Datasets:
tasksource
/
jigsaw_toxicity

Dataset card Data Studio Files
xet
Community
1
id
stringlengths
16
16
comment_text
stringlengths
6
5k
toxic
int64
0
1
severe_toxic
int64
0
1
obscene
int64
0
1
threat
int64
0
1
insult
int64
0
1
identity_hate
int64
0
1
84806a396beecc4d
Here is your evidence, the quoted material on http://indigosociety.com/showthread.php?38059-Monotheism-and-the-Doctrine-of-the-Trinity/page2} clearly links to my blog http://fatimiyasufiorder.org/ . Had you cared to look closely you would have seen it in the quoted material itself. There is no duplication. The quoted material on http://indigosociety.com/showthread.php?38059-Monotheism-and-the-Doctrine-of-the-Trinity/page2 cites its source. Take another look
0
0
0
0
0
0
84857d9822a7e7ea
VOLTAR? What the heck is Voltar supposed to be?
0
0
0
0
0
0
84870927efab2685
are u gay?68.33.41.181
1
0
0
0
0
0
848b0880fba1f687
Washington, D.C., Lincoln Memorial Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages, }} you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia.
0
0
0
0
0
0
848f51eac2f0c664
"Thank you for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test worked, and it has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you may want to do. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. 15 "
0
0
0
0
0
0
8498d7fcff475a94
Your Recent Edits You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. If necessary, pursue dispute resolution.
0
0
0
0
0
0
849ebd1f0e3a2393
Jinxmchue Apparently, I screwed up when I asked if he plans to constructively edit any pages after his block expires. He's now editing at User talk:67.135.49.211, making the same complaints as usual. I placed a rangeblock on 67.135.48.0/23, which went over like a lead balloon (see WP:AN/I#Jinxmchue IP rangeblock). There's some discussion there and some questions about why he was blocked in the first place. I removed the rangeblock and the protections I put on the talk pages earlier, but there's an unblock request at User talk:67.135.49.177. I don't know if you want to provide some explanation, but I figured you might want to at least know about it. It looks like I've caused the interpersonal fiasco that I knew I'd cause right after Christmas. Good going on my part. (Elkspeak)
0
0
0
0
0
0
84a117241f30b852
" Bell curve? ""If there is any difference in ""desirability"", the bell curve of a normal distribution predicts that most experiences will involve average desirability, with roughly equal occurrences of excellence and gross inadequacy."" I disagree: I think it would tend to follow a Pareto distribution with 20% of the books in a genre accounting for 80% of the worthiness of the genre as a whole. I think this is probably closer to what Sturgeon had in mind. Merlin "
0
0
0
0
0
0
84a1af3b3c74bda2
" Re: Notibilty of Dean Sherr Dear WebHamster. Dean Sherr is a published journalist in ""The Age"". he had his own coloumn next to Caroline Wilson. I believe this is notable enough. From, "
0
0
0
0
0
0
84a2db0cd73c5707
Also this admin has removed the context of the quote in order to make it look worse.
0
0
0
0
0
0
84a3aa14f3b13560
I would like a third opinion.
0
0
0
0
0
0
84a97f092f985b94
There is absolutely no reason why the comment and link shouldn't be included. You can accuse me of and edit war but you have no hesitation in involving yourself in it, needlessly vandalising the article by deleting valid additions. You conduct is a complete disgrace to this community.
0
0
0
0
0
0
84ae7fc9be0d458b
Both good ideas. We'll see how it goes.
0
0
0
0
0
0
84ae9a3da98e1dec
Done— talk Thanks for your comments. Hopefully most of them are addressed. Could you check the structure of the lead is what you suggested and woods v wood?— talk
0
0
0
0
0
0
84b00fb9071b6bcc
" Note also section 1 in the main page lists ""R(t+1)."" Shouldn't this be ""R(t)"" as well? RDK"
0
0
0
0
0
0
84b8491e809290d2
" Curious but unreferenced Pig War is curious and has a great potential! that is, the article. Two words of note: Don't insert links to wikipedia articles in footnotes. Use direct links to actual sources (or reference to printed sources). A reference linking just ""Statistik Austria"" makes an impression of a fake ref, and few people will care to explore the subject in depth. These will be reverted on sight. Have some consideration as to where you insert links to the article. Some of these look like spamming. The 1906 affair has little relevance for post-war Austria - the economic growth after the Anschluss and the destruction of 1945 were orders of magnitude higher than any event preceding WW1. Cheers, East of Borschov "
0
0
0
0
0
0
84b84ce45ee22542
Re: Rollback Thanks for your help and support. I do know better now, although I can't say it was a pleasant learning experience finding out that my greatest enemy was myself. -)
0
0
0
0
0
0
84b8df54da88cd8d
For fuck's sake When are they gonna send that piece of shit to the chair?
1
0
1
0
1
0
84c082a85a108414
Patches I added a section about the patches and some of the cut content they had restored, please don't deleted them since other pages like Morrowind,
0
0
0
0
0
0
84c386824362983b
some random stuff very constructive some random stuff constructive enough for you?
