Split (1)

train · 1k rows

Subsets and Splits

No community queries yet

The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.

prompts stringlengths 590 30k	text stringclasses 8 values
<s>[INST] <<SYS>> I am sharing an email body with you. Based on the text in the body, you need to classify the email in one of the following eight categories: 'Company Business, Strategy, etc.'; 'Purely Personal'; 'Personal but in professional context (e.g., it was good working with you)'; 'Logistic Arrangements (meeting scheduling, technical support, etc)'; 'Employment arrangements (job seeking, hiring, recommendations, etc)'; 'Document editing/checking (collaboration)'; 'Empty message (due to missing attachment)'; 'Empty message'. <</SYS>> Mail: I've got a few too many speeches coming up. You are probably in the best position to address this crowd (time for the student to teach the teacher) but I'd understand if you think it would be awkward (the we should just decline). Jeff Dasovich 10/05/2000 01:23 PM To: Tim Belden/HOU/ECT@ECT skean@enron.com cc: Subject: Re: Nov. 13 UC summit conference on electricity Steve: Let me know if you'd like to discuss. I like Tim's idea re: maybe you should take the slot. But in my view definitely not Skilling. I think you saw my thoughts about this conference in a previous email exchange with Schroeder re: Littlechild. Also they're breaking my arms and legs about sponsoring ($3-5K range). I had a thought that maybe EBS could stream the conference as an in-kind contribution---the PR that EBS gets out of streaming might outweigh the cost of providing gratis. I had only raised it as a thought though and am surprised to see it turn up in print. Tim and I had both had Lee as a professor and I've been talking him about this conference alot and have no problem delivering whatever the news is. In fact I had already told them that they shouldn't count on us for this one but that we're always interested in working together. Best Jeff Tim Belden@ECT 10/05/2000 01:00 PM To: Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron@Enron Steven J Kean/NA/Enron@Enron cc: Subject: Nov. 13 UC summit conference on electricity Jeff I sent this e-mail to Kean last night. I am fine with your recommendation for Skilling to pass on this event. Do you want to deliver the news to Lee. Do we want to offer you Steve Kean or me as an alternative? Personally I would like to attend but don't have much interest in speaking (assuming that they would allow low lifes like you or me to speak). Your call on all of this. Call bob Badeer with questions about the BEEP as I am heading out of town in a couple of hours. Tim: I've worked hard with these guys to try to make this conference the best that it could be but it ain't quite there. So I'd rather keep our powder dry and use Skilling at another time. Not top-shelf enough in my view. If you want to discuss further let me know. Also one question: Is the BEEP stack the constrained supply curve post-adjustment bids? I have that right? ----------------- [/INST] Category: Logistic Arrangements(meeting scheduling, technical support, etc)	<s>[INST] [/INST] Logistic Arrangements(meeting scheduling, technical support, etc) </s>
<s>[INST] <<SYS>> I am sharing an email body with you. Based on the text in the body, you need to classify the email in one of the following eight categories: 'Company Business, Strategy, etc.'; 'Purely Personal'; 'Personal but in professional context (e.g., it was good working with you)'; 'Logistic Arrangements (meeting scheduling, technical support, etc)'; 'Employment arrangements (job seeking, hiring, recommendations, etc)'; 'Document editing/checking (collaboration)'; 'Empty message (due to missing attachment)'; 'Empty message'. <</SYS>> Mail: Looks fine to me. I have not cross checked the lists but I assume you have included everyone who was designated to serve on the PRCs per the original memo (in addition to the new bus unit additions) Billy Lemmons 04/30/2001 06:41 PM To: Steven J Kean/NA/Enron@Enron John Sherriff/LON/ECT@ECT cc: Ted C Bland/Enron@EnronXGate Teresa Bosien/Enron@EnronXGate Subject: DRAFT - AA PRC MEMO Attached is a draft memo (including attachments) outlining the modifications we discussed last week. We can communicate changes by email or I'll be happy to arrange a short conference call. If possible I would like to distribute this by Wednesday or Thursday of this week. After the four of us reach consensus I suggest we preview Cindy (and maybe the HR heads) prior to distributing. You will note that based on conversations I had with Skilling last week (where he emphasized his desire that we have one program rather than a fractured program by business unit) I have added a review of the business unit distributions to the final meeting where we discuss the top perfomers. I've also added Janet Dietrich (tent.) and another EES person (tbd) to the AA Committee since they have a large group of AAs and no representation on the committee. Please let me know if you have any questions or comments and thanks for your help. Ted and Terry did all the hard work. Regards Billy Click Print Preview or print a hard copy - it's easier to read. We do not have the Europe groups included. Should probably include or note in the memo itself that info is forthcoming. [/INST] Category: Document editing/checking(collaboration)	<s>[INST] [/INST] Document editing/checking(collaboration) </s>
<s>[INST] <<SYS>> I am sharing an email body with you. Based on the text in the body, you need to classify the email in one of the following eight categories: 'Company Business, Strategy, etc.'; 'Purely Personal'; 'Personal but in professional context (e.g., it was good working with you)'; 'Logistic Arrangements (meeting scheduling, technical support, etc)'; 'Employment arrangements (job seeking, hiring, recommendations, etc)'; 'Document editing/checking (collaboration)'; 'Empty message (due to missing attachment)'; 'Empty message'. <</SYS>> Mail: ----------------- [/INST] Category: Document editing/checking(collaboration)	<s>[INST] [/INST] Document editing/checking(collaboration) </s>
<s>[INST] <<SYS>> I am sharing an email body with you. Based on the text in the body, you need to classify the email in one of the following eight categories: 'Company Business, Strategy, etc.'; 'Purely Personal'; 'Personal but in professional context (e.g., it was good working with you)'; 'Logistic Arrangements (meeting scheduling, technical support, etc)'; 'Employment arrangements (job seeking, hiring, recommendations, etc)'; 'Document editing/checking (collaboration)'; 'Empty message (due to missing attachment)'; 'Empty message'. <</SYS>> Mail: Per your request. ----------------- [/INST] Category: Company Business, Strategy, etc.(elaborate in Section 3 [Topics])	<s>[INST] [/INST] Company Business, Strategy, etc.(elaborate in Section 3 [Topics]) </s>
