premise
stringlengths 923
1.41k
| hypothesis
stringlengths 11
33
| label
stringclasses 4
values |
|---|---|---|
Sidney is odd.
Richard is careful.
Maggie is relevant.
Bowen is not careful.
Boris is not odd.
Boris is purple.
Maggie is not upset.
Marlon is not odd.
Bowen is confident.
Bowen is relevant.
Marlon is not confident.
Boris is not upset.Bowen is relevant if and only if Bowen is upset and Richard is purple.
Someone being both odd and not upset is equivalent to being purple.
Someone who is not purple is always upset.
If someone is purple or not careful, then he is upset.
If Marlon is upset, then Maggie is confident, and vice versa.
Scott is upset if and only if Maggie is not odd.
If someone is not relevant and purple, then he is not odd, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is not careful, then Scott is not relevant and Sidney is not purple.
It can be concluded that Marlon is not careful once knowing that Boris is purple.
Someone who is both odd and not relevant is always purple.
If there is someone who is not relevant, then Scott is not confident and Scott is careful.
Someone is not odd if and only if he is relevant.
|
Richard is upset.
|
self_contradiction
|
Sidney is odd.
Richard is careful.
Maggie is relevant.
Bowen is not careful.
Boris is not odd.
Boris is purple.
Maggie is not upset.
Marlon is not odd.
Bowen is confident.
Bowen is relevant.
Marlon is not confident.
Boris is not upset.Bowen is relevant if and only if Bowen is upset and Richard is purple.
Someone being both odd and not upset is equivalent to being purple.
Someone who is not purple is always upset.
If someone is purple or not careful, then he is upset.
If Marlon is upset, then Maggie is confident, and vice versa.
Scott is upset if and only if Maggie is not odd.
If someone is not relevant and purple, then he is not odd, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is not careful, then Scott is not relevant and Sidney is not purple.
It can be concluded that Marlon is not careful once knowing that Boris is purple.
Someone who is both odd and not relevant is always purple.
If there is someone who is not relevant, then Scott is not confident and Scott is careful.
Someone is not odd if and only if he is relevant.
|
Marlon is relevant.
|
self_contradiction
|
Sidney is odd.
Richard is careful.
Maggie is relevant.
Bowen is not careful.
Boris is not odd.
Boris is purple.
Maggie is not upset.
Marlon is not odd.
Bowen is confident.
Bowen is relevant.
Marlon is not confident.
Boris is not upset.Bowen is relevant if and only if Bowen is upset and Richard is purple.
Someone being both odd and not upset is equivalent to being purple.
Someone who is not purple is always upset.
If someone is purple or not careful, then he is upset.
If Marlon is upset, then Maggie is confident, and vice versa.
Scott is upset if and only if Maggie is not odd.
If someone is not relevant and purple, then he is not odd, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is not careful, then Scott is not relevant and Sidney is not purple.
It can be concluded that Marlon is not careful once knowing that Boris is purple.
Someone who is both odd and not relevant is always purple.
If there is someone who is not relevant, then Scott is not confident and Scott is careful.
Someone is not odd if and only if he is relevant.
|
Boris is not odd.
|
self_contradiction
|
Sidney is odd.
Richard is careful.
Maggie is relevant.
Bowen is not careful.
Boris is not odd.
Boris is purple.
Maggie is not upset.
Marlon is not odd.
Bowen is confident.
Bowen is relevant.
Marlon is not confident.
Boris is not upset.Bowen is relevant if and only if Bowen is upset and Richard is purple.
Someone being both odd and not upset is equivalent to being purple.
Someone who is not purple is always upset.
If someone is purple or not careful, then he is upset.
If Marlon is upset, then Maggie is confident, and vice versa.
Scott is upset if and only if Maggie is not odd.
If someone is not relevant and purple, then he is not odd, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is not careful, then Scott is not relevant and Sidney is not purple.
It can be concluded that Marlon is not careful once knowing that Boris is purple.
Someone who is both odd and not relevant is always purple.
If there is someone who is not relevant, then Scott is not confident and Scott is careful.
Someone is not odd if and only if he is relevant.
|
Sidney is not odd.
|
contradiction
|
Sidney is odd.
Richard is careful.
Maggie is relevant.
Bowen is not careful.
Boris is not odd.
Boris is purple.
Maggie is not upset.
Marlon is not odd.
Bowen is confident.
Bowen is relevant.
Marlon is not confident.
Boris is not upset.Bowen is relevant if and only if Bowen is upset and Richard is purple.
Someone being both odd and not upset is equivalent to being purple.
Someone who is not purple is always upset.
If someone is purple or not careful, then he is upset.
If Marlon is upset, then Maggie is confident, and vice versa.
Scott is upset if and only if Maggie is not odd.
If someone is not relevant and purple, then he is not odd, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is not careful, then Scott is not relevant and Sidney is not purple.
It can be concluded that Marlon is not careful once knowing that Boris is purple.
Someone who is both odd and not relevant is always purple.
If there is someone who is not relevant, then Scott is not confident and Scott is careful.
Someone is not odd if and only if he is relevant.
|
Marlon is purple.
|
entailment
|
Sidney is odd.
Richard is careful.
Maggie is relevant.
Bowen is not careful.
Boris is not odd.
Boris is purple.
Maggie is not upset.
Marlon is not odd.
Bowen is confident.
Bowen is relevant.
Marlon is not confident.
Boris is not upset.Bowen is relevant if and only if Bowen is upset and Richard is purple.
Someone being both odd and not upset is equivalent to being purple.
Someone who is not purple is always upset.
If someone is purple or not careful, then he is upset.
If Marlon is upset, then Maggie is confident, and vice versa.
Scott is upset if and only if Maggie is not odd.
If someone is not relevant and purple, then he is not odd, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is not careful, then Scott is not relevant and Sidney is not purple.
It can be concluded that Marlon is not careful once knowing that Boris is purple.
Someone who is both odd and not relevant is always purple.
If there is someone who is not relevant, then Scott is not confident and Scott is careful.
Someone is not odd if and only if he is relevant.
|
Bowen is purple.
|
entailment
|
Sidney is odd.
Richard is careful.
Maggie is relevant.
Bowen is not careful.
Boris is not odd.
Boris is purple.
Maggie is not upset.
Marlon is not odd.
Bowen is confident.
Bowen is relevant.
Marlon is not confident.
Boris is not upset.Bowen is relevant if and only if Bowen is upset and Richard is purple.
Someone being both odd and not upset is equivalent to being purple.
Someone who is not purple is always upset.
If someone is purple or not careful, then he is upset.
If Marlon is upset, then Maggie is confident, and vice versa.
Scott is upset if and only if Maggie is not odd.
If someone is not relevant and purple, then he is not odd, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is not careful, then Scott is not relevant and Sidney is not purple.
It can be concluded that Marlon is not careful once knowing that Boris is purple.
Someone who is both odd and not relevant is always purple.
If there is someone who is not relevant, then Scott is not confident and Scott is careful.
Someone is not odd if and only if he is relevant.
|
Marlon is upset.
|
self_contradiction
|
Sidney is odd.
Richard is careful.
Maggie is relevant.
Bowen is not careful.
Boris is not odd.
Boris is purple.
Maggie is not upset.
Marlon is not odd.
Bowen is confident.
Bowen is relevant.
Marlon is not confident.
Boris is not upset.Bowen is relevant if and only if Bowen is upset and Richard is purple.
Someone being both odd and not upset is equivalent to being purple.
Someone who is not purple is always upset.
If someone is purple or not careful, then he is upset.
If Marlon is upset, then Maggie is confident, and vice versa.
Scott is upset if and only if Maggie is not odd.
If someone is not relevant and purple, then he is not odd, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is not careful, then Scott is not relevant and Sidney is not purple.
It can be concluded that Marlon is not careful once knowing that Boris is purple.
Someone who is both odd and not relevant is always purple.
If there is someone who is not relevant, then Scott is not confident and Scott is careful.
Someone is not odd if and only if he is relevant.
|
Sidney is purple.
|
contradiction
|
Sidney is odd.
Richard is careful.
Maggie is relevant.
Bowen is not careful.
Boris is not odd.
Boris is purple.
Maggie is not upset.
Marlon is not odd.
Bowen is confident.
Bowen is relevant.
Marlon is not confident.
Boris is not upset.Bowen is relevant if and only if Bowen is upset and Richard is purple.
Someone being both odd and not upset is equivalent to being purple.
Someone who is not purple is always upset.
If someone is purple or not careful, then he is upset.
If Marlon is upset, then Maggie is confident, and vice versa.
Scott is upset if and only if Maggie is not odd.
If someone is not relevant and purple, then he is not odd, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is not careful, then Scott is not relevant and Sidney is not purple.
It can be concluded that Marlon is not careful once knowing that Boris is purple.
Someone who is both odd and not relevant is always purple.
If there is someone who is not relevant, then Scott is not confident and Scott is careful.
Someone is not odd if and only if he is relevant.
|
Boris is not confident.
|
neutral
|
Sidney is odd.
Richard is careful.
Maggie is relevant.
Bowen is not careful.
Boris is not odd.
Boris is purple.
Maggie is not upset.
Marlon is not odd.
Bowen is confident.
Bowen is relevant.
Marlon is not confident.
Boris is not upset.Bowen is relevant if and only if Bowen is upset and Richard is purple.
Someone being both odd and not upset is equivalent to being purple.
Someone who is not purple is always upset.
If someone is purple or not careful, then he is upset.
If Marlon is upset, then Maggie is confident, and vice versa.
Scott is upset if and only if Maggie is not odd.
If someone is not relevant and purple, then he is not odd, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is not careful, then Scott is not relevant and Sidney is not purple.
It can be concluded that Marlon is not careful once knowing that Boris is purple.
Someone who is both odd and not relevant is always purple.
If there is someone who is not relevant, then Scott is not confident and Scott is careful.
Someone is not odd if and only if he is relevant.
|
Richard is confident.
|
neutral
|
Sidney is odd.
Richard is careful.
Maggie is relevant.
Bowen is not careful.
Boris is not odd.
Boris is purple.
Maggie is not upset.
Marlon is not odd.
Bowen is confident.
Bowen is relevant.
Marlon is not confident.
Boris is not upset.Bowen is relevant if and only if Bowen is upset and Richard is purple.
Someone being both odd and not upset is equivalent to being purple.
Someone who is not purple is always upset.
If someone is purple or not careful, then he is upset.
If Marlon is upset, then Maggie is confident, and vice versa.
Scott is upset if and only if Maggie is not odd.
If someone is not relevant and purple, then he is not odd, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is not careful, then Scott is not relevant and Sidney is not purple.
It can be concluded that Marlon is not careful once knowing that Boris is purple.
Someone who is both odd and not relevant is always purple.
If there is someone who is not relevant, then Scott is not confident and Scott is careful.
Someone is not odd if and only if he is relevant.
|
Maggie is not confident.
|
contradiction
|
Sidney is odd.
Richard is careful.
Maggie is relevant.
Bowen is not careful.
Boris is not odd.
Boris is purple.
Maggie is not upset.
Marlon is not odd.
Bowen is confident.
Bowen is relevant.
Marlon is not confident.
Boris is not upset.Bowen is relevant if and only if Bowen is upset and Richard is purple.
Someone being both odd and not upset is equivalent to being purple.
Someone who is not purple is always upset.
If someone is purple or not careful, then he is upset.
If Marlon is upset, then Maggie is confident, and vice versa.
Scott is upset if and only if Maggie is not odd.
If someone is not relevant and purple, then he is not odd, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is not careful, then Scott is not relevant and Sidney is not purple.
It can be concluded that Marlon is not careful once knowing that Boris is purple.
Someone who is both odd and not relevant is always purple.
If there is someone who is not relevant, then Scott is not confident and Scott is careful.
Someone is not odd if and only if he is relevant.
|
Richard is not purple.
|
contradiction
|
Sidney is odd.
Richard is careful.
Maggie is relevant.
Bowen is not careful.
Boris is not odd.
Boris is purple.
Maggie is not upset.
Marlon is not odd.
Bowen is confident.
Bowen is relevant.
Marlon is not confident.
Boris is not upset.Bowen is relevant if and only if Bowen is upset and Richard is purple.
Someone being both odd and not upset is equivalent to being purple.
Someone who is not purple is always upset.
If someone is purple or not careful, then he is upset.
If Marlon is upset, then Maggie is confident, and vice versa.
Scott is upset if and only if Maggie is not odd.
If someone is not relevant and purple, then he is not odd, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is not careful, then Scott is not relevant and Sidney is not purple.
It can be concluded that Marlon is not careful once knowing that Boris is purple.
Someone who is both odd and not relevant is always purple.
If there is someone who is not relevant, then Scott is not confident and Scott is careful.
Someone is not odd if and only if he is relevant.
|
Boris is purple.
|
entailment
|
Sidney is odd.
Richard is careful.
Maggie is relevant.
Bowen is not careful.
Boris is not odd.
Boris is purple.
Maggie is not upset.
Marlon is not odd.
Bowen is confident.
Bowen is relevant.
Marlon is not confident.
Boris is not upset.Bowen is relevant if and only if Bowen is upset and Richard is purple.
Someone being both odd and not upset is equivalent to being purple.
Someone who is not purple is always upset.
If someone is purple or not careful, then he is upset.
If Marlon is upset, then Maggie is confident, and vice versa.
Scott is upset if and only if Maggie is not odd.
If someone is not relevant and purple, then he is not odd, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is not careful, then Scott is not relevant and Sidney is not purple.
It can be concluded that Marlon is not careful once knowing that Boris is purple.
Someone who is both odd and not relevant is always purple.
If there is someone who is not relevant, then Scott is not confident and Scott is careful.
Someone is not odd if and only if he is relevant.
|
Maggie is odd.
|
self_contradiction
|
Sidney is odd.
Richard is careful.
Maggie is relevant.
Bowen is not careful.
Boris is not odd.
Boris is purple.
Maggie is not upset.
Marlon is not odd.
Bowen is confident.
Bowen is relevant.
Marlon is not confident.
Boris is not upset.Bowen is relevant if and only if Bowen is upset and Richard is purple.
