Split (1)

train · 5.95k rows

answer stringlengths 1 13	problem stringlengths 666 16.3k	__index_level_0__ int64 0 5.98k
16.63%	Given the context, answer the question. Context: mutual and pooled funds shares of mutual funds are valued at the net asset value ( nav ) quoted on the exchange where the fund is traded and are classified as level 1 assets . units of pooled funds are valued at the per unit nav determined by the fund manager and are classified as level 2 assets . the investments are utilizing nav as a practical expedient for fair value . corporate and government bonds corporate and government bonds are classified as level 2 assets , as they are either valued at quoted market prices from observable pricing sources at the reporting date or valued based upon comparable securities with similar yields and credit ratings . mortgage and asset-backed securities mortgage and asset 2013backed securities are classified as level 2 assets , as they are either valued at quoted market prices from observable pricing sources at the reporting date or valued based upon comparable securities with similar yields , credit ratings , and purpose of the underlying loan . real estate pooled funds real estate pooled funds are classified as level 3 assets , as they are carried at the estimated fair value of the underlying properties . estimated fair value is calculated utilizing a combination of key inputs , such as revenue and expense growth rates , terminal capitalization rates , and discount rates . these key inputs are consistent with practices prevailing within the real estate investment management industry . other pooled funds other pooled funds classified as level 2 assets are valued at the nav of the shares held at year end , which is based on the fair value of the underlying investments . securities and interests classified as level 3 are carried at the estimated fair value of the underlying investments . the underlying investments are valued based on bids from brokers or other third-party vendor sources that utilize expected cash flow streams and other uncorroborated data , including counterparty credit quality , default risk , discount rates , and the overall capital market liquidity . insurance contracts insurance contracts are classified as level 3 assets , as they are carried at contract value , which approximates the estimated fair value . the estimated fair value is based on the fair value of the underlying investment of the insurance company . contributions and projected benefit payments pension contributions to funded plans and benefit payments for unfunded plans for fiscal year 2015 were $ 137.5 . contributions resulted primarily from an assessment of long-term funding requirements of the plans and tax planning . benefit payments to unfunded plans were due primarily to the timing of retirements and cost reduction actions . we anticipate contributing $ 100 to $ 120 to the defined benefit pension plans in 2016 . these contributions are driven primarily by benefit payments for unfunded plans , which are dependent upon timing of retirements and actions to reorganize the business . projected benefit payments , which reflect expected future service , are as follows: . \| u.s . \| international 2016 \| $ 129.0 \| $ 52.0 2017 \| 135.8 \| 53.5 2018 \| 142.2 \| 55.3 2019 \| 149.6 \| 57.5 2020 \| 157.4 \| 57.8 2021 20132025 \| 917.9 \| 332.3 these estimated benefit payments are based on assumptions about future events . actual benefit payments may vary significantly from these estimates. . Question: c o n s i d e r i n g t h e a v e r a g e f o r t h e y e a r s 2 0 2 1 - 2 0 2 5 , w h a t i s t h e i n c r e a s e o b s e r v e d i n t h e p r o j e c t e d b e n e f i t p a y m e n t s f o r t h e u . s d u r i n g 2 0 2 0 a n d 2 0 2 1 ?	4,931
3.33	Given the context, answer the question. Context: incremental contract start-up costs 2014large municipal contract . during 2018 and 2017 , we incurred costs of $ 5.7 million and $ 8.2 million , respectively , related to the implementation of a large municipal contract . these costs did not meet the capitalization criteria prescribed by the new revenue recognition standard . adoption of the tax act . the tax act was enacted on december 22 , 2017 . among other things , the tax act reduced the u.s . federal corporate tax rate from 35% ( 35 % ) to 21% ( 21 % ) . for the year ended december 31 , 2017 , we recorded provisional amounts based on our estimates of the tax act 2019s effect to our deferred taxes , uncertain tax positions , and one-time transition tax . these adjustments reduced our tax provision by $ 463.9 million . during 2018 , we adjusted the provisional amounts recorded as of december 31 , 2017 for the one-time transition tax , deferred taxes and uncertain tax positions . these adjustments increased our tax provision by $ 0.3 million . bridgeton insurance recovery , net . during 2018 , we collected an insurance recovery of $ 40.0 million related to our closed bridgeton landfill in missouri , which we recognized as a reduction of remediation expenses in our cost of operations . in addition , we incurred $ 12.0 million of incremental costs attributable to the bridgeton insurance recovery . recent developments 2019 financial guidance in 2019 , we will continue to focus on managing the controllable aspects of our business by enhancing the quality of our revenue , investing in profitable growth opportunities and reducing costs . our team remains focused on executing our strategy to deliver consistent earnings and free cash flow growth , and improve return on invested capital . we are committed to an efficient capital structure , maintaining our investment grade credit ratings and increasing cash returned to our shareholders . our guidance is based on current economic conditions and does not assume any significant changes in the overall economy in 2019 . specific guidance follows : revenue we expect 2019 revenue to increase by approximately 4.25 to 4.75% ( 4.75 % ) comprised of the following : increase ( decrease ) . \| increase ( decrease ) average yield \| 2.75% ( 2.75 % ) volume \| 0.0 to 0.25 energy services \| 2013 fuel recovery fees \| 0.25 recycling processing and commodity sales \| 0.25 to 0.5 acquisitions / divestitures net \| 1.0 total change \| 4.25 to 4.75% ( 4.75 % ) changes in price are restricted on approximately 50% ( 50 % ) of our annual service revenue . the majority of these restricted pricing arrangements are tied to fluctuations in a specific index ( primarily a consumer price index ) as defined in the contract . the consumer price index varies from a single historical stated period of time or an average of trailing historical rates over a stated period of time . in addition , the initial effect of pricing resets typically lags 6 to 12 months from the end of the index measurement period to the date the revised pricing goes into effect . as a result , current changes in a specific index may not manifest themselves in our reported pricing for several quarters into the future. . Question: w h a t i s t h e r a t i o o f t h e i n s u r a n c e r e c o v e r y t o t h e i n c r e m e n t a l c o s t r e l a t e d t o o u r c l o s e d b r i d g e t o n l a n d f i l l	4,932
3633	Given the context, answer the question. Context: period . the discount reflects our incremental borrowing rate , which matches the lifetime of the liability . significant changes in the discount rate selected or the estimations of sublease income in the case of leases could impact the amounts recorded . other associated costs with restructuring activities we recognize other costs associated with restructuring activities as they are incurred , including moving costs and consulting and legal fees . pensions we sponsor defined benefit pension plans throughout the world . our most significant plans are located in the u.s. , the u.k. , the netherlands and canada . our significant u.s. , u.k . and canadian pension plans are closed to new entrants . we have ceased crediting future benefits relating to salary and service for our u.s. , u.k . and canadian plans . recognition of gains and losses and prior service certain changes in the value of the obligation and in the value of plan assets , which may occur due to various factors such as changes in the discount rate and actuarial assumptions , actual demographic experience and/or plan asset performance are not immediately recognized in net income . such changes are recognized in other comprehensive income and are amortized into net income as part of the net periodic benefit cost . unrecognized gains and losses that have been deferred in other comprehensive income , as previously described , are amortized into compensation and benefits expense as a component of periodic pension expense based on the average expected future service of active employees for our plans in the netherlands and canada , or the average life expectancy of the u.s . and u.k . plan members . after the effective date of the plan amendments to cease crediting future benefits relating to service , unrecognized gains and losses are also be based on the average life expectancy of members in the canadian plans . we amortize any prior service expense or credits that arise as a result of plan changes over a period consistent with the amortization of gains and losses . as of december 31 , 2013 , our pension plans have deferred losses that have not yet been recognized through income in the consolidated financial statements . we amortize unrecognized actuarial losses outside of a corridor , which is defined as 10% ( 10 % ) of the greater of market-related value of plan assets or projected benefit obligation . to the extent not offset by future gains , incremental amortization as calculated above will continue to affect future pension expense similarly until fully amortized . the following table discloses our combined experience loss , the number of years over which we are amortizing the experience loss , and the estimated 2014 amortization of loss by country ( amounts in millions ) : . \| u.k . \| u.s . \| other combined experience loss \| $ 2012 \| $ 1219 \| $ 402 amortization period ( in years ) \| 29 \| 26 \| 11 - 23 estimated 2014 amortization of loss \| $ 53 \| $ 44 \| $ 10 the unrecognized prior service cost at december 31 , 2013 was $ 27 million in the u.k . and other plans . for the u.s . pension plans we use a market-related valuation of assets approach to determine the expected return on assets , which is a component of net periodic benefit cost recognized in the consolidated statements of income . this approach recognizes 20% ( 20 % ) of any gains or losses in the current year's value of market-related assets , with the remaining 80% ( 80 % ) spread over the next four years . as this approach recognizes gains or losses over a five-year period , the future value of assets and therefore , our net periodic benefit cost will be impacted as previously deferred gains or losses are recorded . as of december 31 , 2013 , the market-related value of assets was $ 1.8 billion . we do not use the market-related valuation approach to determine the funded status of the u.s . plans recorded in the consolidated statements of financial position . instead , we record and present the funded status in the consolidated statements of financial position based on the fair value of the plan assets . as of december 31 , 2013 , the fair value of plan assets was $ 1.9 billion . our non-u.s . plans use fair value to determine expected return on assets. . Question: i n 2 0 1 4 w h a t w a s t h e c o m b i n e d t o t a l e x p e r i e n c e l o s s	4,933