<s>[INST] <<SYS>> I am sharing an email body with you. Based on the text in the body, you need to classify the email in one of the following eight categories: 'Company Business, Strategy, etc.'; 'Purely Personal'; 'Personal but in professional context (e.g., it was good working with you)'; 'Logistic Arrangements (meeting scheduling, technical support, etc)'; 'Employment arrangements (job seeking, hiring, recommendations, etc)'; 'Document editing/checking (collaboration)'; 'Empty message (due to missing attachment)'; 'Empty message'. <</SYS>> Mail: Oxley asked that I send you a few bullets on Tom Martin. Please see below and let me know if you need further info. Feedback from two exit interviews from voluntary terminations in regard to Tom is as follows: was treated as inferior by my manager was lied to and insulted by my supervisor Tom berates employees in front of others and blames underlings for his mistakes. Additionally he second guessed every position I put on sold me out of positions (which turned out good) and used all our allocated VAR for his own benefit. Tom has a reputation for not representing employees well in the end of year review process. I found this to be the case as well. Tom is difficult to communicate with Additionally we had an incident w/ an employee when Tom offered her an employment agreement. She felt that she was being forced to sign the agreement When she declined the agreement and turned in resignation she said that Tom said he would make it difficult for her to leave She said that she felt threatened by Tom Her boy friend called Tom and threatened him As a result Legal asked Tom not to have further contact with the employee. [/INST] Category: Employment arrangements(job seeking, hiring, recommendations, etc)	<s>[INST] [/INST] Employment arrangements(job seeking, hiring, recommendations, etc) </s>
<s>[INST] <<SYS>> I am sharing an email body with you. Based on the text in the body, you need to classify the email in one of the following eight categories: 'Company Business, Strategy, etc.'; 'Purely Personal'; 'Personal but in professional context (e.g., it was good working with you)'; 'Logistic Arrangements (meeting scheduling, technical support, etc)'; 'Employment arrangements (job seeking, hiring, recommendations, etc)'; 'Document editing/checking (collaboration)'; 'Empty message (due to missing attachment)'; 'Empty message'. <</SYS>> Mail: Today's Washington Post contains a favorable comment on negawatts attributed to House Energy & Commerce Committee Chairman Tauzin following efforts we made yesterday with the Chairman and his staff both directly and via our consultants. The Post article reads In the coming months Tauzin said Congress will take steps to allow consumers to sell power back to their local energy grids. We of course will continue to push for a version of this concept that keeps this process open to multiple buyers and sellers not just the local utility. The article dovetails with information directly from Chairman Tauzin and Chairman Barton that they will continue to push our demand buydown proposal although we are working with them to shore up support on the committee in the face of opposition from the usual suspects. [/INST] Category: Company Business, Strategy, etc.(elaborate in Section 3 [Topics])	<s>[INST] [/INST] Company Business, Strategy, etc.(elaborate in Section 3 [Topics]) </s>
<s>[INST] <<SYS>> I am sharing an email body with you. Based on the text in the body, you need to classify the email in one of the following eight categories: 'Company Business, Strategy, etc.'; 'Purely Personal'; 'Personal but in professional context (e.g., it was good working with you)'; 'Logistic Arrangements (meeting scheduling, technical support, etc)'; 'Employment arrangements (job seeking, hiring, recommendations, etc)'; 'Document editing/checking (collaboration)'; 'Empty message (due to missing attachment)'; 'Empty message'. <</SYS>> Mail: Ian My secretary contacted SMS. I was surprised that they want to charge me for the conference. Typically the speakers are invited to attend without incurring the cost of a conference. The is the first invitation to speak I received combined with a request to pay for the privilege. Vince [/INST] Category: Personal but in professional context(e.g., it was good working with you)	<s>[INST] [/INST] Personal but in professional context(e.g., it was good working with you) </s>
<s>[INST] <<SYS>> I am sharing an email body with you. Based on the text in the body, you need to classify the email in one of the following eight categories: 'Company Business, Strategy, etc.'; 'Purely Personal'; 'Personal but in professional context (e.g., it was good working with you)'; 'Logistic Arrangements (meeting scheduling, technical support, etc)'; 'Employment arrangements (job seeking, hiring, recommendations, etc)'; 'Document editing/checking (collaboration)'; 'Empty message (due to missing attachment)'; 'Empty message'. <</SYS>> Mail: Thanks for the update. The Western Governors remain the best avenue we have for preventing price caps and California's attempts to secede from the grid. We need to keep pushing information to them regarding these issues. Attached is some text I have been using for correspondence with policy makers regarding California issues. Feel free to use it. Susan M Landwehr 03/02/2001 05:09 PM To: Steven J Kean/NA/Enron@Enron John cc: Subject: Re: Western Governors update Gentlemen--FYI--here's an update on what we've been doing lately with the Governors. I'll include you guys on future e mails. [/INST] Category: Company Business, Strategy, etc.(elaborate in Section 3 [Topics])	<s>[INST] [/INST] Company Business, Strategy, etc.(elaborate in Section 3 [Topics]) </s>
<s>[INST] <<SYS>> I am sharing an email body with you. Based on the text in the body, you need to classify the email in one of the following eight categories: 'Company Business, Strategy, etc.'; 'Purely Personal'; 'Personal but in professional context (e.g., it was good working with you)'; 'Logistic Arrangements (meeting scheduling, technical support, etc)'; 'Employment arrangements (job seeking, hiring, recommendations, etc)'; 'Document editing/checking (collaboration)'; 'Empty message (due to missing attachment)'; 'Empty message'. <</SYS>> Mail: Is there anything we can tell them about the rates they should expect from the utility? I think that will be the biggest concern and we can reduce backlash if we can provide them some information. Peggy Mahoney@EES 05/22/2001 06:37 PM To: Steven J Kean/NA/Enron@Enron Mark Palmer/Corp/Enron@ENRON Karen Denne/Corp/Enron@ENRON Max Eberts/HOU/EES@EES Elizabeth Ivers/Enron@EnronXGate Mark Koenig/Enron@EnronXGate Paula Rieker/Enron@EnronXGate Richard Shapiro/NA/Enron@Enron James D Steffes/NA/Enron@Enron Marty Sunde/HOU/EES@EES Evan Hughes/HOU/EES@EES Elizabeth Tilney/HOU/EES@EES Diann Huddleson/HOU/EES@EES Janet R Dietrich/HOU/EES@EES Dan Leff/HOU/EES@EES David W Delainey/HOU/EES@EES Don Black/HOU/EES@EES Mark S Muller/HOU/EES@EES Kenneth Lay/Enron@EnronXGate Vicki Sharp/HOU/EES@EES cc: Subject: Letter to residential customers Attached is a draft of the letter we'd like to send to our 16000 residential customers on Friday. Please review and let me know your comments by 12 noon on Wednesday. [/INST] Category: Company Business, Strategy, etc.(elaborate in Section 3 [Topics])	<s>[INST] [/INST] Company Business, Strategy, etc.(elaborate in Section 3 [Topics]) </s>
