Split (1)

train · 1k rows

Subsets and Splits

No community queries yet

The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.

prompts stringlengths 590 30k	text stringclasses 8 values
<s>[INST] <<SYS>> I am sharing an email body with you. Based on the text in the body, you need to classify the email in one of the following eight categories: 'Company Business, Strategy, etc.'; 'Purely Personal'; 'Personal but in professional context (e.g., it was good working with you)'; 'Logistic Arrangements (meeting scheduling, technical support, etc)'; 'Employment arrangements (job seeking, hiring, recommendations, etc)'; 'Document editing/checking (collaboration)'; 'Empty message (due to missing attachment)'; 'Empty message'. <</SYS>> Mail: fyi ----------------- [/INST] Category: Personal but in professional context(e.g., it was good working with you)	<s>[INST] [/INST] Personal but in professional context(e.g., it was good working with you) </s>
<s>[INST] <<SYS>> I am sharing an email body with you. Based on the text in the body, you need to classify the email in one of the following eight categories: 'Company Business, Strategy, etc.'; 'Purely Personal'; 'Personal but in professional context (e.g., it was good working with you)'; 'Logistic Arrangements (meeting scheduling, technical support, etc)'; 'Employment arrangements (job seeking, hiring, recommendations, etc)'; 'Document editing/checking (collaboration)'; 'Empty message (due to missing attachment)'; 'Empty message'. <</SYS>> Mail: I recommend reading CAISO's response. This letter was reported in last week's trade press. I am told that BPA does not consider this letter confidential even though it is labeled as such by CAISO. Many of the CAISO backpedal statements made re: claims of strategic bidding would apply equally to other importers. Alan Comnes [/INST] Category: Company Business, Strategy, etc.(elaborate in Section 3 [Topics])	<s>[INST] [/INST] Company Business, Strategy, etc.(elaborate in Section 3 [Topics]) </s>
<s>[INST] <<SYS>> I am sharing an email body with you. Based on the text in the body, you need to classify the email in one of the following eight categories: 'Company Business, Strategy, etc.'; 'Purely Personal'; 'Personal but in professional context (e.g., it was good working with you)'; 'Logistic Arrangements (meeting scheduling, technical support, etc)'; 'Employment arrangements (job seeking, hiring, recommendations, etc)'; 'Document editing/checking (collaboration)'; 'Empty message (due to missing attachment)'; 'Empty message'. <</SYS>> Mail: Dear Mr. Lay: I'm writing this note to you as a show of support to you during your dire times. The reason that I share this with you is my respect for you as a CEO a business leader and a person. My wife is one of your employees who routinely shares stories about you that are nothing less than inspiring. I know that during difficult times sometimes words emerge that can help people through difficult times. I believe that you are sincere man and know that you must be broken hearted but I hope that this article can help you lead a dispirted workforce to see things more clearly. My wife Shelly Pierce has worked for Enron for the past two years and like many of your employees has lost a great deal of her life savings. Of course I accept most of the blame for this for reasons related to this article. I lost my investment discipline and held out the false hope that Enron could not falter. After reading the article to her while I was out of town I believe that her spirit was a bit rejuvenated and she was ready to face the challenges that lay before you. Mr. Lay I appreciate the opportunity that you have given my wife and our family and hope that this story inspires you to regain your successes. From the USA Today Tuesday November 27 2001 page 15A. In recession face brutal facts thrive By Jim Collins A man in his early 20s recently asked me So what's a recession like? Its an entirely alien concept to him he'd grown up during the greatest economic boom in modern memory. His question drove home the fact that we haven't faced a severe protracted economic setback for nearly 2 decades leaving us terribly unpracticed at dealing with tough times. With this recession - long in coming perhaps long to stay - now officially upon us it is imperative that corporate leaders relearn a key lesson about how great companies (and great people) deal with difficult times differently from how they deal with merely good ones. That lesson is the Stockdale Paradox a peculiar psychology shown by those who emerge from tough times not just intact but stronger. Adm. Jim Stockdale was the highest-ranking U.S. military officer in the Hanoi prison camp during the Vietnam War. Tortured many times during his 8-year imprisonment Stockdale lived without any prisoner's rights no set release date and no certainty as to whether he would ever again see his family. He shouldered the burden of command while fighting an internal war against his captors and their attempts to use the prisoners for propaganda. At one point he beat himself with a stool and cut himself with a razor deliberately disfiguring himself so that he could not be put on video as an example of a well-treated prisoner. He exchanged secret intelligence information with his wife through their letters knowing that discovery would mean more torture and perhaps death. After his release Stockdale became the first three-star officer in the history of the Navy to wear both aviator wings and the Congressional Medal of Honor. You can understand then my anticipation at the prospect of spending part of an afternoon with Stockdale who happened to be at the Hoover Institute across the street from my office when I taught at Stanford. In preparation I read In Love and War the book he and his wife wrote to chronicle their experiences those 8 years. As I read the book I found myself getting depressed. It just seemed so bleak - the uncertainty of his fate the brutality of his captors. And then it dawned on me: Here I am sitting in my warm comfortable office looking out over the Stanford campus on a beautiful Saturday afternoon. I'm getting depressed reading this and I know that he gets out reunites with his family and becomes a national hero. If it feels depressing for me how on earth did he deal with it when he was actually there and did not know the end of the story? I never lost faith in the end of the story Stockdale said when I asked him. I never doubted not only that I would get out but also that I would prevail in the end and turn the experience into the defining event of my life that in retrospect I would not trade. I didn't say anything for many minutes and we continued the slow walk toward the faculty club Stockdale limping and arc-swinging his leg still stiff from repeated torture. Finally I asked Who didn't make it out? Oh that's easy he said. The optimists. The optimists? I don't understand I said completely confused. The optimists. Oh they were the ones who said 'We're going to be out by Christmas.' And Christmas would come and Christmas would go. Then they'd say 'We're going to be out by Easter.' And Easter would come and Easter would go. And then Thanksgiving and then it would be Christmas again. And they died of a broken heart. After another long pause he turned to me and said This is a very important lesson. You must never confuse faith that you will prevail in the end - which you can never afford to lose - with the need for discipline to confront the most brutal facts of your current reality whatever they might be. My conversation with Stockdale had a profound influence on me but I never really considered it a business lesson until my research team began to wrestle with the question of why some companies rise from difficulty to become great while others emerge from those exact same difficulties weakened and dispirited. We found that companies that became great embraced a corporate version of the Stockdale Paradox. Fannie Mae for example found itself in the 1982 recession losing $1M every business day with $56B in loans under water. Many analysts thought Fannie Mae which was getting 9% on its mortgage portfolio but paying 15% on the debt it issued was doomed. But CEO David Maxwell and his team