text
string | predicted_class
string | confidence
float16 |
|---|---|---|
To identify non-coding regions important for FLM expression, we performed multiple sequence alignments of Arabidopsis FLM with its closest sequence homologue MAF3 and FLM homologues from five other Brassicaceae species (Figure 2—figure supplement 1A,B) (Martinez-Castilla and Alvarez-Buylla, 2003; Van de Velde et al., 2014). Within the non-coding sequences, we detected one promoter region of 250 bp and two intron 1 regions of 373 and 101 bp with increased sequence conservation (>60%) (Figure 2A and Figure 2—figure supplement 1). We then generated PROΔ225bp, INT1Δ373bp, and INT1Δ101bp transgenic lines expressing pFLM::gFLM variants (FLMCol-0) with deletions of the three regions in the FLM deletion accession Nd-1 to measure the effects on FLM-ß and FLM-δ expression at 15°C and 23°C (Figure 2B and Figure 2—figure supplement 2) (Werner et al., 2005). To normalize for variability between the transgenic lines, we examined pools of independent T2 segregating lines (n = 21–34). We validated this pooling strategy by demonstrating that the established behaviour of FLM in the Col-0 and Kil-0 accessions could be faithfully recapitulated when performing equivalent analyses with T2 lines expressing gFLMCol-0 and gFLMCol-0 bearing the Kil-0 LINE insertion (Lutz et al., 2015) (Figure 2—figure supplement 2C,D). While we detected a strong downregulation of FLM at 15°C and 23°C in PROΔ225bp and INT1Δ373bp lines, the deletion in INT1Δ101bp had comparably minor effects on FLM expression (Figure 2C,D). This indicated that the proximal 225 bp promoter and the 337 bp intron 1 regions contained important sequences for basal FLM expression. Subsequent experiments showed that the 254 bp promoter fragment alone was, however, not sufficient to confer FLM expression of a genomic FLM fragment (PRO254bp; Figure 2B–D).10.7554/eLife.22114.003Figure 2.Phylogenetic footprinting identifies promoter and intron 1 regions required for FLM expression.(A) Phylogenetic footprinting of promoter and genomic regions of FLM and putative FLM orthologs from six Brassicaceae species. Coverage is shown in blue, identities are shown in ocre (≥30%) and red (<30%). Exons are displayed in green, regions with high non-coding sequence conservation are displayed in orange. (B) Schematic illustration of the FLM genomic region and FLMCol-0 transgenic variants used for expression analysis. (C) and (D) Mean and SD (four replicate pools with five to ten independent T2 transgenic lines) of qRT-PCR analysis of FLM-β (C) and FLM-δ (D) expression at 15°C and 23°C in ten day-old seedlings of 21–40 bulked T2 transgenic lines. Student’s t-tests: *, p≤0.05; **, p≤0.01; ***, p≤0.001; n.s., not significant.DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/eLife.22114.00310.7554/eLife.22114.004Figure 2—figure supplement 1.Phylogenetic footprinting of promoter and genomic regions of FLM and putative FLM orthologs from six Brassicaceae species.(A) and (B) Sequence alignments of promoter (A) and gene sequences (B) of FLM and MAF3 as well as putative FLM orthologs from six Brassicaceae species. Coverage is shown in blue, identities are based on a sliding window word size = 30 and displayed in ocre (≥30%) and red (<30%). FLM exonic regions are shown in green (B). Numbering is indicated according to the position in the alignment.DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/eLife.22114.00410.7554/eLife.22114.005Figure 2—figure supplement 2.The gFLMCol-0 and gFLMCol-0+LINE transgenes faithfully recapitulate FLM expression in the Col-0 and Kil-0 accessions.(A) Representative photographs of 42 day-old plants of Col-0, flm-3, and Nd-1 grown at 15°C in long day photoperiod. The plant images were spliced together but originate from the same photograph as indicated by a white vertical line. (B) Quantitative flowering time analysis of Col-0, flm-3, and Nd-1 grown at 15°C and 23°C in long day photoperiod. (C) and (D) qRT-PCR analyses of FLM-β (C) and FLM-δ (D) expression at 15°C and 23°C in ten day-old flm-3 mutants complemented with a gFLMCol-0 or gFLMCol-0+LINE allele (Lutz et al., 2015). Pools of 35–40 independent T2 transgenic lines were used in comparison to Col-0 and Kil-0 homozygous lines. Shown is the mean and SD of three (Col-0, Kil-0) and four replicate pools comprising each 8 to 10 transgenic lines. Percentages refer to the reduction in FLM expression between the gFLMCol-0+LINE transgenic line in comparison to the gFLMCol-0 line or between Kil-0 and Col-0, respectively. Similar letters indicate no significant difference of total leaf number (Tukey HSD, p<0.05).DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/eLife.22114.005
|
study
| 100.0 |
(A) Phylogenetic footprinting of promoter and genomic regions of FLM and putative FLM orthologs from six Brassicaceae species. Coverage is shown in blue, identities are shown in ocre (≥30%) and red (<30%). Exons are displayed in green, regions with high non-coding sequence conservation are displayed in orange. (B) Schematic illustration of the FLM genomic region and FLMCol-0 transgenic variants used for expression analysis. (C) and (D) Mean and SD (four replicate pools with five to ten independent T2 transgenic lines) of qRT-PCR analysis of FLM-β (C) and FLM-δ (D) expression at 15°C and 23°C in ten day-old seedlings of 21–40 bulked T2 transgenic lines. Student’s t-tests: *, p≤0.05; **, p≤0.01; ***, p≤0.001; n.s., not significant.
|
study
| 100.0 |
10.7554/eLife.22114.004Figure 2—figure supplement 1.Phylogenetic footprinting of promoter and genomic regions of FLM and putative FLM orthologs from six Brassicaceae species.(A) and (B) Sequence alignments of promoter (A) and gene sequences (B) of FLM and MAF3 as well as putative FLM orthologs from six Brassicaceae species. Coverage is shown in blue, identities are based on a sliding window word size = 30 and displayed in ocre (≥30%) and red (<30%). FLM exonic regions are shown in green (B). Numbering is indicated according to the position in the alignment.DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/eLife.22114.004
|
study
| 100.0 |
(A) and (B) Sequence alignments of promoter (A) and gene sequences (B) of FLM and MAF3 as well as putative FLM orthologs from six Brassicaceae species. Coverage is shown in blue, identities are based on a sliding window word size = 30 and displayed in ocre (≥30%) and red (<30%). FLM exonic regions are shown in green (B). Numbering is indicated according to the position in the alignment.
|
study
| 99.94 |
10.7554/eLife.22114.005Figure 2—figure supplement 2.The gFLMCol-0 and gFLMCol-0+LINE transgenes faithfully recapitulate FLM expression in the Col-0 and Kil-0 accessions.(A) Representative photographs of 42 day-old plants of Col-0, flm-3, and Nd-1 grown at 15°C in long day photoperiod. The plant images were spliced together but originate from the same photograph as indicated by a white vertical line. (B) Quantitative flowering time analysis of Col-0, flm-3, and Nd-1 grown at 15°C and 23°C in long day photoperiod. (C) and (D) qRT-PCR analyses of FLM-β (C) and FLM-δ (D) expression at 15°C and 23°C in ten day-old flm-3 mutants complemented with a gFLMCol-0 or gFLMCol-0+LINE allele (Lutz et al., 2015). Pools of 35–40 independent T2 transgenic lines were used in comparison to Col-0 and Kil-0 homozygous lines. Shown is the mean and SD of three (Col-0, Kil-0) and four replicate pools comprising each 8 to 10 transgenic lines. Percentages refer to the reduction in FLM expression between the gFLMCol-0+LINE transgenic line in comparison to the gFLMCol-0 line or between Kil-0 and Col-0, respectively. Similar letters indicate no significant difference of total leaf number (Tukey HSD, p<0.05).DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/eLife.22114.005
|
study
| 100.0 |
(A) Representative photographs of 42 day-old plants of Col-0, flm-3, and Nd-1 grown at 15°C in long day photoperiod. The plant images were spliced together but originate from the same photograph as indicated by a white vertical line. (B) Quantitative flowering time analysis of Col-0, flm-3, and Nd-1 grown at 15°C and 23°C in long day photoperiod. (C) and (D) qRT-PCR analyses of FLM-β (C) and FLM-δ (D) expression at 15°C and 23°C in ten day-old flm-3 mutants complemented with a gFLMCol-0 or gFLMCol-0+LINE allele (Lutz et al., 2015). Pools of 35–40 independent T2 transgenic lines were used in comparison to Col-0 and Kil-0 homozygous lines. Shown is the mean and SD of three (Col-0, Kil-0) and four replicate pools comprising each 8 to 10 transgenic lines. Percentages refer to the reduction in FLM expression between the gFLMCol-0+LINE transgenic line in comparison to the gFLMCol-0 line or between Kil-0 and Col-0, respectively. Similar letters indicate no significant difference of total leaf number (Tukey HSD, p<0.05).
|
study
| 100.0 |
To find further non-coding determinants for FLM expression, we analysed FLM nucleotide variation in 776 sequenced Arabidopsis accessions (The 1001 Genomes Consortium, 2016). We identified 45 promoter and intronic SNPs with a minor allele frequency (MAF)≥5% and used these to define ten major haplotypes (H1–-H10) representing 379 (49%) accessions (Figure 3—figure supplement 1A,B; Supplementary file 1). We defined an initial set with 41 accessions by selecting five to twelve accessions from six of the ten haplotype groups (Figure 3A). Since introns 2–6 seemed important for temperature-sensitive FLM expression, we added 11 accessions with varying intron 2–6 haplotypes (HI2-6) but identical intron 1 haplotype (HI1; Figure 3A and Figure 3—figure supplement 1D–G). Finally, we added Col-0 (H3) and Kil-0 (H1) due to their well characterized FLM regulation to obtain a representative FLM haplotype set with ultimately 54 accessions (Supplementary file 2). We assured, by analytical PCR, that none of these accessions, except Kil-0, carried the previously described intron 1 LINE insertion (Lutz et al., 2015).10.7554/eLife.22114.006Figure 3.FLM haplotype analysis of 776 accessions identifies major haplotypes determined by non-coding variation.(A) Haplotype group affiliation of 54 accessions of the FLM haplotype set based on 45 SNPs for either the 7 kb FLM locus (H7kb), intron 1 (HI1) or introns 2–6 (HI2-6). Group numbering and colouring are according to group size. (B) Summarized expression values of total FLM (exon 1), FLM-ß, and FLM-δ expression of the FLM haplotype set. Outliers were determined based on 1.5 x IQR (interquartile range). The coefficient of variation (CV) is shown in the lower graph.DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/eLife.22114.00610.7554/eLife.22114.007Figure 3—figure supplement 1.Haplotype analysis based on 45 SNPs from 776 accessions.(A) Representation of the position, the frequency and the type of 45 SNPs from 776 accessions used for haplotype clustering. (B), (D), and (E) Haplotype network analysis of the ten (B) most frequent groups of a 7 kb FLM genomic region based on 45 SNPs or the ten (D) or eleven (E) largest haplotype groups when only SNPs of intron 1 (HI1; D) or introns 2–6 (HI2-6; E) are considered. Circle sizes and the color code illustrate number of accessions in each group with group 1 representing 174 (B), 220 (D) and 356 (E) accessions, respectively. In (B), bolt numbers indicate groups from which representative accessions were chosen. (C) Geographic distribution of the ten most frequent groups of a 7 kb FLM genomic region. (F) Venn diagram indicating the overlap of accessions included in the ten largest HI1 and HI2-6 haplotype groups. (G) Clustering of the haplotype groups of the 589 accessions included in the ten largest HI1 and HI2-6 haplotype groups. Accessions were sorted according to their HI1 and HI2-6 haplotype group numbers. Numbers on the left indicate the HI1 haplotype group number as also shown in (D). An enlargement of a subset of accessions highlighted by the dotted boxes is shown on the right. The color coding for haplotype group numbers, which illustrates the group number and group size as shown in (D) and (E) is specified below the graph.DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/eLife.22114.00710.7554/eLife.22114.008Figure 3—figure supplement 2.Flowering time of the accessions of the FLM haplotype set suggest a vernalization requirement for many accessions.(A) Flowering time analysis of the accessions of the FLM haplotype set. Extremely late flowering accessions or accessions that had not flowered are represented at the 60 rosette leaves margin. Outliers were determined based on 1.5 x IQR (interquartile range). (B) Mean and SD (three biological replicates) in qRT-PCR analyses of FLM-β and FLM-δ expression in twelve day-old Col-0, flc-3 and Col-0 with a FRISf-2FLC vernalization module (Michaels and Amasino, 1999).DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/eLife.22114.00810.7554/eLife.22114.009Figure 3—figure supplement 3.Correlation analysis identifies FLM-β as the major FLM transcript at 15°C and 23°C in the FLM haplotype set accessions.(A) and (B) Correlation (simple linear regression) between FLM expression as determined by qRT-PCR over FLM exon 1 with measurements of FLM-β and FLM-δ splice variant abundance at 15°C (A) and 23°C (B) in the 54 accessions of the FLM haplotype set. FLM-ß, 15°C, p<0.0001; FLM-δ, 15°C, p=0.009; FLM-ß, 23°C, p<0.0001; FLM-δ, 23°C, p>0.05.DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/eLife.22114.00910.7554/eLife.22114.010Figure 3—figure supplement 4.119 polymorphic sites among the accessions of the FLM haplotypes set.(A) Position, frequency and type of each the 119 polymorphic sites among 54 accessions of the FLM haplotype set used for simple single locus association tests. (B) Neighbour-joining tree showing the genetic relationship among 54 accessions of the FLM haplotype set based on the 119 polymorphic sites shown in (A). Bootstrap values are indicated at each branch.DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/eLife.22114.01010.7554/eLife.22114.011Figure 3—figure supplement 5.Results from the simple single locus association test between the 119 polymorphic sites with FLM expression values.(A) and (B) Representation of the –log(10)-transformed p-values of the simple single locus association tests of each of the 119 sites that were included in the analysis. The black horizontal line corresponds to a significance threshold of p=0.05. The black dots represent polymorphic sites that associate with p>0.05, the red dots those with p<0.05. The green dots represent sites with p<0.05 that were chosen for detailed experimental analysis as shown Figure 4A. The FLM genomic gene model is as introduced in Figure 1. Each graph represents the analysis of the indicated expression trait. (A) shows all comparisons with relative expression values and (B) shows all comparisons of relative changes of transcript levels between FLM-β and FLM-δ in response to changes in temperature (15°C to 23°C) or ratios between the transcript levels (FLM-δ/FLM-β) at 15°C and 23°C as a readout for the relative abundance of the two splice forms with hypothesized antagonistic functions. Quantitative values are summarized in Supplementary file 5.DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/eLife.22114.01110.7554/eLife.22114.012Figure 3—figure supplement 6.Linkage analysis for the simple single locus association test.Pairwise linkage analysis (R2) of the sites used for the simple single locus association test among the 54 accessions of the FLM haplotype set. Only the 109 biallelic sites of the 119 sites are shown. Red circles show the sites PRO1, PRO2, and two biallelic SNPs of the nucleotide triplet INT6 (at bp +3975 and +3976). Position is set to 1 according to the A of the ATG start codon.DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/eLife.22114.01210.7554/eLife.22114.013Figure 3—figure supplement 7.Effects of the PRO1, PRO2 and INT6 polymorphisms on FLM gene expression.Effects of the PRO1, PRO2 and INT6 alleles on relative expression levels and ratios of these expression values among the 54 accessions of the FLM haplotype set. The background color of each graph indicates that the minor allele associates with upregulation (green) and downregulation (red), respectively. p-values of the association tests are shown: *, p<0.05; **, p≤0.01; ***, p<0.001 as shown in each graph. Non-significant comparisons (p>0.05) are shown with a grey background. Single values are represented as jittered dots. Scale and numbering is set to 1 according to the A of the ATG start codon. Quantitative values are summarized in Supplementary file 5.DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/eLife.22114.013
|
study
| 100.0 |
(A) Haplotype group affiliation of 54 accessions of the FLM haplotype set based on 45 SNPs for either the 7 kb FLM locus (H7kb), intron 1 (HI1) or introns 2–6 (HI2-6). Group numbering and colouring are according to group size. (B) Summarized expression values of total FLM (exon 1), FLM-ß, and FLM-δ expression of the FLM haplotype set. Outliers were determined based on 1.5 x IQR (interquartile range). The coefficient of variation (CV) is shown in the lower graph.
