Split (1)

train · 213k rows

comment stringlengths 1 9.49k	context listlengths 0 760
> The answer is "massive douche canoe."	[ "An empty vessel controlled by the most extreme members of his conference, but all Kevin wants is to be able to look up and point to his name on a placard so it doesn’t really matter.", ">\n\nI hope his place in the history books goes down with Thomas and Trump as partisan hacks that put their own interests ahead of the country who tried to push America into Fascism.", ">\n\nA disgusting fascist" ]
> And a turd sandwich!	[ "An empty vessel controlled by the most extreme members of his conference, but all Kevin wants is to be able to look up and point to his name on a placard so it doesn’t really matter.", ">\n\nI hope his place in the history books goes down with Thomas and Trump as partisan hacks that put their own interests ahead of the country who tried to push America into Fascism.", ">\n\nA disgusting fascist", ">\n\nThe answer is \"massive douche canoe.\"" ]
> “On your knees!”	[ "An empty vessel controlled by the most extreme members of his conference, but all Kevin wants is to be able to look up and point to his name on a placard so it doesn’t really matter.", ">\n\nI hope his place in the history books goes down with Thomas and Trump as partisan hacks that put their own interests ahead of the country who tried to push America into Fascism.", ">\n\nA disgusting fascist", ">\n\nThe answer is \"massive douche canoe.\"", ">\n\nAnd a turd sandwich!" ]
> I suspect he'll be both until he's neither.	[ "An empty vessel controlled by the most extreme members of his conference, but all Kevin wants is to be able to look up and point to his name on a placard so it doesn’t really matter.", ">\n\nI hope his place in the history books goes down with Thomas and Trump as partisan hacks that put their own interests ahead of the country who tried to push America into Fascism.", ">\n\nA disgusting fascist", ">\n\nThe answer is \"massive douche canoe.\"", ">\n\nAnd a turd sandwich!", ">\n\n“On your knees!”" ]
> He is the House Whimperer.	[ "An empty vessel controlled by the most extreme members of his conference, but all Kevin wants is to be able to look up and point to his name on a placard so it doesn’t really matter.", ">\n\nI hope his place in the history books goes down with Thomas and Trump as partisan hacks that put their own interests ahead of the country who tried to push America into Fascism.", ">\n\nA disgusting fascist", ">\n\nThe answer is \"massive douche canoe.\"", ">\n\nAnd a turd sandwich!", ">\n\n“On your knees!”", ">\n\nI suspect he'll be both until he's neither." ]
> He’s definitEly not Beyoncé I’ll put it that way.	[ "An empty vessel controlled by the most extreme members of his conference, but all Kevin wants is to be able to look up and point to his name on a placard so it doesn’t really matter.", ">\n\nI hope his place in the history books goes down with Thomas and Trump as partisan hacks that put their own interests ahead of the country who tried to push America into Fascism.", ">\n\nA disgusting fascist", ">\n\nThe answer is \"massive douche canoe.\"", ">\n\nAnd a turd sandwich!", ">\n\n“On your knees!”", ">\n\nI suspect he'll be both until he's neither.", ">\n\nHe is the House Whimperer." ]
> Hes too weak to last past a week. Under current rules, the second that matt gaetz is too upset he can launch a bid to get him removed as speaker. That is no position of leadership or power.	[ "An empty vessel controlled by the most extreme members of his conference, but all Kevin wants is to be able to look up and point to his name on a placard so it doesn’t really matter.", ">\n\nI hope his place in the history books goes down with Thomas and Trump as partisan hacks that put their own interests ahead of the country who tried to push America into Fascism.", ">\n\nA disgusting fascist", ">\n\nThe answer is \"massive douche canoe.\"", ">\n\nAnd a turd sandwich!", ">\n\n“On your knees!”", ">\n\nI suspect he'll be both until he's neither.", ">\n\nHe is the House Whimperer.", ">\n\nHe’s definitEly not Beyoncé I’ll put it that way." ]
> Is Gaetz the only one that wields that power or can a moderate getting ready to go independent or Democrat also make that choice? Asking for a friend.	[ "An empty vessel controlled by the most extreme members of his conference, but all Kevin wants is to be able to look up and point to his name on a placard so it doesn’t really matter.", ">\n\nI hope his place in the history books goes down with Thomas and Trump as partisan hacks that put their own interests ahead of the country who tried to push America into Fascism.", ">\n\nA disgusting fascist", ">\n\nThe answer is \"massive douche canoe.\"", ">\n\nAnd a turd sandwich!", ">\n\n“On your knees!”", ">\n\nI suspect he'll be both until he's neither.", ">\n\nHe is the House Whimperer.", ">\n\nHe’s definitEly not Beyoncé I’ll put it that way.", ">\n\nHes too weak to last past a week. Under current rules, the second that matt gaetz is too upset he can launch a bid to get him removed as speaker. That is no position of leadership or power." ]
> I still can't believe we're going to fall ass backwards into global financial calamity because a House of 435 lawmakers is being led by a tiny group of people whose entire understanding of economics comes from flipping over the Monopoly board when their Boardwalk investment didn't pay off.	[ "An empty vessel controlled by the most extreme members of his conference, but all Kevin wants is to be able to look up and point to his name on a placard so it doesn’t really matter.", ">\n\nI hope his place in the history books goes down with Thomas and Trump as partisan hacks that put their own interests ahead of the country who tried to push America into Fascism.", ">\n\nA disgusting fascist", ">\n\nThe answer is \"massive douche canoe.\"", ">\n\nAnd a turd sandwich!", ">\n\n“On your knees!”", ">\n\nI suspect he'll be both until he's neither.", ">\n\nHe is the House Whimperer.", ">\n\nHe’s definitEly not Beyoncé I’ll put it that way.", ">\n\nHes too weak to last past a week. Under current rules, the second that matt gaetz is too upset he can launch a bid to get him removed as speaker. That is no position of leadership or power.", ">\n\nIs Gaetz the only one that wields that power or can a moderate getting ready to go independent or Democrat also make that choice? Asking for a friend." ]
> We'll split the difference, he's an emboldened weakling.	[ "An empty vessel controlled by the most extreme members of his conference, but all Kevin wants is to be able to look up and point to his name on a placard so it doesn’t really matter.", ">\n\nI hope his place in the history books goes down with Thomas and Trump as partisan hacks that put their own interests ahead of the country who tried to push America into Fascism.", ">\n\nA disgusting fascist", ">\n\nThe answer is \"massive douche canoe.\"", ">\n\nAnd a turd sandwich!", ">\n\n“On your knees!”", ">\n\nI suspect he'll be both until he's neither.", ">\n\nHe is the House Whimperer.", ">\n\nHe’s definitEly not Beyoncé I’ll put it that way.", ">\n\nHes too weak to last past a week. Under current rules, the second that matt gaetz is too upset he can launch a bid to get him removed as speaker. That is no position of leadership or power.", ">\n\nIs Gaetz the only one that wields that power or can a moderate getting ready to go independent or Democrat also make that choice? Asking for a friend.", ">\n\nI still can't believe we're going to fall ass backwards into global financial calamity because a House of 435 lawmakers is being led by a tiny group of people whose entire understanding of economics comes from flipping over the Monopoly board when their Boardwalk investment didn't pay off." ]
> He's the sick little birdie that's fallen out of its nest...	[ "An empty vessel controlled by the most extreme members of his conference, but all Kevin wants is to be able to look up and point to his name on a placard so it doesn’t really matter.", ">\n\nI hope his place in the history books goes down with Thomas and Trump as partisan hacks that put their own interests ahead of the country who tried to push America into Fascism.", ">\n\nA disgusting fascist", ">\n\nThe answer is \"massive douche canoe.\"", ">\n\nAnd a turd sandwich!", ">\n\n“On your knees!”", ">\n\nI suspect he'll be both until he's neither.", ">\n\nHe is the House Whimperer.", ">\n\nHe’s definitEly not Beyoncé I’ll put it that way.", ">\n\nHes too weak to last past a week. Under current rules, the second that matt gaetz is too upset he can launch a bid to get him removed as speaker. That is no position of leadership or power.", ">\n\nIs Gaetz the only one that wields that power or can a moderate getting ready to go independent or Democrat also make that choice? Asking for a friend.", ">\n\nI still can't believe we're going to fall ass backwards into global financial calamity because a House of 435 lawmakers is being led by a tiny group of people whose entire understanding of economics comes from flipping over the Monopoly board when their Boardwalk investment didn't pay off.", ">\n\nWe'll split the difference, he's an emboldened weakling." ]
> Mt guess? Just the latest GOP fuckwad who doesn't give a shit about anything, his constituents, the constitution, whatever. The main thing is the bank balance, that's what those guys keep an eye on, period. Anything else is way down on the list.	[ "An empty vessel controlled by the most extreme members of his conference, but all Kevin wants is to be able to look up and point to his name on a placard so it doesn’t really matter.", ">\n\nI hope his place in the history books goes down with Thomas and Trump as partisan hacks that put their own interests ahead of the country who tried to push America into Fascism.", ">\n\nA disgusting fascist", ">\n\nThe answer is \"massive douche canoe.\"", ">\n\nAnd a turd sandwich!", ">\n\n“On your knees!”", ">\n\nI suspect he'll be both until he's neither.", ">\n\nHe is the House Whimperer.", ">\n\nHe’s definitEly not Beyoncé I’ll put it that way.", ">\n\nHes too weak to last past a week. Under current rules, the second that matt gaetz is too upset he can launch a bid to get him removed as speaker. That is no position of leadership or power.", ">\n\nIs Gaetz the only one that wields that power or can a moderate getting ready to go independent or Democrat also make that choice? Asking for a friend.", ">\n\nI still can't believe we're going to fall ass backwards into global financial calamity because a House of 435 lawmakers is being led by a tiny group of people whose entire understanding of economics comes from flipping over the Monopoly board when their Boardwalk investment didn't pay off.", ">\n\nWe'll split the difference, he's an emboldened weakling.", ">\n\nHe's the sick little birdie that's fallen out of its nest..." ]
> Duplicitous asshole.	[ "An empty vessel controlled by the most extreme members of his conference, but all Kevin wants is to be able to look up and point to his name on a placard so it doesn’t really matter.", ">\n\nI hope his place in the history books goes down with Thomas and Trump as partisan hacks that put their own interests ahead of the country who tried to push America into Fascism.", ">\n\nA disgusting fascist", ">\n\nThe answer is \"massive douche canoe.\"", ">\n\nAnd a turd sandwich!", ">\n\n“On your knees!”", ">\n\nI suspect he'll be both until he's neither.", ">\n\nHe is the House Whimperer.", ">\n\nHe’s definitEly not Beyoncé I’ll put it that way.", ">\n\nHes too weak to last past a week. Under current rules, the second that matt gaetz is too upset he can launch a bid to get him removed as speaker. That is no position of leadership or power.", ">\n\nIs Gaetz the only one that wields that power or can a moderate getting ready to go independent or Democrat also make that choice? Asking for a friend.", ">\n\nI still can't believe we're going to fall ass backwards into global financial calamity because a House of 435 lawmakers is being led by a tiny group of people whose entire understanding of economics comes from flipping over the Monopoly board when their Boardwalk investment didn't pay off.", ">\n\nWe'll split the difference, he's an emboldened weakling.", ">\n\nHe's the sick little birdie that's fallen out of its nest...", ">\n\nMt guess? Just the latest GOP fuckwad who doesn't give a shit about anything, his constituents, the constitution, whatever. The main thing is the bank balance, that's what those guys keep an eye on, period.\nAnything else is way down on the list." ]
> Least, but not last - spineless Kevin	[ "An empty vessel controlled by the most extreme members of his conference, but all Kevin wants is to be able to look up and point to his name on a placard so it doesn’t really matter.", ">\n\nI hope his place in the history books goes down with Thomas and Trump as partisan hacks that put their own interests ahead of the country who tried to push America into Fascism.", ">\n\nA disgusting fascist", ">\n\nThe answer is \"massive douche canoe.\"", ">\n\nAnd a turd sandwich!", ">\n\n“On your knees!”", ">\n\nI suspect he'll be both until he's neither.", ">\n\nHe is the House Whimperer.", ">\n\nHe’s definitEly not Beyoncé I’ll put it that way.", ">\n\nHes too weak to last past a week. Under current rules, the second that matt gaetz is too upset he can launch a bid to get him removed as speaker. That is no position of leadership or power.", ">\n\nIs Gaetz the only one that wields that power or can a moderate getting ready to go independent or Democrat also make that choice? Asking for a friend.", ">\n\nI still can't believe we're going to fall ass backwards into global financial calamity because a House of 435 lawmakers is being led by a tiny group of people whose entire understanding of economics comes from flipping over the Monopoly board when their Boardwalk investment didn't pay off.", ">\n\nWe'll split the difference, he's an emboldened weakling.", ">\n\nHe's the sick little birdie that's fallen out of its nest...", ">\n\nMt guess? Just the latest GOP fuckwad who doesn't give a shit about anything, his constituents, the constitution, whatever. The main thing is the bank balance, that's what those guys keep an eye on, period.\nAnything else is way down on the list.", ">\n\nDuplicitous asshole." ]
> He is completely controlled by the far right MAGA wing. If Trump is not supported for president by McCarthy and his less far right supporters in the house then you will see McCarthy get into trouble. I wonder if that was one of the concessions McCarthy made to the far right to get speaker. That he would endorse Trump for president.	[ "An empty vessel controlled by the most extreme members of his conference, but all Kevin wants is to be able to look up and point to his name on a placard so it doesn’t really matter.", ">\n\nI hope his place in the history books goes down with Thomas and Trump as partisan hacks that put their own interests ahead of the country who tried to push America into Fascism.", ">\n\nA disgusting fascist", ">\n\nThe answer is \"massive douche canoe.\"", ">\n\nAnd a turd sandwich!", ">\n\n“On your knees!”", ">\n\nI suspect he'll be both until he's neither.", ">\n\nHe is the House Whimperer.", ">\n\nHe’s definitEly not Beyoncé I’ll put it that way.", ">\n\nHes too weak to last past a week. Under current rules, the second that matt gaetz is too upset he can launch a bid to get him removed as speaker. That is no position of leadership or power.", ">\n\nIs Gaetz the only one that wields that power or can a moderate getting ready to go independent or Democrat also make that choice? Asking for a friend.", ">\n\nI still can't believe we're going to fall ass backwards into global financial calamity because a House of 435 lawmakers is being led by a tiny group of people whose entire understanding of economics comes from flipping over the Monopoly board when their Boardwalk investment didn't pay off.", ">\n\nWe'll split the difference, he's an emboldened weakling.", ">\n\nHe's the sick little birdie that's fallen out of its nest...", ">\n\nMt guess? Just the latest GOP fuckwad who doesn't give a shit about anything, his constituents, the constitution, whatever. The main thing is the bank balance, that's what those guys keep an eye on, period.\nAnything else is way down on the list.", ">\n\nDuplicitous asshole.", ">\n\nLeast, but not last - spineless Kevin" ]
> He proved that he cared more about being Speaker than he did about this country or his party. Grab the popcorn…this is gonna be the new Greatest Show on Earth	[ "An empty vessel controlled by the most extreme members of his conference, but all Kevin wants is to be able to look up and point to his name on a placard so it doesn’t really matter.", ">\n\nI hope his place in the history books goes down with Thomas and Trump as partisan hacks that put their own interests ahead of the country who tried to push America into Fascism.", ">\n\nA disgusting fascist", ">\n\nThe answer is \"massive douche canoe.\"", ">\n\nAnd a turd sandwich!", ">\n\n“On your knees!”", ">\n\nI suspect he'll be both until he's neither.", ">\n\nHe is the House Whimperer.", ">\n\nHe’s definitEly not Beyoncé I’ll put it that way.", ">\n\nHes too weak to last past a week. Under current rules, the second that matt gaetz is too upset he can launch a bid to get him removed as speaker. That is no position of leadership or power.", ">\n\nIs Gaetz the only one that wields that power or can a moderate getting ready to go independent or Democrat also make that choice? Asking for a friend.", ">\n\nI still can't believe we're going to fall ass backwards into global financial calamity because a House of 435 lawmakers is being led by a tiny group of people whose entire understanding of economics comes from flipping over the Monopoly board when their Boardwalk investment didn't pay off.", ">\n\nWe'll split the difference, he's an emboldened weakling.", ">\n\nHe's the sick little birdie that's fallen out of its nest...", ">\n\nMt guess? Just the latest GOP fuckwad who doesn't give a shit about anything, his constituents, the constitution, whatever. The main thing is the bank balance, that's what those guys keep an eye on, period.\nAnything else is way down on the list.", ">\n\nDuplicitous asshole.", ">\n\nLeast, but not last - spineless Kevin", ">\n\nHe is completely controlled by the far right MAGA wing. If Trump is not supported for president by McCarthy and his less far right supporters in the house then you will see McCarthy get into trouble.\nI wonder if that was one of the concessions McCarthy made to the far right to get speaker. That he would endorse Trump for president." ]
> No politician should care about their party politics over voters. Democrats (even the supposed squad) forgot this. Fuck establishment corporate slaves on both sides. Force the vote was such an opportunity lost for progressives. Now they are upset that republicans are better at politics than they are. DEMS literally threw their chance at this away. It is almost like they want to lose.	[ "An empty vessel controlled by the most extreme members of his conference, but all Kevin wants is to be able to look up and point to his name on a placard so it doesn’t really matter.", ">\n\nI hope his place in the history books goes down with Thomas and Trump as partisan hacks that put their own interests ahead of the country who tried to push America into Fascism.", ">\n\nA disgusting fascist", ">\n\nThe answer is \"massive douche canoe.\"", ">\n\nAnd a turd sandwich!", ">\n\n“On your knees!”", ">\n\nI suspect he'll be both until he's neither.", ">\n\nHe is the House Whimperer.", ">\n\nHe’s definitEly not Beyoncé I’ll put it that way.", ">\n\nHes too weak to last past a week. Under current rules, the second that matt gaetz is too upset he can launch a bid to get him removed as speaker. That is no position of leadership or power.", ">\n\nIs Gaetz the only one that wields that power or can a moderate getting ready to go independent or Democrat also make that choice? Asking for a friend.", ">\n\nI still can't believe we're going to fall ass backwards into global financial calamity because a House of 435 lawmakers is being led by a tiny group of people whose entire understanding of economics comes from flipping over the Monopoly board when their Boardwalk investment didn't pay off.", ">\n\nWe'll split the difference, he's an emboldened weakling.", ">\n\nHe's the sick little birdie that's fallen out of its nest...", ">\n\nMt guess? Just the latest GOP fuckwad who doesn't give a shit about anything, his constituents, the constitution, whatever. The main thing is the bank balance, that's what those guys keep an eye on, period.\nAnything else is way down on the list.", ">\n\nDuplicitous asshole.", ">\n\nLeast, but not last - spineless Kevin", ">\n\nHe is completely controlled by the far right MAGA wing. If Trump is not supported for president by McCarthy and his less far right supporters in the house then you will see McCarthy get into trouble.\nI wonder if that was one of the concessions McCarthy made to the far right to get speaker. That he would endorse Trump for president.", ">\n\nHe proved that he cared more about being Speaker than he did about this country or his party. Grab the popcorn…this is gonna be the new Greatest Show on Earth" ]
> McCarthy is in first place so far for greatest Ass Kisser of the 21st Century.	[ "An empty vessel controlled by the most extreme members of his conference, but all Kevin wants is to be able to look up and point to his name on a placard so it doesn’t really matter.", ">\n\nI hope his place in the history books goes down with Thomas and Trump as partisan hacks that put their own interests ahead of the country who tried to push America into Fascism.", ">\n\nA disgusting fascist", ">\n\nThe answer is \"massive douche canoe.\"", ">\n\nAnd a turd sandwich!", ">\n\n“On your knees!”", ">\n\nI suspect he'll be both until he's neither.", ">\n\nHe is the House Whimperer.", ">\n\nHe’s definitEly not Beyoncé I’ll put it that way.", ">\n\nHes too weak to last past a week. Under current rules, the second that matt gaetz is too upset he can launch a bid to get him removed as speaker. That is no position of leadership or power.", ">\n\nIs Gaetz the only one that wields that power or can a moderate getting ready to go independent or Democrat also make that choice? Asking for a friend.", ">\n\nI still can't believe we're going to fall ass backwards into global financial calamity because a House of 435 lawmakers is being led by a tiny group of people whose entire understanding of economics comes from flipping over the Monopoly board when their Boardwalk investment didn't pay off.", ">\n\nWe'll split the difference, he's an emboldened weakling.", ">\n\nHe's the sick little birdie that's fallen out of its nest...", ">\n\nMt guess? Just the latest GOP fuckwad who doesn't give a shit about anything, his constituents, the constitution, whatever. The main thing is the bank balance, that's what those guys keep an eye on, period.\nAnything else is way down on the list.", ">\n\nDuplicitous asshole.", ">\n\nLeast, but not last - spineless Kevin", ">\n\nHe is completely controlled by the far right MAGA wing. If Trump is not supported for president by McCarthy and his less far right supporters in the house then you will see McCarthy get into trouble.\nI wonder if that was one of the concessions McCarthy made to the far right to get speaker. That he would endorse Trump for president.", ">\n\nHe proved that he cared more about being Speaker than he did about this country or his party. Grab the popcorn…this is gonna be the new Greatest Show on Earth", ">\n\nNo politician should care about their party politics over voters. Democrats (even the supposed squad) forgot this. \nFuck establishment corporate slaves on both sides. Force the vote was such an opportunity lost for progressives. \nNow they are upset that republicans are better at politics than they are. DEMS literally threw their chance at this away. \nIt is almost like they want to lose." ]
> I can't wait till House votes on his rules package he used to entice the Nazis...lol	[ "An empty vessel controlled by the most extreme members of his conference, but all Kevin wants is to be able to look up and point to his name on a placard so it doesn’t really matter.", ">\n\nI hope his place in the history books goes down with Thomas and Trump as partisan hacks that put their own interests ahead of the country who tried to push America into Fascism.", ">\n\nA disgusting fascist", ">\n\nThe answer is \"massive douche canoe.\"", ">\n\nAnd a turd sandwich!", ">\n\n“On your knees!”", ">\n\nI suspect he'll be both until he's neither.", ">\n\nHe is the House Whimperer.", ">\n\nHe’s definitEly not Beyoncé I’ll put it that way.", ">\n\nHes too weak to last past a week. Under current rules, the second that matt gaetz is too upset he can launch a bid to get him removed as speaker. That is no position of leadership or power.", ">\n\nIs Gaetz the only one that wields that power or can a moderate getting ready to go independent or Democrat also make that choice? Asking for a friend.", ">\n\nI still can't believe we're going to fall ass backwards into global financial calamity because a House of 435 lawmakers is being led by a tiny group of people whose entire understanding of economics comes from flipping over the Monopoly board when their Boardwalk investment didn't pay off.", ">\n\nWe'll split the difference, he's an emboldened weakling.", ">\n\nHe's the sick little birdie that's fallen out of its nest...", ">\n\nMt guess? Just the latest GOP fuckwad who doesn't give a shit about anything, his constituents, the constitution, whatever. The main thing is the bank balance, that's what those guys keep an eye on, period.\nAnything else is way down on the list.", ">\n\nDuplicitous asshole.", ">\n\nLeast, but not last - spineless Kevin", ">\n\nHe is completely controlled by the far right MAGA wing. If Trump is not supported for president by McCarthy and his less far right supporters in the house then you will see McCarthy get into trouble.\nI wonder if that was one of the concessions McCarthy made to the far right to get speaker. That he would endorse Trump for president.", ">\n\nHe proved that he cared more about being Speaker than he did about this country or his party. Grab the popcorn…this is gonna be the new Greatest Show on Earth", ">\n\nNo politician should care about their party politics over voters. Democrats (even the supposed squad) forgot this. \nFuck establishment corporate slaves on both sides. Force the vote was such an opportunity lost for progressives. \nNow they are upset that republicans are better at politics than they are. DEMS literally threw their chance at this away. \nIt is almost like they want to lose.", ">\n\nMcCarthy is in first place so far for greatest Ass Kisser of the 21st Century." ]
> The former.	[ "An empty vessel controlled by the most extreme members of his conference, but all Kevin wants is to be able to look up and point to his name on a placard so it doesn’t really matter.", ">\n\nI hope his place in the history books goes down with Thomas and Trump as partisan hacks that put their own interests ahead of the country who tried to push America into Fascism.", ">\n\nA disgusting fascist", ">\n\nThe answer is \"massive douche canoe.\"", ">\n\nAnd a turd sandwich!", ">\n\n“On your knees!”", ">\n\nI suspect he'll be both until he's neither.", ">\n\nHe is the House Whimperer.", ">\n\nHe’s definitEly not Beyoncé I’ll put it that way.", ">\n\nHes too weak to last past a week. Under current rules, the second that matt gaetz is too upset he can launch a bid to get him removed as speaker. That is no position of leadership or power.", ">\n\nIs Gaetz the only one that wields that power or can a moderate getting ready to go independent or Democrat also make that choice? Asking for a friend.", ">\n\nI still can't believe we're going to fall ass backwards into global financial calamity because a House of 435 lawmakers is being led by a tiny group of people whose entire understanding of economics comes from flipping over the Monopoly board when their Boardwalk investment didn't pay off.", ">\n\nWe'll split the difference, he's an emboldened weakling.", ">\n\nHe's the sick little birdie that's fallen out of its nest...", ">\n\nMt guess? Just the latest GOP fuckwad who doesn't give a shit about anything, his constituents, the constitution, whatever. The main thing is the bank balance, that's what those guys keep an eye on, period.\nAnything else is way down on the list.", ">\n\nDuplicitous asshole.", ">\n\nLeast, but not last - spineless Kevin", ">\n\nHe is completely controlled by the far right MAGA wing. If Trump is not supported for president by McCarthy and his less far right supporters in the house then you will see McCarthy get into trouble.\nI wonder if that was one of the concessions McCarthy made to the far right to get speaker. That he would endorse Trump for president.", ">\n\nHe proved that he cared more about being Speaker than he did about this country or his party. Grab the popcorn…this is gonna be the new Greatest Show on Earth", ">\n\nNo politician should care about their party politics over voters. Democrats (even the supposed squad) forgot this. \nFuck establishment corporate slaves on both sides. Force the vote was such an opportunity lost for progressives. \nNow they are upset that republicans are better at politics than they are. DEMS literally threw their chance at this away. \nIt is almost like they want to lose.", ">\n\nMcCarthy is in first place so far for greatest Ass Kisser of the 21st Century.", ">\n\nI can't wait till House votes on his rules package he used to entice the Nazis...lol" ]
> A sad strange man	[ "An empty vessel controlled by the most extreme members of his conference, but all Kevin wants is to be able to look up and point to his name on a placard so it doesn’t really matter.", ">\n\nI hope his place in the history books goes down with Thomas and Trump as partisan hacks that put their own interests ahead of the country who tried to push America into Fascism.", ">\n\nA disgusting fascist", ">\n\nThe answer is \"massive douche canoe.\"", ">\n\nAnd a turd sandwich!", ">\n\n“On your knees!”", ">\n\nI suspect he'll be both until he's neither.", ">\n\nHe is the House Whimperer.", ">\n\nHe’s definitEly not Beyoncé I’ll put it that way.", ">\n\nHes too weak to last past a week. Under current rules, the second that matt gaetz is too upset he can launch a bid to get him removed as speaker. That is no position of leadership or power.", ">\n\nIs Gaetz the only one that wields that power or can a moderate getting ready to go independent or Democrat also make that choice? Asking for a friend.", ">\n\nI still can't believe we're going to fall ass backwards into global financial calamity because a House of 435 lawmakers is being led by a tiny group of people whose entire understanding of economics comes from flipping over the Monopoly board when their Boardwalk investment didn't pay off.", ">\n\nWe'll split the difference, he's an emboldened weakling.", ">\n\nHe's the sick little birdie that's fallen out of its nest...", ">\n\nMt guess? Just the latest GOP fuckwad who doesn't give a shit about anything, his constituents, the constitution, whatever. The main thing is the bank balance, that's what those guys keep an eye on, period.\nAnything else is way down on the list.", ">\n\nDuplicitous asshole.", ">\n\nLeast, but not last - spineless Kevin", ">\n\nHe is completely controlled by the far right MAGA wing. If Trump is not supported for president by McCarthy and his less far right supporters in the house then you will see McCarthy get into trouble.\nI wonder if that was one of the concessions McCarthy made to the far right to get speaker. That he would endorse Trump for president.", ">\n\nHe proved that he cared more about being Speaker than he did about this country or his party. Grab the popcorn…this is gonna be the new Greatest Show on Earth", ">\n\nNo politician should care about their party politics over voters. Democrats (even the supposed squad) forgot this. \nFuck establishment corporate slaves on both sides. Force the vote was such an opportunity lost for progressives. \nNow they are upset that republicans are better at politics than they are. DEMS literally threw their chance at this away. \nIt is almost like they want to lose.", ">\n\nMcCarthy is in first place so far for greatest Ass Kisser of the 21st Century.", ">\n\nI can't wait till House votes on his rules package he used to entice the Nazis...lol", ">\n\nThe former." ]
> Weakened leader	[ "An empty vessel controlled by the most extreme members of his conference, but all Kevin wants is to be able to look up and point to his name on a placard so it doesn’t really matter.", ">\n\nI hope his place in the history books goes down with Thomas and Trump as partisan hacks that put their own interests ahead of the country who tried to push America into Fascism.", ">\n\nA disgusting fascist", ">\n\nThe answer is \"massive douche canoe.\"", ">\n\nAnd a turd sandwich!", ">\n\n“On your knees!”", ">\n\nI suspect he'll be both until he's neither.", ">\n\nHe is the House Whimperer.", ">\n\nHe’s definitEly not Beyoncé I’ll put it that way.", ">\n\nHes too weak to last past a week. Under current rules, the second that matt gaetz is too upset he can launch a bid to get him removed as speaker. That is no position of leadership or power.", ">\n\nIs Gaetz the only one that wields that power or can a moderate getting ready to go independent or Democrat also make that choice? Asking for a friend.", ">\n\nI still can't believe we're going to fall ass backwards into global financial calamity because a House of 435 lawmakers is being led by a tiny group of people whose entire understanding of economics comes from flipping over the Monopoly board when their Boardwalk investment didn't pay off.", ">\n\nWe'll split the difference, he's an emboldened weakling.", ">\n\nHe's the sick little birdie that's fallen out of its nest...", ">\n\nMt guess? Just the latest GOP fuckwad who doesn't give a shit about anything, his constituents, the constitution, whatever. The main thing is the bank balance, that's what those guys keep an eye on, period.\nAnything else is way down on the list.", ">\n\nDuplicitous asshole.", ">\n\nLeast, but not last - spineless Kevin", ">\n\nHe is completely controlled by the far right MAGA wing. If Trump is not supported for president by McCarthy and his less far right supporters in the house then you will see McCarthy get into trouble.\nI wonder if that was one of the concessions McCarthy made to the far right to get speaker. That he would endorse Trump for president.", ">\n\nHe proved that he cared more about being Speaker than he did about this country or his party. Grab the popcorn…this is gonna be the new Greatest Show on Earth", ">\n\nNo politician should care about their party politics over voters. Democrats (even the supposed squad) forgot this. \nFuck establishment corporate slaves on both sides. Force the vote was such an opportunity lost for progressives. \nNow they are upset that republicans are better at politics than they are. DEMS literally threw their chance at this away. \nIt is almost like they want to lose.", ">\n\nMcCarthy is in first place so far for greatest Ass Kisser of the 21st Century.", ">\n\nI can't wait till House votes on his rules package he used to entice the Nazis...lol", ">\n\nThe former.", ">\n\nA sad strange man" ]
