comment
stringlengths 1
9.9k
| context
listlengths 0
835
|
|---|---|
>
A lack of ethics is what makes him appealing to Republicans in the first place
|
[
"It's unbelievable that someone can lie their way to an election and there's no way to remove them.\nWhat a fucked up system.",
">\n\nALL politicians, both democrat and republican lie to get elected. Obviously not to his extent. \nIt’s honestly the failures of the democratic party, the dnc, and the dccc. The opposition research is supposed to happen DURING a campaign, not a month and a half after the election is over. The only thing his democratic opponent attacked him on were a few pro trump statements. It’s a shame because it was a very winnable district for democrats. They definitely dropped the ball on this one. \nAs far as having a way to remove someone for lying to get elected? There is a way, which is for his constituents to vote him out. His constituents voted him in an removing him any other way is unconstitutional and overturns the will of the people in his district.",
">\n\nThe information was literally published by the North Shore Leader weeks before the election. Democrats did nothing with it, and Republicans didn't care.\n\"His constituents voted him in an removing him any other way is unconstitutional and overturns the will of the people in his district.\"\nIt's not unconstitutional- he can be expelled from Congress.",
">\n\nAnd it’s 100% democrats fault for choosing to do nothing with the information. Again, democrats blew it. No denying that.",
">\n\nIt's not 100% their fault. Yes, they deserve plenty of blame, but so does every single Republican who supported the guy and voted for him.",
">\n\nYour average voter had no way to know that literally every part of this guy's history was literally spun from whole cloth. They voted based on what they believed would be best for them with the information provided. \nThe Republicans that deserve blame for supporting the guy and voting for him are the ones that did so while fully knowing this guy was completely full of shit, and the ones who continue to either support him or stay silent even after he has been exposed.",
">\n\n\"Your average voter had no way to know that literally every part of this guy's history was literally spun from whole cloth.\"\nYes, they did. It was published in the Leader which people do, in fact, read, and was available on Google searches.\n\"They voted based on what they believed would be best for them with the information provided.\"\nEveryone I know in the 3rd District who voted for Santos calls Democrats \"communists\" and literally the only thing they care about is lower taxes (despite choosing to live in areas with some of the highest property taxes in the state) so if that's their definition of \"best for them\" then sure.",
">\n\nAh, the Ethics Committee...where ethics investigations go to die.",
">\n\nBecause 95% of congress is unethical.",
">\n\nTIL some Republicans are aware of the existence of Ethics.",
">\n\nPersonally I think they are all aware of ethics, but put an extraordinary amount of effort into avoiding them",
">\n\nYeah, saying they are dumb is giving them a pass, I agree with you.",
">\n\nYou know, they can be dumb, evil, and unethical all at the same time. It’s their one talent.",
">\n\nIt’s all a dog and pony show. Republicans need Santos for the vote for speaker of the house they won’t abandon him.",
">\n\nI know this guy is a bullshitter but does he actually have the balls to start this with this new term? Imagine that you’re about to start a new job and hundreds of your coworkers already hate you and want you out for being a pathological liar. So embarrassing. He needs Republicans to support him, and I’m not sure they will.",
">\n\nThe guy lied his way into Congress. You think he cares what anyone else thinks about him?",
">\n\nNo, no, he only ever claimed that anything he was saying was true-ish",
">\n\nThe goal of the Ethics Committee is find no wrongdoing by a member regardless of party. Unless its so egregious that they have to say something, which recommended punishment is usually a fine, strip of committee or recommendation to resign. The reason Republicans would want him to go before the ethics committee is to delay the eventual outcome after the House Speakership vote.",
">\n\nHow about we don’t seat this person !",
">\n\nHappy Cake Day!",
">\n\nWhat are they on about? A lack of ethics is what makes this guy a Republican. Come on now.",
">\n\nI love this, some republicans. Why not all? Where is the outage over this liar? It's not fabrication, it's out and out lying about everything. He's just another GOP Fraudster.",
">\n\n\nWhere is all the outrage over this liar?\n\nWith such a thin majority there will be none.",
">\n\nDude went above and beyond the normal lies one tells to get elected. They need to be removed or not seated, or whatever. Just go away",
">\n\nMake some calls, says it's frowned upon, act like they're against it but they'll still push him through as Qevin needs his vote.",
">\n\nInvestigate what? Everyone already knows the guy is a fraud.",
">\n\nAnd next month he’s going to be the “Right Honorable Representative” of NY3. He’ll get his 176K/yr job, platinum healthcare plan, full pension… even if he gets charged with something, found guilty and goes to jail… he still gets all that because the voters in NY3 couldn’t be bothered to vet this guy. His bullshit was out there, but only picked up by a small local paper. His opponent brought it up in the debate, but was ignored. This is all on the voters in NY3. They screwed the pooch on this.",
">\n\n\nHe’ll get his 176K/yr job, platinum healthcare plan, full pension…\n\nHe won't get full pension.\n\"According to Politifact.com, a three-term congressman would be eligible for $17,588 after six years of work upon reaching retirement age.\"\nSo he won't even get his pension, however much that will be, until retirement age.",
">\n\nand what do you get for not showing up to any, even a single day, of work????",
">\n\nI bet he’s not even gay.",
">\n\nHis wife says he’s not.",
">\n\nI also blame the people in the 3rd district for voting for this person...it just reinforces the gullibleness of republicans... So Sad...",
">\n\nIt should be a crime to lie about your entire background as a candidate for public office. It should also serve as a wake up call that every candidate needs to be thoroughly vetted by the media.",
">\n\nAs they should.",
">\n\nWhy are we still beating this dead horse. The Republicans have been investigated for ethics countless times. None have ever been found.",
">\n\nPSA: don’t eat lead paint chips",
">\n\nShow me just one example where Republicans were found to have ethics! Just one!",
">\n\nWeird hair with no sideburns, caked on makeup, creepy smile. He looks like a scary marionette doll or a mannequin.",
">\n\nOr a Trump wannabe.",
">\n\nHe did have Trump signs in his office so there you have it",
">\n\n“Some” and the majority don’t give a fuck so nothing will happen. George Santos is the perfect representative of what the GOP has become.",
">\n\n“Some”, that’s a problem",
">\n\nYeah you can’t be yelling about corruption on the Dem side and let this kind of crap just slide when it’s on the GOP side.",
">\n\nLet me guess; it's the Republicans who lost their seats in 2022...",
">\n\nAnd their strategy didn't work in 2016, 2017, 2018, 2019, 2020, 2021, and 2022. The streak continues.",
">\n\nCountdown till the ethics investigation is on the wrong side of this.",
">\n\nThe ethics committee is a fucking joke. Has anyone ever suffered real consequences from one of their investigations?",
">\n\nI’m going to run as a republican and then fuck off and do nothing, then vote socialist policies in wherever I can. Good way to make money.",
">\n\nWhy wasn't this dude vetted before the election?\nWhy weren't his claims fact checked?\nHow did he get this far spewing all this bullshit?",
">\n\nBecause the public allows Republicans to act this way.",
">\n\nThe Santos grenade pin has been pulled. This is going to blow up big time and the question will be is if it goes off before or after he is in Congress. If it is when he is officially in Congress, the damage to the GOP will be immense. \nThat is why this is so amazing to watch. Everyone knows this is just going to get bigger and bigger and when it goes off the damage will be unreal. Currently the grenade is rolling to the GOP leadership. Smart leadership would shut the door and try and limit exposure, but it looks like they are ready for it to go off inside their....House.",
">\n\nThis would require the GOP to have ethics",
">\n\nExpertly tossed his credentials word salad, not 😂",
">\n\nThey have an ethics committee?",
">\n\nFinally. Took them long enough.",
">\n\nWell thank god… this is a total travesty .. HOW FUCKING EMBARRASSING FOR THE ENTIRE COUNTRY.\nThey are all liars but this guy is somehow beyond that… and he sounds as dumb as a sack of hammers",
">\n\nHe’s far too ugly to be in congress anyways. Get rid of him.",
">\n\nSome\nSome Republicans, not all",
">\n\nWhy is everyone skirting the issue? He is not an ethics nor political problem. His level of deception is criminal fraud on the voters and evidence of a pathological liar. There can be no defense.",
">\n\nHe's slime and he knows he's going to get away with it. The corruption in politics (R) are beyond our wildest imagination. Wonder if he's related to Trump?"
] |
>
What’s with these trash, one paragraph articles lately?
|
[
"It's unbelievable that someone can lie their way to an election and there's no way to remove them.\nWhat a fucked up system.",
">\n\nALL politicians, both democrat and republican lie to get elected. Obviously not to his extent. \nIt’s honestly the failures of the democratic party, the dnc, and the dccc. The opposition research is supposed to happen DURING a campaign, not a month and a half after the election is over. The only thing his democratic opponent attacked him on were a few pro trump statements. It’s a shame because it was a very winnable district for democrats. They definitely dropped the ball on this one. \nAs far as having a way to remove someone for lying to get elected? There is a way, which is for his constituents to vote him out. His constituents voted him in an removing him any other way is unconstitutional and overturns the will of the people in his district.",
">\n\nThe information was literally published by the North Shore Leader weeks before the election. Democrats did nothing with it, and Republicans didn't care.\n\"His constituents voted him in an removing him any other way is unconstitutional and overturns the will of the people in his district.\"\nIt's not unconstitutional- he can be expelled from Congress.",
">\n\nAnd it’s 100% democrats fault for choosing to do nothing with the information. Again, democrats blew it. No denying that.",
">\n\nIt's not 100% their fault. Yes, they deserve plenty of blame, but so does every single Republican who supported the guy and voted for him.",
">\n\nYour average voter had no way to know that literally every part of this guy's history was literally spun from whole cloth. They voted based on what they believed would be best for them with the information provided. \nThe Republicans that deserve blame for supporting the guy and voting for him are the ones that did so while fully knowing this guy was completely full of shit, and the ones who continue to either support him or stay silent even after he has been exposed.",
">\n\n\"Your average voter had no way to know that literally every part of this guy's history was literally spun from whole cloth.\"\nYes, they did. It was published in the Leader which people do, in fact, read, and was available on Google searches.\n\"They voted based on what they believed would be best for them with the information provided.\"\nEveryone I know in the 3rd District who voted for Santos calls Democrats \"communists\" and literally the only thing they care about is lower taxes (despite choosing to live in areas with some of the highest property taxes in the state) so if that's their definition of \"best for them\" then sure.",
">\n\nAh, the Ethics Committee...where ethics investigations go to die.",
">\n\nBecause 95% of congress is unethical.",
">\n\nTIL some Republicans are aware of the existence of Ethics.",
">\n\nPersonally I think they are all aware of ethics, but put an extraordinary amount of effort into avoiding them",
">\n\nYeah, saying they are dumb is giving them a pass, I agree with you.",
">\n\nYou know, they can be dumb, evil, and unethical all at the same time. It’s their one talent.",
">\n\nIt’s all a dog and pony show. Republicans need Santos for the vote for speaker of the house they won’t abandon him.",
">\n\nI know this guy is a bullshitter but does he actually have the balls to start this with this new term? Imagine that you’re about to start a new job and hundreds of your coworkers already hate you and want you out for being a pathological liar. So embarrassing. He needs Republicans to support him, and I’m not sure they will.",
">\n\nThe guy lied his way into Congress. You think he cares what anyone else thinks about him?",
">\n\nNo, no, he only ever claimed that anything he was saying was true-ish",
">\n\nThe goal of the Ethics Committee is find no wrongdoing by a member regardless of party. Unless its so egregious that they have to say something, which recommended punishment is usually a fine, strip of committee or recommendation to resign. The reason Republicans would want him to go before the ethics committee is to delay the eventual outcome after the House Speakership vote.",
">\n\nHow about we don’t seat this person !",
">\n\nHappy Cake Day!",
">\n\nWhat are they on about? A lack of ethics is what makes this guy a Republican. Come on now.",
">\n\nI love this, some republicans. Why not all? Where is the outage over this liar? It's not fabrication, it's out and out lying about everything. He's just another GOP Fraudster.",
">\n\n\nWhere is all the outrage over this liar?\n\nWith such a thin majority there will be none.",
">\n\nDude went above and beyond the normal lies one tells to get elected. They need to be removed or not seated, or whatever. Just go away",
">\n\nMake some calls, says it's frowned upon, act like they're against it but they'll still push him through as Qevin needs his vote.",
">\n\nInvestigate what? Everyone already knows the guy is a fraud.",
">\n\nAnd next month he’s going to be the “Right Honorable Representative” of NY3. He’ll get his 176K/yr job, platinum healthcare plan, full pension… even if he gets charged with something, found guilty and goes to jail… he still gets all that because the voters in NY3 couldn’t be bothered to vet this guy. His bullshit was out there, but only picked up by a small local paper. His opponent brought it up in the debate, but was ignored. This is all on the voters in NY3. They screwed the pooch on this.",
">\n\n\nHe’ll get his 176K/yr job, platinum healthcare plan, full pension…\n\nHe won't get full pension.\n\"According to Politifact.com, a three-term congressman would be eligible for $17,588 after six years of work upon reaching retirement age.\"\nSo he won't even get his pension, however much that will be, until retirement age.",
">\n\nand what do you get for not showing up to any, even a single day, of work????",
">\n\nI bet he’s not even gay.",
">\n\nHis wife says he’s not.",
">\n\nI also blame the people in the 3rd district for voting for this person...it just reinforces the gullibleness of republicans... So Sad...",
">\n\nIt should be a crime to lie about your entire background as a candidate for public office. It should also serve as a wake up call that every candidate needs to be thoroughly vetted by the media.",
">\n\nAs they should.",
">\n\nWhy are we still beating this dead horse. The Republicans have been investigated for ethics countless times. None have ever been found.",
">\n\nPSA: don’t eat lead paint chips",
">\n\nShow me just one example where Republicans were found to have ethics! Just one!",
">\n\nWeird hair with no sideburns, caked on makeup, creepy smile. He looks like a scary marionette doll or a mannequin.",
">\n\nOr a Trump wannabe.",
">\n\nHe did have Trump signs in his office so there you have it",
">\n\n“Some” and the majority don’t give a fuck so nothing will happen. George Santos is the perfect representative of what the GOP has become.",
">\n\n“Some”, that’s a problem",
">\n\nYeah you can’t be yelling about corruption on the Dem side and let this kind of crap just slide when it’s on the GOP side.",
">\n\nLet me guess; it's the Republicans who lost their seats in 2022...",
">\n\nAnd their strategy didn't work in 2016, 2017, 2018, 2019, 2020, 2021, and 2022. The streak continues.",
">\n\nCountdown till the ethics investigation is on the wrong side of this.",
">\n\nThe ethics committee is a fucking joke. Has anyone ever suffered real consequences from one of their investigations?",
">\n\nI’m going to run as a republican and then fuck off and do nothing, then vote socialist policies in wherever I can. Good way to make money.",
">\n\nWhy wasn't this dude vetted before the election?\nWhy weren't his claims fact checked?\nHow did he get this far spewing all this bullshit?",
">\n\nBecause the public allows Republicans to act this way.",
">\n\nThe Santos grenade pin has been pulled. This is going to blow up big time and the question will be is if it goes off before or after he is in Congress. If it is when he is officially in Congress, the damage to the GOP will be immense. \nThat is why this is so amazing to watch. Everyone knows this is just going to get bigger and bigger and when it goes off the damage will be unreal. Currently the grenade is rolling to the GOP leadership. Smart leadership would shut the door and try and limit exposure, but it looks like they are ready for it to go off inside their....House.",
">\n\nThis would require the GOP to have ethics",
">\n\nExpertly tossed his credentials word salad, not 😂",
">\n\nThey have an ethics committee?",
">\n\nFinally. Took them long enough.",
">\n\nWell thank god… this is a total travesty .. HOW FUCKING EMBARRASSING FOR THE ENTIRE COUNTRY.\nThey are all liars but this guy is somehow beyond that… and he sounds as dumb as a sack of hammers",
">\n\nHe’s far too ugly to be in congress anyways. Get rid of him.",
">\n\nSome\nSome Republicans, not all",
">\n\nWhy is everyone skirting the issue? He is not an ethics nor political problem. His level of deception is criminal fraud on the voters and evidence of a pathological liar. There can be no defense.",
">\n\nHe's slime and he knows he's going to get away with it. The corruption in politics (R) are beyond our wildest imagination. Wonder if he's related to Trump?",
">\n\nA lack of ethics is what makes him appealing to Republicans in the first place"
] |
>
Can he still be a “sitting” member if he lied his ass off?
|
[
"It's unbelievable that someone can lie their way to an election and there's no way to remove them.\nWhat a fucked up system.",
">\n\nALL politicians, both democrat and republican lie to get elected. Obviously not to his extent. \nIt’s honestly the failures of the democratic party, the dnc, and the dccc. The opposition research is supposed to happen DURING a campaign, not a month and a half after the election is over. The only thing his democratic opponent attacked him on were a few pro trump statements. It’s a shame because it was a very winnable district for democrats. They definitely dropped the ball on this one. \nAs far as having a way to remove someone for lying to get elected? There is a way, which is for his constituents to vote him out. His constituents voted him in an removing him any other way is unconstitutional and overturns the will of the people in his district.",
">\n\nThe information was literally published by the North Shore Leader weeks before the election. Democrats did nothing with it, and Republicans didn't care.\n\"His constituents voted him in an removing him any other way is unconstitutional and overturns the will of the people in his district.\"\nIt's not unconstitutional- he can be expelled from Congress.",
">\n\nAnd it’s 100% democrats fault for choosing to do nothing with the information. Again, democrats blew it. No denying that.",
">\n\nIt's not 100% their fault. Yes, they deserve plenty of blame, but so does every single Republican who supported the guy and voted for him.",
">\n\nYour average voter had no way to know that literally every part of this guy's history was literally spun from whole cloth. They voted based on what they believed would be best for them with the information provided. \nThe Republicans that deserve blame for supporting the guy and voting for him are the ones that did so while fully knowing this guy was completely full of shit, and the ones who continue to either support him or stay silent even after he has been exposed.",
">\n\n\"Your average voter had no way to know that literally every part of this guy's history was literally spun from whole cloth.\"\nYes, they did. It was published in the Leader which people do, in fact, read, and was available on Google searches.\n\"They voted based on what they believed would be best for them with the information provided.\"\nEveryone I know in the 3rd District who voted for Santos calls Democrats \"communists\" and literally the only thing they care about is lower taxes (despite choosing to live in areas with some of the highest property taxes in the state) so if that's their definition of \"best for them\" then sure.",
">\n\nAh, the Ethics Committee...where ethics investigations go to die.",
">\n\nBecause 95% of congress is unethical.",
">\n\nTIL some Republicans are aware of the existence of Ethics.",
">\n\nPersonally I think they are all aware of ethics, but put an extraordinary amount of effort into avoiding them",
">\n\nYeah, saying they are dumb is giving them a pass, I agree with you.",
">\n\nYou know, they can be dumb, evil, and unethical all at the same time. It’s their one talent.",
">\n\nIt’s all a dog and pony show. Republicans need Santos for the vote for speaker of the house they won’t abandon him.",
">\n\nI know this guy is a bullshitter but does he actually have the balls to start this with this new term? Imagine that you’re about to start a new job and hundreds of your coworkers already hate you and want you out for being a pathological liar. So embarrassing. He needs Republicans to support him, and I’m not sure they will.",
">\n\nThe guy lied his way into Congress. You think he cares what anyone else thinks about him?",
">\n\nNo, no, he only ever claimed that anything he was saying was true-ish",
">\n\nThe goal of the Ethics Committee is find no wrongdoing by a member regardless of party. Unless its so egregious that they have to say something, which recommended punishment is usually a fine, strip of committee or recommendation to resign. The reason Republicans would want him to go before the ethics committee is to delay the eventual outcome after the House Speakership vote.",
">\n\nHow about we don’t seat this person !",
">\n\nHappy Cake Day!",
">\n\nWhat are they on about? A lack of ethics is what makes this guy a Republican. Come on now.",
">\n\nI love this, some republicans. Why not all? Where is the outage over this liar? It's not fabrication, it's out and out lying about everything. He's just another GOP Fraudster.",
">\n\n\nWhere is all the outrage over this liar?\n\nWith such a thin majority there will be none.",
">\n\nDude went above and beyond the normal lies one tells to get elected. They need to be removed or not seated, or whatever. Just go away",
">\n\nMake some calls, says it's frowned upon, act like they're against it but they'll still push him through as Qevin needs his vote.",
">\n\nInvestigate what? Everyone already knows the guy is a fraud.",
">\n\nAnd next month he’s going to be the “Right Honorable Representative” of NY3. He’ll get his 176K/yr job, platinum healthcare plan, full pension… even if he gets charged with something, found guilty and goes to jail… he still gets all that because the voters in NY3 couldn’t be bothered to vet this guy. His bullshit was out there, but only picked up by a small local paper. His opponent brought it up in the debate, but was ignored. This is all on the voters in NY3. They screwed the pooch on this.",
">\n\n\nHe’ll get his 176K/yr job, platinum healthcare plan, full pension…\n\nHe won't get full pension.\n\"According to Politifact.com, a three-term congressman would be eligible for $17,588 after six years of work upon reaching retirement age.\"\nSo he won't even get his pension, however much that will be, until retirement age.",
">\n\nand what do you get for not showing up to any, even a single day, of work????",
">\n\nI bet he’s not even gay.",
">\n\nHis wife says he’s not.",
">\n\nI also blame the people in the 3rd district for voting for this person...it just reinforces the gullibleness of republicans... So Sad...",
">\n\nIt should be a crime to lie about your entire background as a candidate for public office. It should also serve as a wake up call that every candidate needs to be thoroughly vetted by the media.",
">\n\nAs they should.",
">\n\nWhy are we still beating this dead horse. The Republicans have been investigated for ethics countless times. None have ever been found.",
">\n\nPSA: don’t eat lead paint chips",
">\n\nShow me just one example where Republicans were found to have ethics! Just one!",
">\n\nWeird hair with no sideburns, caked on makeup, creepy smile. He looks like a scary marionette doll or a mannequin.",
">\n\nOr a Trump wannabe.",
">\n\nHe did have Trump signs in his office so there you have it",
">\n\n“Some” and the majority don’t give a fuck so nothing will happen. George Santos is the perfect representative of what the GOP has become.",
">\n\n“Some”, that’s a problem",
">\n\nYeah you can’t be yelling about corruption on the Dem side and let this kind of crap just slide when it’s on the GOP side.",
">\n\nLet me guess; it's the Republicans who lost their seats in 2022...",
">\n\nAnd their strategy didn't work in 2016, 2017, 2018, 2019, 2020, 2021, and 2022. The streak continues.",
">\n\nCountdown till the ethics investigation is on the wrong side of this.",
">\n\nThe ethics committee is a fucking joke. Has anyone ever suffered real consequences from one of their investigations?",
">\n\nI’m going to run as a republican and then fuck off and do nothing, then vote socialist policies in wherever I can. Good way to make money.",
">\n\nWhy wasn't this dude vetted before the election?\nWhy weren't his claims fact checked?\nHow did he get this far spewing all this bullshit?",
">\n\nBecause the public allows Republicans to act this way.",
">\n\nThe Santos grenade pin has been pulled. This is going to blow up big time and the question will be is if it goes off before or after he is in Congress. If it is when he is officially in Congress, the damage to the GOP will be immense. \nThat is why this is so amazing to watch. Everyone knows this is just going to get bigger and bigger and when it goes off the damage will be unreal. Currently the grenade is rolling to the GOP leadership. Smart leadership would shut the door and try and limit exposure, but it looks like they are ready for it to go off inside their....House.",
">\n\nThis would require the GOP to have ethics",
">\n\nExpertly tossed his credentials word salad, not 😂",
">\n\nThey have an ethics committee?",
">\n\nFinally. Took them long enough.",
">\n\nWell thank god… this is a total travesty .. HOW FUCKING EMBARRASSING FOR THE ENTIRE COUNTRY.\nThey are all liars but this guy is somehow beyond that… and he sounds as dumb as a sack of hammers",
">\n\nHe’s far too ugly to be in congress anyways. Get rid of him.",
">\n\nSome\nSome Republicans, not all",
">\n\nWhy is everyone skirting the issue? He is not an ethics nor political problem. His level of deception is criminal fraud on the voters and evidence of a pathological liar. There can be no defense.",
">\n\nHe's slime and he knows he's going to get away with it. The corruption in politics (R) are beyond our wildest imagination. Wonder if he's related to Trump?",
">\n\nA lack of ethics is what makes him appealing to Republicans in the first place",
">\n\nWhat’s with these trash, one paragraph articles lately?"
] |
>
What?!? Some republicans have ethics?!?
|
[
"It's unbelievable that someone can lie their way to an election and there's no way to remove them.\nWhat a fucked up system.",
">\n\nALL politicians, both democrat and republican lie to get elected. Obviously not to his extent. \nIt’s honestly the failures of the democratic party, the dnc, and the dccc. The opposition research is supposed to happen DURING a campaign, not a month and a half after the election is over. The only thing his democratic opponent attacked him on were a few pro trump statements. It’s a shame because it was a very winnable district for democrats. They definitely dropped the ball on this one. \nAs far as having a way to remove someone for lying to get elected? There is a way, which is for his constituents to vote him out. His constituents voted him in an removing him any other way is unconstitutional and overturns the will of the people in his district.",
">\n\nThe information was literally published by the North Shore Leader weeks before the election. Democrats did nothing with it, and Republicans didn't care.\n\"His constituents voted him in an removing him any other way is unconstitutional and overturns the will of the people in his district.\"\nIt's not unconstitutional- he can be expelled from Congress.",
">\n\nAnd it’s 100% democrats fault for choosing to do nothing with the information. Again, democrats blew it. No denying that.",
">\n\nIt's not 100% their fault. Yes, they deserve plenty of blame, but so does every single Republican who supported the guy and voted for him.",
">\n\nYour average voter had no way to know that literally every part of this guy's history was literally spun from whole cloth. They voted based on what they believed would be best for them with the information provided. \nThe Republicans that deserve blame for supporting the guy and voting for him are the ones that did so while fully knowing this guy was completely full of shit, and the ones who continue to either support him or stay silent even after he has been exposed.",
">\n\n\"Your average voter had no way to know that literally every part of this guy's history was literally spun from whole cloth.\"\nYes, they did. It was published in the Leader which people do, in fact, read, and was available on Google searches.\n\"They voted based on what they believed would be best for them with the information provided.\"\nEveryone I know in the 3rd District who voted for Santos calls Democrats \"communists\" and literally the only thing they care about is lower taxes (despite choosing to live in areas with some of the highest property taxes in the state) so if that's their definition of \"best for them\" then sure.",
">\n\nAh, the Ethics Committee...where ethics investigations go to die.",
">\n\nBecause 95% of congress is unethical.",
">\n\nTIL some Republicans are aware of the existence of Ethics.",
">\n\nPersonally I think they are all aware of ethics, but put an extraordinary amount of effort into avoiding them",
">\n\nYeah, saying they are dumb is giving them a pass, I agree with you.",
">\n\nYou know, they can be dumb, evil, and unethical all at the same time. It’s their one talent.",
">\n\nIt’s all a dog and pony show. Republicans need Santos for the vote for speaker of the house they won’t abandon him.",
">\n\nI know this guy is a bullshitter but does he actually have the balls to start this with this new term? Imagine that you’re about to start a new job and hundreds of your coworkers already hate you and want you out for being a pathological liar. So embarrassing. He needs Republicans to support him, and I’m not sure they will.",
">\n\nThe guy lied his way into Congress. You think he cares what anyone else thinks about him?",
">\n\nNo, no, he only ever claimed that anything he was saying was true-ish",
">\n\nThe goal of the Ethics Committee is find no wrongdoing by a member regardless of party. Unless its so egregious that they have to say something, which recommended punishment is usually a fine, strip of committee or recommendation to resign. The reason Republicans would want him to go before the ethics committee is to delay the eventual outcome after the House Speakership vote.",
">\n\nHow about we don’t seat this person !",
">\n\nHappy Cake Day!",
">\n\nWhat are they on about? A lack of ethics is what makes this guy a Republican. Come on now.",
">\n\nI love this, some republicans. Why not all? Where is the outage over this liar? It's not fabrication, it's out and out lying about everything. He's just another GOP Fraudster.",
">\n\n\nWhere is all the outrage over this liar?\n\nWith such a thin majority there will be none.",
">\n\nDude went above and beyond the normal lies one tells to get elected. They need to be removed or not seated, or whatever. Just go away",
">\n\nMake some calls, says it's frowned upon, act like they're against it but they'll still push him through as Qevin needs his vote.",
">\n\nInvestigate what? Everyone already knows the guy is a fraud.",
">\n\nAnd next month he’s going to be the “Right Honorable Representative” of NY3. He’ll get his 176K/yr job, platinum healthcare plan, full pension… even if he gets charged with something, found guilty and goes to jail… he still gets all that because the voters in NY3 couldn’t be bothered to vet this guy. His bullshit was out there, but only picked up by a small local paper. His opponent brought it up in the debate, but was ignored. This is all on the voters in NY3. They screwed the pooch on this.",
">\n\n\nHe’ll get his 176K/yr job, platinum healthcare plan, full pension…\n\nHe won't get full pension.\n\"According to Politifact.com, a three-term congressman would be eligible for $17,588 after six years of work upon reaching retirement age.\"\nSo he won't even get his pension, however much that will be, until retirement age.",
">\n\nand what do you get for not showing up to any, even a single day, of work????",
">\n\nI bet he’s not even gay.",
">\n\nHis wife says he’s not.",
">\n\nI also blame the people in the 3rd district for voting for this person...it just reinforces the gullibleness of republicans... So Sad...",
">\n\nIt should be a crime to lie about your entire background as a candidate for public office. It should also serve as a wake up call that every candidate needs to be thoroughly vetted by the media.",
">\n\nAs they should.",
">\n\nWhy are we still beating this dead horse. The Republicans have been investigated for ethics countless times. None have ever been found.",
">\n\nPSA: don’t eat lead paint chips",
">\n\nShow me just one example where Republicans were found to have ethics! Just one!",
">\n\nWeird hair with no sideburns, caked on makeup, creepy smile. He looks like a scary marionette doll or a mannequin.",
">\n\nOr a Trump wannabe.",
">\n\nHe did have Trump signs in his office so there you have it",
">\n\n“Some” and the majority don’t give a fuck so nothing will happen. George Santos is the perfect representative of what the GOP has become.",
">\n\n“Some”, that’s a problem",
">\n\nYeah you can’t be yelling about corruption on the Dem side and let this kind of crap just slide when it’s on the GOP side.",
">\n\nLet me guess; it's the Republicans who lost their seats in 2022...",
">\n\nAnd their strategy didn't work in 2016, 2017, 2018, 2019, 2020, 2021, and 2022. The streak continues.",
">\n\nCountdown till the ethics investigation is on the wrong side of this.",
">\n\nThe ethics committee is a fucking joke. Has anyone ever suffered real consequences from one of their investigations?",
">\n\nI’m going to run as a republican and then fuck off and do nothing, then vote socialist policies in wherever I can. Good way to make money.",
">\n\nWhy wasn't this dude vetted before the election?\nWhy weren't his claims fact checked?\nHow did he get this far spewing all this bullshit?",
">\n\nBecause the public allows Republicans to act this way.",
">\n\nThe Santos grenade pin has been pulled. This is going to blow up big time and the question will be is if it goes off before or after he is in Congress. If it is when he is officially in Congress, the damage to the GOP will be immense. \nThat is why this is so amazing to watch. Everyone knows this is just going to get bigger and bigger and when it goes off the damage will be unreal. Currently the grenade is rolling to the GOP leadership. Smart leadership would shut the door and try and limit exposure, but it looks like they are ready for it to go off inside their....House.",
">\n\nThis would require the GOP to have ethics",
">\n\nExpertly tossed his credentials word salad, not 😂",
">\n\nThey have an ethics committee?",
">\n\nFinally. Took them long enough.",
">\n\nWell thank god… this is a total travesty .. HOW FUCKING EMBARRASSING FOR THE ENTIRE COUNTRY.\nThey are all liars but this guy is somehow beyond that… and he sounds as dumb as a sack of hammers",
">\n\nHe’s far too ugly to be in congress anyways. Get rid of him.",
">\n\nSome\nSome Republicans, not all",
">\n\nWhy is everyone skirting the issue? He is not an ethics nor political problem. His level of deception is criminal fraud on the voters and evidence of a pathological liar. There can be no defense.",
">\n\nHe's slime and he knows he's going to get away with it. The corruption in politics (R) are beyond our wildest imagination. Wonder if he's related to Trump?",
">\n\nA lack of ethics is what makes him appealing to Republicans in the first place",
">\n\nWhat’s with these trash, one paragraph articles lately?",
">\n\nCan he still be a “sitting” member if he lied his ass off?"
] |
>
Will the ethics committee have their dentures in and actually make a different?
My money is on nothing more than a scolding.
|
[
"It's unbelievable that someone can lie their way to an election and there's no way to remove them.\nWhat a fucked up system.",
">\n\nALL politicians, both democrat and republican lie to get elected. Obviously not to his extent. \nIt’s honestly the failures of the democratic party, the dnc, and the dccc. The opposition research is supposed to happen DURING a campaign, not a month and a half after the election is over. The only thing his democratic opponent attacked him on were a few pro trump statements. It’s a shame because it was a very winnable district for democrats. They definitely dropped the ball on this one. \nAs far as having a way to remove someone for lying to get elected? There is a way, which is for his constituents to vote him out. His constituents voted him in an removing him any other way is unconstitutional and overturns the will of the people in his district.",
">\n\nThe information was literally published by the North Shore Leader weeks before the election. Democrats did nothing with it, and Republicans didn't care.\n\"His constituents voted him in an removing him any other way is unconstitutional and overturns the will of the people in his district.\"\nIt's not unconstitutional- he can be expelled from Congress.",
">\n\nAnd it’s 100% democrats fault for choosing to do nothing with the information. Again, democrats blew it. No denying that.",
">\n\nIt's not 100% their fault. Yes, they deserve plenty of blame, but so does every single Republican who supported the guy and voted for him.",
">\n\nYour average voter had no way to know that literally every part of this guy's history was literally spun from whole cloth. They voted based on what they believed would be best for them with the information provided. \nThe Republicans that deserve blame for supporting the guy and voting for him are the ones that did so while fully knowing this guy was completely full of shit, and the ones who continue to either support him or stay silent even after he has been exposed.",
">\n\n\"Your average voter had no way to know that literally every part of this guy's history was literally spun from whole cloth.\"\nYes, they did. It was published in the Leader which people do, in fact, read, and was available on Google searches.\n\"They voted based on what they believed would be best for them with the information provided.\"\nEveryone I know in the 3rd District who voted for Santos calls Democrats \"communists\" and literally the only thing they care about is lower taxes (despite choosing to live in areas with some of the highest property taxes in the state) so if that's their definition of \"best for them\" then sure.",
">\n\nAh, the Ethics Committee...where ethics investigations go to die.",
">\n\nBecause 95% of congress is unethical.",
">\n\nTIL some Republicans are aware of the existence of Ethics.",
">\n\nPersonally I think they are all aware of ethics, but put an extraordinary amount of effort into avoiding them",
">\n\nYeah, saying they are dumb is giving them a pass, I agree with you.",
">\n\nYou know, they can be dumb, evil, and unethical all at the same time. It’s their one talent.",
">\n\nIt’s all a dog and pony show. Republicans need Santos for the vote for speaker of the house they won’t abandon him.",
">\n\nI know this guy is a bullshitter but does he actually have the balls to start this with this new term? Imagine that you’re about to start a new job and hundreds of your coworkers already hate you and want you out for being a pathological liar. So embarrassing. He needs Republicans to support him, and I’m not sure they will.",
">\n\nThe guy lied his way into Congress. You think he cares what anyone else thinks about him?",
">\n\nNo, no, he only ever claimed that anything he was saying was true-ish",
">\n\nThe goal of the Ethics Committee is find no wrongdoing by a member regardless of party. Unless its so egregious that they have to say something, which recommended punishment is usually a fine, strip of committee or recommendation to resign. The reason Republicans would want him to go before the ethics committee is to delay the eventual outcome after the House Speakership vote.",
">\n\nHow about we don’t seat this person !",
">\n\nHappy Cake Day!",
">\n\nWhat are they on about? A lack of ethics is what makes this guy a Republican. Come on now.",
">\n\nI love this, some republicans. Why not all? Where is the outage over this liar? It's not fabrication, it's out and out lying about everything. He's just another GOP Fraudster.",
">\n\n\nWhere is all the outrage over this liar?\n\nWith such a thin majority there will be none.",
">\n\nDude went above and beyond the normal lies one tells to get elected. They need to be removed or not seated, or whatever. Just go away",
">\n\nMake some calls, says it's frowned upon, act like they're against it but they'll still push him through as Qevin needs his vote.",
">\n\nInvestigate what? Everyone already knows the guy is a fraud.",
">\n\nAnd next month he’s going to be the “Right Honorable Representative” of NY3. He’ll get his 176K/yr job, platinum healthcare plan, full pension… even if he gets charged with something, found guilty and goes to jail… he still gets all that because the voters in NY3 couldn’t be bothered to vet this guy. His bullshit was out there, but only picked up by a small local paper. His opponent brought it up in the debate, but was ignored. This is all on the voters in NY3. They screwed the pooch on this.",
">\n\n\nHe’ll get his 176K/yr job, platinum healthcare plan, full pension…\n\nHe won't get full pension.\n\"According to Politifact.com, a three-term congressman would be eligible for $17,588 after six years of work upon reaching retirement age.\"\nSo he won't even get his pension, however much that will be, until retirement age.",
">\n\nand what do you get for not showing up to any, even a single day, of work????",
">\n\nI bet he’s not even gay.",
">\n\nHis wife says he’s not.",
">\n\nI also blame the people in the 3rd district for voting for this person...it just reinforces the gullibleness of republicans... So Sad...",
">\n\nIt should be a crime to lie about your entire background as a candidate for public office. It should also serve as a wake up call that every candidate needs to be thoroughly vetted by the media.",
">\n\nAs they should.",
">\n\nWhy are we still beating this dead horse. The Republicans have been investigated for ethics countless times. None have ever been found.",
">\n\nPSA: don’t eat lead paint chips",
">\n\nShow me just one example where Republicans were found to have ethics! Just one!",
">\n\nWeird hair with no sideburns, caked on makeup, creepy smile. He looks like a scary marionette doll or a mannequin.",
">\n\nOr a Trump wannabe.",
">\n\nHe did have Trump signs in his office so there you have it",
">\n\n“Some” and the majority don’t give a fuck so nothing will happen. George Santos is the perfect representative of what the GOP has become.",
">\n\n“Some”, that’s a problem",
">\n\nYeah you can’t be yelling about corruption on the Dem side and let this kind of crap just slide when it’s on the GOP side.",
">\n\nLet me guess; it's the Republicans who lost their seats in 2022...",
">\n\nAnd their strategy didn't work in 2016, 2017, 2018, 2019, 2020, 2021, and 2022. The streak continues.",
">\n\nCountdown till the ethics investigation is on the wrong side of this.",
">\n\nThe ethics committee is a fucking joke. Has anyone ever suffered real consequences from one of their investigations?",
">\n\nI’m going to run as a republican and then fuck off and do nothing, then vote socialist policies in wherever I can. Good way to make money.",
">\n\nWhy wasn't this dude vetted before the election?\nWhy weren't his claims fact checked?\nHow did he get this far spewing all this bullshit?",
">\n\nBecause the public allows Republicans to act this way.",
">\n\nThe Santos grenade pin has been pulled. This is going to blow up big time and the question will be is if it goes off before or after he is in Congress. If it is when he is officially in Congress, the damage to the GOP will be immense. \nThat is why this is so amazing to watch. Everyone knows this is just going to get bigger and bigger and when it goes off the damage will be unreal. Currently the grenade is rolling to the GOP leadership. Smart leadership would shut the door and try and limit exposure, but it looks like they are ready for it to go off inside their....House.",
">\n\nThis would require the GOP to have ethics",
">\n\nExpertly tossed his credentials word salad, not 😂",
">\n\nThey have an ethics committee?",
">\n\nFinally. Took them long enough.",
">\n\nWell thank god… this is a total travesty .. HOW FUCKING EMBARRASSING FOR THE ENTIRE COUNTRY.\nThey are all liars but this guy is somehow beyond that… and he sounds as dumb as a sack of hammers",
">\n\nHe’s far too ugly to be in congress anyways. Get rid of him.",
">\n\nSome\nSome Republicans, not all",
">\n\nWhy is everyone skirting the issue? He is not an ethics nor political problem. His level of deception is criminal fraud on the voters and evidence of a pathological liar. There can be no defense.",
">\n\nHe's slime and he knows he's going to get away with it. The corruption in politics (R) are beyond our wildest imagination. Wonder if he's related to Trump?",
">\n\nA lack of ethics is what makes him appealing to Republicans in the first place",
">\n\nWhat’s with these trash, one paragraph articles lately?",
">\n\nCan he still be a “sitting” member if he lied his ass off?",
">\n\nWhat?!? Some republicans have ethics?!?"
] |
>
Im glad Democrats and Republicans can come together to shit on this dude.
|
[
"It's unbelievable that someone can lie their way to an election and there's no way to remove them.\nWhat a fucked up system.",
">\n\nALL politicians, both democrat and republican lie to get elected. Obviously not to his extent. \nIt’s honestly the failures of the democratic party, the dnc, and the dccc. The opposition research is supposed to happen DURING a campaign, not a month and a half after the election is over. The only thing his democratic opponent attacked him on were a few pro trump statements. It’s a shame because it was a very winnable district for democrats. They definitely dropped the ball on this one. \nAs far as having a way to remove someone for lying to get elected? There is a way, which is for his constituents to vote him out. His constituents voted him in an removing him any other way is unconstitutional and overturns the will of the people in his district.",
">\n\nThe information was literally published by the North Shore Leader weeks before the election. Democrats did nothing with it, and Republicans didn't care.\n\"His constituents voted him in an removing him any other way is unconstitutional and overturns the will of the people in his district.\"\nIt's not unconstitutional- he can be expelled from Congress.",
">\n\nAnd it’s 100% democrats fault for choosing to do nothing with the information. Again, democrats blew it. No denying that.",
">\n\nIt's not 100% their fault. Yes, they deserve plenty of blame, but so does every single Republican who supported the guy and voted for him.",
">\n\nYour average voter had no way to know that literally every part of this guy's history was literally spun from whole cloth. They voted based on what they believed would be best for them with the information provided. \nThe Republicans that deserve blame for supporting the guy and voting for him are the ones that did so while fully knowing this guy was completely full of shit, and the ones who continue to either support him or stay silent even after he has been exposed.",
">\n\n\"Your average voter had no way to know that literally every part of this guy's history was literally spun from whole cloth.\"\nYes, they did. It was published in the Leader which people do, in fact, read, and was available on Google searches.\n\"They voted based on what they believed would be best for them with the information provided.\"\nEveryone I know in the 3rd District who voted for Santos calls Democrats \"communists\" and literally the only thing they care about is lower taxes (despite choosing to live in areas with some of the highest property taxes in the state) so if that's their definition of \"best for them\" then sure.",
">\n\nAh, the Ethics Committee...where ethics investigations go to die.",
">\n\nBecause 95% of congress is unethical.",
">\n\nTIL some Republicans are aware of the existence of Ethics.",
">\n\nPersonally I think they are all aware of ethics, but put an extraordinary amount of effort into avoiding them",
">\n\nYeah, saying they are dumb is giving them a pass, I agree with you.",
">\n\nYou know, they can be dumb, evil, and unethical all at the same time. It’s their one talent.",
">\n\nIt’s all a dog and pony show. Republicans need Santos for the vote for speaker of the house they won’t abandon him.",
">\n\nI know this guy is a bullshitter but does he actually have the balls to start this with this new term? Imagine that you’re about to start a new job and hundreds of your coworkers already hate you and want you out for being a pathological liar. So embarrassing. He needs Republicans to support him, and I’m not sure they will.",
">\n\nThe guy lied his way into Congress. You think he cares what anyone else thinks about him?",
">\n\nNo, no, he only ever claimed that anything he was saying was true-ish",
">\n\nThe goal of the Ethics Committee is find no wrongdoing by a member regardless of party. Unless its so egregious that they have to say something, which recommended punishment is usually a fine, strip of committee or recommendation to resign. The reason Republicans would want him to go before the ethics committee is to delay the eventual outcome after the House Speakership vote.",
">\n\nHow about we don’t seat this person !",
">\n\nHappy Cake Day!",
">\n\nWhat are they on about? A lack of ethics is what makes this guy a Republican. Come on now.",
">\n\nI love this, some republicans. Why not all? Where is the outage over this liar? It's not fabrication, it's out and out lying about everything. He's just another GOP Fraudster.",
">\n\n\nWhere is all the outrage over this liar?\n\nWith such a thin majority there will be none.",
">\n\nDude went above and beyond the normal lies one tells to get elected. They need to be removed or not seated, or whatever. Just go away",
">\n\nMake some calls, says it's frowned upon, act like they're against it but they'll still push him through as Qevin needs his vote.",
">\n\nInvestigate what? Everyone already knows the guy is a fraud.",
">\n\nAnd next month he’s going to be the “Right Honorable Representative” of NY3. He’ll get his 176K/yr job, platinum healthcare plan, full pension… even if he gets charged with something, found guilty and goes to jail… he still gets all that because the voters in NY3 couldn’t be bothered to vet this guy. His bullshit was out there, but only picked up by a small local paper. His opponent brought it up in the debate, but was ignored. This is all on the voters in NY3. They screwed the pooch on this.",
">\n\n\nHe’ll get his 176K/yr job, platinum healthcare plan, full pension…\n\nHe won't get full pension.\n\"According to Politifact.com, a three-term congressman would be eligible for $17,588 after six years of work upon reaching retirement age.\"\nSo he won't even get his pension, however much that will be, until retirement age.",
">\n\nand what do you get for not showing up to any, even a single day, of work????",
">\n\nI bet he’s not even gay.",
">\n\nHis wife says he’s not.",
">\n\nI also blame the people in the 3rd district for voting for this person...it just reinforces the gullibleness of republicans... So Sad...",
">\n\nIt should be a crime to lie about your entire background as a candidate for public office. It should also serve as a wake up call that every candidate needs to be thoroughly vetted by the media.",
">\n\nAs they should.",
">\n\nWhy are we still beating this dead horse. The Republicans have been investigated for ethics countless times. None have ever been found.",
">\n\nPSA: don’t eat lead paint chips",
">\n\nShow me just one example where Republicans were found to have ethics! Just one!",
">\n\nWeird hair with no sideburns, caked on makeup, creepy smile. He looks like a scary marionette doll or a mannequin.",
">\n\nOr a Trump wannabe.",
">\n\nHe did have Trump signs in his office so there you have it",
">\n\n“Some” and the majority don’t give a fuck so nothing will happen. George Santos is the perfect representative of what the GOP has become.",
">\n\n“Some”, that’s a problem",
">\n\nYeah you can’t be yelling about corruption on the Dem side and let this kind of crap just slide when it’s on the GOP side.",
">\n\nLet me guess; it's the Republicans who lost their seats in 2022...",
">\n\nAnd their strategy didn't work in 2016, 2017, 2018, 2019, 2020, 2021, and 2022. The streak continues.",
">\n\nCountdown till the ethics investigation is on the wrong side of this.",
">\n\nThe ethics committee is a fucking joke. Has anyone ever suffered real consequences from one of their investigations?",
">\n\nI’m going to run as a republican and then fuck off and do nothing, then vote socialist policies in wherever I can. Good way to make money.",
">\n\nWhy wasn't this dude vetted before the election?\nWhy weren't his claims fact checked?\nHow did he get this far spewing all this bullshit?",
">\n\nBecause the public allows Republicans to act this way.",
">\n\nThe Santos grenade pin has been pulled. This is going to blow up big time and the question will be is if it goes off before or after he is in Congress. If it is when he is officially in Congress, the damage to the GOP will be immense. \nThat is why this is so amazing to watch. Everyone knows this is just going to get bigger and bigger and when it goes off the damage will be unreal. Currently the grenade is rolling to the GOP leadership. Smart leadership would shut the door and try and limit exposure, but it looks like they are ready for it to go off inside their....House.",
">\n\nThis would require the GOP to have ethics",
">\n\nExpertly tossed his credentials word salad, not 😂",
">\n\nThey have an ethics committee?",
">\n\nFinally. Took them long enough.",
">\n\nWell thank god… this is a total travesty .. HOW FUCKING EMBARRASSING FOR THE ENTIRE COUNTRY.\nThey are all liars but this guy is somehow beyond that… and he sounds as dumb as a sack of hammers",
">\n\nHe’s far too ugly to be in congress anyways. Get rid of him.",
">\n\nSome\nSome Republicans, not all",
">\n\nWhy is everyone skirting the issue? He is not an ethics nor political problem. His level of deception is criminal fraud on the voters and evidence of a pathological liar. There can be no defense.",
">\n\nHe's slime and he knows he's going to get away with it. The corruption in politics (R) are beyond our wildest imagination. Wonder if he's related to Trump?",
">\n\nA lack of ethics is what makes him appealing to Republicans in the first place",
">\n\nWhat’s with these trash, one paragraph articles lately?",
">\n\nCan he still be a “sitting” member if he lied his ass off?",
">\n\nWhat?!? Some republicans have ethics?!?",
">\n\nWill the ethics committee have their dentures in and actually make a different?\nMy money is on nothing more than a scolding."
] |
>
They call for somebody else to enforce some ethics, then they will no doubt complain about how unfairly he was treated.
|
[
"It's unbelievable that someone can lie their way to an election and there's no way to remove them.\nWhat a fucked up system.",
">\n\nALL politicians, both democrat and republican lie to get elected. Obviously not to his extent. \nIt’s honestly the failures of the democratic party, the dnc, and the dccc. The opposition research is supposed to happen DURING a campaign, not a month and a half after the election is over. The only thing his democratic opponent attacked him on were a few pro trump statements. It’s a shame because it was a very winnable district for democrats. They definitely dropped the ball on this one. \nAs far as having a way to remove someone for lying to get elected? There is a way, which is for his constituents to vote him out. His constituents voted him in an removing him any other way is unconstitutional and overturns the will of the people in his district.",
">\n\nThe information was literally published by the North Shore Leader weeks before the election. Democrats did nothing with it, and Republicans didn't care.\n\"His constituents voted him in an removing him any other way is unconstitutional and overturns the will of the people in his district.\"\nIt's not unconstitutional- he can be expelled from Congress.",
">\n\nAnd it’s 100% democrats fault for choosing to do nothing with the information. Again, democrats blew it. No denying that.",
">\n\nIt's not 100% their fault. Yes, they deserve plenty of blame, but so does every single Republican who supported the guy and voted for him.",
">\n\nYour average voter had no way to know that literally every part of this guy's history was literally spun from whole cloth. They voted based on what they believed would be best for them with the information provided. \nThe Republicans that deserve blame for supporting the guy and voting for him are the ones that did so while fully knowing this guy was completely full of shit, and the ones who continue to either support him or stay silent even after he has been exposed.",
">\n\n\"Your average voter had no way to know that literally every part of this guy's history was literally spun from whole cloth.\"\nYes, they did. It was published in the Leader which people do, in fact, read, and was available on Google searches.\n\"They voted based on what they believed would be best for them with the information provided.\"\nEveryone I know in the 3rd District who voted for Santos calls Democrats \"communists\" and literally the only thing they care about is lower taxes (despite choosing to live in areas with some of the highest property taxes in the state) so if that's their definition of \"best for them\" then sure.",
">\n\nAh, the Ethics Committee...where ethics investigations go to die.",
">\n\nBecause 95% of congress is unethical.",
">\n\nTIL some Republicans are aware of the existence of Ethics.",
">\n\nPersonally I think they are all aware of ethics, but put an extraordinary amount of effort into avoiding them",
">\n\nYeah, saying they are dumb is giving them a pass, I agree with you.",
">\n\nYou know, they can be dumb, evil, and unethical all at the same time. It’s their one talent.",
">\n\nIt’s all a dog and pony show. Republicans need Santos for the vote for speaker of the house they won’t abandon him.",
">\n\nI know this guy is a bullshitter but does he actually have the balls to start this with this new term? Imagine that you’re about to start a new job and hundreds of your coworkers already hate you and want you out for being a pathological liar. So embarrassing. He needs Republicans to support him, and I’m not sure they will.",
">\n\nThe guy lied his way into Congress. You think he cares what anyone else thinks about him?",
">\n\nNo, no, he only ever claimed that anything he was saying was true-ish",
">\n\nThe goal of the Ethics Committee is find no wrongdoing by a member regardless of party. Unless its so egregious that they have to say something, which recommended punishment is usually a fine, strip of committee or recommendation to resign. The reason Republicans would want him to go before the ethics committee is to delay the eventual outcome after the House Speakership vote.",
">\n\nHow about we don’t seat this person !",
">\n\nHappy Cake Day!",
">\n\nWhat are they on about? A lack of ethics is what makes this guy a Republican. Come on now.",
">\n\nI love this, some republicans. Why not all? Where is the outage over this liar? It's not fabrication, it's out and out lying about everything. He's just another GOP Fraudster.",
">\n\n\nWhere is all the outrage over this liar?\n\nWith such a thin majority there will be none.",
">\n\nDude went above and beyond the normal lies one tells to get elected. They need to be removed or not seated, or whatever. Just go away",
">\n\nMake some calls, says it's frowned upon, act like they're against it but they'll still push him through as Qevin needs his vote.",
">\n\nInvestigate what? Everyone already knows the guy is a fraud.",
">\n\nAnd next month he’s going to be the “Right Honorable Representative” of NY3. He’ll get his 176K/yr job, platinum healthcare plan, full pension… even if he gets charged with something, found guilty and goes to jail… he still gets all that because the voters in NY3 couldn’t be bothered to vet this guy. His bullshit was out there, but only picked up by a small local paper. His opponent brought it up in the debate, but was ignored. This is all on the voters in NY3. They screwed the pooch on this.",
">\n\n\nHe’ll get his 176K/yr job, platinum healthcare plan, full pension…\n\nHe won't get full pension.\n\"According to Politifact.com, a three-term congressman would be eligible for $17,588 after six years of work upon reaching retirement age.\"\nSo he won't even get his pension, however much that will be, until retirement age.",
">\n\nand what do you get for not showing up to any, even a single day, of work????",
">\n\nI bet he’s not even gay.",
">\n\nHis wife says he’s not.",
">\n\nI also blame the people in the 3rd district for voting for this person...it just reinforces the gullibleness of republicans... So Sad...",
">\n\nIt should be a crime to lie about your entire background as a candidate for public office. It should also serve as a wake up call that every candidate needs to be thoroughly vetted by the media.",
">\n\nAs they should.",
">\n\nWhy are we still beating this dead horse. The Republicans have been investigated for ethics countless times. None have ever been found.",
">\n\nPSA: don’t eat lead paint chips",
">\n\nShow me just one example where Republicans were found to have ethics! Just one!",
">\n\nWeird hair with no sideburns, caked on makeup, creepy smile. He looks like a scary marionette doll or a mannequin.",
">\n\nOr a Trump wannabe.",
">\n\nHe did have Trump signs in his office so there you have it",
">\n\n“Some” and the majority don’t give a fuck so nothing will happen. George Santos is the perfect representative of what the GOP has become.",
">\n\n“Some”, that’s a problem",
">\n\nYeah you can’t be yelling about corruption on the Dem side and let this kind of crap just slide when it’s on the GOP side.",
">\n\nLet me guess; it's the Republicans who lost their seats in 2022...",
">\n\nAnd their strategy didn't work in 2016, 2017, 2018, 2019, 2020, 2021, and 2022. The streak continues.",
">\n\nCountdown till the ethics investigation is on the wrong side of this.",
">\n\nThe ethics committee is a fucking joke. Has anyone ever suffered real consequences from one of their investigations?",
">\n\nI’m going to run as a republican and then fuck off and do nothing, then vote socialist policies in wherever I can. Good way to make money.",
">\n\nWhy wasn't this dude vetted before the election?\nWhy weren't his claims fact checked?\nHow did he get this far spewing all this bullshit?",
">\n\nBecause the public allows Republicans to act this way.",
">\n\nThe Santos grenade pin has been pulled. This is going to blow up big time and the question will be is if it goes off before or after he is in Congress. If it is when he is officially in Congress, the damage to the GOP will be immense. \nThat is why this is so amazing to watch. Everyone knows this is just going to get bigger and bigger and when it goes off the damage will be unreal. Currently the grenade is rolling to the GOP leadership. Smart leadership would shut the door and try and limit exposure, but it looks like they are ready for it to go off inside their....House.",
">\n\nThis would require the GOP to have ethics",
">\n\nExpertly tossed his credentials word salad, not 😂",
">\n\nThey have an ethics committee?",
">\n\nFinally. Took them long enough.",
">\n\nWell thank god… this is a total travesty .. HOW FUCKING EMBARRASSING FOR THE ENTIRE COUNTRY.\nThey are all liars but this guy is somehow beyond that… and he sounds as dumb as a sack of hammers",
">\n\nHe’s far too ugly to be in congress anyways. Get rid of him.",
">\n\nSome\nSome Republicans, not all",
">\n\nWhy is everyone skirting the issue? He is not an ethics nor political problem. His level of deception is criminal fraud on the voters and evidence of a pathological liar. There can be no defense.",
">\n\nHe's slime and he knows he's going to get away with it. The corruption in politics (R) are beyond our wildest imagination. Wonder if he's related to Trump?",
">\n\nA lack of ethics is what makes him appealing to Republicans in the first place",
">\n\nWhat’s with these trash, one paragraph articles lately?",
">\n\nCan he still be a “sitting” member if he lied his ass off?",
">\n\nWhat?!? Some republicans have ethics?!?",
">\n\nWill the ethics committee have their dentures in and actually make a different?\nMy money is on nothing more than a scolding.",
">\n\nIm glad Democrats and Republicans can come together to shit on this dude."
] |
>
He will be a hi goodbye politician
|
[
"It's unbelievable that someone can lie their way to an election and there's no way to remove them.\nWhat a fucked up system.",
">\n\nALL politicians, both democrat and republican lie to get elected. Obviously not to his extent. \nIt’s honestly the failures of the democratic party, the dnc, and the dccc. The opposition research is supposed to happen DURING a campaign, not a month and a half after the election is over. The only thing his democratic opponent attacked him on were a few pro trump statements. It’s a shame because it was a very winnable district for democrats. They definitely dropped the ball on this one. \nAs far as having a way to remove someone for lying to get elected? There is a way, which is for his constituents to vote him out. His constituents voted him in an removing him any other way is unconstitutional and overturns the will of the people in his district.",
">\n\nThe information was literally published by the North Shore Leader weeks before the election. Democrats did nothing with it, and Republicans didn't care.\n\"His constituents voted him in an removing him any other way is unconstitutional and overturns the will of the people in his district.\"\nIt's not unconstitutional- he can be expelled from Congress.",
">\n\nAnd it’s 100% democrats fault for choosing to do nothing with the information. Again, democrats blew it. No denying that.",
">\n\nIt's not 100% their fault. Yes, they deserve plenty of blame, but so does every single Republican who supported the guy and voted for him.",
">\n\nYour average voter had no way to know that literally every part of this guy's history was literally spun from whole cloth. They voted based on what they believed would be best for them with the information provided. \nThe Republicans that deserve blame for supporting the guy and voting for him are the ones that did so while fully knowing this guy was completely full of shit, and the ones who continue to either support him or stay silent even after he has been exposed.",
">\n\n\"Your average voter had no way to know that literally every part of this guy's history was literally spun from whole cloth.\"\nYes, they did. It was published in the Leader which people do, in fact, read, and was available on Google searches.\n\"They voted based on what they believed would be best for them with the information provided.\"\nEveryone I know in the 3rd District who voted for Santos calls Democrats \"communists\" and literally the only thing they care about is lower taxes (despite choosing to live in areas with some of the highest property taxes in the state) so if that's their definition of \"best for them\" then sure.",
">\n\nAh, the Ethics Committee...where ethics investigations go to die.",
">\n\nBecause 95% of congress is unethical.",
">\n\nTIL some Republicans are aware of the existence of Ethics.",
">\n\nPersonally I think they are all aware of ethics, but put an extraordinary amount of effort into avoiding them",
">\n\nYeah, saying they are dumb is giving them a pass, I agree with you.",
">\n\nYou know, they can be dumb, evil, and unethical all at the same time. It’s their one talent.",
">\n\nIt’s all a dog and pony show. Republicans need Santos for the vote for speaker of the house they won’t abandon him.",
">\n\nI know this guy is a bullshitter but does he actually have the balls to start this with this new term? Imagine that you’re about to start a new job and hundreds of your coworkers already hate you and want you out for being a pathological liar. So embarrassing. He needs Republicans to support him, and I’m not sure they will.",
">\n\nThe guy lied his way into Congress. You think he cares what anyone else thinks about him?",
">\n\nNo, no, he only ever claimed that anything he was saying was true-ish",
">\n\nThe goal of the Ethics Committee is find no wrongdoing by a member regardless of party. Unless its so egregious that they have to say something, which recommended punishment is usually a fine, strip of committee or recommendation to resign. The reason Republicans would want him to go before the ethics committee is to delay the eventual outcome after the House Speakership vote.",
">\n\nHow about we don’t seat this person !",
">\n\nHappy Cake Day!",
">\n\nWhat are they on about? A lack of ethics is what makes this guy a Republican. Come on now.",
">\n\nI love this, some republicans. Why not all? Where is the outage over this liar? It's not fabrication, it's out and out lying about everything. He's just another GOP Fraudster.",
">\n\n\nWhere is all the outrage over this liar?\n\nWith such a thin majority there will be none.",
">\n\nDude went above and beyond the normal lies one tells to get elected. They need to be removed or not seated, or whatever. Just go away",
">\n\nMake some calls, says it's frowned upon, act like they're against it but they'll still push him through as Qevin needs his vote.",
">\n\nInvestigate what? Everyone already knows the guy is a fraud.",
">\n\nAnd next month he’s going to be the “Right Honorable Representative” of NY3. He’ll get his 176K/yr job, platinum healthcare plan, full pension… even if he gets charged with something, found guilty and goes to jail… he still gets all that because the voters in NY3 couldn’t be bothered to vet this guy. His bullshit was out there, but only picked up by a small local paper. His opponent brought it up in the debate, but was ignored. This is all on the voters in NY3. They screwed the pooch on this.",
">\n\n\nHe’ll get his 176K/yr job, platinum healthcare plan, full pension…\n\nHe won't get full pension.\n\"According to Politifact.com, a three-term congressman would be eligible for $17,588 after six years of work upon reaching retirement age.\"\nSo he won't even get his pension, however much that will be, until retirement age.",
">\n\nand what do you get for not showing up to any, even a single day, of work????",
">\n\nI bet he’s not even gay.",
">\n\nHis wife says he’s not.",
">\n\nI also blame the people in the 3rd district for voting for this person...it just reinforces the gullibleness of republicans... So Sad...",
">\n\nIt should be a crime to lie about your entire background as a candidate for public office. It should also serve as a wake up call that every candidate needs to be thoroughly vetted by the media.",
">\n\nAs they should.",
">\n\nWhy are we still beating this dead horse. The Republicans have been investigated for ethics countless times. None have ever been found.",
">\n\nPSA: don’t eat lead paint chips",
">\n\nShow me just one example where Republicans were found to have ethics! Just one!",
">\n\nWeird hair with no sideburns, caked on makeup, creepy smile. He looks like a scary marionette doll or a mannequin.",
">\n\nOr a Trump wannabe.",
">\n\nHe did have Trump signs in his office so there you have it",
">\n\n“Some” and the majority don’t give a fuck so nothing will happen. George Santos is the perfect representative of what the GOP has become.",
">\n\n“Some”, that’s a problem",
">\n\nYeah you can’t be yelling about corruption on the Dem side and let this kind of crap just slide when it’s on the GOP side.",
">\n\nLet me guess; it's the Republicans who lost their seats in 2022...",
">\n\nAnd their strategy didn't work in 2016, 2017, 2018, 2019, 2020, 2021, and 2022. The streak continues.",
">\n\nCountdown till the ethics investigation is on the wrong side of this.",
">\n\nThe ethics committee is a fucking joke. Has anyone ever suffered real consequences from one of their investigations?",
">\n\nI’m going to run as a republican and then fuck off and do nothing, then vote socialist policies in wherever I can. Good way to make money.",
">\n\nWhy wasn't this dude vetted before the election?\nWhy weren't his claims fact checked?\nHow did he get this far spewing all this bullshit?",
">\n\nBecause the public allows Republicans to act this way.",
">\n\nThe Santos grenade pin has been pulled. This is going to blow up big time and the question will be is if it goes off before or after he is in Congress. If it is when he is officially in Congress, the damage to the GOP will be immense. \nThat is why this is so amazing to watch. Everyone knows this is just going to get bigger and bigger and when it goes off the damage will be unreal. Currently the grenade is rolling to the GOP leadership. Smart leadership would shut the door and try and limit exposure, but it looks like they are ready for it to go off inside their....House.",
">\n\nThis would require the GOP to have ethics",
">\n\nExpertly tossed his credentials word salad, not 😂",
">\n\nThey have an ethics committee?",
">\n\nFinally. Took them long enough.",
">\n\nWell thank god… this is a total travesty .. HOW FUCKING EMBARRASSING FOR THE ENTIRE COUNTRY.\nThey are all liars but this guy is somehow beyond that… and he sounds as dumb as a sack of hammers",
">\n\nHe’s far too ugly to be in congress anyways. Get rid of him.",
">\n\nSome\nSome Republicans, not all",
">\n\nWhy is everyone skirting the issue? He is not an ethics nor political problem. His level of deception is criminal fraud on the voters and evidence of a pathological liar. There can be no defense.",
">\n\nHe's slime and he knows he's going to get away with it. The corruption in politics (R) are beyond our wildest imagination. Wonder if he's related to Trump?",
">\n\nA lack of ethics is what makes him appealing to Republicans in the first place",
">\n\nWhat’s with these trash, one paragraph articles lately?",
">\n\nCan he still be a “sitting” member if he lied his ass off?",
">\n\nWhat?!? Some republicans have ethics?!?",
">\n\nWill the ethics committee have their dentures in and actually make a different?\nMy money is on nothing more than a scolding.",
">\n\nIm glad Democrats and Republicans can come together to shit on this dude.",
">\n\nThey call for somebody else to enforce some ethics, then they will no doubt complain about how unfairly he was treated."