never wavered in their aim to not merely survive but also to prevail as a great company. Yes they confronted the brutal fact that the interest-rate problem was not going to magically disappear (certainly not by Christmas). But they used this grim fact as a catalyst for creating an entirely new business model based on asking three central questions of greatness: What can we potentially do better than any other company in the world? What can best drive our economic engine? What best ignites the passions of our people? Instead of reacting to the recession with mindless restructuring Fannie Mae rebuilt itself based on its answers to these questions. Eventually it generated investor returns nearly eight times those of the general stock market. When asked how he dealt with the nay Sayers and the analysts who wrote Fannie Mae off Maxwell said that it was never an issue inside the company. Of course we had to stop doing a lot of stupid things but we never entertained the possibility that we would fail. We were going to use the calamity as an opportunity to remake Fannie Maw into a great company. The sad truth is that most executive teams won't respond that way to these dark days of uncertainty. Instead of using this recession as an opportunity to fundamentally rethink their business and rebuild a culture of discipline the will simply restructure lay off a bunch of people and liquidate their cultural equity. Mediocre leaders will hold out false hopes for a quick fix only to watch those hopes be swept away by events. Their companies will begin to die of a broken heart. It need not be this way. Those who lead with the Stockdale Paradox - those who retain the unwavering faith that they will find a way to prevail in the end but who also retain the discipline to confront the most brutal facts of reality - will find this an ideal time to rebuild and reinforce greatness. Used correctly this recession can be a defining time in your firm's history that in retrospect you would not trade. Used wrongly this recession will weaken your foundations and make it that much harder to become great. The choice is yours. Jim Collins the author of Good to Great operates a management-research laboratory in Boulder Colo. Regards Steve Steve Alexander Vice President North American Artemis Consulting Artemis International Solutions Corporation Office: +1 281.338.9616 Mobile: +1 281.830.7430 www.artemisintl.com [/INST] Category: Personal but in professional context(e.g., it was good working with you)	<s>[INST] [/INST] Personal but in professional context(e.g., it was good working with you) </s>
<s>[INST] <<SYS>> I am sharing an email body with you. Based on the text in the body, you need to classify the email in one of the following eight categories: 'Company Business, Strategy, etc.'; 'Purely Personal'; 'Personal but in professional context (e.g., it was good working with you)'; 'Logistic Arrangements (meeting scheduling, technical support, etc)'; 'Employment arrangements (job seeking, hiring, recommendations, etc)'; 'Document editing/checking (collaboration)'; 'Empty message (due to missing attachment)'; 'Empty message'. <</SYS>> Mail: Am I taking care of you or what?? ----------------- [/INST] Category: Personal but in professional context(e.g., it was good working with you)	<s>[INST] [/INST] Personal but in professional context(e.g., it was good working with you) </s>
<s>[INST] <<SYS>> I am sharing an email body with you. Based on the text in the body, you need to classify the email in one of the following eight categories: 'Company Business, Strategy, etc.'; 'Purely Personal'; 'Personal but in professional context (e.g., it was good working with you)'; 'Logistic Arrangements (meeting scheduling, technical support, etc)'; 'Employment arrangements (job seeking, hiring, recommendations, etc)'; 'Document editing/checking (collaboration)'; 'Empty message (due to missing attachment)'; 'Empty message'. <</SYS>> Mail: Not yet. May not be until sept 5 as ken is on vacation. but there is a chance that ken will try to reach him in the meantime. I'll let you know when I hear. From: Chris Long 08/21/2000 03:22 PM Sent by: Amy Fabian To: Steven J Kean/NA/Enron@Enron cc: Subject: CFTC call to Gramm Steve - Missed you in LA last week. Thanks for working with Ken on the CFTC talking points. Do you know if the call between Ken and Sen. Gramm occured and if there was any follow up needed. Thanks - Chris [/INST] Category: Personal but in professional context(e.g., it was good working with you)	<s>[INST] [/INST] Personal but in professional context(e.g., it was good working with you) </s>
<s>[INST] <<SYS>> I am sharing an email body with you. Based on the text in the body, you need to classify the email in one of the following eight categories: 'Company Business, Strategy, etc.'; 'Purely Personal'; 'Personal but in professional context (e.g., it was good working with you)'; 'Logistic Arrangements (meeting scheduling, technical support, etc)'; 'Employment arrangements (job seeking, hiring, recommendations, etc)'; 'Document editing/checking (collaboration)'; 'Empty message (due to missing attachment)'; 'Empty message'. <</SYS>> Mail: I'm still a junkie .... please email copies of the orders. [/INST] Category: Company Business, Strategy, etc.(elaborate in Section 3 [Topics])	<s>[INST] [/INST] Company Business, Strategy, etc.(elaborate in Section 3 [Topics]) </s>
<s>[INST] <<SYS>> I am sharing an email body with you. Based on the text in the body, you need to classify the email in one of the following eight categories: 'Company Business, Strategy, etc.'; 'Purely Personal'; 'Personal but in professional context (e.g., it was good working with you)'; 'Logistic Arrangements (meeting scheduling, technical support, etc)'; 'Employment arrangements (job seeking, hiring, recommendations, etc)'; 'Document editing/checking (collaboration)'; 'Empty message (due to missing attachment)'; 'Empty message'. <</SYS>> Mail: Below is the text of recommendations taken from the summary of recommendations in the Cheney Energy Report being released later this morning that focus on coal and coal-related issues including environmental. The NEPD Group (National Energy Policy Development) recommends that the President direct the Administrator of the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) to propose multi-pollutant legislation. The NEPD Group recommends that the President direct the EPA Administrator to work with Congress to propose legislation that would establish a flexible market-based program to significantly reduce and cap emissions fo sulfur dioxide nitrogen oxides and mercury from electric power generators. Such a program (with appropriate measures to address local concerns) would provide significant public health benefits even as we increase electricity supplies. Establish mandatory reduction targets to emissions of three main pollutants: sulfur dioxide nitrogen oxides and mercury. Phase in reductions over a reasonable period of time similar to the successful acid rain reduction program established by the 1990 amendments to the Clean Air Act. Provide regulatory certainty to allow utilities to make modifications to their plants without fear of new litigation. Provide market-based incentives such as emissions trading credits to help achieve the required reductions. The NEPD Group recognizes the importance of looking to technology to help us meet the goals of increasing electricity generation while protecting our environment. To that end the NEPD Group recommends that the President direct the Department of Energy to continue to develop advanced clean coal technology by: Investing $2 billion over 10 years to fund research in clean coal technologies. Supporting a permanent extension of the existing research and development tax credit. Directing federal agencies to explore regulatory approaches that will encourage advancements in environmental technology. The NEPD Group recomemnds that the President direct federal agencies to provide greater regulatory certainty relating to coal electricity generation through clear policies that are easily applied to business decisions. The NEPD Group recommends that the President direct the Administrator of the Environmental Protection Agency in consultation with the Secretary of Energy and other relevant agencies to review New Source Review regulations including administrative interpretations and implementation and report to the President within 90 days on the impact of the regulations on investment in new utility and refinery generation capacity energy efficiency and environmental protection. The NEPD Group recommends that the President direct the Attorney General to review existing enforcement actions regarding New Source Review to ensure that the enforcement actions are consistent with the Clean Air Act and its regulations. The NEPD Group recommends that the President direct federal agencies to support continued research into global climate change continue efforts to identify environmentally and cost-effective ways to use market mechanisms and incentives continue development of new technologies and cooperate with allies including through international processes to develop technologies market-based incentives and other innovative approaches to address the issue of global climate change. [/INST] Category: Company Business, Strategy, etc.(elaborate in Section 3 [Topics])	<s>[INST] [/INST] Company Business, Strategy, etc.(elaborate in Section 3 [Topics]) </s>
