hypothesis
stringlengths 17
1.31k
| premise
stringlengths 104
5.14k
| label
stringclasses 3
values |
|---|---|---|
[M]Meghan took a commercial flight from London to Toronto[/M], with Kensington Palace instructing the airline to protect the Duchess’ privacy and not let anyone approach her or take her picture.
|
Update, 8/21: Despite earlier reports that Markle is visiting Toronto and plans to travel to LA where her mother lives, neither are true according to royal correspondent Omid Scobie. “I expect them to be in Balmoral later this week before returning to London ahead of their upcoming engagements, starting with the Hamilton performance in aid of Sentebale on August 29,” Scobie tells BAZAAR.com.
Sources also told Scobie that Meghan and Harry stayed with George and Amal Clooney at Lake Como from Thursday to Sunday over the weekend, contradicting reports that Markle flew out to Canada.
Original story, 8/19: Ahead of her first royal tour with husband Prince Harry, which will see the couple visit Australia, New Zealand, Fiji, and the Kingdom of Tonga, Meghan Markle has reportedly hopped on a flight back to Toronto. Prior to moving to the United Kingdom to be with her husband, Meghan was, of course, based in Toronto, where she filmed all seven seasons of Suits.
More From Harper's BAZAAR play icon The triangle icon that indicates to play
Related Story Meghan Markle Channeled Audrey Hepburn
The Mirror is reporting that Meghan flew via Air Canada to Toronto, and that the airline was asked to protect the Duchess' privacy during her flight. The publication cites royal news hub, Royal Central, as their source for the information regarding Meghan's flight, with it being reported that Kensington Palace gave Air Canada strict instructions in a letter about her itinerary, apparently "requesting that no one takes Meghan’s picture or approaches her on the flight."
This is Meghan's first solo trip abroad since she became the Duchess of Sussex. It's likely that the royal is savoring some time with the close friends she made in the city when she lived there, prior to a busy few months of official engagements alongside Prince Harry.
This content is imported from twitter. You may be able to find the same content in another format, or you may be able to find more information, at their web site. Meghan is in Toronto and apparently she’s there to visit her friends before September.
|
n
|
[M]Meghan is in Toronto[/M] and apparently she’s there [M]to visit her friends before September[/M].
|
Meghan Markle, 37, and Prince Harry, 33, are back in the spotlight, after a relaxing few weeks to themselves over the summer. During August the couple jetted off to Lake Como to spend time with close friends George and Amal Clooney, and also visited Prince Charles and Camilla in the Scottish Highlands. The Duchess of Sussex also made a trip of her own, journeying back to her former home of Canada for a few days of rest and downtime. The details of Meghan’s stay have now been revealed - that she went to Toronto to spend three days with her best friend, Jessica Mulroney.
Meghan Markle news: Inside Duchess’ secret Canada trip and who she went to visit
Rumours of Meghan’s trip to Canada appeared earlier in the month when a letter from the Royal Family to Air Canada emerged giving strict instructions to protect Meghan’s privacy on board. Meghan took a commercial flight from London to Toronto, with Kensington Palace instructing the airline to protect the Duchess’ privacy and not let anyone approach her or take her picture. A source told Royal Central she had one glass of champagne and watched the Book Club during the eight-hour flight. The source revealed: “She seemed very relaxed and sipped on peppermint tea during the journey.” It now turns out that Meghan visited the Canadian city without Harry to visit her stylist Jessica Mulroney, and spent a couple of days relaxing with her family. According to ABC News, “Meghan spent three days holed up at Jessica Mulroney and her husband Ben’s home in Toronto.”
|
n
|
[M]Meghan is in Toronto[/M] and apparently she’s there to visit her friends before September.
|
Meghan Markle, 37, and Prince Harry, 33, are back in the spotlight, after a relaxing few weeks to themselves over the summer. During August the couple jetted off to Lake Como to spend time with close friends George and Amal Clooney, and also visited Prince Charles and Camilla in the Scottish Highlands. The Duchess of Sussex also made a trip of her own, journeying back to her former home of Canada for a few days of rest and downtime. The details of Meghan’s stay have now been revealed - that she went to Toronto to spend three days with her best friend, Jessica Mulroney.
Meghan Markle news: Inside Duchess’ secret Canada trip and who she went to visit
Rumours of Meghan’s trip to Canada appeared earlier in the month when a letter from the Royal Family to Air Canada emerged giving strict instructions to protect Meghan’s privacy on board. Meghan took a commercial flight from London to Toronto, with Kensington Palace instructing the airline to protect the Duchess’ privacy and not let anyone approach her or take her picture. A source told Royal Central she had one glass of champagne and watched the Book Club during the eight-hour flight. The source revealed: “She seemed very relaxed and sipped on peppermint tea during the journey.” It now turns out that Meghan visited the Canadian city without Harry to visit her stylist Jessica Mulroney, and spent a couple of days relaxing with her family. According to ABC News, “Meghan spent three days holed up at Jessica Mulroney and her husband Ben’s home in Toronto.”
|
e
|
It's likely that [M]the royal[/M] is savoring some time with the close friends she made in the city when she lived there, [M]prior to a busy few months of official engagements alongside Prince Harry[/M].
|
Meghan Markle, 37, and Prince Harry, 33, are back in the spotlight, after a relaxing few weeks to themselves over the summer. During August the couple jetted off to Lake Como to spend time with close friends George and Amal Clooney, and also visited Prince Charles and Camilla in the Scottish Highlands. The Duchess of Sussex also made a trip of her own, journeying back to her former home of Canada for a few days of rest and downtime. The details of Meghan’s stay have now been revealed - that she went to Toronto to spend three days with her best friend, Jessica Mulroney.
Meghan Markle news: Inside Duchess’ secret Canada trip and who she went to visit
Rumours of Meghan’s trip to Canada appeared earlier in the month when a letter from the Royal Family to Air Canada emerged giving strict instructions to protect Meghan’s privacy on board. Meghan took a commercial flight from London to Toronto, with Kensington Palace instructing the airline to protect the Duchess’ privacy and not let anyone approach her or take her picture. A source told Royal Central she had one glass of champagne and watched the Book Club during the eight-hour flight. The source revealed: “She seemed very relaxed and sipped on peppermint tea during the journey.” It now turns out that Meghan visited the Canadian city without Harry to visit her stylist Jessica Mulroney, and spent a couple of days relaxing with her family. According to ABC News, “Meghan spent three days holed up at Jessica Mulroney and her husband Ben’s home in Toronto.”
|
n
|
[M]It's likely that the royal is savoring some time with the close friends she made in the city when she lived there[/M], prior to a busy few months of official engagements alongside Prince Harry.
|
Meghan Markle, 37, and Prince Harry, 33, are back in the spotlight, after a relaxing few weeks to themselves over the summer. During August the couple jetted off to Lake Como to spend time with close friends George and Amal Clooney, and also visited Prince Charles and Camilla in the Scottish Highlands. The Duchess of Sussex also made a trip of her own, journeying back to her former home of Canada for a few days of rest and downtime. The details of Meghan’s stay have now been revealed - that she went to Toronto to spend three days with her best friend, Jessica Mulroney.
Meghan Markle news: Inside Duchess’ secret Canada trip and who she went to visit
Rumours of Meghan’s trip to Canada appeared earlier in the month when a letter from the Royal Family to Air Canada emerged giving strict instructions to protect Meghan’s privacy on board. Meghan took a commercial flight from London to Toronto, with Kensington Palace instructing the airline to protect the Duchess’ privacy and not let anyone approach her or take her picture. A source told Royal Central she had one glass of champagne and watched the Book Club during the eight-hour flight. The source revealed: “She seemed very relaxed and sipped on peppermint tea during the journey.” It now turns out that Meghan visited the Canadian city without Harry to visit her stylist Jessica Mulroney, and spent a couple of days relaxing with her family. According to ABC News, “Meghan spent three days holed up at Jessica Mulroney and her husband Ben’s home in Toronto.”
|
n
|
Original story, 8/19: Ahead of [M]her first royal tour with husband Prince Harry, which will see the couple visit[/M] Australia, New Zealand, Fiji, and [M]the Kingdom of Tonga, Meghan Markle[/M] has reportedly hopped on a flight back to Toronto.
|
Meghan Markle, 37, and Prince Harry, 33, are back in the spotlight, after a relaxing few weeks to themselves over the summer. During August the couple jetted off to Lake Como to spend time with close friends George and Amal Clooney, and also visited Prince Charles and Camilla in the Scottish Highlands. The Duchess of Sussex also made a trip of her own, journeying back to her former home of Canada for a few days of rest and downtime. The details of Meghan’s stay have now been revealed - that she went to Toronto to spend three days with her best friend, Jessica Mulroney.
Meghan Markle news: Inside Duchess’ secret Canada trip and who she went to visit
Rumours of Meghan’s trip to Canada appeared earlier in the month when a letter from the Royal Family to Air Canada emerged giving strict instructions to protect Meghan’s privacy on board. Meghan took a commercial flight from London to Toronto, with Kensington Palace instructing the airline to protect the Duchess’ privacy and not let anyone approach her or take her picture. A source told Royal Central she had one glass of champagne and watched the Book Club during the eight-hour flight. The source revealed: “She seemed very relaxed and sipped on peppermint tea during the journey.” It now turns out that Meghan visited the Canadian city without Harry to visit her stylist Jessica Mulroney, and spent a couple of days relaxing with her family. According to ABC News, “Meghan spent three days holed up at Jessica Mulroney and her husband Ben’s home in Toronto.”
|
n
|
Original story, 8/19: Ahead of [M]her first royal tour with husband Prince Harry, which will see the couple visit[/M] Australia, New Zealand, [M]Fiji[/M], and the Kingdom of Tonga, [M]Meghan Markle[/M] has reportedly hopped on a flight back to Toronto.
|
Meghan Markle, 37, and Prince Harry, 33, are back in the spotlight, after a relaxing few weeks to themselves over the summer. During August the couple jetted off to Lake Como to spend time with close friends George and Amal Clooney, and also visited Prince Charles and Camilla in the Scottish Highlands. The Duchess of Sussex also made a trip of her own, journeying back to her former home of Canada for a few days of rest and downtime. The details of Meghan’s stay have now been revealed - that she went to Toronto to spend three days with her best friend, Jessica Mulroney.
Meghan Markle news: Inside Duchess’ secret Canada trip and who she went to visit
Rumours of Meghan’s trip to Canada appeared earlier in the month when a letter from the Royal Family to Air Canada emerged giving strict instructions to protect Meghan’s privacy on board. Meghan took a commercial flight from London to Toronto, with Kensington Palace instructing the airline to protect the Duchess’ privacy and not let anyone approach her or take her picture. A source told Royal Central she had one glass of champagne and watched the Book Club during the eight-hour flight. The source revealed: “She seemed very relaxed and sipped on peppermint tea during the journey.” It now turns out that Meghan visited the Canadian city without Harry to visit her stylist Jessica Mulroney, and spent a couple of days relaxing with her family. According to ABC News, “Meghan spent three days holed up at Jessica Mulroney and her husband Ben’s home in Toronto.”
|
n
|
Original story, 8/19: Ahead of [M]her first royal tour with husband Prince Harry, which will see the couple visit[/M] Australia, [M]New Zealand[/M], Fiji, and the Kingdom of Tonga, [M]Meghan Markle[/M] has reportedly hopped on a flight back to Toronto.
|
Meghan Markle, 37, and Prince Harry, 33, are back in the spotlight, after a relaxing few weeks to themselves over the summer. During August the couple jetted off to Lake Como to spend time with close friends George and Amal Clooney, and also visited Prince Charles and Camilla in the Scottish Highlands. The Duchess of Sussex also made a trip of her own, journeying back to her former home of Canada for a few days of rest and downtime. The details of Meghan’s stay have now been revealed - that she went to Toronto to spend three days with her best friend, Jessica Mulroney.
Meghan Markle news: Inside Duchess’ secret Canada trip and who she went to visit
Rumours of Meghan’s trip to Canada appeared earlier in the month when a letter from the Royal Family to Air Canada emerged giving strict instructions to protect Meghan’s privacy on board. Meghan took a commercial flight from London to Toronto, with Kensington Palace instructing the airline to protect the Duchess’ privacy and not let anyone approach her or take her picture. A source told Royal Central she had one glass of champagne and watched the Book Club during the eight-hour flight. The source revealed: “She seemed very relaxed and sipped on peppermint tea during the journey.” It now turns out that Meghan visited the Canadian city without Harry to visit her stylist Jessica Mulroney, and spent a couple of days relaxing with her family. According to ABC News, “Meghan spent three days holed up at Jessica Mulroney and her husband Ben’s home in Toronto.”
|
n
|
Original story, 8/19: Ahead of her [M]first royal tour with husband Prince Harry, which will see the couple visit Australia[/M], New Zealand, Fiji, and the Kingdom of Tonga, [M]Meghan Markle[/M] has reportedly hopped on a flight back to Toronto.
|
Meghan Markle, 37, and Prince Harry, 33, are back in the spotlight, after a relaxing few weeks to themselves over the summer. During August the couple jetted off to Lake Como to spend time with close friends George and Amal Clooney, and also visited Prince Charles and Camilla in the Scottish Highlands. The Duchess of Sussex also made a trip of her own, journeying back to her former home of Canada for a few days of rest and downtime. The details of Meghan’s stay have now been revealed - that she went to Toronto to spend three days with her best friend, Jessica Mulroney.
Meghan Markle news: Inside Duchess’ secret Canada trip and who she went to visit
Rumours of Meghan’s trip to Canada appeared earlier in the month when a letter from the Royal Family to Air Canada emerged giving strict instructions to protect Meghan’s privacy on board. Meghan took a commercial flight from London to Toronto, with Kensington Palace instructing the airline to protect the Duchess’ privacy and not let anyone approach her or take her picture. A source told Royal Central she had one glass of champagne and watched the Book Club during the eight-hour flight. The source revealed: “She seemed very relaxed and sipped on peppermint tea during the journey.” It now turns out that Meghan visited the Canadian city without Harry to visit her stylist Jessica Mulroney, and spent a couple of days relaxing with her family. According to ABC News, “Meghan spent three days holed up at Jessica Mulroney and her husband Ben’s home in Toronto.”
|
n
|
Original story, 8/19: [M]Ahead of her first royal tour with husband Prince Harry[/M], which will see the couple visit Australia, New Zealand, Fiji, and the Kingdom of Tonga, [M]Meghan Markle has reportedly hopped on a flight back to Toronto[/M].
|
Meghan Markle, 37, and Prince Harry, 33, are back in the spotlight, after a relaxing few weeks to themselves over the summer. During August the couple jetted off to Lake Como to spend time with close friends George and Amal Clooney, and also visited Prince Charles and Camilla in the Scottish Highlands. The Duchess of Sussex also made a trip of her own, journeying back to her former home of Canada for a few days of rest and downtime. The details of Meghan’s stay have now been revealed - that she went to Toronto to spend three days with her best friend, Jessica Mulroney.
Meghan Markle news: Inside Duchess’ secret Canada trip and who she went to visit
Rumours of Meghan’s trip to Canada appeared earlier in the month when a letter from the Royal Family to Air Canada emerged giving strict instructions to protect Meghan’s privacy on board. Meghan took a commercial flight from London to Toronto, with Kensington Palace instructing the airline to protect the Duchess’ privacy and not let anyone approach her or take her picture. A source told Royal Central she had one glass of champagne and watched the Book Club during the eight-hour flight. The source revealed: “She seemed very relaxed and sipped on peppermint tea during the journey.” It now turns out that Meghan visited the Canadian city without Harry to visit her stylist Jessica Mulroney, and spent a couple of days relaxing with her family. According to ABC News, “Meghan spent three days holed up at Jessica Mulroney and her husband Ben’s home in Toronto.”
|
n
|
Original story, 8/19: Ahead of her first royal tour with [M]husband Prince Harry[/M], which will see the couple visit Australia, New Zealand, Fiji, and the Kingdom of Tonga, [M]Meghan Markle[/M] has reportedly hopped on a flight back to Toronto.
|
Meghan Markle, 37, and Prince Harry, 33, are back in the spotlight, after a relaxing few weeks to themselves over the summer. During August the couple jetted off to Lake Como to spend time with close friends George and Amal Clooney, and also visited Prince Charles and Camilla in the Scottish Highlands. The Duchess of Sussex also made a trip of her own, journeying back to her former home of Canada for a few days of rest and downtime. The details of Meghan’s stay have now been revealed - that she went to Toronto to spend three days with her best friend, Jessica Mulroney.