] |
>
Some is the problem.
|
[
"It's unbelievable that someone can lie their way to an election and there's no way to remove them.\nWhat a fucked up system.",
">\n\nALL politicians, both democrat and republican lie to get elected. Obviously not to his extent. \nIt’s honestly the failures of the democratic party, the dnc, and the dccc. The opposition research is supposed to happen DURING a campaign, not a month and a half after the election is over. The only thing his democratic opponent attacked him on were a few pro trump statements. It’s a shame because it was a very winnable district for democrats. They definitely dropped the ball on this one. \nAs far as having a way to remove someone for lying to get elected? There is a way, which is for his constituents to vote him out. His constituents voted him in an removing him any other way is unconstitutional and overturns the will of the people in his district.",
">\n\nThe information was literally published by the North Shore Leader weeks before the election. Democrats did nothing with it, and Republicans didn't care.\n\"His constituents voted him in an removing him any other way is unconstitutional and overturns the will of the people in his district.\"\nIt's not unconstitutional- he can be expelled from Congress.",
">\n\nAnd it’s 100% democrats fault for choosing to do nothing with the information. Again, democrats blew it. No denying that.",
">\n\nIt's not 100% their fault. Yes, they deserve plenty of blame, but so does every single Republican who supported the guy and voted for him.",
">\n\nYour average voter had no way to know that literally every part of this guy's history was literally spun from whole cloth. They voted based on what they believed would be best for them with the information provided. \nThe Republicans that deserve blame for supporting the guy and voting for him are the ones that did so while fully knowing this guy was completely full of shit, and the ones who continue to either support him or stay silent even after he has been exposed.",
">\n\n\"Your average voter had no way to know that literally every part of this guy's history was literally spun from whole cloth.\"\nYes, they did. It was published in the Leader which people do, in fact, read, and was available on Google searches.\n\"They voted based on what they believed would be best for them with the information provided.\"\nEveryone I know in the 3rd District who voted for Santos calls Democrats \"communists\" and literally the only thing they care about is lower taxes (despite choosing to live in areas with some of the highest property taxes in the state) so if that's their definition of \"best for them\" then sure.",
">\n\nAh, the Ethics Committee...where ethics investigations go to die.",
">\n\nBecause 95% of congress is unethical.",
">\n\nTIL some Republicans are aware of the existence of Ethics.",
">\n\nPersonally I think they are all aware of ethics, but put an extraordinary amount of effort into avoiding them",
">\n\nYeah, saying they are dumb is giving them a pass, I agree with you.",
">\n\nYou know, they can be dumb, evil, and unethical all at the same time. It’s their one talent.",
">\n\nIt’s all a dog and pony show. Republicans need Santos for the vote for speaker of the house they won’t abandon him.",
">\n\nI know this guy is a bullshitter but does he actually have the balls to start this with this new term? Imagine that you’re about to start a new job and hundreds of your coworkers already hate you and want you out for being a pathological liar. So embarrassing. He needs Republicans to support him, and I’m not sure they will.",
">\n\nThe guy lied his way into Congress. You think he cares what anyone else thinks about him?",
">\n\nNo, no, he only ever claimed that anything he was saying was true-ish",
">\n\nThe goal of the Ethics Committee is find no wrongdoing by a member regardless of party. Unless its so egregious that they have to say something, which recommended punishment is usually a fine, strip of committee or recommendation to resign. The reason Republicans would want him to go before the ethics committee is to delay the eventual outcome after the House Speakership vote.",
">\n\nHow about we don’t seat this person !",
">\n\nHappy Cake Day!",
">\n\nWhat are they on about? A lack of ethics is what makes this guy a Republican. Come on now.",
">\n\nI love this, some republicans. Why not all? Where is the outage over this liar? It's not fabrication, it's out and out lying about everything. He's just another GOP Fraudster.",
">\n\n\nWhere is all the outrage over this liar?\n\nWith such a thin majority there will be none.",
">\n\nDude went above and beyond the normal lies one tells to get elected. They need to be removed or not seated, or whatever. Just go away",
">\n\nMake some calls, says it's frowned upon, act like they're against it but they'll still push him through as Qevin needs his vote.",
">\n\nInvestigate what? Everyone already knows the guy is a fraud.",
">\n\nAnd next month he’s going to be the “Right Honorable Representative” of NY3. He’ll get his 176K/yr job, platinum healthcare plan, full pension… even if he gets charged with something, found guilty and goes to jail… he still gets all that because the voters in NY3 couldn’t be bothered to vet this guy. His bullshit was out there, but only picked up by a small local paper. His opponent brought it up in the debate, but was ignored. This is all on the voters in NY3. They screwed the pooch on this.",
">\n\n\nHe’ll get his 176K/yr job, platinum healthcare plan, full pension…\n\nHe won't get full pension.\n\"According to Politifact.com, a three-term congressman would be eligible for $17,588 after six years of work upon reaching retirement age.\"\nSo he won't even get his pension, however much that will be, until retirement age.",
">\n\nand what do you get for not showing up to any, even a single day, of work????",
">\n\nI bet he’s not even gay.",
">\n\nHis wife says he’s not.",
">\n\nI also blame the people in the 3rd district for voting for this person...it just reinforces the gullibleness of republicans... So Sad...",
">\n\nIt should be a crime to lie about your entire background as a candidate for public office. It should also serve as a wake up call that every candidate needs to be thoroughly vetted by the media.",
">\n\nAs they should.",
">\n\nWhy are we still beating this dead horse. The Republicans have been investigated for ethics countless times. None have ever been found.",
">\n\nPSA: don’t eat lead paint chips",
">\n\nShow me just one example where Republicans were found to have ethics! Just one!",
">\n\nWeird hair with no sideburns, caked on makeup, creepy smile. He looks like a scary marionette doll or a mannequin.",
">\n\nOr a Trump wannabe.",
">\n\nHe did have Trump signs in his office so there you have it",
">\n\n“Some” and the majority don’t give a fuck so nothing will happen. George Santos is the perfect representative of what the GOP has become.",
">\n\n“Some”, that’s a problem",
">\n\nYeah you can’t be yelling about corruption on the Dem side and let this kind of crap just slide when it’s on the GOP side.",
">\n\nLet me guess; it's the Republicans who lost their seats in 2022...",
">\n\nAnd their strategy didn't work in 2016, 2017, 2018, 2019, 2020, 2021, and 2022. The streak continues.",
">\n\nCountdown till the ethics investigation is on the wrong side of this.",
">\n\nThe ethics committee is a fucking joke. Has anyone ever suffered real consequences from one of their investigations?",
">\n\nI’m going to run as a republican and then fuck off and do nothing, then vote socialist policies in wherever I can. Good way to make money.",
">\n\nWhy wasn't this dude vetted before the election?\nWhy weren't his claims fact checked?\nHow did he get this far spewing all this bullshit?",
">\n\nBecause the public allows Republicans to act this way.",
">\n\nThe Santos grenade pin has been pulled. This is going to blow up big time and the question will be is if it goes off before or after he is in Congress. If it is when he is officially in Congress, the damage to the GOP will be immense. \nThat is why this is so amazing to watch. Everyone knows this is just going to get bigger and bigger and when it goes off the damage will be unreal. Currently the grenade is rolling to the GOP leadership. Smart leadership would shut the door and try and limit exposure, but it looks like they are ready for it to go off inside their....House.",
">\n\nThis would require the GOP to have ethics",
">\n\nExpertly tossed his credentials word salad, not 😂",
">\n\nThey have an ethics committee?",
">\n\nFinally. Took them long enough.",
">\n\nWell thank god… this is a total travesty .. HOW FUCKING EMBARRASSING FOR THE ENTIRE COUNTRY.\nThey are all liars but this guy is somehow beyond that… and he sounds as dumb as a sack of hammers",
">\n\nHe’s far too ugly to be in congress anyways. Get rid of him.",
">\n\nSome\nSome Republicans, not all",
">\n\nWhy is everyone skirting the issue? He is not an ethics nor political problem. His level of deception is criminal fraud on the voters and evidence of a pathological liar. There can be no defense.",
">\n\nHe's slime and he knows he's going to get away with it. The corruption in politics (R) are beyond our wildest imagination. Wonder if he's related to Trump?",
">\n\nA lack of ethics is what makes him appealing to Republicans in the first place",
">\n\nWhat’s with these trash, one paragraph articles lately?",
">\n\nCan he still be a “sitting” member if he lied his ass off?",
">\n\nWhat?!? Some republicans have ethics?!?",
">\n\nWill the ethics committee have their dentures in and actually make a different?\nMy money is on nothing more than a scolding.",
">\n\nIm glad Democrats and Republicans can come together to shit on this dude.",
">\n\nThey call for somebody else to enforce some ethics, then they will no doubt complain about how unfairly he was treated.",
">\n\nHe will be a hi goodbye politician"
] |
>
Gee, you think!!!
|
[
"It's unbelievable that someone can lie their way to an election and there's no way to remove them.\nWhat a fucked up system.",
">\n\nALL politicians, both democrat and republican lie to get elected. Obviously not to his extent. \nIt’s honestly the failures of the democratic party, the dnc, and the dccc. The opposition research is supposed to happen DURING a campaign, not a month and a half after the election is over. The only thing his democratic opponent attacked him on were a few pro trump statements. It’s a shame because it was a very winnable district for democrats. They definitely dropped the ball on this one. \nAs far as having a way to remove someone for lying to get elected? There is a way, which is for his constituents to vote him out. His constituents voted him in an removing him any other way is unconstitutional and overturns the will of the people in his district.",
">\n\nThe information was literally published by the North Shore Leader weeks before the election. Democrats did nothing with it, and Republicans didn't care.\n\"His constituents voted him in an removing him any other way is unconstitutional and overturns the will of the people in his district.\"\nIt's not unconstitutional- he can be expelled from Congress.",
">\n\nAnd it’s 100% democrats fault for choosing to do nothing with the information. Again, democrats blew it. No denying that.",
">\n\nIt's not 100% their fault. Yes, they deserve plenty of blame, but so does every single Republican who supported the guy and voted for him.",
">\n\nYour average voter had no way to know that literally every part of this guy's history was literally spun from whole cloth. They voted based on what they believed would be best for them with the information provided. \nThe Republicans that deserve blame for supporting the guy and voting for him are the ones that did so while fully knowing this guy was completely full of shit, and the ones who continue to either support him or stay silent even after he has been exposed.",
">\n\n\"Your average voter had no way to know that literally every part of this guy's history was literally spun from whole cloth.\"\nYes, they did. It was published in the Leader which people do, in fact, read, and was available on Google searches.\n\"They voted based on what they believed would be best for them with the information provided.\"\nEveryone I know in the 3rd District who voted for Santos calls Democrats \"communists\" and literally the only thing they care about is lower taxes (despite choosing to live in areas with some of the highest property taxes in the state) so if that's their definition of \"best for them\" then sure.",
">\n\nAh, the Ethics Committee...where ethics investigations go to die.",
">\n\nBecause 95% of congress is unethical.",
">\n\nTIL some Republicans are aware of the existence of Ethics.",
">\n\nPersonally I think they are all aware of ethics, but put an extraordinary amount of effort into avoiding them",
">\n\nYeah, saying they are dumb is giving them a pass, I agree with you.",
">\n\nYou know, they can be dumb, evil, and unethical all at the same time. It’s their one talent.",
">\n\nIt’s all a dog and pony show. Republicans need Santos for the vote for speaker of the house they won’t abandon him.",
">\n\nI know this guy is a bullshitter but does he actually have the balls to start this with this new term? Imagine that you’re about to start a new job and hundreds of your coworkers already hate you and want you out for being a pathological liar. So embarrassing. He needs Republicans to support him, and I’m not sure they will.",
">\n\nThe guy lied his way into Congress. You think he cares what anyone else thinks about him?",
">\n\nNo, no, he only ever claimed that anything he was saying was true-ish",
">\n\nThe goal of the Ethics Committee is find no wrongdoing by a member regardless of party. Unless its so egregious that they have to say something, which recommended punishment is usually a fine, strip of committee or recommendation to resign. The reason Republicans would want him to go before the ethics committee is to delay the eventual outcome after the House Speakership vote.",
">\n\nHow about we don’t seat this person !",
">\n\nHappy Cake Day!",
">\n\nWhat are they on about? A lack of ethics is what makes this guy a Republican. Come on now.",
">\n\nI love this, some republicans. Why not all? Where is the outage over this liar? It's not fabrication, it's out and out lying about everything. He's just another GOP Fraudster.",
">\n\n\nWhere is all the outrage over this liar?\n\nWith such a thin majority there will be none.",
">\n\nDude went above and beyond the normal lies one tells to get elected. They need to be removed or not seated, or whatever. Just go away",
">\n\nMake some calls, says it's frowned upon, act like they're against it but they'll still push him through as Qevin needs his vote.",
">\n\nInvestigate what? Everyone already knows the guy is a fraud.",
">\n\nAnd next month he’s going to be the “Right Honorable Representative” of NY3. He’ll get his 176K/yr job, platinum healthcare plan, full pension… even if he gets charged with something, found guilty and goes to jail… he still gets all that because the voters in NY3 couldn’t be bothered to vet this guy. His bullshit was out there, but only picked up by a small local paper. His opponent brought it up in the debate, but was ignored. This is all on the voters in NY3. They screwed the pooch on this.",
">\n\n\nHe’ll get his 176K/yr job, platinum healthcare plan, full pension…\n\nHe won't get full pension.\n\"According to Politifact.com, a three-term congressman would be eligible for $17,588 after six years of work upon reaching retirement age.\"\nSo he won't even get his pension, however much that will be, until retirement age.",
">\n\nand what do you get for not showing up to any, even a single day, of work????",
">\n\nI bet he’s not even gay.",
">\n\nHis wife says he’s not.",
">\n\nI also blame the people in the 3rd district for voting for this person...it just reinforces the gullibleness of republicans... So Sad...",
">\n\nIt should be a crime to lie about your entire background as a candidate for public office. It should also serve as a wake up call that every candidate needs to be thoroughly vetted by the media.",
">\n\nAs they should.",
">\n\nWhy are we still beating this dead horse. The Republicans have been investigated for ethics countless times. None have ever been found.",
">\n\nPSA: don’t eat lead paint chips",
">\n\nShow me just one example where Republicans were found to have ethics! Just one!",
">\n\nWeird hair with no sideburns, caked on makeup, creepy smile. He looks like a scary marionette doll or a mannequin.",
">\n\nOr a Trump wannabe.",
">\n\nHe did have Trump signs in his office so there you have it",
">\n\n“Some” and the majority don’t give a fuck so nothing will happen. George Santos is the perfect representative of what the GOP has become.",
">\n\n“Some”, that’s a problem",
">\n\nYeah you can’t be yelling about corruption on the Dem side and let this kind of crap just slide when it’s on the GOP side.",
">\n\nLet me guess; it's the Republicans who lost their seats in 2022...",
">\n\nAnd their strategy didn't work in 2016, 2017, 2018, 2019, 2020, 2021, and 2022. The streak continues.",
">\n\nCountdown till the ethics investigation is on the wrong side of this.",
">\n\nThe ethics committee is a fucking joke. Has anyone ever suffered real consequences from one of their investigations?",
">\n\nI’m going to run as a republican and then fuck off and do nothing, then vote socialist policies in wherever I can. Good way to make money.",
">\n\nWhy wasn't this dude vetted before the election?\nWhy weren't his claims fact checked?\nHow did he get this far spewing all this bullshit?",
">\n\nBecause the public allows Republicans to act this way.",
">\n\nThe Santos grenade pin has been pulled. This is going to blow up big time and the question will be is if it goes off before or after he is in Congress. If it is when he is officially in Congress, the damage to the GOP will be immense. \nThat is why this is so amazing to watch. Everyone knows this is just going to get bigger and bigger and when it goes off the damage will be unreal. Currently the grenade is rolling to the GOP leadership. Smart leadership would shut the door and try and limit exposure, but it looks like they are ready for it to go off inside their....House.",
">\n\nThis would require the GOP to have ethics",
">\n\nExpertly tossed his credentials word salad, not 😂",
">\n\nThey have an ethics committee?",
">\n\nFinally. Took them long enough.",
">\n\nWell thank god… this is a total travesty .. HOW FUCKING EMBARRASSING FOR THE ENTIRE COUNTRY.\nThey are all liars but this guy is somehow beyond that… and he sounds as dumb as a sack of hammers",
">\n\nHe’s far too ugly to be in congress anyways. Get rid of him.",
">\n\nSome\nSome Republicans, not all",
">\n\nWhy is everyone skirting the issue? He is not an ethics nor political problem. His level of deception is criminal fraud on the voters and evidence of a pathological liar. There can be no defense.",
">\n\nHe's slime and he knows he's going to get away with it. The corruption in politics (R) are beyond our wildest imagination. Wonder if he's related to Trump?",
">\n\nA lack of ethics is what makes him appealing to Republicans in the first place",
">\n\nWhat’s with these trash, one paragraph articles lately?",
">\n\nCan he still be a “sitting” member if he lied his ass off?",
">\n\nWhat?!? Some republicans have ethics?!?",
">\n\nWill the ethics committee have their dentures in and actually make a different?\nMy money is on nothing more than a scolding.",
">\n\nIm glad Democrats and Republicans can come together to shit on this dude.",
">\n\nThey call for somebody else to enforce some ethics, then they will no doubt complain about how unfairly he was treated.",
">\n\nHe will be a hi goodbye politician",
">\n\nSome is the problem."
] |
>
ALL politicians, both democrat and republican lie to get elected. Obviously not to his extent.
It’s honestly the failures of the democratic party, the dnc, and the dccc. The opposition research is supposed to happen DURING a campaign, not a month and a half after the election is over. The only thing his democratic opponent attacked him on were a few pro trump statements. It’s a shame because it was a very winnable district for democrats. They definitely dropped the ball on this one.
|
[
"It's unbelievable that someone can lie their way to an election and there's no way to remove them.\nWhat a fucked up system.",
">\n\nALL politicians, both democrat and republican lie to get elected. Obviously not to his extent. \nIt’s honestly the failures of the democratic party, the dnc, and the dccc. The opposition research is supposed to happen DURING a campaign, not a month and a half after the election is over. The only thing his democratic opponent attacked him on were a few pro trump statements. It’s a shame because it was a very winnable district for democrats. They definitely dropped the ball on this one. \nAs far as having a way to remove someone for lying to get elected? There is a way, which is for his constituents to vote him out. His constituents voted him in an removing him any other way is unconstitutional and overturns the will of the people in his district.",
">\n\nThe information was literally published by the North Shore Leader weeks before the election. Democrats did nothing with it, and Republicans didn't care.\n\"His constituents voted him in an removing him any other way is unconstitutional and overturns the will of the people in his district.\"\nIt's not unconstitutional- he can be expelled from Congress.",
">\n\nAnd it’s 100% democrats fault for choosing to do nothing with the information. Again, democrats blew it. No denying that.",
">\n\nIt's not 100% their fault. Yes, they deserve plenty of blame, but so does every single Republican who supported the guy and voted for him.",
">\n\nYour average voter had no way to know that literally every part of this guy's history was literally spun from whole cloth. They voted based on what they believed would be best for them with the information provided. \nThe Republicans that deserve blame for supporting the guy and voting for him are the ones that did so while fully knowing this guy was completely full of shit, and the ones who continue to either support him or stay silent even after he has been exposed.",
">\n\n\"Your average voter had no way to know that literally every part of this guy's history was literally spun from whole cloth.\"\nYes, they did. It was published in the Leader which people do, in fact, read, and was available on Google searches.\n\"They voted based on what they believed would be best for them with the information provided.\"\nEveryone I know in the 3rd District who voted for Santos calls Democrats \"communists\" and literally the only thing they care about is lower taxes (despite choosing to live in areas with some of the highest property taxes in the state) so if that's their definition of \"best for them\" then sure.",
">\n\nAh, the Ethics Committee...where ethics investigations go to die.",
">\n\nBecause 95% of congress is unethical.",
">\n\nTIL some Republicans are aware of the existence of Ethics.",
">\n\nPersonally I think they are all aware of ethics, but put an extraordinary amount of effort into avoiding them",
">\n\nYeah, saying they are dumb is giving them a pass, I agree with you.",
">\n\nYou know, they can be dumb, evil, and unethical all at the same time. It’s their one talent.",
">\n\nIt’s all a dog and pony show. Republicans need Santos for the vote for speaker of the house they won’t abandon him.",
">\n\nI know this guy is a bullshitter but does he actually have the balls to start this with this new term? Imagine that you’re about to start a new job and hundreds of your coworkers already hate you and want you out for being a pathological liar. So embarrassing. He needs Republicans to support him, and I’m not sure they will.",
">\n\nThe guy lied his way into Congress. You think he cares what anyone else thinks about him?",
">\n\nNo, no, he only ever claimed that anything he was saying was true-ish",
">\n\nThe goal of the Ethics Committee is find no wrongdoing by a member regardless of party. Unless its so egregious that they have to say something, which recommended punishment is usually a fine, strip of committee or recommendation to resign. The reason Republicans would want him to go before the ethics committee is to delay the eventual outcome after the House Speakership vote.",
">\n\nHow about we don’t seat this person !",
">\n\nHappy Cake Day!",
">\n\nWhat are they on about? A lack of ethics is what makes this guy a Republican. Come on now.",
">\n\nI love this, some republicans. Why not all? Where is the outage over this liar? It's not fabrication, it's out and out lying about everything. He's just another GOP Fraudster.",
">\n\n\nWhere is all the outrage over this liar?\n\nWith such a thin majority there will be none.",
">\n\nDude went above and beyond the normal lies one tells to get elected. They need to be removed or not seated, or whatever. Just go away",
">\n\nMake some calls, says it's frowned upon, act like they're against it but they'll still push him through as Qevin needs his vote.",
">\n\nInvestigate what? Everyone already knows the guy is a fraud.",
">\n\nAnd next month he’s going to be the “Right Honorable Representative” of NY3. He’ll get his 176K/yr job, platinum healthcare plan, full pension… even if he gets charged with something, found guilty and goes to jail… he still gets all that because the voters in NY3 couldn’t be bothered to vet this guy. His bullshit was out there, but only picked up by a small local paper. His opponent brought it up in the debate, but was ignored. This is all on the voters in NY3. They screwed the pooch on this.",
">\n\n\nHe’ll get his 176K/yr job, platinum healthcare plan, full pension…\n\nHe won't get full pension.\n\"According to Politifact.com, a three-term congressman would be eligible for $17,588 after six years of work upon reaching retirement age.\"\nSo he won't even get his pension, however much that will be, until retirement age.",
">\n\nand what do you get for not showing up to any, even a single day, of work????",
">\n\nI bet he’s not even gay.",
">\n\nHis wife says he’s not.",
">\n\nI also blame the people in the 3rd district for voting for this person...it just reinforces the gullibleness of republicans... So Sad...",
">\n\nIt should be a crime to lie about your entire background as a candidate for public office. It should also serve as a wake up call that every candidate needs to be thoroughly vetted by the media.",
">\n\nAs they should.",
">\n\nWhy are we still beating this dead horse. The Republicans have been investigated for ethics countless times. None have ever been found.",
">\n\nPSA: don’t eat lead paint chips",
">\n\nShow me just one example where Republicans were found to have ethics! Just one!",
">\n\nWeird hair with no sideburns, caked on makeup, creepy smile. He looks like a scary marionette doll or a mannequin.",
">\n\nOr a Trump wannabe.",
">\n\nHe did have Trump signs in his office so there you have it",
">\n\n“Some” and the majority don’t give a fuck so nothing will happen. George Santos is the perfect representative of what the GOP has become.",
">\n\n“Some”, that’s a problem",
">\n\nYeah you can’t be yelling about corruption on the Dem side and let this kind of crap just slide when it’s on the GOP side.",
">\n\nLet me guess; it's the Republicans who lost their seats in 2022...",
">\n\nAnd their strategy didn't work in 2016, 2017, 2018, 2019, 2020, 2021, and 2022. The streak continues.",
">\n\nCountdown till the ethics investigation is on the wrong side of this.",
">\n\nThe ethics committee is a fucking joke. Has anyone ever suffered real consequences from one of their investigations?",
">\n\nI’m going to run as a republican and then fuck off and do nothing, then vote socialist policies in wherever I can. Good way to make money.",
">\n\nWhy wasn't this dude vetted before the election?\nWhy weren't his claims fact checked?\nHow did he get this far spewing all this bullshit?",
">\n\nBecause the public allows Republicans to act this way.",
">\n\nThe Santos grenade pin has been pulled. This is going to blow up big time and the question will be is if it goes off before or after he is in Congress. If it is when he is officially in Congress, the damage to the GOP will be immense. \nThat is why this is so amazing to watch. Everyone knows this is just going to get bigger and bigger and when it goes off the damage will be unreal. Currently the grenade is rolling to the GOP leadership. Smart leadership would shut the door and try and limit exposure, but it looks like they are ready for it to go off inside their....House.",
">\n\nThis would require the GOP to have ethics",
">\n\nExpertly tossed his credentials word salad, not 😂",
">\n\nThey have an ethics committee?",
">\n\nFinally. Took them long enough.",
">\n\nWell thank god… this is a total travesty .. HOW FUCKING EMBARRASSING FOR THE ENTIRE COUNTRY.\nThey are all liars but this guy is somehow beyond that… and he sounds as dumb as a sack of hammers",
">\n\nHe’s far too ugly to be in congress anyways. Get rid of him.",
">\n\nSome\nSome Republicans, not all",
">\n\nWhy is everyone skirting the issue? He is not an ethics nor political problem. His level of deception is criminal fraud on the voters and evidence of a pathological liar. There can be no defense.",
">\n\nHe's slime and he knows he's going to get away with it. The corruption in politics (R) are beyond our wildest imagination. Wonder if he's related to Trump?",
">\n\nA lack of ethics is what makes him appealing to Republicans in the first place",
">\n\nWhat’s with these trash, one paragraph articles lately?",
">\n\nCan he still be a “sitting” member if he lied his ass off?",
">\n\nWhat?!? Some republicans have ethics?!?",
">\n\nWill the ethics committee have their dentures in and actually make a different?\nMy money is on nothing more than a scolding.",
">\n\nIm glad Democrats and Republicans can come together to shit on this dude.",
">\n\nThey call for somebody else to enforce some ethics, then they will no doubt complain about how unfairly he was treated.",
">\n\nHe will be a hi goodbye politician",
">\n\nSome is the problem.",
">\n\nGee, you think!!!"
] |
>
what a gaslighting ass comment
Republican lies and cheats and it’s…checks notes…Democrats’ fault
I bet you find a way to blame victims in abusive relationships too
|
[
"It's unbelievable that someone can lie their way to an election and there's no way to remove them.\nWhat a fucked up system.",
">\n\nALL politicians, both democrat and republican lie to get elected. Obviously not to his extent. \nIt’s honestly the failures of the democratic party, the dnc, and the dccc. The opposition research is supposed to happen DURING a campaign, not a month and a half after the election is over. The only thing his democratic opponent attacked him on were a few pro trump statements. It’s a shame because it was a very winnable district for democrats. They definitely dropped the ball on this one. \nAs far as having a way to remove someone for lying to get elected? There is a way, which is for his constituents to vote him out. His constituents voted him in an removing him any other way is unconstitutional and overturns the will of the people in his district.",
">\n\nThe information was literally published by the North Shore Leader weeks before the election. Democrats did nothing with it, and Republicans didn't care.\n\"His constituents voted him in an removing him any other way is unconstitutional and overturns the will of the people in his district.\"\nIt's not unconstitutional- he can be expelled from Congress.",
">\n\nAnd it’s 100% democrats fault for choosing to do nothing with the information. Again, democrats blew it. No denying that.",
">\n\nIt's not 100% their fault. Yes, they deserve plenty of blame, but so does every single Republican who supported the guy and voted for him.",
">\n\nYour average voter had no way to know that literally every part of this guy's history was literally spun from whole cloth. They voted based on what they believed would be best for them with the information provided. \nThe Republicans that deserve blame for supporting the guy and voting for him are the ones that did so while fully knowing this guy was completely full of shit, and the ones who continue to either support him or stay silent even after he has been exposed.",
">\n\n\"Your average voter had no way to know that literally every part of this guy's history was literally spun from whole cloth.\"\nYes, they did. It was published in the Leader which people do, in fact, read, and was available on Google searches.\n\"They voted based on what they believed would be best for them with the information provided.\"\nEveryone I know in the 3rd District who voted for Santos calls Democrats \"communists\" and literally the only thing they care about is lower taxes (despite choosing to live in areas with some of the highest property taxes in the state) so if that's their definition of \"best for them\" then sure.",
">\n\nAh, the Ethics Committee...where ethics investigations go to die.",
">\n\nBecause 95% of congress is unethical.",
">\n\nTIL some Republicans are aware of the existence of Ethics.",
">\n\nPersonally I think they are all aware of ethics, but put an extraordinary amount of effort into avoiding them",
">\n\nYeah, saying they are dumb is giving them a pass, I agree with you.",
">\n\nYou know, they can be dumb, evil, and unethical all at the same time. It’s their one talent.",
">\n\nIt’s all a dog and pony show. Republicans need Santos for the vote for speaker of the house they won’t abandon him.",
">\n\nI know this guy is a bullshitter but does he actually have the balls to start this with this new term? Imagine that you’re about to start a new job and hundreds of your coworkers already hate you and want you out for being a pathological liar. So embarrassing. He needs Republicans to support him, and I’m not sure they will.",
">\n\nThe guy lied his way into Congress. You think he cares what anyone else thinks about him?",
">\n\nNo, no, he only ever claimed that anything he was saying was true-ish",
">\n\nThe goal of the Ethics Committee is find no wrongdoing by a member regardless of party. Unless its so egregious that they have to say something, which recommended punishment is usually a fine, strip of committee or recommendation to resign. The reason Republicans would want him to go before the ethics committee is to delay the eventual outcome after the House Speakership vote.",
">\n\nHow about we don’t seat this person !",
">\n\nHappy Cake Day!",
">\n\nWhat are they on about? A lack of ethics is what makes this guy a Republican. Come on now.",
">\n\nI love this, some republicans. Why not all? Where is the outage over this liar? It's not fabrication, it's out and out lying about everything. He's just another GOP Fraudster.",
">\n\n\nWhere is all the outrage over this liar?\n\nWith such a thin majority there will be none.",
">\n\nDude went above and beyond the normal lies one tells to get elected. They need to be removed or not seated, or whatever. Just go away",
">\n\nMake some calls, says it's frowned upon, act like they're against it but they'll still push him through as Qevin needs his vote.",
">\n\nInvestigate what? Everyone already knows the guy is a fraud.",
">\n\nAnd next month he’s going to be the “Right Honorable Representative” of NY3. He’ll get his 176K/yr job, platinum healthcare plan, full pension… even if he gets charged with something, found guilty and goes to jail… he still gets all that because the voters in NY3 couldn’t be bothered to vet this guy. His bullshit was out there, but only picked up by a small local paper. His opponent brought it up in the debate, but was ignored. This is all on the voters in NY3. They screwed the pooch on this.",
">\n\n\nHe’ll get his 176K/yr job, platinum healthcare plan, full pension…\n\nHe won't get full pension.\n\"According to Politifact.com, a three-term congressman would be eligible for $17,588 after six years of work upon reaching retirement age.\"\nSo he won't even get his pension, however much that will be, until retirement age.",
">\n\nand what do you get for not showing up to any, even a single day, of work????",
">\n\nI bet he’s not even gay.",
">\n\nHis wife says he’s not.",
">\n\nI also blame the people in the 3rd district for voting for this person...it just reinforces the gullibleness of republicans... So Sad...",
">\n\nIt should be a crime to lie about your entire background as a candidate for public office. It should also serve as a wake up call that every candidate needs to be thoroughly vetted by the media.",
">\n\nAs they should.",
">\n\nWhy are we still beating this dead horse. The Republicans have been investigated for ethics countless times. None have ever been found.",
">\n\nPSA: don’t eat lead paint chips",
">\n\nShow me just one example where Republicans were found to have ethics! Just one!",
">\n\nWeird hair with no sideburns, caked on makeup, creepy smile. He looks like a scary marionette doll or a mannequin.",
">\n\nOr a Trump wannabe.",
">\n\nHe did have Trump signs in his office so there you have it",
">\n\n“Some” and the majority don’t give a fuck so nothing will happen. George Santos is the perfect representative of what the GOP has become.",
">\n\n“Some”, that’s a problem",
">\n\nYeah you can’t be yelling about corruption on the Dem side and let this kind of crap just slide when it’s on the GOP side.",
">\n\nLet me guess; it's the Republicans who lost their seats in 2022...",
">\n\nAnd their strategy didn't work in 2016, 2017, 2018, 2019, 2020, 2021, and 2022. The streak continues.",
">\n\nCountdown till the ethics investigation is on the wrong side of this.",
">\n\nThe ethics committee is a fucking joke. Has anyone ever suffered real consequences from one of their investigations?",
">\n\nI’m going to run as a republican and then fuck off and do nothing, then vote socialist policies in wherever I can. Good way to make money.",
">\n\nWhy wasn't this dude vetted before the election?\nWhy weren't his claims fact checked?\nHow did he get this far spewing all this bullshit?",
">\n\nBecause the public allows Republicans to act this way.",
">\n\nThe Santos grenade pin has been pulled. This is going to blow up big time and the question will be is if it goes off before or after he is in Congress. If it is when he is officially in Congress, the damage to the GOP will be immense. \nThat is why this is so amazing to watch. Everyone knows this is just going to get bigger and bigger and when it goes off the damage will be unreal. Currently the grenade is rolling to the GOP leadership. Smart leadership would shut the door and try and limit exposure, but it looks like they are ready for it to go off inside their....House.",
">\n\nThis would require the GOP to have ethics",
">\n\nExpertly tossed his credentials word salad, not 😂",
">\n\nThey have an ethics committee?",
">\n\nFinally. Took them long enough.",
">\n\nWell thank god… this is a total travesty .. HOW FUCKING EMBARRASSING FOR THE ENTIRE COUNTRY.\nThey are all liars but this guy is somehow beyond that… and he sounds as dumb as a sack of hammers",
">\n\nHe’s far too ugly to be in congress anyways. Get rid of him.",
">\n\nSome\nSome Republicans, not all",
">\n\nWhy is everyone skirting the issue? He is not an ethics nor political problem. His level of deception is criminal fraud on the voters and evidence of a pathological liar. There can be no defense.",
">\n\nHe's slime and he knows he's going to get away with it. The corruption in politics (R) are beyond our wildest imagination. Wonder if he's related to Trump?",
">\n\nA lack of ethics is what makes him appealing to Republicans in the first place",
">\n\nWhat’s with these trash, one paragraph articles lately?",
">\n\nCan he still be a “sitting” member if he lied his ass off?",
">\n\nWhat?!? Some republicans have ethics?!?",
">\n\nWill the ethics committee have their dentures in and actually make a different?\nMy money is on nothing more than a scolding.",
">\n\nIm glad Democrats and Republicans can come together to shit on this dude.",
">\n\nThey call for somebody else to enforce some ethics, then they will no doubt complain about how unfairly he was treated.",
">\n\nHe will be a hi goodbye politician",
">\n\nSome is the problem.",
">\n\nGee, you think!!!",
">\n\nALL politicians, both democrat and republican lie to get elected. Obviously not to his extent. \nIt’s honestly the failures of the democratic party, the dnc, and the dccc. The opposition research is supposed to happen DURING a campaign, not a month and a half after the election is over. The only thing his democratic opponent attacked him on were a few pro trump statements. It’s a shame because it was a very winnable district for democrats. They definitely dropped the ball on this one."
] |
>
So you’re saying it’s not the democrats fault that opposition research wasn’t thoroughly conducted by his opponent and the dccc? So who’s fault is it that he’s in congress exactly?
|
[
"It's unbelievable that someone can lie their way to an election and there's no way to remove them.\nWhat a fucked up system.",
">\n\nALL politicians, both democrat and republican lie to get elected. Obviously not to his extent. \nIt’s honestly the failures of the democratic party, the dnc, and the dccc. The opposition research is supposed to happen DURING a campaign, not a month and a half after the election is over. The only thing his democratic opponent attacked him on were a few pro trump statements. It’s a shame because it was a very winnable district for democrats. They definitely dropped the ball on this one. \nAs far as having a way to remove someone for lying to get elected? There is a way, which is for his constituents to vote him out. His constituents voted him in an removing him any other way is unconstitutional and overturns the will of the people in his district.",
">\n\nThe information was literally published by the North Shore Leader weeks before the election. Democrats did nothing with it, and Republicans didn't care.\n\"His constituents voted him in an removing him any other way is unconstitutional and overturns the will of the people in his district.\"\nIt's not unconstitutional- he can be expelled from Congress.",
">\n\nAnd it’s 100% democrats fault for choosing to do nothing with the information. Again, democrats blew it. No denying that.",
">\n\nIt's not 100% their fault. Yes, they deserve plenty of blame, but so does every single Republican who supported the guy and voted for him.",
">\n\nYour average voter had no way to know that literally every part of this guy's history was literally spun from whole cloth. They voted based on what they believed would be best for them with the information provided. \nThe Republicans that deserve blame for supporting the guy and voting for him are the ones that did so while fully knowing this guy was completely full of shit, and the ones who continue to either support him or stay silent even after he has been exposed.",
">\n\n\"Your average voter had no way to know that literally every part of this guy's history was literally spun from whole cloth.\"\nYes, they did. It was published in the Leader which people do, in fact, read, and was available on Google searches.\n\"They voted based on what they believed would be best for them with the information provided.\"\nEveryone I know in the 3rd District who voted for Santos calls Democrats \"communists\" and literally the only thing they care about is lower taxes (despite choosing to live in areas with some of the highest property taxes in the state) so if that's their definition of \"best for them\" then sure.",
">\n\nAh, the Ethics Committee...where ethics investigations go to die.",
">\n\nBecause 95% of congress is unethical.",
">\n\nTIL some Republicans are aware of the existence of Ethics.",
">\n\nPersonally I think they are all aware of ethics, but put an extraordinary amount of effort into avoiding them",
">\n\nYeah, saying they are dumb is giving them a pass, I agree with you.",
">\n\nYou know, they can be dumb, evil, and unethical all at the same time. It’s their one talent.",
">\n\nIt’s all a dog and pony show. Republicans need Santos for the vote for speaker of the house they won’t abandon him.",
">\n\nI know this guy is a bullshitter but does he actually have the balls to start this with this new term? Imagine that you’re about to start a new job and hundreds of your coworkers already hate you and want you out for being a pathological liar. So embarrassing. He needs Republicans to support him, and I’m not sure they will.",
">\n\nThe guy lied his way into Congress. You think he cares what anyone else thinks about him?",
">\n\nNo, no, he only ever claimed that anything he was saying was true-ish",
">\n\nThe goal of the Ethics Committee is find no wrongdoing by a member regardless of party. Unless its so egregious that they have to say something, which recommended punishment is usually a fine, strip of committee or recommendation to resign. The reason Republicans would want him to go before the ethics committee is to delay the eventual outcome after the House Speakership vote.",
">\n\nHow about we don’t seat this person !",
">\n\nHappy Cake Day!",
">\n\nWhat are they on about? A lack of ethics is what makes this guy a Republican. Come on now.",
">\n\nI love this, some republicans. Why not all? Where is the outage over this liar? It's not fabrication, it's out and out lying about everything. He's just another GOP Fraudster.",
">\n\n\nWhere is all the outrage over this liar?\n\nWith such a thin majority there will be none.",
">\n\nDude went above and beyond the normal lies one tells to get elected. They need to be removed or not seated, or whatever. Just go away",
">\n\nMake some calls, says it's frowned upon, act like they're against it but they'll still push him through as Qevin needs his vote.",
">\n\nInvestigate what? Everyone already knows the guy is a fraud.",
">\n\nAnd next month he’s going to be the “Right Honorable Representative” of NY3. He’ll get his 176K/yr job, platinum healthcare plan, full pension… even if he gets charged with something, found guilty and goes to jail… he still gets all that because the voters in NY3 couldn’t be bothered to vet this guy. His bullshit was out there, but only picked up by a small local paper. His opponent brought it up in the debate, but was ignored. This is all on the voters in NY3. They screwed the pooch on this.",
">\n\n\nHe’ll get his 176K/yr job, platinum healthcare plan, full pension…\n\nHe won't get full pension.\n\"According to Politifact.com, a three-term congressman would be eligible for $17,588 after six years of work upon reaching retirement age.\"\nSo he won't even get his pension, however much that will be, until retirement age.",
">\n\nand what do you get for not showing up to any, even a single day, of work????",
">\n\nI bet he’s not even gay.",
">\n\nHis wife says he’s not.",
">\n\nI also blame the people in the 3rd district for voting for this person...it just reinforces the gullibleness of republicans... So Sad...",
">\n\nIt should be a crime to lie about your entire background as a candidate for public office. It should also serve as a wake up call that every candidate needs to be thoroughly vetted by the media.",
">\n\nAs they should.",
">\n\nWhy are we still beating this dead horse. The Republicans have been investigated for ethics countless times. None have ever been found.",
">\n\nPSA: don’t eat lead paint chips",
">\n\nShow me just one example where Republicans were found to have ethics! Just one!",
">\n\nWeird hair with no sideburns, caked on makeup, creepy smile. He looks like a scary marionette doll or a mannequin.",
">\n\nOr a Trump wannabe.",
">\n\nHe did have Trump signs in his office so there you have it",
">\n\n“Some” and the majority don’t give a fuck so nothing will happen. George Santos is the perfect representative of what the GOP has become.",
">\n\n“Some”, that’s a problem",
">\n\nYeah you can’t be yelling about corruption on the Dem side and let this kind of crap just slide when it’s on the GOP side.",
">\n\nLet me guess; it's the Republicans who lost their seats in 2022...",
">\n\nAnd their strategy didn't work in 2016, 2017, 2018, 2019, 2020, 2021, and 2022. The streak continues.",
">\n\nCountdown till the ethics investigation is on the wrong side of this.",
">\n\nThe ethics committee is a fucking joke. Has anyone ever suffered real consequences from one of their investigations?",
">\n\nI’m going to run as a republican and then fuck off and do nothing, then vote socialist policies in wherever I can. Good way to make money.",
">\n\nWhy wasn't this dude vetted before the election?\nWhy weren't his claims fact checked?\nHow did he get this far spewing all this bullshit?",
">\n\nBecause the public allows Republicans to act this way.",
">\n\nThe Santos grenade pin has been pulled. This is going to blow up big time and the question will be is if it goes off before or after he is in Congress. If it is when he is officially in Congress, the damage to the GOP will be immense. \nThat is why this is so amazing to watch. Everyone knows this is just going to get bigger and bigger and when it goes off the damage will be unreal. Currently the grenade is rolling to the GOP leadership. Smart leadership would shut the door and try and limit exposure, but it looks like they are ready for it to go off inside their....House.",
">\n\nThis would require the GOP to have ethics",
">\n\nExpertly tossed his credentials word salad, not 😂",
">\n\nThey have an ethics committee?",
">\n\nFinally. Took them long enough.",
">\n\nWell thank god… this is a total travesty .. HOW FUCKING EMBARRASSING FOR THE ENTIRE COUNTRY.\nThey are all liars but this guy is somehow beyond that… and he sounds as dumb as a sack of hammers",
">\n\nHe’s far too ugly to be in congress anyways. Get rid of him.",
">\n\nSome\nSome Republicans, not all",
">\n\nWhy is everyone skirting the issue? He is not an ethics nor political problem. His level of deception is criminal fraud on the voters and evidence of a pathological liar. There can be no defense.",
">\n\nHe's slime and he knows he's going to get away with it. The corruption in politics (R) are beyond our wildest imagination. Wonder if he's related to Trump?",
">\n\nA lack of ethics is what makes him appealing to Republicans in the first place",
">\n\nWhat’s with these trash, one paragraph articles lately?",
">\n\nCan he still be a “sitting” member if he lied his ass off?",
">\n\nWhat?!? Some republicans have ethics?!?",
">\n\nWill the ethics committee have their dentures in and actually make a different?\nMy money is on nothing more than a scolding.",
">\n\nIm glad Democrats and Republicans can come together to shit on this dude.",
">\n\nThey call for somebody else to enforce some ethics, then they will no doubt complain about how unfairly he was treated.",
">\n\nHe will be a hi goodbye politician",
">\n\nSome is the problem.",
">\n\nGee, you think!!!",
">\n\nALL politicians, both democrat and republican lie to get elected. Obviously not to his extent. \nIt’s honestly the failures of the democratic party, the dnc, and the dccc. The opposition research is supposed to happen DURING a campaign, not a month and a half after the election is over. The only thing his democratic opponent attacked him on were a few pro trump statements. It’s a shame because it was a very winnable district for democrats. They definitely dropped the ball on this one.",
">\n\nwhat a gaslighting ass comment \nRepublican lies and cheats and it’s…checks notes…Democrats’ fault\nI bet you find a way to blame victims in abusive relationships too"
] |
>
it’s the fault of the lying shitbird Republican
hard stop
|
[
"It's unbelievable that someone can lie their way to an election and there's no way to remove them.\nWhat a fucked up system.",
">\n\nALL politicians, both democrat and republican lie to get elected. Obviously not to his extent. \nIt’s honestly the failures of the democratic party, the dnc, and the dccc. The opposition research is supposed to happen DURING a campaign, not a month and a half after the election is over. The only thing his democratic opponent attacked him on were a few pro trump statements. It’s a shame because it was a very winnable district for democrats. They definitely dropped the ball on this one. \nAs far as having a way to remove someone for lying to get elected? There is a way, which is for his constituents to vote him out. His constituents voted him in an removing him any other way is unconstitutional and overturns the will of the people in his district.",
">\n\nThe information was literally published by the North Shore Leader weeks before the election. Democrats did nothing with it, and Republicans didn't care.\n\"His constituents voted him in an removing him any other way is unconstitutional and overturns the will of the people in his district.\"\nIt's not unconstitutional- he can be expelled from Congress.",
">\n\nAnd it’s 100% democrats fault for choosing to do nothing with the information. Again, democrats blew it. No denying that.",
">\n\nIt's not 100% their fault. Yes, they deserve plenty of blame, but so does every single Republican who supported the guy and voted for him.",
">\n\nYour average voter had no way to know that literally every part of this guy's history was literally spun from whole cloth. They voted based on what they believed would be best for them with the information provided. \nThe Republicans that deserve blame for supporting the guy and voting for him are the ones that did so while fully knowing this guy was completely full of shit, and the ones who continue to either support him or stay silent even after he has been exposed.",
">\n\n\"Your average voter had no way to know that literally every part of this guy's history was literally spun from whole cloth.\"\nYes, they did. It was published in the Leader which people do, in fact, read, and was available on Google searches.\n\"They voted based on what they believed would be best for them with the information provided.\"\nEveryone I know in the 3rd District who voted for Santos calls Democrats \"communists\" and literally the only thing they care about is lower taxes (despite choosing to live in areas with some of the highest property taxes in the state) so if that's their definition of \"best for them\" then sure.",
">\n\nAh, the Ethics Committee...where ethics investigations go to die.",
">\n\nBecause 95% of congress is unethical.",
">\n\nTIL some Republicans are aware of the existence of Ethics.",
">\n\nPersonally I think they are all aware of ethics, but put an extraordinary amount of effort into avoiding them",
">\n\nYeah, saying they are dumb is giving them a pass, I agree with you.",
">\n\nYou know, they can be dumb, evil, and unethical all at the same time. It’s their one talent.",
">\n\nIt’s all a dog and pony show. Republicans need Santos for the vote for speaker of the house they won’t abandon him.",
">\n\nI know this guy is a bullshitter but does he actually have the balls to start this with this new term? Imagine that you’re about to start a new job and hundreds of your coworkers already hate you and want you out for being a pathological liar. So embarrassing. He needs Republicans to support him, and I’m not sure they will.",
">\n\nThe guy lied his way into Congress. You think he cares what anyone else thinks about him?",
">\n\nNo, no, he only ever claimed that anything he was saying was true-ish",
">\n\nThe goal of the Ethics Committee is find no wrongdoing by a member regardless of party. Unless its so egregious that they have to say something, which recommended punishment is usually a fine, strip of committee or recommendation to resign. The reason Republicans would want him to go before the ethics committee is to delay the eventual outcome after the House Speakership vote.",
">\n\nHow about we don’t seat this person !",
">\n\nHappy Cake Day!",
">\n\nWhat are they on about? A lack of ethics is what makes this guy a Republican. Come on now.",
">\n\nI love this, some republicans. Why not all? Where is the outage over this liar? It's not fabrication, it's out and out lying about everything. He's just another GOP Fraudster.",
">\n\n\nWhere is all the outrage over this liar?\n\nWith such a thin majority there will be none.",
">\n\nDude went above and beyond the normal lies one tells to get elected. They need to be removed or not seated, or whatever. Just go away",
">\n\nMake some calls, says it's frowned upon, act like they're against it but they'll still push him through as Qevin needs his vote.",
">\n\nInvestigate what? Everyone already knows the guy is a fraud.",
">\n\nAnd next month he’s going to be the “Right Honorable Representative” of NY3. He’ll get his 176K/yr job, platinum healthcare plan, full pension… even if he gets charged with something, found guilty and goes to jail… he still gets all that because the voters in NY3 couldn’t be bothered to vet this guy. His bullshit was out there, but only picked up by a small local paper. His opponent brought it up in the debate, but was ignored. This is all on the voters in NY3. They screwed the pooch on this.",
">\n\n\nHe’ll get his 176K/yr job, platinum healthcare plan, full pension…\n\nHe won't get full pension.\n\"According to Politifact.com, a three-term congressman would be eligible for $17,588 after six years of work upon reaching retirement age.\"\nSo he won't even get his pension, however much that will be, until retirement age.",
">\n\nand what do you get for not showing up to any, even a single day, of work????",
">\n\nI bet he’s not even gay.",
">\n\nHis wife says he’s not.",
">\n\nI also blame the people in the 3rd district for voting for this person...it just reinforces the gullibleness of republicans... So Sad...",
">\n\nIt should be a crime to lie about your entire background as a candidate for public office. It should also serve as a wake up call that every candidate needs to be thoroughly vetted by the media.",
">\n\nAs they should.",
">\n\nWhy are we still beating this dead horse. The Republicans have been investigated for ethics countless times. None have ever been found.",
">\n\nPSA: don’t eat lead paint chips",
">\n\nShow me just one example where Republicans were found to have ethics! Just one!",
">\n\nWeird hair with no sideburns, caked on makeup, creepy smile. He looks like a scary marionette doll or a mannequin.",
">\n\nOr a Trump wannabe.",
">\n\nHe did have Trump signs in his office so there you have it",
">\n\n“Some” and the majority don’t give a fuck so nothing will happen. George Santos is the perfect representative of what the GOP has become.",
">\n\n“Some”, that’s a problem",
">\n\nYeah you can’t be yelling about corruption on the Dem side and let this kind of crap just slide when it’s on the GOP side.",
">\n\nLet me guess; it's the Republicans who lost their seats in 2022...",
">\n\nAnd their strategy didn't work in 2016, 2017, 2018, 2019, 2020, 2021, and 2022. The streak continues.",
">\n\nCountdown till the ethics investigation is on the wrong side of this.",
">\n\nThe ethics committee is a fucking joke. Has anyone ever suffered real consequences from one of their investigations?",
">\n\nI’m going to run as a republican and then fuck off and do nothing, then vote socialist policies in wherever I can. Good way to make money.",
">\n\nWhy wasn't this dude vetted before the election?\nWhy weren't his claims fact checked?\nHow did he get this far spewing all this bullshit?",
">\n\nBecause the public allows Republicans to act this way.",
">\n\nThe Santos grenade pin has been pulled. This is going to blow up big time and the question will be is if it goes off before or after he is in Congress. If it is when he is officially in Congress, the damage to the GOP will be immense. \nThat is why this is so amazing to watch. Everyone knows this is just going to get bigger and bigger and when it goes off the damage will be unreal. Currently the grenade is rolling to the GOP leadership. Smart leadership would shut the door and try and limit exposure, but it looks like they are ready for it to go off inside their....House.",
">\n\nThis would require the GOP to have ethics",
">\n\nExpertly tossed his credentials word salad, not 😂",
">\n\nThey have an ethics committee?",
">\n\nFinally. Took them long enough.",
">\n\nWell thank god… this is a total travesty .. HOW FUCKING EMBARRASSING FOR THE ENTIRE COUNTRY.\nThey are all liars but this guy is somehow beyond that… and he sounds as dumb as a sack of hammers",
">\n\nHe’s far too ugly to be in congress anyways. Get rid of him.",
">\n\nSome\nSome Republicans, not all",
">\n\nWhy is everyone skirting the issue? He is not an ethics nor political problem. His level of deception is criminal fraud on the voters and evidence of a pathological liar. There can be no defense.",
">\n\nHe's slime and he knows he's going to get away with it. The corruption in politics (R) are beyond our wildest imagination. Wonder if he's related to Trump?",
">\n\nA lack of ethics is what makes him appealing to Republicans in the first place",
">\n\nWhat’s with these trash, one paragraph articles lately?",
">\n\nCan he still be a “sitting” member if he lied his ass off?",
">\n\nWhat?!? Some republicans have ethics?!?",
">\n\nWill the ethics committee have their dentures in and actually make a different?\nMy money is on nothing more than a scolding.",
">\n\nIm glad Democrats and Republicans can come together to shit on this dude.",
">\n\nThey call for somebody else to enforce some ethics, then they will no doubt complain about how unfairly he was treated.",
">\n\nHe will be a hi goodbye politician",
">\n\nSome is the problem.",
">\n\nGee, you think!!!",
">\n\nALL politicians, both democrat and republican lie to get elected. Obviously not to his extent. \nIt’s honestly the failures of the democratic party, the dnc, and the dccc. The opposition research is supposed to happen DURING a campaign, not a month and a half after the election is over. The only thing his democratic opponent attacked him on were a few pro trump statements. It’s a shame because it was a very winnable district for democrats. They definitely dropped the ball on this one.",
">\n\nwhat a gaslighting ass comment \nRepublican lies and cheats and it’s…checks notes…Democrats’ fault\nI bet you find a way to blame victims in abusive relationships too",
">\n\nSo you’re saying it’s not the democrats fault that opposition research wasn’t thoroughly conducted by his opponent and the dccc? So who’s fault is it that he’s in congress exactly?"
