite of that?\nA surprising number of others couldn't seem to grasp that \"virtue\" is not what they're signaling at all.",
">\n\nVice signaling?",
">\n\nDepravity flagging?",
">\n\nWill he also be given access to classified documents?",
">\n\nIt's OK. He'll simply say he's the President and declassify them with his mind.",
">\n\nI thought he already lied that Santos is the president?",
">\n\nSo this guy's a spy right? Like now we've seen him at Trump rallies years ago using different names. Running for office under different names. Everything he's said is false, but not in a confused Herschel Walker way. It's intentional. Right? Like we can see that he's a spy right?",
">\n\nDon’t forget about the piles of money he randomly finds",
">\n\nI don't think any of that money to Santos is random. It is payment, mostly from Russia, for services rendered. He just has to cause division and disarray within the US government, as ordered by Putin.",
">\n\nEh, tough leap to make. A moderately talented conman can somewhat easily bilk the Republican rank and file for millions of dollars. Particularly when he’s willing to go the extra mile and pay people to impersonate the staff of party leadership to bilk the wealthy donor class. \nIt’s more likely this is going to wind up being Bannon’s build the wall con turned up to 11. Perhaps with some international money mixed in.",
">\n\nSo a guy who couldn't legitimately get hired to sell me an insurance policy is being trusted with actual governance.\nFFS, \"conservatives\" - do you not have anyone around to run for office that isn't a complete fucking embarrassment? Stop voting for awful fuckin people",
">\n\nI can't blame his voters on this one, he straight up lied to them. The people that are keeping him in gov't are the ones we need to worry about.",
">\n\n\n“My staff raised concerns when he had a staff member who impersonated my chief of staff, and that individual was let go when Mr. Santos found out about it,” McCarthy said Tuesday.\n\nshameless loser",
">\n\nTheoretically if he is deemed too risky to get a clearance, can Biden prevent him from getting security clearance for classified intel?",
">\n\nAs the commander in chief id say so. Congress just votes on legislation and handles the purse. Intel is much more relevant to the executive branch.",
">\n\nLol this right here shows how much the Speaker's power is neutered under McCarthy's negotiated rules. He has to seat a sociopathic liar who fraudulently damaged McCarthy's staff personally by impersonating them to get donations, and if he doesn't seat him Santos can demand a vote to remove McCarthy day after day after day. Pathetic.",
">\n\nAt this point Jeffries should offer a gimme to McCarthy - we won’t call for a new speaker unless at least 1 republican does, but we get the committee post. Santos can get the boot, Kev keeps his tenuous grasp on power (but still looks like shit), dems get a slightly better footing and some good press. McCarthy won’t do it, he can’t, but the offer alone would look magnanimous.",
">\n\nConservative voters really are the most easily manipulated, shameless suckers on the planet.",
">\n\nThey convince themselves democrats do the same thing so it's okay for them too. While simultaneously pretending they are held to a higher standard.\nNot even a strawman, that's as synopsis of every thread about him on r/conservative.",
">\n\nI was curious but didn’t want to venture over there.",
">\n\nCome on Brazil let's get that extradition party started.",
">\n\nJust when you think they can't go any lower they find a whole new way to do it...",
">\n\nIt's not a rabbit hole",
">\n\nJesus H. Fu*k. This guy needs to be in jail, and as far away from any real power as possible. \nWait, that could be any of the GOP house... ok, shit, I guess he fits right in then.",
">\n\nThe GOP is a criminal organization and Russia has the receipts. That means Russian assets like Santos have the receipts which means the GOP is over the barrel.",
">\n\nWell the American people just elected those criminals to run the house of representatives. I think it's the 70+ million people voting for the criminals that we really need to be worried about.",
">\n\nSo you can be a lying sack of shit, and suffer no consequences. Wonder if that will work for me on my next job search?🤔",
">\n\nMcCarthy is pandering to people like my cousin who was and is all in on Santos in that district and genuinely thinks that all the evidence against Santos is nonsense, that it's just \"embellishing your resume- everyone does it!\" and it's not a big deal so long as he, \"does what we want and helps stick it to the dirty cheater democrats.\"\nMcCarthy knows what he's doing... the group of diehards made up of people like my cousin could make or break things going forward in elections the same way the people opposing him in his bid for speaker for the first 14 rounds mucked his \"It's my turn!\" coronation up for him. McCarthy is concerned with holding his holding his title and nothing else right now.",
">\n\nTime for a motion to vacate from literally anybody. All it takes is one house member.",
">\n\nOf course.",
">\n\nWell he’s a reflection of the current party so who’s really surprised by this?",
">\n\nThe GOP don’t mind Liars and conmen as long as they lie and con for the GOP",
">\n\nThe thing trump did was show that the narcissists, sociopaths, abusers, and other general empathy-deficient grifters that they don't have to keep pretending to be decent members of society, that they can just relax and openly be their worst selves because reasonable people aren't going to enforce any punishment against them.",
">\n\nI didn't think McCarthy could have LESS credibility, but there it is.",
">\n\nMy inner conspiracy theorist is nagging at me. \nI feel like Santos is the patsy. Not sure for what yet, but he's the guy they happily get to pin it on.",
">\n\nJust shameful. Willfully corrupted.",
">\n\ni would say this is a joke but still waiting for the funny part of the absolute lack of repercussions for people lying to get into / maintain office.",
">\n\nA party of crooks, traitors, and sociopaths",
">\n\nGiven how corrupt he is, I'm surprised he is not chairing a committee.",
">\n\nThere is no bottom. So glad I left the GOP years ago!",
">\n\nIf you ever wanted evidence that nothing matters but what party you're a member of - this is it. \nIt doesn't matter what you stand for, believe, did or didn't do in your life. The only thing that matters is the letter next to your name.\nIf your company hired someone only to find out their resume was completely and laughably fradulent, could you work with them on your team? Could you share an office with them? Would you feel like your workplace had integrity if they kept him around?",
">\n\nLook everyone! The both sides guy!!",
">\n\nMcCarthy did not have the speaker votes without Santos' vote.",
">\n\nGuy looks like he's cosplaying pepe the frog. Big 'ol DSLs.",
">\n\nI feel bad for the writers or Veep who had some of their ideas thrown out for being too outlandish. In 20 years the show will be considered a drama because reality will be so much more ridiculous than the show.",
">\n\nUnder what name?",
">\n\nWould it be normal for a rookie congressman to be appointed to committees within the first few weeks/months of being sworn in?\nI always assumed committee membership was something that would come after having proven yourself to be competent and to have some degree of expertise in the area the committee covers",
">\n\nAll members are assigned committees regardless if you’re a first year or 22nd year. Committee spots for more prestigious and powerful committees are the ones reserved to those more senior and proven",
">\n\nGood to see pathological liars given representation in government.",
">\n\nHe's going lie about being on them regardless.",
">\n\nMcCarthy is the spineless twit the GOP deserves.",
">\n\nRepublicans have no shame. They are evil.",
">\n\nMcCarthy is such a pussy",
">\n\nFirst, why? Secondly, on which committees would his expertise be applicable? The Ethics Committee?",
">\n\nHow can we as a country stand for this behavior? What is this blind allegiance to party over country? This man is a liar. More than a liar. And his own party refuses to condemn him or do anything about it. \nIt’s an absolute disgrace.",
">\n\nHonest question: How many House members typically do NOT get seated on committees?\nThis looks to me like a move McCarthy's making simply to stick it to the criticism and media swarm around Santos's con.",
">\n\nIf he's nothing else he's an (R) vote. And right now, McCarthy knows he/they basically need to take them literally however he/they can get them. \nThere's a bonus to this in that it will \"trigger dems\" so I'm sure that's a big component of it. the absence of any shame is pretty stunning though. I mean I'm not surprised but its still very distasteful.",
">\n\nMcCarthy says I will be seated on committees.",
">\n\nBetter nail down the seats.",
">\n\nSantos says McCarthy will step down and he will be elected Speaker. He also opines that Biden will step down after Vice President Harris steps down and he will be President in late 2023. It must be true, you heard it on the internet.",
">\n\nWhile McCarthy holds the rug sweeping this under it.",
">\n\nSMH only in the party of shameless trumphumping Repugnicans. They don't even try to hide it anymore. CRIMINALS and SOCIOPATHS are running our country.",
">\n\nWill he be the one reporting what the committees do?",
">\n\nWhat if he votes with Democrats? Would his lies be ok with the GOP then?",
">\n\nSantos? You mean Antony? The guy who took Russian money after saying he didnt?",
">\n\nMcCarthy, you pig. NO!",
">\n\nhey gqp made trump president...surely they can seat santos on some committees. perhaps banking or ethics...",
">\n\nWell, or course. Republicans have no shame and this should surprise nobody.",
">\n\nSpeaker Kevin McCarthy (R-Calif.) on Tuesday said Rep. George Santos (R-N.Y.) will be seated on committees, after the embattled freshman lawmaker …….”admitted to embellishing parts of his résumé.”\nSick of seeing this headline!\nSo if a drunk driver killed somebody, their headline would be “ possibly impaired man may have been involved in traffic incident.”",
">\n\nAnd here we see the fatal spread of griftrot starting to take hold of its host."
] |
>
Is Santos like a real life Talented Mr Ripley?
|
[
"It's been like 2 weeks and McCarthy has shown already to be such a weak speaker. \nYou are given a free win. Condemn the liar. But nope, he gets committee seats. \nShows who is really running the show.",
">\n\n\nShows who is really running the show.\n\nVladimir Putin is pleased with his investment.",
">\n\nHopefully Santos will be fed bullshit classified intel just so we can time how quickly Putin remarks about it.",
">\n\nYou're acting like Putin doesn't already own the GOPs lol. Santos is definitely not his only source.",
">\n\nOh hell no, I’m definitely not implying he’s the only one. Just that any briefing given to him specifically should have some notable discrepancies (different names, numbers, locations) that would identify him as the leak. You know, protecting confidential info slightly more securely than the screener dvds sent out for Emmy voting.",
">\n\nSantos is a symbol of the entire Republican party.\nEntirely unscrupulous and amoral, and proudly so. All is acceptable in the pursuit of power.",
">\n\n\nunscrupulous and amoral, and proudly so\n\nAnother poster some time ago described them as \"virtue signaling,\" and I had to ask what's the exact opposite of that?\nA surprising number of others couldn't seem to grasp that \"virtue\" is not what they're signaling at all.",
">\n\nVice signaling?",
">\n\nDepravity flagging?",
">\n\nWill he also be given access to classified documents?",
">\n\nIt's OK. He'll simply say he's the President and declassify them with his mind.",
">\n\nI thought he already lied that Santos is the president?",
">\n\nSo this guy's a spy right? Like now we've seen him at Trump rallies years ago using different names. Running for office under different names. Everything he's said is false, but not in a confused Herschel Walker way. It's intentional. Right? Like we can see that he's a spy right?",
">\n\nDon’t forget about the piles of money he randomly finds",
">\n\nI don't think any of that money to Santos is random. It is payment, mostly from Russia, for services rendered. He just has to cause division and disarray within the US government, as ordered by Putin.",
">\n\nEh, tough leap to make. A moderately talented conman can somewhat easily bilk the Republican rank and file for millions of dollars. Particularly when he’s willing to go the extra mile and pay people to impersonate the staff of party leadership to bilk the wealthy donor class. \nIt’s more likely this is going to wind up being Bannon’s build the wall con turned up to 11. Perhaps with some international money mixed in.",
">\n\nSo a guy who couldn't legitimately get hired to sell me an insurance policy is being trusted with actual governance.\nFFS, \"conservatives\" - do you not have anyone around to run for office that isn't a complete fucking embarrassment? Stop voting for awful fuckin people",
">\n\nI can't blame his voters on this one, he straight up lied to them. The people that are keeping him in gov't are the ones we need to worry about.",
">\n\n\n“My staff raised concerns when he had a staff member who impersonated my chief of staff, and that individual was let go when Mr. Santos found out about it,” McCarthy said Tuesday.\n\nshameless loser",
">\n\nTheoretically if he is deemed too risky to get a clearance, can Biden prevent him from getting security clearance for classified intel?",
">\n\nAs the commander in chief id say so. Congress just votes on legislation and handles the purse. Intel is much more relevant to the executive branch.",
">\n\nLol this right here shows how much the Speaker's power is neutered under McCarthy's negotiated rules. He has to seat a sociopathic liar who fraudulently damaged McCarthy's staff personally by impersonating them to get donations, and if he doesn't seat him Santos can demand a vote to remove McCarthy day after day after day. Pathetic.",
">\n\nAt this point Jeffries should offer a gimme to McCarthy - we won’t call for a new speaker unless at least 1 republican does, but we get the committee post. Santos can get the boot, Kev keeps his tenuous grasp on power (but still looks like shit), dems get a slightly better footing and some good press. McCarthy won’t do it, he can’t, but the offer alone would look magnanimous.",
">\n\nConservative voters really are the most easily manipulated, shameless suckers on the planet.",
">\n\nThey convince themselves democrats do the same thing so it's okay for them too. While simultaneously pretending they are held to a higher standard.\nNot even a strawman, that's as synopsis of every thread about him on r/conservative.",
">\n\nI was curious but didn’t want to venture over there.",
">\n\nCome on Brazil let's get that extradition party started.",
">\n\nJust when you think they can't go any lower they find a whole new way to do it...",
">\n\nIt's not a rabbit hole",
">\n\nJesus H. Fu*k. This guy needs to be in jail, and as far away from any real power as possible. \nWait, that could be any of the GOP house... ok, shit, I guess he fits right in then.",
">\n\nThe GOP is a criminal organization and Russia has the receipts. That means Russian assets like Santos have the receipts which means the GOP is over the barrel.",
">\n\nWell the American people just elected those criminals to run the house of representatives. I think it's the 70+ million people voting for the criminals that we really need to be worried about.",
">\n\nSo you can be a lying sack of shit, and suffer no consequences. Wonder if that will work for me on my next job search?🤔",
">\n\nMcCarthy is pandering to people like my cousin who was and is all in on Santos in that district and genuinely thinks that all the evidence against Santos is nonsense, that it's just \"embellishing your resume- everyone does it!\" and it's not a big deal so long as he, \"does what we want and helps stick it to the dirty cheater democrats.\"\nMcCarthy knows what he's doing... the group of diehards made up of people like my cousin could make or break things going forward in elections the same way the people opposing him in his bid for speaker for the first 14 rounds mucked his \"It's my turn!\" coronation up for him. McCarthy is concerned with holding his holding his title and nothing else right now.",
">\n\nTime for a motion to vacate from literally anybody. All it takes is one house member.",
">\n\nOf course.",
">\n\nWell he’s a reflection of the current party so who’s really surprised by this?",
