premise
stringlengths 923
1.41k
| hypothesis
stringlengths 11
33
| label
stringclasses 4
values |
|---|---|---|
Jerry is bright.
Ethan is electrical.
Bowen is not electrical.
Conroy is not dynamic.
Bowen is not grumpy.
Alexander is grumpy.
Jerry is grumpy.
Jerry is not cheeky.
Jerry is not sad.
Abraham is not dynamic.
Ethan is dynamic.
Abraham is not electrical.Someone who is not cheeky is always both not dynamic and bright.
If someone is electrical, then he is not sad.
It can be concluded that Alexander is not sad once knowing that Conroy is grumpy.
Someone who is not cheeky is always both not sad and grumpy.
As long as someone is cheeky, he is sad and dynamic.
As long as someone is not dynamic, he is bright and not cheeky.
If there is someone who is grumpy, then Bowen is cheeky.
Someone being both not sad and dynamic is equivalent to being not bright.
If someone is not dynamic, then he is not cheeky, and vice versa.
If Ethan is bright and Ethan is not sad, then Abraham is not grumpy.
If there is someone who is cheeky, then Bowen is electrical and Irvin is bright.
If there is at least one people who is cheeky, then Ethan is not electrical.
|
Abraham is not electrical.
|
entailment
|
Jerry is bright.
Ethan is electrical.
Bowen is not electrical.
Conroy is not dynamic.
Bowen is not grumpy.
Alexander is grumpy.
Jerry is grumpy.
Jerry is not cheeky.
Jerry is not sad.
Abraham is not dynamic.
Ethan is dynamic.
Abraham is not electrical.Someone who is not cheeky is always both not dynamic and bright.
If someone is electrical, then he is not sad.
It can be concluded that Alexander is not sad once knowing that Conroy is grumpy.
Someone who is not cheeky is always both not sad and grumpy.
As long as someone is cheeky, he is sad and dynamic.
As long as someone is not dynamic, he is bright and not cheeky.
If there is someone who is grumpy, then Bowen is cheeky.
Someone being both not sad and dynamic is equivalent to being not bright.
If someone is not dynamic, then he is not cheeky, and vice versa.
If Ethan is bright and Ethan is not sad, then Abraham is not grumpy.
If there is someone who is cheeky, then Bowen is electrical and Irvin is bright.
If there is at least one people who is cheeky, then Ethan is not electrical.
|
Bowen is not electrical.
|
self_contradiction
|
Jerry is bright.
Ethan is electrical.
Bowen is not electrical.
Conroy is not dynamic.
Bowen is not grumpy.
Alexander is grumpy.
Jerry is grumpy.
Jerry is not cheeky.
Jerry is not sad.
Abraham is not dynamic.
Ethan is dynamic.
Abraham is not electrical.Someone who is not cheeky is always both not dynamic and bright.
If someone is electrical, then he is not sad.
It can be concluded that Alexander is not sad once knowing that Conroy is grumpy.
Someone who is not cheeky is always both not sad and grumpy.
As long as someone is cheeky, he is sad and dynamic.
As long as someone is not dynamic, he is bright and not cheeky.
If there is someone who is grumpy, then Bowen is cheeky.
Someone being both not sad and dynamic is equivalent to being not bright.
If someone is not dynamic, then he is not cheeky, and vice versa.
If Ethan is bright and Ethan is not sad, then Abraham is not grumpy.
If there is someone who is cheeky, then Bowen is electrical and Irvin is bright.
If there is at least one people who is cheeky, then Ethan is not electrical.
|
Alexander is not bright.
|
neutral
|
Jerry is bright.
Ethan is electrical.
Bowen is not electrical.
Conroy is not dynamic.
Bowen is not grumpy.
Alexander is grumpy.
Jerry is grumpy.
Jerry is not cheeky.
Jerry is not sad.
Abraham is not dynamic.
Ethan is dynamic.
Abraham is not electrical.Someone who is not cheeky is always both not dynamic and bright.
If someone is electrical, then he is not sad.
It can be concluded that Alexander is not sad once knowing that Conroy is grumpy.
Someone who is not cheeky is always both not sad and grumpy.
As long as someone is cheeky, he is sad and dynamic.
As long as someone is not dynamic, he is bright and not cheeky.
If there is someone who is grumpy, then Bowen is cheeky.
Someone being both not sad and dynamic is equivalent to being not bright.
If someone is not dynamic, then he is not cheeky, and vice versa.
If Ethan is bright and Ethan is not sad, then Abraham is not grumpy.
If there is someone who is cheeky, then Bowen is electrical and Irvin is bright.
If there is at least one people who is cheeky, then Ethan is not electrical.
|
Ethan is not electrical.
|
self_contradiction
|
Jerry is bright.
Ethan is electrical.
Bowen is not electrical.
Conroy is not dynamic.
Bowen is not grumpy.
Alexander is grumpy.
Jerry is grumpy.
Jerry is not cheeky.
Jerry is not sad.
Abraham is not dynamic.
Ethan is dynamic.
Abraham is not electrical.Someone who is not cheeky is always both not dynamic and bright.
If someone is electrical, then he is not sad.
It can be concluded that Alexander is not sad once knowing that Conroy is grumpy.
Someone who is not cheeky is always both not sad and grumpy.
As long as someone is cheeky, he is sad and dynamic.
As long as someone is not dynamic, he is bright and not cheeky.
If there is someone who is grumpy, then Bowen is cheeky.
Someone being both not sad and dynamic is equivalent to being not bright.
If someone is not dynamic, then he is not cheeky, and vice versa.
If Ethan is bright and Ethan is not sad, then Abraham is not grumpy.
If there is someone who is cheeky, then Bowen is electrical and Irvin is bright.
If there is at least one people who is cheeky, then Ethan is not electrical.
|
Jerry is not sad.
|
entailment
|
Jerry is bright.
Ethan is electrical.
Bowen is not electrical.
Conroy is not dynamic.
Bowen is not grumpy.
Alexander is grumpy.
Jerry is grumpy.
Jerry is not cheeky.
Jerry is not sad.
Abraham is not dynamic.
Ethan is dynamic.
Abraham is not electrical.Someone who is not cheeky is always both not dynamic and bright.
If someone is electrical, then he is not sad.
It can be concluded that Alexander is not sad once knowing that Conroy is grumpy.
Someone who is not cheeky is always both not sad and grumpy.
As long as someone is cheeky, he is sad and dynamic.
As long as someone is not dynamic, he is bright and not cheeky.
If there is someone who is grumpy, then Bowen is cheeky.
Someone being both not sad and dynamic is equivalent to being not bright.
If someone is not dynamic, then he is not cheeky, and vice versa.
If Ethan is bright and Ethan is not sad, then Abraham is not grumpy.
If there is someone who is cheeky, then Bowen is electrical and Irvin is bright.
If there is at least one people who is cheeky, then Ethan is not electrical.
|
Jerry is not grumpy.
|
contradiction
|
Jerry is bright.
Ethan is electrical.
Bowen is not electrical.
Conroy is not dynamic.
Bowen is not grumpy.
Alexander is grumpy.
Jerry is grumpy.
Jerry is not cheeky.
Jerry is not sad.
Abraham is not dynamic.
Ethan is dynamic.
Abraham is not electrical.Someone who is not cheeky is always both not dynamic and bright.
If someone is electrical, then he is not sad.
It can be concluded that Alexander is not sad once knowing that Conroy is grumpy.
Someone who is not cheeky is always both not sad and grumpy.
As long as someone is cheeky, he is sad and dynamic.
As long as someone is not dynamic, he is bright and not cheeky.
If there is someone who is grumpy, then Bowen is cheeky.
Someone being both not sad and dynamic is equivalent to being not bright.
If someone is not dynamic, then he is not cheeky, and vice versa.
If Ethan is bright and Ethan is not sad, then Abraham is not grumpy.
If there is someone who is cheeky, then Bowen is electrical and Irvin is bright.
If there is at least one people who is cheeky, then Ethan is not electrical.
|
Ethan is not bright.
|
entailment
|
Jerry is bright.
Ethan is electrical.
Bowen is not electrical.
Conroy is not dynamic.
Bowen is not grumpy.
Alexander is grumpy.
Jerry is grumpy.
Jerry is not cheeky.
Jerry is not sad.
Abraham is not dynamic.
Ethan is dynamic.
Abraham is not electrical.Someone who is not cheeky is always both not dynamic and bright.
If someone is electrical, then he is not sad.
It can be concluded that Alexander is not sad once knowing that Conroy is grumpy.
Someone who is not cheeky is always both not sad and grumpy.
As long as someone is cheeky, he is sad and dynamic.
As long as someone is not dynamic, he is bright and not cheeky.
If there is someone who is grumpy, then Bowen is cheeky.
Someone being both not sad and dynamic is equivalent to being not bright.
If someone is not dynamic, then he is not cheeky, and vice versa.
If Ethan is bright and Ethan is not sad, then Abraham is not grumpy.
If there is someone who is cheeky, then Bowen is electrical and Irvin is bright.
If there is at least one people who is cheeky, then Ethan is not electrical.
|
Irvin is not cheeky.
|
neutral
|
Jerry is bright.
Ethan is electrical.
Bowen is not electrical.
Conroy is not dynamic.
Bowen is not grumpy.
Alexander is grumpy.
Jerry is grumpy.
Jerry is not cheeky.
Jerry is not sad.
Abraham is not dynamic.
Ethan is dynamic.
Abraham is not electrical.Someone who is not cheeky is always both not dynamic and bright.
If someone is electrical, then he is not sad.
It can be concluded that Alexander is not sad once knowing that Conroy is grumpy.
Someone who is not cheeky is always both not sad and grumpy.
As long as someone is cheeky, he is sad and dynamic.
As long as someone is not dynamic, he is bright and not cheeky.
If there is someone who is grumpy, then Bowen is cheeky.
Someone being both not sad and dynamic is equivalent to being not bright.
If someone is not dynamic, then he is not cheeky, and vice versa.
If Ethan is bright and Ethan is not sad, then Abraham is not grumpy.
If there is someone who is cheeky, then Bowen is electrical and Irvin is bright.
If there is at least one people who is cheeky, then Ethan is not electrical.
|
Irvin is cheeky.
|
neutral
|
Jerry is bright.
Ethan is electrical.
Bowen is not electrical.
Conroy is not dynamic.
Bowen is not grumpy.
Alexander is grumpy.
Jerry is grumpy.
Jerry is not cheeky.
Jerry is not sad.
Abraham is not dynamic.
Ethan is dynamic.
Abraham is not electrical.Someone who is not cheeky is always both not dynamic and bright.
If someone is electrical, then he is not sad.
It can be concluded that Alexander is not sad once knowing that Conroy is grumpy.
Someone who is not cheeky is always both not sad and grumpy.
As long as someone is cheeky, he is sad and dynamic.
As long as someone is not dynamic, he is bright and not cheeky.
If there is someone who is grumpy, then Bowen is cheeky.
Someone being both not sad and dynamic is equivalent to being not bright.
If someone is not dynamic, then he is not cheeky, and vice versa.
If Ethan is bright and Ethan is not sad, then Abraham is not grumpy.
If there is someone who is cheeky, then Bowen is electrical and Irvin is bright.
If there is at least one people who is cheeky, then Ethan is not electrical.
|
Conroy is cheeky.
|
contradiction
|
Jerry is bright.
Ethan is electrical.
Bowen is not electrical.
Conroy is not dynamic.
Bowen is not grumpy.
Alexander is grumpy.
Jerry is grumpy.
Jerry is not cheeky.
Jerry is not sad.
Abraham is not dynamic.
Ethan is dynamic.
Abraham is not electrical.Someone who is not cheeky is always both not dynamic and bright.
If someone is electrical, then he is not sad.
It can be concluded that Alexander is not sad once knowing that Conroy is grumpy.
Someone who is not cheeky is always both not sad and grumpy.
As long as someone is cheeky, he is sad and dynamic.
As long as someone is not dynamic, he is bright and not cheeky.
If there is someone who is grumpy, then Bowen is cheeky.
Someone being both not sad and dynamic is equivalent to being not bright.
If someone is not dynamic, then he is not cheeky, and vice versa.
If Ethan is bright and Ethan is not sad, then Abraham is not grumpy.
If there is someone who is cheeky, then Bowen is electrical and Irvin is bright.
If there is at least one people who is cheeky, then Ethan is not electrical.
|
Bowen is dynamic.
|
entailment
|
Jerry is bright.
Ethan is electrical.
Bowen is not electrical.
Conroy is not dynamic.
Bowen is not grumpy.
Alexander is grumpy.
Jerry is grumpy.
Jerry is not cheeky.
Jerry is not sad.
Abraham is not dynamic.
Ethan is dynamic.
Abraham is not electrical.Someone who is not cheeky is always both not dynamic and bright.
If someone is electrical, then he is not sad.
It can be concluded that Alexander is not sad once knowing that Conroy is grumpy.
Someone who is not cheeky is always both not sad and grumpy.
As long as someone is cheeky, he is sad and dynamic.
As long as someone is not dynamic, he is bright and not cheeky.
If there is someone who is grumpy, then Bowen is cheeky.
Someone being both not sad and dynamic is equivalent to being not bright.
If someone is not dynamic, then he is not cheeky, and vice versa.
If Ethan is bright and Ethan is not sad, then Abraham is not grumpy.
If there is someone who is cheeky, then Bowen is electrical and Irvin is bright.
If there is at least one people who is cheeky, then Ethan is not electrical.
|
Jerry is dynamic.
|
contradiction
|
Jerry is bright.
Ethan is electrical.
Bowen is not electrical.
Conroy is not dynamic.
Bowen is not grumpy.
Alexander is grumpy.
Jerry is grumpy.
Jerry is not cheeky.
Jerry is not sad.
Abraham is not dynamic.
Ethan is dynamic.
Abraham is not electrical.Someone who is not cheeky is always both not dynamic and bright.
If someone is electrical, then he is not sad.
It can be concluded that Alexander is not sad once knowing that Conroy is grumpy.
Someone who is not cheeky is always both not sad and grumpy.