72%	Given the context, answer the question. Context: icos corporation on january 29 , 2007 , we acquired all of the outstanding common stock of icos corporation ( icos ) , our partner in the lilly icos llc joint venture for the manufacture and sale of cialis for the treatment of erectile dysfunction . the acquisition brought the full value of cialis to us and enabled us to realize operational effi ciencies in the further development , marketing , and selling of this product . the aggregate cash purchase price of approximately $ 2.3 bil- lion was fi nanced through borrowings . the acquisition has been accounted for as a business combination under the purchase method of accounting , resulting in goodwill of $ 646.7 million . no portion of this goodwill was deductible for tax purposes . we determined the following estimated fair values for the assets acquired and liabilities assumed as of the date of acquisition . estimated fair value at january 29 , 2007 . cash and short-term investments \| $ 197.7 developed product technology ( cialis ) 1 \| 1659.9 tax benefit of net operating losses \| 404.1 goodwill \| 646.7 long-term debt assumed \| -275.6 ( 275.6 ) deferred taxes \| -583.5 ( 583.5 ) other assets and liabilities 2014 net \| -32.1 ( 32.1 ) acquired in-process research and development \| 303.5 total purchase price \| $ 2320.7 1this intangible asset will be amortized over the remaining expected patent lives of cialis in each country ; patent expiry dates range from 2015 to 2017 . new indications for and formulations of the cialis compound in clinical testing at the time of the acquisition represented approximately 48 percent of the estimated fair value of the acquired ipr&d . the remaining value of acquired ipr&d represented several other products in development , with no one asset comprising a signifi cant por- tion of this value . the discount rate we used in valuing the acquired ipr&d projects was 20 percent , and the charge for acquired ipr&d of $ 303.5 million recorded in the fi rst quarter of 2007 was not deductible for tax purposes . other acquisitions during the second quarter of 2007 , we acquired all of the outstanding stock of both hypnion , inc . ( hypnion ) , a privately held neuroscience drug discovery company focused on sleep disorders , and ivy animal health , inc . ( ivy ) , a privately held applied research and pharmaceutical product development company focused on the animal health industry , for $ 445.0 million in cash . the acquisition of hypnion provided us with a broader and more substantive presence in the area of sleep disorder research and ownership of hy10275 , a novel phase ii compound with a dual mechanism of action aimed at promoting better sleep onset and sleep maintenance . this was hypnion 2019s only signifi cant asset . for this acquisi- tion , we recorded an acquired ipr&d charge of $ 291.1 million , which was not deductible for tax purposes . because hypnion was a development-stage company , the transaction was accounted for as an acquisition of assets rather than as a business combination and , therefore , goodwill was not recorded . the acquisition of ivy provides us with products that complement those of our animal health business . this acquisition has been accounted for as a business combination under the purchase method of accounting . we allocated $ 88.7 million of the purchase price to other identifi able intangible assets , primarily related to marketed products , $ 37.0 million to acquired ipr&d , and $ 25.0 million to goodwill . the other identifi able intangible assets are being amortized over their estimated remaining useful lives of 10 to 20 years . the $ 37.0 million allocated to acquired ipr&d was charged to expense in the second quarter of 2007 . goodwill resulting from this acquisition was fully allocated to the animal health business segment . the amount allocated to each of the intangible assets acquired , including goodwill of $ 25.0 million and the acquired ipr&d of $ 37.0 million , was deductible for tax purposes . product acquisitions in june 2008 , we entered into a licensing and development agreement with transpharma medical ltd . ( trans- pharma ) to acquire rights to its product and related drug delivery system for the treatment of osteoporosis . the product , which is administered transdermally using transpharma 2019s proprietary technology , was in phase ii clinical testing , and had no alternative future use . under the arrangement , we also gained non-exclusive access to trans- pharma 2019s viaderm drug delivery system for the product . as with many development-phase products , launch of the . Question: w h a t p e r c e n t a g e o f t h e t o t a l p u r c h a s e p r i c e w a s c o m p r i s e d o f d e v e l o p e d p r o d u c t t e c h n o l o g y ( c i a l i s ) ?	4,934
-117	Given the context, answer the question. Context: 7 . derivative instruments effective january 1 , 2001 , aes adopted sfas no . 133 , 2018 2018accounting for derivative instruments and hedging activities , 2019 2019 which , as amended , establishes accounting and reporting standards for derivative instruments and hedging activities . the adoption of sfas no . 133 on january 1 , 2001 , resulted in a cumulative reduction to income of less than $ 1 million , net of deferred income tax effects , and a cumulative reduction of accumulated other comprehensive income in stockholders 2019 equity of $ 93 million , net of deferred income tax effects . for the year ended december 31 , 2001 , the impact of changes in derivative fair value primarily related to derivatives that do not qualify for hedge accounting treatment was a charge of $ 36 million , after income taxes . this amount includes a charge of $ 6 million , after income taxes , related to the ineffective portion of derivatives qualifying as cash flow and fair value hedges for the year ended december 31 , 2001 . there was no net effect on results of operations for the year ended december 31 , 2001 , of derivative and non-derivative instruments that have been designated and qualified as hedging net investments in foreign operations . approximately $ 35 million of other comprehensive loss related to derivative instruments as of december 31 , 2001 is expected to be recognized as a reduction to earnings over the next twelve months . a portion of this amount is expected to be offset by the effects of hedge accounting . the balance in accumulated other comprehensive loss related to derivative transactions will be reclassified into earnings as interest expense is recognized for hedges of interest rate risk , as foreign currency transaction and translation gains and losses are recognized for hedges of foreign currency exposure and as electric and gas sales and purchases are recognized for hedges of forecasted electric and gas transactions . amounts recorded in accumulated other comprehensive income , net of tax , during the year-ended december 31 , 2001 , were as follows ( in millions ) : . transition adjustment on january 1 2001 \| $ -93 ( 93 ) reclassification to earnings \| -32 ( 32 ) change in fair value \| 4 balance december 31 2001 \| $ -121 ( 121 ) aes utilizes derivative financial instruments to hedge interest rate risk , foreign exchange risk and commodity price risk . the company utilizes interest rate swap , cap and floor agreements to hedge interest rate risk on floating rate debt . the majority of aes 2019s interest rate derivatives are designated and qualify as cash flow hedges . currency forward and swap agreements are utilized to hedge foreign exchange risk which is a result of aes or one of its subsidiaries entering into monetary obligations in currencies other than its own functional currency . the majority of aes 2019s foreign currency derivatives are designated and qualify as either fair value hedges or cash flow hedges . certain derivative instruments and other non-derivative instruments are designated and qualify as hedges of the foreign currency exposure of a net investment in a foreign operation . the company utilizes electric and gas derivative instruments , including swaps , options , forwards and futures , to hedge the risk related to electricity and gas sales and purchases . the majority of aes 2019s electric and gas derivatives are designated and qualify as cash flow hedges . the maximum length of time over which aes is hedging its exposure to variability in future cash flows for forecasted transactions , excluding forecasted transactions related to the payment of variable interest , is three years . for the year ended december 31 , 2001 , a charge of $ 4 million , after income taxes , was recorded for two cash flow hedges that were discontinued because it is probable that the hedged forecasted transaction will not occur . a portion of this charge has been classified as discontinued operations . for the year ended december 31 , 2001 , no fair value hedges were de-recognized or discontinued. . Question: w i t h o u t t h e a d j u s t m e n t f o r t h e c h a n g e i n f a i r v a l u e , w h a t w o u l d t h e a o c i b a l a n c e h a v e b e e n i n m i l l i o n s a t d e c e m b e r 3 1 2 0 0 1 ?	4,935
44	Given the context, answer the question. Context: estimates of synthetic crude oil reserves are prepared by glj petroleum consultants of calgary , canada , third-party consultants . their reports for all years are filed as exhibits to this annual report on form 10-k . the team lead responsible for the estimates of our osm reserves has 34 years of experience in petroleum engineering and has conducted surface mineable oil sands evaluations since 1986 . he is a member of spe , having served as regional director from 1998 through 2001 . the second team member has 13 years of experience in petroleum engineering and has conducted surface mineable oil sands evaluations since 2009 . both are registered practicing professional engineers in the province of alberta . audits of estimates third-party consultants are engaged to provide independent estimates for fields that comprise 80 percent of our total proved reserves over a rolling four-year period for the purpose of auditing the in-house reserve estimates . we met this goal for the four- year period ended december 31 , 2012 . we established a tolerance level of 10 percent such that initial estimates by the third-party consultants are accepted if they are within 10 percent of our internal estimates . should the third-party consultants 2019 initial analysis fail to reach our tolerance level , both our team and the consultants re-examine the information provided , request additional data and refine their analysis if appropriate . this resolution process is continued until both estimates are within 10 percent . in the very limited instances where differences outside the 10 percent tolerance cannot be resolved by year end , a plan to resolve the difference is developed and our senior management is informed . this process did not result in significant changes to our reserve estimates in 2012 or 2011 . there were no third-party audits performed in 2010 . during 2012 , netherland , sewell & associates , inc . ( "nsai" ) prepared a certification of december 31 , 2011 reserves for the alba field in e.g . the nsai summary report is filed as an exhibit to this annual report on form 10-k . members of the nsai team have many years of industry experience , having worked for large , international oil and gas companies before joining nsai . the senior technical advisor has a bachelor of science degree in geophysics and over 15 years of experience in the estimation of and evaluation of reserves . the second member has a bachelor of science degree in chemical engineering and master of business administration along with over 3 years of experience in estimation and evaluation of reserves . both are licensed in the state of texas . ryder scott company ( "ryder scott" ) performed audits of several of our fields in 2012 and 2011 . their summary reports on audits performed in 2012 and 2011 are filed as exhibits to this annual report on form 10-k . the team lead for ryder scott has over 20 years of industry experience , having worked for a major international oil and gas company before joining ryder scott . he has a bachelor of science degree in mechanical engineering , is a member of spe where he served on the oil and gas reserves committee and is a registered professional engineer in the state of texas . changes in proved undeveloped reserves as of december 31 , 2012 , 571 mmboe of proved undeveloped reserves were reported , an increase of 176 mmboe from december 31 , 2011 . the following table shows changes in total proved undeveloped reserves for 2012 : ( mmboe ) . beginning of year \| 395 revisions of previous estimates \| -13 ( 13 ) improved recovery \| 2 purchases of reserves in place \| 56 extensions discoveries and other additions \| 201 transfer to proved developed \| -70 ( 70 ) end of year \| 571 significant additions to proved undeveloped reserves during 2012 include 56 mmboe due to acquisitions in the eagle ford shale . development drilling added 124 mmboe in the eagle ford , 35 mmboe in the bakken and 15 mmboe in the oklahoma resource basins shale play . a gas sharing agreement signed with the libyan government in 2012 added 19 mmboe . additionally , 30 mmboe were transferred from proved undeveloped to proved developed reserves in the eagle ford and 14 mmboe in the bakken shale plays due to producing wells . costs incurred in 2012 , 2011 and 2010 relating to the development of proved undeveloped reserves , were $ 1995 million $ 1107 million and $ 1463 million . a total of 27 mmboe was booked as a result of reliable technology . technologies included statistical analysis of production performance , decline curve analysis , rate transient analysis , reservoir simulation and volumetric analysis . the statistical nature of production performance coupled with highly certain reservoir continuity or quality within the reliable technology areas and sufficient proved undeveloped locations establish the reasonable certainty criteria required for booking reserves. . Question: i n m m b o e w h a t w a s t h e t o t a l o f r e s e r v e s t r a n s f e r r e d f r o m p r o v e d u n d e v e l o p e d t o p r o v e d d e v e l o p e d r e s e r v e s i n t h e e a g l e f o r d a n d i n t h e b a k k e n s h a l e p l a y s ?	4,936