">\n\nThe GOP don’t mind Liars and conmen as long as they lie and con for the GOP",
">\n\nThe thing trump did was show that the narcissists, sociopaths, abusers, and other general empathy-deficient grifters that they don't have to keep pretending to be decent members of society, that they can just relax and openly be their worst selves because reasonable people aren't going to enforce any punishment against them.",
">\n\nI didn't think McCarthy could have LESS credibility, but there it is.",
">\n\nMy inner conspiracy theorist is nagging at me. \nI feel like Santos is the patsy. Not sure for what yet, but he's the guy they happily get to pin it on.",
">\n\nJust shameful. Willfully corrupted.",
">\n\ni would say this is a joke but still waiting for the funny part of the absolute lack of repercussions for people lying to get into / maintain office.",
">\n\nA party of crooks, traitors, and sociopaths",
">\n\nGiven how corrupt he is, I'm surprised he is not chairing a committee.",
">\n\nThere is no bottom. So glad I left the GOP years ago!",
">\n\nIf you ever wanted evidence that nothing matters but what party you're a member of - this is it. \nIt doesn't matter what you stand for, believe, did or didn't do in your life. The only thing that matters is the letter next to your name.\nIf your company hired someone only to find out their resume was completely and laughably fradulent, could you work with them on your team? Could you share an office with them? Would you feel like your workplace had integrity if they kept him around?",
">\n\nLook everyone! The both sides guy!!",
">\n\nMcCarthy did not have the speaker votes without Santos' vote.",
">\n\nGuy looks like he's cosplaying pepe the frog. Big 'ol DSLs.",
">\n\nI feel bad for the writers or Veep who had some of their ideas thrown out for being too outlandish. In 20 years the show will be considered a drama because reality will be so much more ridiculous than the show.",
">\n\nUnder what name?",
">\n\nWould it be normal for a rookie congressman to be appointed to committees within the first few weeks/months of being sworn in?\nI always assumed committee membership was something that would come after having proven yourself to be competent and to have some degree of expertise in the area the committee covers",
">\n\nAll members are assigned committees regardless if you’re a first year or 22nd year. Committee spots for more prestigious and powerful committees are the ones reserved to those more senior and proven",
">\n\nGood to see pathological liars given representation in government.",
">\n\nHe's going lie about being on them regardless.",
">\n\nMcCarthy is the spineless twit the GOP deserves.",
">\n\nRepublicans have no shame. They are evil.",
">\n\nMcCarthy is such a pussy",
">\n\nFirst, why? Secondly, on which committees would his expertise be applicable? The Ethics Committee?",
">\n\nHow can we as a country stand for this behavior? What is this blind allegiance to party over country? This man is a liar. More than a liar. And his own party refuses to condemn him or do anything about it. \nIt’s an absolute disgrace.",
">\n\nHonest question: How many House members typically do NOT get seated on committees?\nThis looks to me like a move McCarthy's making simply to stick it to the criticism and media swarm around Santos's con.",
">\n\nIf he's nothing else he's an (R) vote. And right now, McCarthy knows he/they basically need to take them literally however he/they can get them. \nThere's a bonus to this in that it will \"trigger dems\" so I'm sure that's a big component of it. the absence of any shame is pretty stunning though. I mean I'm not surprised but its still very distasteful.",
">\n\nMcCarthy says I will be seated on committees.",
">\n\nBetter nail down the seats.",
">\n\nSantos says McCarthy will step down and he will be elected Speaker. He also opines that Biden will step down after Vice President Harris steps down and he will be President in late 2023. It must be true, you heard it on the internet.",
">\n\nWhile McCarthy holds the rug sweeping this under it.",
">\n\nSMH only in the party of shameless trumphumping Repugnicans. They don't even try to hide it anymore. CRIMINALS and SOCIOPATHS are running our country.",
">\n\nWill he be the one reporting what the committees do?",
">\n\nWhat if he votes with Democrats? Would his lies be ok with the GOP then?",
">\n\nSantos? You mean Antony? The guy who took Russian money after saying he didnt?",
">\n\nMcCarthy, you pig. NO!",
">\n\nhey gqp made trump president...surely they can seat santos on some committees. perhaps banking or ethics...",
">\n\nWell, or course. Republicans have no shame and this should surprise nobody.",
">\n\nSpeaker Kevin McCarthy (R-Calif.) on Tuesday said Rep. George Santos (R-N.Y.) will be seated on committees, after the embattled freshman lawmaker …….”admitted to embellishing parts of his résumé.”\nSick of seeing this headline!\nSo if a drunk driver killed somebody, their headline would be “ possibly impaired man may have been involved in traffic incident.”",
">\n\nAnd here we see the fatal spread of griftrot starting to take hold of its host.",
">\n\nWell at lest he’s not on a national security committee"
] |
>
|
[
"It's been like 2 weeks and McCarthy has shown already to be such a weak speaker. \nYou are given a free win. Condemn the liar. But nope, he gets committee seats. \nShows who is really running the show.",
">\n\n\nShows who is really running the show.\n\nVladimir Putin is pleased with his investment.",
">\n\nHopefully Santos will be fed bullshit classified intel just so we can time how quickly Putin remarks about it.",
">\n\nYou're acting like Putin doesn't already own the GOPs lol. Santos is definitely not his only source.",
">\n\nOh hell no, I’m definitely not implying he’s the only one. Just that any briefing given to him specifically should have some notable discrepancies (different names, numbers, locations) that would identify him as the leak. You know, protecting confidential info slightly more securely than the screener dvds sent out for Emmy voting.",
">\n\nSantos is a symbol of the entire Republican party.\nEntirely unscrupulous and amoral, and proudly so. All is acceptable in the pursuit of power.",
">\n\n\nunscrupulous and amoral, and proudly so\n\nAnother poster some time ago described them as \"virtue signaling,\" and I had to ask what's the exact opposite of that?\nA surprising number of others couldn't seem to grasp that \"virtue\" is not what they're signaling at all.",
">\n\nVice signaling?",
">\n\nDepravity flagging?",
">\n\nWill he also be given access to classified documents?",
">\n\nIt's OK. He'll simply say he's the President and declassify them with his mind.",
">\n\nI thought he already lied that Santos is the president?",
">\n\nSo this guy's a spy right? Like now we've seen him at Trump rallies years ago using different names. Running for office under different names. Everything he's said is false, but not in a confused Herschel Walker way. It's intentional. Right? Like we can see that he's a spy right?",
">\n\nDon’t forget about the piles of money he randomly finds",
">\n\nI don't think any of that money to Santos is random. It is payment, mostly from Russia, for services rendered. He just has to cause division and disarray within the US government, as ordered by Putin.",
">\n\nEh, tough leap to make. A moderately talented conman can somewhat easily bilk the Republican rank and file for millions of dollars. Particularly when he’s willing to go the extra mile and pay people to impersonate the staff of party leadership to bilk the wealthy donor class. \nIt’s more likely this is going to wind up being Bannon’s build the wall con turned up to 11. Perhaps with some international money mixed in.",
">\n\nSo a guy who couldn't legitimately get hired to sell me an insurance policy is being trusted with actual governance.\nFFS, \"conservatives\" - do you not have anyone around to run for office that isn't a complete fucking embarrassment? Stop voting for awful fuckin people",
">\n\nI can't blame his voters on this one, he straight up lied to them. The people that are keeping him in gov't are the ones we need to worry about.",
">\n\n\n“My staff raised concerns when he had a staff member who impersonated my chief of staff, and that individual was let go when Mr. Santos found out about it,” McCarthy said Tuesday.\n\nshameless loser",
">\n\nTheoretically if he is deemed too risky to get a clearance, can Biden prevent him from getting security clearance for classified intel?",
">\n\nAs the commander in chief id say so. Congress just votes on legislation and handles the purse. Intel is much more relevant to the executive branch.",
">\n\nLol this right here shows how much the Speaker's power is neutered under McCarthy's negotiated rules. He has to seat a sociopathic liar who fraudulently damaged McCarthy's staff personally by impersonating them to get donations, and if he doesn't seat him Santos can demand a vote to remove McCarthy day after day after day. Pathetic.",
">\n\nAt this point Jeffries should offer a gimme to McCarthy - we won’t call for a new speaker unless at least 1 republican does, but we get the committee post. Santos can get the boot, Kev keeps his tenuous grasp on power (but still looks like shit), dems get a slightly better footing and some good press. McCarthy won’t do it, he can’t, but the offer alone would look magnanimous.",
">\n\nConservative voters really are the most easily manipulated, shameless suckers on the planet.",
">\n\nThey convince themselves democrats do the same thing so it's okay for them too. While simultaneously pretending they are held to a higher standard.\nNot even a strawman, that's as synopsis of every thread about him on r/conservative.",
">\n\nI was curious but didn’t want to venture over there.",
">\n\nCome on Brazil let's get that extradition party started.",
">\n\nJust when you think they can't go any lower they find a whole new way to do it...",
">\n\nIt's not a rabbit hole",
">\n\nJesus H. Fu*k. This guy needs to be in jail, and as far away from any real power as possible. \nWait, that could be any of the GOP house... ok, shit, I guess he fits right in then.",
">\n\nThe GOP is a criminal organization and Russia has the receipts. That means Russian assets like Santos have the receipts which means the GOP is over the barrel.",
">\n\nWell the American people just elected those criminals to run the house of representatives. I think it's the 70+ million people voting for the criminals that we really need to be worried about.",
">\n\nSo you can be a lying sack of shit, and suffer no consequences. Wonder if that will work for me on my next job search?🤔",
">\n\nMcCarthy is pandering to people like my cousin who was and is all in on Santos in that district and genuinely thinks that all the evidence against Santos is nonsense, that it's just \"embellishing your resume- everyone does it!\" and it's not a big deal so long as he, \"does what we want and helps stick it to the dirty cheater democrats.\"\nMcCarthy knows what he's doing... the group of diehards made up of people like my cousin could make or break things going forward in elections the same way the people opposing him in his bid for speaker for the first 14 rounds mucked his \"It's my turn!\" coronation up for him. McCarthy is concerned with holding his holding his title and nothing else right now.",
">\n\nTime for a motion to vacate from literally anybody. All it takes is one house member.",
">\n\nOf course.",
">\n\nWell he’s a reflection of the current party so who’s really surprised by this?",
">\n\nThe GOP don’t mind Liars and conmen as long as they lie and con for the GOP",
">\n\nThe thing trump did was show that the narcissists, sociopaths, abusers, and other general empathy-deficient grifters that they don't have to keep pretending to be decent members of society, that they can just relax and openly be their worst selves because reasonable people aren't going to enforce any punishment against them.",
">\n\nI didn't think McCarthy could have LESS credibility, but there it is.",
">\n\nMy inner conspiracy theorist is nagging at me. \nI feel like Santos is the patsy. Not sure for what yet, but he's the guy they happily get to pin it on.",
">\n\nJust shameful. Willfully corrupted.",
">\n\ni would say this is a joke but still waiting for the funny part of the absolute lack of repercussions for people lying to get into / maintain office.",
">\n\nA party of crooks, traitors, and sociopaths",
">\n\nGiven how corrupt he is, I'm surprised he is not chairing a committee.",
">\n\nThere is no bottom. So glad I left the GOP years ago!",
">\n\nIf you ever wanted evidence that nothing matters but what party you're a member of - this is it. \nIt doesn't matter what you stand for, believe, did or didn't do in your life. The only thing that matters is the letter next to your name.\nIf your company hired someone only to find out their resume was completely and laughably fradulent, could you work with them on your team? Could you share an office with them? Would you feel like your workplace had integrity if they kept him around?",
">\n\nLook everyone! The both sides guy!!",
">\n\nMcCarthy did not have the speaker votes without Santos' vote.",
">\n\nGuy looks like he's cosplaying pepe the frog. Big 'ol DSLs.",
">\n\nI feel bad for the writers or Veep who had some of their ideas thrown out for being too outlandish. In 20 years the show will be considered a drama because reality will be so much more ridiculous than the show.",
">\n\nUnder what name?",
">\n\nWould it be normal for a rookie congressman to be appointed to committees within the first few weeks/months of being sworn in?\nI always assumed committee membership was something that would come after having proven yourself to be competent and to have some degree of expertise in the area the committee covers",
">\n\nAll members are assigned committees regardless if you’re a first year or 22nd year. Committee spots for more prestigious and powerful committees are the ones reserved to those more senior and proven",
">\n\nGood to see pathological liars given representation in government.",
">\n\nHe's going lie about being on them regardless.",
">\n\nMcCarthy is the spineless twit the GOP deserves.",
">\n\nRepublicans have no shame. They are evil.",
">\n\nMcCarthy is such a pussy",
">\n\nFirst, why? Secondly, on which committees would his expertise be applicable? The Ethics Committee?",
">\n\nHow can we as a country stand for this behavior? What is this blind allegiance to party over country? This man is a liar. More than a liar. And his own party refuses to condemn him or do anything about it. \nIt’s an absolute disgrace.",
">\n\nHonest question: How many House members typically do NOT get seated on committees?\nThis looks to me like a move McCarthy's making simply to stick it to the criticism and media swarm around Santos's con.",
">\n\nIf he's nothing else he's an (R) vote. And right now, McCarthy knows he/they basically need to take them literally however he/they can get them. \nThere's a bonus to this in that it will \"trigger dems\" so I'm sure that's a big component of it. the absence of any shame is pretty stunning though. I mean I'm not surprised but its still very distasteful.",
">\n\nMcCarthy says I will be seated on committees.",
">\n\nBetter nail down the seats.",
">\n\nSantos says McCarthy will step down and he will be elected Speaker. He also opines that Biden will step down after Vice President Harris steps down and he will be President in late 2023. It must be true, you heard it on the internet.",
">\n\nWhile McCarthy holds the rug sweeping this under it.",
">\n\nSMH only in the party of shameless trumphumping Repugnicans. They don't even try to hide it anymore. CRIMINALS and SOCIOPATHS are running our country.",
">\n\nWill he be the one reporting what the committees do?",
">\n\nWhat if he votes with Democrats? Would his lies be ok with the GOP then?",
">\n\nSantos? You mean Antony? The guy who took Russian money after saying he didnt?",
">\n\nMcCarthy, you pig. NO!",
">\n\nhey gqp made trump president...surely they can seat santos on some committees. perhaps banking or ethics...",
">\n\nWell, or course. Republicans have no shame and this should surprise nobody.",
">\n\nSpeaker Kevin McCarthy (R-Calif.) on Tuesday said Rep. George Santos (R-N.Y.) will be seated on committees, after the embattled freshman lawmaker …….”admitted to embellishing parts of his résumé.”\nSick of seeing this headline!\nSo if a drunk driver killed somebody, their headline would be “ possibly impaired man may have been involved in traffic incident.”",
">\n\nAnd here we see the fatal spread of griftrot starting to take hold of its host.",
">\n\nWell at lest he’s not on a national security committee",
">\n\nIs Santos like a real life Talented Mr Ripley?"