Someone being both odd and not upset is equivalent to being purple.
Someone who is not purple is always upset.
If someone is purple or not careful, then he is upset.
If Marlon is upset, then Maggie is confident, and vice versa.
Scott is upset if and only if Maggie is not odd.
If someone is not relevant and purple, then he is not odd, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is not careful, then Scott is not relevant and Sidney is not purple.
It can be concluded that Marlon is not careful once knowing that Boris is purple.
Someone who is both odd and not relevant is always purple.
If there is someone who is not relevant, then Scott is not confident and Scott is careful.
Someone is not odd if and only if he is relevant.
|
Scott is purple.
|
neutral
|
Sidney is odd.
Richard is careful.
Maggie is relevant.
Bowen is not careful.
Boris is not odd.
Boris is purple.
Maggie is not upset.
Marlon is not odd.
Bowen is confident.
Bowen is relevant.
Marlon is not confident.
Boris is not upset.Bowen is relevant if and only if Bowen is upset and Richard is purple.
Someone being both odd and not upset is equivalent to being purple.
Someone who is not purple is always upset.
If someone is purple or not careful, then he is upset.
If Marlon is upset, then Maggie is confident, and vice versa.
Scott is upset if and only if Maggie is not odd.
If someone is not relevant and purple, then he is not odd, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is not careful, then Scott is not relevant and Sidney is not purple.
It can be concluded that Marlon is not careful once knowing that Boris is purple.
Someone who is both odd and not relevant is always purple.
If there is someone who is not relevant, then Scott is not confident and Scott is careful.
Someone is not odd if and only if he is relevant.
|
Sidney is not confident.
|
neutral
|
Sidney is odd.
Richard is careful.
Maggie is relevant.
Bowen is not careful.
Boris is not odd.
Boris is purple.
Maggie is not upset.
Marlon is not odd.
Bowen is confident.
Bowen is relevant.
Marlon is not confident.
Boris is not upset.Bowen is relevant if and only if Bowen is upset and Richard is purple.
Someone being both odd and not upset is equivalent to being purple.
Someone who is not purple is always upset.
If someone is purple or not careful, then he is upset.
If Marlon is upset, then Maggie is confident, and vice versa.
Scott is upset if and only if Maggie is not odd.
If someone is not relevant and purple, then he is not odd, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is not careful, then Scott is not relevant and Sidney is not purple.
It can be concluded that Marlon is not careful once knowing that Boris is purple.
Someone who is both odd and not relevant is always purple.
If there is someone who is not relevant, then Scott is not confident and Scott is careful.
Someone is not odd if and only if he is relevant.
|
Richard is not confident.
|
neutral
|
Sidney is odd.
Richard is careful.
Maggie is relevant.
Bowen is not careful.
Boris is not odd.
Boris is purple.
Maggie is not upset.
Marlon is not odd.
Bowen is confident.
Bowen is relevant.
Marlon is not confident.
Boris is not upset.Bowen is relevant if and only if Bowen is upset and Richard is purple.
Someone being both odd and not upset is equivalent to being purple.
Someone who is not purple is always upset.
If someone is purple or not careful, then he is upset.
If Marlon is upset, then Maggie is confident, and vice versa.
Scott is upset if and only if Maggie is not odd.
If someone is not relevant and purple, then he is not odd, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is not careful, then Scott is not relevant and Sidney is not purple.
It can be concluded that Marlon is not careful once knowing that Boris is purple.
Someone who is both odd and not relevant is always purple.
If there is someone who is not relevant, then Scott is not confident and Scott is careful.
Someone is not odd if and only if he is relevant.
|
Scott is not upset.
|
contradiction
|
Sidney is odd.
Richard is careful.
Maggie is relevant.
Bowen is not careful.
Boris is not odd.
Boris is purple.
Maggie is not upset.
Marlon is not odd.
Bowen is confident.
Bowen is relevant.
Marlon is not confident.
Boris is not upset.Bowen is relevant if and only if Bowen is upset and Richard is purple.
Someone being both odd and not upset is equivalent to being purple.
Someone who is not purple is always upset.
If someone is purple or not careful, then he is upset.
If Marlon is upset, then Maggie is confident, and vice versa.
Scott is upset if and only if Maggie is not odd.
If someone is not relevant and purple, then he is not odd, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is not careful, then Scott is not relevant and Sidney is not purple.
It can be concluded that Marlon is not careful once knowing that Boris is purple.
Someone who is both odd and not relevant is always purple.
If there is someone who is not relevant, then Scott is not confident and Scott is careful.
Someone is not odd if and only if he is relevant.
|
Sidney is not purple.
|
entailment
|
Sidney is odd.
Richard is careful.
Maggie is relevant.
Bowen is not careful.
Boris is not odd.
Boris is purple.
Maggie is not upset.
Marlon is not odd.
Bowen is confident.
Bowen is relevant.
Marlon is not confident.
Boris is not upset.Bowen is relevant if and only if Bowen is upset and Richard is purple.
Someone being both odd and not upset is equivalent to being purple.
Someone who is not purple is always upset.
If someone is purple or not careful, then he is upset.
If Marlon is upset, then Maggie is confident, and vice versa.
Scott is upset if and only if Maggie is not odd.
If someone is not relevant and purple, then he is not odd, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is not careful, then Scott is not relevant and Sidney is not purple.
It can be concluded that Marlon is not careful once knowing that Boris is purple.
Someone who is both odd and not relevant is always purple.
If there is someone who is not relevant, then Scott is not confident and Scott is careful.
Someone is not odd if and only if he is relevant.
|
Marlon is not confident.
|
entailment
|
Luna is self-disciplined.
Luisa is careless.
Luisa is not intellectual.
Maribel is big.
Luisa is not big.
Rupert is big.
Maribel is unsightly.
Maribel is conscientious.
Garth is not self-disciplined.
Arthur is big.
Luisa is conscientious.
Rupert is not intellectual.Someone being both not self-disciplined and unsightly is equivalent to being not big.
Someone is not conscientious if and only if he is not big.
If Garth is not intellectual or Maribel is not careless, then Garth is conscientious.
If Arthur is not careless, then Arthur is big, and vice versa.
Someone being both unsightly and not conscientious is equivalent to being intellectual.
If Maribel is conscientious and Garth is self-disciplined, then Garth is not big and Garth is not intellectual.
If Garth is unsightly and Luna is intellectual, then Maribel is not conscientious.
If someone is conscientious and self-disciplined, then he is both not big and not careless, and vice versa.
If everyone is self-disciplined or not intellectual, then Luisa is big.
If someone is not unsightly, then he is self-disciplined, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is big, then Garth is self-disciplined and Luna is careless.
If Luisa is not big and Rupert is unsightly, then Luisa is intellectual and Luisa is conscientious, and vice versa.
|
Luna is not self-disciplined.
|
contradiction
|
Luna is self-disciplined.
Luisa is careless.
Luisa is not intellectual.
Maribel is big.
Luisa is not big.
Rupert is big.
Maribel is unsightly.
Maribel is conscientious.
Garth is not self-disciplined.
Arthur is big.
Luisa is conscientious.
Rupert is not intellectual.Someone being both not self-disciplined and unsightly is equivalent to being not big.
Someone is not conscientious if and only if he is not big.
If Garth is not intellectual or Maribel is not careless, then Garth is conscientious.
If Arthur is not careless, then Arthur is big, and vice versa.
Someone being both unsightly and not conscientious is equivalent to being intellectual.
If Maribel is conscientious and Garth is self-disciplined, then Garth is not big and Garth is not intellectual.
If Garth is unsightly and Luna is intellectual, then Maribel is not conscientious.
If someone is conscientious and self-disciplined, then he is both not big and not careless, and vice versa.
If everyone is self-disciplined or not intellectual, then Luisa is big.
If someone is not unsightly, then he is self-disciplined, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is big, then Garth is self-disciplined and Luna is careless.
If Luisa is not big and Rupert is unsightly, then Luisa is intellectual and Luisa is conscientious, and vice versa.
|
Garth is big.
|
contradiction
|
Luna is self-disciplined.
Luisa is careless.
Luisa is not intellectual.
Maribel is big.
Luisa is not big.
Rupert is big.
Maribel is unsightly.
Maribel is conscientious.
Garth is not self-disciplined.
Arthur is big.
Luisa is conscientious.
Rupert is not intellectual.Someone being both not self-disciplined and unsightly is equivalent to being not big.
Someone is not conscientious if and only if he is not big.
If Garth is not intellectual or Maribel is not careless, then Garth is conscientious.
If Arthur is not careless, then Arthur is big, and vice versa.
Someone being both unsightly and not conscientious is equivalent to being intellectual.
If Maribel is conscientious and Garth is self-disciplined, then Garth is not big and Garth is not intellectual.
If Garth is unsightly and Luna is intellectual, then Maribel is not conscientious.
If someone is conscientious and self-disciplined, then he is both not big and not careless, and vice versa.
If everyone is self-disciplined or not intellectual, then Luisa is big.
If someone is not unsightly, then he is self-disciplined, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is big, then Garth is self-disciplined and Luna is careless.
If Luisa is not big and Rupert is unsightly, then Luisa is intellectual and Luisa is conscientious, and vice versa.
|
Luna is not careless.
|
contradiction
|
Luna is self-disciplined.
Luisa is careless.
Luisa is not intellectual.
Maribel is big.
Luisa is not big.
Rupert is big.
Maribel is unsightly.
Maribel is conscientious.
Garth is not self-disciplined.
Arthur is big.
Luisa is conscientious.
Rupert is not intellectual.Someone being both not self-disciplined and unsightly is equivalent to being not big.
Someone is not conscientious if and only if he is not big.
If Garth is not intellectual or Maribel is not careless, then Garth is conscientious.
If Arthur is not careless, then Arthur is big, and vice versa.
Someone being both unsightly and not conscientious is equivalent to being intellectual.
If Maribel is conscientious and Garth is self-disciplined, then Garth is not big and Garth is not intellectual.
If Garth is unsightly and Luna is intellectual, then Maribel is not conscientious.
If someone is conscientious and self-disciplined, then he is both not big and not careless, and vice versa.
If everyone is self-disciplined or not intellectual, then Luisa is big.
If someone is not unsightly, then he is self-disciplined, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is big, then Garth is self-disciplined and Luna is careless.
If Luisa is not big and Rupert is unsightly, then Luisa is intellectual and Luisa is conscientious, and vice versa.
|
Luna is not intellectual.
|
neutral
|
Luna is self-disciplined.
Luisa is careless.
Luisa is not intellectual.
Maribel is big.
Luisa is not big.
Rupert is big.
Maribel is unsightly.
Maribel is conscientious.
Garth is not self-disciplined.
Arthur is big.
Luisa is conscientious.
Rupert is not intellectual.Someone being both not self-disciplined and unsightly is equivalent to being not big.
Someone is not conscientious if and only if he is not big.
If Garth is not intellectual or Maribel is not careless, then Garth is conscientious.
If Arthur is not careless, then Arthur is big, and vice versa.
Someone being both unsightly and not conscientious is equivalent to being intellectual.
If Maribel is conscientious and Garth is self-disciplined, then Garth is not big and Garth is not intellectual.
If Garth is unsightly and Luna is intellectual, then Maribel is not conscientious.
If someone is conscientious and self-disciplined, then he is both not big and not careless, and vice versa.
If everyone is self-disciplined or not intellectual, then Luisa is big.
If someone is not unsightly, then he is self-disciplined, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is big, then Garth is self-disciplined and Luna is careless.
If Luisa is not big and Rupert is unsightly, then Luisa is intellectual and Luisa is conscientious, and vice versa.
|
Garth is self-disciplined.
|
self_contradiction
|
Luna is self-disciplined.
Luisa is careless.
Luisa is not intellectual.
Maribel is big.
Luisa is not big.
Rupert is big.
Maribel is unsightly.
Maribel is conscientious.
Garth is not self-disciplined.
Arthur is big.
Luisa is conscientious.
Rupert is not intellectual.Someone being both not self-disciplined and unsightly is equivalent to being not big.
Someone is not conscientious if and only if he is not big.
If Garth is not intellectual or Maribel is not careless, then Garth is conscientious.
If Arthur is not careless, then Arthur is big, and vice versa.
Someone being both unsightly and not conscientious is equivalent to being intellectual.
If Maribel is conscientious and Garth is self-disciplined, then Garth is not big and Garth is not intellectual.
If Garth is unsightly and Luna is intellectual, then Maribel is not conscientious.
If someone is conscientious and self-disciplined, then he is both not big and not careless, and vice versa.
If everyone is self-disciplined or not intellectual, then Luisa is big.
If someone is not unsightly, then he is self-disciplined, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is big, then Garth is self-disciplined and Luna is careless.
If Luisa is not big and Rupert is unsightly, then Luisa is intellectual and Luisa is conscientious, and vice versa.
|
Maribel is big.
|
entailment
|
Luna is self-disciplined.
Luisa is careless.
Luisa is not intellectual.
Maribel is big.
Luisa is not big.
Rupert is big.
Maribel is unsightly.
Maribel is conscientious.
Garth is not self-disciplined.
Arthur is big.
Luisa is conscientious.
Rupert is not intellectual.Someone being both not self-disciplined and unsightly is equivalent to being not big.
Someone is not conscientious if and only if he is not big.
If Garth is not intellectual or Maribel is not careless, then Garth is conscientious.
If Arthur is not careless, then Arthur is big, and vice versa.
Someone being both unsightly and not conscientious is equivalent to being intellectual.
If Maribel is conscientious and Garth is self-disciplined, then Garth is not big and Garth is not intellectual.
If Garth is unsightly and Luna is intellectual, then Maribel is not conscientious.
If someone is conscientious and self-disciplined, then he is both not big and not careless, and vice versa.
If everyone is self-disciplined or not intellectual, then Luisa is big.
If someone is not unsightly, then he is self-disciplined, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is big, then Garth is self-disciplined and Luna is careless.
If Luisa is not big and Rupert is unsightly, then Luisa is intellectual and Luisa is conscientious, and vice versa.
|
Garth is not conscientious.
|
self_contradiction
|
Luna is self-disciplined.
