premise
stringlengths 923
1.41k
| hypothesis
stringlengths 11
33
| label
stringclasses 4
values |
---|---|---|
Ted is comprehensive.
Ricardo is not comprehensive.
Arthur is not mean.
Jorge is comprehensive.
Jonathan is dishonest.
Ted is mean.
Ted is not every.
Arthur is not informal.
Jonathan is every.
Jonathan is mean.
Burton is not every.
Jonathan is comprehensive.Someone who is not informal is always both not every and mean.
It can be concluded that Burton is not mean once knowing that Burton is not every or Ricardo is not informal.
Someone being mean is equivalent to being every.
If there is someone who is boring, then Jonathan is dishonest and Ricardo is informal.
If there is at least one people who is either not boring or every, then Jonathan is mean and Burton is not comprehensive.
Someone is mean and not boring if and only if he is dishonest and not comprehensive.
If there is at least one people who is comprehensive, then Jonathan is informal and Burton is not dishonest.
Someone who is not boring is always not comprehensive.
If Burton is not boring, then Jonathan is not every.
Isabel being not dishonest and Arthur being not comprehensive imply that Burton is mean.
Ricardo being dishonest implies that Burton is mean and Isabel is not informal.
Someone who is both not every and boring is always dishonest.
|
Jorge is comprehensive.
|
entailment
|
Ted is comprehensive.
Ricardo is not comprehensive.
Arthur is not mean.
Jorge is comprehensive.
Jonathan is dishonest.
Ted is mean.
Ted is not every.
Arthur is not informal.
Jonathan is every.
Jonathan is mean.
Burton is not every.
Jonathan is comprehensive.Someone who is not informal is always both not every and mean.
It can be concluded that Burton is not mean once knowing that Burton is not every or Ricardo is not informal.
Someone being mean is equivalent to being every.
If there is someone who is boring, then Jonathan is dishonest and Ricardo is informal.
If there is at least one people who is either not boring or every, then Jonathan is mean and Burton is not comprehensive.
Someone is mean and not boring if and only if he is dishonest and not comprehensive.
If there is at least one people who is comprehensive, then Jonathan is informal and Burton is not dishonest.
Someone who is not boring is always not comprehensive.
If Burton is not boring, then Jonathan is not every.
Isabel being not dishonest and Arthur being not comprehensive imply that Burton is mean.
Ricardo being dishonest implies that Burton is mean and Isabel is not informal.
Someone who is both not every and boring is always dishonest.
|
Ted is not every.
|
self_contradiction
|
Ted is comprehensive.
Ricardo is not comprehensive.
Arthur is not mean.
Jorge is comprehensive.
Jonathan is dishonest.
Ted is mean.
Ted is not every.
Arthur is not informal.
Jonathan is every.
Jonathan is mean.
Burton is not every.
Jonathan is comprehensive.Someone who is not informal is always both not every and mean.
It can be concluded that Burton is not mean once knowing that Burton is not every or Ricardo is not informal.
Someone being mean is equivalent to being every.
If there is someone who is boring, then Jonathan is dishonest and Ricardo is informal.
If there is at least one people who is either not boring or every, then Jonathan is mean and Burton is not comprehensive.
Someone is mean and not boring if and only if he is dishonest and not comprehensive.
If there is at least one people who is comprehensive, then Jonathan is informal and Burton is not dishonest.
Someone who is not boring is always not comprehensive.
If Burton is not boring, then Jonathan is not every.
Isabel being not dishonest and Arthur being not comprehensive imply that Burton is mean.
Ricardo being dishonest implies that Burton is mean and Isabel is not informal.
Someone who is both not every and boring is always dishonest.
|
Jonathan is not comprehensive.
|
contradiction
|
Ted is comprehensive.
Ricardo is not comprehensive.
Arthur is not mean.
Jorge is comprehensive.
Jonathan is dishonest.
Ted is mean.
Ted is not every.
Arthur is not informal.
Jonathan is every.
Jonathan is mean.
Burton is not every.
Jonathan is comprehensive.Someone who is not informal is always both not every and mean.
It can be concluded that Burton is not mean once knowing that Burton is not every or Ricardo is not informal.
Someone being mean is equivalent to being every.
If there is someone who is boring, then Jonathan is dishonest and Ricardo is informal.
If there is at least one people who is either not boring or every, then Jonathan is mean and Burton is not comprehensive.
Someone is mean and not boring if and only if he is dishonest and not comprehensive.
If there is at least one people who is comprehensive, then Jonathan is informal and Burton is not dishonest.
Someone who is not boring is always not comprehensive.
If Burton is not boring, then Jonathan is not every.
Isabel being not dishonest and Arthur being not comprehensive imply that Burton is mean.
Ricardo being dishonest implies that Burton is mean and Isabel is not informal.
Someone who is both not every and boring is always dishonest.
|
Jonathan is not mean.
|
contradiction
|
Ted is comprehensive.
Ricardo is not comprehensive.
Arthur is not mean.
Jorge is comprehensive.
Jonathan is dishonest.
Ted is mean.
Ted is not every.
Arthur is not informal.
Jonathan is every.
Jonathan is mean.
Burton is not every.
Jonathan is comprehensive.Someone who is not informal is always both not every and mean.
It can be concluded that Burton is not mean once knowing that Burton is not every or Ricardo is not informal.
Someone being mean is equivalent to being every.
If there is someone who is boring, then Jonathan is dishonest and Ricardo is informal.
If there is at least one people who is either not boring or every, then Jonathan is mean and Burton is not comprehensive.
Someone is mean and not boring if and only if he is dishonest and not comprehensive.
If there is at least one people who is comprehensive, then Jonathan is informal and Burton is not dishonest.
Someone who is not boring is always not comprehensive.
If Burton is not boring, then Jonathan is not every.
Isabel being not dishonest and Arthur being not comprehensive imply that Burton is mean.
Ricardo being dishonest implies that Burton is mean and Isabel is not informal.
Someone who is both not every and boring is always dishonest.
|
Burton is not comprehensive.
|
entailment
|
Ted is comprehensive.
Ricardo is not comprehensive.
Arthur is not mean.
Jorge is comprehensive.
Jonathan is dishonest.
Ted is mean.
Ted is not every.
Arthur is not informal.
Jonathan is every.
Jonathan is mean.
Burton is not every.
Jonathan is comprehensive.Someone who is not informal is always both not every and mean.
It can be concluded that Burton is not mean once knowing that Burton is not every or Ricardo is not informal.
Someone being mean is equivalent to being every.
If there is someone who is boring, then Jonathan is dishonest and Ricardo is informal.
If there is at least one people who is either not boring or every, then Jonathan is mean and Burton is not comprehensive.
Someone is mean and not boring if and only if he is dishonest and not comprehensive.
If there is at least one people who is comprehensive, then Jonathan is informal and Burton is not dishonest.
Someone who is not boring is always not comprehensive.
If Burton is not boring, then Jonathan is not every.
Isabel being not dishonest and Arthur being not comprehensive imply that Burton is mean.
Ricardo being dishonest implies that Burton is mean and Isabel is not informal.
Someone who is both not every and boring is always dishonest.
|
Burton is every.
|
contradiction
|
Ted is comprehensive.
Ricardo is not comprehensive.
Arthur is not mean.
Jorge is comprehensive.
Jonathan is dishonest.
Ted is mean.
Ted is not every.
Arthur is not informal.
Jonathan is every.
Jonathan is mean.
Burton is not every.
Jonathan is comprehensive.Someone who is not informal is always both not every and mean.
It can be concluded that Burton is not mean once knowing that Burton is not every or Ricardo is not informal.
Someone being mean is equivalent to being every.
If there is someone who is boring, then Jonathan is dishonest and Ricardo is informal.
If there is at least one people who is either not boring or every, then Jonathan is mean and Burton is not comprehensive.
Someone is mean and not boring if and only if he is dishonest and not comprehensive.
If there is at least one people who is comprehensive, then Jonathan is informal and Burton is not dishonest.
Someone who is not boring is always not comprehensive.
If Burton is not boring, then Jonathan is not every.
Isabel being not dishonest and Arthur being not comprehensive imply that Burton is mean.
Ricardo being dishonest implies that Burton is mean and Isabel is not informal.
Someone who is both not every and boring is always dishonest.
|
Ricardo is every.
|
neutral
|
Ted is comprehensive.
Ricardo is not comprehensive.
Arthur is not mean.
Jorge is comprehensive.
Jonathan is dishonest.
Ted is mean.
Ted is not every.
Arthur is not informal.
Jonathan is every.
Jonathan is mean.
Burton is not every.
Jonathan is comprehensive.Someone who is not informal is always both not every and mean.
It can be concluded that Burton is not mean once knowing that Burton is not every or Ricardo is not informal.
Someone being mean is equivalent to being every.
If there is someone who is boring, then Jonathan is dishonest and Ricardo is informal.
If there is at least one people who is either not boring or every, then Jonathan is mean and Burton is not comprehensive.
Someone is mean and not boring if and only if he is dishonest and not comprehensive.
If there is at least one people who is comprehensive, then Jonathan is informal and Burton is not dishonest.
Someone who is not boring is always not comprehensive.
If Burton is not boring, then Jonathan is not every.
Isabel being not dishonest and Arthur being not comprehensive imply that Burton is mean.
Ricardo being dishonest implies that Burton is mean and Isabel is not informal.
Someone who is both not every and boring is always dishonest.
|
Jorge is not informal.
|
neutral
|
Ted is comprehensive.
Ricardo is not comprehensive.
Arthur is not mean.
Jorge is comprehensive.
Jonathan is dishonest.
Ted is mean.
Ted is not every.
Arthur is not informal.
Jonathan is every.
Jonathan is mean.
Burton is not every.
Jonathan is comprehensive.Someone who is not informal is always both not every and mean.
It can be concluded that Burton is not mean once knowing that Burton is not every or Ricardo is not informal.
Someone being mean is equivalent to being every.
If there is someone who is boring, then Jonathan is dishonest and Ricardo is informal.
If there is at least one people who is either not boring or every, then Jonathan is mean and Burton is not comprehensive.
Someone is mean and not boring if and only if he is dishonest and not comprehensive.
If there is at least one people who is comprehensive, then Jonathan is informal and Burton is not dishonest.
Someone who is not boring is always not comprehensive.
If Burton is not boring, then Jonathan is not every.
Isabel being not dishonest and Arthur being not comprehensive imply that Burton is mean.
Ricardo being dishonest implies that Burton is mean and Isabel is not informal.
Someone who is both not every and boring is always dishonest.
|
Arthur is mean.
|
self_contradiction
|
Ted is comprehensive.
Ricardo is not comprehensive.
Arthur is not mean.
Jorge is comprehensive.
Jonathan is dishonest.
Ted is mean.
Ted is not every.
Arthur is not informal.
Jonathan is every.
Jonathan is mean.
Burton is not every.
Jonathan is comprehensive.Someone who is not informal is always both not every and mean.
It can be concluded that Burton is not mean once knowing that Burton is not every or Ricardo is not informal.
Someone being mean is equivalent to being every.
If there is someone who is boring, then Jonathan is dishonest and Ricardo is informal.
If there is at least one people who is either not boring or every, then Jonathan is mean and Burton is not comprehensive.
Someone is mean and not boring if and only if he is dishonest and not comprehensive.
If there is at least one people who is comprehensive, then Jonathan is informal and Burton is not dishonest.
Someone who is not boring is always not comprehensive.
If Burton is not boring, then Jonathan is not every.
Isabel being not dishonest and Arthur being not comprehensive imply that Burton is mean.
Ricardo being dishonest implies that Burton is mean and Isabel is not informal.
Someone who is both not every and boring is always dishonest.
|
Arthur is every.
|
self_contradiction
|
Ted is comprehensive.
Ricardo is not comprehensive.
Arthur is not mean.
Jorge is comprehensive.
Jonathan is dishonest.
Ted is mean.
Ted is not every.
Arthur is not informal.
Jonathan is every.
Jonathan is mean.
Burton is not every.
Jonathan is comprehensive.Someone who is not informal is always both not every and mean.
It can be concluded that Burton is not mean once knowing that Burton is not every or Ricardo is not informal.
Someone being mean is equivalent to being every.
If there is someone who is boring, then Jonathan is dishonest and Ricardo is informal.
If there is at least one people who is either not boring or every, then Jonathan is mean and Burton is not comprehensive.
Someone is mean and not boring if and only if he is dishonest and not comprehensive.
If there is at least one people who is comprehensive, then Jonathan is informal and Burton is not dishonest.
Someone who is not boring is always not comprehensive.
If Burton is not boring, then Jonathan is not every.
Isabel being not dishonest and Arthur being not comprehensive imply that Burton is mean.
Ricardo being dishonest implies that Burton is mean and Isabel is not informal.
Someone who is both not every and boring is always dishonest.
|
Ricardo is not boring.
|
neutral
|
Ted is comprehensive.
Ricardo is not comprehensive.
Arthur is not mean.
Jorge is comprehensive.
Jonathan is dishonest.
Ted is mean.
Ted is not every.
Arthur is not informal.
Jonathan is every.
Jonathan is mean.
Burton is not every.
Jonathan is comprehensive.Someone who is not informal is always both not every and mean.
It can be concluded that Burton is not mean once knowing that Burton is not every or Ricardo is not informal.
Someone being mean is equivalent to being every.
If there is someone who is boring, then Jonathan is dishonest and Ricardo is informal.
If there is at least one people who is either not boring or every, then Jonathan is mean and Burton is not comprehensive.
Someone is mean and not boring if and only if he is dishonest and not comprehensive.
If there is at least one people who is comprehensive, then Jonathan is informal and Burton is not dishonest.
Someone who is not boring is always not comprehensive.
If Burton is not boring, then Jonathan is not every.
Isabel being not dishonest and Arthur being not comprehensive imply that Burton is mean.
Ricardo being dishonest implies that Burton is mean and Isabel is not informal.
Someone who is both not every and boring is always dishonest.
|
Arthur is not mean.
|
self_contradiction
|
Ted is comprehensive.
Ricardo is not comprehensive.
Arthur is not mean.
Jorge is comprehensive.
Jonathan is dishonest.
Ted is mean.
Ted is not every.
Arthur is not informal.
Jonathan is every.
Jonathan is mean.
Burton is not every.
Jonathan is comprehensive.Someone who is not informal is always both not every and mean.
It can be concluded that Burton is not mean once knowing that Burton is not every or Ricardo is not informal.
Someone being mean is equivalent to being every.