<s>[INST] <<SYS>> I am sharing an email body with you. Based on the text in the body, you need to classify the email in one of the following eight categories: 'Company Business, Strategy, etc.'; 'Purely Personal'; 'Personal but in professional context (e.g., it was good working with you)'; 'Logistic Arrangements (meeting scheduling, technical support, etc)'; 'Employment arrangements (job seeking, hiring, recommendations, etc)'; 'Document editing/checking (collaboration)'; 'Empty message (due to missing attachment)'; 'Empty message'. <</SYS>> Mail: Please respond and copy me. ----------------- [/INST] Category: Company Business, Strategy, etc.(elaborate in Section 3 [Topics])	<s>[INST] [/INST] Company Business, Strategy, etc.(elaborate in Section 3 [Topics]) </s>
<s>[INST] <<SYS>> I am sharing an email body with you. Based on the text in the body, you need to classify the email in one of the following eight categories: 'Company Business, Strategy, etc.'; 'Purely Personal'; 'Personal but in professional context (e.g., it was good working with you)'; 'Logistic Arrangements (meeting scheduling, technical support, etc)'; 'Employment arrangements (job seeking, hiring, recommendations, etc)'; 'Document editing/checking (collaboration)'; 'Empty message (due to missing attachment)'; 'Empty message'. <</SYS>> Mail: I do not. Enron Energy Services From: Deborah DeFforge 07/18/2000 08:34 AM Phone No: 713.853.9474 713.646.2621 - Facsimile EB1293 To: Steven J Kean/HOU/EES@EES Richard Shapiro/HOU/EES@EES cc: Subject: ORG CHART Do either of you have an updated org chart depicting EES ENA and EBS? Thank you! d2 [/INST] Category: Company Business, Strategy, etc.(elaborate in Section 3 [Topics])	<s>[INST] [/INST] Company Business, Strategy, etc.(elaborate in Section 3 [Topics]) </s>
<s>[INST] <<SYS>> I am sharing an email body with you. Based on the text in the body, you need to classify the email in one of the following eight categories: 'Company Business, Strategy, etc.'; 'Purely Personal'; 'Personal but in professional context (e.g., it was good working with you)'; 'Logistic Arrangements (meeting scheduling, technical support, etc)'; 'Employment arrangements (job seeking, hiring, recommendations, etc)'; 'Document editing/checking (collaboration)'; 'Empty message (due to missing attachment)'; 'Empty message'. <</SYS>> Mail: fyi [/INST] Category: Company Business, Strategy, etc.(elaborate in Section 3 [Topics])	<s>[INST] [/INST] Company Business, Strategy, etc.(elaborate in Section 3 [Topics]) </s>
<s>[INST] <<SYS>> I am sharing an email body with you. Based on the text in the body, you need to classify the email in one of the following eight categories: 'Company Business, Strategy, etc.'; 'Purely Personal'; 'Personal but in professional context (e.g., it was good working with you)'; 'Logistic Arrangements (meeting scheduling, technical support, etc)'; 'Employment arrangements (job seeking, hiring, recommendations, etc)'; 'Document editing/checking (collaboration)'; 'Empty message (due to missing attachment)'; 'Empty message'. <</SYS>> Mail: Thanks for the update. From: John Hardy@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT on 05/10/2001 09:48 AM To: Rebecca McDonald/Enron@EnronXGate cc: Ben Glisan@ECT Steven J Kean/NA/Enron@Enron Rob Walls/ENRON@enronXgate Subject: USG overtures on Dabhol Rebecca At a meeting yesterday at OPIC on Trakya another of our problem projects Dabhol was raised. A representative from the White House transition team joined the conversation. I was asked the terms under which we were prepared to negotiate and I told them at a minimum upon a commitment by the Indian authorities to serious negotiations which would include full compliance with the terms of the contracts and progress in the reform of the MSEB. I made clear that we do not see the Godbole Committee as the basis for such a discussion. I think the USG wants to be on record politically encouraging the Indian Govt. to engage in discussions all parties consider to be meaningful in hopes of working things out before it is too late even while through OPIC and EXIM it is supporting the move towards PNT. The administration may be concerned that without such a diplomatic overture on its part it could be concluded that the USG has politically taken a position on the project. In Trakya for example the USG has been quite proactive in pressing the Turkish govt on the payments issue and even in discussing the payment concerns with the IMF so that the payments issues for the BOTs (two of the four in Turkey are US sponsored) are taken into account as the IMF program moves forward. So I anticipate that the USG will shortly be meeting with the Indian ambassador here and the US Charge in Delhiwill likely be directed to make the rounds and meet with senior government officals on the project. I wanted you to be aware of this also any guidance you can provide would be helpful. Thanks John [/INST] Category: Personal but in professional context(e.g., it was good working with you)	<s>[INST] [/INST] Personal but in professional context(e.g., it was good working with you) </s>
<s>[INST] <<SYS>> I am sharing an email body with you. Based on the text in the body, you need to classify the email in one of the following eight categories: 'Company Business, Strategy, etc.'; 'Purely Personal'; 'Personal but in professional context (e.g., it was good working with you)'; 'Logistic Arrangements (meeting scheduling, technical support, etc)'; 'Employment arrangements (job seeking, hiring, recommendations, etc)'; 'Document editing/checking (collaboration)'; 'Empty message (due to missing attachment)'; 'Empty message'. <</SYS>> Mail: I assume that if an hourly PX market clearing price is mitigated per a FERC order it would affect variable HC in the formula laid out in the attachment. It is not clear to me which variable represents hourly ISO imbalance energy costs but I assume its Est RT$. If I am right that variable would be affected by the mitigated market price (MMP) for CAISO imbalance energy. My comments are: The FERC is able to only order refunds to jurisdictional entities and given appeals it may take years before the full extent of thre refunds are known. Therefore there will be a significant difference between the change in the mitigated market price (MMP) as declared by FERC and the PX credit. That is a 10% reduction in the MMP should not be construed as having a 10% effect on the PX credit assuming it can be recalculated at all. Specifically only some of the HC or Est RT$ costs can be adjusted per FERC refund orders. Also the PX credit is a tariffed rate. I do not believe the PU code allows for retroactive adjustments to tariffed rates unless there was an explicit cost tracking account (e.g. a balancing A/C). To my knowledge no such account exists here. Finally I do not see a relationship between MMPs and (1) block forward costs on any date and (2) PG&E and/or DWR's procurement costs for the net short position post January 19. So those PX credit costs should be unaffected by any FERC refund order. Alan Comnes [/INST] Category: Company Business, Strategy, etc.(elaborate in Section 3 [Topics])	<s>[INST] [/INST] Company Business, Strategy, etc.(elaborate in Section 3 [Topics]) </s>