Luisa is careless.
Luisa is not intellectual.
Maribel is big.
Luisa is not big.
Rupert is big.
Maribel is unsightly.
Maribel is conscientious.
Garth is not self-disciplined.
Arthur is big.
Luisa is conscientious.
Rupert is not intellectual.Someone being both not self-disciplined and unsightly is equivalent to being not big.
Someone is not conscientious if and only if he is not big.
If Garth is not intellectual or Maribel is not careless, then Garth is conscientious.
If Arthur is not careless, then Arthur is big, and vice versa.
Someone being both unsightly and not conscientious is equivalent to being intellectual.
If Maribel is conscientious and Garth is self-disciplined, then Garth is not big and Garth is not intellectual.
If Garth is unsightly and Luna is intellectual, then Maribel is not conscientious.
If someone is conscientious and self-disciplined, then he is both not big and not careless, and vice versa.
If everyone is self-disciplined or not intellectual, then Luisa is big.
If someone is not unsightly, then he is self-disciplined, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is big, then Garth is self-disciplined and Luna is careless.
If Luisa is not big and Rupert is unsightly, then Luisa is intellectual and Luisa is conscientious, and vice versa.
|
Luisa is not conscientious.
|
self_contradiction
|
Luna is self-disciplined.
Luisa is careless.
Luisa is not intellectual.
Maribel is big.
Luisa is not big.
Rupert is big.
Maribel is unsightly.
Maribel is conscientious.
Garth is not self-disciplined.
Arthur is big.
Luisa is conscientious.
Rupert is not intellectual.Someone being both not self-disciplined and unsightly is equivalent to being not big.
Someone is not conscientious if and only if he is not big.
If Garth is not intellectual or Maribel is not careless, then Garth is conscientious.
If Arthur is not careless, then Arthur is big, and vice versa.
Someone being both unsightly and not conscientious is equivalent to being intellectual.
If Maribel is conscientious and Garth is self-disciplined, then Garth is not big and Garth is not intellectual.
If Garth is unsightly and Luna is intellectual, then Maribel is not conscientious.
If someone is conscientious and self-disciplined, then he is both not big and not careless, and vice versa.
If everyone is self-disciplined or not intellectual, then Luisa is big.
If someone is not unsightly, then he is self-disciplined, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is big, then Garth is self-disciplined and Luna is careless.
If Luisa is not big and Rupert is unsightly, then Luisa is intellectual and Luisa is conscientious, and vice versa.
|
Carl is careless.
|
neutral
|
Luna is self-disciplined.
Luisa is careless.
Luisa is not intellectual.
Maribel is big.
Luisa is not big.
Rupert is big.
Maribel is unsightly.
Maribel is conscientious.
Garth is not self-disciplined.
Arthur is big.
Luisa is conscientious.
Rupert is not intellectual.Someone being both not self-disciplined and unsightly is equivalent to being not big.
Someone is not conscientious if and only if he is not big.
If Garth is not intellectual or Maribel is not careless, then Garth is conscientious.
If Arthur is not careless, then Arthur is big, and vice versa.
Someone being both unsightly and not conscientious is equivalent to being intellectual.
If Maribel is conscientious and Garth is self-disciplined, then Garth is not big and Garth is not intellectual.
If Garth is unsightly and Luna is intellectual, then Maribel is not conscientious.
If someone is conscientious and self-disciplined, then he is both not big and not careless, and vice versa.
If everyone is self-disciplined or not intellectual, then Luisa is big.
If someone is not unsightly, then he is self-disciplined, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is big, then Garth is self-disciplined and Luna is careless.
If Luisa is not big and Rupert is unsightly, then Luisa is intellectual and Luisa is conscientious, and vice versa.
|
Arthur is unsightly.
|
neutral
|
Luna is self-disciplined.
Luisa is careless.
Luisa is not intellectual.
Maribel is big.
Luisa is not big.
Rupert is big.
Maribel is unsightly.
Maribel is conscientious.
Garth is not self-disciplined.
Arthur is big.
Luisa is conscientious.
Rupert is not intellectual.Someone being both not self-disciplined and unsightly is equivalent to being not big.
Someone is not conscientious if and only if he is not big.
If Garth is not intellectual or Maribel is not careless, then Garth is conscientious.
If Arthur is not careless, then Arthur is big, and vice versa.
Someone being both unsightly and not conscientious is equivalent to being intellectual.
If Maribel is conscientious and Garth is self-disciplined, then Garth is not big and Garth is not intellectual.
If Garth is unsightly and Luna is intellectual, then Maribel is not conscientious.
If someone is conscientious and self-disciplined, then he is both not big and not careless, and vice versa.
If everyone is self-disciplined or not intellectual, then Luisa is big.
If someone is not unsightly, then he is self-disciplined, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is big, then Garth is self-disciplined and Luna is careless.
If Luisa is not big and Rupert is unsightly, then Luisa is intellectual and Luisa is conscientious, and vice versa.
|
Garth is not self-disciplined.
|
self_contradiction
|
Luna is self-disciplined.
Luisa is careless.
Luisa is not intellectual.
Maribel is big.
Luisa is not big.
Rupert is big.
Maribel is unsightly.
Maribel is conscientious.
Garth is not self-disciplined.
Arthur is big.
Luisa is conscientious.
Rupert is not intellectual.Someone being both not self-disciplined and unsightly is equivalent to being not big.
Someone is not conscientious if and only if he is not big.
If Garth is not intellectual or Maribel is not careless, then Garth is conscientious.
If Arthur is not careless, then Arthur is big, and vice versa.
Someone being both unsightly and not conscientious is equivalent to being intellectual.
If Maribel is conscientious and Garth is self-disciplined, then Garth is not big and Garth is not intellectual.
If Garth is unsightly and Luna is intellectual, then Maribel is not conscientious.
If someone is conscientious and self-disciplined, then he is both not big and not careless, and vice versa.
If everyone is self-disciplined or not intellectual, then Luisa is big.
If someone is not unsightly, then he is self-disciplined, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is big, then Garth is self-disciplined and Luna is careless.
If Luisa is not big and Rupert is unsightly, then Luisa is intellectual and Luisa is conscientious, and vice versa.
|
Luisa is intellectual.
|
self_contradiction
|
Luna is self-disciplined.
Luisa is careless.
Luisa is not intellectual.
Maribel is big.
Luisa is not big.
Rupert is big.
Maribel is unsightly.
Maribel is conscientious.
Garth is not self-disciplined.
Arthur is big.
Luisa is conscientious.
Rupert is not intellectual.Someone being both not self-disciplined and unsightly is equivalent to being not big.
Someone is not conscientious if and only if he is not big.
If Garth is not intellectual or Maribel is not careless, then Garth is conscientious.
If Arthur is not careless, then Arthur is big, and vice versa.
Someone being both unsightly and not conscientious is equivalent to being intellectual.
If Maribel is conscientious and Garth is self-disciplined, then Garth is not big and Garth is not intellectual.
If Garth is unsightly and Luna is intellectual, then Maribel is not conscientious.
If someone is conscientious and self-disciplined, then he is both not big and not careless, and vice versa.
If everyone is self-disciplined or not intellectual, then Luisa is big.
If someone is not unsightly, then he is self-disciplined, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is big, then Garth is self-disciplined and Luna is careless.
If Luisa is not big and Rupert is unsightly, then Luisa is intellectual and Luisa is conscientious, and vice versa.
|
Luna is unsightly.
|
contradiction
|
Luna is self-disciplined.
Luisa is careless.
Luisa is not intellectual.
Maribel is big.
Luisa is not big.
Rupert is big.
Maribel is unsightly.
Maribel is conscientious.
Garth is not self-disciplined.
Arthur is big.
Luisa is conscientious.
Rupert is not intellectual.Someone being both not self-disciplined and unsightly is equivalent to being not big.
Someone is not conscientious if and only if he is not big.
If Garth is not intellectual or Maribel is not careless, then Garth is conscientious.
If Arthur is not careless, then Arthur is big, and vice versa.
Someone being both unsightly and not conscientious is equivalent to being intellectual.
If Maribel is conscientious and Garth is self-disciplined, then Garth is not big and Garth is not intellectual.
If Garth is unsightly and Luna is intellectual, then Maribel is not conscientious.
If someone is conscientious and self-disciplined, then he is both not big and not careless, and vice versa.
If everyone is self-disciplined or not intellectual, then Luisa is big.
If someone is not unsightly, then he is self-disciplined, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is big, then Garth is self-disciplined and Luna is careless.
If Luisa is not big and Rupert is unsightly, then Luisa is intellectual and Luisa is conscientious, and vice versa.
|
Luna is careless.
|
entailment
|
Luna is self-disciplined.
Luisa is careless.
Luisa is not intellectual.
Maribel is big.
Luisa is not big.
Rupert is big.
Maribel is unsightly.
Maribel is conscientious.
Garth is not self-disciplined.
Arthur is big.
Luisa is conscientious.
Rupert is not intellectual.Someone being both not self-disciplined and unsightly is equivalent to being not big.
Someone is not conscientious if and only if he is not big.
If Garth is not intellectual or Maribel is not careless, then Garth is conscientious.
If Arthur is not careless, then Arthur is big, and vice versa.
Someone being both unsightly and not conscientious is equivalent to being intellectual.
If Maribel is conscientious and Garth is self-disciplined, then Garth is not big and Garth is not intellectual.
If Garth is unsightly and Luna is intellectual, then Maribel is not conscientious.
If someone is conscientious and self-disciplined, then he is both not big and not careless, and vice versa.
If everyone is self-disciplined or not intellectual, then Luisa is big.
If someone is not unsightly, then he is self-disciplined, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is big, then Garth is self-disciplined and Luna is careless.
If Luisa is not big and Rupert is unsightly, then Luisa is intellectual and Luisa is conscientious, and vice versa.
|
Luisa is unsightly.
|
entailment
|
Luna is self-disciplined.
Luisa is careless.
Luisa is not intellectual.
Maribel is big.
Luisa is not big.
Rupert is big.
Maribel is unsightly.
Maribel is conscientious.
Garth is not self-disciplined.
Arthur is big.
Luisa is conscientious.
Rupert is not intellectual.Someone being both not self-disciplined and unsightly is equivalent to being not big.
Someone is not conscientious if and only if he is not big.
If Garth is not intellectual or Maribel is not careless, then Garth is conscientious.
If Arthur is not careless, then Arthur is big, and vice versa.
Someone being both unsightly and not conscientious is equivalent to being intellectual.
If Maribel is conscientious and Garth is self-disciplined, then Garth is not big and Garth is not intellectual.
If Garth is unsightly and Luna is intellectual, then Maribel is not conscientious.
If someone is conscientious and self-disciplined, then he is both not big and not careless, and vice versa.
If everyone is self-disciplined or not intellectual, then Luisa is big.
If someone is not unsightly, then he is self-disciplined, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is big, then Garth is self-disciplined and Luna is careless.
If Luisa is not big and Rupert is unsightly, then Luisa is intellectual and Luisa is conscientious, and vice versa.
|
Carl is not intellectual.
|
neutral
|
Luna is self-disciplined.
Luisa is careless.
Luisa is not intellectual.
Maribel is big.
Luisa is not big.
Rupert is big.
Maribel is unsightly.
Maribel is conscientious.
Garth is not self-disciplined.
Arthur is big.
Luisa is conscientious.
Rupert is not intellectual.Someone being both not self-disciplined and unsightly is equivalent to being not big.
Someone is not conscientious if and only if he is not big.
If Garth is not intellectual or Maribel is not careless, then Garth is conscientious.
If Arthur is not careless, then Arthur is big, and vice versa.
Someone being both unsightly and not conscientious is equivalent to being intellectual.
If Maribel is conscientious and Garth is self-disciplined, then Garth is not big and Garth is not intellectual.
If Garth is unsightly and Luna is intellectual, then Maribel is not conscientious.
If someone is conscientious and self-disciplined, then he is both not big and not careless, and vice versa.
If everyone is self-disciplined or not intellectual, then Luisa is big.
If someone is not unsightly, then he is self-disciplined, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is big, then Garth is self-disciplined and Luna is careless.
If Luisa is not big and Rupert is unsightly, then Luisa is intellectual and Luisa is conscientious, and vice versa.
|
Rupert is intellectual.
|
contradiction
|
Luna is self-disciplined.
Luisa is careless.
Luisa is not intellectual.
Maribel is big.
Luisa is not big.
Rupert is big.
Maribel is unsightly.
Maribel is conscientious.
Garth is not self-disciplined.
Arthur is big.
Luisa is conscientious.
Rupert is not intellectual.Someone being both not self-disciplined and unsightly is equivalent to being not big.
Someone is not conscientious if and only if he is not big.
If Garth is not intellectual or Maribel is not careless, then Garth is conscientious.
If Arthur is not careless, then Arthur is big, and vice versa.
Someone being both unsightly and not conscientious is equivalent to being intellectual.
If Maribel is conscientious and Garth is self-disciplined, then Garth is not big and Garth is not intellectual.
If Garth is unsightly and Luna is intellectual, then Maribel is not conscientious.
If someone is conscientious and self-disciplined, then he is both not big and not careless, and vice versa.
If everyone is self-disciplined or not intellectual, then Luisa is big.
If someone is not unsightly, then he is self-disciplined, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is big, then Garth is self-disciplined and Luna is careless.
If Luisa is not big and Rupert is unsightly, then Luisa is intellectual and Luisa is conscientious, and vice versa.
|
Maribel is self-disciplined.
|
neutral
|
Luna is self-disciplined.
Luisa is careless.
Luisa is not intellectual.
Maribel is big.
Luisa is not big.
Rupert is big.
Maribel is unsightly.
Maribel is conscientious.
Garth is not self-disciplined.
Arthur is big.
Luisa is conscientious.
Rupert is not intellectual.Someone being both not self-disciplined and unsightly is equivalent to being not big.
Someone is not conscientious if and only if he is not big.
If Garth is not intellectual or Maribel is not careless, then Garth is conscientious.
If Arthur is not careless, then Arthur is big, and vice versa.
Someone being both unsightly and not conscientious is equivalent to being intellectual.