If there is someone who is boring, then Jonathan is dishonest and Ricardo is informal.
If there is at least one people who is either not boring or every, then Jonathan is mean and Burton is not comprehensive.
Someone is mean and not boring if and only if he is dishonest and not comprehensive.
If there is at least one people who is comprehensive, then Jonathan is informal and Burton is not dishonest.
Someone who is not boring is always not comprehensive.
If Burton is not boring, then Jonathan is not every.
Isabel being not dishonest and Arthur being not comprehensive imply that Burton is mean.
Ricardo being dishonest implies that Burton is mean and Isabel is not informal.
Someone who is both not every and boring is always dishonest.
|
Burton is comprehensive.
|
contradiction
|
Ted is comprehensive.
Ricardo is not comprehensive.
Arthur is not mean.
Jorge is comprehensive.
Jonathan is dishonest.
Ted is mean.
Ted is not every.
Arthur is not informal.
Jonathan is every.
Jonathan is mean.
Burton is not every.
Jonathan is comprehensive.Someone who is not informal is always both not every and mean.
It can be concluded that Burton is not mean once knowing that Burton is not every or Ricardo is not informal.
Someone being mean is equivalent to being every.
If there is someone who is boring, then Jonathan is dishonest and Ricardo is informal.
If there is at least one people who is either not boring or every, then Jonathan is mean and Burton is not comprehensive.
Someone is mean and not boring if and only if he is dishonest and not comprehensive.
If there is at least one people who is comprehensive, then Jonathan is informal and Burton is not dishonest.
Someone who is not boring is always not comprehensive.
If Burton is not boring, then Jonathan is not every.
Isabel being not dishonest and Arthur being not comprehensive imply that Burton is mean.
Ricardo being dishonest implies that Burton is mean and Isabel is not informal.
Someone who is both not every and boring is always dishonest.
|
Jonathan is mean.
|
entailment
|
Ted is comprehensive.
Ricardo is not comprehensive.
Arthur is not mean.
Jorge is comprehensive.
Jonathan is dishonest.
Ted is mean.
Ted is not every.
Arthur is not informal.
Jonathan is every.
Jonathan is mean.
Burton is not every.
Jonathan is comprehensive.Someone who is not informal is always both not every and mean.
It can be concluded that Burton is not mean once knowing that Burton is not every or Ricardo is not informal.
Someone being mean is equivalent to being every.
If there is someone who is boring, then Jonathan is dishonest and Ricardo is informal.
If there is at least one people who is either not boring or every, then Jonathan is mean and Burton is not comprehensive.
Someone is mean and not boring if and only if he is dishonest and not comprehensive.
If there is at least one people who is comprehensive, then Jonathan is informal and Burton is not dishonest.
Someone who is not boring is always not comprehensive.
If Burton is not boring, then Jonathan is not every.
Isabel being not dishonest and Arthur being not comprehensive imply that Burton is mean.
Ricardo being dishonest implies that Burton is mean and Isabel is not informal.
Someone who is both not every and boring is always dishonest.
|
Isabel is boring.
|
neutral
|
Ted is comprehensive.
Ricardo is not comprehensive.
Arthur is not mean.
Jorge is comprehensive.
Jonathan is dishonest.
Ted is mean.
Ted is not every.
Arthur is not informal.
Jonathan is every.
Jonathan is mean.
Burton is not every.
Jonathan is comprehensive.Someone who is not informal is always both not every and mean.
It can be concluded that Burton is not mean once knowing that Burton is not every or Ricardo is not informal.
Someone being mean is equivalent to being every.
If there is someone who is boring, then Jonathan is dishonest and Ricardo is informal.
If there is at least one people who is either not boring or every, then Jonathan is mean and Burton is not comprehensive.
Someone is mean and not boring if and only if he is dishonest and not comprehensive.
If there is at least one people who is comprehensive, then Jonathan is informal and Burton is not dishonest.
Someone who is not boring is always not comprehensive.
If Burton is not boring, then Jonathan is not every.
Isabel being not dishonest and Arthur being not comprehensive imply that Burton is mean.
Ricardo being dishonest implies that Burton is mean and Isabel is not informal.
Someone who is both not every and boring is always dishonest.
|
Burton is not dishonest.
|
entailment
|
Ted is comprehensive.
Ricardo is not comprehensive.
Arthur is not mean.
Jorge is comprehensive.
Jonathan is dishonest.
Ted is mean.
Ted is not every.
Arthur is not informal.
Jonathan is every.
Jonathan is mean.
Burton is not every.
Jonathan is comprehensive.Someone who is not informal is always both not every and mean.
It can be concluded that Burton is not mean once knowing that Burton is not every or Ricardo is not informal.
Someone being mean is equivalent to being every.
If there is someone who is boring, then Jonathan is dishonest and Ricardo is informal.
If there is at least one people who is either not boring or every, then Jonathan is mean and Burton is not comprehensive.
Someone is mean and not boring if and only if he is dishonest and not comprehensive.
If there is at least one people who is comprehensive, then Jonathan is informal and Burton is not dishonest.
Someone who is not boring is always not comprehensive.
If Burton is not boring, then Jonathan is not every.
Isabel being not dishonest and Arthur being not comprehensive imply that Burton is mean.
Ricardo being dishonest implies that Burton is mean and Isabel is not informal.
Someone who is both not every and boring is always dishonest.
|
Jonathan is dishonest.
|
entailment
|
Ted is comprehensive.
Ricardo is not comprehensive.
Arthur is not mean.
Jorge is comprehensive.
Jonathan is dishonest.
Ted is mean.
Ted is not every.
Arthur is not informal.
Jonathan is every.
Jonathan is mean.
Burton is not every.
Jonathan is comprehensive.Someone who is not informal is always both not every and mean.
It can be concluded that Burton is not mean once knowing that Burton is not every or Ricardo is not informal.
Someone being mean is equivalent to being every.
If there is someone who is boring, then Jonathan is dishonest and Ricardo is informal.
If there is at least one people who is either not boring or every, then Jonathan is mean and Burton is not comprehensive.
Someone is mean and not boring if and only if he is dishonest and not comprehensive.
If there is at least one people who is comprehensive, then Jonathan is informal and Burton is not dishonest.
Someone who is not boring is always not comprehensive.
If Burton is not boring, then Jonathan is not every.
Isabel being not dishonest and Arthur being not comprehensive imply that Burton is mean.
Ricardo being dishonest implies that Burton is mean and Isabel is not informal.
Someone who is both not every and boring is always dishonest.
|
Jorge is not boring.
|
neutral
|
Ted is comprehensive.
Ricardo is not comprehensive.
Arthur is not mean.
Jorge is comprehensive.
Jonathan is dishonest.
Ted is mean.
Ted is not every.
Arthur is not informal.
Jonathan is every.
Jonathan is mean.
Burton is not every.
Jonathan is comprehensive.Someone who is not informal is always both not every and mean.
It can be concluded that Burton is not mean once knowing that Burton is not every or Ricardo is not informal.
Someone being mean is equivalent to being every.
If there is someone who is boring, then Jonathan is dishonest and Ricardo is informal.
If there is at least one people who is either not boring or every, then Jonathan is mean and Burton is not comprehensive.
Someone is mean and not boring if and only if he is dishonest and not comprehensive.
If there is at least one people who is comprehensive, then Jonathan is informal and Burton is not dishonest.
Someone who is not boring is always not comprehensive.
If Burton is not boring, then Jonathan is not every.
Isabel being not dishonest and Arthur being not comprehensive imply that Burton is mean.
Ricardo being dishonest implies that Burton is mean and Isabel is not informal.
Someone who is both not every and boring is always dishonest.
|
Arthur is informal.
|
contradiction
|
Ted is comprehensive.
Ricardo is not comprehensive.
Arthur is not mean.
Jorge is comprehensive.
Jonathan is dishonest.
Ted is mean.
Ted is not every.
Arthur is not informal.
Jonathan is every.
Jonathan is mean.
Burton is not every.
Jonathan is comprehensive.Someone who is not informal is always both not every and mean.
It can be concluded that Burton is not mean once knowing that Burton is not every or Ricardo is not informal.
Someone being mean is equivalent to being every.
If there is someone who is boring, then Jonathan is dishonest and Ricardo is informal.
If there is at least one people who is either not boring or every, then Jonathan is mean and Burton is not comprehensive.
Someone is mean and not boring if and only if he is dishonest and not comprehensive.
If there is at least one people who is comprehensive, then Jonathan is informal and Burton is not dishonest.
Someone who is not boring is always not comprehensive.
If Burton is not boring, then Jonathan is not every.
Isabel being not dishonest and Arthur being not comprehensive imply that Burton is mean.
Ricardo being dishonest implies that Burton is mean and Isabel is not informal.
Someone who is both not every and boring is always dishonest.
|
Ted is every.
|
self_contradiction
|
Stella is messy.
Nathalie is tough.
Harris is tough.
Alexander is not tough.
Alexander is not imaginative.
James is not tough.
Nathalie is messy.
James is not obedient.
Stella is not triangular.
Harris is imaginative.
Nathalie is not imaginative.
Charles is tough.If someone is tough, then he is triangular, and vice versa.
It can be concluded that Charles is not triangular once knowing that Stella is not messy or Tobias is imaginative.
Alexander being triangular and Charles being tough imply that Harris is gentle.
It can be concluded that Nathalie is messy once knowing that James is not imaginative and Harris is obedient.
As long as someone is either not imaginative or not obedient, he is not triangular and not tough.
If there is someone who is not obedient, then Alexander is imaginative.
Someone who is not messy is always imaginative.
If someone is triangular or not messy, then he is not gentle.
If there is at least one people who is not gentle or not tough, then James is obedient.
If someone is not obedient, then he is not gentle.
If everyone is not tough, then Nathalie is messy and Tobias is not triangular.
Tobias is messy if and only if Nathalie is not tough and Stella is imaginative.
|
Charles is not tough.
|
contradiction
|
Stella is messy.
Nathalie is tough.
Harris is tough.
Alexander is not tough.
Alexander is not imaginative.
James is not tough.
Nathalie is messy.
James is not obedient.
Stella is not triangular.
Harris is imaginative.
Nathalie is not imaginative.
Charles is tough.If someone is tough, then he is triangular, and vice versa.
It can be concluded that Charles is not triangular once knowing that Stella is not messy or Tobias is imaginative.
Alexander being triangular and Charles being tough imply that Harris is gentle.
It can be concluded that Nathalie is messy once knowing that James is not imaginative and Harris is obedient.
As long as someone is either not imaginative or not obedient, he is not triangular and not tough.
If there is someone who is not obedient, then Alexander is imaginative.
Someone who is not messy is always imaginative.
If someone is triangular or not messy, then he is not gentle.
If there is at least one people who is not gentle or not tough, then James is obedient.
If someone is not obedient, then he is not gentle.
If everyone is not tough, then Nathalie is messy and Tobias is not triangular.
Tobias is messy if and only if Nathalie is not tough and Stella is imaginative.
|
Stella is imaginative.
|
neutral
|
Stella is messy.
Nathalie is tough.
Harris is tough.
Alexander is not tough.
Alexander is not imaginative.
James is not tough.
Nathalie is messy.
James is not obedient.
Stella is not triangular.
Harris is imaginative.
Nathalie is not imaginative.
Charles is tough.If someone is tough, then he is triangular, and vice versa.
It can be concluded that Charles is not triangular once knowing that Stella is not messy or Tobias is imaginative.
Alexander being triangular and Charles being tough imply that Harris is gentle.
It can be concluded that Nathalie is messy once knowing that James is not imaginative and Harris is obedient.
As long as someone is either not imaginative or not obedient, he is not triangular and not tough.
If there is someone who is not obedient, then Alexander is imaginative.
Someone who is not messy is always imaginative.
If someone is triangular or not messy, then he is not gentle.
If there is at least one people who is not gentle or not tough, then James is obedient.
If someone is not obedient, then he is not gentle.
If everyone is not tough, then Nathalie is messy and Tobias is not triangular.
Tobias is messy if and only if Nathalie is not tough and Stella is imaginative.
|
James is tough.
|
contradiction
|
Stella is messy.
Nathalie is tough.
Harris is tough.
Alexander is not tough.
Alexander is not imaginative.
James is not tough.
Nathalie is messy.
James is not obedient.
Stella is not triangular.
Harris is imaginative.
Nathalie is not imaginative.
Charles is tough.If someone is tough, then he is triangular, and vice versa.
It can be concluded that Charles is not triangular once knowing that Stella is not messy or Tobias is imaginative.
Alexander being triangular and Charles being tough imply that Harris is gentle.
It can be concluded that Nathalie is messy once knowing that James is not imaginative and Harris is obedient.
As long as someone is either not imaginative or not obedient, he is not triangular and not tough.
If there is someone who is not obedient, then Alexander is imaginative.
Someone who is not messy is always imaginative.
If someone is triangular or not messy, then he is not gentle.
If there is at least one people who is not gentle or not tough, then James is obedient.
If someone is not obedient, then he is not gentle.
If everyone is not tough, then Nathalie is messy and Tobias is not triangular.
Tobias is messy if and only if Nathalie is not tough and Stella is imaginative.
|
Nathalie is triangular.
|
self_contradiction
|
Stella is messy.
Nathalie is tough.
Harris is tough.
Alexander is not tough.
Alexander is not imaginative.
James is not tough.
Nathalie is messy.
James is not obedient.
Stella is not triangular.
Harris is imaginative.
Nathalie is not imaginative.
Charles is tough.If someone is tough, then he is triangular, and vice versa.
It can be concluded that Charles is not triangular once knowing that Stella is not messy or Tobias is imaginative.
Alexander being triangular and Charles being tough imply that Harris is gentle.
It can be concluded that Nathalie is messy once knowing that James is not imaginative and Harris is obedient.
As long as someone is either not imaginative or not obedient, he is not triangular and not tough.
If there is someone who is not obedient, then Alexander is imaginative.
Someone who is not messy is always imaginative.
If someone is triangular or not messy, then he is not gentle.
If there is at least one people who is not gentle or not tough, then James is obedient.
If someone is not obedient, then he is not gentle.
If everyone is not tough, then Nathalie is messy and Tobias is not triangular.
Tobias is messy if and only if Nathalie is not tough and Stella is imaginative.
|
Harris is gentle.
|
contradiction
|
Stella is messy.
Nathalie is tough.
Harris is tough.
Alexander is not tough.
Alexander is not imaginative.
James is not tough.