> Maybe a weak, emboldened zombie of a Speaker. No matter how lively he seems, he's dead in terms of political power.	[ "An empty vessel controlled by the most extreme members of his conference, but all Kevin wants is to be able to look up and point to his name on a placard so it doesn’t really matter.", ">\n\nI hope his place in the history books goes down with Thomas and Trump as partisan hacks that put their own interests ahead of the country who tried to push America into Fascism.", ">\n\nA disgusting fascist", ">\n\nThe answer is \"massive douche canoe.\"", ">\n\nAnd a turd sandwich!", ">\n\n“On your knees!”", ">\n\nI suspect he'll be both until he's neither.", ">\n\nHe is the House Whimperer.", ">\n\nHe’s definitEly not Beyoncé I’ll put it that way.", ">\n\nHes too weak to last past a week. Under current rules, the second that matt gaetz is too upset he can launch a bid to get him removed as speaker. That is no position of leadership or power.", ">\n\nIs Gaetz the only one that wields that power or can a moderate getting ready to go independent or Democrat also make that choice? Asking for a friend.", ">\n\nI still can't believe we're going to fall ass backwards into global financial calamity because a House of 435 lawmakers is being led by a tiny group of people whose entire understanding of economics comes from flipping over the Monopoly board when their Boardwalk investment didn't pay off.", ">\n\nWe'll split the difference, he's an emboldened weakling.", ">\n\nHe's the sick little birdie that's fallen out of its nest...", ">\n\nMt guess? Just the latest GOP fuckwad who doesn't give a shit about anything, his constituents, the constitution, whatever. The main thing is the bank balance, that's what those guys keep an eye on, period.\nAnything else is way down on the list.", ">\n\nDuplicitous asshole.", ">\n\nLeast, but not last - spineless Kevin", ">\n\nHe is completely controlled by the far right MAGA wing. If Trump is not supported for president by McCarthy and his less far right supporters in the house then you will see McCarthy get into trouble.\nI wonder if that was one of the concessions McCarthy made to the far right to get speaker. That he would endorse Trump for president.", ">\n\nHe proved that he cared more about being Speaker than he did about this country or his party. Grab the popcorn…this is gonna be the new Greatest Show on Earth", ">\n\nNo politician should care about their party politics over voters. Democrats (even the supposed squad) forgot this. \nFuck establishment corporate slaves on both sides. Force the vote was such an opportunity lost for progressives. \nNow they are upset that republicans are better at politics than they are. DEMS literally threw their chance at this away. \nIt is almost like they want to lose.", ">\n\nMcCarthy is in first place so far for greatest Ass Kisser of the 21st Century.", ">\n\nI can't wait till House votes on his rules package he used to entice the Nazis...lol", ">\n\nThe former.", ">\n\nA sad strange man", ">\n\nWeakened leader" ]
> Those two identifiers are not mutually exclusive.	[ "An empty vessel controlled by the most extreme members of his conference, but all Kevin wants is to be able to look up and point to his name on a placard so it doesn’t really matter.", ">\n\nI hope his place in the history books goes down with Thomas and Trump as partisan hacks that put their own interests ahead of the country who tried to push America into Fascism.", ">\n\nA disgusting fascist", ">\n\nThe answer is \"massive douche canoe.\"", ">\n\nAnd a turd sandwich!", ">\n\n“On your knees!”", ">\n\nI suspect he'll be both until he's neither.", ">\n\nHe is the House Whimperer.", ">\n\nHe’s definitEly not Beyoncé I’ll put it that way.", ">\n\nHes too weak to last past a week. Under current rules, the second that matt gaetz is too upset he can launch a bid to get him removed as speaker. That is no position of leadership or power.", ">\n\nIs Gaetz the only one that wields that power or can a moderate getting ready to go independent or Democrat also make that choice? Asking for a friend.", ">\n\nI still can't believe we're going to fall ass backwards into global financial calamity because a House of 435 lawmakers is being led by a tiny group of people whose entire understanding of economics comes from flipping over the Monopoly board when their Boardwalk investment didn't pay off.", ">\n\nWe'll split the difference, he's an emboldened weakling.", ">\n\nHe's the sick little birdie that's fallen out of its nest...", ">\n\nMt guess? Just the latest GOP fuckwad who doesn't give a shit about anything, his constituents, the constitution, whatever. The main thing is the bank balance, that's what those guys keep an eye on, period.\nAnything else is way down on the list.", ">\n\nDuplicitous asshole.", ">\n\nLeast, but not last - spineless Kevin", ">\n\nHe is completely controlled by the far right MAGA wing. If Trump is not supported for president by McCarthy and his less far right supporters in the house then you will see McCarthy get into trouble.\nI wonder if that was one of the concessions McCarthy made to the far right to get speaker. That he would endorse Trump for president.", ">\n\nHe proved that he cared more about being Speaker than he did about this country or his party. Grab the popcorn…this is gonna be the new Greatest Show on Earth", ">\n\nNo politician should care about their party politics over voters. Democrats (even the supposed squad) forgot this. \nFuck establishment corporate slaves on both sides. Force the vote was such an opportunity lost for progressives. \nNow they are upset that republicans are better at politics than they are. DEMS literally threw their chance at this away. \nIt is almost like they want to lose.", ">\n\nMcCarthy is in first place so far for greatest Ass Kisser of the 21st Century.", ">\n\nI can't wait till House votes on his rules package he used to entice the Nazis...lol", ">\n\nThe former.", ">\n\nA sad strange man", ">\n\nWeakened leader", ">\n\nMaybe a weak, emboldened zombie of a Speaker. No matter how lively he seems, he's dead in terms of political power." ]
> Wrong finger.	[ "An empty vessel controlled by the most extreme members of his conference, but all Kevin wants is to be able to look up and point to his name on a placard so it doesn’t really matter.", ">\n\nI hope his place in the history books goes down with Thomas and Trump as partisan hacks that put their own interests ahead of the country who tried to push America into Fascism.", ">\n\nA disgusting fascist", ">\n\nThe answer is \"massive douche canoe.\"", ">\n\nAnd a turd sandwich!", ">\n\n“On your knees!”", ">\n\nI suspect he'll be both until he's neither.", ">\n\nHe is the House Whimperer.", ">\n\nHe’s definitEly not Beyoncé I’ll put it that way.", ">\n\nHes too weak to last past a week. Under current rules, the second that matt gaetz is too upset he can launch a bid to get him removed as speaker. That is no position of leadership or power.", ">\n\nIs Gaetz the only one that wields that power or can a moderate getting ready to go independent or Democrat also make that choice? Asking for a friend.", ">\n\nI still can't believe we're going to fall ass backwards into global financial calamity because a House of 435 lawmakers is being led by a tiny group of people whose entire understanding of economics comes from flipping over the Monopoly board when their Boardwalk investment didn't pay off.", ">\n\nWe'll split the difference, he's an emboldened weakling.", ">\n\nHe's the sick little birdie that's fallen out of its nest...", ">\n\nMt guess? Just the latest GOP fuckwad who doesn't give a shit about anything, his constituents, the constitution, whatever. The main thing is the bank balance, that's what those guys keep an eye on, period.\nAnything else is way down on the list.", ">\n\nDuplicitous asshole.", ">\n\nLeast, but not last - spineless Kevin", ">\n\nHe is completely controlled by the far right MAGA wing. If Trump is not supported for president by McCarthy and his less far right supporters in the house then you will see McCarthy get into trouble.\nI wonder if that was one of the concessions McCarthy made to the far right to get speaker. That he would endorse Trump for president.", ">\n\nHe proved that he cared more about being Speaker than he did about this country or his party. Grab the popcorn…this is gonna be the new Greatest Show on Earth", ">\n\nNo politician should care about their party politics over voters. Democrats (even the supposed squad) forgot this. \nFuck establishment corporate slaves on both sides. Force the vote was such an opportunity lost for progressives. \nNow they are upset that republicans are better at politics than they are. DEMS literally threw their chance at this away. \nIt is almost like they want to lose.", ">\n\nMcCarthy is in first place so far for greatest Ass Kisser of the 21st Century.", ">\n\nI can't wait till House votes on his rules package he used to entice the Nazis...lol", ">\n\nThe former.", ">\n\nA sad strange man", ">\n\nWeakened leader", ">\n\nMaybe a weak, emboldened zombie of a Speaker. No matter how lively he seems, he's dead in terms of political power.", ">\n\nThose two identifiers are not mutually exclusive." ]
> It's gonna be a 2 year clown shitshow with him as the ringmaster.	[ "An empty vessel controlled by the most extreme members of his conference, but all Kevin wants is to be able to look up and point to his name on a placard so it doesn’t really matter.", ">\n\nI hope his place in the history books goes down with Thomas and Trump as partisan hacks that put their own interests ahead of the country who tried to push America into Fascism.", ">\n\nA disgusting fascist", ">\n\nThe answer is \"massive douche canoe.\"", ">\n\nAnd a turd sandwich!", ">\n\n“On your knees!”", ">\n\nI suspect he'll be both until he's neither.", ">\n\nHe is the House Whimperer.", ">\n\nHe’s definitEly not Beyoncé I’ll put it that way.", ">\n\nHes too weak to last past a week. Under current rules, the second that matt gaetz is too upset he can launch a bid to get him removed as speaker. That is no position of leadership or power.", ">\n\nIs Gaetz the only one that wields that power or can a moderate getting ready to go independent or Democrat also make that choice? Asking for a friend.", ">\n\nI still can't believe we're going to fall ass backwards into global financial calamity because a House of 435 lawmakers is being led by a tiny group of people whose entire understanding of economics comes from flipping over the Monopoly board when their Boardwalk investment didn't pay off.", ">\n\nWe'll split the difference, he's an emboldened weakling.", ">\n\nHe's the sick little birdie that's fallen out of its nest...", ">\n\nMt guess? Just the latest GOP fuckwad who doesn't give a shit about anything, his constituents, the constitution, whatever. The main thing is the bank balance, that's what those guys keep an eye on, period.\nAnything else is way down on the list.", ">\n\nDuplicitous asshole.", ">\n\nLeast, but not last - spineless Kevin", ">\n\nHe is completely controlled by the far right MAGA wing. If Trump is not supported for president by McCarthy and his less far right supporters in the house then you will see McCarthy get into trouble.\nI wonder if that was one of the concessions McCarthy made to the far right to get speaker. That he would endorse Trump for president.", ">\n\nHe proved that he cared more about being Speaker than he did about this country or his party. Grab the popcorn…this is gonna be the new Greatest Show on Earth", ">\n\nNo politician should care about their party politics over voters. Democrats (even the supposed squad) forgot this. \nFuck establishment corporate slaves on both sides. Force the vote was such an opportunity lost for progressives. \nNow they are upset that republicans are better at politics than they are. DEMS literally threw their chance at this away. \nIt is almost like they want to lose.", ">\n\nMcCarthy is in first place so far for greatest Ass Kisser of the 21st Century.", ">\n\nI can't wait till House votes on his rules package he used to entice the Nazis...lol", ">\n\nThe former.", ">\n\nA sad strange man", ">\n\nWeakened leader", ">\n\nMaybe a weak, emboldened zombie of a Speaker. No matter how lively he seems, he's dead in terms of political power.", ">\n\nThose two identifiers are not mutually exclusive.", ">\n\nWrong finger." ]
> ...or an utter immoral POS?	[ "An empty vessel controlled by the most extreme members of his conference, but all Kevin wants is to be able to look up and point to his name on a placard so it doesn’t really matter.", ">\n\nI hope his place in the history books goes down with Thomas and Trump as partisan hacks that put their own interests ahead of the country who tried to push America into Fascism.", ">\n\nA disgusting fascist", ">\n\nThe answer is \"massive douche canoe.\"", ">\n\nAnd a turd sandwich!", ">\n\n“On your knees!”", ">\n\nI suspect he'll be both until he's neither.", ">\n\nHe is the House Whimperer.", ">\n\nHe’s definitEly not Beyoncé I’ll put it that way.", ">\n\nHes too weak to last past a week. Under current rules, the second that matt gaetz is too upset he can launch a bid to get him removed as speaker. That is no position of leadership or power.", ">\n\nIs Gaetz the only one that wields that power or can a moderate getting ready to go independent or Democrat also make that choice? Asking for a friend.", ">\n\nI still can't believe we're going to fall ass backwards into global financial calamity because a House of 435 lawmakers is being led by a tiny group of people whose entire understanding of economics comes from flipping over the Monopoly board when their Boardwalk investment didn't pay off.", ">\n\nWe'll split the difference, he's an emboldened weakling.", ">\n\nHe's the sick little birdie that's fallen out of its nest...", ">\n\nMt guess? Just the latest GOP fuckwad who doesn't give a shit about anything, his constituents, the constitution, whatever. The main thing is the bank balance, that's what those guys keep an eye on, period.\nAnything else is way down on the list.", ">\n\nDuplicitous asshole.", ">\n\nLeast, but not last - spineless Kevin", ">\n\nHe is completely controlled by the far right MAGA wing. If Trump is not supported for president by McCarthy and his less far right supporters in the house then you will see McCarthy get into trouble.\nI wonder if that was one of the concessions McCarthy made to the far right to get speaker. That he would endorse Trump for president.", ">\n\nHe proved that he cared more about being Speaker than he did about this country or his party. Grab the popcorn…this is gonna be the new Greatest Show on Earth", ">\n\nNo politician should care about their party politics over voters. Democrats (even the supposed squad) forgot this. \nFuck establishment corporate slaves on both sides. Force the vote was such an opportunity lost for progressives. \nNow they are upset that republicans are better at politics than they are. DEMS literally threw their chance at this away. \nIt is almost like they want to lose.", ">\n\nMcCarthy is in first place so far for greatest Ass Kisser of the 21st Century.", ">\n\nI can't wait till House votes on his rules package he used to entice the Nazis...lol", ">\n\nThe former.", ">\n\nA sad strange man", ">\n\nWeakened leader", ">\n\nMaybe a weak, emboldened zombie of a Speaker. No matter how lively he seems, he's dead in terms of political power.", ">\n\nThose two identifiers are not mutually exclusive.", ">\n\nWrong finger.", ">\n\nIt's gonna be a 2 year clown shitshow with him as the ringmaster." ]
>	[ "An empty vessel controlled by the most extreme members of his conference, but all Kevin wants is to be able to look up and point to his name on a placard so it doesn’t really matter.", ">\n\nI hope his place in the history books goes down with Thomas and Trump as partisan hacks that put their own interests ahead of the country who tried to push America into Fascism.", ">\n\nA disgusting fascist", ">\n\nThe answer is \"massive douche canoe.\"", ">\n\nAnd a turd sandwich!", ">\n\n“On your knees!”", ">\n\nI suspect he'll be both until he's neither.", ">\n\nHe is the House Whimperer.", ">\n\nHe’s definitEly not Beyoncé I’ll put it that way.", ">\n\nHes too weak to last past a week. Under current rules, the second that matt gaetz is too upset he can launch a bid to get him removed as speaker. That is no position of leadership or power.", ">\n\nIs Gaetz the only one that wields that power or can a moderate getting ready to go independent or Democrat also make that choice? Asking for a friend.", ">\n\nI still can't believe we're going to fall ass backwards into global financial calamity because a House of 435 lawmakers is being led by a tiny group of people whose entire understanding of economics comes from flipping over the Monopoly board when their Boardwalk investment didn't pay off.", ">\n\nWe'll split the difference, he's an emboldened weakling.", ">\n\nHe's the sick little birdie that's fallen out of its nest...", ">\n\nMt guess? Just the latest GOP fuckwad who doesn't give a shit about anything, his constituents, the constitution, whatever. The main thing is the bank balance, that's what those guys keep an eye on, period.\nAnything else is way down on the list.", ">\n\nDuplicitous asshole.", ">\n\nLeast, but not last - spineless Kevin", ">\n\nHe is completely controlled by the far right MAGA wing. If Trump is not supported for president by McCarthy and his less far right supporters in the house then you will see McCarthy get into trouble.\nI wonder if that was one of the concessions McCarthy made to the far right to get speaker. That he would endorse Trump for president.", ">\n\nHe proved that he cared more about being Speaker than he did about this country or his party. Grab the popcorn…this is gonna be the new Greatest Show on Earth", ">\n\nNo politician should care about their party politics over voters. Democrats (even the supposed squad) forgot this. \nFuck establishment corporate slaves on both sides. Force the vote was such an opportunity lost for progressives. \nNow they are upset that republicans are better at politics than they are. DEMS literally threw their chance at this away. \nIt is almost like they want to lose.", ">\n\nMcCarthy is in first place so far for greatest Ass Kisser of the 21st Century.", ">\n\nI can't wait till House votes on his rules package he used to entice the Nazis...lol", ">\n\nThe former.", ">\n\nA sad strange man", ">\n\nWeakened leader", ">\n\nMaybe a weak, emboldened zombie of a Speaker. No matter how lively he seems, he's dead in terms of political power.", ">\n\nThose two identifiers are not mutually exclusive.", ">\n\nWrong finger.", ">\n\nIt's gonna be a 2 year clown shitshow with him as the ringmaster.", ">\n\n...or an utter immoral POS?" ]
I'd imagine it allows the grieving process to progress now. Trial completion will be significantly more closure but having no answer must have been truly horrific.	[]
> Do we know WHY he did it?	[ "I'd imagine it allows the grieving process to progress now. Trial completion will be significantly more closure but having no answer must have been truly horrific." ]
> Many speculate it was some type of incel reasoning. That is pure speculation based on his past, but LE haven't released these type of details yet. We know he went to the area of the victims' house many times in the weeks before the crime.	[ "I'd imagine it allows the grieving process to progress now. Trial completion will be significantly more closure but having no answer must have been truly horrific.", ">\n\nDo we know WHY he did it?" ]
> We know he went to the area of the victims' house many times in the weeks before the crime. And even the morning after! Before the police were called. This guy thought must've thought he was committing the perfect crime to come back to the scene after the fact.	[ "I'd imagine it allows the grieving process to progress now. Trial completion will be significantly more closure but having no answer must have been truly horrific.", ">\n\nDo we know WHY he did it?", ">\n\nMany speculate it was some type of incel reasoning. That is pure speculation based on his past, but LE haven't released these type of details yet. We know he went to the area of the victims' house many times in the weeks before the crime." ]
> I wonder if his intention going back in the morning was to recover his knife sheath. He thought he was so smart, but that simple mistake ultimately led to the needed dna for his relatively swift capture. Either that, or he had another more deranged reason for going back. It will be very interesting to find out.	[ "I'd imagine it allows the grieving process to progress now. Trial completion will be significantly more closure but having no answer must have been truly horrific.", ">\n\nDo we know WHY he did it?", ">\n\nMany speculate it was some type of incel reasoning. That is pure speculation based on his past, but LE haven't released these type of details yet. We know he went to the area of the victims' house many times in the weeks before the crime.", ">\n\n\nWe know he went to the area of the victims' house many times in the weeks before the crime.\n\nAnd even the morning after! Before the police were called.\nThis guy thought must've thought he was committing the perfect crime to come back to the scene after the fact." ]
> I doubt he was that brave considering he picked sleeping sorority girls as his victims. I think he wanted to see the the mayhem he had caused and feel like he was outsmarting the cops by sitting right outside while they were investigating.	[ "I'd imagine it allows the grieving process to progress now. Trial completion will be significantly more closure but having no answer must have been truly horrific.", ">\n\nDo we know WHY he did it?", ">\n\nMany speculate it was some type of incel reasoning. That is pure speculation based on his past, but LE haven't released these type of details yet. We know he went to the area of the victims' house many times in the weeks before the crime.", ">\n\n\nWe know he went to the area of the victims' house many times in the weeks before the crime.\n\nAnd even the morning after! Before the police were called.\nThis guy thought must've thought he was committing the perfect crime to come back to the scene after the fact.", ">\n\nI wonder if his intention going back in the morning was to recover his knife sheath. He thought he was so smart, but that simple mistake ultimately led to the needed dna for his relatively swift capture. Either that, or he had another more deranged reason for going back. It will be very interesting to find out." ]
> Any updates on the tiktoker that blamed a professor for the killings?	[ "I'd imagine it allows the grieving process to progress now. Trial completion will be significantly more closure but having no answer must have been truly horrific.", ">\n\nDo we know WHY he did it?", ">\n\nMany speculate it was some type of incel reasoning. That is pure speculation based on his past, but LE haven't released these type of details yet. We know he went to the area of the victims' house many times in the weeks before the crime.", ">\n\n\nWe know he went to the area of the victims' house many times in the weeks before the crime.\n\nAnd even the morning after! Before the police were called.\nThis guy thought must've thought he was committing the perfect crime to come back to the scene after the fact.", ">\n\nI wonder if his intention going back in the morning was to recover his knife sheath. He thought he was so smart, but that simple mistake ultimately led to the needed dna for his relatively swift capture. Either that, or he had another more deranged reason for going back. It will be very interesting to find out.", ">\n\nI doubt he was that brave considering he picked sleeping sorority girls as his victims. \nI think he wanted to see the the mayhem he had caused and feel like he was outsmarting the cops by sitting right outside while they were investigating." ]
> I was wondering that too. I would say that she probably feels pretty stupid right now, but considering how deluded she seems, she could be chalking this all up as a conspiracy to let "the real killer" go free. Hope she gets sued for everything she has.	[ "I'd imagine it allows the grieving process to progress now. Trial completion will be significantly more closure but having no answer must have been truly horrific.", ">\n\nDo we know WHY he did it?", ">\n\nMany speculate it was some type of incel reasoning. That is pure speculation based on his past, but LE haven't released these type of details yet. We know he went to the area of the victims' house many times in the weeks before the crime.", ">\n\n\nWe know he went to the area of the victims' house many times in the weeks before the crime.\n\nAnd even the morning after! Before the police were called.\nThis guy thought must've thought he was committing the perfect crime to come back to the scene after the fact.", ">\n\nI wonder if his intention going back in the morning was to recover his knife sheath. He thought he was so smart, but that simple mistake ultimately led to the needed dna for his relatively swift capture. Either that, or he had another more deranged reason for going back. It will be very interesting to find out.", ">\n\nI doubt he was that brave considering he picked sleeping sorority girls as his victims. \nI think he wanted to see the the mayhem he had caused and feel like he was outsmarting the cops by sitting right outside while they were investigating.", ">\n\nAny updates on the tiktoker that blamed a professor for the killings?" ]
> I have to say that all the internet trolls slamming Idaho's LE and detectives should apologize to all those agencies that worked methodically to catch this killer. Withholding speculations and evidence from the sensationalist media and internet, was not only wise, but gave the killer a false sense of getting away.	[ "I'd imagine it allows the grieving process to progress now. Trial completion will be significantly more closure but having no answer must have been truly horrific.", ">\n\nDo we know WHY he did it?", ">\n\nMany speculate it was some type of incel reasoning. That is pure speculation based on his past, but LE haven't released these type of details yet. We know he went to the area of the victims' house many times in the weeks before the crime.", ">\n\n\nWe know he went to the area of the victims' house many times in the weeks before the crime.\n\nAnd even the morning after! Before the police were called.\nThis guy thought must've thought he was committing the perfect crime to come back to the scene after the fact.", ">\n\nI wonder if his intention going back in the morning was to recover his knife sheath. He thought he was so smart, but that simple mistake ultimately led to the needed dna for his relatively swift capture. Either that, or he had another more deranged reason for going back. It will be very interesting to find out.", ">\n\nI doubt he was that brave considering he picked sleeping sorority girls as his victims. \nI think he wanted to see the the mayhem he had caused and feel like he was outsmarting the cops by sitting right outside while they were investigating.", ">\n\nAny updates on the tiktoker that blamed a professor for the killings?", ">\n\nI was wondering that too. I would say that she probably feels pretty stupid right now, but considering how deluded she seems, she could be chalking this all up as a conspiracy to let \"the real killer\" go free. Hope she gets sued for everything she has." ]
> Well said, reading the charging report shows that within days of the event they had a suspect and were chasing down solid evidence that would stand up in court. The local police, FBI and multiple state police agencies did very well here.	[ "I'd imagine it allows the grieving process to progress now. Trial completion will be significantly more closure but having no answer must have been truly horrific.", ">\n\nDo we know WHY he did it?", ">\n\nMany speculate it was some type of incel reasoning. That is pure speculation based on his past, but LE haven't released these type of details yet. We know he went to the area of the victims' house many times in the weeks before the crime.", ">\n\n\nWe know he went to the area of the victims' house many times in the weeks before the crime.\n\nAnd even the morning after! Before the police were called.\nThis guy thought must've thought he was committing the perfect crime to come back to the scene after the fact.", ">\n\nI wonder if his intention going back in the morning was to recover his knife sheath. He thought he was so smart, but that simple mistake ultimately led to the needed dna for his relatively swift capture. Either that, or he had another more deranged reason for going back. It will be very interesting to find out.", ">\n\nI doubt he was that brave considering he picked sleeping sorority girls as his victims. \nI think he wanted to see the the mayhem he had caused and feel like he was outsmarting the cops by sitting right outside while they were investigating.", ">\n\nAny updates on the tiktoker that blamed a professor for the killings?", ">\n\nI was wondering that too. I would say that she probably feels pretty stupid right now, but considering how deluded she seems, she could be chalking this all up as a conspiracy to let \"the real killer\" go free. Hope she gets sued for everything she has.", ">\n\nI have to say that all the internet trolls slamming Idaho's LE and detectives should apologize to all those agencies that worked methodically to catch this killer. Withholding speculations and evidence from the sensationalist media and internet, was not only wise, but gave the killer a false sense of getting away." ]
> It really shows the entitlement of the the internet, particularly true crime communities, that thepolice were insulted for not openly laying out every step and detail in real time. Even them publicly stating "we have a suspect" could cause the culprit to feel threatened which could make them go into hiding, flee, or attempt to destroy what could be evidence.	[ "I'd imagine it allows the grieving process to progress now. Trial completion will be significantly more closure but having no answer must have been truly horrific.", ">\n\nDo we know WHY he did it?", ">\n\nMany speculate it was some type of incel reasoning. That is pure speculation based on his past, but LE haven't released these type of details yet. We know he went to the area of the victims' house many times in the weeks before the crime.", ">\n\n\nWe know he went to the area of the victims' house many times in the weeks before the crime.\n\nAnd even the morning after! Before the police were called.\nThis guy thought must've thought he was committing the perfect crime to come back to the scene after the fact.", ">\n\nI wonder if his intention going back in the morning was to recover his knife sheath. He thought he was so smart, but that simple mistake ultimately led to the needed dna for his relatively swift capture. Either that, or he had another more deranged reason for going back. It will be very interesting to find out.", ">\n\nI doubt he was that brave considering he picked sleeping sorority girls as his victims. \nI think he wanted to see the the mayhem he had caused and feel like he was outsmarting the cops by sitting right outside while they were investigating.", ">\n\nAny updates on the tiktoker that blamed a professor for the killings?", ">\n\nI was wondering that too. I would say that she probably feels pretty stupid right now, but considering how deluded she seems, she could be chalking this all up as a conspiracy to let \"the real killer\" go free. Hope she gets sued for everything she has.", ">\n\nI have to say that all the internet trolls slamming Idaho's LE and detectives should apologize to all those agencies that worked methodically to catch this killer. Withholding speculations and evidence from the sensationalist media and internet, was not only wise, but gave the killer a false sense of getting away.", ">\n\nWell said, reading the charging report shows that within days of the event they had a suspect and were chasing down solid evidence that would stand up in court.\nThe local police, FBI and multiple state police agencies did very well here." ]
> it was like a fever dream turning on the local news to see this guy was hiding only a rock skip away from me, he was closer to driving to Canada or Mexico, my luck tho.	[ "I'd imagine it allows the grieving process to progress now. Trial completion will be significantly more closure but having no answer must have been truly horrific.", ">\n\nDo we know WHY he did it?", ">\n\nMany speculate it was some type of incel reasoning. That is pure speculation based on his past, but LE haven't released these type of details yet. We know he went to the area of the victims' house many times in the weeks before the crime.", ">\n\n\nWe know he went to the area of the victims' house many times in the weeks before the crime.\n\nAnd even the morning after! Before the police were called.\nThis guy thought must've thought he was committing the perfect crime to come back to the scene after the fact.", ">\n\nI wonder if his intention going back in the morning was to recover his knife sheath. He thought he was so smart, but that simple mistake ultimately led to the needed dna for his relatively swift capture. Either that, or he had another more deranged reason for going back. It will be very interesting to find out.", ">\n\nI doubt he was that brave considering he picked sleeping sorority girls as his victims. \nI think he wanted to see the the mayhem he had caused and feel like he was outsmarting the cops by sitting right outside while they were investigating.", ">\n\nAny updates on the tiktoker that blamed a professor for the killings?", ">\n\nI was wondering that too. I would say that she probably feels pretty stupid right now, but considering how deluded she seems, she could be chalking this all up as a conspiracy to let \"the real killer\" go free. Hope she gets sued for everything she has.", ">\n\nI have to say that all the internet trolls slamming Idaho's LE and detectives should apologize to all those agencies that worked methodically to catch this killer. Withholding speculations and evidence from the sensationalist media and internet, was not only wise, but gave the killer a false sense of getting away.", ">\n\nWell said, reading the charging report shows that within days of the event they had a suspect and were chasing down solid evidence that would stand up in court.\nThe local police, FBI and multiple state police agencies did very well here.", ">\n\nIt really shows the entitlement of the the internet, particularly true crime communities, that thepolice were insulted for not openly laying out every step and detail in real time. Even them publicly stating \"we have a suspect\" could cause the culprit to feel threatened which could make them go into hiding, flee, or attempt to destroy what could be evidence." ]
