tensorkelechi/arxiv-cstext · Datasets at Hugging Face

text stringlengths 0 89.3k
while preserving SbPGs as foundational game structures of
distributed selflearning
B Gradientbased Optimization
Gradient ascent 24 a cornerstone of optimization involves
iteratively adjusting parameters to maximize an objective
function by following its positive gradient direction with
variants 25 eg stochastic and batch gradient ascent In
contrast gradient descent 24 operates oppositely Various
optimization algorithms like Adam RMSprop and Adagrad
provide strategies for efficiently updating model parameters
thereby improving convergence in optimization tasks 26
These also find application in machine learning which serves
as the backbone for training neural networks 26 opti
mizes support vector machines 27 and fits regression mod
els 28 However when applied to nonconvex problems chal
lenges arise in locating global optima among multiple local
minimamaxima 24 Overcoming these challenges requires
strategies like warm restarts 29 and annealing schedules 30Moreover gradientbased optimization has been theoretically
proven to achieve faster and smoother convergence 31 as
demonstrated in applications such as convolutional neural
networks 32 and nonlinear optimization methods 33 to
name a few In this study we present gradientbased optimiza
tion techniques within SbPGs to achieve faster convergence
improve the balance between exploration and exploitation and
enhance resource utilization compared to the undirected nature
of random sampling
III F UNDAMENTALS OF STATE BASED POTENTIAL GAMES
AND BESTRESPONSE LEARNING
In this section we explain the fundamental game structure
of SbPGs and its learning algorithm best response learning
A Statebased Potential Games
We start with the fundamental principles of SbPGs followed
by their application in optimizing distributed manufactur
ing processes SbPGs represent a subset of potential games
PGs 34 A PG contains a set of Nplayers denoted individu
ally as i 1 N Unlike other games where each players
utility function uiis influenced solely by their individual
actions ai in PGs the utility function uiin PGs is influenced
by the global state of the entire system An additional com
ponent of PGs is a scalar potential function ϕ also known as
the global objective function Consequently the strategicform
game of PGs can be formulated as ΓN Aui ϕ where
Arepresents the set of individual player actions ai
Furthermore in SbPGs 15 the set of states Sand the state
transition process Pare integrated into the game To ensure
SbPGs hold to the fundamental theorem of PGs the potential
function ϕaS Rcimust be available within the game
structure Furthermore each actionstate pairing a sAS
must satisfy the following conditions
uiai suia
i ai s ϕai sϕa
i ai s1
and
ϕai sϕai s 2
for any state sinPa sas well as Rcidenotes continuous
actions
In 15 we demonstrate their application in manufacturing
optimization settings and prove the existence of its convergent
as illustrated in Fig 1 The distributed system under consider
ation is characterised and examined using graph theory 35
Further details regarding SbPGs in a production chain of
manufacturing graph are presented in 6 15 22 The
overarching goal is to optimize production systems in a fully
distributed manner avoiding reliance on a centralized instance
which remains consistent throughout this study
B Best Response Learning
In 15 best response learning was developed as an algo
rithm for training the policy of each player within SbPGs A
performance map is used to record the players experiences
and visualize the distribution of actions across the state space
as shown in Fig 1 This map discretizes the state space intoFig 1 An overview of selflearning mechanism in distributed
production systems using a game structure of SbPGs
support vectors l 1 L Each support vector retains the
bestexplored and its utility value within the related state The
performance maps are updated as follows
ul
imaxsi ul
iksi iful
iksi ul
imaxsi 3
al
imaxsi al
iksi iful
iksi ul
imaxsi 4
in which ul
ikandal
ikrepresents the utility and action resulted
by player iin the current iteration k associated with the lth
support vector
During exploration actions al
iksiare computed based on
random uniform sampling which results in utilities ul
iksi
This process allows agents to gather experiences and store
the bestexplored actions in the maps Meanwhile during
exploitation each player iselects an action ait1by globally
interpolating the performance map according to its current
state The global interpolation rule is managed as follows
DS0Sk