If Maribel is conscientious and Garth is self-disciplined, then Garth is not big and Garth is not intellectual.
If Garth is unsightly and Luna is intellectual, then Maribel is not conscientious.
If someone is conscientious and self-disciplined, then he is both not big and not careless, and vice versa.
If everyone is self-disciplined or not intellectual, then Luisa is big.
If someone is not unsightly, then he is self-disciplined, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is big, then Garth is self-disciplined and Luna is careless.
If Luisa is not big and Rupert is unsightly, then Luisa is intellectual and Luisa is conscientious, and vice versa.
|
Garth is not careless.
|
entailment
|
Luna is self-disciplined.
Luisa is careless.
Luisa is not intellectual.
Maribel is big.
Luisa is not big.
Rupert is big.
Maribel is unsightly.
Maribel is conscientious.
Garth is not self-disciplined.
Arthur is big.
Luisa is conscientious.
Rupert is not intellectual.Someone being both not self-disciplined and unsightly is equivalent to being not big.
Someone is not conscientious if and only if he is not big.
If Garth is not intellectual or Maribel is not careless, then Garth is conscientious.
If Arthur is not careless, then Arthur is big, and vice versa.
Someone being both unsightly and not conscientious is equivalent to being intellectual.
If Maribel is conscientious and Garth is self-disciplined, then Garth is not big and Garth is not intellectual.
If Garth is unsightly and Luna is intellectual, then Maribel is not conscientious.
If someone is conscientious and self-disciplined, then he is both not big and not careless, and vice versa.
If everyone is self-disciplined or not intellectual, then Luisa is big.
If someone is not unsightly, then he is self-disciplined, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is big, then Garth is self-disciplined and Luna is careless.
If Luisa is not big and Rupert is unsightly, then Luisa is intellectual and Luisa is conscientious, and vice versa.
|
Maribel is conscientious.
|
entailment
|
Theobold is attractive.
Danna is not plastic.
Cedric is not plastic.
James is not attractive.
Della is plastic.
James is not unsightly.
Danna is not crazy.
Theobold is crazy.
James is wooden.
Della is optimistic.
Thomas is not crazy.
Theobold is plastic.It can be concluded that Rodney is plastic once knowing that Cedric is not unsightly and Thomas is not optimistic.
It can be concluded that Cedric is crazy once knowing that Theobold is not attractive or Thomas is not optimistic.
If someone is not unsightly, then he is attractive.
If someone is unsightly or not plastic, then he is not crazy.
If someone is attractive, then he is not crazy, and vice versa.
James is not optimistic if and only if Rodney is attractive and Thomas is not unsightly.
If someone is not crazy, then he is plastic.
It can be concluded that Cedric is wooden and Rodney is not crazy once knowing that Della is not unsightly.
Someone is optimistic and not wooden if and only if he is not plastic.
If there is at least one people who is not plastic, then Cedric is unsightly.
Someone who is both not crazy and attractive is always unsightly.
If someone who is wooden is also optimistic, then he is not unsightly.
|
James is unsightly.
|
self_contradiction
|
Theobold is attractive.
Danna is not plastic.
Cedric is not plastic.
James is not attractive.
Della is plastic.
James is not unsightly.
Danna is not crazy.
Theobold is crazy.
James is wooden.
Della is optimistic.
Thomas is not crazy.
Theobold is plastic.It can be concluded that Rodney is plastic once knowing that Cedric is not unsightly and Thomas is not optimistic.
It can be concluded that Cedric is crazy once knowing that Theobold is not attractive or Thomas is not optimistic.
If someone is not unsightly, then he is attractive.
If someone is unsightly or not plastic, then he is not crazy.
If someone is attractive, then he is not crazy, and vice versa.
James is not optimistic if and only if Rodney is attractive and Thomas is not unsightly.
If someone is not crazy, then he is plastic.
It can be concluded that Cedric is wooden and Rodney is not crazy once knowing that Della is not unsightly.
Someone is optimistic and not wooden if and only if he is not plastic.
If there is at least one people who is not plastic, then Cedric is unsightly.
Someone who is both not crazy and attractive is always unsightly.
If someone who is wooden is also optimistic, then he is not unsightly.
|
Thomas is attractive.
|
entailment
|
Theobold is attractive.
Danna is not plastic.
Cedric is not plastic.
James is not attractive.
Della is plastic.
James is not unsightly.
Danna is not crazy.
Theobold is crazy.
James is wooden.
Della is optimistic.
Thomas is not crazy.
Theobold is plastic.It can be concluded that Rodney is plastic once knowing that Cedric is not unsightly and Thomas is not optimistic.
It can be concluded that Cedric is crazy once knowing that Theobold is not attractive or Thomas is not optimistic.
If someone is not unsightly, then he is attractive.
If someone is unsightly or not plastic, then he is not crazy.
If someone is attractive, then he is not crazy, and vice versa.
James is not optimistic if and only if Rodney is attractive and Thomas is not unsightly.
If someone is not crazy, then he is plastic.
It can be concluded that Cedric is wooden and Rodney is not crazy once knowing that Della is not unsightly.
Someone is optimistic and not wooden if and only if he is not plastic.
If there is at least one people who is not plastic, then Cedric is unsightly.
Someone who is both not crazy and attractive is always unsightly.
If someone who is wooden is also optimistic, then he is not unsightly.
|
James is wooden.
|
entailment
|
Theobold is attractive.
Danna is not plastic.
Cedric is not plastic.
James is not attractive.
Della is plastic.
James is not unsightly.
Danna is not crazy.
Theobold is crazy.
James is wooden.
Della is optimistic.
Thomas is not crazy.
Theobold is plastic.It can be concluded that Rodney is plastic once knowing that Cedric is not unsightly and Thomas is not optimistic.
It can be concluded that Cedric is crazy once knowing that Theobold is not attractive or Thomas is not optimistic.
If someone is not unsightly, then he is attractive.
If someone is unsightly or not plastic, then he is not crazy.
If someone is attractive, then he is not crazy, and vice versa.
James is not optimistic if and only if Rodney is attractive and Thomas is not unsightly.
If someone is not crazy, then he is plastic.
It can be concluded that Cedric is wooden and Rodney is not crazy once knowing that Della is not unsightly.
Someone is optimistic and not wooden if and only if he is not plastic.
If there is at least one people who is not plastic, then Cedric is unsightly.
Someone who is both not crazy and attractive is always unsightly.
If someone who is wooden is also optimistic, then he is not unsightly.
|
James is optimistic.
|
neutral
|
Theobold is attractive.
Danna is not plastic.
Cedric is not plastic.
James is not attractive.
Della is plastic.
James is not unsightly.
Danna is not crazy.
Theobold is crazy.
James is wooden.
Della is optimistic.
Thomas is not crazy.
Theobold is plastic.It can be concluded that Rodney is plastic once knowing that Cedric is not unsightly and Thomas is not optimistic.
It can be concluded that Cedric is crazy once knowing that Theobold is not attractive or Thomas is not optimistic.
If someone is not unsightly, then he is attractive.
If someone is unsightly or not plastic, then he is not crazy.
If someone is attractive, then he is not crazy, and vice versa.
James is not optimistic if and only if Rodney is attractive and Thomas is not unsightly.
If someone is not crazy, then he is plastic.
It can be concluded that Cedric is wooden and Rodney is not crazy once knowing that Della is not unsightly.
Someone is optimistic and not wooden if and only if he is not plastic.
If there is at least one people who is not plastic, then Cedric is unsightly.
Someone who is both not crazy and attractive is always unsightly.
If someone who is wooden is also optimistic, then he is not unsightly.
|
Cedric is not unsightly.
|
contradiction
|
Theobold is attractive.
Danna is not plastic.
Cedric is not plastic.
James is not attractive.
Della is plastic.
James is not unsightly.
Danna is not crazy.
Theobold is crazy.
James is wooden.
Della is optimistic.
Thomas is not crazy.
Theobold is plastic.It can be concluded that Rodney is plastic once knowing that Cedric is not unsightly and Thomas is not optimistic.
It can be concluded that Cedric is crazy once knowing that Theobold is not attractive or Thomas is not optimistic.
If someone is not unsightly, then he is attractive.
If someone is unsightly or not plastic, then he is not crazy.
If someone is attractive, then he is not crazy, and vice versa.
James is not optimistic if and only if Rodney is attractive and Thomas is not unsightly.
If someone is not crazy, then he is plastic.
It can be concluded that Cedric is wooden and Rodney is not crazy once knowing that Della is not unsightly.
Someone is optimistic and not wooden if and only if he is not plastic.
If there is at least one people who is not plastic, then Cedric is unsightly.
Someone who is both not crazy and attractive is always unsightly.
If someone who is wooden is also optimistic, then he is not unsightly.
|
Danna is unsightly.
|
entailment
|
Theobold is attractive.
Danna is not plastic.
Cedric is not plastic.
James is not attractive.
Della is plastic.
James is not unsightly.
Danna is not crazy.
Theobold is crazy.
James is wooden.
Della is optimistic.
Thomas is not crazy.
Theobold is plastic.It can be concluded that Rodney is plastic once knowing that Cedric is not unsightly and Thomas is not optimistic.
It can be concluded that Cedric is crazy once knowing that Theobold is not attractive or Thomas is not optimistic.
If someone is not unsightly, then he is attractive.
If someone is unsightly or not plastic, then he is not crazy.
If someone is attractive, then he is not crazy, and vice versa.
James is not optimistic if and only if Rodney is attractive and Thomas is not unsightly.
If someone is not crazy, then he is plastic.
It can be concluded that Cedric is wooden and Rodney is not crazy once knowing that Della is not unsightly.
Someone is optimistic and not wooden if and only if he is not plastic.
If there is at least one people who is not plastic, then Cedric is unsightly.
Someone who is both not crazy and attractive is always unsightly.
If someone who is wooden is also optimistic, then he is not unsightly.
|
Della is attractive.
|
neutral
|
Theobold is attractive.
Danna is not plastic.
Cedric is not plastic.
James is not attractive.
Della is plastic.
James is not unsightly.
Danna is not crazy.
Theobold is crazy.
James is wooden.
Della is optimistic.
Thomas is not crazy.
Theobold is plastic.It can be concluded that Rodney is plastic once knowing that Cedric is not unsightly and Thomas is not optimistic.
It can be concluded that Cedric is crazy once knowing that Theobold is not attractive or Thomas is not optimistic.
If someone is not unsightly, then he is attractive.
If someone is unsightly or not plastic, then he is not crazy.
If someone is attractive, then he is not crazy, and vice versa.
James is not optimistic if and only if Rodney is attractive and Thomas is not unsightly.
If someone is not crazy, then he is plastic.
It can be concluded that Cedric is wooden and Rodney is not crazy once knowing that Della is not unsightly.
Someone is optimistic and not wooden if and only if he is not plastic.
If there is at least one people who is not plastic, then Cedric is unsightly.
Someone who is both not crazy and attractive is always unsightly.
If someone who is wooden is also optimistic, then he is not unsightly.
|
Theobold is not crazy.
|
self_contradiction
|
Theobold is attractive.
Danna is not plastic.
Cedric is not plastic.
James is not attractive.
Della is plastic.
James is not unsightly.
Danna is not crazy.
Theobold is crazy.
James is wooden.
Della is optimistic.
Thomas is not crazy.
Theobold is plastic.It can be concluded that Rodney is plastic once knowing that Cedric is not unsightly and Thomas is not optimistic.
It can be concluded that Cedric is crazy once knowing that Theobold is not attractive or Thomas is not optimistic.
If someone is not unsightly, then he is attractive.
If someone is unsightly or not plastic, then he is not crazy.
If someone is attractive, then he is not crazy, and vice versa.
James is not optimistic if and only if Rodney is attractive and Thomas is not unsightly.
If someone is not crazy, then he is plastic.
It can be concluded that Cedric is wooden and Rodney is not crazy once knowing that Della is not unsightly.
Someone is optimistic and not wooden if and only if he is not plastic.
If there is at least one people who is not plastic, then Cedric is unsightly.
Someone who is both not crazy and attractive is always unsightly.
If someone who is wooden is also optimistic, then he is not unsightly.
|
Theobold is not plastic.
|
contradiction
|
Theobold is attractive.
Danna is not plastic.
Cedric is not plastic.
James is not attractive.
Della is plastic.
James is not unsightly.
Danna is not crazy.
Theobold is crazy.
James is wooden.
Della is optimistic.
Thomas is not crazy.
Theobold is plastic.It can be concluded that Rodney is plastic once knowing that Cedric is not unsightly and Thomas is not optimistic.
It can be concluded that Cedric is crazy once knowing that Theobold is not attractive or Thomas is not optimistic.
If someone is not unsightly, then he is attractive.
If someone is unsightly or not plastic, then he is not crazy.
If someone is attractive, then he is not crazy, and vice versa.
James is not optimistic if and only if Rodney is attractive and Thomas is not unsightly.
If someone is not crazy, then he is plastic.
It can be concluded that Cedric is wooden and Rodney is not crazy once knowing that Della is not unsightly.
Someone is optimistic and not wooden if and only if he is not plastic.
If there is at least one people who is not plastic, then Cedric is unsightly.
Someone who is both not crazy and attractive is always unsightly.
If someone who is wooden is also optimistic, then he is not unsightly.
|
Danna is not optimistic.
|
contradiction
|
Theobold is attractive.
Danna is not plastic.
Cedric is not plastic.
James is not attractive.
Della is plastic.
James is not unsightly.
Danna is not crazy.
Theobold is crazy.
James is wooden.
Della is optimistic.
Thomas is not crazy.
Theobold is plastic.It can be concluded that Rodney is plastic once knowing that Cedric is not unsightly and Thomas is not optimistic.
It can be concluded that Cedric is crazy once knowing that Theobold is not attractive or Thomas is not optimistic.
If someone is not unsightly, then he is attractive.
If someone is unsightly or not plastic, then he is not crazy.
If someone is attractive, then he is not crazy, and vice versa.
James is not optimistic if and only if Rodney is attractive and Thomas is not unsightly.
If someone is not crazy, then he is plastic.
It can be concluded that Cedric is wooden and Rodney is not crazy once knowing that Della is not unsightly.