] |
Holy shit he blasted them? Thank god he didn't slam them, they never would have recovered.
|
[] |
>
I think slam fell off the table and through the floor when he said there was no room in nyc.
|
[
"Holy shit he blasted them? Thank god he didn't slam them, they never would have recovered."
] |
>
Adams can stay there as far as I'm concerned. It's so obvious he's just trying to build his profile so he can run for president. Because that worked out so well for Bloomberg. And de Blasio. And Giuliani. And Lindsay.
|
[
"Holy shit he blasted them? Thank god he didn't slam them, they never would have recovered.",
">\n\nI think slam fell off the table and through the floor when he said there was no room in nyc."
] |
>
He’s such a corrupt, despicable twerp.
|
[
"Holy shit he blasted them? Thank god he didn't slam them, they never would have recovered.",
">\n\nI think slam fell off the table and through the floor when he said there was no room in nyc.",
">\n\nAdams can stay there as far as I'm concerned. It's so obvious he's just trying to build his profile so he can run for president. Because that worked out so well for Bloomberg. And de Blasio. And Giuliani. And Lindsay."
] |
>
Slashing city govt positions to line the pockets of his cronies running departments with no qualifications.
Fuck this guy.
|
[
"Holy shit he blasted them? Thank god he didn't slam them, they never would have recovered.",
">\n\nI think slam fell off the table and through the floor when he said there was no room in nyc.",
">\n\nAdams can stay there as far as I'm concerned. It's so obvious he's just trying to build his profile so he can run for president. Because that worked out so well for Bloomberg. And de Blasio. And Giuliani. And Lindsay.",
">\n\nHe’s such a corrupt, despicable twerp."
] |
>
The only way to curb the influx, imo, is to work the/help the countries the refugees are coming from. They're fleeing absolutely horrid conditions.
Nothing we do at the border is going to help much, period. They will still come, and I'd rather we not be assholes and send them back to die.
Edit: in good conscious, we either take them in or work to fix where they're coming from.
|
[
"Holy shit he blasted them? Thank god he didn't slam them, they never would have recovered.",
">\n\nI think slam fell off the table and through the floor when he said there was no room in nyc.",
">\n\nAdams can stay there as far as I'm concerned. It's so obvious he's just trying to build his profile so he can run for president. Because that worked out so well for Bloomberg. And de Blasio. And Giuliani. And Lindsay.",
">\n\nHe’s such a corrupt, despicable twerp.",
">\n\nSlashing city govt positions to line the pockets of his cronies running departments with no qualifications. \nFuck this guy."
] |
>
Or just issue work visas and, hear me out, collect taxes. Suddenly a problem is a solution.
|
[
"Holy shit he blasted them? Thank god he didn't slam them, they never would have recovered.",
">\n\nI think slam fell off the table and through the floor when he said there was no room in nyc.",
">\n\nAdams can stay there as far as I'm concerned. It's so obvious he's just trying to build his profile so he can run for president. Because that worked out so well for Bloomberg. And de Blasio. And Giuliani. And Lindsay.",
">\n\nHe’s such a corrupt, despicable twerp.",
">\n\nSlashing city govt positions to line the pockets of his cronies running departments with no qualifications. \nFuck this guy.",
">\n\nThe only way to curb the influx, imo, is to work the/help the countries the refugees are coming from. They're fleeing absolutely horrid conditions. \nNothing we do at the border is going to help much, period. They will still come, and I'd rather we not be assholes and send them back to die.\nEdit: in good conscious, we either take them in or work to fix where they're coming from."
] |
>
Correct, when we admit them as refugees they get refugee visas and then become part of the system, are expected to pay taxes, and get all the benefits and detrimenta that go with it.
|
[
"Holy shit he blasted them? Thank god he didn't slam them, they never would have recovered.",
">\n\nI think slam fell off the table and through the floor when he said there was no room in nyc.",
">\n\nAdams can stay there as far as I'm concerned. It's so obvious he's just trying to build his profile so he can run for president. Because that worked out so well for Bloomberg. And de Blasio. And Giuliani. And Lindsay.",
">\n\nHe’s such a corrupt, despicable twerp.",
">\n\nSlashing city govt positions to line the pockets of his cronies running departments with no qualifications. \nFuck this guy.",
">\n\nThe only way to curb the influx, imo, is to work the/help the countries the refugees are coming from. They're fleeing absolutely horrid conditions. \nNothing we do at the border is going to help much, period. They will still come, and I'd rather we not be assholes and send them back to die.\nEdit: in good conscious, we either take them in or work to fix where they're coming from.",
">\n\nOr just issue work visas and, hear me out, collect taxes. Suddenly a problem is a solution."
] |
>
You're describing the setup for an apartheid system though. If they're not given citizenship, then you've got a huge mass of recognized permanent residents that the government officially stamps as "not ours." That will lead to problems too.
|
[
"Holy shit he blasted them? Thank god he didn't slam them, they never would have recovered.",
">\n\nI think slam fell off the table and through the floor when he said there was no room in nyc.",
">\n\nAdams can stay there as far as I'm concerned. It's so obvious he's just trying to build his profile so he can run for president. Because that worked out so well for Bloomberg. And de Blasio. And Giuliani. And Lindsay.",
">\n\nHe’s such a corrupt, despicable twerp.",
">\n\nSlashing city govt positions to line the pockets of his cronies running departments with no qualifications. \nFuck this guy.",
">\n\nThe only way to curb the influx, imo, is to work the/help the countries the refugees are coming from. They're fleeing absolutely horrid conditions. \nNothing we do at the border is going to help much, period. They will still come, and I'd rather we not be assholes and send them back to die.\nEdit: in good conscious, we either take them in or work to fix where they're coming from.",
">\n\nOr just issue work visas and, hear me out, collect taxes. Suddenly a problem is a solution.",
">\n\nCorrect, when we admit them as refugees they get refugee visas and then become part of the system, are expected to pay taxes, and get all the benefits and detrimenta that go with it."
] |
>
When did i say they wouldn't be given citizenship and would be permanently another class? I said the exact opposite. They become the same as anyone else with a visa, which includes a clear path to citizenship.
|
[
"Holy shit he blasted them? Thank god he didn't slam them, they never would have recovered.",
">\n\nI think slam fell off the table and through the floor when he said there was no room in nyc.",
">\n\nAdams can stay there as far as I'm concerned. It's so obvious he's just trying to build his profile so he can run for president. Because that worked out so well for Bloomberg. And de Blasio. And Giuliani. And Lindsay.",
">\n\nHe’s such a corrupt, despicable twerp.",
">\n\nSlashing city govt positions to line the pockets of his cronies running departments with no qualifications. \nFuck this guy.",
">\n\nThe only way to curb the influx, imo, is to work the/help the countries the refugees are coming from. They're fleeing absolutely horrid conditions. \nNothing we do at the border is going to help much, period. They will still come, and I'd rather we not be assholes and send them back to die.\nEdit: in good conscious, we either take them in or work to fix where they're coming from.",
">\n\nOr just issue work visas and, hear me out, collect taxes. Suddenly a problem is a solution.",
">\n\nCorrect, when we admit them as refugees they get refugee visas and then become part of the system, are expected to pay taxes, and get all the benefits and detrimenta that go with it.",
">\n\nYou're describing the setup for an apartheid system though. If they're not given citizenship, then you've got a huge mass of recognized permanent residents that the government officially stamps as \"not ours.\" That will lead to problems too."
] |
>
Sure didn’t take long for the busing strategy to bear fruit.
|
[
"Holy shit he blasted them? Thank god he didn't slam them, they never would have recovered.",
">\n\nI think slam fell off the table and through the floor when he said there was no room in nyc.",
">\n\nAdams can stay there as far as I'm concerned. It's so obvious he's just trying to build his profile so he can run for president. Because that worked out so well for Bloomberg. And de Blasio. And Giuliani. And Lindsay.",
">\n\nHe’s such a corrupt, despicable twerp.",
">\n\nSlashing city govt positions to line the pockets of his cronies running departments with no qualifications. \nFuck this guy.",
">\n\nThe only way to curb the influx, imo, is to work the/help the countries the refugees are coming from. They're fleeing absolutely horrid conditions. \nNothing we do at the border is going to help much, period. They will still come, and I'd rather we not be assholes and send them back to die.\nEdit: in good conscious, we either take them in or work to fix where they're coming from.",
">\n\nOr just issue work visas and, hear me out, collect taxes. Suddenly a problem is a solution.",
">\n\nCorrect, when we admit them as refugees they get refugee visas and then become part of the system, are expected to pay taxes, and get all the benefits and detrimenta that go with it.",
">\n\nYou're describing the setup for an apartheid system though. If they're not given citizenship, then you've got a huge mass of recognized permanent residents that the government officially stamps as \"not ours.\" That will lead to problems too.",
">\n\nWhen did i say they wouldn't be given citizenship and would be permanently another class? I said the exact opposite. They become the same as anyone else with a visa, which includes a clear path to citizenship."
] |
>
What fruit? A trip to the border where Adams continued to criticize Abbot and call for clear coordination from the countries leaders?
That's exactly what him and everyone else who isn't a drooling maga-moron has been saying the whole fucking time
Wow. So much fruit. You might even need immigrant labor to pick that much fruit.
|
[
"Holy shit he blasted them? Thank god he didn't slam them, they never would have recovered.",
">\n\nI think slam fell off the table and through the floor when he said there was no room in nyc.",
">\n\nAdams can stay there as far as I'm concerned. It's so obvious he's just trying to build his profile so he can run for president. Because that worked out so well for Bloomberg. And de Blasio. And Giuliani. And Lindsay.",
">\n\nHe’s such a corrupt, despicable twerp.",
">\n\nSlashing city govt positions to line the pockets of his cronies running departments with no qualifications. \nFuck this guy.",
">\n\nThe only way to curb the influx, imo, is to work the/help the countries the refugees are coming from. They're fleeing absolutely horrid conditions. \nNothing we do at the border is going to help much, period. They will still come, and I'd rather we not be assholes and send them back to die.\nEdit: in good conscious, we either take them in or work to fix where they're coming from.",
">\n\nOr just issue work visas and, hear me out, collect taxes. Suddenly a problem is a solution.",
">\n\nCorrect, when we admit them as refugees they get refugee visas and then become part of the system, are expected to pay taxes, and get all the benefits and detrimenta that go with it.",
">\n\nYou're describing the setup for an apartheid system though. If they're not given citizenship, then you've got a huge mass of recognized permanent residents that the government officially stamps as \"not ours.\" That will lead to problems too.",
">\n\nWhen did i say they wouldn't be given citizenship and would be permanently another class? I said the exact opposite. They become the same as anyone else with a visa, which includes a clear path to citizenship.",
">\n\nSure didn’t take long for the busing strategy to bear fruit."