>	[ "I'd imagine it allows the grieving process to progress now. Trial completion will be significantly more closure but having no answer must have been truly horrific.", ">\n\nDo we know WHY he did it?", ">\n\nMany speculate it was some type of incel reasoning. That is pure speculation based on his past, but LE haven't released these type of details yet. We know he went to the area of the victims' house many times in the weeks before the crime.", ">\n\n\nWe know he went to the area of the victims' house many times in the weeks before the crime.\n\nAnd even the morning after! Before the police were called.\nThis guy thought must've thought he was committing the perfect crime to come back to the scene after the fact.", ">\n\nI wonder if his intention going back in the morning was to recover his knife sheath. He thought he was so smart, but that simple mistake ultimately led to the needed dna for his relatively swift capture. Either that, or he had another more deranged reason for going back. It will be very interesting to find out.", ">\n\nI doubt he was that brave considering he picked sleeping sorority girls as his victims. \nI think he wanted to see the the mayhem he had caused and feel like he was outsmarting the cops by sitting right outside while they were investigating.", ">\n\nAny updates on the tiktoker that blamed a professor for the killings?", ">\n\nI was wondering that too. I would say that she probably feels pretty stupid right now, but considering how deluded she seems, she could be chalking this all up as a conspiracy to let \"the real killer\" go free. Hope she gets sued for everything she has.", ">\n\nI have to say that all the internet trolls slamming Idaho's LE and detectives should apologize to all those agencies that worked methodically to catch this killer. Withholding speculations and evidence from the sensationalist media and internet, was not only wise, but gave the killer a false sense of getting away.", ">\n\nWell said, reading the charging report shows that within days of the event they had a suspect and were chasing down solid evidence that would stand up in court.\nThe local police, FBI and multiple state police agencies did very well here.", ">\n\nIt really shows the entitlement of the the internet, particularly true crime communities, that thepolice were insulted for not openly laying out every step and detail in real time. Even them publicly stating \"we have a suspect\" could cause the culprit to feel threatened which could make them go into hiding, flee, or attempt to destroy what could be evidence.", ">\n\nit was like a fever dream turning on the local news to see this guy was hiding only a rock skip away from me, he was closer to driving to Canada or Mexico, my luck tho." ]
To me, there is a pervasive idea that you can build yourself up by putting others down. And it follows that putting others down is perfectly acceptable.	[]
> Those who push this idea the hardest pathologically enjoy putting others down, and they attempt to train others to feel the same.	[ "To me, there is a pervasive idea that you can build yourself up by putting others down. And it follows that putting others down is perfectly acceptable." ]
> GOP is the party of scientific ignorance, and religious bigotry and homophobia.	[ "To me, there is a pervasive idea that you can build yourself up by putting others down. And it follows that putting others down is perfectly acceptable.", ">\n\nThose who push this idea the hardest pathologically enjoy putting others down, and they attempt to train others to feel the same." ]
> You mean GOP right?	[ "To me, there is a pervasive idea that you can build yourself up by putting others down. And it follows that putting others down is perfectly acceptable.", ">\n\nThose who push this idea the hardest pathologically enjoy putting others down, and they attempt to train others to feel the same.", ">\n\nGOP is the party of scientific ignorance, and religious bigotry and homophobia." ]
> You mean Conservatism.	[ "To me, there is a pervasive idea that you can build yourself up by putting others down. And it follows that putting others down is perfectly acceptable.", ">\n\nThose who push this idea the hardest pathologically enjoy putting others down, and they attempt to train others to feel the same.", ">\n\nGOP is the party of scientific ignorance, and religious bigotry and homophobia.", ">\n\nYou mean GOP right?" ]
> In the broader sense yes	[ "To me, there is a pervasive idea that you can build yourself up by putting others down. And it follows that putting others down is perfectly acceptable.", ">\n\nThose who push this idea the hardest pathologically enjoy putting others down, and they attempt to train others to feel the same.", ">\n\nGOP is the party of scientific ignorance, and religious bigotry and homophobia.", ">\n\nYou mean GOP right?", ">\n\nYou mean Conservatism." ]
> Republicans are big on labeling preexisting things to try to rebrand those things as something more positive. Tea Party, Freedom Caucus,Wokeness They are attempts to re-normalize bigotry …. Because they’re bigots….always have been, always will be.	[ "To me, there is a pervasive idea that you can build yourself up by putting others down. And it follows that putting others down is perfectly acceptable.", ">\n\nThose who push this idea the hardest pathologically enjoy putting others down, and they attempt to train others to feel the same.", ">\n\nGOP is the party of scientific ignorance, and religious bigotry and homophobia.", ">\n\nYou mean GOP right?", ">\n\nYou mean Conservatism.", ">\n\nIn the broader sense yes" ]
> Exactly, they’ve never stop being bigots, they simply rebranded their bigotry. Just as they did during and after the civil rights movement. I tell people all the time, don’t forget the bigots hitting and spitting on black people trying to sit at white lunch counters are still here and their ideology hasn’t changed.	[ "To me, there is a pervasive idea that you can build yourself up by putting others down. And it follows that putting others down is perfectly acceptable.", ">\n\nThose who push this idea the hardest pathologically enjoy putting others down, and they attempt to train others to feel the same.", ">\n\nGOP is the party of scientific ignorance, and religious bigotry and homophobia.", ">\n\nYou mean GOP right?", ">\n\nYou mean Conservatism.", ">\n\nIn the broader sense yes", ">\n\nRepublicans are big on labeling preexisting things to try to rebrand those things as something more positive. Tea Party, Freedom Caucus,Wokeness\nThey are attempts to re-normalize bigotry …. Because they’re bigots….always have been, always will be." ]
> This was the GOP's plan all along.	[ "To me, there is a pervasive idea that you can build yourself up by putting others down. And it follows that putting others down is perfectly acceptable.", ">\n\nThose who push this idea the hardest pathologically enjoy putting others down, and they attempt to train others to feel the same.", ">\n\nGOP is the party of scientific ignorance, and religious bigotry and homophobia.", ">\n\nYou mean GOP right?", ">\n\nYou mean Conservatism.", ">\n\nIn the broader sense yes", ">\n\nRepublicans are big on labeling preexisting things to try to rebrand those things as something more positive. Tea Party, Freedom Caucus,Wokeness\nThey are attempts to re-normalize bigotry …. Because they’re bigots….always have been, always will be.", ">\n\nExactly, they’ve never stop being bigots, they simply rebranded their bigotry. Just as they did during and after the civil rights movement. I tell people all the time, don’t forget the bigots hitting and spitting on black people trying to sit at white lunch counters are still here and their ideology hasn’t changed." ]
> This was actually a really interesting read and something to think about. This is something quite a few of my more well read leftist friends have been criticizing - that looking at society through a purely essentialist lense doesn't accomplish anything, even when it aims to improve conditions for marginalized groups. It doesn't shock me that the same language is being co-opted by the far right, because it can be used for each purpose	[ "To me, there is a pervasive idea that you can build yourself up by putting others down. And it follows that putting others down is perfectly acceptable.", ">\n\nThose who push this idea the hardest pathologically enjoy putting others down, and they attempt to train others to feel the same.", ">\n\nGOP is the party of scientific ignorance, and religious bigotry and homophobia.", ">\n\nYou mean GOP right?", ">\n\nYou mean Conservatism.", ">\n\nIn the broader sense yes", ">\n\nRepublicans are big on labeling preexisting things to try to rebrand those things as something more positive. Tea Party, Freedom Caucus,Wokeness\nThey are attempts to re-normalize bigotry …. Because they’re bigots….always have been, always will be.", ">\n\nExactly, they’ve never stop being bigots, they simply rebranded their bigotry. Just as they did during and after the civil rights movement. I tell people all the time, don’t forget the bigots hitting and spitting on black people trying to sit at white lunch counters are still here and their ideology hasn’t changed.", ">\n\nThis was the GOP's plan all along." ]
> “They’re taking away our history” Another way of saying you’re with the slavers.	[ "To me, there is a pervasive idea that you can build yourself up by putting others down. And it follows that putting others down is perfectly acceptable.", ">\n\nThose who push this idea the hardest pathologically enjoy putting others down, and they attempt to train others to feel the same.", ">\n\nGOP is the party of scientific ignorance, and religious bigotry and homophobia.", ">\n\nYou mean GOP right?", ">\n\nYou mean Conservatism.", ">\n\nIn the broader sense yes", ">\n\nRepublicans are big on labeling preexisting things to try to rebrand those things as something more positive. Tea Party, Freedom Caucus,Wokeness\nThey are attempts to re-normalize bigotry …. Because they’re bigots….always have been, always will be.", ">\n\nExactly, they’ve never stop being bigots, they simply rebranded their bigotry. Just as they did during and after the civil rights movement. I tell people all the time, don’t forget the bigots hitting and spitting on black people trying to sit at white lunch counters are still here and their ideology hasn’t changed.", ">\n\nThis was the GOP's plan all along.", ">\n\nThis was actually a really interesting read and something to think about. This is something quite a few of my more well read leftist friends have been criticizing - that looking at society through a purely essentialist lense doesn't accomplish anything, even when it aims to improve conditions for marginalized groups. It doesn't shock me that the same language is being co-opted by the far right, because it can be used for each purpose" ]
> *how far right & far left ideology feeds off identity politics	[ "To me, there is a pervasive idea that you can build yourself up by putting others down. And it follows that putting others down is perfectly acceptable.", ">\n\nThose who push this idea the hardest pathologically enjoy putting others down, and they attempt to train others to feel the same.", ">\n\nGOP is the party of scientific ignorance, and religious bigotry and homophobia.", ">\n\nYou mean GOP right?", ">\n\nYou mean Conservatism.", ">\n\nIn the broader sense yes", ">\n\nRepublicans are big on labeling preexisting things to try to rebrand those things as something more positive. Tea Party, Freedom Caucus,Wokeness\nThey are attempts to re-normalize bigotry …. Because they’re bigots….always have been, always will be.", ">\n\nExactly, they’ve never stop being bigots, they simply rebranded their bigotry. Just as they did during and after the civil rights movement. I tell people all the time, don’t forget the bigots hitting and spitting on black people trying to sit at white lunch counters are still here and their ideology hasn’t changed.", ">\n\nThis was the GOP's plan all along.", ">\n\nThis was actually a really interesting read and something to think about. This is something quite a few of my more well read leftist friends have been criticizing - that looking at society through a purely essentialist lense doesn't accomplish anything, even when it aims to improve conditions for marginalized groups. It doesn't shock me that the same language is being co-opted by the far right, because it can be used for each purpose", ">\n\n“They’re taking away our history”\nAnother way of saying you’re with the slavers." ]
> That article is pretty disingenuous. We're at a day and age where both parties feed off identity politics in someway shape or form. Both the Left and the Right continue to play people's prejudices and insecurities against one another. Trump himself has a long history of racist behavior, when you have an entire wikipedia article written about it you might have a problem. It's also important to remember that Joe Biden in contrast to Trump's views has even said "You ain't Black if you vote for Trump" in an attempt to gain black voters. It's all a giant game to these clowns and we're the one's getting played.	[ "To me, there is a pervasive idea that you can build yourself up by putting others down. And it follows that putting others down is perfectly acceptable.", ">\n\nThose who push this idea the hardest pathologically enjoy putting others down, and they attempt to train others to feel the same.", ">\n\nGOP is the party of scientific ignorance, and religious bigotry and homophobia.", ">\n\nYou mean GOP right?", ">\n\nYou mean Conservatism.", ">\n\nIn the broader sense yes", ">\n\nRepublicans are big on labeling preexisting things to try to rebrand those things as something more positive. Tea Party, Freedom Caucus,Wokeness\nThey are attempts to re-normalize bigotry …. Because they’re bigots….always have been, always will be.", ">\n\nExactly, they’ve never stop being bigots, they simply rebranded their bigotry. Just as they did during and after the civil rights movement. I tell people all the time, don’t forget the bigots hitting and spitting on black people trying to sit at white lunch counters are still here and their ideology hasn’t changed.", ">\n\nThis was the GOP's plan all along.", ">\n\nThis was actually a really interesting read and something to think about. This is something quite a few of my more well read leftist friends have been criticizing - that looking at society through a purely essentialist lense doesn't accomplish anything, even when it aims to improve conditions for marginalized groups. It doesn't shock me that the same language is being co-opted by the far right, because it can be used for each purpose", ">\n\n“They’re taking away our history”\nAnother way of saying you’re with the slavers.", ">\n\n*how far right & far left ideology feeds off identity politics" ]
> Nice false equivalency.	[ "To me, there is a pervasive idea that you can build yourself up by putting others down. And it follows that putting others down is perfectly acceptable.", ">\n\nThose who push this idea the hardest pathologically enjoy putting others down, and they attempt to train others to feel the same.", ">\n\nGOP is the party of scientific ignorance, and religious bigotry and homophobia.", ">\n\nYou mean GOP right?", ">\n\nYou mean Conservatism.", ">\n\nIn the broader sense yes", ">\n\nRepublicans are big on labeling preexisting things to try to rebrand those things as something more positive. Tea Party, Freedom Caucus,Wokeness\nThey are attempts to re-normalize bigotry …. Because they’re bigots….always have been, always will be.", ">\n\nExactly, they’ve never stop being bigots, they simply rebranded their bigotry. Just as they did during and after the civil rights movement. I tell people all the time, don’t forget the bigots hitting and spitting on black people trying to sit at white lunch counters are still here and their ideology hasn’t changed.", ">\n\nThis was the GOP's plan all along.", ">\n\nThis was actually a really interesting read and something to think about. This is something quite a few of my more well read leftist friends have been criticizing - that looking at society through a purely essentialist lense doesn't accomplish anything, even when it aims to improve conditions for marginalized groups. It doesn't shock me that the same language is being co-opted by the far right, because it can be used for each purpose", ">\n\n“They’re taking away our history”\nAnother way of saying you’re with the slavers.", ">\n\n*how far right & far left ideology feeds off identity politics", ">\n\nThat article is pretty disingenuous. \nWe're at a day and age where both parties feed off identity politics in someway shape or form. Both the Left and the Right continue to play people's prejudices and insecurities against one another. \nTrump himself has a long history of racist behavior, when you have an entire wikipedia article written about it you might have a problem.\nIt's also important to remember that Joe Biden in contrast to Trump's views has even said \"You ain't Black if you vote for Trump\" in an attempt to gain black voters.\nIt's all a giant game to these clowns and we're the one's getting played." ]
> How so?	[ "To me, there is a pervasive idea that you can build yourself up by putting others down. And it follows that putting others down is perfectly acceptable.", ">\n\nThose who push this idea the hardest pathologically enjoy putting others down, and they attempt to train others to feel the same.", ">\n\nGOP is the party of scientific ignorance, and religious bigotry and homophobia.", ">\n\nYou mean GOP right?", ">\n\nYou mean Conservatism.", ">\n\nIn the broader sense yes", ">\n\nRepublicans are big on labeling preexisting things to try to rebrand those things as something more positive. Tea Party, Freedom Caucus,Wokeness\nThey are attempts to re-normalize bigotry …. Because they’re bigots….always have been, always will be.", ">\n\nExactly, they’ve never stop being bigots, they simply rebranded their bigotry. Just as they did during and after the civil rights movement. I tell people all the time, don’t forget the bigots hitting and spitting on black people trying to sit at white lunch counters are still here and their ideology hasn’t changed.", ">\n\nThis was the GOP's plan all along.", ">\n\nThis was actually a really interesting read and something to think about. This is something quite a few of my more well read leftist friends have been criticizing - that looking at society through a purely essentialist lense doesn't accomplish anything, even when it aims to improve conditions for marginalized groups. It doesn't shock me that the same language is being co-opted by the far right, because it can be used for each purpose", ">\n\n“They’re taking away our history”\nAnother way of saying you’re with the slavers.", ">\n\n*how far right & far left ideology feeds off identity politics", ">\n\nThat article is pretty disingenuous. \nWe're at a day and age where both parties feed off identity politics in someway shape or form. Both the Left and the Right continue to play people's prejudices and insecurities against one another. \nTrump himself has a long history of racist behavior, when you have an entire wikipedia article written about it you might have a problem.\nIt's also important to remember that Joe Biden in contrast to Trump's views has even said \"You ain't Black if you vote for Trump\" in an attempt to gain black voters.\nIt's all a giant game to these clowns and we're the one's getting played.", ">\n\nNice false equivalency." ]
> Sorry, but I have already exhausted my budgeted supply of"replying to disingenuous poster" for the day. If you can honestly pretend that there is any equivalency between those two groups there no point trying to convince you otherwise.	[ "To me, there is a pervasive idea that you can build yourself up by putting others down. And it follows that putting others down is perfectly acceptable.", ">\n\nThose who push this idea the hardest pathologically enjoy putting others down, and they attempt to train others to feel the same.", ">\n\nGOP is the party of scientific ignorance, and religious bigotry and homophobia.", ">\n\nYou mean GOP right?", ">\n\nYou mean Conservatism.", ">\n\nIn the broader sense yes", ">\n\nRepublicans are big on labeling preexisting things to try to rebrand those things as something more positive. Tea Party, Freedom Caucus,Wokeness\nThey are attempts to re-normalize bigotry …. Because they’re bigots….always have been, always will be.", ">\n\nExactly, they’ve never stop being bigots, they simply rebranded their bigotry. Just as they did during and after the civil rights movement. I tell people all the time, don’t forget the bigots hitting and spitting on black people trying to sit at white lunch counters are still here and their ideology hasn’t changed.", ">\n\nThis was the GOP's plan all along.", ">\n\nThis was actually a really interesting read and something to think about. This is something quite a few of my more well read leftist friends have been criticizing - that looking at society through a purely essentialist lense doesn't accomplish anything, even when it aims to improve conditions for marginalized groups. It doesn't shock me that the same language is being co-opted by the far right, because it can be used for each purpose", ">\n\n“They’re taking away our history”\nAnother way of saying you’re with the slavers.", ">\n\n*how far right & far left ideology feeds off identity politics", ">\n\nThat article is pretty disingenuous. \nWe're at a day and age where both parties feed off identity politics in someway shape or form. Both the Left and the Right continue to play people's prejudices and insecurities against one another. \nTrump himself has a long history of racist behavior, when you have an entire wikipedia article written about it you might have a problem.\nIt's also important to remember that Joe Biden in contrast to Trump's views has even said \"You ain't Black if you vote for Trump\" in an attempt to gain black voters.\nIt's all a giant game to these clowns and we're the one's getting played.", ">\n\nNice false equivalency.", ">\n\nHow so?" ]
> Far left ideologies feed off identity politics too. It’s all neoliberalism, any suggestion from either side that you deny the self in favour of the community is met with “COMMUNIST” accusations.	[ "To me, there is a pervasive idea that you can build yourself up by putting others down. And it follows that putting others down is perfectly acceptable.", ">\n\nThose who push this idea the hardest pathologically enjoy putting others down, and they attempt to train others to feel the same.", ">\n\nGOP is the party of scientific ignorance, and religious bigotry and homophobia.", ">\n\nYou mean GOP right?", ">\n\nYou mean Conservatism.", ">\n\nIn the broader sense yes", ">\n\nRepublicans are big on labeling preexisting things to try to rebrand those things as something more positive. Tea Party, Freedom Caucus,Wokeness\nThey are attempts to re-normalize bigotry …. Because they’re bigots….always have been, always will be.", ">\n\nExactly, they’ve never stop being bigots, they simply rebranded their bigotry. Just as they did during and after the civil rights movement. I tell people all the time, don’t forget the bigots hitting and spitting on black people trying to sit at white lunch counters are still here and their ideology hasn’t changed.", ">\n\nThis was the GOP's plan all along.", ">\n\nThis was actually a really interesting read and something to think about. This is something quite a few of my more well read leftist friends have been criticizing - that looking at society through a purely essentialist lense doesn't accomplish anything, even when it aims to improve conditions for marginalized groups. It doesn't shock me that the same language is being co-opted by the far right, because it can be used for each purpose", ">\n\n“They’re taking away our history”\nAnother way of saying you’re with the slavers.", ">\n\n*how far right & far left ideology feeds off identity politics", ">\n\nThat article is pretty disingenuous. \nWe're at a day and age where both parties feed off identity politics in someway shape or form. Both the Left and the Right continue to play people's prejudices and insecurities against one another. \nTrump himself has a long history of racist behavior, when you have an entire wikipedia article written about it you might have a problem.\nIt's also important to remember that Joe Biden in contrast to Trump's views has even said \"You ain't Black if you vote for Trump\" in an attempt to gain black voters.\nIt's all a giant game to these clowns and we're the one's getting played.", ">\n\nNice false equivalency.", ">\n\nHow so?", ">\n\nSorry, but I have already exhausted my budgeted supply of\"replying to disingenuous poster\" for the day.\nIf you can honestly pretend that there is any equivalency between those two groups there no point trying to convince you otherwise." ]
> Far left ideologies It’s all Neoliberalism Well, which is it?	[ "To me, there is a pervasive idea that you can build yourself up by putting others down. And it follows that putting others down is perfectly acceptable.", ">\n\nThose who push this idea the hardest pathologically enjoy putting others down, and they attempt to train others to feel the same.", ">\n\nGOP is the party of scientific ignorance, and religious bigotry and homophobia.", ">\n\nYou mean GOP right?", ">\n\nYou mean Conservatism.", ">\n\nIn the broader sense yes", ">\n\nRepublicans are big on labeling preexisting things to try to rebrand those things as something more positive. Tea Party, Freedom Caucus,Wokeness\nThey are attempts to re-normalize bigotry …. Because they’re bigots….always have been, always will be.", ">\n\nExactly, they’ve never stop being bigots, they simply rebranded their bigotry. Just as they did during and after the civil rights movement. I tell people all the time, don’t forget the bigots hitting and spitting on black people trying to sit at white lunch counters are still here and their ideology hasn’t changed.", ">\n\nThis was the GOP's plan all along.", ">\n\nThis was actually a really interesting read and something to think about. This is something quite a few of my more well read leftist friends have been criticizing - that looking at society through a purely essentialist lense doesn't accomplish anything, even when it aims to improve conditions for marginalized groups. It doesn't shock me that the same language is being co-opted by the far right, because it can be used for each purpose", ">\n\n“They’re taking away our history”\nAnother way of saying you’re with the slavers.", ">\n\n*how far right & far left ideology feeds off identity politics", ">\n\nThat article is pretty disingenuous. \nWe're at a day and age where both parties feed off identity politics in someway shape or form. Both the Left and the Right continue to play people's prejudices and insecurities against one another. \nTrump himself has a long history of racist behavior, when you have an entire wikipedia article written about it you might have a problem.\nIt's also important to remember that Joe Biden in contrast to Trump's views has even said \"You ain't Black if you vote for Trump\" in an attempt to gain black voters.\nIt's all a giant game to these clowns and we're the one's getting played.", ">\n\nNice false equivalency.", ">\n\nHow so?", ">\n\nSorry, but I have already exhausted my budgeted supply of\"replying to disingenuous poster\" for the day.\nIf you can honestly pretend that there is any equivalency between those two groups there no point trying to convince you otherwise.", ">\n\nFar left ideologies feed off identity politics too. It’s all neoliberalism, any suggestion from either side that you deny the self in favour of the community is met with “COMMUNIST” accusations." ]
> American fascists genuinely and unironically think Joe Biden is a far left socialist. It's the funniest shit I've ever seen.	[ "To me, there is a pervasive idea that you can build yourself up by putting others down. And it follows that putting others down is perfectly acceptable.", ">\n\nThose who push this idea the hardest pathologically enjoy putting others down, and they attempt to train others to feel the same.", ">\n\nGOP is the party of scientific ignorance, and religious bigotry and homophobia.", ">\n\nYou mean GOP right?", ">\n\nYou mean Conservatism.", ">\n\nIn the broader sense yes", ">\n\nRepublicans are big on labeling preexisting things to try to rebrand those things as something more positive. Tea Party, Freedom Caucus,Wokeness\nThey are attempts to re-normalize bigotry …. Because they’re bigots….always have been, always will be.", ">\n\nExactly, they’ve never stop being bigots, they simply rebranded their bigotry. Just as they did during and after the civil rights movement. I tell people all the time, don’t forget the bigots hitting and spitting on black people trying to sit at white lunch counters are still here and their ideology hasn’t changed.", ">\n\nThis was the GOP's plan all along.", ">\n\nThis was actually a really interesting read and something to think about. This is something quite a few of my more well read leftist friends have been criticizing - that looking at society through a purely essentialist lense doesn't accomplish anything, even when it aims to improve conditions for marginalized groups. It doesn't shock me that the same language is being co-opted by the far right, because it can be used for each purpose", ">\n\n“They’re taking away our history”\nAnother way of saying you’re with the slavers.", ">\n\n*how far right & far left ideology feeds off identity politics", ">\n\nThat article is pretty disingenuous. \nWe're at a day and age where both parties feed off identity politics in someway shape or form. Both the Left and the Right continue to play people's prejudices and insecurities against one another. \nTrump himself has a long history of racist behavior, when you have an entire wikipedia article written about it you might have a problem.\nIt's also important to remember that Joe Biden in contrast to Trump's views has even said \"You ain't Black if you vote for Trump\" in an attempt to gain black voters.\nIt's all a giant game to these clowns and we're the one's getting played.", ">\n\nNice false equivalency.", ">\n\nHow so?", ">\n\nSorry, but I have already exhausted my budgeted supply of\"replying to disingenuous poster\" for the day.\nIf you can honestly pretend that there is any equivalency between those two groups there no point trying to convince you otherwise.", ">\n\nFar left ideologies feed off identity politics too. It’s all neoliberalism, any suggestion from either side that you deny the self in favour of the community is met with “COMMUNIST” accusations.", ">\n\n\nFar left ideologies\nIt’s all Neoliberalism \n\nWell, which is it?" ]
> All sides are feeding off identity politics, stupid. You can’t have identity politics w/o more than one identity. These writers are real knuckle draggers.	[ "To me, there is a pervasive idea that you can build yourself up by putting others down. And it follows that putting others down is perfectly acceptable.", ">\n\nThose who push this idea the hardest pathologically enjoy putting others down, and they attempt to train others to feel the same.", ">\n\nGOP is the party of scientific ignorance, and religious bigotry and homophobia.", ">\n\nYou mean GOP right?", ">\n\nYou mean Conservatism.", ">\n\nIn the broader sense yes", ">\n\nRepublicans are big on labeling preexisting things to try to rebrand those things as something more positive. Tea Party, Freedom Caucus,Wokeness\nThey are attempts to re-normalize bigotry …. Because they’re bigots….always have been, always will be.", ">\n\nExactly, they’ve never stop being bigots, they simply rebranded their bigotry. Just as they did during and after the civil rights movement. I tell people all the time, don’t forget the bigots hitting and spitting on black people trying to sit at white lunch counters are still here and their ideology hasn’t changed.", ">\n\nThis was the GOP's plan all along.", ">\n\nThis was actually a really interesting read and something to think about. This is something quite a few of my more well read leftist friends have been criticizing - that looking at society through a purely essentialist lense doesn't accomplish anything, even when it aims to improve conditions for marginalized groups. It doesn't shock me that the same language is being co-opted by the far right, because it can be used for each purpose", ">\n\n“They’re taking away our history”\nAnother way of saying you’re with the slavers.", ">\n\n*how far right & far left ideology feeds off identity politics", ">\n\nThat article is pretty disingenuous. \nWe're at a day and age where both parties feed off identity politics in someway shape or form. Both the Left and the Right continue to play people's prejudices and insecurities against one another. \nTrump himself has a long history of racist behavior, when you have an entire wikipedia article written about it you might have a problem.\nIt's also important to remember that Joe Biden in contrast to Trump's views has even said \"You ain't Black if you vote for Trump\" in an attempt to gain black voters.\nIt's all a giant game to these clowns and we're the one's getting played.", ">\n\nNice false equivalency.", ">\n\nHow so?", ">\n\nSorry, but I have already exhausted my budgeted supply of\"replying to disingenuous poster\" for the day.\nIf you can honestly pretend that there is any equivalency between those two groups there no point trying to convince you otherwise.", ">\n\nFar left ideologies feed off identity politics too. It’s all neoliberalism, any suggestion from either side that you deny the self in favour of the community is met with “COMMUNIST” accusations.", ">\n\n\nFar left ideologies\nIt’s all Neoliberalism \n\nWell, which is it?", ">\n\nAmerican fascists genuinely and unironically think Joe Biden is a far left socialist. It's the funniest shit I've ever seen." ]