<s>[INST] <<SYS>> I am sharing an email body with you. Based on the text in the body, you need to classify the email in one of the following eight categories: 'Company Business, Strategy, etc.'; 'Purely Personal'; 'Personal but in professional context (e.g., it was good working with you)'; 'Logistic Arrangements (meeting scheduling, technical support, etc)'; 'Employment arrangements (job seeking, hiring, recommendations, etc)'; 'Document editing/checking (collaboration)'; 'Empty message (due to missing attachment)'; 'Empty message'. <</SYS>> Mail: ----------------- [/INST] Category: Company Business, Strategy, etc.(elaborate in Section 3 [Topics])	<s>[INST] [/INST] Company Business, Strategy, etc.(elaborate in Section 3 [Topics]) </s>
<s>[INST] <<SYS>> I am sharing an email body with you. Based on the text in the body, you need to classify the email in one of the following eight categories: 'Company Business, Strategy, etc.'; 'Purely Personal'; 'Personal but in professional context (e.g., it was good working with you)'; 'Logistic Arrangements (meeting scheduling, technical support, etc)'; 'Employment arrangements (job seeking, hiring, recommendations, etc)'; 'Document editing/checking (collaboration)'; 'Empty message (due to missing attachment)'; 'Empty message'. <</SYS>> Mail: I'm afraide this leaves too much room to manuever. Having duties related to setting legislative affairs strategy and developing a plan for contacts on the Hill will give Cynthia the idea that she can run all aspects of those duties not just those related specifically to her substantive area. I think it is also worth covering the heavy emphasis on teamwork and supporting rather than directing others in the organization. Richard Shapiro 08/02/2000 04:17 PM To: Gwendolyn Petteway/HR/Corp/Enron@ENRON cc: Steven J Kean/HOU/EES@EES Subject: Re: Job Description Revised Good to go. Gwendolyn Petteway@ENRON 08/02/2000 04:07 PM To: Richard Shapiro/HOU/EES@EES cc: Subject: Job Description Revised See attached email with revised job description for Cynthia Sandherr. ----------------- [/INST] Category: Employment arrangements(job seeking, hiring, recommendations, etc)	<s>[INST] [/INST] Employment arrangements(job seeking, hiring, recommendations, etc) </s>
<s>[INST] <<SYS>> I am sharing an email body with you. Based on the text in the body, you need to classify the email in one of the following eight categories: 'Company Business, Strategy, etc.'; 'Purely Personal'; 'Personal but in professional context (e.g., it was good working with you)'; 'Logistic Arrangements (meeting scheduling, technical support, etc)'; 'Employment arrangements (job seeking, hiring, recommendations, etc)'; 'Document editing/checking (collaboration)'; 'Empty message (due to missing attachment)'; 'Empty message'. <</SYS>> Mail: To:CASH MICHELLE Email:michelle.cash@enron.com - 7138536401 Enron Wholesale Services - Office of the Chairman From: Mark Frevert Chairman & CEO Mark Haedicke Managing Director & General Counsel Subject: Confidential Information and Securities Trading To keep pace with the fluid and fast-changing demands of our equity trading activities Enron Wholesale Services (EWS) has recently revised its official Policies and Procedures Regarding Confidential Information and Securities Trading (Policies and Procedures). These revisions reflect two major developments: (1) our equity trading activities have been extended into the United Kingdom and (2) in an effort to streamline the information flow process the Review Team will play a more centralized role so that the role of the Resource Group is no longer necessary.You are required to become familiar with and to comply with the Policies and Procedures. The newly revised Policies and Procedures are available for your review on LegalOnline the new intranet website maintained by the Enron Wholesale Services Legal Department. Please click on the attached link to access LegalOnline: If you have already certified compliance with the Policies and Procedures during the 2001 calendar year you need not re-certify at this time although you are still required to to review and become familiar with the revised Policies and Procedures. If you have not certified compliance with the Policies and Procedures during the 2001 calendar year then you must do so within two weeks of your receipt of this message. The LegalOnline site will allow you to quickly and conveniently certify your compliance on-line with your SAP Personal ID number. If you have any questions concerning the Policies or Procedures please call Bob Bruce at extension 5-7780 or Donna Lowry at extension 3-1939. [/INST] Category: Company Business, Strategy, etc.(elaborate in Section 3 [Topics])	<s>[INST] [/INST] Company Business, Strategy, etc.(elaborate in Section 3 [Topics]) </s>
<s>[INST] <<SYS>> I am sharing an email body with you. Based on the text in the body, you need to classify the email in one of the following eight categories: 'Company Business, Strategy, etc.'; 'Purely Personal'; 'Personal but in professional context (e.g., it was good working with you)'; 'Logistic Arrangements (meeting scheduling, technical support, etc)'; 'Employment arrangements (job seeking, hiring, recommendations, etc)'; 'Document editing/checking (collaboration)'; 'Empty message (due to missing attachment)'; 'Empty message'. <</SYS>> Mail: Another bit of background re Frankfurt (see below). I would be a little bi= t=20 more insistent on German Consulate support than Herr Sturm suggests=20 (otherwise this could become a black hole for your time). ----------------- [/INST] Category: Logistic Arrangements(meeting scheduling, technical support, etc)	<s>[INST] [/INST] Logistic Arrangements(meeting scheduling, technical support, etc) </s>
<s>[INST] <<SYS>> I am sharing an email body with you. Based on the text in the body, you need to classify the email in one of the following eight categories: 'Company Business, Strategy, etc.'; 'Purely Personal'; 'Personal but in professional context (e.g., it was good working with you)'; 'Logistic Arrangements (meeting scheduling, technical support, etc)'; 'Employment arrangements (job seeking, hiring, recommendations, etc)'; 'Document editing/checking (collaboration)'; 'Empty message (due to missing attachment)'; 'Empty message'. <</SYS>> Mail: I think it would be a good idea to get together. I would include Eric Thode as he has been living through the PR battles on a daily basis. James D Steffes 05/30/2001 08:31 PM To: Steven J Kean/NA/Enron@Enron cc: Richard Shapiro/NA/Enron@Enron Michael Terraso/OTS/Enron@ENRON Kelly Kimberly/Enron Communications@Enron Communications Subject: Bahamas LNG Steve -- In a discussion today with Mike Kelly etc. it was apparent that the Public Affairs team viewed the Bahamas LNG transaction quite cautiously. Given the recent issues power plant development has had in Florida (big political fights that are going the wrong way) I was wondering if it made sense to bring together a meeting of all of Public Affairs and the deal team to analyze the implications of our development plans. My primary worry is that P/L under water could have severe ecological implications that are not being internalized into the transaction. I would like to try and arrange a meeting to (1) ensure Public Affairs coordination and (2) understand the deal impacts better. Please advise if I'm worrying for no good reason. Jim [/INST] Category: Company Business, Strategy, etc.(elaborate in Section 3 [Topics])	<s>[INST] [/INST] Company Business, Strategy, etc.(elaborate in Section 3 [Topics]) </s>