0
0
0
0
0
0
84d02ef3088ec64d
" Iron Man 2 edits Since you're new to Wikipedia I just wanted to let you know about the mistake you made in your recent edit that most new editors don't even realize is a mistake. Plot summaries for fiction need to be written in present tense. If you have any questions feel free to ask me on my talk page. Welcome to Wikipedia and good luck editing. 104 "
0
0
0
0
0
0
84d48192ac3d90b7
" Comment from IP I was a Sophmore in High School when the 37th division was sent to the South Pacific theater of war. Three years later, in May, 1945, I was a replacement joining this Division where I earned my combat badge in June of that year. June 30th did not see the end of combat for this Division. I was an 18yr. old replacement and a member of Company D, 145th Infantry Regiment when we were sent deep into the Cagahan(Sp?) Valley of Northern Luzon with the assignment to thwart the fleeing soldiers of Japan from reaching the dense forested hills bordering that Valley. Our Company was engaged in many firefights with these retreating Japanese army units. My last combat missions were ended soon after the Dropping of the atomic bombs on the Japanese main land in early August. While my combat experience was very limited, I did come face-to-face with my own mortality during these few months of combat experience. When I came home in 1946, I remember the resentment I felt that my parents had to come with me before I could register to vote in my first National election. I was still under the legal voting age of 21. On another subject, the Name of Medal of Honor winner, John J. Petrarcal is new to me. There is a famous ballad about the only Medal of Honor Winner about whom I had ever read, and that Medal of Honor went to Pvt.Roger Young, 148 Infantry Division,37th Division for bravery on the Island of New Georgia, in the Solomon Islands in May of 1942. I in no way want to detract from John Petrarcal, but I wonder, are there possibly two heroes to recall? Citations: Personal experience and 37th Division written History. Harold A. Keiser — Preceding unsigned comment added by 107.182.34.216 06:28, 9 November 2014 I moved this comment here from the article. "
0
0
0
0
0
0
84d4993416f78c01
Copyright problem This article has been tagged as part of a large-scale clean-up project of multiple article copyright infringement. It will likely be deleted after one week unless it can be verified to be free of infringement. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions must be deleted. Major contributions by contributors who have been verified to have violated copyright in multiple articles may be presumptively deleted in accordance with Wikipedia:Copyright violations. Interested contributors are invited to help clarify the copyright status of this material or rewrite the article in original language at the temporary page linked from the article's face. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text.
0
0
0
0
0
0
84d7d0a1bd8fd4f7
I will castrate you and roast your testicles. Then I will feed them to you.
1
0
1
1
1
0
84e09341e19891a6
" Please do not vandalize pages, as you did with this edit to Lard. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing.   — (|contribs) "
0
0
0
0
0
0
84eab63c33f45bde
" Invitation and Recommendations for writing articles on Hindi Wikipedia Hindi wikipedia invites and welcomes Wikipedians to contribute for the cause of spreading knowledge and the Hindi language. This page contains guidelines for writing a wiki-article on any topic at the Hindi Wikipedia, with special recommendations for writing in Hindi (Note: The script/font-family for Hindi is Devanāgari; the script/font-system for English is Roman script, also, the Hindi spelling system is not completely standardized). This article is yet in English language (mostly), in order to encourage even non-native/foreign people who have learnt/are learning Hindi to contribute to the Hindi wikipedia, and native Hindi speakers who normally write in English. The examples given below are only for explanation. Recommendations: Firstly for proper viewing, it is recommended to keep all links NOT-UNDERLINED. Otherwise the मात्रा below the Hindi alphabets might get partly hidden behind the underlines. For this, please go to My Preferences (मेरी पसंद) at the top of the page, then click Misc., and then choose ""underline links -> Never"". Save your settings. Also, do not click yes for ""justify paragraphs"", otherwise on some browsers, the devanagari script will appear highly distorted. All users are requested and encouraged to contribute articles here, especially, to create new articles on general topics. They are also encouraged to expand the existing articles, and improve upon them. A non-user can also do the same; it is recommended but not required to register yourself as a wikipedian user at the Hindi wikipedia. As far as possible, each article should be written with a Neutral Point of View (NPOV)—no nationalistic or partiality or hatred based articles are welcome. The articles should be based on facts—and appropriate references should be provided as and where needed. See the English wiki's help page for editing in general. Almost all the general wiki-features are available for editing on Hindi wiki too. Guidelines for the content matter is mostly the same as given in English wiki. Since the Hindi wiki is at its initial stages, users are welcome to take introduction and basic points from the English (or another) wikipedia's corresponding article and translate them for small articles. An in-page link to the English wiki's article will be deemed sufficient for references (a template might be created stating this). For longer articles, it is recommended to mention the references separately. Since most computer users in India and elsewhere have the standard Western-type keyboard, it is best recommended (but not necessarily required) to use the virtual (software) keyboard like the one of Hindimozhi or of ISIS (Tavultesoft Keyman)—which are freewares. These are advantageous because the contemporary Hindi-speakers in India often write messages/chat using Hindi words but written in Roman (English) script, and the layout of these keyboards is quite the same that such people use. For example, using the ""normal"" keyboard with this software, typing ga would give ग and ghaa would give घा. Create the article with its name written in Hindi (devanagari script). Always take care to include the nukta (dot below) for foreign / Urdu loanwords wherever it occurs in the standard spelling. For non-Indian names, use that spelling (for article name and other words) which is commonly encountered in Hindi newspapers, G.K.-books, Hindi-dubbed TV documentaries and Hollywood films and magazines. e.g., America-अमरीका (या अमेरिका), China-चीन, French-फ़्रांसिसी. For English acronyms/short-forms, use the initials in Roman script, and again create a full form in Hindi and redirect it to the short form. e.g. IPA (अन्तर्राष्ट्रीय ध्वनि वर्णाक्षर); UNO (संयुक्त राष्ट्र संघ). Doing the opposite is also fine. But creating the article with the Hindi short form, as सं०रा०सं०, is not recommended. Also, the article proper must be written with the proper nukta, as फ़ारसी, and then, a non-nukta (mis-)spelt version फारसी should preferably be created to redirect to the correct spelling. Hindi wikipedia strongly recommends the users to write articles in everyday common Hindi in the खड़ीबोली dialect (Hindustani or Hindi-Urdu, i.e., बोलचाल वाली हिन्दी, which may include many loanwords from Persian and Arabic). The use of शुद्ध संस्कृतनिष्ठ हिन्दी is in general neither required nor recommended. E.g., use: वजह instead of कारण, ख़ास instead of विशेष, वगैरह instead of इत्यादि, लेकिन instead of परन्तु etc. However, for technical and specialized vocabulary, the use of शुद्ध संस्कृतनिष्ठ हिन्दी is recommended and usually