>	[ "To me, there is a pervasive idea that you can build yourself up by putting others down. And it follows that putting others down is perfectly acceptable.", ">\n\nThose who push this idea the hardest pathologically enjoy putting others down, and they attempt to train others to feel the same.", ">\n\nGOP is the party of scientific ignorance, and religious bigotry and homophobia.", ">\n\nYou mean GOP right?", ">\n\nYou mean Conservatism.", ">\n\nIn the broader sense yes", ">\n\nRepublicans are big on labeling preexisting things to try to rebrand those things as something more positive. Tea Party, Freedom Caucus,Wokeness\nThey are attempts to re-normalize bigotry …. Because they’re bigots….always have been, always will be.", ">\n\nExactly, they’ve never stop being bigots, they simply rebranded their bigotry. Just as they did during and after the civil rights movement. I tell people all the time, don’t forget the bigots hitting and spitting on black people trying to sit at white lunch counters are still here and their ideology hasn’t changed.", ">\n\nThis was the GOP's plan all along.", ">\n\nThis was actually a really interesting read and something to think about. This is something quite a few of my more well read leftist friends have been criticizing - that looking at society through a purely essentialist lense doesn't accomplish anything, even when it aims to improve conditions for marginalized groups. It doesn't shock me that the same language is being co-opted by the far right, because it can be used for each purpose", ">\n\n“They’re taking away our history”\nAnother way of saying you’re with the slavers.", ">\n\n*how far right & far left ideology feeds off identity politics", ">\n\nThat article is pretty disingenuous. \nWe're at a day and age where both parties feed off identity politics in someway shape or form. Both the Left and the Right continue to play people's prejudices and insecurities against one another. \nTrump himself has a long history of racist behavior, when you have an entire wikipedia article written about it you might have a problem.\nIt's also important to remember that Joe Biden in contrast to Trump's views has even said \"You ain't Black if you vote for Trump\" in an attempt to gain black voters.\nIt's all a giant game to these clowns and we're the one's getting played.", ">\n\nNice false equivalency.", ">\n\nHow so?", ">\n\nSorry, but I have already exhausted my budgeted supply of\"replying to disingenuous poster\" for the day.\nIf you can honestly pretend that there is any equivalency between those two groups there no point trying to convince you otherwise.", ">\n\nFar left ideologies feed off identity politics too. It’s all neoliberalism, any suggestion from either side that you deny the self in favour of the community is met with “COMMUNIST” accusations.", ">\n\n\nFar left ideologies\nIt’s all Neoliberalism \n\nWell, which is it?", ">\n\nAmerican fascists genuinely and unironically think Joe Biden is a far left socialist. It's the funniest shit I've ever seen.", ">\n\nAll sides are feeding off identity politics, stupid. You can’t have identity politics w/o more than one identity. \nThese writers are real knuckle draggers." ]
This is the best tl;dr I could make, original reduced by 73%. (I'm a bot) A State Department official stressed the importance of Israel's "Independent institutions" for its "Thriving democracy" after the country's new government revealed a plan to pass laws that would weaken the Supreme Court. State of play: Senior Israeli legal experts and former and current Supreme Court judges see the plan as a way for the government to significantly weaken the country's highest court by harming its independence and effectively rendering it irrelevant. What they're saying: "Israel's independent institutions are crucial to upholding the country's thriving democracy, and our shared democratic values are at the heart of our bilateral relationship," a State Department spokesperson told Axios when asked about the new Israeli government's plan. Extended Summary \| FAQ \| Feedback \| Top keywords: plan^#1 government^#2 Israel's^#3 Israeli^#4 Court^#5	[]
> Undermining the balance of powers is one of the classic warning signs, I know the US gets crap for swinging dick on the world stage, but they’re right about this. Israel doesn’t want to end up like Poland or Hungary.	[ "This is the best tl;dr I could make, original reduced by 73%. (I'm a bot)\n\n\nA State Department official stressed the importance of Israel's \"Independent institutions\" for its \"Thriving democracy\" after the country's new government revealed a plan to pass laws that would weaken the Supreme Court.\nState of play: Senior Israeli legal experts and former and current Supreme Court judges see the plan as a way for the government to significantly weaken the country's highest court by harming its independence and effectively rendering it irrelevant.\nWhat they're saying: \"Israel's independent institutions are crucial to upholding the country's thriving democracy, and our shared democratic values are at the heart of our bilateral relationship,\" a State Department spokesperson told Axios when asked about the new Israeli government's plan.\n\n\nExtended Summary \| FAQ \| Feedback \| Top keywords: plan^#1 government^#2 Israel's^#3 Israeli^#4 Court^#5" ]
> This really has nothing to do with the online talking points, propaganda and other crap, this is more analogous to what Trump tried to pull during his presidency. Not everything is about the one aspect of foreign policy you care about.	[ "This is the best tl;dr I could make, original reduced by 73%. (I'm a bot)\n\n\nA State Department official stressed the importance of Israel's \"Independent institutions\" for its \"Thriving democracy\" after the country's new government revealed a plan to pass laws that would weaken the Supreme Court.\nState of play: Senior Israeli legal experts and former and current Supreme Court judges see the plan as a way for the government to significantly weaken the country's highest court by harming its independence and effectively rendering it irrelevant.\nWhat they're saying: \"Israel's independent institutions are crucial to upholding the country's thriving democracy, and our shared democratic values are at the heart of our bilateral relationship,\" a State Department spokesperson told Axios when asked about the new Israeli government's plan.\n\n\nExtended Summary \| FAQ \| Feedback \| Top keywords: plan^#1 government^#2 Israel's^#3 Israeli^#4 Court^#5", ">\n\nUndermining the balance of powers is one of the classic warning signs, I know the US gets crap for swinging dick on the world stage, but they’re right about this. Israel doesn’t want to end up like Poland or Hungary." ]
> The U.S. isn't much better off since Trump packed the Supreme Court with conservative partisan hacks.	[ "This is the best tl;dr I could make, original reduced by 73%. (I'm a bot)\n\n\nA State Department official stressed the importance of Israel's \"Independent institutions\" for its \"Thriving democracy\" after the country's new government revealed a plan to pass laws that would weaken the Supreme Court.\nState of play: Senior Israeli legal experts and former and current Supreme Court judges see the plan as a way for the government to significantly weaken the country's highest court by harming its independence and effectively rendering it irrelevant.\nWhat they're saying: \"Israel's independent institutions are crucial to upholding the country's thriving democracy, and our shared democratic values are at the heart of our bilateral relationship,\" a State Department spokesperson told Axios when asked about the new Israeli government's plan.\n\n\nExtended Summary \| FAQ \| Feedback \| Top keywords: plan^#1 government^#2 Israel's^#3 Israeli^#4 Court^#5", ">\n\nUndermining the balance of powers is one of the classic warning signs, I know the US gets crap for swinging dick on the world stage, but they’re right about this. Israel doesn’t want to end up like Poland or Hungary.", ">\n\nThis really has nothing to do with the online talking points, propaganda and other crap, this is more analogous to what Trump tried to pull during his presidency. \nNot everything is about the one aspect of foreign policy you care about." ]
> That's not what "independence" means in this context. Appointing justices is something the President has always done, and once they're appointed they're no longer beholden to elected officials. In Israel they're considering giving the Knesset a veto over Supreme Court decisions. That would undermine its independence.	[ "This is the best tl;dr I could make, original reduced by 73%. (I'm a bot)\n\n\nA State Department official stressed the importance of Israel's \"Independent institutions\" for its \"Thriving democracy\" after the country's new government revealed a plan to pass laws that would weaken the Supreme Court.\nState of play: Senior Israeli legal experts and former and current Supreme Court judges see the plan as a way for the government to significantly weaken the country's highest court by harming its independence and effectively rendering it irrelevant.\nWhat they're saying: \"Israel's independent institutions are crucial to upholding the country's thriving democracy, and our shared democratic values are at the heart of our bilateral relationship,\" a State Department spokesperson told Axios when asked about the new Israeli government's plan.\n\n\nExtended Summary \| FAQ \| Feedback \| Top keywords: plan^#1 government^#2 Israel's^#3 Israeli^#4 Court^#5", ">\n\nUndermining the balance of powers is one of the classic warning signs, I know the US gets crap for swinging dick on the world stage, but they’re right about this. Israel doesn’t want to end up like Poland or Hungary.", ">\n\nThis really has nothing to do with the online talking points, propaganda and other crap, this is more analogous to what Trump tried to pull during his presidency. \nNot everything is about the one aspect of foreign policy you care about.", ">\n\nThe U.S. isn't much better off since Trump packed the Supreme Court with conservative partisan hacks." ]
> It's not enough to appoint a judge, they also have to be confirmed. The Republicans have made it clear they will never confirm another Supreme Court judge appointed by a Democrat. Democrats have floated the possibility of packing the court. The Supreme Court is headed down the same path.	[ "This is the best tl;dr I could make, original reduced by 73%. (I'm a bot)\n\n\nA State Department official stressed the importance of Israel's \"Independent institutions\" for its \"Thriving democracy\" after the country's new government revealed a plan to pass laws that would weaken the Supreme Court.\nState of play: Senior Israeli legal experts and former and current Supreme Court judges see the plan as a way for the government to significantly weaken the country's highest court by harming its independence and effectively rendering it irrelevant.\nWhat they're saying: \"Israel's independent institutions are crucial to upholding the country's thriving democracy, and our shared democratic values are at the heart of our bilateral relationship,\" a State Department spokesperson told Axios when asked about the new Israeli government's plan.\n\n\nExtended Summary \| FAQ \| Feedback \| Top keywords: plan^#1 government^#2 Israel's^#3 Israeli^#4 Court^#5", ">\n\nUndermining the balance of powers is one of the classic warning signs, I know the US gets crap for swinging dick on the world stage, but they’re right about this. Israel doesn’t want to end up like Poland or Hungary.", ">\n\nThis really has nothing to do with the online talking points, propaganda and other crap, this is more analogous to what Trump tried to pull during his presidency. \nNot everything is about the one aspect of foreign policy you care about.", ">\n\nThe U.S. isn't much better off since Trump packed the Supreme Court with conservative partisan hacks.", ">\n\nThat's not what \"independence\" means in this context. Appointing justices is something the President has always done, and once they're appointed they're no longer beholden to elected officials. In Israel they're considering giving the Knesset a veto over Supreme Court decisions. That would undermine its independence." ]
> ...you realize the last Supreme Court Justice was appointed by a democratic?	[ "This is the best tl;dr I could make, original reduced by 73%. (I'm a bot)\n\n\nA State Department official stressed the importance of Israel's \"Independent institutions\" for its \"Thriving democracy\" after the country's new government revealed a plan to pass laws that would weaken the Supreme Court.\nState of play: Senior Israeli legal experts and former and current Supreme Court judges see the plan as a way for the government to significantly weaken the country's highest court by harming its independence and effectively rendering it irrelevant.\nWhat they're saying: \"Israel's independent institutions are crucial to upholding the country's thriving democracy, and our shared democratic values are at the heart of our bilateral relationship,\" a State Department spokesperson told Axios when asked about the new Israeli government's plan.\n\n\nExtended Summary \| FAQ \| Feedback \| Top keywords: plan^#1 government^#2 Israel's^#3 Israeli^#4 Court^#5", ">\n\nUndermining the balance of powers is one of the classic warning signs, I know the US gets crap for swinging dick on the world stage, but they’re right about this. Israel doesn’t want to end up like Poland or Hungary.", ">\n\nThis really has nothing to do with the online talking points, propaganda and other crap, this is more analogous to what Trump tried to pull during his presidency. \nNot everything is about the one aspect of foreign policy you care about.", ">\n\nThe U.S. isn't much better off since Trump packed the Supreme Court with conservative partisan hacks.", ">\n\nThat's not what \"independence\" means in this context. Appointing justices is something the President has always done, and once they're appointed they're no longer beholden to elected officials. In Israel they're considering giving the Knesset a veto over Supreme Court decisions. That would undermine its independence.", ">\n\nIt's not enough to appoint a judge, they also have to be confirmed. The Republicans have made it clear they will never confirm another Supreme Court judge appointed by a Democrat. Democrats have floated the possibility of packing the court.\nThe Supreme Court is headed down the same path." ]
> Yeah and confirmed by Democrats? Republicans would not do the same thing if they had control of the chamber.	[ "This is the best tl;dr I could make, original reduced by 73%. (I'm a bot)\n\n\nA State Department official stressed the importance of Israel's \"Independent institutions\" for its \"Thriving democracy\" after the country's new government revealed a plan to pass laws that would weaken the Supreme Court.\nState of play: Senior Israeli legal experts and former and current Supreme Court judges see the plan as a way for the government to significantly weaken the country's highest court by harming its independence and effectively rendering it irrelevant.\nWhat they're saying: \"Israel's independent institutions are crucial to upholding the country's thriving democracy, and our shared democratic values are at the heart of our bilateral relationship,\" a State Department spokesperson told Axios when asked about the new Israeli government's plan.\n\n\nExtended Summary \| FAQ \| Feedback \| Top keywords: plan^#1 government^#2 Israel's^#3 Israeli^#4 Court^#5", ">\n\nUndermining the balance of powers is one of the classic warning signs, I know the US gets crap for swinging dick on the world stage, but they’re right about this. Israel doesn’t want to end up like Poland or Hungary.", ">\n\nThis really has nothing to do with the online talking points, propaganda and other crap, this is more analogous to what Trump tried to pull during his presidency. \nNot everything is about the one aspect of foreign policy you care about.", ">\n\nThe U.S. isn't much better off since Trump packed the Supreme Court with conservative partisan hacks.", ">\n\nThat's not what \"independence\" means in this context. Appointing justices is something the President has always done, and once they're appointed they're no longer beholden to elected officials. In Israel they're considering giving the Knesset a veto over Supreme Court decisions. That would undermine its independence.", ">\n\nIt's not enough to appoint a judge, they also have to be confirmed. The Republicans have made it clear they will never confirm another Supreme Court judge appointed by a Democrat. Democrats have floated the possibility of packing the court.\nThe Supreme Court is headed down the same path.", ">\n\n...you realize the last Supreme Court Justice was appointed by a democratic?" ]
> Well, let's examine reality. Scalia dies. Obama nominates Merrick Garland. Republicans refuse to have a hearing, saying the election is too close. Trump nominates Gorsuch, and Democrats are understandably pissed. Three ultimately vote for Gorsuch. Kavanaugh's vote was marred by sexual assault allegations. Not really a typical Supreme Court confirmation. Finally, Barrett was nominated after RBG died. However, RBG died closer to the election than Scalia had died in 2016. When Mitch McConnell moved to quickly confirm Barrett, where he had refused to take any action on Garland, it becomes pretty clear that a Republican majority Senate will not move forward with a nominee put forward by a Democratic President. Multiple Republican Senators said as much. Republicans will vote for Democratic nominees when they lack the power to stop their confirmation. Democrats, meanwhile, have never prevented a Republican President from filling a Supreme Court spot, even during an election year. So I'm describing the precedent after Merrick Garland and Amy Coney Barrett. A Republican majority Senate will not confirm, or even vote, on Democratic nominees.	[ "This is the best tl;dr I could make, original reduced by 73%. (I'm a bot)\n\n\nA State Department official stressed the importance of Israel's \"Independent institutions\" for its \"Thriving democracy\" after the country's new government revealed a plan to pass laws that would weaken the Supreme Court.\nState of play: Senior Israeli legal experts and former and current Supreme Court judges see the plan as a way for the government to significantly weaken the country's highest court by harming its independence and effectively rendering it irrelevant.\nWhat they're saying: \"Israel's independent institutions are crucial to upholding the country's thriving democracy, and our shared democratic values are at the heart of our bilateral relationship,\" a State Department spokesperson told Axios when asked about the new Israeli government's plan.\n\n\nExtended Summary \| FAQ \| Feedback \| Top keywords: plan^#1 government^#2 Israel's^#3 Israeli^#4 Court^#5", ">\n\nUndermining the balance of powers is one of the classic warning signs, I know the US gets crap for swinging dick on the world stage, but they’re right about this. Israel doesn’t want to end up like Poland or Hungary.", ">\n\nThis really has nothing to do with the online talking points, propaganda and other crap, this is more analogous to what Trump tried to pull during his presidency. \nNot everything is about the one aspect of foreign policy you care about.", ">\n\nThe U.S. isn't much better off since Trump packed the Supreme Court with conservative partisan hacks.", ">\n\nThat's not what \"independence\" means in this context. Appointing justices is something the President has always done, and once they're appointed they're no longer beholden to elected officials. In Israel they're considering giving the Knesset a veto over Supreme Court decisions. That would undermine its independence.", ">\n\nIt's not enough to appoint a judge, they also have to be confirmed. The Republicans have made it clear they will never confirm another Supreme Court judge appointed by a Democrat. Democrats have floated the possibility of packing the court.\nThe Supreme Court is headed down the same path.", ">\n\n...you realize the last Supreme Court Justice was appointed by a democratic?", ">\n\nYeah and confirmed by Democrats? Republicans would not do the same thing if they had control of the chamber." ]
> Netanyahu is a cunny.	[ "This is the best tl;dr I could make, original reduced by 73%. (I'm a bot)\n\n\nA State Department official stressed the importance of Israel's \"Independent institutions\" for its \"Thriving democracy\" after the country's new government revealed a plan to pass laws that would weaken the Supreme Court.\nState of play: Senior Israeli legal experts and former and current Supreme Court judges see the plan as a way for the government to significantly weaken the country's highest court by harming its independence and effectively rendering it irrelevant.\nWhat they're saying: \"Israel's independent institutions are crucial to upholding the country's thriving democracy, and our shared democratic values are at the heart of our bilateral relationship,\" a State Department spokesperson told Axios when asked about the new Israeli government's plan.\n\n\nExtended Summary \| FAQ \| Feedback \| Top keywords: plan^#1 government^#2 Israel's^#3 Israeli^#4 Court^#5", ">\n\nUndermining the balance of powers is one of the classic warning signs, I know the US gets crap for swinging dick on the world stage, but they’re right about this. Israel doesn’t want to end up like Poland or Hungary.", ">\n\nThis really has nothing to do with the online talking points, propaganda and other crap, this is more analogous to what Trump tried to pull during his presidency. \nNot everything is about the one aspect of foreign policy you care about.", ">\n\nThe U.S. isn't much better off since Trump packed the Supreme Court with conservative partisan hacks.", ">\n\nThat's not what \"independence\" means in this context. Appointing justices is something the President has always done, and once they're appointed they're no longer beholden to elected officials. In Israel they're considering giving the Knesset a veto over Supreme Court decisions. That would undermine its independence.", ">\n\nIt's not enough to appoint a judge, they also have to be confirmed. The Republicans have made it clear they will never confirm another Supreme Court judge appointed by a Democrat. Democrats have floated the possibility of packing the court.\nThe Supreme Court is headed down the same path.", ">\n\n...you realize the last Supreme Court Justice was appointed by a democratic?", ">\n\nYeah and confirmed by Democrats? Republicans would not do the same thing if they had control of the chamber.", ">\n\nWell, let's examine reality.\nScalia dies. Obama nominates Merrick Garland. Republicans refuse to have a hearing, saying the election is too close.\nTrump nominates Gorsuch, and Democrats are understandably pissed. Three ultimately vote for Gorsuch.\nKavanaugh's vote was marred by sexual assault allegations. Not really a typical Supreme Court confirmation.\nFinally, Barrett was nominated after RBG died. However, RBG died closer to the election than Scalia had died in 2016. When Mitch McConnell moved to quickly confirm Barrett, where he had refused to take any action on Garland, it becomes pretty clear that a Republican majority Senate will not move forward with a nominee put forward by a Democratic President.\nMultiple Republican Senators said as much.\nRepublicans will vote for Democratic nominees when they lack the power to stop their confirmation. Democrats, meanwhile, have never prevented a Republican President from filling a Supreme Court spot, even during an election year.\nSo I'm describing the precedent after Merrick Garland and Amy Coney Barrett. A Republican majority Senate will not confirm, or even vote, on Democratic nominees." ]
> They want to weaken their Supreme Court because they're getting ready to enact laws that violate their constitution.	[ "This is the best tl;dr I could make, original reduced by 73%. (I'm a bot)\n\n\nA State Department official stressed the importance of Israel's \"Independent institutions\" for its \"Thriving democracy\" after the country's new government revealed a plan to pass laws that would weaken the Supreme Court.\nState of play: Senior Israeli legal experts and former and current Supreme Court judges see the plan as a way for the government to significantly weaken the country's highest court by harming its independence and effectively rendering it irrelevant.\nWhat they're saying: \"Israel's independent institutions are crucial to upholding the country's thriving democracy, and our shared democratic values are at the heart of our bilateral relationship,\" a State Department spokesperson told Axios when asked about the new Israeli government's plan.\n\n\nExtended Summary \| FAQ \| Feedback \| Top keywords: plan^#1 government^#2 Israel's^#3 Israeli^#4 Court^#5", ">\n\nUndermining the balance of powers is one of the classic warning signs, I know the US gets crap for swinging dick on the world stage, but they’re right about this. Israel doesn’t want to end up like Poland or Hungary.", ">\n\nThis really has nothing to do with the online talking points, propaganda and other crap, this is more analogous to what Trump tried to pull during his presidency. \nNot everything is about the one aspect of foreign policy you care about.", ">\n\nThe U.S. isn't much better off since Trump packed the Supreme Court with conservative partisan hacks.", ">\n\nThat's not what \"independence\" means in this context. Appointing justices is something the President has always done, and once they're appointed they're no longer beholden to elected officials. In Israel they're considering giving the Knesset a veto over Supreme Court decisions. That would undermine its independence.", ">\n\nIt's not enough to appoint a judge, they also have to be confirmed. The Republicans have made it clear they will never confirm another Supreme Court judge appointed by a Democrat. Democrats have floated the possibility of packing the court.\nThe Supreme Court is headed down the same path.", ">\n\n...you realize the last Supreme Court Justice was appointed by a democratic?", ">\n\nYeah and confirmed by Democrats? Republicans would not do the same thing if they had control of the chamber.", ">\n\nWell, let's examine reality.\nScalia dies. Obama nominates Merrick Garland. Republicans refuse to have a hearing, saying the election is too close.\nTrump nominates Gorsuch, and Democrats are understandably pissed. Three ultimately vote for Gorsuch.\nKavanaugh's vote was marred by sexual assault allegations. Not really a typical Supreme Court confirmation.\nFinally, Barrett was nominated after RBG died. However, RBG died closer to the election than Scalia had died in 2016. When Mitch McConnell moved to quickly confirm Barrett, where he had refused to take any action on Garland, it becomes pretty clear that a Republican majority Senate will not move forward with a nominee put forward by a Democratic President.\nMultiple Republican Senators said as much.\nRepublicans will vote for Democratic nominees when they lack the power to stop their confirmation. Democrats, meanwhile, have never prevented a Republican President from filling a Supreme Court spot, even during an election year.\nSo I'm describing the precedent after Merrick Garland and Amy Coney Barrett. A Republican majority Senate will not confirm, or even vote, on Democratic nominees.", ">\n\nNetanyahu is a cunny." ]
> Israel doesn't have a constitution but something like that, yes.	[ "This is the best tl;dr I could make, original reduced by 73%. (I'm a bot)\n\n\nA State Department official stressed the importance of Israel's \"Independent institutions\" for its \"Thriving democracy\" after the country's new government revealed a plan to pass laws that would weaken the Supreme Court.\nState of play: Senior Israeli legal experts and former and current Supreme Court judges see the plan as a way for the government to significantly weaken the country's highest court by harming its independence and effectively rendering it irrelevant.\nWhat they're saying: \"Israel's independent institutions are crucial to upholding the country's thriving democracy, and our shared democratic values are at the heart of our bilateral relationship,\" a State Department spokesperson told Axios when asked about the new Israeli government's plan.\n\n\nExtended Summary \| FAQ \| Feedback \| Top keywords: plan^#1 government^#2 Israel's^#3 Israeli^#4 Court^#5", ">\n\nUndermining the balance of powers is one of the classic warning signs, I know the US gets crap for swinging dick on the world stage, but they’re right about this. Israel doesn’t want to end up like Poland or Hungary.", ">\n\nThis really has nothing to do with the online talking points, propaganda and other crap, this is more analogous to what Trump tried to pull during his presidency. \nNot everything is about the one aspect of foreign policy you care about.", ">\n\nThe U.S. isn't much better off since Trump packed the Supreme Court with conservative partisan hacks.", ">\n\nThat's not what \"independence\" means in this context. Appointing justices is something the President has always done, and once they're appointed they're no longer beholden to elected officials. In Israel they're considering giving the Knesset a veto over Supreme Court decisions. That would undermine its independence.", ">\n\nIt's not enough to appoint a judge, they also have to be confirmed. The Republicans have made it clear they will never confirm another Supreme Court judge appointed by a Democrat. Democrats have floated the possibility of packing the court.\nThe Supreme Court is headed down the same path.", ">\n\n...you realize the last Supreme Court Justice was appointed by a democratic?", ">\n\nYeah and confirmed by Democrats? Republicans would not do the same thing if they had control of the chamber.", ">\n\nWell, let's examine reality.\nScalia dies. Obama nominates Merrick Garland. Republicans refuse to have a hearing, saying the election is too close.\nTrump nominates Gorsuch, and Democrats are understandably pissed. Three ultimately vote for Gorsuch.\nKavanaugh's vote was marred by sexual assault allegations. Not really a typical Supreme Court confirmation.\nFinally, Barrett was nominated after RBG died. However, RBG died closer to the election than Scalia had died in 2016. When Mitch McConnell moved to quickly confirm Barrett, where he had refused to take any action on Garland, it becomes pretty clear that a Republican majority Senate will not move forward with a nominee put forward by a Democratic President.\nMultiple Republican Senators said as much.\nRepublicans will vote for Democratic nominees when they lack the power to stop their confirmation. Democrats, meanwhile, have never prevented a Republican President from filling a Supreme Court spot, even during an election year.\nSo I'm describing the precedent after Merrick Garland and Amy Coney Barrett. A Republican majority Senate will not confirm, or even vote, on Democratic nominees.", ">\n\nNetanyahu is a cunny.", ">\n\nThey want to weaken their Supreme Court because they're getting ready to enact laws that violate their constitution." ]
> "base laws" as you can call it	[ "This is the best tl;dr I could make, original reduced by 73%. (I'm a bot)\n\n\nA State Department official stressed the importance of Israel's \"Independent institutions\" for its \"Thriving democracy\" after the country's new government revealed a plan to pass laws that would weaken the Supreme Court.\nState of play: Senior Israeli legal experts and former and current Supreme Court judges see the plan as a way for the government to significantly weaken the country's highest court by harming its independence and effectively rendering it irrelevant.\nWhat they're saying: \"Israel's independent institutions are crucial to upholding the country's thriving democracy, and our shared democratic values are at the heart of our bilateral relationship,\" a State Department spokesperson told Axios when asked about the new Israeli government's plan.\n\n\nExtended Summary \| FAQ \| Feedback \| Top keywords: plan^#1 government^#2 Israel's^#3 Israeli^#4 Court^#5", ">\n\nUndermining the balance of powers is one of the classic warning signs, I know the US gets crap for swinging dick on the world stage, but they’re right about this. Israel doesn’t want to end up like Poland or Hungary.", ">\n\nThis really has nothing to do with the online talking points, propaganda and other crap, this is more analogous to what Trump tried to pull during his presidency. \nNot everything is about the one aspect of foreign policy you care about.", ">\n\nThe U.S. isn't much better off since Trump packed the Supreme Court with conservative partisan hacks.", ">\n\nThat's not what \"independence\" means in this context. Appointing justices is something the President has always done, and once they're appointed they're no longer beholden to elected officials. In Israel they're considering giving the Knesset a veto over Supreme Court decisions. That would undermine its independence.", ">\n\nIt's not enough to appoint a judge, they also have to be confirmed. The Republicans have made it clear they will never confirm another Supreme Court judge appointed by a Democrat. Democrats have floated the possibility of packing the court.\nThe Supreme Court is headed down the same path.", ">\n\n...you realize the last Supreme Court Justice was appointed by a democratic?", ">\n\nYeah and confirmed by Democrats? Republicans would not do the same thing if they had control of the chamber.", ">\n\nWell, let's examine reality.\nScalia dies. Obama nominates Merrick Garland. Republicans refuse to have a hearing, saying the election is too close.\nTrump nominates Gorsuch, and Democrats are understandably pissed. Three ultimately vote for Gorsuch.\nKavanaugh's vote was marred by sexual assault allegations. Not really a typical Supreme Court confirmation.\nFinally, Barrett was nominated after RBG died. However, RBG died closer to the election than Scalia had died in 2016. When Mitch McConnell moved to quickly confirm Barrett, where he had refused to take any action on Garland, it becomes pretty clear that a Republican majority Senate will not move forward with a nominee put forward by a Democratic President.\nMultiple Republican Senators said as much.\nRepublicans will vote for Democratic nominees when they lack the power to stop their confirmation. Democrats, meanwhile, have never prevented a Republican President from filling a Supreme Court spot, even during an election year.\nSo I'm describing the precedent after Merrick Garland and Amy Coney Barrett. A Republican majority Senate will not confirm, or even vote, on Democratic nominees.", ">\n\nNetanyahu is a cunny.", ">\n\nThey want to weaken their Supreme Court because they're getting ready to enact laws that violate their constitution.", ">\n\nIsrael doesn't have a constitution but something like that, yes." ]