As long as someone is cheeky, he is sad and dynamic.
As long as someone is not dynamic, he is bright and not cheeky.
If there is someone who is grumpy, then Bowen is cheeky.
Someone being both not sad and dynamic is equivalent to being not bright.
If someone is not dynamic, then he is not cheeky, and vice versa.
If Ethan is bright and Ethan is not sad, then Abraham is not grumpy.
If there is someone who is cheeky, then Bowen is electrical and Irvin is bright.
If there is at least one people who is cheeky, then Ethan is not electrical.
|
Bowen is sad.
|
self_contradiction
|
Jerry is bright.
Ethan is electrical.
Bowen is not electrical.
Conroy is not dynamic.
Bowen is not grumpy.
Alexander is grumpy.
Jerry is grumpy.
Jerry is not cheeky.
Jerry is not sad.
Abraham is not dynamic.
Ethan is dynamic.
Abraham is not electrical.Someone who is not cheeky is always both not dynamic and bright.
If someone is electrical, then he is not sad.
It can be concluded that Alexander is not sad once knowing that Conroy is grumpy.
Someone who is not cheeky is always both not sad and grumpy.
As long as someone is cheeky, he is sad and dynamic.
As long as someone is not dynamic, he is bright and not cheeky.
If there is someone who is grumpy, then Bowen is cheeky.
Someone being both not sad and dynamic is equivalent to being not bright.
If someone is not dynamic, then he is not cheeky, and vice versa.
If Ethan is bright and Ethan is not sad, then Abraham is not grumpy.
If there is someone who is cheeky, then Bowen is electrical and Irvin is bright.
If there is at least one people who is cheeky, then Ethan is not electrical.
|
Abraham is not bright.
|
contradiction
|
Jerry is bright.
Ethan is electrical.
Bowen is not electrical.
Conroy is not dynamic.
Bowen is not grumpy.
Alexander is grumpy.
Jerry is grumpy.
Jerry is not cheeky.
Jerry is not sad.
Abraham is not dynamic.
Ethan is dynamic.
Abraham is not electrical.Someone who is not cheeky is always both not dynamic and bright.
If someone is electrical, then he is not sad.
It can be concluded that Alexander is not sad once knowing that Conroy is grumpy.
Someone who is not cheeky is always both not sad and grumpy.
As long as someone is cheeky, he is sad and dynamic.
As long as someone is not dynamic, he is bright and not cheeky.
If there is someone who is grumpy, then Bowen is cheeky.
Someone being both not sad and dynamic is equivalent to being not bright.
If someone is not dynamic, then he is not cheeky, and vice versa.
If Ethan is bright and Ethan is not sad, then Abraham is not grumpy.
If there is someone who is cheeky, then Bowen is electrical and Irvin is bright.
If there is at least one people who is cheeky, then Ethan is not electrical.
|
Bowen is not sad.
|
self_contradiction
|
Jerry is bright.
Ethan is electrical.
Bowen is not electrical.
Conroy is not dynamic.
Bowen is not grumpy.
Alexander is grumpy.
Jerry is grumpy.
Jerry is not cheeky.
Jerry is not sad.
Abraham is not dynamic.
Ethan is dynamic.
Abraham is not electrical.Someone who is not cheeky is always both not dynamic and bright.
If someone is electrical, then he is not sad.
It can be concluded that Alexander is not sad once knowing that Conroy is grumpy.
Someone who is not cheeky is always both not sad and grumpy.
As long as someone is cheeky, he is sad and dynamic.
As long as someone is not dynamic, he is bright and not cheeky.
If there is someone who is grumpy, then Bowen is cheeky.
Someone being both not sad and dynamic is equivalent to being not bright.
If someone is not dynamic, then he is not cheeky, and vice versa.
If Ethan is bright and Ethan is not sad, then Abraham is not grumpy.
If there is someone who is cheeky, then Bowen is electrical and Irvin is bright.
If there is at least one people who is cheeky, then Ethan is not electrical.
|
Conroy is electrical.
|
neutral
|
Jerry is bright.
Ethan is electrical.
Bowen is not electrical.
Conroy is not dynamic.
Bowen is not grumpy.
Alexander is grumpy.
Jerry is grumpy.
Jerry is not cheeky.
Jerry is not sad.
Abraham is not dynamic.
Ethan is dynamic.
Abraham is not electrical.Someone who is not cheeky is always both not dynamic and bright.
If someone is electrical, then he is not sad.
It can be concluded that Alexander is not sad once knowing that Conroy is grumpy.
Someone who is not cheeky is always both not sad and grumpy.
As long as someone is cheeky, he is sad and dynamic.
As long as someone is not dynamic, he is bright and not cheeky.
If there is someone who is grumpy, then Bowen is cheeky.
Someone being both not sad and dynamic is equivalent to being not bright.
If someone is not dynamic, then he is not cheeky, and vice versa.
If Ethan is bright and Ethan is not sad, then Abraham is not grumpy.
If there is someone who is cheeky, then Bowen is electrical and Irvin is bright.
If there is at least one people who is cheeky, then Ethan is not electrical.
|
Jerry is not dynamic.
|
entailment
|
Jerry is bright.
Ethan is electrical.
Bowen is not electrical.
Conroy is not dynamic.
Bowen is not grumpy.
Alexander is grumpy.
Jerry is grumpy.
Jerry is not cheeky.
Jerry is not sad.
Abraham is not dynamic.
Ethan is dynamic.
Abraham is not electrical.Someone who is not cheeky is always both not dynamic and bright.
If someone is electrical, then he is not sad.
It can be concluded that Alexander is not sad once knowing that Conroy is grumpy.
Someone who is not cheeky is always both not sad and grumpy.
As long as someone is cheeky, he is sad and dynamic.
As long as someone is not dynamic, he is bright and not cheeky.
If there is someone who is grumpy, then Bowen is cheeky.
Someone being both not sad and dynamic is equivalent to being not bright.
If someone is not dynamic, then he is not cheeky, and vice versa.
If Ethan is bright and Ethan is not sad, then Abraham is not grumpy.
If there is someone who is cheeky, then Bowen is electrical and Irvin is bright.
If there is at least one people who is cheeky, then Ethan is not electrical.
|
Ethan is grumpy.
|
neutral
|
Jerry is bright.
Ethan is electrical.
Bowen is not electrical.
Conroy is not dynamic.
Bowen is not grumpy.
Alexander is grumpy.
Jerry is grumpy.
Jerry is not cheeky.
Jerry is not sad.
Abraham is not dynamic.
Ethan is dynamic.
Abraham is not electrical.Someone who is not cheeky is always both not dynamic and bright.
If someone is electrical, then he is not sad.
It can be concluded that Alexander is not sad once knowing that Conroy is grumpy.
Someone who is not cheeky is always both not sad and grumpy.
As long as someone is cheeky, he is sad and dynamic.
As long as someone is not dynamic, he is bright and not cheeky.
If there is someone who is grumpy, then Bowen is cheeky.
Someone being both not sad and dynamic is equivalent to being not bright.
If someone is not dynamic, then he is not cheeky, and vice versa.
If Ethan is bright and Ethan is not sad, then Abraham is not grumpy.
If there is someone who is cheeky, then Bowen is electrical and Irvin is bright.
If there is at least one people who is cheeky, then Ethan is not electrical.
|
Bowen is not cheeky.
|
contradiction
|
Jerry is bright.
Ethan is electrical.
Bowen is not electrical.
Conroy is not dynamic.
Bowen is not grumpy.
Alexander is grumpy.
Jerry is grumpy.
Jerry is not cheeky.
Jerry is not sad.
Abraham is not dynamic.
Ethan is dynamic.
Abraham is not electrical.Someone who is not cheeky is always both not dynamic and bright.
If someone is electrical, then he is not sad.
It can be concluded that Alexander is not sad once knowing that Conroy is grumpy.
Someone who is not cheeky is always both not sad and grumpy.
As long as someone is cheeky, he is sad and dynamic.
As long as someone is not dynamic, he is bright and not cheeky.
If there is someone who is grumpy, then Bowen is cheeky.
Someone being both not sad and dynamic is equivalent to being not bright.
If someone is not dynamic, then he is not cheeky, and vice versa.
If Ethan is bright and Ethan is not sad, then Abraham is not grumpy.
If there is someone who is cheeky, then Bowen is electrical and Irvin is bright.
If there is at least one people who is cheeky, then Ethan is not electrical.
|
Ethan is electrical.
|
self_contradiction
|
Tracey is uptight.
Lincoln is not frantic.
Morris is jealous.
Cadman is uptight.
Buck is frantic.
Lincoln is not successful.
Lincoln is creepy.
Tracey is not successful.
Buck is uptight.
Matthew is not jealous.
Randolph is not successful.
Tracey is not delightful.It can be concluded that Cadman is uptight once knowing that Buck is successful and Tracey is not creepy.
Someone is frantic if and only if he is not delightful.
If there is someone who is either not frantic or not successful, then Tracey is jealous and Randolph is creepy.
If someone is frantic, then he is not creepy, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is creepy, then Cadman is not delightful.
Matthew being delightful and Matthew being jealous are equivalent to Tracey being frantic and Randolph being not successful.
Matthew being not uptight or Cadman being not successful implies that Matthew is frantic.
All not delightful people are not jealous.
If there is someone who is delightful, then Matthew is successful and Lincoln is uptight.
Matthew is not uptight if and only if Buck is successful and Matthew is creepy.
If there is at least one people who is creepy or uptight, then Buck is not frantic.
Someone is not uptight and delightful if and only if he is not jealous and creepy.
|
Cadman is frantic.
|
entailment
|
Tracey is uptight.
Lincoln is not frantic.
Morris is jealous.
Cadman is uptight.
Buck is frantic.
Lincoln is not successful.
Lincoln is creepy.
Tracey is not successful.
Buck is uptight.
Matthew is not jealous.
Randolph is not successful.
Tracey is not delightful.It can be concluded that Cadman is uptight once knowing that Buck is successful and Tracey is not creepy.
Someone is frantic if and only if he is not delightful.
If there is someone who is either not frantic or not successful, then Tracey is jealous and Randolph is creepy.
If someone is frantic, then he is not creepy, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is creepy, then Cadman is not delightful.
Matthew being delightful and Matthew being jealous are equivalent to Tracey being frantic and Randolph being not successful.
Matthew being not uptight or Cadman being not successful implies that Matthew is frantic.
All not delightful people are not jealous.
If there is someone who is delightful, then Matthew is successful and Lincoln is uptight.
Matthew is not uptight if and only if Buck is successful and Matthew is creepy.
If there is at least one people who is creepy or uptight, then Buck is not frantic.
Someone is not uptight and delightful if and only if he is not jealous and creepy.
|
Cadman is not uptight.
|
contradiction
|
Tracey is uptight.
Lincoln is not frantic.
Morris is jealous.
Cadman is uptight.
Buck is frantic.
Lincoln is not successful.
Lincoln is creepy.
Tracey is not successful.
Buck is uptight.
Matthew is not jealous.
Randolph is not successful.
Tracey is not delightful.It can be concluded that Cadman is uptight once knowing that Buck is successful and Tracey is not creepy.
Someone is frantic if and only if he is not delightful.
If there is someone who is either not frantic or not successful, then Tracey is jealous and Randolph is creepy.
If someone is frantic, then he is not creepy, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is creepy, then Cadman is not delightful.
Matthew being delightful and Matthew being jealous are equivalent to Tracey being frantic and Randolph being not successful.
Matthew being not uptight or Cadman being not successful implies that Matthew is frantic.
All not delightful people are not jealous.
If there is someone who is delightful, then Matthew is successful and Lincoln is uptight.
Matthew is not uptight if and only if Buck is successful and Matthew is creepy.
If there is at least one people who is creepy or uptight, then Buck is not frantic.
Someone is not uptight and delightful if and only if he is not jealous and creepy.
|
Buck is not successful.
|
neutral
|
Tracey is uptight.
Lincoln is not frantic.
Morris is jealous.
Cadman is uptight.
Buck is frantic.
Lincoln is not successful.
Lincoln is creepy.
Tracey is not successful.
Buck is uptight.
Matthew is not jealous.
Randolph is not successful.
Tracey is not delightful.It can be concluded that Cadman is uptight once knowing that Buck is successful and Tracey is not creepy.
Someone is frantic if and only if he is not delightful.
If there is someone who is either not frantic or not successful, then Tracey is jealous and Randolph is creepy.
If someone is frantic, then he is not creepy, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is creepy, then Cadman is not delightful.
Matthew being delightful and Matthew being jealous are equivalent to Tracey being frantic and Randolph being not successful.
Matthew being not uptight or Cadman being not successful implies that Matthew is frantic.
All not delightful people are not jealous.
If there is someone who is delightful, then Matthew is successful and Lincoln is uptight.
Matthew is not uptight if and only if Buck is successful and Matthew is creepy.
If there is at least one people who is creepy or uptight, then Buck is not frantic.
Someone is not uptight and delightful if and only if he is not jealous and creepy.
|
Randolph is frantic.
|
neutral
|
Tracey is uptight.
Lincoln is not frantic.
Morris is jealous.
Cadman is uptight.
Buck is frantic.
Lincoln is not successful.
Lincoln is creepy.
Tracey is not successful.
Buck is uptight.
Matthew is not jealous.
Randolph is not successful.
Tracey is not delightful.It can be concluded that Cadman is uptight once knowing that Buck is successful and Tracey is not creepy.
Someone is frantic if and only if he is not delightful.
If there is someone who is either not frantic or not successful, then Tracey is jealous and Randolph is creepy.
If someone is frantic, then he is not creepy, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is creepy, then Cadman is not delightful.
Matthew being delightful and Matthew being jealous are equivalent to Tracey being frantic and Randolph being not successful.
Matthew being not uptight or Cadman being not successful implies that Matthew is frantic.
All not delightful people are not jealous.
If there is someone who is delightful, then Matthew is successful and Lincoln is uptight.
Matthew is not uptight if and only if Buck is successful and Matthew is creepy.
If there is at least one people who is creepy or uptight, then Buck is not frantic.