Someone is optimistic and not wooden if and only if he is not plastic.
If there is at least one people who is not plastic, then Cedric is unsightly.
Someone who is both not crazy and attractive is always unsightly.
If someone who is wooden is also optimistic, then he is not unsightly.
|
Theobold is wooden.
|
neutral
|
Theobold is attractive.
Danna is not plastic.
Cedric is not plastic.
James is not attractive.
Della is plastic.
James is not unsightly.
Danna is not crazy.
Theobold is crazy.
James is wooden.
Della is optimistic.
Thomas is not crazy.
Theobold is plastic.It can be concluded that Rodney is plastic once knowing that Cedric is not unsightly and Thomas is not optimistic.
It can be concluded that Cedric is crazy once knowing that Theobold is not attractive or Thomas is not optimistic.
If someone is not unsightly, then he is attractive.
If someone is unsightly or not plastic, then he is not crazy.
If someone is attractive, then he is not crazy, and vice versa.
James is not optimistic if and only if Rodney is attractive and Thomas is not unsightly.
If someone is not crazy, then he is plastic.
It can be concluded that Cedric is wooden and Rodney is not crazy once knowing that Della is not unsightly.
Someone is optimistic and not wooden if and only if he is not plastic.
If there is at least one people who is not plastic, then Cedric is unsightly.
Someone who is both not crazy and attractive is always unsightly.
If someone who is wooden is also optimistic, then he is not unsightly.
|
James is attractive.
|
self_contradiction
|
Theobold is attractive.
Danna is not plastic.
Cedric is not plastic.
James is not attractive.
Della is plastic.
James is not unsightly.
Danna is not crazy.
Theobold is crazy.
James is wooden.
Della is optimistic.
Thomas is not crazy.
Theobold is plastic.It can be concluded that Rodney is plastic once knowing that Cedric is not unsightly and Thomas is not optimistic.
It can be concluded that Cedric is crazy once knowing that Theobold is not attractive or Thomas is not optimistic.
If someone is not unsightly, then he is attractive.
If someone is unsightly or not plastic, then he is not crazy.
If someone is attractive, then he is not crazy, and vice versa.
James is not optimistic if and only if Rodney is attractive and Thomas is not unsightly.
If someone is not crazy, then he is plastic.
It can be concluded that Cedric is wooden and Rodney is not crazy once knowing that Della is not unsightly.
Someone is optimistic and not wooden if and only if he is not plastic.
If there is at least one people who is not plastic, then Cedric is unsightly.
Someone who is both not crazy and attractive is always unsightly.
If someone who is wooden is also optimistic, then he is not unsightly.
|
Cedric is not wooden.
|
entailment
|
Theobold is attractive.
Danna is not plastic.
Cedric is not plastic.
James is not attractive.
Della is plastic.
James is not unsightly.
Danna is not crazy.
Theobold is crazy.
James is wooden.
Della is optimistic.
Thomas is not crazy.
Theobold is plastic.It can be concluded that Rodney is plastic once knowing that Cedric is not unsightly and Thomas is not optimistic.
It can be concluded that Cedric is crazy once knowing that Theobold is not attractive or Thomas is not optimistic.
If someone is not unsightly, then he is attractive.
If someone is unsightly or not plastic, then he is not crazy.
If someone is attractive, then he is not crazy, and vice versa.
James is not optimistic if and only if Rodney is attractive and Thomas is not unsightly.
If someone is not crazy, then he is plastic.
It can be concluded that Cedric is wooden and Rodney is not crazy once knowing that Della is not unsightly.
Someone is optimistic and not wooden if and only if he is not plastic.
If there is at least one people who is not plastic, then Cedric is unsightly.
Someone who is both not crazy and attractive is always unsightly.
If someone who is wooden is also optimistic, then he is not unsightly.
|
Thomas is wooden.
|
neutral
|
Theobold is attractive.
Danna is not plastic.
Cedric is not plastic.
James is not attractive.
Della is plastic.
James is not unsightly.
Danna is not crazy.
Theobold is crazy.
James is wooden.
Della is optimistic.
Thomas is not crazy.
Theobold is plastic.It can be concluded that Rodney is plastic once knowing that Cedric is not unsightly and Thomas is not optimistic.
It can be concluded that Cedric is crazy once knowing that Theobold is not attractive or Thomas is not optimistic.
If someone is not unsightly, then he is attractive.
If someone is unsightly or not plastic, then he is not crazy.
If someone is attractive, then he is not crazy, and vice versa.
James is not optimistic if and only if Rodney is attractive and Thomas is not unsightly.
If someone is not crazy, then he is plastic.
It can be concluded that Cedric is wooden and Rodney is not crazy once knowing that Della is not unsightly.
Someone is optimistic and not wooden if and only if he is not plastic.
If there is at least one people who is not plastic, then Cedric is unsightly.
Someone who is both not crazy and attractive is always unsightly.
If someone who is wooden is also optimistic, then he is not unsightly.
|
Theobold is crazy.
|
self_contradiction
|
Theobold is attractive.
Danna is not plastic.
Cedric is not plastic.
James is not attractive.
Della is plastic.
James is not unsightly.
Danna is not crazy.
Theobold is crazy.
James is wooden.
Della is optimistic.
Thomas is not crazy.
Theobold is plastic.It can be concluded that Rodney is plastic once knowing that Cedric is not unsightly and Thomas is not optimistic.
It can be concluded that Cedric is crazy once knowing that Theobold is not attractive or Thomas is not optimistic.
If someone is not unsightly, then he is attractive.
If someone is unsightly or not plastic, then he is not crazy.
If someone is attractive, then he is not crazy, and vice versa.
James is not optimistic if and only if Rodney is attractive and Thomas is not unsightly.
If someone is not crazy, then he is plastic.
It can be concluded that Cedric is wooden and Rodney is not crazy once knowing that Della is not unsightly.
Someone is optimistic and not wooden if and only if he is not plastic.
If there is at least one people who is not plastic, then Cedric is unsightly.
Someone who is both not crazy and attractive is always unsightly.
If someone who is wooden is also optimistic, then he is not unsightly.
|
Rodney is unsightly.
|
neutral
|
Theobold is attractive.
Danna is not plastic.
Cedric is not plastic.
James is not attractive.
Della is plastic.
James is not unsightly.
Danna is not crazy.
Theobold is crazy.
James is wooden.
Della is optimistic.
Thomas is not crazy.
Theobold is plastic.It can be concluded that Rodney is plastic once knowing that Cedric is not unsightly and Thomas is not optimistic.
It can be concluded that Cedric is crazy once knowing that Theobold is not attractive or Thomas is not optimistic.
If someone is not unsightly, then he is attractive.
If someone is unsightly or not plastic, then he is not crazy.
If someone is attractive, then he is not crazy, and vice versa.
James is not optimistic if and only if Rodney is attractive and Thomas is not unsightly.
If someone is not crazy, then he is plastic.
It can be concluded that Cedric is wooden and Rodney is not crazy once knowing that Della is not unsightly.
Someone is optimistic and not wooden if and only if he is not plastic.
If there is at least one people who is not plastic, then Cedric is unsightly.
Someone who is both not crazy and attractive is always unsightly.
If someone who is wooden is also optimistic, then he is not unsightly.
|
Danna is not unsightly.
|
contradiction
|
Theobold is attractive.
Danna is not plastic.
Cedric is not plastic.
James is not attractive.
Della is plastic.
James is not unsightly.
Danna is not crazy.
Theobold is crazy.
James is wooden.
Della is optimistic.
Thomas is not crazy.
Theobold is plastic.It can be concluded that Rodney is plastic once knowing that Cedric is not unsightly and Thomas is not optimistic.
It can be concluded that Cedric is crazy once knowing that Theobold is not attractive or Thomas is not optimistic.
If someone is not unsightly, then he is attractive.
If someone is unsightly or not plastic, then he is not crazy.
If someone is attractive, then he is not crazy, and vice versa.
James is not optimistic if and only if Rodney is attractive and Thomas is not unsightly.
If someone is not crazy, then he is plastic.
It can be concluded that Cedric is wooden and Rodney is not crazy once knowing that Della is not unsightly.
Someone is optimistic and not wooden if and only if he is not plastic.
If there is at least one people who is not plastic, then Cedric is unsightly.
Someone who is both not crazy and attractive is always unsightly.
If someone who is wooden is also optimistic, then he is not unsightly.
|
Danna is plastic.
|
self_contradiction
|
Theobold is attractive.
Danna is not plastic.
Cedric is not plastic.
James is not attractive.
Della is plastic.
James is not unsightly.
Danna is not crazy.
Theobold is crazy.
James is wooden.
Della is optimistic.
Thomas is not crazy.
Theobold is plastic.It can be concluded that Rodney is plastic once knowing that Cedric is not unsightly and Thomas is not optimistic.
It can be concluded that Cedric is crazy once knowing that Theobold is not attractive or Thomas is not optimistic.
If someone is not unsightly, then he is attractive.
If someone is unsightly or not plastic, then he is not crazy.
If someone is attractive, then he is not crazy, and vice versa.
James is not optimistic if and only if Rodney is attractive and Thomas is not unsightly.
If someone is not crazy, then he is plastic.
It can be concluded that Cedric is wooden and Rodney is not crazy once knowing that Della is not unsightly.
Someone is optimistic and not wooden if and only if he is not plastic.
If there is at least one people who is not plastic, then Cedric is unsightly.
Someone who is both not crazy and attractive is always unsightly.
If someone who is wooden is also optimistic, then he is not unsightly.
|
James is not plastic.
|
contradiction
|
Theobold is attractive.
Danna is not plastic.
Cedric is not plastic.
James is not attractive.
Della is plastic.
James is not unsightly.
Danna is not crazy.
Theobold is crazy.
James is wooden.
Della is optimistic.
Thomas is not crazy.
Theobold is plastic.It can be concluded that Rodney is plastic once knowing that Cedric is not unsightly and Thomas is not optimistic.
It can be concluded that Cedric is crazy once knowing that Theobold is not attractive or Thomas is not optimistic.
If someone is not unsightly, then he is attractive.
If someone is unsightly or not plastic, then he is not crazy.
If someone is attractive, then he is not crazy, and vice versa.
James is not optimistic if and only if Rodney is attractive and Thomas is not unsightly.
If someone is not crazy, then he is plastic.
It can be concluded that Cedric is wooden and Rodney is not crazy once knowing that Della is not unsightly.
Someone is optimistic and not wooden if and only if he is not plastic.
If there is at least one people who is not plastic, then Cedric is unsightly.
Someone who is both not crazy and attractive is always unsightly.
If someone who is wooden is also optimistic, then he is not unsightly.
|
Thomas is not crazy.
|
entailment
|
Isaiah is not zealous.
Homer is not attractive.
Isaiah is not attractive.
Vera is not useful.
Vera is impartial.
Fred is not zealous.
Halden is not inquisitive.
Fred is useful.
Jarvis is attractive.
Grant is not impartial.
Jarvis is not shallow.
Homer is inquisitive.If someone is not zealous or not inquisitive, then he is not impartial.
Fred being useful is equivalent to Homer being shallow and Halden being not attractive.
If Homer is attractive, then Fred is not inquisitive and Halden is not useful, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is useful, then Grant is inquisitive and Homer is not zealous.
All shallow people are attractive.
Someone is not zealous and not shallow if and only if he is attractive and not inquisitive.
If someone is either not shallow or zealous, then he is not inquisitive and not impartial.
If someone who is not inquisitive is also not attractive, then he is impartial.
If there is someone who is either zealous or impartial, then Fred is not attractive and Halden is not inquisitive.
If there is at least one people who is attractive, then Homer is inquisitive and Grant is not useful.
If there is someone who is not shallow, then Halden is not attractive and Halden is impartial.
If there is someone who is both useful and not inquisitive, then Homer is not impartial and Halden is not shallow.
|
Isaiah is inquisitive.
|
neutral
|
Isaiah is not zealous.
Homer is not attractive.
Isaiah is not attractive.
Vera is not useful.
Vera is impartial.
Fred is not zealous.
Halden is not inquisitive.
Fred is useful.
Jarvis is attractive.
Grant is not impartial.
Jarvis is not shallow.
Homer is inquisitive.If someone is not zealous or not inquisitive, then he is not impartial.
Fred being useful is equivalent to Homer being shallow and Halden being not attractive.
If Homer is attractive, then Fred is not inquisitive and Halden is not useful, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is useful, then Grant is inquisitive and Homer is not zealous.
All shallow people are attractive.
Someone is not zealous and not shallow if and only if he is attractive and not inquisitive.
If someone is either not shallow or zealous, then he is not inquisitive and not impartial.
If someone who is not inquisitive is also not attractive, then he is impartial.
If there is someone who is either zealous or impartial, then Fred is not attractive and Halden is not inquisitive.
If there is at least one people who is attractive, then Homer is inquisitive and Grant is not useful.
If there is someone who is not shallow, then Halden is not attractive and Halden is impartial.
If there is someone who is both useful and not inquisitive, then Homer is not impartial and Halden is not shallow.
|
Grant is inquisitive.
|
entailment
|
Isaiah is not zealous.
Homer is not attractive.
Isaiah is not attractive.
Vera is not useful.
Vera is impartial.
Fred is not zealous.
Halden is not inquisitive.
Fred is useful.
Jarvis is attractive.
Grant is not impartial.
Jarvis is not shallow.
Homer is inquisitive.If someone is not zealous or not inquisitive, then he is not impartial.
Fred being useful is equivalent to Homer being shallow and Halden being not attractive.
If Homer is attractive, then Fred is not inquisitive and Halden is not useful, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is useful, then Grant is inquisitive and Homer is not zealous.
All shallow people are attractive.
Someone is not zealous and not shallow if and only if he is attractive and not inquisitive.
If someone is either not shallow or zealous, then he is not inquisitive and not impartial.
If someone who is not inquisitive is also not attractive, then he is impartial.
If there is someone who is either zealous or impartial, then Fred is not attractive and Halden is not inquisitive.
If there is at least one people who is attractive, then Homer is inquisitive and Grant is not useful.