Meghan Markle news: Inside Duchess’ secret Canada trip and who she went to visit
Rumours of Meghan’s trip to Canada appeared earlier in the month when a letter from the Royal Family to Air Canada emerged giving strict instructions to protect Meghan’s privacy on board. Meghan took a commercial flight from London to Toronto, with Kensington Palace instructing the airline to protect the Duchess’ privacy and not let anyone approach her or take her picture. A source told Royal Central she had one glass of champagne and watched the Book Club during the eight-hour flight. The source revealed: “She seemed very relaxed and sipped on peppermint tea during the journey.” It now turns out that Meghan visited the Canadian city without Harry to visit her stylist Jessica Mulroney, and spent a couple of days relaxing with her family. According to ABC News, “Meghan spent three days holed up at Jessica Mulroney and her husband Ben’s home in Toronto.”
|
n
|
[M]Sources also told Scobie[/M] that Meghan and Harry stayed with George and Amal Clooney at Lake Como from Thursday to Sunday over the weekend, [M]contradicting reports that Markle flew out to Canada.[/M]
|
Meghan Markle, 37, and Prince Harry, 33, are back in the spotlight, after a relaxing few weeks to themselves over the summer. During August the couple jetted off to Lake Como to spend time with close friends George and Amal Clooney, and also visited Prince Charles and Camilla in the Scottish Highlands. The Duchess of Sussex also made a trip of her own, journeying back to her former home of Canada for a few days of rest and downtime. The details of Meghan’s stay have now been revealed - that she went to Toronto to spend three days with her best friend, Jessica Mulroney.
Meghan Markle news: Inside Duchess’ secret Canada trip and who she went to visit
Rumours of Meghan’s trip to Canada appeared earlier in the month when a letter from the Royal Family to Air Canada emerged giving strict instructions to protect Meghan’s privacy on board. Meghan took a commercial flight from London to Toronto, with Kensington Palace instructing the airline to protect the Duchess’ privacy and not let anyone approach her or take her picture. A source told Royal Central she had one glass of champagne and watched the Book Club during the eight-hour flight. The source revealed: “She seemed very relaxed and sipped on peppermint tea during the journey.” It now turns out that Meghan visited the Canadian city without Harry to visit her stylist Jessica Mulroney, and spent a couple of days relaxing with her family. According to ABC News, “Meghan spent three days holed up at Jessica Mulroney and her husband Ben’s home in Toronto.”
|
n
|
Sources also told Scobie that Meghan and [M]Harry stayed[/M] with George and Amal Clooney [M]at Lake Como[/M] from Thursday to Sunday [M]over the weekend[/M], contradicting reports that Markle flew out to Canada.
|
Meghan Markle, 37, and Prince Harry, 33, are back in the spotlight, after a relaxing few weeks to themselves over the summer. During August the couple jetted off to Lake Como to spend time with close friends George and Amal Clooney, and also visited Prince Charles and Camilla in the Scottish Highlands. The Duchess of Sussex also made a trip of her own, journeying back to her former home of Canada for a few days of rest and downtime. The details of Meghan’s stay have now been revealed - that she went to Toronto to spend three days with her best friend, Jessica Mulroney.
Meghan Markle news: Inside Duchess’ secret Canada trip and who she went to visit
Rumours of Meghan’s trip to Canada appeared earlier in the month when a letter from the Royal Family to Air Canada emerged giving strict instructions to protect Meghan’s privacy on board. Meghan took a commercial flight from London to Toronto, with Kensington Palace instructing the airline to protect the Duchess’ privacy and not let anyone approach her or take her picture. A source told Royal Central she had one glass of champagne and watched the Book Club during the eight-hour flight. The source revealed: “She seemed very relaxed and sipped on peppermint tea during the journey.” It now turns out that Meghan visited the Canadian city without Harry to visit her stylist Jessica Mulroney, and spent a couple of days relaxing with her family. According to ABC News, “Meghan spent three days holed up at Jessica Mulroney and her husband Ben’s home in Toronto.”
|
n
|
Sources also told Scobie that Meghan and [M]Harry stayed[/M] with George and Amal Clooney [M]at Lake Como from Thursday to Sunday[/M] over the weekend, contradicting reports that Markle flew out to Canada.
|
Meghan Markle, 37, and Prince Harry, 33, are back in the spotlight, after a relaxing few weeks to themselves over the summer. During August the couple jetted off to Lake Como to spend time with close friends George and Amal Clooney, and also visited Prince Charles and Camilla in the Scottish Highlands. The Duchess of Sussex also made a trip of her own, journeying back to her former home of Canada for a few days of rest and downtime. The details of Meghan’s stay have now been revealed - that she went to Toronto to spend three days with her best friend, Jessica Mulroney.
Meghan Markle news: Inside Duchess’ secret Canada trip and who she went to visit
Rumours of Meghan’s trip to Canada appeared earlier in the month when a letter from the Royal Family to Air Canada emerged giving strict instructions to protect Meghan’s privacy on board. Meghan took a commercial flight from London to Toronto, with Kensington Palace instructing the airline to protect the Duchess’ privacy and not let anyone approach her or take her picture. A source told Royal Central she had one glass of champagne and watched the Book Club during the eight-hour flight. The source revealed: “She seemed very relaxed and sipped on peppermint tea during the journey.” It now turns out that Meghan visited the Canadian city without Harry to visit her stylist Jessica Mulroney, and spent a couple of days relaxing with her family. According to ABC News, “Meghan spent three days holed up at Jessica Mulroney and her husband Ben’s home in Toronto.”
|
n
|
Sources also told Scobie that Meghan and [M]Harry stayed[/M] with George and Amal Clooney [M]at Lake Como[/M] from Thursday to Sunday over the weekend, contradicting reports that Markle flew out to Canada.
|
Meghan Markle, 37, and Prince Harry, 33, are back in the spotlight, after a relaxing few weeks to themselves over the summer. During August the couple jetted off to Lake Como to spend time with close friends George and Amal Clooney, and also visited Prince Charles and Camilla in the Scottish Highlands. The Duchess of Sussex also made a trip of her own, journeying back to her former home of Canada for a few days of rest and downtime. The details of Meghan’s stay have now been revealed - that she went to Toronto to spend three days with her best friend, Jessica Mulroney.
Meghan Markle news: Inside Duchess’ secret Canada trip and who she went to visit
Rumours of Meghan’s trip to Canada appeared earlier in the month when a letter from the Royal Family to Air Canada emerged giving strict instructions to protect Meghan’s privacy on board. Meghan took a commercial flight from London to Toronto, with Kensington Palace instructing the airline to protect the Duchess’ privacy and not let anyone approach her or take her picture. A source told Royal Central she had one glass of champagne and watched the Book Club during the eight-hour flight. The source revealed: “She seemed very relaxed and sipped on peppermint tea during the journey.” It now turns out that Meghan visited the Canadian city without Harry to visit her stylist Jessica Mulroney, and spent a couple of days relaxing with her family. According to ABC News, “Meghan spent three days holed up at Jessica Mulroney and her husband Ben’s home in Toronto.”
|
e
|
Sources also told Scobie that [M]Meghan[/M] and Harry [M]stayed[/M] with George and Amal Clooney [M]at Lake Como[/M] from Thursday to Sunday [M]over the weekend[/M], contradicting reports that Markle flew out to Canada.
|
Meghan Markle, 37, and Prince Harry, 33, are back in the spotlight, after a relaxing few weeks to themselves over the summer. During August the couple jetted off to Lake Como to spend time with close friends George and Amal Clooney, and also visited Prince Charles and Camilla in the Scottish Highlands. The Duchess of Sussex also made a trip of her own, journeying back to her former home of Canada for a few days of rest and downtime. The details of Meghan’s stay have now been revealed - that she went to Toronto to spend three days with her best friend, Jessica Mulroney.
Meghan Markle news: Inside Duchess’ secret Canada trip and who she went to visit
Rumours of Meghan’s trip to Canada appeared earlier in the month when a letter from the Royal Family to Air Canada emerged giving strict instructions to protect Meghan’s privacy on board. Meghan took a commercial flight from London to Toronto, with Kensington Palace instructing the airline to protect the Duchess’ privacy and not let anyone approach her or take her picture. A source told Royal Central she had one glass of champagne and watched the Book Club during the eight-hour flight. The source revealed: “She seemed very relaxed and sipped on peppermint tea during the journey.” It now turns out that Meghan visited the Canadian city without Harry to visit her stylist Jessica Mulroney, and spent a couple of days relaxing with her family. According to ABC News, “Meghan spent three days holed up at Jessica Mulroney and her husband Ben’s home in Toronto.”
|
n
|
Sources also told Scobie that [M]Meghan[/M] and Harry [M]stayed[/M] with George and Amal Clooney [M]at Lake Como from Thursday to Sunday[/M] over the weekend, contradicting reports that Markle flew out to Canada.
|
Meghan Markle, 37, and Prince Harry, 33, are back in the spotlight, after a relaxing few weeks to themselves over the summer. During August the couple jetted off to Lake Como to spend time with close friends George and Amal Clooney, and also visited Prince Charles and Camilla in the Scottish Highlands. The Duchess of Sussex also made a trip of her own, journeying back to her former home of Canada for a few days of rest and downtime. The details of Meghan’s stay have now been revealed - that she went to Toronto to spend three days with her best friend, Jessica Mulroney.
Meghan Markle news: Inside Duchess’ secret Canada trip and who she went to visit
Rumours of Meghan’s trip to Canada appeared earlier in the month when a letter from the Royal Family to Air Canada emerged giving strict instructions to protect Meghan’s privacy on board. Meghan took a commercial flight from London to Toronto, with Kensington Palace instructing the airline to protect the Duchess’ privacy and not let anyone approach her or take her picture. A source told Royal Central she had one glass of champagne and watched the Book Club during the eight-hour flight. The source revealed: “She seemed very relaxed and sipped on peppermint tea during the journey.” It now turns out that Meghan visited the Canadian city without Harry to visit her stylist Jessica Mulroney, and spent a couple of days relaxing with her family. According to ABC News, “Meghan spent three days holed up at Jessica Mulroney and her husband Ben’s home in Toronto.”
|
n
|
Sources also told Scobie that [M]Meghan[/M] and Harry [M]stayed[/M] with George and Amal Clooney [M]at Lake Como[/M] from Thursday to Sunday over the weekend, contradicting reports that Markle flew out to Canada.
|
Meghan Markle, 37, and Prince Harry, 33, are back in the spotlight, after a relaxing few weeks to themselves over the summer. During August the couple jetted off to Lake Como to spend time with close friends George and Amal Clooney, and also visited Prince Charles and Camilla in the Scottish Highlands. The Duchess of Sussex also made a trip of her own, journeying back to her former home of Canada for a few days of rest and downtime. The details of Meghan’s stay have now been revealed - that she went to Toronto to spend three days with her best friend, Jessica Mulroney.
Meghan Markle news: Inside Duchess’ secret Canada trip and who she went to visit
Rumours of Meghan’s trip to Canada appeared earlier in the month when a letter from the Royal Family to Air Canada emerged giving strict instructions to protect Meghan’s privacy on board. Meghan took a commercial flight from London to Toronto, with Kensington Palace instructing the airline to protect the Duchess’ privacy and not let anyone approach her or take her picture. A source told Royal Central she had one glass of champagne and watched the Book Club during the eight-hour flight. The source revealed: “She seemed very relaxed and sipped on peppermint tea during the journey.” It now turns out that Meghan visited the Canadian city without Harry to visit her stylist Jessica Mulroney, and spent a couple of days relaxing with her family. According to ABC News, “Meghan spent three days holed up at Jessica Mulroney and her husband Ben’s home in Toronto.”
|
e
|
[M]Sources[/M] also [M]told Scobie that[/M] Meghan and [M]Harry stayed with George[/M] and Amal [M]Clooney[/M] at Lake Como from Thursday to Sunday over the weekend, contradicting reports that Markle flew out to Canada.
|
Meghan Markle, 37, and Prince Harry, 33, are back in the spotlight, after a relaxing few weeks to themselves over the summer. During August the couple jetted off to Lake Como to spend time with close friends George and Amal Clooney, and also visited Prince Charles and Camilla in the Scottish Highlands. The Duchess of Sussex also made a trip of her own, journeying back to her former home of Canada for a few days of rest and downtime. The details of Meghan’s stay have now been revealed - that she went to Toronto to spend three days with her best friend, Jessica Mulroney.
Meghan Markle news: Inside Duchess’ secret Canada trip and who she went to visit
Rumours of Meghan’s trip to Canada appeared earlier in the month when a letter from the Royal Family to Air Canada emerged giving strict instructions to protect Meghan’s privacy on board. Meghan took a commercial flight from London to Toronto, with Kensington Palace instructing the airline to protect the Duchess’ privacy and not let anyone approach her or take her picture. A source told Royal Central she had one glass of champagne and watched the Book Club during the eight-hour flight. The source revealed: “She seemed very relaxed and sipped on peppermint tea during the journey.” It now turns out that Meghan visited the Canadian city without Harry to visit her stylist Jessica Mulroney, and spent a couple of days relaxing with her family. According to ABC News, “Meghan spent three days holed up at Jessica Mulroney and her husband Ben’s home in Toronto.”
|
n
|
[M]Sources[/M] also [M]told Scobie that[/M] Meghan and [M]Harry stayed with[/M] George and [M]Amal Clooney[/M] at Lake Como from Thursday to Sunday over the weekend, contradicting reports that Markle flew out to Canada.
|
Meghan Markle, 37, and Prince Harry, 33, are back in the spotlight, after a relaxing few weeks to themselves over the summer. During August the couple jetted off to Lake Como to spend time with close friends George and Amal Clooney, and also visited Prince Charles and Camilla in the Scottish Highlands. The Duchess of Sussex also made a trip of her own, journeying back to her former home of Canada for a few days of rest and downtime. The details of Meghan’s stay have now been revealed - that she went to Toronto to spend three days with her best friend, Jessica Mulroney.
Meghan Markle news: Inside Duchess’ secret Canada trip and who she went to visit
Rumours of Meghan’s trip to Canada appeared earlier in the month when a letter from the Royal Family to Air Canada emerged giving strict instructions to protect Meghan’s privacy on board. Meghan took a commercial flight from London to Toronto, with Kensington Palace instructing the airline to protect the Duchess’ privacy and not let anyone approach her or take her picture. A source told Royal Central she had one glass of champagne and watched the Book Club during the eight-hour flight. The source revealed: “She seemed very relaxed and sipped on peppermint tea during the journey.” It now turns out that Meghan visited the Canadian city without Harry to visit her stylist Jessica Mulroney, and spent a couple of days relaxing with her family. According to ABC News, “Meghan spent three days holed up at Jessica Mulroney and her husband Ben’s home in Toronto.”
|
n
|
[M]Sources[/M] also [M]told Scobie that Meghan[/M] and Harry [M]stayed with[/M] George and [M]Amal Clooney[/M] at Lake Como from Thursday to Sunday over the weekend, contradicting reports that Markle flew out to Canada.
|
Meghan Markle, 37, and Prince Harry, 33, are back in the spotlight, after a relaxing few weeks to themselves over the summer. During August the couple jetted off to Lake Como to spend time with close friends George and Amal Clooney, and also visited Prince Charles and Camilla in the Scottish Highlands. The Duchess of Sussex also made a trip of her own, journeying back to her former home of Canada for a few days of rest and downtime. The details of Meghan’s stay have now been revealed - that she went to Toronto to spend three days with her best friend, Jessica Mulroney.