while preserving SbPGs as foundational game structures of

distributed selflearning

B Gradientbased Optimization

Gradient ascent 24 a cornerstone of optimization involves

iteratively adjusting parameters to maximize an objective

function by following its positive gradient direction with

variants 25 eg stochastic and batch gradient ascent In

contrast gradient descent 24 operates oppositely Various

optimization algorithms like Adam RMSprop and Adagrad

provide strategies for efficiently updating model parameters

thereby improving convergence in optimization tasks 26

These also find application in machine learning which serves

as the backbone for training neural networks 26 opti

mizes support vector machines 27 and fits regression mod

els 28 However when applied to nonconvex problems chal

lenges arise in locating global optima among multiple local

minimamaxima 24 Overcoming these challenges requires

strategies like warm restarts 29 and annealing schedules 30Moreover gradientbased optimization has been theoretically

proven to achieve faster and smoother convergence 31 as

demonstrated in applications such as convolutional neural

networks 32 and nonlinear optimization methods 33 to

name a few In this study we present gradientbased optimiza

tion techniques within SbPGs to achieve faster convergence

improve the balance between exploration and exploitation and

enhance resource utilization compared to the undirected nature

of random sampling

III F UNDAMENTALS OF STATE BASED POTENTIAL GAMES

AND BESTRESPONSE LEARNING

In this section we explain the fundamental game structure

of SbPGs and its learning algorithm best response learning

A Statebased Potential Games

We start with the fundamental principles of SbPGs followed

by their application in optimizing distributed manufactur

ing processes SbPGs represent a subset of potential games

PGs 34 A PG contains a set of Nplayers denoted individu

ally as i 1 N Unlike other games where each players

utility function uiis influenced solely by their individual

actions ai in PGs the utility function uiin PGs is influenced

by the global state of the entire system An additional com

ponent of PGs is a scalar potential function ϕ also known as

the global objective function Consequently the strategicform

game of PGs can be formulated as ΓN Aui ϕ where

Arepresents the set of individual player actions ai

Furthermore in SbPGs 15 the set of states Sand the state

transition process Pare integrated into the game To ensure

SbPGs hold to the fundamental theorem of PGs the potential

function ϕaS Rcimust be available within the game

structure Furthermore each actionstate pairing a sAS

must satisfy the following conditions

uiai suia

i ai s ϕai sϕa

i ai s1

and

ϕai sϕai s 2

for any state sinPa sas well as Rcidenotes continuous

actions

In 15 we demonstrate their application in manufacturing

optimization settings and prove the existence of its convergent

as illustrated in Fig 1 The distributed system under consider

ation is characterised and examined using graph theory 35

Further details regarding SbPGs in a production chain of

manufacturing graph are presented in 6 15 22 The

overarching goal is to optimize production systems in a fully

distributed manner avoiding reliance on a centralized instance

which remains consistent throughout this study

B Best Response Learning

In 15 best response learning was developed as an algo

rithm for training the policy of each player within SbPGs A

performance map is used to record the players experiences

and visualize the distribution of actions across the state space

as shown in Fig 1 This map discretizes the state space intoFig 1 An overview of selflearning mechanism in distributed

production systems using a game structure of SbPGs

support vectors l 1 L Each support vector retains the

bestexplored and its utility value within the related state The

performance maps are updated as follows

ul

imaxsi ul

iksi iful

iksi ul

imaxsi 3

al

imaxsi al

iksi iful

iksi ul

imaxsi 4

in which ul

ikandal

ikrepresents the utility and action resulted

by player iin the current iteration k associated with the lth

support vector

During exploration actions al

iksiare computed based on

random uniform sampling which results in utilities ul

iksi

This process allows agents to gather experiences and store

the bestexplored actions in the maps Meanwhile during

exploitation each player iselects an action ait1by globally

interpolating the performance map according to its current

state The global interpolation rule is managed as follows

DS0Sk