<s>[INST] <<SYS>> I am sharing an email body with you. Based on the text in the body, you need to classify the email in one of the following eight categories: 'Company Business, Strategy, etc.'; 'Purely Personal'; 'Personal but in professional context (e.g., it was good working with you)'; 'Logistic Arrangements (meeting scheduling, technical support, etc)'; 'Employment arrangements (job seeking, hiring, recommendations, etc)'; 'Document editing/checking (collaboration)'; 'Empty message (due to missing attachment)'; 'Empty message'. <</SYS>> Mail: Wolak makes some good points. In ERCOT Enron is in support of nodal pricing. I would not go so far as to say we are pushing for PJM's implementation however but for a market with nodal prices (and unilateral bids - aka unbalanced schedules congestion reflect by price differentials etc). I was unaware PJM had such great power to alter bids. This is something we don't want and something for which I am not aware we have advocated. Perhaps in Enron's promotion of locational prices it has been retold as PJM-style locational prices. Given that PJM is the most commonly cited example of locational prices it does not surprise me to have the sloppiness in discussions that could lead to the rumors. Martin [/INST] Category: Company Business, Strategy, etc.(elaborate in Section 3 [Topics])	<s>[INST] [/INST] Company Business, Strategy, etc.(elaborate in Section 3 [Topics]) </s>
<s>[INST] <<SYS>> I am sharing an email body with you. Based on the text in the body, you need to classify the email in one of the following eight categories: 'Company Business, Strategy, etc.'; 'Purely Personal'; 'Personal but in professional context (e.g., it was good working with you)'; 'Logistic Arrangements (meeting scheduling, technical support, etc)'; 'Employment arrangements (job seeking, hiring, recommendations, etc)'; 'Document editing/checking (collaboration)'; 'Empty message (due to missing attachment)'; 'Empty message'. <</SYS>> Mail: Houston has experienced catastrophic flooding. My flight has been cancelled. It is conceivable that I could get out tomorrow but I am wondering if I should try. I could still make the speech if we don't get more rain but given the lack of other reasons for me to go I am considering cancelling. I don't think it makes much sense for me to go for a 15 minute speech. what do you think? phone 713.621.6550 [/INST] Category: Logistic Arrangements(meeting scheduling, technical support, etc)	<s>[INST] [/INST] Logistic Arrangements(meeting scheduling, technical support, etc) </s>
<s>[INST] <<SYS>> I am sharing an email body with you. Based on the text in the body, you need to classify the email in one of the following eight categories: 'Company Business, Strategy, etc.'; 'Purely Personal'; 'Personal but in professional context (e.g., it was good working with you)'; 'Logistic Arrangements (meeting scheduling, technical support, etc)'; 'Employment arrangements (job seeking, hiring, recommendations, etc)'; 'Document editing/checking (collaboration)'; 'Empty message (due to missing attachment)'; 'Empty message'. <</SYS>> Mail: ----------------- [/INST] Category: Company Business, Strategy, etc.(elaborate in Section 3 [Topics])	<s>[INST] [/INST] Company Business, Strategy, etc.(elaborate in Section 3 [Topics]) </s>
<s>[INST] <<SYS>> I am sharing an email body with you. Based on the text in the body, you need to classify the email in one of the following eight categories: 'Company Business, Strategy, etc.'; 'Purely Personal'; 'Personal but in professional context (e.g., it was good working with you)'; 'Logistic Arrangements (meeting scheduling, technical support, etc)'; 'Employment arrangements (job seeking, hiring, recommendations, etc)'; 'Document editing/checking (collaboration)'; 'Empty message (due to missing attachment)'; 'Empty message'. <</SYS>> Mail: Never mind ... I found 'em. ----------------- [/INST] Category: Logistic Arrangements(meeting scheduling, technical support, etc)	<s>[INST] [/INST] Logistic Arrangements(meeting scheduling, technical support, etc) </s>
<s>[INST] <<SYS>> I am sharing an email body with you. Based on the text in the body, you need to classify the email in one of the following eight categories: 'Company Business, Strategy, etc.'; 'Purely Personal'; 'Personal but in professional context (e.g., it was good working with you)'; 'Logistic Arrangements (meeting scheduling, technical support, etc)'; 'Employment arrangements (job seeking, hiring, recommendations, etc)'; 'Document editing/checking (collaboration)'; 'Empty message (due to missing attachment)'; 'Empty message'. <</SYS>> Mail: George Herbert Hoover Bush. Robert Kean <rkean@starband.net> on 07/07/2001 10:13:19 AM Please respond to <rkean@starband.net> To: Alan Kean \(E-mail\) <rex04@msn.com> 'Doug & Karen Reiman \(E-mail\)' <dkreiman@mcleodusa.net> Kathy Wedig \(E-mail\) <kat.wedig@netzero.net> Melissa Kean \(E-mail\) <kean@rice.edu> Phil Kean \(E-mail\) <kean.philip@mcleodusa.net> 'Steve & Melissa Kean \(E-mail\)' <skean@enron.com> cc: Diane Kean \(E-mail 2\) <dkean@starband.net> Subject: FW: Dadisms Dadisms 1. Run for the roundhouse Nellie he'll never corner you there. 2. Slick as catshit and twice as nasty. 3. Like shit through a goose. 4. Yeah that's right keep fiddlin' with that you'll break it 5. Ho! Ho! she cried in excess wild and waved her wooden leg on high! 6. On accounta the war. 7. They'll have to shoot him on judgement day. 8. Then of course there are the names: Katy Devie My Little Mochawk Phil Jofus and Bubba 9. Choke ass (referring to peanut butter) 10. If it tastes good there are no calories 11. Didn't know you were in town (as driver passes on the right etc.) 12. Like a couple of cub bears (meaning Rob and Phil) 13. Washington D.C. District or Corruption 14. Have some onions for defense 15. He won't have the guts to do THAT again (when a bug hits the windshield) 16. Saps goin' up the tree 17. Big Al 18. Douglas Doorite 19. Must be a storm comin' the kids are actin' up 20. Constipate (concentrate) 21. Like being in hell with your back broke 22. gourd cover (hat) 23. mitts dogs paws (hands or feet) 24. you're too young 25. Worthington (when we asked him where something was or where he was going) 26. overhose (blue jeans) 27. excruciating pain! (when we squeezed his hand) 28. That's a hell of a note 29. meat wagon (ambulance) 30. drappies (drapes) 31. grappies (grapes) 32. Whoa horsie! Just cuz you only got 3 legs. (when he was putting on the brakes in the car) 33. Jeana Jeana corpastina I'm in love with you 34. I love you anyway 35. Scuse my boardin' house reach. 36. Come on out and let me lay a wheel on ya! (in traffic) 37. Sit down and start passin' (at meal time) 38. That's a bit of all right. 39. Here guard this with your life (when he handed something to us at a store) 40. SOL (shit out of luck) 41. I'll tell ya when your're 21. 42. fernilla dawberry shocoletta (vanilla strawberry chocolate) 43. straighten up now. 44. Pardon me soldier. (when he burped) 45. I'm going to assume the position of a soldier. (when he was going to lay on the couch for a nap) 46. horses doovers 47. lemon meringoo pie 48. solft 49. go ahead see if it bends (when someone pulled out in front of him) 50. Ioway State 51. Cedar Rapids Cedar Rapids come on down. Hotel Roosevelt center of town. 52. A hundred dogs going wild in the tobacco field. Does your cigarette taste difference? (a quote from the one Russian guy in Cascade) 53. Cut her loose and let her wander. 54. Get your dogs under the table. 55. Shit! cried the queen and a thousand loyal subjects strained their bowels. 56. Who's side are you on?! The power company? (when we left lights on) 57. That makes it soggy and hard to light 58. Full as a tick 59. A treat instead of a treatment 60. Intermittent Power [/INST] Category: Purely Personal	<s>[INST] [/INST] Purely Personal </s>