] |
>
So it’s George santos’ fault that he was elected to congress?
|
[
"It's unbelievable that someone can lie their way to an election and there's no way to remove them.\nWhat a fucked up system.",
">\n\nALL politicians, both democrat and republican lie to get elected. Obviously not to his extent. \nIt’s honestly the failures of the democratic party, the dnc, and the dccc. The opposition research is supposed to happen DURING a campaign, not a month and a half after the election is over. The only thing his democratic opponent attacked him on were a few pro trump statements. It’s a shame because it was a very winnable district for democrats. They definitely dropped the ball on this one. \nAs far as having a way to remove someone for lying to get elected? There is a way, which is for his constituents to vote him out. His constituents voted him in an removing him any other way is unconstitutional and overturns the will of the people in his district.",
">\n\nThe information was literally published by the North Shore Leader weeks before the election. Democrats did nothing with it, and Republicans didn't care.\n\"His constituents voted him in an removing him any other way is unconstitutional and overturns the will of the people in his district.\"\nIt's not unconstitutional- he can be expelled from Congress.",
">\n\nAnd it’s 100% democrats fault for choosing to do nothing with the information. Again, democrats blew it. No denying that.",
">\n\nIt's not 100% their fault. Yes, they deserve plenty of blame, but so does every single Republican who supported the guy and voted for him.",
">\n\nYour average voter had no way to know that literally every part of this guy's history was literally spun from whole cloth. They voted based on what they believed would be best for them with the information provided. \nThe Republicans that deserve blame for supporting the guy and voting for him are the ones that did so while fully knowing this guy was completely full of shit, and the ones who continue to either support him or stay silent even after he has been exposed.",
">\n\n\"Your average voter had no way to know that literally every part of this guy's history was literally spun from whole cloth.\"\nYes, they did. It was published in the Leader which people do, in fact, read, and was available on Google searches.\n\"They voted based on what they believed would be best for them with the information provided.\"\nEveryone I know in the 3rd District who voted for Santos calls Democrats \"communists\" and literally the only thing they care about is lower taxes (despite choosing to live in areas with some of the highest property taxes in the state) so if that's their definition of \"best for them\" then sure.",
">\n\nAh, the Ethics Committee...where ethics investigations go to die.",
">\n\nBecause 95% of congress is unethical.",
">\n\nTIL some Republicans are aware of the existence of Ethics.",
">\n\nPersonally I think they are all aware of ethics, but put an extraordinary amount of effort into avoiding them",
">\n\nYeah, saying they are dumb is giving them a pass, I agree with you.",
">\n\nYou know, they can be dumb, evil, and unethical all at the same time. It’s their one talent.",
">\n\nIt’s all a dog and pony show. Republicans need Santos for the vote for speaker of the house they won’t abandon him.",
">\n\nI know this guy is a bullshitter but does he actually have the balls to start this with this new term? Imagine that you’re about to start a new job and hundreds of your coworkers already hate you and want you out for being a pathological liar. So embarrassing. He needs Republicans to support him, and I’m not sure they will.",
">\n\nThe guy lied his way into Congress. You think he cares what anyone else thinks about him?",
">\n\nNo, no, he only ever claimed that anything he was saying was true-ish",
">\n\nThe goal of the Ethics Committee is find no wrongdoing by a member regardless of party. Unless its so egregious that they have to say something, which recommended punishment is usually a fine, strip of committee or recommendation to resign. The reason Republicans would want him to go before the ethics committee is to delay the eventual outcome after the House Speakership vote.",
">\n\nHow about we don’t seat this person !",
">\n\nHappy Cake Day!",
">\n\nWhat are they on about? A lack of ethics is what makes this guy a Republican. Come on now.",
">\n\nI love this, some republicans. Why not all? Where is the outage over this liar? It's not fabrication, it's out and out lying about everything. He's just another GOP Fraudster.",
">\n\n\nWhere is all the outrage over this liar?\n\nWith such a thin majority there will be none.",
">\n\nDude went above and beyond the normal lies one tells to get elected. They need to be removed or not seated, or whatever. Just go away",
">\n\nMake some calls, says it's frowned upon, act like they're against it but they'll still push him through as Qevin needs his vote.",
">\n\nInvestigate what? Everyone already knows the guy is a fraud.",
">\n\nAnd next month he’s going to be the “Right Honorable Representative” of NY3. He’ll get his 176K/yr job, platinum healthcare plan, full pension… even if he gets charged with something, found guilty and goes to jail… he still gets all that because the voters in NY3 couldn’t be bothered to vet this guy. His bullshit was out there, but only picked up by a small local paper. His opponent brought it up in the debate, but was ignored. This is all on the voters in NY3. They screwed the pooch on this.",
">\n\n\nHe’ll get his 176K/yr job, platinum healthcare plan, full pension…\n\nHe won't get full pension.\n\"According to Politifact.com, a three-term congressman would be eligible for $17,588 after six years of work upon reaching retirement age.\"\nSo he won't even get his pension, however much that will be, until retirement age.",
">\n\nand what do you get for not showing up to any, even a single day, of work????",
">\n\nI bet he’s not even gay.",
">\n\nHis wife says he’s not.",
">\n\nI also blame the people in the 3rd district for voting for this person...it just reinforces the gullibleness of republicans... So Sad...",
">\n\nIt should be a crime to lie about your entire background as a candidate for public office. It should also serve as a wake up call that every candidate needs to be thoroughly vetted by the media.",
">\n\nAs they should.",
">\n\nWhy are we still beating this dead horse. The Republicans have been investigated for ethics countless times. None have ever been found.",
">\n\nPSA: don’t eat lead paint chips",
">\n\nShow me just one example where Republicans were found to have ethics! Just one!",
">\n\nWeird hair with no sideburns, caked on makeup, creepy smile. He looks like a scary marionette doll or a mannequin.",
">\n\nOr a Trump wannabe.",
">\n\nHe did have Trump signs in his office so there you have it",
">\n\n“Some” and the majority don’t give a fuck so nothing will happen. George Santos is the perfect representative of what the GOP has become.",
">\n\n“Some”, that’s a problem",
">\n\nYeah you can’t be yelling about corruption on the Dem side and let this kind of crap just slide when it’s on the GOP side.",
">\n\nLet me guess; it's the Republicans who lost their seats in 2022...",
">\n\nAnd their strategy didn't work in 2016, 2017, 2018, 2019, 2020, 2021, and 2022. The streak continues.",
">\n\nCountdown till the ethics investigation is on the wrong side of this.",
">\n\nThe ethics committee is a fucking joke. Has anyone ever suffered real consequences from one of their investigations?",
">\n\nI’m going to run as a republican and then fuck off and do nothing, then vote socialist policies in wherever I can. Good way to make money.",
">\n\nWhy wasn't this dude vetted before the election?\nWhy weren't his claims fact checked?\nHow did he get this far spewing all this bullshit?",
">\n\nBecause the public allows Republicans to act this way.",
">\n\nThe Santos grenade pin has been pulled. This is going to blow up big time and the question will be is if it goes off before or after he is in Congress. If it is when he is officially in Congress, the damage to the GOP will be immense. \nThat is why this is so amazing to watch. Everyone knows this is just going to get bigger and bigger and when it goes off the damage will be unreal. Currently the grenade is rolling to the GOP leadership. Smart leadership would shut the door and try and limit exposure, but it looks like they are ready for it to go off inside their....House.",
">\n\nThis would require the GOP to have ethics",
">\n\nExpertly tossed his credentials word salad, not 😂",
">\n\nThey have an ethics committee?",
">\n\nFinally. Took them long enough.",
">\n\nWell thank god… this is a total travesty .. HOW FUCKING EMBARRASSING FOR THE ENTIRE COUNTRY.\nThey are all liars but this guy is somehow beyond that… and he sounds as dumb as a sack of hammers",
">\n\nHe’s far too ugly to be in congress anyways. Get rid of him.",
">\n\nSome\nSome Republicans, not all",
">\n\nWhy is everyone skirting the issue? He is not an ethics nor political problem. His level of deception is criminal fraud on the voters and evidence of a pathological liar. There can be no defense.",
">\n\nHe's slime and he knows he's going to get away with it. The corruption in politics (R) are beyond our wildest imagination. Wonder if he's related to Trump?",
">\n\nA lack of ethics is what makes him appealing to Republicans in the first place",
">\n\nWhat’s with these trash, one paragraph articles lately?",
">\n\nCan he still be a “sitting” member if he lied his ass off?",
">\n\nWhat?!? Some republicans have ethics?!?",
">\n\nWill the ethics committee have their dentures in and actually make a different?\nMy money is on nothing more than a scolding.",
">\n\nIm glad Democrats and Republicans can come together to shit on this dude.",
">\n\nThey call for somebody else to enforce some ethics, then they will no doubt complain about how unfairly he was treated.",
">\n\nHe will be a hi goodbye politician",
">\n\nSome is the problem.",
">\n\nGee, you think!!!",
">\n\nALL politicians, both democrat and republican lie to get elected. Obviously not to his extent. \nIt’s honestly the failures of the democratic party, the dnc, and the dccc. The opposition research is supposed to happen DURING a campaign, not a month and a half after the election is over. The only thing his democratic opponent attacked him on were a few pro trump statements. It’s a shame because it was a very winnable district for democrats. They definitely dropped the ball on this one.",
">\n\nwhat a gaslighting ass comment \nRepublican lies and cheats and it’s…checks notes…Democrats’ fault\nI bet you find a way to blame victims in abusive relationships too",
">\n\nSo you’re saying it’s not the democrats fault that opposition research wasn’t thoroughly conducted by his opponent and the dccc? So who’s fault is it that he’s in congress exactly?",
">\n\nit’s the fault of the lying shitbird Republican \nhard stop"
] |
>
The queen has more makeup than Tyra Banks 😂
|
[
"It's unbelievable that someone can lie their way to an election and there's no way to remove them.\nWhat a fucked up system.",
">\n\nALL politicians, both democrat and republican lie to get elected. Obviously not to his extent. \nIt’s honestly the failures of the democratic party, the dnc, and the dccc. The opposition research is supposed to happen DURING a campaign, not a month and a half after the election is over. The only thing his democratic opponent attacked him on were a few pro trump statements. It’s a shame because it was a very winnable district for democrats. They definitely dropped the ball on this one. \nAs far as having a way to remove someone for lying to get elected? There is a way, which is for his constituents to vote him out. His constituents voted him in an removing him any other way is unconstitutional and overturns the will of the people in his district.",
">\n\nThe information was literally published by the North Shore Leader weeks before the election. Democrats did nothing with it, and Republicans didn't care.\n\"His constituents voted him in an removing him any other way is unconstitutional and overturns the will of the people in his district.\"\nIt's not unconstitutional- he can be expelled from Congress.",
">\n\nAnd it’s 100% democrats fault for choosing to do nothing with the information. Again, democrats blew it. No denying that.",
">\n\nIt's not 100% their fault. Yes, they deserve plenty of blame, but so does every single Republican who supported the guy and voted for him.",
">\n\nYour average voter had no way to know that literally every part of this guy's history was literally spun from whole cloth. They voted based on what they believed would be best for them with the information provided. \nThe Republicans that deserve blame for supporting the guy and voting for him are the ones that did so while fully knowing this guy was completely full of shit, and the ones who continue to either support him or stay silent even after he has been exposed.",
">\n\n\"Your average voter had no way to know that literally every part of this guy's history was literally spun from whole cloth.\"\nYes, they did. It was published in the Leader which people do, in fact, read, and was available on Google searches.\n\"They voted based on what they believed would be best for them with the information provided.\"\nEveryone I know in the 3rd District who voted for Santos calls Democrats \"communists\" and literally the only thing they care about is lower taxes (despite choosing to live in areas with some of the highest property taxes in the state) so if that's their definition of \"best for them\" then sure.",
">\n\nAh, the Ethics Committee...where ethics investigations go to die.",
">\n\nBecause 95% of congress is unethical.",
">\n\nTIL some Republicans are aware of the existence of Ethics.",
">\n\nPersonally I think they are all aware of ethics, but put an extraordinary amount of effort into avoiding them",
">\n\nYeah, saying they are dumb is giving them a pass, I agree with you.",
">\n\nYou know, they can be dumb, evil, and unethical all at the same time. It’s their one talent.",
">\n\nIt’s all a dog and pony show. Republicans need Santos for the vote for speaker of the house they won’t abandon him.",
">\n\nI know this guy is a bullshitter but does he actually have the balls to start this with this new term? Imagine that you’re about to start a new job and hundreds of your coworkers already hate you and want you out for being a pathological liar. So embarrassing. He needs Republicans to support him, and I’m not sure they will.",
">\n\nThe guy lied his way into Congress. You think he cares what anyone else thinks about him?",
">\n\nNo, no, he only ever claimed that anything he was saying was true-ish",
">\n\nThe goal of the Ethics Committee is find no wrongdoing by a member regardless of party. Unless its so egregious that they have to say something, which recommended punishment is usually a fine, strip of committee or recommendation to resign. The reason Republicans would want him to go before the ethics committee is to delay the eventual outcome after the House Speakership vote.",
">\n\nHow about we don’t seat this person !",
">\n\nHappy Cake Day!",
">\n\nWhat are they on about? A lack of ethics is what makes this guy a Republican. Come on now.",
">\n\nI love this, some republicans. Why not all? Where is the outage over this liar? It's not fabrication, it's out and out lying about everything. He's just another GOP Fraudster.",
">\n\n\nWhere is all the outrage over this liar?\n\nWith such a thin majority there will be none.",
">\n\nDude went above and beyond the normal lies one tells to get elected. They need to be removed or not seated, or whatever. Just go away",
">\n\nMake some calls, says it's frowned upon, act like they're against it but they'll still push him through as Qevin needs his vote.",
">\n\nInvestigate what? Everyone already knows the guy is a fraud.",
">\n\nAnd next month he’s going to be the “Right Honorable Representative” of NY3. He’ll get his 176K/yr job, platinum healthcare plan, full pension… even if he gets charged with something, found guilty and goes to jail… he still gets all that because the voters in NY3 couldn’t be bothered to vet this guy. His bullshit was out there, but only picked up by a small local paper. His opponent brought it up in the debate, but was ignored. This is all on the voters in NY3. They screwed the pooch on this.",
">\n\n\nHe’ll get his 176K/yr job, platinum healthcare plan, full pension…\n\nHe won't get full pension.\n\"According to Politifact.com, a three-term congressman would be eligible for $17,588 after six years of work upon reaching retirement age.\"\nSo he won't even get his pension, however much that will be, until retirement age.",
">\n\nand what do you get for not showing up to any, even a single day, of work????",
">\n\nI bet he’s not even gay.",
">\n\nHis wife says he’s not.",
">\n\nI also blame the people in the 3rd district for voting for this person...it just reinforces the gullibleness of republicans... So Sad...",
">\n\nIt should be a crime to lie about your entire background as a candidate for public office. It should also serve as a wake up call that every candidate needs to be thoroughly vetted by the media.",
">\n\nAs they should.",
">\n\nWhy are we still beating this dead horse. The Republicans have been investigated for ethics countless times. None have ever been found.",
">\n\nPSA: don’t eat lead paint chips",
">\n\nShow me just one example where Republicans were found to have ethics! Just one!",
">\n\nWeird hair with no sideburns, caked on makeup, creepy smile. He looks like a scary marionette doll or a mannequin.",
">\n\nOr a Trump wannabe.",
">\n\nHe did have Trump signs in his office so there you have it",
">\n\n“Some” and the majority don’t give a fuck so nothing will happen. George Santos is the perfect representative of what the GOP has become.",
">\n\n“Some”, that’s a problem",
">\n\nYeah you can’t be yelling about corruption on the Dem side and let this kind of crap just slide when it’s on the GOP side.",
">\n\nLet me guess; it's the Republicans who lost their seats in 2022...",
">\n\nAnd their strategy didn't work in 2016, 2017, 2018, 2019, 2020, 2021, and 2022. The streak continues.",
">\n\nCountdown till the ethics investigation is on the wrong side of this.",
">\n\nThe ethics committee is a fucking joke. Has anyone ever suffered real consequences from one of their investigations?",
">\n\nI’m going to run as a republican and then fuck off and do nothing, then vote socialist policies in wherever I can. Good way to make money.",
">\n\nWhy wasn't this dude vetted before the election?\nWhy weren't his claims fact checked?\nHow did he get this far spewing all this bullshit?",
">\n\nBecause the public allows Republicans to act this way.",
">\n\nThe Santos grenade pin has been pulled. This is going to blow up big time and the question will be is if it goes off before or after he is in Congress. If it is when he is officially in Congress, the damage to the GOP will be immense. \nThat is why this is so amazing to watch. Everyone knows this is just going to get bigger and bigger and when it goes off the damage will be unreal. Currently the grenade is rolling to the GOP leadership. Smart leadership would shut the door and try and limit exposure, but it looks like they are ready for it to go off inside their....House.",
">\n\nThis would require the GOP to have ethics",
">\n\nExpertly tossed his credentials word salad, not 😂",
">\n\nThey have an ethics committee?",
">\n\nFinally. Took them long enough.",
">\n\nWell thank god… this is a total travesty .. HOW FUCKING EMBARRASSING FOR THE ENTIRE COUNTRY.\nThey are all liars but this guy is somehow beyond that… and he sounds as dumb as a sack of hammers",
">\n\nHe’s far too ugly to be in congress anyways. Get rid of him.",
">\n\nSome\nSome Republicans, not all",
">\n\nWhy is everyone skirting the issue? He is not an ethics nor political problem. His level of deception is criminal fraud on the voters and evidence of a pathological liar. There can be no defense.",
">\n\nHe's slime and he knows he's going to get away with it. The corruption in politics (R) are beyond our wildest imagination. Wonder if he's related to Trump?",
">\n\nA lack of ethics is what makes him appealing to Republicans in the first place",
">\n\nWhat’s with these trash, one paragraph articles lately?",
">\n\nCan he still be a “sitting” member if he lied his ass off?",
">\n\nWhat?!? Some republicans have ethics?!?",
">\n\nWill the ethics committee have their dentures in and actually make a different?\nMy money is on nothing more than a scolding.",
">\n\nIm glad Democrats and Republicans can come together to shit on this dude.",
">\n\nThey call for somebody else to enforce some ethics, then they will no doubt complain about how unfairly he was treated.",
">\n\nHe will be a hi goodbye politician",
">\n\nSome is the problem.",
">\n\nGee, you think!!!",
">\n\nALL politicians, both democrat and republican lie to get elected. Obviously not to his extent. \nIt’s honestly the failures of the democratic party, the dnc, and the dccc. The opposition research is supposed to happen DURING a campaign, not a month and a half after the election is over. The only thing his democratic opponent attacked him on were a few pro trump statements. It’s a shame because it was a very winnable district for democrats. They definitely dropped the ball on this one.",
">\n\nwhat a gaslighting ass comment \nRepublican lies and cheats and it’s…checks notes…Democrats’ fault\nI bet you find a way to blame victims in abusive relationships too",
">\n\nSo you’re saying it’s not the democrats fault that opposition research wasn’t thoroughly conducted by his opponent and the dccc? So who’s fault is it that he’s in congress exactly?",
">\n\nit’s the fault of the lying shitbird Republican \nhard stop",
">\n\nSo it’s George santos’ fault that he was elected to congress?"
] |
>
|
[
"It's unbelievable that someone can lie their way to an election and there's no way to remove them.\nWhat a fucked up system.",
">\n\nALL politicians, both democrat and republican lie to get elected. Obviously not to his extent. \nIt’s honestly the failures of the democratic party, the dnc, and the dccc. The opposition research is supposed to happen DURING a campaign, not a month and a half after the election is over. The only thing his democratic opponent attacked him on were a few pro trump statements. It’s a shame because it was a very winnable district for democrats. They definitely dropped the ball on this one. \nAs far as having a way to remove someone for lying to get elected? There is a way, which is for his constituents to vote him out. His constituents voted him in an removing him any other way is unconstitutional and overturns the will of the people in his district.",
">\n\nThe information was literally published by the North Shore Leader weeks before the election. Democrats did nothing with it, and Republicans didn't care.\n\"His constituents voted him in an removing him any other way is unconstitutional and overturns the will of the people in his district.\"\nIt's not unconstitutional- he can be expelled from Congress.",
">\n\nAnd it’s 100% democrats fault for choosing to do nothing with the information. Again, democrats blew it. No denying that.",
">\n\nIt's not 100% their fault. Yes, they deserve plenty of blame, but so does every single Republican who supported the guy and voted for him.",
">\n\nYour average voter had no way to know that literally every part of this guy's history was literally spun from whole cloth. They voted based on what they believed would be best for them with the information provided. \nThe Republicans that deserve blame for supporting the guy and voting for him are the ones that did so while fully knowing this guy was completely full of shit, and the ones who continue to either support him or stay silent even after he has been exposed.",
">\n\n\"Your average voter had no way to know that literally every part of this guy's history was literally spun from whole cloth.\"\nYes, they did. It was published in the Leader which people do, in fact, read, and was available on Google searches.\n\"They voted based on what they believed would be best for them with the information provided.\"\nEveryone I know in the 3rd District who voted for Santos calls Democrats \"communists\" and literally the only thing they care about is lower taxes (despite choosing to live in areas with some of the highest property taxes in the state) so if that's their definition of \"best for them\" then sure.",
">\n\nAh, the Ethics Committee...where ethics investigations go to die.",
">\n\nBecause 95% of congress is unethical.",
">\n\nTIL some Republicans are aware of the existence of Ethics.",
">\n\nPersonally I think they are all aware of ethics, but put an extraordinary amount of effort into avoiding them",
">\n\nYeah, saying they are dumb is giving them a pass, I agree with you.",
">\n\nYou know, they can be dumb, evil, and unethical all at the same time. It’s their one talent.",
">\n\nIt’s all a dog and pony show. Republicans need Santos for the vote for speaker of the house they won’t abandon him.",
">\n\nI know this guy is a bullshitter but does he actually have the balls to start this with this new term? Imagine that you’re about to start a new job and hundreds of your coworkers already hate you and want you out for being a pathological liar. So embarrassing. He needs Republicans to support him, and I’m not sure they will.",
">\n\nThe guy lied his way into Congress. You think he cares what anyone else thinks about him?",
">\n\nNo, no, he only ever claimed that anything he was saying was true-ish",
">\n\nThe goal of the Ethics Committee is find no wrongdoing by a member regardless of party. Unless its so egregious that they have to say something, which recommended punishment is usually a fine, strip of committee or recommendation to resign. The reason Republicans would want him to go before the ethics committee is to delay the eventual outcome after the House Speakership vote.",
">\n\nHow about we don’t seat this person !",
">\n\nHappy Cake Day!",
">\n\nWhat are they on about? A lack of ethics is what makes this guy a Republican. Come on now.",
">\n\nI love this, some republicans. Why not all? Where is the outage over this liar? It's not fabrication, it's out and out lying about everything. He's just another GOP Fraudster.",
">\n\n\nWhere is all the outrage over this liar?\n\nWith such a thin majority there will be none.",
">\n\nDude went above and beyond the normal lies one tells to get elected. They need to be removed or not seated, or whatever. Just go away",
">\n\nMake some calls, says it's frowned upon, act like they're against it but they'll still push him through as Qevin needs his vote.",
">\n\nInvestigate what? Everyone already knows the guy is a fraud.",
">\n\nAnd next month he’s going to be the “Right Honorable Representative” of NY3. He’ll get his 176K/yr job, platinum healthcare plan, full pension… even if he gets charged with something, found guilty and goes to jail… he still gets all that because the voters in NY3 couldn’t be bothered to vet this guy. His bullshit was out there, but only picked up by a small local paper. His opponent brought it up in the debate, but was ignored. This is all on the voters in NY3. They screwed the pooch on this.",
">\n\n\nHe’ll get his 176K/yr job, platinum healthcare plan, full pension…\n\nHe won't get full pension.\n\"According to Politifact.com, a three-term congressman would be eligible for $17,588 after six years of work upon reaching retirement age.\"\nSo he won't even get his pension, however much that will be, until retirement age.",
">\n\nand what do you get for not showing up to any, even a single day, of work????",
">\n\nI bet he’s not even gay.",
">\n\nHis wife says he’s not.",
">\n\nI also blame the people in the 3rd district for voting for this person...it just reinforces the gullibleness of republicans... So Sad...",
">\n\nIt should be a crime to lie about your entire background as a candidate for public office. It should also serve as a wake up call that every candidate needs to be thoroughly vetted by the media.",
">\n\nAs they should.",
">\n\nWhy are we still beating this dead horse. The Republicans have been investigated for ethics countless times. None have ever been found.",
">\n\nPSA: don’t eat lead paint chips",
">\n\nShow me just one example where Republicans were found to have ethics! Just one!",
">\n\nWeird hair with no sideburns, caked on makeup, creepy smile. He looks like a scary marionette doll or a mannequin.",
">\n\nOr a Trump wannabe.",
">\n\nHe did have Trump signs in his office so there you have it",
">\n\n“Some” and the majority don’t give a fuck so nothing will happen. George Santos is the perfect representative of what the GOP has become.",
">\n\n“Some”, that’s a problem",
">\n\nYeah you can’t be yelling about corruption on the Dem side and let this kind of crap just slide when it’s on the GOP side.",
">\n\nLet me guess; it's the Republicans who lost their seats in 2022...",
">\n\nAnd their strategy didn't work in 2016, 2017, 2018, 2019, 2020, 2021, and 2022. The streak continues.",
">\n\nCountdown till the ethics investigation is on the wrong side of this.",
">\n\nThe ethics committee is a fucking joke. Has anyone ever suffered real consequences from one of their investigations?",
">\n\nI’m going to run as a republican and then fuck off and do nothing, then vote socialist policies in wherever I can. Good way to make money.",
">\n\nWhy wasn't this dude vetted before the election?\nWhy weren't his claims fact checked?\nHow did he get this far spewing all this bullshit?",
">\n\nBecause the public allows Republicans to act this way.",
">\n\nThe Santos grenade pin has been pulled. This is going to blow up big time and the question will be is if it goes off before or after he is in Congress. If it is when he is officially in Congress, the damage to the GOP will be immense. \nThat is why this is so amazing to watch. Everyone knows this is just going to get bigger and bigger and when it goes off the damage will be unreal. Currently the grenade is rolling to the GOP leadership. Smart leadership would shut the door and try and limit exposure, but it looks like they are ready for it to go off inside their....House.",
">\n\nThis would require the GOP to have ethics",
">\n\nExpertly tossed his credentials word salad, not 😂",
">\n\nThey have an ethics committee?",
">\n\nFinally. Took them long enough.",
">\n\nWell thank god… this is a total travesty .. HOW FUCKING EMBARRASSING FOR THE ENTIRE COUNTRY.\nThey are all liars but this guy is somehow beyond that… and he sounds as dumb as a sack of hammers",
">\n\nHe’s far too ugly to be in congress anyways. Get rid of him.",
">\n\nSome\nSome Republicans, not all",
">\n\nWhy is everyone skirting the issue? He is not an ethics nor political problem. His level of deception is criminal fraud on the voters and evidence of a pathological liar. There can be no defense.",
">\n\nHe's slime and he knows he's going to get away with it. The corruption in politics (R) are beyond our wildest imagination. Wonder if he's related to Trump?",
">\n\nA lack of ethics is what makes him appealing to Republicans in the first place",
">\n\nWhat’s with these trash, one paragraph articles lately?",
">\n\nCan he still be a “sitting” member if he lied his ass off?",
">\n\nWhat?!? Some republicans have ethics?!?",
">\n\nWill the ethics committee have their dentures in and actually make a different?\nMy money is on nothing more than a scolding.",
">\n\nIm glad Democrats and Republicans can come together to shit on this dude.",
">\n\nThey call for somebody else to enforce some ethics, then they will no doubt complain about how unfairly he was treated.",
">\n\nHe will be a hi goodbye politician",
">\n\nSome is the problem.",
">\n\nGee, you think!!!",
">\n\nALL politicians, both democrat and republican lie to get elected. Obviously not to his extent. \nIt’s honestly the failures of the democratic party, the dnc, and the dccc. The opposition research is supposed to happen DURING a campaign, not a month and a half after the election is over. The only thing his democratic opponent attacked him on were a few pro trump statements. It’s a shame because it was a very winnable district for democrats. They definitely dropped the ball on this one.",
">\n\nwhat a gaslighting ass comment \nRepublican lies and cheats and it’s…checks notes…Democrats’ fault\nI bet you find a way to blame victims in abusive relationships too",
">\n\nSo you’re saying it’s not the democrats fault that opposition research wasn’t thoroughly conducted by his opponent and the dccc? So who’s fault is it that he’s in congress exactly?",
">\n\nit’s the fault of the lying shitbird Republican \nhard stop",
">\n\nSo it’s George santos’ fault that he was elected to congress?",
">\n\nThe queen has more makeup than Tyra Banks 😂"
] |
This is a friendly reminder to read our rules.
Remember, /r/Showerthoughts is for showerthoughts, not "thoughts had in the shower!"
(For an explanation of what a "showerthought" is, please read this page.)
Rule-breaking posts may result in bans.
|
[] |
>
irony? As the great Alanis once said "Isn't it ironic?". Don't you think?
|
[
"This is a friendly reminder to read our rules.\nRemember, /r/Showerthoughts is for showerthoughts, not \"thoughts had in the shower!\"\n(For an explanation of what a \"showerthought\" is, please read this page.)\nRule-breaking posts may result in bans."
] |
>
Weren't all the examples given in that song just coincidences and not actually ironic?
|
[
"This is a friendly reminder to read our rules.\nRemember, /r/Showerthoughts is for showerthoughts, not \"thoughts had in the shower!\"\n(For an explanation of what a \"showerthought\" is, please read this page.)\nRule-breaking posts may result in bans.",
">\n\nirony? As the great Alanis once said \"Isn't it ironic?\". Don't you think?"
] |
>
They were situational ironies.
Life has a funny way of sneaking up on you when you think everything's okay and everything's going right.
|
[
"This is a friendly reminder to read our rules.\nRemember, /r/Showerthoughts is for showerthoughts, not \"thoughts had in the shower!\"\n(For an explanation of what a \"showerthought\" is, please read this page.)\nRule-breaking posts may result in bans.",
">\n\nirony? As the great Alanis once said \"Isn't it ironic?\". Don't you think?",
">\n\nWeren't all the examples given in that song just coincidences and not actually ironic?"
] |
>
I wouldn’t even say they’re situational ironies. Irony is specifically when something is the opposite of what you expect. If someone says they have a fear of public speaking, that sets you up to expect that they would have a very private career. If they then told you that they were a professor for a Freshman class of 200 students, that would be ironic.
A fly in your chardonnay is not opposite to any expectations because the simple act of having a glass of chardonnay doesn’t set up any expectations. You’re not actively expecting there not to be a fly, so if a fly shows up, it’s simply unexpected. And unexpected and ironic are the same.
|
[
"This is a friendly reminder to read our rules.\nRemember, /r/Showerthoughts is for showerthoughts, not \"thoughts had in the shower!\"\n(For an explanation of what a \"showerthought\" is, please read this page.)\nRule-breaking posts may result in bans.",
">\n\nirony? As the great Alanis once said \"Isn't it ironic?\". Don't you think?",
">\n\nWeren't all the examples given in that song just coincidences and not actually ironic?",
">\n\nThey were situational ironies.\nLife has a funny way of sneaking up on you when you think everything's okay and everything's going right."
] |
>
Tell people to build a fake tree, many will use cardboard. It’s is not the opposite of what you would expect.
|
[
"This is a friendly reminder to read our rules.\nRemember, /r/Showerthoughts is for showerthoughts, not \"thoughts had in the shower!\"\n(For an explanation of what a \"showerthought\" is, please read this page.)\nRule-breaking posts may result in bans.",
">\n\nirony? As the great Alanis once said \"Isn't it ironic?\". Don't you think?",
">\n\nWeren't all the examples given in that song just coincidences and not actually ironic?",
">\n\nThey were situational ironies.\nLife has a funny way of sneaking up on you when you think everything's okay and everything's going right.",
">\n\nI wouldn’t even say they’re situational ironies. Irony is specifically when something is the opposite of what you expect. If someone says they have a fear of public speaking, that sets you up to expect that they would have a very private career. If they then told you that they were a professor for a Freshman class of 200 students, that would be ironic.\nA fly in your chardonnay is not opposite to any expectations because the simple act of having a glass of chardonnay doesn’t set up any expectations. You’re not actively expecting there not to be a fly, so if a fly shows up, it’s simply unexpected. And unexpected and ironic are the same."
] |
>
|
[
"This is a friendly reminder to read our rules.\nRemember, /r/Showerthoughts is for showerthoughts, not \"thoughts had in the shower!\"\n(For an explanation of what a \"showerthought\" is, please read this page.)\nRule-breaking posts may result in bans.",
">\n\nirony? As the great Alanis once said \"Isn't it ironic?\". Don't you think?",
">\n\nWeren't all the examples given in that song just coincidences and not actually ironic?",
">\n\nThey were situational ironies.\nLife has a funny way of sneaking up on you when you think everything's okay and everything's going right.",
">\n\nI wouldn’t even say they’re situational ironies. Irony is specifically when something is the opposite of what you expect. If someone says they have a fear of public speaking, that sets you up to expect that they would have a very private career. If they then told you that they were a professor for a Freshman class of 200 students, that would be ironic.\nA fly in your chardonnay is not opposite to any expectations because the simple act of having a glass of chardonnay doesn’t set up any expectations. You’re not actively expecting there not to be a fly, so if a fly shows up, it’s simply unexpected. And unexpected and ironic are the same.",
">\n\nTell people to build a fake tree, many will use cardboard. It’s is not the opposite of what you would expect."
] |
Was this the White House or Tony Soprano's house? Burning documents, flushing documents... Drain the swamp my ass.
|
[] |
>
Oh, they thought they were Tony Soprano. I wish the world would cut to black for a moment and they would all just disappear.
|
[
"Was this the White House or Tony Soprano's house? Burning documents, flushing documents... Drain the swamp my ass."
] |
>
Don't stop believin'.
|
[
"Was this the White House or Tony Soprano's house? Burning documents, flushing documents... Drain the swamp my ass.",
">\n\nOh, they thought they were Tony Soprano. I wish the world would cut to black for a moment and they would all just disappear."
] |
>
Conservatives support this type of treason. Never forget.
|
[
"Was this the White House or Tony Soprano's house? Burning documents, flushing documents... Drain the swamp my ass.",
">\n\nOh, they thought they were Tony Soprano. I wish the world would cut to black for a moment and they would all just disappear.",
">\n\nDon't stop believin'."
] |
>
Overwhelming majority of elected Republicans are still working to cover up all the treason.
|
[
"Was this the White House or Tony Soprano's house? Burning documents, flushing documents... Drain the swamp my ass.",
">\n\nOh, they thought they were Tony Soprano. I wish the world would cut to black for a moment and they would all just disappear.",
">\n\nDon't stop believin'.",
">\n\nConservatives support this type of treason. Never forget."
] |
>
Why do republicans hate America?
|
[
"Was this the White House or Tony Soprano's house? Burning documents, flushing documents... Drain the swamp my ass.",
">\n\nOh, they thought they were Tony Soprano. I wish the world would cut to black for a moment and they would all just disappear.",
">\n\nDon't stop believin'.",
">\n\nConservatives support this type of treason. Never forget.",
">\n\nOverwhelming majority of elected Republicans are still working to cover up all the treason."
] |
>
They hate everything except POWER
|
[
"Was this the White House or Tony Soprano's house? Burning documents, flushing documents... Drain the swamp my ass.",
">\n\nOh, they thought they were Tony Soprano. I wish the world would cut to black for a moment and they would all just disappear.",
">\n\nDon't stop believin'.",
">\n\nConservatives support this type of treason. Never forget.",
">\n\nOverwhelming majority of elected Republicans are still working to cover up all the treason.",
">\n\nWhy do republicans hate America?"
] |
>
Nothing says innocent like destroying evidence.
|
[
"Was this the White House or Tony Soprano's house? Burning documents, flushing documents... Drain the swamp my ass.",
">\n\nOh, they thought they were Tony Soprano. I wish the world would cut to black for a moment and they would all just disappear.",
">\n\nDon't stop believin'.",
">\n\nConservatives support this type of treason. Never forget.",
">\n\nOverwhelming majority of elected Republicans are still working to cover up all the treason.",
">\n\nWhy do republicans hate America?",
">\n\nThey hate everything except POWER"
] |
>
That huge sigh of relief you hear is coming from Fawn Hall lol.
|
[
"Was this the White House or Tony Soprano's house? Burning documents, flushing documents... Drain the swamp my ass.",
">\n\nOh, they thought they were Tony Soprano. I wish the world would cut to black for a moment and they would all just disappear.",
">\n\nDon't stop believin'.",
">\n\nConservatives support this type of treason. Never forget.",
">\n\nOverwhelming majority of elected Republicans are still working to cover up all the treason.",
">\n\nWhy do republicans hate America?",
">\n\nThey hate everything except POWER",
">\n\nNothing says innocent like destroying evidence."
] |
>
Then-White House chief of staff Mark Meadows burned papers in his office after meeting with a House Republican who was working to challenge the 2020 election, according to testimony the Jan. 6 select committee has heard from one of his former aides.
Cassidy Hutchinson, who worked under Meadows when he was former President Donald Trump’s chief of staff, told the panel investigating the Capitol attack that she saw Meadows incinerate documents after a meeting in his office with Rep. Scott Perry (R-Pa.). A person familiar with the testimony described it on condition of anonymity.
The only person who wished they were Kevin McCarthy is Mark Meadows.
|
[
"Was this the White House or Tony Soprano's house? Burning documents, flushing documents... Drain the swamp my ass.",
">\n\nOh, they thought they were Tony Soprano. I wish the world would cut to black for a moment and they would all just disappear.",
">\n\nDon't stop believin'.",
">\n\nConservatives support this type of treason. Never forget.",
">\n\nOverwhelming majority of elected Republicans are still working to cover up all the treason.",
">\n\nWhy do republicans hate America?",
">\n\nThey hate everything except POWER",
">\n\nNothing says innocent like destroying evidence.",
">\n\nThat huge sigh of relief you hear is coming from Fawn Hall lol."
] |
>
Always seemed like the same dude.
|
[
"Was this the White House or Tony Soprano's house? Burning documents, flushing documents... Drain the swamp my ass.",
">\n\nOh, they thought they were Tony Soprano. I wish the world would cut to black for a moment and they would all just disappear.",
">\n\nDon't stop believin'.",
">\n\nConservatives support this type of treason. Never forget.",
">\n\nOverwhelming majority of elected Republicans are still working to cover up all the treason.",
">\n\nWhy do republicans hate America?",
">\n\nThey hate everything except POWER",
">\n\nNothing says innocent like destroying evidence.",
">\n\nThat huge sigh of relief you hear is coming from Fawn Hall lol.",
">\n\n\nThen-White House chief of staff Mark Meadows burned papers in his office after meeting with a House Republican who was working to challenge the 2020 election, according to testimony the Jan. 6 select committee has heard from one of his former aides.\nCassidy Hutchinson, who worked under Meadows when he was former President Donald Trump’s chief of staff, told the panel investigating the Capitol attack that she saw Meadows incinerate documents after a meeting in his office with Rep. Scott Perry (R-Pa.). A person familiar with the testimony described it on condition of anonymity.\n\nThe only person who wished they were Kevin McCarthy is Mark Meadows."
] |
>
Per CNN just now, he burned papers at least a dozen times.
|
[
"Was this the White House or Tony Soprano's house? Burning documents, flushing documents... Drain the swamp my ass.",
">\n\nOh, they thought they were Tony Soprano. I wish the world would cut to black for a moment and they would all just disappear.",
">\n\nDon't stop believin'.",
">\n\nConservatives support this type of treason. Never forget.",
">\n\nOverwhelming majority of elected Republicans are still working to cover up all the treason.",
">\n\nWhy do republicans hate America?",
">\n\nThey hate everything except POWER",
">\n\nNothing says innocent like destroying evidence.",
">\n\nThat huge sigh of relief you hear is coming from Fawn Hall lol.",
">\n\n\nThen-White House chief of staff Mark Meadows burned papers in his office after meeting with a House Republican who was working to challenge the 2020 election, according to testimony the Jan. 6 select committee has heard from one of his former aides.\nCassidy Hutchinson, who worked under Meadows when he was former President Donald Trump’s chief of staff, told the panel investigating the Capitol attack that she saw Meadows incinerate documents after a meeting in his office with Rep. Scott Perry (R-Pa.). A person familiar with the testimony described it on condition of anonymity.\n\nThe only person who wished they were Kevin McCarthy is Mark Meadows.",
">\n\nAlways seemed like the same dude."
] |
>
Which is illegal on its face. But, DOJ do it's job? Fat fucking chance..
|
[
"Was this the White House or Tony Soprano's house? Burning documents, flushing documents... Drain the swamp my ass.",
">\n\nOh, they thought they were Tony Soprano. I wish the world would cut to black for a moment and they would all just disappear.",
">\n\nDon't stop believin'.",
">\n\nConservatives support this type of treason. Never forget.",
">\n\nOverwhelming majority of elected Republicans are still working to cover up all the treason.",
">\n\nWhy do republicans hate America?",
">\n\nThey hate everything except POWER",
">\n\nNothing says innocent like destroying evidence.",
">\n\nThat huge sigh of relief you hear is coming from Fawn Hall lol.",
">\n\n\nThen-White House chief of staff Mark Meadows burned papers in his office after meeting with a House Republican who was working to challenge the 2020 election, according to testimony the Jan. 6 select committee has heard from one of his former aides.\nCassidy Hutchinson, who worked under Meadows when he was former President Donald Trump’s chief of staff, told the panel investigating the Capitol attack that she saw Meadows incinerate documents after a meeting in his office with Rep. Scott Perry (R-Pa.). A person familiar with the testimony described it on condition of anonymity.\n\nThe only person who wished they were Kevin McCarthy is Mark Meadows.",
">\n\nAlways seemed like the same dude.",
">\n\nPer CNN just now, he burned papers at least a dozen times."
] |
>
I have a feeling he's working with the DOJ, everything ran through him
|
[
"Was this the White House or Tony Soprano's house? Burning documents, flushing documents... Drain the swamp my ass.",
">\n\nOh, they thought they were Tony Soprano. I wish the world would cut to black for a moment and they would all just disappear.",
">\n\nDon't stop believin'.",
">\n\nConservatives support this type of treason. Never forget.",
">\n\nOverwhelming majority of elected Republicans are still working to cover up all the treason.",
">\n\nWhy do republicans hate America?",
">\n\nThey hate everything except POWER",
">\n\nNothing says innocent like destroying evidence.",
">\n\nThat huge sigh of relief you hear is coming from Fawn Hall lol.",
">\n\n\nThen-White House chief of staff Mark Meadows burned papers in his office after meeting with a House Republican who was working to challenge the 2020 election, according to testimony the Jan. 6 select committee has heard from one of his former aides.\nCassidy Hutchinson, who worked under Meadows when he was former President Donald Trump’s chief of staff, told the panel investigating the Capitol attack that she saw Meadows incinerate documents after a meeting in his office with Rep. Scott Perry (R-Pa.). A person familiar with the testimony described it on condition of anonymity.\n\nThe only person who wished they were Kevin McCarthy is Mark Meadows.",
">\n\nAlways seemed like the same dude.",
">\n\nPer CNN just now, he burned papers at least a dozen times.",
">\n\nWhich is illegal on its face. But, DOJ do it's job? Fat fucking chance.."
] |
>
Although wasn't he the one who called Cassidy Hutchinson before her testimony and said "we know you'll do the right thing" witness intimidation thing?
|
[
"Was this the White House or Tony Soprano's house? Burning documents, flushing documents... Drain the swamp my ass.",
">\n\nOh, they thought they were Tony Soprano. I wish the world would cut to black for a moment and they would all just disappear.",
">\n\nDon't stop believin'.",
">\n\nConservatives support this type of treason. Never forget.",
">\n\nOverwhelming majority of elected Republicans are still working to cover up all the treason.",
">\n\nWhy do republicans hate America?",
">\n\nThey hate everything except POWER",
">\n\nNothing says innocent like destroying evidence.",
">\n\nThat huge sigh of relief you hear is coming from Fawn Hall lol.",
">\n\n\nThen-White House chief of staff Mark Meadows burned papers in his office after meeting with a House Republican who was working to challenge the 2020 election, according to testimony the Jan. 6 select committee has heard from one of his former aides.\nCassidy Hutchinson, who worked under Meadows when he was former President Donald Trump’s chief of staff, told the panel investigating the Capitol attack that she saw Meadows incinerate documents after a meeting in his office with Rep. Scott Perry (R-Pa.). A person familiar with the testimony described it on condition of anonymity.\n\nThe only person who wished they were Kevin McCarthy is Mark Meadows.",
">\n\nAlways seemed like the same dude.",
">\n\nPer CNN just now, he burned papers at least a dozen times.",
">\n\nWhich is illegal on its face. But, DOJ do it's job? Fat fucking chance..",
">\n\nI have a feeling he's working with the DOJ, everything ran through him"
] |
>
That is straight-up dialog out of a Mafia film.
|
[
"Was this the White House or Tony Soprano's house? Burning documents, flushing documents... Drain the swamp my ass.",
">\n\nOh, they thought they were Tony Soprano. I wish the world would cut to black for a moment and they would all just disappear.",
">\n\nDon't stop believin'.",
">\n\nConservatives support this type of treason. Never forget.",
">\n\nOverwhelming majority of elected Republicans are still working to cover up all the treason.",
">\n\nWhy do republicans hate America?",
">\n\nThey hate everything except POWER",
">\n\nNothing says innocent like destroying evidence.",
">\n\nThat huge sigh of relief you hear is coming from Fawn Hall lol.",
">\n\n\nThen-White House chief of staff Mark Meadows burned papers in his office after meeting with a House Republican who was working to challenge the 2020 election, according to testimony the Jan. 6 select committee has heard from one of his former aides.\nCassidy Hutchinson, who worked under Meadows when he was former President Donald Trump’s chief of staff, told the panel investigating the Capitol attack that she saw Meadows incinerate documents after a meeting in his office with Rep. Scott Perry (R-Pa.). A person familiar with the testimony described it on condition of anonymity.\n\nThe only person who wished they were Kevin McCarthy is Mark Meadows.",
">\n\nAlways seemed like the same dude.",
">\n\nPer CNN just now, he burned papers at least a dozen times.",
">\n\nWhich is illegal on its face. But, DOJ do it's job? Fat fucking chance..",
">\n\nI have a feeling he's working with the DOJ, everything ran through him",
">\n\nAlthough wasn't he the one who called Cassidy Hutchinson before her testimony and said \"we know you'll do the right thing\" witness intimidation thing?"
] |
>
Oh that's totally normal. Why at my office we have a daily burning rite where we toss all evidence of our criminality in the bin and make s'mores. Nothing wrong with this at all, not a single thing!
|
[
"Was this the White House or Tony Soprano's house? Burning documents, flushing documents... Drain the swamp my ass.",
">\n\nOh, they thought they were Tony Soprano. I wish the world would cut to black for a moment and they would all just disappear.",
">\n\nDon't stop believin'.",
">\n\nConservatives support this type of treason. Never forget.",
">\n\nOverwhelming majority of elected Republicans are still working to cover up all the treason.",
">\n\nWhy do republicans hate America?",
">\n\nThey hate everything except POWER",
">\n\nNothing says innocent like destroying evidence.",
">\n\nThat huge sigh of relief you hear is coming from Fawn Hall lol.",
">\n\n\nThen-White House chief of staff Mark Meadows burned papers in his office after meeting with a House Republican who was working to challenge the 2020 election, according to testimony the Jan. 6 select committee has heard from one of his former aides.\nCassidy Hutchinson, who worked under Meadows when he was former President Donald Trump’s chief of staff, told the panel investigating the Capitol attack that she saw Meadows incinerate documents after a meeting in his office with Rep. Scott Perry (R-Pa.). A person familiar with the testimony described it on condition of anonymity.\n\nThe only person who wished they were Kevin McCarthy is Mark Meadows.",
">\n\nAlways seemed like the same dude.",
">\n\nPer CNN just now, he burned papers at least a dozen times.",
">\n\nWhich is illegal on its face. But, DOJ do it's job? Fat fucking chance..",
">\n\nI have a feeling he's working with the DOJ, everything ran through him",
">\n\nAlthough wasn't he the one who called Cassidy Hutchinson before her testimony and said \"we know you'll do the right thing\" witness intimidation thing?",
">\n\nThat is straight-up dialog out of a Mafia film."
] |
>
"These are delicious! I can't wait to commit s'more crimes, tomorrow!"
|
[
"Was this the White House or Tony Soprano's house? Burning documents, flushing documents... Drain the swamp my ass.",
">\n\nOh, they thought they were Tony Soprano. I wish the world would cut to black for a moment and they would all just disappear.",
">\n\nDon't stop believin'.",
">\n\nConservatives support this type of treason. Never forget.",
">\n\nOverwhelming majority of elected Republicans are still working to cover up all the treason.",
">\n\nWhy do republicans hate America?",
">\n\nThey hate everything except POWER",
">\n\nNothing says innocent like destroying evidence.",
">\n\nThat huge sigh of relief you hear is coming from Fawn Hall lol.",
">\n\n\nThen-White House chief of staff Mark Meadows burned papers in his office after meeting with a House Republican who was working to challenge the 2020 election, according to testimony the Jan. 6 select committee has heard from one of his former aides.\nCassidy Hutchinson, who worked under Meadows when he was former President Donald Trump’s chief of staff, told the panel investigating the Capitol attack that she saw Meadows incinerate documents after a meeting in his office with Rep. Scott Perry (R-Pa.). A person familiar with the testimony described it on condition of anonymity.\n\nThe only person who wished they were Kevin McCarthy is Mark Meadows.",
">\n\nAlways seemed like the same dude.",
">\n\nPer CNN just now, he burned papers at least a dozen times.",
">\n\nWhich is illegal on its face. But, DOJ do it's job? Fat fucking chance..",
">\n\nI have a feeling he's working with the DOJ, everything ran through him",
">\n\nAlthough wasn't he the one who called Cassidy Hutchinson before her testimony and said \"we know you'll do the right thing\" witness intimidation thing?",
">\n\nThat is straight-up dialog out of a Mafia film.",
">\n\nOh that's totally normal. Why at my office we have a daily burning rite where we toss all evidence of our criminality in the bin and make s'mores. Nothing wrong with this at all, not a single thing!"
] |
>
Jesus. This is all illegal, what are we waiting for here??
|
[
"Was this the White House or Tony Soprano's house? Burning documents, flushing documents... Drain the swamp my ass.",
">\n\nOh, they thought they were Tony Soprano. I wish the world would cut to black for a moment and they would all just disappear.",
">\n\nDon't stop believin'.",
">\n\nConservatives support this type of treason. Never forget.",
">\n\nOverwhelming majority of elected Republicans are still working to cover up all the treason.",
">\n\nWhy do republicans hate America?",
">\n\nThey hate everything except POWER",
">\n\nNothing says innocent like destroying evidence.",
">\n\nThat huge sigh of relief you hear is coming from Fawn Hall lol.",
">\n\n\nThen-White House chief of staff Mark Meadows burned papers in his office after meeting with a House Republican who was working to challenge the 2020 election, according to testimony the Jan. 6 select committee has heard from one of his former aides.\nCassidy Hutchinson, who worked under Meadows when he was former President Donald Trump’s chief of staff, told the panel investigating the Capitol attack that she saw Meadows incinerate documents after a meeting in his office with Rep. Scott Perry (R-Pa.). A person familiar with the testimony described it on condition of anonymity.\n\nThe only person who wished they were Kevin McCarthy is Mark Meadows.",
">\n\nAlways seemed like the same dude.",
">\n\nPer CNN just now, he burned papers at least a dozen times.",
">\n\nWhich is illegal on its face. But, DOJ do it's job? Fat fucking chance..",
">\n\nI have a feeling he's working with the DOJ, everything ran through him",
">\n\nAlthough wasn't he the one who called Cassidy Hutchinson before her testimony and said \"we know you'll do the right thing\" witness intimidation thing?",
">\n\nThat is straight-up dialog out of a Mafia film.",
">\n\nOh that's totally normal. Why at my office we have a daily burning rite where we toss all evidence of our criminality in the bin and make s'mores. Nothing wrong with this at all, not a single thing!",
">\n\n\"These are delicious! I can't wait to commit s'more crimes, tomorrow!\""
] |
>
Well you had the joke answers so here's the real deal.
The DOJ just got the complete set of transcripts.
Now they have to cross-check everything the witnesses said to the committee with everything they said to the DOJ.
They do this to check for lies and memory lapses. The liars then get indicted and hopefully flipped. The folks with bad memories get a chance to amend their statements.
Each statement then has to be cross-checked against every other statement the DOJ has received. Again they check for lies and mistakes. And again they indict liars and fix errors.
They do this because they aren't like Bill Durham. He took his Trump Russia investigation to court and lost his case because he didn't resolve inconsistencies before the trial.
Assuming that you want the DOJ to win, you need to wait a while before expecting action.
|
[
"Was this the White House or Tony Soprano's house? Burning documents, flushing documents... Drain the swamp my ass.",
">\n\nOh, they thought they were Tony Soprano. I wish the world would cut to black for a moment and they would all just disappear.",
">\n\nDon't stop believin'.",
">\n\nConservatives support this type of treason. Never forget.",
">\n\nOverwhelming majority of elected Republicans are still working to cover up all the treason.",
">\n\nWhy do republicans hate America?",
">\n\nThey hate everything except POWER",
">\n\nNothing says innocent like destroying evidence.",
">\n\nThat huge sigh of relief you hear is coming from Fawn Hall lol.",
">\n\n\nThen-White House chief of staff Mark Meadows burned papers in his office after meeting with a House Republican who was working to challenge the 2020 election, according to testimony the Jan. 6 select committee has heard from one of his former aides.\nCassidy Hutchinson, who worked under Meadows when he was former President Donald Trump’s chief of staff, told the panel investigating the Capitol attack that she saw Meadows incinerate documents after a meeting in his office with Rep. Scott Perry (R-Pa.). A person familiar with the testimony described it on condition of anonymity.\n\nThe only person who wished they were Kevin McCarthy is Mark Meadows.",
">\n\nAlways seemed like the same dude.",
">\n\nPer CNN just now, he burned papers at least a dozen times.",
">\n\nWhich is illegal on its face. But, DOJ do it's job? Fat fucking chance..",
">\n\nI have a feeling he's working with the DOJ, everything ran through him",
">\n\nAlthough wasn't he the one who called Cassidy Hutchinson before her testimony and said \"we know you'll do the right thing\" witness intimidation thing?",
">\n\nThat is straight-up dialog out of a Mafia film.",
">\n\nOh that's totally normal. Why at my office we have a daily burning rite where we toss all evidence of our criminality in the bin and make s'mores. Nothing wrong with this at all, not a single thing!",
">\n\n\"These are delicious! I can't wait to commit s'more crimes, tomorrow!\"",
">\n\nJesus. This is all illegal, what are we waiting for here??"
] |
>
Thanks for the detailed answer. I do understand it takes time. Married to a lawyer here. But even my lawyer spouse is pretty convinced nothing is going to happen. They have had portions of the testimony for months. I want to be wrong. But it has been 2 years now. That's a long time. It should be a huge priority, disturbing it is not.
|
[
"Was this the White House or Tony Soprano's house? Burning documents, flushing documents... Drain the swamp my ass.",
">\n\nOh, they thought they were Tony Soprano. I wish the world would cut to black for a moment and they would all just disappear.",
">\n\nDon't stop believin'.",
">\n\nConservatives support this type of treason. Never forget.",
">\n\nOverwhelming majority of elected Republicans are still working to cover up all the treason.",
">\n\nWhy do republicans hate America?",
">\n\nThey hate everything except POWER",
">\n\nNothing says innocent like destroying evidence.",
">\n\nThat huge sigh of relief you hear is coming from Fawn Hall lol.",
">\n\n\nThen-White House chief of staff Mark Meadows burned papers in his office after meeting with a House Republican who was working to challenge the 2020 election, according to testimony the Jan. 6 select committee has heard from one of his former aides.\nCassidy Hutchinson, who worked under Meadows when he was former President Donald Trump’s chief of staff, told the panel investigating the Capitol attack that she saw Meadows incinerate documents after a meeting in his office with Rep. Scott Perry (R-Pa.). A person familiar with the testimony described it on condition of anonymity.\n\nThe only person who wished they were Kevin McCarthy is Mark Meadows.",
">\n\nAlways seemed like the same dude.",
">\n\nPer CNN just now, he burned papers at least a dozen times.",
">\n\nWhich is illegal on its face. But, DOJ do it's job? Fat fucking chance..",
">\n\nI have a feeling he's working with the DOJ, everything ran through him",
">\n\nAlthough wasn't he the one who called Cassidy Hutchinson before her testimony and said \"we know you'll do the right thing\" witness intimidation thing?",
">\n\nThat is straight-up dialog out of a Mafia film.",
">\n\nOh that's totally normal. Why at my office we have a daily burning rite where we toss all evidence of our criminality in the bin and make s'mores. Nothing wrong with this at all, not a single thing!",
">\n\n\"These are delicious! I can't wait to commit s'more crimes, tomorrow!\"",
">\n\nJesus. This is all illegal, what are we waiting for here??",
">\n\nWell you had the joke answers so here's the real deal.\nThe DOJ just got the complete set of transcripts.\nNow they have to cross-check everything the witnesses said to the committee with everything they said to the DOJ.\nThey do this to check for lies and memory lapses. The liars then get indicted and hopefully flipped. The folks with bad memories get a chance to amend their statements.\nEach statement then has to be cross-checked against every other statement the DOJ has received. Again they check for lies and mistakes. And again they indict liars and fix errors.\nThey do this because they aren't like Bill Durham. He took his Trump Russia investigation to court and lost his case because he didn't resolve inconsistencies before the trial.\nAssuming that you want the DOJ to win, you need to wait a while before expecting action."
] |
>
An attorney acquaintance put it best - 'Federal attention is like a drunk hippo; it may take a long time to meander towards you, but once it's close up, it's attention is unmistakeable for anything else.'
|
[
"Was this the White House or Tony Soprano's house? Burning documents, flushing documents... Drain the swamp my ass.",
">\n\nOh, they thought they were Tony Soprano. I wish the world would cut to black for a moment and they would all just disappear.",
">\n\nDon't stop believin'.",
">\n\nConservatives support this type of treason. Never forget.",
">\n\nOverwhelming majority of elected Republicans are still working to cover up all the treason.",
">\n\nWhy do republicans hate America?",
">\n\nThey hate everything except POWER",
">\n\nNothing says innocent like destroying evidence.",
">\n\nThat huge sigh of relief you hear is coming from Fawn Hall lol.",
">\n\n\nThen-White House chief of staff Mark Meadows burned papers in his office after meeting with a House Republican who was working to challenge the 2020 election, according to testimony the Jan. 6 select committee has heard from one of his former aides.\nCassidy Hutchinson, who worked under Meadows when he was former President Donald Trump’s chief of staff, told the panel investigating the Capitol attack that she saw Meadows incinerate documents after a meeting in his office with Rep. Scott Perry (R-Pa.). A person familiar with the testimony described it on condition of anonymity.\n\nThe only person who wished they were Kevin McCarthy is Mark Meadows.",
">\n\nAlways seemed like the same dude.",
">\n\nPer CNN just now, he burned papers at least a dozen times.",
">\n\nWhich is illegal on its face. But, DOJ do it's job? Fat fucking chance..",
">\n\nI have a feeling he's working with the DOJ, everything ran through him",
">\n\nAlthough wasn't he the one who called Cassidy Hutchinson before her testimony and said \"we know you'll do the right thing\" witness intimidation thing?",
">\n\nThat is straight-up dialog out of a Mafia film.",
">\n\nOh that's totally normal. Why at my office we have a daily burning rite where we toss all evidence of our criminality in the bin and make s'mores. Nothing wrong with this at all, not a single thing!",
">\n\n\"These are delicious! I can't wait to commit s'more crimes, tomorrow!\"",
">\n\nJesus. This is all illegal, what are we waiting for here??",
">\n\nWell you had the joke answers so here's the real deal.\nThe DOJ just got the complete set of transcripts.\nNow they have to cross-check everything the witnesses said to the committee with everything they said to the DOJ.\nThey do this to check for lies and memory lapses. The liars then get indicted and hopefully flipped. The folks with bad memories get a chance to amend their statements.\nEach statement then has to be cross-checked against every other statement the DOJ has received. Again they check for lies and mistakes. And again they indict liars and fix errors.\nThey do this because they aren't like Bill Durham. He took his Trump Russia investigation to court and lost his case because he didn't resolve inconsistencies before the trial.\nAssuming that you want the DOJ to win, you need to wait a while before expecting action.",
">\n\nThanks for the detailed answer. I do understand it takes time. Married to a lawyer here. But even my lawyer spouse is pretty convinced nothing is going to happen. They have had portions of the testimony for months. I want to be wrong. But it has been 2 years now. That's a long time. It should be a huge priority, disturbing it is not."
] |
>
The thing is we all know that all this horribly corrupt stuff took place. The question is, how do we make the other side of the table understand that this stuff actually happened?
|
[
"Was this the White House or Tony Soprano's house? Burning documents, flushing documents... Drain the swamp my ass.",
">\n\nOh, they thought they were Tony Soprano. I wish the world would cut to black for a moment and they would all just disappear.",
">\n\nDon't stop believin'.",
">\n\nConservatives support this type of treason. Never forget.",
">\n\nOverwhelming majority of elected Republicans are still working to cover up all the treason.",
">\n\nWhy do republicans hate America?",
">\n\nThey hate everything except POWER",
">\n\nNothing says innocent like destroying evidence.",
">\n\nThat huge sigh of relief you hear is coming from Fawn Hall lol.",
">\n\n\nThen-White House chief of staff Mark Meadows burned papers in his office after meeting with a House Republican who was working to challenge the 2020 election, according to testimony the Jan. 6 select committee has heard from one of his former aides.\nCassidy Hutchinson, who worked under Meadows when he was former President Donald Trump’s chief of staff, told the panel investigating the Capitol attack that she saw Meadows incinerate documents after a meeting in his office with Rep. Scott Perry (R-Pa.). A person familiar with the testimony described it on condition of anonymity.\n\nThe only person who wished they were Kevin McCarthy is Mark Meadows.",
">\n\nAlways seemed like the same dude.",
">\n\nPer CNN just now, he burned papers at least a dozen times.",
">\n\nWhich is illegal on its face. But, DOJ do it's job? Fat fucking chance..",
">\n\nI have a feeling he's working with the DOJ, everything ran through him",
">\n\nAlthough wasn't he the one who called Cassidy Hutchinson before her testimony and said \"we know you'll do the right thing\" witness intimidation thing?",
">\n\nThat is straight-up dialog out of a Mafia film.",
">\n\nOh that's totally normal. Why at my office we have a daily burning rite where we toss all evidence of our criminality in the bin and make s'mores. Nothing wrong with this at all, not a single thing!",
">\n\n\"These are delicious! I can't wait to commit s'more crimes, tomorrow!\"",
">\n\nJesus. This is all illegal, what are we waiting for here??",
">\n\nWell you had the joke answers so here's the real deal.\nThe DOJ just got the complete set of transcripts.\nNow they have to cross-check everything the witnesses said to the committee with everything they said to the DOJ.\nThey do this to check for lies and memory lapses. The liars then get indicted and hopefully flipped. The folks with bad memories get a chance to amend their statements.\nEach statement then has to be cross-checked against every other statement the DOJ has received. Again they check for lies and mistakes. And again they indict liars and fix errors.\nThey do this because they aren't like Bill Durham. He took his Trump Russia investigation to court and lost his case because he didn't resolve inconsistencies before the trial.\nAssuming that you want the DOJ to win, you need to wait a while before expecting action.",
">\n\nThanks for the detailed answer. I do understand it takes time. Married to a lawyer here. But even my lawyer spouse is pretty convinced nothing is going to happen. They have had portions of the testimony for months. I want to be wrong. But it has been 2 years now. That's a long time. It should be a huge priority, disturbing it is not.",
">\n\nAn attorney acquaintance put it best - 'Federal attention is like a drunk hippo; it may take a long time to meander towards you, but once it's close up, it's attention is unmistakeable for anything else.'"
] |
>
They don't care. They're beyond caring about legality, morality, rationality or anything decent if it means they don't win by owning the Democrats.
|
[
"Was this the White House or Tony Soprano's house? Burning documents, flushing documents... Drain the swamp my ass.",
">\n\nOh, they thought they were Tony Soprano. I wish the world would cut to black for a moment and they would all just disappear.",
">\n\nDon't stop believin'.",
">\n\nConservatives support this type of treason. Never forget.",
">\n\nOverwhelming majority of elected Republicans are still working to cover up all the treason.",
">\n\nWhy do republicans hate America?",
">\n\nThey hate everything except POWER",
">\n\nNothing says innocent like destroying evidence.",
">\n\nThat huge sigh of relief you hear is coming from Fawn Hall lol.",
">\n\n\nThen-White House chief of staff Mark Meadows burned papers in his office after meeting with a House Republican who was working to challenge the 2020 election, according to testimony the Jan. 6 select committee has heard from one of his former aides.\nCassidy Hutchinson, who worked under Meadows when he was former President Donald Trump’s chief of staff, told the panel investigating the Capitol attack that she saw Meadows incinerate documents after a meeting in his office with Rep. Scott Perry (R-Pa.). A person familiar with the testimony described it on condition of anonymity.\n\nThe only person who wished they were Kevin McCarthy is Mark Meadows.",
">\n\nAlways seemed like the same dude.",
">\n\nPer CNN just now, he burned papers at least a dozen times.",
">\n\nWhich is illegal on its face. But, DOJ do it's job? Fat fucking chance..",
">\n\nI have a feeling he's working with the DOJ, everything ran through him",
">\n\nAlthough wasn't he the one who called Cassidy Hutchinson before her testimony and said \"we know you'll do the right thing\" witness intimidation thing?",
">\n\nThat is straight-up dialog out of a Mafia film.",
">\n\nOh that's totally normal. Why at my office we have a daily burning rite where we toss all evidence of our criminality in the bin and make s'mores. Nothing wrong with this at all, not a single thing!",
">\n\n\"These are delicious! I can't wait to commit s'more crimes, tomorrow!\"",
">\n\nJesus. This is all illegal, what are we waiting for here??",
">\n\nWell you had the joke answers so here's the real deal.\nThe DOJ just got the complete set of transcripts.\nNow they have to cross-check everything the witnesses said to the committee with everything they said to the DOJ.\nThey do this to check for lies and memory lapses. The liars then get indicted and hopefully flipped. The folks with bad memories get a chance to amend their statements.\nEach statement then has to be cross-checked against every other statement the DOJ has received. Again they check for lies and mistakes. And again they indict liars and fix errors.\nThey do this because they aren't like Bill Durham. He took his Trump Russia investigation to court and lost his case because he didn't resolve inconsistencies before the trial.\nAssuming that you want the DOJ to win, you need to wait a while before expecting action.",
">\n\nThanks for the detailed answer. I do understand it takes time. Married to a lawyer here. But even my lawyer spouse is pretty convinced nothing is going to happen. They have had portions of the testimony for months. I want to be wrong. But it has been 2 years now. That's a long time. It should be a huge priority, disturbing it is not.",
">\n\nAn attorney acquaintance put it best - 'Federal attention is like a drunk hippo; it may take a long time to meander towards you, but once it's close up, it's attention is unmistakeable for anything else.'",
">\n\nThe thing is we all know that all this horribly corrupt stuff took place. The question is, how do we make the other side of the table understand that this stuff actually happened?"
] |
>
This is why I honestly feel this country is screwed at times. You would think that regardless of political affiliation that we could all agree to not burning government documents. Furthermore, we should easily all be able to agree that it is a bad thing. But even with something as very obvious as this being a bad thing, you will find a large number of people being okay with it.
Idea of people burning documents. The cases of trying it down the toilet. Like this sort of stuff should not be occurring and should have stopped.
|
[
"Was this the White House or Tony Soprano's house? Burning documents, flushing documents... Drain the swamp my ass.",
">\n\nOh, they thought they were Tony Soprano. I wish the world would cut to black for a moment and they would all just disappear.",
">\n\nDon't stop believin'.",
">\n\nConservatives support this type of treason. Never forget.",
">\n\nOverwhelming majority of elected Republicans are still working to cover up all the treason.",
">\n\nWhy do republicans hate America?",
">\n\nThey hate everything except POWER",
">\n\nNothing says innocent like destroying evidence.",
">\n\nThat huge sigh of relief you hear is coming from Fawn Hall lol.",
">\n\n\nThen-White House chief of staff Mark Meadows burned papers in his office after meeting with a House Republican who was working to challenge the 2020 election, according to testimony the Jan. 6 select committee has heard from one of his former aides.\nCassidy Hutchinson, who worked under Meadows when he was former President Donald Trump’s chief of staff, told the panel investigating the Capitol attack that she saw Meadows incinerate documents after a meeting in his office with Rep. Scott Perry (R-Pa.). A person familiar with the testimony described it on condition of anonymity.\n\nThe only person who wished they were Kevin McCarthy is Mark Meadows.",
">\n\nAlways seemed like the same dude.",
">\n\nPer CNN just now, he burned papers at least a dozen times.",
">\n\nWhich is illegal on its face. But, DOJ do it's job? Fat fucking chance..",
">\n\nI have a feeling he's working with the DOJ, everything ran through him",
">\n\nAlthough wasn't he the one who called Cassidy Hutchinson before her testimony and said \"we know you'll do the right thing\" witness intimidation thing?",
">\n\nThat is straight-up dialog out of a Mafia film.",
">\n\nOh that's totally normal. Why at my office we have a daily burning rite where we toss all evidence of our criminality in the bin and make s'mores. Nothing wrong with this at all, not a single thing!",
">\n\n\"These are delicious! I can't wait to commit s'more crimes, tomorrow!\"",
">\n\nJesus. This is all illegal, what are we waiting for here??",
">\n\nWell you had the joke answers so here's the real deal.\nThe DOJ just got the complete set of transcripts.\nNow they have to cross-check everything the witnesses said to the committee with everything they said to the DOJ.\nThey do this to check for lies and memory lapses. The liars then get indicted and hopefully flipped. The folks with bad memories get a chance to amend their statements.\nEach statement then has to be cross-checked against every other statement the DOJ has received. Again they check for lies and mistakes. And again they indict liars and fix errors.\nThey do this because they aren't like Bill Durham. He took his Trump Russia investigation to court and lost his case because he didn't resolve inconsistencies before the trial.\nAssuming that you want the DOJ to win, you need to wait a while before expecting action.",
">\n\nThanks for the detailed answer. I do understand it takes time. Married to a lawyer here. But even my lawyer spouse is pretty convinced nothing is going to happen. They have had portions of the testimony for months. I want to be wrong. But it has been 2 years now. That's a long time. It should be a huge priority, disturbing it is not.",
">\n\nAn attorney acquaintance put it best - 'Federal attention is like a drunk hippo; it may take a long time to meander towards you, but once it's close up, it's attention is unmistakeable for anything else.'",
">\n\nThe thing is we all know that all this horribly corrupt stuff took place. The question is, how do we make the other side of the table understand that this stuff actually happened?",
">\n\nThey don't care. They're beyond caring about legality, morality, rationality or anything decent if it means they don't win by owning the Democrats."