> When your Judiciary loses its Independence or becomes Partisan to either the Left or Right a government can no longer be seen as Democratic. There’s no longer a check on the Populist or Partisan politicians.	[ "This is the best tl;dr I could make, original reduced by 73%. (I'm a bot)\n\n\nA State Department official stressed the importance of Israel's \"Independent institutions\" for its \"Thriving democracy\" after the country's new government revealed a plan to pass laws that would weaken the Supreme Court.\nState of play: Senior Israeli legal experts and former and current Supreme Court judges see the plan as a way for the government to significantly weaken the country's highest court by harming its independence and effectively rendering it irrelevant.\nWhat they're saying: \"Israel's independent institutions are crucial to upholding the country's thriving democracy, and our shared democratic values are at the heart of our bilateral relationship,\" a State Department spokesperson told Axios when asked about the new Israeli government's plan.\n\n\nExtended Summary \| FAQ \| Feedback \| Top keywords: plan^#1 government^#2 Israel's^#3 Israeli^#4 Court^#5", ">\n\nUndermining the balance of powers is one of the classic warning signs, I know the US gets crap for swinging dick on the world stage, but they’re right about this. Israel doesn’t want to end up like Poland or Hungary.", ">\n\nThis really has nothing to do with the online talking points, propaganda and other crap, this is more analogous to what Trump tried to pull during his presidency. \nNot everything is about the one aspect of foreign policy you care about.", ">\n\nThe U.S. isn't much better off since Trump packed the Supreme Court with conservative partisan hacks.", ">\n\nThat's not what \"independence\" means in this context. Appointing justices is something the President has always done, and once they're appointed they're no longer beholden to elected officials. In Israel they're considering giving the Knesset a veto over Supreme Court decisions. That would undermine its independence.", ">\n\nIt's not enough to appoint a judge, they also have to be confirmed. The Republicans have made it clear they will never confirm another Supreme Court judge appointed by a Democrat. Democrats have floated the possibility of packing the court.\nThe Supreme Court is headed down the same path.", ">\n\n...you realize the last Supreme Court Justice was appointed by a democratic?", ">\n\nYeah and confirmed by Democrats? Republicans would not do the same thing if they had control of the chamber.", ">\n\nWell, let's examine reality.\nScalia dies. Obama nominates Merrick Garland. Republicans refuse to have a hearing, saying the election is too close.\nTrump nominates Gorsuch, and Democrats are understandably pissed. Three ultimately vote for Gorsuch.\nKavanaugh's vote was marred by sexual assault allegations. Not really a typical Supreme Court confirmation.\nFinally, Barrett was nominated after RBG died. However, RBG died closer to the election than Scalia had died in 2016. When Mitch McConnell moved to quickly confirm Barrett, where he had refused to take any action on Garland, it becomes pretty clear that a Republican majority Senate will not move forward with a nominee put forward by a Democratic President.\nMultiple Republican Senators said as much.\nRepublicans will vote for Democratic nominees when they lack the power to stop their confirmation. Democrats, meanwhile, have never prevented a Republican President from filling a Supreme Court spot, even during an election year.\nSo I'm describing the precedent after Merrick Garland and Amy Coney Barrett. A Republican majority Senate will not confirm, or even vote, on Democratic nominees.", ">\n\nNetanyahu is a cunny.", ">\n\nThey want to weaken their Supreme Court because they're getting ready to enact laws that violate their constitution.", ">\n\nIsrael doesn't have a constitution but something like that, yes.", ">\n\n\"base laws\" as you can call it" ]
> The supreme court is basically partisan towards the left, so they've decided to take it to the other extreme. There are certain things in the reform that need to be tweaked in order to make it a good reform that will be accepted and will protect All parts of the political map. The override law should be with a large majority of at least 75/120. The general attorney should be split into two jobs, prosecutor and government attorney מייצג את הממשלה בבית משפט.	[ "This is the best tl;dr I could make, original reduced by 73%. (I'm a bot)\n\n\nA State Department official stressed the importance of Israel's \"Independent institutions\" for its \"Thriving democracy\" after the country's new government revealed a plan to pass laws that would weaken the Supreme Court.\nState of play: Senior Israeli legal experts and former and current Supreme Court judges see the plan as a way for the government to significantly weaken the country's highest court by harming its independence and effectively rendering it irrelevant.\nWhat they're saying: \"Israel's independent institutions are crucial to upholding the country's thriving democracy, and our shared democratic values are at the heart of our bilateral relationship,\" a State Department spokesperson told Axios when asked about the new Israeli government's plan.\n\n\nExtended Summary \| FAQ \| Feedback \| Top keywords: plan^#1 government^#2 Israel's^#3 Israeli^#4 Court^#5", ">\n\nUndermining the balance of powers is one of the classic warning signs, I know the US gets crap for swinging dick on the world stage, but they’re right about this. Israel doesn’t want to end up like Poland or Hungary.", ">\n\nThis really has nothing to do with the online talking points, propaganda and other crap, this is more analogous to what Trump tried to pull during his presidency. \nNot everything is about the one aspect of foreign policy you care about.", ">\n\nThe U.S. isn't much better off since Trump packed the Supreme Court with conservative partisan hacks.", ">\n\nThat's not what \"independence\" means in this context. Appointing justices is something the President has always done, and once they're appointed they're no longer beholden to elected officials. In Israel they're considering giving the Knesset a veto over Supreme Court decisions. That would undermine its independence.", ">\n\nIt's not enough to appoint a judge, they also have to be confirmed. The Republicans have made it clear they will never confirm another Supreme Court judge appointed by a Democrat. Democrats have floated the possibility of packing the court.\nThe Supreme Court is headed down the same path.", ">\n\n...you realize the last Supreme Court Justice was appointed by a democratic?", ">\n\nYeah and confirmed by Democrats? Republicans would not do the same thing if they had control of the chamber.", ">\n\nWell, let's examine reality.\nScalia dies. Obama nominates Merrick Garland. Republicans refuse to have a hearing, saying the election is too close.\nTrump nominates Gorsuch, and Democrats are understandably pissed. Three ultimately vote for Gorsuch.\nKavanaugh's vote was marred by sexual assault allegations. Not really a typical Supreme Court confirmation.\nFinally, Barrett was nominated after RBG died. However, RBG died closer to the election than Scalia had died in 2016. When Mitch McConnell moved to quickly confirm Barrett, where he had refused to take any action on Garland, it becomes pretty clear that a Republican majority Senate will not move forward with a nominee put forward by a Democratic President.\nMultiple Republican Senators said as much.\nRepublicans will vote for Democratic nominees when they lack the power to stop their confirmation. Democrats, meanwhile, have never prevented a Republican President from filling a Supreme Court spot, even during an election year.\nSo I'm describing the precedent after Merrick Garland and Amy Coney Barrett. A Republican majority Senate will not confirm, or even vote, on Democratic nominees.", ">\n\nNetanyahu is a cunny.", ">\n\nThey want to weaken their Supreme Court because they're getting ready to enact laws that violate their constitution.", ">\n\nIsrael doesn't have a constitution but something like that, yes.", ">\n\n\"base laws\" as you can call it", ">\n\nWhen your Judiciary loses its Independence or becomes Partisan to either the Left or Right a government can no longer be seen as Democratic. There’s no longer a check on the Populist or Partisan politicians." ]
> I don’t disagree what they’re saying, but I can’t ignore the irony either.	[ "This is the best tl;dr I could make, original reduced by 73%. (I'm a bot)\n\n\nA State Department official stressed the importance of Israel's \"Independent institutions\" for its \"Thriving democracy\" after the country's new government revealed a plan to pass laws that would weaken the Supreme Court.\nState of play: Senior Israeli legal experts and former and current Supreme Court judges see the plan as a way for the government to significantly weaken the country's highest court by harming its independence and effectively rendering it irrelevant.\nWhat they're saying: \"Israel's independent institutions are crucial to upholding the country's thriving democracy, and our shared democratic values are at the heart of our bilateral relationship,\" a State Department spokesperson told Axios when asked about the new Israeli government's plan.\n\n\nExtended Summary \| FAQ \| Feedback \| Top keywords: plan^#1 government^#2 Israel's^#3 Israeli^#4 Court^#5", ">\n\nUndermining the balance of powers is one of the classic warning signs, I know the US gets crap for swinging dick on the world stage, but they’re right about this. Israel doesn’t want to end up like Poland or Hungary.", ">\n\nThis really has nothing to do with the online talking points, propaganda and other crap, this is more analogous to what Trump tried to pull during his presidency. \nNot everything is about the one aspect of foreign policy you care about.", ">\n\nThe U.S. isn't much better off since Trump packed the Supreme Court with conservative partisan hacks.", ">\n\nThat's not what \"independence\" means in this context. Appointing justices is something the President has always done, and once they're appointed they're no longer beholden to elected officials. In Israel they're considering giving the Knesset a veto over Supreme Court decisions. That would undermine its independence.", ">\n\nIt's not enough to appoint a judge, they also have to be confirmed. The Republicans have made it clear they will never confirm another Supreme Court judge appointed by a Democrat. Democrats have floated the possibility of packing the court.\nThe Supreme Court is headed down the same path.", ">\n\n...you realize the last Supreme Court Justice was appointed by a democratic?", ">\n\nYeah and confirmed by Democrats? Republicans would not do the same thing if they had control of the chamber.", ">\n\nWell, let's examine reality.\nScalia dies. Obama nominates Merrick Garland. Republicans refuse to have a hearing, saying the election is too close.\nTrump nominates Gorsuch, and Democrats are understandably pissed. Three ultimately vote for Gorsuch.\nKavanaugh's vote was marred by sexual assault allegations. Not really a typical Supreme Court confirmation.\nFinally, Barrett was nominated after RBG died. However, RBG died closer to the election than Scalia had died in 2016. When Mitch McConnell moved to quickly confirm Barrett, where he had refused to take any action on Garland, it becomes pretty clear that a Republican majority Senate will not move forward with a nominee put forward by a Democratic President.\nMultiple Republican Senators said as much.\nRepublicans will vote for Democratic nominees when they lack the power to stop their confirmation. Democrats, meanwhile, have never prevented a Republican President from filling a Supreme Court spot, even during an election year.\nSo I'm describing the precedent after Merrick Garland and Amy Coney Barrett. A Republican majority Senate will not confirm, or even vote, on Democratic nominees.", ">\n\nNetanyahu is a cunny.", ">\n\nThey want to weaken their Supreme Court because they're getting ready to enact laws that violate their constitution.", ">\n\nIsrael doesn't have a constitution but something like that, yes.", ">\n\n\"base laws\" as you can call it", ">\n\nWhen your Judiciary loses its Independence or becomes Partisan to either the Left or Right a government can no longer be seen as Democratic. There’s no longer a check on the Populist or Partisan politicians.", ">\n\nThe supreme court is basically partisan towards the left, so they've decided to take it to the other extreme.\nThere are certain things in the reform that need to be tweaked in order to make it a good reform that will be accepted and will protect All parts of the political map. The override law should be with a large majority of at least 75/120. The general attorney should be split into two jobs, prosecutor and government attorney מייצג את הממשלה בבית משפט." ]
> Weird reading about it after every american I met in the past year (most are liberals or left leaning, but not all) complained about the american supreme court system and calling it an illegitimate institution...	[ "This is the best tl;dr I could make, original reduced by 73%. (I'm a bot)\n\n\nA State Department official stressed the importance of Israel's \"Independent institutions\" for its \"Thriving democracy\" after the country's new government revealed a plan to pass laws that would weaken the Supreme Court.\nState of play: Senior Israeli legal experts and former and current Supreme Court judges see the plan as a way for the government to significantly weaken the country's highest court by harming its independence and effectively rendering it irrelevant.\nWhat they're saying: \"Israel's independent institutions are crucial to upholding the country's thriving democracy, and our shared democratic values are at the heart of our bilateral relationship,\" a State Department spokesperson told Axios when asked about the new Israeli government's plan.\n\n\nExtended Summary \| FAQ \| Feedback \| Top keywords: plan^#1 government^#2 Israel's^#3 Israeli^#4 Court^#5", ">\n\nUndermining the balance of powers is one of the classic warning signs, I know the US gets crap for swinging dick on the world stage, but they’re right about this. Israel doesn’t want to end up like Poland or Hungary.", ">\n\nThis really has nothing to do with the online talking points, propaganda and other crap, this is more analogous to what Trump tried to pull during his presidency. \nNot everything is about the one aspect of foreign policy you care about.", ">\n\nThe U.S. isn't much better off since Trump packed the Supreme Court with conservative partisan hacks.", ">\n\nThat's not what \"independence\" means in this context. Appointing justices is something the President has always done, and once they're appointed they're no longer beholden to elected officials. In Israel they're considering giving the Knesset a veto over Supreme Court decisions. That would undermine its independence.", ">\n\nIt's not enough to appoint a judge, they also have to be confirmed. The Republicans have made it clear they will never confirm another Supreme Court judge appointed by a Democrat. Democrats have floated the possibility of packing the court.\nThe Supreme Court is headed down the same path.", ">\n\n...you realize the last Supreme Court Justice was appointed by a democratic?", ">\n\nYeah and confirmed by Democrats? Republicans would not do the same thing if they had control of the chamber.", ">\n\nWell, let's examine reality.\nScalia dies. Obama nominates Merrick Garland. Republicans refuse to have a hearing, saying the election is too close.\nTrump nominates Gorsuch, and Democrats are understandably pissed. Three ultimately vote for Gorsuch.\nKavanaugh's vote was marred by sexual assault allegations. Not really a typical Supreme Court confirmation.\nFinally, Barrett was nominated after RBG died. However, RBG died closer to the election than Scalia had died in 2016. When Mitch McConnell moved to quickly confirm Barrett, where he had refused to take any action on Garland, it becomes pretty clear that a Republican majority Senate will not move forward with a nominee put forward by a Democratic President.\nMultiple Republican Senators said as much.\nRepublicans will vote for Democratic nominees when they lack the power to stop their confirmation. Democrats, meanwhile, have never prevented a Republican President from filling a Supreme Court spot, even during an election year.\nSo I'm describing the precedent after Merrick Garland and Amy Coney Barrett. A Republican majority Senate will not confirm, or even vote, on Democratic nominees.", ">\n\nNetanyahu is a cunny.", ">\n\nThey want to weaken their Supreme Court because they're getting ready to enact laws that violate their constitution.", ">\n\nIsrael doesn't have a constitution but something like that, yes.", ">\n\n\"base laws\" as you can call it", ">\n\nWhen your Judiciary loses its Independence or becomes Partisan to either the Left or Right a government can no longer be seen as Democratic. There’s no longer a check on the Populist or Partisan politicians.", ">\n\nThe supreme court is basically partisan towards the left, so they've decided to take it to the other extreme.\nThere are certain things in the reform that need to be tweaked in order to make it a good reform that will be accepted and will protect All parts of the political map. The override law should be with a large majority of at least 75/120. The general attorney should be split into two jobs, prosecutor and government attorney מייצג את הממשלה בבית משפט.", ">\n\nI don’t disagree what they’re saying, but I can’t ignore the irony either." ]
> The end of democracy as we know it!	[ "This is the best tl;dr I could make, original reduced by 73%. (I'm a bot)\n\n\nA State Department official stressed the importance of Israel's \"Independent institutions\" for its \"Thriving democracy\" after the country's new government revealed a plan to pass laws that would weaken the Supreme Court.\nState of play: Senior Israeli legal experts and former and current Supreme Court judges see the plan as a way for the government to significantly weaken the country's highest court by harming its independence and effectively rendering it irrelevant.\nWhat they're saying: \"Israel's independent institutions are crucial to upholding the country's thriving democracy, and our shared democratic values are at the heart of our bilateral relationship,\" a State Department spokesperson told Axios when asked about the new Israeli government's plan.\n\n\nExtended Summary \| FAQ \| Feedback \| Top keywords: plan^#1 government^#2 Israel's^#3 Israeli^#4 Court^#5", ">\n\nUndermining the balance of powers is one of the classic warning signs, I know the US gets crap for swinging dick on the world stage, but they’re right about this. Israel doesn’t want to end up like Poland or Hungary.", ">\n\nThis really has nothing to do with the online talking points, propaganda and other crap, this is more analogous to what Trump tried to pull during his presidency. \nNot everything is about the one aspect of foreign policy you care about.", ">\n\nThe U.S. isn't much better off since Trump packed the Supreme Court with conservative partisan hacks.", ">\n\nThat's not what \"independence\" means in this context. Appointing justices is something the President has always done, and once they're appointed they're no longer beholden to elected officials. In Israel they're considering giving the Knesset a veto over Supreme Court decisions. That would undermine its independence.", ">\n\nIt's not enough to appoint a judge, they also have to be confirmed. The Republicans have made it clear they will never confirm another Supreme Court judge appointed by a Democrat. Democrats have floated the possibility of packing the court.\nThe Supreme Court is headed down the same path.", ">\n\n...you realize the last Supreme Court Justice was appointed by a democratic?", ">\n\nYeah and confirmed by Democrats? Republicans would not do the same thing if they had control of the chamber.", ">\n\nWell, let's examine reality.\nScalia dies. Obama nominates Merrick Garland. Republicans refuse to have a hearing, saying the election is too close.\nTrump nominates Gorsuch, and Democrats are understandably pissed. Three ultimately vote for Gorsuch.\nKavanaugh's vote was marred by sexual assault allegations. Not really a typical Supreme Court confirmation.\nFinally, Barrett was nominated after RBG died. However, RBG died closer to the election than Scalia had died in 2016. When Mitch McConnell moved to quickly confirm Barrett, where he had refused to take any action on Garland, it becomes pretty clear that a Republican majority Senate will not move forward with a nominee put forward by a Democratic President.\nMultiple Republican Senators said as much.\nRepublicans will vote for Democratic nominees when they lack the power to stop their confirmation. Democrats, meanwhile, have never prevented a Republican President from filling a Supreme Court spot, even during an election year.\nSo I'm describing the precedent after Merrick Garland and Amy Coney Barrett. A Republican majority Senate will not confirm, or even vote, on Democratic nominees.", ">\n\nNetanyahu is a cunny.", ">\n\nThey want to weaken their Supreme Court because they're getting ready to enact laws that violate their constitution.", ">\n\nIsrael doesn't have a constitution but something like that, yes.", ">\n\n\"base laws\" as you can call it", ">\n\nWhen your Judiciary loses its Independence or becomes Partisan to either the Left or Right a government can no longer be seen as Democratic. There’s no longer a check on the Populist or Partisan politicians.", ">\n\nThe supreme court is basically partisan towards the left, so they've decided to take it to the other extreme.\nThere are certain things in the reform that need to be tweaked in order to make it a good reform that will be accepted and will protect All parts of the political map. The override law should be with a large majority of at least 75/120. The general attorney should be split into two jobs, prosecutor and government attorney מייצג את הממשלה בבית משפט.", ">\n\nI don’t disagree what they’re saying, but I can’t ignore the irony either.", ">\n\nWeird reading about it after every american I met in the past year (most are liberals or left leaning, but not all) complained about the american supreme court system and calling it an illegitimate institution..." ]
> Maybe Israel would stop doing all this shit if the US stopped unconditionally supporting them in every way imaginable.	[ "This is the best tl;dr I could make, original reduced by 73%. (I'm a bot)\n\n\nA State Department official stressed the importance of Israel's \"Independent institutions\" for its \"Thriving democracy\" after the country's new government revealed a plan to pass laws that would weaken the Supreme Court.\nState of play: Senior Israeli legal experts and former and current Supreme Court judges see the plan as a way for the government to significantly weaken the country's highest court by harming its independence and effectively rendering it irrelevant.\nWhat they're saying: \"Israel's independent institutions are crucial to upholding the country's thriving democracy, and our shared democratic values are at the heart of our bilateral relationship,\" a State Department spokesperson told Axios when asked about the new Israeli government's plan.\n\n\nExtended Summary \| FAQ \| Feedback \| Top keywords: plan^#1 government^#2 Israel's^#3 Israeli^#4 Court^#5", ">\n\nUndermining the balance of powers is one of the classic warning signs, I know the US gets crap for swinging dick on the world stage, but they’re right about this. Israel doesn’t want to end up like Poland or Hungary.", ">\n\nThis really has nothing to do with the online talking points, propaganda and other crap, this is more analogous to what Trump tried to pull during his presidency. \nNot everything is about the one aspect of foreign policy you care about.", ">\n\nThe U.S. isn't much better off since Trump packed the Supreme Court with conservative partisan hacks.", ">\n\nThat's not what \"independence\" means in this context. Appointing justices is something the President has always done, and once they're appointed they're no longer beholden to elected officials. In Israel they're considering giving the Knesset a veto over Supreme Court decisions. That would undermine its independence.", ">\n\nIt's not enough to appoint a judge, they also have to be confirmed. The Republicans have made it clear they will never confirm another Supreme Court judge appointed by a Democrat. Democrats have floated the possibility of packing the court.\nThe Supreme Court is headed down the same path.", ">\n\n...you realize the last Supreme Court Justice was appointed by a democratic?", ">\n\nYeah and confirmed by Democrats? Republicans would not do the same thing if they had control of the chamber.", ">\n\nWell, let's examine reality.\nScalia dies. Obama nominates Merrick Garland. Republicans refuse to have a hearing, saying the election is too close.\nTrump nominates Gorsuch, and Democrats are understandably pissed. Three ultimately vote for Gorsuch.\nKavanaugh's vote was marred by sexual assault allegations. Not really a typical Supreme Court confirmation.\nFinally, Barrett was nominated after RBG died. However, RBG died closer to the election than Scalia had died in 2016. When Mitch McConnell moved to quickly confirm Barrett, where he had refused to take any action on Garland, it becomes pretty clear that a Republican majority Senate will not move forward with a nominee put forward by a Democratic President.\nMultiple Republican Senators said as much.\nRepublicans will vote for Democratic nominees when they lack the power to stop their confirmation. Democrats, meanwhile, have never prevented a Republican President from filling a Supreme Court spot, even during an election year.\nSo I'm describing the precedent after Merrick Garland and Amy Coney Barrett. A Republican majority Senate will not confirm, or even vote, on Democratic nominees.", ">\n\nNetanyahu is a cunny.", ">\n\nThey want to weaken their Supreme Court because they're getting ready to enact laws that violate their constitution.", ">\n\nIsrael doesn't have a constitution but something like that, yes.", ">\n\n\"base laws\" as you can call it", ">\n\nWhen your Judiciary loses its Independence or becomes Partisan to either the Left or Right a government can no longer be seen as Democratic. There’s no longer a check on the Populist or Partisan politicians.", ">\n\nThe supreme court is basically partisan towards the left, so they've decided to take it to the other extreme.\nThere are certain things in the reform that need to be tweaked in order to make it a good reform that will be accepted and will protect All parts of the political map. The override law should be with a large majority of at least 75/120. The general attorney should be split into two jobs, prosecutor and government attorney מייצג את הממשלה בבית משפט.", ">\n\nI don’t disagree what they’re saying, but I can’t ignore the irony either.", ">\n\nWeird reading about it after every american I met in the past year (most are liberals or left leaning, but not all) complained about the american supreme court system and calling it an illegitimate institution...", ">\n\nThe end of democracy as we know it!" ]
> And lose all the profits to be made off of bombing brown people?	[ "This is the best tl;dr I could make, original reduced by 73%. (I'm a bot)\n\n\nA State Department official stressed the importance of Israel's \"Independent institutions\" for its \"Thriving democracy\" after the country's new government revealed a plan to pass laws that would weaken the Supreme Court.\nState of play: Senior Israeli legal experts and former and current Supreme Court judges see the plan as a way for the government to significantly weaken the country's highest court by harming its independence and effectively rendering it irrelevant.\nWhat they're saying: \"Israel's independent institutions are crucial to upholding the country's thriving democracy, and our shared democratic values are at the heart of our bilateral relationship,\" a State Department spokesperson told Axios when asked about the new Israeli government's plan.\n\n\nExtended Summary \| FAQ \| Feedback \| Top keywords: plan^#1 government^#2 Israel's^#3 Israeli^#4 Court^#5", ">\n\nUndermining the balance of powers is one of the classic warning signs, I know the US gets crap for swinging dick on the world stage, but they’re right about this. Israel doesn’t want to end up like Poland or Hungary.", ">\n\nThis really has nothing to do with the online talking points, propaganda and other crap, this is more analogous to what Trump tried to pull during his presidency. \nNot everything is about the one aspect of foreign policy you care about.", ">\n\nThe U.S. isn't much better off since Trump packed the Supreme Court with conservative partisan hacks.", ">\n\nThat's not what \"independence\" means in this context. Appointing justices is something the President has always done, and once they're appointed they're no longer beholden to elected officials. In Israel they're considering giving the Knesset a veto over Supreme Court decisions. That would undermine its independence.", ">\n\nIt's not enough to appoint a judge, they also have to be confirmed. The Republicans have made it clear they will never confirm another Supreme Court judge appointed by a Democrat. Democrats have floated the possibility of packing the court.\nThe Supreme Court is headed down the same path.", ">\n\n...you realize the last Supreme Court Justice was appointed by a democratic?", ">\n\nYeah and confirmed by Democrats? Republicans would not do the same thing if they had control of the chamber.", ">\n\nWell, let's examine reality.\nScalia dies. Obama nominates Merrick Garland. Republicans refuse to have a hearing, saying the election is too close.\nTrump nominates Gorsuch, and Democrats are understandably pissed. Three ultimately vote for Gorsuch.\nKavanaugh's vote was marred by sexual assault allegations. Not really a typical Supreme Court confirmation.\nFinally, Barrett was nominated after RBG died. However, RBG died closer to the election than Scalia had died in 2016. When Mitch McConnell moved to quickly confirm Barrett, where he had refused to take any action on Garland, it becomes pretty clear that a Republican majority Senate will not move forward with a nominee put forward by a Democratic President.\nMultiple Republican Senators said as much.\nRepublicans will vote for Democratic nominees when they lack the power to stop their confirmation. Democrats, meanwhile, have never prevented a Republican President from filling a Supreme Court spot, even during an election year.\nSo I'm describing the precedent after Merrick Garland and Amy Coney Barrett. A Republican majority Senate will not confirm, or even vote, on Democratic nominees.", ">\n\nNetanyahu is a cunny.", ">\n\nThey want to weaken their Supreme Court because they're getting ready to enact laws that violate their constitution.", ">\n\nIsrael doesn't have a constitution but something like that, yes.", ">\n\n\"base laws\" as you can call it", ">\n\nWhen your Judiciary loses its Independence or becomes Partisan to either the Left or Right a government can no longer be seen as Democratic. There’s no longer a check on the Populist or Partisan politicians.", ">\n\nThe supreme court is basically partisan towards the left, so they've decided to take it to the other extreme.\nThere are certain things in the reform that need to be tweaked in order to make it a good reform that will be accepted and will protect All parts of the political map. The override law should be with a large majority of at least 75/120. The general attorney should be split into two jobs, prosecutor and government attorney מייצג את הממשלה בבית משפט.", ">\n\nI don’t disagree what they’re saying, but I can’t ignore the irony either.", ">\n\nWeird reading about it after every american I met in the past year (most are liberals or left leaning, but not all) complained about the american supreme court system and calling it an illegitimate institution...", ">\n\nThe end of democracy as we know it!", ">\n\nMaybe Israel would stop doing all this shit if the US stopped unconditionally supporting them in every way imaginable." ]