] |
>
|
[
"Holy shit he blasted them? Thank god he didn't slam them, they never would have recovered.",
">\n\nI think slam fell off the table and through the floor when he said there was no room in nyc.",
">\n\nAdams can stay there as far as I'm concerned. It's so obvious he's just trying to build his profile so he can run for president. Because that worked out so well for Bloomberg. And de Blasio. And Giuliani. And Lindsay.",
">\n\nHe’s such a corrupt, despicable twerp.",
">\n\nSlashing city govt positions to line the pockets of his cronies running departments with no qualifications. \nFuck this guy.",
">\n\nThe only way to curb the influx, imo, is to work the/help the countries the refugees are coming from. They're fleeing absolutely horrid conditions. \nNothing we do at the border is going to help much, period. They will still come, and I'd rather we not be assholes and send them back to die.\nEdit: in good conscious, we either take them in or work to fix where they're coming from.",
">\n\nOr just issue work visas and, hear me out, collect taxes. Suddenly a problem is a solution.",
">\n\nCorrect, when we admit them as refugees they get refugee visas and then become part of the system, are expected to pay taxes, and get all the benefits and detrimenta that go with it.",
">\n\nYou're describing the setup for an apartheid system though. If they're not given citizenship, then you've got a huge mass of recognized permanent residents that the government officially stamps as \"not ours.\" That will lead to problems too.",
">\n\nWhen did i say they wouldn't be given citizenship and would be permanently another class? I said the exact opposite. They become the same as anyone else with a visa, which includes a clear path to citizenship.",
">\n\nSure didn’t take long for the busing strategy to bear fruit.",
">\n\nWhat fruit? A trip to the border where Adams continued to criticize Abbot and call for clear coordination from the countries leaders? \nThat's exactly what him and everyone else who isn't a drooling maga-moron has been saying the whole fucking time\nWow. So much fruit. You might even need immigrant labor to pick that much fruit."
] |
I used to hate steak. My parents always ordered theirs well or medium-well.
Then I tried medium-rare.
Steak has been one of my favorites ever since.
|
[] |
>
I personally prefer medium well. It's a balance of tenderness and toughness I enjoy. Plus I use steak sauce so taste is good either way to me. So my reason for preferring it is texture alone. Also medium well isn't dry if prepared correctly.
|
[
"I used to hate steak. My parents always ordered theirs well or medium-well.\nThen I tried medium-rare.\nSteak has been one of my favorites ever since."
] |
>
Hey! I see you're getting downvoted. Probably because you prefer medium well and use streak sauce. Well, I actually prefer medium, but I use steak sauce too! Maybe I can take some of those downvotes off your hands.
|
[
"I used to hate steak. My parents always ordered theirs well or medium-well.\nThen I tried medium-rare.\nSteak has been one of my favorites ever since.",
">\n\nI personally prefer medium well. It's a balance of tenderness and toughness I enjoy. Plus I use steak sauce so taste is good either way to me. So my reason for preferring it is texture alone. Also medium well isn't dry if prepared correctly."
] |
>
Soliciting downvotes is the best way to get none at all.
|
[
"I used to hate steak. My parents always ordered theirs well or medium-well.\nThen I tried medium-rare.\nSteak has been one of my favorites ever since.",
">\n\nI personally prefer medium well. It's a balance of tenderness and toughness I enjoy. Plus I use steak sauce so taste is good either way to me. So my reason for preferring it is texture alone. Also medium well isn't dry if prepared correctly.",
">\n\nHey! I see you're getting downvoted. Probably because you prefer medium well and use streak sauce. Well, I actually prefer medium, but I use steak sauce too! Maybe I can take some of those downvotes off your hands."
] |
>
I got his ass
|
[
"I used to hate steak. My parents always ordered theirs well or medium-well.\nThen I tried medium-rare.\nSteak has been one of my favorites ever since.",
">\n\nI personally prefer medium well. It's a balance of tenderness and toughness I enjoy. Plus I use steak sauce so taste is good either way to me. So my reason for preferring it is texture alone. Also medium well isn't dry if prepared correctly.",
">\n\nHey! I see you're getting downvoted. Probably because you prefer medium well and use streak sauce. Well, I actually prefer medium, but I use steak sauce too! Maybe I can take some of those downvotes off your hands.",
">\n\nSoliciting downvotes is the best way to get none at all."
] |
>
gay
|
[
"I used to hate steak. My parents always ordered theirs well or medium-well.\nThen I tried medium-rare.\nSteak has been one of my favorites ever since.",
">\n\nI personally prefer medium well. It's a balance of tenderness and toughness I enjoy. Plus I use steak sauce so taste is good either way to me. So my reason for preferring it is texture alone. Also medium well isn't dry if prepared correctly.",
">\n\nHey! I see you're getting downvoted. Probably because you prefer medium well and use streak sauce. Well, I actually prefer medium, but I use steak sauce too! Maybe I can take some of those downvotes off your hands.",
">\n\nSoliciting downvotes is the best way to get none at all.",
">\n\nI got his ass"
] |
>
I agree. I love steak, and eating it medium-rare. Well-done steak just isn't nearly as good, but if it's what someone likes, that's their choice and I really don't care what others eat. It's not my business
|
[
"I used to hate steak. My parents always ordered theirs well or medium-well.\nThen I tried medium-rare.\nSteak has been one of my favorites ever since.",
">\n\nI personally prefer medium well. It's a balance of tenderness and toughness I enjoy. Plus I use steak sauce so taste is good either way to me. So my reason for preferring it is texture alone. Also medium well isn't dry if prepared correctly.",
">\n\nHey! I see you're getting downvoted. Probably because you prefer medium well and use streak sauce. Well, I actually prefer medium, but I use steak sauce too! Maybe I can take some of those downvotes off your hands.",
">\n\nSoliciting downvotes is the best way to get none at all.",
">\n\nI got his ass",
">\n\ngay"
] |
>
If they truly like it that way, then sure.
However, I honestly think it is more common to THINK you like well-done steak than to actually like it.
Many people either have just always had it like that, have some neuroses about the color, etc, but would probably fail a blind taste test.
|
[
"I used to hate steak. My parents always ordered theirs well or medium-well.\nThen I tried medium-rare.\nSteak has been one of my favorites ever since.",
">\n\nI personally prefer medium well. It's a balance of tenderness and toughness I enjoy. Plus I use steak sauce so taste is good either way to me. So my reason for preferring it is texture alone. Also medium well isn't dry if prepared correctly.",
">\n\nHey! I see you're getting downvoted. Probably because you prefer medium well and use streak sauce. Well, I actually prefer medium, but I use steak sauce too! Maybe I can take some of those downvotes off your hands.",
">\n\nSoliciting downvotes is the best way to get none at all.",
">\n\nI got his ass",
">\n\ngay",
">\n\nI agree. I love steak, and eating it medium-rare. Well-done steak just isn't nearly as good, but if it's what someone likes, that's their choice and I really don't care what others eat. It's not my business"
] |
>
No, I don't THINK I like my steak well done - I like it well done. Ffs, why is it so hard to believe people don't want to eat raw, bloody meat?
|
[
"I used to hate steak. My parents always ordered theirs well or medium-well.\nThen I tried medium-rare.\nSteak has been one of my favorites ever since.",
">\n\nI personally prefer medium well. It's a balance of tenderness and toughness I enjoy. Plus I use steak sauce so taste is good either way to me. So my reason for preferring it is texture alone. Also medium well isn't dry if prepared correctly.",
">\n\nHey! I see you're getting downvoted. Probably because you prefer medium well and use streak sauce. Well, I actually prefer medium, but I use steak sauce too! Maybe I can take some of those downvotes off your hands.",
">\n\nSoliciting downvotes is the best way to get none at all.",
">\n\nI got his ass",
">\n\ngay",
">\n\nI agree. I love steak, and eating it medium-rare. Well-done steak just isn't nearly as good, but if it's what someone likes, that's their choice and I really don't care what others eat. It's not my business",
">\n\nIf they truly like it that way, then sure. \nHowever, I honestly think it is more common to THINK you like well-done steak than to actually like it.\nMany people either have just always had it like that, have some neuroses about the color, etc, but would probably fail a blind taste test."
] |
>
You very well might. It's just not the more common of the 2 scenarios imo.
It's a fact of chemistry that meat loses flavor and becomes less tender if you overcook it.
So people who have to prefer less steak flavor and prefer it more chewy, for one reason or another.
That just can't be that common
|
[
"I used to hate steak. My parents always ordered theirs well or medium-well.\nThen I tried medium-rare.\nSteak has been one of my favorites ever since.",
">\n\nI personally prefer medium well. It's a balance of tenderness and toughness I enjoy. Plus I use steak sauce so taste is good either way to me. So my reason for preferring it is texture alone. Also medium well isn't dry if prepared correctly.",
">\n\nHey! I see you're getting downvoted. Probably because you prefer medium well and use streak sauce. Well, I actually prefer medium, but I use steak sauce too! Maybe I can take some of those downvotes off your hands.",
">\n\nSoliciting downvotes is the best way to get none at all.",
">\n\nI got his ass",
">\n\ngay",
">\n\nI agree. I love steak, and eating it medium-rare. Well-done steak just isn't nearly as good, but if it's what someone likes, that's their choice and I really don't care what others eat. It's not my business",
">\n\nIf they truly like it that way, then sure. \nHowever, I honestly think it is more common to THINK you like well-done steak than to actually like it.\nMany people either have just always had it like that, have some neuroses about the color, etc, but would probably fail a blind taste test.",
">\n\nNo, I don't THINK I like my steak well done - I like it well done. Ffs, why is it so hard to believe people don't want to eat raw, bloody meat?"
] |
>
well done does not equal overcooked LOL
|
[
"I used to hate steak. My parents always ordered theirs well or medium-well.\nThen I tried medium-rare.\nSteak has been one of my favorites ever since.",
">\n\nI personally prefer medium well. It's a balance of tenderness and toughness I enjoy. Plus I use steak sauce so taste is good either way to me. So my reason for preferring it is texture alone. Also medium well isn't dry if prepared correctly.",
">\n\nHey! I see you're getting downvoted. Probably because you prefer medium well and use streak sauce. Well, I actually prefer medium, but I use steak sauce too! Maybe I can take some of those downvotes off your hands.",
">\n\nSoliciting downvotes is the best way to get none at all.",
">\n\nI got his ass",
">\n\ngay",
">\n\nI agree. I love steak, and eating it medium-rare. Well-done steak just isn't nearly as good, but if it's what someone likes, that's their choice and I really don't care what others eat. It's not my business",
">\n\nIf they truly like it that way, then sure. \nHowever, I honestly think it is more common to THINK you like well-done steak than to actually like it.\nMany people either have just always had it like that, have some neuroses about the color, etc, but would probably fail a blind taste test.",
">\n\nNo, I don't THINK I like my steak well done - I like it well done. Ffs, why is it so hard to believe people don't want to eat raw, bloody meat?",
">\n\nYou very well might. It's just not the more common of the 2 scenarios imo.\nIt's a fact of chemistry that meat loses flavor and becomes less tender if you overcook it. \nSo people who have to prefer less steak flavor and prefer it more chewy, for one reason or another.\nThat just can't be that common"
] |
>
Fine, replace overcooked with well-done if you need that.
It's a fact of chemistry is meat has less steak flavor and is less tender when it is "well-done" as opposed to medium or medium-rare.
It's theoretically possible to prefer less flavor and less tender, but it can't be common.
|
[
"I used to hate steak. My parents always ordered theirs well or medium-well.\nThen I tried medium-rare.\nSteak has been one of my favorites ever since.",
">\n\nI personally prefer medium well. It's a balance of tenderness and toughness I enjoy. Plus I use steak sauce so taste is good either way to me. So my reason for preferring it is texture alone. Also medium well isn't dry if prepared correctly.",
">\n\nHey! I see you're getting downvoted. Probably because you prefer medium well and use streak sauce. Well, I actually prefer medium, but I use steak sauce too! Maybe I can take some of those downvotes off your hands.",
">\n\nSoliciting downvotes is the best way to get none at all.",
">\n\nI got his ass",
">\n\ngay",
">\n\nI agree. I love steak, and eating it medium-rare. Well-done steak just isn't nearly as good, but if it's what someone likes, that's their choice and I really don't care what others eat. It's not my business",
">\n\nIf they truly like it that way, then sure. \nHowever, I honestly think it is more common to THINK you like well-done steak than to actually like it.\nMany people either have just always had it like that, have some neuroses about the color, etc, but would probably fail a blind taste test.",
">\n\nNo, I don't THINK I like my steak well done - I like it well done. Ffs, why is it so hard to believe people don't want to eat raw, bloody meat?",
">\n\nYou very well might. It's just not the more common of the 2 scenarios imo.\nIt's a fact of chemistry that meat loses flavor and becomes less tender if you overcook it. \nSo people who have to prefer less steak flavor and prefer it more chewy, for one reason or another.\nThat just can't be that common",
">\n\nwell done does not equal overcooked LOL"
] |
>
Lol, I will never understand why people are so invested in how someone likes their steak.
I've eaten medium rare, medium, and well-done steak, and well-done has plenty of flavour and it's neither tough nor chewy, if it's actually well done and not "congratulations" level.