Meghan Markle news: Inside Duchess’ secret Canada trip and who she went to visit
Rumours of Meghan’s trip to Canada appeared earlier in the month when a letter from the Royal Family to Air Canada emerged giving strict instructions to protect Meghan’s privacy on board. Meghan took a commercial flight from London to Toronto, with Kensington Palace instructing the airline to protect the Duchess’ privacy and not let anyone approach her or take her picture. A source told Royal Central she had one glass of champagne and watched the Book Club during the eight-hour flight. The source revealed: “She seemed very relaxed and sipped on peppermint tea during the journey.” It now turns out that Meghan visited the Canadian city without Harry to visit her stylist Jessica Mulroney, and spent a couple of days relaxing with her family. According to ABC News, “Meghan spent three days holed up at Jessica Mulroney and her husband Ben’s home in Toronto.”
|
n
|
[M]Sources[/M] also [M]told Scobie that Meghan[/M] and Harry [M]stayed with George[/M] and Amal [M]Clooney[/M] at Lake Como from Thursday to Sunday over the weekend, contradicting reports that Markle flew out to Canada.
|
Meghan Markle, 37, and Prince Harry, 33, are back in the spotlight, after a relaxing few weeks to themselves over the summer. During August the couple jetted off to Lake Como to spend time with close friends George and Amal Clooney, and also visited Prince Charles and Camilla in the Scottish Highlands. The Duchess of Sussex also made a trip of her own, journeying back to her former home of Canada for a few days of rest and downtime. The details of Meghan’s stay have now been revealed - that she went to Toronto to spend three days with her best friend, Jessica Mulroney.
Meghan Markle news: Inside Duchess’ secret Canada trip and who she went to visit
Rumours of Meghan’s trip to Canada appeared earlier in the month when a letter from the Royal Family to Air Canada emerged giving strict instructions to protect Meghan’s privacy on board. Meghan took a commercial flight from London to Toronto, with Kensington Palace instructing the airline to protect the Duchess’ privacy and not let anyone approach her or take her picture. A source told Royal Central she had one glass of champagne and watched the Book Club during the eight-hour flight. The source revealed: “She seemed very relaxed and sipped on peppermint tea during the journey.” It now turns out that Meghan visited the Canadian city without Harry to visit her stylist Jessica Mulroney, and spent a couple of days relaxing with her family. According to ABC News, “Meghan spent three days holed up at Jessica Mulroney and her husband Ben’s home in Toronto.”
|
n
|
The Mirror is reporting that Meghan flew via [M]Air Canada[/M] to Toronto, and that the airline [M]was asked to protect the Duchess' privacy during her flight[/M].
|
Meghan Markle, 37, and Prince Harry, 33, are back in the spotlight, after a relaxing few weeks to themselves over the summer. During August the couple jetted off to Lake Como to spend time with close friends George and Amal Clooney, and also visited Prince Charles and Camilla in the Scottish Highlands. The Duchess of Sussex also made a trip of her own, journeying back to her former home of Canada for a few days of rest and downtime. The details of Meghan’s stay have now been revealed - that she went to Toronto to spend three days with her best friend, Jessica Mulroney.
Meghan Markle news: Inside Duchess’ secret Canada trip and who she went to visit
Rumours of Meghan’s trip to Canada appeared earlier in the month when a letter from the Royal Family to Air Canada emerged giving strict instructions to protect Meghan’s privacy on board. Meghan took a commercial flight from London to Toronto, with Kensington Palace instructing the airline to protect the Duchess’ privacy and not let anyone approach her or take her picture. A source told Royal Central she had one glass of champagne and watched the Book Club during the eight-hour flight. The source revealed: “She seemed very relaxed and sipped on peppermint tea during the journey.” It now turns out that Meghan visited the Canadian city without Harry to visit her stylist Jessica Mulroney, and spent a couple of days relaxing with her family. According to ABC News, “Meghan spent three days holed up at Jessica Mulroney and her husband Ben’s home in Toronto.”
|
e
|
[M]The Mirror is reporting that Meghan flew via Air Canada to Toronto[/M], and that the airline was asked to protect the Duchess' privacy during her flight.
|
Meghan Markle, 37, and Prince Harry, 33, are back in the spotlight, after a relaxing few weeks to themselves over the summer. During August the couple jetted off to Lake Como to spend time with close friends George and Amal Clooney, and also visited Prince Charles and Camilla in the Scottish Highlands. The Duchess of Sussex also made a trip of her own, journeying back to her former home of Canada for a few days of rest and downtime. The details of Meghan’s stay have now been revealed - that she went to Toronto to spend three days with her best friend, Jessica Mulroney.
Meghan Markle news: Inside Duchess’ secret Canada trip and who she went to visit
Rumours of Meghan’s trip to Canada appeared earlier in the month when a letter from the Royal Family to Air Canada emerged giving strict instructions to protect Meghan’s privacy on board. Meghan took a commercial flight from London to Toronto, with Kensington Palace instructing the airline to protect the Duchess’ privacy and not let anyone approach her or take her picture. A source told Royal Central she had one glass of champagne and watched the Book Club during the eight-hour flight. The source revealed: “She seemed very relaxed and sipped on peppermint tea during the journey.” It now turns out that Meghan visited the Canadian city without Harry to visit her stylist Jessica Mulroney, and spent a couple of days relaxing with her family. According to ABC News, “Meghan spent three days holed up at Jessica Mulroney and her husband Ben’s home in Toronto.”
|
n
|
Prior to moving to the United Kingdom to be with her husband, [M]Meghan[/M] was, of course, based in Toronto, where she [M]filmed all seven seasons of Suits[/M].
|
Meghan Markle, 37, and Prince Harry, 33, are back in the spotlight, after a relaxing few weeks to themselves over the summer. During August the couple jetted off to Lake Como to spend time with close friends George and Amal Clooney, and also visited Prince Charles and Camilla in the Scottish Highlands. The Duchess of Sussex also made a trip of her own, journeying back to her former home of Canada for a few days of rest and downtime. The details of Meghan’s stay have now been revealed - that she went to Toronto to spend three days with her best friend, Jessica Mulroney.
Meghan Markle news: Inside Duchess’ secret Canada trip and who she went to visit
Rumours of Meghan’s trip to Canada appeared earlier in the month when a letter from the Royal Family to Air Canada emerged giving strict instructions to protect Meghan’s privacy on board. Meghan took a commercial flight from London to Toronto, with Kensington Palace instructing the airline to protect the Duchess’ privacy and not let anyone approach her or take her picture. A source told Royal Central she had one glass of champagne and watched the Book Club during the eight-hour flight. The source revealed: “She seemed very relaxed and sipped on peppermint tea during the journey.” It now turns out that Meghan visited the Canadian city without Harry to visit her stylist Jessica Mulroney, and spent a couple of days relaxing with her family. According to ABC News, “Meghan spent three days holed up at Jessica Mulroney and her husband Ben’s home in Toronto.”
|
n
|
Prior to moving to the United Kingdom to be with her husband, [M]Meghan[/M] was, of course, based in Toronto, where she [M]filmed[/M] all seven seasons of [M]Suits[/M].
|
Meghan Markle, 37, and Prince Harry, 33, are back in the spotlight, after a relaxing few weeks to themselves over the summer. During August the couple jetted off to Lake Como to spend time with close friends George and Amal Clooney, and also visited Prince Charles and Camilla in the Scottish Highlands. The Duchess of Sussex also made a trip of her own, journeying back to her former home of Canada for a few days of rest and downtime. The details of Meghan’s stay have now been revealed - that she went to Toronto to spend three days with her best friend, Jessica Mulroney.
Meghan Markle news: Inside Duchess’ secret Canada trip and who she went to visit
Rumours of Meghan’s trip to Canada appeared earlier in the month when a letter from the Royal Family to Air Canada emerged giving strict instructions to protect Meghan’s privacy on board. Meghan took a commercial flight from London to Toronto, with Kensington Palace instructing the airline to protect the Duchess’ privacy and not let anyone approach her or take her picture. A source told Royal Central she had one glass of champagne and watched the Book Club during the eight-hour flight. The source revealed: “She seemed very relaxed and sipped on peppermint tea during the journey.” It now turns out that Meghan visited the Canadian city without Harry to visit her stylist Jessica Mulroney, and spent a couple of days relaxing with her family. According to ABC News, “Meghan spent three days holed up at Jessica Mulroney and her husband Ben’s home in Toronto.”
|
n
|
Prior to [M]moving to the United Kingdom to be with her husband[/M], [M]Meghan[/M] was, of course, based in Toronto, where she filmed all seven seasons of Suits.
|
Meghan Markle, 37, and Prince Harry, 33, are back in the spotlight, after a relaxing few weeks to themselves over the summer. During August the couple jetted off to Lake Como to spend time with close friends George and Amal Clooney, and also visited Prince Charles and Camilla in the Scottish Highlands. The Duchess of Sussex also made a trip of her own, journeying back to her former home of Canada for a few days of rest and downtime. The details of Meghan’s stay have now been revealed - that she went to Toronto to spend three days with her best friend, Jessica Mulroney.
Meghan Markle news: Inside Duchess’ secret Canada trip and who she went to visit
Rumours of Meghan’s trip to Canada appeared earlier in the month when a letter from the Royal Family to Air Canada emerged giving strict instructions to protect Meghan’s privacy on board. Meghan took a commercial flight from London to Toronto, with Kensington Palace instructing the airline to protect the Duchess’ privacy and not let anyone approach her or take her picture. A source told Royal Central she had one glass of champagne and watched the Book Club during the eight-hour flight. The source revealed: “She seemed very relaxed and sipped on peppermint tea during the journey.” It now turns out that Meghan visited the Canadian city without Harry to visit her stylist Jessica Mulroney, and spent a couple of days relaxing with her family. According to ABC News, “Meghan spent three days holed up at Jessica Mulroney and her husband Ben’s home in Toronto.”
|
n
|
Prior to [M]moving to the United Kingdom[/M] to be with her husband, [M]Meghan[/M] was, of course, based in Toronto, where she filmed all seven seasons of Suits.
|
Meghan Markle, 37, and Prince Harry, 33, are back in the spotlight, after a relaxing few weeks to themselves over the summer. During August the couple jetted off to Lake Como to spend time with close friends George and Amal Clooney, and also visited Prince Charles and Camilla in the Scottish Highlands. The Duchess of Sussex also made a trip of her own, journeying back to her former home of Canada for a few days of rest and downtime. The details of Meghan’s stay have now been revealed - that she went to Toronto to spend three days with her best friend, Jessica Mulroney.
Meghan Markle news: Inside Duchess’ secret Canada trip and who she went to visit
Rumours of Meghan’s trip to Canada appeared earlier in the month when a letter from the Royal Family to Air Canada emerged giving strict instructions to protect Meghan’s privacy on board. Meghan took a commercial flight from London to Toronto, with Kensington Palace instructing the airline to protect the Duchess’ privacy and not let anyone approach her or take her picture. A source told Royal Central she had one glass of champagne and watched the Book Club during the eight-hour flight. The source revealed: “She seemed very relaxed and sipped on peppermint tea during the journey.” It now turns out that Meghan visited the Canadian city without Harry to visit her stylist Jessica Mulroney, and spent a couple of days relaxing with her family. According to ABC News, “Meghan spent three days holed up at Jessica Mulroney and her husband Ben’s home in Toronto.”
|
n
|
[M]Prior to moving[/M] to the United Kingdom to be with her husband, [M]Meghan was[/M], of course, [M]based in Toronto[/M], where she filmed all seven seasons of Suits.
|
Meghan Markle, 37, and Prince Harry, 33, are back in the spotlight, after a relaxing few weeks to themselves over the summer. During August the couple jetted off to Lake Como to spend time with close friends George and Amal Clooney, and also visited Prince Charles and Camilla in the Scottish Highlands. The Duchess of Sussex also made a trip of her own, journeying back to her former home of Canada for a few days of rest and downtime. The details of Meghan’s stay have now been revealed - that she went to Toronto to spend three days with her best friend, Jessica Mulroney.
Meghan Markle news: Inside Duchess’ secret Canada trip and who she went to visit
Rumours of Meghan’s trip to Canada appeared earlier in the month when a letter from the Royal Family to Air Canada emerged giving strict instructions to protect Meghan’s privacy on board. Meghan took a commercial flight from London to Toronto, with Kensington Palace instructing the airline to protect the Duchess’ privacy and not let anyone approach her or take her picture. A source told Royal Central she had one glass of champagne and watched the Book Club during the eight-hour flight. The source revealed: “She seemed very relaxed and sipped on peppermint tea during the journey.” It now turns out that Meghan visited the Canadian city without Harry to visit her stylist Jessica Mulroney, and spent a couple of days relaxing with her family. According to ABC News, “Meghan spent three days holed up at Jessica Mulroney and her husband Ben’s home in Toronto.”
|
n
|
“I expect [M]them[/M] to be in Balmoral later this week before [M]returning to London ahead of their upcoming engagements[/M], starting with the Hamilton performance in aid of Sentebale on August 29,” Scobie tells BAZAAR.com.
|
Meghan Markle, 37, and Prince Harry, 33, are back in the spotlight, after a relaxing few weeks to themselves over the summer. During August the couple jetted off to Lake Como to spend time with close friends George and Amal Clooney, and also visited Prince Charles and Camilla in the Scottish Highlands. The Duchess of Sussex also made a trip of her own, journeying back to her former home of Canada for a few days of rest and downtime. The details of Meghan’s stay have now been revealed - that she went to Toronto to spend three days with her best friend, Jessica Mulroney.
Meghan Markle news: Inside Duchess’ secret Canada trip and who she went to visit
Rumours of Meghan’s trip to Canada appeared earlier in the month when a letter from the Royal Family to Air Canada emerged giving strict instructions to protect Meghan’s privacy on board. Meghan took a commercial flight from London to Toronto, with Kensington Palace instructing the airline to protect the Duchess’ privacy and not let anyone approach her or take her picture. A source told Royal Central she had one glass of champagne and watched the Book Club during the eight-hour flight. The source revealed: “She seemed very relaxed and sipped on peppermint tea during the journey.” It now turns out that Meghan visited the Canadian city without Harry to visit her stylist Jessica Mulroney, and spent a couple of days relaxing with her family. According to ABC News, “Meghan spent three days holed up at Jessica Mulroney and her husband Ben’s home in Toronto.”
|
n
|
“I expect [M]them[/M] to be in Balmoral later this week before [M]returning to London[/M] ahead of their upcoming engagements, starting with the Hamilton performance in aid of Sentebale on August 29,” Scobie tells BAZAAR.com.
|
Meghan Markle, 37, and Prince Harry, 33, are back in the spotlight, after a relaxing few weeks to themselves over the summer. During August the couple jetted off to Lake Como to spend time with close friends George and Amal Clooney, and also visited Prince Charles and Camilla in the Scottish Highlands. The Duchess of Sussex also made a trip of her own, journeying back to her former home of Canada for a few days of rest and downtime. The details of Meghan’s stay have now been revealed - that she went to Toronto to spend three days with her best friend, Jessica Mulroney.
Meghan Markle news: Inside Duchess’ secret Canada trip and who she went to visit
Rumours of Meghan’s trip to Canada appeared earlier in the month when a letter from the Royal Family to Air Canada emerged giving strict instructions to protect Meghan’s privacy on board. Meghan took a commercial flight from London to Toronto, with Kensington Palace instructing the airline to protect the Duchess’ privacy and not let anyone approach her or take her picture. A source told Royal Central she had one glass of champagne and watched the Book Club during the eight-hour flight. The source revealed: “She seemed very relaxed and sipped on peppermint tea during the journey.” It now turns out that Meghan visited the Canadian city without Harry to visit her stylist Jessica Mulroney, and spent a couple of days relaxing with her family. According to ABC News, “Meghan spent three days holed up at Jessica Mulroney and her husband Ben’s home in Toronto.”
|
n
|
[M]“I expect them to be in Balmoral later this week before returning to London ahead of their upcoming engagements, starting with the Hamilton performance in aid of Sentebale on August 29,” Scobie tells BAZAAR.com.[/M]
|
Meghan Markle, 37, and Prince Harry, 33, are back in the spotlight, after a relaxing few weeks to themselves over the summer. During August the couple jetted off to Lake Como to spend time with close friends George and Amal Clooney, and also visited Prince Charles and Camilla in the Scottish Highlands. The Duchess of Sussex also made a trip of her own, journeying back to her former home of Canada for a few days of rest and downtime. The details of Meghan’s stay have now been revealed - that she went to Toronto to spend three days with her best friend, Jessica Mulroney.