] |
>
Pretty wild how all that it takes to be held completely unaccountable for domestic and global crimes against humanity is to burn, flush or swallow paper.
|
[
"Was this the White House or Tony Soprano's house? Burning documents, flushing documents... Drain the swamp my ass.",
">\n\nOh, they thought they were Tony Soprano. I wish the world would cut to black for a moment and they would all just disappear.",
">\n\nDon't stop believin'.",
">\n\nConservatives support this type of treason. Never forget.",
">\n\nOverwhelming majority of elected Republicans are still working to cover up all the treason.",
">\n\nWhy do republicans hate America?",
">\n\nThey hate everything except POWER",
">\n\nNothing says innocent like destroying evidence.",
">\n\nThat huge sigh of relief you hear is coming from Fawn Hall lol.",
">\n\n\nThen-White House chief of staff Mark Meadows burned papers in his office after meeting with a House Republican who was working to challenge the 2020 election, according to testimony the Jan. 6 select committee has heard from one of his former aides.\nCassidy Hutchinson, who worked under Meadows when he was former President Donald Trump’s chief of staff, told the panel investigating the Capitol attack that she saw Meadows incinerate documents after a meeting in his office with Rep. Scott Perry (R-Pa.). A person familiar with the testimony described it on condition of anonymity.\n\nThe only person who wished they were Kevin McCarthy is Mark Meadows.",
">\n\nAlways seemed like the same dude.",
">\n\nPer CNN just now, he burned papers at least a dozen times.",
">\n\nWhich is illegal on its face. But, DOJ do it's job? Fat fucking chance..",
">\n\nI have a feeling he's working with the DOJ, everything ran through him",
">\n\nAlthough wasn't he the one who called Cassidy Hutchinson before her testimony and said \"we know you'll do the right thing\" witness intimidation thing?",
">\n\nThat is straight-up dialog out of a Mafia film.",
">\n\nOh that's totally normal. Why at my office we have a daily burning rite where we toss all evidence of our criminality in the bin and make s'mores. Nothing wrong with this at all, not a single thing!",
">\n\n\"These are delicious! I can't wait to commit s'more crimes, tomorrow!\"",
">\n\nJesus. This is all illegal, what are we waiting for here??",
">\n\nWell you had the joke answers so here's the real deal.\nThe DOJ just got the complete set of transcripts.\nNow they have to cross-check everything the witnesses said to the committee with everything they said to the DOJ.\nThey do this to check for lies and memory lapses. The liars then get indicted and hopefully flipped. The folks with bad memories get a chance to amend their statements.\nEach statement then has to be cross-checked against every other statement the DOJ has received. Again they check for lies and mistakes. And again they indict liars and fix errors.\nThey do this because they aren't like Bill Durham. He took his Trump Russia investigation to court and lost his case because he didn't resolve inconsistencies before the trial.\nAssuming that you want the DOJ to win, you need to wait a while before expecting action.",
">\n\nThanks for the detailed answer. I do understand it takes time. Married to a lawyer here. But even my lawyer spouse is pretty convinced nothing is going to happen. They have had portions of the testimony for months. I want to be wrong. But it has been 2 years now. That's a long time. It should be a huge priority, disturbing it is not.",
">\n\nAn attorney acquaintance put it best - 'Federal attention is like a drunk hippo; it may take a long time to meander towards you, but once it's close up, it's attention is unmistakeable for anything else.'",
">\n\nThe thing is we all know that all this horribly corrupt stuff took place. The question is, how do we make the other side of the table understand that this stuff actually happened?",
">\n\nThey don't care. They're beyond caring about legality, morality, rationality or anything decent if it means they don't win by owning the Democrats.",
">\n\nThis is why I honestly feel this country is screwed at times. You would think that regardless of political affiliation that we could all agree to not burning government documents. Furthermore, we should easily all be able to agree that it is a bad thing. But even with something as very obvious as this being a bad thing, you will find a large number of people being okay with it.\nIdea of people burning documents. The cases of trying it down the toilet. Like this sort of stuff should not be occurring and should have stopped."
] |
>
Really outrageous behavior with consciousness of guilt. You only burn papers in the White House for one reason.
|
[
"Was this the White House or Tony Soprano's house? Burning documents, flushing documents... Drain the swamp my ass.",
">\n\nOh, they thought they were Tony Soprano. I wish the world would cut to black for a moment and they would all just disappear.",
">\n\nDon't stop believin'.",
">\n\nConservatives support this type of treason. Never forget.",
">\n\nOverwhelming majority of elected Republicans are still working to cover up all the treason.",
">\n\nWhy do republicans hate America?",
">\n\nThey hate everything except POWER",
">\n\nNothing says innocent like destroying evidence.",
">\n\nThat huge sigh of relief you hear is coming from Fawn Hall lol.",
">\n\n\nThen-White House chief of staff Mark Meadows burned papers in his office after meeting with a House Republican who was working to challenge the 2020 election, according to testimony the Jan. 6 select committee has heard from one of his former aides.\nCassidy Hutchinson, who worked under Meadows when he was former President Donald Trump’s chief of staff, told the panel investigating the Capitol attack that she saw Meadows incinerate documents after a meeting in his office with Rep. Scott Perry (R-Pa.). A person familiar with the testimony described it on condition of anonymity.\n\nThe only person who wished they were Kevin McCarthy is Mark Meadows.",
">\n\nAlways seemed like the same dude.",
">\n\nPer CNN just now, he burned papers at least a dozen times.",
">\n\nWhich is illegal on its face. But, DOJ do it's job? Fat fucking chance..",
">\n\nI have a feeling he's working with the DOJ, everything ran through him",
">\n\nAlthough wasn't he the one who called Cassidy Hutchinson before her testimony and said \"we know you'll do the right thing\" witness intimidation thing?",
">\n\nThat is straight-up dialog out of a Mafia film.",
">\n\nOh that's totally normal. Why at my office we have a daily burning rite where we toss all evidence of our criminality in the bin and make s'mores. Nothing wrong with this at all, not a single thing!",
">\n\n\"These are delicious! I can't wait to commit s'more crimes, tomorrow!\"",
">\n\nJesus. This is all illegal, what are we waiting for here??",
">\n\nWell you had the joke answers so here's the real deal.\nThe DOJ just got the complete set of transcripts.\nNow they have to cross-check everything the witnesses said to the committee with everything they said to the DOJ.\nThey do this to check for lies and memory lapses. The liars then get indicted and hopefully flipped. The folks with bad memories get a chance to amend their statements.\nEach statement then has to be cross-checked against every other statement the DOJ has received. Again they check for lies and mistakes. And again they indict liars and fix errors.\nThey do this because they aren't like Bill Durham. He took his Trump Russia investigation to court and lost his case because he didn't resolve inconsistencies before the trial.\nAssuming that you want the DOJ to win, you need to wait a while before expecting action.",
">\n\nThanks for the detailed answer. I do understand it takes time. Married to a lawyer here. But even my lawyer spouse is pretty convinced nothing is going to happen. They have had portions of the testimony for months. I want to be wrong. But it has been 2 years now. That's a long time. It should be a huge priority, disturbing it is not.",
">\n\nAn attorney acquaintance put it best - 'Federal attention is like a drunk hippo; it may take a long time to meander towards you, but once it's close up, it's attention is unmistakeable for anything else.'",
">\n\nThe thing is we all know that all this horribly corrupt stuff took place. The question is, how do we make the other side of the table understand that this stuff actually happened?",
">\n\nThey don't care. They're beyond caring about legality, morality, rationality or anything decent if it means they don't win by owning the Democrats.",
">\n\nThis is why I honestly feel this country is screwed at times. You would think that regardless of political affiliation that we could all agree to not burning government documents. Furthermore, we should easily all be able to agree that it is a bad thing. But even with something as very obvious as this being a bad thing, you will find a large number of people being okay with it.\nIdea of people burning documents. The cases of trying it down the toilet. Like this sort of stuff should not be occurring and should have stopped.",
">\n\nPretty wild how all that it takes to be held completely unaccountable for domestic and global crimes against humanity is to burn, flush or swallow paper."
] |
>
Nothing to see here, just your normal post-meeting brazier ritual. Totally normal, right?
|
[
"Was this the White House or Tony Soprano's house? Burning documents, flushing documents... Drain the swamp my ass.",
">\n\nOh, they thought they were Tony Soprano. I wish the world would cut to black for a moment and they would all just disappear.",
">\n\nDon't stop believin'.",
">\n\nConservatives support this type of treason. Never forget.",
">\n\nOverwhelming majority of elected Republicans are still working to cover up all the treason.",
">\n\nWhy do republicans hate America?",
">\n\nThey hate everything except POWER",
">\n\nNothing says innocent like destroying evidence.",
">\n\nThat huge sigh of relief you hear is coming from Fawn Hall lol.",
">\n\n\nThen-White House chief of staff Mark Meadows burned papers in his office after meeting with a House Republican who was working to challenge the 2020 election, according to testimony the Jan. 6 select committee has heard from one of his former aides.\nCassidy Hutchinson, who worked under Meadows when he was former President Donald Trump’s chief of staff, told the panel investigating the Capitol attack that she saw Meadows incinerate documents after a meeting in his office with Rep. Scott Perry (R-Pa.). A person familiar with the testimony described it on condition of anonymity.\n\nThe only person who wished they were Kevin McCarthy is Mark Meadows.",
">\n\nAlways seemed like the same dude.",
">\n\nPer CNN just now, he burned papers at least a dozen times.",
">\n\nWhich is illegal on its face. But, DOJ do it's job? Fat fucking chance..",
">\n\nI have a feeling he's working with the DOJ, everything ran through him",
">\n\nAlthough wasn't he the one who called Cassidy Hutchinson before her testimony and said \"we know you'll do the right thing\" witness intimidation thing?",
">\n\nThat is straight-up dialog out of a Mafia film.",
">\n\nOh that's totally normal. Why at my office we have a daily burning rite where we toss all evidence of our criminality in the bin and make s'mores. Nothing wrong with this at all, not a single thing!",
">\n\n\"These are delicious! I can't wait to commit s'more crimes, tomorrow!\"",
">\n\nJesus. This is all illegal, what are we waiting for here??",
">\n\nWell you had the joke answers so here's the real deal.\nThe DOJ just got the complete set of transcripts.\nNow they have to cross-check everything the witnesses said to the committee with everything they said to the DOJ.\nThey do this to check for lies and memory lapses. The liars then get indicted and hopefully flipped. The folks with bad memories get a chance to amend their statements.\nEach statement then has to be cross-checked against every other statement the DOJ has received. Again they check for lies and mistakes. And again they indict liars and fix errors.\nThey do this because they aren't like Bill Durham. He took his Trump Russia investigation to court and lost his case because he didn't resolve inconsistencies before the trial.\nAssuming that you want the DOJ to win, you need to wait a while before expecting action.",
">\n\nThanks for the detailed answer. I do understand it takes time. Married to a lawyer here. But even my lawyer spouse is pretty convinced nothing is going to happen. They have had portions of the testimony for months. I want to be wrong. But it has been 2 years now. That's a long time. It should be a huge priority, disturbing it is not.",
">\n\nAn attorney acquaintance put it best - 'Federal attention is like a drunk hippo; it may take a long time to meander towards you, but once it's close up, it's attention is unmistakeable for anything else.'",
">\n\nThe thing is we all know that all this horribly corrupt stuff took place. The question is, how do we make the other side of the table understand that this stuff actually happened?",
">\n\nThey don't care. They're beyond caring about legality, morality, rationality or anything decent if it means they don't win by owning the Democrats.",
">\n\nThis is why I honestly feel this country is screwed at times. You would think that regardless of political affiliation that we could all agree to not burning government documents. Furthermore, we should easily all be able to agree that it is a bad thing. But even with something as very obvious as this being a bad thing, you will find a large number of people being okay with it.\nIdea of people burning documents. The cases of trying it down the toilet. Like this sort of stuff should not be occurring and should have stopped.",
">\n\nPretty wild how all that it takes to be held completely unaccountable for domestic and global crimes against humanity is to burn, flush or swallow paper.",
">\n\nReally outrageous behavior with consciousness of guilt. You only burn papers in the White House for one reason."
] |
>
Is that a clear indication they were discussing something criminal, or what?
|
[
"Was this the White House or Tony Soprano's house? Burning documents, flushing documents... Drain the swamp my ass.",
">\n\nOh, they thought they were Tony Soprano. I wish the world would cut to black for a moment and they would all just disappear.",
">\n\nDon't stop believin'.",
">\n\nConservatives support this type of treason. Never forget.",
">\n\nOverwhelming majority of elected Republicans are still working to cover up all the treason.",
">\n\nWhy do republicans hate America?",
">\n\nThey hate everything except POWER",
">\n\nNothing says innocent like destroying evidence.",
">\n\nThat huge sigh of relief you hear is coming from Fawn Hall lol.",
">\n\n\nThen-White House chief of staff Mark Meadows burned papers in his office after meeting with a House Republican who was working to challenge the 2020 election, according to testimony the Jan. 6 select committee has heard from one of his former aides.\nCassidy Hutchinson, who worked under Meadows when he was former President Donald Trump’s chief of staff, told the panel investigating the Capitol attack that she saw Meadows incinerate documents after a meeting in his office with Rep. Scott Perry (R-Pa.). A person familiar with the testimony described it on condition of anonymity.\n\nThe only person who wished they were Kevin McCarthy is Mark Meadows.",
">\n\nAlways seemed like the same dude.",
">\n\nPer CNN just now, he burned papers at least a dozen times.",
">\n\nWhich is illegal on its face. But, DOJ do it's job? Fat fucking chance..",
">\n\nI have a feeling he's working with the DOJ, everything ran through him",
">\n\nAlthough wasn't he the one who called Cassidy Hutchinson before her testimony and said \"we know you'll do the right thing\" witness intimidation thing?",
">\n\nThat is straight-up dialog out of a Mafia film.",
">\n\nOh that's totally normal. Why at my office we have a daily burning rite where we toss all evidence of our criminality in the bin and make s'mores. Nothing wrong with this at all, not a single thing!",
">\n\n\"These are delicious! I can't wait to commit s'more crimes, tomorrow!\"",
">\n\nJesus. This is all illegal, what are we waiting for here??",
">\n\nWell you had the joke answers so here's the real deal.\nThe DOJ just got the complete set of transcripts.\nNow they have to cross-check everything the witnesses said to the committee with everything they said to the DOJ.\nThey do this to check for lies and memory lapses. The liars then get indicted and hopefully flipped. The folks with bad memories get a chance to amend their statements.\nEach statement then has to be cross-checked against every other statement the DOJ has received. Again they check for lies and mistakes. And again they indict liars and fix errors.\nThey do this because they aren't like Bill Durham. He took his Trump Russia investigation to court and lost his case because he didn't resolve inconsistencies before the trial.\nAssuming that you want the DOJ to win, you need to wait a while before expecting action.",
">\n\nThanks for the detailed answer. I do understand it takes time. Married to a lawyer here. But even my lawyer spouse is pretty convinced nothing is going to happen. They have had portions of the testimony for months. I want to be wrong. But it has been 2 years now. That's a long time. It should be a huge priority, disturbing it is not.",
">\n\nAn attorney acquaintance put it best - 'Federal attention is like a drunk hippo; it may take a long time to meander towards you, but once it's close up, it's attention is unmistakeable for anything else.'",
">\n\nThe thing is we all know that all this horribly corrupt stuff took place. The question is, how do we make the other side of the table understand that this stuff actually happened?",
">\n\nThey don't care. They're beyond caring about legality, morality, rationality or anything decent if it means they don't win by owning the Democrats.",
">\n\nThis is why I honestly feel this country is screwed at times. You would think that regardless of political affiliation that we could all agree to not burning government documents. Furthermore, we should easily all be able to agree that it is a bad thing. But even with something as very obvious as this being a bad thing, you will find a large number of people being okay with it.\nIdea of people burning documents. The cases of trying it down the toilet. Like this sort of stuff should not be occurring and should have stopped.",
">\n\nPretty wild how all that it takes to be held completely unaccountable for domestic and global crimes against humanity is to burn, flush or swallow paper.",
">\n\nReally outrageous behavior with consciousness of guilt. You only burn papers in the White House for one reason.",
">\n\nNothing to see here, just your normal post-meeting brazier ritual. Totally normal, right?"
] |
>
Oh come on, people who hate America and want to undermine our country do stuff like this all the time.
|
[
"Was this the White House or Tony Soprano's house? Burning documents, flushing documents... Drain the swamp my ass.",
">\n\nOh, they thought they were Tony Soprano. I wish the world would cut to black for a moment and they would all just disappear.",
">\n\nDon't stop believin'.",
">\n\nConservatives support this type of treason. Never forget.",
">\n\nOverwhelming majority of elected Republicans are still working to cover up all the treason.",
">\n\nWhy do republicans hate America?",
">\n\nThey hate everything except POWER",
">\n\nNothing says innocent like destroying evidence.",
">\n\nThat huge sigh of relief you hear is coming from Fawn Hall lol.",
">\n\n\nThen-White House chief of staff Mark Meadows burned papers in his office after meeting with a House Republican who was working to challenge the 2020 election, according to testimony the Jan. 6 select committee has heard from one of his former aides.\nCassidy Hutchinson, who worked under Meadows when he was former President Donald Trump’s chief of staff, told the panel investigating the Capitol attack that she saw Meadows incinerate documents after a meeting in his office with Rep. Scott Perry (R-Pa.). A person familiar with the testimony described it on condition of anonymity.\n\nThe only person who wished they were Kevin McCarthy is Mark Meadows.",
">\n\nAlways seemed like the same dude.",
">\n\nPer CNN just now, he burned papers at least a dozen times.",
">\n\nWhich is illegal on its face. But, DOJ do it's job? Fat fucking chance..",
">\n\nI have a feeling he's working with the DOJ, everything ran through him",
">\n\nAlthough wasn't he the one who called Cassidy Hutchinson before her testimony and said \"we know you'll do the right thing\" witness intimidation thing?",
">\n\nThat is straight-up dialog out of a Mafia film.",
">\n\nOh that's totally normal. Why at my office we have a daily burning rite where we toss all evidence of our criminality in the bin and make s'mores. Nothing wrong with this at all, not a single thing!",
">\n\n\"These are delicious! I can't wait to commit s'more crimes, tomorrow!\"",
">\n\nJesus. This is all illegal, what are we waiting for here??",
">\n\nWell you had the joke answers so here's the real deal.\nThe DOJ just got the complete set of transcripts.\nNow they have to cross-check everything the witnesses said to the committee with everything they said to the DOJ.\nThey do this to check for lies and memory lapses. The liars then get indicted and hopefully flipped. The folks with bad memories get a chance to amend their statements.\nEach statement then has to be cross-checked against every other statement the DOJ has received. Again they check for lies and mistakes. And again they indict liars and fix errors.\nThey do this because they aren't like Bill Durham. He took his Trump Russia investigation to court and lost his case because he didn't resolve inconsistencies before the trial.\nAssuming that you want the DOJ to win, you need to wait a while before expecting action.",
">\n\nThanks for the detailed answer. I do understand it takes time. Married to a lawyer here. But even my lawyer spouse is pretty convinced nothing is going to happen. They have had portions of the testimony for months. I want to be wrong. But it has been 2 years now. That's a long time. It should be a huge priority, disturbing it is not.",
">\n\nAn attorney acquaintance put it best - 'Federal attention is like a drunk hippo; it may take a long time to meander towards you, but once it's close up, it's attention is unmistakeable for anything else.'",
">\n\nThe thing is we all know that all this horribly corrupt stuff took place. The question is, how do we make the other side of the table understand that this stuff actually happened?",
">\n\nThey don't care. They're beyond caring about legality, morality, rationality or anything decent if it means they don't win by owning the Democrats.",
">\n\nThis is why I honestly feel this country is screwed at times. You would think that regardless of political affiliation that we could all agree to not burning government documents. Furthermore, we should easily all be able to agree that it is a bad thing. But even with something as very obvious as this being a bad thing, you will find a large number of people being okay with it.\nIdea of people burning documents. The cases of trying it down the toilet. Like this sort of stuff should not be occurring and should have stopped.",
">\n\nPretty wild how all that it takes to be held completely unaccountable for domestic and global crimes against humanity is to burn, flush or swallow paper.",
">\n\nReally outrageous behavior with consciousness of guilt. You only burn papers in the White House for one reason.",
">\n\nNothing to see here, just your normal post-meeting brazier ritual. Totally normal, right?",
">\n\nIs that a clear indication they were discussing something criminal, or what?"
] |
>
They don't hate America - they hate that there are Americans who aren't like them.
|
[
"Was this the White House or Tony Soprano's house? Burning documents, flushing documents... Drain the swamp my ass.",
">\n\nOh, they thought they were Tony Soprano. I wish the world would cut to black for a moment and they would all just disappear.",
">\n\nDon't stop believin'.",
">\n\nConservatives support this type of treason. Never forget.",
">\n\nOverwhelming majority of elected Republicans are still working to cover up all the treason.",
">\n\nWhy do republicans hate America?",
">\n\nThey hate everything except POWER",
">\n\nNothing says innocent like destroying evidence.",
">\n\nThat huge sigh of relief you hear is coming from Fawn Hall lol.",
">\n\n\nThen-White House chief of staff Mark Meadows burned papers in his office after meeting with a House Republican who was working to challenge the 2020 election, according to testimony the Jan. 6 select committee has heard from one of his former aides.\nCassidy Hutchinson, who worked under Meadows when he was former President Donald Trump’s chief of staff, told the panel investigating the Capitol attack that she saw Meadows incinerate documents after a meeting in his office with Rep. Scott Perry (R-Pa.). A person familiar with the testimony described it on condition of anonymity.\n\nThe only person who wished they were Kevin McCarthy is Mark Meadows.",
">\n\nAlways seemed like the same dude.",
">\n\nPer CNN just now, he burned papers at least a dozen times.",
">\n\nWhich is illegal on its face. But, DOJ do it's job? Fat fucking chance..",
">\n\nI have a feeling he's working with the DOJ, everything ran through him",
">\n\nAlthough wasn't he the one who called Cassidy Hutchinson before her testimony and said \"we know you'll do the right thing\" witness intimidation thing?",
">\n\nThat is straight-up dialog out of a Mafia film.",
">\n\nOh that's totally normal. Why at my office we have a daily burning rite where we toss all evidence of our criminality in the bin and make s'mores. Nothing wrong with this at all, not a single thing!",
">\n\n\"These are delicious! I can't wait to commit s'more crimes, tomorrow!\"",
">\n\nJesus. This is all illegal, what are we waiting for here??",
">\n\nWell you had the joke answers so here's the real deal.\nThe DOJ just got the complete set of transcripts.\nNow they have to cross-check everything the witnesses said to the committee with everything they said to the DOJ.\nThey do this to check for lies and memory lapses. The liars then get indicted and hopefully flipped. The folks with bad memories get a chance to amend their statements.\nEach statement then has to be cross-checked against every other statement the DOJ has received. Again they check for lies and mistakes. And again they indict liars and fix errors.\nThey do this because they aren't like Bill Durham. He took his Trump Russia investigation to court and lost his case because he didn't resolve inconsistencies before the trial.\nAssuming that you want the DOJ to win, you need to wait a while before expecting action.",
">\n\nThanks for the detailed answer. I do understand it takes time. Married to a lawyer here. But even my lawyer spouse is pretty convinced nothing is going to happen. They have had portions of the testimony for months. I want to be wrong. But it has been 2 years now. That's a long time. It should be a huge priority, disturbing it is not.",
">\n\nAn attorney acquaintance put it best - 'Federal attention is like a drunk hippo; it may take a long time to meander towards you, but once it's close up, it's attention is unmistakeable for anything else.'",
">\n\nThe thing is we all know that all this horribly corrupt stuff took place. The question is, how do we make the other side of the table understand that this stuff actually happened?",
">\n\nThey don't care. They're beyond caring about legality, morality, rationality or anything decent if it means they don't win by owning the Democrats.",
">\n\nThis is why I honestly feel this country is screwed at times. You would think that regardless of political affiliation that we could all agree to not burning government documents. Furthermore, we should easily all be able to agree that it is a bad thing. But even with something as very obvious as this being a bad thing, you will find a large number of people being okay with it.\nIdea of people burning documents. The cases of trying it down the toilet. Like this sort of stuff should not be occurring and should have stopped.",
">\n\nPretty wild how all that it takes to be held completely unaccountable for domestic and global crimes against humanity is to burn, flush or swallow paper.",
">\n\nReally outrageous behavior with consciousness of guilt. You only burn papers in the White House for one reason.",
">\n\nNothing to see here, just your normal post-meeting brazier ritual. Totally normal, right?",
">\n\nIs that a clear indication they were discussing something criminal, or what?",
">\n\nOh come on, people who hate America and want to undermine our country do stuff like this all the time."
] |
>
then they hate america until they’re all gone. these people aren’t driven by love, they are driven by hate
|
[
"Was this the White House or Tony Soprano's house? Burning documents, flushing documents... Drain the swamp my ass.",
">\n\nOh, they thought they were Tony Soprano. I wish the world would cut to black for a moment and they would all just disappear.",
">\n\nDon't stop believin'.",
">\n\nConservatives support this type of treason. Never forget.",
">\n\nOverwhelming majority of elected Republicans are still working to cover up all the treason.",
">\n\nWhy do republicans hate America?",
">\n\nThey hate everything except POWER",
">\n\nNothing says innocent like destroying evidence.",
">\n\nThat huge sigh of relief you hear is coming from Fawn Hall lol.",
">\n\n\nThen-White House chief of staff Mark Meadows burned papers in his office after meeting with a House Republican who was working to challenge the 2020 election, according to testimony the Jan. 6 select committee has heard from one of his former aides.\nCassidy Hutchinson, who worked under Meadows when he was former President Donald Trump’s chief of staff, told the panel investigating the Capitol attack that she saw Meadows incinerate documents after a meeting in his office with Rep. Scott Perry (R-Pa.). A person familiar with the testimony described it on condition of anonymity.\n\nThe only person who wished they were Kevin McCarthy is Mark Meadows.",
">\n\nAlways seemed like the same dude.",
">\n\nPer CNN just now, he burned papers at least a dozen times.",
">\n\nWhich is illegal on its face. But, DOJ do it's job? Fat fucking chance..",
">\n\nI have a feeling he's working with the DOJ, everything ran through him",
">\n\nAlthough wasn't he the one who called Cassidy Hutchinson before her testimony and said \"we know you'll do the right thing\" witness intimidation thing?",
">\n\nThat is straight-up dialog out of a Mafia film.",
">\n\nOh that's totally normal. Why at my office we have a daily burning rite where we toss all evidence of our criminality in the bin and make s'mores. Nothing wrong with this at all, not a single thing!",
">\n\n\"These are delicious! I can't wait to commit s'more crimes, tomorrow!\"",
">\n\nJesus. This is all illegal, what are we waiting for here??",
">\n\nWell you had the joke answers so here's the real deal.\nThe DOJ just got the complete set of transcripts.\nNow they have to cross-check everything the witnesses said to the committee with everything they said to the DOJ.\nThey do this to check for lies and memory lapses. The liars then get indicted and hopefully flipped. The folks with bad memories get a chance to amend their statements.\nEach statement then has to be cross-checked against every other statement the DOJ has received. Again they check for lies and mistakes. And again they indict liars and fix errors.\nThey do this because they aren't like Bill Durham. He took his Trump Russia investigation to court and lost his case because he didn't resolve inconsistencies before the trial.\nAssuming that you want the DOJ to win, you need to wait a while before expecting action.",
">\n\nThanks for the detailed answer. I do understand it takes time. Married to a lawyer here. But even my lawyer spouse is pretty convinced nothing is going to happen. They have had portions of the testimony for months. I want to be wrong. But it has been 2 years now. That's a long time. It should be a huge priority, disturbing it is not.",
">\n\nAn attorney acquaintance put it best - 'Federal attention is like a drunk hippo; it may take a long time to meander towards you, but once it's close up, it's attention is unmistakeable for anything else.'",
">\n\nThe thing is we all know that all this horribly corrupt stuff took place. The question is, how do we make the other side of the table understand that this stuff actually happened?",
">\n\nThey don't care. They're beyond caring about legality, morality, rationality or anything decent if it means they don't win by owning the Democrats.",
">\n\nThis is why I honestly feel this country is screwed at times. You would think that regardless of political affiliation that we could all agree to not burning government documents. Furthermore, we should easily all be able to agree that it is a bad thing. But even with something as very obvious as this being a bad thing, you will find a large number of people being okay with it.\nIdea of people burning documents. The cases of trying it down the toilet. Like this sort of stuff should not be occurring and should have stopped.",
">\n\nPretty wild how all that it takes to be held completely unaccountable for domestic and global crimes against humanity is to burn, flush or swallow paper.",
">\n\nReally outrageous behavior with consciousness of guilt. You only burn papers in the White House for one reason.",
">\n\nNothing to see here, just your normal post-meeting brazier ritual. Totally normal, right?",
">\n\nIs that a clear indication they were discussing something criminal, or what?",
">\n\nOh come on, people who hate America and want to undermine our country do stuff like this all the time.",
">\n\nThey don't hate America - they hate that there are Americans who aren't like them."
] |
>
I love that this makes him the most intelligent part of the administration purely because he remembered fire exists and didn't head straight for the shitter.
|
[
"Was this the White House or Tony Soprano's house? Burning documents, flushing documents... Drain the swamp my ass.",
">\n\nOh, they thought they were Tony Soprano. I wish the world would cut to black for a moment and they would all just disappear.",
">\n\nDon't stop believin'.",
">\n\nConservatives support this type of treason. Never forget.",
">\n\nOverwhelming majority of elected Republicans are still working to cover up all the treason.",
">\n\nWhy do republicans hate America?",
">\n\nThey hate everything except POWER",
">\n\nNothing says innocent like destroying evidence.",
">\n\nThat huge sigh of relief you hear is coming from Fawn Hall lol.",
">\n\n\nThen-White House chief of staff Mark Meadows burned papers in his office after meeting with a House Republican who was working to challenge the 2020 election, according to testimony the Jan. 6 select committee has heard from one of his former aides.\nCassidy Hutchinson, who worked under Meadows when he was former President Donald Trump’s chief of staff, told the panel investigating the Capitol attack that she saw Meadows incinerate documents after a meeting in his office with Rep. Scott Perry (R-Pa.). A person familiar with the testimony described it on condition of anonymity.\n\nThe only person who wished they were Kevin McCarthy is Mark Meadows.",
">\n\nAlways seemed like the same dude.",
">\n\nPer CNN just now, he burned papers at least a dozen times.",
">\n\nWhich is illegal on its face. But, DOJ do it's job? Fat fucking chance..",
">\n\nI have a feeling he's working with the DOJ, everything ran through him",
">\n\nAlthough wasn't he the one who called Cassidy Hutchinson before her testimony and said \"we know you'll do the right thing\" witness intimidation thing?",
">\n\nThat is straight-up dialog out of a Mafia film.",
">\n\nOh that's totally normal. Why at my office we have a daily burning rite where we toss all evidence of our criminality in the bin and make s'mores. Nothing wrong with this at all, not a single thing!",
">\n\n\"These are delicious! I can't wait to commit s'more crimes, tomorrow!\"",
">\n\nJesus. This is all illegal, what are we waiting for here??",
">\n\nWell you had the joke answers so here's the real deal.\nThe DOJ just got the complete set of transcripts.\nNow they have to cross-check everything the witnesses said to the committee with everything they said to the DOJ.\nThey do this to check for lies and memory lapses. The liars then get indicted and hopefully flipped. The folks with bad memories get a chance to amend their statements.\nEach statement then has to be cross-checked against every other statement the DOJ has received. Again they check for lies and mistakes. And again they indict liars and fix errors.\nThey do this because they aren't like Bill Durham. He took his Trump Russia investigation to court and lost his case because he didn't resolve inconsistencies before the trial.\nAssuming that you want the DOJ to win, you need to wait a while before expecting action.",
">\n\nThanks for the detailed answer. I do understand it takes time. Married to a lawyer here. But even my lawyer spouse is pretty convinced nothing is going to happen. They have had portions of the testimony for months. I want to be wrong. But it has been 2 years now. That's a long time. It should be a huge priority, disturbing it is not.",
">\n\nAn attorney acquaintance put it best - 'Federal attention is like a drunk hippo; it may take a long time to meander towards you, but once it's close up, it's attention is unmistakeable for anything else.'",
">\n\nThe thing is we all know that all this horribly corrupt stuff took place. The question is, how do we make the other side of the table understand that this stuff actually happened?",
">\n\nThey don't care. They're beyond caring about legality, morality, rationality or anything decent if it means they don't win by owning the Democrats.",
">\n\nThis is why I honestly feel this country is screwed at times. You would think that regardless of political affiliation that we could all agree to not burning government documents. Furthermore, we should easily all be able to agree that it is a bad thing. But even with something as very obvious as this being a bad thing, you will find a large number of people being okay with it.\nIdea of people burning documents. The cases of trying it down the toilet. Like this sort of stuff should not be occurring and should have stopped.",
">\n\nPretty wild how all that it takes to be held completely unaccountable for domestic and global crimes against humanity is to burn, flush or swallow paper.",
">\n\nReally outrageous behavior with consciousness of guilt. You only burn papers in the White House for one reason.",
">\n\nNothing to see here, just your normal post-meeting brazier ritual. Totally normal, right?",
">\n\nIs that a clear indication they were discussing something criminal, or what?",
">\n\nOh come on, people who hate America and want to undermine our country do stuff like this all the time.",
">\n\nThey don't hate America - they hate that there are Americans who aren't like them.",
">\n\nthen they hate america until they’re all gone. these people aren’t driven by love, they are driven by hate"
] |
>
I have doubts that Trump will see justice, but Meadows is looking proper fucked.
|
[
"Was this the White House or Tony Soprano's house? Burning documents, flushing documents... Drain the swamp my ass.",
">\n\nOh, they thought they were Tony Soprano. I wish the world would cut to black for a moment and they would all just disappear.",
">\n\nDon't stop believin'.",
">\n\nConservatives support this type of treason. Never forget.",
">\n\nOverwhelming majority of elected Republicans are still working to cover up all the treason.",
">\n\nWhy do republicans hate America?",
">\n\nThey hate everything except POWER",
">\n\nNothing says innocent like destroying evidence.",
">\n\nThat huge sigh of relief you hear is coming from Fawn Hall lol.",
">\n\n\nThen-White House chief of staff Mark Meadows burned papers in his office after meeting with a House Republican who was working to challenge the 2020 election, according to testimony the Jan. 6 select committee has heard from one of his former aides.\nCassidy Hutchinson, who worked under Meadows when he was former President Donald Trump’s chief of staff, told the panel investigating the Capitol attack that she saw Meadows incinerate documents after a meeting in his office with Rep. Scott Perry (R-Pa.). A person familiar with the testimony described it on condition of anonymity.\n\nThe only person who wished they were Kevin McCarthy is Mark Meadows.",
">\n\nAlways seemed like the same dude.",
">\n\nPer CNN just now, he burned papers at least a dozen times.",
">\n\nWhich is illegal on its face. But, DOJ do it's job? Fat fucking chance..",
">\n\nI have a feeling he's working with the DOJ, everything ran through him",
">\n\nAlthough wasn't he the one who called Cassidy Hutchinson before her testimony and said \"we know you'll do the right thing\" witness intimidation thing?",
">\n\nThat is straight-up dialog out of a Mafia film.",
">\n\nOh that's totally normal. Why at my office we have a daily burning rite where we toss all evidence of our criminality in the bin and make s'mores. Nothing wrong with this at all, not a single thing!",
">\n\n\"These are delicious! I can't wait to commit s'more crimes, tomorrow!\"",
">\n\nJesus. This is all illegal, what are we waiting for here??",
">\n\nWell you had the joke answers so here's the real deal.\nThe DOJ just got the complete set of transcripts.\nNow they have to cross-check everything the witnesses said to the committee with everything they said to the DOJ.\nThey do this to check for lies and memory lapses. The liars then get indicted and hopefully flipped. The folks with bad memories get a chance to amend their statements.\nEach statement then has to be cross-checked against every other statement the DOJ has received. Again they check for lies and mistakes. And again they indict liars and fix errors.\nThey do this because they aren't like Bill Durham. He took his Trump Russia investigation to court and lost his case because he didn't resolve inconsistencies before the trial.\nAssuming that you want the DOJ to win, you need to wait a while before expecting action.",
">\n\nThanks for the detailed answer. I do understand it takes time. Married to a lawyer here. But even my lawyer spouse is pretty convinced nothing is going to happen. They have had portions of the testimony for months. I want to be wrong. But it has been 2 years now. That's a long time. It should be a huge priority, disturbing it is not.",
">\n\nAn attorney acquaintance put it best - 'Federal attention is like a drunk hippo; it may take a long time to meander towards you, but once it's close up, it's attention is unmistakeable for anything else.'",
">\n\nThe thing is we all know that all this horribly corrupt stuff took place. The question is, how do we make the other side of the table understand that this stuff actually happened?",
">\n\nThey don't care. They're beyond caring about legality, morality, rationality or anything decent if it means they don't win by owning the Democrats.",
">\n\nThis is why I honestly feel this country is screwed at times. You would think that regardless of political affiliation that we could all agree to not burning government documents. Furthermore, we should easily all be able to agree that it is a bad thing. But even with something as very obvious as this being a bad thing, you will find a large number of people being okay with it.\nIdea of people burning documents. The cases of trying it down the toilet. Like this sort of stuff should not be occurring and should have stopped.",
">\n\nPretty wild how all that it takes to be held completely unaccountable for domestic and global crimes against humanity is to burn, flush or swallow paper.",
">\n\nReally outrageous behavior with consciousness of guilt. You only burn papers in the White House for one reason.",
">\n\nNothing to see here, just your normal post-meeting brazier ritual. Totally normal, right?",
">\n\nIs that a clear indication they were discussing something criminal, or what?",
">\n\nOh come on, people who hate America and want to undermine our country do stuff like this all the time.",
">\n\nThey don't hate America - they hate that there are Americans who aren't like them.",
">\n\nthen they hate america until they’re all gone. these people aren’t driven by love, they are driven by hate",
">\n\nI love that this makes him the most intelligent part of the administration purely because he remembered fire exists and didn't head straight for the shitter."
] |
>
If meadows is fucked, then trump is, too. meadows WILL flip if threatened with serious jail time.
|
[
"Was this the White House or Tony Soprano's house? Burning documents, flushing documents... Drain the swamp my ass.",
">\n\nOh, they thought they were Tony Soprano. I wish the world would cut to black for a moment and they would all just disappear.",
">\n\nDon't stop believin'.",
">\n\nConservatives support this type of treason. Never forget.",
">\n\nOverwhelming majority of elected Republicans are still working to cover up all the treason.",
">\n\nWhy do republicans hate America?",
">\n\nThey hate everything except POWER",
">\n\nNothing says innocent like destroying evidence.",
">\n\nThat huge sigh of relief you hear is coming from Fawn Hall lol.",
">\n\n\nThen-White House chief of staff Mark Meadows burned papers in his office after meeting with a House Republican who was working to challenge the 2020 election, according to testimony the Jan. 6 select committee has heard from one of his former aides.\nCassidy Hutchinson, who worked under Meadows when he was former President Donald Trump’s chief of staff, told the panel investigating the Capitol attack that she saw Meadows incinerate documents after a meeting in his office with Rep. Scott Perry (R-Pa.). A person familiar with the testimony described it on condition of anonymity.\n\nThe only person who wished they were Kevin McCarthy is Mark Meadows.",
">\n\nAlways seemed like the same dude.",
">\n\nPer CNN just now, he burned papers at least a dozen times.",
">\n\nWhich is illegal on its face. But, DOJ do it's job? Fat fucking chance..",
">\n\nI have a feeling he's working with the DOJ, everything ran through him",
">\n\nAlthough wasn't he the one who called Cassidy Hutchinson before her testimony and said \"we know you'll do the right thing\" witness intimidation thing?",
">\n\nThat is straight-up dialog out of a Mafia film.",
">\n\nOh that's totally normal. Why at my office we have a daily burning rite where we toss all evidence of our criminality in the bin and make s'mores. Nothing wrong with this at all, not a single thing!",
">\n\n\"These are delicious! I can't wait to commit s'more crimes, tomorrow!\"",
">\n\nJesus. This is all illegal, what are we waiting for here??",
">\n\nWell you had the joke answers so here's the real deal.\nThe DOJ just got the complete set of transcripts.\nNow they have to cross-check everything the witnesses said to the committee with everything they said to the DOJ.\nThey do this to check for lies and memory lapses. The liars then get indicted and hopefully flipped. The folks with bad memories get a chance to amend their statements.\nEach statement then has to be cross-checked against every other statement the DOJ has received. Again they check for lies and mistakes. And again they indict liars and fix errors.\nThey do this because they aren't like Bill Durham. He took his Trump Russia investigation to court and lost his case because he didn't resolve inconsistencies before the trial.\nAssuming that you want the DOJ to win, you need to wait a while before expecting action.",
">\n\nThanks for the detailed answer. I do understand it takes time. Married to a lawyer here. But even my lawyer spouse is pretty convinced nothing is going to happen. They have had portions of the testimony for months. I want to be wrong. But it has been 2 years now. That's a long time. It should be a huge priority, disturbing it is not.",
">\n\nAn attorney acquaintance put it best - 'Federal attention is like a drunk hippo; it may take a long time to meander towards you, but once it's close up, it's attention is unmistakeable for anything else.'",
">\n\nThe thing is we all know that all this horribly corrupt stuff took place. The question is, how do we make the other side of the table understand that this stuff actually happened?",
">\n\nThey don't care. They're beyond caring about legality, morality, rationality or anything decent if it means they don't win by owning the Democrats.",
">\n\nThis is why I honestly feel this country is screwed at times. You would think that regardless of political affiliation that we could all agree to not burning government documents. Furthermore, we should easily all be able to agree that it is a bad thing. But even with something as very obvious as this being a bad thing, you will find a large number of people being okay with it.\nIdea of people burning documents. The cases of trying it down the toilet. Like this sort of stuff should not be occurring and should have stopped.",
">\n\nPretty wild how all that it takes to be held completely unaccountable for domestic and global crimes against humanity is to burn, flush or swallow paper.",
">\n\nReally outrageous behavior with consciousness of guilt. You only burn papers in the White House for one reason.",
">\n\nNothing to see here, just your normal post-meeting brazier ritual. Totally normal, right?",
">\n\nIs that a clear indication they were discussing something criminal, or what?",
">\n\nOh come on, people who hate America and want to undermine our country do stuff like this all the time.",
">\n\nThey don't hate America - they hate that there are Americans who aren't like them.",
">\n\nthen they hate america until they’re all gone. these people aren’t driven by love, they are driven by hate",
">\n\nI love that this makes him the most intelligent part of the administration purely because he remembered fire exists and didn't head straight for the shitter.",
">\n\nI have doubts that Trump will see justice, but Meadows is looking proper fucked."
] |
>
I'm sure you're right that Meadows would flip, but then I expect the same BS happen there that happened with the sex trafficking charges against Gaetz. Charges were not filed bc the source was considered unreliable because they were getting a better deal for flipping essentially.
|
[
"Was this the White House or Tony Soprano's house? Burning documents, flushing documents... Drain the swamp my ass.",
">\n\nOh, they thought they were Tony Soprano. I wish the world would cut to black for a moment and they would all just disappear.",
">\n\nDon't stop believin'.",
">\n\nConservatives support this type of treason. Never forget.",
">\n\nOverwhelming majority of elected Republicans are still working to cover up all the treason.",
">\n\nWhy do republicans hate America?",
">\n\nThey hate everything except POWER",
">\n\nNothing says innocent like destroying evidence.",
">\n\nThat huge sigh of relief you hear is coming from Fawn Hall lol.",
">\n\n\nThen-White House chief of staff Mark Meadows burned papers in his office after meeting with a House Republican who was working to challenge the 2020 election, according to testimony the Jan. 6 select committee has heard from one of his former aides.\nCassidy Hutchinson, who worked under Meadows when he was former President Donald Trump’s chief of staff, told the panel investigating the Capitol attack that she saw Meadows incinerate documents after a meeting in his office with Rep. Scott Perry (R-Pa.). A person familiar with the testimony described it on condition of anonymity.\n\nThe only person who wished they were Kevin McCarthy is Mark Meadows.",
">\n\nAlways seemed like the same dude.",
">\n\nPer CNN just now, he burned papers at least a dozen times.",
">\n\nWhich is illegal on its face. But, DOJ do it's job? Fat fucking chance..",
">\n\nI have a feeling he's working with the DOJ, everything ran through him",
">\n\nAlthough wasn't he the one who called Cassidy Hutchinson before her testimony and said \"we know you'll do the right thing\" witness intimidation thing?",
">\n\nThat is straight-up dialog out of a Mafia film.",
">\n\nOh that's totally normal. Why at my office we have a daily burning rite where we toss all evidence of our criminality in the bin and make s'mores. Nothing wrong with this at all, not a single thing!",
">\n\n\"These are delicious! I can't wait to commit s'more crimes, tomorrow!\"",
">\n\nJesus. This is all illegal, what are we waiting for here??",
">\n\nWell you had the joke answers so here's the real deal.\nThe DOJ just got the complete set of transcripts.\nNow they have to cross-check everything the witnesses said to the committee with everything they said to the DOJ.\nThey do this to check for lies and memory lapses. The liars then get indicted and hopefully flipped. The folks with bad memories get a chance to amend their statements.\nEach statement then has to be cross-checked against every other statement the DOJ has received. Again they check for lies and mistakes. And again they indict liars and fix errors.\nThey do this because they aren't like Bill Durham. He took his Trump Russia investigation to court and lost his case because he didn't resolve inconsistencies before the trial.\nAssuming that you want the DOJ to win, you need to wait a while before expecting action.",
">\n\nThanks for the detailed answer. I do understand it takes time. Married to a lawyer here. But even my lawyer spouse is pretty convinced nothing is going to happen. They have had portions of the testimony for months. I want to be wrong. But it has been 2 years now. That's a long time. It should be a huge priority, disturbing it is not.",
">\n\nAn attorney acquaintance put it best - 'Federal attention is like a drunk hippo; it may take a long time to meander towards you, but once it's close up, it's attention is unmistakeable for anything else.'",
">\n\nThe thing is we all know that all this horribly corrupt stuff took place. The question is, how do we make the other side of the table understand that this stuff actually happened?",
">\n\nThey don't care. They're beyond caring about legality, morality, rationality or anything decent if it means they don't win by owning the Democrats.",
">\n\nThis is why I honestly feel this country is screwed at times. You would think that regardless of political affiliation that we could all agree to not burning government documents. Furthermore, we should easily all be able to agree that it is a bad thing. But even with something as very obvious as this being a bad thing, you will find a large number of people being okay with it.\nIdea of people burning documents. The cases of trying it down the toilet. Like this sort of stuff should not be occurring and should have stopped.",
">\n\nPretty wild how all that it takes to be held completely unaccountable for domestic and global crimes against humanity is to burn, flush or swallow paper.",
">\n\nReally outrageous behavior with consciousness of guilt. You only burn papers in the White House for one reason.",
">\n\nNothing to see here, just your normal post-meeting brazier ritual. Totally normal, right?",
">\n\nIs that a clear indication they were discussing something criminal, or what?",
">\n\nOh come on, people who hate America and want to undermine our country do stuff like this all the time.",
">\n\nThey don't hate America - they hate that there are Americans who aren't like them.",
">\n\nthen they hate america until they’re all gone. these people aren’t driven by love, they are driven by hate",
">\n\nI love that this makes him the most intelligent part of the administration purely because he remembered fire exists and didn't head straight for the shitter.",
">\n\nI have doubts that Trump will see justice, but Meadows is looking proper fucked.",
">\n\nIf meadows is fucked, then trump is, too. meadows WILL flip if threatened with serious jail time."
] |
>
When will enough be enough? Its to the point where everyone from Trump down needs to be procuted . i for one hope Jack Smith throws the book at them no matter what government position the hold or have held.
|
[
"Was this the White House or Tony Soprano's house? Burning documents, flushing documents... Drain the swamp my ass.",
">\n\nOh, they thought they were Tony Soprano. I wish the world would cut to black for a moment and they would all just disappear.",
">\n\nDon't stop believin'.",
">\n\nConservatives support this type of treason. Never forget.",
">\n\nOverwhelming majority of elected Republicans are still working to cover up all the treason.",
">\n\nWhy do republicans hate America?",
">\n\nThey hate everything except POWER",
">\n\nNothing says innocent like destroying evidence.",
">\n\nThat huge sigh of relief you hear is coming from Fawn Hall lol.",
">\n\n\nThen-White House chief of staff Mark Meadows burned papers in his office after meeting with a House Republican who was working to challenge the 2020 election, according to testimony the Jan. 6 select committee has heard from one of his former aides.\nCassidy Hutchinson, who worked under Meadows when he was former President Donald Trump’s chief of staff, told the panel investigating the Capitol attack that she saw Meadows incinerate documents after a meeting in his office with Rep. Scott Perry (R-Pa.). A person familiar with the testimony described it on condition of anonymity.\n\nThe only person who wished they were Kevin McCarthy is Mark Meadows.",
">\n\nAlways seemed like the same dude.",
">\n\nPer CNN just now, he burned papers at least a dozen times.",
">\n\nWhich is illegal on its face. But, DOJ do it's job? Fat fucking chance..",
">\n\nI have a feeling he's working with the DOJ, everything ran through him",
">\n\nAlthough wasn't he the one who called Cassidy Hutchinson before her testimony and said \"we know you'll do the right thing\" witness intimidation thing?",
">\n\nThat is straight-up dialog out of a Mafia film.",
">\n\nOh that's totally normal. Why at my office we have a daily burning rite where we toss all evidence of our criminality in the bin and make s'mores. Nothing wrong with this at all, not a single thing!",
">\n\n\"These are delicious! I can't wait to commit s'more crimes, tomorrow!\"",
">\n\nJesus. This is all illegal, what are we waiting for here??",
">\n\nWell you had the joke answers so here's the real deal.\nThe DOJ just got the complete set of transcripts.\nNow they have to cross-check everything the witnesses said to the committee with everything they said to the DOJ.\nThey do this to check for lies and memory lapses. The liars then get indicted and hopefully flipped. The folks with bad memories get a chance to amend their statements.\nEach statement then has to be cross-checked against every other statement the DOJ has received. Again they check for lies and mistakes. And again they indict liars and fix errors.\nThey do this because they aren't like Bill Durham. He took his Trump Russia investigation to court and lost his case because he didn't resolve inconsistencies before the trial.\nAssuming that you want the DOJ to win, you need to wait a while before expecting action.",
">\n\nThanks for the detailed answer. I do understand it takes time. Married to a lawyer here. But even my lawyer spouse is pretty convinced nothing is going to happen. They have had portions of the testimony for months. I want to be wrong. But it has been 2 years now. That's a long time. It should be a huge priority, disturbing it is not.",
">\n\nAn attorney acquaintance put it best - 'Federal attention is like a drunk hippo; it may take a long time to meander towards you, but once it's close up, it's attention is unmistakeable for anything else.'",
">\n\nThe thing is we all know that all this horribly corrupt stuff took place. The question is, how do we make the other side of the table understand that this stuff actually happened?",
">\n\nThey don't care. They're beyond caring about legality, morality, rationality or anything decent if it means they don't win by owning the Democrats.",
">\n\nThis is why I honestly feel this country is screwed at times. You would think that regardless of political affiliation that we could all agree to not burning government documents. Furthermore, we should easily all be able to agree that it is a bad thing. But even with something as very obvious as this being a bad thing, you will find a large number of people being okay with it.\nIdea of people burning documents. The cases of trying it down the toilet. Like this sort of stuff should not be occurring and should have stopped.",
">\n\nPretty wild how all that it takes to be held completely unaccountable for domestic and global crimes against humanity is to burn, flush or swallow paper.",
">\n\nReally outrageous behavior with consciousness of guilt. You only burn papers in the White House for one reason.",
">\n\nNothing to see here, just your normal post-meeting brazier ritual. Totally normal, right?",
">\n\nIs that a clear indication they were discussing something criminal, or what?",
">\n\nOh come on, people who hate America and want to undermine our country do stuff like this all the time.",
">\n\nThey don't hate America - they hate that there are Americans who aren't like them.",
">\n\nthen they hate america until they’re all gone. these people aren’t driven by love, they are driven by hate",
">\n\nI love that this makes him the most intelligent part of the administration purely because he remembered fire exists and didn't head straight for the shitter.",
">\n\nI have doubts that Trump will see justice, but Meadows is looking proper fucked.",
">\n\nIf meadows is fucked, then trump is, too. meadows WILL flip if threatened with serious jail time.",
">\n\nI'm sure you're right that Meadows would flip, but then I expect the same BS happen there that happened with the sex trafficking charges against Gaetz. Charges were not filed bc the source was considered unreliable because they were getting a better deal for flipping essentially."
] |
>
Scott Perry is scum of the Earth.
|
[
"Was this the White House or Tony Soprano's house? Burning documents, flushing documents... Drain the swamp my ass.",
">\n\nOh, they thought they were Tony Soprano. I wish the world would cut to black for a moment and they would all just disappear.",
">\n\nDon't stop believin'.",
">\n\nConservatives support this type of treason. Never forget.",
">\n\nOverwhelming majority of elected Republicans are still working to cover up all the treason.",
">\n\nWhy do republicans hate America?",
">\n\nThey hate everything except POWER",
">\n\nNothing says innocent like destroying evidence.",
">\n\nThat huge sigh of relief you hear is coming from Fawn Hall lol.",
">\n\n\nThen-White House chief of staff Mark Meadows burned papers in his office after meeting with a House Republican who was working to challenge the 2020 election, according to testimony the Jan. 6 select committee has heard from one of his former aides.\nCassidy Hutchinson, who worked under Meadows when he was former President Donald Trump’s chief of staff, told the panel investigating the Capitol attack that she saw Meadows incinerate documents after a meeting in his office with Rep. Scott Perry (R-Pa.). A person familiar with the testimony described it on condition of anonymity.\n\nThe only person who wished they were Kevin McCarthy is Mark Meadows.",
">\n\nAlways seemed like the same dude.",
">\n\nPer CNN just now, he burned papers at least a dozen times.",
">\n\nWhich is illegal on its face. But, DOJ do it's job? Fat fucking chance..",
">\n\nI have a feeling he's working with the DOJ, everything ran through him",
">\n\nAlthough wasn't he the one who called Cassidy Hutchinson before her testimony and said \"we know you'll do the right thing\" witness intimidation thing?",
">\n\nThat is straight-up dialog out of a Mafia film.",
">\n\nOh that's totally normal. Why at my office we have a daily burning rite where we toss all evidence of our criminality in the bin and make s'mores. Nothing wrong with this at all, not a single thing!",
">\n\n\"These are delicious! I can't wait to commit s'more crimes, tomorrow!\"",
">\n\nJesus. This is all illegal, what are we waiting for here??",
">\n\nWell you had the joke answers so here's the real deal.\nThe DOJ just got the complete set of transcripts.\nNow they have to cross-check everything the witnesses said to the committee with everything they said to the DOJ.\nThey do this to check for lies and memory lapses. The liars then get indicted and hopefully flipped. The folks with bad memories get a chance to amend their statements.\nEach statement then has to be cross-checked against every other statement the DOJ has received. Again they check for lies and mistakes. And again they indict liars and fix errors.\nThey do this because they aren't like Bill Durham. He took his Trump Russia investigation to court and lost his case because he didn't resolve inconsistencies before the trial.\nAssuming that you want the DOJ to win, you need to wait a while before expecting action.",
">\n\nThanks for the detailed answer. I do understand it takes time. Married to a lawyer here. But even my lawyer spouse is pretty convinced nothing is going to happen. They have had portions of the testimony for months. I want to be wrong. But it has been 2 years now. That's a long time. It should be a huge priority, disturbing it is not.",
">\n\nAn attorney acquaintance put it best - 'Federal attention is like a drunk hippo; it may take a long time to meander towards you, but once it's close up, it's attention is unmistakeable for anything else.'",
">\n\nThe thing is we all know that all this horribly corrupt stuff took place. The question is, how do we make the other side of the table understand that this stuff actually happened?",
">\n\nThey don't care. They're beyond caring about legality, morality, rationality or anything decent if it means they don't win by owning the Democrats.",
">\n\nThis is why I honestly feel this country is screwed at times. You would think that regardless of political affiliation that we could all agree to not burning government documents. Furthermore, we should easily all be able to agree that it is a bad thing. But even with something as very obvious as this being a bad thing, you will find a large number of people being okay with it.\nIdea of people burning documents. The cases of trying it down the toilet. Like this sort of stuff should not be occurring and should have stopped.",
">\n\nPretty wild how all that it takes to be held completely unaccountable for domestic and global crimes against humanity is to burn, flush or swallow paper.",
">\n\nReally outrageous behavior with consciousness of guilt. You only burn papers in the White House for one reason.",
">\n\nNothing to see here, just your normal post-meeting brazier ritual. Totally normal, right?",
">\n\nIs that a clear indication they were discussing something criminal, or what?",
">\n\nOh come on, people who hate America and want to undermine our country do stuff like this all the time.",
">\n\nThey don't hate America - they hate that there are Americans who aren't like them.",
">\n\nthen they hate america until they’re all gone. these people aren’t driven by love, they are driven by hate",
">\n\nI love that this makes him the most intelligent part of the administration purely because he remembered fire exists and didn't head straight for the shitter.",
">\n\nI have doubts that Trump will see justice, but Meadows is looking proper fucked.",
">\n\nIf meadows is fucked, then trump is, too. meadows WILL flip if threatened with serious jail time.",
">\n\nI'm sure you're right that Meadows would flip, but then I expect the same BS happen there that happened with the sex trafficking charges against Gaetz. Charges were not filed bc the source was considered unreliable because they were getting a better deal for flipping essentially.",
">\n\nWhen will enough be enough? Its to the point where everyone from Trump down needs to be procuted . i for one hope Jack Smith throws the book at them no matter what government position the hold or have held."
] |
>
The law is only for the poors !
|
[
"Was this the White House or Tony Soprano's house? Burning documents, flushing documents... Drain the swamp my ass.",
">\n\nOh, they thought they were Tony Soprano. I wish the world would cut to black for a moment and they would all just disappear.",
">\n\nDon't stop believin'.",
">\n\nConservatives support this type of treason. Never forget.",
">\n\nOverwhelming majority of elected Republicans are still working to cover up all the treason.",
">\n\nWhy do republicans hate America?",
">\n\nThey hate everything except POWER",
">\n\nNothing says innocent like destroying evidence.",
">\n\nThat huge sigh of relief you hear is coming from Fawn Hall lol.",
">\n\n\nThen-White House chief of staff Mark Meadows burned papers in his office after meeting with a House Republican who was working to challenge the 2020 election, according to testimony the Jan. 6 select committee has heard from one of his former aides.\nCassidy Hutchinson, who worked under Meadows when he was former President Donald Trump’s chief of staff, told the panel investigating the Capitol attack that she saw Meadows incinerate documents after a meeting in his office with Rep. Scott Perry (R-Pa.). A person familiar with the testimony described it on condition of anonymity.\n\nThe only person who wished they were Kevin McCarthy is Mark Meadows.",
">\n\nAlways seemed like the same dude.",
">\n\nPer CNN just now, he burned papers at least a dozen times.",
">\n\nWhich is illegal on its face. But, DOJ do it's job? Fat fucking chance..",
">\n\nI have a feeling he's working with the DOJ, everything ran through him",
">\n\nAlthough wasn't he the one who called Cassidy Hutchinson before her testimony and said \"we know you'll do the right thing\" witness intimidation thing?",
">\n\nThat is straight-up dialog out of a Mafia film.",
">\n\nOh that's totally normal. Why at my office we have a daily burning rite where we toss all evidence of our criminality in the bin and make s'mores. Nothing wrong with this at all, not a single thing!",
">\n\n\"These are delicious! I can't wait to commit s'more crimes, tomorrow!\"",
">\n\nJesus. This is all illegal, what are we waiting for here??",
">\n\nWell you had the joke answers so here's the real deal.\nThe DOJ just got the complete set of transcripts.\nNow they have to cross-check everything the witnesses said to the committee with everything they said to the DOJ.\nThey do this to check for lies and memory lapses. The liars then get indicted and hopefully flipped. The folks with bad memories get a chance to amend their statements.\nEach statement then has to be cross-checked against every other statement the DOJ has received. Again they check for lies and mistakes. And again they indict liars and fix errors.\nThey do this because they aren't like Bill Durham. He took his Trump Russia investigation to court and lost his case because he didn't resolve inconsistencies before the trial.\nAssuming that you want the DOJ to win, you need to wait a while before expecting action.",
">\n\nThanks for the detailed answer. I do understand it takes time. Married to a lawyer here. But even my lawyer spouse is pretty convinced nothing is going to happen. They have had portions of the testimony for months. I want to be wrong. But it has been 2 years now. That's a long time. It should be a huge priority, disturbing it is not.",
">\n\nAn attorney acquaintance put it best - 'Federal attention is like a drunk hippo; it may take a long time to meander towards you, but once it's close up, it's attention is unmistakeable for anything else.'",
">\n\nThe thing is we all know that all this horribly corrupt stuff took place. The question is, how do we make the other side of the table understand that this stuff actually happened?",
">\n\nThey don't care. They're beyond caring about legality, morality, rationality or anything decent if it means they don't win by owning the Democrats.",
">\n\nThis is why I honestly feel this country is screwed at times. You would think that regardless of political affiliation that we could all agree to not burning government documents. Furthermore, we should easily all be able to agree that it is a bad thing. But even with something as very obvious as this being a bad thing, you will find a large number of people being okay with it.\nIdea of people burning documents. The cases of trying it down the toilet. Like this sort of stuff should not be occurring and should have stopped.",
">\n\nPretty wild how all that it takes to be held completely unaccountable for domestic and global crimes against humanity is to burn, flush or swallow paper.",
">\n\nReally outrageous behavior with consciousness of guilt. You only burn papers in the White House for one reason.",
">\n\nNothing to see here, just your normal post-meeting brazier ritual. Totally normal, right?",
">\n\nIs that a clear indication they were discussing something criminal, or what?",
">\n\nOh come on, people who hate America and want to undermine our country do stuff like this all the time.",
">\n\nThey don't hate America - they hate that there are Americans who aren't like them.",
">\n\nthen they hate america until they’re all gone. these people aren’t driven by love, they are driven by hate",
">\n\nI love that this makes him the most intelligent part of the administration purely because he remembered fire exists and didn't head straight for the shitter.",
">\n\nI have doubts that Trump will see justice, but Meadows is looking proper fucked.",
">\n\nIf meadows is fucked, then trump is, too. meadows WILL flip if threatened with serious jail time.",
">\n\nI'm sure you're right that Meadows would flip, but then I expect the same BS happen there that happened with the sex trafficking charges against Gaetz. Charges were not filed bc the source was considered unreliable because they were getting a better deal for flipping essentially.",
">\n\nWhen will enough be enough? Its to the point where everyone from Trump down needs to be procuted . i for one hope Jack Smith throws the book at them no matter what government position the hold or have held.",
">\n\nScott Perry is scum of the Earth."