39.3%	Given the context, answer the question. Context: table of contents rent expense under all operating leases , including both cancelable and noncancelable leases , was $ 645 million , $ 488 million and $ 338 million in 2013 , 2012 and 2011 , respectively . future minimum lease payments under noncancelable operating leases having remaining terms in excess of one year as of september 28 , 2013 , are as follows ( in millions ) : other commitments as of september 28 , 2013 , the company had outstanding off-balance sheet third-party manufacturing commitments and component purchase commitments of $ 18.6 billion . in addition to the off-balance sheet commitments mentioned above , the company had outstanding obligations of $ 1.3 billion as of september 28 , 2013 , which consisted mainly of commitments to acquire capital assets , including product tooling and manufacturing process equipment , and commitments related to advertising , research and development , internet and telecommunications services and other obligations . contingencies the company is subject to various legal proceedings and claims that have arisen in the ordinary course of business and that have not been fully adjudicated . in the opinion of management , there was not at least a reasonable possibility the company may have incurred a material loss , or a material loss in excess of a recorded accrual , with respect to loss contingencies . however , the outcome of litigation is inherently uncertain . therefore , although management considers the likelihood of such an outcome to be remote , if one or more of these legal matters were resolved against the company in a reporting period for amounts in excess of management 2019s expectations , the company 2019s consolidated financial statements for that reporting period could be materially adversely affected . apple inc . v . samsung electronics co. , ltd , et al . on august 24 , 2012 , a jury returned a verdict awarding the company $ 1.05 billion in its lawsuit against samsung electronics co. , ltd and affiliated parties in the united states district court , northern district of california , san jose division . on march 1 , 2013 , the district court upheld $ 599 million of the jury 2019s award and ordered a new trial as to the remainder . because the award is subject to entry of final judgment , partial re-trial and appeal , the company has not recognized the award in its results of operations . virnetx , inc . v . apple inc . et al . on august 11 , 2010 , virnetx , inc . filed an action against the company alleging that certain of its products infringed on four patents relating to network communications technology . on november 6 , 2012 , a jury returned a verdict against the company , and awarded damages of $ 368 million . the company is challenging the verdict , believes it has valid defenses and has not recorded a loss accrual at this time. . 2014 \| $ 610 2015 \| 613 2016 \| 587 2017 \| 551 2018 \| 505 thereafter \| 1855 total minimum lease payments \| $ 4721 . Question: o f t h e t o t a l m i n i m u m l e a s e p a y m e n t s , w h a t p e r c e n t a g e w e r e d u e a f t e r 2 0 1 8 ?	4,937
0.86	Given the context, answer the question. Context: celanese purchases of its equity securities information regarding repurchases of our common stock during the three months ended december 31 , 2014 is as follows : period number of shares purchased ( 1 ) average price paid per share total number of shares purchased as part of publicly announced program approximate dollar value of shares remaining that may be purchased under the program ( 2 ) . period \| totalnumberof sharespurchased ( 1 ) \| averageprice paidper share \| total numberof sharespurchased aspart of publiclyannounced program \| approximatedollarvalue of sharesremaining thatmay bepurchased underthe program ( 2 ) october 1 - 31 2014 \| 192580 \| $ 58.02 \| 164800 \| $ 490000000 november 1 - 30 2014 \| 468128 \| $ 59.25 \| 468128 \| $ 463000000 december 1 - 31 2014 \| 199796 \| $ 60.78 \| 190259 \| $ 451000000 total \| 860504 \| \| 823187 \| ___________________________ ( 1 ) includes 27780 and 9537 for october and december 2014 , respectively , related to shares withheld from employees to cover their statutory minimum withholding requirements for personal income taxes related to the vesting of restricted stock units . ( 2 ) our board of directors has authorized the aggregate repurchase of $ 1.4 billion of our common stock since february 2008 . see note 17 - stockholders' equity in the accompanying consolidated financial statements for further information . performance graph the following performance graph and related information shall not be deemed "soliciting material" or to be "filed" with the securities and exchange commission , nor shall such information be incorporated by reference into any future filing under the securities act of 1933 or securities exchange act of 1934 , each as amended , except to the extent that we specifically incorporate it by reference into such filing . comparison of cumulative total return . Question: i n 2 0 1 4 f o r t h e p e r i o d o c t o b e r 1 - 3 1 2 0 1 4 w h a t w a s t h e r a t i o o f t h e s h a r e s p u r c h a s e d a s p a r t o f p u b l i c l y a n n o u n c e d p r o g r a m t o t h e t o t a l n u m b e r o f s h a r e s p u r c h a s e d	4,938
-2106	Given the context, answer the question. Context: in addition , the company has reclassified the following amounts from 201cdistributions from other invested assets 201d included in cash flows from investing activities to 201cdistribution of limited partnership income 201d included in cash flows from operations for interim reporting periods of 2013 : $ 33686 thousand for the three months ended march 31 , 2013 ; $ 9409 thousand and $ 43095 thousand for the three months and six months ended june 30 , 2013 , respectively ; and $ 5638 thousand and $ 48733 thousand for the three months and nine months ended september 30 , 2013 , respectively . b . investments . fixed maturity and equity security investments available for sale , at market value , reflect unrealized appreciation and depreciation , as a result of temporary changes in market value during the period , in shareholders 2019 equity , net of income taxes in 201caccumulated other comprehensive income ( loss ) 201d in the consolidated balance sheets . fixed maturity and equity securities carried at fair value reflect fair value re- measurements as net realized capital gains and losses in the consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive income ( loss ) . the company records changes in fair value for its fixed maturities available for sale , at market value through shareholders 2019 equity , net of taxes in accumulated other comprehensive income ( loss ) since cash flows from these investments will be primarily used to settle its reserve for losses and loss adjustment expense liabilities . the company anticipates holding these investments for an extended period as the cash flow from interest and maturities will fund the projected payout of these liabilities . fixed maturities carried at fair value represent a portfolio of convertible bond securities , which have characteristics similar to equity securities and at times , designated foreign denominated fixed maturity securities , which will be used to settle loss and loss adjustment reserves in the same currency . the company carries all of its equity securities at fair value except for mutual fund investments whose underlying investments are comprised of fixed maturity securities . for equity securities , available for sale , at fair value , the company reflects changes in value as net realized capital gains and losses since these securities may be sold in the near term depending on financial market conditions . interest income on all fixed maturities and dividend income on all equity securities are included as part of net investment income in the consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive income ( loss ) . unrealized losses on fixed maturities , which are deemed other-than-temporary and related to the credit quality of a security , are charged to net income ( loss ) as net realized capital losses . short-term investments are stated at cost , which approximates market value . realized gains or losses on sales of investments are determined on the basis of identified cost . for non- publicly traded securities , market prices are determined through the use of pricing models that evaluate securities relative to the u.s . treasury yield curve , taking into account the issue type , credit quality , and cash flow characteristics of each security . for publicly traded securities , market value is based on quoted market prices or valuation models that use observable market inputs . when a sector of the financial markets is inactive or illiquid , the company may use its own assumptions about future cash flows and risk-adjusted discount rates to determine fair value . retrospective adjustments are employed to recalculate the values of asset-backed securities . each acquisition lot is reviewed to recalculate the effective yield . the recalculated effective yield is used to derive a book value as if the new yield were applied at the time of acquisition . outstanding principal factors from the time of acquisition to the adjustment date are used to calculate the prepayment history for all applicable securities . conditional prepayment rates , computed with life to date factor histories and weighted average maturities , are used to effect the calculation of projected and prepayments for pass-through security types . other invested assets include limited partnerships , rabbi trusts and an affiliated entity . limited partnerships and the affiliated entity are accounted for under the equity method of accounting , which can be recorded on a monthly or quarterly lag . c . uncollectible receivable balances . the company provides reserves for uncollectible reinsurance recoverable and premium receivable balances based on management 2019s assessment of the collectability of the outstanding balances . such reserves are presented in the table below for the periods indicated. . ( dollars in thousands ) \| years ended december 31 , 2013 \| years ended december 31 , 2012 reinsurance receivables and premium receivables \| $ 29905 \| $ 32011 . Question: w h a t i s t h e n e t c h a n g e i n t h e b a l a n c e o f r e i n s u r a n c e r e c e i v a b l e s a n d p r e m i u m r e c e i v a b l e s i n 2 0 1 3 ?	4,939
$ 125000	Given the context, answer the question. Context: notes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) the following table summarizes the changes in non-vested restricted stock awards for the year ended may 31 , 2009 ( share awards in thousands ) : share awards weighted average grant-date fair value . \| share awards \| weighted average grant-date fair value non-vested at may 31 2007 \| 278 \| $ 37 granted \| 400 \| 38 vested \| -136 ( 136 ) \| 30 forfeited \| -24 ( 24 ) \| 40 non-vested at may 31 2008 \| 518 \| 39 granted \| 430 \| 43 vested \| -159 ( 159 ) \| 39 forfeited \| -27 ( 27 ) \| 41 non-vested at may 31 2009 \| 762 \| 42 the weighted average grant-date fair value of share awards granted in the years ended may 31 , 2008 and 2007 was $ 38 and $ 45 , respectively . the total fair value of share awards vested during the years ended may 31 , 2009 , 2008 and 2007 was $ 6.2 million , $ 4.1 million and $ 1.7 million , respectively . we recognized compensation expense for restricted stock of $ 9.0 million , $ 5.7 million , and $ 2.7 million in the years ended may 31 , 2009 , 2008 and 2007 . as of may 31 , 2009 , there was $ 23.5 million of total unrecognized compensation cost related to unvested restricted stock awards that is expected to be recognized over a weighted average period of 2.9 years . employee stock purchase plan we have an employee stock purchase plan under which the sale of 2.4 million shares of our common stock has been authorized . employees may designate up to the lesser of $ 25000 or 20% ( 20 % ) of their annual compensation for the purchase of stock . the price for shares purchased under the plan is 85% ( 85 % ) of the market value on the last day of the quarterly purchase period . as of may 31 , 2009 , 0.8 million shares had been issued under this plan , with 1.6 million shares reserved for future issuance . the weighted average grant-date fair value of each designated share purchased under this plan was $ 6 , $ 6 and $ 8 in the years ended may 31 , 2009 , 2008 and 2007 , respectively . these values represent the fair value of the 15% ( 15 % ) discount . note 12 2014segment information general information during fiscal 2009 , we began assessing our operating performance using a new segment structure . we made this change as a result of our june 30 , 2008 acquisition of 51% ( 51 % ) of hsbc merchant services llp in the united kingdom , in addition to anticipated future international expansion . beginning with the quarter ended august 31 , 2008 , the reportable segments are defined as north america merchant services , international merchant services , and money transfer . the following tables reflect these changes and such reportable segments for fiscal years 2009 , 2008 , and 2007. . Question: w h a t i s a n e m p l o y e e s t o t a l a n n u a l c o m p e n s a t i o n ?	4,940
