text
stringlengths 0
89.3k
|
---|
βM2
|
iΠT
|
iΠi T2I3
|
vecSi
|
vecµ1
|
βΠT
|
iWiM2
|
iRT
|
piSiT1
|
βRT
|
piYi
|
3T
|
43
|
The update formulas for the other optimization variables in
|
Model 38 remain unchanged
|
Orig Sequence
|
ˆSΛ SProxy ShapesStretch in Mocap
|
DegenerateSmoothingLow Rank
|
DoF
|
Deformation
|
lowrank friendly Update Nearly Rigid Part
|
Update
|
NonRigid
|
PartFigure 8 Illustration of the proxy shape construction and shape
|
update principle
|
8 Supplement to Spatiallyvariant Modeling
|
In this section We provide an additional explanation of the
|
construction of the proxy shape and how it plays a role in
|
optimization refer to Fig 8
|
1 Definition of proxy shape We divide the nonrigid
|
object into two regions with different deformation degrees
|
through frequency domain analysis of 3D trajectories Then
|
by spatial weighting we merge the single super point
|
degenerated from NonRigid part with Nearly Rigid
|
points to form the proxy shapes ieSˆSΛ The weight
|
matrix Λdefined by the feature mapping ϕEq 12 in
|
them main text is rankdeficient when αr1 so the re
|
sultant proxy sequence Shas fewer degrees of freedom than
|
ˆSand more satisfies the lowrank constraint
|
2 How SWNN works We enforce the lowrank constraint
|
on proxy shapes and update new shapes by Eq 27 The
|
newˆSis mainly composed of Safter lowrank regulariza
|
tion and Safter smoothing regularization Since Λis rank
|
deficient the lowrank constrained Safter inverse transfor
|
mation only retains the structural information of nearly rigid
|
part Therefore ˆSupdates nearly rigid part mainly through
|
lowrank and nonrigid part is finetuned by S
|
Our method combines lowrank and smoothing con
|
straints through spatial weighting which improves the
|
accuracy of the reconstruction by avoiding the over
|
penalization of localized drastic deformations with low
|
rank constraint To verify the validity of the combination
|
we designed the comparison experiment presented in Fig 9
|
We compare the reconstruction error of Eq 20 with meth
|
ods using only lowrank or smoothing constraints on the
|
NRSfM Challenge dataset For the lowrankonly method
|
we compared with RBMM 26 which is an improvement
|
on the priorfree classical method BMM 11 For the
|
approach using only the smooth prior we removed the low
|
rank constraint term from Eq 20 and compared with itFigure 9 Comparison of the reconstruction errors of our model
|
with methods using only lowrank or smoothing constraints on the
|
NRSfM Challenge dataset
|
ie
|
min
|
SSQLµ1
|
2WΠS2
|
Fµ2
|
2F1X
|
i1
|
QiSiQi1Si1
|
2
|
F
|
β
|
2
|
SRpS
|
2
|
FD
|
Y1SRpSE
|
44
|
As shown in Fig 9 the reconstruction error of our method
|
is lower than that of the lowrankonlysmoothonly method
|
on all types of deformation and there is a significant im
|
provement on Articul Balloon and Tearing
|
Our approach can effectively couple lowrank and
|
smoothing constraints to improve the stability of the algo
|
rithm over different types of deformations Moreover sta
|
tistical prior methods tend to be sensitive to the statistical
|
properties of the data which are also related to the com
|
plexity of the corresponding object deformation In other
|
words it is not enough to only mine the smooth prior to
|
complement the lowrank constraints so finding constraints
|
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.