If there is someone who is not shallow, then Halden is not attractive and Halden is impartial.
If there is someone who is both useful and not inquisitive, then Homer is not impartial and Halden is not shallow.
|
Jarvis is not inquisitive.
|
entailment
|
Isaiah is not zealous.
Homer is not attractive.
Isaiah is not attractive.
Vera is not useful.
Vera is impartial.
Fred is not zealous.
Halden is not inquisitive.
Fred is useful.
Jarvis is attractive.
Grant is not impartial.
Jarvis is not shallow.
Homer is inquisitive.If someone is not zealous or not inquisitive, then he is not impartial.
Fred being useful is equivalent to Homer being shallow and Halden being not attractive.
If Homer is attractive, then Fred is not inquisitive and Halden is not useful, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is useful, then Grant is inquisitive and Homer is not zealous.
All shallow people are attractive.
Someone is not zealous and not shallow if and only if he is attractive and not inquisitive.
If someone is either not shallow or zealous, then he is not inquisitive and not impartial.
If someone who is not inquisitive is also not attractive, then he is impartial.
If there is someone who is either zealous or impartial, then Fred is not attractive and Halden is not inquisitive.
If there is at least one people who is attractive, then Homer is inquisitive and Grant is not useful.
If there is someone who is not shallow, then Halden is not attractive and Halden is impartial.
If there is someone who is both useful and not inquisitive, then Homer is not impartial and Halden is not shallow.
|
Vera is zealous.
|
neutral
|
Isaiah is not zealous.
Homer is not attractive.
Isaiah is not attractive.
Vera is not useful.
Vera is impartial.
Fred is not zealous.
Halden is not inquisitive.
Fred is useful.
Jarvis is attractive.
Grant is not impartial.
Jarvis is not shallow.
Homer is inquisitive.If someone is not zealous or not inquisitive, then he is not impartial.
Fred being useful is equivalent to Homer being shallow and Halden being not attractive.
If Homer is attractive, then Fred is not inquisitive and Halden is not useful, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is useful, then Grant is inquisitive and Homer is not zealous.
All shallow people are attractive.
Someone is not zealous and not shallow if and only if he is attractive and not inquisitive.
If someone is either not shallow or zealous, then he is not inquisitive and not impartial.
If someone who is not inquisitive is also not attractive, then he is impartial.
If there is someone who is either zealous or impartial, then Fred is not attractive and Halden is not inquisitive.
If there is at least one people who is attractive, then Homer is inquisitive and Grant is not useful.
If there is someone who is not shallow, then Halden is not attractive and Halden is impartial.
If there is someone who is both useful and not inquisitive, then Homer is not impartial and Halden is not shallow.
|
Jarvis is useful.
|
neutral
|
Isaiah is not zealous.
Homer is not attractive.
Isaiah is not attractive.
Vera is not useful.
Vera is impartial.
Fred is not zealous.
Halden is not inquisitive.
Fred is useful.
Jarvis is attractive.
Grant is not impartial.
Jarvis is not shallow.
Homer is inquisitive.If someone is not zealous or not inquisitive, then he is not impartial.
Fred being useful is equivalent to Homer being shallow and Halden being not attractive.
If Homer is attractive, then Fred is not inquisitive and Halden is not useful, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is useful, then Grant is inquisitive and Homer is not zealous.
All shallow people are attractive.
Someone is not zealous and not shallow if and only if he is attractive and not inquisitive.
If someone is either not shallow or zealous, then he is not inquisitive and not impartial.
If someone who is not inquisitive is also not attractive, then he is impartial.
If there is someone who is either zealous or impartial, then Fred is not attractive and Halden is not inquisitive.
If there is at least one people who is attractive, then Homer is inquisitive and Grant is not useful.
If there is someone who is not shallow, then Halden is not attractive and Halden is impartial.
If there is someone who is both useful and not inquisitive, then Homer is not impartial and Halden is not shallow.
|
Fred is not impartial.
|
self_contradiction
|
Isaiah is not zealous.
Homer is not attractive.
Isaiah is not attractive.
Vera is not useful.
Vera is impartial.
Fred is not zealous.
Halden is not inquisitive.
Fred is useful.
Jarvis is attractive.
Grant is not impartial.
Jarvis is not shallow.
Homer is inquisitive.If someone is not zealous or not inquisitive, then he is not impartial.
Fred being useful is equivalent to Homer being shallow and Halden being not attractive.
If Homer is attractive, then Fred is not inquisitive and Halden is not useful, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is useful, then Grant is inquisitive and Homer is not zealous.
All shallow people are attractive.
Someone is not zealous and not shallow if and only if he is attractive and not inquisitive.
If someone is either not shallow or zealous, then he is not inquisitive and not impartial.
If someone who is not inquisitive is also not attractive, then he is impartial.
If there is someone who is either zealous or impartial, then Fred is not attractive and Halden is not inquisitive.
If there is at least one people who is attractive, then Homer is inquisitive and Grant is not useful.
If there is someone who is not shallow, then Halden is not attractive and Halden is impartial.
If there is someone who is both useful and not inquisitive, then Homer is not impartial and Halden is not shallow.
|
Grant is impartial.
|
contradiction
|
Isaiah is not zealous.
Homer is not attractive.
Isaiah is not attractive.
Vera is not useful.
Vera is impartial.
Fred is not zealous.
Halden is not inquisitive.
Fred is useful.
Jarvis is attractive.
Grant is not impartial.
Jarvis is not shallow.
Homer is inquisitive.If someone is not zealous or not inquisitive, then he is not impartial.
Fred being useful is equivalent to Homer being shallow and Halden being not attractive.
If Homer is attractive, then Fred is not inquisitive and Halden is not useful, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is useful, then Grant is inquisitive and Homer is not zealous.
All shallow people are attractive.
Someone is not zealous and not shallow if and only if he is attractive and not inquisitive.
If someone is either not shallow or zealous, then he is not inquisitive and not impartial.
If someone who is not inquisitive is also not attractive, then he is impartial.
If there is someone who is either zealous or impartial, then Fred is not attractive and Halden is not inquisitive.
If there is at least one people who is attractive, then Homer is inquisitive and Grant is not useful.
If there is someone who is not shallow, then Halden is not attractive and Halden is impartial.
If there is someone who is both useful and not inquisitive, then Homer is not impartial and Halden is not shallow.
|
Vera is attractive.
|
neutral
|
Isaiah is not zealous.
Homer is not attractive.
Isaiah is not attractive.
Vera is not useful.
Vera is impartial.
Fred is not zealous.
Halden is not inquisitive.
Fred is useful.
Jarvis is attractive.
Grant is not impartial.
Jarvis is not shallow.
Homer is inquisitive.If someone is not zealous or not inquisitive, then he is not impartial.
Fred being useful is equivalent to Homer being shallow and Halden being not attractive.
If Homer is attractive, then Fred is not inquisitive and Halden is not useful, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is useful, then Grant is inquisitive and Homer is not zealous.
All shallow people are attractive.
Someone is not zealous and not shallow if and only if he is attractive and not inquisitive.
If someone is either not shallow or zealous, then he is not inquisitive and not impartial.
If someone who is not inquisitive is also not attractive, then he is impartial.
If there is someone who is either zealous or impartial, then Fred is not attractive and Halden is not inquisitive.
If there is at least one people who is attractive, then Homer is inquisitive and Grant is not useful.
If there is someone who is not shallow, then Halden is not attractive and Halden is impartial.
If there is someone who is both useful and not inquisitive, then Homer is not impartial and Halden is not shallow.
|
Halden is not impartial.
|
self_contradiction
|
Isaiah is not zealous.
Homer is not attractive.
Isaiah is not attractive.
Vera is not useful.
Vera is impartial.
Fred is not zealous.
Halden is not inquisitive.
Fred is useful.
Jarvis is attractive.
Grant is not impartial.
Jarvis is not shallow.
Homer is inquisitive.If someone is not zealous or not inquisitive, then he is not impartial.
Fred being useful is equivalent to Homer being shallow and Halden being not attractive.
If Homer is attractive, then Fred is not inquisitive and Halden is not useful, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is useful, then Grant is inquisitive and Homer is not zealous.
All shallow people are attractive.
Someone is not zealous and not shallow if and only if he is attractive and not inquisitive.
If someone is either not shallow or zealous, then he is not inquisitive and not impartial.
If someone who is not inquisitive is also not attractive, then he is impartial.
If there is someone who is either zealous or impartial, then Fred is not attractive and Halden is not inquisitive.
If there is at least one people who is attractive, then Homer is inquisitive and Grant is not useful.
If there is someone who is not shallow, then Halden is not attractive and Halden is impartial.
If there is someone who is both useful and not inquisitive, then Homer is not impartial and Halden is not shallow.
|
Isaiah is zealous.
|
contradiction
|
Isaiah is not zealous.
Homer is not attractive.
Isaiah is not attractive.
Vera is not useful.
Vera is impartial.
Fred is not zealous.
Halden is not inquisitive.
Fred is useful.
Jarvis is attractive.
Grant is not impartial.
Jarvis is not shallow.
Homer is inquisitive.If someone is not zealous or not inquisitive, then he is not impartial.
Fred being useful is equivalent to Homer being shallow and Halden being not attractive.
If Homer is attractive, then Fred is not inquisitive and Halden is not useful, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is useful, then Grant is inquisitive and Homer is not zealous.
All shallow people are attractive.
Someone is not zealous and not shallow if and only if he is attractive and not inquisitive.
If someone is either not shallow or zealous, then he is not inquisitive and not impartial.
If someone who is not inquisitive is also not attractive, then he is impartial.
If there is someone who is either zealous or impartial, then Fred is not attractive and Halden is not inquisitive.
If there is at least one people who is attractive, then Homer is inquisitive and Grant is not useful.
If there is someone who is not shallow, then Halden is not attractive and Halden is impartial.
If there is someone who is both useful and not inquisitive, then Homer is not impartial and Halden is not shallow.
|
Homer is not inquisitive.
|
contradiction
|
Isaiah is not zealous.
Homer is not attractive.
Isaiah is not attractive.
Vera is not useful.
Vera is impartial.
Fred is not zealous.
Halden is not inquisitive.
Fred is useful.
Jarvis is attractive.
Grant is not impartial.
Jarvis is not shallow.
Homer is inquisitive.If someone is not zealous or not inquisitive, then he is not impartial.
Fred being useful is equivalent to Homer being shallow and Halden being not attractive.
If Homer is attractive, then Fred is not inquisitive and Halden is not useful, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is useful, then Grant is inquisitive and Homer is not zealous.
All shallow people are attractive.
Someone is not zealous and not shallow if and only if he is attractive and not inquisitive.
If someone is either not shallow or zealous, then he is not inquisitive and not impartial.
If someone who is not inquisitive is also not attractive, then he is impartial.
If there is someone who is either zealous or impartial, then Fred is not attractive and Halden is not inquisitive.
If there is at least one people who is attractive, then Homer is inquisitive and Grant is not useful.
If there is someone who is not shallow, then Halden is not attractive and Halden is impartial.
If there is someone who is both useful and not inquisitive, then Homer is not impartial and Halden is not shallow.
|
Halden is impartial.
|
self_contradiction
|
Isaiah is not zealous.
Homer is not attractive.
Isaiah is not attractive.
Vera is not useful.
Vera is impartial.
Fred is not zealous.
Halden is not inquisitive.
Fred is useful.
Jarvis is attractive.
Grant is not impartial.
Jarvis is not shallow.
Homer is inquisitive.If someone is not zealous or not inquisitive, then he is not impartial.
Fred being useful is equivalent to Homer being shallow and Halden being not attractive.
If Homer is attractive, then Fred is not inquisitive and Halden is not useful, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is useful, then Grant is inquisitive and Homer is not zealous.
All shallow people are attractive.
Someone is not zealous and not shallow if and only if he is attractive and not inquisitive.
If someone is either not shallow or zealous, then he is not inquisitive and not impartial.
If someone who is not inquisitive is also not attractive, then he is impartial.
If there is someone who is either zealous or impartial, then Fred is not attractive and Halden is not inquisitive.
If there is at least one people who is attractive, then Homer is inquisitive and Grant is not useful.
If there is someone who is not shallow, then Halden is not attractive and Halden is impartial.
If there is someone who is both useful and not inquisitive, then Homer is not impartial and Halden is not shallow.
|
Homer is attractive.
|
self_contradiction
|
Isaiah is not zealous.
Homer is not attractive.
Isaiah is not attractive.
Vera is not useful.
Vera is impartial.
Fred is not zealous.
Halden is not inquisitive.
Fred is useful.
Jarvis is attractive.
Grant is not impartial.
Jarvis is not shallow.
Homer is inquisitive.If someone is not zealous or not inquisitive, then he is not impartial.
Fred being useful is equivalent to Homer being shallow and Halden being not attractive.
If Homer is attractive, then Fred is not inquisitive and Halden is not useful, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is useful, then Grant is inquisitive and Homer is not zealous.
All shallow people are attractive.
Someone is not zealous and not shallow if and only if he is attractive and not inquisitive.
If someone is either not shallow or zealous, then he is not inquisitive and not impartial.
If someone who is not inquisitive is also not attractive, then he is impartial.
If there is someone who is either zealous or impartial, then Fred is not attractive and Halden is not inquisitive.
If there is at least one people who is attractive, then Homer is inquisitive and Grant is not useful.
If there is someone who is not shallow, then Halden is not attractive and Halden is impartial.
If there is someone who is both useful and not inquisitive, then Homer is not impartial and Halden is not shallow.
|
Jarvis is not impartial.
|
entailment
|
Isaiah is not zealous.
Homer is not attractive.
Isaiah is not attractive.
Vera is not useful.
Vera is impartial.
Fred is not zealous.
Halden is not inquisitive.
Fred is useful.
Jarvis is attractive.
Grant is not impartial.
Jarvis is not shallow.
Homer is inquisitive.If someone is not zealous or not inquisitive, then he is not impartial.
Fred being useful is equivalent to Homer being shallow and Halden being not attractive.
If Homer is attractive, then Fred is not inquisitive and Halden is not useful, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is useful, then Grant is inquisitive and Homer is not zealous.