Meghan Markle news: Inside Duchess’ secret Canada trip and who she went to visit
Rumours of Meghan’s trip to Canada appeared earlier in the month when a letter from the Royal Family to Air Canada emerged giving strict instructions to protect Meghan’s privacy on board. Meghan took a commercial flight from London to Toronto, with Kensington Palace instructing the airline to protect the Duchess’ privacy and not let anyone approach her or take her picture. A source told Royal Central she had one glass of champagne and watched the Book Club during the eight-hour flight. The source revealed: “She seemed very relaxed and sipped on peppermint tea during the journey.” It now turns out that Meghan visited the Canadian city without Harry to visit her stylist Jessica Mulroney, and spent a couple of days relaxing with her family. According to ABC News, “Meghan spent three days holed up at Jessica Mulroney and her husband Ben’s home in Toronto.”
|
n
|
“I expect them to be in Balmoral later this week before returning to London ahead of [M]their upcoming engagements[/M], [M]starting with the Hamilton performance[/M] in aid of Sentebale on August 29,” Scobie tells BAZAAR.com.
|
Meghan Markle, 37, and Prince Harry, 33, are back in the spotlight, after a relaxing few weeks to themselves over the summer. During August the couple jetted off to Lake Como to spend time with close friends George and Amal Clooney, and also visited Prince Charles and Camilla in the Scottish Highlands. The Duchess of Sussex also made a trip of her own, journeying back to her former home of Canada for a few days of rest and downtime. The details of Meghan’s stay have now been revealed - that she went to Toronto to spend three days with her best friend, Jessica Mulroney.
Meghan Markle news: Inside Duchess’ secret Canada trip and who she went to visit
Rumours of Meghan’s trip to Canada appeared earlier in the month when a letter from the Royal Family to Air Canada emerged giving strict instructions to protect Meghan’s privacy on board. Meghan took a commercial flight from London to Toronto, with Kensington Palace instructing the airline to protect the Duchess’ privacy and not let anyone approach her or take her picture. A source told Royal Central she had one glass of champagne and watched the Book Club during the eight-hour flight. The source revealed: “She seemed very relaxed and sipped on peppermint tea during the journey.” It now turns out that Meghan visited the Canadian city without Harry to visit her stylist Jessica Mulroney, and spent a couple of days relaxing with her family. According to ABC News, “Meghan spent three days holed up at Jessica Mulroney and her husband Ben’s home in Toronto.”
|
n
|
“I expect them to be in Balmoral later this week before returning to London ahead of [M]their upcoming engagements[/M], starting with the Hamilton performance in aid of Sentebale [M]on August 29[/M],” Scobie tells BAZAAR.com.
|
Meghan Markle, 37, and Prince Harry, 33, are back in the spotlight, after a relaxing few weeks to themselves over the summer. During August the couple jetted off to Lake Como to spend time with close friends George and Amal Clooney, and also visited Prince Charles and Camilla in the Scottish Highlands. The Duchess of Sussex also made a trip of her own, journeying back to her former home of Canada for a few days of rest and downtime. The details of Meghan’s stay have now been revealed - that she went to Toronto to spend three days with her best friend, Jessica Mulroney.
Meghan Markle news: Inside Duchess’ secret Canada trip and who she went to visit
Rumours of Meghan’s trip to Canada appeared earlier in the month when a letter from the Royal Family to Air Canada emerged giving strict instructions to protect Meghan’s privacy on board. Meghan took a commercial flight from London to Toronto, with Kensington Palace instructing the airline to protect the Duchess’ privacy and not let anyone approach her or take her picture. A source told Royal Central she had one glass of champagne and watched the Book Club during the eight-hour flight. The source revealed: “She seemed very relaxed and sipped on peppermint tea during the journey.” It now turns out that Meghan visited the Canadian city without Harry to visit her stylist Jessica Mulroney, and spent a couple of days relaxing with her family. According to ABC News, “Meghan spent three days holed up at Jessica Mulroney and her husband Ben’s home in Toronto.”
|
n
|
“I expect them to be in Balmoral later this week before returning to London ahead of [M]their upcoming engagements[/M], starting with the Hamilton performance [M]in aid of Sentebale[/M] on August 29,” Scobie tells BAZAAR.com.
|
Meghan Markle, 37, and Prince Harry, 33, are back in the spotlight, after a relaxing few weeks to themselves over the summer. During August the couple jetted off to Lake Como to spend time with close friends George and Amal Clooney, and also visited Prince Charles and Camilla in the Scottish Highlands. The Duchess of Sussex also made a trip of her own, journeying back to her former home of Canada for a few days of rest and downtime. The details of Meghan’s stay have now been revealed - that she went to Toronto to spend three days with her best friend, Jessica Mulroney.
Meghan Markle news: Inside Duchess’ secret Canada trip and who she went to visit
Rumours of Meghan’s trip to Canada appeared earlier in the month when a letter from the Royal Family to Air Canada emerged giving strict instructions to protect Meghan’s privacy on board. Meghan took a commercial flight from London to Toronto, with Kensington Palace instructing the airline to protect the Duchess’ privacy and not let anyone approach her or take her picture. A source told Royal Central she had one glass of champagne and watched the Book Club during the eight-hour flight. The source revealed: “She seemed very relaxed and sipped on peppermint tea during the journey.” It now turns out that Meghan visited the Canadian city without Harry to visit her stylist Jessica Mulroney, and spent a couple of days relaxing with her family. According to ABC News, “Meghan spent three days holed up at Jessica Mulroney and her husband Ben’s home in Toronto.”
|
n
|
“I expect them to be in Balmoral later this week before returning to London ahead of [M]their upcoming engagements[/M], starting with [M]the Hamilton performance[/M] in aid of Sentebale on August 29,” Scobie tells BAZAAR.com.
|
Meghan Markle, 37, and Prince Harry, 33, are back in the spotlight, after a relaxing few weeks to themselves over the summer. During August the couple jetted off to Lake Como to spend time with close friends George and Amal Clooney, and also visited Prince Charles and Camilla in the Scottish Highlands. The Duchess of Sussex also made a trip of her own, journeying back to her former home of Canada for a few days of rest and downtime. The details of Meghan’s stay have now been revealed - that she went to Toronto to spend three days with her best friend, Jessica Mulroney.
Meghan Markle news: Inside Duchess’ secret Canada trip and who she went to visit
Rumours of Meghan’s trip to Canada appeared earlier in the month when a letter from the Royal Family to Air Canada emerged giving strict instructions to protect Meghan’s privacy on board. Meghan took a commercial flight from London to Toronto, with Kensington Palace instructing the airline to protect the Duchess’ privacy and not let anyone approach her or take her picture. A source told Royal Central she had one glass of champagne and watched the Book Club during the eight-hour flight. The source revealed: “She seemed very relaxed and sipped on peppermint tea during the journey.” It now turns out that Meghan visited the Canadian city without Harry to visit her stylist Jessica Mulroney, and spent a couple of days relaxing with her family. According to ABC News, “Meghan spent three days holed up at Jessica Mulroney and her husband Ben’s home in Toronto.”
|
n
|
"[M]Google[/M]'s subsequent changes to its policy, after it has already obtained location data on Internet users, [M]fails to comply with the 2011 order," Epic quoted its letter as stating.[/M]
|
Now, the first lawsuit has been filed against the search engine giant over this issue, according to documents posted by Ars Technica(Opens in a new tab).
On Friday, attorneys representing the plaintiff, Napoleon Patacsil from San Diego, filed the lawsuit(Opens in a new tab) in federal court in San Francisco. The lawsuit is looking to establish an “iPhone class” and an “Android class” in its desire to obtain class action status. This could potentially affect millions of users — anyone who uses either an iPhone or Android device and had turned off Location History yet were still tracked by Google.
“Google expressly represented to users of its operating system and apps that the activation of certain settings will prevent the tracking of users’ geolocations. This representation was false. Despite users’ attempts to protect their location privacy, Google collects and stores users’ location data, thereby invading users’ reasonable expectations of privacy, counter to Google’s own representations about how users can configure Google’s products to prevent such egregious privacy violations,” the lawsuit states.
|
n
|
"[M]Google[/M]'s subsequent changes to its policy, after it has [M]already obtained location data on Internet users[/M], fails to comply with the 2011 order," [M]Epic quoted its letter as stating.[/M]
|
Now, the first lawsuit has been filed against the search engine giant over this issue, according to documents posted by Ars Technica(Opens in a new tab).
On Friday, attorneys representing the plaintiff, Napoleon Patacsil from San Diego, filed the lawsuit(Opens in a new tab) in federal court in San Francisco. The lawsuit is looking to establish an “iPhone class” and an “Android class” in its desire to obtain class action status. This could potentially affect millions of users — anyone who uses either an iPhone or Android device and had turned off Location History yet were still tracked by Google.
“Google expressly represented to users of its operating system and apps that the activation of certain settings will prevent the tracking of users’ geolocations. This representation was false. Despite users’ attempts to protect their location privacy, Google collects and stores users’ location data, thereby invading users’ reasonable expectations of privacy, counter to Google’s own representations about how users can configure Google’s products to prevent such egregious privacy violations,” the lawsuit states.
|
n
|
[M]"Google's subsequent changes to its policy, after it has already obtained location data on Internet users, fails to comply with the 2011 order," Epic quoted its letter as stating.[/M]
|
Now, the first lawsuit has been filed against the search engine giant over this issue, according to documents posted by Ars Technica(Opens in a new tab).
On Friday, attorneys representing the plaintiff, Napoleon Patacsil from San Diego, filed the lawsuit(Opens in a new tab) in federal court in San Francisco. The lawsuit is looking to establish an “iPhone class” and an “Android class” in its desire to obtain class action status. This could potentially affect millions of users — anyone who uses either an iPhone or Android device and had turned off Location History yet were still tracked by Google.
“Google expressly represented to users of its operating system and apps that the activation of certain settings will prevent the tracking of users’ geolocations. This representation was false. Despite users’ attempts to protect their location privacy, Google collects and stores users’ location data, thereby invading users’ reasonable expectations of privacy, counter to Google’s own representations about how users can configure Google’s products to prevent such egregious privacy violations,” the lawsuit states.
|
n
|
[M]The suit[/M] filed Friday by a California man [M]seeks[/M] unspecified damages along with [M]class-action status to represent all US[/M] iPhone or [M]Android smartphone users who turned off location history in order not to have their movements logged by Google.[/M]
|
Now, the first lawsuit has been filed against the search engine giant over this issue, according to documents posted by Ars Technica(Opens in a new tab).
On Friday, attorneys representing the plaintiff, Napoleon Patacsil from San Diego, filed the lawsuit(Opens in a new tab) in federal court in San Francisco. The lawsuit is looking to establish an “iPhone class” and an “Android class” in its desire to obtain class action status. This could potentially affect millions of users — anyone who uses either an iPhone or Android device and had turned off Location History yet were still tracked by Google.
“Google expressly represented to users of its operating system and apps that the activation of certain settings will prevent the tracking of users’ geolocations. This representation was false. Despite users’ attempts to protect their location privacy, Google collects and stores users’ location data, thereby invading users’ reasonable expectations of privacy, counter to Google’s own representations about how users can configure Google’s products to prevent such egregious privacy violations,” the lawsuit states.
|
e
|
[M]The suit[/M] filed Friday by a California man [M]seeks[/M] unspecified damages along with [M]class-action status to represent all US iPhone[/M] or Android [M]smartphone users who turned off location history in order not to have their movements logged by Google.[/M]
|
Now, the first lawsuit has been filed against the search engine giant over this issue, according to documents posted by Ars Technica(Opens in a new tab).
On Friday, attorneys representing the plaintiff, Napoleon Patacsil from San Diego, filed the lawsuit(Opens in a new tab) in federal court in San Francisco. The lawsuit is looking to establish an “iPhone class” and an “Android class” in its desire to obtain class action status. This could potentially affect millions of users — anyone who uses either an iPhone or Android device and had turned off Location History yet were still tracked by Google.
“Google expressly represented to users of its operating system and apps that the activation of certain settings will prevent the tracking of users’ geolocations. This representation was false. Despite users’ attempts to protect their location privacy, Google collects and stores users’ location data, thereby invading users’ reasonable expectations of privacy, counter to Google’s own representations about how users can configure Google’s products to prevent such egregious privacy violations,” the lawsuit states.
|
e
|
[M]The suit[/M] filed Friday by a California man [M]seeks unspecified damages[/M] along with class-action status to represent all US iPhone or Android smartphone users who turned off location history in order not to have their movements logged by Google.
|
Now, the first lawsuit has been filed against the search engine giant over this issue, according to documents posted by Ars Technica(Opens in a new tab).
On Friday, attorneys representing the plaintiff, Napoleon Patacsil from San Diego, filed the lawsuit(Opens in a new tab) in federal court in San Francisco. The lawsuit is looking to establish an “iPhone class” and an “Android class” in its desire to obtain class action status. This could potentially affect millions of users — anyone who uses either an iPhone or Android device and had turned off Location History yet were still tracked by Google.
“Google expressly represented to users of its operating system and apps that the activation of certain settings will prevent the tracking of users’ geolocations. This representation was false. Despite users’ attempts to protect their location privacy, Google collects and stores users’ location data, thereby invading users’ reasonable expectations of privacy, counter to Google’s own representations about how users can configure Google’s products to prevent such egregious privacy violations,” the lawsuit states.
|
n
|
[M]The suit filed[/M] Friday [M]by a California man[/M] seeks unspecified damages along with class-action status to represent all US iPhone or Android smartphone users who turned off location history in order not to have their movements logged by Google.
|
Now, the first lawsuit has been filed against the search engine giant over this issue, according to documents posted by Ars Technica(Opens in a new tab).
On Friday, attorneys representing the plaintiff, Napoleon Patacsil from San Diego, filed the lawsuit(Opens in a new tab) in federal court in San Francisco. The lawsuit is looking to establish an “iPhone class” and an “Android class” in its desire to obtain class action status. This could potentially affect millions of users — anyone who uses either an iPhone or Android device and had turned off Location History yet were still tracked by Google.
“Google expressly represented to users of its operating system and apps that the activation of certain settings will prevent the tracking of users’ geolocations. This representation was false. Despite users’ attempts to protect their location privacy, Google collects and stores users’ location data, thereby invading users’ reasonable expectations of privacy, counter to Google’s own representations about how users can configure Google’s products to prevent such egregious privacy violations,” the lawsuit states.
|
e
|
[M]The suit filed Friday[/M] by a California man seeks unspecified damages along with class-action status to represent all US iPhone or Android smartphone users who turned off location history in order not to have their movements logged by Google.
|
Now, the first lawsuit has been filed against the search engine giant over this issue, according to documents posted by Ars Technica(Opens in a new tab).
On Friday, attorneys representing the plaintiff, Napoleon Patacsil from San Diego, filed the lawsuit(Opens in a new tab) in federal court in San Francisco. The lawsuit is looking to establish an “iPhone class” and an “Android class” in its desire to obtain class action status. This could potentially affect millions of users — anyone who uses either an iPhone or Android device and had turned off Location History yet were still tracked by Google.
“Google expressly represented to users of its operating system and apps that the activation of certain settings will prevent the tracking of users’ geolocations. This representation was false. Despite users’ attempts to protect their location privacy, Google collects and stores users’ location data, thereby invading users’ reasonable expectations of privacy, counter to Google’s own representations about how users can configure Google’s products to prevent such egregious privacy violations,” the lawsuit states.
|
e
|
[M]A lawsuit[/M] filed in federal court here [M]accuses Google of[/M] invading people's privacy by [M]tracking the whereabouts of smartphones users despite "location history" settings being turned off[/M].
|
Now, the first lawsuit has been filed against the search engine giant over this issue, according to documents posted by Ars Technica(Opens in a new tab).
On Friday, attorneys representing the plaintiff, Napoleon Patacsil from San Diego, filed the lawsuit(Opens in a new tab) in federal court in San Francisco. The lawsuit is looking to establish an “iPhone class” and an “Android class” in its desire to obtain class action status. This could potentially affect millions of users — anyone who uses either an iPhone or Android device and had turned off Location History yet were still tracked by Google.
