WeRateDogs / DATASHEET.md
tbroad's picture
Add readme and datasheet (#1)
aae6f9a verified

Datasheet: English Nursery Rhymes

Author: Terence Broad

Organization: Creative Computing Institute, University of the Arts London.

Date: 08/12/2023

Datasheet template is taken from: github.com/JRMeyer/markdown-datasheet-for-datasets

Motivation

The questions in this section are primarily intended to encourage dataset creators to clearly articulate their reasons for creating the dataset and to promote transparency about funding interests.

  1. For what purpose was the dataset created? Was there a specific task in mind? Was there a specific gap that needed to be filled? Please provide a description.

This dataset was created for education purposes. The original intention was for it to be used as a learning tool for teaching image processing techniques.

  1. Who created this dataset (e.g. which team, research group) and on behalf of which entity (e.g. company, institution, organization)?

Terence Broad on behalf of the Creative Computing Institute (CCI).

  1. What support was needed to make this dataset? (e.g. who funded the creation of the dataset? If there is an associated grant, provide the name of the grantor and the grant name and number, or if it was supported by a company or government agency, give those details.)

This dataset was created for teaching and was created by a lecturer working at CCI.

  1. Any other comments?

No other comments.

Composition

Dataset creators should read through the questions in this section prior to any data collection and then provide answers once collection is complete. Most of these questions are intended to provide dataset consumers with the information they need to make informed decisions about using the dataset for specific tasks. The answers to some of these questions reveal information about compliance with the EU’s General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) or comparable regulations in other jurisdictions.

  1. What do the instances that comprise the dataset represent (e.g. documents, photos, people, countries)? Are there multiple types of instances (e.g. movies, users, and ratings; people and interactions between them; nodes and edges)? Please provide a description.

The dataset consits of images of dogs, with captions and numerical ratings of each dog.

  1. How many instances are there in total (of each type, if appropriate)?

  2. Does the dataset contain all possible instances or is it a sample (not necessarily random) of instances from a larger set? If the dataset is a sample, then what is the larger set? Is the sample representative of the larger set (e.g. geographic coverage)? If so, please describe how this representativeness was validated/verified. If it is not representative of the larger set, please describe why not (e.g. to cover a more diverse range of instances, because instances were withheld or unavailable).

No, the dataset is a subset of all photographs of dogs.

  1. What data does each instance consist of? "Raw" data (e.g. unprocessed text or images) or features? In either case, please provide a description.

Each datum is an image of a dog, with an associated text caption and numerical rating.

  1. Is there a label or target associated with each instance? If so, please provide a description.

A text caption and rating of the dog.

  1. Is any information missing from individual instances? If so, please provide a description, explaining why this information is missing (e.g. because it was unavailable). This does not include intentionally removed information, but might include, e.g. redacted text.

No.

  1. Are relationships between individual instances made explicit (e.g. users' movie ratings, social network links)? If so, please describe how these relationships are made explicit.

Not applicable.

  1. Are there recommended data splits (e.g. training, development/validation, testing)? If so, please provide a description of these splits, explaining the rationale behind them.

No.

  1. Are there any errors, sources of noise, or redundancies in the dataset? If so, please provide a description.

No.

  1. Is the dataset self-contained, or does it link to or otherwise rely on external resources (e.g. websites, tweets, other datasets)? If it links to or relies on external resources, a) are there guarantees that they will exist, and remain constant, over time; b) are there official archival versions of the complete dataset (i.e., including the external resources as they existed at the time the dataset was created); c) are there any restrictions (e.g. licenses, fees) associated with any of the external resources that might apply to a future user? Please provide descriptions of all external resources and any restrictions associated with them, as well as links or other access points, as appropriate.

The dataset is self contained.

  1. Does the dataset contain data that might be considered confidential (e.g. data that is protected by legal privilege or by doctor-patient confidentiality, data that includes the content of individuals' non-public communications)? If so, please provide a description.

No.

  1. Does the dataset contain data that, if viewed directly, might be offensive, insulting, threatening, or might otherwise cause anxiety? If so, please describe why.

The data is unlikely to be offensive to anyone.

  1. Does the dataset relate to people? If not, you may skip the remaining questions in this section.

No it relates mostly to dogs, and some non-canine animals.

  1. Does the dataset identify any subpopulations (e.g. by age, gender)? If so, please describe how these subpopulations are identified and provide a description of their respective distributions within the dataset.

No.