|
study
| 100.0 |
10.7554/eLife.22114.007Figure 3—figure supplement 1.Haplotype analysis based on 45 SNPs from 776 accessions.(A) Representation of the position, the frequency and the type of 45 SNPs from 776 accessions used for haplotype clustering. (B), (D), and (E) Haplotype network analysis of the ten (B) most frequent groups of a 7 kb FLM genomic region based on 45 SNPs or the ten (D) or eleven (E) largest haplotype groups when only SNPs of intron 1 (HI1; D) or introns 2–6 (HI2-6; E) are considered. Circle sizes and the color code illustrate number of accessions in each group with group 1 representing 174 (B), 220 (D) and 356 (E) accessions, respectively. In (B), bolt numbers indicate groups from which representative accessions were chosen. (C) Geographic distribution of the ten most frequent groups of a 7 kb FLM genomic region. (F) Venn diagram indicating the overlap of accessions included in the ten largest HI1 and HI2-6 haplotype groups. (G) Clustering of the haplotype groups of the 589 accessions included in the ten largest HI1 and HI2-6 haplotype groups. Accessions were sorted according to their HI1 and HI2-6 haplotype group numbers. Numbers on the left indicate the HI1 haplotype group number as also shown in (D). An enlargement of a subset of accessions highlighted by the dotted boxes is shown on the right. The color coding for haplotype group numbers, which illustrates the group number and group size as shown in (D) and (E) is specified below the graph.DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/eLife.22114.007
|
study
| 100.0 |
(A) Representation of the position, the frequency and the type of 45 SNPs from 776 accessions used for haplotype clustering. (B), (D), and (E) Haplotype network analysis of the ten (B) most frequent groups of a 7 kb FLM genomic region based on 45 SNPs or the ten (D) or eleven (E) largest haplotype groups when only SNPs of intron 1 (HI1; D) or introns 2–6 (HI2-6; E) are considered. Circle sizes and the color code illustrate number of accessions in each group with group 1 representing 174 (B), 220 (D) and 356 (E) accessions, respectively. In (B), bolt numbers indicate groups from which representative accessions were chosen. (C) Geographic distribution of the ten most frequent groups of a 7 kb FLM genomic region. (F) Venn diagram indicating the overlap of accessions included in the ten largest HI1 and HI2-6 haplotype groups. (G) Clustering of the haplotype groups of the 589 accessions included in the ten largest HI1 and HI2-6 haplotype groups. Accessions were sorted according to their HI1 and HI2-6 haplotype group numbers. Numbers on the left indicate the HI1 haplotype group number as also shown in (D). An enlargement of a subset of accessions highlighted by the dotted boxes is shown on the right. The color coding for haplotype group numbers, which illustrates the group number and group size as shown in (D) and (E) is specified below the graph.
|
study
| 100.0 |
10.7554/eLife.22114.008Figure 3—figure supplement 2.Flowering time of the accessions of the FLM haplotype set suggest a vernalization requirement for many accessions.(A) Flowering time analysis of the accessions of the FLM haplotype set. Extremely late flowering accessions or accessions that had not flowered are represented at the 60 rosette leaves margin. Outliers were determined based on 1.5 x IQR (interquartile range). (B) Mean and SD (three biological replicates) in qRT-PCR analyses of FLM-β and FLM-δ expression in twelve day-old Col-0, flc-3 and Col-0 with a FRISf-2FLC vernalization module (Michaels and Amasino, 1999).DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/eLife.22114.008
|
study
| 100.0 |
(A) Flowering time analysis of the accessions of the FLM haplotype set. Extremely late flowering accessions or accessions that had not flowered are represented at the 60 rosette leaves margin. Outliers were determined based on 1.5 x IQR (interquartile range). (B) Mean and SD (three biological replicates) in qRT-PCR analyses of FLM-β and FLM-δ expression in twelve day-old Col-0, flc-3 and Col-0 with a FRISf-2FLC vernalization module (Michaels and Amasino, 1999).
|
study
| 100.0 |
10.7554/eLife.22114.009Figure 3—figure supplement 3.Correlation analysis identifies FLM-β as the major FLM transcript at 15°C and 23°C in the FLM haplotype set accessions.(A) and (B) Correlation (simple linear regression) between FLM expression as determined by qRT-PCR over FLM exon 1 with measurements of FLM-β and FLM-δ splice variant abundance at 15°C (A) and 23°C (B) in the 54 accessions of the FLM haplotype set. FLM-ß, 15°C, p<0.0001; FLM-δ, 15°C, p=0.009; FLM-ß, 23°C, p<0.0001; FLM-δ, 23°C, p>0.05.DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/eLife.22114.009
|
study
| 100.0 |
(A) and (B) Correlation (simple linear regression) between FLM expression as determined by qRT-PCR over FLM exon 1 with measurements of FLM-β and FLM-δ splice variant abundance at 15°C (A) and 23°C (B) in the 54 accessions of the FLM haplotype set. FLM-ß, 15°C, p<0.0001; FLM-δ, 15°C, p=0.009; FLM-ß, 23°C, p<0.0001; FLM-δ, 23°C, p>0.05.
|
study
| 100.0 |
10.7554/eLife.22114.010Figure 3—figure supplement 4.119 polymorphic sites among the accessions of the FLM haplotypes set.(A) Position, frequency and type of each the 119 polymorphic sites among 54 accessions of the FLM haplotype set used for simple single locus association tests. (B) Neighbour-joining tree showing the genetic relationship among 54 accessions of the FLM haplotype set based on the 119 polymorphic sites shown in (A). Bootstrap values are indicated at each branch.DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/eLife.22114.010
|
study
| 100.0 |
(A) Position, frequency and type of each the 119 polymorphic sites among 54 accessions of the FLM haplotype set used for simple single locus association tests. (B) Neighbour-joining tree showing the genetic relationship among 54 accessions of the FLM haplotype set based on the 119 polymorphic sites shown in (A). Bootstrap values are indicated at each branch.
|
study
| 100.0 |
10.7554/eLife.22114.011Figure 3—figure supplement 5.Results from the simple single locus association test between the 119 polymorphic sites with FLM expression values.(A) and (B) Representation of the –log(10)-transformed p-values of the simple single locus association tests of each of the 119 sites that were included in the analysis. The black horizontal line corresponds to a significance threshold of p=0.05. The black dots represent polymorphic sites that associate with p>0.05, the red dots those with p<0.05. The green dots represent sites with p<0.05 that were chosen for detailed experimental analysis as shown Figure 4A. The FLM genomic gene model is as introduced in Figure 1. Each graph represents the analysis of the indicated expression trait. (A) shows all comparisons with relative expression values and (B) shows all comparisons of relative changes of transcript levels between FLM-β and FLM-δ in response to changes in temperature (15°C to 23°C) or ratios between the transcript levels (FLM-δ/FLM-β) at 15°C and 23°C as a readout for the relative abundance of the two splice forms with hypothesized antagonistic functions. Quantitative values are summarized in Supplementary file 5.DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/eLife.22114.011
|
study
| 100.0 |
(A) and (B) Representation of the –log(10)-transformed p-values of the simple single locus association tests of each of the 119 sites that were included in the analysis. The black horizontal line corresponds to a significance threshold of p=0.05. The black dots represent polymorphic sites that associate with p>0.05, the red dots those with p<0.05. The green dots represent sites with p<0.05 that were chosen for detailed experimental analysis as shown Figure 4A. The FLM genomic gene model is as introduced in Figure 1. Each graph represents the analysis of the indicated expression trait. (A) shows all comparisons with relative expression values and (B) shows all comparisons of relative changes of transcript levels between FLM-β and FLM-δ in response to changes in temperature (15°C to 23°C) or ratios between the transcript levels (FLM-δ/FLM-β) at 15°C and 23°C as a readout for the relative abundance of the two splice forms with hypothesized antagonistic functions. Quantitative values are summarized in Supplementary file 5.
|
study
| 100.0 |
10.7554/eLife.22114.012Figure 3—figure supplement 6.Linkage analysis for the simple single locus association test.Pairwise linkage analysis (R2) of the sites used for the simple single locus association test among the 54 accessions of the FLM haplotype set. Only the 109 biallelic sites of the 119 sites are shown. Red circles show the sites PRO1, PRO2, and two biallelic SNPs of the nucleotide triplet INT6 (at bp +3975 and +3976). Position is set to 1 according to the A of the ATG start codon.DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/eLife.22114.012
|
study
| 100.0 |
Pairwise linkage analysis (R2) of the sites used for the simple single locus association test among the 54 accessions of the FLM haplotype set. Only the 109 biallelic sites of the 119 sites are shown. Red circles show the sites PRO1, PRO2, and two biallelic SNPs of the nucleotide triplet INT6 (at bp +3975 and +3976). Position is set to 1 according to the A of the ATG start codon.
