text
stringlengths 0
89.3k
|
---|
Proxy ShapeSuper Point
|
iSEnhance
|
Connection
|
Degenerate
|
Nearly Rigid Point b Construction for proxy Shape
|
Figure 2 Overview of region segmentation and proxy shape construction a We use DFT to analyze the 3D trajectories dividing them
|
by comparing the frequency components contained in each trajectory The figure shows a segmentation result b The geometric center of
|
the nonrigid region is set as the super point and it is linearly combined with nearly rigid points to construct the proxy shape
|
other deformation regularization constraints should be sat
|
isfied in the smooth motion sequence We propose a cam
|
era motion refinement module called Temporallysmooth
|
Procrustean Alignment TPA which aligns the shape se
|
quence under the smoothness constraint as follows
|
LtpaRS 1
|
2F1X
|
i1RiSiRi1Si12
|
F3
|
where RdiagRiRiSO3 The TPA module
|
3 estimates alignment matrix Rby the principle of mini
|
mizing the difference between the 3D shapes of consecutive
|
frames after rotation transformation as in Fig 1 b Dif
|
ferent from GPA 1 TPA does not need to estimate the
|
mean shape of the sequence which greatly simplifies the
|
optimization and avoids overpenalizing nonisotropic de
|
formations In addition we have experimentally verified
|
that sequences aligned by the TPA module can have more
|
similar lowrank and smoothing properties to the real se
|
quences compared with GPA see Sec 43 and Fig 4
|
Under the NRSfM problem setting the TPA module can
|
gradually put the shape sequence in a smooth state by ad
|
justing the camera motion Assume that the estimated cam
|
era poses are Ri i 1 Fand define the initialization
|
of the alignment transformation as RpiRT
|
i We denote
|
RpiSiasSi where Siis in the camera coordinate Then
|
we use the TPA module to estimate the correction rotation
|
QdiagQias follows
|
LQ
|
tpa
|
QS
|
1
|
2F1X
|
i1
|
QiSiQi1Si1
|
2
|
F
|
1
|
2F1X
|
i1PX
|
j1Qi sijQi1 si1j2
|
24
|
where sijR31is the jth column of Si We take the Lie
|
algebra ϕiso3ofQias the optimization variable andthe derivative of the optimization objective LQ
|
tpa4 with
|
respect to ϕican be derived as
|
LQ
|
tpa
|
ϕiPX
|
j1
|
Qi sijT
|
r1
|
ijr0
|
ij
|
5
|
where rm
|
ijQim simjQim1 sim1j and a
|
represents the skewsymmetric matrix of vector a Once the
|
gradient is calculated we can use traditional numerical op
|
timization algorithms to solve model 4 eg BFGS LMF
|
etc 33 see more derivation details and discussions in the
|
Supplementary Material Supp Sec 1
|
TPA largely separates the rigid motion between consec
|
utive frames in the sequence Sand makes it gradually con
|
verge to a smooth state After reducing the interference of
|
rigid motion we can better utilize the lowrank constraint to
|
recover nonrigid deformation of the aligned sequence QS
|
In the following we introduce the shape estimation method
|
and unify them afterward
|
33 SpatialWeighted Nonrigid Structure Model
|
331 SpatialWeighted Nuclear Norm
|
In realworld scenarios lowrank regularization can han
|
dle many nonrigid deformation situations but always over
|
penalize drastic deformations In the absence of priors to
|
reconstruct the deformation we can give higher degrees of
|
freedom for shape recovery by relaxing the lowrank con
|
straint An object whose overall or local deformation is very
|
drastic can lead to its 3D shape sequence ˆSin the world co
|
ordinate not satisfying the lowrank constraint But we can
|
transform its spatial structure by linearly combining the tra
|
jectories of ˆSto degenerate the object to a lowrank state
|
Given the affinity matrix ΛRPP we define the sequence
|
ofproxy shape asSˆSΛ We can then utilize lowrank
|
constraint to recover the proxy shapes which in turn re
|
duces the strength of the constraint in the region of severe
|
deformation to better recover ˆSWe use the nuclear norm with the rearrangement op
|
erator g11 to build the lowrank constraint and denote
|
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.