0
0
0
0
0
0
84ebfe2d9c147c15
"""mein Gewehr"", Jim ;) What's your problem? "
0
0
0
0
0
0
84ed6ac1358c3369
" If you think you can do the references better, go ahead. I challenge you. Don't tell me to ""have it my way"" as though you are doing me a favor; you are not. If you think you can do the article better, go ahead, I would like to see it. The reason I handled the references that way is that it seems to me to be the most convenient for the reader (and other editors), which is all I care about. If that pisses other editors off (and how many other editors would that be?), it says something about them, not about me. I have no interest in ""owning"" an article. But I have worked long and hard to do a good job and deserve to have my work treated with respect, which BMK has certainly not done. Just look at the section above titled ""Wallack's Theatre."" Rewrite the article to your heart's content; just make sure you are improving it. The claim that I think I own the article is BMK's complete fiction. If you look at the record, you will see that I have welcomed constructive changes. But Wikipedia has a rule about collegiality and collaboration. Making many and significant changes to someone else's work without discussing it with him is not collaboration, it is contemptuous. Look how I interacted with him here (under cul-de-sac). Do you think I deserve to be treated the same way? I do. Just try to change an article that BMK has edited. I have and have almost always been immediately reverted, even though in most cases it turned out I was right. And these instances do not concern matters of taste; they concern matters of fact. This has happened many times most recently here (by coincidence, on October 3rd). So BMK has a double standard: one for him, and the opposite for me (and presumably everyone else). I give respect to those who give me respect; most often I have been treated by him with dismissive disdain. The reason I blanket-reverted his changes (I didn't even look at them) is only that: that his way of going about editing my article was contemptuous. He reminds me of Lucy kicking down Linus' sand castles in Peanuts. I was not objecting to the content of his changes (although I do, to some of them), but to the process. Observe how Moonriddengirl did it: She discussed the issues on the article's Talk Page first and I had no trouble making the changes. Is it too much to expect BMK to do the same? As for Footnote 1, that was someone else's contribution, as the record shows (see the history at 26 June 2013); I merely relocated it to where I thought it was more appropriate. And notice how I politely explained to that editor on the Talk Page what I did and why and said I hoped he agreed. If you think the article is better without it, delete it (you might want to explain the reason for doing so to that contributor, as he deserves an explanation). And speaking of original research, you might want to have a look at the edit war here (discussed above in the section ""Madison Square depot"") and explain to me how the note I added constitutes ""original research"" and is therefore unacceptable. And how about the edit war here. Can you explain BMK's behavior in that case? (And notice that BMK began editing my article again for the first time in two months on October 2nd, right after these three exchanges Madison Square depot, the map image, and the categories. Could it possibly be spite?) The problem is not me; for a year I have been a conscientious editor, and carefully sensitive to the feelings of others, including BMK. But although we have occasionally had cordial exchanges, for the most part, I did not receive similar treatment in return. And now he is completely misrepresenting me and our history. And when I say so to protect myself your response is, ""Come on."" "
0
0
0
0
0
0
84f23f94f5fc2aed
" replied on user talk page - talk to me? Deletion of The leaf Jimbaran Hello jim, i want to know why you just delete my page https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:The_leaf_jimbaran , which part is advertising ? I just write about the history and all have a valid citation. I spend the whole day to write and citate that and you just delete that, why you not just put mark where i should be edit on the article that you thing ""ambigous/advertising"" ?? Thank you. "
0
0
0
0
0
0
84f5e44b69c356c9
" Fletcher Baronets Thank you for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test worked, and it has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you may want to do. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Thanks ~~ talk ~~ "
0
0
0
0
0
0
84fe3a1550db114c
Congratulations! Congratulations, Floquenbeam, you have won the asshole of the year award! You have won this award by saying mean things about and to other people! In order to claim your award, you must call 1-800-Asshole(1-800-277-4653)! Once again, congratulations for your win! 142.162.13.40
0
0
0
0
0
0
85058619881781b8
During his televisived debate with Vice President Walter Mondale in 2002, Mondale bashed Coleman for his abortion position. Norm Coleman retorted, and included that he and his wife personally knew the tragedy that comes with the death of children, as he and his wife lost two children through miscarriage. The transcripts of the debate are readily availible on any number of websites. Please look it up and alter the page back to what I had before you so carelessly altered it. Your remark about Freemasonry was a really careless thing to add. I think now that you realize there is absolutely no credible source on that, you made the right decision by deleting it.
0
0
0
0
0
0
850b0467c60e0190
Tell me what is better ways to stop the other guys from keep deleting (and of course reverting too) every change I made and to keep their own. Make some common sense before warning me, OK?