27.5%	Given the context, answer the question. Context: as of december 31 , 2006 , we also leased an office and laboratory facility in connecticut , additional office , distribution and storage facilities in san diego , and four foreign facilities located in japan , singapore , china and the netherlands under non-cancelable operating leases that expire at various times through july 2011 . these leases contain renewal options ranging from one to five years . as of december 31 , 2006 , our contractual obligations were ( in thousands ) : contractual obligation total less than 1 year 1 2013 3 years 1 2013 5 years more than 5 years . contractual obligation \| payments due by period total \| payments due by period less than 1 year \| payments due by period 1 2013 3 years \| payments due by period 1 2013 5 years \| payments due by period more than 5 years operating leases \| $ 37899 \| $ 5320 \| $ 10410 \| $ 9371 \| $ 12798 total \| $ 37899 \| $ 5320 \| $ 10410 \| $ 9371 \| $ 12798 the above table does not include orders for goods and services entered into in the normal course of business that are not enforceable or legally binding . item 7a . quantitative and qualitative disclosures about market risk . interest rate sensitivity our exposure to market risk for changes in interest rates relates primarily to our investment portfolio . the fair market value of fixed rate securities may be adversely impacted by fluctuations in interest rates while income earned on floating rate securities may decline as a result of decreases in interest rates . under our current policies , we do not use interest rate derivative instruments to manage exposure to interest rate changes . we attempt to ensure the safety and preservation of our invested principal funds by limiting default risk , market risk and reinvestment risk . we mitigate default risk by investing in investment grade securities . we have historically maintained a relatively short average maturity for our investment portfolio , and we believe a hypothetical 100 basis point adverse move in interest rates along the entire interest rate yield curve would not materially affect the fair value of our interest sensitive financial instruments . foreign currency exchange risk although most of our revenue is realized in u.s . dollars , some portions of our revenue are realized in foreign currencies . as a result , our financial results could be affected by factors such as changes in foreign currency exchange rates or weak economic conditions in foreign markets . the functional currencies of our subsidiaries are their respective local currencies . accordingly , the accounts of these operations are translated from the local currency to the u.s . dollar using the current exchange rate in effect at the balance sheet date for the balance sheet accounts , and using the average exchange rate during the period for revenue and expense accounts . the effects of translation are recorded in accumulated other comprehensive income as a separate component of stockholders 2019 equity. . Question: w h a t i s t h e p e r c e n t o f t h e o p e r a t i n g l e a s e s t h a t a r e d u e i n 1 2 0 1 3 3 y e a r s t o t h e t o t a l l e a s e s .	4,941
15.7%	Given the context, answer the question. Context: entergy corporation and subsidiaries notes to financial statements as of december 31 , 2008 , system energy had future minimum lease payments ( reflecting an implicit rate of 5.13% ( 5.13 % ) ) , which are recorded as long-term debt as follows : amount ( in thousands ) . \| amount ( in thousands ) 2009 \| $ 47760 2010 \| 48569 2011 \| 49437 2012 \| 49959 2013 \| 50546 years thereafter \| 103890 total \| 350161 less : amount representing interest \| 54857 present value of net minimum lease payments \| $ 295304 . Question: w h a t p o r t i o n o f t h e t o t a l m i n i m u m l e a s e p a y m e n t s i s r e l a t e d t o i n t e r e s t ?	4,942
3.6%	Given the context, answer the question. Context: entergy gulf states , inc . management's financial discussion and analysis . \| ( in millions ) 2003 net revenue \| $ 1110.1 volume/weather \| 26.7 net wholesale revenue \| 13.0 summer capacity charges \| 5.5 price applied to unbilled sales \| 4.8 fuel recovery revenues \| -14.2 ( 14.2 ) other \| 3.9 2004 net revenue \| $ 1149.8 the volume/weather variance resulted primarily from an increase of 1179 gwh in electricity usage in the industrial sector . billed usage also increased a total of 291 gwh in the residential , commercial , and governmental sectors . the increase in net wholesale revenue is primarily due to an increase in sales volume to municipal and co-op customers . summer capacity charges variance is due to the amortization in 2003 of deferred capacity charges for the summer of 2001 compared to the absence of the amortization in 2004 . the amortization of these capacity charges began in june 2002 and ended in may 2003 . the price applied to unbilled sales variance resulted primarily from an increase in the fuel price applied to unbilled sales . fuel recovery revenues represent an under-recovery of fuel charges that are recovered in base rates . entergy gulf states recorded $ 22.6 million of provisions in 2004 for potential rate refunds . these provisions are not included in the net revenue table above because they are more than offset by provisions recorded in 2003 . gross operating revenues , fuel and purchased power expenses , and other regulatory credits gross operating revenues increased primarily due to an increase of $ 187.8 million in fuel cost recovery revenues as a result of higher fuel rates in both the louisiana and texas jurisdictions . the increases in volume/weather and wholesale revenue , discussed above , also contributed to the increase . fuel and purchased power expenses increased primarily due to : 2022 increased recovery of deferred fuel costs due to higher fuel rates ; 2022 increases in the market prices of natural gas , coal , and purchased power ; and 2022 an increase in electricity usage , discussed above . other regulatory credits increased primarily due to the amortization in 2003 of deferred capacity charges for the summer of 2001 compared to the absence of amortization in 2004 . the amortization of these charges began in june 2002 and ended in may 2003 . 2003 compared to 2002 net revenue , which is entergy gulf states' measure of gross margin , consists of operating revenues net of : 1 ) fuel , fuel-related , and purchased power expenses and 2 ) other regulatory credits . following is an analysis of the change in net revenue comparing 2003 to 2002. . Question: w h a t i s t h e g r o w t h r a t e i n n e t r e v e n u e i n 2 0 0 4 f o r e n t e r g y g u l f s t a t e s , i n c ?	4,943
2844	Given the context, answer the question. Context: acquire operations and facilities from municipalities and other local governments , as they increasingly seek to raise capital and reduce risk . we realize synergies from consolidating businesses into our existing operations , whether through acquisitions or public-private partnerships , which allow us to reduce capital and expense requirements associated with truck routing , personnel , fleet maintenance , inventories and back-office administration . operating model the goal of our operating model pillar is to deliver a consistent , high quality service to all of our customers through the republic way : one way . everywhere . every day . this approach of developing standardized processes with rigorous controls and tracking allows us to leverage our scale and deliver durable operational excellence . the republic way is the key to harnessing the best of what we do as operators and translating that across all facets of our business . a key enabler of the republic way is our organizational structure that fosters a high performance culture by maintaining 360 degree accountability and full profit and loss responsibility with local management , supported by a functional structure to provide subject matter expertise . this structure allows us to take advantage of our scale by coordinating functionally across all of our markets , while empowering local management to respond to unique market dynamics . we have rolled out several productivity and cost control initiatives designed to deliver the best service possible to our customers in the most efficient and environmentally sound way . fleet automation approximately 74% ( 74 % ) of our residential routes have been converted to automated single driver trucks . by converting our residential routes to automated service , we reduce labor costs , improve driver productivity , decrease emissions and create a safer work environment for our employees . additionally , communities using automated vehicles have higher participation rates in recycling programs , thereby complementing our initiative to expand our recycling capabilities . fleet conversion to compressed natural gas ( cng ) approximately 18% ( 18 % ) of our fleet operates on natural gas . we expect to continue our gradual fleet conversion to cng , our preferred alternative fuel technology , as part of our ordinary annual fleet replacement process . we believe a gradual fleet conversion is most prudent to realize the full value of our previous fleet investments . approximately 36% ( 36 % ) of our replacement vehicle purchases during 2016 were cng vehicles . we believe using cng vehicles provides us a competitive advantage in communities with strict clean emission initiatives that focus on protecting the environment . although upfront capital costs are higher , using cng reduces our overall fleet operating costs through lower fuel expenses . as of december 31 , 2016 , we operated 38 cng fueling stations . standardized maintenance based on an industry trade publication , we operate the eighth largest vocational fleet in the united states . as of december 31 , 2016 , our average fleet age in years , by line of business , was as follows : approximate number of vehicles approximate average age . \| approximate number of vehicles \| approximate average age residential \| 7300 \| 7 small-container commercial \| 4400 \| 7 large-container industrial \| 4100 \| 9 total \| 15800 \| 7.5 . Question: w h a t i s t h e a p p r o x i m a t e n u m b e r o f v e h i c l e s t h a t h a v e b e e n c o n v e r t e d t o c o m p r e s s e d n a t u r a l g a s ( c n g )	4,944
5.4%	Given the context, answer the question. Context: management 2019s discussion and analysis jpmorgan chase & co./2009 annual report 130 the following histogram illustrates the daily market risk 2013related gains and losses for ib and consumer/cio positions for 2009 . the chart shows that the firm posted market risk 2013related gains on 227 out of 261 days in this period , with 69 days exceeding $ 160 million . the inset graph looks at those days on which the firm experienced losses and depicts the amount by which the 95% ( 95 % ) confidence level var exceeded the actual loss on each of those days . losses were sustained on 34 days during 2009 and exceeded the var measure on one day due to high market volatility in the first quarter of 2009 . under the 95% ( 95 % ) confidence interval , the firm would expect to incur daily losses greater than that pre- dicted by var estimates about twelve times a year . the following table provides information about the gross sensitivity of dva to a one-basis-point increase in jpmorgan chase 2019s credit spreads . this sensitivity represents the impact from a one-basis-point parallel shift in jpmorgan chase 2019s entire credit curve . as credit curves do not typically move in a parallel fashion , the sensitivity multiplied by the change in spreads at a single maturity point may not be representative of the actual revenue recognized . debit valuation adjustment sensitivity 1 basis point increase in ( in millions ) jpmorgan chase credit spread . ( in millions ) \| 1 basis point increase in jpmorgan chase credit spread december 31 2009 \| $ 39 december 31 2008 \| $ 37 loss advisories and drawdowns loss advisories and drawdowns are tools used to highlight to senior management trading losses above certain levels and initiate discus- sion of remedies . economic value stress testing while var reflects the risk of loss due to adverse changes in normal markets , stress testing captures the firm 2019s exposure to unlikely but plausible events in abnormal markets . the firm conducts economic- value stress tests using multiple scenarios that assume credit spreads widen significantly , equity prices decline and significant changes in interest rates across the major currencies . other scenar- ios focus on the risks predominant in individual business segments and include scenarios that focus on the potential for adverse movements in complex portfolios . scenarios were updated more frequently in 2009 and , in some cases , redefined to reflect the signifi- cant market volatility which began in late 2008 . along with var , stress testing is important in measuring and controlling risk . stress testing enhances the understanding of the firm 2019s risk profile and loss potential , and stress losses are monitored against limits . stress testing is also utilized in one-off approvals and cross-business risk measurement , as well as an input to economic capital allocation . stress-test results , trends and explanations based on current market risk positions are reported to the firm 2019s senior management and to the lines of business to help them better measure and manage risks and to understand event risk 2013sensitive positions. . Question: w h a t w a s t h e p e r c e n t o f t h e b a s i s p o i n t i n c r e a s e i n j p m o r g a n c h a s e c r e d i t s p r e a d f r o m 2 0 0 8 \ \ n t o 2 0 0 9	4,945