“Google expressly represented to users of its operating system and apps that the activation of certain settings will prevent the tracking of users’ geolocations. This representation was false. Despite users’ attempts to protect their location privacy, Google collects and stores users’ location data, thereby invading users’ reasonable expectations of privacy, counter to Google’s own representations about how users can configure Google’s products to prevent such egregious privacy violations,” the lawsuit states.
|
e
|
[M]A lawsuit[/M] filed in federal court here [M]accuses Google of invading people's privacy[/M] by tracking the whereabouts of smartphones users despite "location history" settings being turned off.
|
Now, the first lawsuit has been filed against the search engine giant over this issue, according to documents posted by Ars Technica(Opens in a new tab).
On Friday, attorneys representing the plaintiff, Napoleon Patacsil from San Diego, filed the lawsuit(Opens in a new tab) in federal court in San Francisco. The lawsuit is looking to establish an “iPhone class” and an “Android class” in its desire to obtain class action status. This could potentially affect millions of users — anyone who uses either an iPhone or Android device and had turned off Location History yet were still tracked by Google.
“Google expressly represented to users of its operating system and apps that the activation of certain settings will prevent the tracking of users’ geolocations. This representation was false. Despite users’ attempts to protect their location privacy, Google collects and stores users’ location data, thereby invading users’ reasonable expectations of privacy, counter to Google’s own representations about how users can configure Google’s products to prevent such egregious privacy violations,” the lawsuit states.
|
e
|
[M]A lawsuit filed in federal court[/M] here accuses Google of invading people's privacy by tracking the whereabouts of smartphones users despite "location history" settings being turned off.
|
Now, the first lawsuit has been filed against the search engine giant over this issue, according to documents posted by Ars Technica(Opens in a new tab).
On Friday, attorneys representing the plaintiff, Napoleon Patacsil from San Diego, filed the lawsuit(Opens in a new tab) in federal court in San Francisco. The lawsuit is looking to establish an “iPhone class” and an “Android class” in its desire to obtain class action status. This could potentially affect millions of users — anyone who uses either an iPhone or Android device and had turned off Location History yet were still tracked by Google.
“Google expressly represented to users of its operating system and apps that the activation of certain settings will prevent the tracking of users’ geolocations. This representation was false. Despite users’ attempts to protect their location privacy, Google collects and stores users’ location data, thereby invading users’ reasonable expectations of privacy, counter to Google’s own representations about how users can configure Google’s products to prevent such egregious privacy violations,” the lawsuit states.
|
e
|
[M]Google did not respond to a request for comment[/M].
|
Now, the first lawsuit has been filed against the search engine giant over this issue, according to documents posted by Ars Technica(Opens in a new tab).
On Friday, attorneys representing the plaintiff, Napoleon Patacsil from San Diego, filed the lawsuit(Opens in a new tab) in federal court in San Francisco. The lawsuit is looking to establish an “iPhone class” and an “Android class” in its desire to obtain class action status. This could potentially affect millions of users — anyone who uses either an iPhone or Android device and had turned off Location History yet were still tracked by Google.
“Google expressly represented to users of its operating system and apps that the activation of certain settings will prevent the tracking of users’ geolocations. This representation was false. Despite users’ attempts to protect their location privacy, Google collects and stores users’ location data, thereby invading users’ reasonable expectations of privacy, counter to Google’s own representations about how users can configure Google’s products to prevent such egregious privacy violations,” the lawsuit states.
|
n
|
The Electronic Privacy Information Center, a non-profit public interest group, said it has sent a letter to the US Federal Trade Commission to look into whether [M]Google[/M] has violated [M]a 2011 consent order[/M].
|
Now, the first lawsuit has been filed against the search engine giant over this issue, according to documents posted by Ars Technica(Opens in a new tab).
On Friday, attorneys representing the plaintiff, Napoleon Patacsil from San Diego, filed the lawsuit(Opens in a new tab) in federal court in San Francisco. The lawsuit is looking to establish an “iPhone class” and an “Android class” in its desire to obtain class action status. This could potentially affect millions of users — anyone who uses either an iPhone or Android device and had turned off Location History yet were still tracked by Google.
“Google expressly represented to users of its operating system and apps that the activation of certain settings will prevent the tracking of users’ geolocations. This representation was false. Despite users’ attempts to protect their location privacy, Google collects and stores users’ location data, thereby invading users’ reasonable expectations of privacy, counter to Google’s own representations about how users can configure Google’s products to prevent such egregious privacy violations,” the lawsuit states.
|
n
|
[M]The Electronic Privacy Information Center[/M], a non-profit public interest group, [M]said it has sent a letter to the US Federal Trade Commission to look into whether Google has violated a 2011 consent order[/M].
|
Now, the first lawsuit has been filed against the search engine giant over this issue, according to documents posted by Ars Technica(Opens in a new tab).
On Friday, attorneys representing the plaintiff, Napoleon Patacsil from San Diego, filed the lawsuit(Opens in a new tab) in federal court in San Francisco. The lawsuit is looking to establish an “iPhone class” and an “Android class” in its desire to obtain class action status. This could potentially affect millions of users — anyone who uses either an iPhone or Android device and had turned off Location History yet were still tracked by Google.
“Google expressly represented to users of its operating system and apps that the activation of certain settings will prevent the tracking of users’ geolocations. This representation was false. Despite users’ attempts to protect their location privacy, Google collects and stores users’ location data, thereby invading users’ reasonable expectations of privacy, counter to Google’s own representations about how users can configure Google’s products to prevent such egregious privacy violations,” the lawsuit states.
|
n
|
[M]The Electronic Privacy Information Center[/M], a non-profit public interest group, [M]said it has sent a letter to the US Federal Trade Commission[/M] to look into whether Google has violated a 2011 consent order.
|
Now, the first lawsuit has been filed against the search engine giant over this issue, according to documents posted by Ars Technica(Opens in a new tab).
On Friday, attorneys representing the plaintiff, Napoleon Patacsil from San Diego, filed the lawsuit(Opens in a new tab) in federal court in San Francisco. The lawsuit is looking to establish an “iPhone class” and an “Android class” in its desire to obtain class action status. This could potentially affect millions of users — anyone who uses either an iPhone or Android device and had turned off Location History yet were still tracked by Google.
“Google expressly represented to users of its operating system and apps that the activation of certain settings will prevent the tracking of users’ geolocations. This representation was false. Despite users’ attempts to protect their location privacy, Google collects and stores users’ location data, thereby invading users’ reasonable expectations of privacy, counter to Google’s own representations about how users can configure Google’s products to prevent such egregious privacy violations,” the lawsuit states.
|
n
|
[M]The Electronic Privacy Information Center, a non-profit public interest group[/M], said it has sent a letter to the US Federal Trade Commission to look into whether Google has violated a 2011 consent order.
|
Now, the first lawsuit has been filed against the search engine giant over this issue, according to documents posted by Ars Technica(Opens in a new tab).
On Friday, attorneys representing the plaintiff, Napoleon Patacsil from San Diego, filed the lawsuit(Opens in a new tab) in federal court in San Francisco. The lawsuit is looking to establish an “iPhone class” and an “Android class” in its desire to obtain class action status. This could potentially affect millions of users — anyone who uses either an iPhone or Android device and had turned off Location History yet were still tracked by Google.
“Google expressly represented to users of its operating system and apps that the activation of certain settings will prevent the tracking of users’ geolocations. This representation was false. Despite users’ attempts to protect their location privacy, Google collects and stores users’ location data, thereby invading users’ reasonable expectations of privacy, counter to Google’s own representations about how users can configure Google’s products to prevent such egregious privacy violations,” the lawsuit states.
|
n
|
[M]The suit seeks[/M] damages along with [M]class-action status to represent all[/M] US iPhone or [M]Android users[/M].
|
Now, the first lawsuit has been filed against the search engine giant over this issue, according to documents posted by Ars Technica(Opens in a new tab).
On Friday, attorneys representing the plaintiff, Napoleon Patacsil from San Diego, filed the lawsuit(Opens in a new tab) in federal court in San Francisco. The lawsuit is looking to establish an “iPhone class” and an “Android class” in its desire to obtain class action status. This could potentially affect millions of users — anyone who uses either an iPhone or Android device and had turned off Location History yet were still tracked by Google.
“Google expressly represented to users of its operating system and apps that the activation of certain settings will prevent the tracking of users’ geolocations. This representation was false. Despite users’ attempts to protect their location privacy, Google collects and stores users’ location data, thereby invading users’ reasonable expectations of privacy, counter to Google’s own representations about how users can configure Google’s products to prevent such egregious privacy violations,” the lawsuit states.
|
e
|
[M]The suit seeks[/M] damages along with [M]class-action status to represent all US iPhone[/M] or Android [M]users[/M].
|
Now, the first lawsuit has been filed against the search engine giant over this issue, according to documents posted by Ars Technica(Opens in a new tab).
On Friday, attorneys representing the plaintiff, Napoleon Patacsil from San Diego, filed the lawsuit(Opens in a new tab) in federal court in San Francisco. The lawsuit is looking to establish an “iPhone class” and an “Android class” in its desire to obtain class action status. This could potentially affect millions of users — anyone who uses either an iPhone or Android device and had turned off Location History yet were still tracked by Google.
“Google expressly represented to users of its operating system and apps that the activation of certain settings will prevent the tracking of users’ geolocations. This representation was false. Despite users’ attempts to protect their location privacy, Google collects and stores users’ location data, thereby invading users’ reasonable expectations of privacy, counter to Google’s own representations about how users can configure Google’s products to prevent such egregious privacy violations,” the lawsuit states.
|
e
|
[M]The suit seeks damages[/M] along with class-action status to represent all US iPhone or Android users.
|
Now, the first lawsuit has been filed against the search engine giant over this issue, according to documents posted by Ars Technica(Opens in a new tab).
On Friday, attorneys representing the plaintiff, Napoleon Patacsil from San Diego, filed the lawsuit(Opens in a new tab) in federal court in San Francisco. The lawsuit is looking to establish an “iPhone class” and an “Android class” in its desire to obtain class action status. This could potentially affect millions of users — anyone who uses either an iPhone or Android device and had turned off Location History yet were still tracked by Google.
“Google expressly represented to users of its operating system and apps that the activation of certain settings will prevent the tracking of users’ geolocations. This representation was false. Despite users’ attempts to protect their location privacy, Google collects and stores users’ location data, thereby invading users’ reasonable expectations of privacy, counter to Google’s own representations about how users can configure Google’s products to prevent such egregious privacy violations,” the lawsuit states.
|
n
|
"[M]This representation was false[/M]."
The suit accuses Google of violating privacy law, and cites a news report last week confirmed by university researchers.
|
Now, the first lawsuit has been filed against the search engine giant over this issue, according to documents posted by Ars Technica(Opens in a new tab).
On Friday, attorneys representing the plaintiff, Napoleon Patacsil from San Diego, filed the lawsuit(Opens in a new tab) in federal court in San Francisco. The lawsuit is looking to establish an “iPhone class” and an “Android class” in its desire to obtain class action status. This could potentially affect millions of users — anyone who uses either an iPhone or Android device and had turned off Location History yet were still tracked by Google.
“Google expressly represented to users of its operating system and apps that the activation of certain settings will prevent the tracking of users’ geolocations. This representation was false. Despite users’ attempts to protect their location privacy, Google collects and stores users’ location data, thereby invading users’ reasonable expectations of privacy, counter to Google’s own representations about how users can configure Google’s products to prevent such egregious privacy violations,” the lawsuit states.
|
e
|
"This representation was false."
[M]The suit[/M] accuses Google of violating privacy law, and [M]cites a news report last week confirmed by university researchers[/M].
|
Now, the first lawsuit has been filed against the search engine giant over this issue, according to documents posted by Ars Technica(Opens in a new tab).
On Friday, attorneys representing the plaintiff, Napoleon Patacsil from San Diego, filed the lawsuit(Opens in a new tab) in federal court in San Francisco. The lawsuit is looking to establish an “iPhone class” and an “Android class” in its desire to obtain class action status. This could potentially affect millions of users — anyone who uses either an iPhone or Android device and had turned off Location History yet were still tracked by Google.
“Google expressly represented to users of its operating system and apps that the activation of certain settings will prevent the tracking of users’ geolocations. This representation was false. Despite users’ attempts to protect their location privacy, Google collects and stores users’ location data, thereby invading users’ reasonable expectations of privacy, counter to Google’s own representations about how users can configure Google’s products to prevent such egregious privacy violations,” the lawsuit states.
|
n
|
"This representation was false."
[M]The suit accuses Google of violating privacy law[/M], and cites a news report last week confirmed by university researchers.
|
Now, the first lawsuit has been filed against the search engine giant over this issue, according to documents posted by Ars Technica(Opens in a new tab).
On Friday, attorneys representing the plaintiff, Napoleon Patacsil from San Diego, filed the lawsuit(Opens in a new tab) in federal court in San Francisco. The lawsuit is looking to establish an “iPhone class” and an “Android class” in its desire to obtain class action status. This could potentially affect millions of users — anyone who uses either an iPhone or Android device and had turned off Location History yet were still tracked by Google.
“Google expressly represented to users of its operating system and apps that the activation of certain settings will prevent the tracking of users’ geolocations. This representation was false. Despite users’ attempts to protect their location privacy, Google collects and stores users’ location data, thereby invading users’ reasonable expectations of privacy, counter to Google’s own representations about how users can configure Google’s products to prevent such egregious privacy violations,” the lawsuit states.
|
e
|
[M]The page had previously indicated that turning location history off meant places visited were not stored by Google[/M].
|
Now, the first lawsuit has been filed against the search engine giant over this issue, according to documents posted by Ars Technica(Opens in a new tab).
On Friday, attorneys representing the plaintiff, Napoleon Patacsil from San Diego, filed the lawsuit(Opens in a new tab) in federal court in San Francisco. The lawsuit is looking to establish an “iPhone class” and an “Android class” in its desire to obtain class action status. This could potentially affect millions of users — anyone who uses either an iPhone or Android device and had turned off Location History yet were still tracked by Google.
“Google expressly represented to users of its operating system and apps that the activation of certain settings will prevent the tracking of users’ geolocations. This representation was false. Despite users’ attempts to protect their location privacy, Google collects and stores users’ location data, thereby invading users’ reasonable expectations of privacy, counter to Google’s own representations about how users can configure Google’s products to prevent such egregious privacy violations,” the lawsuit states.
|
n
|
"[M]Google expressly represented to users of its[/M] operating system and [M]apps that the activation of certain settings will prevent the tracking of users' geolocations[/M]," [M]the lawsuit read.[/M]
|
Now, the first lawsuit has been filed against the search engine giant over this issue, according to documents posted by Ars Technica(Opens in a new tab).
On Friday, attorneys representing the plaintiff, Napoleon Patacsil from San Diego, filed the lawsuit(Opens in a new tab) in federal court in San Francisco. The lawsuit is looking to establish an “iPhone class” and an “Android class” in its desire to obtain class action status. This could potentially affect millions of users — anyone who uses either an iPhone or Android device and had turned off Location History yet were still tracked by Google.
“Google expressly represented to users of its operating system and apps that the activation of certain settings will prevent the tracking of users’ geolocations. This representation was false. Despite users’ attempts to protect their location privacy, Google collects and stores users’ location data, thereby invading users’ reasonable expectations of privacy, counter to Google’s own representations about how users can configure Google’s products to prevent such egregious privacy violations,” the lawsuit states.
|
e
|
"[M]Google expressly represented to users of its operating system[/M] and apps [M]that the activation of certain settings will prevent the tracking of users' geolocations[/M]," [M]the lawsuit read.[/M]
|
Now, the first lawsuit has been filed against the search engine giant over this issue, according to documents posted by Ars Technica(Opens in a new tab).
On Friday, attorneys representing the plaintiff, Napoleon Patacsil from San Diego, filed the lawsuit(Opens in a new tab) in federal court in San Francisco. The lawsuit is looking to establish an “iPhone class” and an “Android class” in its desire to obtain class action status. This could potentially affect millions of users — anyone who uses either an iPhone or Android device and had turned off Location History yet were still tracked by Google.