0
0
0
0
0
0
850cd60ad3ad0e29
(or at least review)
0
0
0
0
0
0
8510356129fa63bf
" As a rule, Facebook is not a reliable source. Doesn't matter who or what put the information there...if the information is to be usable, it should be on a site that actually gives some evidence of editorial control and fact checking. As it stands, we have no idea who wrote that information about H2O, or where they got their information, or for that matter if they even have the authority to post such information on the FB page. — (t @ c) "
0
0
0
0
0
0
8510cc0a6b69815f
" Ok, I've changed it to ""Many Iranian-Americans are irreligious, agnostic and atheist, but also of Muslim, Christian, Jewish, Baha'i and Zoroastrian religious backgrounds."" "
0
0
0
0
0
0
8514e8914dfbc03e
(deleting information) and unacceptable on Wikipedia (making hostile edits during a dispute instead of working it out on the talk page and via the process)
0
0
0
0
0
0
8515128d618d5e41
" Support. The sad thing is that if he hadn't pushed his agenda so zealously, he may have been able to write-up a good piece on the issues surrounding the smokers' rights movement, and that would have been informative... References to add Under Smoking#Smoking_in_culture, ""Art"" subsection, third paragraph (slightly re-worded for clarity): But this was a pleasure that was to be confined to a male world; women smokers were associated with prostitution, and smoling was not something that society thought proper ladies should be involved in.[citation needed] I would like to add the following refs to the end of that statement: Greaves, Lorraine.(November 2002) High Culture: Reflections on Addiction and Modernity Edited by Anna Alexander and Mark S. Roberts. pp. 266 ISBN 079145553XRudy, Jarret. (October 2005) Freedom to Smoke: Tobacco Consumption And Identity. McGill-Queen's University Press. pp. 18, ISBN 077352911X Walkowitz, Judith R. (October 29, 1982) Prostitution and Victorian Society: Women, Class, and the State pp.26-27 ISBN 0521270642 Thanks. "
0
0
0
0
0
0
85169f5e4133c76d
ps you are a faggot with a clipboard Megna
1
0
0
0
0
0
8519a7cefb9478cf
Avtually it is just a general reminder on any motto that has been used multiple times. south.... improving for 5 years So much for ER
0
0
0
0
0
0
8521ed6839f1bfef
" ""why are they important? what habitat are they living? what animals eat their seeds? are they important economically? what minerals or grounds they need?"" I ask you if you could enlarge Dipterocarpaceae making better known this group of trees in Wikipedia, adding links to ""Dipterocarpaceae"" and information about ""Dipterocarpaceae"" existence on topics as trees articles in tropical articles or botanical or biodiversity articles. You are welcome if you want edit this article, Lauraceae or some genera or species in these families or another one. Really, there are few knowledge about tropical and subtropical trees and they are so many. I thank you very much your help. "
0
0
0
0
0
0
8525605dcff88053
" This is what I read: This is the source; It seems ""his brother diplomatist"" may have been taken too literally. (signed) Yngvadottir. Which is page 46 and now I have read (at the risk of losing my eyesight!) page 43 and I don't understand you, or rather, why you think it is significant. Please use words of as few syllables as possible. Thanks, "
0
0
0
0
0
0
852c22d37a9becdb
NETWORK FORENSICS You might want to wonder about someone who owns a security company and harrasign them on wikipedia nad what they could be doing monitoring you on wikipedia. You are really stupid.
1
0
0
0
1
0
853528ff1f9eace6
Since I don't know who left the last set of comments on this talk page, I am unable to comment. Please register and sign.
0
0
0
0
0
0
853b8d5d833af3c8
" Hello Hi MF, I was blocked trying to defend you. I obviously made some bad choices and regret them awfully, but I'm glad that I at least had the power to try to help you out. No I'm not mad at you, I was only off Wiki for 31 hrs. I still hope you won't be leaving. I knew deep down I shouldn't have posted that message on Wingard's talk page. I just hope now everything will be the same; that no one will look into my files and ignore me or be snide to me because I was blocked trying to defend one of my companions. It's not that I'm mad, I'm just distraught. I was extremely angry when I got the message of my ban; not at you just in general. Anyway, it's all over now and I just hope that I can put in the past and everyone else can too ) Thanks for your support. It goes a long way. PS - Let me know on if you will be leaving soon or not. ) Talk? "
0
0
0
0
0
0
853ea7a6027f7d2b
This is the last time I will say this, WAIT UNTIL IT'S CONFIRMED ON DOJO. I'm sick of you people ignoring me, and when you do talk to me, you only bring up negative stuff about me. For instance, saying that it's rare when you agree with me is negative. And when I do make a point, you just pretend I did'nt say anything and keep going with your pointless disscussion. Just because I'm not an administrator, dose'nt mean I can't help.
0
0
0
0
0
0
854c1c265f50af5f
" I see.. although you could add rationales to the new images, and explain their source more specifically. Also, please sign your post using ~~~~. (Talk) "
0
0
0
0
0
0
854c8f9607d22e0d
Please delete this account because I'd like to get a fresh start with wikipedia. I've messed up, been bloked 5 times, you know I just want to start.
0
0
0
0
0
0
8554fe6cd1cfc5ae
Hong Kong slum image The image of the HK slum was taken in the 1990s. I changed the text from 1980s to 1990s. The image showed a buildings of Central Plaza, Times Square, etc. which were completed in the 1990s.