<s>[INST] <<SYS>> I am sharing an email body with you. Based on the text in the body, you need to classify the email in one of the following eight categories: 'Company Business, Strategy, etc.'; 'Purely Personal'; 'Personal but in professional context (e.g., it was good working with you)'; 'Logistic Arrangements (meeting scheduling, technical support, etc)'; 'Employment arrangements (job seeking, hiring, recommendations, etc)'; 'Document editing/checking (collaboration)'; 'Empty message (due to missing attachment)'; 'Empty message'. <</SYS>> Mail: With Rick Mark Lou and possibly Hillings [/INST] Category: Logistic Arrangements(meeting scheduling, technical support, etc)	<s>[INST] [/INST] Logistic Arrangements(meeting scheduling, technical support, etc) </s>
<s>[INST] <<SYS>> I am sharing an email body with you. Based on the text in the body, you need to classify the email in one of the following eight categories: 'Company Business, Strategy, etc.'; 'Purely Personal'; 'Personal but in professional context (e.g., it was good working with you)'; 'Logistic Arrangements (meeting scheduling, technical support, etc)'; 'Employment arrangements (job seeking, hiring, recommendations, etc)'; 'Document editing/checking (collaboration)'; 'Empty message (due to missing attachment)'; 'Empty message'. <</SYS>> Mail: Liz Greg: Frank Wolak from Stanford will be back in the office on Tuesday August 7. I hope to set up a meeting with him and then to finalize the meeting with Prediction Co. I shall be shooting for August 23 - 24 in view of Greg's trip on the 15th and 16th. I left a message for Norman Packard telling him that I should be able to get back to him regarding the trip to Santa Fe by Tuesday this week. The first draft of the non-disclosure agreement will be ready by Tuesday or Wednesday. Have a good trip. Vince [/INST] Category: Logistic Arrangements(meeting scheduling, technical support, etc)	<s>[INST] [/INST] Logistic Arrangements(meeting scheduling, technical support, etc) </s>
<s>[INST] <<SYS>> I am sharing an email body with you. Based on the text in the body, you need to classify the email in one of the following eight categories: 'Company Business, Strategy, etc.'; 'Purely Personal'; 'Personal but in professional context (e.g., it was good working with you)'; 'Logistic Arrangements (meeting scheduling, technical support, etc)'; 'Employment arrangements (job seeking, hiring, recommendations, etc)'; 'Document editing/checking (collaboration)'; 'Empty message (due to missing attachment)'; 'Empty message'. <</SYS>> Mail: what do you think? [/INST] Category: Company Business, Strategy, etc.(elaborate in Section 3 [Topics])	<s>[INST] [/INST] Company Business, Strategy, etc.(elaborate in Section 3 [Topics]) </s>
<s>[INST] <<SYS>> I am sharing an email body with you. Based on the text in the body, you need to classify the email in one of the following eight categories: 'Company Business, Strategy, etc.'; 'Purely Personal'; 'Personal but in professional context (e.g., it was good working with you)'; 'Logistic Arrangements (meeting scheduling, technical support, etc)'; 'Employment arrangements (job seeking, hiring, recommendations, etc)'; 'Document editing/checking (collaboration)'; 'Empty message (due to missing attachment)'; 'Empty message'. <</SYS>> Mail: Sue Landwehr in government affairs spoke to a member of the Thompson administration who indicated that the governor may be interested in talking to you about Amtrak. Specifically ECT has been working with Amtrak for quite some time on an electricity [/INST] Category: Company Business, Strategy, etc.(elaborate in Section 3 [Topics])	<s>[INST] [/INST] Company Business, Strategy, etc.(elaborate in Section 3 [Topics]) </s>
<s>[INST] <<SYS>> I am sharing an email body with you. Based on the text in the body, you need to classify the email in one of the following eight categories: 'Company Business, Strategy, etc.'; 'Purely Personal'; 'Personal but in professional context (e.g., it was good working with you)'; 'Logistic Arrangements (meeting scheduling, technical support, etc)'; 'Employment arrangements (job seeking, hiring, recommendations, etc)'; 'Document editing/checking (collaboration)'; 'Empty message (due to missing attachment)'; 'Empty message'. <</SYS>> Mail: This one is due Monday! Lots of notice. Sue Mara Enron Corp. Tel: (415) 782-7802 Fax:(415) 782-7854 [/INST] Category: Company Business, Strategy, etc.(elaborate in Section 3 [Topics])	<s>[INST] [/INST] Company Business, Strategy, etc.(elaborate in Section 3 [Topics]) </s>
<s>[INST] <<SYS>> I am sharing an email body with you. Based on the text in the body, you need to classify the email in one of the following eight categories: 'Company Business, Strategy, etc.'; 'Purely Personal'; 'Personal but in professional context (e.g., it was good working with you)'; 'Logistic Arrangements (meeting scheduling, technical support, etc)'; 'Employment arrangements (job seeking, hiring, recommendations, etc)'; 'Document editing/checking (collaboration)'; 'Empty message (due to missing attachment)'; 'Empty message'. <</SYS>> Mail: Please get available dates. I need to be there for this. ----------------- [/INST] Category: Logistic Arrangements(meeting scheduling, technical support, etc)	<s>[INST] [/INST] Logistic Arrangements(meeting scheduling, technical support, etc) </s>
<s>[INST] <<SYS>> I am sharing an email body with you. Based on the text in the body, you need to classify the email in one of the following eight categories: 'Company Business, Strategy, etc.'; 'Purely Personal'; 'Personal but in professional context (e.g., it was good working with you)'; 'Logistic Arrangements (meeting scheduling, technical support, etc)'; 'Employment arrangements (job seeking, hiring, recommendations, etc)'; 'Document editing/checking (collaboration)'; 'Empty message (due to missing attachment)'; 'Empty message'. <</SYS>> Mail: It's hard to formulate a position without more of the specifics but I think our message should generally be: We support providing immediate rate relief to small residential customers. We believe that relief is best provided by giving San Diego the ability to procure power on a fixed price basis from the market. San Diego has offers in front of it now those should be evaluated and the legislature and the commission should give San Diego the flexibility to accept one or more of them. This is sounder than running huge deferrals (deficits) to be later recovered from consumers. Rate relief should be accompanied by real reform. Rate caps have bad long term consequences: they cause shortages. Combining short-medium term rate relief with expedited siting of new facilities will address the near term problem while laying the proper groundwork for a long term solution. Bruno Gaillard@EES 08/24/2000 11:08 AM To: Edward Hamb/HOU/EES@EES Jennifer Rudolph/HOU/EES@EES Chris Hendrix/HOU/EES@EES Greg Cordell/HOU/EES@EES Harold G Buchanan/HOU/EES@EES Martin Wenzel/SFO/HOU/EES@EES Douglas Condon/SFO/EES@EES James M Wood/HOU/EES@EES Gary Mirich/HOU/EES@EES Dennis Benevides/HOU/EES@EES Roger Yang/SFO/EES@EES David Parquet@ECT mday@gmssr.com SF Directors Paul Kaufman/PDX/ECT@ECT Marcie Milner/Corp/Enron@ENRON Mary Hain@Enron Harry Kingerski/HOU/EES@EES James D Steffes/HOU/EES@EES Richard Shapiro/HOU/EES@EES Peggy Mahoney/HOU/EES@EES Karen Denne@Enron Mark Palmer/Corp/Enron@ENRON Steven J Kean/NA/Enron@Enron Christopher F Calger/PDX/ECT@ECT cc: Subject: Daily Update / Legislative Update - 8/23/00 This email reflects today's events in Sacramento. The information provided is subject to change because of constant flux. However it is important for us to provide this information for feedback and to caution as to new regulations that may affect some deals in the making . Governor Davis Assembly Women Susan Davis and Senator Alpert had a press conference. They will introduce a rate/bill stabilization plan for SDG&E and an expediting siting bill. There is no language as of yet. Although there is no specific language the following elements may be included: The stabilization plan will be applicable to residential and probably commercial customers in SDG&E The bill cap may be set at $68 for residential. The cap will be in place until the end of 2002 There will be language on expediting siting for generation plants Sam Wehn and Sandra McCubbin have been talking with the CEC executive director and several legislators about the siting portion of the bill. Any comments as to the bill cap proposal? [/INST] Category: Company Business, Strategy, etc.(elaborate in Section 3 [Topics])	<s>[INST] [/INST] Company Business, Strategy, etc.(elaborate in Section 3 [Topics]) </s>