Nathalie is messy.
James is not obedient.
Stella is not triangular.
Harris is imaginative.
Nathalie is not imaginative.
Charles is tough.If someone is tough, then he is triangular, and vice versa.
It can be concluded that Charles is not triangular once knowing that Stella is not messy or Tobias is imaginative.
Alexander being triangular and Charles being tough imply that Harris is gentle.
It can be concluded that Nathalie is messy once knowing that James is not imaginative and Harris is obedient.
As long as someone is either not imaginative or not obedient, he is not triangular and not tough.
If there is someone who is not obedient, then Alexander is imaginative.
Someone who is not messy is always imaginative.
If someone is triangular or not messy, then he is not gentle.
If there is at least one people who is not gentle or not tough, then James is obedient.
If someone is not obedient, then he is not gentle.
If everyone is not tough, then Nathalie is messy and Tobias is not triangular.
Tobias is messy if and only if Nathalie is not tough and Stella is imaginative.
|
James is not messy.
|
neutral
|
Stella is messy.
Nathalie is tough.
Harris is tough.
Alexander is not tough.
Alexander is not imaginative.
James is not tough.
Nathalie is messy.
James is not obedient.
Stella is not triangular.
Harris is imaginative.
Nathalie is not imaginative.
Charles is tough.If someone is tough, then he is triangular, and vice versa.
It can be concluded that Charles is not triangular once knowing that Stella is not messy or Tobias is imaginative.
Alexander being triangular and Charles being tough imply that Harris is gentle.
It can be concluded that Nathalie is messy once knowing that James is not imaginative and Harris is obedient.
As long as someone is either not imaginative or not obedient, he is not triangular and not tough.
If there is someone who is not obedient, then Alexander is imaginative.
Someone who is not messy is always imaginative.
If someone is triangular or not messy, then he is not gentle.
If there is at least one people who is not gentle or not tough, then James is obedient.
If someone is not obedient, then he is not gentle.
If everyone is not tough, then Nathalie is messy and Tobias is not triangular.
Tobias is messy if and only if Nathalie is not tough and Stella is imaginative.
|
Alexander is imaginative.
|
self_contradiction
|
Stella is messy.
Nathalie is tough.
Harris is tough.
Alexander is not tough.
Alexander is not imaginative.
James is not tough.
Nathalie is messy.
James is not obedient.
Stella is not triangular.
Harris is imaginative.
Nathalie is not imaginative.
Charles is tough.If someone is tough, then he is triangular, and vice versa.
It can be concluded that Charles is not triangular once knowing that Stella is not messy or Tobias is imaginative.
Alexander being triangular and Charles being tough imply that Harris is gentle.
It can be concluded that Nathalie is messy once knowing that James is not imaginative and Harris is obedient.
As long as someone is either not imaginative or not obedient, he is not triangular and not tough.
If there is someone who is not obedient, then Alexander is imaginative.
Someone who is not messy is always imaginative.
If someone is triangular or not messy, then he is not gentle.
If there is at least one people who is not gentle or not tough, then James is obedient.
If someone is not obedient, then he is not gentle.
If everyone is not tough, then Nathalie is messy and Tobias is not triangular.
Tobias is messy if and only if Nathalie is not tough and Stella is imaginative.
|
Harris is not gentle.
|
entailment
|
Stella is messy.
Nathalie is tough.
Harris is tough.
Alexander is not tough.
Alexander is not imaginative.
James is not tough.
Nathalie is messy.
James is not obedient.
Stella is not triangular.
Harris is imaginative.
Nathalie is not imaginative.
Charles is tough.If someone is tough, then he is triangular, and vice versa.
It can be concluded that Charles is not triangular once knowing that Stella is not messy or Tobias is imaginative.
Alexander being triangular and Charles being tough imply that Harris is gentle.
It can be concluded that Nathalie is messy once knowing that James is not imaginative and Harris is obedient.
As long as someone is either not imaginative or not obedient, he is not triangular and not tough.
If there is someone who is not obedient, then Alexander is imaginative.
Someone who is not messy is always imaginative.
If someone is triangular or not messy, then he is not gentle.
If there is at least one people who is not gentle or not tough, then James is obedient.
If someone is not obedient, then he is not gentle.
If everyone is not tough, then Nathalie is messy and Tobias is not triangular.
Tobias is messy if and only if Nathalie is not tough and Stella is imaginative.
|
Alexander is tough.
|
contradiction
|
Stella is messy.
Nathalie is tough.
Harris is tough.
Alexander is not tough.
Alexander is not imaginative.
James is not tough.
Nathalie is messy.
James is not obedient.
Stella is not triangular.
Harris is imaginative.
Nathalie is not imaginative.
Charles is tough.If someone is tough, then he is triangular, and vice versa.
It can be concluded that Charles is not triangular once knowing that Stella is not messy or Tobias is imaginative.
Alexander being triangular and Charles being tough imply that Harris is gentle.
It can be concluded that Nathalie is messy once knowing that James is not imaginative and Harris is obedient.
As long as someone is either not imaginative or not obedient, he is not triangular and not tough.
If there is someone who is not obedient, then Alexander is imaginative.
Someone who is not messy is always imaginative.
If someone is triangular or not messy, then he is not gentle.
If there is at least one people who is not gentle or not tough, then James is obedient.
If someone is not obedient, then he is not gentle.
If everyone is not tough, then Nathalie is messy and Tobias is not triangular.
Tobias is messy if and only if Nathalie is not tough and Stella is imaginative.
|
James is not obedient.
|
self_contradiction
|
Stella is messy.
Nathalie is tough.
Harris is tough.
Alexander is not tough.
Alexander is not imaginative.
James is not tough.
Nathalie is messy.
James is not obedient.
Stella is not triangular.
Harris is imaginative.
Nathalie is not imaginative.
Charles is tough.If someone is tough, then he is triangular, and vice versa.
It can be concluded that Charles is not triangular once knowing that Stella is not messy or Tobias is imaginative.
Alexander being triangular and Charles being tough imply that Harris is gentle.
It can be concluded that Nathalie is messy once knowing that James is not imaginative and Harris is obedient.
As long as someone is either not imaginative or not obedient, he is not triangular and not tough.
If there is someone who is not obedient, then Alexander is imaginative.
Someone who is not messy is always imaginative.
If someone is triangular or not messy, then he is not gentle.
If there is at least one people who is not gentle or not tough, then James is obedient.
If someone is not obedient, then he is not gentle.
If everyone is not tough, then Nathalie is messy and Tobias is not triangular.
Tobias is messy if and only if Nathalie is not tough and Stella is imaginative.
|
Harris is triangular.
|
entailment
|
Stella is messy.
Nathalie is tough.
Harris is tough.
Alexander is not tough.
Alexander is not imaginative.
James is not tough.
Nathalie is messy.
James is not obedient.
Stella is not triangular.
Harris is imaginative.
Nathalie is not imaginative.
Charles is tough.If someone is tough, then he is triangular, and vice versa.
It can be concluded that Charles is not triangular once knowing that Stella is not messy or Tobias is imaginative.
Alexander being triangular and Charles being tough imply that Harris is gentle.
It can be concluded that Nathalie is messy once knowing that James is not imaginative and Harris is obedient.
As long as someone is either not imaginative or not obedient, he is not triangular and not tough.
If there is someone who is not obedient, then Alexander is imaginative.
Someone who is not messy is always imaginative.
If someone is triangular or not messy, then he is not gentle.
If there is at least one people who is not gentle or not tough, then James is obedient.
If someone is not obedient, then he is not gentle.
If everyone is not tough, then Nathalie is messy and Tobias is not triangular.
Tobias is messy if and only if Nathalie is not tough and Stella is imaginative.
|
Charles is tough.
|
entailment
|
Stella is messy.
Nathalie is tough.
Harris is tough.
Alexander is not tough.
Alexander is not imaginative.
James is not tough.
Nathalie is messy.
James is not obedient.
Stella is not triangular.
Harris is imaginative.
Nathalie is not imaginative.
Charles is tough.If someone is tough, then he is triangular, and vice versa.
It can be concluded that Charles is not triangular once knowing that Stella is not messy or Tobias is imaginative.
Alexander being triangular and Charles being tough imply that Harris is gentle.
It can be concluded that Nathalie is messy once knowing that James is not imaginative and Harris is obedient.
As long as someone is either not imaginative or not obedient, he is not triangular and not tough.
If there is someone who is not obedient, then Alexander is imaginative.
Someone who is not messy is always imaginative.
If someone is triangular or not messy, then he is not gentle.
If there is at least one people who is not gentle or not tough, then James is obedient.
If someone is not obedient, then he is not gentle.
If everyone is not tough, then Nathalie is messy and Tobias is not triangular.
Tobias is messy if and only if Nathalie is not tough and Stella is imaginative.
|
Tobias is not imaginative.
|
neutral
|
Stella is messy.
Nathalie is tough.
Harris is tough.
Alexander is not tough.
Alexander is not imaginative.
James is not tough.
Nathalie is messy.
James is not obedient.
Stella is not triangular.
Harris is imaginative.
Nathalie is not imaginative.
Charles is tough.If someone is tough, then he is triangular, and vice versa.
It can be concluded that Charles is not triangular once knowing that Stella is not messy or Tobias is imaginative.
Alexander being triangular and Charles being tough imply that Harris is gentle.
It can be concluded that Nathalie is messy once knowing that James is not imaginative and Harris is obedient.
As long as someone is either not imaginative or not obedient, he is not triangular and not tough.
If there is someone who is not obedient, then Alexander is imaginative.
Someone who is not messy is always imaginative.
If someone is triangular or not messy, then he is not gentle.
If there is at least one people who is not gentle or not tough, then James is obedient.
If someone is not obedient, then he is not gentle.
If everyone is not tough, then Nathalie is messy and Tobias is not triangular.
Tobias is messy if and only if Nathalie is not tough and Stella is imaginative.
|
Nathalie is tough.
|
self_contradiction
|
Stella is messy.
Nathalie is tough.
Harris is tough.
Alexander is not tough.
Alexander is not imaginative.
James is not tough.
Nathalie is messy.
James is not obedient.
Stella is not triangular.
Harris is imaginative.
Nathalie is not imaginative.
Charles is tough.If someone is tough, then he is triangular, and vice versa.
It can be concluded that Charles is not triangular once knowing that Stella is not messy or Tobias is imaginative.
Alexander being triangular and Charles being tough imply that Harris is gentle.
It can be concluded that Nathalie is messy once knowing that James is not imaginative and Harris is obedient.
As long as someone is either not imaginative or not obedient, he is not triangular and not tough.
If there is someone who is not obedient, then Alexander is imaginative.
Someone who is not messy is always imaginative.
If someone is triangular or not messy, then he is not gentle.
If there is at least one people who is not gentle or not tough, then James is obedient.
If someone is not obedient, then he is not gentle.
If everyone is not tough, then Nathalie is messy and Tobias is not triangular.
Tobias is messy if and only if Nathalie is not tough and Stella is imaginative.
|
Charles is triangular.
|
entailment
|
Stella is messy.
Nathalie is tough.
Harris is tough.
Alexander is not tough.
Alexander is not imaginative.
James is not tough.
Nathalie is messy.
James is not obedient.
Stella is not triangular.
Harris is imaginative.
Nathalie is not imaginative.
Charles is tough.If someone is tough, then he is triangular, and vice versa.
It can be concluded that Charles is not triangular once knowing that Stella is not messy or Tobias is imaginative.
Alexander being triangular and Charles being tough imply that Harris is gentle.
It can be concluded that Nathalie is messy once knowing that James is not imaginative and Harris is obedient.
As long as someone is either not imaginative or not obedient, he is not triangular and not tough.
If there is someone who is not obedient, then Alexander is imaginative.
Someone who is not messy is always imaginative.
If someone is triangular or not messy, then he is not gentle.
If there is at least one people who is not gentle or not tough, then James is obedient.
If someone is not obedient, then he is not gentle.
If everyone is not tough, then Nathalie is messy and Tobias is not triangular.
Tobias is messy if and only if Nathalie is not tough and Stella is imaginative.
|
James is obedient.
|
self_contradiction
|
Stella is messy.
Nathalie is tough.
Harris is tough.
Alexander is not tough.
Alexander is not imaginative.
James is not tough.
Nathalie is messy.
James is not obedient.
Stella is not triangular.
Harris is imaginative.
Nathalie is not imaginative.
Charles is tough.If someone is tough, then he is triangular, and vice versa.
It can be concluded that Charles is not triangular once knowing that Stella is not messy or Tobias is imaginative.
Alexander being triangular and Charles being tough imply that Harris is gentle.
It can be concluded that Nathalie is messy once knowing that James is not imaginative and Harris is obedient.
As long as someone is either not imaginative or not obedient, he is not triangular and not tough.
If there is someone who is not obedient, then Alexander is imaginative.
Someone who is not messy is always imaginative.
If someone is triangular or not messy, then he is not gentle.
If there is at least one people who is not gentle or not tough, then James is obedient.
If someone is not obedient, then he is not gentle.
If everyone is not tough, then Nathalie is messy and Tobias is not triangular.
Tobias is messy if and only if Nathalie is not tough and Stella is imaginative.
|
Stella is not triangular.
|
entailment
|
Stella is messy.
Nathalie is tough.
Harris is tough.
Alexander is not tough.
Alexander is not imaginative.
James is not tough.
Nathalie is messy.
James is not obedient.
Stella is not triangular.
Harris is imaginative.
Nathalie is not imaginative.
Charles is tough.If someone is tough, then he is triangular, and vice versa.
It can be concluded that Charles is not triangular once knowing that Stella is not messy or Tobias is imaginative.
Alexander being triangular and Charles being tough imply that Harris is gentle.
It can be concluded that Nathalie is messy once knowing that James is not imaginative and Harris is obedient.
As long as someone is either not imaginative or not obedient, he is not triangular and not tough.
If there is someone who is not obedient, then Alexander is imaginative.
Someone who is not messy is always imaginative.
If someone is triangular or not messy, then he is not gentle.
If there is at least one people who is not gentle or not tough, then James is obedient.
If someone is not obedient, then he is not gentle.
If everyone is not tough, then Nathalie is messy and Tobias is not triangular.
Tobias is messy if and only if Nathalie is not tough and Stella is imaginative.
|
Tobias is not triangular.
|
neutral
|
Stella is messy.
Nathalie is tough.
Harris is tough.
Alexander is not tough.
Alexander is not imaginative.
James is not tough.
Nathalie is messy.