0
0
0
0
0
0
8555ac2cab38a5ec
" My proposed lead paragraph, which treats the topic of the article (unlike the current lead paragraph). ""The historical Jesus is Jesus of Nazareth as reconstructed by historians who regard him as a natural man rather than as a supernatural entity. Though these acounts vary, in general they portray Jesus as a 1st-century Jewish sage or prophet who had a following but who did not establish a religion or send his disciples to convert the gentiles. Scholars of the historical Jesus use the historical method and Israeli archeology to reconstruct a biography of Jesus. They debate whether he preached the imminent end of the world, his connection to religious groups (such as the Essenes), and which sayings attributed to him are actually his. The so-called quest for the historical Jesus began with Hermann Samuel Reimarus and continues today with scholars such as the fellows of the Jesus Seminar."" LC, I imagine that you will assert that this isn't what's meant by the term ""historical Jesus,"" but if you google ""historical Jesus was,"" you'll see that this is how the term is generally used. "
0
0
0
0
0
0
855707c1a35cafb2
" Crazy Shirts Please stop adding links for unrelated companies to the Crazy Shirts article. The article is about a company with the name ""Crazy Shirts,"" not about ""crazy shirts' in general. Thanks. "
0
0
0
0
0
0
8558070cc140e5a3
" And I object to your unwarranted criticisms of me, based on the reversion of an edit that I think most people would agree wasn't constructive. I guess we're even. See WP:MOS. '''' msg!'' "
0
0
0
0
0
0
855fd03c2f988652
" HereToHelp sometimes has Terminal Sarcasm Syndrome, I suspect. D Talk| "
0
0
0
0
0
0
85601bb800e927ec
Werieth is a deletionist. His idea of contributing to Wikipedia is undoing other people's work and acting like an enforcer on subject matters he knows nothing about. You won't get anywhere trying to talk sense to him. He was dropped on his head repeatedly as a child.
0
0
0
0
0
0
8560558af3a4969b
"Firstly the report of the first commission is yet to be tabled. the commission which leaked its report has been criticized by Supreme Court and not allowed to be tabled in Parliament, not has it been discussed in Parliament of anywhere else. Seconly the original Nanavati-Shah report has yet to be tabled, so any findings of any committee just cannot be considered to push POV. So, that reference just cannot be made. Let us wait how that turns out. IF SUPREME COURT HAS stopped that report being submitted in Parliament yet, respect the SUPREME COURT of INDIA and dont post any findings of ANY commission here before it is tabled in parliament. so, that and especially the widely believed conspiracy theory that RSS and BJP etc started the riots by blaming Muslims just cannot stand. Such a statement is just not admissible. Anyone can then write any conpiracy theory and pass it off as widely believed and truth etc. Wide ""beliefs"" like this just cannot be written. You need proof just as when you deleted that Muslims burnt Hindus. If that cannot be written then the POV that it was a Hindu conspiracy is patent nonsense and cannot be tolerated. So, deleted... "
0
0
0
0
0
0
85642e26f3dc6b49
I dedicate this article my several Apostle's who do so enjoy following their God around the Wiki ! Do You Have Any Elves I Can Mash
0
0
0
0
0
0
85665e6293355e58
Are you slow or something??? Why would you remove sourced information???? I do not understand what your problem is. Meester has spoken about her upbringing MANY MANY times. In magazines, newspapers, TV interviews, etc. Why do you want the information removed???? It is all from reliable sources. Do a little bit of research. You have no reason to want the information removed. Leighton has acknowledged it in the past and you have NO reason at all to be making a fuss about it. It's pathetic.
0
0
0
0
0
0
856d09464a9e6a1f
British? Exactly how is she American-British? There is part of chapter in the section 'Personal life': In 1990, Khan emigrated to the United Kingdom where she had a steady relationship. She splits her time between Los Angeles, Germany and London but has been living mainly in London since 2006. Start would mean that she went to live in UK 1990, but then is said that she's only been 'living mainly' there since 2006. And what is this Germany thing? Shouldn't it then be American-British-German? What is the source for this? Can't see any. 82.141.119.195
0
0
0
0
0
0
856df79731b9e103
understand why SOCK is a hugely important issue here, or if you do not
0
0
0
0
0
0
85748bdc6fda41d2
" UEFA Euro 2016 qualifying Please refer to WP:INFOBOXFLAG, namely this passage: ""Generally, flag icons should not be used in infoboxes, even when there is a ""country"", ""nationality"" or equivalent field: they are unnecessarily distracting and give undue prominence to one field among many"". Thanks, "
0
0
0
0
0
0
857c17d472cd2d4b
Citations Now that considerable and excellent work has been done by Linmhall and others to add references and citations to the article, I think that the can be removed. Any objections?
0
0
0
0
0
0
8581e700136c4c4a
" Image copyright problem with Image:Whharam.jpg Thanks for uploading Image:Whharam.jpg. However, the image may soon be deleted unless we can determine the copyright holder and copyright status. The Wikimedia Foundation is very careful about the images included in Wikipedia because of copyright law (see Wikipedia's Copyright policy). The copyright holder is usually the creator, the creator's employer, or the last person who was transferred ownership rights. Copyright information on images is signified using copyright templates. The three basic license types on Wikipedia are open content, public domain, and fair use. Find the appropriate template in Wikipedia:Image copyright tags and place it on the image page like this: {{TemplateName}}. If you have not already done so, please also include the source of the image. In many cases this will be the website where you found it. Please specify the copyright information and source on any other images you have uploaded or will upload. Remember that images without this important information can be deleted by an administrator. If you have any questions, feel free to contact me, or ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Talk to me! "
0
0
0
0
0
0
8589cfcab0c591da
WP:RM Why are you removing my voiced support for the page protection for List of Washington State Routes? t c
0
0
0
0
0
0
858b9ced5a03f69f
Thanks for the info! I didn't realize I was deleting your post; my apologies. Explanation duly noted. Happy Holidays! ~
0
0
0
0
0
0
85901a437bb5259a
As Sophia has patiently pointed out, this article is very sub-standard, and yet almost impossible to improve because of knee-jerk revisions (witness my recent attempts) and the inability of Xian apologists to differentiate evidence from opinion.