In any case, people like what they like, and there may be more people liking well-done steaks than you think :)
|
[
"I used to hate steak. My parents always ordered theirs well or medium-well.\nThen I tried medium-rare.\nSteak has been one of my favorites ever since.",
">\n\nI personally prefer medium well. It's a balance of tenderness and toughness I enjoy. Plus I use steak sauce so taste is good either way to me. So my reason for preferring it is texture alone. Also medium well isn't dry if prepared correctly.",
">\n\nHey! I see you're getting downvoted. Probably because you prefer medium well and use streak sauce. Well, I actually prefer medium, but I use steak sauce too! Maybe I can take some of those downvotes off your hands.",
">\n\nSoliciting downvotes is the best way to get none at all.",
">\n\nI got his ass",
">\n\ngay",
">\n\nI agree. I love steak, and eating it medium-rare. Well-done steak just isn't nearly as good, but if it's what someone likes, that's their choice and I really don't care what others eat. It's not my business",
">\n\nIf they truly like it that way, then sure. \nHowever, I honestly think it is more common to THINK you like well-done steak than to actually like it.\nMany people either have just always had it like that, have some neuroses about the color, etc, but would probably fail a blind taste test.",
">\n\nNo, I don't THINK I like my steak well done - I like it well done. Ffs, why is it so hard to believe people don't want to eat raw, bloody meat?",
">\n\nYou very well might. It's just not the more common of the 2 scenarios imo.\nIt's a fact of chemistry that meat loses flavor and becomes less tender if you overcook it. \nSo people who have to prefer less steak flavor and prefer it more chewy, for one reason or another.\nThat just can't be that common",
">\n\nwell done does not equal overcooked LOL",
">\n\nFine, replace overcooked with well-done if you need that.\nIt's a fact of chemistry is meat has less steak flavor and is less tender when it is \"well-done\" as opposed to medium or medium-rare.\nIt's theoretically possible to prefer less flavor and less tender, but it can't be common."
] |
>
I don't eat steak very often (maybe once every few years) and I will only eat it well done.
I don't order it in a restaurant and usually eat it at someone's home where that is on the menu for the meal.
Always tasted fine to me.
|
[
"I used to hate steak. My parents always ordered theirs well or medium-well.\nThen I tried medium-rare.\nSteak has been one of my favorites ever since.",
">\n\nI personally prefer medium well. It's a balance of tenderness and toughness I enjoy. Plus I use steak sauce so taste is good either way to me. So my reason for preferring it is texture alone. Also medium well isn't dry if prepared correctly.",
">\n\nHey! I see you're getting downvoted. Probably because you prefer medium well and use streak sauce. Well, I actually prefer medium, but I use steak sauce too! Maybe I can take some of those downvotes off your hands.",
">\n\nSoliciting downvotes is the best way to get none at all.",
">\n\nI got his ass",
">\n\ngay",
">\n\nI agree. I love steak, and eating it medium-rare. Well-done steak just isn't nearly as good, but if it's what someone likes, that's their choice and I really don't care what others eat. It's not my business",
">\n\nIf they truly like it that way, then sure. \nHowever, I honestly think it is more common to THINK you like well-done steak than to actually like it.\nMany people either have just always had it like that, have some neuroses about the color, etc, but would probably fail a blind taste test.",
">\n\nNo, I don't THINK I like my steak well done - I like it well done. Ffs, why is it so hard to believe people don't want to eat raw, bloody meat?",
">\n\nYou very well might. It's just not the more common of the 2 scenarios imo.\nIt's a fact of chemistry that meat loses flavor and becomes less tender if you overcook it. \nSo people who have to prefer less steak flavor and prefer it more chewy, for one reason or another.\nThat just can't be that common",
">\n\nwell done does not equal overcooked LOL",
">\n\nFine, replace overcooked with well-done if you need that.\nIt's a fact of chemistry is meat has less steak flavor and is less tender when it is \"well-done\" as opposed to medium or medium-rare.\nIt's theoretically possible to prefer less flavor and less tender, but it can't be common.",
">\n\nLol, I will never understand why people are so invested in how someone likes their steak. \nI've eaten medium rare, medium, and well-done steak, and well-done has plenty of flavour and it's neither tough nor chewy, if it's actually well done and not \"congratulations\" level.\nIn any case, people like what they like, and there may be more people liking well-done steaks than you think :)"
] |
>
Exactly!
|
[
"I used to hate steak. My parents always ordered theirs well or medium-well.\nThen I tried medium-rare.\nSteak has been one of my favorites ever since.",
">\n\nI personally prefer medium well. It's a balance of tenderness and toughness I enjoy. Plus I use steak sauce so taste is good either way to me. So my reason for preferring it is texture alone. Also medium well isn't dry if prepared correctly.",
">\n\nHey! I see you're getting downvoted. Probably because you prefer medium well and use streak sauce. Well, I actually prefer medium, but I use steak sauce too! Maybe I can take some of those downvotes off your hands.",
">\n\nSoliciting downvotes is the best way to get none at all.",
">\n\nI got his ass",
">\n\ngay",
">\n\nI agree. I love steak, and eating it medium-rare. Well-done steak just isn't nearly as good, but if it's what someone likes, that's their choice and I really don't care what others eat. It's not my business",
">\n\nIf they truly like it that way, then sure. \nHowever, I honestly think it is more common to THINK you like well-done steak than to actually like it.\nMany people either have just always had it like that, have some neuroses about the color, etc, but would probably fail a blind taste test.",
">\n\nNo, I don't THINK I like my steak well done - I like it well done. Ffs, why is it so hard to believe people don't want to eat raw, bloody meat?",
">\n\nYou very well might. It's just not the more common of the 2 scenarios imo.\nIt's a fact of chemistry that meat loses flavor and becomes less tender if you overcook it. \nSo people who have to prefer less steak flavor and prefer it more chewy, for one reason or another.\nThat just can't be that common",
">\n\nwell done does not equal overcooked LOL",
">\n\nFine, replace overcooked with well-done if you need that.\nIt's a fact of chemistry is meat has less steak flavor and is less tender when it is \"well-done\" as opposed to medium or medium-rare.\nIt's theoretically possible to prefer less flavor and less tender, but it can't be common.",
">\n\nLol, I will never understand why people are so invested in how someone likes their steak. \nI've eaten medium rare, medium, and well-done steak, and well-done has plenty of flavour and it's neither tough nor chewy, if it's actually well done and not \"congratulations\" level.\nIn any case, people like what they like, and there may be more people liking well-done steaks than you think :)",
">\n\nI don't eat steak very often (maybe once every few years) and I will only eat it well done. \nI don't order it in a restaurant and usually eat it at someone's home where that is on the menu for the meal. \nAlways tasted fine to me."
] |
>
My general philosophy is, let people do whatever the fuck they wanna do unless it is tangibly harming me. Lots of things bother me, lots of things make me uncomfortable, but guess what, that’s my own damn problem and I keep it to myself. Too many people think it’s their job to care about other people’s business and make a fuss over every stupid little thing. And frankly, that’s so much more annoying than some trivial personal choice or preference, like enjoying your steak well done. Just worry about yourself ffs.
^(Disclaimer: I like my steak rare)
|
[
"I used to hate steak. My parents always ordered theirs well or medium-well.\nThen I tried medium-rare.\nSteak has been one of my favorites ever since.",
">\n\nI personally prefer medium well. It's a balance of tenderness and toughness I enjoy. Plus I use steak sauce so taste is good either way to me. So my reason for preferring it is texture alone. Also medium well isn't dry if prepared correctly.",
">\n\nHey! I see you're getting downvoted. Probably because you prefer medium well and use streak sauce. Well, I actually prefer medium, but I use steak sauce too! Maybe I can take some of those downvotes off your hands.",
">\n\nSoliciting downvotes is the best way to get none at all.",
">\n\nI got his ass",
">\n\ngay",
">\n\nI agree. I love steak, and eating it medium-rare. Well-done steak just isn't nearly as good, but if it's what someone likes, that's their choice and I really don't care what others eat. It's not my business",
">\n\nIf they truly like it that way, then sure. \nHowever, I honestly think it is more common to THINK you like well-done steak than to actually like it.\nMany people either have just always had it like that, have some neuroses about the color, etc, but would probably fail a blind taste test.",
">\n\nNo, I don't THINK I like my steak well done - I like it well done. Ffs, why is it so hard to believe people don't want to eat raw, bloody meat?",
">\n\nYou very well might. It's just not the more common of the 2 scenarios imo.\nIt's a fact of chemistry that meat loses flavor and becomes less tender if you overcook it. \nSo people who have to prefer less steak flavor and prefer it more chewy, for one reason or another.\nThat just can't be that common",
">\n\nwell done does not equal overcooked LOL",
">\n\nFine, replace overcooked with well-done if you need that.\nIt's a fact of chemistry is meat has less steak flavor and is less tender when it is \"well-done\" as opposed to medium or medium-rare.\nIt's theoretically possible to prefer less flavor and less tender, but it can't be common.",
">\n\nLol, I will never understand why people are so invested in how someone likes their steak. \nI've eaten medium rare, medium, and well-done steak, and well-done has plenty of flavour and it's neither tough nor chewy, if it's actually well done and not \"congratulations\" level.\nIn any case, people like what they like, and there may be more people liking well-done steaks than you think :)",
">\n\nI don't eat steak very often (maybe once every few years) and I will only eat it well done. \nI don't order it in a restaurant and usually eat it at someone's home where that is on the menu for the meal. \nAlways tasted fine to me.",
">\n\nExactly!"
] |
>
Preach. This is the only answer
|
[
"I used to hate steak. My parents always ordered theirs well or medium-well.\nThen I tried medium-rare.\nSteak has been one of my favorites ever since.",
">\n\nI personally prefer medium well. It's a balance of tenderness and toughness I enjoy. Plus I use steak sauce so taste is good either way to me. So my reason for preferring it is texture alone. Also medium well isn't dry if prepared correctly.",
">\n\nHey! I see you're getting downvoted. Probably because you prefer medium well and use streak sauce. Well, I actually prefer medium, but I use steak sauce too! Maybe I can take some of those downvotes off your hands.",
">\n\nSoliciting downvotes is the best way to get none at all.",
">\n\nI got his ass",
">\n\ngay",
">\n\nI agree. I love steak, and eating it medium-rare. Well-done steak just isn't nearly as good, but if it's what someone likes, that's their choice and I really don't care what others eat. It's not my business",
">\n\nIf they truly like it that way, then sure. \nHowever, I honestly think it is more common to THINK you like well-done steak than to actually like it.\nMany people either have just always had it like that, have some neuroses about the color, etc, but would probably fail a blind taste test.",
">\n\nNo, I don't THINK I like my steak well done - I like it well done. Ffs, why is it so hard to believe people don't want to eat raw, bloody meat?",
">\n\nYou very well might. It's just not the more common of the 2 scenarios imo.\nIt's a fact of chemistry that meat loses flavor and becomes less tender if you overcook it. \nSo people who have to prefer less steak flavor and prefer it more chewy, for one reason or another.\nThat just can't be that common",
">\n\nwell done does not equal overcooked LOL",
">\n\nFine, replace overcooked with well-done if you need that.\nIt's a fact of chemistry is meat has less steak flavor and is less tender when it is \"well-done\" as opposed to medium or medium-rare.\nIt's theoretically possible to prefer less flavor and less tender, but it can't be common.",
">\n\nLol, I will never understand why people are so invested in how someone likes their steak. \nI've eaten medium rare, medium, and well-done steak, and well-done has plenty of flavour and it's neither tough nor chewy, if it's actually well done and not \"congratulations\" level.\nIn any case, people like what they like, and there may be more people liking well-done steaks than you think :)",
">\n\nI don't eat steak very often (maybe once every few years) and I will only eat it well done. \nI don't order it in a restaurant and usually eat it at someone's home where that is on the menu for the meal. \nAlways tasted fine to me.",
">\n\nExactly!",
">\n\nMy general philosophy is, let people do whatever the fuck they wanna do unless it is tangibly harming me. Lots of things bother me, lots of things make me uncomfortable, but guess what, that’s my own damn problem and I keep it to myself. Too many people think it’s their job to care about other people’s business and make a fuss over every stupid little thing. And frankly, that’s so much more annoying than some trivial personal choice or preference, like enjoying your steak well done. Just worry about yourself ffs.\n^(Disclaimer: I like my steak rare)"
] |
>
Spoken like someone who eats well done steak 🥩
|
[
"I used to hate steak. My parents always ordered theirs well or medium-well.\nThen I tried medium-rare.\nSteak has been one of my favorites ever since.",
">\n\nI personally prefer medium well. It's a balance of tenderness and toughness I enjoy. Plus I use steak sauce so taste is good either way to me. So my reason for preferring it is texture alone. Also medium well isn't dry if prepared correctly.",
">\n\nHey! I see you're getting downvoted. Probably because you prefer medium well and use streak sauce. Well, I actually prefer medium, but I use steak sauce too! Maybe I can take some of those downvotes off your hands.",
">\n\nSoliciting downvotes is the best way to get none at all.",
">\n\nI got his ass",
">\n\ngay",
">\n\nI agree. I love steak, and eating it medium-rare. Well-done steak just isn't nearly as good, but if it's what someone likes, that's their choice and I really don't care what others eat. It's not my business",
">\n\nIf they truly like it that way, then sure. \nHowever, I honestly think it is more common to THINK you like well-done steak than to actually like it.\nMany people either have just always had it like that, have some neuroses about the color, etc, but would probably fail a blind taste test.",
">\n\nNo, I don't THINK I like my steak well done - I like it well done. Ffs, why is it so hard to believe people don't want to eat raw, bloody meat?",
">\n\nYou very well might. It's just not the more common of the 2 scenarios imo.\nIt's a fact of chemistry that meat loses flavor and becomes less tender if you overcook it. \nSo people who have to prefer less steak flavor and prefer it more chewy, for one reason or another.\nThat just can't be that common",
">\n\nwell done does not equal overcooked LOL",
">\n\nFine, replace overcooked with well-done if you need that.\nIt's a fact of chemistry is meat has less steak flavor and is less tender when it is \"well-done\" as opposed to medium or medium-rare.\nIt's theoretically possible to prefer less flavor and less tender, but it can't be common.",
">\n\nLol, I will never understand why people are so invested in how someone likes their steak. \nI've eaten medium rare, medium, and well-done steak, and well-done has plenty of flavour and it's neither tough nor chewy, if it's actually well done and not \"congratulations\" level.\nIn any case, people like what they like, and there may be more people liking well-done steaks than you think :)",
">\n\nI don't eat steak very often (maybe once every few years) and I will only eat it well done. \nI don't order it in a restaurant and usually eat it at someone's home where that is on the menu for the meal. \nAlways tasted fine to me.",
">\n\nExactly!",
">\n\nMy general philosophy is, let people do whatever the fuck they wanna do unless it is tangibly harming me. Lots of things bother me, lots of things make me uncomfortable, but guess what, that’s my own damn problem and I keep it to myself. Too many people think it’s their job to care about other people’s business and make a fuss over every stupid little thing. And frankly, that’s so much more annoying than some trivial personal choice or preference, like enjoying your steak well done. Just worry about yourself ffs.\n^(Disclaimer: I like my steak rare)",
">\n\nPreach. This is the only answer"
] |
>
Probably with ketchup.