|
study
| 99.94 |
10.7554/eLife.22114.013Figure 3—figure supplement 7.Effects of the PRO1, PRO2 and INT6 polymorphisms on FLM gene expression.Effects of the PRO1, PRO2 and INT6 alleles on relative expression levels and ratios of these expression values among the 54 accessions of the FLM haplotype set. The background color of each graph indicates that the minor allele associates with upregulation (green) and downregulation (red), respectively. p-values of the association tests are shown: *, p<0.05; **, p≤0.01; ***, p<0.001 as shown in each graph. Non-significant comparisons (p>0.05) are shown with a grey background. Single values are represented as jittered dots. Scale and numbering is set to 1 according to the A of the ATG start codon. Quantitative values are summarized in Supplementary file 5.DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/eLife.22114.013
|
study
| 100.0 |
Effects of the PRO1, PRO2 and INT6 alleles on relative expression levels and ratios of these expression values among the 54 accessions of the FLM haplotype set. The background color of each graph indicates that the minor allele associates with upregulation (green) and downregulation (red), respectively. p-values of the association tests are shown: *, p<0.05; **, p≤0.01; ***, p<0.001 as shown in each graph. Non-significant comparisons (p>0.05) are shown with a grey background. Single values are represented as jittered dots. Scale and numbering is set to 1 according to the A of the ATG start codon. Quantitative values are summarized in Supplementary file 5.
|
study
| 100.0 |
To find polymorphisms regulating FLM expression and splicing, we performed a genotype-phenotype association analysis. Since the vernalization pathway strongly delayed flowering in 24 of the 54 accessions and consequently suppressed FLM effects, we used FLM expression as a phenotype for the association analysis (Figure 3—figure supplement 2A). To ascertain that FLM expression was not affected by FLC, we examined FLM in non-vernalized wild type Col-0 and flc-3 mutants as well as in Col-0 carrying a functional vernalization module (Michaels and Amasino, 1999). Concurrent with previous reports, we did not detect an influence of FLC on FLM transcript abundance in our conditions (Figure 3—figure supplement 2B) (Scortecci et al., 2001; Ratcliffe et al., 2001). We then obtained FLM expression data from the FLM haplotype set and measured total FLM transcript levels as well as FLM-ß and FLM-δ levels at 15°C or 23°C (Supplementary file 3). In line with the reported behaviour of FLM in Col-0, we observed that FLM-ß expression decreased (on average 0.6 fold) and FLM-δ increased (on average 1.4 fold) with increasing temperature in most accessions (Figure 3B and Supplementary file 3) (Lee et al., 2013; Posé et al., 2013; Lutz et al., 2015). At the same time, we also observed substantial variation in FLM-ß and FLM-δ expression between the accessions of the FLM haplotype set, inviting the conclusion that non-coding sequence variation modulates FLM expression (Figure 3B and Supplementary file 3). Since total FLM transcript levels strongly correlated with FLM-ß but not with FLM-δ abundance at 15°C and at 23°C, it could be suggested that FLM-ß represents the major FLM form among the FLM transcripts (Figure 3—figure supplement 3A,B).
|
study
| 100.0 |
Using the FLM haplotype set, we next performed association tests between FLM expression at 15°C and 23°C or expression ratios derived from these values and an extended set of 119 polymorphisms along the 7 kb FLM region, which included the 45 SNPs, but also low frequent SNPs (MAF>1%) and indels (≤2 bp; MAF>1%) (Figure 3—figure supplement 4). The association analysis detected polymorphisms with significant associations (p<0.001) (Figure 3—figure supplement 5 and Supplementary file 4). We decided to investigate the potential role of a single base pair deletion (PRO1T/-; bp −215) and a genetically slightly linked SNP (PRO2A/C; bp −93), because they were both located in the proximal part of the FLM promoter. Further, we investigated three genetically unlinked nucleotides because they were positioned as a highly diverse nucleotide triplet in intron 6 (INT6A/C-A/C-A/T/C; bp +3975–+ 3977) in an otherwise conserved sequence context (Figure 4A, Figure 3—figure supplements 5–7, Supplementary file 5).10.7554/eLife.22114.014Figure 4.Polymorphisms in PRO2+ and INT6+ sites influence basal and temperature-dependent FLM expression.(A) Schematic representation of the FLM genomic locus as shown in Figure 1. Green dots indicate the positions of the PRO1, PRO2, and INT6 sites that were chosen for further investigation. Sequence logos display the allele frequencies at these sites among the 54 accessions of the FLM haplotype set. (B) Sequence logos and allele frequency distribution of PRO2+ and INT6+ polymorphisms among 840 Arabidopsis accessions. All polymorphic residues are marked with asterisks and the respective allele frequencies are indicated by the sequence logo. The Col-0 reference haplotype is marked in yellow, haplotypes chosen for further investigation are marked in green. (C) and (D) Alignment of the PRO2+ and INT6+ polymorphisms (C) and schematic representation of the FLMCol-0 reference construct (pFLM::gFLM) as well as the FLMCol-0 variants selected for transgenic analysis in the FLM deletion accession Nd-1. Bases that differ between FLMCol-0 and the variants are coloured. Deletions in the deletion constructs of the PRO2+ and INT6+ sites as well as the PolyA motifs are displayed with red lines (not drawn to scale). (E) and (F) Mean and SD (four replicate pools with four to eleven independent T2 transgenic lines) of qRT-PCR analyses of FLM-β (E) and FLM-δ (F). For easier comparison, the values obtained with FLMCol-0 are displayed as red and blue dotted lines. Student’s t-tests: *p≤0.05; **p≤0.01; ***p≤0.001; n.s., not significant.DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/eLife.22114.01410.7554/eLife.22114.015Figure 4—figure supplement 1.Increasing the number of PolyA motif deletions results in the gradual reduction of FLM-ß expression.(A) Schematic representation of the FLMCol-0 reference construct (pFLM::gFLM) as well as the FLM PolyA deletion variants selected for transgenic analysis in Nd-1. Deletions of the PolyA motifs are displayed with red lines (not drawn to scale). (B) and (C) Mean and SD (four replicate pools comprising between five and ten independent T2 transgenic lines) from qRT-PCR analyses of FLM-β (B) and FLM-δ (C) expression in ten day-old seedlings. Student’s t-test: *p≤0.05; **p≤0.01; ***p≤0.001; otherwise not significant.DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/eLife.22114.015
|
study
| 100.0 |
(A) Schematic representation of the FLM genomic locus as shown in Figure 1. Green dots indicate the positions of the PRO1, PRO2, and INT6 sites that were chosen for further investigation. Sequence logos display the allele frequencies at these sites among the 54 accessions of the FLM haplotype set. (B) Sequence logos and allele frequency distribution of PRO2+ and INT6+ polymorphisms among 840 Arabidopsis accessions. All polymorphic residues are marked with asterisks and the respective allele frequencies are indicated by the sequence logo. The Col-0 reference haplotype is marked in yellow, haplotypes chosen for further investigation are marked in green. (C) and (D) Alignment of the PRO2+ and INT6+ polymorphisms (C) and schematic representation of the FLMCol-0 reference construct (pFLM::gFLM) as well as the FLMCol-0 variants selected for transgenic analysis in the FLM deletion accession Nd-1. Bases that differ between FLMCol-0 and the variants are coloured. Deletions in the deletion constructs of the PRO2+ and INT6+ sites as well as the PolyA motifs are displayed with red lines (not drawn to scale). (E) and (F) Mean and SD (four replicate pools with four to eleven independent T2 transgenic lines) of qRT-PCR analyses of FLM-β (E) and FLM-δ (F). For easier comparison, the values obtained with FLMCol-0 are displayed as red and blue dotted lines. Student’s t-tests: *p≤0.05; **p≤0.01; ***p≤0.001; n.s., not significant.
|
study
| 100.0 |
10.7554/eLife.22114.015Figure 4—figure supplement 1.Increasing the number of PolyA motif deletions results in the gradual reduction of FLM-ß expression.(A) Schematic representation of the FLMCol-0 reference construct (pFLM::gFLM) as well as the FLM PolyA deletion variants selected for transgenic analysis in Nd-1. Deletions of the PolyA motifs are displayed with red lines (not drawn to scale). (B) and (C) Mean and SD (four replicate pools comprising between five and ten independent T2 transgenic lines) from qRT-PCR analyses of FLM-β (B) and FLM-δ (C) expression in ten day-old seedlings. Student’s t-test: *p≤0.05; **p≤0.01; ***p≤0.001; otherwise not significant.DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/eLife.22114.015
|
study
| 100.0 |
(A) Schematic representation of the FLMCol-0 reference construct (pFLM::gFLM) as well as the FLM PolyA deletion variants selected for transgenic analysis in Nd-1. Deletions of the PolyA motifs are displayed with red lines (not drawn to scale). (B) and (C) Mean and SD (four replicate pools comprising between five and ten independent T2 transgenic lines) from qRT-PCR analyses of FLM-β (B) and FLM-δ (C) expression in ten day-old seedlings. Student’s t-test: *p≤0.05; **p≤0.01; ***p≤0.001; otherwise not significant.
|
study
| 100.0 |
Strikingly, the PRO2 and INT6 sites were directly flanked or in close proximity to a total of four PolyA motifs of variable length ([A]7-11), one of which represented a so-called CArG-box, a potential binding site for MADS-box transcription factors (Zhang et al., 2016). Two more PolyA motifs resided in introns 3 and 5 (Figure 4D and Figure 4—figure supplement 1A). Since PolyA motifs had been reported to be important for gene expression, we reasoned that these motifs could be relevant for FLM regulation, in isolation or in combination with the highly significant non-coding variations (O'Malley et al., 2016; Horton et al., 2012).
|
study
| 100.0 |
To understand the sequence variation surrounding the PRO1, PRO2 and INT6 sites, we reanalysed available Arabidopsis genome sequences (The 1001 Genomes Consortium, 2016). Besides the PRO1 1 bp deletion, the region surrounding PRO1 was conserved and we therefore focussed on the PRO1T/- deletion polymorphism (Figure 4A). Few bases up- and downstream of PRO2 (bp −102 to bp −92), we detected four additional highly diverse SNPs and designated this region PRO2+. We also identified additional frequent haplotypes of the INT6 triplet (INT6+). Apart from the two PolyA motifs located at PRO2+ and INT6+, the four remaining PolyA motifs were conserved across all accessions examined (Figure 4B).
|
study
| 100.0 |
To examine the effects of the non-coding sequence variations in a homogenous background, we transformed the deletion accession Nd-1 with FLMCol-0 variants carrying the PRO1, PRO2+ and INT6+ polymorphisms or deletions of PRO2+ (PRO2+Δ16bp) and INT6+ (INT6+Δ17bp) (Figure 4C,D). Additionally, we transformed variants with deletions of between two and six PolyA stretches (PolyA_2xΔa, PolyA_2xΔb, PolyA_3xΔ, PolyA_4xΔ, PolyA_5xΔ, PolyA_6xΔ; Figure 4D and Figure 4—figure supplement 1A). Using pooled T2 segregating lines (n = 18–45) for each of the transgenes, we analysed the effects of the sequence variation on FLM-ß and FLM-δ expression at 15°C and 23°C. The PRO1- deletion, as present in the FLMCol-0 reference, did not reveal differences in FLM transcript levels when compared to PRO1T (FLMCol-0) (Fig. Figure 4—figure supplement 1B,C). However, two PRO2+ (PRO2+GGAAC, PRO2+AAACC) and three INT6+ variants (INT6+ACA, INT6+CAC and INT6+AAA) displayed an upregulation of FLM-ß at 15°C when compared to FLMCol-0 (Figure 4E). Increases and decreases of FLM-δ levels largely followed those of FLM-ß levels except for INT6+AAA, which showed an upregulation exclusively of FLM-ß (Figure 4E,F). The deletion variant PRO2+Δ16bp showed upregulation of FLM-ß but INT6+Δ17bp did not have significantly altered FLM-ß and FLM-δ levels when compared to FLMCol-0 (Figure 4E,F). We concluded that the identity of these regions rather than their presence controlled FLM expression and temperature-sensitive FLM regulation. The PolyA motif deletion variants showed gradually decreasing FLM-ß and FLM-δ levels with an increasing number of deletions while the deletion of all six PolyA motifs (PolyA_6xΔ) had an especially strong effect on FLM-ß expression and its temperature-sensitive expression (Figure 4E,F and Figure 4—figure supplement 1B,C). Thus, the PolyA motifs possess a regulatory role but may function in a redundant manner.