> Of course they do, far right Benni is in power again. Israelis must have got bored because of the lack of Muslim oppression and voted him back in.	[ "This is the best tl;dr I could make, original reduced by 73%. (I'm a bot)\n\n\nA State Department official stressed the importance of Israel's \"Independent institutions\" for its \"Thriving democracy\" after the country's new government revealed a plan to pass laws that would weaken the Supreme Court.\nState of play: Senior Israeli legal experts and former and current Supreme Court judges see the plan as a way for the government to significantly weaken the country's highest court by harming its independence and effectively rendering it irrelevant.\nWhat they're saying: \"Israel's independent institutions are crucial to upholding the country's thriving democracy, and our shared democratic values are at the heart of our bilateral relationship,\" a State Department spokesperson told Axios when asked about the new Israeli government's plan.\n\n\nExtended Summary \| FAQ \| Feedback \| Top keywords: plan^#1 government^#2 Israel's^#3 Israeli^#4 Court^#5", ">\n\nUndermining the balance of powers is one of the classic warning signs, I know the US gets crap for swinging dick on the world stage, but they’re right about this. Israel doesn’t want to end up like Poland or Hungary.", ">\n\nThis really has nothing to do with the online talking points, propaganda and other crap, this is more analogous to what Trump tried to pull during his presidency. \nNot everything is about the one aspect of foreign policy you care about.", ">\n\nThe U.S. isn't much better off since Trump packed the Supreme Court with conservative partisan hacks.", ">\n\nThat's not what \"independence\" means in this context. Appointing justices is something the President has always done, and once they're appointed they're no longer beholden to elected officials. In Israel they're considering giving the Knesset a veto over Supreme Court decisions. That would undermine its independence.", ">\n\nIt's not enough to appoint a judge, they also have to be confirmed. The Republicans have made it clear they will never confirm another Supreme Court judge appointed by a Democrat. Democrats have floated the possibility of packing the court.\nThe Supreme Court is headed down the same path.", ">\n\n...you realize the last Supreme Court Justice was appointed by a democratic?", ">\n\nYeah and confirmed by Democrats? Republicans would not do the same thing if they had control of the chamber.", ">\n\nWell, let's examine reality.\nScalia dies. Obama nominates Merrick Garland. Republicans refuse to have a hearing, saying the election is too close.\nTrump nominates Gorsuch, and Democrats are understandably pissed. Three ultimately vote for Gorsuch.\nKavanaugh's vote was marred by sexual assault allegations. Not really a typical Supreme Court confirmation.\nFinally, Barrett was nominated after RBG died. However, RBG died closer to the election than Scalia had died in 2016. When Mitch McConnell moved to quickly confirm Barrett, where he had refused to take any action on Garland, it becomes pretty clear that a Republican majority Senate will not move forward with a nominee put forward by a Democratic President.\nMultiple Republican Senators said as much.\nRepublicans will vote for Democratic nominees when they lack the power to stop their confirmation. Democrats, meanwhile, have never prevented a Republican President from filling a Supreme Court spot, even during an election year.\nSo I'm describing the precedent after Merrick Garland and Amy Coney Barrett. A Republican majority Senate will not confirm, or even vote, on Democratic nominees.", ">\n\nNetanyahu is a cunny.", ">\n\nThey want to weaken their Supreme Court because they're getting ready to enact laws that violate their constitution.", ">\n\nIsrael doesn't have a constitution but something like that, yes.", ">\n\n\"base laws\" as you can call it", ">\n\nWhen your Judiciary loses its Independence or becomes Partisan to either the Left or Right a government can no longer be seen as Democratic. There’s no longer a check on the Populist or Partisan politicians.", ">\n\nThe supreme court is basically partisan towards the left, so they've decided to take it to the other extreme.\nThere are certain things in the reform that need to be tweaked in order to make it a good reform that will be accepted and will protect All parts of the political map. The override law should be with a large majority of at least 75/120. The general attorney should be split into two jobs, prosecutor and government attorney מייצג את הממשלה בבית משפט.", ">\n\nI don’t disagree what they’re saying, but I can’t ignore the irony either.", ">\n\nWeird reading about it after every american I met in the past year (most are liberals or left leaning, but not all) complained about the american supreme court system and calling it an illegitimate institution...", ">\n\nThe end of democracy as we know it!", ">\n\nMaybe Israel would stop doing all this shit if the US stopped unconditionally supporting them in every way imaginable.", ">\n\nAnd lose all the profits to be made off of bombing brown people?" ]
> Yes, netanyahu was voted in with 120 seats because as we all know all of Israel is a monolith!	[ "This is the best tl;dr I could make, original reduced by 73%. (I'm a bot)\n\n\nA State Department official stressed the importance of Israel's \"Independent institutions\" for its \"Thriving democracy\" after the country's new government revealed a plan to pass laws that would weaken the Supreme Court.\nState of play: Senior Israeli legal experts and former and current Supreme Court judges see the plan as a way for the government to significantly weaken the country's highest court by harming its independence and effectively rendering it irrelevant.\nWhat they're saying: \"Israel's independent institutions are crucial to upholding the country's thriving democracy, and our shared democratic values are at the heart of our bilateral relationship,\" a State Department spokesperson told Axios when asked about the new Israeli government's plan.\n\n\nExtended Summary \| FAQ \| Feedback \| Top keywords: plan^#1 government^#2 Israel's^#3 Israeli^#4 Court^#5", ">\n\nUndermining the balance of powers is one of the classic warning signs, I know the US gets crap for swinging dick on the world stage, but they’re right about this. Israel doesn’t want to end up like Poland or Hungary.", ">\n\nThis really has nothing to do with the online talking points, propaganda and other crap, this is more analogous to what Trump tried to pull during his presidency. \nNot everything is about the one aspect of foreign policy you care about.", ">\n\nThe U.S. isn't much better off since Trump packed the Supreme Court with conservative partisan hacks.", ">\n\nThat's not what \"independence\" means in this context. Appointing justices is something the President has always done, and once they're appointed they're no longer beholden to elected officials. In Israel they're considering giving the Knesset a veto over Supreme Court decisions. That would undermine its independence.", ">\n\nIt's not enough to appoint a judge, they also have to be confirmed. The Republicans have made it clear they will never confirm another Supreme Court judge appointed by a Democrat. Democrats have floated the possibility of packing the court.\nThe Supreme Court is headed down the same path.", ">\n\n...you realize the last Supreme Court Justice was appointed by a democratic?", ">\n\nYeah and confirmed by Democrats? Republicans would not do the same thing if they had control of the chamber.", ">\n\nWell, let's examine reality.\nScalia dies. Obama nominates Merrick Garland. Republicans refuse to have a hearing, saying the election is too close.\nTrump nominates Gorsuch, and Democrats are understandably pissed. Three ultimately vote for Gorsuch.\nKavanaugh's vote was marred by sexual assault allegations. Not really a typical Supreme Court confirmation.\nFinally, Barrett was nominated after RBG died. However, RBG died closer to the election than Scalia had died in 2016. When Mitch McConnell moved to quickly confirm Barrett, where he had refused to take any action on Garland, it becomes pretty clear that a Republican majority Senate will not move forward with a nominee put forward by a Democratic President.\nMultiple Republican Senators said as much.\nRepublicans will vote for Democratic nominees when they lack the power to stop their confirmation. Democrats, meanwhile, have never prevented a Republican President from filling a Supreme Court spot, even during an election year.\nSo I'm describing the precedent after Merrick Garland and Amy Coney Barrett. A Republican majority Senate will not confirm, or even vote, on Democratic nominees.", ">\n\nNetanyahu is a cunny.", ">\n\nThey want to weaken their Supreme Court because they're getting ready to enact laws that violate their constitution.", ">\n\nIsrael doesn't have a constitution but something like that, yes.", ">\n\n\"base laws\" as you can call it", ">\n\nWhen your Judiciary loses its Independence or becomes Partisan to either the Left or Right a government can no longer be seen as Democratic. There’s no longer a check on the Populist or Partisan politicians.", ">\n\nThe supreme court is basically partisan towards the left, so they've decided to take it to the other extreme.\nThere are certain things in the reform that need to be tweaked in order to make it a good reform that will be accepted and will protect All parts of the political map. The override law should be with a large majority of at least 75/120. The general attorney should be split into two jobs, prosecutor and government attorney מייצג את הממשלה בבית משפט.", ">\n\nI don’t disagree what they’re saying, but I can’t ignore the irony either.", ">\n\nWeird reading about it after every american I met in the past year (most are liberals or left leaning, but not all) complained about the american supreme court system and calling it an illegitimate institution...", ">\n\nThe end of democracy as we know it!", ">\n\nMaybe Israel would stop doing all this shit if the US stopped unconditionally supporting them in every way imaginable.", ">\n\nAnd lose all the profits to be made off of bombing brown people?", ">\n\nOf course they do, far right Benni is in power again. Israelis must have got bored because of the lack of Muslim oppression and voted him back in." ]
> So going from a gang of judges that choose who replaces them when its time to retire, to having the kinesset which can have either the left or right and have said people being certified lawyers and former judges sitting in knesset seats vote on who will be a Supreme Court Judge is somehow making israel less democratic? Israel is trying to amaricanize its government while the US is losing its shit because I guess that's a bad thing. Just like most news today, this is mostly just gaslighting at full throttle.	[ "This is the best tl;dr I could make, original reduced by 73%. (I'm a bot)\n\n\nA State Department official stressed the importance of Israel's \"Independent institutions\" for its \"Thriving democracy\" after the country's new government revealed a plan to pass laws that would weaken the Supreme Court.\nState of play: Senior Israeli legal experts and former and current Supreme Court judges see the plan as a way for the government to significantly weaken the country's highest court by harming its independence and effectively rendering it irrelevant.\nWhat they're saying: \"Israel's independent institutions are crucial to upholding the country's thriving democracy, and our shared democratic values are at the heart of our bilateral relationship,\" a State Department spokesperson told Axios when asked about the new Israeli government's plan.\n\n\nExtended Summary \| FAQ \| Feedback \| Top keywords: plan^#1 government^#2 Israel's^#3 Israeli^#4 Court^#5", ">\n\nUndermining the balance of powers is one of the classic warning signs, I know the US gets crap for swinging dick on the world stage, but they’re right about this. Israel doesn’t want to end up like Poland or Hungary.", ">\n\nThis really has nothing to do with the online talking points, propaganda and other crap, this is more analogous to what Trump tried to pull during his presidency. \nNot everything is about the one aspect of foreign policy you care about.", ">\n\nThe U.S. isn't much better off since Trump packed the Supreme Court with conservative partisan hacks.", ">\n\nThat's not what \"independence\" means in this context. Appointing justices is something the President has always done, and once they're appointed they're no longer beholden to elected officials. In Israel they're considering giving the Knesset a veto over Supreme Court decisions. That would undermine its independence.", ">\n\nIt's not enough to appoint a judge, they also have to be confirmed. The Republicans have made it clear they will never confirm another Supreme Court judge appointed by a Democrat. Democrats have floated the possibility of packing the court.\nThe Supreme Court is headed down the same path.", ">\n\n...you realize the last Supreme Court Justice was appointed by a democratic?", ">\n\nYeah and confirmed by Democrats? Republicans would not do the same thing if they had control of the chamber.", ">\n\nWell, let's examine reality.\nScalia dies. Obama nominates Merrick Garland. Republicans refuse to have a hearing, saying the election is too close.\nTrump nominates Gorsuch, and Democrats are understandably pissed. Three ultimately vote for Gorsuch.\nKavanaugh's vote was marred by sexual assault allegations. Not really a typical Supreme Court confirmation.\nFinally, Barrett was nominated after RBG died. However, RBG died closer to the election than Scalia had died in 2016. When Mitch McConnell moved to quickly confirm Barrett, where he had refused to take any action on Garland, it becomes pretty clear that a Republican majority Senate will not move forward with a nominee put forward by a Democratic President.\nMultiple Republican Senators said as much.\nRepublicans will vote for Democratic nominees when they lack the power to stop their confirmation. Democrats, meanwhile, have never prevented a Republican President from filling a Supreme Court spot, even during an election year.\nSo I'm describing the precedent after Merrick Garland and Amy Coney Barrett. A Republican majority Senate will not confirm, or even vote, on Democratic nominees.", ">\n\nNetanyahu is a cunny.", ">\n\nThey want to weaken their Supreme Court because they're getting ready to enact laws that violate their constitution.", ">\n\nIsrael doesn't have a constitution but something like that, yes.", ">\n\n\"base laws\" as you can call it", ">\n\nWhen your Judiciary loses its Independence or becomes Partisan to either the Left or Right a government can no longer be seen as Democratic. There’s no longer a check on the Populist or Partisan politicians.", ">\n\nThe supreme court is basically partisan towards the left, so they've decided to take it to the other extreme.\nThere are certain things in the reform that need to be tweaked in order to make it a good reform that will be accepted and will protect All parts of the political map. The override law should be with a large majority of at least 75/120. The general attorney should be split into two jobs, prosecutor and government attorney מייצג את הממשלה בבית משפט.", ">\n\nI don’t disagree what they’re saying, but I can’t ignore the irony either.", ">\n\nWeird reading about it after every american I met in the past year (most are liberals or left leaning, but not all) complained about the american supreme court system and calling it an illegitimate institution...", ">\n\nThe end of democracy as we know it!", ">\n\nMaybe Israel would stop doing all this shit if the US stopped unconditionally supporting them in every way imaginable.", ">\n\nAnd lose all the profits to be made off of bombing brown people?", ">\n\nOf course they do, far right Benni is in power again. Israelis must have got bored because of the lack of Muslim oppression and voted him back in.", ">\n\nYes, netanyahu was voted in with 120 seats because as we all know all of Israel is a monolith!" ]
> יהיה לשופטים זכות וטו. הבעיה היא חוק ההתבגרות עם רק 61. צריך שזה יהיה לפחות 75	[ "This is the best tl;dr I could make, original reduced by 73%. (I'm a bot)\n\n\nA State Department official stressed the importance of Israel's \"Independent institutions\" for its \"Thriving democracy\" after the country's new government revealed a plan to pass laws that would weaken the Supreme Court.\nState of play: Senior Israeli legal experts and former and current Supreme Court judges see the plan as a way for the government to significantly weaken the country's highest court by harming its independence and effectively rendering it irrelevant.\nWhat they're saying: \"Israel's independent institutions are crucial to upholding the country's thriving democracy, and our shared democratic values are at the heart of our bilateral relationship,\" a State Department spokesperson told Axios when asked about the new Israeli government's plan.\n\n\nExtended Summary \| FAQ \| Feedback \| Top keywords: plan^#1 government^#2 Israel's^#3 Israeli^#4 Court^#5", ">\n\nUndermining the balance of powers is one of the classic warning signs, I know the US gets crap for swinging dick on the world stage, but they’re right about this. Israel doesn’t want to end up like Poland or Hungary.", ">\n\nThis really has nothing to do with the online talking points, propaganda and other crap, this is more analogous to what Trump tried to pull during his presidency. \nNot everything is about the one aspect of foreign policy you care about.", ">\n\nThe U.S. isn't much better off since Trump packed the Supreme Court with conservative partisan hacks.", ">\n\nThat's not what \"independence\" means in this context. Appointing justices is something the President has always done, and once they're appointed they're no longer beholden to elected officials. In Israel they're considering giving the Knesset a veto over Supreme Court decisions. That would undermine its independence.", ">\n\nIt's not enough to appoint a judge, they also have to be confirmed. The Republicans have made it clear they will never confirm another Supreme Court judge appointed by a Democrat. Democrats have floated the possibility of packing the court.\nThe Supreme Court is headed down the same path.", ">\n\n...you realize the last Supreme Court Justice was appointed by a democratic?", ">\n\nYeah and confirmed by Democrats? Republicans would not do the same thing if they had control of the chamber.", ">\n\nWell, let's examine reality.\nScalia dies. Obama nominates Merrick Garland. Republicans refuse to have a hearing, saying the election is too close.\nTrump nominates Gorsuch, and Democrats are understandably pissed. Three ultimately vote for Gorsuch.\nKavanaugh's vote was marred by sexual assault allegations. Not really a typical Supreme Court confirmation.\nFinally, Barrett was nominated after RBG died. However, RBG died closer to the election than Scalia had died in 2016. When Mitch McConnell moved to quickly confirm Barrett, where he had refused to take any action on Garland, it becomes pretty clear that a Republican majority Senate will not move forward with a nominee put forward by a Democratic President.\nMultiple Republican Senators said as much.\nRepublicans will vote for Democratic nominees when they lack the power to stop their confirmation. Democrats, meanwhile, have never prevented a Republican President from filling a Supreme Court spot, even during an election year.\nSo I'm describing the precedent after Merrick Garland and Amy Coney Barrett. A Republican majority Senate will not confirm, or even vote, on Democratic nominees.", ">\n\nNetanyahu is a cunny.", ">\n\nThey want to weaken their Supreme Court because they're getting ready to enact laws that violate their constitution.", ">\n\nIsrael doesn't have a constitution but something like that, yes.", ">\n\n\"base laws\" as you can call it", ">\n\nWhen your Judiciary loses its Independence or becomes Partisan to either the Left or Right a government can no longer be seen as Democratic. There’s no longer a check on the Populist or Partisan politicians.", ">\n\nThe supreme court is basically partisan towards the left, so they've decided to take it to the other extreme.\nThere are certain things in the reform that need to be tweaked in order to make it a good reform that will be accepted and will protect All parts of the political map. The override law should be with a large majority of at least 75/120. The general attorney should be split into two jobs, prosecutor and government attorney מייצג את הממשלה בבית משפט.", ">\n\nI don’t disagree what they’re saying, but I can’t ignore the irony either.", ">\n\nWeird reading about it after every american I met in the past year (most are liberals or left leaning, but not all) complained about the american supreme court system and calling it an illegitimate institution...", ">\n\nThe end of democracy as we know it!", ">\n\nMaybe Israel would stop doing all this shit if the US stopped unconditionally supporting them in every way imaginable.", ">\n\nAnd lose all the profits to be made off of bombing brown people?", ">\n\nOf course they do, far right Benni is in power again. Israelis must have got bored because of the lack of Muslim oppression and voted him back in.", ">\n\nYes, netanyahu was voted in with 120 seats because as we all know all of Israel is a monolith!", ">\n\nSo going from a gang of judges that choose who replaces them when its time to retire, to having the kinesset which can have either the left or right and have said people being certified lawyers and former judges sitting in knesset seats vote on who will be a Supreme Court Judge is somehow making israel less democratic? Israel is trying to amaricanize its government while the US is losing its shit because I guess that's a bad thing. Just like most news today, this is mostly just gaslighting at full throttle." ]
> בשביל מדינה דו מפלגות כמו ארה"ב ממש כן, ישראל יש יותר מידי מפלגים שיושבים ביחד אז 75 לא יעבוד בחיים. בממשלה של צד אחד זה ניראה לא טוב אבל ממשלה אחדות זה יכול להיות טוב	[ "This is the best tl;dr I could make, original reduced by 73%. (I'm a bot)\n\n\nA State Department official stressed the importance of Israel's \"Independent institutions\" for its \"Thriving democracy\" after the country's new government revealed a plan to pass laws that would weaken the Supreme Court.\nState of play: Senior Israeli legal experts and former and current Supreme Court judges see the plan as a way for the government to significantly weaken the country's highest court by harming its independence and effectively rendering it irrelevant.\nWhat they're saying: \"Israel's independent institutions are crucial to upholding the country's thriving democracy, and our shared democratic values are at the heart of our bilateral relationship,\" a State Department spokesperson told Axios when asked about the new Israeli government's plan.\n\n\nExtended Summary \| FAQ \| Feedback \| Top keywords: plan^#1 government^#2 Israel's^#3 Israeli^#4 Court^#5", ">\n\nUndermining the balance of powers is one of the classic warning signs, I know the US gets crap for swinging dick on the world stage, but they’re right about this. Israel doesn’t want to end up like Poland or Hungary.", ">\n\nThis really has nothing to do with the online talking points, propaganda and other crap, this is more analogous to what Trump tried to pull during his presidency. \nNot everything is about the one aspect of foreign policy you care about.", ">\n\nThe U.S. isn't much better off since Trump packed the Supreme Court with conservative partisan hacks.", ">\n\nThat's not what \"independence\" means in this context. Appointing justices is something the President has always done, and once they're appointed they're no longer beholden to elected officials. In Israel they're considering giving the Knesset a veto over Supreme Court decisions. That would undermine its independence.", ">\n\nIt's not enough to appoint a judge, they also have to be confirmed. The Republicans have made it clear they will never confirm another Supreme Court judge appointed by a Democrat. Democrats have floated the possibility of packing the court.\nThe Supreme Court is headed down the same path.", ">\n\n...you realize the last Supreme Court Justice was appointed by a democratic?", ">\n\nYeah and confirmed by Democrats? Republicans would not do the same thing if they had control of the chamber.", ">\n\nWell, let's examine reality.\nScalia dies. Obama nominates Merrick Garland. Republicans refuse to have a hearing, saying the election is too close.\nTrump nominates Gorsuch, and Democrats are understandably pissed. Three ultimately vote for Gorsuch.\nKavanaugh's vote was marred by sexual assault allegations. Not really a typical Supreme Court confirmation.\nFinally, Barrett was nominated after RBG died. However, RBG died closer to the election than Scalia had died in 2016. When Mitch McConnell moved to quickly confirm Barrett, where he had refused to take any action on Garland, it becomes pretty clear that a Republican majority Senate will not move forward with a nominee put forward by a Democratic President.\nMultiple Republican Senators said as much.\nRepublicans will vote for Democratic nominees when they lack the power to stop their confirmation. Democrats, meanwhile, have never prevented a Republican President from filling a Supreme Court spot, even during an election year.\nSo I'm describing the precedent after Merrick Garland and Amy Coney Barrett. A Republican majority Senate will not confirm, or even vote, on Democratic nominees.", ">\n\nNetanyahu is a cunny.", ">\n\nThey want to weaken their Supreme Court because they're getting ready to enact laws that violate their constitution.", ">\n\nIsrael doesn't have a constitution but something like that, yes.", ">\n\n\"base laws\" as you can call it", ">\n\nWhen your Judiciary loses its Independence or becomes Partisan to either the Left or Right a government can no longer be seen as Democratic. There’s no longer a check on the Populist or Partisan politicians.", ">\n\nThe supreme court is basically partisan towards the left, so they've decided to take it to the other extreme.\nThere are certain things in the reform that need to be tweaked in order to make it a good reform that will be accepted and will protect All parts of the political map. The override law should be with a large majority of at least 75/120. The general attorney should be split into two jobs, prosecutor and government attorney מייצג את הממשלה בבית משפט.", ">\n\nI don’t disagree what they’re saying, but I can’t ignore the irony either.", ">\n\nWeird reading about it after every american I met in the past year (most are liberals or left leaning, but not all) complained about the american supreme court system and calling it an illegitimate institution...", ">\n\nThe end of democracy as we know it!", ">\n\nMaybe Israel would stop doing all this shit if the US stopped unconditionally supporting them in every way imaginable.", ">\n\nAnd lose all the profits to be made off of bombing brown people?", ">\n\nOf course they do, far right Benni is in power again. Israelis must have got bored because of the lack of Muslim oppression and voted him back in.", ">\n\nYes, netanyahu was voted in with 120 seats because as we all know all of Israel is a monolith!", ">\n\nSo going from a gang of judges that choose who replaces them when its time to retire, to having the kinesset which can have either the left or right and have said people being certified lawyers and former judges sitting in knesset seats vote on who will be a Supreme Court Judge is somehow making israel less democratic? Israel is trying to amaricanize its government while the US is losing its shit because I guess that's a bad thing. Just like most news today, this is mostly just gaslighting at full throttle.", ">\n\nיהיה לשופטים זכות וטו. הבעיה היא חוק ההתבגרות עם רק 61. צריך שזה יהיה לפחות 75" ]
> זה צריך להיות כמו הפלת יו"ר כנסת. כלומר אמירה של כוחות פוליטיים עויינים שבית משפט עבר את הגבול.	[ "This is the best tl;dr I could make, original reduced by 73%. (I'm a bot)\n\n\nA State Department official stressed the importance of Israel's \"Independent institutions\" for its \"Thriving democracy\" after the country's new government revealed a plan to pass laws that would weaken the Supreme Court.\nState of play: Senior Israeli legal experts and former and current Supreme Court judges see the plan as a way for the government to significantly weaken the country's highest court by harming its independence and effectively rendering it irrelevant.\nWhat they're saying: \"Israel's independent institutions are crucial to upholding the country's thriving democracy, and our shared democratic values are at the heart of our bilateral relationship,\" a State Department spokesperson told Axios when asked about the new Israeli government's plan.\n\n\nExtended Summary \| FAQ \| Feedback \| Top keywords: plan^#1 government^#2 Israel's^#3 Israeli^#4 Court^#5", ">\n\nUndermining the balance of powers is one of the classic warning signs, I know the US gets crap for swinging dick on the world stage, but they’re right about this. Israel doesn’t want to end up like Poland or Hungary.", ">\n\nThis really has nothing to do with the online talking points, propaganda and other crap, this is more analogous to what Trump tried to pull during his presidency. \nNot everything is about the one aspect of foreign policy you care about.", ">\n\nThe U.S. isn't much better off since Trump packed the Supreme Court with conservative partisan hacks.", ">\n\nThat's not what \"independence\" means in this context. Appointing justices is something the President has always done, and once they're appointed they're no longer beholden to elected officials. In Israel they're considering giving the Knesset a veto over Supreme Court decisions. That would undermine its independence.", ">\n\nIt's not enough to appoint a judge, they also have to be confirmed. The Republicans have made it clear they will never confirm another Supreme Court judge appointed by a Democrat. Democrats have floated the possibility of packing the court.\nThe Supreme Court is headed down the same path.", ">\n\n...you realize the last Supreme Court Justice was appointed by a democratic?", ">\n\nYeah and confirmed by Democrats? Republicans would not do the same thing if they had control of the chamber.", ">\n\nWell, let's examine reality.\nScalia dies. Obama nominates Merrick Garland. Republicans refuse to have a hearing, saying the election is too close.\nTrump nominates Gorsuch, and Democrats are understandably pissed. Three ultimately vote for Gorsuch.\nKavanaugh's vote was marred by sexual assault allegations. Not really a typical Supreme Court confirmation.\nFinally, Barrett was nominated after RBG died. However, RBG died closer to the election than Scalia had died in 2016. When Mitch McConnell moved to quickly confirm Barrett, where he had refused to take any action on Garland, it becomes pretty clear that a Republican majority Senate will not move forward with a nominee put forward by a Democratic President.\nMultiple Republican Senators said as much.\nRepublicans will vote for Democratic nominees when they lack the power to stop their confirmation. Democrats, meanwhile, have never prevented a Republican President from filling a Supreme Court spot, even during an election year.\nSo I'm describing the precedent after Merrick Garland and Amy Coney Barrett. A Republican majority Senate will not confirm, or even vote, on Democratic nominees.", ">\n\nNetanyahu is a cunny.", ">\n\nThey want to weaken their Supreme Court because they're getting ready to enact laws that violate their constitution.", ">\n\nIsrael doesn't have a constitution but something like that, yes.", ">\n\n\"base laws\" as you can call it", ">\n\nWhen your Judiciary loses its Independence or becomes Partisan to either the Left or Right a government can no longer be seen as Democratic. There’s no longer a check on the Populist or Partisan politicians.", ">\n\nThe supreme court is basically partisan towards the left, so they've decided to take it to the other extreme.\nThere are certain things in the reform that need to be tweaked in order to make it a good reform that will be accepted and will protect All parts of the political map. The override law should be with a large majority of at least 75/120. The general attorney should be split into two jobs, prosecutor and government attorney מייצג את הממשלה בבית משפט.", ">\n\nI don’t disagree what they’re saying, but I can’t ignore the irony either.", ">\n\nWeird reading about it after every american I met in the past year (most are liberals or left leaning, but not all) complained about the american supreme court system and calling it an illegitimate institution...", ">\n\nThe end of democracy as we know it!", ">\n\nMaybe Israel would stop doing all this shit if the US stopped unconditionally supporting them in every way imaginable.", ">\n\nAnd lose all the profits to be made off of bombing brown people?", ">\n\nOf course they do, far right Benni is in power again. Israelis must have got bored because of the lack of Muslim oppression and voted him back in.", ">\n\nYes, netanyahu was voted in with 120 seats because as we all know all of Israel is a monolith!", ">\n\nSo going from a gang of judges that choose who replaces them when its time to retire, to having the kinesset which can have either the left or right and have said people being certified lawyers and former judges sitting in knesset seats vote on who will be a Supreme Court Judge is somehow making israel less democratic? Israel is trying to amaricanize its government while the US is losing its shit because I guess that's a bad thing. Just like most news today, this is mostly just gaslighting at full throttle.", ">\n\nיהיה לשופטים זכות וטו. הבעיה היא חוק ההתבגרות עם רק 61. צריך שזה יהיה לפחות 75", ">\n\nבשביל מדינה דו מפלגות כמו ארה\"ב ממש כן, ישראל יש יותר מידי מפלגים שיושבים ביחד אז 75 לא יעבוד בחיים. בממשלה של צד אחד זה ניראה לא טוב אבל ממשלה אחדות זה יכול להיות טוב" ]