|
[
"I used to hate steak. My parents always ordered theirs well or medium-well.\nThen I tried medium-rare.\nSteak has been one of my favorites ever since.",
">\n\nI personally prefer medium well. It's a balance of tenderness and toughness I enjoy. Plus I use steak sauce so taste is good either way to me. So my reason for preferring it is texture alone. Also medium well isn't dry if prepared correctly.",
">\n\nHey! I see you're getting downvoted. Probably because you prefer medium well and use streak sauce. Well, I actually prefer medium, but I use steak sauce too! Maybe I can take some of those downvotes off your hands.",
">\n\nSoliciting downvotes is the best way to get none at all.",
">\n\nI got his ass",
">\n\ngay",
">\n\nI agree. I love steak, and eating it medium-rare. Well-done steak just isn't nearly as good, but if it's what someone likes, that's their choice and I really don't care what others eat. It's not my business",
">\n\nIf they truly like it that way, then sure. \nHowever, I honestly think it is more common to THINK you like well-done steak than to actually like it.\nMany people either have just always had it like that, have some neuroses about the color, etc, but would probably fail a blind taste test.",
">\n\nNo, I don't THINK I like my steak well done - I like it well done. Ffs, why is it so hard to believe people don't want to eat raw, bloody meat?",
">\n\nYou very well might. It's just not the more common of the 2 scenarios imo.\nIt's a fact of chemistry that meat loses flavor and becomes less tender if you overcook it. \nSo people who have to prefer less steak flavor and prefer it more chewy, for one reason or another.\nThat just can't be that common",
">\n\nwell done does not equal overcooked LOL",
">\n\nFine, replace overcooked with well-done if you need that.\nIt's a fact of chemistry is meat has less steak flavor and is less tender when it is \"well-done\" as opposed to medium or medium-rare.\nIt's theoretically possible to prefer less flavor and less tender, but it can't be common.",
">\n\nLol, I will never understand why people are so invested in how someone likes their steak. \nI've eaten medium rare, medium, and well-done steak, and well-done has plenty of flavour and it's neither tough nor chewy, if it's actually well done and not \"congratulations\" level.\nIn any case, people like what they like, and there may be more people liking well-done steaks than you think :)",
">\n\nI don't eat steak very often (maybe once every few years) and I will only eat it well done. \nI don't order it in a restaurant and usually eat it at someone's home where that is on the menu for the meal. \nAlways tasted fine to me.",
">\n\nExactly!",
">\n\nMy general philosophy is, let people do whatever the fuck they wanna do unless it is tangibly harming me. Lots of things bother me, lots of things make me uncomfortable, but guess what, that’s my own damn problem and I keep it to myself. Too many people think it’s their job to care about other people’s business and make a fuss over every stupid little thing. And frankly, that’s so much more annoying than some trivial personal choice or preference, like enjoying your steak well done. Just worry about yourself ffs.\n^(Disclaimer: I like my steak rare)",
">\n\nPreach. This is the only answer",
">\n\nSpoken like someone who eats well done steak 🥩"
] |
>
Mmmm mmm nothin sets off the flavor of a steak like some ketchup
|
[
"I used to hate steak. My parents always ordered theirs well or medium-well.\nThen I tried medium-rare.\nSteak has been one of my favorites ever since.",
">\n\nI personally prefer medium well. It's a balance of tenderness and toughness I enjoy. Plus I use steak sauce so taste is good either way to me. So my reason for preferring it is texture alone. Also medium well isn't dry if prepared correctly.",
">\n\nHey! I see you're getting downvoted. Probably because you prefer medium well and use streak sauce. Well, I actually prefer medium, but I use steak sauce too! Maybe I can take some of those downvotes off your hands.",
">\n\nSoliciting downvotes is the best way to get none at all.",
">\n\nI got his ass",
">\n\ngay",
">\n\nI agree. I love steak, and eating it medium-rare. Well-done steak just isn't nearly as good, but if it's what someone likes, that's their choice and I really don't care what others eat. It's not my business",
">\n\nIf they truly like it that way, then sure. \nHowever, I honestly think it is more common to THINK you like well-done steak than to actually like it.\nMany people either have just always had it like that, have some neuroses about the color, etc, but would probably fail a blind taste test.",
">\n\nNo, I don't THINK I like my steak well done - I like it well done. Ffs, why is it so hard to believe people don't want to eat raw, bloody meat?",
">\n\nYou very well might. It's just not the more common of the 2 scenarios imo.\nIt's a fact of chemistry that meat loses flavor and becomes less tender if you overcook it. \nSo people who have to prefer less steak flavor and prefer it more chewy, for one reason or another.\nThat just can't be that common",
">\n\nwell done does not equal overcooked LOL",
">\n\nFine, replace overcooked with well-done if you need that.\nIt's a fact of chemistry is meat has less steak flavor and is less tender when it is \"well-done\" as opposed to medium or medium-rare.\nIt's theoretically possible to prefer less flavor and less tender, but it can't be common.",
">\n\nLol, I will never understand why people are so invested in how someone likes their steak. \nI've eaten medium rare, medium, and well-done steak, and well-done has plenty of flavour and it's neither tough nor chewy, if it's actually well done and not \"congratulations\" level.\nIn any case, people like what they like, and there may be more people liking well-done steaks than you think :)",
">\n\nI don't eat steak very often (maybe once every few years) and I will only eat it well done. \nI don't order it in a restaurant and usually eat it at someone's home where that is on the menu for the meal. \nAlways tasted fine to me.",
">\n\nExactly!",
">\n\nMy general philosophy is, let people do whatever the fuck they wanna do unless it is tangibly harming me. Lots of things bother me, lots of things make me uncomfortable, but guess what, that’s my own damn problem and I keep it to myself. Too many people think it’s their job to care about other people’s business and make a fuss over every stupid little thing. And frankly, that’s so much more annoying than some trivial personal choice or preference, like enjoying your steak well done. Just worry about yourself ffs.\n^(Disclaimer: I like my steak rare)",
">\n\nPreach. This is the only answer",
">\n\nSpoken like someone who eats well done steak 🥩",
">\n\nProbably with ketchup."
] |
>
Well hell, get a diet coke. It's our anniversary.
|
[
"I used to hate steak. My parents always ordered theirs well or medium-well.\nThen I tried medium-rare.\nSteak has been one of my favorites ever since.",
">\n\nI personally prefer medium well. It's a balance of tenderness and toughness I enjoy. Plus I use steak sauce so taste is good either way to me. So my reason for preferring it is texture alone. Also medium well isn't dry if prepared correctly.",
">\n\nHey! I see you're getting downvoted. Probably because you prefer medium well and use streak sauce. Well, I actually prefer medium, but I use steak sauce too! Maybe I can take some of those downvotes off your hands.",
">\n\nSoliciting downvotes is the best way to get none at all.",
">\n\nI got his ass",
">\n\ngay",
">\n\nI agree. I love steak, and eating it medium-rare. Well-done steak just isn't nearly as good, but if it's what someone likes, that's their choice and I really don't care what others eat. It's not my business",
">\n\nIf they truly like it that way, then sure. \nHowever, I honestly think it is more common to THINK you like well-done steak than to actually like it.\nMany people either have just always had it like that, have some neuroses about the color, etc, but would probably fail a blind taste test.",
">\n\nNo, I don't THINK I like my steak well done - I like it well done. Ffs, why is it so hard to believe people don't want to eat raw, bloody meat?",
">\n\nYou very well might. It's just not the more common of the 2 scenarios imo.\nIt's a fact of chemistry that meat loses flavor and becomes less tender if you overcook it. \nSo people who have to prefer less steak flavor and prefer it more chewy, for one reason or another.\nThat just can't be that common",
">\n\nwell done does not equal overcooked LOL",
">\n\nFine, replace overcooked with well-done if you need that.\nIt's a fact of chemistry is meat has less steak flavor and is less tender when it is \"well-done\" as opposed to medium or medium-rare.\nIt's theoretically possible to prefer less flavor and less tender, but it can't be common.",
">\n\nLol, I will never understand why people are so invested in how someone likes their steak. \nI've eaten medium rare, medium, and well-done steak, and well-done has plenty of flavour and it's neither tough nor chewy, if it's actually well done and not \"congratulations\" level.\nIn any case, people like what they like, and there may be more people liking well-done steaks than you think :)",
">\n\nI don't eat steak very often (maybe once every few years) and I will only eat it well done. \nI don't order it in a restaurant and usually eat it at someone's home where that is on the menu for the meal. \nAlways tasted fine to me.",
">\n\nExactly!",
">\n\nMy general philosophy is, let people do whatever the fuck they wanna do unless it is tangibly harming me. Lots of things bother me, lots of things make me uncomfortable, but guess what, that’s my own damn problem and I keep it to myself. Too many people think it’s their job to care about other people’s business and make a fuss over every stupid little thing. And frankly, that’s so much more annoying than some trivial personal choice or preference, like enjoying your steak well done. Just worry about yourself ffs.\n^(Disclaimer: I like my steak rare)",
">\n\nPreach. This is the only answer",
">\n\nSpoken like someone who eats well done steak 🥩",
">\n\nProbably with ketchup.",
">\n\nMmmm mmm nothin sets off the flavor of a steak like some ketchup"
] |
>
But dad, what If someone wants their well done?
We politely, yet firmly, ask them leave
|
[
"I used to hate steak. My parents always ordered theirs well or medium-well.\nThen I tried medium-rare.\nSteak has been one of my favorites ever since.",
">\n\nI personally prefer medium well. It's a balance of tenderness and toughness I enjoy. Plus I use steak sauce so taste is good either way to me. So my reason for preferring it is texture alone. Also medium well isn't dry if prepared correctly.",
">\n\nHey! I see you're getting downvoted. Probably because you prefer medium well and use streak sauce. Well, I actually prefer medium, but I use steak sauce too! Maybe I can take some of those downvotes off your hands.",
">\n\nSoliciting downvotes is the best way to get none at all.",
">\n\nI got his ass",
">\n\ngay",
">\n\nI agree. I love steak, and eating it medium-rare. Well-done steak just isn't nearly as good, but if it's what someone likes, that's their choice and I really don't care what others eat. It's not my business",
">\n\nIf they truly like it that way, then sure. \nHowever, I honestly think it is more common to THINK you like well-done steak than to actually like it.\nMany people either have just always had it like that, have some neuroses about the color, etc, but would probably fail a blind taste test.",
">\n\nNo, I don't THINK I like my steak well done - I like it well done. Ffs, why is it so hard to believe people don't want to eat raw, bloody meat?",
">\n\nYou very well might. It's just not the more common of the 2 scenarios imo.\nIt's a fact of chemistry that meat loses flavor and becomes less tender if you overcook it. \nSo people who have to prefer less steak flavor and prefer it more chewy, for one reason or another.\nThat just can't be that common",
">\n\nwell done does not equal overcooked LOL",
">\n\nFine, replace overcooked with well-done if you need that.\nIt's a fact of chemistry is meat has less steak flavor and is less tender when it is \"well-done\" as opposed to medium or medium-rare.\nIt's theoretically possible to prefer less flavor and less tender, but it can't be common.",
">\n\nLol, I will never understand why people are so invested in how someone likes their steak. \nI've eaten medium rare, medium, and well-done steak, and well-done has plenty of flavour and it's neither tough nor chewy, if it's actually well done and not \"congratulations\" level.\nIn any case, people like what they like, and there may be more people liking well-done steaks than you think :)",
">\n\nI don't eat steak very often (maybe once every few years) and I will only eat it well done. \nI don't order it in a restaurant and usually eat it at someone's home where that is on the menu for the meal. \nAlways tasted fine to me.",
">\n\nExactly!",
">\n\nMy general philosophy is, let people do whatever the fuck they wanna do unless it is tangibly harming me. Lots of things bother me, lots of things make me uncomfortable, but guess what, that’s my own damn problem and I keep it to myself. Too many people think it’s their job to care about other people’s business and make a fuss over every stupid little thing. And frankly, that’s so much more annoying than some trivial personal choice or preference, like enjoying your steak well done. Just worry about yourself ffs.\n^(Disclaimer: I like my steak rare)",
">\n\nPreach. This is the only answer",
">\n\nSpoken like someone who eats well done steak 🥩",
">\n\nProbably with ketchup.",
">\n\nMmmm mmm nothin sets off the flavor of a steak like some ketchup",
">\n\nWell hell, get a diet coke. It's our anniversary."