] |
>
Drain the swamp my ass. Trump thinks he’s the Don and all these other clowns are his capos.
|
[
"Was this the White House or Tony Soprano's house? Burning documents, flushing documents... Drain the swamp my ass.",
">\n\nOh, they thought they were Tony Soprano. I wish the world would cut to black for a moment and they would all just disappear.",
">\n\nDon't stop believin'.",
">\n\nConservatives support this type of treason. Never forget.",
">\n\nOverwhelming majority of elected Republicans are still working to cover up all the treason.",
">\n\nWhy do republicans hate America?",
">\n\nThey hate everything except POWER",
">\n\nNothing says innocent like destroying evidence.",
">\n\nThat huge sigh of relief you hear is coming from Fawn Hall lol.",
">\n\n\nThen-White House chief of staff Mark Meadows burned papers in his office after meeting with a House Republican who was working to challenge the 2020 election, according to testimony the Jan. 6 select committee has heard from one of his former aides.\nCassidy Hutchinson, who worked under Meadows when he was former President Donald Trump’s chief of staff, told the panel investigating the Capitol attack that she saw Meadows incinerate documents after a meeting in his office with Rep. Scott Perry (R-Pa.). A person familiar with the testimony described it on condition of anonymity.\n\nThe only person who wished they were Kevin McCarthy is Mark Meadows.",
">\n\nAlways seemed like the same dude.",
">\n\nPer CNN just now, he burned papers at least a dozen times.",
">\n\nWhich is illegal on its face. But, DOJ do it's job? Fat fucking chance..",
">\n\nI have a feeling he's working with the DOJ, everything ran through him",
">\n\nAlthough wasn't he the one who called Cassidy Hutchinson before her testimony and said \"we know you'll do the right thing\" witness intimidation thing?",
">\n\nThat is straight-up dialog out of a Mafia film.",
">\n\nOh that's totally normal. Why at my office we have a daily burning rite where we toss all evidence of our criminality in the bin and make s'mores. Nothing wrong with this at all, not a single thing!",
">\n\n\"These are delicious! I can't wait to commit s'more crimes, tomorrow!\"",
">\n\nJesus. This is all illegal, what are we waiting for here??",
">\n\nWell you had the joke answers so here's the real deal.\nThe DOJ just got the complete set of transcripts.\nNow they have to cross-check everything the witnesses said to the committee with everything they said to the DOJ.\nThey do this to check for lies and memory lapses. The liars then get indicted and hopefully flipped. The folks with bad memories get a chance to amend their statements.\nEach statement then has to be cross-checked against every other statement the DOJ has received. Again they check for lies and mistakes. And again they indict liars and fix errors.\nThey do this because they aren't like Bill Durham. He took his Trump Russia investigation to court and lost his case because he didn't resolve inconsistencies before the trial.\nAssuming that you want the DOJ to win, you need to wait a while before expecting action.",
">\n\nThanks for the detailed answer. I do understand it takes time. Married to a lawyer here. But even my lawyer spouse is pretty convinced nothing is going to happen. They have had portions of the testimony for months. I want to be wrong. But it has been 2 years now. That's a long time. It should be a huge priority, disturbing it is not.",
">\n\nAn attorney acquaintance put it best - 'Federal attention is like a drunk hippo; it may take a long time to meander towards you, but once it's close up, it's attention is unmistakeable for anything else.'",
">\n\nThe thing is we all know that all this horribly corrupt stuff took place. The question is, how do we make the other side of the table understand that this stuff actually happened?",
">\n\nThey don't care. They're beyond caring about legality, morality, rationality or anything decent if it means they don't win by owning the Democrats.",
">\n\nThis is why I honestly feel this country is screwed at times. You would think that regardless of political affiliation that we could all agree to not burning government documents. Furthermore, we should easily all be able to agree that it is a bad thing. But even with something as very obvious as this being a bad thing, you will find a large number of people being okay with it.\nIdea of people burning documents. The cases of trying it down the toilet. Like this sort of stuff should not be occurring and should have stopped.",
">\n\nPretty wild how all that it takes to be held completely unaccountable for domestic and global crimes against humanity is to burn, flush or swallow paper.",
">\n\nReally outrageous behavior with consciousness of guilt. You only burn papers in the White House for one reason.",
">\n\nNothing to see here, just your normal post-meeting brazier ritual. Totally normal, right?",
">\n\nIs that a clear indication they were discussing something criminal, or what?",
">\n\nOh come on, people who hate America and want to undermine our country do stuff like this all the time.",
">\n\nThey don't hate America - they hate that there are Americans who aren't like them.",
">\n\nthen they hate america until they’re all gone. these people aren’t driven by love, they are driven by hate",
">\n\nI love that this makes him the most intelligent part of the administration purely because he remembered fire exists and didn't head straight for the shitter.",
">\n\nI have doubts that Trump will see justice, but Meadows is looking proper fucked.",
">\n\nIf meadows is fucked, then trump is, too. meadows WILL flip if threatened with serious jail time.",
">\n\nI'm sure you're right that Meadows would flip, but then I expect the same BS happen there that happened with the sex trafficking charges against Gaetz. Charges were not filed bc the source was considered unreliable because they were getting a better deal for flipping essentially.",
">\n\nWhen will enough be enough? Its to the point where everyone from Trump down needs to be procuted . i for one hope Jack Smith throws the book at them no matter what government position the hold or have held.",
">\n\nScott Perry is scum of the Earth.",
">\n\nThe law is only for the poors !"
] |
>
Consequences? Prison?
|
[
"Was this the White House or Tony Soprano's house? Burning documents, flushing documents... Drain the swamp my ass.",
">\n\nOh, they thought they were Tony Soprano. I wish the world would cut to black for a moment and they would all just disappear.",
">\n\nDon't stop believin'.",
">\n\nConservatives support this type of treason. Never forget.",
">\n\nOverwhelming majority of elected Republicans are still working to cover up all the treason.",
">\n\nWhy do republicans hate America?",
">\n\nThey hate everything except POWER",
">\n\nNothing says innocent like destroying evidence.",
">\n\nThat huge sigh of relief you hear is coming from Fawn Hall lol.",
">\n\n\nThen-White House chief of staff Mark Meadows burned papers in his office after meeting with a House Republican who was working to challenge the 2020 election, according to testimony the Jan. 6 select committee has heard from one of his former aides.\nCassidy Hutchinson, who worked under Meadows when he was former President Donald Trump’s chief of staff, told the panel investigating the Capitol attack that she saw Meadows incinerate documents after a meeting in his office with Rep. Scott Perry (R-Pa.). A person familiar with the testimony described it on condition of anonymity.\n\nThe only person who wished they were Kevin McCarthy is Mark Meadows.",
">\n\nAlways seemed like the same dude.",
">\n\nPer CNN just now, he burned papers at least a dozen times.",
">\n\nWhich is illegal on its face. But, DOJ do it's job? Fat fucking chance..",
">\n\nI have a feeling he's working with the DOJ, everything ran through him",
">\n\nAlthough wasn't he the one who called Cassidy Hutchinson before her testimony and said \"we know you'll do the right thing\" witness intimidation thing?",
">\n\nThat is straight-up dialog out of a Mafia film.",
">\n\nOh that's totally normal. Why at my office we have a daily burning rite where we toss all evidence of our criminality in the bin and make s'mores. Nothing wrong with this at all, not a single thing!",
">\n\n\"These are delicious! I can't wait to commit s'more crimes, tomorrow!\"",
">\n\nJesus. This is all illegal, what are we waiting for here??",
">\n\nWell you had the joke answers so here's the real deal.\nThe DOJ just got the complete set of transcripts.\nNow they have to cross-check everything the witnesses said to the committee with everything they said to the DOJ.\nThey do this to check for lies and memory lapses. The liars then get indicted and hopefully flipped. The folks with bad memories get a chance to amend their statements.\nEach statement then has to be cross-checked against every other statement the DOJ has received. Again they check for lies and mistakes. And again they indict liars and fix errors.\nThey do this because they aren't like Bill Durham. He took his Trump Russia investigation to court and lost his case because he didn't resolve inconsistencies before the trial.\nAssuming that you want the DOJ to win, you need to wait a while before expecting action.",
">\n\nThanks for the detailed answer. I do understand it takes time. Married to a lawyer here. But even my lawyer spouse is pretty convinced nothing is going to happen. They have had portions of the testimony for months. I want to be wrong. But it has been 2 years now. That's a long time. It should be a huge priority, disturbing it is not.",
">\n\nAn attorney acquaintance put it best - 'Federal attention is like a drunk hippo; it may take a long time to meander towards you, but once it's close up, it's attention is unmistakeable for anything else.'",
">\n\nThe thing is we all know that all this horribly corrupt stuff took place. The question is, how do we make the other side of the table understand that this stuff actually happened?",
">\n\nThey don't care. They're beyond caring about legality, morality, rationality or anything decent if it means they don't win by owning the Democrats.",
">\n\nThis is why I honestly feel this country is screwed at times. You would think that regardless of political affiliation that we could all agree to not burning government documents. Furthermore, we should easily all be able to agree that it is a bad thing. But even with something as very obvious as this being a bad thing, you will find a large number of people being okay with it.\nIdea of people burning documents. The cases of trying it down the toilet. Like this sort of stuff should not be occurring and should have stopped.",
">\n\nPretty wild how all that it takes to be held completely unaccountable for domestic and global crimes against humanity is to burn, flush or swallow paper.",
">\n\nReally outrageous behavior with consciousness of guilt. You only burn papers in the White House for one reason.",
">\n\nNothing to see here, just your normal post-meeting brazier ritual. Totally normal, right?",
">\n\nIs that a clear indication they were discussing something criminal, or what?",
">\n\nOh come on, people who hate America and want to undermine our country do stuff like this all the time.",
">\n\nThey don't hate America - they hate that there are Americans who aren't like them.",
">\n\nthen they hate america until they’re all gone. these people aren’t driven by love, they are driven by hate",
">\n\nI love that this makes him the most intelligent part of the administration purely because he remembered fire exists and didn't head straight for the shitter.",
">\n\nI have doubts that Trump will see justice, but Meadows is looking proper fucked.",
">\n\nIf meadows is fucked, then trump is, too. meadows WILL flip if threatened with serious jail time.",
">\n\nI'm sure you're right that Meadows would flip, but then I expect the same BS happen there that happened with the sex trafficking charges against Gaetz. Charges were not filed bc the source was considered unreliable because they were getting a better deal for flipping essentially.",
">\n\nWhen will enough be enough? Its to the point where everyone from Trump down needs to be procuted . i for one hope Jack Smith throws the book at them no matter what government position the hold or have held.",
">\n\nScott Perry is scum of the Earth.",
">\n\nThe law is only for the poors !",
">\n\nDrain the swamp my ass. Trump thinks he’s the Don and all these other clowns are his capos."
] |
>
We all what he was burning. Clearly it was his Sonic the Hedgehog fanfiction where Sonic was spending quality time playing in the Meadows
|
[
"Was this the White House or Tony Soprano's house? Burning documents, flushing documents... Drain the swamp my ass.",
">\n\nOh, they thought they were Tony Soprano. I wish the world would cut to black for a moment and they would all just disappear.",
">\n\nDon't stop believin'.",
">\n\nConservatives support this type of treason. Never forget.",
">\n\nOverwhelming majority of elected Republicans are still working to cover up all the treason.",
">\n\nWhy do republicans hate America?",
">\n\nThey hate everything except POWER",
">\n\nNothing says innocent like destroying evidence.",
">\n\nThat huge sigh of relief you hear is coming from Fawn Hall lol.",
">\n\n\nThen-White House chief of staff Mark Meadows burned papers in his office after meeting with a House Republican who was working to challenge the 2020 election, according to testimony the Jan. 6 select committee has heard from one of his former aides.\nCassidy Hutchinson, who worked under Meadows when he was former President Donald Trump’s chief of staff, told the panel investigating the Capitol attack that she saw Meadows incinerate documents after a meeting in his office with Rep. Scott Perry (R-Pa.). A person familiar with the testimony described it on condition of anonymity.\n\nThe only person who wished they were Kevin McCarthy is Mark Meadows.",
">\n\nAlways seemed like the same dude.",
">\n\nPer CNN just now, he burned papers at least a dozen times.",
">\n\nWhich is illegal on its face. But, DOJ do it's job? Fat fucking chance..",
">\n\nI have a feeling he's working with the DOJ, everything ran through him",
">\n\nAlthough wasn't he the one who called Cassidy Hutchinson before her testimony and said \"we know you'll do the right thing\" witness intimidation thing?",
">\n\nThat is straight-up dialog out of a Mafia film.",
">\n\nOh that's totally normal. Why at my office we have a daily burning rite where we toss all evidence of our criminality in the bin and make s'mores. Nothing wrong with this at all, not a single thing!",
">\n\n\"These are delicious! I can't wait to commit s'more crimes, tomorrow!\"",
">\n\nJesus. This is all illegal, what are we waiting for here??",
">\n\nWell you had the joke answers so here's the real deal.\nThe DOJ just got the complete set of transcripts.\nNow they have to cross-check everything the witnesses said to the committee with everything they said to the DOJ.\nThey do this to check for lies and memory lapses. The liars then get indicted and hopefully flipped. The folks with bad memories get a chance to amend their statements.\nEach statement then has to be cross-checked against every other statement the DOJ has received. Again they check for lies and mistakes. And again they indict liars and fix errors.\nThey do this because they aren't like Bill Durham. He took his Trump Russia investigation to court and lost his case because he didn't resolve inconsistencies before the trial.\nAssuming that you want the DOJ to win, you need to wait a while before expecting action.",
">\n\nThanks for the detailed answer. I do understand it takes time. Married to a lawyer here. But even my lawyer spouse is pretty convinced nothing is going to happen. They have had portions of the testimony for months. I want to be wrong. But it has been 2 years now. That's a long time. It should be a huge priority, disturbing it is not.",
">\n\nAn attorney acquaintance put it best - 'Federal attention is like a drunk hippo; it may take a long time to meander towards you, but once it's close up, it's attention is unmistakeable for anything else.'",
">\n\nThe thing is we all know that all this horribly corrupt stuff took place. The question is, how do we make the other side of the table understand that this stuff actually happened?",
">\n\nThey don't care. They're beyond caring about legality, morality, rationality or anything decent if it means they don't win by owning the Democrats.",
">\n\nThis is why I honestly feel this country is screwed at times. You would think that regardless of political affiliation that we could all agree to not burning government documents. Furthermore, we should easily all be able to agree that it is a bad thing. But even with something as very obvious as this being a bad thing, you will find a large number of people being okay with it.\nIdea of people burning documents. The cases of trying it down the toilet. Like this sort of stuff should not be occurring and should have stopped.",
">\n\nPretty wild how all that it takes to be held completely unaccountable for domestic and global crimes against humanity is to burn, flush or swallow paper.",
">\n\nReally outrageous behavior with consciousness of guilt. You only burn papers in the White House for one reason.",
">\n\nNothing to see here, just your normal post-meeting brazier ritual. Totally normal, right?",
">\n\nIs that a clear indication they were discussing something criminal, or what?",
">\n\nOh come on, people who hate America and want to undermine our country do stuff like this all the time.",
">\n\nThey don't hate America - they hate that there are Americans who aren't like them.",
">\n\nthen they hate america until they’re all gone. these people aren’t driven by love, they are driven by hate",
">\n\nI love that this makes him the most intelligent part of the administration purely because he remembered fire exists and didn't head straight for the shitter.",
">\n\nI have doubts that Trump will see justice, but Meadows is looking proper fucked.",
">\n\nIf meadows is fucked, then trump is, too. meadows WILL flip if threatened with serious jail time.",
">\n\nI'm sure you're right that Meadows would flip, but then I expect the same BS happen there that happened with the sex trafficking charges against Gaetz. Charges were not filed bc the source was considered unreliable because they were getting a better deal for flipping essentially.",
">\n\nWhen will enough be enough? Its to the point where everyone from Trump down needs to be procuted . i for one hope Jack Smith throws the book at them no matter what government position the hold or have held.",
">\n\nScott Perry is scum of the Earth.",
">\n\nThe law is only for the poors !",
">\n\nDrain the swamp my ass. Trump thinks he’s the Don and all these other clowns are his capos.",
">\n\nConsequences? Prison?"
] |
>
I mean. I'm not superstitious, but I'd get some sage and smudge the whole room after talking with Scott Perry.
|
[
"Was this the White House or Tony Soprano's house? Burning documents, flushing documents... Drain the swamp my ass.",
">\n\nOh, they thought they were Tony Soprano. I wish the world would cut to black for a moment and they would all just disappear.",
">\n\nDon't stop believin'.",
">\n\nConservatives support this type of treason. Never forget.",
">\n\nOverwhelming majority of elected Republicans are still working to cover up all the treason.",
">\n\nWhy do republicans hate America?",
">\n\nThey hate everything except POWER",
">\n\nNothing says innocent like destroying evidence.",
">\n\nThat huge sigh of relief you hear is coming from Fawn Hall lol.",
">\n\n\nThen-White House chief of staff Mark Meadows burned papers in his office after meeting with a House Republican who was working to challenge the 2020 election, according to testimony the Jan. 6 select committee has heard from one of his former aides.\nCassidy Hutchinson, who worked under Meadows when he was former President Donald Trump’s chief of staff, told the panel investigating the Capitol attack that she saw Meadows incinerate documents after a meeting in his office with Rep. Scott Perry (R-Pa.). A person familiar with the testimony described it on condition of anonymity.\n\nThe only person who wished they were Kevin McCarthy is Mark Meadows.",
">\n\nAlways seemed like the same dude.",
">\n\nPer CNN just now, he burned papers at least a dozen times.",
">\n\nWhich is illegal on its face. But, DOJ do it's job? Fat fucking chance..",
">\n\nI have a feeling he's working with the DOJ, everything ran through him",
">\n\nAlthough wasn't he the one who called Cassidy Hutchinson before her testimony and said \"we know you'll do the right thing\" witness intimidation thing?",
">\n\nThat is straight-up dialog out of a Mafia film.",
">\n\nOh that's totally normal. Why at my office we have a daily burning rite where we toss all evidence of our criminality in the bin and make s'mores. Nothing wrong with this at all, not a single thing!",
">\n\n\"These are delicious! I can't wait to commit s'more crimes, tomorrow!\"",
">\n\nJesus. This is all illegal, what are we waiting for here??",
">\n\nWell you had the joke answers so here's the real deal.\nThe DOJ just got the complete set of transcripts.\nNow they have to cross-check everything the witnesses said to the committee with everything they said to the DOJ.\nThey do this to check for lies and memory lapses. The liars then get indicted and hopefully flipped. The folks with bad memories get a chance to amend their statements.\nEach statement then has to be cross-checked against every other statement the DOJ has received. Again they check for lies and mistakes. And again they indict liars and fix errors.\nThey do this because they aren't like Bill Durham. He took his Trump Russia investigation to court and lost his case because he didn't resolve inconsistencies before the trial.\nAssuming that you want the DOJ to win, you need to wait a while before expecting action.",
">\n\nThanks for the detailed answer. I do understand it takes time. Married to a lawyer here. But even my lawyer spouse is pretty convinced nothing is going to happen. They have had portions of the testimony for months. I want to be wrong. But it has been 2 years now. That's a long time. It should be a huge priority, disturbing it is not.",
">\n\nAn attorney acquaintance put it best - 'Federal attention is like a drunk hippo; it may take a long time to meander towards you, but once it's close up, it's attention is unmistakeable for anything else.'",
">\n\nThe thing is we all know that all this horribly corrupt stuff took place. The question is, how do we make the other side of the table understand that this stuff actually happened?",
">\n\nThey don't care. They're beyond caring about legality, morality, rationality or anything decent if it means they don't win by owning the Democrats.",
">\n\nThis is why I honestly feel this country is screwed at times. You would think that regardless of political affiliation that we could all agree to not burning government documents. Furthermore, we should easily all be able to agree that it is a bad thing. But even with something as very obvious as this being a bad thing, you will find a large number of people being okay with it.\nIdea of people burning documents. The cases of trying it down the toilet. Like this sort of stuff should not be occurring and should have stopped.",
">\n\nPretty wild how all that it takes to be held completely unaccountable for domestic and global crimes against humanity is to burn, flush or swallow paper.",
">\n\nReally outrageous behavior with consciousness of guilt. You only burn papers in the White House for one reason.",
">\n\nNothing to see here, just your normal post-meeting brazier ritual. Totally normal, right?",
">\n\nIs that a clear indication they were discussing something criminal, or what?",
">\n\nOh come on, people who hate America and want to undermine our country do stuff like this all the time.",
">\n\nThey don't hate America - they hate that there are Americans who aren't like them.",
">\n\nthen they hate america until they’re all gone. these people aren’t driven by love, they are driven by hate",
">\n\nI love that this makes him the most intelligent part of the administration purely because he remembered fire exists and didn't head straight for the shitter.",
">\n\nI have doubts that Trump will see justice, but Meadows is looking proper fucked.",
">\n\nIf meadows is fucked, then trump is, too. meadows WILL flip if threatened with serious jail time.",
">\n\nI'm sure you're right that Meadows would flip, but then I expect the same BS happen there that happened with the sex trafficking charges against Gaetz. Charges were not filed bc the source was considered unreliable because they were getting a better deal for flipping essentially.",
">\n\nWhen will enough be enough? Its to the point where everyone from Trump down needs to be procuted . i for one hope Jack Smith throws the book at them no matter what government position the hold or have held.",
">\n\nScott Perry is scum of the Earth.",
">\n\nThe law is only for the poors !",
">\n\nDrain the swamp my ass. Trump thinks he’s the Don and all these other clowns are his capos.",
">\n\nConsequences? Prison?",
">\n\nWe all what he was burning. Clearly it was his Sonic the Hedgehog fanfiction where Sonic was spending quality time playing in the Meadows"
] |
>
Take my up vote
|
[
"Was this the White House or Tony Soprano's house? Burning documents, flushing documents... Drain the swamp my ass.",
">\n\nOh, they thought they were Tony Soprano. I wish the world would cut to black for a moment and they would all just disappear.",
">\n\nDon't stop believin'.",
">\n\nConservatives support this type of treason. Never forget.",
">\n\nOverwhelming majority of elected Republicans are still working to cover up all the treason.",
">\n\nWhy do republicans hate America?",
">\n\nThey hate everything except POWER",
">\n\nNothing says innocent like destroying evidence.",
">\n\nThat huge sigh of relief you hear is coming from Fawn Hall lol.",
">\n\n\nThen-White House chief of staff Mark Meadows burned papers in his office after meeting with a House Republican who was working to challenge the 2020 election, according to testimony the Jan. 6 select committee has heard from one of his former aides.\nCassidy Hutchinson, who worked under Meadows when he was former President Donald Trump’s chief of staff, told the panel investigating the Capitol attack that she saw Meadows incinerate documents after a meeting in his office with Rep. Scott Perry (R-Pa.). A person familiar with the testimony described it on condition of anonymity.\n\nThe only person who wished they were Kevin McCarthy is Mark Meadows.",
">\n\nAlways seemed like the same dude.",
">\n\nPer CNN just now, he burned papers at least a dozen times.",
">\n\nWhich is illegal on its face. But, DOJ do it's job? Fat fucking chance..",
">\n\nI have a feeling he's working with the DOJ, everything ran through him",
">\n\nAlthough wasn't he the one who called Cassidy Hutchinson before her testimony and said \"we know you'll do the right thing\" witness intimidation thing?",
">\n\nThat is straight-up dialog out of a Mafia film.",
">\n\nOh that's totally normal. Why at my office we have a daily burning rite where we toss all evidence of our criminality in the bin and make s'mores. Nothing wrong with this at all, not a single thing!",
">\n\n\"These are delicious! I can't wait to commit s'more crimes, tomorrow!\"",
">\n\nJesus. This is all illegal, what are we waiting for here??",
">\n\nWell you had the joke answers so here's the real deal.\nThe DOJ just got the complete set of transcripts.\nNow they have to cross-check everything the witnesses said to the committee with everything they said to the DOJ.\nThey do this to check for lies and memory lapses. The liars then get indicted and hopefully flipped. The folks with bad memories get a chance to amend their statements.\nEach statement then has to be cross-checked against every other statement the DOJ has received. Again they check for lies and mistakes. And again they indict liars and fix errors.\nThey do this because they aren't like Bill Durham. He took his Trump Russia investigation to court and lost his case because he didn't resolve inconsistencies before the trial.\nAssuming that you want the DOJ to win, you need to wait a while before expecting action.",
">\n\nThanks for the detailed answer. I do understand it takes time. Married to a lawyer here. But even my lawyer spouse is pretty convinced nothing is going to happen. They have had portions of the testimony for months. I want to be wrong. But it has been 2 years now. That's a long time. It should be a huge priority, disturbing it is not.",
">\n\nAn attorney acquaintance put it best - 'Federal attention is like a drunk hippo; it may take a long time to meander towards you, but once it's close up, it's attention is unmistakeable for anything else.'",
">\n\nThe thing is we all know that all this horribly corrupt stuff took place. The question is, how do we make the other side of the table understand that this stuff actually happened?",
">\n\nThey don't care. They're beyond caring about legality, morality, rationality or anything decent if it means they don't win by owning the Democrats.",
">\n\nThis is why I honestly feel this country is screwed at times. You would think that regardless of political affiliation that we could all agree to not burning government documents. Furthermore, we should easily all be able to agree that it is a bad thing. But even with something as very obvious as this being a bad thing, you will find a large number of people being okay with it.\nIdea of people burning documents. The cases of trying it down the toilet. Like this sort of stuff should not be occurring and should have stopped.",
">\n\nPretty wild how all that it takes to be held completely unaccountable for domestic and global crimes against humanity is to burn, flush or swallow paper.",
">\n\nReally outrageous behavior with consciousness of guilt. You only burn papers in the White House for one reason.",
">\n\nNothing to see here, just your normal post-meeting brazier ritual. Totally normal, right?",
">\n\nIs that a clear indication they were discussing something criminal, or what?",
">\n\nOh come on, people who hate America and want to undermine our country do stuff like this all the time.",
">\n\nThey don't hate America - they hate that there are Americans who aren't like them.",
">\n\nthen they hate america until they’re all gone. these people aren’t driven by love, they are driven by hate",
">\n\nI love that this makes him the most intelligent part of the administration purely because he remembered fire exists and didn't head straight for the shitter.",
">\n\nI have doubts that Trump will see justice, but Meadows is looking proper fucked.",
">\n\nIf meadows is fucked, then trump is, too. meadows WILL flip if threatened with serious jail time.",
">\n\nI'm sure you're right that Meadows would flip, but then I expect the same BS happen there that happened with the sex trafficking charges against Gaetz. Charges were not filed bc the source was considered unreliable because they were getting a better deal for flipping essentially.",
">\n\nWhen will enough be enough? Its to the point where everyone from Trump down needs to be procuted . i for one hope Jack Smith throws the book at them no matter what government position the hold or have held.",
">\n\nScott Perry is scum of the Earth.",
">\n\nThe law is only for the poors !",
">\n\nDrain the swamp my ass. Trump thinks he’s the Don and all these other clowns are his capos.",
">\n\nConsequences? Prison?",
">\n\nWe all what he was burning. Clearly it was his Sonic the Hedgehog fanfiction where Sonic was spending quality time playing in the Meadows",
">\n\nI mean. I'm not superstitious, but I'd get some sage and smudge the whole room after talking with Scott Perry."
] |
>
of fucking course it was Perry.
Dude's my rep. I hate him. he is an asshat that has no morals.
|
[
"Was this the White House or Tony Soprano's house? Burning documents, flushing documents... Drain the swamp my ass.",
">\n\nOh, they thought they were Tony Soprano. I wish the world would cut to black for a moment and they would all just disappear.",
">\n\nDon't stop believin'.",
">\n\nConservatives support this type of treason. Never forget.",
">\n\nOverwhelming majority of elected Republicans are still working to cover up all the treason.",
">\n\nWhy do republicans hate America?",
">\n\nThey hate everything except POWER",
">\n\nNothing says innocent like destroying evidence.",
">\n\nThat huge sigh of relief you hear is coming from Fawn Hall lol.",
">\n\n\nThen-White House chief of staff Mark Meadows burned papers in his office after meeting with a House Republican who was working to challenge the 2020 election, according to testimony the Jan. 6 select committee has heard from one of his former aides.\nCassidy Hutchinson, who worked under Meadows when he was former President Donald Trump’s chief of staff, told the panel investigating the Capitol attack that she saw Meadows incinerate documents after a meeting in his office with Rep. Scott Perry (R-Pa.). A person familiar with the testimony described it on condition of anonymity.\n\nThe only person who wished they were Kevin McCarthy is Mark Meadows.",
">\n\nAlways seemed like the same dude.",
">\n\nPer CNN just now, he burned papers at least a dozen times.",
">\n\nWhich is illegal on its face. But, DOJ do it's job? Fat fucking chance..",
">\n\nI have a feeling he's working with the DOJ, everything ran through him",
">\n\nAlthough wasn't he the one who called Cassidy Hutchinson before her testimony and said \"we know you'll do the right thing\" witness intimidation thing?",
">\n\nThat is straight-up dialog out of a Mafia film.",
">\n\nOh that's totally normal. Why at my office we have a daily burning rite where we toss all evidence of our criminality in the bin and make s'mores. Nothing wrong with this at all, not a single thing!",
">\n\n\"These are delicious! I can't wait to commit s'more crimes, tomorrow!\"",
">\n\nJesus. This is all illegal, what are we waiting for here??",
">\n\nWell you had the joke answers so here's the real deal.\nThe DOJ just got the complete set of transcripts.\nNow they have to cross-check everything the witnesses said to the committee with everything they said to the DOJ.\nThey do this to check for lies and memory lapses. The liars then get indicted and hopefully flipped. The folks with bad memories get a chance to amend their statements.\nEach statement then has to be cross-checked against every other statement the DOJ has received. Again they check for lies and mistakes. And again they indict liars and fix errors.\nThey do this because they aren't like Bill Durham. He took his Trump Russia investigation to court and lost his case because he didn't resolve inconsistencies before the trial.\nAssuming that you want the DOJ to win, you need to wait a while before expecting action.",
">\n\nThanks for the detailed answer. I do understand it takes time. Married to a lawyer here. But even my lawyer spouse is pretty convinced nothing is going to happen. They have had portions of the testimony for months. I want to be wrong. But it has been 2 years now. That's a long time. It should be a huge priority, disturbing it is not.",
">\n\nAn attorney acquaintance put it best - 'Federal attention is like a drunk hippo; it may take a long time to meander towards you, but once it's close up, it's attention is unmistakeable for anything else.'",
">\n\nThe thing is we all know that all this horribly corrupt stuff took place. The question is, how do we make the other side of the table understand that this stuff actually happened?",
">\n\nThey don't care. They're beyond caring about legality, morality, rationality or anything decent if it means they don't win by owning the Democrats.",
">\n\nThis is why I honestly feel this country is screwed at times. You would think that regardless of political affiliation that we could all agree to not burning government documents. Furthermore, we should easily all be able to agree that it is a bad thing. But even with something as very obvious as this being a bad thing, you will find a large number of people being okay with it.\nIdea of people burning documents. The cases of trying it down the toilet. Like this sort of stuff should not be occurring and should have stopped.",
">\n\nPretty wild how all that it takes to be held completely unaccountable for domestic and global crimes against humanity is to burn, flush or swallow paper.",
">\n\nReally outrageous behavior with consciousness of guilt. You only burn papers in the White House for one reason.",
">\n\nNothing to see here, just your normal post-meeting brazier ritual. Totally normal, right?",
">\n\nIs that a clear indication they were discussing something criminal, or what?",
">\n\nOh come on, people who hate America and want to undermine our country do stuff like this all the time.",
">\n\nThey don't hate America - they hate that there are Americans who aren't like them.",
">\n\nthen they hate america until they’re all gone. these people aren’t driven by love, they are driven by hate",
">\n\nI love that this makes him the most intelligent part of the administration purely because he remembered fire exists and didn't head straight for the shitter.",
">\n\nI have doubts that Trump will see justice, but Meadows is looking proper fucked.",
">\n\nIf meadows is fucked, then trump is, too. meadows WILL flip if threatened with serious jail time.",
">\n\nI'm sure you're right that Meadows would flip, but then I expect the same BS happen there that happened with the sex trafficking charges against Gaetz. Charges were not filed bc the source was considered unreliable because they were getting a better deal for flipping essentially.",
">\n\nWhen will enough be enough? Its to the point where everyone from Trump down needs to be procuted . i for one hope Jack Smith throws the book at them no matter what government position the hold or have held.",
">\n\nScott Perry is scum of the Earth.",
">\n\nThe law is only for the poors !",
">\n\nDrain the swamp my ass. Trump thinks he’s the Don and all these other clowns are his capos.",
">\n\nConsequences? Prison?",
">\n\nWe all what he was burning. Clearly it was his Sonic the Hedgehog fanfiction where Sonic was spending quality time playing in the Meadows",
">\n\nI mean. I'm not superstitious, but I'd get some sage and smudge the whole room after talking with Scott Perry.",
">\n\nTake my up vote"
] |
>
Call him and tell him so
|
[
"Was this the White House or Tony Soprano's house? Burning documents, flushing documents... Drain the swamp my ass.",
">\n\nOh, they thought they were Tony Soprano. I wish the world would cut to black for a moment and they would all just disappear.",
">\n\nDon't stop believin'.",
">\n\nConservatives support this type of treason. Never forget.",
">\n\nOverwhelming majority of elected Republicans are still working to cover up all the treason.",
">\n\nWhy do republicans hate America?",
">\n\nThey hate everything except POWER",
">\n\nNothing says innocent like destroying evidence.",
">\n\nThat huge sigh of relief you hear is coming from Fawn Hall lol.",
">\n\n\nThen-White House chief of staff Mark Meadows burned papers in his office after meeting with a House Republican who was working to challenge the 2020 election, according to testimony the Jan. 6 select committee has heard from one of his former aides.\nCassidy Hutchinson, who worked under Meadows when he was former President Donald Trump’s chief of staff, told the panel investigating the Capitol attack that she saw Meadows incinerate documents after a meeting in his office with Rep. Scott Perry (R-Pa.). A person familiar with the testimony described it on condition of anonymity.\n\nThe only person who wished they were Kevin McCarthy is Mark Meadows.",
">\n\nAlways seemed like the same dude.",
">\n\nPer CNN just now, he burned papers at least a dozen times.",
">\n\nWhich is illegal on its face. But, DOJ do it's job? Fat fucking chance..",
">\n\nI have a feeling he's working with the DOJ, everything ran through him",
">\n\nAlthough wasn't he the one who called Cassidy Hutchinson before her testimony and said \"we know you'll do the right thing\" witness intimidation thing?",
">\n\nThat is straight-up dialog out of a Mafia film.",
">\n\nOh that's totally normal. Why at my office we have a daily burning rite where we toss all evidence of our criminality in the bin and make s'mores. Nothing wrong with this at all, not a single thing!",
">\n\n\"These are delicious! I can't wait to commit s'more crimes, tomorrow!\"",
">\n\nJesus. This is all illegal, what are we waiting for here??",
">\n\nWell you had the joke answers so here's the real deal.\nThe DOJ just got the complete set of transcripts.\nNow they have to cross-check everything the witnesses said to the committee with everything they said to the DOJ.\nThey do this to check for lies and memory lapses. The liars then get indicted and hopefully flipped. The folks with bad memories get a chance to amend their statements.\nEach statement then has to be cross-checked against every other statement the DOJ has received. Again they check for lies and mistakes. And again they indict liars and fix errors.\nThey do this because they aren't like Bill Durham. He took his Trump Russia investigation to court and lost his case because he didn't resolve inconsistencies before the trial.\nAssuming that you want the DOJ to win, you need to wait a while before expecting action.",
">\n\nThanks for the detailed answer. I do understand it takes time. Married to a lawyer here. But even my lawyer spouse is pretty convinced nothing is going to happen. They have had portions of the testimony for months. I want to be wrong. But it has been 2 years now. That's a long time. It should be a huge priority, disturbing it is not.",
">\n\nAn attorney acquaintance put it best - 'Federal attention is like a drunk hippo; it may take a long time to meander towards you, but once it's close up, it's attention is unmistakeable for anything else.'",
">\n\nThe thing is we all know that all this horribly corrupt stuff took place. The question is, how do we make the other side of the table understand that this stuff actually happened?",
">\n\nThey don't care. They're beyond caring about legality, morality, rationality or anything decent if it means they don't win by owning the Democrats.",
">\n\nThis is why I honestly feel this country is screwed at times. You would think that regardless of political affiliation that we could all agree to not burning government documents. Furthermore, we should easily all be able to agree that it is a bad thing. But even with something as very obvious as this being a bad thing, you will find a large number of people being okay with it.\nIdea of people burning documents. The cases of trying it down the toilet. Like this sort of stuff should not be occurring and should have stopped.",
">\n\nPretty wild how all that it takes to be held completely unaccountable for domestic and global crimes against humanity is to burn, flush or swallow paper.",
">\n\nReally outrageous behavior with consciousness of guilt. You only burn papers in the White House for one reason.",
">\n\nNothing to see here, just your normal post-meeting brazier ritual. Totally normal, right?",
">\n\nIs that a clear indication they were discussing something criminal, or what?",
">\n\nOh come on, people who hate America and want to undermine our country do stuff like this all the time.",
">\n\nThey don't hate America - they hate that there are Americans who aren't like them.",
">\n\nthen they hate america until they’re all gone. these people aren’t driven by love, they are driven by hate",
">\n\nI love that this makes him the most intelligent part of the administration purely because he remembered fire exists and didn't head straight for the shitter.",
">\n\nI have doubts that Trump will see justice, but Meadows is looking proper fucked.",
">\n\nIf meadows is fucked, then trump is, too. meadows WILL flip if threatened with serious jail time.",
">\n\nI'm sure you're right that Meadows would flip, but then I expect the same BS happen there that happened with the sex trafficking charges against Gaetz. Charges were not filed bc the source was considered unreliable because they were getting a better deal for flipping essentially.",
">\n\nWhen will enough be enough? Its to the point where everyone from Trump down needs to be procuted . i for one hope Jack Smith throws the book at them no matter what government position the hold or have held.",
">\n\nScott Perry is scum of the Earth.",
">\n\nThe law is only for the poors !",
">\n\nDrain the swamp my ass. Trump thinks he’s the Don and all these other clowns are his capos.",
">\n\nConsequences? Prison?",
">\n\nWe all what he was burning. Clearly it was his Sonic the Hedgehog fanfiction where Sonic was spending quality time playing in the Meadows",
">\n\nI mean. I'm not superstitious, but I'd get some sage and smudge the whole room after talking with Scott Perry.",
">\n\nTake my up vote",
">\n\nof fucking course it was Perry. \nDude's my rep. I hate him. he is an asshat that has no morals."
] |
>
Oh, I have... and I have written him.
All I get back is "well, Trump is completely right, screw the PA supreme court they don't have power in the state of PA... so I am signing on to the texas judicial request because texas courts should have more power in PA than the PA courts"
|
[
"Was this the White House or Tony Soprano's house? Burning documents, flushing documents... Drain the swamp my ass.",
">\n\nOh, they thought they were Tony Soprano. I wish the world would cut to black for a moment and they would all just disappear.",
">\n\nDon't stop believin'.",
">\n\nConservatives support this type of treason. Never forget.",
">\n\nOverwhelming majority of elected Republicans are still working to cover up all the treason.",
">\n\nWhy do republicans hate America?",
">\n\nThey hate everything except POWER",
">\n\nNothing says innocent like destroying evidence.",
">\n\nThat huge sigh of relief you hear is coming from Fawn Hall lol.",
">\n\n\nThen-White House chief of staff Mark Meadows burned papers in his office after meeting with a House Republican who was working to challenge the 2020 election, according to testimony the Jan. 6 select committee has heard from one of his former aides.\nCassidy Hutchinson, who worked under Meadows when he was former President Donald Trump’s chief of staff, told the panel investigating the Capitol attack that she saw Meadows incinerate documents after a meeting in his office with Rep. Scott Perry (R-Pa.). A person familiar with the testimony described it on condition of anonymity.\n\nThe only person who wished they were Kevin McCarthy is Mark Meadows.",
">\n\nAlways seemed like the same dude.",
">\n\nPer CNN just now, he burned papers at least a dozen times.",
">\n\nWhich is illegal on its face. But, DOJ do it's job? Fat fucking chance..",
">\n\nI have a feeling he's working with the DOJ, everything ran through him",
">\n\nAlthough wasn't he the one who called Cassidy Hutchinson before her testimony and said \"we know you'll do the right thing\" witness intimidation thing?",
">\n\nThat is straight-up dialog out of a Mafia film.",
">\n\nOh that's totally normal. Why at my office we have a daily burning rite where we toss all evidence of our criminality in the bin and make s'mores. Nothing wrong with this at all, not a single thing!",
">\n\n\"These are delicious! I can't wait to commit s'more crimes, tomorrow!\"",
">\n\nJesus. This is all illegal, what are we waiting for here??",
">\n\nWell you had the joke answers so here's the real deal.\nThe DOJ just got the complete set of transcripts.\nNow they have to cross-check everything the witnesses said to the committee with everything they said to the DOJ.\nThey do this to check for lies and memory lapses. The liars then get indicted and hopefully flipped. The folks with bad memories get a chance to amend their statements.\nEach statement then has to be cross-checked against every other statement the DOJ has received. Again they check for lies and mistakes. And again they indict liars and fix errors.\nThey do this because they aren't like Bill Durham. He took his Trump Russia investigation to court and lost his case because he didn't resolve inconsistencies before the trial.\nAssuming that you want the DOJ to win, you need to wait a while before expecting action.",
">\n\nThanks for the detailed answer. I do understand it takes time. Married to a lawyer here. But even my lawyer spouse is pretty convinced nothing is going to happen. They have had portions of the testimony for months. I want to be wrong. But it has been 2 years now. That's a long time. It should be a huge priority, disturbing it is not.",
">\n\nAn attorney acquaintance put it best - 'Federal attention is like a drunk hippo; it may take a long time to meander towards you, but once it's close up, it's attention is unmistakeable for anything else.'",
">\n\nThe thing is we all know that all this horribly corrupt stuff took place. The question is, how do we make the other side of the table understand that this stuff actually happened?",
">\n\nThey don't care. They're beyond caring about legality, morality, rationality or anything decent if it means they don't win by owning the Democrats.",
">\n\nThis is why I honestly feel this country is screwed at times. You would think that regardless of political affiliation that we could all agree to not burning government documents. Furthermore, we should easily all be able to agree that it is a bad thing. But even with something as very obvious as this being a bad thing, you will find a large number of people being okay with it.\nIdea of people burning documents. The cases of trying it down the toilet. Like this sort of stuff should not be occurring and should have stopped.",
">\n\nPretty wild how all that it takes to be held completely unaccountable for domestic and global crimes against humanity is to burn, flush or swallow paper.",
">\n\nReally outrageous behavior with consciousness of guilt. You only burn papers in the White House for one reason.",
">\n\nNothing to see here, just your normal post-meeting brazier ritual. Totally normal, right?",
">\n\nIs that a clear indication they were discussing something criminal, or what?",
">\n\nOh come on, people who hate America and want to undermine our country do stuff like this all the time.",
">\n\nThey don't hate America - they hate that there are Americans who aren't like them.",
">\n\nthen they hate america until they’re all gone. these people aren’t driven by love, they are driven by hate",
">\n\nI love that this makes him the most intelligent part of the administration purely because he remembered fire exists and didn't head straight for the shitter.",
">\n\nI have doubts that Trump will see justice, but Meadows is looking proper fucked.",
">\n\nIf meadows is fucked, then trump is, too. meadows WILL flip if threatened with serious jail time.",
">\n\nI'm sure you're right that Meadows would flip, but then I expect the same BS happen there that happened with the sex trafficking charges against Gaetz. Charges were not filed bc the source was considered unreliable because they were getting a better deal for flipping essentially.",
">\n\nWhen will enough be enough? Its to the point where everyone from Trump down needs to be procuted . i for one hope Jack Smith throws the book at them no matter what government position the hold or have held.",
">\n\nScott Perry is scum of the Earth.",
">\n\nThe law is only for the poors !",
">\n\nDrain the swamp my ass. Trump thinks he’s the Don and all these other clowns are his capos.",
">\n\nConsequences? Prison?",
">\n\nWe all what he was burning. Clearly it was his Sonic the Hedgehog fanfiction where Sonic was spending quality time playing in the Meadows",
">\n\nI mean. I'm not superstitious, but I'd get some sage and smudge the whole room after talking with Scott Perry.",
">\n\nTake my up vote",
">\n\nof fucking course it was Perry. \nDude's my rep. I hate him. he is an asshat that has no morals.",
">\n\nCall him and tell him so"
] |
>
In the back of my mind I keep wondering, what papers?
Is there a stack of handouts titled "How to Overthrow the Government"? What are they writing on paper that's incriminating and why are they writing it at all?
I know that's all beside the point but I can't help wondering.
|
[
"Was this the White House or Tony Soprano's house? Burning documents, flushing documents... Drain the swamp my ass.",
">\n\nOh, they thought they were Tony Soprano. I wish the world would cut to black for a moment and they would all just disappear.",
">\n\nDon't stop believin'.",
">\n\nConservatives support this type of treason. Never forget.",
">\n\nOverwhelming majority of elected Republicans are still working to cover up all the treason.",
">\n\nWhy do republicans hate America?",
">\n\nThey hate everything except POWER",
">\n\nNothing says innocent like destroying evidence.",
">\n\nThat huge sigh of relief you hear is coming from Fawn Hall lol.",
">\n\n\nThen-White House chief of staff Mark Meadows burned papers in his office after meeting with a House Republican who was working to challenge the 2020 election, according to testimony the Jan. 6 select committee has heard from one of his former aides.\nCassidy Hutchinson, who worked under Meadows when he was former President Donald Trump’s chief of staff, told the panel investigating the Capitol attack that she saw Meadows incinerate documents after a meeting in his office with Rep. Scott Perry (R-Pa.). A person familiar with the testimony described it on condition of anonymity.\n\nThe only person who wished they were Kevin McCarthy is Mark Meadows.",
">\n\nAlways seemed like the same dude.",
">\n\nPer CNN just now, he burned papers at least a dozen times.",
">\n\nWhich is illegal on its face. But, DOJ do it's job? Fat fucking chance..",
">\n\nI have a feeling he's working with the DOJ, everything ran through him",
">\n\nAlthough wasn't he the one who called Cassidy Hutchinson before her testimony and said \"we know you'll do the right thing\" witness intimidation thing?",
">\n\nThat is straight-up dialog out of a Mafia film.",
">\n\nOh that's totally normal. Why at my office we have a daily burning rite where we toss all evidence of our criminality in the bin and make s'mores. Nothing wrong with this at all, not a single thing!",
">\n\n\"These are delicious! I can't wait to commit s'more crimes, tomorrow!\"",
">\n\nJesus. This is all illegal, what are we waiting for here??",
">\n\nWell you had the joke answers so here's the real deal.\nThe DOJ just got the complete set of transcripts.\nNow they have to cross-check everything the witnesses said to the committee with everything they said to the DOJ.\nThey do this to check for lies and memory lapses. The liars then get indicted and hopefully flipped. The folks with bad memories get a chance to amend their statements.\nEach statement then has to be cross-checked against every other statement the DOJ has received. Again they check for lies and mistakes. And again they indict liars and fix errors.\nThey do this because they aren't like Bill Durham. He took his Trump Russia investigation to court and lost his case because he didn't resolve inconsistencies before the trial.\nAssuming that you want the DOJ to win, you need to wait a while before expecting action.",
">\n\nThanks for the detailed answer. I do understand it takes time. Married to a lawyer here. But even my lawyer spouse is pretty convinced nothing is going to happen. They have had portions of the testimony for months. I want to be wrong. But it has been 2 years now. That's a long time. It should be a huge priority, disturbing it is not.",
">\n\nAn attorney acquaintance put it best - 'Federal attention is like a drunk hippo; it may take a long time to meander towards you, but once it's close up, it's attention is unmistakeable for anything else.'",
">\n\nThe thing is we all know that all this horribly corrupt stuff took place. The question is, how do we make the other side of the table understand that this stuff actually happened?",
">\n\nThey don't care. They're beyond caring about legality, morality, rationality or anything decent if it means they don't win by owning the Democrats.",
">\n\nThis is why I honestly feel this country is screwed at times. You would think that regardless of political affiliation that we could all agree to not burning government documents. Furthermore, we should easily all be able to agree that it is a bad thing. But even with something as very obvious as this being a bad thing, you will find a large number of people being okay with it.\nIdea of people burning documents. The cases of trying it down the toilet. Like this sort of stuff should not be occurring and should have stopped.",
">\n\nPretty wild how all that it takes to be held completely unaccountable for domestic and global crimes against humanity is to burn, flush or swallow paper.",
">\n\nReally outrageous behavior with consciousness of guilt. You only burn papers in the White House for one reason.",
">\n\nNothing to see here, just your normal post-meeting brazier ritual. Totally normal, right?",
">\n\nIs that a clear indication they were discussing something criminal, or what?",
">\n\nOh come on, people who hate America and want to undermine our country do stuff like this all the time.",
">\n\nThey don't hate America - they hate that there are Americans who aren't like them.",
">\n\nthen they hate america until they’re all gone. these people aren’t driven by love, they are driven by hate",
">\n\nI love that this makes him the most intelligent part of the administration purely because he remembered fire exists and didn't head straight for the shitter.",
">\n\nI have doubts that Trump will see justice, but Meadows is looking proper fucked.",
">\n\nIf meadows is fucked, then trump is, too. meadows WILL flip if threatened with serious jail time.",
">\n\nI'm sure you're right that Meadows would flip, but then I expect the same BS happen there that happened with the sex trafficking charges against Gaetz. Charges were not filed bc the source was considered unreliable because they were getting a better deal for flipping essentially.",
">\n\nWhen will enough be enough? Its to the point where everyone from Trump down needs to be procuted . i for one hope Jack Smith throws the book at them no matter what government position the hold or have held.",
">\n\nScott Perry is scum of the Earth.",
">\n\nThe law is only for the poors !",
">\n\nDrain the swamp my ass. Trump thinks he’s the Don and all these other clowns are his capos.",
">\n\nConsequences? Prison?",
">\n\nWe all what he was burning. Clearly it was his Sonic the Hedgehog fanfiction where Sonic was spending quality time playing in the Meadows",
">\n\nI mean. I'm not superstitious, but I'd get some sage and smudge the whole room after talking with Scott Perry.",
">\n\nTake my up vote",
">\n\nof fucking course it was Perry. \nDude's my rep. I hate him. he is an asshat that has no morals.",
">\n\nCall him and tell him so",
">\n\nOh, I have... and I have written him. \nAll I get back is \"well, Trump is completely right, screw the PA supreme court they don't have power in the state of PA... so I am signing on to the texas judicial request because texas courts should have more power in PA than the PA courts\""
] |
>
I know that's all beside the point
Ultimately this is what matters because it will be impossible to prove what was burned. Burning papers is not inherently illegal - without an email chain that says something like "President Trump, at your request I burned documents X, Y, and Z in order to destroy incriminating evidence." there is no way to make an actual case.
|
[
"Was this the White House or Tony Soprano's house? Burning documents, flushing documents... Drain the swamp my ass.",
">\n\nOh, they thought they were Tony Soprano. I wish the world would cut to black for a moment and they would all just disappear.",
">\n\nDon't stop believin'.",
">\n\nConservatives support this type of treason. Never forget.",
">\n\nOverwhelming majority of elected Republicans are still working to cover up all the treason.",
">\n\nWhy do republicans hate America?",
">\n\nThey hate everything except POWER",
">\n\nNothing says innocent like destroying evidence.",
">\n\nThat huge sigh of relief you hear is coming from Fawn Hall lol.",
">\n\n\nThen-White House chief of staff Mark Meadows burned papers in his office after meeting with a House Republican who was working to challenge the 2020 election, according to testimony the Jan. 6 select committee has heard from one of his former aides.\nCassidy Hutchinson, who worked under Meadows when he was former President Donald Trump’s chief of staff, told the panel investigating the Capitol attack that she saw Meadows incinerate documents after a meeting in his office with Rep. Scott Perry (R-Pa.). A person familiar with the testimony described it on condition of anonymity.\n\nThe only person who wished they were Kevin McCarthy is Mark Meadows.",
">\n\nAlways seemed like the same dude.",
">\n\nPer CNN just now, he burned papers at least a dozen times.",
">\n\nWhich is illegal on its face. But, DOJ do it's job? Fat fucking chance..",
">\n\nI have a feeling he's working with the DOJ, everything ran through him",
">\n\nAlthough wasn't he the one who called Cassidy Hutchinson before her testimony and said \"we know you'll do the right thing\" witness intimidation thing?",
">\n\nThat is straight-up dialog out of a Mafia film.",
">\n\nOh that's totally normal. Why at my office we have a daily burning rite where we toss all evidence of our criminality in the bin and make s'mores. Nothing wrong with this at all, not a single thing!",
">\n\n\"These are delicious! I can't wait to commit s'more crimes, tomorrow!\"",
">\n\nJesus. This is all illegal, what are we waiting for here??",
">\n\nWell you had the joke answers so here's the real deal.\nThe DOJ just got the complete set of transcripts.\nNow they have to cross-check everything the witnesses said to the committee with everything they said to the DOJ.\nThey do this to check for lies and memory lapses. The liars then get indicted and hopefully flipped. The folks with bad memories get a chance to amend their statements.\nEach statement then has to be cross-checked against every other statement the DOJ has received. Again they check for lies and mistakes. And again they indict liars and fix errors.\nThey do this because they aren't like Bill Durham. He took his Trump Russia investigation to court and lost his case because he didn't resolve inconsistencies before the trial.\nAssuming that you want the DOJ to win, you need to wait a while before expecting action.",
">\n\nThanks for the detailed answer. I do understand it takes time. Married to a lawyer here. But even my lawyer spouse is pretty convinced nothing is going to happen. They have had portions of the testimony for months. I want to be wrong. But it has been 2 years now. That's a long time. It should be a huge priority, disturbing it is not.",
">\n\nAn attorney acquaintance put it best - 'Federal attention is like a drunk hippo; it may take a long time to meander towards you, but once it's close up, it's attention is unmistakeable for anything else.'",
">\n\nThe thing is we all know that all this horribly corrupt stuff took place. The question is, how do we make the other side of the table understand that this stuff actually happened?",
">\n\nThey don't care. They're beyond caring about legality, morality, rationality or anything decent if it means they don't win by owning the Democrats.",
">\n\nThis is why I honestly feel this country is screwed at times. You would think that regardless of political affiliation that we could all agree to not burning government documents. Furthermore, we should easily all be able to agree that it is a bad thing. But even with something as very obvious as this being a bad thing, you will find a large number of people being okay with it.\nIdea of people burning documents. The cases of trying it down the toilet. Like this sort of stuff should not be occurring and should have stopped.",
">\n\nPretty wild how all that it takes to be held completely unaccountable for domestic and global crimes against humanity is to burn, flush or swallow paper.",
">\n\nReally outrageous behavior with consciousness of guilt. You only burn papers in the White House for one reason.",
">\n\nNothing to see here, just your normal post-meeting brazier ritual. Totally normal, right?",
">\n\nIs that a clear indication they were discussing something criminal, or what?",
">\n\nOh come on, people who hate America and want to undermine our country do stuff like this all the time.",
">\n\nThey don't hate America - they hate that there are Americans who aren't like them.",
">\n\nthen they hate america until they’re all gone. these people aren’t driven by love, they are driven by hate",
">\n\nI love that this makes him the most intelligent part of the administration purely because he remembered fire exists and didn't head straight for the shitter.",
">\n\nI have doubts that Trump will see justice, but Meadows is looking proper fucked.",
">\n\nIf meadows is fucked, then trump is, too. meadows WILL flip if threatened with serious jail time.",
">\n\nI'm sure you're right that Meadows would flip, but then I expect the same BS happen there that happened with the sex trafficking charges against Gaetz. Charges were not filed bc the source was considered unreliable because they were getting a better deal for flipping essentially.",
">\n\nWhen will enough be enough? Its to the point where everyone from Trump down needs to be procuted . i for one hope Jack Smith throws the book at them no matter what government position the hold or have held.",
">\n\nScott Perry is scum of the Earth.",
">\n\nThe law is only for the poors !",
">\n\nDrain the swamp my ass. Trump thinks he’s the Don and all these other clowns are his capos.",
">\n\nConsequences? Prison?",
">\n\nWe all what he was burning. Clearly it was his Sonic the Hedgehog fanfiction where Sonic was spending quality time playing in the Meadows",
">\n\nI mean. I'm not superstitious, but I'd get some sage and smudge the whole room after talking with Scott Perry.",
">\n\nTake my up vote",
">\n\nof fucking course it was Perry. \nDude's my rep. I hate him. he is an asshat that has no morals.",
">\n\nCall him and tell him so",
">\n\nOh, I have... and I have written him. \nAll I get back is \"well, Trump is completely right, screw the PA supreme court they don't have power in the state of PA... so I am signing on to the texas judicial request because texas courts should have more power in PA than the PA courts\"",
">\n\nIn the back of my mind I keep wondering, what papers?\nIs there a stack of handouts titled \"How to Overthrow the Government\"? What are they writing on paper that's incriminating and why are they writing it at all?\nI know that's all beside the point but I can't help wondering."
] |
>
The evidence gathered by the J6 committee was bad enough, imagine the shit they thought they needed to destroy.
|
[
"Was this the White House or Tony Soprano's house? Burning documents, flushing documents... Drain the swamp my ass.",
">\n\nOh, they thought they were Tony Soprano. I wish the world would cut to black for a moment and they would all just disappear.",
">\n\nDon't stop believin'.",
">\n\nConservatives support this type of treason. Never forget.",
">\n\nOverwhelming majority of elected Republicans are still working to cover up all the treason.",
">\n\nWhy do republicans hate America?",
">\n\nThey hate everything except POWER",
">\n\nNothing says innocent like destroying evidence.",
">\n\nThat huge sigh of relief you hear is coming from Fawn Hall lol.",
">\n\n\nThen-White House chief of staff Mark Meadows burned papers in his office after meeting with a House Republican who was working to challenge the 2020 election, according to testimony the Jan. 6 select committee has heard from one of his former aides.\nCassidy Hutchinson, who worked under Meadows when he was former President Donald Trump’s chief of staff, told the panel investigating the Capitol attack that she saw Meadows incinerate documents after a meeting in his office with Rep. Scott Perry (R-Pa.). A person familiar with the testimony described it on condition of anonymity.\n\nThe only person who wished they were Kevin McCarthy is Mark Meadows.",
">\n\nAlways seemed like the same dude.",
">\n\nPer CNN just now, he burned papers at least a dozen times.",
">\n\nWhich is illegal on its face. But, DOJ do it's job? Fat fucking chance..",
">\n\nI have a feeling he's working with the DOJ, everything ran through him",
">\n\nAlthough wasn't he the one who called Cassidy Hutchinson before her testimony and said \"we know you'll do the right thing\" witness intimidation thing?",
">\n\nThat is straight-up dialog out of a Mafia film.",
">\n\nOh that's totally normal. Why at my office we have a daily burning rite where we toss all evidence of our criminality in the bin and make s'mores. Nothing wrong with this at all, not a single thing!",
">\n\n\"These are delicious! I can't wait to commit s'more crimes, tomorrow!\"",
">\n\nJesus. This is all illegal, what are we waiting for here??",
">\n\nWell you had the joke answers so here's the real deal.\nThe DOJ just got the complete set of transcripts.\nNow they have to cross-check everything the witnesses said to the committee with everything they said to the DOJ.\nThey do this to check for lies and memory lapses. The liars then get indicted and hopefully flipped. The folks with bad memories get a chance to amend their statements.\nEach statement then has to be cross-checked against every other statement the DOJ has received. Again they check for lies and mistakes. And again they indict liars and fix errors.\nThey do this because they aren't like Bill Durham. He took his Trump Russia investigation to court and lost his case because he didn't resolve inconsistencies before the trial.\nAssuming that you want the DOJ to win, you need to wait a while before expecting action.",
">\n\nThanks for the detailed answer. I do understand it takes time. Married to a lawyer here. But even my lawyer spouse is pretty convinced nothing is going to happen. They have had portions of the testimony for months. I want to be wrong. But it has been 2 years now. That's a long time. It should be a huge priority, disturbing it is not.",
">\n\nAn attorney acquaintance put it best - 'Federal attention is like a drunk hippo; it may take a long time to meander towards you, but once it's close up, it's attention is unmistakeable for anything else.'",
">\n\nThe thing is we all know that all this horribly corrupt stuff took place. The question is, how do we make the other side of the table understand that this stuff actually happened?",
">\n\nThey don't care. They're beyond caring about legality, morality, rationality or anything decent if it means they don't win by owning the Democrats.",
">\n\nThis is why I honestly feel this country is screwed at times. You would think that regardless of political affiliation that we could all agree to not burning government documents. Furthermore, we should easily all be able to agree that it is a bad thing. But even with something as very obvious as this being a bad thing, you will find a large number of people being okay with it.\nIdea of people burning documents. The cases of trying it down the toilet. Like this sort of stuff should not be occurring and should have stopped.",
">\n\nPretty wild how all that it takes to be held completely unaccountable for domestic and global crimes against humanity is to burn, flush or swallow paper.",
">\n\nReally outrageous behavior with consciousness of guilt. You only burn papers in the White House for one reason.",
">\n\nNothing to see here, just your normal post-meeting brazier ritual. Totally normal, right?",
">\n\nIs that a clear indication they were discussing something criminal, or what?",
">\n\nOh come on, people who hate America and want to undermine our country do stuff like this all the time.",
">\n\nThey don't hate America - they hate that there are Americans who aren't like them.",
">\n\nthen they hate america until they’re all gone. these people aren’t driven by love, they are driven by hate",
">\n\nI love that this makes him the most intelligent part of the administration purely because he remembered fire exists and didn't head straight for the shitter.",
">\n\nI have doubts that Trump will see justice, but Meadows is looking proper fucked.",
">\n\nIf meadows is fucked, then trump is, too. meadows WILL flip if threatened with serious jail time.",
">\n\nI'm sure you're right that Meadows would flip, but then I expect the same BS happen there that happened with the sex trafficking charges against Gaetz. Charges were not filed bc the source was considered unreliable because they were getting a better deal for flipping essentially.",
">\n\nWhen will enough be enough? Its to the point where everyone from Trump down needs to be procuted . i for one hope Jack Smith throws the book at them no matter what government position the hold or have held.",
">\n\nScott Perry is scum of the Earth.",
">\n\nThe law is only for the poors !",
">\n\nDrain the swamp my ass. Trump thinks he’s the Don and all these other clowns are his capos.",
">\n\nConsequences? Prison?",
">\n\nWe all what he was burning. Clearly it was his Sonic the Hedgehog fanfiction where Sonic was spending quality time playing in the Meadows",
">\n\nI mean. I'm not superstitious, but I'd get some sage and smudge the whole room after talking with Scott Perry.",
">\n\nTake my up vote",
">\n\nof fucking course it was Perry. \nDude's my rep. I hate him. he is an asshat that has no morals.",
">\n\nCall him and tell him so",
">\n\nOh, I have... and I have written him. \nAll I get back is \"well, Trump is completely right, screw the PA supreme court they don't have power in the state of PA... so I am signing on to the texas judicial request because texas courts should have more power in PA than the PA courts\"",
">\n\nIn the back of my mind I keep wondering, what papers?\nIs there a stack of handouts titled \"How to Overthrow the Government\"? What are they writing on paper that's incriminating and why are they writing it at all?\nI know that's all beside the point but I can't help wondering.",
">\n\n\nI know that's all beside the point\n\nUltimately this is what matters because it will be impossible to prove what was burned. Burning papers is not inherently illegal - without an email chain that says something like \"President Trump, at your request I burned documents X, Y, and Z in order to destroy incriminating evidence.\" there is no way to make an actual case."