5.8%	Given the context, answer the question. Context: incentive compensation expense ( $ 8.2 million ) and related fringe benefit costs ( $ 1.4 million ) , and higher warehousing costs due to customer requirements ( $ 2.0 million ) . corporate overhead for the year ended december 31 , 2006 , increased $ 3.1 million , or 6.5% ( 6.5 % ) , from the year ended december 31 , 2005 . the increase was primarily attributable to higher incentive compensation expense ( $ 2.6 million ) and other increased costs which were not individually significant . other expense , net , decreased $ 2.1 million , or 20.1% ( 20.1 % ) for the year ended december 31 , 2006 compared to the year ended december 31 , 2005 . the decrease was primarily due to a $ 3.1 million decrease in expenses related to the disposals of property , plant and equipment as part of planned disposals in connection with capital projects . partially offsetting the decrease in fixed asset disposal expense was higher legal expenses ( $ 0.5 million ) and increased losses on disposals of storeroom items ( $ 0.4 million ) . interest expense , net and income taxes interest expense , net of interest income , increased by $ 3.1 million , or 11.1% ( 11.1 % ) , for the year ended december 31 , 2006 compared to the full year 2005 , primarily as a result of higher interest expense on our variable rate debt due to higher interest rates . pca 2019s effective tax rate was 35.8% ( 35.8 % ) for the year ended december 31 , 2006 and 40.2% ( 40.2 % ) for the year ended december 31 , 2005 . the lower tax rate in 2006 is primarily due to a larger domestic manufacturer 2019s deduction and a reduction in the texas state tax rate . for both years 2006 and 2005 , tax rates were higher than the federal statutory rate of 35.0% ( 35.0 % ) due to state income taxes . year ended december 31 , 2005 compared to year ended december 31 , 2004 the historical results of operations of pca for the years ended december 31 , 2005 and 2004 are set forth below : for the year ended december 31 , ( in millions ) 2005 2004 change . ( in millions ) \| for the year ended december 31 , 2005 \| for the year ended december 31 , 2004 \| change net sales \| $ 1993.7 \| $ 1890.1 \| $ 103.6 income from operations \| $ 116.1 \| $ 140.5 \| $ -24.4 ( 24.4 ) interest expense net \| -28.1 ( 28.1 ) \| -29.6 ( 29.6 ) \| 1.5 income before taxes \| 88.0 \| 110.9 \| -22.9 ( 22.9 ) provision for income taxes \| -35.4 ( 35.4 ) \| -42.2 ( 42.2 ) \| 6.8 net income \| $ 52.6 \| $ 68.7 \| $ -16.1 ( 16.1 ) net sales net sales increased by $ 103.6 million , or 5.5% ( 5.5 % ) , for the year ended december 31 , 2005 from the year ended december 31 , 2004 . net sales increased primarily due to increased sales prices and volumes of corrugated products compared to 2004 . total corrugated products volume sold increased 4.2% ( 4.2 % ) to 31.2 billion square feet in 2005 compared to 29.9 billion square feet in 2004 . on a comparable shipment-per-workday basis , corrugated products sales volume increased 4.6% ( 4.6 % ) in 2005 from 2004 . excluding pca 2019s acquisition of midland container in april 2005 , corrugated products volume was 3.0% ( 3.0 % ) higher in 2005 than 2004 and up 3.4% ( 3.4 % ) compared to 2004 on a shipment-per-workday basis . shipments-per-workday is calculated by dividing our total corrugated products volume during the year by the number of workdays within the year . the larger percentage increase was due to the fact that 2005 had one less workday ( 250 days ) , those days not falling on a weekend or holiday , than 2004 ( 251 days ) . containerboard sales volume to external domestic and export customers decreased 12.2% ( 12.2 % ) to 417000 tons for the year ended december 31 , 2005 from 475000 tons in 2004. . Question: i n c o m e f r o m o p e r a t i o n s w a s w h a t p e r c e n t o f n e t s a l e s f o r 2 0 0 5 ?	4,946
200	Given the context, answer the question. Context: a black-scholes option-pricing model was used for purposes of estimating the fair value of state street 2019s employee stock options at the grant date . the following were the weighted average assumptions for the years ended december 31 , 2001 , 2000 and 1999 , respectively : risk-free interest rates of 3.99% ( 3.99 % ) , 5.75% ( 5.75 % ) and 5.90% ( 5.90 % ) ; dividend yields of 1.08% ( 1.08 % ) , .73% ( .73 % ) and .92% ( .92 % ) ; and volatility factors of the expected market price of state street common stock of .30 , .30 and .30 . the estimated weighted average life of the stock options granted was 4.1 years for the years ended december 31 , 2001 , 2000 and 1999 . o t h e r u n r e a l i z e d c o m p r e h e n s i v e i n c o m e ( l o s s ) at december 31 , the components of other unrealized comprehensive income ( loss ) , net of related taxes , were as follows: . ( dollars in millions ) \| 2001 \| 2000 unrealized gain on available-for-sale securities \| $ 96 \| $ 19 foreign currency translation \| -27 ( 27 ) \| -20 ( 20 ) other \| 1 \| total \| $ 70 \| $ -1 ( 1 ) note j shareholders 2019 rights plan in 1988 , state street declared a dividend of one preferred share purchase right for each outstanding share of common stock . in 1998 , the rights agreement was amended and restated , and in 2001 , the rights plan was impacted by the 2-for-1 stock split . accordingly , a right may be exercised , under certain conditions , to purchase one eight-hundredths share of a series of participating preferred stock at an exercise price of $ 132.50 , subject to adjustment . the rights become exercisable if a party acquires or obtains the right to acquire 10% ( 10 % ) or more of state street 2019s common stock or after commencement or public announcement of an offer for 10% ( 10 % ) or more of state street 2019s common stock . when exercisable , under certain conditions , each right entitles the holder thereof to purchase shares of common stock , of either state street or of the acquirer , having a market value of two times the then-current exercise price of that right . the rights expire in september 2008 , and may be redeemed at a price of $ .00125 per right , subject to adjustment , at any time prior to expiration or the acquisition of 10% ( 10 % ) of state street 2019s common stock . under certain circumstances , the rights may be redeemed after they become exercisable and may be subject to automatic redemption . note k regulatory matters r e g u l a t o r y c a p i t a l state street is subject to various regulatory capital requirements administered by federal banking agencies . failure to meet minimum capital requirements can initiate certain mandatory and discretionary actions by regulators that , if undertaken , could have a direct material effect on state street 2019s financial condition . under capital adequacy guidelines , state street must meet specific capital guidelines that involve quantitative measures of state street 2019s assets , liabilities and off-balance sheet items as calculated under regulatory accounting practices . state street 2019s capital amounts and classification are subject to qualitative judgments by the regulators about components , risk weightings and other factors . 42 state street corporation . Question: a s s u m i n g t h a t t h e o u t s t a n d i n g n u m b e r o f s h a r e s i s 1 0 0 m i l l i o n b e f o r e t h e 2 0 0 1 s t o c k s p l i t , h o w m a n y s h a r e s w i l l b e o u t s t a n d i n g a f t e r t h e s p l i t , i n m i l l i o n s ?	4,947
160.2	Given the context, answer the question. Context: for the valuation of the 4199466 performance-based options granted in 2005 : the risk free interest rate was 4.2% ( 4.2 % ) , the volatility factor for the expected market price of the common stock was 44% ( 44 % ) , the expected dividend yield was zero and the objective time to exercise was 4.7 years with an objective in the money assumption of 2.95 years . it was also expected that the initial public offering assumption would occur within a 9 month period from grant date . the fair value of the performance-based options was calculated to be $ 5.85 . the fair value for fis options granted in 2006 was estimated at the date of grant using a black-scholes option- pricing model with the following weighted average assumptions . the risk free interest rates used in the calculation are the rate that corresponds to the weighted average expected life of an option . the risk free interest rate used for options granted during 2006 was 4.9% ( 4.9 % ) . a volatility factor for the expected market price of the common stock of 30% ( 30 % ) was used for options granted in 2006 . the expected dividend yield used for 2006 was 0.5% ( 0.5 % ) . a weighted average expected life of 6.4 years was used for 2006 . the weighted average fair value of each option granted during 2006 was $ 15.52 . at december 31 , 2006 , the total unrecognized compensation cost related to non-vested stock option grants is $ 86.1 million , which is expected to be recognized in pre-tax income over a weighted average period of 1.9 years . the company intends to limit dilution caused by option exercises , including anticipated exercises , by repurchasing shares on the open market or in privately negotiated transactions . during 2006 , the company repurchased 4261200 shares at an average price of $ 37.60 . on october 25 , 2006 , the company 2019s board of directors approved a plan authorizing the repurchase of up to an additional $ 200 million worth of the company 2019s common stock . defined benefit plans certegy pension plan in connection with the certegy merger , the company announced that it will terminate and settle the certegy u.s . retirement income plan ( usrip ) . the estimated impact of this settlement was reflected in the purchase price allocation as an increase in the pension liability , less the fair value of the pension plan assets , based on estimates of the total cost to settle the liability through the purchase of annuity contracts or lump sum settlements to the beneficiaries . the final settlement will not occur until after an irs determination has been obtained , which is expected to be received in 2007 . in addition to the net pension plan obligation of $ 21.6 million , the company assumed liabilities of $ 8.0 million for certegy 2019s supplemental executive retirement plan ( 201cserp 201d ) and $ 3.0 mil- lion for a postretirement benefit plan . a reconciliation of the changes in the fair value of plan assets of the usrip for the period from february 1 , 2006 through december 31 , 2006 is as follows ( in thousands ) : . \| 2006 fair value of plan assets at acquisition date \| $ 57369 actual return on plan assets \| 8200 benefits paid \| -797 ( 797 ) fair value of plan assets at end of year \| $ 64772 benefits paid in the above table include only those amounts paid directly from plan assets . as of december 31 , 2006 and for 2007 through the pay out of the pension liability , the assets are being invested in u.s . treasury bonds due to the short duration until final payment . fidelity national information services , inc . and subsidiaries and affiliates consolidated and combined financial statements notes to consolidated and combined financial statements 2014 ( continued ) . Question: w h a t i s t h e t o t a l c a s h s p e n t f o r t h e r e p u r c h a s e o f s h a r e s d u r i n g 2 0 0 6 , ( i n m i l l i o n s ) ?	4,948