<s>[INST] <<SYS>> I am sharing an email body with you. Based on the text in the body, you need to classify the email in one of the following eight categories: 'Company Business, Strategy, etc.'; 'Purely Personal'; 'Personal but in professional context (e.g., it was good working with you)'; 'Logistic Arrangements (meeting scheduling, technical support, etc)'; 'Employment arrangements (job seeking, hiring, recommendations, etc)'; 'Document editing/checking (collaboration)'; 'Empty message (due to missing attachment)'; 'Empty message'. <</SYS>> Mail: pena - 1:30 Spurling @11:15 and D'Amato @12:00 11:15 D'Amato 12:00 Sperling 1:30 Pena meeting - Tentative 3:30 Janel Guerrero Flying up on company plane. [/INST] Category: Logistic Arrangements(meeting scheduling, technical support, etc)	<s>[INST] [/INST] Logistic Arrangements(meeting scheduling, technical support, etc) </s>
<s>[INST] <<SYS>> I am sharing an email body with you. Based on the text in the body, you need to classify the email in one of the following eight categories: 'Company Business, Strategy, etc.'; 'Purely Personal'; 'Personal but in professional context (e.g., it was good working with you)'; 'Logistic Arrangements (meeting scheduling, technical support, etc)'; 'Employment arrangements (job seeking, hiring, recommendations, etc)'; 'Document editing/checking (collaboration)'; 'Empty message (due to missing attachment)'; 'Empty message'. <</SYS>> Mail: See first item below [/INST] Category: Company Business, Strategy, etc.(elaborate in Section 3 [Topics])	<s>[INST] [/INST] Company Business, Strategy, etc.(elaborate in Section 3 [Topics]) </s>
<s>[INST] <<SYS>> I am sharing an email body with you. Based on the text in the body, you need to classify the email in one of the following eight categories: 'Company Business, Strategy, etc.'; 'Purely Personal'; 'Personal but in professional context (e.g., it was good working with you)'; 'Logistic Arrangements (meeting scheduling, technical support, etc)'; 'Employment arrangements (job seeking, hiring, recommendations, etc)'; 'Document editing/checking (collaboration)'; 'Empty message (due to missing attachment)'; 'Empty message'. <</SYS>> Mail: I didn't sell any right? ----------------- [/INST] Category: Company Business, Strategy, etc.(elaborate in Section 3 [Topics])	<s>[INST] [/INST] Company Business, Strategy, etc.(elaborate in Section 3 [Topics]) </s>
<s>[INST] <<SYS>> I am sharing an email body with you. Based on the text in the body, you need to classify the email in one of the following eight categories: 'Company Business, Strategy, etc.'; 'Purely Personal'; 'Personal but in professional context (e.g., it was good working with you)'; 'Logistic Arrangements (meeting scheduling, technical support, etc)'; 'Employment arrangements (job seeking, hiring, recommendations, etc)'; 'Document editing/checking (collaboration)'; 'Empty message (due to missing attachment)'; 'Empty message'. <</SYS>> Mail: The EPSA leg. affairs cmt. met today during the fall meeting. The speakers were Howard Useem Republican counsel to the Senate Energy Committee and Jimmy Glotfelty senior policy advisory to the Secretary of Energy. Useem said Senate Energy Committee Republicans were meeting later this morning to finalize their energy proposal. (We later learned that they opted against including any electricity provisions not even the PURPA PUHCA and reliability issues that Howard thought might be included when he spoke before the senators met this is good news since it makes it less likely that anti-FERC provisions will be added.) (Howard said now is the best time to legislative on electricity because the Supreme Court has not yet acted on the bundling/unbundling issue.) On RTOs in some what of a surprise Useem said that there is general support among Senate Republicans for RTOs including consolidating them into a few RTOs of large scope (surprising since this is not what we have heard in meetings with individual Senate offices). While he said that he also said that support is stronger in the abstract than in specifics. He said the biggest opposition was coming from very vocal state regulators (EPSA staff did a good job of pointing to state regulators mainly in the Midwest who support larger RTOs). Most importantly Howard said none of the senators on his committee take a not over my dead body approach to RTOs. Jimmy Glotfelty explained to several EPSA members who asked questions just why it is that the Administration wants Congress to be silent on RTOs. He said while they would prefer a sentence or two affirming FERC's authority they do not believe this is what would come out of the legislative process. They are not willing to run that risk. He stressed that the president wants to include other electricity issues. He said they were very close to an agreement with Western governors on regional transmission siting. Jimmy further said that the Administration also wants silence on incentive rates another issue where FERC can act now. They continue to talk to Barton and his staff in an attempt to get them to back away from the restrictive approach to RTOs in the Barton discussion draft. (He said Pat Wood spent several hours with Barton and other House committee staff yesterday.) Of concern Jimmy said something like could be 4 RTOs could be 8 RTOs what is important is getting standard design. He also said DOE will make sure that PMAs are included in RTOs. [/INST] Category: Company Business, Strategy, etc.(elaborate in Section 3 [Topics])	<s>[INST] [/INST] Company Business, Strategy, etc.(elaborate in Section 3 [Topics]) </s>
<s>[INST] <<SYS>> I am sharing an email body with you. Based on the text in the body, you need to classify the email in one of the following eight categories: 'Company Business, Strategy, etc.'; 'Purely Personal'; 'Personal but in professional context (e.g., it was good working with you)'; 'Logistic Arrangements (meeting scheduling, technical support, etc)'; 'Employment arrangements (job seeking, hiring, recommendations, etc)'; 'Document editing/checking (collaboration)'; 'Empty message (due to missing attachment)'; 'Empty message'. <</SYS>> Mail: I am having lunch on Monday with Michael Isikoff a newsweek investigative reporter. He is doing yet another Ken Lay/Enron political influence story. One of the things he wants to talk about though -- and I think this is a good sign -- is Enron's climate change policy and how it compares to the administration's. What I need from you as soon as possible is a timeline (what the Administration said when -- doesn't have to be down to the day) the Administrations position and our position (and how they differ). Borrow heavily from existing materials. [/INST] Category: Company Business, Strategy, etc.(elaborate in Section 3 [Topics])	<s>[INST] [/INST] Company Business, Strategy, etc.(elaborate in Section 3 [Topics]) </s>
<s>[INST] <<SYS>> I am sharing an email body with you. Based on the text in the body, you need to classify the email in one of the following eight categories: 'Company Business, Strategy, etc.'; 'Purely Personal'; 'Personal but in professional context (e.g., it was good working with you)'; 'Logistic Arrangements (meeting scheduling, technical support, etc)'; 'Employment arrangements (job seeking, hiring, recommendations, etc)'; 'Document editing/checking (collaboration)'; 'Empty message (due to missing attachment)'; 'Empty message'. <</SYS>> Mail: prepare for my siganture. cc Lisa ----------------- [/INST] Category: Logistic Arrangements(meeting scheduling, technical support, etc)	<s>[INST] [/INST] Logistic Arrangements(meeting scheduling, technical support, etc) </s>
