tensorkelechi/arxiv-cstext · Datasets at Hugging Face

text stringlengths 0 89.3k
GLEU AccuracyZero LLMProfessional Safe
HelpfulPairwise
DISCMedLLM 37 MTQA MCQA Accuracy Zero Few LLMProactive
Professional HelpfulIndividual
Zhongjing 38 STQA MTQAHuman
LLMProfessional Safe
FluentPairwise
Case Study
BianQue 39 MTQABLEU ROUGE
PQAZero Human Case Study
Alpacare 40 STQA MTQA Accuracy Rouge Zero FewHuman
LLMProfessional HelpfulPairwise
Case Study
QilinMed 41 STQA MTQAF1Score BLEU
ROUGEZero Few SFT Human Case Study
Taiyi 42 MTQA NLP F1Score Accuracy Zero Human Case Study
ChiMedGPT 43STQA MTQA
MCQA NLPF1Scores Accuracy
BLEU ROUGEZero Few Human Case Study
MediTron 44 MCQA Accuracy Zero Few SFT
HuatuoGPTII 45STQA MTQA
MCQAAccuracy ZeroHuman
LLMProfessional Helpful
Patientfriendly FluentPairwise
Case Study
AntGLMMed 46 MCQA Accuracy Few SFT
GPTdoctor 47 STQAHuman
LLMProfessional Fluent
Patientfriendly
DoctorlikeIndividual
Pairwise
BioMistral 48 MCQA Accuracy Zero Few SFT
MMedLM 49 STQA MCQAAccuracy BLEU
ROUGE BERTScoreZero SFTHuman
LLMProfessional Pairwise
InMDX 9 Human Case Study
MeLLaMA 50 MCQA NLPAccuracy F1score
ROUGE BERTScoreZero Few SFT
JMLR 51 Human Case Study
BiMediX 52 MCQA Accuracy Zero
OncoGPT 53 STQA BERTScore Zero Human Case Study
Apollo 54 MCQA Accuracy Few
Qibo 55STQA MCQA
NLPAccuracy Rouge ZeroHuman
LLMProfessional Safe
FluentPairwiseJOURNAL OF L ATEX CLASS FILES VOL 14 NO 8 AUGUST 2021 15
QA benchmark involves consecutive questions and answers
such as a dialog between a doctor and a patient This bench
mark assesses the ability of medical LLMs to perform medical
diagnosis understand context ensuring answers are based on
previous dialog and engage in interactive QA testing the
models ability to interact in realworld medical scenarios and
maintain fluent dialog The multiplechoice QA benchmark
presents a question along with multiple options requiring the
model to identify the correct answer With explicit correct
answers this benchmark allows precise quantification of the
medical LLMs capability Additionally some works not only
evaluate the options outputted by the model but also assess
reasoning content The varied multiplechoice questions eval
uate the models depth of knowledge across diverse medical
domains and its logical reasoning ability The commonly used
evaluation metrics for natural language generation tasks are
Accuracy BLEU 130 ROUGE 131 Distinct 132 and
GLEU 133 In addition to traditional evaluation metrics
certain studies have introduced evaluation metrics tailored to
healthcare dialog contexts For instance BianQue 39 pro
poses a novel evaluation metric named Proactive Questioning
Ability PAQ to assess the capability of LLMs in proactively
asking and querying questions to users
The majority of medical QA benchmarks comprise existing
medical QA datasets with only a limited number of bench
marks specifically gathered for particular evaluations Note
that the vast datasets employed in training LLMs may result
in overlap between training and test sets Therefore data de
duplication and data leakage checks are necessary to ensure
fairness of the test results
2 Protocols Medical LLMs are commonly assessed
through three protocols Zeroshot Fewshot and Task
specific Supervised Finetuning aiming to investigate model
performance across varying levels of contextual information
The zeroshot protocol is to evaluate the ability of a model to
directly perform a medical task with an unknown distribution
while assessing its generalization ability and adaptability It
only requires a natural language description of the downstream
task without providing specific examples to ask the model to
understand the medical task and use the intrinsic knowledge
to accomplish this task In the natural language understanding
task MeLLaMA 50 and Taiyi 42 designed prompt tem
plates for each downstream task to guide the output format of
the model to meet the expected requirements For the prompt
for QA tasks it usually give a role to the LLM and then guide
the models output style in line with expectations For instance
a prompt might be You are an experienced doctor please
respond to the patients inquiries with patience and kindness
Patient inputs Doctor Moreover addressing
medical issues often necessitates intricate multistep reasoning
Hence certain studies have employed prompt strategies to
enhance model performance For instance MediTron 44 uti
lizes the prompt strategy Zeroshot ChainofThought 134 to
guide the model towards a more comprehensive understanding