“Google expressly represented to users of its operating system and apps that the activation of certain settings will prevent the tracking of users’ geolocations. This representation was false. Despite users’ attempts to protect their location privacy, Google collects and stores users’ location data, thereby invading users’ reasonable expectations of privacy, counter to Google’s own representations about how users can configure Google’s products to prevent such egregious privacy violations,” the lawsuit states.
|
e
|
The [M]lawsuit is looking to establish an “iPhone class”[/M] and an “Android class” [M]in its desire to obtain class action status.[/M]
|
The suit seeks damages along with class-action status to represent all US iPhone or Android users.
A lawsuit filed in federal court here accuses Google of invading people's privacy by tracking the whereabouts of smartphones users despite "location history" settings being turned off.
The suit filed Friday by a California man seeks unspecified damages along with class-action status to represent all US iPhone or Android smartphone users who turned off location history in order not to have their movements logged by Google.
"Google expressly represented to users of its operating system and apps that the activation of certain settings will prevent the tracking of users' geolocations," the lawsuit read.
"This representation was false."
The suit accuses Google of violating privacy law, and cites a news report last week confirmed by university researchers.
Google did not respond to a request for comment.
After the report, Alphabet-owned Google modified its support page to read that turning off location history off "does not affect other location services on your device, like Google Location Services and Find My Device."
Location data may also be tracked for use in other services such as maps or search, the support page indicated.
The page had previously indicated that turning location history off meant places visited were not stored by Google.
The Electronic Privacy Information Center, a non-profit public interest group, said it has sent a letter to the US Federal Trade Commission to look into whether Google has violated a 2011 consent order.
"Google's subsequent changes to its policy, after it has already obtained location data on Internet users, fails to comply with the 2011 order," Epic quoted its letter as stating.
|
e
|
The [M]lawsuit is looking to establish an[/M] “iPhone class” and an [M]“Android class” in its desire to obtain class action status.[/M]
|
The suit seeks damages along with class-action status to represent all US iPhone or Android users.
A lawsuit filed in federal court here accuses Google of invading people's privacy by tracking the whereabouts of smartphones users despite "location history" settings being turned off.
The suit filed Friday by a California man seeks unspecified damages along with class-action status to represent all US iPhone or Android smartphone users who turned off location history in order not to have their movements logged by Google.
"Google expressly represented to users of its operating system and apps that the activation of certain settings will prevent the tracking of users' geolocations," the lawsuit read.
"This representation was false."
The suit accuses Google of violating privacy law, and cites a news report last week confirmed by university researchers.
Google did not respond to a request for comment.
After the report, Alphabet-owned Google modified its support page to read that turning off location history off "does not affect other location services on your device, like Google Location Services and Find My Device."
Location data may also be tracked for use in other services such as maps or search, the support page indicated.
The page had previously indicated that turning location history off meant places visited were not stored by Google.
The Electronic Privacy Information Center, a non-profit public interest group, said it has sent a letter to the US Federal Trade Commission to look into whether Google has violated a 2011 consent order.
"Google's subsequent changes to its policy, after it has already obtained location data on Internet users, fails to comply with the 2011 order," Epic quoted its letter as stating.
|
e
|
The [M]lawsuit is looking to establish an[/M] “iPhone class” and an [M]“Android class”[/M] in its desire to obtain class action status.
|
The suit seeks damages along with class-action status to represent all US iPhone or Android users.
A lawsuit filed in federal court here accuses Google of invading people's privacy by tracking the whereabouts of smartphones users despite "location history" settings being turned off.
The suit filed Friday by a California man seeks unspecified damages along with class-action status to represent all US iPhone or Android smartphone users who turned off location history in order not to have their movements logged by Google.
"Google expressly represented to users of its operating system and apps that the activation of certain settings will prevent the tracking of users' geolocations," the lawsuit read.
"This representation was false."
The suit accuses Google of violating privacy law, and cites a news report last week confirmed by university researchers.
Google did not respond to a request for comment.
After the report, Alphabet-owned Google modified its support page to read that turning off location history off "does not affect other location services on your device, like Google Location Services and Find My Device."
Location data may also be tracked for use in other services such as maps or search, the support page indicated.
The page had previously indicated that turning location history off meant places visited were not stored by Google.
The Electronic Privacy Information Center, a non-profit public interest group, said it has sent a letter to the US Federal Trade Commission to look into whether Google has violated a 2011 consent order.
"Google's subsequent changes to its policy, after it has already obtained location data on Internet users, fails to comply with the 2011 order," Epic quoted its letter as stating.
|
e
|
The [M]lawsuit is looking to establish an “iPhone class”[/M] and an “Android class” in its desire to obtain class action status.
|
The suit seeks damages along with class-action status to represent all US iPhone or Android users.
A lawsuit filed in federal court here accuses Google of invading people's privacy by tracking the whereabouts of smartphones users despite "location history" settings being turned off.
The suit filed Friday by a California man seeks unspecified damages along with class-action status to represent all US iPhone or Android smartphone users who turned off location history in order not to have their movements logged by Google.
"Google expressly represented to users of its operating system and apps that the activation of certain settings will prevent the tracking of users' geolocations," the lawsuit read.
"This representation was false."
The suit accuses Google of violating privacy law, and cites a news report last week confirmed by university researchers.
Google did not respond to a request for comment.
After the report, Alphabet-owned Google modified its support page to read that turning off location history off "does not affect other location services on your device, like Google Location Services and Find My Device."
Location data may also be tracked for use in other services such as maps or search, the support page indicated.
The page had previously indicated that turning location history off meant places visited were not stored by Google.
The Electronic Privacy Information Center, a non-profit public interest group, said it has sent a letter to the US Federal Trade Commission to look into whether Google has violated a 2011 consent order.
"Google's subsequent changes to its policy, after it has already obtained location data on Internet users, fails to comply with the 2011 order," Epic quoted its letter as stating.
|
e
|
“[M]Google expressly represented to users of its[/M] operating system and [M]apps that the activation of certain settings will prevent the tracking of users’ geolocations[/M].
|
The suit seeks damages along with class-action status to represent all US iPhone or Android users.
A lawsuit filed in federal court here accuses Google of invading people's privacy by tracking the whereabouts of smartphones users despite "location history" settings being turned off.
The suit filed Friday by a California man seeks unspecified damages along with class-action status to represent all US iPhone or Android smartphone users who turned off location history in order not to have their movements logged by Google.
"Google expressly represented to users of its operating system and apps that the activation of certain settings will prevent the tracking of users' geolocations," the lawsuit read.
"This representation was false."
The suit accuses Google of violating privacy law, and cites a news report last week confirmed by university researchers.
Google did not respond to a request for comment.
After the report, Alphabet-owned Google modified its support page to read that turning off location history off "does not affect other location services on your device, like Google Location Services and Find My Device."
Location data may also be tracked for use in other services such as maps or search, the support page indicated.
The page had previously indicated that turning location history off meant places visited were not stored by Google.
The Electronic Privacy Information Center, a non-profit public interest group, said it has sent a letter to the US Federal Trade Commission to look into whether Google has violated a 2011 consent order.
"Google's subsequent changes to its policy, after it has already obtained location data on Internet users, fails to comply with the 2011 order," Epic quoted its letter as stating.
|
e
|
“[M]Google expressly represented to users of its operating system[/M] and apps [M]that the activation of certain settings will prevent the tracking of users’ geolocations[/M].
|
The suit seeks damages along with class-action status to represent all US iPhone or Android users.
A lawsuit filed in federal court here accuses Google of invading people's privacy by tracking the whereabouts of smartphones users despite "location history" settings being turned off.
The suit filed Friday by a California man seeks unspecified damages along with class-action status to represent all US iPhone or Android smartphone users who turned off location history in order not to have their movements logged by Google.
"Google expressly represented to users of its operating system and apps that the activation of certain settings will prevent the tracking of users' geolocations," the lawsuit read.
"This representation was false."
The suit accuses Google of violating privacy law, and cites a news report last week confirmed by university researchers.
Google did not respond to a request for comment.
After the report, Alphabet-owned Google modified its support page to read that turning off location history off "does not affect other location services on your device, like Google Location Services and Find My Device."
Location data may also be tracked for use in other services such as maps or search, the support page indicated.
The page had previously indicated that turning location history off meant places visited were not stored by Google.
The Electronic Privacy Information Center, a non-profit public interest group, said it has sent a letter to the US Federal Trade Commission to look into whether Google has violated a 2011 consent order.
"Google's subsequent changes to its policy, after it has already obtained location data on Internet users, fails to comply with the 2011 order," Epic quoted its letter as stating.
|
e
|
Now, [M]the first lawsuit has been filed against the search engine giant over this issue[/M], according to documents posted by Ars Technica(
|
The suit seeks damages along with class-action status to represent all US iPhone or Android users.
A lawsuit filed in federal court here accuses Google of invading people's privacy by tracking the whereabouts of smartphones users despite "location history" settings being turned off.
The suit filed Friday by a California man seeks unspecified damages along with class-action status to represent all US iPhone or Android smartphone users who turned off location history in order not to have their movements logged by Google.
"Google expressly represented to users of its operating system and apps that the activation of certain settings will prevent the tracking of users' geolocations," the lawsuit read.
"This representation was false."
The suit accuses Google of violating privacy law, and cites a news report last week confirmed by university researchers.
Google did not respond to a request for comment.
After the report, Alphabet-owned Google modified its support page to read that turning off location history off "does not affect other location services on your device, like Google Location Services and Find My Device."
Location data may also be tracked for use in other services such as maps or search, the support page indicated.
The page had previously indicated that turning location history off meant places visited were not stored by Google.
The Electronic Privacy Information Center, a non-profit public interest group, said it has sent a letter to the US Federal Trade Commission to look into whether Google has violated a 2011 consent order.
"Google's subsequent changes to its policy, after it has already obtained location data on Internet users, fails to comply with the 2011 order," Epic quoted its letter as stating.
|
n
|
This could potentially affect millions of users — [M]anyone who uses[/M] either an iPhone or [M]Android[/M] device [M]and had turned off Location History yet were still tracked by Google.[/M]
|
The suit seeks damages along with class-action status to represent all US iPhone or Android users.
A lawsuit filed in federal court here accuses Google of invading people's privacy by tracking the whereabouts of smartphones users despite "location history" settings being turned off.
The suit filed Friday by a California man seeks unspecified damages along with class-action status to represent all US iPhone or Android smartphone users who turned off location history in order not to have their movements logged by Google.
"Google expressly represented to users of its operating system and apps that the activation of certain settings will prevent the tracking of users' geolocations," the lawsuit read.
"This representation was false."
The suit accuses Google of violating privacy law, and cites a news report last week confirmed by university researchers.
Google did not respond to a request for comment.
After the report, Alphabet-owned Google modified its support page to read that turning off location history off "does not affect other location services on your device, like Google Location Services and Find My Device."
Location data may also be tracked for use in other services such as maps or search, the support page indicated.
The page had previously indicated that turning location history off meant places visited were not stored by Google.
The Electronic Privacy Information Center, a non-profit public interest group, said it has sent a letter to the US Federal Trade Commission to look into whether Google has violated a 2011 consent order.
"Google's subsequent changes to its policy, after it has already obtained location data on Internet users, fails to comply with the 2011 order," Epic quoted its letter as stating.
|
n
|
This could potentially affect millions of users — [M]anyone who uses[/M] either an [M]iPhone[/M] or Android device [M]and had turned off Location History yet were still tracked by Google.[/M]
|
The suit seeks damages along with class-action status to represent all US iPhone or Android users.
A lawsuit filed in federal court here accuses Google of invading people's privacy by tracking the whereabouts of smartphones users despite "location history" settings being turned off.
The suit filed Friday by a California man seeks unspecified damages along with class-action status to represent all US iPhone or Android smartphone users who turned off location history in order not to have their movements logged by Google.
"Google expressly represented to users of its operating system and apps that the activation of certain settings will prevent the tracking of users' geolocations," the lawsuit read.
"This representation was false."
The suit accuses Google of violating privacy law, and cites a news report last week confirmed by university researchers.
Google did not respond to a request for comment.
After the report, Alphabet-owned Google modified its support page to read that turning off location history off "does not affect other location services on your device, like Google Location Services and Find My Device."
Location data may also be tracked for use in other services such as maps or search, the support page indicated.
The page had previously indicated that turning location history off meant places visited were not stored by Google.
The Electronic Privacy Information Center, a non-profit public interest group, said it has sent a letter to the US Federal Trade Commission to look into whether Google has violated a 2011 consent order.
"Google's subsequent changes to its policy, after it has already obtained location data on Internet users, fails to comply with the 2011 order," Epic quoted its letter as stating.
|
n
|
[M]This could potentially affect millions of users[/M] — anyone who uses either an iPhone or Android device and had turned off Location History yet were still tracked by Google.
|
The suit seeks damages along with class-action status to represent all US iPhone or Android users.
A lawsuit filed in federal court here accuses Google of invading people's privacy by tracking the whereabouts of smartphones users despite "location history" settings being turned off.
The suit filed Friday by a California man seeks unspecified damages along with class-action status to represent all US iPhone or Android smartphone users who turned off location history in order not to have their movements logged by Google.
"Google expressly represented to users of its operating system and apps that the activation of certain settings will prevent the tracking of users' geolocations," the lawsuit read.
"This representation was false."
The suit accuses Google of violating privacy law, and cites a news report last week confirmed by university researchers.
Google did not respond to a request for comment.
After the report, Alphabet-owned Google modified its support page to read that turning off location history off "does not affect other location services on your device, like Google Location Services and Find My Device."
Location data may also be tracked for use in other services such as maps or search, the support page indicated.
The page had previously indicated that turning location history off meant places visited were not stored by Google.
The Electronic Privacy Information Center, a non-profit public interest group, said it has sent a letter to the US Federal Trade Commission to look into whether Google has violated a 2011 consent order.
"Google's subsequent changes to its policy, after it has already obtained location data on Internet users, fails to comply with the 2011 order," Epic quoted its letter as stating.
|
n
|
Despite users’ attempts to protect their location privacy, Google collects and stores users’ location data, thereby invading users’ reasonable expectations of privacy, [M]counter to Google’s own representations about how users can configure Google’s products to prevent such egregious privacy violations,” the lawsuit states[/M].
|
The suit seeks damages along with class-action status to represent all US iPhone or Android users.
A lawsuit filed in federal court here accuses Google of invading people's privacy by tracking the whereabouts of smartphones users despite "location history" settings being turned off.
The suit filed Friday by a California man seeks unspecified damages along with class-action status to represent all US iPhone or Android smartphone users who turned off location history in order not to have their movements logged by Google.
"Google expressly represented to users of its operating system and apps that the activation of certain settings will prevent the tracking of users' geolocations," the lawsuit read.
"This representation was false."
The suit accuses Google of violating privacy law, and cites a news report last week confirmed by university researchers.
Google did not respond to a request for comment.
After the report, Alphabet-owned Google modified its support page to read that turning off location history off "does not affect other location services on your device, like Google Location Services and Find My Device."
Location data may also be tracked for use in other services such as maps or search, the support page indicated.
The page had previously indicated that turning location history off meant places visited were not stored by Google.
The Electronic Privacy Information Center, a non-profit public interest group, said it has sent a letter to the US Federal Trade Commission to look into whether Google has violated a 2011 consent order.
"Google's subsequent changes to its policy, after it has already obtained location data on Internet users, fails to comply with the 2011 order," Epic quoted its letter as stating.
|
n
|
Despite users’ attempts to protect their location privacy, [M]Google[/M] collects and stores users’ location data, thereby [M]invading users’ reasonable expectations of privacy[/M], counter to Google’s own representations about how users can configure Google’s products to prevent such egregious privacy violations,” [M]the lawsuit states[/M].
|
The suit seeks damages along with class-action status to represent all US iPhone or Android users.
A lawsuit filed in federal court here accuses Google of invading people's privacy by tracking the whereabouts of smartphones users despite "location history" settings being turned off.