<s>[INST] <<SYS>> I am sharing an email body with you. Based on the text in the body, you need to classify the email in one of the following eight categories: 'Company Business, Strategy, etc.'; 'Purely Personal'; 'Personal but in professional context (e.g., it was good working with you)'; 'Logistic Arrangements (meeting scheduling, technical support, etc)'; 'Employment arrangements (job seeking, hiring, recommendations, etc)'; 'Document editing/checking (collaboration)'; 'Empty message (due to missing attachment)'; 'Empty message'. <</SYS>> Mail: Shanna I'm supportive of the raise to $150k. I think he is doing a good job and has a lot of value. He didn't fair well during the ranking due to lack of big $ or closure but maybe this will send him a good message. Thanks m [/INST] Category: Personal but in professional context(e.g., it was good working with you)	<s>[INST] [/INST] Personal but in professional context(e.g., it was good working with you) </s>
<s>[INST] <<SYS>> I am sharing an email body with you. Based on the text in the body, you need to classify the email in one of the following eight categories: 'Company Business, Strategy, etc.'; 'Purely Personal'; 'Personal but in professional context (e.g., it was good working with you)'; 'Logistic Arrangements (meeting scheduling, technical support, etc)'; 'Employment arrangements (job seeking, hiring, recommendations, etc)'; 'Document editing/checking (collaboration)'; 'Empty message (due to missing attachment)'; 'Empty message'. <</SYS>> Mail: JBennett <JBennett@GMSSR.com> 05/18/2001 01:25 PM To: Robert Williams (E-mail) Richard Sanders (E-mail) Mike Smith (E-mail) <msmith1@enron.com> Dennis Benevides (E-mail) <dbenevid@enron.com> George Phillips (E-mail) <gphillip@enron.com> cc: MDay <MDay@GMSSR.com> Subject: SCE Counter Claim -- Underreporting of Volumes -- Confidential -- Attorney Work Product After speaking with George Phillips yesterday about SCE's counterclaim against EES and EEMC regarding underreporting of usage to the ISO I think there may be some internal confusion (of which I may have contributed to) about the nature of SCE's counterclaim. As I understand from my review of certain documents received from SCE in response to our data requests review of an Executive Summary prepared by George Phillips on the issue and from my conversation with him yesterday EES and EEMC as a result of some problems with their settlement system did indeed underreport customers' usage to the ISO during the time period claimed by SCE. This has I believe resulted in two separate (although interrelated) points of contention with SCE -- of which only one is the subject matter of its counterclaim. First the underreporting resulted in Unaccounted For Energy (UFE) charges to the market. In correspondence sent by SCE to EEMC and EES during the last quarter of 2001 it appears that SCE was calculating the cost to the market from the EES/EEMC underreporting by applying the hourly day ahead market clearing price to the individual hourly variances. This cost to the market is overestimated however as SCE failed to take into account the fact that the ISO nets underreported amounts against overreported accounts to get a net amount of underreporting. This underreported amount is then allocated to all providers of physical load within a service territory through the assessment of UFE charges. Thus whatever the ultimate cost was determined to be SCE would not be allocated the entire amount. Second the underreporting of usage to the ISO results according to SCE in SCE paying EES and EEMC a PX credit for energy they never purchased. This claim is separate and apart from what SCE claims EES/EEMC cost the market in the way of UFE charges. What SCE is saying is that it believes that EES and EEMC only purchased on behalf of their customers the amount of energy which they reported to the ISO. EES' and EEMC's customers actually used more than the amount which EES and EEMC reported. SCE calculated the PX credit based on the amount used not reported. It is SCE's claim that EES and EEMC are not entitled to a PX credit on the delta as the market not EES and EEMC purchased those volumes. It is only the second point of contention which is the subject matter of SCE's counterclaim. SCE is alleging that it should not have to pay a PX credit to EES and EEMC for volumes that EES and EEMC did not purchase. SCE is claiming that we only purchased the amount we reported to the ISO. While SCE may believe that it should not have to pay any UFE charges as the result of EES/EEMC underreporting the UFE charges are not the basis of its counterclaim. Based on the above analysis I think that the most critical piece of information to refute the counterclaim is that despite the underreporting of volumes to the ISO EES and EEMC actually purchased on behalf of their DA customers those customers' full usage. Can we make such claim? and do we have data to back it up? Jeanne Bennett [/INST] Category: Company Business, Strategy, etc.(elaborate in Section 3 [Topics])	<s>[INST] [/INST] Company Business, Strategy, etc.(elaborate in Section 3 [Topics]) </s>
<s>[INST] <<SYS>> I am sharing an email body with you. Based on the text in the body, you need to classify the email in one of the following eight categories: 'Company Business, Strategy, etc.'; 'Purely Personal'; 'Personal but in professional context (e.g., it was good working with you)'; 'Logistic Arrangements (meeting scheduling, technical support, etc)'; 'Employment arrangements (job seeking, hiring, recommendations, etc)'; 'Document editing/checking (collaboration)'; 'Empty message (due to missing attachment)'; 'Empty message'. <</SYS>> Mail: Thanks for the note. I am forwarding it on to our analyst and associate recruiting program leaders. We may have already filled the summer spots (we also cut down the number a bit this year to ensure a higher quality experience) but we will be out looking for a large number of permanent hires in the Fall. Severin Borenstein <borenste@Haas.Berkeley.EDU> 03/31/2001 06:00 PM To: Steve Kean <skean@enron.com> cc: James Bushnell <jimb@IEOR.Berkeley.EDU> Subject: Job candidates for Enron Dear Steve: Jim Bushnell and I are teaching a course called Energy Market Strategies and Policies this semester. The course is cross-listed between the Haas School of Business and the Energy & Resources Group at UC Berkeley. The syllabus for the course is attached. We have 43 graduate students in the course most pursuing a masters degree in business or energy & resources though there are also a few PhD students. These are very smart students -- many of whom already have experience in the energy industries -- and we believe the course puts them in a position to immediately contribute to any energy-related organization that they would join. Many of these students are interested in either summer or permanent employment starting as early as May. If Enron has openings that you would like to advertise to these students please send me the job description (or the URL for it)and I can forward it to the class list. Jim and I think this is a very strong class and many of the students are interested in making a career in either the business or the public policy side of the energy industry. We're hoping to provide the connections to help make sure they find the best job matches possible. Sincerely Severin Severin Borenstein E.T. Grether Professor of Business Administration and Public Policy Director Haas School of Business U.C. Energy Institute University of California 2539 Channing Way Berkeley CA 94720-1900 Berkeley CA 94720-5180 (p) 510-642-3689 (p) 510-642-5145 (f) 707-885-2508 http://www.ucei.org Email: borenste@haas.berkeley.edu WWW: - EnergyMarketsSyllabus.pdf [/INST] Category: Employment arrangements(job seeking, hiring, recommendations, etc)	<s>[INST] [/INST] Employment arrangements(job seeking, hiring, recommendations, etc) </s>