All shallow people are attractive.
Someone is not zealous and not shallow if and only if he is attractive and not inquisitive.
If someone is either not shallow or zealous, then he is not inquisitive and not impartial.
If someone who is not inquisitive is also not attractive, then he is impartial.
If there is someone who is either zealous or impartial, then Fred is not attractive and Halden is not inquisitive.
If there is at least one people who is attractive, then Homer is inquisitive and Grant is not useful.
If there is someone who is not shallow, then Halden is not attractive and Halden is impartial.
If there is someone who is both useful and not inquisitive, then Homer is not impartial and Halden is not shallow.
|
Homer is not attractive.
|
self_contradiction
|
Isaiah is not zealous.
Homer is not attractive.
Isaiah is not attractive.
Vera is not useful.
Vera is impartial.
Fred is not zealous.
Halden is not inquisitive.
Fred is useful.
Jarvis is attractive.
Grant is not impartial.
Jarvis is not shallow.
Homer is inquisitive.If someone is not zealous or not inquisitive, then he is not impartial.
Fred being useful is equivalent to Homer being shallow and Halden being not attractive.
If Homer is attractive, then Fred is not inquisitive and Halden is not useful, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is useful, then Grant is inquisitive and Homer is not zealous.
All shallow people are attractive.
Someone is not zealous and not shallow if and only if he is attractive and not inquisitive.
If someone is either not shallow or zealous, then he is not inquisitive and not impartial.
If someone who is not inquisitive is also not attractive, then he is impartial.
If there is someone who is either zealous or impartial, then Fred is not attractive and Halden is not inquisitive.
If there is at least one people who is attractive, then Homer is inquisitive and Grant is not useful.
If there is someone who is not shallow, then Halden is not attractive and Halden is impartial.
If there is someone who is both useful and not inquisitive, then Homer is not impartial and Halden is not shallow.
|
Jarvis is not zealous.
|
entailment
|
Isaiah is not zealous.
Homer is not attractive.
Isaiah is not attractive.
Vera is not useful.
Vera is impartial.
Fred is not zealous.
Halden is not inquisitive.
Fred is useful.
Jarvis is attractive.
Grant is not impartial.
Jarvis is not shallow.
Homer is inquisitive.If someone is not zealous or not inquisitive, then he is not impartial.
Fred being useful is equivalent to Homer being shallow and Halden being not attractive.
If Homer is attractive, then Fred is not inquisitive and Halden is not useful, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is useful, then Grant is inquisitive and Homer is not zealous.
All shallow people are attractive.
Someone is not zealous and not shallow if and only if he is attractive and not inquisitive.
If someone is either not shallow or zealous, then he is not inquisitive and not impartial.
If someone who is not inquisitive is also not attractive, then he is impartial.
If there is someone who is either zealous or impartial, then Fred is not attractive and Halden is not inquisitive.
If there is at least one people who is attractive, then Homer is inquisitive and Grant is not useful.
If there is someone who is not shallow, then Halden is not attractive and Halden is impartial.
If there is someone who is both useful and not inquisitive, then Homer is not impartial and Halden is not shallow.
|
Homer is not shallow.
|
contradiction
|
Isaiah is not zealous.
Homer is not attractive.
Isaiah is not attractive.
Vera is not useful.
Vera is impartial.
Fred is not zealous.
Halden is not inquisitive.
Fred is useful.
Jarvis is attractive.
Grant is not impartial.
Jarvis is not shallow.
Homer is inquisitive.If someone is not zealous or not inquisitive, then he is not impartial.
Fred being useful is equivalent to Homer being shallow and Halden being not attractive.
If Homer is attractive, then Fred is not inquisitive and Halden is not useful, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is useful, then Grant is inquisitive and Homer is not zealous.
All shallow people are attractive.
Someone is not zealous and not shallow if and only if he is attractive and not inquisitive.
If someone is either not shallow or zealous, then he is not inquisitive and not impartial.
If someone who is not inquisitive is also not attractive, then he is impartial.
If there is someone who is either zealous or impartial, then Fred is not attractive and Halden is not inquisitive.
If there is at least one people who is attractive, then Homer is inquisitive and Grant is not useful.
If there is someone who is not shallow, then Halden is not attractive and Halden is impartial.
If there is someone who is both useful and not inquisitive, then Homer is not impartial and Halden is not shallow.
|
Grant is not inquisitive.
|
contradiction
|
Isaiah is not zealous.
Homer is not attractive.
Isaiah is not attractive.
Vera is not useful.
Vera is impartial.
Fred is not zealous.
Halden is not inquisitive.
Fred is useful.
Jarvis is attractive.
Grant is not impartial.
Jarvis is not shallow.
Homer is inquisitive.If someone is not zealous or not inquisitive, then he is not impartial.
Fred being useful is equivalent to Homer being shallow and Halden being not attractive.
If Homer is attractive, then Fred is not inquisitive and Halden is not useful, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is useful, then Grant is inquisitive and Homer is not zealous.
All shallow people are attractive.
Someone is not zealous and not shallow if and only if he is attractive and not inquisitive.
If someone is either not shallow or zealous, then he is not inquisitive and not impartial.
If someone who is not inquisitive is also not attractive, then he is impartial.
If there is someone who is either zealous or impartial, then Fred is not attractive and Halden is not inquisitive.
If there is at least one people who is attractive, then Homer is inquisitive and Grant is not useful.
If there is someone who is not shallow, then Halden is not attractive and Halden is impartial.
If there is someone who is both useful and not inquisitive, then Homer is not impartial and Halden is not shallow.
|
Jarvis is attractive.
|
entailment
|
Isaiah is not zealous.
Homer is not attractive.
Isaiah is not attractive.
Vera is not useful.
Vera is impartial.
Fred is not zealous.
Halden is not inquisitive.
Fred is useful.
Jarvis is attractive.
Grant is not impartial.
Jarvis is not shallow.
Homer is inquisitive.If someone is not zealous or not inquisitive, then he is not impartial.
Fred being useful is equivalent to Homer being shallow and Halden being not attractive.
If Homer is attractive, then Fred is not inquisitive and Halden is not useful, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is useful, then Grant is inquisitive and Homer is not zealous.
All shallow people are attractive.
Someone is not zealous and not shallow if and only if he is attractive and not inquisitive.
If someone is either not shallow or zealous, then he is not inquisitive and not impartial.
If someone who is not inquisitive is also not attractive, then he is impartial.
If there is someone who is either zealous or impartial, then Fred is not attractive and Halden is not inquisitive.
If there is at least one people who is attractive, then Homer is inquisitive and Grant is not useful.
If there is someone who is not shallow, then Halden is not attractive and Halden is impartial.
If there is someone who is both useful and not inquisitive, then Homer is not impartial and Halden is not shallow.
|
Isaiah is useful.
|
neutral
|
Marlin is not victorious.
Glen is victorious.
Luna is not sleepy.
Alexis is sane.
Marlin is sleepy.
Alexis is not sleepy.
Luna is not sane.
Glen is combative.
Bryant is sane.
Alexis is delightful.
Luna is not aggressive.
Glen is not sleepy.If there is someone who is either not aggressive or not victorious, then Marlin is not delightful.
If someone is victorious or not combative, then he is not aggressive.
If there is at least one people who is not delightful, then Marlin is not sleepy.
If there is someone who is not aggressive, then Bryant is not sane and Marlin is not sleepy.
Alexis being not delightful or Glen being sane implies that Alexis is not combative.
If there is someone who is either not combative or delightful, then Luna is victorious.
If someone is not combative, then he is not sane, and vice versa.
Glen is not aggressive if and only if Marlin is not combative and Leith is delightful.
Someone who is not sane is always not combative.
If someone is sane, then he is aggressive, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is both not sleepy and victorious, then Jed is sane.
If someone who is delightful is also not sane, then he is sleepy.
|
Jed is not combative.
|
neutral
|
Marlin is not victorious.
Glen is victorious.
Luna is not sleepy.
Alexis is sane.
Marlin is sleepy.
Alexis is not sleepy.
Luna is not sane.
Glen is combative.
Bryant is sane.
Alexis is delightful.
Luna is not aggressive.
Glen is not sleepy.If there is someone who is either not aggressive or not victorious, then Marlin is not delightful.
If someone is victorious or not combative, then he is not aggressive.
If there is at least one people who is not delightful, then Marlin is not sleepy.
If there is someone who is not aggressive, then Bryant is not sane and Marlin is not sleepy.
Alexis being not delightful or Glen being sane implies that Alexis is not combative.
If there is someone who is either not combative or delightful, then Luna is victorious.
If someone is not combative, then he is not sane, and vice versa.
Glen is not aggressive if and only if Marlin is not combative and Leith is delightful.
Someone who is not sane is always not combative.
If someone is sane, then he is aggressive, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is both not sleepy and victorious, then Jed is sane.
If someone who is delightful is also not sane, then he is sleepy.
|
Alexis is sleepy.
|
contradiction
|
Marlin is not victorious.
Glen is victorious.
Luna is not sleepy.
Alexis is sane.
Marlin is sleepy.
Alexis is not sleepy.
Luna is not sane.
Glen is combative.
Bryant is sane.
Alexis is delightful.
Luna is not aggressive.
Glen is not sleepy.If there is someone who is either not aggressive or not victorious, then Marlin is not delightful.
If someone is victorious or not combative, then he is not aggressive.
If there is at least one people who is not delightful, then Marlin is not sleepy.
If there is someone who is not aggressive, then Bryant is not sane and Marlin is not sleepy.
Alexis being not delightful or Glen being sane implies that Alexis is not combative.
If there is someone who is either not combative or delightful, then Luna is victorious.
If someone is not combative, then he is not sane, and vice versa.
Glen is not aggressive if and only if Marlin is not combative and Leith is delightful.
Someone who is not sane is always not combative.
If someone is sane, then he is aggressive, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is both not sleepy and victorious, then Jed is sane.
If someone who is delightful is also not sane, then he is sleepy.
|
Marlin is not victorious.
|
entailment
|
Marlin is not victorious.
Glen is victorious.
Luna is not sleepy.
Alexis is sane.
Marlin is sleepy.
Alexis is not sleepy.
Luna is not sane.
Glen is combative.
Bryant is sane.
Alexis is delightful.
Luna is not aggressive.
Glen is not sleepy.If there is someone who is either not aggressive or not victorious, then Marlin is not delightful.
If someone is victorious or not combative, then he is not aggressive.
If there is at least one people who is not delightful, then Marlin is not sleepy.
If there is someone who is not aggressive, then Bryant is not sane and Marlin is not sleepy.
Alexis being not delightful or Glen being sane implies that Alexis is not combative.
If there is someone who is either not combative or delightful, then Luna is victorious.
If someone is not combative, then he is not sane, and vice versa.
Glen is not aggressive if and only if Marlin is not combative and Leith is delightful.
Someone who is not sane is always not combative.
If someone is sane, then he is aggressive, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is both not sleepy and victorious, then Jed is sane.
If someone who is delightful is also not sane, then he is sleepy.
|
Bryant is sane.
|
self_contradiction
|
Marlin is not victorious.
Glen is victorious.
Luna is not sleepy.
Alexis is sane.
Marlin is sleepy.
Alexis is not sleepy.
Luna is not sane.
Glen is combative.
Bryant is sane.
Alexis is delightful.
Luna is not aggressive.
Glen is not sleepy.If there is someone who is either not aggressive or not victorious, then Marlin is not delightful.
If someone is victorious or not combative, then he is not aggressive.
If there is at least one people who is not delightful, then Marlin is not sleepy.
If there is someone who is not aggressive, then Bryant is not sane and Marlin is not sleepy.
Alexis being not delightful or Glen being sane implies that Alexis is not combative.
If there is someone who is either not combative or delightful, then Luna is victorious.
If someone is not combative, then he is not sane, and vice versa.
Glen is not aggressive if and only if Marlin is not combative and Leith is delightful.
Someone who is not sane is always not combative.
If someone is sane, then he is aggressive, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is both not sleepy and victorious, then Jed is sane.
If someone who is delightful is also not sane, then he is sleepy.
|
Luna is not sleepy.
|
entailment
|
Marlin is not victorious.
Glen is victorious.
Luna is not sleepy.
Alexis is sane.
Marlin is sleepy.
Alexis is not sleepy.
Luna is not sane.
Glen is combative.
Bryant is sane.
Alexis is delightful.
Luna is not aggressive.
Glen is not sleepy.If there is someone who is either not aggressive or not victorious, then Marlin is not delightful.
If someone is victorious or not combative, then he is not aggressive.
If there is at least one people who is not delightful, then Marlin is not sleepy.
If there is someone who is not aggressive, then Bryant is not sane and Marlin is not sleepy.
Alexis being not delightful or Glen being sane implies that Alexis is not combative.
If there is someone who is either not combative or delightful, then Luna is victorious.
If someone is not combative, then he is not sane, and vice versa.
Glen is not aggressive if and only if Marlin is not combative and Leith is delightful.
Someone who is not sane is always not combative.
If someone is sane, then he is aggressive, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is both not sleepy and victorious, then Jed is sane.
If someone who is delightful is also not sane, then he is sleepy.
|
Bryant is not aggressive.
|
self_contradiction
|
Marlin is not victorious.
Glen is victorious.
Luna is not sleepy.
Alexis is sane.
Marlin is sleepy.
Alexis is not sleepy.
Luna is not sane.
Glen is combative.
Bryant is sane.
Alexis is delightful.
Luna is not aggressive.
Glen is not sleepy.If there is someone who is either not aggressive or not victorious, then Marlin is not delightful.
If someone is victorious or not combative, then he is not aggressive.
If there is at least one people who is not delightful, then Marlin is not sleepy.
If there is someone who is not aggressive, then Bryant is not sane and Marlin is not sleepy.
Alexis being not delightful or Glen being sane implies that Alexis is not combative.
If there is someone who is either not combative or delightful, then Luna is victorious.
If someone is not combative, then he is not sane, and vice versa.
Glen is not aggressive if and only if Marlin is not combative and Leith is delightful.
Someone who is not sane is always not combative.
If someone is sane, then he is aggressive, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is both not sleepy and victorious, then Jed is sane.