James is not obedient.
Stella is not triangular.
Harris is imaginative.
Nathalie is not imaginative.
Charles is tough.If someone is tough, then he is triangular, and vice versa.
It can be concluded that Charles is not triangular once knowing that Stella is not messy or Tobias is imaginative.
Alexander being triangular and Charles being tough imply that Harris is gentle.
It can be concluded that Nathalie is messy once knowing that James is not imaginative and Harris is obedient.
As long as someone is either not imaginative or not obedient, he is not triangular and not tough.
If there is someone who is not obedient, then Alexander is imaginative.
Someone who is not messy is always imaginative.
If someone is triangular or not messy, then he is not gentle.
If there is at least one people who is not gentle or not tough, then James is obedient.
If someone is not obedient, then he is not gentle.
If everyone is not tough, then Nathalie is messy and Tobias is not triangular.
Tobias is messy if and only if Nathalie is not tough and Stella is imaginative.
|
Nathalie is gentle.
|
contradiction
|
Stella is messy.
Nathalie is tough.
Harris is tough.
Alexander is not tough.
Alexander is not imaginative.
James is not tough.
Nathalie is messy.
James is not obedient.
Stella is not triangular.
Harris is imaginative.
Nathalie is not imaginative.
Charles is tough.If someone is tough, then he is triangular, and vice versa.
It can be concluded that Charles is not triangular once knowing that Stella is not messy or Tobias is imaginative.
Alexander being triangular and Charles being tough imply that Harris is gentle.
It can be concluded that Nathalie is messy once knowing that James is not imaginative and Harris is obedient.
As long as someone is either not imaginative or not obedient, he is not triangular and not tough.
If there is someone who is not obedient, then Alexander is imaginative.
Someone who is not messy is always imaginative.
If someone is triangular or not messy, then he is not gentle.
If there is at least one people who is not gentle or not tough, then James is obedient.
If someone is not obedient, then he is not gentle.
If everyone is not tough, then Nathalie is messy and Tobias is not triangular.
Tobias is messy if and only if Nathalie is not tough and Stella is imaginative.
|
Charles is not obedient.
|
neutral
|
Brian is magnificent.
Jesse is competitive.
Tobias is not magnificent.
Jesse is dangerous.
Jerry is not competitive.
Brian is cold.
Jesse is cold.
Jesse is silly.
Tobias is silly.
Albert is quiet.
Brian is not quiet.
Burton is not competitive.It can be concluded that Jerry is quiet and Burton is dangerous once knowing that Jesse is silly.
Brian being silly is equivalent to Brian being not dangerous and Orlando being not competitive.
If someone is quiet and not dangerous, then he is cold, and vice versa.
If someone is both not cold and not competitive, then he is silly.
If someone is dangerous and not magnificent, then he is both not cold and quiet, and vice versa.
It can be concluded that Jesse is quiet once knowing that Jesse is magnificent or Jerry is competitive.
If there is someone who is either competitive or not cold, then Brian is not silly.
If there is someone who is either not quiet or not magnificent, then Jerry is not dangerous and Orlando is competitive.
If everyone is quiet or not silly, then Tobias is not competitive.
If someone is not competitive and magnificent, then he is cold, and vice versa.
If someone is not dangerous, then he is cold, and vice versa.
If Jerry is not competitive or Jesse is not silly, then Orlando is quiet.
|
Tobias is magnificent.
|
contradiction
|
Brian is magnificent.
Jesse is competitive.
Tobias is not magnificent.
Jesse is dangerous.
Jerry is not competitive.
Brian is cold.
Jesse is cold.
Jesse is silly.
Tobias is silly.
Albert is quiet.
Brian is not quiet.
Burton is not competitive.It can be concluded that Jerry is quiet and Burton is dangerous once knowing that Jesse is silly.
Brian being silly is equivalent to Brian being not dangerous and Orlando being not competitive.
If someone is quiet and not dangerous, then he is cold, and vice versa.
If someone is both not cold and not competitive, then he is silly.
If someone is dangerous and not magnificent, then he is both not cold and quiet, and vice versa.
It can be concluded that Jesse is quiet once knowing that Jesse is magnificent or Jerry is competitive.
If there is someone who is either competitive or not cold, then Brian is not silly.
If there is someone who is either not quiet or not magnificent, then Jerry is not dangerous and Orlando is competitive.
If everyone is quiet or not silly, then Tobias is not competitive.
If someone is not competitive and magnificent, then he is cold, and vice versa.
If someone is not dangerous, then he is cold, and vice versa.
If Jerry is not competitive or Jesse is not silly, then Orlando is quiet.
|
Tobias is not silly.
|
contradiction
|
Brian is magnificent.
Jesse is competitive.
Tobias is not magnificent.
Jesse is dangerous.
Jerry is not competitive.
Brian is cold.
Jesse is cold.
Jesse is silly.
Tobias is silly.
Albert is quiet.
Brian is not quiet.
Burton is not competitive.It can be concluded that Jerry is quiet and Burton is dangerous once knowing that Jesse is silly.
Brian being silly is equivalent to Brian being not dangerous and Orlando being not competitive.
If someone is quiet and not dangerous, then he is cold, and vice versa.
If someone is both not cold and not competitive, then he is silly.
If someone is dangerous and not magnificent, then he is both not cold and quiet, and vice versa.
It can be concluded that Jesse is quiet once knowing that Jesse is magnificent or Jerry is competitive.
If there is someone who is either competitive or not cold, then Brian is not silly.
If there is someone who is either not quiet or not magnificent, then Jerry is not dangerous and Orlando is competitive.
If everyone is quiet or not silly, then Tobias is not competitive.
If someone is not competitive and magnificent, then he is cold, and vice versa.
If someone is not dangerous, then he is cold, and vice versa.
If Jerry is not competitive or Jesse is not silly, then Orlando is quiet.
|
Brian is not quiet.
|
self_contradiction
|
Brian is magnificent.
Jesse is competitive.
Tobias is not magnificent.
Jesse is dangerous.
Jerry is not competitive.
Brian is cold.
Jesse is cold.
Jesse is silly.
Tobias is silly.
Albert is quiet.
Brian is not quiet.
Burton is not competitive.It can be concluded that Jerry is quiet and Burton is dangerous once knowing that Jesse is silly.
Brian being silly is equivalent to Brian being not dangerous and Orlando being not competitive.
If someone is quiet and not dangerous, then he is cold, and vice versa.
If someone is both not cold and not competitive, then he is silly.
If someone is dangerous and not magnificent, then he is both not cold and quiet, and vice versa.
It can be concluded that Jesse is quiet once knowing that Jesse is magnificent or Jerry is competitive.
If there is someone who is either competitive or not cold, then Brian is not silly.
If there is someone who is either not quiet or not magnificent, then Jerry is not dangerous and Orlando is competitive.
If everyone is quiet or not silly, then Tobias is not competitive.
If someone is not competitive and magnificent, then he is cold, and vice versa.
If someone is not dangerous, then he is cold, and vice versa.
If Jerry is not competitive or Jesse is not silly, then Orlando is quiet.
|
Brian is not competitive.
|
entailment
|
Brian is magnificent.
Jesse is competitive.
Tobias is not magnificent.
Jesse is dangerous.
Jerry is not competitive.
Brian is cold.
Jesse is cold.
Jesse is silly.
Tobias is silly.
Albert is quiet.
Brian is not quiet.
Burton is not competitive.It can be concluded that Jerry is quiet and Burton is dangerous once knowing that Jesse is silly.
Brian being silly is equivalent to Brian being not dangerous and Orlando being not competitive.
If someone is quiet and not dangerous, then he is cold, and vice versa.
If someone is both not cold and not competitive, then he is silly.
If someone is dangerous and not magnificent, then he is both not cold and quiet, and vice versa.
It can be concluded that Jesse is quiet once knowing that Jesse is magnificent or Jerry is competitive.
If there is someone who is either competitive or not cold, then Brian is not silly.
If there is someone who is either not quiet or not magnificent, then Jerry is not dangerous and Orlando is competitive.
If everyone is quiet or not silly, then Tobias is not competitive.
If someone is not competitive and magnificent, then he is cold, and vice versa.
If someone is not dangerous, then he is cold, and vice versa.
If Jerry is not competitive or Jesse is not silly, then Orlando is quiet.
|
Brian is quiet.
|
self_contradiction
|
Brian is magnificent.
Jesse is competitive.
Tobias is not magnificent.
Jesse is dangerous.
Jerry is not competitive.
Brian is cold.
Jesse is cold.
Jesse is silly.
Tobias is silly.
Albert is quiet.
Brian is not quiet.
Burton is not competitive.It can be concluded that Jerry is quiet and Burton is dangerous once knowing that Jesse is silly.
Brian being silly is equivalent to Brian being not dangerous and Orlando being not competitive.
If someone is quiet and not dangerous, then he is cold, and vice versa.
If someone is both not cold and not competitive, then he is silly.
If someone is dangerous and not magnificent, then he is both not cold and quiet, and vice versa.
It can be concluded that Jesse is quiet once knowing that Jesse is magnificent or Jerry is competitive.
If there is someone who is either competitive or not cold, then Brian is not silly.
If there is someone who is either not quiet or not magnificent, then Jerry is not dangerous and Orlando is competitive.
If everyone is quiet or not silly, then Tobias is not competitive.
If someone is not competitive and magnificent, then he is cold, and vice versa.
If someone is not dangerous, then he is cold, and vice versa.
If Jerry is not competitive or Jesse is not silly, then Orlando is quiet.
|
Jerry is dangerous.
|
contradiction
|
Brian is magnificent.
Jesse is competitive.
Tobias is not magnificent.
Jesse is dangerous.
Jerry is not competitive.
Brian is cold.
Jesse is cold.
Jesse is silly.
Tobias is silly.
Albert is quiet.
Brian is not quiet.
Burton is not competitive.It can be concluded that Jerry is quiet and Burton is dangerous once knowing that Jesse is silly.
Brian being silly is equivalent to Brian being not dangerous and Orlando being not competitive.
If someone is quiet and not dangerous, then he is cold, and vice versa.
If someone is both not cold and not competitive, then he is silly.
If someone is dangerous and not magnificent, then he is both not cold and quiet, and vice versa.
It can be concluded that Jesse is quiet once knowing that Jesse is magnificent or Jerry is competitive.
If there is someone who is either competitive or not cold, then Brian is not silly.
If there is someone who is either not quiet or not magnificent, then Jerry is not dangerous and Orlando is competitive.
If everyone is quiet or not silly, then Tobias is not competitive.
If someone is not competitive and magnificent, then he is cold, and vice versa.
If someone is not dangerous, then he is cold, and vice versa.
If Jerry is not competitive or Jesse is not silly, then Orlando is quiet.
|
Orlando is not silly.
|
neutral
|
Brian is magnificent.
Jesse is competitive.
Tobias is not magnificent.
Jesse is dangerous.
Jerry is not competitive.
Brian is cold.
Jesse is cold.
Jesse is silly.
Tobias is silly.
Albert is quiet.
Brian is not quiet.
Burton is not competitive.It can be concluded that Jerry is quiet and Burton is dangerous once knowing that Jesse is silly.
Brian being silly is equivalent to Brian being not dangerous and Orlando being not competitive.
If someone is quiet and not dangerous, then he is cold, and vice versa.
If someone is both not cold and not competitive, then he is silly.
If someone is dangerous and not magnificent, then he is both not cold and quiet, and vice versa.
It can be concluded that Jesse is quiet once knowing that Jesse is magnificent or Jerry is competitive.
If there is someone who is either competitive or not cold, then Brian is not silly.
If there is someone who is either not quiet or not magnificent, then Jerry is not dangerous and Orlando is competitive.
If everyone is quiet or not silly, then Tobias is not competitive.
If someone is not competitive and magnificent, then he is cold, and vice versa.
If someone is not dangerous, then he is cold, and vice versa.
If Jerry is not competitive or Jesse is not silly, then Orlando is quiet.
|
Jesse is not dangerous.
|
self_contradiction
|
Brian is magnificent.
Jesse is competitive.
Tobias is not magnificent.
Jesse is dangerous.
Jerry is not competitive.
Brian is cold.
Jesse is cold.
Jesse is silly.
Tobias is silly.
Albert is quiet.
Brian is not quiet.
Burton is not competitive.It can be concluded that Jerry is quiet and Burton is dangerous once knowing that Jesse is silly.
Brian being silly is equivalent to Brian being not dangerous and Orlando being not competitive.
If someone is quiet and not dangerous, then he is cold, and vice versa.
If someone is both not cold and not competitive, then he is silly.
If someone is dangerous and not magnificent, then he is both not cold and quiet, and vice versa.
It can be concluded that Jesse is quiet once knowing that Jesse is magnificent or Jerry is competitive.
If there is someone who is either competitive or not cold, then Brian is not silly.
If there is someone who is either not quiet or not magnificent, then Jerry is not dangerous and Orlando is competitive.
If everyone is quiet or not silly, then Tobias is not competitive.
If someone is not competitive and magnificent, then he is cold, and vice versa.
If someone is not dangerous, then he is cold, and vice versa.
If Jerry is not competitive or Jesse is not silly, then Orlando is quiet.
|
Jerry is not cold.
|
contradiction
|
Brian is magnificent.
Jesse is competitive.
Tobias is not magnificent.
Jesse is dangerous.
Jerry is not competitive.
Brian is cold.
Jesse is cold.
Jesse is silly.
Tobias is silly.
Albert is quiet.
Brian is not quiet.
Burton is not competitive.It can be concluded that Jerry is quiet and Burton is dangerous once knowing that Jesse is silly.
Brian being silly is equivalent to Brian being not dangerous and Orlando being not competitive.
If someone is quiet and not dangerous, then he is cold, and vice versa.
If someone is both not cold and not competitive, then he is silly.
If someone is dangerous and not magnificent, then he is both not cold and quiet, and vice versa.
It can be concluded that Jesse is quiet once knowing that Jesse is magnificent or Jerry is competitive.
If there is someone who is either competitive or not cold, then Brian is not silly.
If there is someone who is either not quiet or not magnificent, then Jerry is not dangerous and Orlando is competitive.
If everyone is quiet or not silly, then Tobias is not competitive.
If someone is not competitive and magnificent, then he is cold, and vice versa.
If someone is not dangerous, then he is cold, and vice versa.
If Jerry is not competitive or Jesse is not silly, then Orlando is quiet.
|
Albert is quiet.
|
entailment
|
Brian is magnificent.