24.8%	Given the context, answer the question. Context: new term loan a facility , with the remaining unpaid principal amount of loans under the new term loan a facility due and payable in full at maturity on june 6 , 2021 . principal amounts outstanding under the new revolving loan facility are due and payable in full at maturity on june 6 , 2021 , subject to earlier repayment pursuant to the springing maturity date described above . in addition to paying interest on outstanding principal under the borrowings , we are obligated to pay a quarterly commitment fee at a rate determined by reference to a total leverage ratio , with a maximum commitment fee of 40% ( 40 % ) of the applicable margin for eurocurrency loans . in july 2016 , breakaway four , ltd. , as borrower , and nclc , as guarantor , entered into a supplemental agreement , which amended the breakaway four loan to , among other things , increase the aggregate principal amount of commitments under the multi-draw term loan credit facility from 20ac590.5 million to 20ac729.9 million . in june 2016 , we took delivery of seven seas explorer . to finance the payment due upon delivery , we had export credit financing in place for 80% ( 80 % ) of the contract price . the associated $ 373.6 million term loan bears interest at 3.43% ( 3.43 % ) with a maturity date of june 30 , 2028 . principal and interest payments shall be paid semiannually . in december 2016 , nclc issued $ 700.0 million aggregate principal amount of 4.750% ( 4.750 % ) senior unsecured notes due december 2021 ( the 201cnotes 201d ) in a private offering ( the 201coffering 201d ) at par . nclc used the net proceeds from the offering , after deducting the initial purchasers 2019 discount and estimated fees and expenses , together with cash on hand , to purchase its outstanding 5.25% ( 5.25 % ) senior notes due 2019 having an aggregate outstanding principal amount of $ 680 million . the redemption of the 5.25% ( 5.25 % ) senior notes due 2019 was completed in january 2017 . nclc will pay interest on the notes at 4.750% ( 4.750 % ) per annum , semiannually on june 15 and december 15 of each year , commencing on june 15 , 2017 , to holders of record at the close of business on the immediately preceding june 1 and december 1 , respectively . nclc may redeem the notes , in whole or part , at any time prior to december 15 , 2018 , at a price equal to 100% ( 100 % ) of the principal amount of the notes redeemed plus accrued and unpaid interest to , but not including , the redemption date and a 201cmake-whole premium . 201d nclc may redeem the notes , in whole or in part , on or after december 15 , 2018 , at the redemption prices set forth in the indenture governing the notes . at any time ( which may be more than once ) on or prior to december 15 , 2018 , nclc may choose to redeem up to 40% ( 40 % ) of the aggregate principal amount of the notes at a redemption price equal to 104.750% ( 104.750 % ) of the face amount thereof with an amount equal to the net proceeds of one or more equity offerings , so long as at least 60% ( 60 % ) of the aggregate principal amount of the notes issued remains outstanding following such redemption . the indenture governing the notes contains covenants that limit nclc 2019s ability ( and its restricted subsidiaries 2019 ability ) to , among other things : ( i ) incur or guarantee additional indebtedness or issue certain preferred shares ; ( ii ) pay dividends and make certain other restricted payments ; ( iii ) create restrictions on the payment of dividends or other distributions to nclc from its restricted subsidiaries ; ( iv ) create liens on certain assets to secure debt ; ( v ) make certain investments ; ( vi ) engage in transactions with affiliates ; ( vii ) engage in sales of assets and subsidiary stock ; and ( viii ) transfer all or substantially all of its assets or enter into merger or consolidation transactions . the indenture governing the notes also provides for events of default , which , if any of them occurs , would permit or require the principal , premium ( if any ) , interest and other monetary obligations on all of the then-outstanding notes to become due and payable immediately . interest expense , net for the year ended december 31 , 2016 was $ 276.9 million which included $ 34.7 million of amortization of deferred financing fees and a $ 27.7 million loss on extinguishment of debt . interest expense , net for the year ended december 31 , 2015 was $ 221.9 million which included $ 36.7 million of amortization of deferred financing fees and a $ 12.7 million loss on extinguishment of debt . interest expense , net for the year ended december 31 , 2014 was $ 151.8 million which included $ 32.3 million of amortization of deferred financing fees and $ 15.4 million of expenses related to financing transactions in connection with the acquisition of prestige . certain of our debt agreements contain covenants that , among other things , require us to maintain a minimum level of liquidity , as well as limit our net funded debt-to-capital ratio , maintain certain other ratios and restrict our ability to pay dividends . substantially all of our ships and other property and equipment are pledged as collateral for certain of our debt . we believe we were in compliance with these covenants as of december 31 , 2016 . the following are scheduled principal repayments on long-term debt including capital lease obligations as of december 31 , 2016 for each of the next five years ( in thousands ) : . year \| amount 2017 \| $ 560193 2018 \| 554846 2019 \| 561687 2020 \| 1153733 2021 \| 2193823 thereafter \| 1490322 total \| $ 6514604 we had an accrued interest liability of $ 32.5 million and $ 34.2 million as of december 31 , 2016 and 2015 , respectively. . Question: w h a t i s t h e p e r c e n t a g e c h a n g e i n i n t e r e s t e x p e n s e - n e t , f r o m 2 0 1 5 t o 2 0 1 6 ?	4,949
$ 1.32	Given the context, answer the question. Context: our refining and wholesale marketing gross margin is the difference between the prices of refined products sold and the costs of crude oil and other charge and blendstocks refined , including the costs to transport these inputs to our refineries , the costs of purchased products and manufacturing expenses , including depreciation . the crack spread is a measure of the difference between market prices for refined products and crude oil , commonly used by the industry as an indicator of the impact of price on the refining margin . crack spreads can fluctuate significantly , particularly when prices of refined products do not move in the same relationship as the cost of crude oil . as a performance benchmark and a comparison with other industry participants , we calculate midwest ( chicago ) and u.s . gulf coast crack spreads that we feel most closely track our operations and slate of products . posted light louisiana sweet ( 201clls 201d ) prices and a 6-3-2-1 ratio of products ( 6 barrels of crude oil producing 3 barrels of gasoline , 2 barrels of distillate and 1 barrel of residual fuel ) are used for the crack spread calculation . the following table lists calculated average crack spreads by quarter for the midwest ( chicago ) and gulf coast markets in 2008 . crack spreads ( dollars per barrel ) 1st qtr 2nd qtr 3rd qtr 4th qtr 2008 . crack spreads ( dollars per barrel ) \| 1st qtr \| 2nd qtr \| 3rd qtr \| 4th qtr \| 2008 chicago lls 6-3-2-1 \| $ 0.07 \| $ 2.71 \| $ 7.81 \| $ 2.31 \| $ 3.27 us gulf coast lls 6-3-2-1 \| $ 1.39 \| $ 1.99 \| $ 6.32 \| ( $ 0.01 ) \| $ 2.45 in addition to the market changes indicated by the crack spreads , our refining and wholesale marketing gross margin is impacted by factors such as the types of crude oil and other charge and blendstocks processed , the selling prices realized for refined products , the impact of commodity derivative instruments used to mitigate price risk and the cost of purchased products for resale . we process significant amounts of sour crude oil which can enhance our profitability compared to certain of our competitors , as sour crude oil typically can be purchased at a discount to sweet crude oil . finally , our refining and wholesale marketing gross margin is impacted by changes in manufacturing costs , which are primarily driven by the level of maintenance activities at the refineries and the price of purchased natural gas used for plant fuel . our 2008 refining and wholesale marketing gross margin was the key driver of the 43 percent decrease in rm&t segment income when compared to 2007 . our average refining and wholesale marketing gross margin per gallon decreased 37 percent , to 11.66 cents in 2008 from 18.48 cents in 2007 , primarily due to the significant and rapid increases in crude oil prices early in 2008 and lagging wholesale price realizations . our retail marketing gross margin for gasoline and distillates , which is the difference between the ultimate price paid by consumers and the cost of refined products , including secondary transportation and consumer excise taxes , also impacts rm&t segment profitability . while on average demand has been increasing for several years , there are numerous factors including local competition , seasonal demand fluctuations , the available wholesale supply , the level of economic activity in our marketing areas and weather conditions that impact gasoline and distillate demand throughout the year . in 2008 , demand began to drop due to the combination of significant increases in retail petroleum prices and a broad slowdown in general activity . the gross margin on merchandise sold at retail outlets has historically been more constant . the profitability of our pipeline transportation operations is primarily dependent on the volumes shipped through our crude oil and refined products pipelines . the volume of crude oil that we transport is directly affected by the supply of , and refiner demand for , crude oil in the markets served directly by our crude oil pipelines . key factors in this supply and demand balance are the production levels of crude oil by producers , the availability and cost of alternative modes of transportation , and refinery and transportation system maintenance levels . the volume of refined products that we transport is directly affected by the production levels of , and user demand for , refined products in the markets served by our refined product pipelines . in most of our markets , demand for gasoline peaks during the summer and declines during the fall and winter months , whereas distillate demand is more ratable throughout the year . as with crude oil , other transportation alternatives and system maintenance levels influence refined product movements . integrated gas our integrated gas strategy is to link stranded natural gas resources with areas where a supply gap is emerging due to declining production and growing demand . our integrated gas operations include marketing and transportation of products manufactured from natural gas , such as lng and methanol , primarily in the u.s. , europe and west africa . our most significant lng investment is our 60 percent ownership in a production facility in equatorial guinea , which sells lng under a long-term contract at prices tied to henry hub natural gas prices . in 2008 , its . Question: h o w m u c h h i g h e r w a s t h e u . s g u l f c o a s t c r a c k s p r e a d t h a n t h e c h i c a g o c r a c k s p r e a d i n t h e f i r s t q u a r t e r o f 2 0 0 8 ?	4,950
