text
stringlengths 0
89.3k
|
---|
ing all the pixels in all the views and renderingprojecting
|
such a point cloud at a view to generate the structured
|
noise Directly implementing this literal description is com
|
plicated and inefficient
|
Therefore we use an equivalent implementation
|
Instead of explicitly generating this dense point cloud we
|
just put the weighted noises on each pixel of all views
|
For the view we query for structured noise we warp the
|
noise from all other views to it This is equivalent to pro
|
jecting the subpoint cloud generated by each view to the
|
querying view therefore it is equivalent to the original
|
design
|
With this implementation explicitly generating main
|
taining and projecting a point cloud with billions of points
|
number of views height width is unnecessary and a
|
query can be completed in less than one second
|
D5 Surrounding Views Reference View Selection
|
We construct the surrounding view with one large main
|
view and several small reference views The purpose of
|
the reference views is twofolded 1 to provide enough
|
context about the whole scene and 2 to have enough
|
overlapped parts of the main view to facilitate consistency
|
enforcing training Therefore we select 40 of the views to
|
be a random view of the scene and the rest 60 of the views
|
to be a view with at least 20 overlap of the main view
|
quantified by the area of matched pixels through warping
|
The order of the views is randomly shuffled We observed
|
that none of these randomnesses highly alter the editing re
|
sult after consistencyenforcing training any choice of
|
reference views and their order will lead to a consistent
|
edited result of the main view
|
D6 Training Pixel Weights
|
In consistencyenforcing training we apply warping and
|
weighted averages to compute the training reference views
|
v so that all the views in vare 3D consistent Using
|
identical weights for all pixels will result in blurred images
|
In a scene of a person one view only contains their face
|
and another view contains the whole body Warping the lat
|
ter to the former indicates an upsampling of the face part
|
which will be blurred Merging the blurred warped view
|
with the former view at the same weight results in blurred
|
overall results
|
We propose a better pixelweighting strategy based on a
|
further analysis of this situation If we warp pixel ato pixel
|
b where ahas a larger scope and contains more scene
|
objects then we need to upsample the bpart of the view
|
froma resulting in blurry Therefore the weight should be
|
related to the scope of the pixel Following this we define
|
14the pixel area to quantify this scope For a pixel pin a view
|
from camera position o the four vertices of the pixel grids
|
correspond to the rays otdi4
|
i1 We use NeRF to predict
|
each of their depth ti4
|
i1 and calculate their correspond
|
ing points Piotidi The pixel area Spof this pixel is
|
defined as the area of a square with vertices P1 P2 P3 P4
|
in the 3D space which can be regarded as an approximation
|
of the surface area the pixel represents As we need a lower
|
weight for a pixel with a larger scope ielarger Sp we
|
define the weight as 1Sp which satisfies all our needs
|
D7 Training MultiGPU Pipeline
|
An illustration of our multiGPU training pipeline is in Fig
|
D1 By implementing such a parallelization pipeline by
|
ourselves we decouple NeRF training with diffusion gen
|
eration and training in the most asynchronized way waiving
|
the necessity of tradeoffs between NeRF training and dif
|
fusion achieving considerable speed up
|
D8 Training Regularizations
|
We use the consistency loss as the main loss in the
|
consistencyenforcing training However this loss only en
|
forces several equalities required by consistency leading
|
to trivial results of a purecolor image without regulariza
|
tion losses this is also reasonable as all purecolor images
|
of the same color are perfectly consistent Also there is no
|
encouragement or enforcement to use the 3D information in
|
the 3D positional embedding To avoid these we propose
|
several regularization losses as shown below
|
Maintain Original Behavior We expect that the trained
|
diffusion model will generate images that are very similar
|
to the original model when all the inputs image noises
|
and 3D positional embeddings are identical Therefore
|
we use MSE and VGG perceptual and stylization losses
|
to regularize both the generated images and the con
|
structed referenced images with gradient generated by
|
warping and averaging of the trained diffusion with the
|
original models output We further expect that the UNet
|
in the trained diffusion model predicts similar noises at
|
each denoising step as the original UNet so we also use
|
this to regularize during each denoising step
|
Encourage 3D Information Utilization The original 2
|
takes the original image of the scene as another part of
|
input using it as a condition to generate the edited image
|
To encourage 3D information utilization we design a reg
|
ularization loss to enforce the diffusion model without
|
the original image input to generate very similar results
|
to the one with the original image input both with 3D po
|
sitional embedding input With the lack of the original
|
image the only way for the diffusion model to perceive
|
the original view is the 3D positional embedding There
|
fore the diffusion is trained to use the 3D positional em
|
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.