|
study
| 100.0 |
The phylogenetic footprinting and association analyses resulted in the identification of polymorphisms and regions that significantly altered FLM expression when present in a homogenous molecular and genomic context. To correlate FLM expression with flowering, we measured flowering time in T2 transgenic lines of eight variants with significantly different FLM abundance (Figure 5A and Figure 5—figure supplement 1A–C). We detected a very strong correlation between FLM-ß transcript levels and flowering time (R2 = 0.94) in plants grown at 15°C. Flowering time responded in a linear manner to FLM-ß levels with 17 to 30 rosette leaves until flowering in the range of relative transcript levels from 0.6 to 2.4 (Figure 5B). Further, the low expression variants PolyA_6xΔ, INT1Δ373bp, and PROΔ225bp flowered as early as the deletion accession Nd-1 suggesting that there must be a critical lower threshold for FLM-ß to be effective (Figure 5A,B). The correlation was much lower for FLM-δ (R2 = 0.70) suggesting that FLM-ß is the major determinant for flowering time in these conditions (Figure 5—figure supplement 1D). Within the range of lines examined, we did not detect a saturating effect at the upper expression level.10.7554/eLife.22114.016Figure 5.FLM-ß expression shows high correlation with flowering time of transgenic plants.(A) Box plot of quantitative flowering time analysis (rosette leaf number) of independent T2 transgenic lines at 15°C and long day photoperiod. Ten plants of three replicate pools were analysed for each construct. The data were corrected for the anticipated 25% of non-transgenic Nd-1 segregants (see Figure 5—figure supplement 1D for the uncorrected analysis). Single values are shown as jittered dots, the colour represents the type of variant as introduced in Figure 4D, the median of the FLMCol-0 reference is indicated as dotted line. Wilcoxon rank test: *p≤0.05; **p≤0.01; ***p≤0.001; n.s., not significant. (B) Correlation (simple linear regression) between FLM-ß and qRT-PCR expression data as presented in Figure 5—figure supplement 1A,B and flowering time analysis as shown in (A). Datapoints of INT6+ variants with contrasting FLM expression and FLMCol-0 are designated. The color code corresponds to (A). The variants PolyA_6xΔ, INT1Δ373bp, and PROΔ225bp, which do not respond in a linear manner are shown as dotted circles. The shaded areas indicate the 95% confidence intervals; p<0.0001. Note, that the flowering time data shown in (A) were corrected by removing values of non-transgenic T2 segregants. An analysis using the uncorrected data is shown in Figure 5—figure supplement 1E,F.DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/eLife.22114.01610.7554/eLife.22114.017Figure 5—figure supplement 1.FLM-ß expression correlates with flowering time in transgenic lines carrying different FLM alleles.(A) and (B) Results from qRT-PCR analyses of FLM-β (A) and FLM-δ (B) expression in ten day-old seedlings of pools (n = 18–40) of independent T2 transgenic lines. Error bars indicate SD of four replicate pools comprising between four and ten transgenic lines or three Col-0 replicates. (C) Photographs of representative 57 day-old plants expressing FLMCol-0 and PRO2+ and INT6+ variants grown at 15°C in long-day photoperiod. Col-0 and Nd-1, which served as genetic background for the transgenic analysis, are shown in each photograph for comparison. Plants of both pictures are from the same experiment but were photographed separately. (D) Correlation (simple linear regression) between FLM-δ expression data as presented in (B) and flowering time as shown in Figure 5A. Data points of INT6+ variants with contrasting FLM expression and FLMCol-0 are designated. p=0.005. The shaded areas indicate the 95% confidence intervals. (E) Box plot of quantitative flowering time analysis (rosette leaf number) of independent T2 transgenic lines at 15°C and long day photoperiod. Ten plants of three replicate pools were analysed for each construct (uncorrected data). Single values are shown as jittered dots, the colour represents the type of variant as introduced in Figure 4D, the median of the FLMCol-0 reference is indicated as dotted line. The 25% of the plants that show a very early flowering that most likely represent the wild type Nd-1 segregants are indicated with a red circle and these were extracted for correction as presented in Figure 5A. Wilcoxon rank test: *p≤0.05; **p≤0.01; ***p≤0.001; n.s., not significant. (F) Correlation (simple linear regression) between FLM-ß and FLM-δ. qRT-PCR expression data as presented in (A) and (B) and flowering time analysis as shown in (D). FLM-ß, p<0.0001; FLM-δ, p=0.002. The shaded areas indicate the 95% confidence intervals.DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/eLife.22114.017
|
study
| 100.0 |
(A) Box plot of quantitative flowering time analysis (rosette leaf number) of independent T2 transgenic lines at 15°C and long day photoperiod. Ten plants of three replicate pools were analysed for each construct. The data were corrected for the anticipated 25% of non-transgenic Nd-1 segregants (see Figure 5—figure supplement 1D for the uncorrected analysis). Single values are shown as jittered dots, the colour represents the type of variant as introduced in Figure 4D, the median of the FLMCol-0 reference is indicated as dotted line. Wilcoxon rank test: *p≤0.05; **p≤0.01; ***p≤0.001; n.s., not significant. (B) Correlation (simple linear regression) between FLM-ß and qRT-PCR expression data as presented in Figure 5—figure supplement 1A,B and flowering time analysis as shown in (A). Datapoints of INT6+ variants with contrasting FLM expression and FLMCol-0 are designated. The color code corresponds to (A). The variants PolyA_6xΔ, INT1Δ373bp, and PROΔ225bp, which do not respond in a linear manner are shown as dotted circles. The shaded areas indicate the 95% confidence intervals; p<0.0001. Note, that the flowering time data shown in (A) were corrected by removing values of non-transgenic T2 segregants. An analysis using the uncorrected data is shown in Figure 5—figure supplement 1E,F.
|
study
| 100.0 |
10.7554/eLife.22114.017Figure 5—figure supplement 1.FLM-ß expression correlates with flowering time in transgenic lines carrying different FLM alleles.(A) and (B) Results from qRT-PCR analyses of FLM-β (A) and FLM-δ (B) expression in ten day-old seedlings of pools (n = 18–40) of independent T2 transgenic lines. Error bars indicate SD of four replicate pools comprising between four and ten transgenic lines or three Col-0 replicates. (C) Photographs of representative 57 day-old plants expressing FLMCol-0 and PRO2+ and INT6+ variants grown at 15°C in long-day photoperiod. Col-0 and Nd-1, which served as genetic background for the transgenic analysis, are shown in each photograph for comparison. Plants of both pictures are from the same experiment but were photographed separately. (D) Correlation (simple linear regression) between FLM-δ expression data as presented in (B) and flowering time as shown in Figure 5A. Data points of INT6+ variants with contrasting FLM expression and FLMCol-0 are designated. p=0.005. The shaded areas indicate the 95% confidence intervals. (E) Box plot of quantitative flowering time analysis (rosette leaf number) of independent T2 transgenic lines at 15°C and long day photoperiod. Ten plants of three replicate pools were analysed for each construct (uncorrected data). Single values are shown as jittered dots, the colour represents the type of variant as introduced in Figure 4D, the median of the FLMCol-0 reference is indicated as dotted line. The 25% of the plants that show a very early flowering that most likely represent the wild type Nd-1 segregants are indicated with a red circle and these were extracted for correction as presented in Figure 5A. Wilcoxon rank test: *p≤0.05; **p≤0.01; ***p≤0.001; n.s., not significant. (F) Correlation (simple linear regression) between FLM-ß and FLM-δ. qRT-PCR expression data as presented in (A) and (B) and flowering time analysis as shown in (D). FLM-ß, p<0.0001; FLM-δ, p=0.002. The shaded areas indicate the 95% confidence intervals.DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/eLife.22114.017
|
study
| 100.0 |
(A) and (B) Results from qRT-PCR analyses of FLM-β (A) and FLM-δ (B) expression in ten day-old seedlings of pools (n = 18–40) of independent T2 transgenic lines. Error bars indicate SD of four replicate pools comprising between four and ten transgenic lines or three Col-0 replicates. (C) Photographs of representative 57 day-old plants expressing FLMCol-0 and PRO2+ and INT6+ variants grown at 15°C in long-day photoperiod. Col-0 and Nd-1, which served as genetic background for the transgenic analysis, are shown in each photograph for comparison. Plants of both pictures are from the same experiment but were photographed separately. (D) Correlation (simple linear regression) between FLM-δ expression data as presented in (B) and flowering time as shown in Figure 5A. Data points of INT6+ variants with contrasting FLM expression and FLMCol-0 are designated. p=0.005. The shaded areas indicate the 95% confidence intervals. (E) Box plot of quantitative flowering time analysis (rosette leaf number) of independent T2 transgenic lines at 15°C and long day photoperiod. Ten plants of three replicate pools were analysed for each construct (uncorrected data). Single values are shown as jittered dots, the colour represents the type of variant as introduced in Figure 4D, the median of the FLMCol-0 reference is indicated as dotted line. The 25% of the plants that show a very early flowering that most likely represent the wild type Nd-1 segregants are indicated with a red circle and these were extracted for correction as presented in Figure 5A. Wilcoxon rank test: *p≤0.05; **p≤0.01; ***p≤0.001; n.s., not significant. (F) Correlation (simple linear regression) between FLM-ß and FLM-δ. qRT-PCR expression data as presented in (A) and (B) and flowering time analysis as shown in (D). FLM-ß, p<0.0001; FLM-δ, p=0.002. The shaded areas indicate the 95% confidence intervals.
|
study
| 100.0 |
Introns 2–6 were required for temperature-sensitive FLM expression (Figure 1). When we statistically tested the interaction between genotype and temperature with a multiple linear model, we found that temperature-sensitive FLM-ß regulation was significantly reduced in INT6+CAA between 15°C and 23°C and when compared to the FLMCol-0 control variant (p=0.012) (Figures 4E and 6A,B). In line with the prediction, flowering of this variant was indeed less sensitive to temperature changes when tested at 15°C and 23°C in homozygous T3 progeny plants and compared to the FLMCol-0 reference (Figure 6C,D). Thus, temperature-independent FLM-ß expression changes correlate with temperature-insensitive flowering in the selected temperature range.10.7554/eLife.22114.018Figure 6.The INT6+CAA polymorphism reduces temperature-sensitivity of FLM expression and flowering.(A) qRT-PCR analysis and (B) expression ratios of FLM-β of FLMCol-0 (INT6+AAT) and INT6+CAA grown in 15°C and 23°C. Statistical tests of temperature-sensitivity are described in the text. (C) Means and SD of quantitative flowering time analysis (rosette leaf number). n = 5 (15°C) and 8 (23°C) replicates from five independent homozygous T3 transgenic lines grown at 15°C and 23°C in long day photoperiod. (D) Mean and SD of ratios of rosette leaf numbers from the analysis shown in (C). Student’s t-test: *p<0.05; **p≤0.01.DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/eLife.22114.018
|
study
| 100.0 |
(A) qRT-PCR analysis and (B) expression ratios of FLM-β of FLMCol-0 (INT6+AAT) and INT6+CAA grown in 15°C and 23°C. Statistical tests of temperature-sensitivity are described in the text. (C) Means and SD of quantitative flowering time analysis (rosette leaf number). n = 5 (15°C) and 8 (23°C) replicates from five independent homozygous T3 transgenic lines grown at 15°C and 23°C in long day photoperiod. (D) Mean and SD of ratios of rosette leaf numbers from the analysis shown in (C). Student’s t-test: *p<0.05; **p≤0.01.