251599.7	Given the context, answer the question. Context: 2018 emerson annual report \| 51 as of september 30 , 2018 , 1874750 shares awarded primarily in 2016 were outstanding , contingent on the company achieving its performance objectives through 2018 . the objectives for these shares were met at the 97 percent level at the end of 2018 and 1818508 shares will be distributed in early 2019 . additionally , the rights to receive a maximum of 2261700 and 2375313 common shares were awarded in 2018 and 2017 , respectively , under the new performance shares program , and are outstanding and contingent upon the company achieving its performance objectives through 2020 and 2019 , respectively . incentive shares plans also include restricted stock awards which involve distribution of common stock to key management employees subject to cliff vesting at the end of service periods ranging from three to ten years . the fair value of restricted stock awards is determined based on the average of the high and low market prices of the company 2019s common stock on the date of grant , with compensation expense recognized ratably over the applicable service period . in 2018 , 310000 shares of restricted stock vested as a result of participants fulfilling the applicable service requirements . consequently , 167837 shares were issued while 142163 shares were withheld for income taxes in accordance with minimum withholding requirements . as of september 30 , 2018 , there were 1276200 shares of unvested restricted stock outstanding . the total fair value of shares distributed under incentive shares plans was $ 20 , $ 245 and $ 11 , respectively , in 2018 , 2017 and 2016 , of which $ 9 , $ 101 and $ 4 was paid in cash , primarily for tax withholding . as of september 30 , 2018 , 10.3 million shares remained available for award under incentive shares plans . changes in shares outstanding but not yet earned under incentive shares plans during the year ended september 30 , 2018 follow ( shares in thousands ; assumes 100 percent payout of unvested awards ) : average grant date shares fair value per share . \| shares \| average grant datefair value per share beginning of year \| 4999 \| $ 50.33 granted \| 2295 \| $ 63.79 earned/vested \| -310 ( 310 ) \| $ 51.27 canceled \| -86 ( 86 ) \| $ 56.53 end of year \| 6898 \| $ 54.69 total compensation expense for stock options and incentive shares was $ 216 , $ 115 and $ 159 for 2018 , 2017 and 2016 , respectively , of which $ 5 and $ 14 was included in discontinued operations for 2017 and 2016 , respectively . the increase in expense for 2018 reflects an increase in the company 2019s stock price and progress toward achieving its performance objectives . the decrease in expense for 2017 reflects the impact of changes in the stock price . income tax benefits recognized in the income statement for these compensation arrangements during 2018 , 2017 and 2016 were $ 42 , $ 33 and $ 45 , respectively . as of september 30 , 2018 , total unrecognized compensation expense related to unvested shares awarded under these plans was $ 182 , which is expected to be recognized over a weighted-average period of 1.1 years . in addition to the employee stock option and incentive shares plans , in 2018 the company awarded 12228 shares of restricted stock and 2038 restricted stock units under the restricted stock plan for non-management directors . as of september 30 , 2018 , 159965 shares were available for issuance under this plan . ( 16 ) common and preferred stock at september 30 , 2018 , 37.0 million shares of common stock were reserved for issuance under the company 2019s stock-based compensation plans . during 2018 , 15.1 million common shares were purchased and 2.6 million treasury shares were reissued . in 2017 , 6.6 million common shares were purchased and 5.5 million treasury shares were reissued . at september 30 , 2018 and 2017 , the company had 5.4 million shares of $ 2.50 par value preferred stock authorized , with none issued. . Question: w h a t w a s t h e t o t a l g r a n t d a t e f a i r v a l u e , i n d o l l a r s , a t t h e b e g i n n i n g o f t h e y e a r ?	4,951
162.7	Given the context, answer the question. Context: entergy louisiana , llc and subsidiaries management 2019s financial discussion and analysis in industrial usage is primarily due to increased demand from new customers and expansion projects , primarily in the chemicals industry . the louisiana act 55 financing savings obligation variance results from a regulatory charge for tax savings to be shared with customers per an agreement approved by the lpsc . the tax savings resulted from the 2010-2011 irs audit settlement on the treatment of the louisiana act 55 financing of storm costs for hurricane gustav and hurricane ike . see note 3 to the financial statements for additional discussion of the settlement and benefit sharing . included in other is a provision of $ 23 million recorded in 2016 related to the settlement of the waterford 3 replacement steam generator prudence review proceeding , offset by a provision of $ 32 million recorded in 2015 related to the uncertainty at that time associated with the resolution of the waterford 3 replacement steam generator prudence review proceeding . see note 2 to the financial statements for a discussion of the waterford 3 replacement steam generator prudence review proceeding . 2015 compared to 2014 net revenue consists of operating revenues net of : 1 ) fuel , fuel-related expenses , and gas purchased for resale , 2 ) purchased power expenses , and 3 ) other regulatory charges ( credits ) . following is an analysis of the change in net revenue comparing 2015 to 2014 . amount ( in millions ) . \| amount ( in millions ) 2014 net revenue \| $ 2246.1 retail electric price \| 180.0 volume/weather \| 39.5 waterford 3 replacement steam generator provision \| -32.0 ( 32.0 ) miso deferral \| -32.0 ( 32.0 ) other \| 7.2 2015 net revenue \| $ 2408.8 the retail electric price variance is primarily due to formula rate plan increases , as approved by the lpsc , effective december 2014 and january 2015 . entergy louisiana 2019s formula rate plan increases are discussed in note 2 to the financial statements . the volume/weather variance is primarily due to an increase of 841 gwh , or 2% ( 2 % ) , in billed electricity usage , as a result of increased industrial usage primarily due to increased demand for existing large refinery customers , new customers , and expansion projects primarily in the chemicals industry , partially offset by a decrease in demand in the chemicals industry as a result of a seasonal outage for an existing customer . the waterford 3 replacement steam generator provision is due to a regulatory charge of approximately $ 32 million recorded in 2015 related to the uncertainty associated with the resolution of the waterford 3 replacement steam generator project . see note 2 to the financial statements for a discussion of the waterford 3 replacement steam generator prudence review proceeding . the miso deferral variance is due to the deferral in 2014 of non-fuel miso-related charges , as approved by the lpsc . the deferral of non-fuel miso-related charges is partially offset in other operation and maintenance expenses . see note 2 to the financial statements for further discussion of the recovery of non-fuel miso-related charges. . Question: w h a t i s t h e n e t c h a n g e i n n e t r e v e n u e d u r i n g 2 0 1 5 f o r e n t e r g y l o u i s i a n a ?	4,952
21.54	Given the context, answer the question. Context: 2014 , 2013 and 2012 . the decrease in our consolidated net adjustments for 2014 compared to 2013 was primarily due to a decrease in profit booking rate adjustments at our aeronautics , mfc and mst business segments . the increase in our consolidated net adjustments for 2013 as compared to 2012 was primarily due to an increase in profit booking rate adjustments at our mst and mfc business segments and , to a lesser extent , the increase in the favorable resolution of contractual matters for the corporation . the consolidated net adjustments for 2014 are inclusive of approximately $ 650 million in unfavorable items , which include reserves recorded on certain training and logistics solutions programs at mst and net warranty reserve adjustments for various programs ( including jassm and gmlrs ) at mfc as described in the respective business segment 2019s results of operations below . the consolidated net adjustments for 2013 and 2012 are inclusive of approximately $ 600 million and $ 500 million in unfavorable items , which include a significant profit reduction on the f-35 development contract in both years , as well as a significant profit reduction on the c-5 program in 2013 , each as described in our aeronautics business segment 2019s results of operations discussion below . aeronautics our aeronautics business segment is engaged in the research , design , development , manufacture , integration , sustainment , support and upgrade of advanced military aircraft , including combat and air mobility aircraft , unmanned air vehicles and related technologies . aeronautics 2019 major programs include the f-35 lightning ii joint strike fighter , c-130 hercules , f-16 fighting falcon , f-22 raptor and the c-5m super galaxy . aeronautics 2019 operating results included the following ( in millions ) : . \| 2014 \| 2013 \| 2012 net sales \| $ 14920 \| $ 14123 \| $ 14953 operating profit \| 1649 \| 1612 \| 1699 operating margins \| 11.1% ( 11.1 % ) \| 11.4% ( 11.4 % ) \| 11.4% ( 11.4 % ) backlog at year-end \| $ 27600 \| $ 28000 \| $ 30100 2014 compared to 2013 aeronautics 2019 net sales for 2014 increased $ 797 million , or 6% ( 6 % ) , compared to 2013 . the increase was primarily attributable to higher net sales of approximately $ 790 million for f-35 production contracts due to increased volume and sustainment activities ; about $ 55 million for the f-16 program due to increased deliveries ( 17 aircraft delivered in 2014 compared to 13 delivered in 2013 ) partially offset by contract mix ; and approximately $ 45 million for the f-22 program due to increased risk retirements . the increases were partially offset by lower net sales of approximately $ 55 million for the f-35 development contract due to decreased volume , partially offset by the absence in 2014 of the downward revision to the profit booking rate that occurred in 2013 ; and about $ 40 million for the c-130 program due to fewer deliveries ( 24 aircraft delivered in 2014 compared to 25 delivered in 2013 ) and decreased sustainment activities , partially offset by contract mix . aeronautics 2019 operating profit for 2014 increased $ 37 million , or 2% ( 2 % ) , compared to 2013 . the increase was primarily attributable to higher operating profit of approximately $ 85 million for the f-35 development contract due to the absence in 2014 of the downward revision to the profit booking rate that occurred in 2013 ; about $ 75 million for the f-22 program due to increased risk retirements ; approximately $ 50 million for the c-130 program due to increased risk retirements and contract mix , partially offset by fewer deliveries ; and about $ 25 million for the c-5 program due to the absence in 2014 of the downward revisions to the profit booking rate that occurred in 2013 . the increases were partially offset by lower operating profit of approximately $ 130 million for the f-16 program due to decreased risk retirements , partially offset by increased deliveries ; and about $ 70 million for sustainment activities due to decreased risk retirements and volume . operating profit was comparable for f-35 production contracts as higher volume was offset by lower risk retirements . adjustments not related to volume , including net profit booking rate adjustments and other matters , were approximately $ 105 million lower for 2014 compared to 2013 . 2013 compared to 2012 aeronautics 2019 net sales for 2013 decreased $ 830 million , or 6% ( 6 % ) , compared to 2012 . the decrease was primarily attributable to lower net sales of approximately $ 530 million for the f-16 program due to fewer aircraft deliveries ( 13 aircraft delivered in 2013 compared to 37 delivered in 2012 ) partially offset by aircraft configuration mix ; about $ 385 million for the c-130 program due to fewer aircraft deliveries ( 25 aircraft delivered in 2013 compared to 34 in 2012 ) partially offset by increased sustainment activities ; approximately $ 255 million for the f-22 program , which includes about $ 205 million due to . Question: w h a t w a s t h e r a t i o o f t h e i n c r e a s e i n t h e n e t s a l e s t o t h e o p e r a t i n g p r o f i t	4,953