Jesse is competitive.
Tobias is not magnificent.
Jesse is dangerous.
Jerry is not competitive.
Brian is cold.
Jesse is cold.
Jesse is silly.
Tobias is silly.
Albert is quiet.
Brian is not quiet.
Burton is not competitive.It can be concluded that Jerry is quiet and Burton is dangerous once knowing that Jesse is silly.
Brian being silly is equivalent to Brian being not dangerous and Orlando being not competitive.
If someone is quiet and not dangerous, then he is cold, and vice versa.
If someone is both not cold and not competitive, then he is silly.
If someone is dangerous and not magnificent, then he is both not cold and quiet, and vice versa.
It can be concluded that Jesse is quiet once knowing that Jesse is magnificent or Jerry is competitive.
If there is someone who is either competitive or not cold, then Brian is not silly.
If there is someone who is either not quiet or not magnificent, then Jerry is not dangerous and Orlando is competitive.
If everyone is quiet or not silly, then Tobias is not competitive.
If someone is not competitive and magnificent, then he is cold, and vice versa.
If someone is not dangerous, then he is cold, and vice versa.
If Jerry is not competitive or Jesse is not silly, then Orlando is quiet.
|
Albert is cold.
|
neutral
|
Brian is magnificent.
Jesse is competitive.
Tobias is not magnificent.
Jesse is dangerous.
Jerry is not competitive.
Brian is cold.
Jesse is cold.
Jesse is silly.
Tobias is silly.
Albert is quiet.
Brian is not quiet.
Burton is not competitive.It can be concluded that Jerry is quiet and Burton is dangerous once knowing that Jesse is silly.
Brian being silly is equivalent to Brian being not dangerous and Orlando being not competitive.
If someone is quiet and not dangerous, then he is cold, and vice versa.
If someone is both not cold and not competitive, then he is silly.
If someone is dangerous and not magnificent, then he is both not cold and quiet, and vice versa.
It can be concluded that Jesse is quiet once knowing that Jesse is magnificent or Jerry is competitive.
If there is someone who is either competitive or not cold, then Brian is not silly.
If there is someone who is either not quiet or not magnificent, then Jerry is not dangerous and Orlando is competitive.
If everyone is quiet or not silly, then Tobias is not competitive.
If someone is not competitive and magnificent, then he is cold, and vice versa.
If someone is not dangerous, then he is cold, and vice versa.
If Jerry is not competitive or Jesse is not silly, then Orlando is quiet.
|
Burton is not dangerous.
|
contradiction
|
Brian is magnificent.
Jesse is competitive.
Tobias is not magnificent.
Jesse is dangerous.
Jerry is not competitive.
Brian is cold.
Jesse is cold.
Jesse is silly.
Tobias is silly.
Albert is quiet.
Brian is not quiet.
Burton is not competitive.It can be concluded that Jerry is quiet and Burton is dangerous once knowing that Jesse is silly.
Brian being silly is equivalent to Brian being not dangerous and Orlando being not competitive.
If someone is quiet and not dangerous, then he is cold, and vice versa.
If someone is both not cold and not competitive, then he is silly.
If someone is dangerous and not magnificent, then he is both not cold and quiet, and vice versa.
It can be concluded that Jesse is quiet once knowing that Jesse is magnificent or Jerry is competitive.
If there is someone who is either competitive or not cold, then Brian is not silly.
If there is someone who is either not quiet or not magnificent, then Jerry is not dangerous and Orlando is competitive.
If everyone is quiet or not silly, then Tobias is not competitive.
If someone is not competitive and magnificent, then he is cold, and vice versa.
If someone is not dangerous, then he is cold, and vice versa.
If Jerry is not competitive or Jesse is not silly, then Orlando is quiet.
|
Jesse is not competitive.
|
self_contradiction
|
Brian is magnificent.
Jesse is competitive.
Tobias is not magnificent.
Jesse is dangerous.
Jerry is not competitive.
Brian is cold.
Jesse is cold.
Jesse is silly.
Tobias is silly.
Albert is quiet.
Brian is not quiet.
Burton is not competitive.It can be concluded that Jerry is quiet and Burton is dangerous once knowing that Jesse is silly.
Brian being silly is equivalent to Brian being not dangerous and Orlando being not competitive.
If someone is quiet and not dangerous, then he is cold, and vice versa.
If someone is both not cold and not competitive, then he is silly.
If someone is dangerous and not magnificent, then he is both not cold and quiet, and vice versa.
It can be concluded that Jesse is quiet once knowing that Jesse is magnificent or Jerry is competitive.
If there is someone who is either competitive or not cold, then Brian is not silly.
If there is someone who is either not quiet or not magnificent, then Jerry is not dangerous and Orlando is competitive.
If everyone is quiet or not silly, then Tobias is not competitive.
If someone is not competitive and magnificent, then he is cold, and vice versa.
If someone is not dangerous, then he is cold, and vice versa.
If Jerry is not competitive or Jesse is not silly, then Orlando is quiet.
|
Orlando is quiet.
|
entailment
|
Brian is magnificent.
Jesse is competitive.
Tobias is not magnificent.
Jesse is dangerous.
Jerry is not competitive.
Brian is cold.
Jesse is cold.
Jesse is silly.
Tobias is silly.
Albert is quiet.
Brian is not quiet.
Burton is not competitive.It can be concluded that Jerry is quiet and Burton is dangerous once knowing that Jesse is silly.
Brian being silly is equivalent to Brian being not dangerous and Orlando being not competitive.
If someone is quiet and not dangerous, then he is cold, and vice versa.
If someone is both not cold and not competitive, then he is silly.
If someone is dangerous and not magnificent, then he is both not cold and quiet, and vice versa.
It can be concluded that Jesse is quiet once knowing that Jesse is magnificent or Jerry is competitive.
If there is someone who is either competitive or not cold, then Brian is not silly.
If there is someone who is either not quiet or not magnificent, then Jerry is not dangerous and Orlando is competitive.
If everyone is quiet or not silly, then Tobias is not competitive.
If someone is not competitive and magnificent, then he is cold, and vice versa.
If someone is not dangerous, then he is cold, and vice versa.
If Jerry is not competitive or Jesse is not silly, then Orlando is quiet.
|
Tobias is quiet.
|
neutral
|
Brian is magnificent.
Jesse is competitive.
Tobias is not magnificent.
Jesse is dangerous.
Jerry is not competitive.
Brian is cold.
Jesse is cold.
Jesse is silly.
Tobias is silly.
Albert is quiet.
Brian is not quiet.
Burton is not competitive.It can be concluded that Jerry is quiet and Burton is dangerous once knowing that Jesse is silly.
Brian being silly is equivalent to Brian being not dangerous and Orlando being not competitive.
If someone is quiet and not dangerous, then he is cold, and vice versa.
If someone is both not cold and not competitive, then he is silly.
If someone is dangerous and not magnificent, then he is both not cold and quiet, and vice versa.
It can be concluded that Jesse is quiet once knowing that Jesse is magnificent or Jerry is competitive.
If there is someone who is either competitive or not cold, then Brian is not silly.
If there is someone who is either not quiet or not magnificent, then Jerry is not dangerous and Orlando is competitive.
If everyone is quiet or not silly, then Tobias is not competitive.
If someone is not competitive and magnificent, then he is cold, and vice versa.
If someone is not dangerous, then he is cold, and vice versa.
If Jerry is not competitive or Jesse is not silly, then Orlando is quiet.
|
Jesse is dangerous.
|
self_contradiction
|
Brian is magnificent.
Jesse is competitive.
Tobias is not magnificent.
Jesse is dangerous.
Jerry is not competitive.
Brian is cold.
Jesse is cold.
Jesse is silly.
Tobias is silly.
Albert is quiet.
Brian is not quiet.
Burton is not competitive.It can be concluded that Jerry is quiet and Burton is dangerous once knowing that Jesse is silly.
Brian being silly is equivalent to Brian being not dangerous and Orlando being not competitive.
If someone is quiet and not dangerous, then he is cold, and vice versa.
If someone is both not cold and not competitive, then he is silly.
If someone is dangerous and not magnificent, then he is both not cold and quiet, and vice versa.
It can be concluded that Jesse is quiet once knowing that Jesse is magnificent or Jerry is competitive.
If there is someone who is either competitive or not cold, then Brian is not silly.
If there is someone who is either not quiet or not magnificent, then Jerry is not dangerous and Orlando is competitive.
If everyone is quiet or not silly, then Tobias is not competitive.
If someone is not competitive and magnificent, then he is cold, and vice versa.
If someone is not dangerous, then he is cold, and vice versa.
If Jerry is not competitive or Jesse is not silly, then Orlando is quiet.
|
Tobias is dangerous.
|
neutral
|
Brian is magnificent.
Jesse is competitive.
Tobias is not magnificent.
Jesse is dangerous.
Jerry is not competitive.
Brian is cold.
Jesse is cold.
Jesse is silly.
Tobias is silly.
Albert is quiet.
Brian is not quiet.
Burton is not competitive.It can be concluded that Jerry is quiet and Burton is dangerous once knowing that Jesse is silly.
Brian being silly is equivalent to Brian being not dangerous and Orlando being not competitive.
If someone is quiet and not dangerous, then he is cold, and vice versa.
If someone is both not cold and not competitive, then he is silly.
If someone is dangerous and not magnificent, then he is both not cold and quiet, and vice versa.
It can be concluded that Jesse is quiet once knowing that Jesse is magnificent or Jerry is competitive.
If there is someone who is either competitive or not cold, then Brian is not silly.
If there is someone who is either not quiet or not magnificent, then Jerry is not dangerous and Orlando is competitive.
If everyone is quiet or not silly, then Tobias is not competitive.
If someone is not competitive and magnificent, then he is cold, and vice versa.
If someone is not dangerous, then he is cold, and vice versa.
If Jerry is not competitive or Jesse is not silly, then Orlando is quiet.
|
Jerry is magnificent.
|
entailment
|
Brian is magnificent.
Jesse is competitive.
Tobias is not magnificent.
Jesse is dangerous.
Jerry is not competitive.
Brian is cold.
Jesse is cold.
Jesse is silly.
Tobias is silly.
Albert is quiet.
Brian is not quiet.
Burton is not competitive.It can be concluded that Jerry is quiet and Burton is dangerous once knowing that Jesse is silly.
Brian being silly is equivalent to Brian being not dangerous and Orlando being not competitive.
If someone is quiet and not dangerous, then he is cold, and vice versa.
If someone is both not cold and not competitive, then he is silly.
If someone is dangerous and not magnificent, then he is both not cold and quiet, and vice versa.
It can be concluded that Jesse is quiet once knowing that Jesse is magnificent or Jerry is competitive.
If there is someone who is either competitive or not cold, then Brian is not silly.
If there is someone who is either not quiet or not magnificent, then Jerry is not dangerous and Orlando is competitive.
If everyone is quiet or not silly, then Tobias is not competitive.
If someone is not competitive and magnificent, then he is cold, and vice versa.
If someone is not dangerous, then he is cold, and vice versa.
If Jerry is not competitive or Jesse is not silly, then Orlando is quiet.
|
Jerry is not competitive.
|
entailment
|
Brian is magnificent.
Jesse is competitive.
Tobias is not magnificent.
Jesse is dangerous.
Jerry is not competitive.
Brian is cold.
Jesse is cold.
Jesse is silly.
Tobias is silly.
Albert is quiet.
Brian is not quiet.
Burton is not competitive.It can be concluded that Jerry is quiet and Burton is dangerous once knowing that Jesse is silly.
Brian being silly is equivalent to Brian being not dangerous and Orlando being not competitive.
If someone is quiet and not dangerous, then he is cold, and vice versa.
If someone is both not cold and not competitive, then he is silly.
If someone is dangerous and not magnificent, then he is both not cold and quiet, and vice versa.
It can be concluded that Jesse is quiet once knowing that Jesse is magnificent or Jerry is competitive.
If there is someone who is either competitive or not cold, then Brian is not silly.
If there is someone who is either not quiet or not magnificent, then Jerry is not dangerous and Orlando is competitive.
If everyone is quiet or not silly, then Tobias is not competitive.
If someone is not competitive and magnificent, then he is cold, and vice versa.
If someone is not dangerous, then he is cold, and vice versa.
If Jerry is not competitive or Jesse is not silly, then Orlando is quiet.
|
Orlando is not dangerous.
|
neutral
|
Ethan is not red.
Lincoln is not helpful.
Cedric is sufficient.
Cedric is not red.
Kimberly is not dull.
Lucille is not sufficient.
Lincoln is not dull.
Cedric is lucky.
Brent is not red.
Debra is not helpful.
Kimberly is not sufficient.
Debra is dull.Someone is not sufficient and dull if and only if he is helpful and not elegant.
if there is at least one people who is not helpful and elegant, then Lincoln is lucky and Lucille is dull.
If there is someone who is both not elegant and red, then Brent is not helpful.
If there is at least one people who is not helpful, then Brent is not dull.
If someone who is not helpful is also not sufficient, then he is not elegant.
It can be concluded that Lucille is not dull and Lincoln is not sufficient once knowing that Brent is not red.
If someone who is lucky is also helpful, then he is red.
Ethan being not sufficient or Lincoln being not dull implies that Lincoln is lucky.
Debra being helpful implies that Kimberly is sufficient.
If someone is elegant, then he is both not red and not helpful.
If Kimberly is not dull, then Kimberly is not red, and vice versa.
Someone being lucky is equivalent to being helpful.
|
Lincoln is not dull.
|
self_contradiction
|
Ethan is not red.
Lincoln is not helpful.
Cedric is sufficient.
Cedric is not red.
Kimberly is not dull.
Lucille is not sufficient.
Lincoln is not dull.
Cedric is lucky.
Brent is not red.
Debra is not helpful.
Kimberly is not sufficient.
Debra is dull.Someone is not sufficient and dull if and only if he is helpful and not elegant.
if there is at least one people who is not helpful and elegant, then Lincoln is lucky and Lucille is dull.
If there is someone who is both not elegant and red, then Brent is not helpful.
If there is at least one people who is not helpful, then Brent is not dull.
If someone who is not helpful is also not sufficient, then he is not elegant.
It can be concluded that Lucille is not dull and Lincoln is not sufficient once knowing that Brent is not red.
If someone who is lucky is also helpful, then he is red.
Ethan being not sufficient or Lincoln being not dull implies that Lincoln is lucky.
Debra being helpful implies that Kimberly is sufficient.
If someone is elegant, then he is both not red and not helpful.