> It's funny, because the whole point of what the coalition wants to do is about the fact that Israel's "independent institutions" aren't independent anymore. For the last 30 years it's half a dictatorship under Bagats, which has much more power in the government than what the judges are supposed to have in a well functioning Democratic government. The people in Israel cry for decades about it already, this isn't something new and has nothing to do with Netanyahu itself. Yeah, he wants to change it - but all of the people who are actually working on it, has began their work far before Netanyahu's trials. Hell, some of them maybe before Netanyahu's ministry (I'm talking about the almost continuous ministry of now. Idk if before his first ever ministry they've worked on it). And they even show it themselves - it's a very extensive list of laws about how to actually regain control to the people and the ones chosen by the people, which was for 40 years in the Knesset itself - while unlike what others claim here, they don't undermine the point of Bagats's option to cancel something that is actually corrupt, like fascism or dictatorship. Not only will it be hard for the Knesset, with this laws, to overcome bagats - but Bagats can still overcome back and have the last point if they agree as one on something.	[ "This is the best tl;dr I could make, original reduced by 73%. (I'm a bot)\n\n\nA State Department official stressed the importance of Israel's \"Independent institutions\" for its \"Thriving democracy\" after the country's new government revealed a plan to pass laws that would weaken the Supreme Court.\nState of play: Senior Israeli legal experts and former and current Supreme Court judges see the plan as a way for the government to significantly weaken the country's highest court by harming its independence and effectively rendering it irrelevant.\nWhat they're saying: \"Israel's independent institutions are crucial to upholding the country's thriving democracy, and our shared democratic values are at the heart of our bilateral relationship,\" a State Department spokesperson told Axios when asked about the new Israeli government's plan.\n\n\nExtended Summary \| FAQ \| Feedback \| Top keywords: plan^#1 government^#2 Israel's^#3 Israeli^#4 Court^#5", ">\n\nUndermining the balance of powers is one of the classic warning signs, I know the US gets crap for swinging dick on the world stage, but they’re right about this. Israel doesn’t want to end up like Poland or Hungary.", ">\n\nThis really has nothing to do with the online talking points, propaganda and other crap, this is more analogous to what Trump tried to pull during his presidency. \nNot everything is about the one aspect of foreign policy you care about.", ">\n\nThe U.S. isn't much better off since Trump packed the Supreme Court with conservative partisan hacks.", ">\n\nThat's not what \"independence\" means in this context. Appointing justices is something the President has always done, and once they're appointed they're no longer beholden to elected officials. In Israel they're considering giving the Knesset a veto over Supreme Court decisions. That would undermine its independence.", ">\n\nIt's not enough to appoint a judge, they also have to be confirmed. The Republicans have made it clear they will never confirm another Supreme Court judge appointed by a Democrat. Democrats have floated the possibility of packing the court.\nThe Supreme Court is headed down the same path.", ">\n\n...you realize the last Supreme Court Justice was appointed by a democratic?", ">\n\nYeah and confirmed by Democrats? Republicans would not do the same thing if they had control of the chamber.", ">\n\nWell, let's examine reality.\nScalia dies. Obama nominates Merrick Garland. Republicans refuse to have a hearing, saying the election is too close.\nTrump nominates Gorsuch, and Democrats are understandably pissed. Three ultimately vote for Gorsuch.\nKavanaugh's vote was marred by sexual assault allegations. Not really a typical Supreme Court confirmation.\nFinally, Barrett was nominated after RBG died. However, RBG died closer to the election than Scalia had died in 2016. When Mitch McConnell moved to quickly confirm Barrett, where he had refused to take any action on Garland, it becomes pretty clear that a Republican majority Senate will not move forward with a nominee put forward by a Democratic President.\nMultiple Republican Senators said as much.\nRepublicans will vote for Democratic nominees when they lack the power to stop their confirmation. Democrats, meanwhile, have never prevented a Republican President from filling a Supreme Court spot, even during an election year.\nSo I'm describing the precedent after Merrick Garland and Amy Coney Barrett. A Republican majority Senate will not confirm, or even vote, on Democratic nominees.", ">\n\nNetanyahu is a cunny.", ">\n\nThey want to weaken their Supreme Court because they're getting ready to enact laws that violate their constitution.", ">\n\nIsrael doesn't have a constitution but something like that, yes.", ">\n\n\"base laws\" as you can call it", ">\n\nWhen your Judiciary loses its Independence or becomes Partisan to either the Left or Right a government can no longer be seen as Democratic. There’s no longer a check on the Populist or Partisan politicians.", ">\n\nThe supreme court is basically partisan towards the left, so they've decided to take it to the other extreme.\nThere are certain things in the reform that need to be tweaked in order to make it a good reform that will be accepted and will protect All parts of the political map. The override law should be with a large majority of at least 75/120. The general attorney should be split into two jobs, prosecutor and government attorney מייצג את הממשלה בבית משפט.", ">\n\nI don’t disagree what they’re saying, but I can’t ignore the irony either.", ">\n\nWeird reading about it after every american I met in the past year (most are liberals or left leaning, but not all) complained about the american supreme court system and calling it an illegitimate institution...", ">\n\nThe end of democracy as we know it!", ">\n\nMaybe Israel would stop doing all this shit if the US stopped unconditionally supporting them in every way imaginable.", ">\n\nAnd lose all the profits to be made off of bombing brown people?", ">\n\nOf course they do, far right Benni is in power again. Israelis must have got bored because of the lack of Muslim oppression and voted him back in.", ">\n\nYes, netanyahu was voted in with 120 seats because as we all know all of Israel is a monolith!", ">\n\nSo going from a gang of judges that choose who replaces them when its time to retire, to having the kinesset which can have either the left or right and have said people being certified lawyers and former judges sitting in knesset seats vote on who will be a Supreme Court Judge is somehow making israel less democratic? Israel is trying to amaricanize its government while the US is losing its shit because I guess that's a bad thing. Just like most news today, this is mostly just gaslighting at full throttle.", ">\n\nיהיה לשופטים זכות וטו. הבעיה היא חוק ההתבגרות עם רק 61. צריך שזה יהיה לפחות 75", ">\n\nבשביל מדינה דו מפלגות כמו ארה\"ב ממש כן, ישראל יש יותר מידי מפלגים שיושבים ביחד אז 75 לא יעבוד בחיים. בממשלה של צד אחד זה ניראה לא טוב אבל ממשלה אחדות זה יכול להיות טוב", ">\n\nזה צריך להיות כמו הפלת יו\"ר כנסת. כלומר אמירה של כוחות פוליטיים עויינים שבית משפט עבר את הגבול." ]
> There's a reason why Supere Court judges aren't chosen by the people. If they were chosen by the people, their rulings would be a political campaign rather than ruling by their core understanding of the law.	[ "This is the best tl;dr I could make, original reduced by 73%. (I'm a bot)\n\n\nA State Department official stressed the importance of Israel's \"Independent institutions\" for its \"Thriving democracy\" after the country's new government revealed a plan to pass laws that would weaken the Supreme Court.\nState of play: Senior Israeli legal experts and former and current Supreme Court judges see the plan as a way for the government to significantly weaken the country's highest court by harming its independence and effectively rendering it irrelevant.\nWhat they're saying: \"Israel's independent institutions are crucial to upholding the country's thriving democracy, and our shared democratic values are at the heart of our bilateral relationship,\" a State Department spokesperson told Axios when asked about the new Israeli government's plan.\n\n\nExtended Summary \| FAQ \| Feedback \| Top keywords: plan^#1 government^#2 Israel's^#3 Israeli^#4 Court^#5", ">\n\nUndermining the balance of powers is one of the classic warning signs, I know the US gets crap for swinging dick on the world stage, but they’re right about this. Israel doesn’t want to end up like Poland or Hungary.", ">\n\nThis really has nothing to do with the online talking points, propaganda and other crap, this is more analogous to what Trump tried to pull during his presidency. \nNot everything is about the one aspect of foreign policy you care about.", ">\n\nThe U.S. isn't much better off since Trump packed the Supreme Court with conservative partisan hacks.", ">\n\nThat's not what \"independence\" means in this context. Appointing justices is something the President has always done, and once they're appointed they're no longer beholden to elected officials. In Israel they're considering giving the Knesset a veto over Supreme Court decisions. That would undermine its independence.", ">\n\nIt's not enough to appoint a judge, they also have to be confirmed. The Republicans have made it clear they will never confirm another Supreme Court judge appointed by a Democrat. Democrats have floated the possibility of packing the court.\nThe Supreme Court is headed down the same path.", ">\n\n...you realize the last Supreme Court Justice was appointed by a democratic?", ">\n\nYeah and confirmed by Democrats? Republicans would not do the same thing if they had control of the chamber.", ">\n\nWell, let's examine reality.\nScalia dies. Obama nominates Merrick Garland. Republicans refuse to have a hearing, saying the election is too close.\nTrump nominates Gorsuch, and Democrats are understandably pissed. Three ultimately vote for Gorsuch.\nKavanaugh's vote was marred by sexual assault allegations. Not really a typical Supreme Court confirmation.\nFinally, Barrett was nominated after RBG died. However, RBG died closer to the election than Scalia had died in 2016. When Mitch McConnell moved to quickly confirm Barrett, where he had refused to take any action on Garland, it becomes pretty clear that a Republican majority Senate will not move forward with a nominee put forward by a Democratic President.\nMultiple Republican Senators said as much.\nRepublicans will vote for Democratic nominees when they lack the power to stop their confirmation. Democrats, meanwhile, have never prevented a Republican President from filling a Supreme Court spot, even during an election year.\nSo I'm describing the precedent after Merrick Garland and Amy Coney Barrett. A Republican majority Senate will not confirm, or even vote, on Democratic nominees.", ">\n\nNetanyahu is a cunny.", ">\n\nThey want to weaken their Supreme Court because they're getting ready to enact laws that violate their constitution.", ">\n\nIsrael doesn't have a constitution but something like that, yes.", ">\n\n\"base laws\" as you can call it", ">\n\nWhen your Judiciary loses its Independence or becomes Partisan to either the Left or Right a government can no longer be seen as Democratic. There’s no longer a check on the Populist or Partisan politicians.", ">\n\nThe supreme court is basically partisan towards the left, so they've decided to take it to the other extreme.\nThere are certain things in the reform that need to be tweaked in order to make it a good reform that will be accepted and will protect All parts of the political map. The override law should be with a large majority of at least 75/120. The general attorney should be split into two jobs, prosecutor and government attorney מייצג את הממשלה בבית משפט.", ">\n\nI don’t disagree what they’re saying, but I can’t ignore the irony either.", ">\n\nWeird reading about it after every american I met in the past year (most are liberals or left leaning, but not all) complained about the american supreme court system and calling it an illegitimate institution...", ">\n\nThe end of democracy as we know it!", ">\n\nMaybe Israel would stop doing all this shit if the US stopped unconditionally supporting them in every way imaginable.", ">\n\nAnd lose all the profits to be made off of bombing brown people?", ">\n\nOf course they do, far right Benni is in power again. Israelis must have got bored because of the lack of Muslim oppression and voted him back in.", ">\n\nYes, netanyahu was voted in with 120 seats because as we all know all of Israel is a monolith!", ">\n\nSo going from a gang of judges that choose who replaces them when its time to retire, to having the kinesset which can have either the left or right and have said people being certified lawyers and former judges sitting in knesset seats vote on who will be a Supreme Court Judge is somehow making israel less democratic? Israel is trying to amaricanize its government while the US is losing its shit because I guess that's a bad thing. Just like most news today, this is mostly just gaslighting at full throttle.", ">\n\nיהיה לשופטים זכות וטו. הבעיה היא חוק ההתבגרות עם רק 61. צריך שזה יהיה לפחות 75", ">\n\nבשביל מדינה דו מפלגות כמו ארה\"ב ממש כן, ישראל יש יותר מידי מפלגים שיושבים ביחד אז 75 לא יעבוד בחיים. בממשלה של צד אחד זה ניראה לא טוב אבל ממשלה אחדות זה יכול להיות טוב", ">\n\nזה צריך להיות כמו הפלת יו\"ר כנסת. כלומר אמירה של כוחות פוליטיים עויינים שבית משפט עבר את הגבול.", ">\n\nIt's funny, because the whole point of what the coalition wants to do is about the fact that Israel's \"independent institutions\" aren't independent anymore.\nFor the last 30 years it's half a dictatorship under Bagats, which has much more power in the government than what the judges are supposed to have in a well functioning Democratic government.\nThe people in Israel cry for decades about it already, this isn't something new and has nothing to do with Netanyahu itself. Yeah, he wants to change it - but all of the people who are actually working on it, has began their work far before Netanyahu's trials. Hell, some of them maybe before Netanyahu's ministry (I'm talking about the almost continuous ministry of now. Idk if before his first ever ministry they've worked on it).\nAnd they even show it themselves - it's a very extensive list of laws about how to actually regain control to the people and the ones chosen by the people, which was for 40 years in the Knesset itself - while unlike what others claim here, they don't undermine the point of Bagats's option to cancel something that is actually corrupt, like fascism or dictatorship. Not only will it be hard for the Knesset, with this laws, to overcome bagats - but Bagats can still overcome back and have the last point if they agree as one on something." ]
> In the reform the judges will have veto power on appointments. The big problem is the override law with only 61/120 it should be a large majority of at least 75/120. It should only be a tool to show the courts that they over stepped.	[ "This is the best tl;dr I could make, original reduced by 73%. (I'm a bot)\n\n\nA State Department official stressed the importance of Israel's \"Independent institutions\" for its \"Thriving democracy\" after the country's new government revealed a plan to pass laws that would weaken the Supreme Court.\nState of play: Senior Israeli legal experts and former and current Supreme Court judges see the plan as a way for the government to significantly weaken the country's highest court by harming its independence and effectively rendering it irrelevant.\nWhat they're saying: \"Israel's independent institutions are crucial to upholding the country's thriving democracy, and our shared democratic values are at the heart of our bilateral relationship,\" a State Department spokesperson told Axios when asked about the new Israeli government's plan.\n\n\nExtended Summary \| FAQ \| Feedback \| Top keywords: plan^#1 government^#2 Israel's^#3 Israeli^#4 Court^#5", ">\n\nUndermining the balance of powers is one of the classic warning signs, I know the US gets crap for swinging dick on the world stage, but they’re right about this. Israel doesn’t want to end up like Poland or Hungary.", ">\n\nThis really has nothing to do with the online talking points, propaganda and other crap, this is more analogous to what Trump tried to pull during his presidency. \nNot everything is about the one aspect of foreign policy you care about.", ">\n\nThe U.S. isn't much better off since Trump packed the Supreme Court with conservative partisan hacks.", ">\n\nThat's not what \"independence\" means in this context. Appointing justices is something the President has always done, and once they're appointed they're no longer beholden to elected officials. In Israel they're considering giving the Knesset a veto over Supreme Court decisions. That would undermine its independence.", ">\n\nIt's not enough to appoint a judge, they also have to be confirmed. The Republicans have made it clear they will never confirm another Supreme Court judge appointed by a Democrat. Democrats have floated the possibility of packing the court.\nThe Supreme Court is headed down the same path.", ">\n\n...you realize the last Supreme Court Justice was appointed by a democratic?", ">\n\nYeah and confirmed by Democrats? Republicans would not do the same thing if they had control of the chamber.", ">\n\nWell, let's examine reality.\nScalia dies. Obama nominates Merrick Garland. Republicans refuse to have a hearing, saying the election is too close.\nTrump nominates Gorsuch, and Democrats are understandably pissed. Three ultimately vote for Gorsuch.\nKavanaugh's vote was marred by sexual assault allegations. Not really a typical Supreme Court confirmation.\nFinally, Barrett was nominated after RBG died. However, RBG died closer to the election than Scalia had died in 2016. When Mitch McConnell moved to quickly confirm Barrett, where he had refused to take any action on Garland, it becomes pretty clear that a Republican majority Senate will not move forward with a nominee put forward by a Democratic President.\nMultiple Republican Senators said as much.\nRepublicans will vote for Democratic nominees when they lack the power to stop their confirmation. Democrats, meanwhile, have never prevented a Republican President from filling a Supreme Court spot, even during an election year.\nSo I'm describing the precedent after Merrick Garland and Amy Coney Barrett. A Republican majority Senate will not confirm, or even vote, on Democratic nominees.", ">\n\nNetanyahu is a cunny.", ">\n\nThey want to weaken their Supreme Court because they're getting ready to enact laws that violate their constitution.", ">\n\nIsrael doesn't have a constitution but something like that, yes.", ">\n\n\"base laws\" as you can call it", ">\n\nWhen your Judiciary loses its Independence or becomes Partisan to either the Left or Right a government can no longer be seen as Democratic. There’s no longer a check on the Populist or Partisan politicians.", ">\n\nThe supreme court is basically partisan towards the left, so they've decided to take it to the other extreme.\nThere are certain things in the reform that need to be tweaked in order to make it a good reform that will be accepted and will protect All parts of the political map. The override law should be with a large majority of at least 75/120. The general attorney should be split into two jobs, prosecutor and government attorney מייצג את הממשלה בבית משפט.", ">\n\nI don’t disagree what they’re saying, but I can’t ignore the irony either.", ">\n\nWeird reading about it after every american I met in the past year (most are liberals or left leaning, but not all) complained about the american supreme court system and calling it an illegitimate institution...", ">\n\nThe end of democracy as we know it!", ">\n\nMaybe Israel would stop doing all this shit if the US stopped unconditionally supporting them in every way imaginable.", ">\n\nAnd lose all the profits to be made off of bombing brown people?", ">\n\nOf course they do, far right Benni is in power again. Israelis must have got bored because of the lack of Muslim oppression and voted him back in.", ">\n\nYes, netanyahu was voted in with 120 seats because as we all know all of Israel is a monolith!", ">\n\nSo going from a gang of judges that choose who replaces them when its time to retire, to having the kinesset which can have either the left or right and have said people being certified lawyers and former judges sitting in knesset seats vote on who will be a Supreme Court Judge is somehow making israel less democratic? Israel is trying to amaricanize its government while the US is losing its shit because I guess that's a bad thing. Just like most news today, this is mostly just gaslighting at full throttle.", ">\n\nיהיה לשופטים זכות וטו. הבעיה היא חוק ההתבגרות עם רק 61. צריך שזה יהיה לפחות 75", ">\n\nבשביל מדינה דו מפלגות כמו ארה\"ב ממש כן, ישראל יש יותר מידי מפלגים שיושבים ביחד אז 75 לא יעבוד בחיים. בממשלה של צד אחד זה ניראה לא טוב אבל ממשלה אחדות זה יכול להיות טוב", ">\n\nזה צריך להיות כמו הפלת יו\"ר כנסת. כלומר אמירה של כוחות פוליטיים עויינים שבית משפט עבר את הגבול.", ">\n\nIt's funny, because the whole point of what the coalition wants to do is about the fact that Israel's \"independent institutions\" aren't independent anymore.\nFor the last 30 years it's half a dictatorship under Bagats, which has much more power in the government than what the judges are supposed to have in a well functioning Democratic government.\nThe people in Israel cry for decades about it already, this isn't something new and has nothing to do with Netanyahu itself. Yeah, he wants to change it - but all of the people who are actually working on it, has began their work far before Netanyahu's trials. Hell, some of them maybe before Netanyahu's ministry (I'm talking about the almost continuous ministry of now. Idk if before his first ever ministry they've worked on it).\nAnd they even show it themselves - it's a very extensive list of laws about how to actually regain control to the people and the ones chosen by the people, which was for 40 years in the Knesset itself - while unlike what others claim here, they don't undermine the point of Bagats's option to cancel something that is actually corrupt, like fascism or dictatorship. Not only will it be hard for the Knesset, with this laws, to overcome bagats - but Bagats can still overcome back and have the last point if they agree as one on something.", ">\n\nThere's a reason why Supere Court judges aren't chosen by the people.\nIf they were chosen by the people, their rulings would be a political campaign rather than ruling by their core understanding of the law." ]
> Thats rich coming from the US, especially with what happened with Roe v Wade. Might want to solve your own problems first with corrupt judiciary.	[ "This is the best tl;dr I could make, original reduced by 73%. (I'm a bot)\n\n\nA State Department official stressed the importance of Israel's \"Independent institutions\" for its \"Thriving democracy\" after the country's new government revealed a plan to pass laws that would weaken the Supreme Court.\nState of play: Senior Israeli legal experts and former and current Supreme Court judges see the plan as a way for the government to significantly weaken the country's highest court by harming its independence and effectively rendering it irrelevant.\nWhat they're saying: \"Israel's independent institutions are crucial to upholding the country's thriving democracy, and our shared democratic values are at the heart of our bilateral relationship,\" a State Department spokesperson told Axios when asked about the new Israeli government's plan.\n\n\nExtended Summary \| FAQ \| Feedback \| Top keywords: plan^#1 government^#2 Israel's^#3 Israeli^#4 Court^#5", ">\n\nUndermining the balance of powers is one of the classic warning signs, I know the US gets crap for swinging dick on the world stage, but they’re right about this. Israel doesn’t want to end up like Poland or Hungary.", ">\n\nThis really has nothing to do with the online talking points, propaganda and other crap, this is more analogous to what Trump tried to pull during his presidency. \nNot everything is about the one aspect of foreign policy you care about.", ">\n\nThe U.S. isn't much better off since Trump packed the Supreme Court with conservative partisan hacks.", ">\n\nThat's not what \"independence\" means in this context. Appointing justices is something the President has always done, and once they're appointed they're no longer beholden to elected officials. In Israel they're considering giving the Knesset a veto over Supreme Court decisions. That would undermine its independence.", ">\n\nIt's not enough to appoint a judge, they also have to be confirmed. The Republicans have made it clear they will never confirm another Supreme Court judge appointed by a Democrat. Democrats have floated the possibility of packing the court.\nThe Supreme Court is headed down the same path.", ">\n\n...you realize the last Supreme Court Justice was appointed by a democratic?", ">\n\nYeah and confirmed by Democrats? Republicans would not do the same thing if they had control of the chamber.", ">\n\nWell, let's examine reality.\nScalia dies. Obama nominates Merrick Garland. Republicans refuse to have a hearing, saying the election is too close.\nTrump nominates Gorsuch, and Democrats are understandably pissed. Three ultimately vote for Gorsuch.\nKavanaugh's vote was marred by sexual assault allegations. Not really a typical Supreme Court confirmation.\nFinally, Barrett was nominated after RBG died. However, RBG died closer to the election than Scalia had died in 2016. When Mitch McConnell moved to quickly confirm Barrett, where he had refused to take any action on Garland, it becomes pretty clear that a Republican majority Senate will not move forward with a nominee put forward by a Democratic President.\nMultiple Republican Senators said as much.\nRepublicans will vote for Democratic nominees when they lack the power to stop their confirmation. Democrats, meanwhile, have never prevented a Republican President from filling a Supreme Court spot, even during an election year.\nSo I'm describing the precedent after Merrick Garland and Amy Coney Barrett. A Republican majority Senate will not confirm, or even vote, on Democratic nominees.", ">\n\nNetanyahu is a cunny.", ">\n\nThey want to weaken their Supreme Court because they're getting ready to enact laws that violate their constitution.", ">\n\nIsrael doesn't have a constitution but something like that, yes.", ">\n\n\"base laws\" as you can call it", ">\n\nWhen your Judiciary loses its Independence or becomes Partisan to either the Left or Right a government can no longer be seen as Democratic. There’s no longer a check on the Populist or Partisan politicians.", ">\n\nThe supreme court is basically partisan towards the left, so they've decided to take it to the other extreme.\nThere are certain things in the reform that need to be tweaked in order to make it a good reform that will be accepted and will protect All parts of the political map. The override law should be with a large majority of at least 75/120. The general attorney should be split into two jobs, prosecutor and government attorney מייצג את הממשלה בבית משפט.", ">\n\nI don’t disagree what they’re saying, but I can’t ignore the irony either.", ">\n\nWeird reading about it after every american I met in the past year (most are liberals or left leaning, but not all) complained about the american supreme court system and calling it an illegitimate institution...", ">\n\nThe end of democracy as we know it!", ">\n\nMaybe Israel would stop doing all this shit if the US stopped unconditionally supporting them in every way imaginable.", ">\n\nAnd lose all the profits to be made off of bombing brown people?", ">\n\nOf course they do, far right Benni is in power again. Israelis must have got bored because of the lack of Muslim oppression and voted him back in.", ">\n\nYes, netanyahu was voted in with 120 seats because as we all know all of Israel is a monolith!", ">\n\nSo going from a gang of judges that choose who replaces them when its time to retire, to having the kinesset which can have either the left or right and have said people being certified lawyers and former judges sitting in knesset seats vote on who will be a Supreme Court Judge is somehow making israel less democratic? Israel is trying to amaricanize its government while the US is losing its shit because I guess that's a bad thing. Just like most news today, this is mostly just gaslighting at full throttle.", ">\n\nיהיה לשופטים זכות וטו. הבעיה היא חוק ההתבגרות עם רק 61. צריך שזה יהיה לפחות 75", ">\n\nבשביל מדינה דו מפלגות כמו ארה\"ב ממש כן, ישראל יש יותר מידי מפלגים שיושבים ביחד אז 75 לא יעבוד בחיים. בממשלה של צד אחד זה ניראה לא טוב אבל ממשלה אחדות זה יכול להיות טוב", ">\n\nזה צריך להיות כמו הפלת יו\"ר כנסת. כלומר אמירה של כוחות פוליטיים עויינים שבית משפט עבר את הגבול.", ">\n\nIt's funny, because the whole point of what the coalition wants to do is about the fact that Israel's \"independent institutions\" aren't independent anymore.\nFor the last 30 years it's half a dictatorship under Bagats, which has much more power in the government than what the judges are supposed to have in a well functioning Democratic government.\nThe people in Israel cry for decades about it already, this isn't something new and has nothing to do with Netanyahu itself. Yeah, he wants to change it - but all of the people who are actually working on it, has began their work far before Netanyahu's trials. Hell, some of them maybe before Netanyahu's ministry (I'm talking about the almost continuous ministry of now. Idk if before his first ever ministry they've worked on it).\nAnd they even show it themselves - it's a very extensive list of laws about how to actually regain control to the people and the ones chosen by the people, which was for 40 years in the Knesset itself - while unlike what others claim here, they don't undermine the point of Bagats's option to cancel something that is actually corrupt, like fascism or dictatorship. Not only will it be hard for the Knesset, with this laws, to overcome bagats - but Bagats can still overcome back and have the last point if they agree as one on something.", ">\n\nThere's a reason why Supere Court judges aren't chosen by the people.\nIf they were chosen by the people, their rulings would be a political campaign rather than ruling by their core understanding of the law.", ">\n\nIn the reform the judges will have veto power on appointments. The big problem is the override law with only 61/120 it should be a large majority of at least 75/120. It should only be a tool to show the courts that they over stepped." ]
> Also, in the obituary section it has been learned that Irony is dead.	[ "This is the best tl;dr I could make, original reduced by 73%. (I'm a bot)\n\n\nA State Department official stressed the importance of Israel's \"Independent institutions\" for its \"Thriving democracy\" after the country's new government revealed a plan to pass laws that would weaken the Supreme Court.\nState of play: Senior Israeli legal experts and former and current Supreme Court judges see the plan as a way for the government to significantly weaken the country's highest court by harming its independence and effectively rendering it irrelevant.\nWhat they're saying: \"Israel's independent institutions are crucial to upholding the country's thriving democracy, and our shared democratic values are at the heart of our bilateral relationship,\" a State Department spokesperson told Axios when asked about the new Israeli government's plan.\n\n\nExtended Summary \| FAQ \| Feedback \| Top keywords: plan^#1 government^#2 Israel's^#3 Israeli^#4 Court^#5", ">\n\nUndermining the balance of powers is one of the classic warning signs, I know the US gets crap for swinging dick on the world stage, but they’re right about this. Israel doesn’t want to end up like Poland or Hungary.", ">\n\nThis really has nothing to do with the online talking points, propaganda and other crap, this is more analogous to what Trump tried to pull during his presidency. \nNot everything is about the one aspect of foreign policy you care about.", ">\n\nThe U.S. isn't much better off since Trump packed the Supreme Court with conservative partisan hacks.", ">\n\nThat's not what \"independence\" means in this context. Appointing justices is something the President has always done, and once they're appointed they're no longer beholden to elected officials. In Israel they're considering giving the Knesset a veto over Supreme Court decisions. That would undermine its independence.", ">\n\nIt's not enough to appoint a judge, they also have to be confirmed. The Republicans have made it clear they will never confirm another Supreme Court judge appointed by a Democrat. Democrats have floated the possibility of packing the court.\nThe Supreme Court is headed down the same path.", ">\n\n...you realize the last Supreme Court Justice was appointed by a democratic?", ">\n\nYeah and confirmed by Democrats? Republicans would not do the same thing if they had control of the chamber.", ">\n\nWell, let's examine reality.\nScalia dies. Obama nominates Merrick Garland. Republicans refuse to have a hearing, saying the election is too close.\nTrump nominates Gorsuch, and Democrats are understandably pissed. Three ultimately vote for Gorsuch.\nKavanaugh's vote was marred by sexual assault allegations. Not really a typical Supreme Court confirmation.\nFinally, Barrett was nominated after RBG died. However, RBG died closer to the election than Scalia had died in 2016. When Mitch McConnell moved to quickly confirm Barrett, where he had refused to take any action on Garland, it becomes pretty clear that a Republican majority Senate will not move forward with a nominee put forward by a Democratic President.\nMultiple Republican Senators said as much.\nRepublicans will vote for Democratic nominees when they lack the power to stop their confirmation. Democrats, meanwhile, have never prevented a Republican President from filling a Supreme Court spot, even during an election year.\nSo I'm describing the precedent after Merrick Garland and Amy Coney Barrett. A Republican majority Senate will not confirm, or even vote, on Democratic nominees.", ">\n\nNetanyahu is a cunny.", ">\n\nThey want to weaken their Supreme Court because they're getting ready to enact laws that violate their constitution.", ">\n\nIsrael doesn't have a constitution but something like that, yes.", ">\n\n\"base laws\" as you can call it", ">\n\nWhen your Judiciary loses its Independence or becomes Partisan to either the Left or Right a government can no longer be seen as Democratic. There’s no longer a check on the Populist or Partisan politicians.", ">\n\nThe supreme court is basically partisan towards the left, so they've decided to take it to the other extreme.\nThere are certain things in the reform that need to be tweaked in order to make it a good reform that will be accepted and will protect All parts of the political map. The override law should be with a large majority of at least 75/120. The general attorney should be split into two jobs, prosecutor and government attorney מייצג את הממשלה בבית משפט.", ">\n\nI don’t disagree what they’re saying, but I can’t ignore the irony either.", ">\n\nWeird reading about it after every american I met in the past year (most are liberals or left leaning, but not all) complained about the american supreme court system and calling it an illegitimate institution...", ">\n\nThe end of democracy as we know it!", ">\n\nMaybe Israel would stop doing all this shit if the US stopped unconditionally supporting them in every way imaginable.", ">\n\nAnd lose all the profits to be made off of bombing brown people?", ">\n\nOf course they do, far right Benni is in power again. Israelis must have got bored because of the lack of Muslim oppression and voted him back in.", ">\n\nYes, netanyahu was voted in with 120 seats because as we all know all of Israel is a monolith!", ">\n\nSo going from a gang of judges that choose who replaces them when its time to retire, to having the kinesset which can have either the left or right and have said people being certified lawyers and former judges sitting in knesset seats vote on who will be a Supreme Court Judge is somehow making israel less democratic? Israel is trying to amaricanize its government while the US is losing its shit because I guess that's a bad thing. Just like most news today, this is mostly just gaslighting at full throttle.", ">\n\nיהיה לשופטים זכות וטו. הבעיה היא חוק ההתבגרות עם רק 61. צריך שזה יהיה לפחות 75", ">\n\nבשביל מדינה דו מפלגות כמו ארה\"ב ממש כן, ישראל יש יותר מידי מפלגים שיושבים ביחד אז 75 לא יעבוד בחיים. בממשלה של צד אחד זה ניראה לא טוב אבל ממשלה אחדות זה יכול להיות טוב", ">\n\nזה צריך להיות כמו הפלת יו\"ר כנסת. כלומר אמירה של כוחות פוליטיים עויינים שבית משפט עבר את הגבול.", ">\n\nIt's funny, because the whole point of what the coalition wants to do is about the fact that Israel's \"independent institutions\" aren't independent anymore.\nFor the last 30 years it's half a dictatorship under Bagats, which has much more power in the government than what the judges are supposed to have in a well functioning Democratic government.\nThe people in Israel cry for decades about it already, this isn't something new and has nothing to do with Netanyahu itself. Yeah, he wants to change it - but all of the people who are actually working on it, has began their work far before Netanyahu's trials. Hell, some of them maybe before Netanyahu's ministry (I'm talking about the almost continuous ministry of now. Idk if before his first ever ministry they've worked on it).\nAnd they even show it themselves - it's a very extensive list of laws about how to actually regain control to the people and the ones chosen by the people, which was for 40 years in the Knesset itself - while unlike what others claim here, they don't undermine the point of Bagats's option to cancel something that is actually corrupt, like fascism or dictatorship. Not only will it be hard for the Knesset, with this laws, to overcome bagats - but Bagats can still overcome back and have the last point if they agree as one on something.", ">\n\nThere's a reason why Supere Court judges aren't chosen by the people.\nIf they were chosen by the people, their rulings would be a political campaign rather than ruling by their core understanding of the law.", ">\n\nIn the reform the judges will have veto power on appointments. The big problem is the override law with only 61/120 it should be a large majority of at least 75/120. It should only be a tool to show the courts that they over stepped.", ">\n\nThats rich coming from the US, especially with what happened with Roe v Wade. Might want to solve your own problems first with corrupt judiciary." ]