  1. Is it possible to identify individuals (i.e., one or more natural persons), either directly or indirectly (i.e., in combination with other data) from the dataset? If so, please describe how.

The dogs may be named, and sometimes links to their respective social media accounts may be included in the captions.

  1. Does the dataset contain data that might be considered sensitive in any way (e.g. data that reveals racial or ethnic origins, sexual orientations, religious beliefs, political opinions or union memberships, or locations; financial or health data; biometric or genetic data; forms of government identification, such as social security numbers; criminal history)? If so, please provide a description.

No.

  1. Any other comments?

No.

Collection

As with the previous section, dataset creators should read through these questions prior to any data collection to flag potential issues and then provide answers once collection is complete. In addition to the goals of the prior section, the answers to questions here may provide information that allow others to reconstruct the dataset without access to it.

  1. How was the data associated with each instance acquired? Was the data directly observable (e.g. raw text, movie ratings), reported by subjects (e.g. survey responses), or indirectly inferred/derived from other data (e.g. part-of-speech tags, model-based guesses for age or language)? If data was reported by subjects or indirectly inferred/derived from other data, was the data validated/verified? If so, please describe how.

Each instance is an image, with an associated caption and numerical rating in a .tsv (tab-seperated values) file.

  1. What mechanisms or procedures were used to collect the data (e.g. hardware apparatus or sensor, manual human curation, software program, software API)? How were these mechanisms or procedures validated?

The data was collected using web scraping code using the libraries instaloader.

  1. If the dataset is a sample from a larger set, what was the sampling strategy (e.g. deterministic, probabilistic with specific sampling probabilities)?

The dataset consists of all images uploaded to the weratedogs instagram account (https://www.instagram.com/weratedogs) up to the date 24th September 2023. Posts uploaded after this date won't be included. Only the image from the first slide is used in a post (if the post was a slideshow of multiple images). If the user uploaded a video, only the thumbnail image provided by instagram is used.

  1. Who was involved in the data collection process (e.g. students, crowdworkers, contractors) and how were they compensated (e.g. how much were crowdworkers paid)?

Terence Broad built the web scraping code and collected the data. He is employed as a Senior Lecturer at CCI.

  1. Over what timeframe was the data collected? Does this timeframe match the creation timeframe of the data associated with the instances (e.g. recent crawl of old news articles)? If not, please describe the timeframe in which the data associated with the instances was created. Finally, list when the dataset was first published.

All of the data was collected on the 24/09/2023.

  1. Were any ethical review processes conducted (e.g. by an institutional review board)? If so, please provide a description of these review processes, including the outcomes, as well as a link or other access point to any supporting documentation.

No.

  1. Does the dataset relate to people? If not, you may skip the remainder of the questions in this section.

No.

  1. Did you collect the data from the individuals in question directly, or obtain it via third parties or other sources (e.g. websites)?

N/A

  1. Were the individuals in question notified about the data collection? If so, please describe (or show with screenshots or other information) how notice was provided, and provide a link or other access point to, or otherwise reproduce, the exact language of the notification itself.

N/A

  1. Did the individuals in question consent to the collection and use of their data? If so, please describe (or show with screenshots or other information) how consent was requested and provided, and provide a link or other access point to, or otherwise reproduce, the exact language to which the individuals consented.

N/A

  1. If consent was obtained, were the consenting individuals provided with a mechanism to revoke their consent in the future or for certain uses? If so, please provide a description, as well as a link or other access point to the mechanism (if appropriate).

N/A

  1. Has an analysis of the potential impact of the dataset and its use on data subjects (e.g. a data protection impact analysis) been conducted? If so, please provide a description of this analysis, including the outcomes, as well as a link or other access point to any supporting documentation.

N/A

  1. Any other comments?

No.

Preprocessing / Cleaning / Labeling

Dataset creators should read through these questions prior to any pre-processing, cleaning, or labeling and then provide answers once these tasks are complete. The questions in this section are intended to provide dataset consumers with the information they need to determine whether the “raw” data has been processed in ways that are compatible with their chosen tasks. For example, text that has been converted into a “bag-of-words” is not suitable for tasks involving word order.

  1. Was any preprocessing/cleaning/labeling of the data done (e.g. discretization or bucketing, tokenization, part-of-speech tagging, SIFT feature extraction, removal of instances, processing of missing values)? If so, please provide a description. If not, you may skip the remainder of the questions in this section.

The rating of each dog was extracted from the text caption using regex.