If Kimberly is not dull, then Kimberly is not red, and vice versa.
Someone being lucky is equivalent to being helpful.
|
Lucille is dull.
|
contradiction
|
Ethan is not red.
Lincoln is not helpful.
Cedric is sufficient.
Cedric is not red.
Kimberly is not dull.
Lucille is not sufficient.
Lincoln is not dull.
Cedric is lucky.
Brent is not red.
Debra is not helpful.
Kimberly is not sufficient.
Debra is dull.Someone is not sufficient and dull if and only if he is helpful and not elegant.
if there is at least one people who is not helpful and elegant, then Lincoln is lucky and Lucille is dull.
If there is someone who is both not elegant and red, then Brent is not helpful.
If there is at least one people who is not helpful, then Brent is not dull.
If someone who is not helpful is also not sufficient, then he is not elegant.
It can be concluded that Lucille is not dull and Lincoln is not sufficient once knowing that Brent is not red.
If someone who is lucky is also helpful, then he is red.
Ethan being not sufficient or Lincoln being not dull implies that Lincoln is lucky.
Debra being helpful implies that Kimberly is sufficient.
If someone is elegant, then he is both not red and not helpful.
If Kimberly is not dull, then Kimberly is not red, and vice versa.
Someone being lucky is equivalent to being helpful.
|
Cedric is helpful.
|
entailment
|
Ethan is not red.
Lincoln is not helpful.
Cedric is sufficient.
Cedric is not red.
Kimberly is not dull.
Lucille is not sufficient.
Lincoln is not dull.
Cedric is lucky.
Brent is not red.
Debra is not helpful.
Kimberly is not sufficient.
Debra is dull.Someone is not sufficient and dull if and only if he is helpful and not elegant.
if there is at least one people who is not helpful and elegant, then Lincoln is lucky and Lucille is dull.
If there is someone who is both not elegant and red, then Brent is not helpful.
If there is at least one people who is not helpful, then Brent is not dull.
If someone who is not helpful is also not sufficient, then he is not elegant.
It can be concluded that Lucille is not dull and Lincoln is not sufficient once knowing that Brent is not red.
If someone who is lucky is also helpful, then he is red.
Ethan being not sufficient or Lincoln being not dull implies that Lincoln is lucky.
Debra being helpful implies that Kimberly is sufficient.
If someone is elegant, then he is both not red and not helpful.
If Kimberly is not dull, then Kimberly is not red, and vice versa.
Someone being lucky is equivalent to being helpful.
|
Lincoln is red.
|
entailment
|
Ethan is not red.
Lincoln is not helpful.
Cedric is sufficient.
Cedric is not red.
Kimberly is not dull.
Lucille is not sufficient.
Lincoln is not dull.
Cedric is lucky.
Brent is not red.
Debra is not helpful.
Kimberly is not sufficient.
Debra is dull.Someone is not sufficient and dull if and only if he is helpful and not elegant.
if there is at least one people who is not helpful and elegant, then Lincoln is lucky and Lucille is dull.
If there is someone who is both not elegant and red, then Brent is not helpful.
If there is at least one people who is not helpful, then Brent is not dull.
If someone who is not helpful is also not sufficient, then he is not elegant.
It can be concluded that Lucille is not dull and Lincoln is not sufficient once knowing that Brent is not red.
If someone who is lucky is also helpful, then he is red.
Ethan being not sufficient or Lincoln being not dull implies that Lincoln is lucky.
Debra being helpful implies that Kimberly is sufficient.
If someone is elegant, then he is both not red and not helpful.
If Kimberly is not dull, then Kimberly is not red, and vice versa.
Someone being lucky is equivalent to being helpful.
|
Brent is not red.
|
entailment
|
Ethan is not red.
Lincoln is not helpful.
Cedric is sufficient.
Cedric is not red.
Kimberly is not dull.
Lucille is not sufficient.
Lincoln is not dull.
Cedric is lucky.
Brent is not red.
Debra is not helpful.
Kimberly is not sufficient.
Debra is dull.Someone is not sufficient and dull if and only if he is helpful and not elegant.
if there is at least one people who is not helpful and elegant, then Lincoln is lucky and Lucille is dull.
If there is someone who is both not elegant and red, then Brent is not helpful.
If there is at least one people who is not helpful, then Brent is not dull.
If someone who is not helpful is also not sufficient, then he is not elegant.
It can be concluded that Lucille is not dull and Lincoln is not sufficient once knowing that Brent is not red.
If someone who is lucky is also helpful, then he is red.
Ethan being not sufficient or Lincoln being not dull implies that Lincoln is lucky.
Debra being helpful implies that Kimberly is sufficient.
If someone is elegant, then he is both not red and not helpful.
If Kimberly is not dull, then Kimberly is not red, and vice versa.
Someone being lucky is equivalent to being helpful.
|
Cedric is not red.
|
self_contradiction
|
Ethan is not red.
Lincoln is not helpful.
Cedric is sufficient.
Cedric is not red.
Kimberly is not dull.
Lucille is not sufficient.
Lincoln is not dull.
Cedric is lucky.
Brent is not red.
Debra is not helpful.
Kimberly is not sufficient.
Debra is dull.Someone is not sufficient and dull if and only if he is helpful and not elegant.
if there is at least one people who is not helpful and elegant, then Lincoln is lucky and Lucille is dull.
If there is someone who is both not elegant and red, then Brent is not helpful.
If there is at least one people who is not helpful, then Brent is not dull.
If someone who is not helpful is also not sufficient, then he is not elegant.
It can be concluded that Lucille is not dull and Lincoln is not sufficient once knowing that Brent is not red.
If someone who is lucky is also helpful, then he is red.
Ethan being not sufficient or Lincoln being not dull implies that Lincoln is lucky.
Debra being helpful implies that Kimberly is sufficient.
If someone is elegant, then he is both not red and not helpful.
If Kimberly is not dull, then Kimberly is not red, and vice versa.
Someone being lucky is equivalent to being helpful.
|
Lincoln is dull.
|
self_contradiction
|
Ethan is not red.
Lincoln is not helpful.
Cedric is sufficient.
Cedric is not red.
Kimberly is not dull.
Lucille is not sufficient.
Lincoln is not dull.
Cedric is lucky.
Brent is not red.
Debra is not helpful.
Kimberly is not sufficient.
Debra is dull.Someone is not sufficient and dull if and only if he is helpful and not elegant.
if there is at least one people who is not helpful and elegant, then Lincoln is lucky and Lucille is dull.
If there is someone who is both not elegant and red, then Brent is not helpful.
If there is at least one people who is not helpful, then Brent is not dull.
If someone who is not helpful is also not sufficient, then he is not elegant.
It can be concluded that Lucille is not dull and Lincoln is not sufficient once knowing that Brent is not red.
If someone who is lucky is also helpful, then he is red.
Ethan being not sufficient or Lincoln being not dull implies that Lincoln is lucky.
Debra being helpful implies that Kimberly is sufficient.
If someone is elegant, then he is both not red and not helpful.
If Kimberly is not dull, then Kimberly is not red, and vice versa.
Someone being lucky is equivalent to being helpful.
|
Debra is not dull.
|
contradiction
|
Ethan is not red.
Lincoln is not helpful.
Cedric is sufficient.
Cedric is not red.
Kimberly is not dull.
Lucille is not sufficient.
Lincoln is not dull.
Cedric is lucky.
Brent is not red.
Debra is not helpful.
Kimberly is not sufficient.
Debra is dull.Someone is not sufficient and dull if and only if he is helpful and not elegant.
if there is at least one people who is not helpful and elegant, then Lincoln is lucky and Lucille is dull.
If there is someone who is both not elegant and red, then Brent is not helpful.
If there is at least one people who is not helpful, then Brent is not dull.
If someone who is not helpful is also not sufficient, then he is not elegant.
It can be concluded that Lucille is not dull and Lincoln is not sufficient once knowing that Brent is not red.
If someone who is lucky is also helpful, then he is red.
Ethan being not sufficient or Lincoln being not dull implies that Lincoln is lucky.
Debra being helpful implies that Kimberly is sufficient.
If someone is elegant, then he is both not red and not helpful.
If Kimberly is not dull, then Kimberly is not red, and vice versa.
Someone being lucky is equivalent to being helpful.
|
Ethan is red.
|
contradiction
|
Ethan is not red.
Lincoln is not helpful.
Cedric is sufficient.
Cedric is not red.
Kimberly is not dull.
Lucille is not sufficient.
Lincoln is not dull.
Cedric is lucky.
Brent is not red.
Debra is not helpful.
Kimberly is not sufficient.
Debra is dull.Someone is not sufficient and dull if and only if he is helpful and not elegant.
if there is at least one people who is not helpful and elegant, then Lincoln is lucky and Lucille is dull.
If there is someone who is both not elegant and red, then Brent is not helpful.
If there is at least one people who is not helpful, then Brent is not dull.
If someone who is not helpful is also not sufficient, then he is not elegant.
It can be concluded that Lucille is not dull and Lincoln is not sufficient once knowing that Brent is not red.
If someone who is lucky is also helpful, then he is red.
Ethan being not sufficient or Lincoln being not dull implies that Lincoln is lucky.
Debra being helpful implies that Kimberly is sufficient.
If someone is elegant, then he is both not red and not helpful.
If Kimberly is not dull, then Kimberly is not red, and vice versa.
Someone being lucky is equivalent to being helpful.
|
Lincoln is not elegant.
|
entailment
|
Ethan is not red.
Lincoln is not helpful.
Cedric is sufficient.
Cedric is not red.
Kimberly is not dull.
Lucille is not sufficient.
Lincoln is not dull.
Cedric is lucky.
Brent is not red.
Debra is not helpful.
Kimberly is not sufficient.
Debra is dull.Someone is not sufficient and dull if and only if he is helpful and not elegant.
if there is at least one people who is not helpful and elegant, then Lincoln is lucky and Lucille is dull.
If there is someone who is both not elegant and red, then Brent is not helpful.
If there is at least one people who is not helpful, then Brent is not dull.
If someone who is not helpful is also not sufficient, then he is not elegant.
It can be concluded that Lucille is not dull and Lincoln is not sufficient once knowing that Brent is not red.
If someone who is lucky is also helpful, then he is red.
Ethan being not sufficient or Lincoln being not dull implies that Lincoln is lucky.
Debra being helpful implies that Kimberly is sufficient.
If someone is elegant, then he is both not red and not helpful.
If Kimberly is not dull, then Kimberly is not red, and vice versa.
Someone being lucky is equivalent to being helpful.
|
Cedric is sufficient.
|
entailment
|
Ethan is not red.
Lincoln is not helpful.
Cedric is sufficient.
Cedric is not red.
Kimberly is not dull.
Lucille is not sufficient.
Lincoln is not dull.
Cedric is lucky.
Brent is not red.
Debra is not helpful.
Kimberly is not sufficient.
Debra is dull.Someone is not sufficient and dull if and only if he is helpful and not elegant.
if there is at least one people who is not helpful and elegant, then Lincoln is lucky and Lucille is dull.
If there is someone who is both not elegant and red, then Brent is not helpful.
If there is at least one people who is not helpful, then Brent is not dull.
If someone who is not helpful is also not sufficient, then he is not elegant.
It can be concluded that Lucille is not dull and Lincoln is not sufficient once knowing that Brent is not red.
If someone who is lucky is also helpful, then he is red.
Ethan being not sufficient or Lincoln being not dull implies that Lincoln is lucky.
Debra being helpful implies that Kimberly is sufficient.
If someone is elegant, then he is both not red and not helpful.
If Kimberly is not dull, then Kimberly is not red, and vice versa.
Someone being lucky is equivalent to being helpful.
|
Cedric is red.
|
self_contradiction
|
Ethan is not red.
Lincoln is not helpful.
Cedric is sufficient.
Cedric is not red.
Kimberly is not dull.
Lucille is not sufficient.
Lincoln is not dull.
Cedric is lucky.
Brent is not red.
Debra is not helpful.
Kimberly is not sufficient.
Debra is dull.Someone is not sufficient and dull if and only if he is helpful and not elegant.
if there is at least one people who is not helpful and elegant, then Lincoln is lucky and Lucille is dull.
If there is someone who is both not elegant and red, then Brent is not helpful.
If there is at least one people who is not helpful, then Brent is not dull.
If someone who is not helpful is also not sufficient, then he is not elegant.
It can be concluded that Lucille is not dull and Lincoln is not sufficient once knowing that Brent is not red.
If someone who is lucky is also helpful, then he is red.
Ethan being not sufficient or Lincoln being not dull implies that Lincoln is lucky.
Debra being helpful implies that Kimberly is sufficient.
If someone is elegant, then he is both not red and not helpful.
If Kimberly is not dull, then Kimberly is not red, and vice versa.
Someone being lucky is equivalent to being helpful.
|
Lucille is not red.
|
neutral
|
Ethan is not red.
Lincoln is not helpful.
Cedric is sufficient.
Cedric is not red.
Kimberly is not dull.
Lucille is not sufficient.
Lincoln is not dull.
Cedric is lucky.
Brent is not red.
Debra is not helpful.
Kimberly is not sufficient.
Debra is dull.Someone is not sufficient and dull if and only if he is helpful and not elegant.
if there is at least one people who is not helpful and elegant, then Lincoln is lucky and Lucille is dull.
If there is someone who is both not elegant and red, then Brent is not helpful.
If there is at least one people who is not helpful, then Brent is not dull.
If someone who is not helpful is also not sufficient, then he is not elegant.
It can be concluded that Lucille is not dull and Lincoln is not sufficient once knowing that Brent is not red.
If someone who is lucky is also helpful, then he is red.
Ethan being not sufficient or Lincoln being not dull implies that Lincoln is lucky.
Debra being helpful implies that Kimberly is sufficient.
If someone is elegant, then he is both not red and not helpful.
If Kimberly is not dull, then Kimberly is not red, and vice versa.
Someone being lucky is equivalent to being helpful.
|
Lincoln is helpful.
|
self_contradiction
|
Ethan is not red.
Lincoln is not helpful.
Cedric is sufficient.
Cedric is not red.
Kimberly is not dull.
Lucille is not sufficient.
Lincoln is not dull.
Cedric is lucky.
Brent is not red.
Debra is not helpful.
Kimberly is not sufficient.
Debra is dull.Someone is not sufficient and dull if and only if he is helpful and not elegant.
if there is at least one people who is not helpful and elegant, then Lincoln is lucky and Lucille is dull.