|
study
| 100.0 |
To understand whether the same or different molecular mechanisms are the basis of altered FLM expression in FLM variants, we estimated FLM transcription of variants with strongly altered abundance of processed FLM abundance by measuring levels of unprocessed FLM pre-mRNA from plants grown at 15°C. When compared to the levels of processed FLM mRNA, the PROΔ225bp and INT1Δ373bp variants showed similarly strong reductions of unprocessed pre-mRNA, suggesting that the respective deletion polymorphisms directly affect FLM transcription (Figures 4E,F and and 7A). In turn, the INT6+CAA and PolyA_6xΔ lines had reduced FLM mRNA levels but, when compared to FLMCol-0, did not show substantial changes in unprocessed pre-mRNA levels (Figures 4E,F and and 7B). Since this indicated that post-transcriptional events may be affected in these variants, we tested for the abundance of differential polyadenylated splice variants after semi-quantitative 3’-RACE-PCR and sequencing of the cloned PCR products (Figure 7—figure supplement 1A). There, we detected a relative reduction of FLM-ß transcripts in INT6+CAA and PolyA_6xΔ that was accompanied by increases in the abundance of two polyadenylated transcripts containing exon 1 and intron 1 (E1I1p) that had already been noted in an earlier publication (Figure 7C,D) (Lutz et al., 2015). Importantly, we did not identify a single FLM-δ clone among the 163 sequenced cDNAs. The relative increase in E1I1p transcripts could also be independently confirmed by E1I1p-specific qRT-PCRs and suggested in summary that splicing site choice at the exon 1 - intron 1 junction is changed in the INT6+CAA and PolyA_6xΔ alleles (Figure 7—figure supplement 1B,C). In relation to all exon 1-containing transcripts, the overall abundance of these intron 1-containing transcripts was comparatively low (Figure 7—figure supplement 1C).10.7554/eLife.22114.019Figure 7.FLM polymorphisms affect FLM transcription or splicing at the expense of FLM-ß.(A) and (B) Mean and SD (n = 3) of FLM pre-mRNA levels. Student’s t-test: ***p≤0.001; n.s. = not significant. (C) Schematic representation of FLM cDNAs detected more than once (n = 163). FLM-δ transcripts were not detected and are only shown for completeness. Grey areas correspond to FLM exons of the FLM-ß and FLM-δ gene models as specified in Figure 1A. The arrow indicates the position of the 3' RACE primer used in combination with an oligo(dT) reverse primer to detect polyadenylated transcripts. (D) Frequency distribution of the transcripts displayed in (B) with total number of sequences depicted in the graph.DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/eLife.22114.01910.7554/eLife.22114.020Figure 7—figure supplement 1.Transgenic lines expressing different FLM alleles display differential FLM expression and splicing patterns.(A) Image of an agarose gel with the results of a 3’-RACE PCR. The primer used for 3’ amplification is indicated in Figure 7C. The gel portions from the FLMCol-0, INT6+CAA and PolyA_6xΔ amplification products framed with a dotted line were purified, cloned and subjected to DNA sequencing. (B) Schematic representation of the primers used for the qRT-PCR quantification of total FLM levels (exon 1) and the E1I1p intron 1 sequence-containing transcripts as indicated by arrows below the gene model. The black box corresponds to FLM exon 1, the grey box to the proximal portion of intron 1. Numbering is respective to the A of the ATG start codon. (C) Mean and SD of qRT-PCR analyses of intron 1 sequence-containing transcripts from four replicate pools of independent T2 lines. The relative decrease in E1I1p expression values compared to exon 1 transcript is indicated for each line in the graph. Note that the comparison of the expression values between the fragments are approximations since the primer efficiencies may not be identical. Primer sequences are listed in Supplementary file 7.DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/eLife.22114.020
|
study
| 100.0 |
(A) and (B) Mean and SD (n = 3) of FLM pre-mRNA levels. Student’s t-test: ***p≤0.001; n.s. = not significant. (C) Schematic representation of FLM cDNAs detected more than once (n = 163). FLM-δ transcripts were not detected and are only shown for completeness. Grey areas correspond to FLM exons of the FLM-ß and FLM-δ gene models as specified in Figure 1A. The arrow indicates the position of the 3' RACE primer used in combination with an oligo(dT) reverse primer to detect polyadenylated transcripts. (D) Frequency distribution of the transcripts displayed in (B) with total number of sequences depicted in the graph.
|
study
| 100.0 |
10.7554/eLife.22114.020Figure 7—figure supplement 1.Transgenic lines expressing different FLM alleles display differential FLM expression and splicing patterns.(A) Image of an agarose gel with the results of a 3’-RACE PCR. The primer used for 3’ amplification is indicated in Figure 7C. The gel portions from the FLMCol-0, INT6+CAA and PolyA_6xΔ amplification products framed with a dotted line were purified, cloned and subjected to DNA sequencing. (B) Schematic representation of the primers used for the qRT-PCR quantification of total FLM levels (exon 1) and the E1I1p intron 1 sequence-containing transcripts as indicated by arrows below the gene model. The black box corresponds to FLM exon 1, the grey box to the proximal portion of intron 1. Numbering is respective to the A of the ATG start codon. (C) Mean and SD of qRT-PCR analyses of intron 1 sequence-containing transcripts from four replicate pools of independent T2 lines. The relative decrease in E1I1p expression values compared to exon 1 transcript is indicated for each line in the graph. Note that the comparison of the expression values between the fragments are approximations since the primer efficiencies may not be identical. Primer sequences are listed in Supplementary file 7.DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/eLife.22114.020
|
study
| 100.0 |
(A) Image of an agarose gel with the results of a 3’-RACE PCR. The primer used for 3’ amplification is indicated in Figure 7C. The gel portions from the FLMCol-0, INT6+CAA and PolyA_6xΔ amplification products framed with a dotted line were purified, cloned and subjected to DNA sequencing. (B) Schematic representation of the primers used for the qRT-PCR quantification of total FLM levels (exon 1) and the E1I1p intron 1 sequence-containing transcripts as indicated by arrows below the gene model. The black box corresponds to FLM exon 1, the grey box to the proximal portion of intron 1. Numbering is respective to the A of the ATG start codon. (C) Mean and SD of qRT-PCR analyses of intron 1 sequence-containing transcripts from four replicate pools of independent T2 lines. The relative decrease in E1I1p expression values compared to exon 1 transcript is indicated for each line in the graph. Note that the comparison of the expression values between the fragments are approximations since the primer efficiencies may not be identical. Primer sequences are listed in Supplementary file 7.
|
study
| 100.0 |
The nine PRO2+ and INT6+ haplotypes tested in transgenic experiments were present in 579 (69%) of all 840 accession with available genome sequence information (Figure 8—figure supplement 1A). To examine whether these haplotypes explain natural variation of FLM-ß levels in natural accessions, we randomly selected an experimental population of 94 accessions (2 to 14 accessions per PRO2+/INT6+ group, average 10) with a broad genetic and geographic distribution (Figure 8—figure supplement 1B,C). We next determined FLM-ß expression and, following quality filtering, grouped 85 accessions according to their PRO2+ or INT6+ haplotypes (Supplementary file 6A).
|
study
| 100.0 |
We found that the PRO2+/INT6+ haplotype significantly affected FLM-ß transcript levels (Figure 8—figure supplement 1D). When we integrated the average values from these natural accessions with the respective values from the transgenic analysis, we detected a positive, however not significant correlation, a likely consequence of the small number of datapoints (FLM-ß, R2 = 0.13) (Figure 8—figure supplement 1E).
|
study
| 100.0 |
To examine the correlation between FLM-ß expression and flowering time, we determined flowering time of accessions at 15°C. To avoid strong interference from the vernalization pathway, we selected 27 genetically diverse summer-annual accessions, which initiate flowering without the need of vernalization (Figure 8—figure supplement 2A, Supplementary file 6B). We measured FLM-ß transcript levels and flowering time at 15°C. As residual FLC transcript in these summer-annual accessions may still affect flowering time, we also determined FLC transcript levels (Coustham et al., 2012; Li et al., 2014; Duncan et al., 2015). Using a multiple linear regression approach, we found that FLM-ß and FLC explained 32.9% (R2 = 0.329, p=0.0083) of flowering time variation, with FLM-ß significantly explaining a subfraction of 21.0% (R2 = 0.210, p=0.011) and FLC only 11.9%, however not significantly (R2 = 0.119, p>0.05) (Figure 8B and Figure 8—figure supplement 2B). Further, by integration of expression data and flowering time data into a multiple linear model and comparison of the slopes, we found that flowering time responded stronger to FLM-ß levels in the accessions than in the transgenic variants (p=0.0321) (Figure 5B and Figure 8). Taken together, we concluded that variations in FLM-ß levels account for flowering time in cool ambient spring temperatures in a diverse population of summer-annual Arabidopsis accessions (Figure 9).10.7554/eLife.22114.021Figure 8.FLM-ß expression shows high correlation with flowering time in Arabidopsis accessions.(A) Correlation (simple linear regression) of FLM-ß transcript levels detected in transgenic plants and natural accessions with identical PRO2+ and INT6+ haplotypes. When the contribution of individual haplotypes was assessed, PRO2+AAAAC INT6+CAA showed an exceptional response in accessions and was excluded. Figure 8—figure supplement 1E shows the complete analysis. Horizontal and vertical error bars depict SD of four replicate transgenic line pools or SD of the accessions. Data of the transgenic lines was taken from Figure 4E. The grey area indicates the 95% confidence interval. (B) Correlation of FLM-ß transcript levels with flowering time (n = 8–10) as measured in rosette leaf number of summer-annual accessions. p=0.011.DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/eLife.22114.02110.7554/eLife.22114.022Figure 8—figure supplement 1.Geographic and genetic distribution of the PRO2+/INT6+ haplotypes among 840 accessions.(A) Pie chart with the relative distribution of the PRO2+/INT6+ haplotypes among 840 accessions. The Col-0 haplotype is marked in yellow, haplotypes analyzed as part of this study are marked in green. Haplotypes only represented by a single accession are not included. (B) Number of accessions selected from each of the nine PRO2+/INT6+ groups (average 10, in total 94 accessions). The color code indicates the genetic group membership (k = 9) of every accession as retrieved from the 1001 Genomes ADMIXTURE tool (http://tools.1001genomes.org/) (The 1001 Genomes Consortium, 2016). (C) Geographic distribution of the accessions shown in (B). (D) FLM-β transcript levels of accessions shown in (B) and (C) grouped by the PRO2+/INT6+ haplotype. Similar letters indicate no significant difference of total leaf number (Tukey HSD, p<0.05). (E) Correlation (simple linear regression) between FLM-ß transcript levels as detected in the transgenic analysis and in accessions with identical PRO2+/INT6+ haplotypes from plants grown at 15°C. The PRO2+AAAAC INT6+CAA haplotype, which was removed in Figure 8A, is shown and highlighted with a red arrow. Circle sizes represent the number of accessions analysed of each group as specified in the legend. Horizontal and vertical error bars depict SD of four replicate transgenic line pools or SD of the accessions of each group. Data for the transgenic line analysis were taken from Figure 4E. The grey area indicates the 95% confidence interval.DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/eLife.22114.02210.7554/eLife.22114.023Figure 8—figure supplement 2.Geographic distribution of summer-annual accessions.(A) Geographic distribution of the 27 summer-annual accessions as described in Figure 8B. (B) Correlation of FLC transcript levels with flowering time data (n = 8–10) as measured in rosette leaf number of summer-annual accessions. p>0.05.DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/eLife.22114.02310.7554/eLife.22114.024Figure 9.Model of the proposed role of PRO2+ and INT6+ haplotypes and temperature on FLM-ß abundance and flowering.The abundance of the flowering repressor FLM-ß decreases in response to higher temperature and flowering is consequently accelerated (Figures 1B and 4E) (Lee et al., 2013; Posé et al., 2013; Lutz et al., 2015). Note, that previous studies showed an especially prominent effect of FLM in a range from 9°C to 21°C (long-day photoperiod) (Lee et al., 2013; Posé et al., 2013; Lutz et al., 2015). At the genetic level, FLM-ß abundance is triggered by the PRO2+ (purple) and/or the INT6+ (pink) haplotype and flowering time correlated to FLM-ß abundance (Figure 4E). Among the PRO2+/INT6+ combinations tested, the Col-0 (grey) reference allele (PRO2+AAAAC/INT6+AAT) showed intermediate FLM-ß levels (Figure 4E). We suggest, that changes in flowering time due to changing ambient temperature can be precisely buffered by modifying the PRO2+ and INT6+ regions, as illustrated by similar plant symbols.DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/eLife.22114.024
|
study
| 100.0 |
(A) Correlation (simple linear regression) of FLM-ß transcript levels detected in transgenic plants and natural accessions with identical PRO2+ and INT6+ haplotypes. When the contribution of individual haplotypes was assessed, PRO2+AAAAC INT6+CAA showed an exceptional response in accessions and was excluded. Figure 8—figure supplement 1E shows the complete analysis. Horizontal and vertical error bars depict SD of four replicate transgenic line pools or SD of the accessions. Data of the transgenic lines was taken from Figure 4E. The grey area indicates the 95% confidence interval. (B) Correlation of FLM-ß transcript levels with flowering time (n = 8–10) as measured in rosette leaf number of summer-annual accessions. p=0.011.