] |
>
Where did Meadows train as a gangster?
|
[
"Was this the White House or Tony Soprano's house? Burning documents, flushing documents... Drain the swamp my ass.",
">\n\nOh, they thought they were Tony Soprano. I wish the world would cut to black for a moment and they would all just disappear.",
">\n\nDon't stop believin'.",
">\n\nConservatives support this type of treason. Never forget.",
">\n\nOverwhelming majority of elected Republicans are still working to cover up all the treason.",
">\n\nWhy do republicans hate America?",
">\n\nThey hate everything except POWER",
">\n\nNothing says innocent like destroying evidence.",
">\n\nThat huge sigh of relief you hear is coming from Fawn Hall lol.",
">\n\n\nThen-White House chief of staff Mark Meadows burned papers in his office after meeting with a House Republican who was working to challenge the 2020 election, according to testimony the Jan. 6 select committee has heard from one of his former aides.\nCassidy Hutchinson, who worked under Meadows when he was former President Donald Trump’s chief of staff, told the panel investigating the Capitol attack that she saw Meadows incinerate documents after a meeting in his office with Rep. Scott Perry (R-Pa.). A person familiar with the testimony described it on condition of anonymity.\n\nThe only person who wished they were Kevin McCarthy is Mark Meadows.",
">\n\nAlways seemed like the same dude.",
">\n\nPer CNN just now, he burned papers at least a dozen times.",
">\n\nWhich is illegal on its face. But, DOJ do it's job? Fat fucking chance..",
">\n\nI have a feeling he's working with the DOJ, everything ran through him",
">\n\nAlthough wasn't he the one who called Cassidy Hutchinson before her testimony and said \"we know you'll do the right thing\" witness intimidation thing?",
">\n\nThat is straight-up dialog out of a Mafia film.",
">\n\nOh that's totally normal. Why at my office we have a daily burning rite where we toss all evidence of our criminality in the bin and make s'mores. Nothing wrong with this at all, not a single thing!",
">\n\n\"These are delicious! I can't wait to commit s'more crimes, tomorrow!\"",
">\n\nJesus. This is all illegal, what are we waiting for here??",
">\n\nWell you had the joke answers so here's the real deal.\nThe DOJ just got the complete set of transcripts.\nNow they have to cross-check everything the witnesses said to the committee with everything they said to the DOJ.\nThey do this to check for lies and memory lapses. The liars then get indicted and hopefully flipped. The folks with bad memories get a chance to amend their statements.\nEach statement then has to be cross-checked against every other statement the DOJ has received. Again they check for lies and mistakes. And again they indict liars and fix errors.\nThey do this because they aren't like Bill Durham. He took his Trump Russia investigation to court and lost his case because he didn't resolve inconsistencies before the trial.\nAssuming that you want the DOJ to win, you need to wait a while before expecting action.",
">\n\nThanks for the detailed answer. I do understand it takes time. Married to a lawyer here. But even my lawyer spouse is pretty convinced nothing is going to happen. They have had portions of the testimony for months. I want to be wrong. But it has been 2 years now. That's a long time. It should be a huge priority, disturbing it is not.",
">\n\nAn attorney acquaintance put it best - 'Federal attention is like a drunk hippo; it may take a long time to meander towards you, but once it's close up, it's attention is unmistakeable for anything else.'",
">\n\nThe thing is we all know that all this horribly corrupt stuff took place. The question is, how do we make the other side of the table understand that this stuff actually happened?",
">\n\nThey don't care. They're beyond caring about legality, morality, rationality or anything decent if it means they don't win by owning the Democrats.",
">\n\nThis is why I honestly feel this country is screwed at times. You would think that regardless of political affiliation that we could all agree to not burning government documents. Furthermore, we should easily all be able to agree that it is a bad thing. But even with something as very obvious as this being a bad thing, you will find a large number of people being okay with it.\nIdea of people burning documents. The cases of trying it down the toilet. Like this sort of stuff should not be occurring and should have stopped.",
">\n\nPretty wild how all that it takes to be held completely unaccountable for domestic and global crimes against humanity is to burn, flush or swallow paper.",
">\n\nReally outrageous behavior with consciousness of guilt. You only burn papers in the White House for one reason.",
">\n\nNothing to see here, just your normal post-meeting brazier ritual. Totally normal, right?",
">\n\nIs that a clear indication they were discussing something criminal, or what?",
">\n\nOh come on, people who hate America and want to undermine our country do stuff like this all the time.",
">\n\nThey don't hate America - they hate that there are Americans who aren't like them.",
">\n\nthen they hate america until they’re all gone. these people aren’t driven by love, they are driven by hate",
">\n\nI love that this makes him the most intelligent part of the administration purely because he remembered fire exists and didn't head straight for the shitter.",
">\n\nI have doubts that Trump will see justice, but Meadows is looking proper fucked.",
">\n\nIf meadows is fucked, then trump is, too. meadows WILL flip if threatened with serious jail time.",
">\n\nI'm sure you're right that Meadows would flip, but then I expect the same BS happen there that happened with the sex trafficking charges against Gaetz. Charges were not filed bc the source was considered unreliable because they were getting a better deal for flipping essentially.",
">\n\nWhen will enough be enough? Its to the point where everyone from Trump down needs to be procuted . i for one hope Jack Smith throws the book at them no matter what government position the hold or have held.",
">\n\nScott Perry is scum of the Earth.",
">\n\nThe law is only for the poors !",
">\n\nDrain the swamp my ass. Trump thinks he’s the Don and all these other clowns are his capos.",
">\n\nConsequences? Prison?",
">\n\nWe all what he was burning. Clearly it was his Sonic the Hedgehog fanfiction where Sonic was spending quality time playing in the Meadows",
">\n\nI mean. I'm not superstitious, but I'd get some sage and smudge the whole room after talking with Scott Perry.",
">\n\nTake my up vote",
">\n\nof fucking course it was Perry. \nDude's my rep. I hate him. he is an asshat that has no morals.",
">\n\nCall him and tell him so",
">\n\nOh, I have... and I have written him. \nAll I get back is \"well, Trump is completely right, screw the PA supreme court they don't have power in the state of PA... so I am signing on to the texas judicial request because texas courts should have more power in PA than the PA courts\"",
">\n\nIn the back of my mind I keep wondering, what papers?\nIs there a stack of handouts titled \"How to Overthrow the Government\"? What are they writing on paper that's incriminating and why are they writing it at all?\nI know that's all beside the point but I can't help wondering.",
">\n\n\nI know that's all beside the point\n\nUltimately this is what matters because it will be impossible to prove what was burned. Burning papers is not inherently illegal - without an email chain that says something like \"President Trump, at your request I burned documents X, Y, and Z in order to destroy incriminating evidence.\" there is no way to make an actual case.",
">\n\nThe evidence gathered by the J6 committee was bad enough, imagine the shit they thought they needed to destroy."
] |
>
Trump University.
|
[
"Was this the White House or Tony Soprano's house? Burning documents, flushing documents... Drain the swamp my ass.",
">\n\nOh, they thought they were Tony Soprano. I wish the world would cut to black for a moment and they would all just disappear.",
">\n\nDon't stop believin'.",
">\n\nConservatives support this type of treason. Never forget.",
">\n\nOverwhelming majority of elected Republicans are still working to cover up all the treason.",
">\n\nWhy do republicans hate America?",
">\n\nThey hate everything except POWER",
">\n\nNothing says innocent like destroying evidence.",
">\n\nThat huge sigh of relief you hear is coming from Fawn Hall lol.",
">\n\n\nThen-White House chief of staff Mark Meadows burned papers in his office after meeting with a House Republican who was working to challenge the 2020 election, according to testimony the Jan. 6 select committee has heard from one of his former aides.\nCassidy Hutchinson, who worked under Meadows when he was former President Donald Trump’s chief of staff, told the panel investigating the Capitol attack that she saw Meadows incinerate documents after a meeting in his office with Rep. Scott Perry (R-Pa.). A person familiar with the testimony described it on condition of anonymity.\n\nThe only person who wished they were Kevin McCarthy is Mark Meadows.",
">\n\nAlways seemed like the same dude.",
">\n\nPer CNN just now, he burned papers at least a dozen times.",
">\n\nWhich is illegal on its face. But, DOJ do it's job? Fat fucking chance..",
">\n\nI have a feeling he's working with the DOJ, everything ran through him",
">\n\nAlthough wasn't he the one who called Cassidy Hutchinson before her testimony and said \"we know you'll do the right thing\" witness intimidation thing?",
">\n\nThat is straight-up dialog out of a Mafia film.",
">\n\nOh that's totally normal. Why at my office we have a daily burning rite where we toss all evidence of our criminality in the bin and make s'mores. Nothing wrong with this at all, not a single thing!",
">\n\n\"These are delicious! I can't wait to commit s'more crimes, tomorrow!\"",
">\n\nJesus. This is all illegal, what are we waiting for here??",
">\n\nWell you had the joke answers so here's the real deal.\nThe DOJ just got the complete set of transcripts.\nNow they have to cross-check everything the witnesses said to the committee with everything they said to the DOJ.\nThey do this to check for lies and memory lapses. The liars then get indicted and hopefully flipped. The folks with bad memories get a chance to amend their statements.\nEach statement then has to be cross-checked against every other statement the DOJ has received. Again they check for lies and mistakes. And again they indict liars and fix errors.\nThey do this because they aren't like Bill Durham. He took his Trump Russia investigation to court and lost his case because he didn't resolve inconsistencies before the trial.\nAssuming that you want the DOJ to win, you need to wait a while before expecting action.",
">\n\nThanks for the detailed answer. I do understand it takes time. Married to a lawyer here. But even my lawyer spouse is pretty convinced nothing is going to happen. They have had portions of the testimony for months. I want to be wrong. But it has been 2 years now. That's a long time. It should be a huge priority, disturbing it is not.",
">\n\nAn attorney acquaintance put it best - 'Federal attention is like a drunk hippo; it may take a long time to meander towards you, but once it's close up, it's attention is unmistakeable for anything else.'",
">\n\nThe thing is we all know that all this horribly corrupt stuff took place. The question is, how do we make the other side of the table understand that this stuff actually happened?",
">\n\nThey don't care. They're beyond caring about legality, morality, rationality or anything decent if it means they don't win by owning the Democrats.",
">\n\nThis is why I honestly feel this country is screwed at times. You would think that regardless of political affiliation that we could all agree to not burning government documents. Furthermore, we should easily all be able to agree that it is a bad thing. But even with something as very obvious as this being a bad thing, you will find a large number of people being okay with it.\nIdea of people burning documents. The cases of trying it down the toilet. Like this sort of stuff should not be occurring and should have stopped.",
">\n\nPretty wild how all that it takes to be held completely unaccountable for domestic and global crimes against humanity is to burn, flush or swallow paper.",
">\n\nReally outrageous behavior with consciousness of guilt. You only burn papers in the White House for one reason.",
">\n\nNothing to see here, just your normal post-meeting brazier ritual. Totally normal, right?",
">\n\nIs that a clear indication they were discussing something criminal, or what?",
">\n\nOh come on, people who hate America and want to undermine our country do stuff like this all the time.",
">\n\nThey don't hate America - they hate that there are Americans who aren't like them.",
">\n\nthen they hate america until they’re all gone. these people aren’t driven by love, they are driven by hate",
">\n\nI love that this makes him the most intelligent part of the administration purely because he remembered fire exists and didn't head straight for the shitter.",
">\n\nI have doubts that Trump will see justice, but Meadows is looking proper fucked.",
">\n\nIf meadows is fucked, then trump is, too. meadows WILL flip if threatened with serious jail time.",
">\n\nI'm sure you're right that Meadows would flip, but then I expect the same BS happen there that happened with the sex trafficking charges against Gaetz. Charges were not filed bc the source was considered unreliable because they were getting a better deal for flipping essentially.",
">\n\nWhen will enough be enough? Its to the point where everyone from Trump down needs to be procuted . i for one hope Jack Smith throws the book at them no matter what government position the hold or have held.",
">\n\nScott Perry is scum of the Earth.",
">\n\nThe law is only for the poors !",
">\n\nDrain the swamp my ass. Trump thinks he’s the Don and all these other clowns are his capos.",
">\n\nConsequences? Prison?",
">\n\nWe all what he was burning. Clearly it was his Sonic the Hedgehog fanfiction where Sonic was spending quality time playing in the Meadows",
">\n\nI mean. I'm not superstitious, but I'd get some sage and smudge the whole room after talking with Scott Perry.",
">\n\nTake my up vote",
">\n\nof fucking course it was Perry. \nDude's my rep. I hate him. he is an asshat that has no morals.",
">\n\nCall him and tell him so",
">\n\nOh, I have... and I have written him. \nAll I get back is \"well, Trump is completely right, screw the PA supreme court they don't have power in the state of PA... so I am signing on to the texas judicial request because texas courts should have more power in PA than the PA courts\"",
">\n\nIn the back of my mind I keep wondering, what papers?\nIs there a stack of handouts titled \"How to Overthrow the Government\"? What are they writing on paper that's incriminating and why are they writing it at all?\nI know that's all beside the point but I can't help wondering.",
">\n\n\nI know that's all beside the point\n\nUltimately this is what matters because it will be impossible to prove what was burned. Burning papers is not inherently illegal - without an email chain that says something like \"President Trump, at your request I burned documents X, Y, and Z in order to destroy incriminating evidence.\" there is no way to make an actual case.",
">\n\nThe evidence gathered by the J6 committee was bad enough, imagine the shit they thought they needed to destroy.",
">\n\nWhere did Meadows train as a gangster?"
] |
>
For the WIN!!!
|
[
"Was this the White House or Tony Soprano's house? Burning documents, flushing documents... Drain the swamp my ass.",
">\n\nOh, they thought they were Tony Soprano. I wish the world would cut to black for a moment and they would all just disappear.",
">\n\nDon't stop believin'.",
">\n\nConservatives support this type of treason. Never forget.",
">\n\nOverwhelming majority of elected Republicans are still working to cover up all the treason.",
">\n\nWhy do republicans hate America?",
">\n\nThey hate everything except POWER",
">\n\nNothing says innocent like destroying evidence.",
">\n\nThat huge sigh of relief you hear is coming from Fawn Hall lol.",
">\n\n\nThen-White House chief of staff Mark Meadows burned papers in his office after meeting with a House Republican who was working to challenge the 2020 election, according to testimony the Jan. 6 select committee has heard from one of his former aides.\nCassidy Hutchinson, who worked under Meadows when he was former President Donald Trump’s chief of staff, told the panel investigating the Capitol attack that she saw Meadows incinerate documents after a meeting in his office with Rep. Scott Perry (R-Pa.). A person familiar with the testimony described it on condition of anonymity.\n\nThe only person who wished they were Kevin McCarthy is Mark Meadows.",
">\n\nAlways seemed like the same dude.",
">\n\nPer CNN just now, he burned papers at least a dozen times.",
">\n\nWhich is illegal on its face. But, DOJ do it's job? Fat fucking chance..",
">\n\nI have a feeling he's working with the DOJ, everything ran through him",
">\n\nAlthough wasn't he the one who called Cassidy Hutchinson before her testimony and said \"we know you'll do the right thing\" witness intimidation thing?",
">\n\nThat is straight-up dialog out of a Mafia film.",
">\n\nOh that's totally normal. Why at my office we have a daily burning rite where we toss all evidence of our criminality in the bin and make s'mores. Nothing wrong with this at all, not a single thing!",
">\n\n\"These are delicious! I can't wait to commit s'more crimes, tomorrow!\"",
">\n\nJesus. This is all illegal, what are we waiting for here??",
">\n\nWell you had the joke answers so here's the real deal.\nThe DOJ just got the complete set of transcripts.\nNow they have to cross-check everything the witnesses said to the committee with everything they said to the DOJ.\nThey do this to check for lies and memory lapses. The liars then get indicted and hopefully flipped. The folks with bad memories get a chance to amend their statements.\nEach statement then has to be cross-checked against every other statement the DOJ has received. Again they check for lies and mistakes. And again they indict liars and fix errors.\nThey do this because they aren't like Bill Durham. He took his Trump Russia investigation to court and lost his case because he didn't resolve inconsistencies before the trial.\nAssuming that you want the DOJ to win, you need to wait a while before expecting action.",
">\n\nThanks for the detailed answer. I do understand it takes time. Married to a lawyer here. But even my lawyer spouse is pretty convinced nothing is going to happen. They have had portions of the testimony for months. I want to be wrong. But it has been 2 years now. That's a long time. It should be a huge priority, disturbing it is not.",
">\n\nAn attorney acquaintance put it best - 'Federal attention is like a drunk hippo; it may take a long time to meander towards you, but once it's close up, it's attention is unmistakeable for anything else.'",
">\n\nThe thing is we all know that all this horribly corrupt stuff took place. The question is, how do we make the other side of the table understand that this stuff actually happened?",
">\n\nThey don't care. They're beyond caring about legality, morality, rationality or anything decent if it means they don't win by owning the Democrats.",
">\n\nThis is why I honestly feel this country is screwed at times. You would think that regardless of political affiliation that we could all agree to not burning government documents. Furthermore, we should easily all be able to agree that it is a bad thing. But even with something as very obvious as this being a bad thing, you will find a large number of people being okay with it.\nIdea of people burning documents. The cases of trying it down the toilet. Like this sort of stuff should not be occurring and should have stopped.",
">\n\nPretty wild how all that it takes to be held completely unaccountable for domestic and global crimes against humanity is to burn, flush or swallow paper.",
">\n\nReally outrageous behavior with consciousness of guilt. You only burn papers in the White House for one reason.",
">\n\nNothing to see here, just your normal post-meeting brazier ritual. Totally normal, right?",
">\n\nIs that a clear indication they were discussing something criminal, or what?",
">\n\nOh come on, people who hate America and want to undermine our country do stuff like this all the time.",
">\n\nThey don't hate America - they hate that there are Americans who aren't like them.",
">\n\nthen they hate america until they’re all gone. these people aren’t driven by love, they are driven by hate",
">\n\nI love that this makes him the most intelligent part of the administration purely because he remembered fire exists and didn't head straight for the shitter.",
">\n\nI have doubts that Trump will see justice, but Meadows is looking proper fucked.",
">\n\nIf meadows is fucked, then trump is, too. meadows WILL flip if threatened with serious jail time.",
">\n\nI'm sure you're right that Meadows would flip, but then I expect the same BS happen there that happened with the sex trafficking charges against Gaetz. Charges were not filed bc the source was considered unreliable because they were getting a better deal for flipping essentially.",
">\n\nWhen will enough be enough? Its to the point where everyone from Trump down needs to be procuted . i for one hope Jack Smith throws the book at them no matter what government position the hold or have held.",
">\n\nScott Perry is scum of the Earth.",
">\n\nThe law is only for the poors !",
">\n\nDrain the swamp my ass. Trump thinks he’s the Don and all these other clowns are his capos.",
">\n\nConsequences? Prison?",
">\n\nWe all what he was burning. Clearly it was his Sonic the Hedgehog fanfiction where Sonic was spending quality time playing in the Meadows",
">\n\nI mean. I'm not superstitious, but I'd get some sage and smudge the whole room after talking with Scott Perry.",
">\n\nTake my up vote",
">\n\nof fucking course it was Perry. \nDude's my rep. I hate him. he is an asshat that has no morals.",
">\n\nCall him and tell him so",
">\n\nOh, I have... and I have written him. \nAll I get back is \"well, Trump is completely right, screw the PA supreme court they don't have power in the state of PA... so I am signing on to the texas judicial request because texas courts should have more power in PA than the PA courts\"",
">\n\nIn the back of my mind I keep wondering, what papers?\nIs there a stack of handouts titled \"How to Overthrow the Government\"? What are they writing on paper that's incriminating and why are they writing it at all?\nI know that's all beside the point but I can't help wondering.",
">\n\n\nI know that's all beside the point\n\nUltimately this is what matters because it will be impossible to prove what was burned. Burning papers is not inherently illegal - without an email chain that says something like \"President Trump, at your request I burned documents X, Y, and Z in order to destroy incriminating evidence.\" there is no way to make an actual case.",
">\n\nThe evidence gathered by the J6 committee was bad enough, imagine the shit they thought they needed to destroy.",
">\n\nWhere did Meadows train as a gangster?",
">\n\nTrump University."
] |
>
“Mark, just checking in as time continues to count down,” Perry texted Meadows on Dec. 26, 2020, according to messages released by the select panel. “11 days to 1/6 and 25 days to inauguration. We gotta get going!”
Ready to get going, Mark?
|
[
"Was this the White House or Tony Soprano's house? Burning documents, flushing documents... Drain the swamp my ass.",
">\n\nOh, they thought they were Tony Soprano. I wish the world would cut to black for a moment and they would all just disappear.",
">\n\nDon't stop believin'.",
">\n\nConservatives support this type of treason. Never forget.",
">\n\nOverwhelming majority of elected Republicans are still working to cover up all the treason.",
">\n\nWhy do republicans hate America?",
">\n\nThey hate everything except POWER",
">\n\nNothing says innocent like destroying evidence.",
">\n\nThat huge sigh of relief you hear is coming from Fawn Hall lol.",
">\n\n\nThen-White House chief of staff Mark Meadows burned papers in his office after meeting with a House Republican who was working to challenge the 2020 election, according to testimony the Jan. 6 select committee has heard from one of his former aides.\nCassidy Hutchinson, who worked under Meadows when he was former President Donald Trump’s chief of staff, told the panel investigating the Capitol attack that she saw Meadows incinerate documents after a meeting in his office with Rep. Scott Perry (R-Pa.). A person familiar with the testimony described it on condition of anonymity.\n\nThe only person who wished they were Kevin McCarthy is Mark Meadows.",
">\n\nAlways seemed like the same dude.",
">\n\nPer CNN just now, he burned papers at least a dozen times.",
">\n\nWhich is illegal on its face. But, DOJ do it's job? Fat fucking chance..",
">\n\nI have a feeling he's working with the DOJ, everything ran through him",
">\n\nAlthough wasn't he the one who called Cassidy Hutchinson before her testimony and said \"we know you'll do the right thing\" witness intimidation thing?",
">\n\nThat is straight-up dialog out of a Mafia film.",
">\n\nOh that's totally normal. Why at my office we have a daily burning rite where we toss all evidence of our criminality in the bin and make s'mores. Nothing wrong with this at all, not a single thing!",
">\n\n\"These are delicious! I can't wait to commit s'more crimes, tomorrow!\"",
">\n\nJesus. This is all illegal, what are we waiting for here??",
">\n\nWell you had the joke answers so here's the real deal.\nThe DOJ just got the complete set of transcripts.\nNow they have to cross-check everything the witnesses said to the committee with everything they said to the DOJ.\nThey do this to check for lies and memory lapses. The liars then get indicted and hopefully flipped. The folks with bad memories get a chance to amend their statements.\nEach statement then has to be cross-checked against every other statement the DOJ has received. Again they check for lies and mistakes. And again they indict liars and fix errors.\nThey do this because they aren't like Bill Durham. He took his Trump Russia investigation to court and lost his case because he didn't resolve inconsistencies before the trial.\nAssuming that you want the DOJ to win, you need to wait a while before expecting action.",
">\n\nThanks for the detailed answer. I do understand it takes time. Married to a lawyer here. But even my lawyer spouse is pretty convinced nothing is going to happen. They have had portions of the testimony for months. I want to be wrong. But it has been 2 years now. That's a long time. It should be a huge priority, disturbing it is not.",
">\n\nAn attorney acquaintance put it best - 'Federal attention is like a drunk hippo; it may take a long time to meander towards you, but once it's close up, it's attention is unmistakeable for anything else.'",
">\n\nThe thing is we all know that all this horribly corrupt stuff took place. The question is, how do we make the other side of the table understand that this stuff actually happened?",
">\n\nThey don't care. They're beyond caring about legality, morality, rationality or anything decent if it means they don't win by owning the Democrats.",
">\n\nThis is why I honestly feel this country is screwed at times. You would think that regardless of political affiliation that we could all agree to not burning government documents. Furthermore, we should easily all be able to agree that it is a bad thing. But even with something as very obvious as this being a bad thing, you will find a large number of people being okay with it.\nIdea of people burning documents. The cases of trying it down the toilet. Like this sort of stuff should not be occurring and should have stopped.",
">\n\nPretty wild how all that it takes to be held completely unaccountable for domestic and global crimes against humanity is to burn, flush or swallow paper.",
">\n\nReally outrageous behavior with consciousness of guilt. You only burn papers in the White House for one reason.",
">\n\nNothing to see here, just your normal post-meeting brazier ritual. Totally normal, right?",
">\n\nIs that a clear indication they were discussing something criminal, or what?",
">\n\nOh come on, people who hate America and want to undermine our country do stuff like this all the time.",
">\n\nThey don't hate America - they hate that there are Americans who aren't like them.",
">\n\nthen they hate america until they’re all gone. these people aren’t driven by love, they are driven by hate",
">\n\nI love that this makes him the most intelligent part of the administration purely because he remembered fire exists and didn't head straight for the shitter.",
">\n\nI have doubts that Trump will see justice, but Meadows is looking proper fucked.",
">\n\nIf meadows is fucked, then trump is, too. meadows WILL flip if threatened with serious jail time.",
">\n\nI'm sure you're right that Meadows would flip, but then I expect the same BS happen there that happened with the sex trafficking charges against Gaetz. Charges were not filed bc the source was considered unreliable because they were getting a better deal for flipping essentially.",
">\n\nWhen will enough be enough? Its to the point where everyone from Trump down needs to be procuted . i for one hope Jack Smith throws the book at them no matter what government position the hold or have held.",
">\n\nScott Perry is scum of the Earth.",
">\n\nThe law is only for the poors !",
">\n\nDrain the swamp my ass. Trump thinks he’s the Don and all these other clowns are his capos.",
">\n\nConsequences? Prison?",
">\n\nWe all what he was burning. Clearly it was his Sonic the Hedgehog fanfiction where Sonic was spending quality time playing in the Meadows",
">\n\nI mean. I'm not superstitious, but I'd get some sage and smudge the whole room after talking with Scott Perry.",
">\n\nTake my up vote",
">\n\nof fucking course it was Perry. \nDude's my rep. I hate him. he is an asshat that has no morals.",
">\n\nCall him and tell him so",
">\n\nOh, I have... and I have written him. \nAll I get back is \"well, Trump is completely right, screw the PA supreme court they don't have power in the state of PA... so I am signing on to the texas judicial request because texas courts should have more power in PA than the PA courts\"",
">\n\nIn the back of my mind I keep wondering, what papers?\nIs there a stack of handouts titled \"How to Overthrow the Government\"? What are they writing on paper that's incriminating and why are they writing it at all?\nI know that's all beside the point but I can't help wondering.",
">\n\n\nI know that's all beside the point\n\nUltimately this is what matters because it will be impossible to prove what was burned. Burning papers is not inherently illegal - without an email chain that says something like \"President Trump, at your request I burned documents X, Y, and Z in order to destroy incriminating evidence.\" there is no way to make an actual case.",
">\n\nThe evidence gathered by the J6 committee was bad enough, imagine the shit they thought they needed to destroy.",
">\n\nWhere did Meadows train as a gangster?",
">\n\nTrump University.",
">\n\nFor the WIN!!!"
] |
>
Funny that r/conservative doesn't have a single post discussing this. Just more Biden hate, covid hate, woke language hate, etc.
|
[
"Was this the White House or Tony Soprano's house? Burning documents, flushing documents... Drain the swamp my ass.",
">\n\nOh, they thought they were Tony Soprano. I wish the world would cut to black for a moment and they would all just disappear.",
">\n\nDon't stop believin'.",
">\n\nConservatives support this type of treason. Never forget.",
">\n\nOverwhelming majority of elected Republicans are still working to cover up all the treason.",
">\n\nWhy do republicans hate America?",
">\n\nThey hate everything except POWER",
">\n\nNothing says innocent like destroying evidence.",
">\n\nThat huge sigh of relief you hear is coming from Fawn Hall lol.",
">\n\n\nThen-White House chief of staff Mark Meadows burned papers in his office after meeting with a House Republican who was working to challenge the 2020 election, according to testimony the Jan. 6 select committee has heard from one of his former aides.\nCassidy Hutchinson, who worked under Meadows when he was former President Donald Trump’s chief of staff, told the panel investigating the Capitol attack that she saw Meadows incinerate documents after a meeting in his office with Rep. Scott Perry (R-Pa.). A person familiar with the testimony described it on condition of anonymity.\n\nThe only person who wished they were Kevin McCarthy is Mark Meadows.",
">\n\nAlways seemed like the same dude.",
">\n\nPer CNN just now, he burned papers at least a dozen times.",
">\n\nWhich is illegal on its face. But, DOJ do it's job? Fat fucking chance..",
">\n\nI have a feeling he's working with the DOJ, everything ran through him",
">\n\nAlthough wasn't he the one who called Cassidy Hutchinson before her testimony and said \"we know you'll do the right thing\" witness intimidation thing?",
">\n\nThat is straight-up dialog out of a Mafia film.",
">\n\nOh that's totally normal. Why at my office we have a daily burning rite where we toss all evidence of our criminality in the bin and make s'mores. Nothing wrong with this at all, not a single thing!",
">\n\n\"These are delicious! I can't wait to commit s'more crimes, tomorrow!\"",
">\n\nJesus. This is all illegal, what are we waiting for here??",
">\n\nWell you had the joke answers so here's the real deal.\nThe DOJ just got the complete set of transcripts.\nNow they have to cross-check everything the witnesses said to the committee with everything they said to the DOJ.\nThey do this to check for lies and memory lapses. The liars then get indicted and hopefully flipped. The folks with bad memories get a chance to amend their statements.\nEach statement then has to be cross-checked against every other statement the DOJ has received. Again they check for lies and mistakes. And again they indict liars and fix errors.\nThey do this because they aren't like Bill Durham. He took his Trump Russia investigation to court and lost his case because he didn't resolve inconsistencies before the trial.\nAssuming that you want the DOJ to win, you need to wait a while before expecting action.",
">\n\nThanks for the detailed answer. I do understand it takes time. Married to a lawyer here. But even my lawyer spouse is pretty convinced nothing is going to happen. They have had portions of the testimony for months. I want to be wrong. But it has been 2 years now. That's a long time. It should be a huge priority, disturbing it is not.",
">\n\nAn attorney acquaintance put it best - 'Federal attention is like a drunk hippo; it may take a long time to meander towards you, but once it's close up, it's attention is unmistakeable for anything else.'",
">\n\nThe thing is we all know that all this horribly corrupt stuff took place. The question is, how do we make the other side of the table understand that this stuff actually happened?",
">\n\nThey don't care. They're beyond caring about legality, morality, rationality or anything decent if it means they don't win by owning the Democrats.",
">\n\nThis is why I honestly feel this country is screwed at times. You would think that regardless of political affiliation that we could all agree to not burning government documents. Furthermore, we should easily all be able to agree that it is a bad thing. But even with something as very obvious as this being a bad thing, you will find a large number of people being okay with it.\nIdea of people burning documents. The cases of trying it down the toilet. Like this sort of stuff should not be occurring and should have stopped.",
">\n\nPretty wild how all that it takes to be held completely unaccountable for domestic and global crimes against humanity is to burn, flush or swallow paper.",
">\n\nReally outrageous behavior with consciousness of guilt. You only burn papers in the White House for one reason.",
">\n\nNothing to see here, just your normal post-meeting brazier ritual. Totally normal, right?",
">\n\nIs that a clear indication they were discussing something criminal, or what?",
">\n\nOh come on, people who hate America and want to undermine our country do stuff like this all the time.",
">\n\nThey don't hate America - they hate that there are Americans who aren't like them.",
">\n\nthen they hate america until they’re all gone. these people aren’t driven by love, they are driven by hate",
">\n\nI love that this makes him the most intelligent part of the administration purely because he remembered fire exists and didn't head straight for the shitter.",
">\n\nI have doubts that Trump will see justice, but Meadows is looking proper fucked.",
">\n\nIf meadows is fucked, then trump is, too. meadows WILL flip if threatened with serious jail time.",
">\n\nI'm sure you're right that Meadows would flip, but then I expect the same BS happen there that happened with the sex trafficking charges against Gaetz. Charges were not filed bc the source was considered unreliable because they were getting a better deal for flipping essentially.",
">\n\nWhen will enough be enough? Its to the point where everyone from Trump down needs to be procuted . i for one hope Jack Smith throws the book at them no matter what government position the hold or have held.",
">\n\nScott Perry is scum of the Earth.",
">\n\nThe law is only for the poors !",
">\n\nDrain the swamp my ass. Trump thinks he’s the Don and all these other clowns are his capos.",
">\n\nConsequences? Prison?",
">\n\nWe all what he was burning. Clearly it was his Sonic the Hedgehog fanfiction where Sonic was spending quality time playing in the Meadows",
">\n\nI mean. I'm not superstitious, but I'd get some sage and smudge the whole room after talking with Scott Perry.",
">\n\nTake my up vote",
">\n\nof fucking course it was Perry. \nDude's my rep. I hate him. he is an asshat that has no morals.",
">\n\nCall him and tell him so",
">\n\nOh, I have... and I have written him. \nAll I get back is \"well, Trump is completely right, screw the PA supreme court they don't have power in the state of PA... so I am signing on to the texas judicial request because texas courts should have more power in PA than the PA courts\"",
">\n\nIn the back of my mind I keep wondering, what papers?\nIs there a stack of handouts titled \"How to Overthrow the Government\"? What are they writing on paper that's incriminating and why are they writing it at all?\nI know that's all beside the point but I can't help wondering.",
">\n\n\nI know that's all beside the point\n\nUltimately this is what matters because it will be impossible to prove what was burned. Burning papers is not inherently illegal - without an email chain that says something like \"President Trump, at your request I burned documents X, Y, and Z in order to destroy incriminating evidence.\" there is no way to make an actual case.",
">\n\nThe evidence gathered by the J6 committee was bad enough, imagine the shit they thought they needed to destroy.",
">\n\nWhere did Meadows train as a gangster?",
">\n\nTrump University.",
">\n\nFor the WIN!!!",
">\n\n“Mark, just checking in as time continues to count down,” Perry texted Meadows on Dec. 26, 2020, according to messages released by the select panel. “11 days to 1/6 and 25 days to inauguration. We gotta get going!”\nReady to get going, Mark?"
] |
>
How do you burn a bunch of papers inside an office without setting off every smoke alarm within 300 feet? It’s not like the White House windows open up.
|
[
"Was this the White House or Tony Soprano's house? Burning documents, flushing documents... Drain the swamp my ass.",
">\n\nOh, they thought they were Tony Soprano. I wish the world would cut to black for a moment and they would all just disappear.",
">\n\nDon't stop believin'.",
">\n\nConservatives support this type of treason. Never forget.",
">\n\nOverwhelming majority of elected Republicans are still working to cover up all the treason.",
">\n\nWhy do republicans hate America?",
">\n\nThey hate everything except POWER",
">\n\nNothing says innocent like destroying evidence.",
">\n\nThat huge sigh of relief you hear is coming from Fawn Hall lol.",
">\n\n\nThen-White House chief of staff Mark Meadows burned papers in his office after meeting with a House Republican who was working to challenge the 2020 election, according to testimony the Jan. 6 select committee has heard from one of his former aides.\nCassidy Hutchinson, who worked under Meadows when he was former President Donald Trump’s chief of staff, told the panel investigating the Capitol attack that she saw Meadows incinerate documents after a meeting in his office with Rep. Scott Perry (R-Pa.). A person familiar with the testimony described it on condition of anonymity.\n\nThe only person who wished they were Kevin McCarthy is Mark Meadows.",
">\n\nAlways seemed like the same dude.",
">\n\nPer CNN just now, he burned papers at least a dozen times.",
">\n\nWhich is illegal on its face. But, DOJ do it's job? Fat fucking chance..",
">\n\nI have a feeling he's working with the DOJ, everything ran through him",
">\n\nAlthough wasn't he the one who called Cassidy Hutchinson before her testimony and said \"we know you'll do the right thing\" witness intimidation thing?",
">\n\nThat is straight-up dialog out of a Mafia film.",
">\n\nOh that's totally normal. Why at my office we have a daily burning rite where we toss all evidence of our criminality in the bin and make s'mores. Nothing wrong with this at all, not a single thing!",
">\n\n\"These are delicious! I can't wait to commit s'more crimes, tomorrow!\"",
">\n\nJesus. This is all illegal, what are we waiting for here??",
">\n\nWell you had the joke answers so here's the real deal.\nThe DOJ just got the complete set of transcripts.\nNow they have to cross-check everything the witnesses said to the committee with everything they said to the DOJ.\nThey do this to check for lies and memory lapses. The liars then get indicted and hopefully flipped. The folks with bad memories get a chance to amend their statements.\nEach statement then has to be cross-checked against every other statement the DOJ has received. Again they check for lies and mistakes. And again they indict liars and fix errors.\nThey do this because they aren't like Bill Durham. He took his Trump Russia investigation to court and lost his case because he didn't resolve inconsistencies before the trial.\nAssuming that you want the DOJ to win, you need to wait a while before expecting action.",
">\n\nThanks for the detailed answer. I do understand it takes time. Married to a lawyer here. But even my lawyer spouse is pretty convinced nothing is going to happen. They have had portions of the testimony for months. I want to be wrong. But it has been 2 years now. That's a long time. It should be a huge priority, disturbing it is not.",
">\n\nAn attorney acquaintance put it best - 'Federal attention is like a drunk hippo; it may take a long time to meander towards you, but once it's close up, it's attention is unmistakeable for anything else.'",
">\n\nThe thing is we all know that all this horribly corrupt stuff took place. The question is, how do we make the other side of the table understand that this stuff actually happened?",
">\n\nThey don't care. They're beyond caring about legality, morality, rationality or anything decent if it means they don't win by owning the Democrats.",
">\n\nThis is why I honestly feel this country is screwed at times. You would think that regardless of political affiliation that we could all agree to not burning government documents. Furthermore, we should easily all be able to agree that it is a bad thing. But even with something as very obvious as this being a bad thing, you will find a large number of people being okay with it.\nIdea of people burning documents. The cases of trying it down the toilet. Like this sort of stuff should not be occurring and should have stopped.",
">\n\nPretty wild how all that it takes to be held completely unaccountable for domestic and global crimes against humanity is to burn, flush or swallow paper.",
">\n\nReally outrageous behavior with consciousness of guilt. You only burn papers in the White House for one reason.",
">\n\nNothing to see here, just your normal post-meeting brazier ritual. Totally normal, right?",
">\n\nIs that a clear indication they were discussing something criminal, or what?",
">\n\nOh come on, people who hate America and want to undermine our country do stuff like this all the time.",
">\n\nThey don't hate America - they hate that there are Americans who aren't like them.",
">\n\nthen they hate america until they’re all gone. these people aren’t driven by love, they are driven by hate",
">\n\nI love that this makes him the most intelligent part of the administration purely because he remembered fire exists and didn't head straight for the shitter.",
">\n\nI have doubts that Trump will see justice, but Meadows is looking proper fucked.",
">\n\nIf meadows is fucked, then trump is, too. meadows WILL flip if threatened with serious jail time.",
">\n\nI'm sure you're right that Meadows would flip, but then I expect the same BS happen there that happened with the sex trafficking charges against Gaetz. Charges were not filed bc the source was considered unreliable because they were getting a better deal for flipping essentially.",
">\n\nWhen will enough be enough? Its to the point where everyone from Trump down needs to be procuted . i for one hope Jack Smith throws the book at them no matter what government position the hold or have held.",
">\n\nScott Perry is scum of the Earth.",
">\n\nThe law is only for the poors !",
">\n\nDrain the swamp my ass. Trump thinks he’s the Don and all these other clowns are his capos.",
">\n\nConsequences? Prison?",
">\n\nWe all what he was burning. Clearly it was his Sonic the Hedgehog fanfiction where Sonic was spending quality time playing in the Meadows",
">\n\nI mean. I'm not superstitious, but I'd get some sage and smudge the whole room after talking with Scott Perry.",
">\n\nTake my up vote",
">\n\nof fucking course it was Perry. \nDude's my rep. I hate him. he is an asshat that has no morals.",
">\n\nCall him and tell him so",
">\n\nOh, I have... and I have written him. \nAll I get back is \"well, Trump is completely right, screw the PA supreme court they don't have power in the state of PA... so I am signing on to the texas judicial request because texas courts should have more power in PA than the PA courts\"",
">\n\nIn the back of my mind I keep wondering, what papers?\nIs there a stack of handouts titled \"How to Overthrow the Government\"? What are they writing on paper that's incriminating and why are they writing it at all?\nI know that's all beside the point but I can't help wondering.",
">\n\n\nI know that's all beside the point\n\nUltimately this is what matters because it will be impossible to prove what was burned. Burning papers is not inherently illegal - without an email chain that says something like \"President Trump, at your request I burned documents X, Y, and Z in order to destroy incriminating evidence.\" there is no way to make an actual case.",
">\n\nThe evidence gathered by the J6 committee was bad enough, imagine the shit they thought they needed to destroy.",
">\n\nWhere did Meadows train as a gangster?",
">\n\nTrump University.",
">\n\nFor the WIN!!!",
">\n\n“Mark, just checking in as time continues to count down,” Perry texted Meadows on Dec. 26, 2020, according to messages released by the select panel. “11 days to 1/6 and 25 days to inauguration. We gotta get going!”\nReady to get going, Mark?",
">\n\nFunny that r/conservative doesn't have a single post discussing this. Just more Biden hate, covid hate, woke language hate, etc."
] |
>
There are fireplaces
|
[
"Was this the White House or Tony Soprano's house? Burning documents, flushing documents... Drain the swamp my ass.",
">\n\nOh, they thought they were Tony Soprano. I wish the world would cut to black for a moment and they would all just disappear.",
">\n\nDon't stop believin'.",
">\n\nConservatives support this type of treason. Never forget.",
">\n\nOverwhelming majority of elected Republicans are still working to cover up all the treason.",
">\n\nWhy do republicans hate America?",
">\n\nThey hate everything except POWER",
">\n\nNothing says innocent like destroying evidence.",
">\n\nThat huge sigh of relief you hear is coming from Fawn Hall lol.",
">\n\n\nThen-White House chief of staff Mark Meadows burned papers in his office after meeting with a House Republican who was working to challenge the 2020 election, according to testimony the Jan. 6 select committee has heard from one of his former aides.\nCassidy Hutchinson, who worked under Meadows when he was former President Donald Trump’s chief of staff, told the panel investigating the Capitol attack that she saw Meadows incinerate documents after a meeting in his office with Rep. Scott Perry (R-Pa.). A person familiar with the testimony described it on condition of anonymity.\n\nThe only person who wished they were Kevin McCarthy is Mark Meadows.",
">\n\nAlways seemed like the same dude.",
">\n\nPer CNN just now, he burned papers at least a dozen times.",
">\n\nWhich is illegal on its face. But, DOJ do it's job? Fat fucking chance..",
">\n\nI have a feeling he's working with the DOJ, everything ran through him",
">\n\nAlthough wasn't he the one who called Cassidy Hutchinson before her testimony and said \"we know you'll do the right thing\" witness intimidation thing?",
">\n\nThat is straight-up dialog out of a Mafia film.",
">\n\nOh that's totally normal. Why at my office we have a daily burning rite where we toss all evidence of our criminality in the bin and make s'mores. Nothing wrong with this at all, not a single thing!",
">\n\n\"These are delicious! I can't wait to commit s'more crimes, tomorrow!\"",
">\n\nJesus. This is all illegal, what are we waiting for here??",
">\n\nWell you had the joke answers so here's the real deal.\nThe DOJ just got the complete set of transcripts.\nNow they have to cross-check everything the witnesses said to the committee with everything they said to the DOJ.\nThey do this to check for lies and memory lapses. The liars then get indicted and hopefully flipped. The folks with bad memories get a chance to amend their statements.\nEach statement then has to be cross-checked against every other statement the DOJ has received. Again they check for lies and mistakes. And again they indict liars and fix errors.\nThey do this because they aren't like Bill Durham. He took his Trump Russia investigation to court and lost his case because he didn't resolve inconsistencies before the trial.\nAssuming that you want the DOJ to win, you need to wait a while before expecting action.",
">\n\nThanks for the detailed answer. I do understand it takes time. Married to a lawyer here. But even my lawyer spouse is pretty convinced nothing is going to happen. They have had portions of the testimony for months. I want to be wrong. But it has been 2 years now. That's a long time. It should be a huge priority, disturbing it is not.",
">\n\nAn attorney acquaintance put it best - 'Federal attention is like a drunk hippo; it may take a long time to meander towards you, but once it's close up, it's attention is unmistakeable for anything else.'",
">\n\nThe thing is we all know that all this horribly corrupt stuff took place. The question is, how do we make the other side of the table understand that this stuff actually happened?",
">\n\nThey don't care. They're beyond caring about legality, morality, rationality or anything decent if it means they don't win by owning the Democrats.",
">\n\nThis is why I honestly feel this country is screwed at times. You would think that regardless of political affiliation that we could all agree to not burning government documents. Furthermore, we should easily all be able to agree that it is a bad thing. But even with something as very obvious as this being a bad thing, you will find a large number of people being okay with it.\nIdea of people burning documents. The cases of trying it down the toilet. Like this sort of stuff should not be occurring and should have stopped.",
">\n\nPretty wild how all that it takes to be held completely unaccountable for domestic and global crimes against humanity is to burn, flush or swallow paper.",
">\n\nReally outrageous behavior with consciousness of guilt. You only burn papers in the White House for one reason.",
">\n\nNothing to see here, just your normal post-meeting brazier ritual. Totally normal, right?",
">\n\nIs that a clear indication they were discussing something criminal, or what?",
">\n\nOh come on, people who hate America and want to undermine our country do stuff like this all the time.",
">\n\nThey don't hate America - they hate that there are Americans who aren't like them.",
">\n\nthen they hate america until they’re all gone. these people aren’t driven by love, they are driven by hate",
">\n\nI love that this makes him the most intelligent part of the administration purely because he remembered fire exists and didn't head straight for the shitter.",
">\n\nI have doubts that Trump will see justice, but Meadows is looking proper fucked.",
">\n\nIf meadows is fucked, then trump is, too. meadows WILL flip if threatened with serious jail time.",
">\n\nI'm sure you're right that Meadows would flip, but then I expect the same BS happen there that happened with the sex trafficking charges against Gaetz. Charges were not filed bc the source was considered unreliable because they were getting a better deal for flipping essentially.",
">\n\nWhen will enough be enough? Its to the point where everyone from Trump down needs to be procuted . i for one hope Jack Smith throws the book at them no matter what government position the hold or have held.",
">\n\nScott Perry is scum of the Earth.",
">\n\nThe law is only for the poors !",
">\n\nDrain the swamp my ass. Trump thinks he’s the Don and all these other clowns are his capos.",
">\n\nConsequences? Prison?",
">\n\nWe all what he was burning. Clearly it was his Sonic the Hedgehog fanfiction where Sonic was spending quality time playing in the Meadows",
">\n\nI mean. I'm not superstitious, but I'd get some sage and smudge the whole room after talking with Scott Perry.",
">\n\nTake my up vote",
">\n\nof fucking course it was Perry. \nDude's my rep. I hate him. he is an asshat that has no morals.",
">\n\nCall him and tell him so",
">\n\nOh, I have... and I have written him. \nAll I get back is \"well, Trump is completely right, screw the PA supreme court they don't have power in the state of PA... so I am signing on to the texas judicial request because texas courts should have more power in PA than the PA courts\"",
">\n\nIn the back of my mind I keep wondering, what papers?\nIs there a stack of handouts titled \"How to Overthrow the Government\"? What are they writing on paper that's incriminating and why are they writing it at all?\nI know that's all beside the point but I can't help wondering.",
">\n\n\nI know that's all beside the point\n\nUltimately this is what matters because it will be impossible to prove what was burned. Burning papers is not inherently illegal - without an email chain that says something like \"President Trump, at your request I burned documents X, Y, and Z in order to destroy incriminating evidence.\" there is no way to make an actual case.",
">\n\nThe evidence gathered by the J6 committee was bad enough, imagine the shit they thought they needed to destroy.",
">\n\nWhere did Meadows train as a gangster?",
">\n\nTrump University.",
">\n\nFor the WIN!!!",
">\n\n“Mark, just checking in as time continues to count down,” Perry texted Meadows on Dec. 26, 2020, according to messages released by the select panel. “11 days to 1/6 and 25 days to inauguration. We gotta get going!”\nReady to get going, Mark?",
">\n\nFunny that r/conservative doesn't have a single post discussing this. Just more Biden hate, covid hate, woke language hate, etc.",
">\n\nHow do you burn a bunch of papers inside an office without setting off every smoke alarm within 300 feet? It’s not like the White House windows open up."
] |
>
So it is mentioned he burned papers in the fireplace, is this something that typically occurs. If not, there may be some video showing smoke coming out of a chimney that may have been filmed by one of the multitude of news agencies that film outside the WH. Just a thought.
|
[
"Was this the White House or Tony Soprano's house? Burning documents, flushing documents... Drain the swamp my ass.",
">\n\nOh, they thought they were Tony Soprano. I wish the world would cut to black for a moment and they would all just disappear.",
">\n\nDon't stop believin'.",
">\n\nConservatives support this type of treason. Never forget.",
">\n\nOverwhelming majority of elected Republicans are still working to cover up all the treason.",
">\n\nWhy do republicans hate America?",
">\n\nThey hate everything except POWER",
">\n\nNothing says innocent like destroying evidence.",
">\n\nThat huge sigh of relief you hear is coming from Fawn Hall lol.",
">\n\n\nThen-White House chief of staff Mark Meadows burned papers in his office after meeting with a House Republican who was working to challenge the 2020 election, according to testimony the Jan. 6 select committee has heard from one of his former aides.\nCassidy Hutchinson, who worked under Meadows when he was former President Donald Trump’s chief of staff, told the panel investigating the Capitol attack that she saw Meadows incinerate documents after a meeting in his office with Rep. Scott Perry (R-Pa.). A person familiar with the testimony described it on condition of anonymity.\n\nThe only person who wished they were Kevin McCarthy is Mark Meadows.",
">\n\nAlways seemed like the same dude.",
">\n\nPer CNN just now, he burned papers at least a dozen times.",
">\n\nWhich is illegal on its face. But, DOJ do it's job? Fat fucking chance..",
">\n\nI have a feeling he's working with the DOJ, everything ran through him",
">\n\nAlthough wasn't he the one who called Cassidy Hutchinson before her testimony and said \"we know you'll do the right thing\" witness intimidation thing?",
">\n\nThat is straight-up dialog out of a Mafia film.",
">\n\nOh that's totally normal. Why at my office we have a daily burning rite where we toss all evidence of our criminality in the bin and make s'mores. Nothing wrong with this at all, not a single thing!",
">\n\n\"These are delicious! I can't wait to commit s'more crimes, tomorrow!\"",
">\n\nJesus. This is all illegal, what are we waiting for here??",
">\n\nWell you had the joke answers so here's the real deal.\nThe DOJ just got the complete set of transcripts.\nNow they have to cross-check everything the witnesses said to the committee with everything they said to the DOJ.\nThey do this to check for lies and memory lapses. The liars then get indicted and hopefully flipped. The folks with bad memories get a chance to amend their statements.\nEach statement then has to be cross-checked against every other statement the DOJ has received. Again they check for lies and mistakes. And again they indict liars and fix errors.\nThey do this because they aren't like Bill Durham. He took his Trump Russia investigation to court and lost his case because he didn't resolve inconsistencies before the trial.\nAssuming that you want the DOJ to win, you need to wait a while before expecting action.",
">\n\nThanks for the detailed answer. I do understand it takes time. Married to a lawyer here. But even my lawyer spouse is pretty convinced nothing is going to happen. They have had portions of the testimony for months. I want to be wrong. But it has been 2 years now. That's a long time. It should be a huge priority, disturbing it is not.",
">\n\nAn attorney acquaintance put it best - 'Federal attention is like a drunk hippo; it may take a long time to meander towards you, but once it's close up, it's attention is unmistakeable for anything else.'",
">\n\nThe thing is we all know that all this horribly corrupt stuff took place. The question is, how do we make the other side of the table understand that this stuff actually happened?",
">\n\nThey don't care. They're beyond caring about legality, morality, rationality or anything decent if it means they don't win by owning the Democrats.",
">\n\nThis is why I honestly feel this country is screwed at times. You would think that regardless of political affiliation that we could all agree to not burning government documents. Furthermore, we should easily all be able to agree that it is a bad thing. But even with something as very obvious as this being a bad thing, you will find a large number of people being okay with it.\nIdea of people burning documents. The cases of trying it down the toilet. Like this sort of stuff should not be occurring and should have stopped.",
">\n\nPretty wild how all that it takes to be held completely unaccountable for domestic and global crimes against humanity is to burn, flush or swallow paper.",
">\n\nReally outrageous behavior with consciousness of guilt. You only burn papers in the White House for one reason.",
">\n\nNothing to see here, just your normal post-meeting brazier ritual. Totally normal, right?",
">\n\nIs that a clear indication they were discussing something criminal, or what?",
">\n\nOh come on, people who hate America and want to undermine our country do stuff like this all the time.",
">\n\nThey don't hate America - they hate that there are Americans who aren't like them.",
">\n\nthen they hate america until they’re all gone. these people aren’t driven by love, they are driven by hate",
">\n\nI love that this makes him the most intelligent part of the administration purely because he remembered fire exists and didn't head straight for the shitter.",
">\n\nI have doubts that Trump will see justice, but Meadows is looking proper fucked.",
">\n\nIf meadows is fucked, then trump is, too. meadows WILL flip if threatened with serious jail time.",
">\n\nI'm sure you're right that Meadows would flip, but then I expect the same BS happen there that happened with the sex trafficking charges against Gaetz. Charges were not filed bc the source was considered unreliable because they were getting a better deal for flipping essentially.",
">\n\nWhen will enough be enough? Its to the point where everyone from Trump down needs to be procuted . i for one hope Jack Smith throws the book at them no matter what government position the hold or have held.",
">\n\nScott Perry is scum of the Earth.",
">\n\nThe law is only for the poors !",
">\n\nDrain the swamp my ass. Trump thinks he’s the Don and all these other clowns are his capos.",
">\n\nConsequences? Prison?",
">\n\nWe all what he was burning. Clearly it was his Sonic the Hedgehog fanfiction where Sonic was spending quality time playing in the Meadows",
">\n\nI mean. I'm not superstitious, but I'd get some sage and smudge the whole room after talking with Scott Perry.",
">\n\nTake my up vote",
">\n\nof fucking course it was Perry. \nDude's my rep. I hate him. he is an asshat that has no morals.",
">\n\nCall him and tell him so",
">\n\nOh, I have... and I have written him. \nAll I get back is \"well, Trump is completely right, screw the PA supreme court they don't have power in the state of PA... so I am signing on to the texas judicial request because texas courts should have more power in PA than the PA courts\"",
">\n\nIn the back of my mind I keep wondering, what papers?\nIs there a stack of handouts titled \"How to Overthrow the Government\"? What are they writing on paper that's incriminating and why are they writing it at all?\nI know that's all beside the point but I can't help wondering.",
">\n\n\nI know that's all beside the point\n\nUltimately this is what matters because it will be impossible to prove what was burned. Burning papers is not inherently illegal - without an email chain that says something like \"President Trump, at your request I burned documents X, Y, and Z in order to destroy incriminating evidence.\" there is no way to make an actual case.",
">\n\nThe evidence gathered by the J6 committee was bad enough, imagine the shit they thought they needed to destroy.",
">\n\nWhere did Meadows train as a gangster?",
">\n\nTrump University.",
">\n\nFor the WIN!!!",
">\n\n“Mark, just checking in as time continues to count down,” Perry texted Meadows on Dec. 26, 2020, according to messages released by the select panel. “11 days to 1/6 and 25 days to inauguration. We gotta get going!”\nReady to get going, Mark?",
">\n\nFunny that r/conservative doesn't have a single post discussing this. Just more Biden hate, covid hate, woke language hate, etc.",
">\n\nHow do you burn a bunch of papers inside an office without setting off every smoke alarm within 300 feet? It’s not like the White House windows open up.",
">\n\nThere are fireplaces"
] |
>
It is very atypical. Disposing documents by burning them is normal, but generally you put them in a burn bag and then they are securely sent to an incinerator. The only reason the chief of staff would personally be burning documents in a Whitehouse fireplace is because he didn't even want his own aids to possibly see them.
|
[
"Was this the White House or Tony Soprano's house? Burning documents, flushing documents... Drain the swamp my ass.",
">\n\nOh, they thought they were Tony Soprano. I wish the world would cut to black for a moment and they would all just disappear.",
">\n\nDon't stop believin'.",
">\n\nConservatives support this type of treason. Never forget.",
">\n\nOverwhelming majority of elected Republicans are still working to cover up all the treason.",
">\n\nWhy do republicans hate America?",
">\n\nThey hate everything except POWER",
">\n\nNothing says innocent like destroying evidence.",
">\n\nThat huge sigh of relief you hear is coming from Fawn Hall lol.",
">\n\n\nThen-White House chief of staff Mark Meadows burned papers in his office after meeting with a House Republican who was working to challenge the 2020 election, according to testimony the Jan. 6 select committee has heard from one of his former aides.\nCassidy Hutchinson, who worked under Meadows when he was former President Donald Trump’s chief of staff, told the panel investigating the Capitol attack that she saw Meadows incinerate documents after a meeting in his office with Rep. Scott Perry (R-Pa.). A person familiar with the testimony described it on condition of anonymity.\n\nThe only person who wished they were Kevin McCarthy is Mark Meadows.",
">\n\nAlways seemed like the same dude.",
">\n\nPer CNN just now, he burned papers at least a dozen times.",
">\n\nWhich is illegal on its face. But, DOJ do it's job? Fat fucking chance..",
">\n\nI have a feeling he's working with the DOJ, everything ran through him",
">\n\nAlthough wasn't he the one who called Cassidy Hutchinson before her testimony and said \"we know you'll do the right thing\" witness intimidation thing?",
">\n\nThat is straight-up dialog out of a Mafia film.",
">\n\nOh that's totally normal. Why at my office we have a daily burning rite where we toss all evidence of our criminality in the bin and make s'mores. Nothing wrong with this at all, not a single thing!",
">\n\n\"These are delicious! I can't wait to commit s'more crimes, tomorrow!\"",
">\n\nJesus. This is all illegal, what are we waiting for here??",
">\n\nWell you had the joke answers so here's the real deal.\nThe DOJ just got the complete set of transcripts.\nNow they have to cross-check everything the witnesses said to the committee with everything they said to the DOJ.\nThey do this to check for lies and memory lapses. The liars then get indicted and hopefully flipped. The folks with bad memories get a chance to amend their statements.\nEach statement then has to be cross-checked against every other statement the DOJ has received. Again they check for lies and mistakes. And again they indict liars and fix errors.\nThey do this because they aren't like Bill Durham. He took his Trump Russia investigation to court and lost his case because he didn't resolve inconsistencies before the trial.\nAssuming that you want the DOJ to win, you need to wait a while before expecting action.",
">\n\nThanks for the detailed answer. I do understand it takes time. Married to a lawyer here. But even my lawyer spouse is pretty convinced nothing is going to happen. They have had portions of the testimony for months. I want to be wrong. But it has been 2 years now. That's a long time. It should be a huge priority, disturbing it is not.",
">\n\nAn attorney acquaintance put it best - 'Federal attention is like a drunk hippo; it may take a long time to meander towards you, but once it's close up, it's attention is unmistakeable for anything else.'",
">\n\nThe thing is we all know that all this horribly corrupt stuff took place. The question is, how do we make the other side of the table understand that this stuff actually happened?",
">\n\nThey don't care. They're beyond caring about legality, morality, rationality or anything decent if it means they don't win by owning the Democrats.",
">\n\nThis is why I honestly feel this country is screwed at times. You would think that regardless of political affiliation that we could all agree to not burning government documents. Furthermore, we should easily all be able to agree that it is a bad thing. But even with something as very obvious as this being a bad thing, you will find a large number of people being okay with it.\nIdea of people burning documents. The cases of trying it down the toilet. Like this sort of stuff should not be occurring and should have stopped.",
">\n\nPretty wild how all that it takes to be held completely unaccountable for domestic and global crimes against humanity is to burn, flush or swallow paper.",
">\n\nReally outrageous behavior with consciousness of guilt. You only burn papers in the White House for one reason.",
">\n\nNothing to see here, just your normal post-meeting brazier ritual. Totally normal, right?",
">\n\nIs that a clear indication they were discussing something criminal, or what?",
">\n\nOh come on, people who hate America and want to undermine our country do stuff like this all the time.",
">\n\nThey don't hate America - they hate that there are Americans who aren't like them.",
">\n\nthen they hate america until they’re all gone. these people aren’t driven by love, they are driven by hate",
">\n\nI love that this makes him the most intelligent part of the administration purely because he remembered fire exists and didn't head straight for the shitter.",
">\n\nI have doubts that Trump will see justice, but Meadows is looking proper fucked.",
">\n\nIf meadows is fucked, then trump is, too. meadows WILL flip if threatened with serious jail time.",
">\n\nI'm sure you're right that Meadows would flip, but then I expect the same BS happen there that happened with the sex trafficking charges against Gaetz. Charges were not filed bc the source was considered unreliable because they were getting a better deal for flipping essentially.",
">\n\nWhen will enough be enough? Its to the point where everyone from Trump down needs to be procuted . i for one hope Jack Smith throws the book at them no matter what government position the hold or have held.",
">\n\nScott Perry is scum of the Earth.",
">\n\nThe law is only for the poors !",
">\n\nDrain the swamp my ass. Trump thinks he’s the Don and all these other clowns are his capos.",
">\n\nConsequences? Prison?",
">\n\nWe all what he was burning. Clearly it was his Sonic the Hedgehog fanfiction where Sonic was spending quality time playing in the Meadows",
">\n\nI mean. I'm not superstitious, but I'd get some sage and smudge the whole room after talking with Scott Perry.",
">\n\nTake my up vote",
">\n\nof fucking course it was Perry. \nDude's my rep. I hate him. he is an asshat that has no morals.",
">\n\nCall him and tell him so",
">\n\nOh, I have... and I have written him. \nAll I get back is \"well, Trump is completely right, screw the PA supreme court they don't have power in the state of PA... so I am signing on to the texas judicial request because texas courts should have more power in PA than the PA courts\"",
">\n\nIn the back of my mind I keep wondering, what papers?\nIs there a stack of handouts titled \"How to Overthrow the Government\"? What are they writing on paper that's incriminating and why are they writing it at all?\nI know that's all beside the point but I can't help wondering.",
">\n\n\nI know that's all beside the point\n\nUltimately this is what matters because it will be impossible to prove what was burned. Burning papers is not inherently illegal - without an email chain that says something like \"President Trump, at your request I burned documents X, Y, and Z in order to destroy incriminating evidence.\" there is no way to make an actual case.",
">\n\nThe evidence gathered by the J6 committee was bad enough, imagine the shit they thought they needed to destroy.",
">\n\nWhere did Meadows train as a gangster?",
">\n\nTrump University.",
">\n\nFor the WIN!!!",
">\n\n“Mark, just checking in as time continues to count down,” Perry texted Meadows on Dec. 26, 2020, according to messages released by the select panel. “11 days to 1/6 and 25 days to inauguration. We gotta get going!”\nReady to get going, Mark?",
">\n\nFunny that r/conservative doesn't have a single post discussing this. Just more Biden hate, covid hate, woke language hate, etc.",
">\n\nHow do you burn a bunch of papers inside an office without setting off every smoke alarm within 300 feet? It’s not like the White House windows open up.",
">\n\nThere are fireplaces",
">\n\nSo it is mentioned he burned papers in the fireplace, is this something that typically occurs. If not, there may be some video showing smoke coming out of a chimney that may have been filmed by one of the multitude of news agencies that film outside the WH. Just a thought."