If there is someone who is both not elegant and red, then Brent is not helpful.
If there is at least one people who is not helpful, then Brent is not dull.
If someone who is not helpful is also not sufficient, then he is not elegant.
It can be concluded that Lucille is not dull and Lincoln is not sufficient once knowing that Brent is not red.
If someone who is lucky is also helpful, then he is red.
Ethan being not sufficient or Lincoln being not dull implies that Lincoln is lucky.
Debra being helpful implies that Kimberly is sufficient.
If someone is elegant, then he is both not red and not helpful.
If Kimberly is not dull, then Kimberly is not red, and vice versa.
Someone being lucky is equivalent to being helpful.
|
Ethan is not elegant.
|
neutral
|
Ethan is not red.
Lincoln is not helpful.
Cedric is sufficient.
Cedric is not red.
Kimberly is not dull.
Lucille is not sufficient.
Lincoln is not dull.
Cedric is lucky.
Brent is not red.
Debra is not helpful.
Kimberly is not sufficient.
Debra is dull.Someone is not sufficient and dull if and only if he is helpful and not elegant.
if there is at least one people who is not helpful and elegant, then Lincoln is lucky and Lucille is dull.
If there is someone who is both not elegant and red, then Brent is not helpful.
If there is at least one people who is not helpful, then Brent is not dull.
If someone who is not helpful is also not sufficient, then he is not elegant.
It can be concluded that Lucille is not dull and Lincoln is not sufficient once knowing that Brent is not red.
If someone who is lucky is also helpful, then he is red.
Ethan being not sufficient or Lincoln being not dull implies that Lincoln is lucky.
Debra being helpful implies that Kimberly is sufficient.
If someone is elegant, then he is both not red and not helpful.
If Kimberly is not dull, then Kimberly is not red, and vice versa.
Someone being lucky is equivalent to being helpful.
|
Ethan is not sufficient.
|
neutral
|
Ethan is not red.
Lincoln is not helpful.
Cedric is sufficient.
Cedric is not red.
Kimberly is not dull.
Lucille is not sufficient.
Lincoln is not dull.
Cedric is lucky.
Brent is not red.
Debra is not helpful.
Kimberly is not sufficient.
Debra is dull.Someone is not sufficient and dull if and only if he is helpful and not elegant.
if there is at least one people who is not helpful and elegant, then Lincoln is lucky and Lucille is dull.
If there is someone who is both not elegant and red, then Brent is not helpful.
If there is at least one people who is not helpful, then Brent is not dull.
If someone who is not helpful is also not sufficient, then he is not elegant.
It can be concluded that Lucille is not dull and Lincoln is not sufficient once knowing that Brent is not red.
If someone who is lucky is also helpful, then he is red.
Ethan being not sufficient or Lincoln being not dull implies that Lincoln is lucky.
Debra being helpful implies that Kimberly is sufficient.
If someone is elegant, then he is both not red and not helpful.
If Kimberly is not dull, then Kimberly is not red, and vice versa.
Someone being lucky is equivalent to being helpful.
|
Brent is not sufficient.
|
neutral
|
Ethan is not red.
Lincoln is not helpful.
Cedric is sufficient.
Cedric is not red.
Kimberly is not dull.
Lucille is not sufficient.
Lincoln is not dull.
Cedric is lucky.
Brent is not red.
Debra is not helpful.
Kimberly is not sufficient.
Debra is dull.Someone is not sufficient and dull if and only if he is helpful and not elegant.
if there is at least one people who is not helpful and elegant, then Lincoln is lucky and Lucille is dull.
If there is someone who is both not elegant and red, then Brent is not helpful.
If there is at least one people who is not helpful, then Brent is not dull.
If someone who is not helpful is also not sufficient, then he is not elegant.
It can be concluded that Lucille is not dull and Lincoln is not sufficient once knowing that Brent is not red.
If someone who is lucky is also helpful, then he is red.
Ethan being not sufficient or Lincoln being not dull implies that Lincoln is lucky.
Debra being helpful implies that Kimberly is sufficient.
If someone is elegant, then he is both not red and not helpful.
If Kimberly is not dull, then Kimberly is not red, and vice versa.
Someone being lucky is equivalent to being helpful.
|
Lincoln is not red.
|
contradiction
|
Ethan is not red.
Lincoln is not helpful.
Cedric is sufficient.
Cedric is not red.
Kimberly is not dull.
Lucille is not sufficient.
Lincoln is not dull.
Cedric is lucky.
Brent is not red.
Debra is not helpful.
Kimberly is not sufficient.
Debra is dull.Someone is not sufficient and dull if and only if he is helpful and not elegant.
if there is at least one people who is not helpful and elegant, then Lincoln is lucky and Lucille is dull.
If there is someone who is both not elegant and red, then Brent is not helpful.
If there is at least one people who is not helpful, then Brent is not dull.
If someone who is not helpful is also not sufficient, then he is not elegant.
It can be concluded that Lucille is not dull and Lincoln is not sufficient once knowing that Brent is not red.
If someone who is lucky is also helpful, then he is red.
Ethan being not sufficient or Lincoln being not dull implies that Lincoln is lucky.
Debra being helpful implies that Kimberly is sufficient.
If someone is elegant, then he is both not red and not helpful.
If Kimberly is not dull, then Kimberly is not red, and vice versa.
Someone being lucky is equivalent to being helpful.
|
Kimberly is elegant.
|
neutral
|
Ethan is not red.
Lincoln is not helpful.
Cedric is sufficient.
Cedric is not red.
Kimberly is not dull.
Lucille is not sufficient.
Lincoln is not dull.
Cedric is lucky.
Brent is not red.
Debra is not helpful.
Kimberly is not sufficient.
Debra is dull.Someone is not sufficient and dull if and only if he is helpful and not elegant.
if there is at least one people who is not helpful and elegant, then Lincoln is lucky and Lucille is dull.
If there is someone who is both not elegant and red, then Brent is not helpful.
If there is at least one people who is not helpful, then Brent is not dull.
If someone who is not helpful is also not sufficient, then he is not elegant.
It can be concluded that Lucille is not dull and Lincoln is not sufficient once knowing that Brent is not red.
If someone who is lucky is also helpful, then he is red.
Ethan being not sufficient or Lincoln being not dull implies that Lincoln is lucky.
Debra being helpful implies that Kimberly is sufficient.
If someone is elegant, then he is both not red and not helpful.
If Kimberly is not dull, then Kimberly is not red, and vice versa.
Someone being lucky is equivalent to being helpful.
|
Kimberly is sufficient.
|
contradiction
|
Gabriel is not ugly.
Ethan is silly.
Graham is optimistic.
Graham is quiet.
Jerry is not quiet.
Joshua is quiet.
Joshua is not serious.
Joshua is silly.
Gabriel is not optimistic.
Jerry is not lucky.
Graham is ugly.
Jerry is not optimistic.As long as someone is not quiet, he is not optimistic and lucky.
Someone is not lucky if and only if he is ugly.
If there is at least one people who is silly, then Kerwin is lucky.
Jerry being ugly and Gabriel being not optimistic imply that Graham is silly and Gabriel is lucky.
If there is someone who is quiet, then Kerwin is lucky.
Someone who is both not optimistic and lucky is always not serious.
Graham being not lucky and Graham being serious imply that Gabriel is ugly.
Someone being serious is equivalent to being not silly.
Ethan being silly is equivalent to Jerry being not lucky.
If there is at least one people who is ugly, then Gabriel is not lucky and Graham is silly.
Aedan being ugly and Kerwin being quiet imply that Joshua is optimistic.
Someone who is eithor not serious or not ugly is always optimistic.
|
Aedan is not quiet.
|
neutral
|
Gabriel is not ugly.
Ethan is silly.
Graham is optimistic.
Graham is quiet.
Jerry is not quiet.
Joshua is quiet.
Joshua is not serious.
Joshua is silly.
Gabriel is not optimistic.
Jerry is not lucky.
Graham is ugly.
Jerry is not optimistic.As long as someone is not quiet, he is not optimistic and lucky.
Someone is not lucky if and only if he is ugly.
If there is at least one people who is silly, then Kerwin is lucky.
Jerry being ugly and Gabriel being not optimistic imply that Graham is silly and Gabriel is lucky.
If there is someone who is quiet, then Kerwin is lucky.
Someone who is both not optimistic and lucky is always not serious.
Graham being not lucky and Graham being serious imply that Gabriel is ugly.
Someone being serious is equivalent to being not silly.
Ethan being silly is equivalent to Jerry being not lucky.
If there is at least one people who is ugly, then Gabriel is not lucky and Graham is silly.
Aedan being ugly and Kerwin being quiet imply that Joshua is optimistic.
Someone who is eithor not serious or not ugly is always optimistic.
|
Gabriel is serious.
|
contradiction
|
Gabriel is not ugly.
Ethan is silly.
Graham is optimistic.
Graham is quiet.
Jerry is not quiet.
Joshua is quiet.
Joshua is not serious.
Joshua is silly.
Gabriel is not optimistic.
Jerry is not lucky.
Graham is ugly.
Jerry is not optimistic.As long as someone is not quiet, he is not optimistic and lucky.
Someone is not lucky if and only if he is ugly.
If there is at least one people who is silly, then Kerwin is lucky.
Jerry being ugly and Gabriel being not optimistic imply that Graham is silly and Gabriel is lucky.
If there is someone who is quiet, then Kerwin is lucky.
Someone who is both not optimistic and lucky is always not serious.
Graham being not lucky and Graham being serious imply that Gabriel is ugly.
Someone being serious is equivalent to being not silly.
Ethan being silly is equivalent to Jerry being not lucky.
If there is at least one people who is ugly, then Gabriel is not lucky and Graham is silly.
Aedan being ugly and Kerwin being quiet imply that Joshua is optimistic.
Someone who is eithor not serious or not ugly is always optimistic.
|
Joshua is not quiet.
|
contradiction
|
Gabriel is not ugly.
Ethan is silly.
Graham is optimistic.
Graham is quiet.
Jerry is not quiet.
Joshua is quiet.
Joshua is not serious.
Joshua is silly.
Gabriel is not optimistic.
Jerry is not lucky.
Graham is ugly.
Jerry is not optimistic.As long as someone is not quiet, he is not optimistic and lucky.
Someone is not lucky if and only if he is ugly.
If there is at least one people who is silly, then Kerwin is lucky.
Jerry being ugly and Gabriel being not optimistic imply that Graham is silly and Gabriel is lucky.
If there is someone who is quiet, then Kerwin is lucky.
Someone who is both not optimistic and lucky is always not serious.
Graham being not lucky and Graham being serious imply that Gabriel is ugly.
Someone being serious is equivalent to being not silly.
Ethan being silly is equivalent to Jerry being not lucky.
If there is at least one people who is ugly, then Gabriel is not lucky and Graham is silly.
Aedan being ugly and Kerwin being quiet imply that Joshua is optimistic.
Someone who is eithor not serious or not ugly is always optimistic.
|
Jerry is not lucky.
|
self_contradiction
|
Gabriel is not ugly.
Ethan is silly.
Graham is optimistic.
Graham is quiet.
Jerry is not quiet.
Joshua is quiet.
Joshua is not serious.
Joshua is silly.
Gabriel is not optimistic.
Jerry is not lucky.
Graham is ugly.
Jerry is not optimistic.As long as someone is not quiet, he is not optimistic and lucky.
Someone is not lucky if and only if he is ugly.
If there is at least one people who is silly, then Kerwin is lucky.
Jerry being ugly and Gabriel being not optimistic imply that Graham is silly and Gabriel is lucky.
If there is someone who is quiet, then Kerwin is lucky.
Someone who is both not optimistic and lucky is always not serious.
Graham being not lucky and Graham being serious imply that Gabriel is ugly.
Someone being serious is equivalent to being not silly.
Ethan being silly is equivalent to Jerry being not lucky.
If there is at least one people who is ugly, then Gabriel is not lucky and Graham is silly.
Aedan being ugly and Kerwin being quiet imply that Joshua is optimistic.
Someone who is eithor not serious or not ugly is always optimistic.
|
Graham is ugly.
|
entailment
|
Gabriel is not ugly.
Ethan is silly.
Graham is optimistic.
Graham is quiet.
Jerry is not quiet.
Joshua is quiet.
Joshua is not serious.
Joshua is silly.
Gabriel is not optimistic.
Jerry is not lucky.
Graham is ugly.
Jerry is not optimistic.As long as someone is not quiet, he is not optimistic and lucky.
Someone is not lucky if and only if he is ugly.
If there is at least one people who is silly, then Kerwin is lucky.
Jerry being ugly and Gabriel being not optimistic imply that Graham is silly and Gabriel is lucky.
If there is someone who is quiet, then Kerwin is lucky.
Someone who is both not optimistic and lucky is always not serious.
Graham being not lucky and Graham being serious imply that Gabriel is ugly.
Someone being serious is equivalent to being not silly.
Ethan being silly is equivalent to Jerry being not lucky.
If there is at least one people who is ugly, then Gabriel is not lucky and Graham is silly.
Aedan being ugly and Kerwin being quiet imply that Joshua is optimistic.
Someone who is eithor not serious or not ugly is always optimistic.
|
Jerry is ugly.
|
entailment
|
Gabriel is not ugly.
Ethan is silly.
Graham is optimistic.
Graham is quiet.
Jerry is not quiet.
Joshua is quiet.
Joshua is not serious.
Joshua is silly.
Gabriel is not optimistic.
Jerry is not lucky.
Graham is ugly.
Jerry is not optimistic.As long as someone is not quiet, he is not optimistic and lucky.
Someone is not lucky if and only if he is ugly.
If there is at least one people who is silly, then Kerwin is lucky.
Jerry being ugly and Gabriel being not optimistic imply that Graham is silly and Gabriel is lucky.
If there is someone who is quiet, then Kerwin is lucky.
Someone who is both not optimistic and lucky is always not serious.
Graham being not lucky and Graham being serious imply that Gabriel is ugly.
Someone being serious is equivalent to being not silly.
Ethan being silly is equivalent to Jerry being not lucky.
If there is at least one people who is ugly, then Gabriel is not lucky and Graham is silly.
Aedan being ugly and Kerwin being quiet imply that Joshua is optimistic.
Someone who is eithor not serious or not ugly is always optimistic.
|
Jerry is not ugly.
|
contradiction
|
Gabriel is not ugly.
Ethan is silly.
Graham is optimistic.
Graham is quiet.
Jerry is not quiet.
Joshua is quiet.