If someone who is delightful is also not sane, then he is sleepy.
|
Luna is not sane.
|
entailment
|
Marlin is not victorious.
Glen is victorious.
Luna is not sleepy.
Alexis is sane.
Marlin is sleepy.
Alexis is not sleepy.
Luna is not sane.
Glen is combative.
Bryant is sane.
Alexis is delightful.
Luna is not aggressive.
Glen is not sleepy.If there is someone who is either not aggressive or not victorious, then Marlin is not delightful.
If someone is victorious or not combative, then he is not aggressive.
If there is at least one people who is not delightful, then Marlin is not sleepy.
If there is someone who is not aggressive, then Bryant is not sane and Marlin is not sleepy.
Alexis being not delightful or Glen being sane implies that Alexis is not combative.
If there is someone who is either not combative or delightful, then Luna is victorious.
If someone is not combative, then he is not sane, and vice versa.
Glen is not aggressive if and only if Marlin is not combative and Leith is delightful.
Someone who is not sane is always not combative.
If someone is sane, then he is aggressive, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is both not sleepy and victorious, then Jed is sane.
If someone who is delightful is also not sane, then he is sleepy.
|
Luna is delightful.
|
neutral
|
Marlin is not victorious.
Glen is victorious.
Luna is not sleepy.
Alexis is sane.
Marlin is sleepy.
Alexis is not sleepy.
Luna is not sane.
Glen is combative.
Bryant is sane.
Alexis is delightful.
Luna is not aggressive.
Glen is not sleepy.If there is someone who is either not aggressive or not victorious, then Marlin is not delightful.
If someone is victorious or not combative, then he is not aggressive.
If there is at least one people who is not delightful, then Marlin is not sleepy.
If there is someone who is not aggressive, then Bryant is not sane and Marlin is not sleepy.
Alexis being not delightful or Glen being sane implies that Alexis is not combative.
If there is someone who is either not combative or delightful, then Luna is victorious.
If someone is not combative, then he is not sane, and vice versa.
Glen is not aggressive if and only if Marlin is not combative and Leith is delightful.
Someone who is not sane is always not combative.
If someone is sane, then he is aggressive, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is both not sleepy and victorious, then Jed is sane.
If someone who is delightful is also not sane, then he is sleepy.
|
Luna is not aggressive.
|
entailment
|
Marlin is not victorious.
Glen is victorious.
Luna is not sleepy.
Alexis is sane.
Marlin is sleepy.
Alexis is not sleepy.
Luna is not sane.
Glen is combative.
Bryant is sane.
Alexis is delightful.
Luna is not aggressive.
Glen is not sleepy.If there is someone who is either not aggressive or not victorious, then Marlin is not delightful.
If someone is victorious or not combative, then he is not aggressive.
If there is at least one people who is not delightful, then Marlin is not sleepy.
If there is someone who is not aggressive, then Bryant is not sane and Marlin is not sleepy.
Alexis being not delightful or Glen being sane implies that Alexis is not combative.
If there is someone who is either not combative or delightful, then Luna is victorious.
If someone is not combative, then he is not sane, and vice versa.
Glen is not aggressive if and only if Marlin is not combative and Leith is delightful.
Someone who is not sane is always not combative.
If someone is sane, then he is aggressive, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is both not sleepy and victorious, then Jed is sane.
If someone who is delightful is also not sane, then he is sleepy.
|
Leith is delightful.
|
entailment
|
Marlin is not victorious.
Glen is victorious.
Luna is not sleepy.
Alexis is sane.
Marlin is sleepy.
Alexis is not sleepy.
Luna is not sane.
Glen is combative.
Bryant is sane.
Alexis is delightful.
Luna is not aggressive.
Glen is not sleepy.If there is someone who is either not aggressive or not victorious, then Marlin is not delightful.
If someone is victorious or not combative, then he is not aggressive.
If there is at least one people who is not delightful, then Marlin is not sleepy.
If there is someone who is not aggressive, then Bryant is not sane and Marlin is not sleepy.
Alexis being not delightful or Glen being sane implies that Alexis is not combative.
If there is someone who is either not combative or delightful, then Luna is victorious.
If someone is not combative, then he is not sane, and vice versa.
Glen is not aggressive if and only if Marlin is not combative and Leith is delightful.
Someone who is not sane is always not combative.
If someone is sane, then he is aggressive, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is both not sleepy and victorious, then Jed is sane.
If someone who is delightful is also not sane, then he is sleepy.
|
Jed is sane.
|
neutral
|
Marlin is not victorious.
Glen is victorious.
Luna is not sleepy.
Alexis is sane.
Marlin is sleepy.
Alexis is not sleepy.
Luna is not sane.
Glen is combative.
Bryant is sane.
Alexis is delightful.
Luna is not aggressive.
Glen is not sleepy.If there is someone who is either not aggressive or not victorious, then Marlin is not delightful.
If someone is victorious or not combative, then he is not aggressive.
If there is at least one people who is not delightful, then Marlin is not sleepy.
If there is someone who is not aggressive, then Bryant is not sane and Marlin is not sleepy.
Alexis being not delightful or Glen being sane implies that Alexis is not combative.
If there is someone who is either not combative or delightful, then Luna is victorious.
If someone is not combative, then he is not sane, and vice versa.
Glen is not aggressive if and only if Marlin is not combative and Leith is delightful.
Someone who is not sane is always not combative.
If someone is sane, then he is aggressive, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is both not sleepy and victorious, then Jed is sane.
If someone who is delightful is also not sane, then he is sleepy.
|
Alexis is not aggressive.
|
contradiction
|
Marlin is not victorious.
Glen is victorious.
Luna is not sleepy.
Alexis is sane.
Marlin is sleepy.
Alexis is not sleepy.
Luna is not sane.
Glen is combative.
Bryant is sane.
Alexis is delightful.
Luna is not aggressive.
Glen is not sleepy.If there is someone who is either not aggressive or not victorious, then Marlin is not delightful.
If someone is victorious or not combative, then he is not aggressive.
If there is at least one people who is not delightful, then Marlin is not sleepy.
If there is someone who is not aggressive, then Bryant is not sane and Marlin is not sleepy.
Alexis being not delightful or Glen being sane implies that Alexis is not combative.
If there is someone who is either not combative or delightful, then Luna is victorious.
If someone is not combative, then he is not sane, and vice versa.
Glen is not aggressive if and only if Marlin is not combative and Leith is delightful.
Someone who is not sane is always not combative.
If someone is sane, then he is aggressive, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is both not sleepy and victorious, then Jed is sane.
If someone who is delightful is also not sane, then he is sleepy.
|
Jed is combative.
|
neutral
|
Marlin is not victorious.
Glen is victorious.
Luna is not sleepy.
Alexis is sane.
Marlin is sleepy.
Alexis is not sleepy.
Luna is not sane.
Glen is combative.
Bryant is sane.
Alexis is delightful.
Luna is not aggressive.
Glen is not sleepy.If there is someone who is either not aggressive or not victorious, then Marlin is not delightful.
If someone is victorious or not combative, then he is not aggressive.
If there is at least one people who is not delightful, then Marlin is not sleepy.
If there is someone who is not aggressive, then Bryant is not sane and Marlin is not sleepy.
Alexis being not delightful or Glen being sane implies that Alexis is not combative.
If there is someone who is either not combative or delightful, then Luna is victorious.
If someone is not combative, then he is not sane, and vice versa.
Glen is not aggressive if and only if Marlin is not combative and Leith is delightful.
Someone who is not sane is always not combative.
If someone is sane, then he is aggressive, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is both not sleepy and victorious, then Jed is sane.
If someone who is delightful is also not sane, then he is sleepy.
|
Marlin is sleepy.
|
self_contradiction
|
Marlin is not victorious.
Glen is victorious.
Luna is not sleepy.
Alexis is sane.
Marlin is sleepy.
Alexis is not sleepy.
Luna is not sane.
Glen is combative.
Bryant is sane.
Alexis is delightful.
Luna is not aggressive.
Glen is not sleepy.If there is someone who is either not aggressive or not victorious, then Marlin is not delightful.
If someone is victorious or not combative, then he is not aggressive.
If there is at least one people who is not delightful, then Marlin is not sleepy.
If there is someone who is not aggressive, then Bryant is not sane and Marlin is not sleepy.
Alexis being not delightful or Glen being sane implies that Alexis is not combative.
If there is someone who is either not combative or delightful, then Luna is victorious.
If someone is not combative, then he is not sane, and vice versa.
Glen is not aggressive if and only if Marlin is not combative and Leith is delightful.
Someone who is not sane is always not combative.
If someone is sane, then he is aggressive, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is both not sleepy and victorious, then Jed is sane.
If someone who is delightful is also not sane, then he is sleepy.
|
Luna is sleepy.
|
contradiction
|
Marlin is not victorious.
Glen is victorious.
Luna is not sleepy.
Alexis is sane.
Marlin is sleepy.
Alexis is not sleepy.
Luna is not sane.
Glen is combative.
Bryant is sane.
Alexis is delightful.
Luna is not aggressive.
Glen is not sleepy.If there is someone who is either not aggressive or not victorious, then Marlin is not delightful.
If someone is victorious or not combative, then he is not aggressive.
If there is at least one people who is not delightful, then Marlin is not sleepy.
If there is someone who is not aggressive, then Bryant is not sane and Marlin is not sleepy.
Alexis being not delightful or Glen being sane implies that Alexis is not combative.
If there is someone who is either not combative or delightful, then Luna is victorious.
If someone is not combative, then he is not sane, and vice versa.
Glen is not aggressive if and only if Marlin is not combative and Leith is delightful.
Someone who is not sane is always not combative.
If someone is sane, then he is aggressive, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is both not sleepy and victorious, then Jed is sane.
If someone who is delightful is also not sane, then he is sleepy.
|
Bryant is aggressive.
|
self_contradiction
|
Marlin is not victorious.
Glen is victorious.
Luna is not sleepy.
Alexis is sane.
Marlin is sleepy.
Alexis is not sleepy.
Luna is not sane.
Glen is combative.
Bryant is sane.
Alexis is delightful.
Luna is not aggressive.
Glen is not sleepy.If there is someone who is either not aggressive or not victorious, then Marlin is not delightful.
If someone is victorious or not combative, then he is not aggressive.
If there is at least one people who is not delightful, then Marlin is not sleepy.
If there is someone who is not aggressive, then Bryant is not sane and Marlin is not sleepy.
Alexis being not delightful or Glen being sane implies that Alexis is not combative.
If there is someone who is either not combative or delightful, then Luna is victorious.
If someone is not combative, then he is not sane, and vice versa.
Glen is not aggressive if and only if Marlin is not combative and Leith is delightful.
Someone who is not sane is always not combative.
If someone is sane, then he is aggressive, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is both not sleepy and victorious, then Jed is sane.
If someone who is delightful is also not sane, then he is sleepy.
|
Luna is not victorious.
|
contradiction
|
Marlin is not victorious.
Glen is victorious.
Luna is not sleepy.
Alexis is sane.
Marlin is sleepy.
Alexis is not sleepy.
Luna is not sane.
Glen is combative.
Bryant is sane.
Alexis is delightful.
Luna is not aggressive.
Glen is not sleepy.If there is someone who is either not aggressive or not victorious, then Marlin is not delightful.
If someone is victorious or not combative, then he is not aggressive.
If there is at least one people who is not delightful, then Marlin is not sleepy.
If there is someone who is not aggressive, then Bryant is not sane and Marlin is not sleepy.
Alexis being not delightful or Glen being sane implies that Alexis is not combative.
If there is someone who is either not combative or delightful, then Luna is victorious.
If someone is not combative, then he is not sane, and vice versa.
Glen is not aggressive if and only if Marlin is not combative and Leith is delightful.
Someone who is not sane is always not combative.
If someone is sane, then he is aggressive, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is both not sleepy and victorious, then Jed is sane.
If someone who is delightful is also not sane, then he is sleepy.
|
Marlin is not sleepy.
|
self_contradiction
|
Marlin is not victorious.
Glen is victorious.
Luna is not sleepy.
Alexis is sane.
Marlin is sleepy.
Alexis is not sleepy.
Luna is not sane.
Glen is combative.
Bryant is sane.
Alexis is delightful.
Luna is not aggressive.
Glen is not sleepy.If there is someone who is either not aggressive or not victorious, then Marlin is not delightful.
If someone is victorious or not combative, then he is not aggressive.
If there is at least one people who is not delightful, then Marlin is not sleepy.
If there is someone who is not aggressive, then Bryant is not sane and Marlin is not sleepy.
Alexis being not delightful or Glen being sane implies that Alexis is not combative.
If there is someone who is either not combative or delightful, then Luna is victorious.
If someone is not combative, then he is not sane, and vice versa.
Glen is not aggressive if and only if Marlin is not combative and Leith is delightful.
Someone who is not sane is always not combative.
If someone is sane, then he is aggressive, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is both not sleepy and victorious, then Jed is sane.
If someone who is delightful is also not sane, then he is sleepy.
|
Marlin is delightful.
|
contradiction
|
Marlin is not victorious.
Glen is victorious.
Luna is not sleepy.
Alexis is sane.
Marlin is sleepy.
Alexis is not sleepy.
Luna is not sane.
Glen is combative.
Bryant is sane.
Alexis is delightful.
Luna is not aggressive.
Glen is not sleepy.If there is someone who is either not aggressive or not victorious, then Marlin is not delightful.
If someone is victorious or not combative, then he is not aggressive.
If there is at least one people who is not delightful, then Marlin is not sleepy.
If there is someone who is not aggressive, then Bryant is not sane and Marlin is not sleepy.
Alexis being not delightful or Glen being sane implies that Alexis is not combative.
If there is someone who is either not combative or delightful, then Luna is victorious.
If someone is not combative, then he is not sane, and vice versa.
Glen is not aggressive if and only if Marlin is not combative and Leith is delightful.
Someone who is not sane is always not combative.
If someone is sane, then he is aggressive, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is both not sleepy and victorious, then Jed is sane.
If someone who is delightful is also not sane, then he is sleepy.
|
Leith is not combative.
|
neutral
|
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.