text
stringlengths 0
89.3k
|
---|
of the information foraging process For instance if a user is
|
interested in information about health it would be unneces
|
sary to search posts talking about sport
|
Consequently and given the above observations we propose
|
to introduce a new step in the Elephant Herding Optimization
|
algorithm consisting of dividing the search space into multi
|
ple regions in order to explore them more efficiently In addi
|
tion to modeling the concept of territories in nature this will
|
improve the performance of the algorithm especially when
|
dealing with large scale problems
|
There are numerous methods for grouping similar objects
|
together they can be either supervised or unsupervised de
|
pending on whether classes of objects already exist or not
|
Supervised classification considers classes to insert the ob
|
jects whereas unsupervised classification generates clusters
|
as outcome Clustering is the process of organizing objects
|
into groups whose members are similar A cluster is a col
|
lection of objects which are consistent internally but clearly
|
dissimilar to the objects belonging to other clusters One of
|
the main advantages of clustering over supervised classifica
|
tion is the fact that it doesnt require predefined classes and It
|
can therefore be performed with data of different sizes with
|
out the need of a taxonomy or a training set
|
In this paper we perform the clustering phase using k
|
means algorithm which is known for its efficiency with
|
large datasets and its capacity of working with textual data
|
32 33 It intends to automatically group a set of nobjects
|
intokclusters so that objects in a same cluster are similar
|
to one another while objects from different clusters are dis
|
similar 34 The grouping decision is based on the distance
|
between the object and each cluster centroid mean in a way
|
that each object belongs to the cluster with the nearest cen
|
troid A centeroid serves as a prototype of its corresponding
|
cluster and is defined as the average of all the objects in that
|
cluster The number of clusters kcan be either predefined or
|
userdefined depending on the problem the number of ob
|
jects and the goal behind clustering
|
When it comes to textual data clustering the idea consists in
|
grouping texts or documents in clusters based on their con
|
tent similarity In order to achieve this goal a proper doc
|
ument representation method is necessary We use the vec
|
tor space model VSM to represent each social post eias a
|
weighted vector of terms ei wi1 wi2 w iTwhere
|
Tis the set of terms or features that occur at least once in
|
the social graph G The detailed clustering process using k
|
means is presented in the following subsectionsEnhanced Elephant Herding Optimization for Large Scale Information Access on Social Media 34
|
A Text preprocessing
|
This preprocessing phase refers to the set of actions that are
|
applied to the social posts in order to achieve a good sta
|
tistical representation of the whole collection This phase
|
is performed before defining the weights of the words using
|
TFIDF and includes the following actions
|
Tokenization which consists in dividing the text into
|
individual words
|
Removing special characters related to social media
|
platforms links usernames etc
|
Deleting common words that dont bring any semantic
|
meaning to the text using a stop words list
|
Reducing each word to its root using adequate algo
|
rithms such as Porter Stemming As a result inflected
|
words will be grouped under their word stem which is
|
referred to as a term
|
The result of the textual preprocessing is a collection of posts
|
that are each represented by a set of significant terms The
|
following subsection explain how each post is afterwards
|
converted into a weighted vector of terms
|
B Feature extraction with TFIDF
|
The goal of the feature extraction using TFIDF is to create
|
a mapping of the textual data into vectors of terms This
|
vector representation of the social posts is grounded on the
|
term relevance concept The weight associated to each term
|
should be proportional to its importance so that terms with
|
high weight values are considered as relevant This method
|
consists in increasing the weight of a term when it appears
|
many times in a post and lowering it when it is common in
|
many posts We can summarize the TFIDF calculation with
|
the two following steps
|
1 Term Frequency TF
|
The term frequency TFtiejestimates the importance of
|
a term tiin a post ejbased on how often tiappears in ej
|
The more frequent a term is in a post the more important it
|
is in its description We use Formula 8 to compute the term
|
frequency
|
TFtiej freq ijP
|
tlejfreq lj8
|
With freq ijbeing the number of occurrences of term tiin
|
postej
|
2 Inverse Document Frequency IDF
|
Inverse Document Frequency indicates how commonly a
|
word is used in a collection of documents A term has an
|
important characterizing power if its frequency is high in a
|
particular social post and low in the rest of the posts We
|
estimate the inverse document frequency using Formula 9
|
IDF ti logE
|
ni 9
|
WhereEis the total number of posts in the social graph
|
niis the number of posts containing the term ti
|
3 TFIDF
|
We compute the weigh of a term tiin a post ejusing the
|
TFIDscore which is obtained by Formula 10 The
|
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.