text
stringlengths 0
89.3k
|
|---|
2
|
F
|
HQS
|
2
|
F 29
|
Then the optimization model for the variable Scan be ex
|
pressed as follows
|
S arg min
|
Sµ3
|
2
|
HQS
|
2
|
F
|
β
|
2
|
ˆSQS
|
2
|
FD
|
Y2ˆSQSE
|
β
|
2
|
SRpS
|
2
|
FD
|
Y3SRpSE
|
30
|
Calculating the derivative of model 30 and equating it to
|
zero yields the closedform solution of Sas follows
|
µ3
|
βQTHTHQ 2I3FS
|
QTˆS1
|
βQTY2RpS1
|
βY331
|
Solution for SThe optimization model for the variable S
|
can be expressed as follows
|
S arg min
|
Sµ1
|
2WΠS2
|
F
|
β
|
2
|
SRpS
|
2
|
FD
|
Y3SRpSE
|
32
|
Calculating the derivative of model 32 and equating it tozero yields the closedform solution of Sas follows
|
µ1
|
βΠTΠI3FS
|
µ1
|
βΠTWRT
|
pS1
|
βRT
|
pY333
|
Solution for QWe have already discussed how to solve the
|
TPA module in Sec 61 But in model 20 the variables in
|
Ωare coupled and need to be optimized alternatively so
|
the updating formula for Qneeds adjustments The opti
|
mization terms in model 20 containing the optimization
|
variable Qi i 1 Fare
|
Qi arg min
|
Qiµ3
|
2F1X
|
i1
|
QiSiQi1Si1
|
2
|
F
|
β
|
2
|
ˆSQS
|
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.