Someone is not uptight and delightful if and only if he is not jealous and creepy.
|
Matthew is not delightful.
|
contradiction
|
Tracey is uptight.
Lincoln is not frantic.
Morris is jealous.
Cadman is uptight.
Buck is frantic.
Lincoln is not successful.
Lincoln is creepy.
Tracey is not successful.
Buck is uptight.
Matthew is not jealous.
Randolph is not successful.
Tracey is not delightful.It can be concluded that Cadman is uptight once knowing that Buck is successful and Tracey is not creepy.
Someone is frantic if and only if he is not delightful.
If there is someone who is either not frantic or not successful, then Tracey is jealous and Randolph is creepy.
If someone is frantic, then he is not creepy, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is creepy, then Cadman is not delightful.
Matthew being delightful and Matthew being jealous are equivalent to Tracey being frantic and Randolph being not successful.
Matthew being not uptight or Cadman being not successful implies that Matthew is frantic.
All not delightful people are not jealous.
If there is someone who is delightful, then Matthew is successful and Lincoln is uptight.
Matthew is not uptight if and only if Buck is successful and Matthew is creepy.
If there is at least one people who is creepy or uptight, then Buck is not frantic.
Someone is not uptight and delightful if and only if he is not jealous and creepy.
|
Matthew is not jealous.
|
self_contradiction
|
Tracey is uptight.
Lincoln is not frantic.
Morris is jealous.
Cadman is uptight.
Buck is frantic.
Lincoln is not successful.
Lincoln is creepy.
Tracey is not successful.
Buck is uptight.
Matthew is not jealous.
Randolph is not successful.
Tracey is not delightful.It can be concluded that Cadman is uptight once knowing that Buck is successful and Tracey is not creepy.
Someone is frantic if and only if he is not delightful.
If there is someone who is either not frantic or not successful, then Tracey is jealous and Randolph is creepy.
If someone is frantic, then he is not creepy, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is creepy, then Cadman is not delightful.
Matthew being delightful and Matthew being jealous are equivalent to Tracey being frantic and Randolph being not successful.
Matthew being not uptight or Cadman being not successful implies that Matthew is frantic.
All not delightful people are not jealous.
If there is someone who is delightful, then Matthew is successful and Lincoln is uptight.
Matthew is not uptight if and only if Buck is successful and Matthew is creepy.
If there is at least one people who is creepy or uptight, then Buck is not frantic.
Someone is not uptight and delightful if and only if he is not jealous and creepy.
|
Tracey is jealous.
|
self_contradiction
|
Tracey is uptight.
Lincoln is not frantic.
Morris is jealous.
Cadman is uptight.
Buck is frantic.
Lincoln is not successful.
Lincoln is creepy.
Tracey is not successful.
Buck is uptight.
Matthew is not jealous.
Randolph is not successful.
Tracey is not delightful.It can be concluded that Cadman is uptight once knowing that Buck is successful and Tracey is not creepy.
Someone is frantic if and only if he is not delightful.
If there is someone who is either not frantic or not successful, then Tracey is jealous and Randolph is creepy.
If someone is frantic, then he is not creepy, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is creepy, then Cadman is not delightful.
Matthew being delightful and Matthew being jealous are equivalent to Tracey being frantic and Randolph being not successful.
Matthew being not uptight or Cadman being not successful implies that Matthew is frantic.
All not delightful people are not jealous.
If there is someone who is delightful, then Matthew is successful and Lincoln is uptight.
Matthew is not uptight if and only if Buck is successful and Matthew is creepy.
If there is at least one people who is creepy or uptight, then Buck is not frantic.
Someone is not uptight and delightful if and only if he is not jealous and creepy.
|
Cadman is jealous.
|
contradiction
|
Tracey is uptight.
Lincoln is not frantic.
Morris is jealous.
Cadman is uptight.
Buck is frantic.
Lincoln is not successful.
Lincoln is creepy.
Tracey is not successful.
Buck is uptight.
Matthew is not jealous.
Randolph is not successful.
Tracey is not delightful.It can be concluded that Cadman is uptight once knowing that Buck is successful and Tracey is not creepy.
Someone is frantic if and only if he is not delightful.
If there is someone who is either not frantic or not successful, then Tracey is jealous and Randolph is creepy.
If someone is frantic, then he is not creepy, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is creepy, then Cadman is not delightful.
Matthew being delightful and Matthew being jealous are equivalent to Tracey being frantic and Randolph being not successful.
Matthew being not uptight or Cadman being not successful implies that Matthew is frantic.
All not delightful people are not jealous.
If there is someone who is delightful, then Matthew is successful and Lincoln is uptight.
Matthew is not uptight if and only if Buck is successful and Matthew is creepy.
If there is at least one people who is creepy or uptight, then Buck is not frantic.
Someone is not uptight and delightful if and only if he is not jealous and creepy.
|
Matthew is jealous.
|
self_contradiction
|
Tracey is uptight.
Lincoln is not frantic.
Morris is jealous.
Cadman is uptight.
Buck is frantic.
Lincoln is not successful.
Lincoln is creepy.
Tracey is not successful.
Buck is uptight.
Matthew is not jealous.
Randolph is not successful.
Tracey is not delightful.It can be concluded that Cadman is uptight once knowing that Buck is successful and Tracey is not creepy.
Someone is frantic if and only if he is not delightful.
If there is someone who is either not frantic or not successful, then Tracey is jealous and Randolph is creepy.
If someone is frantic, then he is not creepy, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is creepy, then Cadman is not delightful.
Matthew being delightful and Matthew being jealous are equivalent to Tracey being frantic and Randolph being not successful.
Matthew being not uptight or Cadman being not successful implies that Matthew is frantic.
All not delightful people are not jealous.
If there is someone who is delightful, then Matthew is successful and Lincoln is uptight.
Matthew is not uptight if and only if Buck is successful and Matthew is creepy.
If there is at least one people who is creepy or uptight, then Buck is not frantic.
Someone is not uptight and delightful if and only if he is not jealous and creepy.
|
Lincoln is not uptight.
|
contradiction
|
Tracey is uptight.
Lincoln is not frantic.
Morris is jealous.
Cadman is uptight.
Buck is frantic.
Lincoln is not successful.
Lincoln is creepy.
Tracey is not successful.
Buck is uptight.
Matthew is not jealous.
Randolph is not successful.
Tracey is not delightful.It can be concluded that Cadman is uptight once knowing that Buck is successful and Tracey is not creepy.
Someone is frantic if and only if he is not delightful.
If there is someone who is either not frantic or not successful, then Tracey is jealous and Randolph is creepy.
If someone is frantic, then he is not creepy, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is creepy, then Cadman is not delightful.
Matthew being delightful and Matthew being jealous are equivalent to Tracey being frantic and Randolph being not successful.
Matthew being not uptight or Cadman being not successful implies that Matthew is frantic.
All not delightful people are not jealous.
If there is someone who is delightful, then Matthew is successful and Lincoln is uptight.
Matthew is not uptight if and only if Buck is successful and Matthew is creepy.
If there is at least one people who is creepy or uptight, then Buck is not frantic.
Someone is not uptight and delightful if and only if he is not jealous and creepy.
|
Buck is frantic.
|
self_contradiction
|
Tracey is uptight.
Lincoln is not frantic.
Morris is jealous.
Cadman is uptight.
Buck is frantic.
Lincoln is not successful.
Lincoln is creepy.
Tracey is not successful.
Buck is uptight.
Matthew is not jealous.
Randolph is not successful.
Tracey is not delightful.It can be concluded that Cadman is uptight once knowing that Buck is successful and Tracey is not creepy.
Someone is frantic if and only if he is not delightful.
If there is someone who is either not frantic or not successful, then Tracey is jealous and Randolph is creepy.
If someone is frantic, then he is not creepy, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is creepy, then Cadman is not delightful.
Matthew being delightful and Matthew being jealous are equivalent to Tracey being frantic and Randolph being not successful.
Matthew being not uptight or Cadman being not successful implies that Matthew is frantic.
All not delightful people are not jealous.
If there is someone who is delightful, then Matthew is successful and Lincoln is uptight.
Matthew is not uptight if and only if Buck is successful and Matthew is creepy.
If there is at least one people who is creepy or uptight, then Buck is not frantic.
Someone is not uptight and delightful if and only if he is not jealous and creepy.
|
Morris is delightful.
|
neutral
|
Tracey is uptight.
Lincoln is not frantic.
Morris is jealous.
Cadman is uptight.
Buck is frantic.
Lincoln is not successful.
Lincoln is creepy.
Tracey is not successful.
Buck is uptight.
Matthew is not jealous.
Randolph is not successful.
Tracey is not delightful.It can be concluded that Cadman is uptight once knowing that Buck is successful and Tracey is not creepy.
Someone is frantic if and only if he is not delightful.
If there is someone who is either not frantic or not successful, then Tracey is jealous and Randolph is creepy.
If someone is frantic, then he is not creepy, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is creepy, then Cadman is not delightful.
Matthew being delightful and Matthew being jealous are equivalent to Tracey being frantic and Randolph being not successful.
Matthew being not uptight or Cadman being not successful implies that Matthew is frantic.
All not delightful people are not jealous.
If there is someone who is delightful, then Matthew is successful and Lincoln is uptight.
Matthew is not uptight if and only if Buck is successful and Matthew is creepy.
If there is at least one people who is creepy or uptight, then Buck is not frantic.
Someone is not uptight and delightful if and only if he is not jealous and creepy.
|
Buck is not creepy.
|
entailment
|
Tracey is uptight.
Lincoln is not frantic.
Morris is jealous.
Cadman is uptight.
Buck is frantic.
Lincoln is not successful.
Lincoln is creepy.
Tracey is not successful.
Buck is uptight.
Matthew is not jealous.
Randolph is not successful.
Tracey is not delightful.It can be concluded that Cadman is uptight once knowing that Buck is successful and Tracey is not creepy.
Someone is frantic if and only if he is not delightful.
If there is someone who is either not frantic or not successful, then Tracey is jealous and Randolph is creepy.
If someone is frantic, then he is not creepy, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is creepy, then Cadman is not delightful.
Matthew being delightful and Matthew being jealous are equivalent to Tracey being frantic and Randolph being not successful.
Matthew being not uptight or Cadman being not successful implies that Matthew is frantic.
All not delightful people are not jealous.
If there is someone who is delightful, then Matthew is successful and Lincoln is uptight.
Matthew is not uptight if and only if Buck is successful and Matthew is creepy.
If there is at least one people who is creepy or uptight, then Buck is not frantic.
Someone is not uptight and delightful if and only if he is not jealous and creepy.
|
Morris is successful.
|
neutral
|
Tracey is uptight.
Lincoln is not frantic.
Morris is jealous.
Cadman is uptight.
Buck is frantic.
Lincoln is not successful.
Lincoln is creepy.
Tracey is not successful.
Buck is uptight.
Matthew is not jealous.
Randolph is not successful.
Tracey is not delightful.It can be concluded that Cadman is uptight once knowing that Buck is successful and Tracey is not creepy.
Someone is frantic if and only if he is not delightful.
If there is someone who is either not frantic or not successful, then Tracey is jealous and Randolph is creepy.
If someone is frantic, then he is not creepy, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is creepy, then Cadman is not delightful.
Matthew being delightful and Matthew being jealous are equivalent to Tracey being frantic and Randolph being not successful.
Matthew being not uptight or Cadman being not successful implies that Matthew is frantic.
All not delightful people are not jealous.
If there is someone who is delightful, then Matthew is successful and Lincoln is uptight.
Matthew is not uptight if and only if Buck is successful and Matthew is creepy.
If there is at least one people who is creepy or uptight, then Buck is not frantic.
Someone is not uptight and delightful if and only if he is not jealous and creepy.
|
Cadman is not delightful.
|
entailment
|
Tracey is uptight.
Lincoln is not frantic.
Morris is jealous.
Cadman is uptight.
Buck is frantic.
Lincoln is not successful.
Lincoln is creepy.
Tracey is not successful.
Buck is uptight.
Matthew is not jealous.
Randolph is not successful.
Tracey is not delightful.It can be concluded that Cadman is uptight once knowing that Buck is successful and Tracey is not creepy.
Someone is frantic if and only if he is not delightful.
If there is someone who is either not frantic or not successful, then Tracey is jealous and Randolph is creepy.
If someone is frantic, then he is not creepy, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is creepy, then Cadman is not delightful.
Matthew being delightful and Matthew being jealous are equivalent to Tracey being frantic and Randolph being not successful.
Matthew being not uptight or Cadman being not successful implies that Matthew is frantic.
All not delightful people are not jealous.
If there is someone who is delightful, then Matthew is successful and Lincoln is uptight.
Matthew is not uptight if and only if Buck is successful and Matthew is creepy.
If there is at least one people who is creepy or uptight, then Buck is not frantic.
Someone is not uptight and delightful if and only if he is not jealous and creepy.
|
Randolph is creepy.
|
entailment
|
Tracey is uptight.
Lincoln is not frantic.
Morris is jealous.
Cadman is uptight.
Buck is frantic.
Lincoln is not successful.
Lincoln is creepy.
Tracey is not successful.
Buck is uptight.
Matthew is not jealous.
Randolph is not successful.
Tracey is not delightful.It can be concluded that Cadman is uptight once knowing that Buck is successful and Tracey is not creepy.
Someone is frantic if and only if he is not delightful.
If there is someone who is either not frantic or not successful, then Tracey is jealous and Randolph is creepy.
If someone is frantic, then he is not creepy, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is creepy, then Cadman is not delightful.
Matthew being delightful and Matthew being jealous are equivalent to Tracey being frantic and Randolph being not successful.
Matthew being not uptight or Cadman being not successful implies that Matthew is frantic.
All not delightful people are not jealous.
If there is someone who is delightful, then Matthew is successful and Lincoln is uptight.
Matthew is not uptight if and only if Buck is successful and Matthew is creepy.
If there is at least one people who is creepy or uptight, then Buck is not frantic.
Someone is not uptight and delightful if and only if he is not jealous and creepy.
|
Lincoln is not successful.
|
entailment
|
Tracey is uptight.