0
0
0
0
0
0
85920a4179026029
"{| style=""background-color: #fdffe7; border: 1px solid #fceb92;"" |rowspan=""2"" style=""vertical-align: middle; padding: 5px;"" | |style=""font-size: x-large; padding: 3px 3px 0 3px; height: 1.5em;"" | Merry Christmas |- |style=""vertical-align: middle; padding: 3px;"" |And from me, a happy NSW Xmas bush Xmas from us all down here in Oz (damn, should have 5x expanded that for this Xmas...is there still time I wonder....) (talk · contribs) |} "
0
0
0
0
0
0
859904dec8a9bc46
" GAIA observation limit I used a source that gives the named brightness limit directly and I used ""may"" because the GAIA team has apparently weighed options to read out the CCD differently to get to bright stars and obtain better estimates than Hipparcos, presumably. "
0
0
0
0
0
0
85ad1a928ec87c89
Good call on the history section. WWII bit (rewritten entirely and based on the source) is now back in, and I've deleted the rest.
0
0
0
0
0
0
85ad644fb99ce730
(UTC) I agree 21:50, 18 March 2010
0
0
0
0
0
0
85ae4d8136185fb5
" Hello again, . I think you may have misread the requirements: You only need to make ten (and have your account for four days) to upload images. But even after that, there are still some rules you have to follow. I'm guessing you want to add the photo here. Copyrighted images (like this one) can only be added if they meet certain requirements. One of the requirements is that there is no way to replace it with another one that is free content. Unfortunately, photos of living people usually fail this one, because someone else could take a photo of her at a public appearance. If you really want to, you could try to take her photo at an event and upload it. ( / talk / contribs) "
0
0
0
0
0
0
85b02eda478549ee
===>It's impossible to say I don't know why something doesn't occur, in fact, it is virtually impossible to prove or conclude anything from a lack of information. -, talk
0
0
0
0
0
0
85b8f018ded0e750
" re: Intermediawiki linking re: (My talk) First off: please don't get mad at me for what I say below. I say it in good faith, and most likely a naive view.It seems to me that you're going about interwiki-linking to the other wikimedia sites in an overly complex way. Wouldn't something along the same style as the inter-language wikipedia links (i.e. in the bar on the left of the page) be far better, and much more elegant? Not only would it reduce the amount of clutter on the page, it would also remove any issues with categories being named differently as the interlanguage links deal with this as a routine matter. Additionally, there are a number of bots that would be able to propagate these interwiki links (i.e. you'd add one set of links on, say, Wikipedia, and a bot could propagate them to all of the other sites). I can see two issues with this: 1. it requires developer changes to the mediawiki code, 2. it's not possible to use tracking categories. Hopefully the first one of these shouldn't be too difficult to arrange, and if inter-wikimedia-ing becomes popular, I think that the benefit of the tracking categories is fairly minimal. ... or am I misunderstanding what you're doing? The above works nicely if you're just linking similar templates together, and even if you're making sure that they have similar functionality. However, if you're making sure that all of the templates _are exactly the same_, it's not so good. In this case, a system like that used at Help:Link would be better - having a single master copy (the best place I can see for this is on the meta), which is then copied over to all of the mediawiki wikis every so often. That copying could be done by a bot, say every 24 hours, with the template being flagged for human attention if it's been modified anywhere but on meta. Of course, extra care would then have to be taken if the template calls were modified. '' Mike I be putting this whole section in WT:TSP, but the short answer is first that I concluded last fall this belongs on Meta, and much of our 'good stuff' is already there and many of our best template programmers contribute there as well (Omegatron, CBD, etc.) But here people know me and so this is where it began. Like David, RL called (demanded!) and I went wiki-missing much of last fall, and was busy with mediation stuff when I first returned to having regular time for wiki's, then iterwikitmp-grp hit Tfd... so that boot in the rear restarted things. I'd really rather be working on categorization between here and the commons! Sigh... life is not a selection of first choices, most of the time we're lucky to be able to get one selection in our top fifteen! I'll address your points on WT:TSP. But thanks for the interest and input. I like that idea of intersister interwiki's! As for 'What I'm doing', the WP:TSP has new revision that may help communicate the focus as I see it. This is really a local need as much as one off in the smaller sister's though Wikispecies and Wikiversity much need template expertise and libraries. ttfn // nkB "
0
0
0
0
0
0
85b95257fcdb42ee
You're a fag Do you have anything better to do?
1
0
1
0
1
0
85bacc6ee468e822
Okay, that makes sense, but doesn't it go against the original way Fischer wanted to modify Chess960? In original Chess, I have the option to either castle king-side or queen-side when there are only Rooks and King on the back rank. But now, if I have this start position of 946 or 947, I have to move a rook. Are there official rules out there by FIDE or USCF that explain what to do here? If we are to be faithful to the original Chess setup, then castling must be allowed either way I would think. Instead, we now have to move a rook away in order to castle queen-side, and it's only for roughly 2 (maybe more?) initial setups. I think what you said should be explained in a new subsection of the castling rules. Like, in original chess, I have people argue about En Passant, and I have an official place I can point to and tell them that En Passant is a real move. Now if 946 or 947 arise, they may either try to do a null move, or they may force me to move a rook (if a null move is allowed). This seems like either a flaw or something that should be outlined in the rules specifically. If it is the case where the rook must move first, then I think a new subsection should be added to explain this. )
0
0
0
0
0
0
85bd0fd0674e0794
" Sockpuppetry case Your name has been in mentioned in connection with a sockpuppetry case. Please refer to Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/EZW for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to cases before editing the evidence page. "
0
0
0
0
0
0
85bf68bb5c03f699
==Abuse== And you Saxifrage would do well to explain why my msg is incivil and the one it is a comment to is not. I have removed your comment as I beleive yours is far more incivil than mine.