] |
>
It is proper procedure for someone with clearance to go through the contents of a burn bag and make sure nothing in it would cause an illegal act by being destroyed. That is why we have so many stories regarding Trump aids taping back together torn and shredded documents.
|
[
"Was this the White House or Tony Soprano's house? Burning documents, flushing documents... Drain the swamp my ass.",
">\n\nOh, they thought they were Tony Soprano. I wish the world would cut to black for a moment and they would all just disappear.",
">\n\nDon't stop believin'.",
">\n\nConservatives support this type of treason. Never forget.",
">\n\nOverwhelming majority of elected Republicans are still working to cover up all the treason.",
">\n\nWhy do republicans hate America?",
">\n\nThey hate everything except POWER",
">\n\nNothing says innocent like destroying evidence.",
">\n\nThat huge sigh of relief you hear is coming from Fawn Hall lol.",
">\n\n\nThen-White House chief of staff Mark Meadows burned papers in his office after meeting with a House Republican who was working to challenge the 2020 election, according to testimony the Jan. 6 select committee has heard from one of his former aides.\nCassidy Hutchinson, who worked under Meadows when he was former President Donald Trump’s chief of staff, told the panel investigating the Capitol attack that she saw Meadows incinerate documents after a meeting in his office with Rep. Scott Perry (R-Pa.). A person familiar with the testimony described it on condition of anonymity.\n\nThe only person who wished they were Kevin McCarthy is Mark Meadows.",
">\n\nAlways seemed like the same dude.",
">\n\nPer CNN just now, he burned papers at least a dozen times.",
">\n\nWhich is illegal on its face. But, DOJ do it's job? Fat fucking chance..",
">\n\nI have a feeling he's working with the DOJ, everything ran through him",
">\n\nAlthough wasn't he the one who called Cassidy Hutchinson before her testimony and said \"we know you'll do the right thing\" witness intimidation thing?",
">\n\nThat is straight-up dialog out of a Mafia film.",
">\n\nOh that's totally normal. Why at my office we have a daily burning rite where we toss all evidence of our criminality in the bin and make s'mores. Nothing wrong with this at all, not a single thing!",
">\n\n\"These are delicious! I can't wait to commit s'more crimes, tomorrow!\"",
">\n\nJesus. This is all illegal, what are we waiting for here??",
">\n\nWell you had the joke answers so here's the real deal.\nThe DOJ just got the complete set of transcripts.\nNow they have to cross-check everything the witnesses said to the committee with everything they said to the DOJ.\nThey do this to check for lies and memory lapses. The liars then get indicted and hopefully flipped. The folks with bad memories get a chance to amend their statements.\nEach statement then has to be cross-checked against every other statement the DOJ has received. Again they check for lies and mistakes. And again they indict liars and fix errors.\nThey do this because they aren't like Bill Durham. He took his Trump Russia investigation to court and lost his case because he didn't resolve inconsistencies before the trial.\nAssuming that you want the DOJ to win, you need to wait a while before expecting action.",
">\n\nThanks for the detailed answer. I do understand it takes time. Married to a lawyer here. But even my lawyer spouse is pretty convinced nothing is going to happen. They have had portions of the testimony for months. I want to be wrong. But it has been 2 years now. That's a long time. It should be a huge priority, disturbing it is not.",
">\n\nAn attorney acquaintance put it best - 'Federal attention is like a drunk hippo; it may take a long time to meander towards you, but once it's close up, it's attention is unmistakeable for anything else.'",
">\n\nThe thing is we all know that all this horribly corrupt stuff took place. The question is, how do we make the other side of the table understand that this stuff actually happened?",
">\n\nThey don't care. They're beyond caring about legality, morality, rationality or anything decent if it means they don't win by owning the Democrats.",
">\n\nThis is why I honestly feel this country is screwed at times. You would think that regardless of political affiliation that we could all agree to not burning government documents. Furthermore, we should easily all be able to agree that it is a bad thing. But even with something as very obvious as this being a bad thing, you will find a large number of people being okay with it.\nIdea of people burning documents. The cases of trying it down the toilet. Like this sort of stuff should not be occurring and should have stopped.",
">\n\nPretty wild how all that it takes to be held completely unaccountable for domestic and global crimes against humanity is to burn, flush or swallow paper.",
">\n\nReally outrageous behavior with consciousness of guilt. You only burn papers in the White House for one reason.",
">\n\nNothing to see here, just your normal post-meeting brazier ritual. Totally normal, right?",
">\n\nIs that a clear indication they were discussing something criminal, or what?",
">\n\nOh come on, people who hate America and want to undermine our country do stuff like this all the time.",
">\n\nThey don't hate America - they hate that there are Americans who aren't like them.",
">\n\nthen they hate america until they’re all gone. these people aren’t driven by love, they are driven by hate",
">\n\nI love that this makes him the most intelligent part of the administration purely because he remembered fire exists and didn't head straight for the shitter.",
">\n\nI have doubts that Trump will see justice, but Meadows is looking proper fucked.",
">\n\nIf meadows is fucked, then trump is, too. meadows WILL flip if threatened with serious jail time.",
">\n\nI'm sure you're right that Meadows would flip, but then I expect the same BS happen there that happened with the sex trafficking charges against Gaetz. Charges were not filed bc the source was considered unreliable because they were getting a better deal for flipping essentially.",
">\n\nWhen will enough be enough? Its to the point where everyone from Trump down needs to be procuted . i for one hope Jack Smith throws the book at them no matter what government position the hold or have held.",
">\n\nScott Perry is scum of the Earth.",
">\n\nThe law is only for the poors !",
">\n\nDrain the swamp my ass. Trump thinks he’s the Don and all these other clowns are his capos.",
">\n\nConsequences? Prison?",
">\n\nWe all what he was burning. Clearly it was his Sonic the Hedgehog fanfiction where Sonic was spending quality time playing in the Meadows",
">\n\nI mean. I'm not superstitious, but I'd get some sage and smudge the whole room after talking with Scott Perry.",
">\n\nTake my up vote",
">\n\nof fucking course it was Perry. \nDude's my rep. I hate him. he is an asshat that has no morals.",
">\n\nCall him and tell him so",
">\n\nOh, I have... and I have written him. \nAll I get back is \"well, Trump is completely right, screw the PA supreme court they don't have power in the state of PA... so I am signing on to the texas judicial request because texas courts should have more power in PA than the PA courts\"",
">\n\nIn the back of my mind I keep wondering, what papers?\nIs there a stack of handouts titled \"How to Overthrow the Government\"? What are they writing on paper that's incriminating and why are they writing it at all?\nI know that's all beside the point but I can't help wondering.",
">\n\n\nI know that's all beside the point\n\nUltimately this is what matters because it will be impossible to prove what was burned. Burning papers is not inherently illegal - without an email chain that says something like \"President Trump, at your request I burned documents X, Y, and Z in order to destroy incriminating evidence.\" there is no way to make an actual case.",
">\n\nThe evidence gathered by the J6 committee was bad enough, imagine the shit they thought they needed to destroy.",
">\n\nWhere did Meadows train as a gangster?",
">\n\nTrump University.",
">\n\nFor the WIN!!!",
">\n\n“Mark, just checking in as time continues to count down,” Perry texted Meadows on Dec. 26, 2020, according to messages released by the select panel. “11 days to 1/6 and 25 days to inauguration. We gotta get going!”\nReady to get going, Mark?",
">\n\nFunny that r/conservative doesn't have a single post discussing this. Just more Biden hate, covid hate, woke language hate, etc.",
">\n\nHow do you burn a bunch of papers inside an office without setting off every smoke alarm within 300 feet? It’s not like the White House windows open up.",
">\n\nThere are fireplaces",
">\n\nSo it is mentioned he burned papers in the fireplace, is this something that typically occurs. If not, there may be some video showing smoke coming out of a chimney that may have been filmed by one of the multitude of news agencies that film outside the WH. Just a thought.",
">\n\nIt is very atypical. Disposing documents by burning them is normal, but generally you put them in a burn bag and then they are securely sent to an incinerator. The only reason the chief of staff would personally be burning documents in a Whitehouse fireplace is because he didn't even want his own aids to possibly see them."
] |
>
That just sounds like a lie
|
[
"Was this the White House or Tony Soprano's house? Burning documents, flushing documents... Drain the swamp my ass.",
">\n\nOh, they thought they were Tony Soprano. I wish the world would cut to black for a moment and they would all just disappear.",
">\n\nDon't stop believin'.",
">\n\nConservatives support this type of treason. Never forget.",
">\n\nOverwhelming majority of elected Republicans are still working to cover up all the treason.",
">\n\nWhy do republicans hate America?",
">\n\nThey hate everything except POWER",
">\n\nNothing says innocent like destroying evidence.",
">\n\nThat huge sigh of relief you hear is coming from Fawn Hall lol.",
">\n\n\nThen-White House chief of staff Mark Meadows burned papers in his office after meeting with a House Republican who was working to challenge the 2020 election, according to testimony the Jan. 6 select committee has heard from one of his former aides.\nCassidy Hutchinson, who worked under Meadows when he was former President Donald Trump’s chief of staff, told the panel investigating the Capitol attack that she saw Meadows incinerate documents after a meeting in his office with Rep. Scott Perry (R-Pa.). A person familiar with the testimony described it on condition of anonymity.\n\nThe only person who wished they were Kevin McCarthy is Mark Meadows.",
">\n\nAlways seemed like the same dude.",
">\n\nPer CNN just now, he burned papers at least a dozen times.",
">\n\nWhich is illegal on its face. But, DOJ do it's job? Fat fucking chance..",
">\n\nI have a feeling he's working with the DOJ, everything ran through him",
">\n\nAlthough wasn't he the one who called Cassidy Hutchinson before her testimony and said \"we know you'll do the right thing\" witness intimidation thing?",
">\n\nThat is straight-up dialog out of a Mafia film.",
">\n\nOh that's totally normal. Why at my office we have a daily burning rite where we toss all evidence of our criminality in the bin and make s'mores. Nothing wrong with this at all, not a single thing!",
">\n\n\"These are delicious! I can't wait to commit s'more crimes, tomorrow!\"",
">\n\nJesus. This is all illegal, what are we waiting for here??",
">\n\nWell you had the joke answers so here's the real deal.\nThe DOJ just got the complete set of transcripts.\nNow they have to cross-check everything the witnesses said to the committee with everything they said to the DOJ.\nThey do this to check for lies and memory lapses. The liars then get indicted and hopefully flipped. The folks with bad memories get a chance to amend their statements.\nEach statement then has to be cross-checked against every other statement the DOJ has received. Again they check for lies and mistakes. And again they indict liars and fix errors.\nThey do this because they aren't like Bill Durham. He took his Trump Russia investigation to court and lost his case because he didn't resolve inconsistencies before the trial.\nAssuming that you want the DOJ to win, you need to wait a while before expecting action.",
">\n\nThanks for the detailed answer. I do understand it takes time. Married to a lawyer here. But even my lawyer spouse is pretty convinced nothing is going to happen. They have had portions of the testimony for months. I want to be wrong. But it has been 2 years now. That's a long time. It should be a huge priority, disturbing it is not.",
">\n\nAn attorney acquaintance put it best - 'Federal attention is like a drunk hippo; it may take a long time to meander towards you, but once it's close up, it's attention is unmistakeable for anything else.'",
">\n\nThe thing is we all know that all this horribly corrupt stuff took place. The question is, how do we make the other side of the table understand that this stuff actually happened?",
">\n\nThey don't care. They're beyond caring about legality, morality, rationality or anything decent if it means they don't win by owning the Democrats.",
">\n\nThis is why I honestly feel this country is screwed at times. You would think that regardless of political affiliation that we could all agree to not burning government documents. Furthermore, we should easily all be able to agree that it is a bad thing. But even with something as very obvious as this being a bad thing, you will find a large number of people being okay with it.\nIdea of people burning documents. The cases of trying it down the toilet. Like this sort of stuff should not be occurring and should have stopped.",
">\n\nPretty wild how all that it takes to be held completely unaccountable for domestic and global crimes against humanity is to burn, flush or swallow paper.",
">\n\nReally outrageous behavior with consciousness of guilt. You only burn papers in the White House for one reason.",
">\n\nNothing to see here, just your normal post-meeting brazier ritual. Totally normal, right?",
">\n\nIs that a clear indication they were discussing something criminal, or what?",
">\n\nOh come on, people who hate America and want to undermine our country do stuff like this all the time.",
">\n\nThey don't hate America - they hate that there are Americans who aren't like them.",
">\n\nthen they hate america until they’re all gone. these people aren’t driven by love, they are driven by hate",
">\n\nI love that this makes him the most intelligent part of the administration purely because he remembered fire exists and didn't head straight for the shitter.",
">\n\nI have doubts that Trump will see justice, but Meadows is looking proper fucked.",
">\n\nIf meadows is fucked, then trump is, too. meadows WILL flip if threatened with serious jail time.",
">\n\nI'm sure you're right that Meadows would flip, but then I expect the same BS happen there that happened with the sex trafficking charges against Gaetz. Charges were not filed bc the source was considered unreliable because they were getting a better deal for flipping essentially.",
">\n\nWhen will enough be enough? Its to the point where everyone from Trump down needs to be procuted . i for one hope Jack Smith throws the book at them no matter what government position the hold or have held.",
">\n\nScott Perry is scum of the Earth.",
">\n\nThe law is only for the poors !",
">\n\nDrain the swamp my ass. Trump thinks he’s the Don and all these other clowns are his capos.",
">\n\nConsequences? Prison?",
">\n\nWe all what he was burning. Clearly it was his Sonic the Hedgehog fanfiction where Sonic was spending quality time playing in the Meadows",
">\n\nI mean. I'm not superstitious, but I'd get some sage and smudge the whole room after talking with Scott Perry.",
">\n\nTake my up vote",
">\n\nof fucking course it was Perry. \nDude's my rep. I hate him. he is an asshat that has no morals.",
">\n\nCall him and tell him so",
">\n\nOh, I have... and I have written him. \nAll I get back is \"well, Trump is completely right, screw the PA supreme court they don't have power in the state of PA... so I am signing on to the texas judicial request because texas courts should have more power in PA than the PA courts\"",
">\n\nIn the back of my mind I keep wondering, what papers?\nIs there a stack of handouts titled \"How to Overthrow the Government\"? What are they writing on paper that's incriminating and why are they writing it at all?\nI know that's all beside the point but I can't help wondering.",
">\n\n\nI know that's all beside the point\n\nUltimately this is what matters because it will be impossible to prove what was burned. Burning papers is not inherently illegal - without an email chain that says something like \"President Trump, at your request I burned documents X, Y, and Z in order to destroy incriminating evidence.\" there is no way to make an actual case.",
">\n\nThe evidence gathered by the J6 committee was bad enough, imagine the shit they thought they needed to destroy.",
">\n\nWhere did Meadows train as a gangster?",
">\n\nTrump University.",
">\n\nFor the WIN!!!",
">\n\n“Mark, just checking in as time continues to count down,” Perry texted Meadows on Dec. 26, 2020, according to messages released by the select panel. “11 days to 1/6 and 25 days to inauguration. We gotta get going!”\nReady to get going, Mark?",
">\n\nFunny that r/conservative doesn't have a single post discussing this. Just more Biden hate, covid hate, woke language hate, etc.",
">\n\nHow do you burn a bunch of papers inside an office without setting off every smoke alarm within 300 feet? It’s not like the White House windows open up.",
">\n\nThere are fireplaces",
">\n\nSo it is mentioned he burned papers in the fireplace, is this something that typically occurs. If not, there may be some video showing smoke coming out of a chimney that may have been filmed by one of the multitude of news agencies that film outside the WH. Just a thought.",
">\n\nIt is very atypical. Disposing documents by burning them is normal, but generally you put them in a burn bag and then they are securely sent to an incinerator. The only reason the chief of staff would personally be burning documents in a Whitehouse fireplace is because he didn't even want his own aids to possibly see them.",
">\n\nIt is proper procedure for someone with clearance to go through the contents of a burn bag and make sure nothing in it would cause an illegal act by being destroyed. That is why we have so many stories regarding Trump aids taping back together torn and shredded documents."
] |
>
really needs to answer.
|
[
"Was this the White House or Tony Soprano's house? Burning documents, flushing documents... Drain the swamp my ass.",
">\n\nOh, they thought they were Tony Soprano. I wish the world would cut to black for a moment and they would all just disappear.",
">\n\nDon't stop believin'.",
">\n\nConservatives support this type of treason. Never forget.",
">\n\nOverwhelming majority of elected Republicans are still working to cover up all the treason.",
">\n\nWhy do republicans hate America?",
">\n\nThey hate everything except POWER",
">\n\nNothing says innocent like destroying evidence.",
">\n\nThat huge sigh of relief you hear is coming from Fawn Hall lol.",
">\n\n\nThen-White House chief of staff Mark Meadows burned papers in his office after meeting with a House Republican who was working to challenge the 2020 election, according to testimony the Jan. 6 select committee has heard from one of his former aides.\nCassidy Hutchinson, who worked under Meadows when he was former President Donald Trump’s chief of staff, told the panel investigating the Capitol attack that she saw Meadows incinerate documents after a meeting in his office with Rep. Scott Perry (R-Pa.). A person familiar with the testimony described it on condition of anonymity.\n\nThe only person who wished they were Kevin McCarthy is Mark Meadows.",
">\n\nAlways seemed like the same dude.",
">\n\nPer CNN just now, he burned papers at least a dozen times.",
">\n\nWhich is illegal on its face. But, DOJ do it's job? Fat fucking chance..",
">\n\nI have a feeling he's working with the DOJ, everything ran through him",
">\n\nAlthough wasn't he the one who called Cassidy Hutchinson before her testimony and said \"we know you'll do the right thing\" witness intimidation thing?",
">\n\nThat is straight-up dialog out of a Mafia film.",
">\n\nOh that's totally normal. Why at my office we have a daily burning rite where we toss all evidence of our criminality in the bin and make s'mores. Nothing wrong with this at all, not a single thing!",
">\n\n\"These are delicious! I can't wait to commit s'more crimes, tomorrow!\"",
">\n\nJesus. This is all illegal, what are we waiting for here??",
">\n\nWell you had the joke answers so here's the real deal.\nThe DOJ just got the complete set of transcripts.\nNow they have to cross-check everything the witnesses said to the committee with everything they said to the DOJ.\nThey do this to check for lies and memory lapses. The liars then get indicted and hopefully flipped. The folks with bad memories get a chance to amend their statements.\nEach statement then has to be cross-checked against every other statement the DOJ has received. Again they check for lies and mistakes. And again they indict liars and fix errors.\nThey do this because they aren't like Bill Durham. He took his Trump Russia investigation to court and lost his case because he didn't resolve inconsistencies before the trial.\nAssuming that you want the DOJ to win, you need to wait a while before expecting action.",
">\n\nThanks for the detailed answer. I do understand it takes time. Married to a lawyer here. But even my lawyer spouse is pretty convinced nothing is going to happen. They have had portions of the testimony for months. I want to be wrong. But it has been 2 years now. That's a long time. It should be a huge priority, disturbing it is not.",
">\n\nAn attorney acquaintance put it best - 'Federal attention is like a drunk hippo; it may take a long time to meander towards you, but once it's close up, it's attention is unmistakeable for anything else.'",
">\n\nThe thing is we all know that all this horribly corrupt stuff took place. The question is, how do we make the other side of the table understand that this stuff actually happened?",
">\n\nThey don't care. They're beyond caring about legality, morality, rationality or anything decent if it means they don't win by owning the Democrats.",
">\n\nThis is why I honestly feel this country is screwed at times. You would think that regardless of political affiliation that we could all agree to not burning government documents. Furthermore, we should easily all be able to agree that it is a bad thing. But even with something as very obvious as this being a bad thing, you will find a large number of people being okay with it.\nIdea of people burning documents. The cases of trying it down the toilet. Like this sort of stuff should not be occurring and should have stopped.",
">\n\nPretty wild how all that it takes to be held completely unaccountable for domestic and global crimes against humanity is to burn, flush or swallow paper.",
">\n\nReally outrageous behavior with consciousness of guilt. You only burn papers in the White House for one reason.",
">\n\nNothing to see here, just your normal post-meeting brazier ritual. Totally normal, right?",
">\n\nIs that a clear indication they were discussing something criminal, or what?",
">\n\nOh come on, people who hate America and want to undermine our country do stuff like this all the time.",
">\n\nThey don't hate America - they hate that there are Americans who aren't like them.",
">\n\nthen they hate america until they’re all gone. these people aren’t driven by love, they are driven by hate",
">\n\nI love that this makes him the most intelligent part of the administration purely because he remembered fire exists and didn't head straight for the shitter.",
">\n\nI have doubts that Trump will see justice, but Meadows is looking proper fucked.",
">\n\nIf meadows is fucked, then trump is, too. meadows WILL flip if threatened with serious jail time.",
">\n\nI'm sure you're right that Meadows would flip, but then I expect the same BS happen there that happened with the sex trafficking charges against Gaetz. Charges were not filed bc the source was considered unreliable because they were getting a better deal for flipping essentially.",
">\n\nWhen will enough be enough? Its to the point where everyone from Trump down needs to be procuted . i for one hope Jack Smith throws the book at them no matter what government position the hold or have held.",
">\n\nScott Perry is scum of the Earth.",
">\n\nThe law is only for the poors !",
">\n\nDrain the swamp my ass. Trump thinks he’s the Don and all these other clowns are his capos.",
">\n\nConsequences? Prison?",
">\n\nWe all what he was burning. Clearly it was his Sonic the Hedgehog fanfiction where Sonic was spending quality time playing in the Meadows",
">\n\nI mean. I'm not superstitious, but I'd get some sage and smudge the whole room after talking with Scott Perry.",
">\n\nTake my up vote",
">\n\nof fucking course it was Perry. \nDude's my rep. I hate him. he is an asshat that has no morals.",
">\n\nCall him and tell him so",
">\n\nOh, I have... and I have written him. \nAll I get back is \"well, Trump is completely right, screw the PA supreme court they don't have power in the state of PA... so I am signing on to the texas judicial request because texas courts should have more power in PA than the PA courts\"",
">\n\nIn the back of my mind I keep wondering, what papers?\nIs there a stack of handouts titled \"How to Overthrow the Government\"? What are they writing on paper that's incriminating and why are they writing it at all?\nI know that's all beside the point but I can't help wondering.",
">\n\n\nI know that's all beside the point\n\nUltimately this is what matters because it will be impossible to prove what was burned. Burning papers is not inherently illegal - without an email chain that says something like \"President Trump, at your request I burned documents X, Y, and Z in order to destroy incriminating evidence.\" there is no way to make an actual case.",
">\n\nThe evidence gathered by the J6 committee was bad enough, imagine the shit they thought they needed to destroy.",
">\n\nWhere did Meadows train as a gangster?",
">\n\nTrump University.",
">\n\nFor the WIN!!!",
">\n\n“Mark, just checking in as time continues to count down,” Perry texted Meadows on Dec. 26, 2020, according to messages released by the select panel. “11 days to 1/6 and 25 days to inauguration. We gotta get going!”\nReady to get going, Mark?",
">\n\nFunny that r/conservative doesn't have a single post discussing this. Just more Biden hate, covid hate, woke language hate, etc.",
">\n\nHow do you burn a bunch of papers inside an office without setting off every smoke alarm within 300 feet? It’s not like the White House windows open up.",
">\n\nThere are fireplaces",
">\n\nSo it is mentioned he burned papers in the fireplace, is this something that typically occurs. If not, there may be some video showing smoke coming out of a chimney that may have been filmed by one of the multitude of news agencies that film outside the WH. Just a thought.",
">\n\nIt is very atypical. Disposing documents by burning them is normal, but generally you put them in a burn bag and then they are securely sent to an incinerator. The only reason the chief of staff would personally be burning documents in a Whitehouse fireplace is because he didn't even want his own aids to possibly see them.",
">\n\nIt is proper procedure for someone with clearance to go through the contents of a burn bag and make sure nothing in it would cause an illegal act by being destroyed. That is why we have so many stories regarding Trump aids taping back together torn and shredded documents.",
">\n\nThat just sounds like a lie"
] |
>
Shred it, don't regret it!
|
[
"Was this the White House or Tony Soprano's house? Burning documents, flushing documents... Drain the swamp my ass.",
">\n\nOh, they thought they were Tony Soprano. I wish the world would cut to black for a moment and they would all just disappear.",
">\n\nDon't stop believin'.",
">\n\nConservatives support this type of treason. Never forget.",
">\n\nOverwhelming majority of elected Republicans are still working to cover up all the treason.",
">\n\nWhy do republicans hate America?",
">\n\nThey hate everything except POWER",
">\n\nNothing says innocent like destroying evidence.",
">\n\nThat huge sigh of relief you hear is coming from Fawn Hall lol.",
">\n\n\nThen-White House chief of staff Mark Meadows burned papers in his office after meeting with a House Republican who was working to challenge the 2020 election, according to testimony the Jan. 6 select committee has heard from one of his former aides.\nCassidy Hutchinson, who worked under Meadows when he was former President Donald Trump’s chief of staff, told the panel investigating the Capitol attack that she saw Meadows incinerate documents after a meeting in his office with Rep. Scott Perry (R-Pa.). A person familiar with the testimony described it on condition of anonymity.\n\nThe only person who wished they were Kevin McCarthy is Mark Meadows.",
">\n\nAlways seemed like the same dude.",
">\n\nPer CNN just now, he burned papers at least a dozen times.",
">\n\nWhich is illegal on its face. But, DOJ do it's job? Fat fucking chance..",
">\n\nI have a feeling he's working with the DOJ, everything ran through him",
">\n\nAlthough wasn't he the one who called Cassidy Hutchinson before her testimony and said \"we know you'll do the right thing\" witness intimidation thing?",
">\n\nThat is straight-up dialog out of a Mafia film.",
">\n\nOh that's totally normal. Why at my office we have a daily burning rite where we toss all evidence of our criminality in the bin and make s'mores. Nothing wrong with this at all, not a single thing!",
">\n\n\"These are delicious! I can't wait to commit s'more crimes, tomorrow!\"",
">\n\nJesus. This is all illegal, what are we waiting for here??",
">\n\nWell you had the joke answers so here's the real deal.\nThe DOJ just got the complete set of transcripts.\nNow they have to cross-check everything the witnesses said to the committee with everything they said to the DOJ.\nThey do this to check for lies and memory lapses. The liars then get indicted and hopefully flipped. The folks with bad memories get a chance to amend their statements.\nEach statement then has to be cross-checked against every other statement the DOJ has received. Again they check for lies and mistakes. And again they indict liars and fix errors.\nThey do this because they aren't like Bill Durham. He took his Trump Russia investigation to court and lost his case because he didn't resolve inconsistencies before the trial.\nAssuming that you want the DOJ to win, you need to wait a while before expecting action.",
">\n\nThanks for the detailed answer. I do understand it takes time. Married to a lawyer here. But even my lawyer spouse is pretty convinced nothing is going to happen. They have had portions of the testimony for months. I want to be wrong. But it has been 2 years now. That's a long time. It should be a huge priority, disturbing it is not.",
">\n\nAn attorney acquaintance put it best - 'Federal attention is like a drunk hippo; it may take a long time to meander towards you, but once it's close up, it's attention is unmistakeable for anything else.'",
">\n\nThe thing is we all know that all this horribly corrupt stuff took place. The question is, how do we make the other side of the table understand that this stuff actually happened?",
">\n\nThey don't care. They're beyond caring about legality, morality, rationality or anything decent if it means they don't win by owning the Democrats.",
">\n\nThis is why I honestly feel this country is screwed at times. You would think that regardless of political affiliation that we could all agree to not burning government documents. Furthermore, we should easily all be able to agree that it is a bad thing. But even with something as very obvious as this being a bad thing, you will find a large number of people being okay with it.\nIdea of people burning documents. The cases of trying it down the toilet. Like this sort of stuff should not be occurring and should have stopped.",
">\n\nPretty wild how all that it takes to be held completely unaccountable for domestic and global crimes against humanity is to burn, flush or swallow paper.",
">\n\nReally outrageous behavior with consciousness of guilt. You only burn papers in the White House for one reason.",
">\n\nNothing to see here, just your normal post-meeting brazier ritual. Totally normal, right?",
">\n\nIs that a clear indication they were discussing something criminal, or what?",
">\n\nOh come on, people who hate America and want to undermine our country do stuff like this all the time.",
">\n\nThey don't hate America - they hate that there are Americans who aren't like them.",
">\n\nthen they hate america until they’re all gone. these people aren’t driven by love, they are driven by hate",
">\n\nI love that this makes him the most intelligent part of the administration purely because he remembered fire exists and didn't head straight for the shitter.",
">\n\nI have doubts that Trump will see justice, but Meadows is looking proper fucked.",
">\n\nIf meadows is fucked, then trump is, too. meadows WILL flip if threatened with serious jail time.",
">\n\nI'm sure you're right that Meadows would flip, but then I expect the same BS happen there that happened with the sex trafficking charges against Gaetz. Charges were not filed bc the source was considered unreliable because they were getting a better deal for flipping essentially.",
">\n\nWhen will enough be enough? Its to the point where everyone from Trump down needs to be procuted . i for one hope Jack Smith throws the book at them no matter what government position the hold or have held.",
">\n\nScott Perry is scum of the Earth.",
">\n\nThe law is only for the poors !",
">\n\nDrain the swamp my ass. Trump thinks he’s the Don and all these other clowns are his capos.",
">\n\nConsequences? Prison?",
">\n\nWe all what he was burning. Clearly it was his Sonic the Hedgehog fanfiction where Sonic was spending quality time playing in the Meadows",
">\n\nI mean. I'm not superstitious, but I'd get some sage and smudge the whole room after talking with Scott Perry.",
">\n\nTake my up vote",
">\n\nof fucking course it was Perry. \nDude's my rep. I hate him. he is an asshat that has no morals.",
">\n\nCall him and tell him so",
">\n\nOh, I have... and I have written him. \nAll I get back is \"well, Trump is completely right, screw the PA supreme court they don't have power in the state of PA... so I am signing on to the texas judicial request because texas courts should have more power in PA than the PA courts\"",
">\n\nIn the back of my mind I keep wondering, what papers?\nIs there a stack of handouts titled \"How to Overthrow the Government\"? What are they writing on paper that's incriminating and why are they writing it at all?\nI know that's all beside the point but I can't help wondering.",
">\n\n\nI know that's all beside the point\n\nUltimately this is what matters because it will be impossible to prove what was burned. Burning papers is not inherently illegal - without an email chain that says something like \"President Trump, at your request I burned documents X, Y, and Z in order to destroy incriminating evidence.\" there is no way to make an actual case.",
">\n\nThe evidence gathered by the J6 committee was bad enough, imagine the shit they thought they needed to destroy.",
">\n\nWhere did Meadows train as a gangster?",
">\n\nTrump University.",
">\n\nFor the WIN!!!",
">\n\n“Mark, just checking in as time continues to count down,” Perry texted Meadows on Dec. 26, 2020, according to messages released by the select panel. “11 days to 1/6 and 25 days to inauguration. We gotta get going!”\nReady to get going, Mark?",
">\n\nFunny that r/conservative doesn't have a single post discussing this. Just more Biden hate, covid hate, woke language hate, etc.",
">\n\nHow do you burn a bunch of papers inside an office without setting off every smoke alarm within 300 feet? It’s not like the White House windows open up.",
">\n\nThere are fireplaces",
">\n\nSo it is mentioned he burned papers in the fireplace, is this something that typically occurs. If not, there may be some video showing smoke coming out of a chimney that may have been filmed by one of the multitude of news agencies that film outside the WH. Just a thought.",
">\n\nIt is very atypical. Disposing documents by burning them is normal, but generally you put them in a burn bag and then they are securely sent to an incinerator. The only reason the chief of staff would personally be burning documents in a Whitehouse fireplace is because he didn't even want his own aids to possibly see them.",
">\n\nIt is proper procedure for someone with clearance to go through the contents of a burn bag and make sure nothing in it would cause an illegal act by being destroyed. That is why we have so many stories regarding Trump aids taping back together torn and shredded documents.",
">\n\nThat just sounds like a lie",
">\n\nreally needs to answer."
] |
>
A Republican cookout
|
[
"Was this the White House or Tony Soprano's house? Burning documents, flushing documents... Drain the swamp my ass.",
">\n\nOh, they thought they were Tony Soprano. I wish the world would cut to black for a moment and they would all just disappear.",
">\n\nDon't stop believin'.",
">\n\nConservatives support this type of treason. Never forget.",
">\n\nOverwhelming majority of elected Republicans are still working to cover up all the treason.",
">\n\nWhy do republicans hate America?",
">\n\nThey hate everything except POWER",
">\n\nNothing says innocent like destroying evidence.",
">\n\nThat huge sigh of relief you hear is coming from Fawn Hall lol.",
">\n\n\nThen-White House chief of staff Mark Meadows burned papers in his office after meeting with a House Republican who was working to challenge the 2020 election, according to testimony the Jan. 6 select committee has heard from one of his former aides.\nCassidy Hutchinson, who worked under Meadows when he was former President Donald Trump’s chief of staff, told the panel investigating the Capitol attack that she saw Meadows incinerate documents after a meeting in his office with Rep. Scott Perry (R-Pa.). A person familiar with the testimony described it on condition of anonymity.\n\nThe only person who wished they were Kevin McCarthy is Mark Meadows.",
">\n\nAlways seemed like the same dude.",
">\n\nPer CNN just now, he burned papers at least a dozen times.",
">\n\nWhich is illegal on its face. But, DOJ do it's job? Fat fucking chance..",
">\n\nI have a feeling he's working with the DOJ, everything ran through him",
">\n\nAlthough wasn't he the one who called Cassidy Hutchinson before her testimony and said \"we know you'll do the right thing\" witness intimidation thing?",
">\n\nThat is straight-up dialog out of a Mafia film.",
">\n\nOh that's totally normal. Why at my office we have a daily burning rite where we toss all evidence of our criminality in the bin and make s'mores. Nothing wrong with this at all, not a single thing!",
">\n\n\"These are delicious! I can't wait to commit s'more crimes, tomorrow!\"",
">\n\nJesus. This is all illegal, what are we waiting for here??",
">\n\nWell you had the joke answers so here's the real deal.\nThe DOJ just got the complete set of transcripts.\nNow they have to cross-check everything the witnesses said to the committee with everything they said to the DOJ.\nThey do this to check for lies and memory lapses. The liars then get indicted and hopefully flipped. The folks with bad memories get a chance to amend their statements.\nEach statement then has to be cross-checked against every other statement the DOJ has received. Again they check for lies and mistakes. And again they indict liars and fix errors.\nThey do this because they aren't like Bill Durham. He took his Trump Russia investigation to court and lost his case because he didn't resolve inconsistencies before the trial.\nAssuming that you want the DOJ to win, you need to wait a while before expecting action.",
">\n\nThanks for the detailed answer. I do understand it takes time. Married to a lawyer here. But even my lawyer spouse is pretty convinced nothing is going to happen. They have had portions of the testimony for months. I want to be wrong. But it has been 2 years now. That's a long time. It should be a huge priority, disturbing it is not.",
">\n\nAn attorney acquaintance put it best - 'Federal attention is like a drunk hippo; it may take a long time to meander towards you, but once it's close up, it's attention is unmistakeable for anything else.'",
">\n\nThe thing is we all know that all this horribly corrupt stuff took place. The question is, how do we make the other side of the table understand that this stuff actually happened?",
">\n\nThey don't care. They're beyond caring about legality, morality, rationality or anything decent if it means they don't win by owning the Democrats.",
">\n\nThis is why I honestly feel this country is screwed at times. You would think that regardless of political affiliation that we could all agree to not burning government documents. Furthermore, we should easily all be able to agree that it is a bad thing. But even with something as very obvious as this being a bad thing, you will find a large number of people being okay with it.\nIdea of people burning documents. The cases of trying it down the toilet. Like this sort of stuff should not be occurring and should have stopped.",
">\n\nPretty wild how all that it takes to be held completely unaccountable for domestic and global crimes against humanity is to burn, flush or swallow paper.",
">\n\nReally outrageous behavior with consciousness of guilt. You only burn papers in the White House for one reason.",
">\n\nNothing to see here, just your normal post-meeting brazier ritual. Totally normal, right?",
">\n\nIs that a clear indication they were discussing something criminal, or what?",
">\n\nOh come on, people who hate America and want to undermine our country do stuff like this all the time.",
">\n\nThey don't hate America - they hate that there are Americans who aren't like them.",
">\n\nthen they hate america until they’re all gone. these people aren’t driven by love, they are driven by hate",
">\n\nI love that this makes him the most intelligent part of the administration purely because he remembered fire exists and didn't head straight for the shitter.",
">\n\nI have doubts that Trump will see justice, but Meadows is looking proper fucked.",
">\n\nIf meadows is fucked, then trump is, too. meadows WILL flip if threatened with serious jail time.",
">\n\nI'm sure you're right that Meadows would flip, but then I expect the same BS happen there that happened with the sex trafficking charges against Gaetz. Charges were not filed bc the source was considered unreliable because they were getting a better deal for flipping essentially.",
">\n\nWhen will enough be enough? Its to the point where everyone from Trump down needs to be procuted . i for one hope Jack Smith throws the book at them no matter what government position the hold or have held.",
">\n\nScott Perry is scum of the Earth.",
">\n\nThe law is only for the poors !",
">\n\nDrain the swamp my ass. Trump thinks he’s the Don and all these other clowns are his capos.",
">\n\nConsequences? Prison?",
">\n\nWe all what he was burning. Clearly it was his Sonic the Hedgehog fanfiction where Sonic was spending quality time playing in the Meadows",
">\n\nI mean. I'm not superstitious, but I'd get some sage and smudge the whole room after talking with Scott Perry.",
">\n\nTake my up vote",
">\n\nof fucking course it was Perry. \nDude's my rep. I hate him. he is an asshat that has no morals.",
">\n\nCall him and tell him so",
">\n\nOh, I have... and I have written him. \nAll I get back is \"well, Trump is completely right, screw the PA supreme court they don't have power in the state of PA... so I am signing on to the texas judicial request because texas courts should have more power in PA than the PA courts\"",
">\n\nIn the back of my mind I keep wondering, what papers?\nIs there a stack of handouts titled \"How to Overthrow the Government\"? What are they writing on paper that's incriminating and why are they writing it at all?\nI know that's all beside the point but I can't help wondering.",
">\n\n\nI know that's all beside the point\n\nUltimately this is what matters because it will be impossible to prove what was burned. Burning papers is not inherently illegal - without an email chain that says something like \"President Trump, at your request I burned documents X, Y, and Z in order to destroy incriminating evidence.\" there is no way to make an actual case.",
">\n\nThe evidence gathered by the J6 committee was bad enough, imagine the shit they thought they needed to destroy.",
">\n\nWhere did Meadows train as a gangster?",
">\n\nTrump University.",
">\n\nFor the WIN!!!",
">\n\n“Mark, just checking in as time continues to count down,” Perry texted Meadows on Dec. 26, 2020, according to messages released by the select panel. “11 days to 1/6 and 25 days to inauguration. We gotta get going!”\nReady to get going, Mark?",
">\n\nFunny that r/conservative doesn't have a single post discussing this. Just more Biden hate, covid hate, woke language hate, etc.",
">\n\nHow do you burn a bunch of papers inside an office without setting off every smoke alarm within 300 feet? It’s not like the White House windows open up.",
">\n\nThere are fireplaces",
">\n\nSo it is mentioned he burned papers in the fireplace, is this something that typically occurs. If not, there may be some video showing smoke coming out of a chimney that may have been filmed by one of the multitude of news agencies that film outside the WH. Just a thought.",
">\n\nIt is very atypical. Disposing documents by burning them is normal, but generally you put them in a burn bag and then they are securely sent to an incinerator. The only reason the chief of staff would personally be burning documents in a Whitehouse fireplace is because he didn't even want his own aids to possibly see them.",
">\n\nIt is proper procedure for someone with clearance to go through the contents of a burn bag and make sure nothing in it would cause an illegal act by being destroyed. That is why we have so many stories regarding Trump aids taping back together torn and shredded documents.",
">\n\nThat just sounds like a lie",
">\n\nreally needs to answer.",
">\n\nShred it, don't regret it!"
] |
>
Lock him up.
|
[
"Was this the White House or Tony Soprano's house? Burning documents, flushing documents... Drain the swamp my ass.",
">\n\nOh, they thought they were Tony Soprano. I wish the world would cut to black for a moment and they would all just disappear.",
">\n\nDon't stop believin'.",
">\n\nConservatives support this type of treason. Never forget.",
">\n\nOverwhelming majority of elected Republicans are still working to cover up all the treason.",
">\n\nWhy do republicans hate America?",
">\n\nThey hate everything except POWER",
">\n\nNothing says innocent like destroying evidence.",
">\n\nThat huge sigh of relief you hear is coming from Fawn Hall lol.",
">\n\n\nThen-White House chief of staff Mark Meadows burned papers in his office after meeting with a House Republican who was working to challenge the 2020 election, according to testimony the Jan. 6 select committee has heard from one of his former aides.\nCassidy Hutchinson, who worked under Meadows when he was former President Donald Trump’s chief of staff, told the panel investigating the Capitol attack that she saw Meadows incinerate documents after a meeting in his office with Rep. Scott Perry (R-Pa.). A person familiar with the testimony described it on condition of anonymity.\n\nThe only person who wished they were Kevin McCarthy is Mark Meadows.",
">\n\nAlways seemed like the same dude.",
">\n\nPer CNN just now, he burned papers at least a dozen times.",
">\n\nWhich is illegal on its face. But, DOJ do it's job? Fat fucking chance..",
">\n\nI have a feeling he's working with the DOJ, everything ran through him",
">\n\nAlthough wasn't he the one who called Cassidy Hutchinson before her testimony and said \"we know you'll do the right thing\" witness intimidation thing?",
">\n\nThat is straight-up dialog out of a Mafia film.",
">\n\nOh that's totally normal. Why at my office we have a daily burning rite where we toss all evidence of our criminality in the bin and make s'mores. Nothing wrong with this at all, not a single thing!",
">\n\n\"These are delicious! I can't wait to commit s'more crimes, tomorrow!\"",
">\n\nJesus. This is all illegal, what are we waiting for here??",
">\n\nWell you had the joke answers so here's the real deal.\nThe DOJ just got the complete set of transcripts.\nNow they have to cross-check everything the witnesses said to the committee with everything they said to the DOJ.\nThey do this to check for lies and memory lapses. The liars then get indicted and hopefully flipped. The folks with bad memories get a chance to amend their statements.\nEach statement then has to be cross-checked against every other statement the DOJ has received. Again they check for lies and mistakes. And again they indict liars and fix errors.\nThey do this because they aren't like Bill Durham. He took his Trump Russia investigation to court and lost his case because he didn't resolve inconsistencies before the trial.\nAssuming that you want the DOJ to win, you need to wait a while before expecting action.",
">\n\nThanks for the detailed answer. I do understand it takes time. Married to a lawyer here. But even my lawyer spouse is pretty convinced nothing is going to happen. They have had portions of the testimony for months. I want to be wrong. But it has been 2 years now. That's a long time. It should be a huge priority, disturbing it is not.",
">\n\nAn attorney acquaintance put it best - 'Federal attention is like a drunk hippo; it may take a long time to meander towards you, but once it's close up, it's attention is unmistakeable for anything else.'",
">\n\nThe thing is we all know that all this horribly corrupt stuff took place. The question is, how do we make the other side of the table understand that this stuff actually happened?",
">\n\nThey don't care. They're beyond caring about legality, morality, rationality or anything decent if it means they don't win by owning the Democrats.",
">\n\nThis is why I honestly feel this country is screwed at times. You would think that regardless of political affiliation that we could all agree to not burning government documents. Furthermore, we should easily all be able to agree that it is a bad thing. But even with something as very obvious as this being a bad thing, you will find a large number of people being okay with it.\nIdea of people burning documents. The cases of trying it down the toilet. Like this sort of stuff should not be occurring and should have stopped.",
">\n\nPretty wild how all that it takes to be held completely unaccountable for domestic and global crimes against humanity is to burn, flush or swallow paper.",
">\n\nReally outrageous behavior with consciousness of guilt. You only burn papers in the White House for one reason.",
">\n\nNothing to see here, just your normal post-meeting brazier ritual. Totally normal, right?",
">\n\nIs that a clear indication they were discussing something criminal, or what?",
">\n\nOh come on, people who hate America and want to undermine our country do stuff like this all the time.",
">\n\nThey don't hate America - they hate that there are Americans who aren't like them.",
">\n\nthen they hate america until they’re all gone. these people aren’t driven by love, they are driven by hate",
">\n\nI love that this makes him the most intelligent part of the administration purely because he remembered fire exists and didn't head straight for the shitter.",
">\n\nI have doubts that Trump will see justice, but Meadows is looking proper fucked.",
">\n\nIf meadows is fucked, then trump is, too. meadows WILL flip if threatened with serious jail time.",
">\n\nI'm sure you're right that Meadows would flip, but then I expect the same BS happen there that happened with the sex trafficking charges against Gaetz. Charges were not filed bc the source was considered unreliable because they were getting a better deal for flipping essentially.",
">\n\nWhen will enough be enough? Its to the point where everyone from Trump down needs to be procuted . i for one hope Jack Smith throws the book at them no matter what government position the hold or have held.",
">\n\nScott Perry is scum of the Earth.",
">\n\nThe law is only for the poors !",
">\n\nDrain the swamp my ass. Trump thinks he’s the Don and all these other clowns are his capos.",
">\n\nConsequences? Prison?",
">\n\nWe all what he was burning. Clearly it was his Sonic the Hedgehog fanfiction where Sonic was spending quality time playing in the Meadows",
">\n\nI mean. I'm not superstitious, but I'd get some sage and smudge the whole room after talking with Scott Perry.",
">\n\nTake my up vote",
">\n\nof fucking course it was Perry. \nDude's my rep. I hate him. he is an asshat that has no morals.",
">\n\nCall him and tell him so",
">\n\nOh, I have... and I have written him. \nAll I get back is \"well, Trump is completely right, screw the PA supreme court they don't have power in the state of PA... so I am signing on to the texas judicial request because texas courts should have more power in PA than the PA courts\"",
">\n\nIn the back of my mind I keep wondering, what papers?\nIs there a stack of handouts titled \"How to Overthrow the Government\"? What are they writing on paper that's incriminating and why are they writing it at all?\nI know that's all beside the point but I can't help wondering.",
">\n\n\nI know that's all beside the point\n\nUltimately this is what matters because it will be impossible to prove what was burned. Burning papers is not inherently illegal - without an email chain that says something like \"President Trump, at your request I burned documents X, Y, and Z in order to destroy incriminating evidence.\" there is no way to make an actual case.",
">\n\nThe evidence gathered by the J6 committee was bad enough, imagine the shit they thought they needed to destroy.",
">\n\nWhere did Meadows train as a gangster?",
">\n\nTrump University.",
">\n\nFor the WIN!!!",
">\n\n“Mark, just checking in as time continues to count down,” Perry texted Meadows on Dec. 26, 2020, according to messages released by the select panel. “11 days to 1/6 and 25 days to inauguration. We gotta get going!”\nReady to get going, Mark?",
">\n\nFunny that r/conservative doesn't have a single post discussing this. Just more Biden hate, covid hate, woke language hate, etc.",
">\n\nHow do you burn a bunch of papers inside an office without setting off every smoke alarm within 300 feet? It’s not like the White House windows open up.",
">\n\nThere are fireplaces",
">\n\nSo it is mentioned he burned papers in the fireplace, is this something that typically occurs. If not, there may be some video showing smoke coming out of a chimney that may have been filmed by one of the multitude of news agencies that film outside the WH. Just a thought.",
">\n\nIt is very atypical. Disposing documents by burning them is normal, but generally you put them in a burn bag and then they are securely sent to an incinerator. The only reason the chief of staff would personally be burning documents in a Whitehouse fireplace is because he didn't even want his own aids to possibly see them.",
">\n\nIt is proper procedure for someone with clearance to go through the contents of a burn bag and make sure nothing in it would cause an illegal act by being destroyed. That is why we have so many stories regarding Trump aids taping back together torn and shredded documents.",
">\n\nThat just sounds like a lie",
">\n\nreally needs to answer.",
">\n\nShred it, don't regret it!",
">\n\nA Republican cookout"
] |
>
Shocker, corrupt holier than thou gop member does illegal things !
|
[
"Was this the White House or Tony Soprano's house? Burning documents, flushing documents... Drain the swamp my ass.",
">\n\nOh, they thought they were Tony Soprano. I wish the world would cut to black for a moment and they would all just disappear.",
">\n\nDon't stop believin'.",
">\n\nConservatives support this type of treason. Never forget.",
">\n\nOverwhelming majority of elected Republicans are still working to cover up all the treason.",
">\n\nWhy do republicans hate America?",
">\n\nThey hate everything except POWER",
">\n\nNothing says innocent like destroying evidence.",
">\n\nThat huge sigh of relief you hear is coming from Fawn Hall lol.",
">\n\n\nThen-White House chief of staff Mark Meadows burned papers in his office after meeting with a House Republican who was working to challenge the 2020 election, according to testimony the Jan. 6 select committee has heard from one of his former aides.\nCassidy Hutchinson, who worked under Meadows when he was former President Donald Trump’s chief of staff, told the panel investigating the Capitol attack that she saw Meadows incinerate documents after a meeting in his office with Rep. Scott Perry (R-Pa.). A person familiar with the testimony described it on condition of anonymity.\n\nThe only person who wished they were Kevin McCarthy is Mark Meadows.",
">\n\nAlways seemed like the same dude.",
">\n\nPer CNN just now, he burned papers at least a dozen times.",
">\n\nWhich is illegal on its face. But, DOJ do it's job? Fat fucking chance..",
">\n\nI have a feeling he's working with the DOJ, everything ran through him",
">\n\nAlthough wasn't he the one who called Cassidy Hutchinson before her testimony and said \"we know you'll do the right thing\" witness intimidation thing?",
">\n\nThat is straight-up dialog out of a Mafia film.",
">\n\nOh that's totally normal. Why at my office we have a daily burning rite where we toss all evidence of our criminality in the bin and make s'mores. Nothing wrong with this at all, not a single thing!",
">\n\n\"These are delicious! I can't wait to commit s'more crimes, tomorrow!\"",
">\n\nJesus. This is all illegal, what are we waiting for here??",
">\n\nWell you had the joke answers so here's the real deal.\nThe DOJ just got the complete set of transcripts.\nNow they have to cross-check everything the witnesses said to the committee with everything they said to the DOJ.\nThey do this to check for lies and memory lapses. The liars then get indicted and hopefully flipped. The folks with bad memories get a chance to amend their statements.\nEach statement then has to be cross-checked against every other statement the DOJ has received. Again they check for lies and mistakes. And again they indict liars and fix errors.\nThey do this because they aren't like Bill Durham. He took his Trump Russia investigation to court and lost his case because he didn't resolve inconsistencies before the trial.\nAssuming that you want the DOJ to win, you need to wait a while before expecting action.",
">\n\nThanks for the detailed answer. I do understand it takes time. Married to a lawyer here. But even my lawyer spouse is pretty convinced nothing is going to happen. They have had portions of the testimony for months. I want to be wrong. But it has been 2 years now. That's a long time. It should be a huge priority, disturbing it is not.",
">\n\nAn attorney acquaintance put it best - 'Federal attention is like a drunk hippo; it may take a long time to meander towards you, but once it's close up, it's attention is unmistakeable for anything else.'",
">\n\nThe thing is we all know that all this horribly corrupt stuff took place. The question is, how do we make the other side of the table understand that this stuff actually happened?",
">\n\nThey don't care. They're beyond caring about legality, morality, rationality or anything decent if it means they don't win by owning the Democrats.",
">\n\nThis is why I honestly feel this country is screwed at times. You would think that regardless of political affiliation that we could all agree to not burning government documents. Furthermore, we should easily all be able to agree that it is a bad thing. But even with something as very obvious as this being a bad thing, you will find a large number of people being okay with it.\nIdea of people burning documents. The cases of trying it down the toilet. Like this sort of stuff should not be occurring and should have stopped.",
">\n\nPretty wild how all that it takes to be held completely unaccountable for domestic and global crimes against humanity is to burn, flush or swallow paper.",
">\n\nReally outrageous behavior with consciousness of guilt. You only burn papers in the White House for one reason.",
">\n\nNothing to see here, just your normal post-meeting brazier ritual. Totally normal, right?",
">\n\nIs that a clear indication they were discussing something criminal, or what?",
">\n\nOh come on, people who hate America and want to undermine our country do stuff like this all the time.",
">\n\nThey don't hate America - they hate that there are Americans who aren't like them.",
">\n\nthen they hate america until they’re all gone. these people aren’t driven by love, they are driven by hate",
">\n\nI love that this makes him the most intelligent part of the administration purely because he remembered fire exists and didn't head straight for the shitter.",
">\n\nI have doubts that Trump will see justice, but Meadows is looking proper fucked.",
">\n\nIf meadows is fucked, then trump is, too. meadows WILL flip if threatened with serious jail time.",
">\n\nI'm sure you're right that Meadows would flip, but then I expect the same BS happen there that happened with the sex trafficking charges against Gaetz. Charges were not filed bc the source was considered unreliable because they were getting a better deal for flipping essentially.",
">\n\nWhen will enough be enough? Its to the point where everyone from Trump down needs to be procuted . i for one hope Jack Smith throws the book at them no matter what government position the hold or have held.",
">\n\nScott Perry is scum of the Earth.",
">\n\nThe law is only for the poors !",
">\n\nDrain the swamp my ass. Trump thinks he’s the Don and all these other clowns are his capos.",
">\n\nConsequences? Prison?",
">\n\nWe all what he was burning. Clearly it was his Sonic the Hedgehog fanfiction where Sonic was spending quality time playing in the Meadows",
">\n\nI mean. I'm not superstitious, but I'd get some sage and smudge the whole room after talking with Scott Perry.",
">\n\nTake my up vote",
">\n\nof fucking course it was Perry. \nDude's my rep. I hate him. he is an asshat that has no morals.",
">\n\nCall him and tell him so",
">\n\nOh, I have... and I have written him. \nAll I get back is \"well, Trump is completely right, screw the PA supreme court they don't have power in the state of PA... so I am signing on to the texas judicial request because texas courts should have more power in PA than the PA courts\"",
">\n\nIn the back of my mind I keep wondering, what papers?\nIs there a stack of handouts titled \"How to Overthrow the Government\"? What are they writing on paper that's incriminating and why are they writing it at all?\nI know that's all beside the point but I can't help wondering.",
">\n\n\nI know that's all beside the point\n\nUltimately this is what matters because it will be impossible to prove what was burned. Burning papers is not inherently illegal - without an email chain that says something like \"President Trump, at your request I burned documents X, Y, and Z in order to destroy incriminating evidence.\" there is no way to make an actual case.",
">\n\nThe evidence gathered by the J6 committee was bad enough, imagine the shit they thought they needed to destroy.",
">\n\nWhere did Meadows train as a gangster?",
">\n\nTrump University.",
">\n\nFor the WIN!!!",
">\n\n“Mark, just checking in as time continues to count down,” Perry texted Meadows on Dec. 26, 2020, according to messages released by the select panel. “11 days to 1/6 and 25 days to inauguration. We gotta get going!”\nReady to get going, Mark?",
">\n\nFunny that r/conservative doesn't have a single post discussing this. Just more Biden hate, covid hate, woke language hate, etc.",
">\n\nHow do you burn a bunch of papers inside an office without setting off every smoke alarm within 300 feet? It’s not like the White House windows open up.",
">\n\nThere are fireplaces",
">\n\nSo it is mentioned he burned papers in the fireplace, is this something that typically occurs. If not, there may be some video showing smoke coming out of a chimney that may have been filmed by one of the multitude of news agencies that film outside the WH. Just a thought.",
">\n\nIt is very atypical. Disposing documents by burning them is normal, but generally you put them in a burn bag and then they are securely sent to an incinerator. The only reason the chief of staff would personally be burning documents in a Whitehouse fireplace is because he didn't even want his own aids to possibly see them.",
">\n\nIt is proper procedure for someone with clearance to go through the contents of a burn bag and make sure nothing in it would cause an illegal act by being destroyed. That is why we have so many stories regarding Trump aids taping back together torn and shredded documents.",
">\n\nThat just sounds like a lie",
">\n\nreally needs to answer.",
">\n\nShred it, don't regret it!",
">\n\nA Republican cookout",
">\n\nLock him up."
] |
>
Cue the right wing who will now tell us this perfectly normal behavior and has gone on for years! Remember the Obama and Clinton bonfires? /s
|
[
"Was this the White House or Tony Soprano's house? Burning documents, flushing documents... Drain the swamp my ass.",
">\n\nOh, they thought they were Tony Soprano. I wish the world would cut to black for a moment and they would all just disappear.",
">\n\nDon't stop believin'.",
">\n\nConservatives support this type of treason. Never forget.",
">\n\nOverwhelming majority of elected Republicans are still working to cover up all the treason.",
">\n\nWhy do republicans hate America?",
">\n\nThey hate everything except POWER",
">\n\nNothing says innocent like destroying evidence.",
">\n\nThat huge sigh of relief you hear is coming from Fawn Hall lol.",
">\n\n\nThen-White House chief of staff Mark Meadows burned papers in his office after meeting with a House Republican who was working to challenge the 2020 election, according to testimony the Jan. 6 select committee has heard from one of his former aides.\nCassidy Hutchinson, who worked under Meadows when he was former President Donald Trump’s chief of staff, told the panel investigating the Capitol attack that she saw Meadows incinerate documents after a meeting in his office with Rep. Scott Perry (R-Pa.). A person familiar with the testimony described it on condition of anonymity.\n\nThe only person who wished they were Kevin McCarthy is Mark Meadows.",
">\n\nAlways seemed like the same dude.",
">\n\nPer CNN just now, he burned papers at least a dozen times.",
">\n\nWhich is illegal on its face. But, DOJ do it's job? Fat fucking chance..",
">\n\nI have a feeling he's working with the DOJ, everything ran through him",
">\n\nAlthough wasn't he the one who called Cassidy Hutchinson before her testimony and said \"we know you'll do the right thing\" witness intimidation thing?",
">\n\nThat is straight-up dialog out of a Mafia film.",
">\n\nOh that's totally normal. Why at my office we have a daily burning rite where we toss all evidence of our criminality in the bin and make s'mores. Nothing wrong with this at all, not a single thing!",
">\n\n\"These are delicious! I can't wait to commit s'more crimes, tomorrow!\"",
">\n\nJesus. This is all illegal, what are we waiting for here??",
">\n\nWell you had the joke answers so here's the real deal.\nThe DOJ just got the complete set of transcripts.\nNow they have to cross-check everything the witnesses said to the committee with everything they said to the DOJ.\nThey do this to check for lies and memory lapses. The liars then get indicted and hopefully flipped. The folks with bad memories get a chance to amend their statements.\nEach statement then has to be cross-checked against every other statement the DOJ has received. Again they check for lies and mistakes. And again they indict liars and fix errors.\nThey do this because they aren't like Bill Durham. He took his Trump Russia investigation to court and lost his case because he didn't resolve inconsistencies before the trial.\nAssuming that you want the DOJ to win, you need to wait a while before expecting action.",
">\n\nThanks for the detailed answer. I do understand it takes time. Married to a lawyer here. But even my lawyer spouse is pretty convinced nothing is going to happen. They have had portions of the testimony for months. I want to be wrong. But it has been 2 years now. That's a long time. It should be a huge priority, disturbing it is not.",
">\n\nAn attorney acquaintance put it best - 'Federal attention is like a drunk hippo; it may take a long time to meander towards you, but once it's close up, it's attention is unmistakeable for anything else.'",
">\n\nThe thing is we all know that all this horribly corrupt stuff took place. The question is, how do we make the other side of the table understand that this stuff actually happened?",
">\n\nThey don't care. They're beyond caring about legality, morality, rationality or anything decent if it means they don't win by owning the Democrats.",
">\n\nThis is why I honestly feel this country is screwed at times. You would think that regardless of political affiliation that we could all agree to not burning government documents. Furthermore, we should easily all be able to agree that it is a bad thing. But even with something as very obvious as this being a bad thing, you will find a large number of people being okay with it.\nIdea of people burning documents. The cases of trying it down the toilet. Like this sort of stuff should not be occurring and should have stopped.",
">\n\nPretty wild how all that it takes to be held completely unaccountable for domestic and global crimes against humanity is to burn, flush or swallow paper.",
">\n\nReally outrageous behavior with consciousness of guilt. You only burn papers in the White House for one reason.",
">\n\nNothing to see here, just your normal post-meeting brazier ritual. Totally normal, right?",
">\n\nIs that a clear indication they were discussing something criminal, or what?",
">\n\nOh come on, people who hate America and want to undermine our country do stuff like this all the time.",
">\n\nThey don't hate America - they hate that there are Americans who aren't like them.",
">\n\nthen they hate america until they’re all gone. these people aren’t driven by love, they are driven by hate",
">\n\nI love that this makes him the most intelligent part of the administration purely because he remembered fire exists and didn't head straight for the shitter.",
">\n\nI have doubts that Trump will see justice, but Meadows is looking proper fucked.",
">\n\nIf meadows is fucked, then trump is, too. meadows WILL flip if threatened with serious jail time.",
">\n\nI'm sure you're right that Meadows would flip, but then I expect the same BS happen there that happened with the sex trafficking charges against Gaetz. Charges were not filed bc the source was considered unreliable because they were getting a better deal for flipping essentially.",
">\n\nWhen will enough be enough? Its to the point where everyone from Trump down needs to be procuted . i for one hope Jack Smith throws the book at them no matter what government position the hold or have held.",
">\n\nScott Perry is scum of the Earth.",
">\n\nThe law is only for the poors !",
">\n\nDrain the swamp my ass. Trump thinks he’s the Don and all these other clowns are his capos.",
">\n\nConsequences? Prison?",
">\n\nWe all what he was burning. Clearly it was his Sonic the Hedgehog fanfiction where Sonic was spending quality time playing in the Meadows",
">\n\nI mean. I'm not superstitious, but I'd get some sage and smudge the whole room after talking with Scott Perry.",
">\n\nTake my up vote",
">\n\nof fucking course it was Perry. \nDude's my rep. I hate him. he is an asshat that has no morals.",
">\n\nCall him and tell him so",
">\n\nOh, I have... and I have written him. \nAll I get back is \"well, Trump is completely right, screw the PA supreme court they don't have power in the state of PA... so I am signing on to the texas judicial request because texas courts should have more power in PA than the PA courts\"",
">\n\nIn the back of my mind I keep wondering, what papers?\nIs there a stack of handouts titled \"How to Overthrow the Government\"? What are they writing on paper that's incriminating and why are they writing it at all?\nI know that's all beside the point but I can't help wondering.",
">\n\n\nI know that's all beside the point\n\nUltimately this is what matters because it will be impossible to prove what was burned. Burning papers is not inherently illegal - without an email chain that says something like \"President Trump, at your request I burned documents X, Y, and Z in order to destroy incriminating evidence.\" there is no way to make an actual case.",
">\n\nThe evidence gathered by the J6 committee was bad enough, imagine the shit they thought they needed to destroy.",
">\n\nWhere did Meadows train as a gangster?",
">\n\nTrump University.",
">\n\nFor the WIN!!!",
">\n\n“Mark, just checking in as time continues to count down,” Perry texted Meadows on Dec. 26, 2020, according to messages released by the select panel. “11 days to 1/6 and 25 days to inauguration. We gotta get going!”\nReady to get going, Mark?",
">\n\nFunny that r/conservative doesn't have a single post discussing this. Just more Biden hate, covid hate, woke language hate, etc.",
">\n\nHow do you burn a bunch of papers inside an office without setting off every smoke alarm within 300 feet? It’s not like the White House windows open up.",
">\n\nThere are fireplaces",
">\n\nSo it is mentioned he burned papers in the fireplace, is this something that typically occurs. If not, there may be some video showing smoke coming out of a chimney that may have been filmed by one of the multitude of news agencies that film outside the WH. Just a thought.",
">\n\nIt is very atypical. Disposing documents by burning them is normal, but generally you put them in a burn bag and then they are securely sent to an incinerator. The only reason the chief of staff would personally be burning documents in a Whitehouse fireplace is because he didn't even want his own aids to possibly see them.",
">\n\nIt is proper procedure for someone with clearance to go through the contents of a burn bag and make sure nothing in it would cause an illegal act by being destroyed. That is why we have so many stories regarding Trump aids taping back together torn and shredded documents.",
">\n\nThat just sounds like a lie",
">\n\nreally needs to answer.",
">\n\nShred it, don't regret it!",
">\n\nA Republican cookout",
">\n\nLock him up.",
">\n\nShocker, corrupt holier than thou gop member does illegal things !"