<s>[INST] <<SYS>> I am sharing an email body with you. Based on the text in the body, you need to classify the email in one of the following eight categories: 'Company Business, Strategy, etc.'; 'Purely Personal'; 'Personal but in professional context (e.g., it was good working with you)'; 'Logistic Arrangements (meeting scheduling, technical support, etc)'; 'Employment arrangements (job seeking, hiring, recommendations, etc)'; 'Document editing/checking (collaboration)'; 'Empty message (due to missing attachment)'; 'Empty message'. <</SYS>> Mail: The amendment was defeated Jeff Dasovich Sent by: Jeff Dasovich 03/14/2001 11:11 AM To: James D Steffes/NA/Enron@Enron Chip Schneider/Enron@EnronXGate Linda Robertson/NA/Enron@ENRON Richard Shapiro/NA/Enron@Enron skean@enron.com cc: Subject: Wyden Bankruptcy Amendment [/INST] Category: Company Business, Strategy, etc.(elaborate in Section 3 [Topics])	<s>[INST] [/INST] Company Business, Strategy, etc.(elaborate in Section 3 [Topics]) </s>
<s>[INST] <<SYS>> I am sharing an email body with you. Based on the text in the body, you need to classify the email in one of the following eight categories: 'Company Business, Strategy, etc.'; 'Purely Personal'; 'Personal but in professional context (e.g., it was good working with you)'; 'Logistic Arrangements (meeting scheduling, technical support, etc)'; 'Employment arrangements (job seeking, hiring, recommendations, etc)'; 'Document editing/checking (collaboration)'; 'Empty message (due to missing attachment)'; 'Empty message'. <</SYS>> Mail: *Sent on behalf of Sandi Thompson* To All California Power Exchange Participants: Notice is hereby provided pursuant to Section 19.3.4 of the California Power Exchange Tariff that the Attorney General for the State of California (AG) as part of an ongoing investigation of California markets has requested information that may be confidential under Section 19.3.2 of the Tariff. Such information is detailed in the attached subpoena. The California Power Exchange will provide such information no later than Wednesday October 25 2000. If you desire to assert a claim of privilege or confidentiality pursuant to legal authority the California Power Exchange will include your written assertion of that claim together with its submittal to the AG provided that it is timely received. Your written statement should be directed to the AG as follows: Bill Lockyer Attorney General Attn: Richard Rochman Deputy Attorney General 455 Golden Gate Avenue Suite 11000 San Francisco CA 94102-7004 Please deliver your statement to the California Power Exchange as follows: Karen Koyano California Power Exchange 1000 S. Fremont Avenue Unit 20 Alhambra CA 91801 626.537.3173 facsimile Any written statement must be received no later than Friday October 20 2000 5:00 p.m. Pacific Daylight Time to be included with any information delivered to the AG. You are also free to take any other legal action you may deem appropriate in the circumstances of this inquiry. Thank you. (See attached file: calpxsubpoena1 AG 10-3-00.doc) (See attached file: AG Confidentiality Ltr 10-13-00.doc) - calpxsubpoena1 AG 10-3-00.doc - AG Confidentiality Ltr 10-13-00.doc [/INST] Category: Company Business, Strategy, etc.(elaborate in Section 3 [Topics])	<s>[INST] [/INST] Company Business, Strategy, etc.(elaborate in Section 3 [Topics]) </s>
<s>[INST] <<SYS>> I am sharing an email body with you. Based on the text in the body, you need to classify the email in one of the following eight categories: 'Company Business, Strategy, etc.'; 'Purely Personal'; 'Personal but in professional context (e.g., it was good working with you)'; 'Logistic Arrangements (meeting scheduling, technical support, etc)'; 'Employment arrangements (job seeking, hiring, recommendations, etc)'; 'Document editing/checking (collaboration)'; 'Empty message (due to missing attachment)'; 'Empty message'. <</SYS>> Mail: I just forwarded this to Ellen. ----------------- [/INST] Category: Company Business, Strategy, etc.(elaborate in Section 3 [Topics])	<s>[INST] [/INST] Company Business, Strategy, etc.(elaborate in Section 3 [Topics]) </s>
<s>[INST] <<SYS>> I am sharing an email body with you. Based on the text in the body, you need to classify the email in one of the following eight categories: 'Company Business, Strategy, etc.'; 'Purely Personal'; 'Personal but in professional context (e.g., it was good working with you)'; 'Logistic Arrangements (meeting scheduling, technical support, etc)'; 'Employment arrangements (job seeking, hiring, recommendations, etc)'; 'Document editing/checking (collaboration)'; 'Empty message (due to missing attachment)'; 'Empty message'. <</SYS>> Mail: Strong work Laura! ----------------- [/INST] Category: Personal but in professional context(e.g., it was good working with you)	<s>[INST] [/INST] Personal but in professional context(e.g., it was good working with you) </s>
<s>[INST] <<SYS>> I am sharing an email body with you. Based on the text in the body, you need to classify the email in one of the following eight categories: 'Company Business, Strategy, etc.'; 'Purely Personal'; 'Personal but in professional context (e.g., it was good working with you)'; 'Logistic Arrangements (meeting scheduling, technical support, etc)'; 'Employment arrangements (job seeking, hiring, recommendations, etc)'; 'Document editing/checking (collaboration)'; 'Empty message (due to missing attachment)'; 'Empty message'. <</SYS>> Mail: Another agenda item I got a call today from Bob Pease Attorney with Market Oversight and Enforcement at FERC 202-208-0131 to invite Enron to a meeting called by Chairman Wood at the CAISO offices on 24-25 Sep 01. The purpose of the meeting is to try to get the FERC CAISO DWR and other market participants to work out issues related to reliability that have arisen in recent months. Issues include those that that affect operations and reliability such as the must-offer requirements ramping etc. He was not clear as to whether they would address creditworthiness issues. From the FERC staff non-decisional employees will attend. He invited solutions/proposals in advance of the meeting. Enron needs to decide who to send. Alan Comnes [/INST] Category: Company Business, Strategy, etc.(elaborate in Section 3 [Topics])	<s>[INST] [/INST] Company Business, Strategy, etc.(elaborate in Section 3 [Topics]) </s>