The suit filed Friday by a California man seeks unspecified damages along with class-action status to represent all US iPhone or Android smartphone users who turned off location history in order not to have their movements logged by Google.
"Google expressly represented to users of its operating system and apps that the activation of certain settings will prevent the tracking of users' geolocations," the lawsuit read.
"This representation was false."
The suit accuses Google of violating privacy law, and cites a news report last week confirmed by university researchers.
Google did not respond to a request for comment.
After the report, Alphabet-owned Google modified its support page to read that turning off location history off "does not affect other location services on your device, like Google Location Services and Find My Device."
Location data may also be tracked for use in other services such as maps or search, the support page indicated.
The page had previously indicated that turning location history off meant places visited were not stored by Google.
The Electronic Privacy Information Center, a non-profit public interest group, said it has sent a letter to the US Federal Trade Commission to look into whether Google has violated a 2011 consent order.
"Google's subsequent changes to its policy, after it has already obtained location data on Internet users, fails to comply with the 2011 order," Epic quoted its letter as stating.
|
e
|
Despite users’ attempts to protect their location privacy, [M]Google[/M] collects and [M]stores users’ location data[/M], thereby invading users’ reasonable expectations of privacy, counter to Google’s own representations about how users can configure Google’s products to prevent such egregious privacy violations,” [M]the lawsuit states[/M].
|
The suit seeks damages along with class-action status to represent all US iPhone or Android users.
A lawsuit filed in federal court here accuses Google of invading people's privacy by tracking the whereabouts of smartphones users despite "location history" settings being turned off.
The suit filed Friday by a California man seeks unspecified damages along with class-action status to represent all US iPhone or Android smartphone users who turned off location history in order not to have their movements logged by Google.
"Google expressly represented to users of its operating system and apps that the activation of certain settings will prevent the tracking of users' geolocations," the lawsuit read.
"This representation was false."
The suit accuses Google of violating privacy law, and cites a news report last week confirmed by university researchers.
Google did not respond to a request for comment.
After the report, Alphabet-owned Google modified its support page to read that turning off location history off "does not affect other location services on your device, like Google Location Services and Find My Device."
Location data may also be tracked for use in other services such as maps or search, the support page indicated.
The page had previously indicated that turning location history off meant places visited were not stored by Google.
The Electronic Privacy Information Center, a non-profit public interest group, said it has sent a letter to the US Federal Trade Commission to look into whether Google has violated a 2011 consent order.
"Google's subsequent changes to its policy, after it has already obtained location data on Internet users, fails to comply with the 2011 order," Epic quoted its letter as stating.
|
n
|
Despite users’ attempts to protect their location privacy, [M]Google collects[/M] and stores [M]users’ location data[/M], thereby invading users’ reasonable expectations of privacy, counter to Google’s own representations about how users can configure Google’s products to prevent such egregious privacy violations,” [M]the lawsuit states[/M].
|
The suit seeks damages along with class-action status to represent all US iPhone or Android users.
A lawsuit filed in federal court here accuses Google of invading people's privacy by tracking the whereabouts of smartphones users despite "location history" settings being turned off.
The suit filed Friday by a California man seeks unspecified damages along with class-action status to represent all US iPhone or Android smartphone users who turned off location history in order not to have their movements logged by Google.
"Google expressly represented to users of its operating system and apps that the activation of certain settings will prevent the tracking of users' geolocations," the lawsuit read.
"This representation was false."
The suit accuses Google of violating privacy law, and cites a news report last week confirmed by university researchers.
Google did not respond to a request for comment.
After the report, Alphabet-owned Google modified its support page to read that turning off location history off "does not affect other location services on your device, like Google Location Services and Find My Device."
Location data may also be tracked for use in other services such as maps or search, the support page indicated.
The page had previously indicated that turning location history off meant places visited were not stored by Google.
The Electronic Privacy Information Center, a non-profit public interest group, said it has sent a letter to the US Federal Trade Commission to look into whether Google has violated a 2011 consent order.
"Google's subsequent changes to its policy, after it has already obtained location data on Internet users, fails to comply with the 2011 order," Epic quoted its letter as stating.
|
n
|
Despite [M]users’ attempts to protect their location privacy[/M], [M]Google[/M] collects and stores users’ location data, thereby invading users’ reasonable expectations of privacy, counter to Google’s own representations about how users can configure Google’s products to prevent such egregious privacy violations,” [M]the lawsuit states[/M].
|
The suit seeks damages along with class-action status to represent all US iPhone or Android users.
A lawsuit filed in federal court here accuses Google of invading people's privacy by tracking the whereabouts of smartphones users despite "location history" settings being turned off.
The suit filed Friday by a California man seeks unspecified damages along with class-action status to represent all US iPhone or Android smartphone users who turned off location history in order not to have their movements logged by Google.
"Google expressly represented to users of its operating system and apps that the activation of certain settings will prevent the tracking of users' geolocations," the lawsuit read.
"This representation was false."
The suit accuses Google of violating privacy law, and cites a news report last week confirmed by university researchers.
Google did not respond to a request for comment.
After the report, Alphabet-owned Google modified its support page to read that turning off location history off "does not affect other location services on your device, like Google Location Services and Find My Device."
Location data may also be tracked for use in other services such as maps or search, the support page indicated.
The page had previously indicated that turning location history off meant places visited were not stored by Google.
The Electronic Privacy Information Center, a non-profit public interest group, said it has sent a letter to the US Federal Trade Commission to look into whether Google has violated a 2011 consent order.
"Google's subsequent changes to its policy, after it has already obtained location data on Internet users, fails to comply with the 2011 order," Epic quoted its letter as stating.
|
e
|
[M]This representation was false.[/M]
|
The suit seeks damages along with class-action status to represent all US iPhone or Android users.
A lawsuit filed in federal court here accuses Google of invading people's privacy by tracking the whereabouts of smartphones users despite "location history" settings being turned off.
The suit filed Friday by a California man seeks unspecified damages along with class-action status to represent all US iPhone or Android smartphone users who turned off location history in order not to have their movements logged by Google.
"Google expressly represented to users of its operating system and apps that the activation of certain settings will prevent the tracking of users' geolocations," the lawsuit read.
"This representation was false."
The suit accuses Google of violating privacy law, and cites a news report last week confirmed by university researchers.
Google did not respond to a request for comment.
After the report, Alphabet-owned Google modified its support page to read that turning off location history off "does not affect other location services on your device, like Google Location Services and Find My Device."
Location data may also be tracked for use in other services such as maps or search, the support page indicated.
The page had previously indicated that turning location history off meant places visited were not stored by Google.
The Electronic Privacy Information Center, a non-profit public interest group, said it has sent a letter to the US Federal Trade Commission to look into whether Google has violated a 2011 consent order.
"Google's subsequent changes to its policy, after it has already obtained location data on Internet users, fails to comply with the 2011 order," Epic quoted its letter as stating.
|
e
|
Despite the fact that [M]Connelly[/M] acted in films since childhood, she gained recognition much later, after the appearance on the screens of the films "Dark City" (1998), "Requiem for a Dream" (2000) and "Mind Games" (2001), for the last of which she [M]won[/M] an [M]Oscar[/M] for Best Supporting Actress.
|
Jennifer Lynn Connelly (born December 12, 1970, Keiro, New York, USA) is an American actress. She has been acting in films since childhood, but she achieved fame with the release of the films "Dark City" (1998), "Requiem for a Dream" (2000) and "A Beautiful Mind" (2001), for the last of which she received an Oscar, BAFTA and Golden Globe Award for Best Supporting Actress and a Screen Actors Guild Award nomination for Best Actress. She is also known for her roles in films such as "The Hulk" (2003), "House of Sand and Fog" (2003), "Blood Diamond" (2006), "Like Little Children" (2006), "The Day the Earth stopped "(2008) and" Promising is not getting married "(2009).
Since 2005, Jennifer Connelly has been the Human Rights Ambassador for Amnesty International. Throughout her career, she was included in various magazines, including People, Time, Vanity Fair and Esquire, among the most beautiful women on the planet.
|
e
|
Despite the fact that [M]Connelly acted in[/M] films since childhood, she gained recognition much later, after the appearance on the screens of the films "Dark City" (1998), "Requiem for a Dream" (2000) and "[M]Mind Games" (2001[/M]), for the last of [M]which she won an Oscar for Best Supporting Actress[/M].
|
Jennifer Lynn Connelly (born December 12, 1970, Keiro, New York, USA) is an American actress. She has been acting in films since childhood, but she achieved fame with the release of the films "Dark City" (1998), "Requiem for a Dream" (2000) and "A Beautiful Mind" (2001), for the last of which she received an Oscar, BAFTA and Golden Globe Award for Best Supporting Actress and a Screen Actors Guild Award nomination for Best Actress. She is also known for her roles in films such as "The Hulk" (2003), "House of Sand and Fog" (2003), "Blood Diamond" (2006), "Like Little Children" (2006), "The Day the Earth stopped "(2008) and" Promising is not getting married "(2009).
Since 2005, Jennifer Connelly has been the Human Rights Ambassador for Amnesty International. Throughout her career, she was included in various magazines, including People, Time, Vanity Fair and Esquire, among the most beautiful women on the planet.
|
c
|
Despite the fact that [M]Connelly acted in[/M] films since childhood, she gained recognition much later, after the appearance on the screens of the films "Dark City" (1998), "Requiem for a Dream" (2000) and "[M]Mind Games" (2001[/M]), for the last of [M]which she won an Oscar[/M] for Best Supporting Actress.
|
Jennifer Lynn Connelly (born December 12, 1970, Keiro, New York, USA) is an American actress. She has been acting in films since childhood, but she achieved fame with the release of the films "Dark City" (1998), "Requiem for a Dream" (2000) and "A Beautiful Mind" (2001), for the last of which she received an Oscar, BAFTA and Golden Globe Award for Best Supporting Actress and a Screen Actors Guild Award nomination for Best Actress. She is also known for her roles in films such as "The Hulk" (2003), "House of Sand and Fog" (2003), "Blood Diamond" (2006), "Like Little Children" (2006), "The Day the Earth stopped "(2008) and" Promising is not getting married "(2009).
Since 2005, Jennifer Connelly has been the Human Rights Ambassador for Amnesty International. Throughout her career, she was included in various magazines, including People, Time, Vanity Fair and Esquire, among the most beautiful women on the planet.
|
c
|
Despite the fact that [M]Connelly[/M] acted in films since childhood, she [M]gained recognition[/M] much later, [M]after the appearance[/M] on the screens of the [M]films[/M] "Dark City" (1998), "Requiem for a Dream" (2000) and "[M]Mind Games" (2001[/M]), for the last of which she won an Oscar for Best Supporting Actress.
|
Jennifer Lynn Connelly (born December 12, 1970, Keiro, New York, USA) is an American actress. She has been acting in films since childhood, but she achieved fame with the release of the films "Dark City" (1998), "Requiem for a Dream" (2000) and "A Beautiful Mind" (2001), for the last of which she received an Oscar, BAFTA and Golden Globe Award for Best Supporting Actress and a Screen Actors Guild Award nomination for Best Actress. She is also known for her roles in films such as "The Hulk" (2003), "House of Sand and Fog" (2003), "Blood Diamond" (2006), "Like Little Children" (2006), "The Day the Earth stopped "(2008) and" Promising is not getting married "(2009).
Since 2005, Jennifer Connelly has been the Human Rights Ambassador for Amnesty International. Throughout her career, she was included in various magazines, including People, Time, Vanity Fair and Esquire, among the most beautiful women on the planet.
|
c
|
Despite the fact that [M]Connelly[/M] acted in films since childhood, she [M]gained recognition[/M] much later, [M]after the appearance[/M] on the screens of the [M]films[/M] "Dark City" (1998), "Requiem for a Dream" (2000) and "[M]Mind Games" (2001[/M]), for the last of which she won an Oscar for Best Supporting Actress.
|
Jennifer Lynn Connelly (born December 12, 1970, Keiro, New York, USA) is an American actress. She has been acting in films since childhood, but she achieved fame with the release of the films "Dark City" (1998), "Requiem for a Dream" (2000) and "A Beautiful Mind" (2001), for the last of which she received an Oscar, BAFTA and Golden Globe Award for Best Supporting Actress and a Screen Actors Guild Award nomination for Best Actress. She is also known for her roles in films such as "The Hulk" (2003), "House of Sand and Fog" (2003), "Blood Diamond" (2006), "Like Little Children" (2006), "The Day the Earth stopped "(2008) and" Promising is not getting married "(2009).
Since 2005, Jennifer Connelly has been the Human Rights Ambassador for Amnesty International. Throughout her career, she was included in various magazines, including People, Time, Vanity Fair and Esquire, among the most beautiful women on the planet.
|
c
|
Despite the fact that [M]Connelly[/M] acted in films since childhood, she [M]gained recognition[/M] much later, [M]after the appearance[/M] on the screens of the [M]films[/M] "Dark City" (1998), "[M]Requiem for a Dream" (2000[/M]) and "Mind Games" (2001), for the last of which she won an Oscar for Best Supporting Actress.
|
Jennifer Lynn Connelly (born December 12, 1970, Keiro, New York, USA) is an American actress. She has been acting in films since childhood, but she achieved fame with the release of the films "Dark City" (1998), "Requiem for a Dream" (2000) and "A Beautiful Mind" (2001), for the last of which she received an Oscar, BAFTA and Golden Globe Award for Best Supporting Actress and a Screen Actors Guild Award nomination for Best Actress. She is also known for her roles in films such as "The Hulk" (2003), "House of Sand and Fog" (2003), "Blood Diamond" (2006), "Like Little Children" (2006), "The Day the Earth stopped "(2008) and" Promising is not getting married "(2009).
Since 2005, Jennifer Connelly has been the Human Rights Ambassador for Amnesty International. Throughout her career, she was included in various magazines, including People, Time, Vanity Fair and Esquire, among the most beautiful women on the planet.
|
e
|
Despite the fact that [M]Connelly[/M] acted in films since childhood, she [M]gained recognition[/M] much later, [M]after the appearance[/M] on the screens of the [M]films[/M] "[M]Dark City" (1998[/M]), "Requiem for a Dream" (2000) and "Mind Games" (2001), for the last of which she won an Oscar for Best Supporting Actress.
|
Jennifer Lynn Connelly (born December 12, 1970, Keiro, New York, USA) is an American actress. She has been acting in films since childhood, but she achieved fame with the release of the films "Dark City" (1998), "Requiem for a Dream" (2000) and "A Beautiful Mind" (2001), for the last of which she received an Oscar, BAFTA and Golden Globe Award for Best Supporting Actress and a Screen Actors Guild Award nomination for Best Actress. She is also known for her roles in films such as "The Hulk" (2003), "House of Sand and Fog" (2003), "Blood Diamond" (2006), "Like Little Children" (2006), "The Day the Earth stopped "(2008) and" Promising is not getting married "(2009).
Since 2005, Jennifer Connelly has been the Human Rights Ambassador for Amnesty International. Throughout her career, she was included in various magazines, including People, Time, Vanity Fair and Esquire, among the most beautiful women on the planet.
|
e
|
[M]Despite the fact that Connelly acted in films since childhood, she gained recognition much later[/M], after the appearance on the screens of the films "Dark City" (1998), "Requiem for a Dream" (2000) and "Mind Games" (2001), for the last of which she won an Oscar for Best Supporting Actress.
|
Jennifer Lynn Connelly (born December 12, 1970, Keiro, New York, USA) is an American actress. She has been acting in films since childhood, but she achieved fame with the release of the films "Dark City" (1998), "Requiem for a Dream" (2000) and "A Beautiful Mind" (2001), for the last of which she received an Oscar, BAFTA and Golden Globe Award for Best Supporting Actress and a Screen Actors Guild Award nomination for Best Actress. She is also known for her roles in films such as "The Hulk" (2003), "House of Sand and Fog" (2003), "Blood Diamond" (2006), "Like Little Children" (2006), "The Day the Earth stopped "(2008) and" Promising is not getting married "(2009).