] |
>
Perry: oops
|
[
"Was this the White House or Tony Soprano's house? Burning documents, flushing documents... Drain the swamp my ass.",
">\n\nOh, they thought they were Tony Soprano. I wish the world would cut to black for a moment and they would all just disappear.",
">\n\nDon't stop believin'.",
">\n\nConservatives support this type of treason. Never forget.",
">\n\nOverwhelming majority of elected Republicans are still working to cover up all the treason.",
">\n\nWhy do republicans hate America?",
">\n\nThey hate everything except POWER",
">\n\nNothing says innocent like destroying evidence.",
">\n\nThat huge sigh of relief you hear is coming from Fawn Hall lol.",
">\n\n\nThen-White House chief of staff Mark Meadows burned papers in his office after meeting with a House Republican who was working to challenge the 2020 election, according to testimony the Jan. 6 select committee has heard from one of his former aides.\nCassidy Hutchinson, who worked under Meadows when he was former President Donald Trump’s chief of staff, told the panel investigating the Capitol attack that she saw Meadows incinerate documents after a meeting in his office with Rep. Scott Perry (R-Pa.). A person familiar with the testimony described it on condition of anonymity.\n\nThe only person who wished they were Kevin McCarthy is Mark Meadows.",
">\n\nAlways seemed like the same dude.",
">\n\nPer CNN just now, he burned papers at least a dozen times.",
">\n\nWhich is illegal on its face. But, DOJ do it's job? Fat fucking chance..",
">\n\nI have a feeling he's working with the DOJ, everything ran through him",
">\n\nAlthough wasn't he the one who called Cassidy Hutchinson before her testimony and said \"we know you'll do the right thing\" witness intimidation thing?",
">\n\nThat is straight-up dialog out of a Mafia film.",
">\n\nOh that's totally normal. Why at my office we have a daily burning rite where we toss all evidence of our criminality in the bin and make s'mores. Nothing wrong with this at all, not a single thing!",
">\n\n\"These are delicious! I can't wait to commit s'more crimes, tomorrow!\"",
">\n\nJesus. This is all illegal, what are we waiting for here??",
">\n\nWell you had the joke answers so here's the real deal.\nThe DOJ just got the complete set of transcripts.\nNow they have to cross-check everything the witnesses said to the committee with everything they said to the DOJ.\nThey do this to check for lies and memory lapses. The liars then get indicted and hopefully flipped. The folks with bad memories get a chance to amend their statements.\nEach statement then has to be cross-checked against every other statement the DOJ has received. Again they check for lies and mistakes. And again they indict liars and fix errors.\nThey do this because they aren't like Bill Durham. He took his Trump Russia investigation to court and lost his case because he didn't resolve inconsistencies before the trial.\nAssuming that you want the DOJ to win, you need to wait a while before expecting action.",
">\n\nThanks for the detailed answer. I do understand it takes time. Married to a lawyer here. But even my lawyer spouse is pretty convinced nothing is going to happen. They have had portions of the testimony for months. I want to be wrong. But it has been 2 years now. That's a long time. It should be a huge priority, disturbing it is not.",
">\n\nAn attorney acquaintance put it best - 'Federal attention is like a drunk hippo; it may take a long time to meander towards you, but once it's close up, it's attention is unmistakeable for anything else.'",
">\n\nThe thing is we all know that all this horribly corrupt stuff took place. The question is, how do we make the other side of the table understand that this stuff actually happened?",
">\n\nThey don't care. They're beyond caring about legality, morality, rationality or anything decent if it means they don't win by owning the Democrats.",
">\n\nThis is why I honestly feel this country is screwed at times. You would think that regardless of political affiliation that we could all agree to not burning government documents. Furthermore, we should easily all be able to agree that it is a bad thing. But even with something as very obvious as this being a bad thing, you will find a large number of people being okay with it.\nIdea of people burning documents. The cases of trying it down the toilet. Like this sort of stuff should not be occurring and should have stopped.",
">\n\nPretty wild how all that it takes to be held completely unaccountable for domestic and global crimes against humanity is to burn, flush or swallow paper.",
">\n\nReally outrageous behavior with consciousness of guilt. You only burn papers in the White House for one reason.",
">\n\nNothing to see here, just your normal post-meeting brazier ritual. Totally normal, right?",
">\n\nIs that a clear indication they were discussing something criminal, or what?",
">\n\nOh come on, people who hate America and want to undermine our country do stuff like this all the time.",
">\n\nThey don't hate America - they hate that there are Americans who aren't like them.",
">\n\nthen they hate america until they’re all gone. these people aren’t driven by love, they are driven by hate",
">\n\nI love that this makes him the most intelligent part of the administration purely because he remembered fire exists and didn't head straight for the shitter.",
">\n\nI have doubts that Trump will see justice, but Meadows is looking proper fucked.",
">\n\nIf meadows is fucked, then trump is, too. meadows WILL flip if threatened with serious jail time.",
">\n\nI'm sure you're right that Meadows would flip, but then I expect the same BS happen there that happened with the sex trafficking charges against Gaetz. Charges were not filed bc the source was considered unreliable because they were getting a better deal for flipping essentially.",
">\n\nWhen will enough be enough? Its to the point where everyone from Trump down needs to be procuted . i for one hope Jack Smith throws the book at them no matter what government position the hold or have held.",
">\n\nScott Perry is scum of the Earth.",
">\n\nThe law is only for the poors !",
">\n\nDrain the swamp my ass. Trump thinks he’s the Don and all these other clowns are his capos.",
">\n\nConsequences? Prison?",
">\n\nWe all what he was burning. Clearly it was his Sonic the Hedgehog fanfiction where Sonic was spending quality time playing in the Meadows",
">\n\nI mean. I'm not superstitious, but I'd get some sage and smudge the whole room after talking with Scott Perry.",
">\n\nTake my up vote",
">\n\nof fucking course it was Perry. \nDude's my rep. I hate him. he is an asshat that has no morals.",
">\n\nCall him and tell him so",
">\n\nOh, I have... and I have written him. \nAll I get back is \"well, Trump is completely right, screw the PA supreme court they don't have power in the state of PA... so I am signing on to the texas judicial request because texas courts should have more power in PA than the PA courts\"",
">\n\nIn the back of my mind I keep wondering, what papers?\nIs there a stack of handouts titled \"How to Overthrow the Government\"? What are they writing on paper that's incriminating and why are they writing it at all?\nI know that's all beside the point but I can't help wondering.",
">\n\n\nI know that's all beside the point\n\nUltimately this is what matters because it will be impossible to prove what was burned. Burning papers is not inherently illegal - without an email chain that says something like \"President Trump, at your request I burned documents X, Y, and Z in order to destroy incriminating evidence.\" there is no way to make an actual case.",
">\n\nThe evidence gathered by the J6 committee was bad enough, imagine the shit they thought they needed to destroy.",
">\n\nWhere did Meadows train as a gangster?",
">\n\nTrump University.",
">\n\nFor the WIN!!!",
">\n\n“Mark, just checking in as time continues to count down,” Perry texted Meadows on Dec. 26, 2020, according to messages released by the select panel. “11 days to 1/6 and 25 days to inauguration. We gotta get going!”\nReady to get going, Mark?",
">\n\nFunny that r/conservative doesn't have a single post discussing this. Just more Biden hate, covid hate, woke language hate, etc.",
">\n\nHow do you burn a bunch of papers inside an office without setting off every smoke alarm within 300 feet? It’s not like the White House windows open up.",
">\n\nThere are fireplaces",
">\n\nSo it is mentioned he burned papers in the fireplace, is this something that typically occurs. If not, there may be some video showing smoke coming out of a chimney that may have been filmed by one of the multitude of news agencies that film outside the WH. Just a thought.",
">\n\nIt is very atypical. Disposing documents by burning them is normal, but generally you put them in a burn bag and then they are securely sent to an incinerator. The only reason the chief of staff would personally be burning documents in a Whitehouse fireplace is because he didn't even want his own aids to possibly see them.",
">\n\nIt is proper procedure for someone with clearance to go through the contents of a burn bag and make sure nothing in it would cause an illegal act by being destroyed. That is why we have so many stories regarding Trump aids taping back together torn and shredded documents.",
">\n\nThat just sounds like a lie",
">\n\nreally needs to answer.",
">\n\nShred it, don't regret it!",
">\n\nA Republican cookout",
">\n\nLock him up.",
">\n\nShocker, corrupt holier than thou gop member does illegal things !",
">\n\nCue the right wing who will now tell us this perfectly normal behavior and has gone on for years! Remember the Obama and Clinton bonfires? /s"
] |
>
I can see them rubbing sticks together to start the fire
|
[
"Was this the White House or Tony Soprano's house? Burning documents, flushing documents... Drain the swamp my ass.",
">\n\nOh, they thought they were Tony Soprano. I wish the world would cut to black for a moment and they would all just disappear.",
">\n\nDon't stop believin'.",
">\n\nConservatives support this type of treason. Never forget.",
">\n\nOverwhelming majority of elected Republicans are still working to cover up all the treason.",
">\n\nWhy do republicans hate America?",
">\n\nThey hate everything except POWER",
">\n\nNothing says innocent like destroying evidence.",
">\n\nThat huge sigh of relief you hear is coming from Fawn Hall lol.",
">\n\n\nThen-White House chief of staff Mark Meadows burned papers in his office after meeting with a House Republican who was working to challenge the 2020 election, according to testimony the Jan. 6 select committee has heard from one of his former aides.\nCassidy Hutchinson, who worked under Meadows when he was former President Donald Trump’s chief of staff, told the panel investigating the Capitol attack that she saw Meadows incinerate documents after a meeting in his office with Rep. Scott Perry (R-Pa.). A person familiar with the testimony described it on condition of anonymity.\n\nThe only person who wished they were Kevin McCarthy is Mark Meadows.",
">\n\nAlways seemed like the same dude.",
">\n\nPer CNN just now, he burned papers at least a dozen times.",
">\n\nWhich is illegal on its face. But, DOJ do it's job? Fat fucking chance..",
">\n\nI have a feeling he's working with the DOJ, everything ran through him",
">\n\nAlthough wasn't he the one who called Cassidy Hutchinson before her testimony and said \"we know you'll do the right thing\" witness intimidation thing?",
">\n\nThat is straight-up dialog out of a Mafia film.",
">\n\nOh that's totally normal. Why at my office we have a daily burning rite where we toss all evidence of our criminality in the bin and make s'mores. Nothing wrong with this at all, not a single thing!",
">\n\n\"These are delicious! I can't wait to commit s'more crimes, tomorrow!\"",
">\n\nJesus. This is all illegal, what are we waiting for here??",
">\n\nWell you had the joke answers so here's the real deal.\nThe DOJ just got the complete set of transcripts.\nNow they have to cross-check everything the witnesses said to the committee with everything they said to the DOJ.\nThey do this to check for lies and memory lapses. The liars then get indicted and hopefully flipped. The folks with bad memories get a chance to amend their statements.\nEach statement then has to be cross-checked against every other statement the DOJ has received. Again they check for lies and mistakes. And again they indict liars and fix errors.\nThey do this because they aren't like Bill Durham. He took his Trump Russia investigation to court and lost his case because he didn't resolve inconsistencies before the trial.\nAssuming that you want the DOJ to win, you need to wait a while before expecting action.",
">\n\nThanks for the detailed answer. I do understand it takes time. Married to a lawyer here. But even my lawyer spouse is pretty convinced nothing is going to happen. They have had portions of the testimony for months. I want to be wrong. But it has been 2 years now. That's a long time. It should be a huge priority, disturbing it is not.",
">\n\nAn attorney acquaintance put it best - 'Federal attention is like a drunk hippo; it may take a long time to meander towards you, but once it's close up, it's attention is unmistakeable for anything else.'",
">\n\nThe thing is we all know that all this horribly corrupt stuff took place. The question is, how do we make the other side of the table understand that this stuff actually happened?",
">\n\nThey don't care. They're beyond caring about legality, morality, rationality or anything decent if it means they don't win by owning the Democrats.",
">\n\nThis is why I honestly feel this country is screwed at times. You would think that regardless of political affiliation that we could all agree to not burning government documents. Furthermore, we should easily all be able to agree that it is a bad thing. But even with something as very obvious as this being a bad thing, you will find a large number of people being okay with it.\nIdea of people burning documents. The cases of trying it down the toilet. Like this sort of stuff should not be occurring and should have stopped.",
">\n\nPretty wild how all that it takes to be held completely unaccountable for domestic and global crimes against humanity is to burn, flush or swallow paper.",
">\n\nReally outrageous behavior with consciousness of guilt. You only burn papers in the White House for one reason.",
">\n\nNothing to see here, just your normal post-meeting brazier ritual. Totally normal, right?",
">\n\nIs that a clear indication they were discussing something criminal, or what?",
">\n\nOh come on, people who hate America and want to undermine our country do stuff like this all the time.",
">\n\nThey don't hate America - they hate that there are Americans who aren't like them.",
">\n\nthen they hate america until they’re all gone. these people aren’t driven by love, they are driven by hate",
">\n\nI love that this makes him the most intelligent part of the administration purely because he remembered fire exists and didn't head straight for the shitter.",
">\n\nI have doubts that Trump will see justice, but Meadows is looking proper fucked.",
">\n\nIf meadows is fucked, then trump is, too. meadows WILL flip if threatened with serious jail time.",
">\n\nI'm sure you're right that Meadows would flip, but then I expect the same BS happen there that happened with the sex trafficking charges against Gaetz. Charges were not filed bc the source was considered unreliable because they were getting a better deal for flipping essentially.",
">\n\nWhen will enough be enough? Its to the point where everyone from Trump down needs to be procuted . i for one hope Jack Smith throws the book at them no matter what government position the hold or have held.",
">\n\nScott Perry is scum of the Earth.",
">\n\nThe law is only for the poors !",
">\n\nDrain the swamp my ass. Trump thinks he’s the Don and all these other clowns are his capos.",
">\n\nConsequences? Prison?",
">\n\nWe all what he was burning. Clearly it was his Sonic the Hedgehog fanfiction where Sonic was spending quality time playing in the Meadows",
">\n\nI mean. I'm not superstitious, but I'd get some sage and smudge the whole room after talking with Scott Perry.",
">\n\nTake my up vote",
">\n\nof fucking course it was Perry. \nDude's my rep. I hate him. he is an asshat that has no morals.",
">\n\nCall him and tell him so",
">\n\nOh, I have... and I have written him. \nAll I get back is \"well, Trump is completely right, screw the PA supreme court they don't have power in the state of PA... so I am signing on to the texas judicial request because texas courts should have more power in PA than the PA courts\"",
">\n\nIn the back of my mind I keep wondering, what papers?\nIs there a stack of handouts titled \"How to Overthrow the Government\"? What are they writing on paper that's incriminating and why are they writing it at all?\nI know that's all beside the point but I can't help wondering.",
">\n\n\nI know that's all beside the point\n\nUltimately this is what matters because it will be impossible to prove what was burned. Burning papers is not inherently illegal - without an email chain that says something like \"President Trump, at your request I burned documents X, Y, and Z in order to destroy incriminating evidence.\" there is no way to make an actual case.",
">\n\nThe evidence gathered by the J6 committee was bad enough, imagine the shit they thought they needed to destroy.",
">\n\nWhere did Meadows train as a gangster?",
">\n\nTrump University.",
">\n\nFor the WIN!!!",
">\n\n“Mark, just checking in as time continues to count down,” Perry texted Meadows on Dec. 26, 2020, according to messages released by the select panel. “11 days to 1/6 and 25 days to inauguration. We gotta get going!”\nReady to get going, Mark?",
">\n\nFunny that r/conservative doesn't have a single post discussing this. Just more Biden hate, covid hate, woke language hate, etc.",
">\n\nHow do you burn a bunch of papers inside an office without setting off every smoke alarm within 300 feet? It’s not like the White House windows open up.",
">\n\nThere are fireplaces",
">\n\nSo it is mentioned he burned papers in the fireplace, is this something that typically occurs. If not, there may be some video showing smoke coming out of a chimney that may have been filmed by one of the multitude of news agencies that film outside the WH. Just a thought.",
">\n\nIt is very atypical. Disposing documents by burning them is normal, but generally you put them in a burn bag and then they are securely sent to an incinerator. The only reason the chief of staff would personally be burning documents in a Whitehouse fireplace is because he didn't even want his own aids to possibly see them.",
">\n\nIt is proper procedure for someone with clearance to go through the contents of a burn bag and make sure nothing in it would cause an illegal act by being destroyed. That is why we have so many stories regarding Trump aids taping back together torn and shredded documents.",
">\n\nThat just sounds like a lie",
">\n\nreally needs to answer.",
">\n\nShred it, don't regret it!",
">\n\nA Republican cookout",
">\n\nLock him up.",
">\n\nShocker, corrupt holier than thou gop member does illegal things !",
">\n\nCue the right wing who will now tell us this perfectly normal behavior and has gone on for years! Remember the Obama and Clinton bonfires? /s",
">\n\nPerry: oops"
] |
>
Add this to the pile of things the right would lose their shit over had Obama/etc done it
|
[
"Was this the White House or Tony Soprano's house? Burning documents, flushing documents... Drain the swamp my ass.",
">\n\nOh, they thought they were Tony Soprano. I wish the world would cut to black for a moment and they would all just disappear.",
">\n\nDon't stop believin'.",
">\n\nConservatives support this type of treason. Never forget.",
">\n\nOverwhelming majority of elected Republicans are still working to cover up all the treason.",
">\n\nWhy do republicans hate America?",
">\n\nThey hate everything except POWER",
">\n\nNothing says innocent like destroying evidence.",
">\n\nThat huge sigh of relief you hear is coming from Fawn Hall lol.",
">\n\n\nThen-White House chief of staff Mark Meadows burned papers in his office after meeting with a House Republican who was working to challenge the 2020 election, according to testimony the Jan. 6 select committee has heard from one of his former aides.\nCassidy Hutchinson, who worked under Meadows when he was former President Donald Trump’s chief of staff, told the panel investigating the Capitol attack that she saw Meadows incinerate documents after a meeting in his office with Rep. Scott Perry (R-Pa.). A person familiar with the testimony described it on condition of anonymity.\n\nThe only person who wished they were Kevin McCarthy is Mark Meadows.",
">\n\nAlways seemed like the same dude.",
">\n\nPer CNN just now, he burned papers at least a dozen times.",
">\n\nWhich is illegal on its face. But, DOJ do it's job? Fat fucking chance..",
">\n\nI have a feeling he's working with the DOJ, everything ran through him",
">\n\nAlthough wasn't he the one who called Cassidy Hutchinson before her testimony and said \"we know you'll do the right thing\" witness intimidation thing?",
">\n\nThat is straight-up dialog out of a Mafia film.",
">\n\nOh that's totally normal. Why at my office we have a daily burning rite where we toss all evidence of our criminality in the bin and make s'mores. Nothing wrong with this at all, not a single thing!",
">\n\n\"These are delicious! I can't wait to commit s'more crimes, tomorrow!\"",
">\n\nJesus. This is all illegal, what are we waiting for here??",
">\n\nWell you had the joke answers so here's the real deal.\nThe DOJ just got the complete set of transcripts.\nNow they have to cross-check everything the witnesses said to the committee with everything they said to the DOJ.\nThey do this to check for lies and memory lapses. The liars then get indicted and hopefully flipped. The folks with bad memories get a chance to amend their statements.\nEach statement then has to be cross-checked against every other statement the DOJ has received. Again they check for lies and mistakes. And again they indict liars and fix errors.\nThey do this because they aren't like Bill Durham. He took his Trump Russia investigation to court and lost his case because he didn't resolve inconsistencies before the trial.\nAssuming that you want the DOJ to win, you need to wait a while before expecting action.",
">\n\nThanks for the detailed answer. I do understand it takes time. Married to a lawyer here. But even my lawyer spouse is pretty convinced nothing is going to happen. They have had portions of the testimony for months. I want to be wrong. But it has been 2 years now. That's a long time. It should be a huge priority, disturbing it is not.",
">\n\nAn attorney acquaintance put it best - 'Federal attention is like a drunk hippo; it may take a long time to meander towards you, but once it's close up, it's attention is unmistakeable for anything else.'",
">\n\nThe thing is we all know that all this horribly corrupt stuff took place. The question is, how do we make the other side of the table understand that this stuff actually happened?",
">\n\nThey don't care. They're beyond caring about legality, morality, rationality or anything decent if it means they don't win by owning the Democrats.",
">\n\nThis is why I honestly feel this country is screwed at times. You would think that regardless of political affiliation that we could all agree to not burning government documents. Furthermore, we should easily all be able to agree that it is a bad thing. But even with something as very obvious as this being a bad thing, you will find a large number of people being okay with it.\nIdea of people burning documents. The cases of trying it down the toilet. Like this sort of stuff should not be occurring and should have stopped.",
">\n\nPretty wild how all that it takes to be held completely unaccountable for domestic and global crimes against humanity is to burn, flush or swallow paper.",
">\n\nReally outrageous behavior with consciousness of guilt. You only burn papers in the White House for one reason.",
">\n\nNothing to see here, just your normal post-meeting brazier ritual. Totally normal, right?",
">\n\nIs that a clear indication they were discussing something criminal, or what?",
">\n\nOh come on, people who hate America and want to undermine our country do stuff like this all the time.",
">\n\nThey don't hate America - they hate that there are Americans who aren't like them.",
">\n\nthen they hate america until they’re all gone. these people aren’t driven by love, they are driven by hate",
">\n\nI love that this makes him the most intelligent part of the administration purely because he remembered fire exists and didn't head straight for the shitter.",
">\n\nI have doubts that Trump will see justice, but Meadows is looking proper fucked.",
">\n\nIf meadows is fucked, then trump is, too. meadows WILL flip if threatened with serious jail time.",
">\n\nI'm sure you're right that Meadows would flip, but then I expect the same BS happen there that happened with the sex trafficking charges against Gaetz. Charges were not filed bc the source was considered unreliable because they were getting a better deal for flipping essentially.",
">\n\nWhen will enough be enough? Its to the point where everyone from Trump down needs to be procuted . i for one hope Jack Smith throws the book at them no matter what government position the hold or have held.",
">\n\nScott Perry is scum of the Earth.",
">\n\nThe law is only for the poors !",
">\n\nDrain the swamp my ass. Trump thinks he’s the Don and all these other clowns are his capos.",
">\n\nConsequences? Prison?",
">\n\nWe all what he was burning. Clearly it was his Sonic the Hedgehog fanfiction where Sonic was spending quality time playing in the Meadows",
">\n\nI mean. I'm not superstitious, but I'd get some sage and smudge the whole room after talking with Scott Perry.",
">\n\nTake my up vote",
">\n\nof fucking course it was Perry. \nDude's my rep. I hate him. he is an asshat that has no morals.",
">\n\nCall him and tell him so",
">\n\nOh, I have... and I have written him. \nAll I get back is \"well, Trump is completely right, screw the PA supreme court they don't have power in the state of PA... so I am signing on to the texas judicial request because texas courts should have more power in PA than the PA courts\"",
">\n\nIn the back of my mind I keep wondering, what papers?\nIs there a stack of handouts titled \"How to Overthrow the Government\"? What are they writing on paper that's incriminating and why are they writing it at all?\nI know that's all beside the point but I can't help wondering.",
">\n\n\nI know that's all beside the point\n\nUltimately this is what matters because it will be impossible to prove what was burned. Burning papers is not inherently illegal - without an email chain that says something like \"President Trump, at your request I burned documents X, Y, and Z in order to destroy incriminating evidence.\" there is no way to make an actual case.",
">\n\nThe evidence gathered by the J6 committee was bad enough, imagine the shit they thought they needed to destroy.",
">\n\nWhere did Meadows train as a gangster?",
">\n\nTrump University.",
">\n\nFor the WIN!!!",
">\n\n“Mark, just checking in as time continues to count down,” Perry texted Meadows on Dec. 26, 2020, according to messages released by the select panel. “11 days to 1/6 and 25 days to inauguration. We gotta get going!”\nReady to get going, Mark?",
">\n\nFunny that r/conservative doesn't have a single post discussing this. Just more Biden hate, covid hate, woke language hate, etc.",
">\n\nHow do you burn a bunch of papers inside an office without setting off every smoke alarm within 300 feet? It’s not like the White House windows open up.",
">\n\nThere are fireplaces",
">\n\nSo it is mentioned he burned papers in the fireplace, is this something that typically occurs. If not, there may be some video showing smoke coming out of a chimney that may have been filmed by one of the multitude of news agencies that film outside the WH. Just a thought.",
">\n\nIt is very atypical. Disposing documents by burning them is normal, but generally you put them in a burn bag and then they are securely sent to an incinerator. The only reason the chief of staff would personally be burning documents in a Whitehouse fireplace is because he didn't even want his own aids to possibly see them.",
">\n\nIt is proper procedure for someone with clearance to go through the contents of a burn bag and make sure nothing in it would cause an illegal act by being destroyed. That is why we have so many stories regarding Trump aids taping back together torn and shredded documents.",
">\n\nThat just sounds like a lie",
">\n\nreally needs to answer.",
">\n\nShred it, don't regret it!",
">\n\nA Republican cookout",
">\n\nLock him up.",
">\n\nShocker, corrupt holier than thou gop member does illegal things !",
">\n\nCue the right wing who will now tell us this perfectly normal behavior and has gone on for years! Remember the Obama and Clinton bonfires? /s",
">\n\nPerry: oops",
">\n\nI can see them rubbing sticks together to start the fire"
] |
>
“Don’t worry. Those weren’t presidential records. They were just notes on our criminal coup conspiracy”
|
[
"Was this the White House or Tony Soprano's house? Burning documents, flushing documents... Drain the swamp my ass.",
">\n\nOh, they thought they were Tony Soprano. I wish the world would cut to black for a moment and they would all just disappear.",
">\n\nDon't stop believin'.",
">\n\nConservatives support this type of treason. Never forget.",
">\n\nOverwhelming majority of elected Republicans are still working to cover up all the treason.",
">\n\nWhy do republicans hate America?",
">\n\nThey hate everything except POWER",
">\n\nNothing says innocent like destroying evidence.",
">\n\nThat huge sigh of relief you hear is coming from Fawn Hall lol.",
">\n\n\nThen-White House chief of staff Mark Meadows burned papers in his office after meeting with a House Republican who was working to challenge the 2020 election, according to testimony the Jan. 6 select committee has heard from one of his former aides.\nCassidy Hutchinson, who worked under Meadows when he was former President Donald Trump’s chief of staff, told the panel investigating the Capitol attack that she saw Meadows incinerate documents after a meeting in his office with Rep. Scott Perry (R-Pa.). A person familiar with the testimony described it on condition of anonymity.\n\nThe only person who wished they were Kevin McCarthy is Mark Meadows.",
">\n\nAlways seemed like the same dude.",
">\n\nPer CNN just now, he burned papers at least a dozen times.",
">\n\nWhich is illegal on its face. But, DOJ do it's job? Fat fucking chance..",
">\n\nI have a feeling he's working with the DOJ, everything ran through him",
">\n\nAlthough wasn't he the one who called Cassidy Hutchinson before her testimony and said \"we know you'll do the right thing\" witness intimidation thing?",
">\n\nThat is straight-up dialog out of a Mafia film.",
">\n\nOh that's totally normal. Why at my office we have a daily burning rite where we toss all evidence of our criminality in the bin and make s'mores. Nothing wrong with this at all, not a single thing!",
">\n\n\"These are delicious! I can't wait to commit s'more crimes, tomorrow!\"",
">\n\nJesus. This is all illegal, what are we waiting for here??",
">\n\nWell you had the joke answers so here's the real deal.\nThe DOJ just got the complete set of transcripts.\nNow they have to cross-check everything the witnesses said to the committee with everything they said to the DOJ.\nThey do this to check for lies and memory lapses. The liars then get indicted and hopefully flipped. The folks with bad memories get a chance to amend their statements.\nEach statement then has to be cross-checked against every other statement the DOJ has received. Again they check for lies and mistakes. And again they indict liars and fix errors.\nThey do this because they aren't like Bill Durham. He took his Trump Russia investigation to court and lost his case because he didn't resolve inconsistencies before the trial.\nAssuming that you want the DOJ to win, you need to wait a while before expecting action.",
">\n\nThanks for the detailed answer. I do understand it takes time. Married to a lawyer here. But even my lawyer spouse is pretty convinced nothing is going to happen. They have had portions of the testimony for months. I want to be wrong. But it has been 2 years now. That's a long time. It should be a huge priority, disturbing it is not.",
">\n\nAn attorney acquaintance put it best - 'Federal attention is like a drunk hippo; it may take a long time to meander towards you, but once it's close up, it's attention is unmistakeable for anything else.'",
">\n\nThe thing is we all know that all this horribly corrupt stuff took place. The question is, how do we make the other side of the table understand that this stuff actually happened?",
">\n\nThey don't care. They're beyond caring about legality, morality, rationality or anything decent if it means they don't win by owning the Democrats.",
">\n\nThis is why I honestly feel this country is screwed at times. You would think that regardless of political affiliation that we could all agree to not burning government documents. Furthermore, we should easily all be able to agree that it is a bad thing. But even with something as very obvious as this being a bad thing, you will find a large number of people being okay with it.\nIdea of people burning documents. The cases of trying it down the toilet. Like this sort of stuff should not be occurring and should have stopped.",
">\n\nPretty wild how all that it takes to be held completely unaccountable for domestic and global crimes against humanity is to burn, flush or swallow paper.",
">\n\nReally outrageous behavior with consciousness of guilt. You only burn papers in the White House for one reason.",
">\n\nNothing to see here, just your normal post-meeting brazier ritual. Totally normal, right?",
">\n\nIs that a clear indication they were discussing something criminal, or what?",
">\n\nOh come on, people who hate America and want to undermine our country do stuff like this all the time.",
">\n\nThey don't hate America - they hate that there are Americans who aren't like them.",
">\n\nthen they hate america until they’re all gone. these people aren’t driven by love, they are driven by hate",
">\n\nI love that this makes him the most intelligent part of the administration purely because he remembered fire exists and didn't head straight for the shitter.",
">\n\nI have doubts that Trump will see justice, but Meadows is looking proper fucked.",
">\n\nIf meadows is fucked, then trump is, too. meadows WILL flip if threatened with serious jail time.",
">\n\nI'm sure you're right that Meadows would flip, but then I expect the same BS happen there that happened with the sex trafficking charges against Gaetz. Charges were not filed bc the source was considered unreliable because they were getting a better deal for flipping essentially.",
">\n\nWhen will enough be enough? Its to the point where everyone from Trump down needs to be procuted . i for one hope Jack Smith throws the book at them no matter what government position the hold or have held.",
">\n\nScott Perry is scum of the Earth.",
">\n\nThe law is only for the poors !",
">\n\nDrain the swamp my ass. Trump thinks he’s the Don and all these other clowns are his capos.",
">\n\nConsequences? Prison?",
">\n\nWe all what he was burning. Clearly it was his Sonic the Hedgehog fanfiction where Sonic was spending quality time playing in the Meadows",
">\n\nI mean. I'm not superstitious, but I'd get some sage and smudge the whole room after talking with Scott Perry.",
">\n\nTake my up vote",
">\n\nof fucking course it was Perry. \nDude's my rep. I hate him. he is an asshat that has no morals.",
">\n\nCall him and tell him so",
">\n\nOh, I have... and I have written him. \nAll I get back is \"well, Trump is completely right, screw the PA supreme court they don't have power in the state of PA... so I am signing on to the texas judicial request because texas courts should have more power in PA than the PA courts\"",
">\n\nIn the back of my mind I keep wondering, what papers?\nIs there a stack of handouts titled \"How to Overthrow the Government\"? What are they writing on paper that's incriminating and why are they writing it at all?\nI know that's all beside the point but I can't help wondering.",
">\n\n\nI know that's all beside the point\n\nUltimately this is what matters because it will be impossible to prove what was burned. Burning papers is not inherently illegal - without an email chain that says something like \"President Trump, at your request I burned documents X, Y, and Z in order to destroy incriminating evidence.\" there is no way to make an actual case.",
">\n\nThe evidence gathered by the J6 committee was bad enough, imagine the shit they thought they needed to destroy.",
">\n\nWhere did Meadows train as a gangster?",
">\n\nTrump University.",
">\n\nFor the WIN!!!",
">\n\n“Mark, just checking in as time continues to count down,” Perry texted Meadows on Dec. 26, 2020, according to messages released by the select panel. “11 days to 1/6 and 25 days to inauguration. We gotta get going!”\nReady to get going, Mark?",
">\n\nFunny that r/conservative doesn't have a single post discussing this. Just more Biden hate, covid hate, woke language hate, etc.",
">\n\nHow do you burn a bunch of papers inside an office without setting off every smoke alarm within 300 feet? It’s not like the White House windows open up.",
">\n\nThere are fireplaces",
">\n\nSo it is mentioned he burned papers in the fireplace, is this something that typically occurs. If not, there may be some video showing smoke coming out of a chimney that may have been filmed by one of the multitude of news agencies that film outside the WH. Just a thought.",
">\n\nIt is very atypical. Disposing documents by burning them is normal, but generally you put them in a burn bag and then they are securely sent to an incinerator. The only reason the chief of staff would personally be burning documents in a Whitehouse fireplace is because he didn't even want his own aids to possibly see them.",
">\n\nIt is proper procedure for someone with clearance to go through the contents of a burn bag and make sure nothing in it would cause an illegal act by being destroyed. That is why we have so many stories regarding Trump aids taping back together torn and shredded documents.",
">\n\nThat just sounds like a lie",
">\n\nreally needs to answer.",
">\n\nShred it, don't regret it!",
">\n\nA Republican cookout",
">\n\nLock him up.",
">\n\nShocker, corrupt holier than thou gop member does illegal things !",
">\n\nCue the right wing who will now tell us this perfectly normal behavior and has gone on for years! Remember the Obama and Clinton bonfires? /s",
">\n\nPerry: oops",
">\n\nI can see them rubbing sticks together to start the fire",
">\n\nAdd this to the pile of things the right would lose their shit over had Obama/etc done it"
] |
>
She lied about the suv steering wheel, then said it was a lie, then changed back to her original story. Now the chief of staff burning documents in the Whitehouse "a couple" of times a week. So comical that people actually believe this BS. I wonder if she's getting paid by the dnc, or is just getting off on the media attention. I look forward to her debut as a CNN or MSNBC anchor.
|
[
"Was this the White House or Tony Soprano's house? Burning documents, flushing documents... Drain the swamp my ass.",
">\n\nOh, they thought they were Tony Soprano. I wish the world would cut to black for a moment and they would all just disappear.",
">\n\nDon't stop believin'.",
">\n\nConservatives support this type of treason. Never forget.",
">\n\nOverwhelming majority of elected Republicans are still working to cover up all the treason.",
">\n\nWhy do republicans hate America?",
">\n\nThey hate everything except POWER",
">\n\nNothing says innocent like destroying evidence.",
">\n\nThat huge sigh of relief you hear is coming from Fawn Hall lol.",
">\n\n\nThen-White House chief of staff Mark Meadows burned papers in his office after meeting with a House Republican who was working to challenge the 2020 election, according to testimony the Jan. 6 select committee has heard from one of his former aides.\nCassidy Hutchinson, who worked under Meadows when he was former President Donald Trump’s chief of staff, told the panel investigating the Capitol attack that she saw Meadows incinerate documents after a meeting in his office with Rep. Scott Perry (R-Pa.). A person familiar with the testimony described it on condition of anonymity.\n\nThe only person who wished they were Kevin McCarthy is Mark Meadows.",
">\n\nAlways seemed like the same dude.",
">\n\nPer CNN just now, he burned papers at least a dozen times.",
">\n\nWhich is illegal on its face. But, DOJ do it's job? Fat fucking chance..",
">\n\nI have a feeling he's working with the DOJ, everything ran through him",
">\n\nAlthough wasn't he the one who called Cassidy Hutchinson before her testimony and said \"we know you'll do the right thing\" witness intimidation thing?",
">\n\nThat is straight-up dialog out of a Mafia film.",
">\n\nOh that's totally normal. Why at my office we have a daily burning rite where we toss all evidence of our criminality in the bin and make s'mores. Nothing wrong with this at all, not a single thing!",
">\n\n\"These are delicious! I can't wait to commit s'more crimes, tomorrow!\"",
">\n\nJesus. This is all illegal, what are we waiting for here??",
">\n\nWell you had the joke answers so here's the real deal.\nThe DOJ just got the complete set of transcripts.\nNow they have to cross-check everything the witnesses said to the committee with everything they said to the DOJ.\nThey do this to check for lies and memory lapses. The liars then get indicted and hopefully flipped. The folks with bad memories get a chance to amend their statements.\nEach statement then has to be cross-checked against every other statement the DOJ has received. Again they check for lies and mistakes. And again they indict liars and fix errors.\nThey do this because they aren't like Bill Durham. He took his Trump Russia investigation to court and lost his case because he didn't resolve inconsistencies before the trial.\nAssuming that you want the DOJ to win, you need to wait a while before expecting action.",
">\n\nThanks for the detailed answer. I do understand it takes time. Married to a lawyer here. But even my lawyer spouse is pretty convinced nothing is going to happen. They have had portions of the testimony for months. I want to be wrong. But it has been 2 years now. That's a long time. It should be a huge priority, disturbing it is not.",
">\n\nAn attorney acquaintance put it best - 'Federal attention is like a drunk hippo; it may take a long time to meander towards you, but once it's close up, it's attention is unmistakeable for anything else.'",
">\n\nThe thing is we all know that all this horribly corrupt stuff took place. The question is, how do we make the other side of the table understand that this stuff actually happened?",
">\n\nThey don't care. They're beyond caring about legality, morality, rationality or anything decent if it means they don't win by owning the Democrats.",
">\n\nThis is why I honestly feel this country is screwed at times. You would think that regardless of political affiliation that we could all agree to not burning government documents. Furthermore, we should easily all be able to agree that it is a bad thing. But even with something as very obvious as this being a bad thing, you will find a large number of people being okay with it.\nIdea of people burning documents. The cases of trying it down the toilet. Like this sort of stuff should not be occurring and should have stopped.",
">\n\nPretty wild how all that it takes to be held completely unaccountable for domestic and global crimes against humanity is to burn, flush or swallow paper.",
">\n\nReally outrageous behavior with consciousness of guilt. You only burn papers in the White House for one reason.",
">\n\nNothing to see here, just your normal post-meeting brazier ritual. Totally normal, right?",
">\n\nIs that a clear indication they were discussing something criminal, or what?",
">\n\nOh come on, people who hate America and want to undermine our country do stuff like this all the time.",
">\n\nThey don't hate America - they hate that there are Americans who aren't like them.",
">\n\nthen they hate america until they’re all gone. these people aren’t driven by love, they are driven by hate",
">\n\nI love that this makes him the most intelligent part of the administration purely because he remembered fire exists and didn't head straight for the shitter.",
">\n\nI have doubts that Trump will see justice, but Meadows is looking proper fucked.",
">\n\nIf meadows is fucked, then trump is, too. meadows WILL flip if threatened with serious jail time.",
">\n\nI'm sure you're right that Meadows would flip, but then I expect the same BS happen there that happened with the sex trafficking charges against Gaetz. Charges were not filed bc the source was considered unreliable because they were getting a better deal for flipping essentially.",
">\n\nWhen will enough be enough? Its to the point where everyone from Trump down needs to be procuted . i for one hope Jack Smith throws the book at them no matter what government position the hold or have held.",
">\n\nScott Perry is scum of the Earth.",
">\n\nThe law is only for the poors !",
">\n\nDrain the swamp my ass. Trump thinks he’s the Don and all these other clowns are his capos.",
">\n\nConsequences? Prison?",
">\n\nWe all what he was burning. Clearly it was his Sonic the Hedgehog fanfiction where Sonic was spending quality time playing in the Meadows",
">\n\nI mean. I'm not superstitious, but I'd get some sage and smudge the whole room after talking with Scott Perry.",
">\n\nTake my up vote",
">\n\nof fucking course it was Perry. \nDude's my rep. I hate him. he is an asshat that has no morals.",
">\n\nCall him and tell him so",
">\n\nOh, I have... and I have written him. \nAll I get back is \"well, Trump is completely right, screw the PA supreme court they don't have power in the state of PA... so I am signing on to the texas judicial request because texas courts should have more power in PA than the PA courts\"",
">\n\nIn the back of my mind I keep wondering, what papers?\nIs there a stack of handouts titled \"How to Overthrow the Government\"? What are they writing on paper that's incriminating and why are they writing it at all?\nI know that's all beside the point but I can't help wondering.",
">\n\n\nI know that's all beside the point\n\nUltimately this is what matters because it will be impossible to prove what was burned. Burning papers is not inherently illegal - without an email chain that says something like \"President Trump, at your request I burned documents X, Y, and Z in order to destroy incriminating evidence.\" there is no way to make an actual case.",
">\n\nThe evidence gathered by the J6 committee was bad enough, imagine the shit they thought they needed to destroy.",
">\n\nWhere did Meadows train as a gangster?",
">\n\nTrump University.",
">\n\nFor the WIN!!!",
">\n\n“Mark, just checking in as time continues to count down,” Perry texted Meadows on Dec. 26, 2020, according to messages released by the select panel. “11 days to 1/6 and 25 days to inauguration. We gotta get going!”\nReady to get going, Mark?",
">\n\nFunny that r/conservative doesn't have a single post discussing this. Just more Biden hate, covid hate, woke language hate, etc.",
">\n\nHow do you burn a bunch of papers inside an office without setting off every smoke alarm within 300 feet? It’s not like the White House windows open up.",
">\n\nThere are fireplaces",
">\n\nSo it is mentioned he burned papers in the fireplace, is this something that typically occurs. If not, there may be some video showing smoke coming out of a chimney that may have been filmed by one of the multitude of news agencies that film outside the WH. Just a thought.",
">\n\nIt is very atypical. Disposing documents by burning them is normal, but generally you put them in a burn bag and then they are securely sent to an incinerator. The only reason the chief of staff would personally be burning documents in a Whitehouse fireplace is because he didn't even want his own aids to possibly see them.",
">\n\nIt is proper procedure for someone with clearance to go through the contents of a burn bag and make sure nothing in it would cause an illegal act by being destroyed. That is why we have so many stories regarding Trump aids taping back together torn and shredded documents.",
">\n\nThat just sounds like a lie",
">\n\nreally needs to answer.",
">\n\nShred it, don't regret it!",
">\n\nA Republican cookout",
">\n\nLock him up.",
">\n\nShocker, corrupt holier than thou gop member does illegal things !",
">\n\nCue the right wing who will now tell us this perfectly normal behavior and has gone on for years! Remember the Obama and Clinton bonfires? /s",
">\n\nPerry: oops",
">\n\nI can see them rubbing sticks together to start the fire",
">\n\nAdd this to the pile of things the right would lose their shit over had Obama/etc done it",
">\n\n“Don’t worry. Those weren’t presidential records. They were just notes on our criminal coup conspiracy”"
] |
>
Spot on... But it was ok that they paid for a fake dossier, then used that fake dossier to lie to the FISA court at least 6 times that we know to spy on a presidential campaign. Fabricate stories about Russia Russia Russia and as were now confirming using federal law enforcement agencies and every major media outlet and social media platform to black list legitimate need stories that would have absolutely swung the election... How's died the FBI have possession of a laptop for over a year and never look at it??? But yeah Republicans are to blame for the highest inflation, gas prices, cost of living, etc... It's all the Republicans faults...
|
[
"Was this the White House or Tony Soprano's house? Burning documents, flushing documents... Drain the swamp my ass.",
">\n\nOh, they thought they were Tony Soprano. I wish the world would cut to black for a moment and they would all just disappear.",
">\n\nDon't stop believin'.",
">\n\nConservatives support this type of treason. Never forget.",
">\n\nOverwhelming majority of elected Republicans are still working to cover up all the treason.",
">\n\nWhy do republicans hate America?",
">\n\nThey hate everything except POWER",
">\n\nNothing says innocent like destroying evidence.",
">\n\nThat huge sigh of relief you hear is coming from Fawn Hall lol.",
">\n\n\nThen-White House chief of staff Mark Meadows burned papers in his office after meeting with a House Republican who was working to challenge the 2020 election, according to testimony the Jan. 6 select committee has heard from one of his former aides.\nCassidy Hutchinson, who worked under Meadows when he was former President Donald Trump’s chief of staff, told the panel investigating the Capitol attack that she saw Meadows incinerate documents after a meeting in his office with Rep. Scott Perry (R-Pa.). A person familiar with the testimony described it on condition of anonymity.\n\nThe only person who wished they were Kevin McCarthy is Mark Meadows.",
">\n\nAlways seemed like the same dude.",
">\n\nPer CNN just now, he burned papers at least a dozen times.",
">\n\nWhich is illegal on its face. But, DOJ do it's job? Fat fucking chance..",
">\n\nI have a feeling he's working with the DOJ, everything ran through him",
">\n\nAlthough wasn't he the one who called Cassidy Hutchinson before her testimony and said \"we know you'll do the right thing\" witness intimidation thing?",
">\n\nThat is straight-up dialog out of a Mafia film.",
">\n\nOh that's totally normal. Why at my office we have a daily burning rite where we toss all evidence of our criminality in the bin and make s'mores. Nothing wrong with this at all, not a single thing!",
">\n\n\"These are delicious! I can't wait to commit s'more crimes, tomorrow!\"",
">\n\nJesus. This is all illegal, what are we waiting for here??",
">\n\nWell you had the joke answers so here's the real deal.\nThe DOJ just got the complete set of transcripts.\nNow they have to cross-check everything the witnesses said to the committee with everything they said to the DOJ.\nThey do this to check for lies and memory lapses. The liars then get indicted and hopefully flipped. The folks with bad memories get a chance to amend their statements.\nEach statement then has to be cross-checked against every other statement the DOJ has received. Again they check for lies and mistakes. And again they indict liars and fix errors.\nThey do this because they aren't like Bill Durham. He took his Trump Russia investigation to court and lost his case because he didn't resolve inconsistencies before the trial.\nAssuming that you want the DOJ to win, you need to wait a while before expecting action.",
">\n\nThanks for the detailed answer. I do understand it takes time. Married to a lawyer here. But even my lawyer spouse is pretty convinced nothing is going to happen. They have had portions of the testimony for months. I want to be wrong. But it has been 2 years now. That's a long time. It should be a huge priority, disturbing it is not.",
">\n\nAn attorney acquaintance put it best - 'Federal attention is like a drunk hippo; it may take a long time to meander towards you, but once it's close up, it's attention is unmistakeable for anything else.'",
">\n\nThe thing is we all know that all this horribly corrupt stuff took place. The question is, how do we make the other side of the table understand that this stuff actually happened?",
">\n\nThey don't care. They're beyond caring about legality, morality, rationality or anything decent if it means they don't win by owning the Democrats.",
">\n\nThis is why I honestly feel this country is screwed at times. You would think that regardless of political affiliation that we could all agree to not burning government documents. Furthermore, we should easily all be able to agree that it is a bad thing. But even with something as very obvious as this being a bad thing, you will find a large number of people being okay with it.\nIdea of people burning documents. The cases of trying it down the toilet. Like this sort of stuff should not be occurring and should have stopped.",
">\n\nPretty wild how all that it takes to be held completely unaccountable for domestic and global crimes against humanity is to burn, flush or swallow paper.",
">\n\nReally outrageous behavior with consciousness of guilt. You only burn papers in the White House for one reason.",
">\n\nNothing to see here, just your normal post-meeting brazier ritual. Totally normal, right?",
">\n\nIs that a clear indication they were discussing something criminal, or what?",
">\n\nOh come on, people who hate America and want to undermine our country do stuff like this all the time.",
">\n\nThey don't hate America - they hate that there are Americans who aren't like them.",
">\n\nthen they hate america until they’re all gone. these people aren’t driven by love, they are driven by hate",
">\n\nI love that this makes him the most intelligent part of the administration purely because he remembered fire exists and didn't head straight for the shitter.",
">\n\nI have doubts that Trump will see justice, but Meadows is looking proper fucked.",
">\n\nIf meadows is fucked, then trump is, too. meadows WILL flip if threatened with serious jail time.",
">\n\nI'm sure you're right that Meadows would flip, but then I expect the same BS happen there that happened with the sex trafficking charges against Gaetz. Charges were not filed bc the source was considered unreliable because they were getting a better deal for flipping essentially.",
">\n\nWhen will enough be enough? Its to the point where everyone from Trump down needs to be procuted . i for one hope Jack Smith throws the book at them no matter what government position the hold or have held.",
">\n\nScott Perry is scum of the Earth.",
">\n\nThe law is only for the poors !",
">\n\nDrain the swamp my ass. Trump thinks he’s the Don and all these other clowns are his capos.",
">\n\nConsequences? Prison?",
">\n\nWe all what he was burning. Clearly it was his Sonic the Hedgehog fanfiction where Sonic was spending quality time playing in the Meadows",
">\n\nI mean. I'm not superstitious, but I'd get some sage and smudge the whole room after talking with Scott Perry.",
">\n\nTake my up vote",
">\n\nof fucking course it was Perry. \nDude's my rep. I hate him. he is an asshat that has no morals.",
">\n\nCall him and tell him so",
">\n\nOh, I have... and I have written him. \nAll I get back is \"well, Trump is completely right, screw the PA supreme court they don't have power in the state of PA... so I am signing on to the texas judicial request because texas courts should have more power in PA than the PA courts\"",
">\n\nIn the back of my mind I keep wondering, what papers?\nIs there a stack of handouts titled \"How to Overthrow the Government\"? What are they writing on paper that's incriminating and why are they writing it at all?\nI know that's all beside the point but I can't help wondering.",
">\n\n\nI know that's all beside the point\n\nUltimately this is what matters because it will be impossible to prove what was burned. Burning papers is not inherently illegal - without an email chain that says something like \"President Trump, at your request I burned documents X, Y, and Z in order to destroy incriminating evidence.\" there is no way to make an actual case.",
">\n\nThe evidence gathered by the J6 committee was bad enough, imagine the shit they thought they needed to destroy.",
">\n\nWhere did Meadows train as a gangster?",
">\n\nTrump University.",
">\n\nFor the WIN!!!",
">\n\n“Mark, just checking in as time continues to count down,” Perry texted Meadows on Dec. 26, 2020, according to messages released by the select panel. “11 days to 1/6 and 25 days to inauguration. We gotta get going!”\nReady to get going, Mark?",
">\n\nFunny that r/conservative doesn't have a single post discussing this. Just more Biden hate, covid hate, woke language hate, etc.",
">\n\nHow do you burn a bunch of papers inside an office without setting off every smoke alarm within 300 feet? It’s not like the White House windows open up.",
">\n\nThere are fireplaces",
">\n\nSo it is mentioned he burned papers in the fireplace, is this something that typically occurs. If not, there may be some video showing smoke coming out of a chimney that may have been filmed by one of the multitude of news agencies that film outside the WH. Just a thought.",
">\n\nIt is very atypical. Disposing documents by burning them is normal, but generally you put them in a burn bag and then they are securely sent to an incinerator. The only reason the chief of staff would personally be burning documents in a Whitehouse fireplace is because he didn't even want his own aids to possibly see them.",
">\n\nIt is proper procedure for someone with clearance to go through the contents of a burn bag and make sure nothing in it would cause an illegal act by being destroyed. That is why we have so many stories regarding Trump aids taping back together torn and shredded documents.",
">\n\nThat just sounds like a lie",
">\n\nreally needs to answer.",
">\n\nShred it, don't regret it!",
">\n\nA Republican cookout",
">\n\nLock him up.",
">\n\nShocker, corrupt holier than thou gop member does illegal things !",
">\n\nCue the right wing who will now tell us this perfectly normal behavior and has gone on for years! Remember the Obama and Clinton bonfires? /s",
">\n\nPerry: oops",
">\n\nI can see them rubbing sticks together to start the fire",
">\n\nAdd this to the pile of things the right would lose their shit over had Obama/etc done it",
">\n\n“Don’t worry. Those weren’t presidential records. They were just notes on our criminal coup conspiracy”",
">\n\nShe lied about the suv steering wheel, then said it was a lie, then changed back to her original story. Now the chief of staff burning documents in the Whitehouse \"a couple\" of times a week. So comical that people actually believe this BS. I wonder if she's getting paid by the dnc, or is just getting off on the media attention. I look forward to her debut as a CNN or MSNBC anchor."
] |
>
|
[
"Was this the White House or Tony Soprano's house? Burning documents, flushing documents... Drain the swamp my ass.",
">\n\nOh, they thought they were Tony Soprano. I wish the world would cut to black for a moment and they would all just disappear.",
">\n\nDon't stop believin'.",
">\n\nConservatives support this type of treason. Never forget.",
">\n\nOverwhelming majority of elected Republicans are still working to cover up all the treason.",
">\n\nWhy do republicans hate America?",
">\n\nThey hate everything except POWER",
">\n\nNothing says innocent like destroying evidence.",
">\n\nThat huge sigh of relief you hear is coming from Fawn Hall lol.",
">\n\n\nThen-White House chief of staff Mark Meadows burned papers in his office after meeting with a House Republican who was working to challenge the 2020 election, according to testimony the Jan. 6 select committee has heard from one of his former aides.\nCassidy Hutchinson, who worked under Meadows when he was former President Donald Trump’s chief of staff, told the panel investigating the Capitol attack that she saw Meadows incinerate documents after a meeting in his office with Rep. Scott Perry (R-Pa.). A person familiar with the testimony described it on condition of anonymity.\n\nThe only person who wished they were Kevin McCarthy is Mark Meadows.",
">\n\nAlways seemed like the same dude.",
">\n\nPer CNN just now, he burned papers at least a dozen times.",
">\n\nWhich is illegal on its face. But, DOJ do it's job? Fat fucking chance..",
">\n\nI have a feeling he's working with the DOJ, everything ran through him",
">\n\nAlthough wasn't he the one who called Cassidy Hutchinson before her testimony and said \"we know you'll do the right thing\" witness intimidation thing?",
">\n\nThat is straight-up dialog out of a Mafia film.",
">\n\nOh that's totally normal. Why at my office we have a daily burning rite where we toss all evidence of our criminality in the bin and make s'mores. Nothing wrong with this at all, not a single thing!",
">\n\n\"These are delicious! I can't wait to commit s'more crimes, tomorrow!\"",
">\n\nJesus. This is all illegal, what are we waiting for here??",
">\n\nWell you had the joke answers so here's the real deal.\nThe DOJ just got the complete set of transcripts.\nNow they have to cross-check everything the witnesses said to the committee with everything they said to the DOJ.\nThey do this to check for lies and memory lapses. The liars then get indicted and hopefully flipped. The folks with bad memories get a chance to amend their statements.\nEach statement then has to be cross-checked against every other statement the DOJ has received. Again they check for lies and mistakes. And again they indict liars and fix errors.\nThey do this because they aren't like Bill Durham. He took his Trump Russia investigation to court and lost his case because he didn't resolve inconsistencies before the trial.\nAssuming that you want the DOJ to win, you need to wait a while before expecting action.",
">\n\nThanks for the detailed answer. I do understand it takes time. Married to a lawyer here. But even my lawyer spouse is pretty convinced nothing is going to happen. They have had portions of the testimony for months. I want to be wrong. But it has been 2 years now. That's a long time. It should be a huge priority, disturbing it is not.",
">\n\nAn attorney acquaintance put it best - 'Federal attention is like a drunk hippo; it may take a long time to meander towards you, but once it's close up, it's attention is unmistakeable for anything else.'",
">\n\nThe thing is we all know that all this horribly corrupt stuff took place. The question is, how do we make the other side of the table understand that this stuff actually happened?",
">\n\nThey don't care. They're beyond caring about legality, morality, rationality or anything decent if it means they don't win by owning the Democrats.",
">\n\nThis is why I honestly feel this country is screwed at times. You would think that regardless of political affiliation that we could all agree to not burning government documents. Furthermore, we should easily all be able to agree that it is a bad thing. But even with something as very obvious as this being a bad thing, you will find a large number of people being okay with it.\nIdea of people burning documents. The cases of trying it down the toilet. Like this sort of stuff should not be occurring and should have stopped.",
">\n\nPretty wild how all that it takes to be held completely unaccountable for domestic and global crimes against humanity is to burn, flush or swallow paper.",
">\n\nReally outrageous behavior with consciousness of guilt. You only burn papers in the White House for one reason.",
">\n\nNothing to see here, just your normal post-meeting brazier ritual. Totally normal, right?",
">\n\nIs that a clear indication they were discussing something criminal, or what?",
">\n\nOh come on, people who hate America and want to undermine our country do stuff like this all the time.",
">\n\nThey don't hate America - they hate that there are Americans who aren't like them.",
">\n\nthen they hate america until they’re all gone. these people aren’t driven by love, they are driven by hate",
">\n\nI love that this makes him the most intelligent part of the administration purely because he remembered fire exists and didn't head straight for the shitter.",
">\n\nI have doubts that Trump will see justice, but Meadows is looking proper fucked.",
">\n\nIf meadows is fucked, then trump is, too. meadows WILL flip if threatened with serious jail time.",
">\n\nI'm sure you're right that Meadows would flip, but then I expect the same BS happen there that happened with the sex trafficking charges against Gaetz. Charges were not filed bc the source was considered unreliable because they were getting a better deal for flipping essentially.",
">\n\nWhen will enough be enough? Its to the point where everyone from Trump down needs to be procuted . i for one hope Jack Smith throws the book at them no matter what government position the hold or have held.",
">\n\nScott Perry is scum of the Earth.",
">\n\nThe law is only for the poors !",
">\n\nDrain the swamp my ass. Trump thinks he’s the Don and all these other clowns are his capos.",
">\n\nConsequences? Prison?",
">\n\nWe all what he was burning. Clearly it was his Sonic the Hedgehog fanfiction where Sonic was spending quality time playing in the Meadows",
">\n\nI mean. I'm not superstitious, but I'd get some sage and smudge the whole room after talking with Scott Perry.",
">\n\nTake my up vote",
">\n\nof fucking course it was Perry. \nDude's my rep. I hate him. he is an asshat that has no morals.",
">\n\nCall him and tell him so",
">\n\nOh, I have... and I have written him. \nAll I get back is \"well, Trump is completely right, screw the PA supreme court they don't have power in the state of PA... so I am signing on to the texas judicial request because texas courts should have more power in PA than the PA courts\"",
">\n\nIn the back of my mind I keep wondering, what papers?\nIs there a stack of handouts titled \"How to Overthrow the Government\"? What are they writing on paper that's incriminating and why are they writing it at all?\nI know that's all beside the point but I can't help wondering.",
">\n\n\nI know that's all beside the point\n\nUltimately this is what matters because it will be impossible to prove what was burned. Burning papers is not inherently illegal - without an email chain that says something like \"President Trump, at your request I burned documents X, Y, and Z in order to destroy incriminating evidence.\" there is no way to make an actual case.",
">\n\nThe evidence gathered by the J6 committee was bad enough, imagine the shit they thought they needed to destroy.",
">\n\nWhere did Meadows train as a gangster?",
">\n\nTrump University.",
">\n\nFor the WIN!!!",
">\n\n“Mark, just checking in as time continues to count down,” Perry texted Meadows on Dec. 26, 2020, according to messages released by the select panel. “11 days to 1/6 and 25 days to inauguration. We gotta get going!”\nReady to get going, Mark?",
">\n\nFunny that r/conservative doesn't have a single post discussing this. Just more Biden hate, covid hate, woke language hate, etc.",
">\n\nHow do you burn a bunch of papers inside an office without setting off every smoke alarm within 300 feet? It’s not like the White House windows open up.",
">\n\nThere are fireplaces",
">\n\nSo it is mentioned he burned papers in the fireplace, is this something that typically occurs. If not, there may be some video showing smoke coming out of a chimney that may have been filmed by one of the multitude of news agencies that film outside the WH. Just a thought.",
">\n\nIt is very atypical. Disposing documents by burning them is normal, but generally you put them in a burn bag and then they are securely sent to an incinerator. The only reason the chief of staff would personally be burning documents in a Whitehouse fireplace is because he didn't even want his own aids to possibly see them.",
">\n\nIt is proper procedure for someone with clearance to go through the contents of a burn bag and make sure nothing in it would cause an illegal act by being destroyed. That is why we have so many stories regarding Trump aids taping back together torn and shredded documents.",
">\n\nThat just sounds like a lie",
">\n\nreally needs to answer.",
">\n\nShred it, don't regret it!",
">\n\nA Republican cookout",
">\n\nLock him up.",
">\n\nShocker, corrupt holier than thou gop member does illegal things !",
">\n\nCue the right wing who will now tell us this perfectly normal behavior and has gone on for years! Remember the Obama and Clinton bonfires? /s",
">\n\nPerry: oops",
">\n\nI can see them rubbing sticks together to start the fire",
">\n\nAdd this to the pile of things the right would lose their shit over had Obama/etc done it",
">\n\n“Don’t worry. Those weren’t presidential records. They were just notes on our criminal coup conspiracy”",
">\n\nShe lied about the suv steering wheel, then said it was a lie, then changed back to her original story. Now the chief of staff burning documents in the Whitehouse \"a couple\" of times a week. So comical that people actually believe this BS. I wonder if she's getting paid by the dnc, or is just getting off on the media attention. I look forward to her debut as a CNN or MSNBC anchor.",
">\n\nSpot on... But it was ok that they paid for a fake dossier, then used that fake dossier to lie to the FISA court at least 6 times that we know to spy on a presidential campaign. Fabricate stories about Russia Russia Russia and as were now confirming using federal law enforcement agencies and every major media outlet and social media platform to black list legitimate need stories that would have absolutely swung the election... How's died the FBI have possession of a laptop for over a year and never look at it??? But yeah Republicans are to blame for the highest inflation, gas prices, cost of living, etc... It's all the Republicans faults..."
] |
Useless, thanks a lot
|
[] |
>
the ny governor is a complete clown karen
|
[
"Useless, thanks a lot"
] |
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.