<s>[INST] <<SYS>> I am sharing an email body with you. Based on the text in the body, you need to classify the email in one of the following eight categories: 'Company Business, Strategy, etc.'; 'Purely Personal'; 'Personal but in professional context (e.g., it was good working with you)'; 'Logistic Arrangements (meeting scheduling, technical support, etc)'; 'Employment arrangements (job seeking, hiring, recommendations, etc)'; 'Document editing/checking (collaboration)'; 'Empty message (due to missing attachment)'; 'Empty message'. <</SYS>> Mail: looks fine From: Terrie James/ENRON@enronXgate on 07/19/2001 04:31 PM To: Steven J Kean/NA/Enron@Enron Cindy Olson/ENRON@enronXgate cc: Sherri Sera/ENRON@enronXgate Marge Nadasky/ENRON@enronXgate Subject: Management Conference - Save the Date Steve and Cindy Attached is the electronic Save the Date memo for the Management Conference. We are preparing to send it out next week. Please let me know if you have any comments or concerns on the e-mail. As for distribution we've worked with HR on the distribution list for VPs but will circle back with David Oxley's team to ensure we have the most up-to-date list. Since some VPs in redeployment will most likely find positions within Enron by November I don't plan to exclude them from the distribution ... unlike United Way where we are not soliciting employees in redeployment for a contribution. I look forward to any feedback. Terrie James Senior Director Public Relations Enron Broadband Services (ph) 713.853.7727 (fax) 713.646.3248 terrie.james@enron.com [/INST] Category: Document editing/checking(collaboration)	<s>[INST] [/INST] Document editing/checking(collaboration) </s>
<s>[INST] <<SYS>> I am sharing an email body with you. Based on the text in the body, you need to classify the email in one of the following eight categories: 'Company Business, Strategy, etc.'; 'Purely Personal'; 'Personal but in professional context (e.g., it was good working with you)'; 'Logistic Arrangements (meeting scheduling, technical support, etc)'; 'Employment arrangements (job seeking, hiring, recommendations, etc)'; 'Document editing/checking (collaboration)'; 'Empty message (due to missing attachment)'; 'Empty message'. <</SYS>> Mail: Here it is. Peggy Mahoney@EES 09/12/2000 11:19 AM To: Karen Denne/Corp/Enron@ENRON Mark Palmer/Corp/Enron@ENRON Steven J Kean/NA/Enron@Enron cc: Subject: testimony Can I plez have a copy of Steve's testimony from yesterday in San Diego? Thanks Peggy [/INST] Category: Company Business, Strategy, etc.(elaborate in Section 3 [Topics])	<s>[INST] [/INST] Company Business, Strategy, etc.(elaborate in Section 3 [Topics]) </s>
<s>[INST] <<SYS>> I am sharing an email body with you. Based on the text in the body, you need to classify the email in one of the following eight categories: 'Company Business, Strategy, etc.'; 'Purely Personal'; 'Personal but in professional context (e.g., it was good working with you)'; 'Logistic Arrangements (meeting scheduling, technical support, etc)'; 'Employment arrangements (job seeking, hiring, recommendations, etc)'; 'Document editing/checking (collaboration)'; 'Empty message (due to missing attachment)'; 'Empty message'. <</SYS>> Mail: This follows up on Rick's inquiry late last week on the talks between EPSA and EEI on reliability. Yesterday I spoke with Mark Bennett and Donn Salvosa of the EPSA staff. Mark did the talking. The upshot is that EPSA and EEI are meeting to see if they can't agree on reliability legislation. EEI is working off of the NERC draft and has sent a version to EPSA dated 9/14 (see attached) that was the basis for last Thursday's meeting. EPSA is now doing some drafting of its own. I need to read the 9/14 draft but the fact that they are working off of the old NERC language is of considerable concern. EPSA staff emphasizes the value of having EEI off the NERC reservation (which is good in terms of showing that there is NERC consensus) but I think EPSA staff may be too flexible in how they are approaching it. I reminded them of our position and concerns and of Jim's prepared statement on EPSA's behalf filed for the Sept. 11 Barton hearing. EPSA staff claims that other EPSA members are OK with them embarking on this project. It is not clear if this effort will succeed. EPSA staff said EEI's board insists on having engineers do reliability which is objectionable to EPSA. EPSA staff seems to think that some type of reliablity SRO is inevitable and that it is wise to get the best one they can. I will check with some other EPSA members. [/INST] Category: Company Business, Strategy, etc.(elaborate in Section 3 [Topics])	<s>[INST] [/INST] Company Business, Strategy, etc.(elaborate in Section 3 [Topics]) </s>
<s>[INST] <<SYS>> I am sharing an email body with you. Based on the text in the body, you need to classify the email in one of the following eight categories: 'Company Business, Strategy, etc.'; 'Purely Personal'; 'Personal but in professional context (e.g., it was good working with you)'; 'Logistic Arrangements (meeting scheduling, technical support, etc)'; 'Employment arrangements (job seeking, hiring, recommendations, etc)'; 'Document editing/checking (collaboration)'; 'Empty message (due to missing attachment)'; 'Empty message'. <</SYS>> Mail: For those who attended the FERC meeting yesterday can anyone elaborate on the reference in the Energy Daily article today that said Pat Wood remarked at the meeting that the Barton RTO language is balanced and that he likes it. I am working on our own and helping EPSA with their comments on the Barton language which is as we know a retrenchment from current law and FERC's plans on RTOs. But if Pat Wood likes it and thinks it is balanced that undercuts our position. Since the trade press is not always accurate I thought I would first check with those of you who were there. Thanks. [/INST] Category: Company Business, Strategy, etc.(elaborate in Section 3 [Topics])	<s>[INST] [/INST] Company Business, Strategy, etc.(elaborate in Section 3 [Topics]) </s>
<s>[INST] <<SYS>> I am sharing an email body with you. Based on the text in the body, you need to classify the email in one of the following eight categories: 'Company Business, Strategy, etc.'; 'Purely Personal'; 'Personal but in professional context (e.g., it was good working with you)'; 'Logistic Arrangements (meeting scheduling, technical support, etc)'; 'Employment arrangements (job seeking, hiring, recommendations, etc)'; 'Document editing/checking (collaboration)'; 'Empty message (due to missing attachment)'; 'Empty message'. <</SYS>> Mail: calendar [/INST] Category: Logistic Arrangements(meeting scheduling, technical support, etc)	<s>[INST] [/INST] Logistic Arrangements(meeting scheduling, technical support, etc) </s>