Lincoln is not frantic.
Morris is jealous.
Cadman is uptight.
Buck is frantic.
Lincoln is not successful.
Lincoln is creepy.
Tracey is not successful.
Buck is uptight.
Matthew is not jealous.
Randolph is not successful.
Tracey is not delightful.It can be concluded that Cadman is uptight once knowing that Buck is successful and Tracey is not creepy.
Someone is frantic if and only if he is not delightful.
If there is someone who is either not frantic or not successful, then Tracey is jealous and Randolph is creepy.
If someone is frantic, then he is not creepy, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is creepy, then Cadman is not delightful.
Matthew being delightful and Matthew being jealous are equivalent to Tracey being frantic and Randolph being not successful.
Matthew being not uptight or Cadman being not successful implies that Matthew is frantic.
All not delightful people are not jealous.
If there is someone who is delightful, then Matthew is successful and Lincoln is uptight.
Matthew is not uptight if and only if Buck is successful and Matthew is creepy.
If there is at least one people who is creepy or uptight, then Buck is not frantic.
Someone is not uptight and delightful if and only if he is not jealous and creepy.
|
Buck is not frantic.
|
self_contradiction
|
Tracey is uptight.
Lincoln is not frantic.
Morris is jealous.
Cadman is uptight.
Buck is frantic.
Lincoln is not successful.
Lincoln is creepy.
Tracey is not successful.
Buck is uptight.
Matthew is not jealous.
Randolph is not successful.
Tracey is not delightful.It can be concluded that Cadman is uptight once knowing that Buck is successful and Tracey is not creepy.
Someone is frantic if and only if he is not delightful.
If there is someone who is either not frantic or not successful, then Tracey is jealous and Randolph is creepy.
If someone is frantic, then he is not creepy, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is creepy, then Cadman is not delightful.
Matthew being delightful and Matthew being jealous are equivalent to Tracey being frantic and Randolph being not successful.
Matthew being not uptight or Cadman being not successful implies that Matthew is frantic.
All not delightful people are not jealous.
If there is someone who is delightful, then Matthew is successful and Lincoln is uptight.
Matthew is not uptight if and only if Buck is successful and Matthew is creepy.
If there is at least one people who is creepy or uptight, then Buck is not frantic.
Someone is not uptight and delightful if and only if he is not jealous and creepy.
|
Lincoln is delightful.
|
neutral
|
Tracey is uptight.
Lincoln is not frantic.
Morris is jealous.
Cadman is uptight.
Buck is frantic.
Lincoln is not successful.
Lincoln is creepy.
Tracey is not successful.
Buck is uptight.
Matthew is not jealous.
Randolph is not successful.
Tracey is not delightful.It can be concluded that Cadman is uptight once knowing that Buck is successful and Tracey is not creepy.
Someone is frantic if and only if he is not delightful.
If there is someone who is either not frantic or not successful, then Tracey is jealous and Randolph is creepy.
If someone is frantic, then he is not creepy, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is creepy, then Cadman is not delightful.
Matthew being delightful and Matthew being jealous are equivalent to Tracey being frantic and Randolph being not successful.
Matthew being not uptight or Cadman being not successful implies that Matthew is frantic.
All not delightful people are not jealous.
If there is someone who is delightful, then Matthew is successful and Lincoln is uptight.
Matthew is not uptight if and only if Buck is successful and Matthew is creepy.
If there is at least one people who is creepy or uptight, then Buck is not frantic.
Someone is not uptight and delightful if and only if he is not jealous and creepy.
|
Tracey is successful.
|
contradiction
|
Johnny is not lucky.
Henry is versatile.
Henry is lucky.
Sophia is not versatile.
Trent is not thoughtless.
Henry is not unsightly.
Rosie is not thoughtless.
Neil is ugliest.
Henry is blue.
Sophia is not unsightly.
Sophia is blue.
Trent is not lucky.If someone is blue or not unsightly, then he is not versatile.
It can be concluded that Trent is ugliest once knowing that Henry is not versatile.
If Neil is not thoughtless and Henry is unsightly, then Trent is blue.
Someone is unsightly and blue if and only if he is ugliest.
If there is at least one people who is lucky, then Neil is versatile and Isaac is ugliest.
If there is someone who is both unsightly and ugliest, then Sophia is blue and Henry is not thoughtless.
As long as someone is not unsightly, he is not thoughtless and not lucky.
If everyone is not lucky or not unsightly, then Henry is not blue.
If there is someone who is ugliest, then Rosie is thoughtless.
If someone who is not unsightly is also versatile, then he is not lucky.
If someone is unsightly, then he is versatile.
It can be concluded that Neil is not unsightly once knowing that Henry is versatile and Trent is ugliest.
|
Isaac is blue.
|
entailment
|
Johnny is not lucky.
Henry is versatile.
Henry is lucky.
Sophia is not versatile.
Trent is not thoughtless.
Henry is not unsightly.
Rosie is not thoughtless.
Neil is ugliest.
Henry is blue.
Sophia is not unsightly.
Sophia is blue.
Trent is not lucky.If someone is blue or not unsightly, then he is not versatile.
It can be concluded that Trent is ugliest once knowing that Henry is not versatile.
If Neil is not thoughtless and Henry is unsightly, then Trent is blue.
Someone is unsightly and blue if and only if he is ugliest.
If there is at least one people who is lucky, then Neil is versatile and Isaac is ugliest.
If there is someone who is both unsightly and ugliest, then Sophia is blue and Henry is not thoughtless.
As long as someone is not unsightly, he is not thoughtless and not lucky.
If everyone is not lucky or not unsightly, then Henry is not blue.
If there is someone who is ugliest, then Rosie is thoughtless.
If someone who is not unsightly is also versatile, then he is not lucky.
If someone is unsightly, then he is versatile.
It can be concluded that Neil is not unsightly once knowing that Henry is versatile and Trent is ugliest.
|
Isaac is not blue.
|
contradiction
|
Johnny is not lucky.
Henry is versatile.
Henry is lucky.
Sophia is not versatile.
Trent is not thoughtless.
Henry is not unsightly.
Rosie is not thoughtless.
Neil is ugliest.
Henry is blue.
Sophia is not unsightly.
Sophia is blue.
Trent is not lucky.If someone is blue or not unsightly, then he is not versatile.
It can be concluded that Trent is ugliest once knowing that Henry is not versatile.
If Neil is not thoughtless and Henry is unsightly, then Trent is blue.
Someone is unsightly and blue if and only if he is ugliest.
If there is at least one people who is lucky, then Neil is versatile and Isaac is ugliest.
If there is someone who is both unsightly and ugliest, then Sophia is blue and Henry is not thoughtless.
As long as someone is not unsightly, he is not thoughtless and not lucky.
If everyone is not lucky or not unsightly, then Henry is not blue.
If there is someone who is ugliest, then Rosie is thoughtless.
If someone who is not unsightly is also versatile, then he is not lucky.
If someone is unsightly, then he is versatile.
It can be concluded that Neil is not unsightly once knowing that Henry is versatile and Trent is ugliest.
|
Sophia is not unsightly.
|
entailment
|
Johnny is not lucky.
Henry is versatile.
Henry is lucky.
Sophia is not versatile.
Trent is not thoughtless.
Henry is not unsightly.
Rosie is not thoughtless.
Neil is ugliest.
Henry is blue.
Sophia is not unsightly.
Sophia is blue.
Trent is not lucky.If someone is blue or not unsightly, then he is not versatile.
It can be concluded that Trent is ugliest once knowing that Henry is not versatile.
If Neil is not thoughtless and Henry is unsightly, then Trent is blue.
Someone is unsightly and blue if and only if he is ugliest.
If there is at least one people who is lucky, then Neil is versatile and Isaac is ugliest.
If there is someone who is both unsightly and ugliest, then Sophia is blue and Henry is not thoughtless.
As long as someone is not unsightly, he is not thoughtless and not lucky.
If everyone is not lucky or not unsightly, then Henry is not blue.
If there is someone who is ugliest, then Rosie is thoughtless.
If someone who is not unsightly is also versatile, then he is not lucky.
If someone is unsightly, then he is versatile.
It can be concluded that Neil is not unsightly once knowing that Henry is versatile and Trent is ugliest.
|
Neil is thoughtless.
|
contradiction
|
Johnny is not lucky.
Henry is versatile.
Henry is lucky.
Sophia is not versatile.
Trent is not thoughtless.
Henry is not unsightly.
Rosie is not thoughtless.
Neil is ugliest.
Henry is blue.
Sophia is not unsightly.
Sophia is blue.
Trent is not lucky.If someone is blue or not unsightly, then he is not versatile.
It can be concluded that Trent is ugliest once knowing that Henry is not versatile.
If Neil is not thoughtless and Henry is unsightly, then Trent is blue.
Someone is unsightly and blue if and only if he is ugliest.
If there is at least one people who is lucky, then Neil is versatile and Isaac is ugliest.
If there is someone who is both unsightly and ugliest, then Sophia is blue and Henry is not thoughtless.
As long as someone is not unsightly, he is not thoughtless and not lucky.
If everyone is not lucky or not unsightly, then Henry is not blue.
If there is someone who is ugliest, then Rosie is thoughtless.
If someone who is not unsightly is also versatile, then he is not lucky.
If someone is unsightly, then he is versatile.
It can be concluded that Neil is not unsightly once knowing that Henry is versatile and Trent is ugliest.
|
Sophia is versatile.
|
contradiction
|
Johnny is not lucky.
Henry is versatile.
Henry is lucky.
Sophia is not versatile.
Trent is not thoughtless.
Henry is not unsightly.
Rosie is not thoughtless.
Neil is ugliest.
Henry is blue.
Sophia is not unsightly.
Sophia is blue.
Trent is not lucky.If someone is blue or not unsightly, then he is not versatile.
It can be concluded that Trent is ugliest once knowing that Henry is not versatile.
If Neil is not thoughtless and Henry is unsightly, then Trent is blue.
Someone is unsightly and blue if and only if he is ugliest.
If there is at least one people who is lucky, then Neil is versatile and Isaac is ugliest.
If there is someone who is both unsightly and ugliest, then Sophia is blue and Henry is not thoughtless.
As long as someone is not unsightly, he is not thoughtless and not lucky.
If everyone is not lucky or not unsightly, then Henry is not blue.
If there is someone who is ugliest, then Rosie is thoughtless.
If someone who is not unsightly is also versatile, then he is not lucky.
If someone is unsightly, then he is versatile.
It can be concluded that Neil is not unsightly once knowing that Henry is versatile and Trent is ugliest.
|
Isaac is thoughtless.
|
neutral
|
Johnny is not lucky.
Henry is versatile.
Henry is lucky.
Sophia is not versatile.
Trent is not thoughtless.
Henry is not unsightly.
Rosie is not thoughtless.
Neil is ugliest.
Henry is blue.
Sophia is not unsightly.
Sophia is blue.
Trent is not lucky.If someone is blue or not unsightly, then he is not versatile.
It can be concluded that Trent is ugliest once knowing that Henry is not versatile.
If Neil is not thoughtless and Henry is unsightly, then Trent is blue.
Someone is unsightly and blue if and only if he is ugliest.
If there is at least one people who is lucky, then Neil is versatile and Isaac is ugliest.
If there is someone who is both unsightly and ugliest, then Sophia is blue and Henry is not thoughtless.
As long as someone is not unsightly, he is not thoughtless and not lucky.
If everyone is not lucky or not unsightly, then Henry is not blue.
If there is someone who is ugliest, then Rosie is thoughtless.
If someone who is not unsightly is also versatile, then he is not lucky.
If someone is unsightly, then he is versatile.
It can be concluded that Neil is not unsightly once knowing that Henry is versatile and Trent is ugliest.
|
Henry is not lucky.
|
self_contradiction
|
Johnny is not lucky.
Henry is versatile.
Henry is lucky.
Sophia is not versatile.
Trent is not thoughtless.
Henry is not unsightly.
Rosie is not thoughtless.
Neil is ugliest.
Henry is blue.
Sophia is not unsightly.
Sophia is blue.
Trent is not lucky.If someone is blue or not unsightly, then he is not versatile.
It can be concluded that Trent is ugliest once knowing that Henry is not versatile.
If Neil is not thoughtless and Henry is unsightly, then Trent is blue.
Someone is unsightly and blue if and only if he is ugliest.
If there is at least one people who is lucky, then Neil is versatile and Isaac is ugliest.
If there is someone who is both unsightly and ugliest, then Sophia is blue and Henry is not thoughtless.
As long as someone is not unsightly, he is not thoughtless and not lucky.
If everyone is not lucky or not unsightly, then Henry is not blue.
If there is someone who is ugliest, then Rosie is thoughtless.
If someone who is not unsightly is also versatile, then he is not lucky.
If someone is unsightly, then he is versatile.
It can be concluded that Neil is not unsightly once knowing that Henry is versatile and Trent is ugliest.
|
Johnny is not lucky.
|
entailment
|
Johnny is not lucky.
Henry is versatile.
Henry is lucky.
Sophia is not versatile.
Trent is not thoughtless.
Henry is not unsightly.
Rosie is not thoughtless.
Neil is ugliest.
Henry is blue.
Sophia is not unsightly.
Sophia is blue.
Trent is not lucky.If someone is blue or not unsightly, then he is not versatile.
It can be concluded that Trent is ugliest once knowing that Henry is not versatile.
If Neil is not thoughtless and Henry is unsightly, then Trent is blue.
Someone is unsightly and blue if and only if he is ugliest.
If there is at least one people who is lucky, then Neil is versatile and Isaac is ugliest.
If there is someone who is both unsightly and ugliest, then Sophia is blue and Henry is not thoughtless.
As long as someone is not unsightly, he is not thoughtless and not lucky.
If everyone is not lucky or not unsightly, then Henry is not blue.
If there is someone who is ugliest, then Rosie is thoughtless.
If someone who is not unsightly is also versatile, then he is not lucky.
If someone is unsightly, then he is versatile.
It can be concluded that Neil is not unsightly once knowing that Henry is versatile and Trent is ugliest.
|
Rosie is thoughtless.
|
self_contradiction
|
Johnny is not lucky.