] |
>
sub-human pretending to be a waiter, to go fuck themselves
This is why you get bad service in restaurants
|
[
"I used to hate steak. My parents always ordered theirs well or medium-well.\nThen I tried medium-rare.\nSteak has been one of my favorites ever since.",
">\n\nI personally prefer medium well. It's a balance of tenderness and toughness I enjoy. Plus I use steak sauce so taste is good either way to me. So my reason for preferring it is texture alone. Also medium well isn't dry if prepared correctly.",
">\n\nHey! I see you're getting downvoted. Probably because you prefer medium well and use streak sauce. Well, I actually prefer medium, but I use steak sauce too! Maybe I can take some of those downvotes off your hands.",
">\n\nSoliciting downvotes is the best way to get none at all.",
">\n\nI got his ass",
">\n\ngay",
">\n\nI agree. I love steak, and eating it medium-rare. Well-done steak just isn't nearly as good, but if it's what someone likes, that's their choice and I really don't care what others eat. It's not my business",
">\n\nIf they truly like it that way, then sure. \nHowever, I honestly think it is more common to THINK you like well-done steak than to actually like it.\nMany people either have just always had it like that, have some neuroses about the color, etc, but would probably fail a blind taste test.",
">\n\nNo, I don't THINK I like my steak well done - I like it well done. Ffs, why is it so hard to believe people don't want to eat raw, bloody meat?",
">\n\nYou very well might. It's just not the more common of the 2 scenarios imo.\nIt's a fact of chemistry that meat loses flavor and becomes less tender if you overcook it. \nSo people who have to prefer less steak flavor and prefer it more chewy, for one reason or another.\nThat just can't be that common",
">\n\nwell done does not equal overcooked LOL",
">\n\nFine, replace overcooked with well-done if you need that.\nIt's a fact of chemistry is meat has less steak flavor and is less tender when it is \"well-done\" as opposed to medium or medium-rare.\nIt's theoretically possible to prefer less flavor and less tender, but it can't be common.",
">\n\nLol, I will never understand why people are so invested in how someone likes their steak. \nI've eaten medium rare, medium, and well-done steak, and well-done has plenty of flavour and it's neither tough nor chewy, if it's actually well done and not \"congratulations\" level.\nIn any case, people like what they like, and there may be more people liking well-done steaks than you think :)",
">\n\nI don't eat steak very often (maybe once every few years) and I will only eat it well done. \nI don't order it in a restaurant and usually eat it at someone's home where that is on the menu for the meal. \nAlways tasted fine to me.",
">\n\nExactly!",
">\n\nMy general philosophy is, let people do whatever the fuck they wanna do unless it is tangibly harming me. Lots of things bother me, lots of things make me uncomfortable, but guess what, that’s my own damn problem and I keep it to myself. Too many people think it’s their job to care about other people’s business and make a fuss over every stupid little thing. And frankly, that’s so much more annoying than some trivial personal choice or preference, like enjoying your steak well done. Just worry about yourself ffs.\n^(Disclaimer: I like my steak rare)",
">\n\nPreach. This is the only answer",
">\n\nSpoken like someone who eats well done steak 🥩",
">\n\nProbably with ketchup.",
">\n\nMmmm mmm nothin sets off the flavor of a steak like some ketchup",
">\n\nWell hell, get a diet coke. It's our anniversary.",
">\n\nBut dad, what If someone wants their well done?\nWe politely, yet firmly, ask them leave"
] |
>
I generally dislike when people comment on food on other people plates. Listen, I went through a process when selecting my food, let me enjoy my meal. I don’t need your (often very detailed) opinion on what you like and don’t like. I am an not making you eat it. Enjoy the food you selected and leave mine alone.
|
[
"I used to hate steak. My parents always ordered theirs well or medium-well.\nThen I tried medium-rare.\nSteak has been one of my favorites ever since.",
">\n\nI personally prefer medium well. It's a balance of tenderness and toughness I enjoy. Plus I use steak sauce so taste is good either way to me. So my reason for preferring it is texture alone. Also medium well isn't dry if prepared correctly.",
">\n\nHey! I see you're getting downvoted. Probably because you prefer medium well and use streak sauce. Well, I actually prefer medium, but I use steak sauce too! Maybe I can take some of those downvotes off your hands.",
">\n\nSoliciting downvotes is the best way to get none at all.",
">\n\nI got his ass",
">\n\ngay",
">\n\nI agree. I love steak, and eating it medium-rare. Well-done steak just isn't nearly as good, but if it's what someone likes, that's their choice and I really don't care what others eat. It's not my business",
">\n\nIf they truly like it that way, then sure. \nHowever, I honestly think it is more common to THINK you like well-done steak than to actually like it.\nMany people either have just always had it like that, have some neuroses about the color, etc, but would probably fail a blind taste test.",
">\n\nNo, I don't THINK I like my steak well done - I like it well done. Ffs, why is it so hard to believe people don't want to eat raw, bloody meat?",
">\n\nYou very well might. It's just not the more common of the 2 scenarios imo.\nIt's a fact of chemistry that meat loses flavor and becomes less tender if you overcook it. \nSo people who have to prefer less steak flavor and prefer it more chewy, for one reason or another.\nThat just can't be that common",
">\n\nwell done does not equal overcooked LOL",
">\n\nFine, replace overcooked with well-done if you need that.\nIt's a fact of chemistry is meat has less steak flavor and is less tender when it is \"well-done\" as opposed to medium or medium-rare.\nIt's theoretically possible to prefer less flavor and less tender, but it can't be common.",
">\n\nLol, I will never understand why people are so invested in how someone likes their steak. \nI've eaten medium rare, medium, and well-done steak, and well-done has plenty of flavour and it's neither tough nor chewy, if it's actually well done and not \"congratulations\" level.\nIn any case, people like what they like, and there may be more people liking well-done steaks than you think :)",
">\n\nI don't eat steak very often (maybe once every few years) and I will only eat it well done. \nI don't order it in a restaurant and usually eat it at someone's home where that is on the menu for the meal. \nAlways tasted fine to me.",
">\n\nExactly!",
">\n\nMy general philosophy is, let people do whatever the fuck they wanna do unless it is tangibly harming me. Lots of things bother me, lots of things make me uncomfortable, but guess what, that’s my own damn problem and I keep it to myself. Too many people think it’s their job to care about other people’s business and make a fuss over every stupid little thing. And frankly, that’s so much more annoying than some trivial personal choice or preference, like enjoying your steak well done. Just worry about yourself ffs.\n^(Disclaimer: I like my steak rare)",
">\n\nPreach. This is the only answer",
">\n\nSpoken like someone who eats well done steak 🥩",
">\n\nProbably with ketchup.",
">\n\nMmmm mmm nothin sets off the flavor of a steak like some ketchup",
">\n\nWell hell, get a diet coke. It's our anniversary.",
">\n\nBut dad, what If someone wants their well done?\nWe politely, yet firmly, ask them leave",
">\n\n\nsub-human pretending to be a waiter, to go fuck themselves\n\nThis is why you get bad service in restaurants"
] |
>
People who tell others how to enjoy their food in general, need to fuck off
|
[
"I used to hate steak. My parents always ordered theirs well or medium-well.\nThen I tried medium-rare.\nSteak has been one of my favorites ever since.",
">\n\nI personally prefer medium well. It's a balance of tenderness and toughness I enjoy. Plus I use steak sauce so taste is good either way to me. So my reason for preferring it is texture alone. Also medium well isn't dry if prepared correctly.",
">\n\nHey! I see you're getting downvoted. Probably because you prefer medium well and use streak sauce. Well, I actually prefer medium, but I use steak sauce too! Maybe I can take some of those downvotes off your hands.",
">\n\nSoliciting downvotes is the best way to get none at all.",
">\n\nI got his ass",
">\n\ngay",
">\n\nI agree. I love steak, and eating it medium-rare. Well-done steak just isn't nearly as good, but if it's what someone likes, that's their choice and I really don't care what others eat. It's not my business",
">\n\nIf they truly like it that way, then sure. \nHowever, I honestly think it is more common to THINK you like well-done steak than to actually like it.\nMany people either have just always had it like that, have some neuroses about the color, etc, but would probably fail a blind taste test.",
">\n\nNo, I don't THINK I like my steak well done - I like it well done. Ffs, why is it so hard to believe people don't want to eat raw, bloody meat?",
">\n\nYou very well might. It's just not the more common of the 2 scenarios imo.\nIt's a fact of chemistry that meat loses flavor and becomes less tender if you overcook it. \nSo people who have to prefer less steak flavor and prefer it more chewy, for one reason or another.\nThat just can't be that common",
">\n\nwell done does not equal overcooked LOL",
">\n\nFine, replace overcooked with well-done if you need that.\nIt's a fact of chemistry is meat has less steak flavor and is less tender when it is \"well-done\" as opposed to medium or medium-rare.\nIt's theoretically possible to prefer less flavor and less tender, but it can't be common.",
">\n\nLol, I will never understand why people are so invested in how someone likes their steak. \nI've eaten medium rare, medium, and well-done steak, and well-done has plenty of flavour and it's neither tough nor chewy, if it's actually well done and not \"congratulations\" level.\nIn any case, people like what they like, and there may be more people liking well-done steaks than you think :)",
">\n\nI don't eat steak very often (maybe once every few years) and I will only eat it well done. \nI don't order it in a restaurant and usually eat it at someone's home where that is on the menu for the meal. \nAlways tasted fine to me.",
">\n\nExactly!",
">\n\nMy general philosophy is, let people do whatever the fuck they wanna do unless it is tangibly harming me. Lots of things bother me, lots of things make me uncomfortable, but guess what, that’s my own damn problem and I keep it to myself. Too many people think it’s their job to care about other people’s business and make a fuss over every stupid little thing. And frankly, that’s so much more annoying than some trivial personal choice or preference, like enjoying your steak well done. Just worry about yourself ffs.\n^(Disclaimer: I like my steak rare)",
">\n\nPreach. This is the only answer",
">\n\nSpoken like someone who eats well done steak 🥩",
">\n\nProbably with ketchup.",
">\n\nMmmm mmm nothin sets off the flavor of a steak like some ketchup",
">\n\nWell hell, get a diet coke. It's our anniversary.",
">\n\nBut dad, what If someone wants their well done?\nWe politely, yet firmly, ask them leave",
">\n\n\nsub-human pretending to be a waiter, to go fuck themselves\n\nThis is why you get bad service in restaurants",
">\n\nI generally dislike when people comment on food on other people plates. Listen, I went through a process when selecting my food, let me enjoy my meal. I don’t need your (often very detailed) opinion on what you like and don’t like. I am an not making you eat it. Enjoy the food you selected and leave mine alone."