<s>[INST] <<SYS>> I am sharing an email body with you. Based on the text in the body, you need to classify the email in one of the following eight categories: 'Company Business, Strategy, etc.'; 'Purely Personal'; 'Personal but in professional context (e.g., it was good working with you)'; 'Logistic Arrangements (meeting scheduling, technical support, etc)'; 'Employment arrangements (job seeking, hiring, recommendations, etc)'; 'Document editing/checking (collaboration)'; 'Empty message (due to missing attachment)'; 'Empty message'. <</SYS>> Mail: I would'nt have it introduced by the corporate policy committee. I would say Enron is introducing or there is a new tool available to you. I am anxious to see how this goes over it's a great tool. From: Karen Moore/ENRON@enronXgate on 04/16/2001 05:34 PM To: Karen Denne/Corp/Enron@ENRON Steven J Kean/NA/Enron@Enron cc: Andrea Yowman/Corp/Enron@ENRON Subject: FW: expertfinder - The Power of Who Karen and Steve Could you take a quick peek at this and let me know if you have any thoughts or concerns? Thanks Karen [/INST] Category: Company Business, Strategy, etc.(elaborate in Section 3 [Topics])	<s>[INST] [/INST] Company Business, Strategy, etc.(elaborate in Section 3 [Topics]) </s>
<s>[INST] <<SYS>> I am sharing an email body with you. Based on the text in the body, you need to classify the email in one of the following eight categories: 'Company Business, Strategy, etc.'; 'Purely Personal'; 'Personal but in professional context (e.g., it was good working with you)'; 'Logistic Arrangements (meeting scheduling, technical support, etc)'; 'Employment arrangements (job seeking, hiring, recommendations, etc)'; 'Document editing/checking (collaboration)'; 'Empty message (due to missing attachment)'; 'Empty message'. <</SYS>> Mail: I am so sorry. You guys gave him a really good life. Robert Kean <rkean@starband.net> on 07/07/2001 01:48:08 PM Please respond to <rkean@starband.net> To: Pat Hilleman \(E-mail\) <pat.hilleman@rsparch.com> Greg Smith \(E-mail\) <grsmith@qwest.net> Greg Smith \(E-mail 2\) <gregory_r_smith@uhc.com> Colin Lamb \(E-mail\) <dsmcolin@home.com> Maggie Kean \(E-mail\) <Ginny85956@aol.com> Nora Kean \(E-mail\) <Beetle81088@aol.com> Nora Kean \(E-mail 2\) <nora_kean@duchesne.org> Sann & Evelyn Gossum \(E-mail\) <gossumr@worldnet.att.net> Doug & Karen Reiman \(E-mail\) <dkreiman@mcleodusa.net> Jean Kean \(E-mail\) <rex04@msn.com> Kathy Wedig \(E-mail\) <kat.wedig@netzero.net> Melissa Kean \(E-mail\) <kean@rice.edu> Phil Kean \(E-mail\) <kean.philip@mcleodusa.net> Steve & Melissa Kean \(E-mail\) <skean@enron.com> cc: Subject: Houston 1996 - 2001 Houston died today after a long battle with Auto Immune Hemolytic Anemia. Rest in peace. Rob Kean [/INST] Category: Purely Personal	<s>[INST] [/INST] Purely Personal </s>
<s>[INST] <<SYS>> I am sharing an email body with you. Based on the text in the body, you need to classify the email in one of the following eight categories: 'Company Business, Strategy, etc.'; 'Purely Personal'; 'Personal but in professional context (e.g., it was good working with you)'; 'Logistic Arrangements (meeting scheduling, technical support, etc)'; 'Employment arrangements (job seeking, hiring, recommendations, etc)'; 'Document editing/checking (collaboration)'; 'Empty message (due to missing attachment)'; 'Empty message'. <</SYS>> Mail: In our July 30 2001 document entitled Receipt Capacity Allocation Proposal Prepared By Salt River Project there is an inadvertent error. Section I.F. properly states that the numbers used in this proposal would be updated with peak figures through the last season prior to additional capacity being placed into service by El Paso. Consistent with that Section II.A. in describing the CD and FR Entitlement Methodology should read as follows: II.A. A total peak day entitlement is established for each FR customer by summing its highest (peak) single day takes during the period January 1 1997 through the end of the last season prior to additional capacity being placed into service by El Paso at each of its D-Code points (eg. DAPSPHX DSWGPHX etc.). (footnotes 1 and 2 unchanged) Please make this change to your document. We apologize for the error. Joel Greene Energy Advocates LLP 202-371-9889 202-371-9025 (fax) jlgreene@energyadvocates.com [/INST] Category: Company Business, Strategy, etc.(elaborate in Section 3 [Topics])	<s>[INST] [/INST] Company Business, Strategy, etc.(elaborate in Section 3 [Topics]) </s>
<s>[INST] <<SYS>> I am sharing an email body with you. Based on the text in the body, you need to classify the email in one of the following eight categories: 'Company Business, Strategy, etc.'; 'Purely Personal'; 'Personal but in professional context (e.g., it was good working with you)'; 'Logistic Arrangements (meeting scheduling, technical support, etc)'; 'Employment arrangements (job seeking, hiring, recommendations, etc)'; 'Document editing/checking (collaboration)'; 'Empty message (due to missing attachment)'; 'Empty message'. <</SYS>> Mail: Please read and follow below: Thanks ----------------- [/INST] Category: Company Business, Strategy, etc.(elaborate in Section 3 [Topics])	<s>[INST] [/INST] Company Business, Strategy, etc.(elaborate in Section 3 [Topics]) </s>
<s>[INST] <<SYS>> I am sharing an email body with you. Based on the text in the body, you need to classify the email in one of the following eight categories: 'Company Business, Strategy, etc.'; 'Purely Personal'; 'Personal but in professional context (e.g., it was good working with you)'; 'Logistic Arrangements (meeting scheduling, technical support, etc)'; 'Employment arrangements (job seeking, hiring, recommendations, etc)'; 'Document editing/checking (collaboration)'; 'Empty message (due to missing attachment)'; 'Empty message'. <</SYS>> Mail: Sorry I got overwhelmed by California. I have not talked to Ken yet and will be in Japan until Friday. Perhaps we can hook up then? From: Rebecca McDonald/ENRON@enronXgate on 05/11/2001 02:46 PM To: Steven J Kean/NA/Enron@Enron cc: Subject: Kissinger Steve We never closed the loop on Kissinger. If you are around next week why don't we talk and resolve what we want to do so that I can proceed? Does that work for you? Rebecca [/INST] Category: Logistic Arrangements(meeting scheduling, technical support, etc)	<s>[INST] [/INST] Logistic Arrangements(meeting scheduling, technical support, etc) </s>
<s>[INST] <<SYS>> I am sharing an email body with you. Based on the text in the body, you need to classify the email in one of the following eight categories: 'Company Business, Strategy, etc.'; 'Purely Personal'; 'Personal but in professional context (e.g., it was good working with you)'; 'Logistic Arrangements (meeting scheduling, technical support, etc)'; 'Employment arrangements (job seeking, hiring, recommendations, etc)'; 'Document editing/checking (collaboration)'; 'Empty message (due to missing attachment)'; 'Empty message'. <</SYS>> Mail: I'm still a junkie .... please email copies of the orders. [/INST] Category: Document editing/checking(collaboration)	<s>[INST] [/INST] Document editing/checking(collaboration) </s>