Joshua is not serious.
Joshua is silly.
Gabriel is not optimistic.
Jerry is not lucky.
Graham is ugly.
Jerry is not optimistic.As long as someone is not quiet, he is not optimistic and lucky.
Someone is not lucky if and only if he is ugly.
If there is at least one people who is silly, then Kerwin is lucky.
Jerry being ugly and Gabriel being not optimistic imply that Graham is silly and Gabriel is lucky.
If there is someone who is quiet, then Kerwin is lucky.
Someone who is both not optimistic and lucky is always not serious.
Graham being not lucky and Graham being serious imply that Gabriel is ugly.
Someone being serious is equivalent to being not silly.
Ethan being silly is equivalent to Jerry being not lucky.
If there is at least one people who is ugly, then Gabriel is not lucky and Graham is silly.
Aedan being ugly and Kerwin being quiet imply that Joshua is optimistic.
Someone who is eithor not serious or not ugly is always optimistic.
|
Gabriel is lucky.
|
self_contradiction
|
Gabriel is not ugly.
Ethan is silly.
Graham is optimistic.
Graham is quiet.
Jerry is not quiet.
Joshua is quiet.
Joshua is not serious.
Joshua is silly.
Gabriel is not optimistic.
Jerry is not lucky.
Graham is ugly.
Jerry is not optimistic.As long as someone is not quiet, he is not optimistic and lucky.
Someone is not lucky if and only if he is ugly.
If there is at least one people who is silly, then Kerwin is lucky.
Jerry being ugly and Gabriel being not optimistic imply that Graham is silly and Gabriel is lucky.
If there is someone who is quiet, then Kerwin is lucky.
Someone who is both not optimistic and lucky is always not serious.
Graham being not lucky and Graham being serious imply that Gabriel is ugly.
Someone being serious is equivalent to being not silly.
Ethan being silly is equivalent to Jerry being not lucky.
If there is at least one people who is ugly, then Gabriel is not lucky and Graham is silly.
Aedan being ugly and Kerwin being quiet imply that Joshua is optimistic.
Someone who is eithor not serious or not ugly is always optimistic.
|
Gabriel is ugly.
|
self_contradiction
|
Gabriel is not ugly.
Ethan is silly.
Graham is optimistic.
Graham is quiet.
Jerry is not quiet.
Joshua is quiet.
Joshua is not serious.
Joshua is silly.
Gabriel is not optimistic.
Jerry is not lucky.
Graham is ugly.
Jerry is not optimistic.As long as someone is not quiet, he is not optimistic and lucky.
Someone is not lucky if and only if he is ugly.
If there is at least one people who is silly, then Kerwin is lucky.
Jerry being ugly and Gabriel being not optimistic imply that Graham is silly and Gabriel is lucky.
If there is someone who is quiet, then Kerwin is lucky.
Someone who is both not optimistic and lucky is always not serious.
Graham being not lucky and Graham being serious imply that Gabriel is ugly.
Someone being serious is equivalent to being not silly.
Ethan being silly is equivalent to Jerry being not lucky.
If there is at least one people who is ugly, then Gabriel is not lucky and Graham is silly.
Aedan being ugly and Kerwin being quiet imply that Joshua is optimistic.
Someone who is eithor not serious or not ugly is always optimistic.
|
Graham is lucky.
|
contradiction
|
Gabriel is not ugly.
Ethan is silly.
Graham is optimistic.
Graham is quiet.
Jerry is not quiet.
Joshua is quiet.
Joshua is not serious.
Joshua is silly.
Gabriel is not optimistic.
Jerry is not lucky.
Graham is ugly.
Jerry is not optimistic.As long as someone is not quiet, he is not optimistic and lucky.
Someone is not lucky if and only if he is ugly.
If there is at least one people who is silly, then Kerwin is lucky.
Jerry being ugly and Gabriel being not optimistic imply that Graham is silly and Gabriel is lucky.
If there is someone who is quiet, then Kerwin is lucky.
Someone who is both not optimistic and lucky is always not serious.
Graham being not lucky and Graham being serious imply that Gabriel is ugly.
Someone being serious is equivalent to being not silly.
Ethan being silly is equivalent to Jerry being not lucky.
If there is at least one people who is ugly, then Gabriel is not lucky and Graham is silly.
Aedan being ugly and Kerwin being quiet imply that Joshua is optimistic.
Someone who is eithor not serious or not ugly is always optimistic.
|
Jerry is not quiet.
|
entailment
|
Gabriel is not ugly.
Ethan is silly.
Graham is optimistic.
Graham is quiet.
Jerry is not quiet.
Joshua is quiet.
Joshua is not serious.
Joshua is silly.
Gabriel is not optimistic.
Jerry is not lucky.
Graham is ugly.
Jerry is not optimistic.As long as someone is not quiet, he is not optimistic and lucky.
Someone is not lucky if and only if he is ugly.
If there is at least one people who is silly, then Kerwin is lucky.
Jerry being ugly and Gabriel being not optimistic imply that Graham is silly and Gabriel is lucky.
If there is someone who is quiet, then Kerwin is lucky.
Someone who is both not optimistic and lucky is always not serious.
Graham being not lucky and Graham being serious imply that Gabriel is ugly.
Someone being serious is equivalent to being not silly.
Ethan being silly is equivalent to Jerry being not lucky.
If there is at least one people who is ugly, then Gabriel is not lucky and Graham is silly.
Aedan being ugly and Kerwin being quiet imply that Joshua is optimistic.
Someone who is eithor not serious or not ugly is always optimistic.
|
Gabriel is not lucky.
|
self_contradiction
|
Gabriel is not ugly.
Ethan is silly.
Graham is optimistic.
Graham is quiet.
Jerry is not quiet.
Joshua is quiet.
Joshua is not serious.
Joshua is silly.
Gabriel is not optimistic.
Jerry is not lucky.
Graham is ugly.
Jerry is not optimistic.As long as someone is not quiet, he is not optimistic and lucky.
Someone is not lucky if and only if he is ugly.
If there is at least one people who is silly, then Kerwin is lucky.
Jerry being ugly and Gabriel being not optimistic imply that Graham is silly and Gabriel is lucky.
If there is someone who is quiet, then Kerwin is lucky.
Someone who is both not optimistic and lucky is always not serious.
Graham being not lucky and Graham being serious imply that Gabriel is ugly.
Someone being serious is equivalent to being not silly.
Ethan being silly is equivalent to Jerry being not lucky.
If there is at least one people who is ugly, then Gabriel is not lucky and Graham is silly.
Aedan being ugly and Kerwin being quiet imply that Joshua is optimistic.
Someone who is eithor not serious or not ugly is always optimistic.
|
Jerry is lucky.
|
self_contradiction
|
Gabriel is not ugly.
Ethan is silly.
Graham is optimistic.
Graham is quiet.
Jerry is not quiet.
Joshua is quiet.
Joshua is not serious.
Joshua is silly.
Gabriel is not optimistic.
Jerry is not lucky.
Graham is ugly.
Jerry is not optimistic.As long as someone is not quiet, he is not optimistic and lucky.
Someone is not lucky if and only if he is ugly.
If there is at least one people who is silly, then Kerwin is lucky.
Jerry being ugly and Gabriel being not optimistic imply that Graham is silly and Gabriel is lucky.
If there is someone who is quiet, then Kerwin is lucky.
Someone who is both not optimistic and lucky is always not serious.
Graham being not lucky and Graham being serious imply that Gabriel is ugly.
Someone being serious is equivalent to being not silly.
Ethan being silly is equivalent to Jerry being not lucky.
If there is at least one people who is ugly, then Gabriel is not lucky and Graham is silly.
Aedan being ugly and Kerwin being quiet imply that Joshua is optimistic.
Someone who is eithor not serious or not ugly is always optimistic.
|
Ethan is not silly.
|
contradiction
|
Gabriel is not ugly.
Ethan is silly.
Graham is optimistic.
Graham is quiet.
Jerry is not quiet.
Joshua is quiet.
Joshua is not serious.
Joshua is silly.
Gabriel is not optimistic.
Jerry is not lucky.
Graham is ugly.
Jerry is not optimistic.As long as someone is not quiet, he is not optimistic and lucky.
Someone is not lucky if and only if he is ugly.
If there is at least one people who is silly, then Kerwin is lucky.
Jerry being ugly and Gabriel being not optimistic imply that Graham is silly and Gabriel is lucky.
If there is someone who is quiet, then Kerwin is lucky.
Someone who is both not optimistic and lucky is always not serious.
Graham being not lucky and Graham being serious imply that Gabriel is ugly.
Someone being serious is equivalent to being not silly.
Ethan being silly is equivalent to Jerry being not lucky.
If there is at least one people who is ugly, then Gabriel is not lucky and Graham is silly.
Aedan being ugly and Kerwin being quiet imply that Joshua is optimistic.
Someone who is eithor not serious or not ugly is always optimistic.
|
Ethan is not ugly.
|
neutral
|
Gabriel is not ugly.
Ethan is silly.
Graham is optimistic.
Graham is quiet.
Jerry is not quiet.
Joshua is quiet.
Joshua is not serious.
Joshua is silly.
Gabriel is not optimistic.
Jerry is not lucky.
Graham is ugly.
Jerry is not optimistic.As long as someone is not quiet, he is not optimistic and lucky.
Someone is not lucky if and only if he is ugly.
If there is at least one people who is silly, then Kerwin is lucky.
Jerry being ugly and Gabriel being not optimistic imply that Graham is silly and Gabriel is lucky.
If there is someone who is quiet, then Kerwin is lucky.
Someone who is both not optimistic and lucky is always not serious.
Graham being not lucky and Graham being serious imply that Gabriel is ugly.
Someone being serious is equivalent to being not silly.
Ethan being silly is equivalent to Jerry being not lucky.
If there is at least one people who is ugly, then Gabriel is not lucky and Graham is silly.
Aedan being ugly and Kerwin being quiet imply that Joshua is optimistic.
Someone who is eithor not serious or not ugly is always optimistic.
|
Ethan is silly.
|
entailment
|
Gabriel is not ugly.
Ethan is silly.
Graham is optimistic.
Graham is quiet.
Jerry is not quiet.
Joshua is quiet.
Joshua is not serious.
Joshua is silly.
Gabriel is not optimistic.
Jerry is not lucky.
Graham is ugly.
Jerry is not optimistic.As long as someone is not quiet, he is not optimistic and lucky.
Someone is not lucky if and only if he is ugly.
If there is at least one people who is silly, then Kerwin is lucky.
Jerry being ugly and Gabriel being not optimistic imply that Graham is silly and Gabriel is lucky.
If there is someone who is quiet, then Kerwin is lucky.
Someone who is both not optimistic and lucky is always not serious.
Graham being not lucky and Graham being serious imply that Gabriel is ugly.
Someone being serious is equivalent to being not silly.
Ethan being silly is equivalent to Jerry being not lucky.
If there is at least one people who is ugly, then Gabriel is not lucky and Graham is silly.
Aedan being ugly and Kerwin being quiet imply that Joshua is optimistic.
Someone who is eithor not serious or not ugly is always optimistic.
|
Graham is serious.
|
neutral
|
Gabriel is not ugly.
Ethan is silly.
Graham is optimistic.
Graham is quiet.
Jerry is not quiet.
Joshua is quiet.
Joshua is not serious.
Joshua is silly.
Gabriel is not optimistic.
Jerry is not lucky.
Graham is ugly.
Jerry is not optimistic.As long as someone is not quiet, he is not optimistic and lucky.
Someone is not lucky if and only if he is ugly.
If there is at least one people who is silly, then Kerwin is lucky.
Jerry being ugly and Gabriel being not optimistic imply that Graham is silly and Gabriel is lucky.
If there is someone who is quiet, then Kerwin is lucky.
Someone who is both not optimistic and lucky is always not serious.
Graham being not lucky and Graham being serious imply that Gabriel is ugly.
Someone being serious is equivalent to being not silly.
Ethan being silly is equivalent to Jerry being not lucky.
If there is at least one people who is ugly, then Gabriel is not lucky and Graham is silly.
Aedan being ugly and Kerwin being quiet imply that Joshua is optimistic.
Someone who is eithor not serious or not ugly is always optimistic.
|
Ethan is ugly.
|
neutral
|
Gabriel is not ugly.
Ethan is silly.
Graham is optimistic.
Graham is quiet.
Jerry is not quiet.
Joshua is quiet.
Joshua is not serious.
Joshua is silly.
Gabriel is not optimistic.
Jerry is not lucky.
Graham is ugly.
Jerry is not optimistic.As long as someone is not quiet, he is not optimistic and lucky.
Someone is not lucky if and only if he is ugly.
If there is at least one people who is silly, then Kerwin is lucky.
Jerry being ugly and Gabriel being not optimistic imply that Graham is silly and Gabriel is lucky.
If there is someone who is quiet, then Kerwin is lucky.
Someone who is both not optimistic and lucky is always not serious.
Graham being not lucky and Graham being serious imply that Gabriel is ugly.
Someone being serious is equivalent to being not silly.
Ethan being silly is equivalent to Jerry being not lucky.
If there is at least one people who is ugly, then Gabriel is not lucky and Graham is silly.
Aedan being ugly and Kerwin being quiet imply that Joshua is optimistic.
Someone who is eithor not serious or not ugly is always optimistic.
|
Aedan is not silly.
|
neutral
|
Gabriel is not ugly.
Ethan is silly.
Graham is optimistic.
Graham is quiet.
Jerry is not quiet.
Joshua is quiet.
Joshua is not serious.
Joshua is silly.
Gabriel is not optimistic.
Jerry is not lucky.
Graham is ugly.
Jerry is not optimistic.As long as someone is not quiet, he is not optimistic and lucky.
Someone is not lucky if and only if he is ugly.
If there is at least one people who is silly, then Kerwin is lucky.
Jerry being ugly and Gabriel being not optimistic imply that Graham is silly and Gabriel is lucky.
If there is someone who is quiet, then Kerwin is lucky.
Someone who is both not optimistic and lucky is always not serious.
Graham being not lucky and Graham being serious imply that Gabriel is ugly.
Someone being serious is equivalent to being not silly.
Ethan being silly is equivalent to Jerry being not lucky.
If there is at least one people who is ugly, then Gabriel is not lucky and Graham is silly.
Aedan being ugly and Kerwin being quiet imply that Joshua is optimistic.
Someone who is eithor not serious or not ugly is always optimistic.
|
Joshua is quiet.
|
entailment
|
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.