  1. Was the "raw" data saved in addition to the preprocessed/cleaned/labeled data (e.g. to support unanticipated future uses)? If so, please provide a link or other access point to the "raw" data.

No.

  1. Is the software used to preprocess/clean/label the instances available? If so, please provide a link or other access point.

The code for performing web-scraping and cleaning the data can be found here: https://git.arts.ac.uk/tbroad/web-scrape-we-rate-dogs

  1. Any other comments?

No.

Uses

These questions are intended to encourage dataset creators to reflect on the tasks for which the dataset should and should not be used. By explicitly highlighting these tasks, dataset creators can help dataset consumers to make informed decisions, thereby avoiding potential risks or harms.

  1. Has the dataset been used for any tasks already? If so, please provide a description.

No, the dataset will be used for education purposes only.

  1. Is there a repository that links to any or all papers or systems that use the dataset? If so, please provide a link or other access point.

No.

  1. What (other) tasks could the dataset be used for?

Automated rating of dogs.

  1. Is there anything about the composition of the dataset or the way it was collected and preprocessed/cleaned/labeled that might impact future uses? For example, is there anything that a future user might need to know to avoid uses that could result in unfair treatment of individuals or groups (e.g. stereotyping, quality of service issues) or other undesirable harms (e.g. financial harms, legal risks) If so, please provide a description. Is there anything a future user could do to mitigate these undesirable harms?

Not applicable.

  1. Are there tasks for which the dataset should not be used? If so, please provide a description.

For rating animals other than dogs.

  1. Any other comments?

    Your Answer Here

Distribution

Dataset creators should provide answers to these questions prior to distributing the dataset either internally within the entity on behalf of which the dataset was created or externally to third parties.

  1. Will the dataset be distributed to third parties outside of the entity (e.g. company, institution, organization) on behalf of which the dataset was created? If so, please provide a description.

Yes, the dataset will be shared on web platforms for sharing datasets and code.

  1. How will the dataset will be distributed (e.g. tarball on website, API, GitHub)? Does the dataset have a digital object identifier (DOI)?

The dataset will be distributed on Github, Kaggle and Huggingface.

  1. When will the dataset be distributed?

January 2024.

  1. Will the dataset be distributed under a copyright or other intellectual property (IP) license, and/or under applicable terms of use (ToU)? If so, please describe this license and/or ToU, and provide a link or other access point to, or otherwise reproduce, any relevant licensing terms or ToU, as well as any fees associated with these restrictions.

No.

  1. Have any third parties imposed IP-based or other restrictions on the data associated with the instances? If so, please describe these restrictions, and provide a link or other access point to, or otherwise reproduce, any relevant licensing terms, as well as any fees associated with these restrictions.

No.

  1. Do any export controls or other regulatory restrictions apply to the dataset or to individual instances? If so, please describe these restrictions, and provide a link or other access point to, or otherwise reproduce, any supporting documentation.

No.

  1. Any other comments?

No.

Maintenance

As with the previous section, dataset creators should provide answers to these questions prior to distributing the dataset. These questions are intended to encourage dataset creators to plan for dataset maintenance and communicate this plan with dataset consumers.

  1. Who is supporting/hosting/maintaining the dataset?

Terence Broad is the maintainer of the dataset.

  1. How can the owner/curator/manager of the dataset be contacted (e.g. email address)?

t [dot] broad [at] arts [dot] ac [dot] uk

  1. Is there an erratum? If so, please provide a link or other access point.

No

  1. Will the dataset be updated (e.g. to correct labeling errors, add new instances, delete instances)? If so, please describe how often, by whom, and how updates will be communicated to users (e.g. mailing list, GitHub)?

Terence Broad will update the dataset if errors are found or instances changed. Check the github repository for updates.

  1. If the dataset relates to people, are there applicable limits on the retention of the data associated with the instances (e.g. were individuals in question told that their data would be retained for a fixed period of time and then deleted)? If so, please describe these limits and explain how they will be enforced.

No

  1. Will older versions of the dataset continue to be supported/hosted/maintained? If so, please describe how. If not, please describe how its obsolescence will be communicated to users.

They will be available in the git history on github.

  1. If others want to extend/augment/build on/contribute to the dataset, is there a mechanism for them to do so? If so, please provide a description. Will these contributions be validated/verified? If so, please describe how. If not, why not? Is there a process for communicating/distributing these contributions to other users? If so, please provide a description.

No, but they are free to run the web scraping code themselves if they want to make an updated version of the dataset.

  1. Any other comments?

No.