0
0
0
0
0
0
85c4722385dea18f
" ""Written about by several unrelated research groups and cited by _many_ unrelated research groups"" would be a good start. This applies both to the concept of ""process physics"" itself, and to its viability as an explanation for dark matter, separately. Please see WP:UNDUE for additional information about weight, and WP:RS for a description of what sources are and aren't considered to have weight in a scientific context. Also please take a glance at WP:COI, as your first IP address suggests that you might have a vested interest in having PP prominently mentioned. "
0
0
0
0
0
0
85d9e4892c319b6d
Thanks very much, it's greatly appreciated.
0
0
0
0
0
0
85e02bdfa42fc362
====Regarding the ghey ass admins Lick deez nuts and suck a fart out of my ass!
1
0
1
0
1
0
85e4a80c3b443acb
That's Right That's right you leave my changes in that article.
0
0
0
0
0
0
85ec1e89d9e2675c
Yes, ignoring is probably the best course of action in these cases so far. Y'all know ... I've been doing some reading of my own, and am seeing a bit of a pattern. In any case, perhaps 'they' will actually be true to their word. Again (sigh): I will be referring this dispute to a more appropriate forum, and will no longer be involved in the dispute myself. — KieferSkunk (talk) — ...and leave this 'dispute' - as I keep asking - alone this time. We'll see. But you won't leave it will ya? I don't think its in your nature. If you're still around, I'd really like for you to explain in one small paragraph... that's called 'egging it on' KS. 'n I take this as code for 'inconvenient truth:' (not this drawn-out mess of one-line responses to other people's comments taken out of context). You, remarkably, when you came on the scene, posed as a 'mediator,' as far as I can see. There are others, outside of me, have asserted that you can pour the equivalent of gas on fires. I have reminded you of this, earlier: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:KieferSkunk#Disruptions_at_Integral Later, this year, in November, Friends over the UK are meeting in seminars on 'Building Harmony.' You would be most welcome. Perhaps you may see the world as not quite like you appear to want to view it. Apologies if you find the language 'elaborate.' I call it 'reasoning' and, trust me, I find it just as difficult to reason with y'all ... being partial to Truth m'self. Now ... am I dismissed ...? 'gards ...
0
0
0
0
0
0
85ee267a97c444f0
I have no problem with having fewer politicians, but Prince H. is 1/2 German of true heritage, transplanted within recent history, and not representative of the natural evolution or migration to the British Isles.
0
0
0
0
0
0
85f110023c5f12ad
I didn't mean to discourage you. If you need a hand, let me know. I know quite a bit about chemical weapons from my time in the military and am a pretty handy researcher.
0
0
0
0
0
0
85fa2d5703f56b33
I need help to improve this page.
0
0
0
0
0
0
85fa61fa33ec45c8
"I see that on the 28th November 2009 you edited the entry for the Sennar Dam stating the information below. ""It was built in 1925 by the British engineer, desert explorer and adventurer, Stephen ""Roy"" Sherlock, under the direction of Weetman Pearson."" You further go on to say that ""Once completed, the dam was managed by Roy Sherlock until the 1970's."" Although I cannot contest the second statement, I cannot agree with the contention in the first sentence. It may be that Stephen ""Roy"" Sherlock worked on the construction of the Sennar (Makwar) Dam. However Pearson's Contract Agent was my grandfather, John Watson Gibson. The entry for the Sennar Dam gives a reference to: O. L. Prowde, The Gezira Irrigation Scheme, Including the Sennar Dam on the Blue Nile, Minutes of Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers, Vol. 222, p. 80 (1926). Page 96 of that document contains the following: The scheme was designed by Sir Murdoch MacDonald, M. Inst. C.E., Adviser to the Egyptian Ministry of Public Works. He also exercised control over the carrying out of the work until his retirement from the Egyptian Government Service in 1921. The consulting engineers were the late Sir A. L. Webb, M. Inst. C.E., from 1914 until his death in 1921, and Messrs. Coode, Fitzmaurice, Wilson, and Mitchell, from 1922 to the present date. Colonel L. N. Cooper, M. Inst. C.E., was appointed resident engineer in 1914, followed by Mr. E. W. Buckley from 1914 to 1917. The Author has held that office from 1917 to the present date. The contractors from 1919 to 1922 were the Sudan Construction Company (Messrs. E. Alessandrini and G. S. Perry, M. Inst. C.E.). From 1922 to the completion Messrs. S. Pearson and Son, Ltd., carried out the work. Their director in charge was Sir Frederick T. Hopkinson, M. Inst. CE., the agent in charge being Mr. J. W. Gibson. The sub-contractors for the supply and erection of the sluice steelwork were Messrs. Ransomes and Rapier, Ltd., of Ipswich, their engineer in charge being Mr. J. R. Russell. On this basis I propose to amend the entry accordingly. I would be very interested to know more about Stephen ""Roy"" Sherlock if you have it. "
0
0
0
0
0
0
85fef722c66d5940
" You are quite wrong. An article consisting only of external links is not ""fine"" - it qualifies for speedy deletion under WP:CSD#A3 (No content). Your article contained only a single link to a company website, and had been like that for over an hour when I deleted it. People often put those in by way of advertisement, which is one reason why they are speedied. What the guidelines actually say is: WP:STUB: ""When you write a stub, bear in mind that it should contain enough information for other editors to expand upon it. The key is to provide adequate context—articles with little or no context usually end up being speedily deleted."" WP:Your first article#Things to avoid: ""A single sentence or only a website link - articles need to have real content of their own."" WP:List of bad article ideas #7: ""Anything about which you are not going to write at least one complete sentence."" WP:Avoiding common mistakes: ""Articles which are too short to have encyclopedic value. Articles must establish the context and notability of the subject. If an article does not contain enough content to classify it as a stub, then it may qualify for speedy deletion. Instead of creating a very short article, consider adding more content to the page before saving it, or using the tag to indicate that the article is in the process of expansion."" "
0
0
0
0
0
0
8600630899b24e89
self hating jew another user is deleting your edits en masse and i am having trouble keeping up with him. you might want to come check out this page.