GLEU AccuracyZero LLMProfessional Safe

HelpfulPairwise

DISCMedLLM 37 MTQA MCQA Accuracy Zero Few LLMProactive

Professional HelpfulIndividual

Zhongjing 38 STQA MTQAHuman

LLMProfessional Safe

FluentPairwise

Case Study

BianQue 39 MTQABLEU ROUGE

PQAZero Human Case Study

Alpacare 40 STQA MTQA Accuracy Rouge Zero FewHuman

LLMProfessional HelpfulPairwise

Case Study

QilinMed 41 STQA MTQAF1Score BLEU

ROUGEZero Few SFT Human Case Study

Taiyi 42 MTQA NLP F1Score Accuracy Zero Human Case Study

ChiMedGPT 43STQA MTQA

MCQA NLPF1Scores Accuracy

BLEU ROUGEZero Few Human Case Study

MediTron 44 MCQA Accuracy Zero Few SFT

HuatuoGPTII 45STQA MTQA

MCQAAccuracy ZeroHuman

LLMProfessional Helpful

Patientfriendly FluentPairwise

Case Study

AntGLMMed 46 MCQA Accuracy Few SFT

GPTdoctor 47 STQAHuman

LLMProfessional Fluent

Patientfriendly

DoctorlikeIndividual

Pairwise

BioMistral 48 MCQA Accuracy Zero Few SFT

MMedLM 49 STQA MCQAAccuracy BLEU

ROUGE BERTScoreZero SFTHuman

LLMProfessional Pairwise

InMDX 9 Human Case Study

MeLLaMA 50 MCQA NLPAccuracy F1score

ROUGE BERTScoreZero Few SFT

JMLR 51 Human Case Study

BiMediX 52 MCQA Accuracy Zero

OncoGPT 53 STQA BERTScore Zero Human Case Study

Apollo 54 MCQA Accuracy Few

Qibo 55STQA MCQA

NLPAccuracy Rouge ZeroHuman

LLMProfessional Safe

FluentPairwiseJOURNAL OF L ATEX CLASS FILES VOL 14 NO 8 AUGUST 2021 15

QA benchmark involves consecutive questions and answers

such as a dialog between a doctor and a patient This bench

mark assesses the ability of medical LLMs to perform medical

diagnosis understand context ensuring answers are based on

previous dialog and engage in interactive QA testing the

models ability to interact in realworld medical scenarios and

maintain fluent dialog The multiplechoice QA benchmark

presents a question along with multiple options requiring the

model to identify the correct answer With explicit correct

answers this benchmark allows precise quantification of the

medical LLMs capability Additionally some works not only

evaluate the options outputted by the model but also assess

reasoning content The varied multiplechoice questions eval

uate the models depth of knowledge across diverse medical

domains and its logical reasoning ability The commonly used

evaluation metrics for natural language generation tasks are

Accuracy BLEU 130 ROUGE 131 Distinct 132 and

GLEU 133 In addition to traditional evaluation metrics

certain studies have introduced evaluation metrics tailored to

healthcare dialog contexts For instance BianQue 39 pro

poses a novel evaluation metric named Proactive Questioning

Ability PAQ to assess the capability of LLMs in proactively

asking and querying questions to users

The majority of medical QA benchmarks comprise existing

medical QA datasets with only a limited number of bench

marks specifically gathered for particular evaluations Note

that the vast datasets employed in training LLMs may result

in overlap between training and test sets Therefore data de

duplication and data leakage checks are necessary to ensure

fairness of the test results

2 Protocols Medical LLMs are commonly assessed

through three protocols Zeroshot Fewshot and Task

specific Supervised Finetuning aiming to investigate model

performance across varying levels of contextual information

The zeroshot protocol is to evaluate the ability of a model to

directly perform a medical task with an unknown distribution

while assessing its generalization ability and adaptability It

only requires a natural language description of the downstream

task without providing specific examples to ask the model to

understand the medical task and use the intrinsic knowledge

to accomplish this task In the natural language understanding

task MeLLaMA 50 and Taiyi 42 designed prompt tem

plates for each downstream task to guide the output format of

the model to meet the expected requirements For the prompt

for QA tasks it usually give a role to the LLM and then guide

the models output style in line with expectations For instance

a prompt might be You are an experienced doctor please

respond to the patients inquiries with patience and kindness

Patient inputs Doctor Moreover addressing

medical issues often necessitates intricate multistep reasoning

Hence certain studies have employed prompt strategies to

enhance model performance For instance MediTron 44 uti

lizes the prompt strategy Zeroshot ChainofThought 134 to

guide the model towards a more comprehensive understanding