<s>[INST] <<SYS>> I am sharing an email body with you. Based on the text in the body, you need to classify the email in one of the following eight categories: 'Company Business, Strategy, etc.'; 'Purely Personal'; 'Personal but in professional context (e.g., it was good working with you)'; 'Logistic Arrangements (meeting scheduling, technical support, etc)'; 'Employment arrangements (job seeking, hiring, recommendations, etc)'; 'Document editing/checking (collaboration)'; 'Empty message (due to missing attachment)'; 'Empty message'. <</SYS>> Mail: Yes please. From: Elizabeth Linnell on 05/16/2001 12:02 PM To: Steven J Kean/NA/Enron@Enron cc: Subject: Astros I noticed that several groups within your overall organization charged tickets or our suite to their cost centers this month. I know of the business purpose for a couple but not all. Let me know if you're interested in this info and I'll get more data from Greg. [/INST] Category: Logistic Arrangements(meeting scheduling, technical support, etc)	<s>[INST] [/INST] Logistic Arrangements(meeting scheduling, technical support, etc) </s>
<s>[INST] <<SYS>> I am sharing an email body with you. Based on the text in the body, you need to classify the email in one of the following eight categories: 'Company Business, Strategy, etc.'; 'Purely Personal'; 'Personal but in professional context (e.g., it was good working with you)'; 'Logistic Arrangements (meeting scheduling, technical support, etc)'; 'Employment arrangements (job seeking, hiring, recommendations, etc)'; 'Document editing/checking (collaboration)'; 'Empty message (due to missing attachment)'; 'Empty message'. <</SYS>> Mail: Heads up. This is not to be discussed in advance out side of Enron but you guys need to know. If there are ways we can be helpful call Carolyn Green to discuss. ----------------- [/INST] Category: Company Business, Strategy, etc.(elaborate in Section 3 [Topics])	<s>[INST] [/INST] Company Business, Strategy, etc.(elaborate in Section 3 [Topics]) </s>
<s>[INST] <<SYS>> I am sharing an email body with you. Based on the text in the body, you need to classify the email in one of the following eight categories: 'Company Business, Strategy, etc.'; 'Purely Personal'; 'Personal but in professional context (e.g., it was good working with you)'; 'Logistic Arrangements (meeting scheduling, technical support, etc)'; 'Employment arrangements (job seeking, hiring, recommendations, etc)'; 'Document editing/checking (collaboration)'; 'Empty message (due to missing attachment)'; 'Empty message'. <</SYS>> Mail: Excerpts by email are fine. Also as I mentioned I am very impressed with your background and accomplishments but I would like to have you meet a couple of other people in my group before making a final offer. Thanks and stay warm! Kim Amy <AKim@m-g.com> 03/09/2001 08:44 AM To: 'skean@enron.com' <skean@enron.com> cc: Subject: followup to telephone conversation of 3-7-01 Dear Mr. Kean: Thank you for your call. I am looking forward to working for you. I will be available as of June 1 2001. I will have the writing samples and resume ready for you on Monday March 1 2001. Should I fax it to you? Also my dissertation is quite lengthy. Would you like for me to forward you one chapter or just a couple pages? As discussed I will be available to come down to Houston between March 30 and April 6 2001. More snow (as in 6 inches) is expected today and tomorrow. I'm only 5'6. Pretty soon I will be buried in it since it's snow upon snow. HELP!! I look forward to seeing you again. Regards Amy [/INST] Category: Employment arrangements(job seeking, hiring, recommendations, etc)	<s>[INST] [/INST] Employment arrangements(job seeking, hiring, recommendations, etc) </s>
<s>[INST] <<SYS>> I am sharing an email body with you. Based on the text in the body, you need to classify the email in one of the following eight categories: 'Company Business, Strategy, etc.'; 'Purely Personal'; 'Personal but in professional context (e.g., it was good working with you)'; 'Logistic Arrangements (meeting scheduling, technical support, etc)'; 'Employment arrangements (job seeking, hiring, recommendations, etc)'; 'Document editing/checking (collaboration)'; 'Empty message (due to missing attachment)'; 'Empty message'. <</SYS>> Mail: Andy Zipper [/INST] Category: Logistic Arrangements(meeting scheduling, technical support, etc)	<s>[INST] [/INST] Logistic Arrangements(meeting scheduling, technical support, etc) </s>
<s>[INST] <<SYS>> I am sharing an email body with you. Based on the text in the body, you need to classify the email in one of the following eight categories: 'Company Business, Strategy, etc.'; 'Purely Personal'; 'Personal but in professional context (e.g., it was good working with you)'; 'Logistic Arrangements (meeting scheduling, technical support, etc)'; 'Employment arrangements (job seeking, hiring, recommendations, etc)'; 'Document editing/checking (collaboration)'; 'Empty message (due to missing attachment)'; 'Empty message'. <</SYS>> Mail: I have read through the 19 pages of Administration comments on the Bingaman draft electricity bill released last month. Here are the main items in a quick bullet format so you have the flavor of them. Delete provision on federal jurisdiction over bundled/unbundled (they don't offer a reason). We of course agree for tactical reasons. Add a provision to authorize FERC to order wheeling in States that open retail markets. Add a provision to allow FERC to issue wheeling orders on its own motion based on an informal hearing rather than an adjudicatory hearing as under current law. Make it clear that the Federal Power Act does not affect the authority of a State to require retail competition (the comments say some utilities have tried to argue that the FPA prohibits states). The provision giving FERC power to order RTO participation should be deleted. The comments raise drafting question. The changes to the FERC merger review sections of the FPA should be limited. FERC lite should be extended only to state municipal utilities and cooperatives not the Federal utilities. The FERC should authority over the Federal transmission systems equivalent to FERC authority over public utilities (with special BPA rules). No need to legislate on market-based rates (we oppose the Bingaman language anyway so this is helpful). Interconnection language should be limited to transmission facilities not local distribution. No objection to streamlined reliability provision (this is good for us). Remedial measures for market power should be deleted. Administration to provide legislative language on federal transmission siting provisions which they want to retain. Not convinced there is a need for market transparency rules because FERC and DOE already have enough authority. Administration supports even tougher criminal penalties. Recordkeeping under PUHCA repeal should be clarified. Federal purchase requirement for renewable energy should be deleted. No objection to real-time pricing standard. Net metering should be limited to small residential renewable facilities. Do not support federal renewable portfolio standard (but could clarify state authority to adopt same). [/INST] Category: Company Business, Strategy, etc.(elaborate in Section 3 [Topics])	<s>[INST] [/INST] Company Business, Strategy, etc.(elaborate in Section 3 [Topics]) </s>