] |
>
unless they enjoy their chicken medium rare
|
[
"I used to hate steak. My parents always ordered theirs well or medium-well.\nThen I tried medium-rare.\nSteak has been one of my favorites ever since.",
">\n\nI personally prefer medium well. It's a balance of tenderness and toughness I enjoy. Plus I use steak sauce so taste is good either way to me. So my reason for preferring it is texture alone. Also medium well isn't dry if prepared correctly.",
">\n\nHey! I see you're getting downvoted. Probably because you prefer medium well and use streak sauce. Well, I actually prefer medium, but I use steak sauce too! Maybe I can take some of those downvotes off your hands.",
">\n\nSoliciting downvotes is the best way to get none at all.",
">\n\nI got his ass",
">\n\ngay",
">\n\nI agree. I love steak, and eating it medium-rare. Well-done steak just isn't nearly as good, but if it's what someone likes, that's their choice and I really don't care what others eat. It's not my business",
">\n\nIf they truly like it that way, then sure. \nHowever, I honestly think it is more common to THINK you like well-done steak than to actually like it.\nMany people either have just always had it like that, have some neuroses about the color, etc, but would probably fail a blind taste test.",
">\n\nNo, I don't THINK I like my steak well done - I like it well done. Ffs, why is it so hard to believe people don't want to eat raw, bloody meat?",
">\n\nYou very well might. It's just not the more common of the 2 scenarios imo.\nIt's a fact of chemistry that meat loses flavor and becomes less tender if you overcook it. \nSo people who have to prefer less steak flavor and prefer it more chewy, for one reason or another.\nThat just can't be that common",
">\n\nwell done does not equal overcooked LOL",
">\n\nFine, replace overcooked with well-done if you need that.\nIt's a fact of chemistry is meat has less steak flavor and is less tender when it is \"well-done\" as opposed to medium or medium-rare.\nIt's theoretically possible to prefer less flavor and less tender, but it can't be common.",
">\n\nLol, I will never understand why people are so invested in how someone likes their steak. \nI've eaten medium rare, medium, and well-done steak, and well-done has plenty of flavour and it's neither tough nor chewy, if it's actually well done and not \"congratulations\" level.\nIn any case, people like what they like, and there may be more people liking well-done steaks than you think :)",
">\n\nI don't eat steak very often (maybe once every few years) and I will only eat it well done. \nI don't order it in a restaurant and usually eat it at someone's home where that is on the menu for the meal. \nAlways tasted fine to me.",
">\n\nExactly!",
">\n\nMy general philosophy is, let people do whatever the fuck they wanna do unless it is tangibly harming me. Lots of things bother me, lots of things make me uncomfortable, but guess what, that’s my own damn problem and I keep it to myself. Too many people think it’s their job to care about other people’s business and make a fuss over every stupid little thing. And frankly, that’s so much more annoying than some trivial personal choice or preference, like enjoying your steak well done. Just worry about yourself ffs.\n^(Disclaimer: I like my steak rare)",
">\n\nPreach. This is the only answer",
">\n\nSpoken like someone who eats well done steak 🥩",
">\n\nProbably with ketchup.",
">\n\nMmmm mmm nothin sets off the flavor of a steak like some ketchup",
">\n\nWell hell, get a diet coke. It's our anniversary.",
">\n\nBut dad, what If someone wants their well done?\nWe politely, yet firmly, ask them leave",
">\n\n\nsub-human pretending to be a waiter, to go fuck themselves\n\nThis is why you get bad service in restaurants",
">\n\nI generally dislike when people comment on food on other people plates. Listen, I went through a process when selecting my food, let me enjoy my meal. I don’t need your (often very detailed) opinion on what you like and don’t like. I am an not making you eat it. Enjoy the food you selected and leave mine alone.",
">\n\nPeople who tell others how to enjoy their food in general, need to fuck off"
] |
>
It's rare for that to happen
|
[
"I used to hate steak. My parents always ordered theirs well or medium-well.\nThen I tried medium-rare.\nSteak has been one of my favorites ever since.",
">\n\nI personally prefer medium well. It's a balance of tenderness and toughness I enjoy. Plus I use steak sauce so taste is good either way to me. So my reason for preferring it is texture alone. Also medium well isn't dry if prepared correctly.",
">\n\nHey! I see you're getting downvoted. Probably because you prefer medium well and use streak sauce. Well, I actually prefer medium, but I use steak sauce too! Maybe I can take some of those downvotes off your hands.",
">\n\nSoliciting downvotes is the best way to get none at all.",
">\n\nI got his ass",
">\n\ngay",
">\n\nI agree. I love steak, and eating it medium-rare. Well-done steak just isn't nearly as good, but if it's what someone likes, that's their choice and I really don't care what others eat. It's not my business",
">\n\nIf they truly like it that way, then sure. \nHowever, I honestly think it is more common to THINK you like well-done steak than to actually like it.\nMany people either have just always had it like that, have some neuroses about the color, etc, but would probably fail a blind taste test.",
">\n\nNo, I don't THINK I like my steak well done - I like it well done. Ffs, why is it so hard to believe people don't want to eat raw, bloody meat?",
">\n\nYou very well might. It's just not the more common of the 2 scenarios imo.\nIt's a fact of chemistry that meat loses flavor and becomes less tender if you overcook it. \nSo people who have to prefer less steak flavor and prefer it more chewy, for one reason or another.\nThat just can't be that common",
">\n\nwell done does not equal overcooked LOL",
">\n\nFine, replace overcooked with well-done if you need that.\nIt's a fact of chemistry is meat has less steak flavor and is less tender when it is \"well-done\" as opposed to medium or medium-rare.\nIt's theoretically possible to prefer less flavor and less tender, but it can't be common.",
">\n\nLol, I will never understand why people are so invested in how someone likes their steak. \nI've eaten medium rare, medium, and well-done steak, and well-done has plenty of flavour and it's neither tough nor chewy, if it's actually well done and not \"congratulations\" level.\nIn any case, people like what they like, and there may be more people liking well-done steaks than you think :)",
">\n\nI don't eat steak very often (maybe once every few years) and I will only eat it well done. \nI don't order it in a restaurant and usually eat it at someone's home where that is on the menu for the meal. \nAlways tasted fine to me.",
">\n\nExactly!",
">\n\nMy general philosophy is, let people do whatever the fuck they wanna do unless it is tangibly harming me. Lots of things bother me, lots of things make me uncomfortable, but guess what, that’s my own damn problem and I keep it to myself. Too many people think it’s their job to care about other people’s business and make a fuss over every stupid little thing. And frankly, that’s so much more annoying than some trivial personal choice or preference, like enjoying your steak well done. Just worry about yourself ffs.\n^(Disclaimer: I like my steak rare)",
">\n\nPreach. This is the only answer",
">\n\nSpoken like someone who eats well done steak 🥩",
">\n\nProbably with ketchup.",
">\n\nMmmm mmm nothin sets off the flavor of a steak like some ketchup",
">\n\nWell hell, get a diet coke. It's our anniversary.",
">\n\nBut dad, what If someone wants their well done?\nWe politely, yet firmly, ask them leave",
">\n\n\nsub-human pretending to be a waiter, to go fuck themselves\n\nThis is why you get bad service in restaurants",
">\n\nI generally dislike when people comment on food on other people plates. Listen, I went through a process when selecting my food, let me enjoy my meal. I don’t need your (often very detailed) opinion on what you like and don’t like. I am an not making you eat it. Enjoy the food you selected and leave mine alone.",
">\n\nPeople who tell others how to enjoy their food in general, need to fuck off",
">\n\nunless they enjoy their chicken medium rare"
] |
>
Rare (°_°)
|
[
"I used to hate steak. My parents always ordered theirs well or medium-well.\nThen I tried medium-rare.\nSteak has been one of my favorites ever since.",
">\n\nI personally prefer medium well. It's a balance of tenderness and toughness I enjoy. Plus I use steak sauce so taste is good either way to me. So my reason for preferring it is texture alone. Also medium well isn't dry if prepared correctly.",
">\n\nHey! I see you're getting downvoted. Probably because you prefer medium well and use streak sauce. Well, I actually prefer medium, but I use steak sauce too! Maybe I can take some of those downvotes off your hands.",
">\n\nSoliciting downvotes is the best way to get none at all.",
">\n\nI got his ass",
">\n\ngay",
">\n\nI agree. I love steak, and eating it medium-rare. Well-done steak just isn't nearly as good, but if it's what someone likes, that's their choice and I really don't care what others eat. It's not my business",
">\n\nIf they truly like it that way, then sure. \nHowever, I honestly think it is more common to THINK you like well-done steak than to actually like it.\nMany people either have just always had it like that, have some neuroses about the color, etc, but would probably fail a blind taste test.",
">\n\nNo, I don't THINK I like my steak well done - I like it well done. Ffs, why is it so hard to believe people don't want to eat raw, bloody meat?",
">\n\nYou very well might. It's just not the more common of the 2 scenarios imo.\nIt's a fact of chemistry that meat loses flavor and becomes less tender if you overcook it. \nSo people who have to prefer less steak flavor and prefer it more chewy, for one reason or another.\nThat just can't be that common",
">\n\nwell done does not equal overcooked LOL",
">\n\nFine, replace overcooked with well-done if you need that.\nIt's a fact of chemistry is meat has less steak flavor and is less tender when it is \"well-done\" as opposed to medium or medium-rare.\nIt's theoretically possible to prefer less flavor and less tender, but it can't be common.",
">\n\nLol, I will never understand why people are so invested in how someone likes their steak. \nI've eaten medium rare, medium, and well-done steak, and well-done has plenty of flavour and it's neither tough nor chewy, if it's actually well done and not \"congratulations\" level.\nIn any case, people like what they like, and there may be more people liking well-done steaks than you think :)",
">\n\nI don't eat steak very often (maybe once every few years) and I will only eat it well done. \nI don't order it in a restaurant and usually eat it at someone's home where that is on the menu for the meal. \nAlways tasted fine to me.",
">\n\nExactly!",
">\n\nMy general philosophy is, let people do whatever the fuck they wanna do unless it is tangibly harming me. Lots of things bother me, lots of things make me uncomfortable, but guess what, that’s my own damn problem and I keep it to myself. Too many people think it’s their job to care about other people’s business and make a fuss over every stupid little thing. And frankly, that’s so much more annoying than some trivial personal choice or preference, like enjoying your steak well done. Just worry about yourself ffs.\n^(Disclaimer: I like my steak rare)",
">\n\nPreach. This is the only answer",
">\n\nSpoken like someone who eats well done steak 🥩",
">\n\nProbably with ketchup.",
">\n\nMmmm mmm nothin sets off the flavor of a steak like some ketchup",
">\n\nWell hell, get a diet coke. It's our anniversary.",
">\n\nBut dad, what If someone wants their well done?\nWe politely, yet firmly, ask them leave",
">\n\n\nsub-human pretending to be a waiter, to go fuck themselves\n\nThis is why you get bad service in restaurants",
">\n\nI generally dislike when people comment on food on other people plates. Listen, I went through a process when selecting my food, let me enjoy my meal. I don’t need your (often very detailed) opinion on what you like and don’t like. I am an not making you eat it. Enjoy the food you selected and leave mine alone.",
">\n\nPeople who tell others how to enjoy their food in general, need to fuck off",
">\n\nunless they enjoy their chicken medium rare",
">\n\nIt's rare for that to happen"
] |
>
'elitism' about steak or any food is moronic and childish anyway. I agree, let people enjoy their food the way they like it. I don't cry about you not liking a specific veggie or only eating chicken breasts.
Look at your own plate.
|
[
"I used to hate steak. My parents always ordered theirs well or medium-well.\nThen I tried medium-rare.\nSteak has been one of my favorites ever since.",
">\n\nI personally prefer medium well. It's a balance of tenderness and toughness I enjoy. Plus I use steak sauce so taste is good either way to me. So my reason for preferring it is texture alone. Also medium well isn't dry if prepared correctly.",
">\n\nHey! I see you're getting downvoted. Probably because you prefer medium well and use streak sauce. Well, I actually prefer medium, but I use steak sauce too! Maybe I can take some of those downvotes off your hands.",
">\n\nSoliciting downvotes is the best way to get none at all.",
">\n\nI got his ass",
">\n\ngay",
">\n\nI agree. I love steak, and eating it medium-rare. Well-done steak just isn't nearly as good, but if it's what someone likes, that's their choice and I really don't care what others eat. It's not my business",
">\n\nIf they truly like it that way, then sure. \nHowever, I honestly think it is more common to THINK you like well-done steak than to actually like it.\nMany people either have just always had it like that, have some neuroses about the color, etc, but would probably fail a blind taste test.",
">\n\nNo, I don't THINK I like my steak well done - I like it well done. Ffs, why is it so hard to believe people don't want to eat raw, bloody meat?",
">\n\nYou very well might. It's just not the more common of the 2 scenarios imo.\nIt's a fact of chemistry that meat loses flavor and becomes less tender if you overcook it. \nSo people who have to prefer less steak flavor and prefer it more chewy, for one reason or another.\nThat just can't be that common",
">\n\nwell done does not equal overcooked LOL",
">\n\nFine, replace overcooked with well-done if you need that.\nIt's a fact of chemistry is meat has less steak flavor and is less tender when it is \"well-done\" as opposed to medium or medium-rare.\nIt's theoretically possible to prefer less flavor and less tender, but it can't be common.",
">\n\nLol, I will never understand why people are so invested in how someone likes their steak. \nI've eaten medium rare, medium, and well-done steak, and well-done has plenty of flavour and it's neither tough nor chewy, if it's actually well done and not \"congratulations\" level.\nIn any case, people like what they like, and there may be more people liking well-done steaks than you think :)",
">\n\nI don't eat steak very often (maybe once every few years) and I will only eat it well done. \nI don't order it in a restaurant and usually eat it at someone's home where that is on the menu for the meal. \nAlways tasted fine to me.",
">\n\nExactly!",
">\n\nMy general philosophy is, let people do whatever the fuck they wanna do unless it is tangibly harming me. Lots of things bother me, lots of things make me uncomfortable, but guess what, that’s my own damn problem and I keep it to myself. Too many people think it’s their job to care about other people’s business and make a fuss over every stupid little thing. And frankly, that’s so much more annoying than some trivial personal choice or preference, like enjoying your steak well done. Just worry about yourself ffs.\n^(Disclaimer: I like my steak rare)",
">\n\nPreach. This is the only answer",
">\n\nSpoken like someone who eats well done steak 🥩",
">\n\nProbably with ketchup.",
">\n\nMmmm mmm nothin sets off the flavor of a steak like some ketchup",
">\n\nWell hell, get a diet coke. It's our anniversary.",
">\n\nBut dad, what If someone wants their well done?\nWe politely, yet firmly, ask them leave",
">\n\n\nsub-human pretending to be a waiter, to go fuck themselves\n\nThis is why you get bad service in restaurants",
">\n\nI generally dislike when people comment on food on other people plates. Listen, I went through a process when selecting my food, let me enjoy my meal. I don’t need your (often very detailed) opinion on what you like and don’t like. I am an not making you eat it. Enjoy the food you selected and leave mine alone.",
">\n\nPeople who tell others how to enjoy their food in general, need to fuck off",
">\n\nunless they enjoy their chicken medium rare",
">\n\nIt's rare for that to happen",
">\n\nRare (°_°)"
] |
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.