Henry is versatile.
Henry is lucky.
Sophia is not versatile.
Trent is not thoughtless.
Henry is not unsightly.
Rosie is not thoughtless.
Neil is ugliest.
Henry is blue.
Sophia is not unsightly.
Sophia is blue.
Trent is not lucky.If someone is blue or not unsightly, then he is not versatile.
It can be concluded that Trent is ugliest once knowing that Henry is not versatile.
If Neil is not thoughtless and Henry is unsightly, then Trent is blue.
Someone is unsightly and blue if and only if he is ugliest.
If there is at least one people who is lucky, then Neil is versatile and Isaac is ugliest.
If there is someone who is both unsightly and ugliest, then Sophia is blue and Henry is not thoughtless.
As long as someone is not unsightly, he is not thoughtless and not lucky.
If everyone is not lucky or not unsightly, then Henry is not blue.
If there is someone who is ugliest, then Rosie is thoughtless.
If someone who is not unsightly is also versatile, then he is not lucky.
If someone is unsightly, then he is versatile.
It can be concluded that Neil is not unsightly once knowing that Henry is versatile and Trent is ugliest.
|
Neil is ugliest.
|
entailment
|
Johnny is not lucky.
Henry is versatile.
Henry is lucky.
Sophia is not versatile.
Trent is not thoughtless.
Henry is not unsightly.
Rosie is not thoughtless.
Neil is ugliest.
Henry is blue.
Sophia is not unsightly.
Sophia is blue.
Trent is not lucky.If someone is blue or not unsightly, then he is not versatile.
It can be concluded that Trent is ugliest once knowing that Henry is not versatile.
If Neil is not thoughtless and Henry is unsightly, then Trent is blue.
Someone is unsightly and blue if and only if he is ugliest.
If there is at least one people who is lucky, then Neil is versatile and Isaac is ugliest.
If there is someone who is both unsightly and ugliest, then Sophia is blue and Henry is not thoughtless.
As long as someone is not unsightly, he is not thoughtless and not lucky.
If everyone is not lucky or not unsightly, then Henry is not blue.
If there is someone who is ugliest, then Rosie is thoughtless.
If someone who is not unsightly is also versatile, then he is not lucky.
If someone is unsightly, then he is versatile.
It can be concluded that Neil is not unsightly once knowing that Henry is versatile and Trent is ugliest.
|
Rosie is not unsightly.
|
neutral
|
Johnny is not lucky.
Henry is versatile.
Henry is lucky.
Sophia is not versatile.
Trent is not thoughtless.
Henry is not unsightly.
Rosie is not thoughtless.
Neil is ugliest.
Henry is blue.
Sophia is not unsightly.
Sophia is blue.
Trent is not lucky.If someone is blue or not unsightly, then he is not versatile.
It can be concluded that Trent is ugliest once knowing that Henry is not versatile.
If Neil is not thoughtless and Henry is unsightly, then Trent is blue.
Someone is unsightly and blue if and only if he is ugliest.
If there is at least one people who is lucky, then Neil is versatile and Isaac is ugliest.
If there is someone who is both unsightly and ugliest, then Sophia is blue and Henry is not thoughtless.
As long as someone is not unsightly, he is not thoughtless and not lucky.
If everyone is not lucky or not unsightly, then Henry is not blue.
If there is someone who is ugliest, then Rosie is thoughtless.
If someone who is not unsightly is also versatile, then he is not lucky.
If someone is unsightly, then he is versatile.
It can be concluded that Neil is not unsightly once knowing that Henry is versatile and Trent is ugliest.
|
Henry is lucky.
|
self_contradiction
|
Johnny is not lucky.
Henry is versatile.
Henry is lucky.
Sophia is not versatile.
Trent is not thoughtless.
Henry is not unsightly.
Rosie is not thoughtless.
Neil is ugliest.
Henry is blue.
Sophia is not unsightly.
Sophia is blue.
Trent is not lucky.If someone is blue or not unsightly, then he is not versatile.
It can be concluded that Trent is ugliest once knowing that Henry is not versatile.
If Neil is not thoughtless and Henry is unsightly, then Trent is blue.
Someone is unsightly and blue if and only if he is ugliest.
If there is at least one people who is lucky, then Neil is versatile and Isaac is ugliest.
If there is someone who is both unsightly and ugliest, then Sophia is blue and Henry is not thoughtless.
As long as someone is not unsightly, he is not thoughtless and not lucky.
If everyone is not lucky or not unsightly, then Henry is not blue.
If there is someone who is ugliest, then Rosie is thoughtless.
If someone who is not unsightly is also versatile, then he is not lucky.
If someone is unsightly, then he is versatile.
It can be concluded that Neil is not unsightly once knowing that Henry is versatile and Trent is ugliest.
|
Isaac is unsightly.
|
entailment
|
Johnny is not lucky.
Henry is versatile.
Henry is lucky.
Sophia is not versatile.
Trent is not thoughtless.
Henry is not unsightly.
Rosie is not thoughtless.
Neil is ugliest.
Henry is blue.
Sophia is not unsightly.
Sophia is blue.
Trent is not lucky.If someone is blue or not unsightly, then he is not versatile.
It can be concluded that Trent is ugliest once knowing that Henry is not versatile.
If Neil is not thoughtless and Henry is unsightly, then Trent is blue.
Someone is unsightly and blue if and only if he is ugliest.
If there is at least one people who is lucky, then Neil is versatile and Isaac is ugliest.
If there is someone who is both unsightly and ugliest, then Sophia is blue and Henry is not thoughtless.
As long as someone is not unsightly, he is not thoughtless and not lucky.
If everyone is not lucky or not unsightly, then Henry is not blue.
If there is someone who is ugliest, then Rosie is thoughtless.
If someone who is not unsightly is also versatile, then he is not lucky.
If someone is unsightly, then he is versatile.
It can be concluded that Neil is not unsightly once knowing that Henry is versatile and Trent is ugliest.
|
Sophia is lucky.
|
contradiction
|
Johnny is not lucky.
Henry is versatile.
Henry is lucky.
Sophia is not versatile.
Trent is not thoughtless.
Henry is not unsightly.
Rosie is not thoughtless.
Neil is ugliest.
Henry is blue.
Sophia is not unsightly.
Sophia is blue.
Trent is not lucky.If someone is blue or not unsightly, then he is not versatile.
It can be concluded that Trent is ugliest once knowing that Henry is not versatile.
If Neil is not thoughtless and Henry is unsightly, then Trent is blue.
Someone is unsightly and blue if and only if he is ugliest.
If there is at least one people who is lucky, then Neil is versatile and Isaac is ugliest.
If there is someone who is both unsightly and ugliest, then Sophia is blue and Henry is not thoughtless.
As long as someone is not unsightly, he is not thoughtless and not lucky.
If everyone is not lucky or not unsightly, then Henry is not blue.
If there is someone who is ugliest, then Rosie is thoughtless.
If someone who is not unsightly is also versatile, then he is not lucky.
If someone is unsightly, then he is versatile.
It can be concluded that Neil is not unsightly once knowing that Henry is versatile and Trent is ugliest.
|
Johnny is not blue.
|
neutral
|
Johnny is not lucky.
Henry is versatile.
Henry is lucky.
Sophia is not versatile.
Trent is not thoughtless.
Henry is not unsightly.
Rosie is not thoughtless.
Neil is ugliest.
Henry is blue.
Sophia is not unsightly.
Sophia is blue.
Trent is not lucky.If someone is blue or not unsightly, then he is not versatile.
It can be concluded that Trent is ugliest once knowing that Henry is not versatile.
If Neil is not thoughtless and Henry is unsightly, then Trent is blue.
Someone is unsightly and blue if and only if he is ugliest.
If there is at least one people who is lucky, then Neil is versatile and Isaac is ugliest.
If there is someone who is both unsightly and ugliest, then Sophia is blue and Henry is not thoughtless.
As long as someone is not unsightly, he is not thoughtless and not lucky.
If everyone is not lucky or not unsightly, then Henry is not blue.
If there is someone who is ugliest, then Rosie is thoughtless.
If someone who is not unsightly is also versatile, then he is not lucky.
If someone is unsightly, then he is versatile.
It can be concluded that Neil is not unsightly once knowing that Henry is versatile and Trent is ugliest.
|
Neil is not versatile.
|
self_contradiction
|
Johnny is not lucky.
Henry is versatile.
Henry is lucky.
Sophia is not versatile.
Trent is not thoughtless.
Henry is not unsightly.
Rosie is not thoughtless.
Neil is ugliest.
Henry is blue.
Sophia is not unsightly.
Sophia is blue.
Trent is not lucky.If someone is blue or not unsightly, then he is not versatile.
It can be concluded that Trent is ugliest once knowing that Henry is not versatile.
If Neil is not thoughtless and Henry is unsightly, then Trent is blue.
Someone is unsightly and blue if and only if he is ugliest.
If there is at least one people who is lucky, then Neil is versatile and Isaac is ugliest.
If there is someone who is both unsightly and ugliest, then Sophia is blue and Henry is not thoughtless.
As long as someone is not unsightly, he is not thoughtless and not lucky.
If everyone is not lucky or not unsightly, then Henry is not blue.
If there is someone who is ugliest, then Rosie is thoughtless.
If someone who is not unsightly is also versatile, then he is not lucky.
If someone is unsightly, then he is versatile.
It can be concluded that Neil is not unsightly once knowing that Henry is versatile and Trent is ugliest.
|
Johnny is not versatile.
|
neutral
|
Johnny is not lucky.
Henry is versatile.
Henry is lucky.
Sophia is not versatile.
Trent is not thoughtless.
Henry is not unsightly.
Rosie is not thoughtless.
Neil is ugliest.
Henry is blue.
Sophia is not unsightly.
Sophia is blue.
Trent is not lucky.If someone is blue or not unsightly, then he is not versatile.
It can be concluded that Trent is ugliest once knowing that Henry is not versatile.
If Neil is not thoughtless and Henry is unsightly, then Trent is blue.
Someone is unsightly and blue if and only if he is ugliest.
If there is at least one people who is lucky, then Neil is versatile and Isaac is ugliest.
If there is someone who is both unsightly and ugliest, then Sophia is blue and Henry is not thoughtless.
As long as someone is not unsightly, he is not thoughtless and not lucky.
If everyone is not lucky or not unsightly, then Henry is not blue.
If there is someone who is ugliest, then Rosie is thoughtless.
If someone who is not unsightly is also versatile, then he is not lucky.
If someone is unsightly, then he is versatile.
It can be concluded that Neil is not unsightly once knowing that Henry is versatile and Trent is ugliest.
|
Rosie is unsightly.
|
neutral
|
Johnny is not lucky.
Henry is versatile.
Henry is lucky.
Sophia is not versatile.
Trent is not thoughtless.
Henry is not unsightly.
Rosie is not thoughtless.
Neil is ugliest.
Henry is blue.
Sophia is not unsightly.
Sophia is blue.
Trent is not lucky.If someone is blue or not unsightly, then he is not versatile.
It can be concluded that Trent is ugliest once knowing that Henry is not versatile.
If Neil is not thoughtless and Henry is unsightly, then Trent is blue.
Someone is unsightly and blue if and only if he is ugliest.
If there is at least one people who is lucky, then Neil is versatile and Isaac is ugliest.
If there is someone who is both unsightly and ugliest, then Sophia is blue and Henry is not thoughtless.
As long as someone is not unsightly, he is not thoughtless and not lucky.
If everyone is not lucky or not unsightly, then Henry is not blue.
If there is someone who is ugliest, then Rosie is thoughtless.
If someone who is not unsightly is also versatile, then he is not lucky.
If someone is unsightly, then he is versatile.
It can be concluded that Neil is not unsightly once knowing that Henry is versatile and Trent is ugliest.
|
Isaac is versatile.
|
self_contradiction
|
Johnny is not lucky.
Henry is versatile.
Henry is lucky.
Sophia is not versatile.
Trent is not thoughtless.
Henry is not unsightly.
Rosie is not thoughtless.
Neil is ugliest.
Henry is blue.
Sophia is not unsightly.
Sophia is blue.
Trent is not lucky.If someone is blue or not unsightly, then he is not versatile.
It can be concluded that Trent is ugliest once knowing that Henry is not versatile.
If Neil is not thoughtless and Henry is unsightly, then Trent is blue.
Someone is unsightly and blue if and only if he is ugliest.
If there is at least one people who is lucky, then Neil is versatile and Isaac is ugliest.
If there is someone who is both unsightly and ugliest, then Sophia is blue and Henry is not thoughtless.
As long as someone is not unsightly, he is not thoughtless and not lucky.
If everyone is not lucky or not unsightly, then Henry is not blue.
If there is someone who is ugliest, then Rosie is thoughtless.
If someone who is not unsightly is also versatile, then he is not lucky.
If someone is unsightly, then he is versatile.
It can be concluded that Neil is not unsightly once knowing that Henry is versatile and Trent is ugliest.
|
Isaac is not ugliest.
|
contradiction
|
Arthur is famous.
Kelvin is not wrong.
Kelvin is not excited.
Quinn is not rare.
Charlie is weak.
Kelvin is rare.
Gresham is not wrong.
Gresham is not shallow.
Arthur is rare.
Charlie is shallow.
Arthur is not weak.
Gresham is not rare.Someone who is both rare and not shallow is always wrong.
If Kelvin is not excited or Johnny is rare, then Charlie is famous.
Charlie being famous implies that Albern is not shallow.
If there is someone who is famous, then Kelvin is excited and Albern is not weak.
If there is someone who is both not shallow and not excited, then Johnny is rare.
If everyone is excited, then Kelvin is not weak and Arthur is shallow.
If Quinn is not shallow or Kelvin is weak, then Charlie is famous.
Johnny being shallow is equivalent to Gresham being excited and Arthur being rare.
Someone being both not shallow and famous is equivalent to being rare and not wrong.
Someone being both not rare and not famous is equivalent to being not weak.
It can be concluded that Johnny is not excited once knowing that Arthur is rare.