<s>[INST] <<SYS>> I am sharing an email body with you. Based on the text in the body, you need to classify the email in one of the following eight categories: 'Company Business, Strategy, etc.'; 'Purely Personal'; 'Personal but in professional context (e.g., it was good working with you)'; 'Logistic Arrangements (meeting scheduling, technical support, etc)'; 'Employment arrangements (job seeking, hiring, recommendations, etc)'; 'Document editing/checking (collaboration)'; 'Empty message (due to missing attachment)'; 'Empty message'. <</SYS>> Mail: Please send any comments directly to Peggy. ----------------- [/INST] Category: Document editing/checking(collaboration)	<s>[INST] [/INST] Document editing/checking(collaboration) </s>
<s>[INST] <<SYS>> I am sharing an email body with you. Based on the text in the body, you need to classify the email in one of the following eight categories: 'Company Business, Strategy, etc.'; 'Purely Personal'; 'Personal but in professional context (e.g., it was good working with you)'; 'Logistic Arrangements (meeting scheduling, technical support, etc)'; 'Employment arrangements (job seeking, hiring, recommendations, etc)'; 'Document editing/checking (collaboration)'; 'Empty message (due to missing attachment)'; 'Empty message'. <</SYS>> Mail: John Brindle David Cromley and others in the Corporate Business Controls group (formerly part of EBS) have been working over the last several weeks to make sure that we can get our people out of Dabhol if there are threats to their safety. While no plan is perfectly reliable (particularly during monsoon season) we believe that we are as ready as we can be. ----------------- [/INST] Category: Company Business, Strategy, etc.(elaborate in Section 3 [Topics])	<s>[INST] [/INST] Company Business, Strategy, etc.(elaborate in Section 3 [Topics]) </s>
<s>[INST] <<SYS>> I am sharing an email body with you. Based on the text in the body, you need to classify the email in one of the following eight categories: 'Company Business, Strategy, etc.'; 'Purely Personal'; 'Personal but in professional context (e.g., it was good working with you)'; 'Logistic Arrangements (meeting scheduling, technical support, etc)'; 'Employment arrangements (job seeking, hiring, recommendations, etc)'; 'Document editing/checking (collaboration)'; 'Empty message (due to missing attachment)'; 'Empty message'. <</SYS>> Mail: Attached is my testimony. [/INST] Category: Company Business, Strategy, etc.(elaborate in Section 3 [Topics])	<s>[INST] [/INST] Company Business, Strategy, etc.(elaborate in Section 3 [Topics]) </s>
<s>[INST] <<SYS>> I am sharing an email body with you. Based on the text in the body, you need to classify the email in one of the following eight categories: 'Company Business, Strategy, etc.'; 'Purely Personal'; 'Personal but in professional context (e.g., it was good working with you)'; 'Logistic Arrangements (meeting scheduling, technical support, etc)'; 'Employment arrangements (job seeking, hiring, recommendations, etc)'; 'Document editing/checking (collaboration)'; 'Empty message (due to missing attachment)'; 'Empty message'. <</SYS>> Mail: USA: UPDATE 1-Calif. seizes stranded SoCal Edison energy contracts. 02/02/2001 Reuters English News Service (C) Reuters Limited 2001. SAN FRANCISCO Feb 2 (Reuters) - California Gov. Gray Davis on Friday blocked the California Power Exchange from liquidating stranded energy contracts held by cash-strapped utility Southern California Edison seizing the assets for the state. The governor's office said the order issued late on Thursday and put in effect on Friday was needed to preserve the contracts' value for power-starved California consumers. I am using my emergency powers to seize options to buy very inexpensive power that would otherwise be lost forever Davis said in a statement. These options will provide reliable power through the end of the year. It is important to protect these contracts for the people of California he said. A Los Angeles judge on January 24 issued a temporary injunction valid for a week blocking the exchange's sale of the contracts. The California Power Exchange (CalPX) said Davis' order nullified a Los Angeles County Superior Court decision earlier Friday that authorized CalPX to liquidate Edison's forward market positions. The exchange said they had sought to liquidate the contracts to recover about $255 million that Edison has failed to pay to CalPX market participants. While agreeing to transfer the contracts to the state the exchange pointed out that the law requires that California pay a reasonable value for them which it estimated at nearly $652 million on today's market. Delivery of the first contracts which total 2.8 million megawatt hours is scheduled to begin Monday February 5. One megawatt hour is roughly the amount of electricity needed to light 1000 homes for 60 minutes. Davis is desperately seeking cheap power for the state after the utilities' financial meltdown pushed them to the market's sidelines. Spot market purchases for the state are currently being made by the Department of Water Resources but at typically higher prices than in the forwards market. Block forward energy contracts secure electricity deliveries over a given block of time at a price agreed months in advance shielding the buyer from the kind of price volatility that has recently roiled the short-term spot market. The overall value of SoCal Edison's contracts agreed last year for power to be delivered in 2001 was not immediately known but CalPX officials said last month they hoped their liquidation would cover the $215 million SoCalEdison owned the exchange. SoCal Edison the utility subsidiary of Rosemead Calif.-based Edison International has warned it is no longer able to meet its financial obligations after running up a debt of nearly $5 billion buying wholesale power in the spot market where prices have soared ten-fold over the past few months amid a regional energy shortage. The utility is blocked by the state's 1996 deregulation law from passing these high wholesale prices down to consumers who are still protected by a rate freeze. That same deregulation legislation created the CalPX making it the state-sanctioned exchange for electricity trading. SoCal Edison was among the biggest buyers on the exchange. CalPX crushed by a mountain of debt it is unable to recover from Edison has shut its spot market operations and is winding down its business affairs. Copyright 2000 Dow Jones & Company Inc. All Rights Reserved. [/INST] Category: Company Business, Strategy, etc.(elaborate in Section 3 [Topics])	<s>[INST] [/INST] Company Business, Strategy, etc.(elaborate in Section 3 [Topics]) </s>
<s>[INST] <<SYS>> I am sharing an email body with you. Based on the text in the body, you need to classify the email in one of the following eight categories: 'Company Business, Strategy, etc.'; 'Purely Personal'; 'Personal but in professional context (e.g., it was good working with you)'; 'Logistic Arrangements (meeting scheduling, technical support, etc)'; 'Employment arrangements (job seeking, hiring, recommendations, etc)'; 'Document editing/checking (collaboration)'; 'Empty message (due to missing attachment)'; 'Empty message'. <</SYS>> Mail: fyi ----------------- [/INST] Category: Company Business, Strategy, etc.(elaborate in Section 3 [Topics])	<s>[INST] [/INST] Company Business, Strategy, etc.(elaborate in Section 3 [Topics]) </s>