<s>[INST] <<SYS>> I am sharing an email body with you. Based on the text in the body, you need to classify the email in one of the following eight categories: 'Company Business, Strategy, etc.'; 'Purely Personal'; 'Personal but in professional context (e.g., it was good working with you)'; 'Logistic Arrangements (meeting scheduling, technical support, etc)'; 'Employment arrangements (job seeking, hiring, recommendations, etc)'; 'Document editing/checking (collaboration)'; 'Empty message (due to missing attachment)'; 'Empty message'. <</SYS>> Mail: what does the siting bill provide for? Mona L Petrochko@EES 08/29/2000 04:38 PM To: Douglas Condon/SFO/EES@EES Martin Wenzel/SFO/HOU/EES@EES James M Wood/HOU/EES@EES Dennis Benevides/HOU/EES@EES Greg Cordell Roger Yang Edward Hamb/HOU/EES@EES Peggy Mahoney/HOU/EES@EES Karen Denne@Enron Mark Palmer/Corp/Enron@ENRON cc: James D Steffes/HOU/EES@EES West GA Richard Shapiro/HOU/EES@EES Steven J Kean/NA/Enron@Enron Mary Hain@Enron Subject: Senate passes Alper/Davis Bill 30-0 AB 265 passed through the Senate a few minutes ago. It now must go to the Assembly where there is still a lot of uncertainty about what changes the Assembly will want to the bill. We still haven't seen the latest republican language. Also AB 265 is double joined to AB 970 controversial siting bill. To the extent one or the other fails they both fail. AB 265 (Davis/Alpert) has: 1. a 6.5 cent/kWh energy rate cap through 2002 with potential extension through 2003. 2. Applicable to residential small commercial (up to 100 kW) 3. Opt-in provision for large industrial/agricultural customers at 6.5 cents with an annual true-up 4. Use of revenues from utility generation assets (including PPA) to offset undercollections. 5. Reasonableness review for San Diego G&E Will update with more information as available. No news about SCE. [/INST] Category: Company Business, Strategy, etc.(elaborate in Section 3 [Topics])	<s>[INST] [/INST] Company Business, Strategy, etc.(elaborate in Section 3 [Topics]) </s>
<s>[INST] <<SYS>> I am sharing an email body with you. Based on the text in the body, you need to classify the email in one of the following eight categories: 'Company Business, Strategy, etc.'; 'Purely Personal'; 'Personal but in professional context (e.g., it was good working with you)'; 'Logistic Arrangements (meeting scheduling, technical support, etc)'; 'Employment arrangements (job seeking, hiring, recommendations, etc)'; 'Document editing/checking (collaboration)'; 'Empty message (due to missing attachment)'; 'Empty message'. <</SYS>> Mail: Ehud Sorry for the delay in replying to your message. I was on the road a lot. I am in London right now and plan to attend the conference. I am leaving on Saturday morning for Houston. I have asked Shirley to get tickets for one of the evening you mentioned. I should know by Thursday if the tickets are available. Vince [/INST] Category: Personal but in professional context(e.g., it was good working with you)	<s>[INST] [/INST] Personal but in professional context(e.g., it was good working with you) </s>
<s>[INST] <<SYS>> I am sharing an email body with you. Based on the text in the body, you need to classify the email in one of the following eight categories: 'Company Business, Strategy, etc.'; 'Purely Personal'; 'Personal but in professional context (e.g., it was good working with you)'; 'Logistic Arrangements (meeting scheduling, technical support, etc)'; 'Employment arrangements (job seeking, hiring, recommendations, etc)'; 'Document editing/checking (collaboration)'; 'Empty message (due to missing attachment)'; 'Empty message'. <</SYS>> Mail: See attached From: Karen Denne/ENRON@enronXgate on 07/12/2001 08:33 PM To: Jim Fallon/Enron Communications@Enron Communications Ken Rice/Enron Communications@Enron Communications cc: Mark Palmer/ENRON@enronXgate Steven J Kean/NA/Enron@Enron Kelly Kimberly/Enron Communications@Enron Communications Subject: EBS Article for eBiz Jim and Ken -- Attached is an article for eBiz (our biweekly online newsletter) which we are scheduled to launch at 7:30 a.m. Friday. Kelly Kimberly has reviewed it but has asked that you view the article as well. Since only EBS employees received your memo about the restructuring -- and the rest of the employees did not receive any communication -- it is extremely important to provide information through this vehicle. Please let me know of your approval or if you have any questions. Thank you. Karen x39757 [/INST] Category: Document editing/checking(collaboration)	<s>[INST] [/INST] Document editing/checking(collaboration) </s>
<s>[INST] <<SYS>> I am sharing an email body with you. Based on the text in the body, you need to classify the email in one of the following eight categories: 'Company Business, Strategy, etc.'; 'Purely Personal'; 'Personal but in professional context (e.g., it was good working with you)'; 'Logistic Arrangements (meeting scheduling, technical support, etc)'; 'Employment arrangements (job seeking, hiring, recommendations, etc)'; 'Document editing/checking (collaboration)'; 'Empty message (due to missing attachment)'; 'Empty message'. <</SYS>> Mail: Just a heads up ... Ken may get a call from Gov Gilmore regarding the Republican Governors' Association. Below are Sue Landwehr's recommendations (with which I concur). Let me know if he calls and let us know if you need any additional information. [/INST] Category: Company Business, Strategy, etc.(elaborate in Section 3 [Topics])	<s>[INST] [/INST] Company Business, Strategy, etc.(elaborate in Section 3 [Topics]) </s>
<s>[INST] <<SYS>> I am sharing an email body with you. Based on the text in the body, you need to classify the email in one of the following eight categories: 'Company Business, Strategy, etc.'; 'Purely Personal'; 'Personal but in professional context (e.g., it was good working with you)'; 'Logistic Arrangements (meeting scheduling, technical support, etc)'; 'Employment arrangements (job seeking, hiring, recommendations, etc)'; 'Document editing/checking (collaboration)'; 'Empty message (due to missing attachment)'; 'Empty message'. <</SYS>> Mail: Except that my understanding of the SCE model is that the CTC structure will continue beyond 3/31/02 (and may then apply for PG&E). I agree that if you were to go to a bottom's up it would require the CPUC to put in place a surcharge for remaining stranded costs (non-generation for example QFs) and a second surcharge for Negative CTC overpayment. Key question is who will pay the Negative CTC overpayment? On trying to understand the PX Credit algorithim my concern is that to understand how much the overpayment was during Oct - Feb we need to understand how costs hit the structure during that time period. Otherwise we don't know what form or amount of discount is required in the Settlement talks. Jim [/INST] Category: Company Business, Strategy, etc.(elaborate in Section 3 [Topics])	<s>[INST] [/INST] Company Business, Strategy, etc.(elaborate in Section 3 [Topics]) </s>
<s>[INST] <<SYS>> I am sharing an email body with you. Based on the text in the body, you need to classify the email in one of the following eight categories: 'Company Business, Strategy, etc.'; 'Purely Personal'; 'Personal but in professional context (e.g., it was good working with you)'; 'Logistic Arrangements (meeting scheduling, technical support, etc)'; 'Employment arrangements (job seeking, hiring, recommendations, etc)'; 'Document editing/checking (collaboration)'; 'Empty message (due to missing attachment)'; 'Empty message'. <</SYS>> Mail: I think you or someone in your group should cover this. The attendees are operations focussed and may be interested in issues such as siting interconnection and environmental issues. Also from a more macro perspective what kinds of demands the new industry structure may place on operators -- the importance of flexibility in asset operations (ie the premium the market will place on quick response) or the challenges of different scheduling regimes between the gas and power markets. ----------------- [/INST] Category: Company Business, Strategy, etc.(elaborate in Section 3 [Topics])	<s>[INST] [/INST] Company Business, Strategy, etc.(elaborate in Section 3 [Topics]) </s>
<s>[INST] <<SYS>> I am sharing an email body with you. Based on the text in the body, you need to classify the email in one of the following eight categories: 'Company Business, Strategy, etc.'; 'Purely Personal'; 'Personal but in professional context (e.g., it was good working with you)'; 'Logistic Arrangements (meeting scheduling, technical support, etc)'; 'Employment arrangements (job seeking, hiring, recommendations, etc)'; 'Document editing/checking (collaboration)'; 'Empty message (due to missing attachment)'; 'Empty message'. <</SYS>> Mail: Aruna No address was attached. Vince [/INST] Category: Company Business, Strategy, etc.(elaborate in Section 3 [Topics])	<s>[INST] [/INST] Company Business, Strategy, etc.(elaborate in Section 3 [Topics]) </s>