Since 2005, Jennifer Connelly has been the Human Rights Ambassador for Amnesty International. Throughout her career, she was included in various magazines, including People, Time, Vanity Fair and Esquire, among the most beautiful women on the planet.
|
e
|
Since 2005 [M]he has been an ambassador for human rights at Amnesty International.[/M]
|
Jennifer Lynn Connelly (born December 12, 1970, Keiro, New York, USA) is an American actress. She has been acting in films since childhood, but she achieved fame with the release of the films "Dark City" (1998), "Requiem for a Dream" (2000) and "A Beautiful Mind" (2001), for the last of which she received an Oscar, BAFTA and Golden Globe Award for Best Supporting Actress and a Screen Actors Guild Award nomination for Best Actress. She is also known for her roles in films such as "The Hulk" (2003), "House of Sand and Fog" (2003), "Blood Diamond" (2006), "Like Little Children" (2006), "The Day the Earth stopped "(2008) and" Promising is not getting married "(2009).
Since 2005, Jennifer Connelly has been the Human Rights Ambassador for Amnesty International. Throughout her career, she was included in various magazines, including People, Time, Vanity Fair and Esquire, among the most beautiful women on the planet.
|
e
|
[M]Since 2005 he has been an ambassador for human rights at Amnesty International.[/M]
|
Jennifer Lynn Connelly (born December 12, 1970, Keiro, New York, USA) is an American actress. She has been acting in films since childhood, but she achieved fame with the release of the films "Dark City" (1998), "Requiem for a Dream" (2000) and "A Beautiful Mind" (2001), for the last of which she received an Oscar, BAFTA and Golden Globe Award for Best Supporting Actress and a Screen Actors Guild Award nomination for Best Actress. She is also known for her roles in films such as "The Hulk" (2003), "House of Sand and Fog" (2003), "Blood Diamond" (2006), "Like Little Children" (2006), "The Day the Earth stopped "(2008) and" Promising is not getting married "(2009).
Since 2005, Jennifer Connelly has been the Human Rights Ambassador for Amnesty International. Throughout her career, she was included in various magazines, including People, Time, Vanity Fair and Esquire, among the most beautiful women on the planet.
|
e
|
[M]She is also known for her roles in such films as[/M] "The Hulk" (2003), "House of Sand and Fog" (2003), "Bloody Diamond" (2006), "Like Little Children" (2006), "The Day the Earth Stood Still". (2008) and "Promise - not yet married" (2009), "[M]Noah" (2014[/M]).
|
Jennifer Lynn Connelly (born December 12, 1970, Keiro, New York, USA) is an American actress. She has been acting in films since childhood, but she achieved fame with the release of the films "Dark City" (1998), "Requiem for a Dream" (2000) and "A Beautiful Mind" (2001), for the last of which she received an Oscar, BAFTA and Golden Globe Award for Best Supporting Actress and a Screen Actors Guild Award nomination for Best Actress. She is also known for her roles in films such as "The Hulk" (2003), "House of Sand and Fog" (2003), "Blood Diamond" (2006), "Like Little Children" (2006), "The Day the Earth stopped "(2008) and" Promising is not getting married "(2009).
Since 2005, Jennifer Connelly has been the Human Rights Ambassador for Amnesty International. Throughout her career, she was included in various magazines, including People, Time, Vanity Fair and Esquire, among the most beautiful women on the planet.
|
n
|
[M]She is also known for her roles in such films as[/M] "The Hulk" (2003), "House of Sand and Fog" (2003), "Bloody Diamond" (2006), "Like Little Children" (2006), "The Day the Earth Stood Still". (2008) and "[M]Promise - not yet married" (2009[/M]), "Noah" (2014).
|
Jennifer Lynn Connelly (born December 12, 1970, Keiro, New York, USA) is an American actress. She has been acting in films since childhood, but she achieved fame with the release of the films "Dark City" (1998), "Requiem for a Dream" (2000) and "A Beautiful Mind" (2001), for the last of which she received an Oscar, BAFTA and Golden Globe Award for Best Supporting Actress and a Screen Actors Guild Award nomination for Best Actress. She is also known for her roles in films such as "The Hulk" (2003), "House of Sand and Fog" (2003), "Blood Diamond" (2006), "Like Little Children" (2006), "The Day the Earth stopped "(2008) and" Promising is not getting married "(2009).
Since 2005, Jennifer Connelly has been the Human Rights Ambassador for Amnesty International. Throughout her career, she was included in various magazines, including People, Time, Vanity Fair and Esquire, among the most beautiful women on the planet.
|
e
|
[M]She is also known for her roles in such films as[/M] "The Hulk" (2003), "House of Sand and Fog" (2003), "Bloody Diamond" (2006), "Like Little Children" (2006), "[M]The Day the Earth Stood Still". (2008[/M]) and "Promise - not yet married" (2009), "Noah" (2014).
|
Jennifer Lynn Connelly (born December 12, 1970, Keiro, New York, USA) is an American actress. She has been acting in films since childhood, but she achieved fame with the release of the films "Dark City" (1998), "Requiem for a Dream" (2000) and "A Beautiful Mind" (2001), for the last of which she received an Oscar, BAFTA and Golden Globe Award for Best Supporting Actress and a Screen Actors Guild Award nomination for Best Actress. She is also known for her roles in films such as "The Hulk" (2003), "House of Sand and Fog" (2003), "Blood Diamond" (2006), "Like Little Children" (2006), "The Day the Earth stopped "(2008) and" Promising is not getting married "(2009).
Since 2005, Jennifer Connelly has been the Human Rights Ambassador for Amnesty International. Throughout her career, she was included in various magazines, including People, Time, Vanity Fair and Esquire, among the most beautiful women on the planet.
|
e
|
[M]She is also known for her roles in such films as[/M] "The Hulk" (2003), "House of Sand and Fog" (2003), "Bloody Diamond" (2006), "[M]Like Little Children" (2006[/M]), "The Day the Earth Stood Still". (2008) and "Promise - not yet married" (2009), "Noah" (2014).
|
Jennifer Lynn Connelly (born December 12, 1970, Keiro, New York, USA) is an American actress. She has been acting in films since childhood, but she achieved fame with the release of the films "Dark City" (1998), "Requiem for a Dream" (2000) and "A Beautiful Mind" (2001), for the last of which she received an Oscar, BAFTA and Golden Globe Award for Best Supporting Actress and a Screen Actors Guild Award nomination for Best Actress. She is also known for her roles in films such as "The Hulk" (2003), "House of Sand and Fog" (2003), "Blood Diamond" (2006), "Like Little Children" (2006), "The Day the Earth stopped "(2008) and" Promising is not getting married "(2009).
Since 2005, Jennifer Connelly has been the Human Rights Ambassador for Amnesty International. Throughout her career, she was included in various magazines, including People, Time, Vanity Fair and Esquire, among the most beautiful women on the planet.
|
e
|
[M]She is also known for her roles in such films as[/M] "The Hulk" (2003), "House of Sand and Fog" (2003), [M]"Bloody Diamond" (2006[/M]), "Like Little Children" (2006), "The Day the Earth Stood Still". (2008) and "Promise - not yet married" (2009), "Noah" (2014).
|
Jennifer Lynn Connelly (born December 12, 1970, Keiro, New York, USA) is an American actress. She has been acting in films since childhood, but she achieved fame with the release of the films "Dark City" (1998), "Requiem for a Dream" (2000) and "A Beautiful Mind" (2001), for the last of which she received an Oscar, BAFTA and Golden Globe Award for Best Supporting Actress and a Screen Actors Guild Award nomination for Best Actress. She is also known for her roles in films such as "The Hulk" (2003), "House of Sand and Fog" (2003), "Blood Diamond" (2006), "Like Little Children" (2006), "The Day the Earth stopped "(2008) and" Promising is not getting married "(2009).
Since 2005, Jennifer Connelly has been the Human Rights Ambassador for Amnesty International. Throughout her career, she was included in various magazines, including People, Time, Vanity Fair and Esquire, among the most beautiful women on the planet.
|
e
|
[M]She is also known for her roles in such films as[/M] "The Hulk" (2003), "[M]House of Sand and Fog" (2003[/M]), "Bloody Diamond" (2006), "Like Little Children" (2006), "The Day the Earth Stood Still". (2008) and "Promise - not yet married" (2009), "Noah" (2014).
|
Jennifer Lynn Connelly (born December 12, 1970, Keiro, New York, USA) is an American actress. She has been acting in films since childhood, but she achieved fame with the release of the films "Dark City" (1998), "Requiem for a Dream" (2000) and "A Beautiful Mind" (2001), for the last of which she received an Oscar, BAFTA and Golden Globe Award for Best Supporting Actress and a Screen Actors Guild Award nomination for Best Actress. She is also known for her roles in films such as "The Hulk" (2003), "House of Sand and Fog" (2003), "Blood Diamond" (2006), "Like Little Children" (2006), "The Day the Earth stopped "(2008) and" Promising is not getting married "(2009).
Since 2005, Jennifer Connelly has been the Human Rights Ambassador for Amnesty International. Throughout her career, she was included in various magazines, including People, Time, Vanity Fair and Esquire, among the most beautiful women on the planet.
|
e
|
[M]She is also known for her roles in such films as "The Hulk" (2003[/M]), "House of Sand and Fog" (2003), "Bloody Diamond" (2006), "Like Little Children" (2006), "The Day the Earth Stood Still". (2008) and "Promise - not yet married" (2009), "Noah" (2014).
|
Jennifer Lynn Connelly (born December 12, 1970, Keiro, New York, USA) is an American actress. She has been acting in films since childhood, but she achieved fame with the release of the films "Dark City" (1998), "Requiem for a Dream" (2000) and "A Beautiful Mind" (2001), for the last of which she received an Oscar, BAFTA and Golden Globe Award for Best Supporting Actress and a Screen Actors Guild Award nomination for Best Actress. She is also known for her roles in films such as "The Hulk" (2003), "House of Sand and Fog" (2003), "Blood Diamond" (2006), "Like Little Children" (2006), "The Day the Earth stopped "(2008) and" Promising is not getting married "(2009).
Since 2005, Jennifer Connelly has been the Human Rights Ambassador for Amnesty International. Throughout her career, she was included in various magazines, including People, Time, Vanity Fair and Esquire, among the most beautiful women on the planet.
|
e
|
[M]Jennifer Lynn Connelly[/M] (born December 12, 1970) [M]is an[/M] American [M]film actress[/M].
|
Jennifer Lynn Connelly (born December 12, 1970, Keiro, New York, USA) is an American actress. She has been acting in films since childhood, but she achieved fame with the release of the films "Dark City" (1998), "Requiem for a Dream" (2000) and "A Beautiful Mind" (2001), for the last of which she received an Oscar, BAFTA and Golden Globe Award for Best Supporting Actress and a Screen Actors Guild Award nomination for Best Actress. She is also known for her roles in films such as "The Hulk" (2003), "House of Sand and Fog" (2003), "Blood Diamond" (2006), "Like Little Children" (2006), "The Day the Earth stopped "(2008) and" Promising is not getting married "(2009).
Since 2005, Jennifer Connelly has been the Human Rights Ambassador for Amnesty International. Throughout her career, she was included in various magazines, including People, Time, Vanity Fair and Esquire, among the most beautiful women on the planet.
|
e
|
[M]Jennifer Lynn Connelly[/M] (born December 12, 1970) [M]is an American[/M] film actress.
|
Jennifer Lynn Connelly (born December 12, 1970, Keiro, New York, USA) is an American actress. She has been acting in films since childhood, but she achieved fame with the release of the films "Dark City" (1998), "Requiem for a Dream" (2000) and "A Beautiful Mind" (2001), for the last of which she received an Oscar, BAFTA and Golden Globe Award for Best Supporting Actress and a Screen Actors Guild Award nomination for Best Actress. She is also known for her roles in films such as "The Hulk" (2003), "House of Sand and Fog" (2003), "Blood Diamond" (2006), "Like Little Children" (2006), "The Day the Earth stopped "(2008) and" Promising is not getting married "(2009).
Since 2005, Jennifer Connelly has been the Human Rights Ambassador for Amnesty International. Throughout her career, she was included in various magazines, including People, Time, Vanity Fair and Esquire, among the most beautiful women on the planet.
|
e
|
[M]Jennifer Lynn Connelly[/M] ([M]born December 12, 1970[/M]) is an American film actress.
|
Jennifer Lynn Connelly (born December 12, 1970, Keiro, New York, USA) is an American actress. She has been acting in films since childhood, but she achieved fame with the release of the films "Dark City" (1998), "Requiem for a Dream" (2000) and "A Beautiful Mind" (2001), for the last of which she received an Oscar, BAFTA and Golden Globe Award for Best Supporting Actress and a Screen Actors Guild Award nomination for Best Actress. She is also known for her roles in films such as "The Hulk" (2003), "House of Sand and Fog" (2003), "Blood Diamond" (2006), "Like Little Children" (2006), "The Day the Earth stopped "(2008) and" Promising is not getting married "(2009).
Since 2005, Jennifer Connelly has been the Human Rights Ambassador for Amnesty International. Throughout her career, she was included in various magazines, including People, Time, Vanity Fair and Esquire, among the most beautiful women on the planet.
|
e
|
Throughout her career, [M]various magazines, including[/M] "People", "Time", "Vanity Fair" and "[M]Esquire[/M]", [M]included her in the list of the most beautiful women on the planet[/M].
|
Jennifer Lynn Connelly (born December 12, 1970, Keiro, New York, USA) is an American actress. She has been acting in films since childhood, but she achieved fame with the release of the films "Dark City" (1998), "Requiem for a Dream" (2000) and "A Beautiful Mind" (2001), for the last of which she received an Oscar, BAFTA and Golden Globe Award for Best Supporting Actress and a Screen Actors Guild Award nomination for Best Actress. She is also known for her roles in films such as "The Hulk" (2003), "House of Sand and Fog" (2003), "Blood Diamond" (2006), "Like Little Children" (2006), "The Day the Earth stopped "(2008) and" Promising is not getting married "(2009).
Since 2005, Jennifer Connelly has been the Human Rights Ambassador for Amnesty International. Throughout her career, she was included in various magazines, including People, Time, Vanity Fair and Esquire, among the most beautiful women on the planet.
|
e
|
Throughout her career, [M]various magazines, including[/M] "People", "Time", "[M]Vanity Fair[/M]" and "Esquire", [M]included her in the list of the most beautiful women on the planet[/M].
|
Jennifer Lynn Connelly (born December 12, 1970, Keiro, New York, USA) is an American actress. She has been acting in films since childhood, but she achieved fame with the release of the films "Dark City" (1998), "Requiem for a Dream" (2000) and "A Beautiful Mind" (2001), for the last of which she received an Oscar, BAFTA and Golden Globe Award for Best Supporting Actress and a Screen Actors Guild Award nomination for Best Actress. She is also known for her roles in films such as "The Hulk" (2003), "House of Sand and Fog" (2003), "Blood Diamond" (2006), "Like Little Children" (2006), "The Day the Earth stopped "(2008) and" Promising is not getting married "(2009).
Since 2005, Jennifer Connelly has been the Human Rights Ambassador for Amnesty International. Throughout her career, she was included in various magazines, including People, Time, Vanity Fair and Esquire, among the most beautiful women on the planet.
|
e
|
Throughout her career, [M]various magazines, including[/M] "People", "[M]Time[/M]", "Vanity Fair" and "Esquire", [M]included her in the list of the most beautiful women on the planet[/M].
|
Jennifer Lynn Connelly (born December 12, 1970, Keiro, New York, USA) is an American actress. She has been acting in films since childhood, but she achieved fame with the release of the films "Dark City" (1998), "Requiem for a Dream" (2000) and "A Beautiful Mind" (2001), for the last of which she received an Oscar, BAFTA and Golden Globe Award for Best Supporting Actress and a Screen Actors Guild Award nomination for Best Actress. She is also known for her roles in films such as "The Hulk" (2003), "House of Sand and Fog" (2003), "Blood Diamond" (2006), "Like Little Children" (2006), "The Day the Earth stopped "(2008) and" Promising is not getting married "(2009).
Since 2005, Jennifer Connelly has been the Human Rights Ambassador for Amnesty International. Throughout her career, she was included in various magazines, including People, Time, Vanity Fair and Esquire, among the most beautiful women on the planet.
|
e
|
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.