|
study
| 100.0 |
10.7554/eLife.22114.022Figure 8—figure supplement 1.Geographic and genetic distribution of the PRO2+/INT6+ haplotypes among 840 accessions.(A) Pie chart with the relative distribution of the PRO2+/INT6+ haplotypes among 840 accessions. The Col-0 haplotype is marked in yellow, haplotypes analyzed as part of this study are marked in green. Haplotypes only represented by a single accession are not included. (B) Number of accessions selected from each of the nine PRO2+/INT6+ groups (average 10, in total 94 accessions). The color code indicates the genetic group membership (k = 9) of every accession as retrieved from the 1001 Genomes ADMIXTURE tool (http://tools.1001genomes.org/) (The 1001 Genomes Consortium, 2016). (C) Geographic distribution of the accessions shown in (B). (D) FLM-β transcript levels of accessions shown in (B) and (C) grouped by the PRO2+/INT6+ haplotype. Similar letters indicate no significant difference of total leaf number (Tukey HSD, p<0.05). (E) Correlation (simple linear regression) between FLM-ß transcript levels as detected in the transgenic analysis and in accessions with identical PRO2+/INT6+ haplotypes from plants grown at 15°C. The PRO2+AAAAC INT6+CAA haplotype, which was removed in Figure 8A, is shown and highlighted with a red arrow. Circle sizes represent the number of accessions analysed of each group as specified in the legend. Horizontal and vertical error bars depict SD of four replicate transgenic line pools or SD of the accessions of each group. Data for the transgenic line analysis were taken from Figure 4E. The grey area indicates the 95% confidence interval.DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/eLife.22114.022
|
study
| 100.0 |
(A) Pie chart with the relative distribution of the PRO2+/INT6+ haplotypes among 840 accessions. The Col-0 haplotype is marked in yellow, haplotypes analyzed as part of this study are marked in green. Haplotypes only represented by a single accession are not included. (B) Number of accessions selected from each of the nine PRO2+/INT6+ groups (average 10, in total 94 accessions). The color code indicates the genetic group membership (k = 9) of every accession as retrieved from the 1001 Genomes ADMIXTURE tool (http://tools.1001genomes.org/) (The 1001 Genomes Consortium, 2016). (C) Geographic distribution of the accessions shown in (B). (D) FLM-β transcript levels of accessions shown in (B) and (C) grouped by the PRO2+/INT6+ haplotype. Similar letters indicate no significant difference of total leaf number (Tukey HSD, p<0.05). (E) Correlation (simple linear regression) between FLM-ß transcript levels as detected in the transgenic analysis and in accessions with identical PRO2+/INT6+ haplotypes from plants grown at 15°C. The PRO2+AAAAC INT6+CAA haplotype, which was removed in Figure 8A, is shown and highlighted with a red arrow. Circle sizes represent the number of accessions analysed of each group as specified in the legend. Horizontal and vertical error bars depict SD of four replicate transgenic line pools or SD of the accessions of each group. Data for the transgenic line analysis were taken from Figure 4E. The grey area indicates the 95% confidence interval.
|
study
| 100.0 |
10.7554/eLife.22114.023Figure 8—figure supplement 2.Geographic distribution of summer-annual accessions.(A) Geographic distribution of the 27 summer-annual accessions as described in Figure 8B. (B) Correlation of FLC transcript levels with flowering time data (n = 8–10) as measured in rosette leaf number of summer-annual accessions. p>0.05.DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/eLife.22114.023
|
study
| 100.0 |
The abundance of the flowering repressor FLM-ß decreases in response to higher temperature and flowering is consequently accelerated (Figures 1B and 4E) (Lee et al., 2013; Posé et al., 2013; Lutz et al., 2015). Note, that previous studies showed an especially prominent effect of FLM in a range from 9°C to 21°C (long-day photoperiod) (Lee et al., 2013; Posé et al., 2013; Lutz et al., 2015). At the genetic level, FLM-ß abundance is triggered by the PRO2+ (purple) and/or the INT6+ (pink) haplotype and flowering time correlated to FLM-ß abundance (Figure 4E). Among the PRO2+/INT6+ combinations tested, the Col-0 (grey) reference allele (PRO2+AAAAC/INT6+AAT) showed intermediate FLM-ß levels (Figure 4E). We suggest, that changes in flowering time due to changing ambient temperature can be precisely buffered by modifying the PRO2+ and INT6+ regions, as illustrated by similar plant symbols.
|
study
| 100.0 |
Ambient temperature during spring is a major cue determining flowering time. Cool temperatures generally delay and warm temperatures promote flowering time of Arabidopsis. The FLM locus explains flowering time variation in different ambient temperatures but the underlying genetic bases of FLM-dependent flowering remained largely unclear (Salomé et al., 2011; el-Lithy et al., 2006; O'Neill et al., 2008).
|
study
| 99.94 |
We found that, besides the FLM promoter, also intron 1 sequences were essential for FLM basal expression and subsequently identified by phylogenomic footprinting a conserved 373 bp intron 1 region essential for FLM basal expression (Figure 2). Further, through association analyses using genomic sequence information, we uncovered FLM regulatory regions (PRO2+ and INT6+) that control temperature-dependent FLM expression in a haplotype-specific manner (Figure 4). While most PRO2+ and INT6+ haplotypes displayed differential basal but temperature-sensitive FLM expression, correlating strongly with changes in flowering time, one INT6+ variant, INT6+CAA, was strongly compromised in temperature-sensitive FLM regulation and flowering pointing at the importance of this intronic region for flowering time adaptation (Figures 4 and 6).
|
study
| 100.0 |
In all our experiments, FLM-ß highly correlated (R2 = 0.94) with flowering time over a broad vegetative range (15–30 rosette leaves) when determined at 15°C and tested in a homozygous background, regardless of the type of variant (Figure 5). Our finding that FLM-ß had a stronger effect in the control of flowering time than FLM-δ indicates that previously phrased functional models proposing that FLM-δ had an antagonistic activity to FLM-ß need to be corrected (Posé et al., 2013; Sureshkumar et al., 2016). This is further supported by the fact that our results estimate that FLM-δ levels are overall very low and that we did not identify a single FLM-δ clone in a directed sequencing approach that identified 53 FLM-ß clones. Our findings thus support more recent studies suggesting that the FLM-δ splice variant may be biologically irrelevant (Sureshkumar et al., 2016; Lutz et al., 2015). One of these studies also identified a large number of biologically irrelevant transcripts that could be identified with the primer combination used here for the detection of FLM-δ (Sureshkumar et al., 2016). Our data thus support the conclusion that none of these amplification products has a biologically important function (Sureshkumar et al., 2016).
|
study
| 100.0 |
Whereas the PRO2+ and INT6+ polymorphisms tested affected FLM transcript abundance, the molecular causes of these transcription changes varied among the different polymorphisms (Figures 4 and 7). Deletion of a 225 bp promoter region including the PRO2+ polymorphic site was associated with tenfold reduced levels of FLM pre-mRNA indicating that this promoter region was essential for FLM expression (Figure 7). A twofold relative difference of FLM-ß levels was found when comparing the PRO2+GATAC and PRO2+AAACC variants with the lowest and highest FLM-ß expression, respectively, and our linear model would predict a flowering time difference of 14.4 leaves at 15°C (Figures 4 and 5). The PRO2+ region harbours a predicted MADS-box transcription factor binding site and several instances of auto- or cross-regulation of MADS-box factors have been described (de Folter et al., 2005; Kaufmann et al., 2009; Smaczniak et al., 2012). It can therefore be envisioned that FLM expression is regulated by MADS-box transcription factors and that PRO2+ polymorphisms modulate the efficiency or specificity of these binding events and thereby modulate basal FLM expression.
|
study
| 100.0 |
Similarly, the deletion of a 373 bp fragment in FLM intron 1 resulted in an elevenfold reduction in FLM expression and earlier flowering by 11.5 leaves as experimentally determined. This effect size is much smaller than predicted by the linear model. However, as proposed earlier, this may likely be due to a critical lower threshold for FLM-ß to become effective (Figures 4 and 5). Intronic cis-regulatory transcription factor binding sites have been identified in other MADS-box transcription factors and interactions of enhancer and silencer elements that reside in the promoter sequence or the 3’-end of the first intron were reported (Hong et al., 2003; Schauer et al., 2009). Thus, similar mechanisms may govern the expression of FLM at intron 1 sites that may act in isolation or together with binding events at the FLM promoter.
|
study
| 100.0 |
Interestingly, natural polymorphisms in intron 6 (INT6+) led to about fourfold differences in the abundance of FLM-ß, which could, as predicted by the linear model, relate to a flowering time delay by 28.8 leaves, suggesting that INT6+ harbours extensive potential to fine-tune flowering (Figures 4 and 5). Importantly, this molecular effect appears to be mediated, in the case of INT6+CAA, by effects on the splicing efficiency and specificity at the distal intron 1. There, INT6+CAA promotes the formation of short intron 1-containing transcripts, at the expense of FLM-ß, that are likely subjected for degradation by nonsense-mediated decay (Figure 7) (Lutz et al., 2015).
|
study
| 100.0 |
The INT6+ site is directly flanked by a short PolyA motif and such sites represent potential recognition sites of hnRNP (heterogeneous nuclear ribonucleoprotein) splicing factors. The predicted hnRNP binding pattern at INT6+ depended indeed on the INT6+ haplotype, when predicted by web-based algorithms, and their binding preference and activity, in concert with other splicing or transcriptional regulators, may ultimately be the basis of the splicing changes observed here (Piva et al., 2012; Carrillo Oesterreich et al., 2011; Reddy et al., 2013).
|
study
| 100.0 |
The cooccurrence of PolyA motifs ([A]7-11) with the PRO2+ and the INT6+ sites had attracted our attention (Figure 4—figure supplement 1). Combinatorial deletions of all six FLM PolyA motifs led to gradual decreases in FLM-ß abundance, which could be explained be altered intron 1 splicing (Figure 7). This ultimately resulted in FLM-ß levels below a lower effective threshold in the PolyA_6xΔ lines and consequently very early flowering (Figure 4—figure supplement 1). This suggested that the PolyA motifs may modulate FLM expression by altering FLM splicing. In support of this conclusion, we found that an extended PolyA motif, as it is present in the INT6+AAA variant when compared to the Col-0 reference variant INT6+AAT, correlated with strong increases in FLM-ß but not in FLM-δ abundance (Figure 4). PolyA motifs are known to prevent nucleosome binding and changes of chromatin architecture may influence splicing (Reddy et al., 2013; Suter et al., 2000; Wijnker et al., 2013). The knowledge about the underlying molecular mechanisms and the identity and specificity of the splicing regulators in plants is still very limited. We noted with interest, however, that several hnRNPs have a reported role in flowering time regulation in Arabidopsis and wheat (Kippes et al., 2015; Fusaro et al., 2007; Streitner et al., 2012; Xiao et al., 2015).
|
study
| 100.0 |
The nine PRO2+/INT6+ haplotype combinations included in our transgenic experiments represent 69% of the world-wide PRO2+/INT6+ variation (Figure 8—figure supplement 1A,B). We found, that FLM-ß explained around 21% of flowering time in a genetically heterogeneous population of summer-annual Arabidopsis accessions (Figure 8). Hence, PRO2+ and INT6+ haplotypes regulate FLM-ß abundance and, in turn, contribute to flowering time regulation in Arabidopsis accessions (Figures 8 and 9). We consider it not surprising that the correlation of flowering time with FLM-ß levels (21% versus 94%) as well as the responsiveness of flowering time to FLM-ß levels differ between a genetically heterogeneous natural population and the homogenous transgenic population. First, we showed that residual FLC transcript may also slightly contribute to variation of flowering time of summer-annual accessions, possibly interfering with the effects of FLM-ß (Balasubramanian et al., 2006; Li et al., 2006). Further, additional sequence variation in FLM in natural accessions may contribute to relevant expression changes, e.g. in the part of intron 1 identified as essential for FLM expression but not analysed in further detail here (Figure 2). Then, it is possible that these accessions harbour variation in the FLM-related MAF2 - 4, and this variation may differentially affect flowering time, in isolation or in combination with variation of their common interaction partner SVP (Ratcliffe et al., 2003; Airoldi et al., 2015; Scortecci et al., 2003). Bearing these possible genetic and environmental interferences in mind, we regard the detected effect of FLM-ß on flowering (21%) in cool (15°C) temperatures as considerable and suggest that it is rather an underestimation.
|
study
| 100.0 |
We found a uniform distribution of nine PRO2+/INT6+ haplotype combinations among the genetic clusters that have recently been established based on the analysis of genomic sequences from 1135 Arabidopsis accessions (The 1001 Genomes Consortium, 2016). Interestingly, the PRO2+GGAAC/INT6+AAT haplotype was overrepresented among the relict accessions and the PRO2+AAAAC/INT6+AAA haplotype was overrepresented among the Asian group (The 1001 Genomes Consortium, 2016) (Figure 8—figure supplement 1). In our experiments, both of these haplotypes were associated with increased FLM-ß transcript levels and consequently late flowering (Figure 4). Since the relict and Asian accessions have been proposed to originate from glacial refugia from where central Europe was recolonized after the last ice age, these late-flowering PRO2+/INT6+ haplotypes may represent original haplotypes (Sharbel et al., 2000; Schmid et al., 2006). The late flowering phenotype associated with these haplotypes would be in line with the hypothesis that late flowering alleles are more ancient and that early flowering alleles were derived only during the more recent Arabidopsis evolution (Toomajian et al., 2006). Further, genetic linkage among the PRO2+ and INT6+ polymorphic sites was overall low (R2 = 0.11–0.55) and the sequences surrounding PRO2+ and INT6+ were comparatively conserved. Taken together, this suggests that mutations in the PRO2+ and INT6+ sites independently arose multiple times and that these sites were preferentially selected during Arabidopsis flowering adaptation. All PRO2+/INT6+ alleles displayed a broad geographic distribution, except PRO2+GGAAC/INT6+AAT, which was overrepresented in Spain (Figure 8—figure supplement 1). Likely, microclimates at specific geographic locations rather than general climate conditions at broad geographic regions may be important to drive adaptation of flowering to changing ambient temperature, as it was previously suggested for broadly distributed non-coding haplotypes of FLC that explain variation in vernalization (Li et al., 2014; Weigel, 2012; Shindo et al., 2006).