Someone is excited and weak if and only if he is famous.
|
Arthur is not famous.
|
self_contradiction
|
Arthur is famous.
Kelvin is not wrong.
Kelvin is not excited.
Quinn is not rare.
Charlie is weak.
Kelvin is rare.
Gresham is not wrong.
Gresham is not shallow.
Arthur is rare.
Charlie is shallow.
Arthur is not weak.
Gresham is not rare.Someone who is both rare and not shallow is always wrong.
If Kelvin is not excited or Johnny is rare, then Charlie is famous.
Charlie being famous implies that Albern is not shallow.
If there is someone who is famous, then Kelvin is excited and Albern is not weak.
If there is someone who is both not shallow and not excited, then Johnny is rare.
If everyone is excited, then Kelvin is not weak and Arthur is shallow.
If Quinn is not shallow or Kelvin is weak, then Charlie is famous.
Johnny being shallow is equivalent to Gresham being excited and Arthur being rare.
Someone being both not shallow and famous is equivalent to being rare and not wrong.
Someone being both not rare and not famous is equivalent to being not weak.
It can be concluded that Johnny is not excited once knowing that Arthur is rare.
Someone is excited and weak if and only if he is famous.
|
Kelvin is excited.
|
self_contradiction
|
Arthur is famous.
Kelvin is not wrong.
Kelvin is not excited.
Quinn is not rare.
Charlie is weak.
Kelvin is rare.
Gresham is not wrong.
Gresham is not shallow.
Arthur is rare.
Charlie is shallow.
Arthur is not weak.
Gresham is not rare.Someone who is both rare and not shallow is always wrong.
If Kelvin is not excited or Johnny is rare, then Charlie is famous.
Charlie being famous implies that Albern is not shallow.
If there is someone who is famous, then Kelvin is excited and Albern is not weak.
If there is someone who is both not shallow and not excited, then Johnny is rare.
If everyone is excited, then Kelvin is not weak and Arthur is shallow.
If Quinn is not shallow or Kelvin is weak, then Charlie is famous.
Johnny being shallow is equivalent to Gresham being excited and Arthur being rare.
Someone being both not shallow and famous is equivalent to being rare and not wrong.
Someone being both not rare and not famous is equivalent to being not weak.
It can be concluded that Johnny is not excited once knowing that Arthur is rare.
Someone is excited and weak if and only if he is famous.
|
Albern is not shallow.
|
entailment
|
Arthur is famous.
Kelvin is not wrong.
Kelvin is not excited.
Quinn is not rare.
Charlie is weak.
Kelvin is rare.
Gresham is not wrong.
Gresham is not shallow.
Arthur is rare.
Charlie is shallow.
Arthur is not weak.
Gresham is not rare.Someone who is both rare and not shallow is always wrong.
If Kelvin is not excited or Johnny is rare, then Charlie is famous.
Charlie being famous implies that Albern is not shallow.
If there is someone who is famous, then Kelvin is excited and Albern is not weak.
If there is someone who is both not shallow and not excited, then Johnny is rare.
If everyone is excited, then Kelvin is not weak and Arthur is shallow.
If Quinn is not shallow or Kelvin is weak, then Charlie is famous.
Johnny being shallow is equivalent to Gresham being excited and Arthur being rare.
Someone being both not shallow and famous is equivalent to being rare and not wrong.
Someone being both not rare and not famous is equivalent to being not weak.
It can be concluded that Johnny is not excited once knowing that Arthur is rare.
Someone is excited and weak if and only if he is famous.
|
Gresham is rare.
|
contradiction
|
Arthur is famous.
Kelvin is not wrong.
Kelvin is not excited.
Quinn is not rare.
Charlie is weak.
Kelvin is rare.
Gresham is not wrong.
Gresham is not shallow.
Arthur is rare.
Charlie is shallow.
Arthur is not weak.
Gresham is not rare.Someone who is both rare and not shallow is always wrong.
If Kelvin is not excited or Johnny is rare, then Charlie is famous.
Charlie being famous implies that Albern is not shallow.
If there is someone who is famous, then Kelvin is excited and Albern is not weak.
If there is someone who is both not shallow and not excited, then Johnny is rare.
If everyone is excited, then Kelvin is not weak and Arthur is shallow.
If Quinn is not shallow or Kelvin is weak, then Charlie is famous.
Johnny being shallow is equivalent to Gresham being excited and Arthur being rare.
Someone being both not shallow and famous is equivalent to being rare and not wrong.
Someone being both not rare and not famous is equivalent to being not weak.
It can be concluded that Johnny is not excited once knowing that Arthur is rare.
Someone is excited and weak if and only if he is famous.
|
Kelvin is wrong.
|
self_contradiction
|
Arthur is famous.
Kelvin is not wrong.
Kelvin is not excited.
Quinn is not rare.
Charlie is weak.
Kelvin is rare.
Gresham is not wrong.
Gresham is not shallow.
Arthur is rare.
Charlie is shallow.
Arthur is not weak.
Gresham is not rare.Someone who is both rare and not shallow is always wrong.
If Kelvin is not excited or Johnny is rare, then Charlie is famous.
Charlie being famous implies that Albern is not shallow.
If there is someone who is famous, then Kelvin is excited and Albern is not weak.
If there is someone who is both not shallow and not excited, then Johnny is rare.
If everyone is excited, then Kelvin is not weak and Arthur is shallow.
If Quinn is not shallow or Kelvin is weak, then Charlie is famous.
Johnny being shallow is equivalent to Gresham being excited and Arthur being rare.
Someone being both not shallow and famous is equivalent to being rare and not wrong.
Someone being both not rare and not famous is equivalent to being not weak.
It can be concluded that Johnny is not excited once knowing that Arthur is rare.
Someone is excited and weak if and only if he is famous.
|
Johnny is not rare.
|
contradiction
|
Arthur is famous.
Kelvin is not wrong.
Kelvin is not excited.
Quinn is not rare.
Charlie is weak.
Kelvin is rare.
Gresham is not wrong.
Gresham is not shallow.
Arthur is rare.
Charlie is shallow.
Arthur is not weak.
Gresham is not rare.Someone who is both rare and not shallow is always wrong.
If Kelvin is not excited or Johnny is rare, then Charlie is famous.
Charlie being famous implies that Albern is not shallow.
If there is someone who is famous, then Kelvin is excited and Albern is not weak.
If there is someone who is both not shallow and not excited, then Johnny is rare.
If everyone is excited, then Kelvin is not weak and Arthur is shallow.
If Quinn is not shallow or Kelvin is weak, then Charlie is famous.
Johnny being shallow is equivalent to Gresham being excited and Arthur being rare.
Someone being both not shallow and famous is equivalent to being rare and not wrong.
Someone being both not rare and not famous is equivalent to being not weak.
It can be concluded that Johnny is not excited once knowing that Arthur is rare.
Someone is excited and weak if and only if he is famous.
|
Charlie is not shallow.
|
contradiction
|
Arthur is famous.
Kelvin is not wrong.
Kelvin is not excited.
Quinn is not rare.
Charlie is weak.
Kelvin is rare.
Gresham is not wrong.
Gresham is not shallow.
Arthur is rare.
Charlie is shallow.
Arthur is not weak.
Gresham is not rare.Someone who is both rare and not shallow is always wrong.
If Kelvin is not excited or Johnny is rare, then Charlie is famous.
Charlie being famous implies that Albern is not shallow.
If there is someone who is famous, then Kelvin is excited and Albern is not weak.
If there is someone who is both not shallow and not excited, then Johnny is rare.
If everyone is excited, then Kelvin is not weak and Arthur is shallow.
If Quinn is not shallow or Kelvin is weak, then Charlie is famous.
Johnny being shallow is equivalent to Gresham being excited and Arthur being rare.
Someone being both not shallow and famous is equivalent to being rare and not wrong.
Someone being both not rare and not famous is equivalent to being not weak.
It can be concluded that Johnny is not excited once knowing that Arthur is rare.
Someone is excited and weak if and only if he is famous.
|
Johnny is not famous.
|
neutral
|
Arthur is famous.
Kelvin is not wrong.
Kelvin is not excited.
Quinn is not rare.
Charlie is weak.
Kelvin is rare.
Gresham is not wrong.
Gresham is not shallow.
Arthur is rare.
Charlie is shallow.
Arthur is not weak.
Gresham is not rare.Someone who is both rare and not shallow is always wrong.
If Kelvin is not excited or Johnny is rare, then Charlie is famous.
Charlie being famous implies that Albern is not shallow.
If there is someone who is famous, then Kelvin is excited and Albern is not weak.
If there is someone who is both not shallow and not excited, then Johnny is rare.
If everyone is excited, then Kelvin is not weak and Arthur is shallow.
If Quinn is not shallow or Kelvin is weak, then Charlie is famous.
Johnny being shallow is equivalent to Gresham being excited and Arthur being rare.
Someone being both not shallow and famous is equivalent to being rare and not wrong.
Someone being both not rare and not famous is equivalent to being not weak.
It can be concluded that Johnny is not excited once knowing that Arthur is rare.
Someone is excited and weak if and only if he is famous.
|
Arthur is not rare.
|
self_contradiction
|
Arthur is famous.
Kelvin is not wrong.
Kelvin is not excited.
Quinn is not rare.
Charlie is weak.
Kelvin is rare.
Gresham is not wrong.
Gresham is not shallow.
Arthur is rare.
Charlie is shallow.
Arthur is not weak.
Gresham is not rare.Someone who is both rare and not shallow is always wrong.
If Kelvin is not excited or Johnny is rare, then Charlie is famous.
Charlie being famous implies that Albern is not shallow.
If there is someone who is famous, then Kelvin is excited and Albern is not weak.
If there is someone who is both not shallow and not excited, then Johnny is rare.
If everyone is excited, then Kelvin is not weak and Arthur is shallow.
If Quinn is not shallow or Kelvin is weak, then Charlie is famous.
Johnny being shallow is equivalent to Gresham being excited and Arthur being rare.
Someone being both not shallow and famous is equivalent to being rare and not wrong.
Someone being both not rare and not famous is equivalent to being not weak.
It can be concluded that Johnny is not excited once knowing that Arthur is rare.
Someone is excited and weak if and only if he is famous.
|
Quinn is not famous.
|
neutral
|
Arthur is famous.
Kelvin is not wrong.
Kelvin is not excited.
Quinn is not rare.
Charlie is weak.
Kelvin is rare.
Gresham is not wrong.
Gresham is not shallow.
Arthur is rare.
Charlie is shallow.
Arthur is not weak.
Gresham is not rare.Someone who is both rare and not shallow is always wrong.
If Kelvin is not excited or Johnny is rare, then Charlie is famous.
Charlie being famous implies that Albern is not shallow.
If there is someone who is famous, then Kelvin is excited and Albern is not weak.
If there is someone who is both not shallow and not excited, then Johnny is rare.
If everyone is excited, then Kelvin is not weak and Arthur is shallow.
If Quinn is not shallow or Kelvin is weak, then Charlie is famous.
Johnny being shallow is equivalent to Gresham being excited and Arthur being rare.
Someone being both not shallow and famous is equivalent to being rare and not wrong.
Someone being both not rare and not famous is equivalent to being not weak.
It can be concluded that Johnny is not excited once knowing that Arthur is rare.
Someone is excited and weak if and only if he is famous.
|
Gresham is famous.
|
neutral
|
Arthur is famous.
Kelvin is not wrong.
Kelvin is not excited.
Quinn is not rare.
Charlie is weak.
Kelvin is rare.
Gresham is not wrong.
Gresham is not shallow.
Arthur is rare.
Charlie is shallow.
Arthur is not weak.
Gresham is not rare.Someone who is both rare and not shallow is always wrong.
If Kelvin is not excited or Johnny is rare, then Charlie is famous.
Charlie being famous implies that Albern is not shallow.
If there is someone who is famous, then Kelvin is excited and Albern is not weak.
If there is someone who is both not shallow and not excited, then Johnny is rare.
If everyone is excited, then Kelvin is not weak and Arthur is shallow.
If Quinn is not shallow or Kelvin is weak, then Charlie is famous.
Johnny being shallow is equivalent to Gresham being excited and Arthur being rare.
Someone being both not shallow and famous is equivalent to being rare and not wrong.
Someone being both not rare and not famous is equivalent to being not weak.
It can be concluded that Johnny is not excited once knowing that Arthur is rare.
Someone is excited and weak if and only if he is famous.
|
Gresham is not wrong.
|
entailment
|
Arthur is famous.
Kelvin is not wrong.
Kelvin is not excited.
Quinn is not rare.
Charlie is weak.
Kelvin is rare.
Gresham is not wrong.
Gresham is not shallow.
Arthur is rare.
Charlie is shallow.
Arthur is not weak.
Gresham is not rare.Someone who is both rare and not shallow is always wrong.
If Kelvin is not excited or Johnny is rare, then Charlie is famous.
Charlie being famous implies that Albern is not shallow.
If there is someone who is famous, then Kelvin is excited and Albern is not weak.
If there is someone who is both not shallow and not excited, then Johnny is rare.
If everyone is excited, then Kelvin is not weak and Arthur is shallow.
If Quinn is not shallow or Kelvin is weak, then Charlie is famous.
Johnny being shallow is equivalent to Gresham being excited and Arthur being rare.
Someone being both not shallow and famous is equivalent to being rare and not wrong.
Someone being both not rare and not famous is equivalent to being not weak.
It can be concluded that Johnny is not excited once knowing that Arthur is rare.
Someone is excited and weak if and only if he is famous.
|
Arthur is famous.
|
self_contradiction
|
Arthur is famous.
Kelvin is not wrong.
Kelvin is not excited.
Quinn is not rare.
Charlie is weak.
Kelvin is rare.
Gresham is not wrong.
Gresham is not shallow.
Arthur is rare.
Charlie is shallow.
Arthur is not weak.
Gresham is not rare.Someone who is both rare and not shallow is always wrong.
If Kelvin is not excited or Johnny is rare, then Charlie is famous.
Charlie being famous implies that Albern is not shallow.
If there is someone who is famous, then Kelvin is excited and Albern is not weak.
If there is someone who is both not shallow and not excited, then Johnny is rare.