> "Do what we say, not what we do"	[ "This is the best tl;dr I could make, original reduced by 73%. (I'm a bot)\n\n\nA State Department official stressed the importance of Israel's \"Independent institutions\" for its \"Thriving democracy\" after the country's new government revealed a plan to pass laws that would weaken the Supreme Court.\nState of play: Senior Israeli legal experts and former and current Supreme Court judges see the plan as a way for the government to significantly weaken the country's highest court by harming its independence and effectively rendering it irrelevant.\nWhat they're saying: \"Israel's independent institutions are crucial to upholding the country's thriving democracy, and our shared democratic values are at the heart of our bilateral relationship,\" a State Department spokesperson told Axios when asked about the new Israeli government's plan.\n\n\nExtended Summary \| FAQ \| Feedback \| Top keywords: plan^#1 government^#2 Israel's^#3 Israeli^#4 Court^#5", ">\n\nUndermining the balance of powers is one of the classic warning signs, I know the US gets crap for swinging dick on the world stage, but they’re right about this. Israel doesn’t want to end up like Poland or Hungary.", ">\n\nThis really has nothing to do with the online talking points, propaganda and other crap, this is more analogous to what Trump tried to pull during his presidency. \nNot everything is about the one aspect of foreign policy you care about.", ">\n\nThe U.S. isn't much better off since Trump packed the Supreme Court with conservative partisan hacks.", ">\n\nThat's not what \"independence\" means in this context. Appointing justices is something the President has always done, and once they're appointed they're no longer beholden to elected officials. In Israel they're considering giving the Knesset a veto over Supreme Court decisions. That would undermine its independence.", ">\n\nIt's not enough to appoint a judge, they also have to be confirmed. The Republicans have made it clear they will never confirm another Supreme Court judge appointed by a Democrat. Democrats have floated the possibility of packing the court.\nThe Supreme Court is headed down the same path.", ">\n\n...you realize the last Supreme Court Justice was appointed by a democratic?", ">\n\nYeah and confirmed by Democrats? Republicans would not do the same thing if they had control of the chamber.", ">\n\nWell, let's examine reality.\nScalia dies. Obama nominates Merrick Garland. Republicans refuse to have a hearing, saying the election is too close.\nTrump nominates Gorsuch, and Democrats are understandably pissed. Three ultimately vote for Gorsuch.\nKavanaugh's vote was marred by sexual assault allegations. Not really a typical Supreme Court confirmation.\nFinally, Barrett was nominated after RBG died. However, RBG died closer to the election than Scalia had died in 2016. When Mitch McConnell moved to quickly confirm Barrett, where he had refused to take any action on Garland, it becomes pretty clear that a Republican majority Senate will not move forward with a nominee put forward by a Democratic President.\nMultiple Republican Senators said as much.\nRepublicans will vote for Democratic nominees when they lack the power to stop their confirmation. Democrats, meanwhile, have never prevented a Republican President from filling a Supreme Court spot, even during an election year.\nSo I'm describing the precedent after Merrick Garland and Amy Coney Barrett. A Republican majority Senate will not confirm, or even vote, on Democratic nominees.", ">\n\nNetanyahu is a cunny.", ">\n\nThey want to weaken their Supreme Court because they're getting ready to enact laws that violate their constitution.", ">\n\nIsrael doesn't have a constitution but something like that, yes.", ">\n\n\"base laws\" as you can call it", ">\n\nWhen your Judiciary loses its Independence or becomes Partisan to either the Left or Right a government can no longer be seen as Democratic. There’s no longer a check on the Populist or Partisan politicians.", ">\n\nThe supreme court is basically partisan towards the left, so they've decided to take it to the other extreme.\nThere are certain things in the reform that need to be tweaked in order to make it a good reform that will be accepted and will protect All parts of the political map. The override law should be with a large majority of at least 75/120. The general attorney should be split into two jobs, prosecutor and government attorney מייצג את הממשלה בבית משפט.", ">\n\nI don’t disagree what they’re saying, but I can’t ignore the irony either.", ">\n\nWeird reading about it after every american I met in the past year (most are liberals or left leaning, but not all) complained about the american supreme court system and calling it an illegitimate institution...", ">\n\nThe end of democracy as we know it!", ">\n\nMaybe Israel would stop doing all this shit if the US stopped unconditionally supporting them in every way imaginable.", ">\n\nAnd lose all the profits to be made off of bombing brown people?", ">\n\nOf course they do, far right Benni is in power again. Israelis must have got bored because of the lack of Muslim oppression and voted him back in.", ">\n\nYes, netanyahu was voted in with 120 seats because as we all know all of Israel is a monolith!", ">\n\nSo going from a gang of judges that choose who replaces them when its time to retire, to having the kinesset which can have either the left or right and have said people being certified lawyers and former judges sitting in knesset seats vote on who will be a Supreme Court Judge is somehow making israel less democratic? Israel is trying to amaricanize its government while the US is losing its shit because I guess that's a bad thing. Just like most news today, this is mostly just gaslighting at full throttle.", ">\n\nיהיה לשופטים זכות וטו. הבעיה היא חוק ההתבגרות עם רק 61. צריך שזה יהיה לפחות 75", ">\n\nבשביל מדינה דו מפלגות כמו ארה\"ב ממש כן, ישראל יש יותר מידי מפלגים שיושבים ביחד אז 75 לא יעבוד בחיים. בממשלה של צד אחד זה ניראה לא טוב אבל ממשלה אחדות זה יכול להיות טוב", ">\n\nזה צריך להיות כמו הפלת יו\"ר כנסת. כלומר אמירה של כוחות פוליטיים עויינים שבית משפט עבר את הגבול.", ">\n\nIt's funny, because the whole point of what the coalition wants to do is about the fact that Israel's \"independent institutions\" aren't independent anymore.\nFor the last 30 years it's half a dictatorship under Bagats, which has much more power in the government than what the judges are supposed to have in a well functioning Democratic government.\nThe people in Israel cry for decades about it already, this isn't something new and has nothing to do with Netanyahu itself. Yeah, he wants to change it - but all of the people who are actually working on it, has began their work far before Netanyahu's trials. Hell, some of them maybe before Netanyahu's ministry (I'm talking about the almost continuous ministry of now. Idk if before his first ever ministry they've worked on it).\nAnd they even show it themselves - it's a very extensive list of laws about how to actually regain control to the people and the ones chosen by the people, which was for 40 years in the Knesset itself - while unlike what others claim here, they don't undermine the point of Bagats's option to cancel something that is actually corrupt, like fascism or dictatorship. Not only will it be hard for the Knesset, with this laws, to overcome bagats - but Bagats can still overcome back and have the last point if they agree as one on something.", ">\n\nThere's a reason why Supere Court judges aren't chosen by the people.\nIf they were chosen by the people, their rulings would be a political campaign rather than ruling by their core understanding of the law.", ">\n\nIn the reform the judges will have veto power on appointments. The big problem is the override law with only 61/120 it should be a large majority of at least 75/120. It should only be a tool to show the courts that they over stepped.", ">\n\nThats rich coming from the US, especially with what happened with Roe v Wade. Might want to solve your own problems first with corrupt judiciary.", ">\n\nAlso, in the obituary section it has been learned that Irony is dead." ]
> Israel is ethnically jewish, not religiously jewish	[ "This is the best tl;dr I could make, original reduced by 73%. (I'm a bot)\n\n\nA State Department official stressed the importance of Israel's \"Independent institutions\" for its \"Thriving democracy\" after the country's new government revealed a plan to pass laws that would weaken the Supreme Court.\nState of play: Senior Israeli legal experts and former and current Supreme Court judges see the plan as a way for the government to significantly weaken the country's highest court by harming its independence and effectively rendering it irrelevant.\nWhat they're saying: \"Israel's independent institutions are crucial to upholding the country's thriving democracy, and our shared democratic values are at the heart of our bilateral relationship,\" a State Department spokesperson told Axios when asked about the new Israeli government's plan.\n\n\nExtended Summary \| FAQ \| Feedback \| Top keywords: plan^#1 government^#2 Israel's^#3 Israeli^#4 Court^#5", ">\n\nUndermining the balance of powers is one of the classic warning signs, I know the US gets crap for swinging dick on the world stage, but they’re right about this. Israel doesn’t want to end up like Poland or Hungary.", ">\n\nThis really has nothing to do with the online talking points, propaganda and other crap, this is more analogous to what Trump tried to pull during his presidency. \nNot everything is about the one aspect of foreign policy you care about.", ">\n\nThe U.S. isn't much better off since Trump packed the Supreme Court with conservative partisan hacks.", ">\n\nThat's not what \"independence\" means in this context. Appointing justices is something the President has always done, and once they're appointed they're no longer beholden to elected officials. In Israel they're considering giving the Knesset a veto over Supreme Court decisions. That would undermine its independence.", ">\n\nIt's not enough to appoint a judge, they also have to be confirmed. The Republicans have made it clear they will never confirm another Supreme Court judge appointed by a Democrat. Democrats have floated the possibility of packing the court.\nThe Supreme Court is headed down the same path.", ">\n\n...you realize the last Supreme Court Justice was appointed by a democratic?", ">\n\nYeah and confirmed by Democrats? Republicans would not do the same thing if they had control of the chamber.", ">\n\nWell, let's examine reality.\nScalia dies. Obama nominates Merrick Garland. Republicans refuse to have a hearing, saying the election is too close.\nTrump nominates Gorsuch, and Democrats are understandably pissed. Three ultimately vote for Gorsuch.\nKavanaugh's vote was marred by sexual assault allegations. Not really a typical Supreme Court confirmation.\nFinally, Barrett was nominated after RBG died. However, RBG died closer to the election than Scalia had died in 2016. When Mitch McConnell moved to quickly confirm Barrett, where he had refused to take any action on Garland, it becomes pretty clear that a Republican majority Senate will not move forward with a nominee put forward by a Democratic President.\nMultiple Republican Senators said as much.\nRepublicans will vote for Democratic nominees when they lack the power to stop their confirmation. Democrats, meanwhile, have never prevented a Republican President from filling a Supreme Court spot, even during an election year.\nSo I'm describing the precedent after Merrick Garland and Amy Coney Barrett. A Republican majority Senate will not confirm, or even vote, on Democratic nominees.", ">\n\nNetanyahu is a cunny.", ">\n\nThey want to weaken their Supreme Court because they're getting ready to enact laws that violate their constitution.", ">\n\nIsrael doesn't have a constitution but something like that, yes.", ">\n\n\"base laws\" as you can call it", ">\n\nWhen your Judiciary loses its Independence or becomes Partisan to either the Left or Right a government can no longer be seen as Democratic. There’s no longer a check on the Populist or Partisan politicians.", ">\n\nThe supreme court is basically partisan towards the left, so they've decided to take it to the other extreme.\nThere are certain things in the reform that need to be tweaked in order to make it a good reform that will be accepted and will protect All parts of the political map. The override law should be with a large majority of at least 75/120. The general attorney should be split into two jobs, prosecutor and government attorney מייצג את הממשלה בבית משפט.", ">\n\nI don’t disagree what they’re saying, but I can’t ignore the irony either.", ">\n\nWeird reading about it after every american I met in the past year (most are liberals or left leaning, but not all) complained about the american supreme court system and calling it an illegitimate institution...", ">\n\nThe end of democracy as we know it!", ">\n\nMaybe Israel would stop doing all this shit if the US stopped unconditionally supporting them in every way imaginable.", ">\n\nAnd lose all the profits to be made off of bombing brown people?", ">\n\nOf course they do, far right Benni is in power again. Israelis must have got bored because of the lack of Muslim oppression and voted him back in.", ">\n\nYes, netanyahu was voted in with 120 seats because as we all know all of Israel is a monolith!", ">\n\nSo going from a gang of judges that choose who replaces them when its time to retire, to having the kinesset which can have either the left or right and have said people being certified lawyers and former judges sitting in knesset seats vote on who will be a Supreme Court Judge is somehow making israel less democratic? Israel is trying to amaricanize its government while the US is losing its shit because I guess that's a bad thing. Just like most news today, this is mostly just gaslighting at full throttle.", ">\n\nיהיה לשופטים זכות וטו. הבעיה היא חוק ההתבגרות עם רק 61. צריך שזה יהיה לפחות 75", ">\n\nבשביל מדינה דו מפלגות כמו ארה\"ב ממש כן, ישראל יש יותר מידי מפלגים שיושבים ביחד אז 75 לא יעבוד בחיים. בממשלה של צד אחד זה ניראה לא טוב אבל ממשלה אחדות זה יכול להיות טוב", ">\n\nזה צריך להיות כמו הפלת יו\"ר כנסת. כלומר אמירה של כוחות פוליטיים עויינים שבית משפט עבר את הגבול.", ">\n\nIt's funny, because the whole point of what the coalition wants to do is about the fact that Israel's \"independent institutions\" aren't independent anymore.\nFor the last 30 years it's half a dictatorship under Bagats, which has much more power in the government than what the judges are supposed to have in a well functioning Democratic government.\nThe people in Israel cry for decades about it already, this isn't something new and has nothing to do with Netanyahu itself. Yeah, he wants to change it - but all of the people who are actually working on it, has began their work far before Netanyahu's trials. Hell, some of them maybe before Netanyahu's ministry (I'm talking about the almost continuous ministry of now. Idk if before his first ever ministry they've worked on it).\nAnd they even show it themselves - it's a very extensive list of laws about how to actually regain control to the people and the ones chosen by the people, which was for 40 years in the Knesset itself - while unlike what others claim here, they don't undermine the point of Bagats's option to cancel something that is actually corrupt, like fascism or dictatorship. Not only will it be hard for the Knesset, with this laws, to overcome bagats - but Bagats can still overcome back and have the last point if they agree as one on something.", ">\n\nThere's a reason why Supere Court judges aren't chosen by the people.\nIf they were chosen by the people, their rulings would be a political campaign rather than ruling by their core understanding of the law.", ">\n\nIn the reform the judges will have veto power on appointments. The big problem is the override law with only 61/120 it should be a large majority of at least 75/120. It should only be a tool to show the courts that they over stepped.", ">\n\nThats rich coming from the US, especially with what happened with Roe v Wade. Might want to solve your own problems first with corrupt judiciary.", ">\n\nAlso, in the obituary section it has been learned that Irony is dead.", ">\n\n\"Do what we say, not what we do\"" ]
> There’s no prizes for guessing where this hard line right wing stuff has come from. Russia’s influence once again corrupting the world.	[ "This is the best tl;dr I could make, original reduced by 73%. (I'm a bot)\n\n\nA State Department official stressed the importance of Israel's \"Independent institutions\" for its \"Thriving democracy\" after the country's new government revealed a plan to pass laws that would weaken the Supreme Court.\nState of play: Senior Israeli legal experts and former and current Supreme Court judges see the plan as a way for the government to significantly weaken the country's highest court by harming its independence and effectively rendering it irrelevant.\nWhat they're saying: \"Israel's independent institutions are crucial to upholding the country's thriving democracy, and our shared democratic values are at the heart of our bilateral relationship,\" a State Department spokesperson told Axios when asked about the new Israeli government's plan.\n\n\nExtended Summary \| FAQ \| Feedback \| Top keywords: plan^#1 government^#2 Israel's^#3 Israeli^#4 Court^#5", ">\n\nUndermining the balance of powers is one of the classic warning signs, I know the US gets crap for swinging dick on the world stage, but they’re right about this. Israel doesn’t want to end up like Poland or Hungary.", ">\n\nThis really has nothing to do with the online talking points, propaganda and other crap, this is more analogous to what Trump tried to pull during his presidency. \nNot everything is about the one aspect of foreign policy you care about.", ">\n\nThe U.S. isn't much better off since Trump packed the Supreme Court with conservative partisan hacks.", ">\n\nThat's not what \"independence\" means in this context. Appointing justices is something the President has always done, and once they're appointed they're no longer beholden to elected officials. In Israel they're considering giving the Knesset a veto over Supreme Court decisions. That would undermine its independence.", ">\n\nIt's not enough to appoint a judge, they also have to be confirmed. The Republicans have made it clear they will never confirm another Supreme Court judge appointed by a Democrat. Democrats have floated the possibility of packing the court.\nThe Supreme Court is headed down the same path.", ">\n\n...you realize the last Supreme Court Justice was appointed by a democratic?", ">\n\nYeah and confirmed by Democrats? Republicans would not do the same thing if they had control of the chamber.", ">\n\nWell, let's examine reality.\nScalia dies. Obama nominates Merrick Garland. Republicans refuse to have a hearing, saying the election is too close.\nTrump nominates Gorsuch, and Democrats are understandably pissed. Three ultimately vote for Gorsuch.\nKavanaugh's vote was marred by sexual assault allegations. Not really a typical Supreme Court confirmation.\nFinally, Barrett was nominated after RBG died. However, RBG died closer to the election than Scalia had died in 2016. When Mitch McConnell moved to quickly confirm Barrett, where he had refused to take any action on Garland, it becomes pretty clear that a Republican majority Senate will not move forward with a nominee put forward by a Democratic President.\nMultiple Republican Senators said as much.\nRepublicans will vote for Democratic nominees when they lack the power to stop their confirmation. Democrats, meanwhile, have never prevented a Republican President from filling a Supreme Court spot, even during an election year.\nSo I'm describing the precedent after Merrick Garland and Amy Coney Barrett. A Republican majority Senate will not confirm, or even vote, on Democratic nominees.", ">\n\nNetanyahu is a cunny.", ">\n\nThey want to weaken their Supreme Court because they're getting ready to enact laws that violate their constitution.", ">\n\nIsrael doesn't have a constitution but something like that, yes.", ">\n\n\"base laws\" as you can call it", ">\n\nWhen your Judiciary loses its Independence or becomes Partisan to either the Left or Right a government can no longer be seen as Democratic. There’s no longer a check on the Populist or Partisan politicians.", ">\n\nThe supreme court is basically partisan towards the left, so they've decided to take it to the other extreme.\nThere are certain things in the reform that need to be tweaked in order to make it a good reform that will be accepted and will protect All parts of the political map. The override law should be with a large majority of at least 75/120. The general attorney should be split into two jobs, prosecutor and government attorney מייצג את הממשלה בבית משפט.", ">\n\nI don’t disagree what they’re saying, but I can’t ignore the irony either.", ">\n\nWeird reading about it after every american I met in the past year (most are liberals or left leaning, but not all) complained about the american supreme court system and calling it an illegitimate institution...", ">\n\nThe end of democracy as we know it!", ">\n\nMaybe Israel would stop doing all this shit if the US stopped unconditionally supporting them in every way imaginable.", ">\n\nAnd lose all the profits to be made off of bombing brown people?", ">\n\nOf course they do, far right Benni is in power again. Israelis must have got bored because of the lack of Muslim oppression and voted him back in.", ">\n\nYes, netanyahu was voted in with 120 seats because as we all know all of Israel is a monolith!", ">\n\nSo going from a gang of judges that choose who replaces them when its time to retire, to having the kinesset which can have either the left or right and have said people being certified lawyers and former judges sitting in knesset seats vote on who will be a Supreme Court Judge is somehow making israel less democratic? Israel is trying to amaricanize its government while the US is losing its shit because I guess that's a bad thing. Just like most news today, this is mostly just gaslighting at full throttle.", ">\n\nיהיה לשופטים זכות וטו. הבעיה היא חוק ההתבגרות עם רק 61. צריך שזה יהיה לפחות 75", ">\n\nבשביל מדינה דו מפלגות כמו ארה\"ב ממש כן, ישראל יש יותר מידי מפלגים שיושבים ביחד אז 75 לא יעבוד בחיים. בממשלה של צד אחד זה ניראה לא טוב אבל ממשלה אחדות זה יכול להיות טוב", ">\n\nזה צריך להיות כמו הפלת יו\"ר כנסת. כלומר אמירה של כוחות פוליטיים עויינים שבית משפט עבר את הגבול.", ">\n\nIt's funny, because the whole point of what the coalition wants to do is about the fact that Israel's \"independent institutions\" aren't independent anymore.\nFor the last 30 years it's half a dictatorship under Bagats, which has much more power in the government than what the judges are supposed to have in a well functioning Democratic government.\nThe people in Israel cry for decades about it already, this isn't something new and has nothing to do with Netanyahu itself. Yeah, he wants to change it - but all of the people who are actually working on it, has began their work far before Netanyahu's trials. Hell, some of them maybe before Netanyahu's ministry (I'm talking about the almost continuous ministry of now. Idk if before his first ever ministry they've worked on it).\nAnd they even show it themselves - it's a very extensive list of laws about how to actually regain control to the people and the ones chosen by the people, which was for 40 years in the Knesset itself - while unlike what others claim here, they don't undermine the point of Bagats's option to cancel something that is actually corrupt, like fascism or dictatorship. Not only will it be hard for the Knesset, with this laws, to overcome bagats - but Bagats can still overcome back and have the last point if they agree as one on something.", ">\n\nThere's a reason why Supere Court judges aren't chosen by the people.\nIf they were chosen by the people, their rulings would be a political campaign rather than ruling by their core understanding of the law.", ">\n\nIn the reform the judges will have veto power on appointments. The big problem is the override law with only 61/120 it should be a large majority of at least 75/120. It should only be a tool to show the courts that they over stepped.", ">\n\nThats rich coming from the US, especially with what happened with Roe v Wade. Might want to solve your own problems first with corrupt judiciary.", ">\n\nAlso, in the obituary section it has been learned that Irony is dead.", ">\n\n\"Do what we say, not what we do\"", ">\n\nIsrael is ethnically jewish, not religiously jewish" ]
>	[ "This is the best tl;dr I could make, original reduced by 73%. (I'm a bot)\n\n\nA State Department official stressed the importance of Israel's \"Independent institutions\" for its \"Thriving democracy\" after the country's new government revealed a plan to pass laws that would weaken the Supreme Court.\nState of play: Senior Israeli legal experts and former and current Supreme Court judges see the plan as a way for the government to significantly weaken the country's highest court by harming its independence and effectively rendering it irrelevant.\nWhat they're saying: \"Israel's independent institutions are crucial to upholding the country's thriving democracy, and our shared democratic values are at the heart of our bilateral relationship,\" a State Department spokesperson told Axios when asked about the new Israeli government's plan.\n\n\nExtended Summary \| FAQ \| Feedback \| Top keywords: plan^#1 government^#2 Israel's^#3 Israeli^#4 Court^#5", ">\n\nUndermining the balance of powers is one of the classic warning signs, I know the US gets crap for swinging dick on the world stage, but they’re right about this. Israel doesn’t want to end up like Poland or Hungary.", ">\n\nThis really has nothing to do with the online talking points, propaganda and other crap, this is more analogous to what Trump tried to pull during his presidency. \nNot everything is about the one aspect of foreign policy you care about.", ">\n\nThe U.S. isn't much better off since Trump packed the Supreme Court with conservative partisan hacks.", ">\n\nThat's not what \"independence\" means in this context. Appointing justices is something the President has always done, and once they're appointed they're no longer beholden to elected officials. In Israel they're considering giving the Knesset a veto over Supreme Court decisions. That would undermine its independence.", ">\n\nIt's not enough to appoint a judge, they also have to be confirmed. The Republicans have made it clear they will never confirm another Supreme Court judge appointed by a Democrat. Democrats have floated the possibility of packing the court.\nThe Supreme Court is headed down the same path.", ">\n\n...you realize the last Supreme Court Justice was appointed by a democratic?", ">\n\nYeah and confirmed by Democrats? Republicans would not do the same thing if they had control of the chamber.", ">\n\nWell, let's examine reality.\nScalia dies. Obama nominates Merrick Garland. Republicans refuse to have a hearing, saying the election is too close.\nTrump nominates Gorsuch, and Democrats are understandably pissed. Three ultimately vote for Gorsuch.\nKavanaugh's vote was marred by sexual assault allegations. Not really a typical Supreme Court confirmation.\nFinally, Barrett was nominated after RBG died. However, RBG died closer to the election than Scalia had died in 2016. When Mitch McConnell moved to quickly confirm Barrett, where he had refused to take any action on Garland, it becomes pretty clear that a Republican majority Senate will not move forward with a nominee put forward by a Democratic President.\nMultiple Republican Senators said as much.\nRepublicans will vote for Democratic nominees when they lack the power to stop their confirmation. Democrats, meanwhile, have never prevented a Republican President from filling a Supreme Court spot, even during an election year.\nSo I'm describing the precedent after Merrick Garland and Amy Coney Barrett. A Republican majority Senate will not confirm, or even vote, on Democratic nominees.", ">\n\nNetanyahu is a cunny.", ">\n\nThey want to weaken their Supreme Court because they're getting ready to enact laws that violate their constitution.", ">\n\nIsrael doesn't have a constitution but something like that, yes.", ">\n\n\"base laws\" as you can call it", ">\n\nWhen your Judiciary loses its Independence or becomes Partisan to either the Left or Right a government can no longer be seen as Democratic. There’s no longer a check on the Populist or Partisan politicians.", ">\n\nThe supreme court is basically partisan towards the left, so they've decided to take it to the other extreme.\nThere are certain things in the reform that need to be tweaked in order to make it a good reform that will be accepted and will protect All parts of the political map. The override law should be with a large majority of at least 75/120. The general attorney should be split into two jobs, prosecutor and government attorney מייצג את הממשלה בבית משפט.", ">\n\nI don’t disagree what they’re saying, but I can’t ignore the irony either.", ">\n\nWeird reading about it after every american I met in the past year (most are liberals or left leaning, but not all) complained about the american supreme court system and calling it an illegitimate institution...", ">\n\nThe end of democracy as we know it!", ">\n\nMaybe Israel would stop doing all this shit if the US stopped unconditionally supporting them in every way imaginable.", ">\n\nAnd lose all the profits to be made off of bombing brown people?", ">\n\nOf course they do, far right Benni is in power again. Israelis must have got bored because of the lack of Muslim oppression and voted him back in.", ">\n\nYes, netanyahu was voted in with 120 seats because as we all know all of Israel is a monolith!", ">\n\nSo going from a gang of judges that choose who replaces them when its time to retire, to having the kinesset which can have either the left or right and have said people being certified lawyers and former judges sitting in knesset seats vote on who will be a Supreme Court Judge is somehow making israel less democratic? Israel is trying to amaricanize its government while the US is losing its shit because I guess that's a bad thing. Just like most news today, this is mostly just gaslighting at full throttle.", ">\n\nיהיה לשופטים זכות וטו. הבעיה היא חוק ההתבגרות עם רק 61. צריך שזה יהיה לפחות 75", ">\n\nבשביל מדינה דו מפלגות כמו ארה\"ב ממש כן, ישראל יש יותר מידי מפלגים שיושבים ביחד אז 75 לא יעבוד בחיים. בממשלה של צד אחד זה ניראה לא טוב אבל ממשלה אחדות זה יכול להיות טוב", ">\n\nזה צריך להיות כמו הפלת יו\"ר כנסת. כלומר אמירה של כוחות פוליטיים עויינים שבית משפט עבר את הגבול.", ">\n\nIt's funny, because the whole point of what the coalition wants to do is about the fact that Israel's \"independent institutions\" aren't independent anymore.\nFor the last 30 years it's half a dictatorship under Bagats, which has much more power in the government than what the judges are supposed to have in a well functioning Democratic government.\nThe people in Israel cry for decades about it already, this isn't something new and has nothing to do with Netanyahu itself. Yeah, he wants to change it - but all of the people who are actually working on it, has began their work far before Netanyahu's trials. Hell, some of them maybe before Netanyahu's ministry (I'm talking about the almost continuous ministry of now. Idk if before his first ever ministry they've worked on it).\nAnd they even show it themselves - it's a very extensive list of laws about how to actually regain control to the people and the ones chosen by the people, which was for 40 years in the Knesset itself - while unlike what others claim here, they don't undermine the point of Bagats's option to cancel something that is actually corrupt, like fascism or dictatorship. Not only will it be hard for the Knesset, with this laws, to overcome bagats - but Bagats can still overcome back and have the last point if they agree as one on something.", ">\n\nThere's a reason why Supere Court judges aren't chosen by the people.\nIf they were chosen by the people, their rulings would be a political campaign rather than ruling by their core understanding of the law.", ">\n\nIn the reform the judges will have veto power on appointments. The big problem is the override law with only 61/120 it should be a large majority of at least 75/120. It should only be a tool to show the courts that they over stepped.", ">\n\nThats rich coming from the US, especially with what happened with Roe v Wade. Might want to solve your own problems first with corrupt judiciary.", ">\n\nAlso, in the obituary section it has been learned that Irony is dead.", ">\n\n\"Do what we say, not what we do\"", ">\n\nIsrael is ethnically jewish, not religiously jewish", ">\n\nThere’s no prizes for guessing where this hard line right wing stuff has come from.\nRussia’s influence once again corrupting the world." ]
I wonder which officer it belongs to.	[]
> He’s a pidgeon, but he ain’t no stool pigeon.	[ "I wonder which officer it belongs to." ]
> I'm upset that there was no picture of the tiny backpack with or without the pigeon wearing it.	[ "I wonder which officer it belongs to.", ">\n\nHe’s a pidgeon, but he ain’t no stool pigeon." ]

Subsets and Splits

No community queries yet

The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.