|
study
| 100.0 |
Mutations in cis-regulatory regions are important for adaptation and phenotypic evolution and have a low probability to generate negative pleiotropic effects (Swinnen et al., 2016; Meyer and Purugganan, 2013; Wray, 2007). FLM may be an ideal candidate for flowering time adaptation through non-coding sequence variation at PRO2+ and INT6+ sites since changes in FLM-ß abundance precisely modulate flowering while maintaining phenotypic plasticity and without generating negative pleiotropic effects (Figure 9). Changes at the PRO2+ and INT6+ sites should allow adapting flowering time in response to altered geographic distribution and consequently climate conditions as well as during changing global environments (Figure 9). The role of FLM orthologues in other Brassicaceae, including a number of agronomically important species, is as yet not understood. It is thus at present not possible to predict the role of Arabidopsis FLM polymorphisms for flowering time adaptation and plant breeding in this plant family. However, in view of the availability of new genome editing methodologies, the knowledge about important non-coding regions may be useful to fine-tune flowering time (Shan et al., 2013). This may allow buffering the anticipated negative effects on agricultural systems that occur as a consequence of small temperature changes during climate change (Moore and Lobell, 2015; Wheeler and von Braun, 2013).
|
study
| 99.4 |
All Arabidopsis thaliana accessions used in this study as well as flm-3 (Salk_141971; Col-0) and Nd-1 (N1636) were provided by the Nottingham Arabidopsis Stock Centre (NASC; Nottingham, UK). flc-3 and FRISF-2 FLC (Michaels and Amasino, 1999) were a gift from Franziska Turck and George Coupland (Max-Planck Institute of Plant Breeding Research, Cologne, Germany). pFLM::gFLM (pDP34), pFLM::FLM-ß (pDP96), and pFLM::FLM-δ (pDP97) were previously reported (Posé et al., 2013). Primers to screen the accessions for the FLMLINE insertion were used as previously described (Lutz et al., 2015).
|
study
| 100.0 |
For flowering time analyses, plants were grown under long day-conditions with 16 hr white light (110–130 μmol m−2 s−1)/8 hr dark in MLR-351 SANYO growth chambers (Ewald, Bad Nenndorf, Germany). Plants were randomly arranged in trays and trays were rearranged every day. Water was supplied by subirrigation. Flowering time was quantified by counting rosette leaf numbers (RLN). Consistent with previous reports, we observed a strong correlation between days to bolting and rosette leaf number of Arabidopsis accessions (Figure 8—figure supplement 2C) (Atwell et al., 2010). Student’s t-tests (normally distributed values), Wilcoxon rank tests (not normally distributed values), and multiple regression models were calculated with R (http://www.r-project.org/).
|
study
| 100.0 |
A previously described construct with the Col-0 genomic FLM fragment pFLM::gFLM template (pDP34) (Posé et al., 2013) was recombined into a pDONR201 destination vector using the Gateway system (Life Technologies, Carlsbad, CA). This vector was used as a template (FLMCol-0) to generate mutations using either a single phosphorylated primer or a combination of forward and reverse primers (Sawano and Miyawaki, 2000; Hansson et al., 2008). In case of variants with multiple modifications, individual mutations were introduced one at a time. The mutated inserts were recombined to the pFAST-R07 expression vector using the Gateway system (Life Technologies, Carlsbad, CA) (Shimada et al., 2010). All expression constructs were verified by sequencing and transformed into Agrobacterium tumefaciens strain GV3101. Nd-1 plants were transformed using the floral-dip method (Clough and Bent, 1998) and transgenic plants were identified based on seed fluorescence (Shimada et al., 2010). Segregation of T2 lines was examined and lines with single insertion events were selected for further analysis based on segregation ratios (Shimada et al., 2010). A list of primers and expression constructs is listed in Supplementary file 7.
|
study
| 100.0 |
For qRT-PCR analyses of homozygous lines, total RNA was isolated from three biological replicates using the NucleoSpin RNA kit (Machery-Nagel, Düren, Germany). DNA was removed by an on-column treatment with rDNase (Machery-Nagel, Düren, Germany). 2–3 μg total RNA were reverse transcribed with M-MuLV Reverse Transcriptase (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, USA) using an oligo(dT) primer. The cDNA equivalent of 30–50 ng total RNA was used in a 12 μl PCR reaction with SsoAdvancedUniversal SYBR Green Supermix (BioRad, München, Germany) in a CFX96 Real-Time System Cycler (BioRad, München, Germany). The relative quantification was calculated with the ΔΔCt method using ACT8 (AT1G49240) as a standard (Pfaffl, 2001). For the analysis of the pooled independent T2 transgenic lines, a quarter of all available independent lines per construct (18 to 45) was sampled resulting in four replicate pools comprising between four and eleven lines. Around 1000 seeds were used for pooling per line. One RNA sample was extracted per replicate pool and processed as described above.
|
study
| 100.0 |
The large scale expression experiments were performed using a previously described 96-well format (Figure 8 and Supplementary file 3) (Box et al., 2011). DNA was digested with DNaseI (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, USA) and reverse transcription and qPCR reactions were performed as described above using a CFX384 Real-Time System Cycler (BioRad, München, Germany). ACT8 (AT1G49240) and BETA-TUBULIN-4 (AT5G44340) were used as reference genes. Student’s t-tests were calculated with Excel (Microsoft). qRT-PCR primers are listed in Supplementary file 7.
|
study
| 100.0 |
Sequence information from datasets of 776 and 840 accessions, respectively, have been available that were used in this study. The genomic sequences of a comprehensive set of 1135 Arabidopsis accessions have just recently been released and were used for concluding analyses (The 1001 Genomes Consortium, 2016). Genomic FLM sequences (7 kb; Chr1: 28953637–28960296; including 2 kb upstream and 0.2 kb downstream sequence) were extracted from 776 accessions from the 1001 Genomes portal (http://1001genomes.org/datacenter/) using the Wang dataset (343 accessions), the GMI dataset (180 accessions), the Salk dataset (171 accessions) and the MPI dataset (80 accessions) (The 1001 Genomes Consortium, 2016; Schmitz et al., 2013; Long et al., 2013; Cao et al., 2011). 45 SNPs with a MAF>5% were extracted and used for haplotype analysis of the FLM locus (Figure 3A and Figure 3—figure supplement 1). 31 SNPs were polymorphic between the 54 selected accessions represented in the FLM haplotype set (Supplementary file 1).
|
study
| 100.0 |
To obtain an extended set of sequences that included not only SNPs but also information about insertions and deletions, we extracted FLM genomic sequences (including 2 kb upstream and 0.38 kb downstream sequence) from the GEBrowser 3.0 resource (http://signal.salk.edu/atg1001/3.0/gebrowser.php). A set of 850 sequences was manually curated and aligned using MEGA7.0.14 (Tamura et al., 2011). Some sequences were excluded since they possessed a high number of ambiguous bases. The core sequence set consisted of 840 sequences. This sequence set was used for association analysis (Figure 3—figure supplements 4–7) and all further analysis on FLM PRO2+ and INT6+ variation (Figure 8 and Figure 8—figure supplement 1). Accession identifiers, geographic data, and ADMIXTURE group membership (k = 9) were obtained from the 1001 genomes tool collection (http://tools.1001genomes.org/) (The 1001 Genomes Consortium, 2016).
|
study
| 100.0 |
Alignments were calculated using ClustalW2 or MUSCLE and Neighbor-Joining trees (Maximum Composite Likelihood method, 1000 bootstrap replicates) were constructed with Geneious vR7.0.5 (Biomatters Limited, Auckland, New Zealand) and MEGA7.0.14 (Tamura et al., 2011).
|
study
| 99.94 |
To detect variants with significant effects on FLM transcript levels (simple single locus association test), 119 variants of a 7 kb FLM locus were extracted from a set of 840 sequences retrieved from the GEBrowser 3.0, as described above. To examine whether a variant showed a significant effect on FLM expression, the qRT-PCR expression values of the 54 accessions from the FLM haplotype set were used as input data (Supplementary file 4) to run Kruskal-Wallis tests using R (http://www.r-project.org/). p-values from all comparisons were corrected following the Benjamini-Hochberg multiple testing correction and resulting values were -log(10) transformed and plotted along the gene model (Figure 3—figure supplement 5 and Supplementary file 5).
|
study
| 100.0 |
FLM orthologues were identified first by OrthoMCL (V2.0) clustering (PMID: 12952885; standard parameters, inflation value = 1.5, BLAST e-value-cutoff = e-05), incorporating predicted protein sequences from Arabidopsis thaliana (TAIR10; AT1G77080.4, AT5G65060.1), Arabidopsis lyrata (V1.0; fgenesh2_kg.2__2000__AT1G77080, fgenesh2_kg.8__2543__AT5G65050, fgenesh2_kg.233__4__AT5G65050), Boechera stricta (V1.2; Bostr.4104s0001.1), Brassica rapa (V1.3; Brara.B03928.1.p, Brara.F02378.1.p), Brassica oleracea (V2.1; Bo2g166500.1, Bo2g166560.1), Capsella grandiflora (V1.1; Cagra.0450s0030.1, Cagra.0917s0081.1), Capsella rubella (V1.0; Carubv10020979m, Carubv10027327m), Gossypium raimondii (V2.1), Medicago truncatula (V4.0), Oryza sativa (MSU7), Populus trichocarpa (V3.0) and Solanum lycopersicum (ITAG2.3). Data sets were downloaded from Phytozome (Goodstein et al., 2012), PGSB PlantsDB (Spannagl et al., 2016) and Ensembl Plants (Kersey et al., 2016). Cluster(s) containing FLM were extracted and, in case of the presence of multiple group members from individual species, filtered further using the best bi-directional BLAST hit criterion. Genomic sequences and 2 kb upstream region were aligned with ClustalW2 (Larkin et al., 2007). Conserved regions in the alignment were manually annotated.
|
study
| 100.0 |
In the interests of transparency, eLife includes the editorial decision letter and accompanying author responses. A lightly edited version of the letter sent to the authors after peer review is shown, indicating the most substantive concerns; minor comments are not usually included.
|
other
| 99.94 |
Thank you for submitting your article "Natural haplotypes of FLM non-coding sequences fine-tune flowering time in ambient spring temperatures in Arabidopsis" for consideration by eLife. Your article has been favorably evaluated by Ian Baldwin (Senior Editor) and three reviewers, one of whom is a member of our Board of Reviewing Editors. The following individual involved in review of your submission has agreed to reveal his identity: Dan Runcie (Reviewer #2).
|
other
| 99.94 |
1) The FLM expression to flowering correlation is not sufficient. The exclusion of multiple accessions was considered not justified. A multiple regression approach with FLC expression included in the model is a way that may account for this and would be a more correct statistical test of the hypothesis.
|
study
| 99.94 |
The authors present a detailed search for the genetic basis of variation in ambient temperature sensitivity for flowering time in Arabidopsis. Focusing specifically on the control of the expression of FLM which has been previously linked to temperature sensitivity, the authors draw on a range of modern and innovative tools to pinpoint alleles conferring variation FLM expression within the species. They identify the major alleles controlling both basal expression and temperature sensitivity of FLM segregating at high frequency in the species and confirm effects of these alleles using transgenics. Overall, this study is important in its demonstration of how modern tools in Arabidopsis can be used to rapidly identify the specific base-pairs underlying natural variation in important traits. While I think that the major conclusions seem robust and well-supported, this is a very complicated paper and I do have concerns about specific analyses and interpretations.
|
review
| 99.8 |
1) My main concern is with the central focus on the comparison between two isoforms of FLM (FLMb and FLMd). A recent study showed that the qPCR assays targeting these isoforms actually pick up other isoforms, many of which produce truncated proteins (Sureshkumar et al. 2016 Nature Plants). Here, the authors note that they can't even find a true FLMd transcript (out of 163 tested). It is not clear what if any conclusions can be drawn from the FLMd assay, and so devoting so much space throughout the article and figures to FLMd is not useful and distracting. On the other hand, this and earlier studies the FLMb assay does seem to be useful for assaying FLM activity, so I am comfortable with these results.