If everyone is excited, then Kelvin is not weak and Arthur is shallow.
If Quinn is not shallow or Kelvin is weak, then Charlie is famous.
Johnny being shallow is equivalent to Gresham being excited and Arthur being rare.
Someone being both not shallow and famous is equivalent to being rare and not wrong.
Someone being both not rare and not famous is equivalent to being not weak.
It can be concluded that Johnny is not excited once knowing that Arthur is rare.
Someone is excited and weak if and only if he is famous.
|
Johnny is shallow.
|
neutral
|
Arthur is famous.
Kelvin is not wrong.
Kelvin is not excited.
Quinn is not rare.
Charlie is weak.
Kelvin is rare.
Gresham is not wrong.
Gresham is not shallow.
Arthur is rare.
Charlie is shallow.
Arthur is not weak.
Gresham is not rare.Someone who is both rare and not shallow is always wrong.
If Kelvin is not excited or Johnny is rare, then Charlie is famous.
Charlie being famous implies that Albern is not shallow.
If there is someone who is famous, then Kelvin is excited and Albern is not weak.
If there is someone who is both not shallow and not excited, then Johnny is rare.
If everyone is excited, then Kelvin is not weak and Arthur is shallow.
If Quinn is not shallow or Kelvin is weak, then Charlie is famous.
Johnny being shallow is equivalent to Gresham being excited and Arthur being rare.
Someone being both not shallow and famous is equivalent to being rare and not wrong.
Someone being both not rare and not famous is equivalent to being not weak.
It can be concluded that Johnny is not excited once knowing that Arthur is rare.
Someone is excited and weak if and only if he is famous.
|
Charlie is famous.
|
entailment
|
Arthur is famous.
Kelvin is not wrong.
Kelvin is not excited.
Quinn is not rare.
Charlie is weak.
Kelvin is rare.
Gresham is not wrong.
Gresham is not shallow.
Arthur is rare.
Charlie is shallow.
Arthur is not weak.
Gresham is not rare.Someone who is both rare and not shallow is always wrong.
If Kelvin is not excited or Johnny is rare, then Charlie is famous.
Charlie being famous implies that Albern is not shallow.
If there is someone who is famous, then Kelvin is excited and Albern is not weak.
If there is someone who is both not shallow and not excited, then Johnny is rare.
If everyone is excited, then Kelvin is not weak and Arthur is shallow.
If Quinn is not shallow or Kelvin is weak, then Charlie is famous.
Johnny being shallow is equivalent to Gresham being excited and Arthur being rare.
Someone being both not shallow and famous is equivalent to being rare and not wrong.
Someone being both not rare and not famous is equivalent to being not weak.
It can be concluded that Johnny is not excited once knowing that Arthur is rare.
Someone is excited and weak if and only if he is famous.
|
Charlie is weak.
|
entailment
|
Arthur is famous.
Kelvin is not wrong.
Kelvin is not excited.
Quinn is not rare.
Charlie is weak.
Kelvin is rare.
Gresham is not wrong.
Gresham is not shallow.
Arthur is rare.
Charlie is shallow.
Arthur is not weak.
Gresham is not rare.Someone who is both rare and not shallow is always wrong.
If Kelvin is not excited or Johnny is rare, then Charlie is famous.
Charlie being famous implies that Albern is not shallow.
If there is someone who is famous, then Kelvin is excited and Albern is not weak.
If there is someone who is both not shallow and not excited, then Johnny is rare.
If everyone is excited, then Kelvin is not weak and Arthur is shallow.
If Quinn is not shallow or Kelvin is weak, then Charlie is famous.
Johnny being shallow is equivalent to Gresham being excited and Arthur being rare.
Someone being both not shallow and famous is equivalent to being rare and not wrong.
Someone being both not rare and not famous is equivalent to being not weak.
It can be concluded that Johnny is not excited once knowing that Arthur is rare.
Someone is excited and weak if and only if he is famous.
|
Kelvin is famous.
|
entailment
|
Arthur is famous.
Kelvin is not wrong.
Kelvin is not excited.
Quinn is not rare.
Charlie is weak.
Kelvin is rare.
Gresham is not wrong.
Gresham is not shallow.
Arthur is rare.
Charlie is shallow.
Arthur is not weak.
Gresham is not rare.Someone who is both rare and not shallow is always wrong.
If Kelvin is not excited or Johnny is rare, then Charlie is famous.
Charlie being famous implies that Albern is not shallow.
If there is someone who is famous, then Kelvin is excited and Albern is not weak.
If there is someone who is both not shallow and not excited, then Johnny is rare.
If everyone is excited, then Kelvin is not weak and Arthur is shallow.
If Quinn is not shallow or Kelvin is weak, then Charlie is famous.
Johnny being shallow is equivalent to Gresham being excited and Arthur being rare.
Someone being both not shallow and famous is equivalent to being rare and not wrong.
Someone being both not rare and not famous is equivalent to being not weak.
It can be concluded that Johnny is not excited once knowing that Arthur is rare.
Someone is excited and weak if and only if he is famous.
|
Kelvin is not famous.
|
contradiction
|
Arthur is famous.
Kelvin is not wrong.
Kelvin is not excited.
Quinn is not rare.
Charlie is weak.
Kelvin is rare.
Gresham is not wrong.
Gresham is not shallow.
Arthur is rare.
Charlie is shallow.
Arthur is not weak.
Gresham is not rare.Someone who is both rare and not shallow is always wrong.
If Kelvin is not excited or Johnny is rare, then Charlie is famous.
Charlie being famous implies that Albern is not shallow.
If there is someone who is famous, then Kelvin is excited and Albern is not weak.
If there is someone who is both not shallow and not excited, then Johnny is rare.
If everyone is excited, then Kelvin is not weak and Arthur is shallow.
If Quinn is not shallow or Kelvin is weak, then Charlie is famous.
Johnny being shallow is equivalent to Gresham being excited and Arthur being rare.
Someone being both not shallow and famous is equivalent to being rare and not wrong.
Someone being both not rare and not famous is equivalent to being not weak.
It can be concluded that Johnny is not excited once knowing that Arthur is rare.
Someone is excited and weak if and only if he is famous.
|
Arthur is not wrong.
|
neutral
|
Arthur is famous.
Kelvin is not wrong.
Kelvin is not excited.
Quinn is not rare.
Charlie is weak.
Kelvin is rare.
Gresham is not wrong.
Gresham is not shallow.
Arthur is rare.
Charlie is shallow.
Arthur is not weak.
Gresham is not rare.Someone who is both rare and not shallow is always wrong.
If Kelvin is not excited or Johnny is rare, then Charlie is famous.
Charlie being famous implies that Albern is not shallow.
If there is someone who is famous, then Kelvin is excited and Albern is not weak.
If there is someone who is both not shallow and not excited, then Johnny is rare.
If everyone is excited, then Kelvin is not weak and Arthur is shallow.
If Quinn is not shallow or Kelvin is weak, then Charlie is famous.
Johnny being shallow is equivalent to Gresham being excited and Arthur being rare.
Someone being both not shallow and famous is equivalent to being rare and not wrong.
Someone being both not rare and not famous is equivalent to being not weak.
It can be concluded that Johnny is not excited once knowing that Arthur is rare.
Someone is excited and weak if and only if he is famous.
|
Gresham is shallow.
|
contradiction
|
Valentina is glorious.
Valentina is impossible.
Rex is not triangular.
Valentina is not skinny.
Rex is not frightened.
Luisa is triangular.
Ian is safe.
Quimby is not glorious.
Amery is impossible.
Quimby is impossible.
Rex is not skinny.
Amery is skinny.If there is someone who is both not safe and frightened, then Rex is glorious.
If Rex is not frightened, then Rex is safe, and vice versa.
Someone who is skinny is always not impossible.
Quimby being impossible implies that Amery is not frightened.
If there is at least one people who is glorious, then Amery is triangular.
Someone who is eithor impossible or skinny is always not frightened.
Quimby being triangular and Ian being not safe imply that Ian is not impossible.
As long as someone is not triangular, he is glorious and not safe.
If there is at least one people who is triangular, then Luisa is not glorious and Ian is safe.
Someone being not frightened is equivalent to being not skinny.
As long as someone is not glorious and frightened, he is not safe and triangular.
If someone is not frightened, then he is not impossible, and vice versa.
|
Quimby is safe.
|
neutral
|
Valentina is glorious.
Valentina is impossible.
Rex is not triangular.
Valentina is not skinny.
Rex is not frightened.
Luisa is triangular.
Ian is safe.
Quimby is not glorious.
Amery is impossible.
Quimby is impossible.
Rex is not skinny.
Amery is skinny.If there is someone who is both not safe and frightened, then Rex is glorious.
If Rex is not frightened, then Rex is safe, and vice versa.
Someone who is skinny is always not impossible.
Quimby being impossible implies that Amery is not frightened.
If there is at least one people who is glorious, then Amery is triangular.
Someone who is eithor impossible or skinny is always not frightened.
Quimby being triangular and Ian being not safe imply that Ian is not impossible.
As long as someone is not triangular, he is glorious and not safe.
If there is at least one people who is triangular, then Luisa is not glorious and Ian is safe.
Someone being not frightened is equivalent to being not skinny.
As long as someone is not glorious and frightened, he is not safe and triangular.
If someone is not frightened, then he is not impossible, and vice versa.
|
Quimby is skinny.
|
contradiction
|
Valentina is glorious.
Valentina is impossible.
Rex is not triangular.
Valentina is not skinny.
Rex is not frightened.
Luisa is triangular.
Ian is safe.
Quimby is not glorious.
Amery is impossible.
Quimby is impossible.
Rex is not skinny.
Amery is skinny.If there is someone who is both not safe and frightened, then Rex is glorious.
If Rex is not frightened, then Rex is safe, and vice versa.
Someone who is skinny is always not impossible.
Quimby being impossible implies that Amery is not frightened.
If there is at least one people who is glorious, then Amery is triangular.
Someone who is eithor impossible or skinny is always not frightened.
Quimby being triangular and Ian being not safe imply that Ian is not impossible.
As long as someone is not triangular, he is glorious and not safe.
If there is at least one people who is triangular, then Luisa is not glorious and Ian is safe.
Someone being not frightened is equivalent to being not skinny.
As long as someone is not glorious and frightened, he is not safe and triangular.
If someone is not frightened, then he is not impossible, and vice versa.
|
Quimby is not impossible.
|
self_contradiction
|
Valentina is glorious.
Valentina is impossible.
Rex is not triangular.
Valentina is not skinny.
Rex is not frightened.
Luisa is triangular.
Ian is safe.
Quimby is not glorious.
Amery is impossible.
Quimby is impossible.
Rex is not skinny.
Amery is skinny.If there is someone who is both not safe and frightened, then Rex is glorious.
If Rex is not frightened, then Rex is safe, and vice versa.
Someone who is skinny is always not impossible.
Quimby being impossible implies that Amery is not frightened.
If there is at least one people who is glorious, then Amery is triangular.
Someone who is eithor impossible or skinny is always not frightened.
Quimby being triangular and Ian being not safe imply that Ian is not impossible.
As long as someone is not triangular, he is glorious and not safe.
If there is at least one people who is triangular, then Luisa is not glorious and Ian is safe.
Someone being not frightened is equivalent to being not skinny.
As long as someone is not glorious and frightened, he is not safe and triangular.
If someone is not frightened, then he is not impossible, and vice versa.
|
Luisa is not triangular.
|
contradiction
|
Valentina is glorious.
Valentina is impossible.
Rex is not triangular.
Valentina is not skinny.
Rex is not frightened.
Luisa is triangular.
Ian is safe.
Quimby is not glorious.
Amery is impossible.
Quimby is impossible.
Rex is not skinny.
Amery is skinny.If there is someone who is both not safe and frightened, then Rex is glorious.
If Rex is not frightened, then Rex is safe, and vice versa.
Someone who is skinny is always not impossible.
Quimby being impossible implies that Amery is not frightened.
If there is at least one people who is glorious, then Amery is triangular.
Someone who is eithor impossible or skinny is always not frightened.
Quimby being triangular and Ian being not safe imply that Ian is not impossible.
As long as someone is not triangular, he is glorious and not safe.
If there is at least one people who is triangular, then Luisa is not glorious and Ian is safe.
Someone being not frightened is equivalent to being not skinny.
As long as someone is not glorious and frightened, he is not safe and triangular.
If someone is not frightened, then he is not impossible, and vice versa.
|
Luisa is not glorious.
|
entailment
|
Valentina is glorious.
Valentina is impossible.
Rex is not triangular.
Valentina is not skinny.
Rex is not frightened.
Luisa is triangular.
Ian is safe.
Quimby is not glorious.
Amery is impossible.
Quimby is impossible.
Rex is not skinny.
Amery is skinny.If there is someone who is both not safe and frightened, then Rex is glorious.
If Rex is not frightened, then Rex is safe, and vice versa.
Someone who is skinny is always not impossible.
Quimby being impossible implies that Amery is not frightened.
If there is at least one people who is glorious, then Amery is triangular.
Someone who is eithor impossible or skinny is always not frightened.
Quimby being triangular and Ian being not safe imply that Ian is not impossible.
As long as someone is not triangular, he is glorious and not safe.
If there is at least one people who is triangular, then Luisa is not glorious and Ian is safe.
Someone being not frightened is equivalent to being not skinny.
As long as someone is not glorious and frightened, he is not safe and triangular.
If someone is not frightened, then he is not impossible, and vice versa.
|
Quimby is not glorious.
|
entailment
|
Valentina is glorious.
Valentina is impossible.
Rex is not triangular.
Valentina is not skinny.
Rex is not frightened.
Luisa is triangular.
Ian is safe.
Quimby is not glorious.
Amery is impossible.
Quimby is impossible.
Rex is not skinny.
Amery is skinny.If there is someone who is both not safe and frightened, then Rex is glorious.
If Rex is not frightened, then Rex is safe, and vice versa.
Someone who is skinny is always not impossible.
Quimby being impossible implies that Amery is not frightened.
If there is at least one people who is glorious, then Amery is triangular.