0
0
0
0
0
0
86061b38d0808275
Indeed, please don't assume that Gwen Gale is not a capable admin whom can speak for themselves. I have asked reasonable questions which need not be obfuscated by citations of boiler plate. Thanks
0
0
0
0
0
0
8617223d4caa3101
Needless to say, I have unblocked myself. - talk/email
0
0
0
0
0
0
861728ddd27f7c7b
" Revert Warrior Cutting off your nose to spite your face C - U - Nnnnnnn - Totally! "
0
0
0
0
0
0
8619218fdb44bfec
What I meant was to check if the relevant article existed before a talk page was created for it. Must be possible (he says, having given up programming at COBOL 3).
0
0
0
0
0
0
861f4f46a14a0dbd
A friendly reminder
0
0
0
0
0
0
86230241a32c841a
JamesJJames I note that I was blocked for apparently outing JamesJJames. I think there have been numerous discussions on the site about privacy. Personally I think you should stick a name on an article. However I believe that JamesJJames has launched a personal attack on myself. I do note his comments are generally aggressive(see contribs) and his approach is destructive(deleting, criticising) rather than constructive in the sense of putting things on WP. I believe my article on Golden Age of Cricket was sound and I wonder if JamesJJames could point out any factual errors. It was a work in progress. I note that it was not passed for deletion ny peer review. Obviously I know who JamesJJames is and he, me, likewise. He does not like me(from ACS days) and I think that in all fairness one cannot describe his comment as anything other than an attack. I therefore propose he be blocked temporarily.
0
0
0
0
0
0
862631256d7f7d70
reason they didnt need to be on every page just put it on the main page..it gets redicolous to have them everywhere
0
0
0
0
0
0
8629dc0629451046
" Oh, great and glorious one. I was thinking that it might do the various religion projects some good if maybe there were a line added to the template page for the various religion projects, maybe particularly the Saints project (which I'm on), and the newer Calvinism and Lutheranism projects as well. If you would know of any way to add a few ""lines"" to the page for these groups, or maybe for the newer projects in general, I think we would all be very grateful for your profound magnaminousness and generosity. And, yes, I really do talk this way, particularly when I'm trying to flatter people to get them to do something I want. ) "
0
0
0
0
0
0
862e998acc718286
fucking stupid liberals like you
1
0
1
0
1
1
8630210cae8bed26
Thanks. Since I nominated it, you have added to it immensely. I have found a head shot for him, but I think we are lacking on some of the personality section. At Somerset, he seems to have been the hard-bitten pro, but what was he like as a Test player? I will keep looking. Cheers, \talk
0
0
0
0
0
0
8631fe3dd7b8bd71
Snowded demonstrating his autism once again.
0
0
0
0
1
0
8637fb2b9256c30b
" Well, per WP:NPOV it's probably better to provide all the narratives, how he describes himself (+how his supporters describe him) and how he's described by independent reliable sources so that readers can get a proper overview. Phrasing like 'variously described as ""x"", ""y"", ""z""' with the appropriate sources cited might be a better approach. There seems to be fairly wide variety of descriptions e.g. the BBC say ""controversial Indian guru"". Either way, Nithyananda's version of the truth has to be presented as his version not the encyclopedia's. ''' - talk''' "
0
0
0
0
0
0
863fde83d453f88c
♥Valentine's Day Couples♥ (alpahbetical order by last names) ALTIERI, ANTHONY & ALLYSON FETZER BENEDETTO, DAVID & RONALD VARN CRIBBEN, EVAN & CHING SHIN SHOO DeLONG, ANDREW & JOEL TEAL FETZER, ALLISON & MITCH MUIR GILL, JEFFERY & MARY J. WANA HARTZELL, TIMOTHY & LAURA LEVITT ICHIKAWA, SHIZUYO & NATHANIEL HUMPHREY KARNUTH, GREGORY & MICHEAL KOHLER LASLO, ERICA & DANIEL LEEK MADDAMMA, JAMES & DENNY LEEK PELLEGRINI, JORDAN & KATIE BARTON QIN, SIMON & SHIZUYO ICHIKAWA RARESHEID, KARA & BRIAN RASILE SCHAUB, MEGAN & JOHN RUTH SCHILSTRA, KEITH & DYLAN ROSSETT SICH, ANNA & HOMER RICHARDS TEAL, JOEL & NICHOLAS SINCERE UITTO, MATTHEW & VID. E. OJUEGOS
0
0
0
0
0
0