|
review
| 99.8 |
2) Secondly, I am concerned with the results presented in Figure 8 – the correlations between FLM expression in accessions and a) expression in constructs and b) flowering times of the accessions. In order to find a correlation between FLM expression in accessions and in the transgenic lines with the corresponding constructs, the authors dropped an "outlier" point (1 each for FLMb and FLMd). No justification for this is given beyond the point not fitting expectations. It's not clear from Figure 8—figure supplement 1 that these points are really more outliers than any others. And, it's not that this is really a single point – on the y-axis this is the average expression of ~10 accessions, so why should they all be dropped?
|
study
| 98.7 |
3) For the flowering time comparison, the lines were vernalized. However, FLM is known to be repressed by vernalization (as the authors note), so how could it be affecting flowering, and might there be variation among lines in how FLM responds to the vernalization? It seems more likely that other loci that are correlated with FLM are controlling flowering time here. The authors should either measure FLM expression in these vernalized plants and correlate that with flowering, or repeat the experiment without vernalization where FLM and FLC expression in these lines has already been measured. A better way to control for FLC variation would be to statistically account for its effects with multiple regression.
|
study
| 86.56 |
4) Finally, on the statistical side, the conclusions about "temperature insensitivity" for INT6+ alleles are not backed by statistics – the authors should explicitly test for a change in the temperature sensitivity between FLM-Col0 and INT6+. From the graphs, it appears temperature sensitivity is reduced, but certainly not eliminated (Figure 6).
|
other
| 97.7 |
In “Natural haplotypes of FLM non-coding sequences fine-tune flowering time in ambient spring temperatures in Arabidopsis" Lutz et al. address the biological relevance of FLM splice variants for variation in flowering time in natural accessions and identify non-coding sequence polymorphisms that contribute to the regulation of basal expression levels and the differential, thermo-responsive generation of the β and δ splice variants. As such, this work provides novel insights into the regulation of flowering in the ambient temperature range and manages to dissect polymorphisms which are relevant for basal FLM expression and temperature-induced effects on the β and δ splice variants.
|
study
| 100.0 |
The manuscript is overall very well written and the authors provide extensive data which has apparently been subjected to comprehensive and sound statistical analyses. The data is presented in an attractive manner. Main manuscript figures are supported by extensive supplementary material including the presentation of extensive control data, which is greatly appreciated. In some cases the figure descriptions or legends should be extended. Due to the vast amount of data condensed in the figures, the descriptions (at least in the text) should be detailed enough for a wide readership to follow the authors through their argumentation.
|
other
| 99.94 |
1) The authors state that “The presence of intron 1 is sufficient to restore the basal expression of FLM” – while it does restore expression levels to detectable levels, the expression level of the β splice variant at 15°C is considerably lower than the WT, whereas the FLMδ levels are similar the WT at this temperature. This would indicate that intron 1 alone cannot fully account for basal levels of FLM β.
|
study
| 99.94 |
2) The use of pools of independent segregating T2 lines for transcriptional analysis seems unusual. While the controls presented in Figure 2—figure supplement 2 suggest that this can recapitulate the “natural” situation (why not subjected to statistical analysis?), it seems nonetheless risky to deliberately tolerate the presence of non-transgenics in the mix. Could the authors state their reasoning for this unusual procedure and provide the missing statistics here? Also, the phrase “replicate pools compromising…” should probably read “comprising”.
|
other
| 97.4 |
3) I had a hard time to comprehensively grasp the information provided in Figure 3, especially when it comes to the color code and its use in Figure 3B. Figure 3—figure supplement 1 provides additional information, but still the color coding of haplotypes which is provided for three different regions (full length, intron 1 or intron 6) is confusing as the composition of the different haplotypes varies depending on the selected gene region (Figure 3—figure supplement.1G). The authors may want to better explain these figures to enable a wide readership to follow their analysis and key points here. Also, in the caption of Figure 3—figure supplement 1G the haplotype “Numbers on the left” probably refer to (D) not (E)?
|
other
| 98.75 |
4) Figure 5B and C: Please specify again in the figure caption that this data corresponds to 40 selected accessions. Why was the FLM β level not determined in the vernalized plants? Even though FLC effects seem to be generally negligible, it would have been as easy to do the analysis on the same material.
|
other
| 99.44 |
5) In Figure 5—figure supplement 1D/E: removing the lower quartile (or more!) of flowering time data for the correlation analysis by simple assumption that these represent the non-transformed Nd-1 individuals of the segregating population is questionable. While this may be an attractive assumption, it negates the fact that each line pool may represent its individual set of variances (also present in ND-1 itself). This would at least require a spot check for the presence of transgenes in this pool or the percentage of “clean” Nd-1 individuals. In principle, a simple test by PCR would have provided a solid answer to that. As is, the authors should include these lines in the correlation analysis as the factual genotype is not known.
|
other
| 91.0 |
Thank you for resubmitting your work entitled "Natural haplotypes of FLM non-coding sequences fine-tune flowering time in ambient spring temperatures in Arabidopsis" for further consideration at eLife. Your revised article has been favorably evaluated by Ian Baldwin (Senior Editor), a Reviewing Editor, and two reviewers.
|
other
| 99.94 |
The new experiment to test this is very helpful, and does provide good evidence that FLMB expression level is important for flowering time variation. My concern is with interpretation: The authors provide several explanations for why the correlation between flowering and FLMB expression in this accession set is lower than in the transgenics. This is trivial because there is much more variation within each haplotype class in the accessions than the transgenics, because they vary at many loci across the genome. I think the real question should be: Is the slope of the relationship between FLMB and flowering time significantly less in the accessions? This would ask if the equivalent change in FLMB expression would cause the same change in flowering. This is a more meaningful metric than change in R2. The correct test would be to include both accessions and transgenics in the same model (flowering_time ~ FLMB * genotype_class), and ask if the interaction is significant.
|
study
| 99.75 |
This is the aim of the analysis in Figure 8A and Figure 8—figure supplement 1D/E. The main claim is that the expression variation induced by these haplotypes in the transgenics is correlated with the expression variation of accessions carrying the same haplotypes. This conclusion only holds when one of the 9 haplotypes is excluded. The explanation given for excluding this haplotype is that the correlation goes up after removing this. I did a quick simulation study and found that using this algorithm you'd expect that the best correlation found by dropping each of the 9 pairs would be greater than 46% about 21% of the time even if there were actually no correlation at all. So, this is really not very strong evidence that the haplotype effects are similar. Certainly, the statement "We found that the PRO2+/INT6+ effects, as detected in transgenic experiments (R2 = 0.94), partially explain the FLM-ß expression variation in natural Arabidopsis accessions (R2 = 0.46)" is not supported, because this 46% number is only true when you exclude those accessions that don't fit.
|
study
| 99.94 |
As above, I think a more appropriate analysis would be to ask if the sizes of the differences between the haplotypes is the same in the transgenics and the accessions (i.e., is the slope of the graph different from 1?). A more straightforward answer to the question of how much variation in FLMB is explained by these haplotypes is simply to report the R2 for the analysis shown in Figure 8—figure supplement 1D.
|
study
| 99.9 |
This conclusion is important because of the model that FLM controls temperature sensitivity of flowering. New data are presented here relative to the previous version, though where they came from is not clear. The correct test for a change in temperature sensitivity is to ask if the interaction between genotype and temperature is significant (expression ~ Genotype + Temp + Genotype:Temp). The n.s. effect of temperature on expression for INT6+ is not evidence of no temperature effect, only a lack of evidence for a temperature effect. The figure caption states the statistics are done based on a t-test. A t-test can't be used to test for an interaction (except in 6C/D if the 5 transgenic lines per genotype were used as the replicates, n = 5). An ANOVA is needed to conclude that this haplotype affects temperature sensitivity.
|
study
| 100.0 |
1) The authors have clarified that the major concerns about the exclusion of accessions from the correlation of FLM expression and flowering time was largely based on a misunderstanding of the method and intention of the analysis. The changes to the text makes this much more clear now. The exclusion of the “exceptional" haplotypes raises the correlation from 0.13 to 0.46 in a linear regression analysis. Please also provide the corresponding p-values here to make sure that the p-values reflect a robust correlation effect (as is done in the further analysis of FLMß/FLC expression via multiple regression analysis). Please also describe how p-values were obtained for both cases then.
|
review
| 99.56 |
2) I appreciate the explanation regarding the use of the pooling strategy and the inclusion of statistics. However, no information on the performed test is given in the figure caption. was this also a t-test as mentioned in the methods? If so, please state whether a two-sided t-test and correction for multiple testing was implicated. Otherwise perform an ANOVA with suitable post-hoc test.
|
other
| 99.7 |
1) The FLM expression to flowering correlation is not sufficient. The exclusion of multiple accessions was considered not justified. A multiple regression approach with FLC expression included in the model is a way that may account for this and would be a more correct statistical test of the hypothesis.
|
study
| 99.94 |
The authors present a detailed search for the genetic basis of variation in ambient temperature sensitivity for flowering time in Arabidopsis. Focusing specifically on the control of the expression of FLM which has been previously linked to temperature sensitivity, the authors draw on a range of modern and innovative tools to pinpoint alleles conferring variation FLM expression within the species. They identify the major alleles controlling both basal expression and temperature sensitivity of FLM segregating at high frequency in the species and confirm effects of these alleles using transgenics. Overall, this study is important in its demonstration of how modern tools in Arabidopsis can be used to rapidly identify the specific base-pairs underlying natural variation in important traits. While I think that the major conclusions seem robust and well-supported, this is a very complicated paper and I do have concerns about specific analyses and interpretations.
|
review
| 99.8 |
1) My main concern is with the central focus on the comparison between two isoforms of FLM (FLMb and FLMd). A recent study showed that the qPCR assays targeting these isoforms actually pick up other isoforms, many of which produce truncated proteins (Sureshkumar et al. 2016 Nature Plants). Here, the authors note that they can't even find a true FLMd transcript (out of 163 tested). It is not clear what if any conclusions can be drawn from the FLMd assay, and so devoting so much space throughout the article and figures to FLMd is not useful and distracting. On the other hand, this and earlier studies the FLMb assay does seem to be useful for assaying FLM activity, so I am comfortable with these results.
|
review
| 99.8 |
The major concept of our study had been to elucidate regulatory regions of FLM transcription and this also included analysis of FLMd. Rejecting the importance of FLMd was not a prerequisite but an important result of the study. It is true that the finding that FLMd may not have a function in flowering time control had already been a conclusion from our earlier work (Lutz et al., 2015). On the other side, the two papers that led to the original model, which now has to be considered invalid, were published very prominently (Nature, Science), reached a very large readership and are still frequently discussed and cited, e.g. in a very recent review (Deng and Cao, 2016, Current Opinion in Plant Biology). We therefore also felt that it may be used as an argument against our current data analysis and manuscript if we ignored FLMd.
|
review
| 99.9 |
We also felt that the two recent studies that put the model that attributed a functional role to FLMd into question (Lutz et al., 2015; Sureshkumar et al.,2016) did not yet convincingly proof that any regulatory role for FLMd could be completely rejected. We therefore included FLMd in the present study to test a putative regulatory role of FLMd with our new genetic materials and testing FLM expression in different environmental conditions. We had discussed internally and before submission of the original manuscript whether it was possible to reduce the data load by omitting FLMd data but came to the conclusion that this would weaken the significance of the data set. We have now reexamined this point and made the following changes to reduce the FLMd data load:
|
study
| 99.94 |
We have moved the FLMd data of Figure 5C to Figure 5—figure supplement1D. We removed the FLMd data from Figure 8—figure supplement 1E/F and the respective section in the text since, at this point, the conclusion that FLMd was not important had already been phrased.
|
other
| 99.7 |
That the primers used to detect FLMd may also amplify other minor isoforms was published comparatively late during our analysis (Sureshkumar et al., 2016). We agree that this issue needs to be addressed in the manuscript and discuss this point briefly in the Discussion:
|
other
| 99.75 |
“Our findings thus support more recent studies suggesting that the FLM-δ splice variant may be biologically irrelevant {Lutz, 2015 #118;Sureshkumar, 2016 #96}. One of these studies also identified a large number of biologically irrelevant transcripts that could be identified with the primer combination used here for the detection of FLM-δ {Sureshkumar, 2016 #96}. Our data thus support the conclusion that none of these amplification products has a biologically important function {Sureshkumar, 2016 #96}."
|
study
| 100.0 |
2) Secondly, I am concerned with the results presented in Figure 8 – the correlations between FLM expression in accessions and a) expression in constructs and b) flowering times of the accessions. In order to find a correlation between FLM expression in accessions and in the transgenic lines with the corresponding constructs, the authors dropped an "outlier" point (1 each for FLMb and FLMd). No justification for this is given beyond the point not fitting expectations. It's not clear from Figure 8—figure supplement 1 that these points are really more outliers than any others. And, it's not that this is really a single point – on the y-axis this is the average expression of ~10 accessions, so why should they all be dropped?
|
study
| 98.7 |
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.