Someone who is eithor impossible or skinny is always not frightened.
Quimby being triangular and Ian being not safe imply that Ian is not impossible.
As long as someone is not triangular, he is glorious and not safe.
If there is at least one people who is triangular, then Luisa is not glorious and Ian is safe.
Someone being not frightened is equivalent to being not skinny.
As long as someone is not glorious and frightened, he is not safe and triangular.
If someone is not frightened, then he is not impossible, and vice versa.
|
Amery is impossible.
|
self_contradiction
|
Valentina is glorious.
Valentina is impossible.
Rex is not triangular.
Valentina is not skinny.
Rex is not frightened.
Luisa is triangular.
Ian is safe.
Quimby is not glorious.
Amery is impossible.
Quimby is impossible.
Rex is not skinny.
Amery is skinny.If there is someone who is both not safe and frightened, then Rex is glorious.
If Rex is not frightened, then Rex is safe, and vice versa.
Someone who is skinny is always not impossible.
Quimby being impossible implies that Amery is not frightened.
If there is at least one people who is glorious, then Amery is triangular.
Someone who is eithor impossible or skinny is always not frightened.
Quimby being triangular and Ian being not safe imply that Ian is not impossible.
As long as someone is not triangular, he is glorious and not safe.
If there is at least one people who is triangular, then Luisa is not glorious and Ian is safe.
Someone being not frightened is equivalent to being not skinny.
As long as someone is not glorious and frightened, he is not safe and triangular.
If someone is not frightened, then he is not impossible, and vice versa.
|
Lombard is not triangular.
|
neutral
|
Valentina is glorious.
Valentina is impossible.
Rex is not triangular.
Valentina is not skinny.
Rex is not frightened.
Luisa is triangular.
Ian is safe.
Quimby is not glorious.
Amery is impossible.
Quimby is impossible.
Rex is not skinny.
Amery is skinny.If there is someone who is both not safe and frightened, then Rex is glorious.
If Rex is not frightened, then Rex is safe, and vice versa.
Someone who is skinny is always not impossible.
Quimby being impossible implies that Amery is not frightened.
If there is at least one people who is glorious, then Amery is triangular.
Someone who is eithor impossible or skinny is always not frightened.
Quimby being triangular and Ian being not safe imply that Ian is not impossible.
As long as someone is not triangular, he is glorious and not safe.
If there is at least one people who is triangular, then Luisa is not glorious and Ian is safe.
Someone being not frightened is equivalent to being not skinny.
As long as someone is not glorious and frightened, he is not safe and triangular.
If someone is not frightened, then he is not impossible, and vice versa.
|
Amery is skinny.
|
self_contradiction
|
Valentina is glorious.
Valentina is impossible.
Rex is not triangular.
Valentina is not skinny.
Rex is not frightened.
Luisa is triangular.
Ian is safe.
Quimby is not glorious.
Amery is impossible.
Quimby is impossible.
Rex is not skinny.
Amery is skinny.If there is someone who is both not safe and frightened, then Rex is glorious.
If Rex is not frightened, then Rex is safe, and vice versa.
Someone who is skinny is always not impossible.
Quimby being impossible implies that Amery is not frightened.
If there is at least one people who is glorious, then Amery is triangular.
Someone who is eithor impossible or skinny is always not frightened.
Quimby being triangular and Ian being not safe imply that Ian is not impossible.
As long as someone is not triangular, he is glorious and not safe.
If there is at least one people who is triangular, then Luisa is not glorious and Ian is safe.
Someone being not frightened is equivalent to being not skinny.
As long as someone is not glorious and frightened, he is not safe and triangular.
If someone is not frightened, then he is not impossible, and vice versa.
|
Lombard is not frightened.
|
neutral
|
Valentina is glorious.
Valentina is impossible.
Rex is not triangular.
Valentina is not skinny.
Rex is not frightened.
Luisa is triangular.
Ian is safe.
Quimby is not glorious.
Amery is impossible.
Quimby is impossible.
Rex is not skinny.
Amery is skinny.If there is someone who is both not safe and frightened, then Rex is glorious.
If Rex is not frightened, then Rex is safe, and vice versa.
Someone who is skinny is always not impossible.
Quimby being impossible implies that Amery is not frightened.
If there is at least one people who is glorious, then Amery is triangular.
Someone who is eithor impossible or skinny is always not frightened.
Quimby being triangular and Ian being not safe imply that Ian is not impossible.
As long as someone is not triangular, he is glorious and not safe.
If there is at least one people who is triangular, then Luisa is not glorious and Ian is safe.
Someone being not frightened is equivalent to being not skinny.
As long as someone is not glorious and frightened, he is not safe and triangular.
If someone is not frightened, then he is not impossible, and vice versa.
|
Amery is not skinny.
|
self_contradiction
|
Valentina is glorious.
Valentina is impossible.
Rex is not triangular.
Valentina is not skinny.
Rex is not frightened.
Luisa is triangular.
Ian is safe.
Quimby is not glorious.
Amery is impossible.
Quimby is impossible.
Rex is not skinny.
Amery is skinny.If there is someone who is both not safe and frightened, then Rex is glorious.
If Rex is not frightened, then Rex is safe, and vice versa.
Someone who is skinny is always not impossible.
Quimby being impossible implies that Amery is not frightened.
If there is at least one people who is glorious, then Amery is triangular.
Someone who is eithor impossible or skinny is always not frightened.
Quimby being triangular and Ian being not safe imply that Ian is not impossible.
As long as someone is not triangular, he is glorious and not safe.
If there is at least one people who is triangular, then Luisa is not glorious and Ian is safe.
Someone being not frightened is equivalent to being not skinny.
As long as someone is not glorious and frightened, he is not safe and triangular.
If someone is not frightened, then he is not impossible, and vice versa.
|
Luisa is glorious.
|
contradiction
|
Valentina is glorious.
Valentina is impossible.
Rex is not triangular.
Valentina is not skinny.
Rex is not frightened.
Luisa is triangular.
Ian is safe.
Quimby is not glorious.
Amery is impossible.
Quimby is impossible.
Rex is not skinny.
Amery is skinny.If there is someone who is both not safe and frightened, then Rex is glorious.
If Rex is not frightened, then Rex is safe, and vice versa.
Someone who is skinny is always not impossible.
Quimby being impossible implies that Amery is not frightened.
If there is at least one people who is glorious, then Amery is triangular.
Someone who is eithor impossible or skinny is always not frightened.
Quimby being triangular and Ian being not safe imply that Ian is not impossible.
As long as someone is not triangular, he is glorious and not safe.
If there is at least one people who is triangular, then Luisa is not glorious and Ian is safe.
Someone being not frightened is equivalent to being not skinny.
As long as someone is not glorious and frightened, he is not safe and triangular.
If someone is not frightened, then he is not impossible, and vice versa.
|
Rex is not frightened.
|
entailment
|
Valentina is glorious.
Valentina is impossible.
Rex is not triangular.
Valentina is not skinny.
Rex is not frightened.
Luisa is triangular.
Ian is safe.
Quimby is not glorious.
Amery is impossible.
Quimby is impossible.
Rex is not skinny.
Amery is skinny.If there is someone who is both not safe and frightened, then Rex is glorious.
If Rex is not frightened, then Rex is safe, and vice versa.
Someone who is skinny is always not impossible.
Quimby being impossible implies that Amery is not frightened.
If there is at least one people who is glorious, then Amery is triangular.
Someone who is eithor impossible or skinny is always not frightened.
Quimby being triangular and Ian being not safe imply that Ian is not impossible.
As long as someone is not triangular, he is glorious and not safe.
If there is at least one people who is triangular, then Luisa is not glorious and Ian is safe.
Someone being not frightened is equivalent to being not skinny.
As long as someone is not glorious and frightened, he is not safe and triangular.
If someone is not frightened, then he is not impossible, and vice versa.
|
Valentina is not safe.
|
neutral
|
Valentina is glorious.
Valentina is impossible.
Rex is not triangular.
Valentina is not skinny.
Rex is not frightened.
Luisa is triangular.
Ian is safe.
Quimby is not glorious.
Amery is impossible.
Quimby is impossible.
Rex is not skinny.
Amery is skinny.If there is someone who is both not safe and frightened, then Rex is glorious.
If Rex is not frightened, then Rex is safe, and vice versa.
Someone who is skinny is always not impossible.
Quimby being impossible implies that Amery is not frightened.
If there is at least one people who is glorious, then Amery is triangular.
Someone who is eithor impossible or skinny is always not frightened.
Quimby being triangular and Ian being not safe imply that Ian is not impossible.
As long as someone is not triangular, he is glorious and not safe.
If there is at least one people who is triangular, then Luisa is not glorious and Ian is safe.
Someone being not frightened is equivalent to being not skinny.
As long as someone is not glorious and frightened, he is not safe and triangular.
If someone is not frightened, then he is not impossible, and vice versa.
|
Ian is glorious.
|
neutral
|
Valentina is glorious.
Valentina is impossible.
Rex is not triangular.
Valentina is not skinny.
Rex is not frightened.
Luisa is triangular.
Ian is safe.
Quimby is not glorious.
Amery is impossible.
Quimby is impossible.
Rex is not skinny.
Amery is skinny.If there is someone who is both not safe and frightened, then Rex is glorious.
If Rex is not frightened, then Rex is safe, and vice versa.
Someone who is skinny is always not impossible.
Quimby being impossible implies that Amery is not frightened.
If there is at least one people who is glorious, then Amery is triangular.
Someone who is eithor impossible or skinny is always not frightened.
Quimby being triangular and Ian being not safe imply that Ian is not impossible.
As long as someone is not triangular, he is glorious and not safe.
If there is at least one people who is triangular, then Luisa is not glorious and Ian is safe.
Someone being not frightened is equivalent to being not skinny.
As long as someone is not glorious and frightened, he is not safe and triangular.
If someone is not frightened, then he is not impossible, and vice versa.
|
Amery is not impossible.
|
self_contradiction
|
Valentina is glorious.
Valentina is impossible.
Rex is not triangular.
Valentina is not skinny.
Rex is not frightened.
Luisa is triangular.
Ian is safe.
Quimby is not glorious.
Amery is impossible.
Quimby is impossible.
Rex is not skinny.
Amery is skinny.If there is someone who is both not safe and frightened, then Rex is glorious.
If Rex is not frightened, then Rex is safe, and vice versa.
Someone who is skinny is always not impossible.
Quimby being impossible implies that Amery is not frightened.
If there is at least one people who is glorious, then Amery is triangular.
Someone who is eithor impossible or skinny is always not frightened.
Quimby being triangular and Ian being not safe imply that Ian is not impossible.
As long as someone is not triangular, he is glorious and not safe.
If there is at least one people who is triangular, then Luisa is not glorious and Ian is safe.
Someone being not frightened is equivalent to being not skinny.
As long as someone is not glorious and frightened, he is not safe and triangular.
If someone is not frightened, then he is not impossible, and vice versa.
|
Rex is not impossible.
|
entailment
|
Valentina is glorious.
Valentina is impossible.
Rex is not triangular.
Valentina is not skinny.
Rex is not frightened.
Luisa is triangular.
Ian is safe.
Quimby is not glorious.
Amery is impossible.
Quimby is impossible.
Rex is not skinny.
Amery is skinny.If there is someone who is both not safe and frightened, then Rex is glorious.
If Rex is not frightened, then Rex is safe, and vice versa.
Someone who is skinny is always not impossible.
Quimby being impossible implies that Amery is not frightened.
If there is at least one people who is glorious, then Amery is triangular.
Someone who is eithor impossible or skinny is always not frightened.
Quimby being triangular and Ian being not safe imply that Ian is not impossible.
As long as someone is not triangular, he is glorious and not safe.
If there is at least one people who is triangular, then Luisa is not glorious and Ian is safe.
Someone being not frightened is equivalent to being not skinny.
As long as someone is not glorious and frightened, he is not safe and triangular.
If someone is not frightened, then he is not impossible, and vice versa.
|
Rex is frightened.
|
contradiction
|
Valentina is glorious.
Valentina is impossible.
Rex is not triangular.
Valentina is not skinny.
Rex is not frightened.
Luisa is triangular.
Ian is safe.
Quimby is not glorious.
Amery is impossible.
Quimby is impossible.
Rex is not skinny.
Amery is skinny.If there is someone who is both not safe and frightened, then Rex is glorious.
If Rex is not frightened, then Rex is safe, and vice versa.
Someone who is skinny is always not impossible.
Quimby being impossible implies that Amery is not frightened.
If there is at least one people who is glorious, then Amery is triangular.
Someone who is eithor impossible or skinny is always not frightened.
Quimby being triangular and Ian being not safe imply that Ian is not impossible.
As long as someone is not triangular, he is glorious and not safe.
If there is at least one people who is triangular, then Luisa is not glorious and Ian is safe.
Someone being not frightened is equivalent to being not skinny.
As long as someone is not glorious and frightened, he is not safe and triangular.
If someone is not frightened, then he is not impossible, and vice versa.
|
Rex is glorious.
|
entailment
|
Valentina is glorious.
Valentina is impossible.
Rex is not triangular.
Valentina is not skinny.
Rex is not frightened.
Luisa is triangular.
Ian is safe.
Quimby is not glorious.
Amery is impossible.
Quimby is impossible.
Rex is not skinny.
Amery is skinny.If there is someone who is both not safe and frightened, then Rex is glorious.
If Rex is not frightened, then Rex is safe, and vice versa.
Someone who is skinny is always not impossible.
Quimby being impossible implies that Amery is not frightened.
If there is at least one people who is glorious, then Amery is triangular.
Someone who is eithor impossible or skinny is always not frightened.
Quimby being triangular and Ian being not safe imply that Ian is not impossible.
As long as someone is not triangular, he is glorious and not safe.
If there is at least one people who is triangular, then Luisa is not glorious and Ian is safe.
Someone being not frightened is equivalent to being not skinny.
As long as someone is not glorious and frightened, he is not safe and triangular.
If someone is not frightened, then he is not impossible, and vice versa.
|
Rex is triangular.
|
contradiction
|
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.