3%	Given the context, answer the question. Context: united parcel service , inc . and subsidiaries notes to consolidated financial statements floating-rate senior notes the floating-rate senior notes with principal amounts totaling $ 1.043 billion , bear interest at either one or three-month libor , less a spread ranging from 30 to 45 basis points . the average interest rate for 2017 and 2016 was 0.74% ( 0.74 % ) and 0.21% ( 0.21 % ) , respectively . these notes are callable at various times after 30 years at a stated percentage of par value , and putable by the note holders at various times after one year at a stated percentage of par value . the notes have maturities ranging from 2049 through 2067 . we classified the floating-rate senior notes that are putable by the note holder as a long-term liability , due to our intent and ability to refinance the debt if the put option is exercised by the note holder . in march and november 2017 , we issued floating-rate senior notes in the principal amounts of $ 147 and $ 64 million , respectively , which are included in the $ 1.043 billion floating-rate senior notes described above . these notes will bear interest at three-month libor less 30 and 35 basis points , respectively and mature in 2067 . the remaining three floating-rate senior notes in the principal amounts of $ 350 , $ 400 and $ 500 million , bear interest at three-month libor , plus a spread ranging from 15 to 45 basis points . the average interest rate for 2017 and 2016 was 0.50% ( 0.50 % ) and 0.0% ( 0.0 % ) , respectively . these notes are not callable . the notes have maturities ranging from 2021 through 2023 . we classified the floating-rate senior notes that are putable by the note holder as a long-term liability , due to our intent and ability to refinance the debt if the put option is exercised by the note holder . capital lease obligations we have certain property , plant and equipment subject to capital leases . some of the obligations associated with these capital leases have been legally defeased . the recorded value of our property , plant and equipment subject to capital leases is as follows as of december 31 ( in millions ) : . \| 2017 \| 2016 vehicles \| $ 70 \| $ 68 aircraft \| 2291 \| 2291 buildings \| 285 \| 190 accumulated amortization \| -990 ( 990 ) \| -896 ( 896 ) property plant and equipment subject to capital leases \| $ 1656 \| $ 1653 these capital lease obligations have principal payments due at various dates from 2018 through 3005 . facility notes and bonds we have entered into agreements with certain municipalities to finance the construction of , or improvements to , facilities that support our u.s . domestic package and supply chain & freight operations in the united states . these facilities are located around airport properties in louisville , kentucky ; dallas , texas ; and philadelphia , pennsylvania . under these arrangements , we enter into a lease or loan agreement that covers the debt service obligations on the bonds issued by the municipalities , as follows : 2022 bonds with a principal balance of $ 149 million issued by the louisville regional airport authority associated with our worldport facility in louisville , kentucky . the bonds , which are due in january 2029 , bear interest at a variable rate , and the average interest rates for 2017 and 2016 were 0.83% ( 0.83 % ) and 0.37% ( 0.37 % ) , respectively . 2022 bonds with a principal balance of $ 42 million and due in november 2036 issued by the louisville regional airport authority associated with our air freight facility in louisville , kentucky . the bonds bear interest at a variable rate , and the average interest rates for 2017 and 2016 were 0.80% ( 0.80 % ) and 0.36% ( 0.36 % ) , respectively . 2022 bonds with a principal balance of $ 29 million issued by the dallas / fort worth international airport facility improvement corporation associated with our dallas , texas airport facilities . the bonds are due in may 2032 and bear interest at a variable rate , however the variable cash flows on the obligation have been swapped to a fixed 5.11% ( 5.11 % ) . 2022 in september 2015 , we entered into an agreement with the delaware county , pennsylvania industrial development authority , associated with our philadelphia , pennsylvania airport facilities , for bonds issued with a principal balance of $ 100 million . these bonds , which are due september 2045 , bear interest at a variable rate . the average interest rate for 2017 and 2016 was 0.78% ( 0.78 % ) and 0.40% ( 0.40 % ) , respectively. . Question: w h a t w a s t h e p e r c e n t a g e c h a n g e i n v e h i c l e s u n d e r c a p i t a l l e a s e f r o m 2 0 1 6 t o 2 0 1 7 ?	4,954
-74%	Given the context, answer the question. Context: note 10 . commitments and contingencies credit-related commitments and contingencies : credit-related financial instruments , which are off-balance sheet , include indemnified securities financing , unfunded commitments to extend credit or purchase assets , and standby letters of credit . the potential loss associated with indemnified securities financing , unfunded commitments and standby letters of credit is equal to the total gross contractual amount , which does not consider the value of any collateral . the following table summarizes the total gross contractual amounts of credit-related off-balance sheet financial instruments at december 31 . amounts reported do not reflect participations to independent third parties. . ( in millions ) \| 2009 \| 2008 indemnified securities financing \| $ 365251 \| $ 324590 asset purchase agreements ( 1 ) \| 8211 \| 31780 unfunded commitments to extend credit \| 18078 \| 20981 standby letters of credit \| 4784 \| 6061 ( 1 ) amount for 2009 excludes agreements related to the commercial paper conduits , which were consolidated in may 2009 ; see note 11 . approximately 81% ( 81 % ) of the unfunded commitments to extend credit expire within one year from the date of issue . since many of these commitments are expected to expire or renew without being drawn upon , the total commitment amount does not necessarily represent future cash requirements . securities finance : on behalf of our customers , we lend their securities to creditworthy brokers and other institutions . we generally indemnify our customers for the fair market value of those securities against a failure of the borrower to return such securities . collateral funds received in connection with our securities finance services are held by us as agent and are not recorded in our consolidated statement of condition . we require the borrowers to provide collateral in an amount equal to or in excess of 100% ( 100 % ) of the fair market value of the securities borrowed . the borrowed securities are revalued daily to determine if additional collateral is necessary . in this regard , we held , as agent , cash and u.s . government securities with an aggregate fair value of $ 375.92 billion and $ 333.07 billion as collateral for indemnified securities on loan at december 31 , 2009 and 2008 , respectively , presented in the table above . the collateral held by us is invested on behalf of our customers in accordance with their guidelines . in certain cases , the collateral is invested in third-party repurchase agreements , for which we indemnify the customer against loss of the principal invested . we require the repurchase agreement counterparty to provide collateral in an amount equal to or in excess of 100% ( 100 % ) of the amount of the repurchase agreement . the indemnified repurchase agreements and the related collateral are not recorded in our consolidated statement of condition . of the collateral of $ 375.92 billion at december 31 , 2009 and $ 333.07 billion at december 31 , 2008 referenced above , $ 77.73 billion at december 31 , 2009 and $ 68.37 billion at december 31 , 2008 was invested in indemnified repurchase agreements . we held , as agent , cash and securities with an aggregate fair value of $ 82.62 billion and $ 71.87 billion as collateral for indemnified investments in repurchase agreements at december 31 , 2009 and december 31 , 2008 , respectively . legal proceedings : in the ordinary course of business , we and our subsidiaries are involved in disputes , litigation and regulatory inquiries and investigations , both pending and threatened . these matters , if resolved adversely against us , may result in monetary damages , fines and penalties or require changes in our business practices . the resolution of these proceedings is inherently difficult to predict . however , we do not believe that the amount of any judgment , settlement or other action arising from any pending proceeding will have a material adverse effect on our consolidated financial condition , although the outcome of certain of the matters described below may have a material adverse effect on our consolidated results of operations for the period in which such matter is resolved . Question: w h a t i s t h e p e r c e n t c h a n g e i n a s s e t p u r c h a s e a g r e e m e n t s b e t w e e n 2 0 0 8 a n d 2 0 0 9 ?	4,955
49%	Given the context, answer the question. Context: table of contents capital deployment program will be subject to market and economic conditions , applicable legal requirements and other relevant factors . our capital deployment program does not obligate us to continue a dividend for any fixed period , and payment of dividends may be suspended at any time at our discretion . stock performance graph the following stock performance graph and related information shall not be deemed 201csoliciting material 201d or 201cfiled 201d with the securities and exchange commission , nor shall such information be incorporated by reference into any future filings under the securities act of 1933 or the exchange act , each as amended , except to the extent that we specifically incorporate it by reference into such filing . the following stock performance graph compares our cumulative total stockholder return on an annual basis on our common stock with the cumulative total return on the standard and poor 2019s 500 stock index and the amex airline index from december 9 , 2013 ( the first trading day of aag common stock ) through december 31 , 2015 . the comparison assumes $ 100 was invested on december 9 , 2013 in aag common stock and in each of the foregoing indices and assumes reinvestment of dividends . the stock performance shown on the graph below represents historical stock performance and is not necessarily indicative of future stock price performance. . \| 12/9/2013 \| 12/31/2013 \| 12/31/2014 \| 12/31/2015 american airlines group inc . \| $ 100 \| $ 103 \| $ 219 \| $ 175 amex airline index \| 100 \| 102 \| 152 \| 127 s&p 500 \| 100 \| 102 \| 114 \| 113 purchases of equity securities by the issuer and affiliated purchasers since july 2014 , our board of directors has approved several share repurchase programs aggregating $ 7.0 billion of authority of which , as of december 31 , 2015 , $ 2.4 billion remained unused under repurchase programs . Question: w h a t w a s t h e r a t e o f g r o w t h o r d e c r e a s e f r o m 2 0 1 3 t o 2 0 1 4 o n t h e a m e x a i r l i n e i n d e x	4,956
-68.2	Given the context, answer the question. Context: commodities purchased for use in our supply chain . we manage our exposures through a combination of purchase orders , long-term contracts with suppliers , exchange-traded futures and options , and over-the-counter options and swaps . we offset our exposures based on current and projected market conditions and generally seek to acquire the inputs at as close to our planned cost as possible . we use derivatives to manage our exposure to changes in commodity prices . we do not perform the assessments required to achieve hedge accounting for commodity derivative positions . accordingly , the changes in the values of these derivatives are recorded currently in cost of sales in our consolidated statements of earnings . although we do not meet the criteria for cash flow hedge accounting , we believe that these instruments are effective in achieving our objective of providing certainty in the future price of commodities purchased for use in our supply chain . accordingly , for purposes of measuring segment operating performance these gains and losses are reported in unallocated corporate items outside of segment operating results until such time that the exposure we are managing affects earnings . at that time we reclassify the gain or loss from unallocated corporate items to segment operating profit , allowing our operating segments to realize the economic effects of the derivative without experiencing any resulting mark-to-market volatility , which remains in unallocated corporate items . unallocated corporate items for fiscal 2019 , 2018 and 2017 included: . in millions \| fiscal year 2019 \| fiscal year 2018 \| fiscal year 2017 net gain ( loss ) onmark-to-marketvaluation of commodity positions \| $ -39.0 ( 39.0 ) \| $ 14.3 \| $ -22.0 ( 22.0 ) net loss on commodity positions reclassified from unallocated corporate items to segmentoperating profit \| 10.0 \| 11.3 \| 32.0 netmark-to-marketrevaluation of certain grain inventories \| -7.0 ( 7.0 ) \| 6.5 \| 3.9 netmark-to-marketvaluation of certain commodity positions recognized in unallocated corporate items \| $ -36.0 ( 36.0 ) \| $ 32.1 \| $ 13.9 net mark-to-market valuation of certain commodity positions recognized in unallocated corporate items $ ( 36.0 ) $ 32.1 $ 13.9 as of may 26 , 2019 , the net notional value of commodity derivatives was $ 312.5 million , of which $ 242.9 million related to agricultural inputs and $ 69.6 million related to energy inputs . these contracts relate to inputs that generally will be utilized within the next 12 months . interest rate risk we are exposed to interest rate volatility with regard to future issuances of fixed-rate debt , and existing and future issuances of floating-rate debt . primary exposures include u.s . treasury rates , libor , euribor , and commercial paper rates in the united states and europe . we use interest rate swaps , forward-starting interest rate swaps , and treasury locks to hedge our exposure to interest rate changes , to reduce the volatility of our financing costs , and to achieve a desired proportion of fixed rate versus floating-rate debt , based on current and projected market conditions . generally under these swaps , we agree with a counterparty to exchange the difference between fixed-rate and floating-rate interest amounts based on an agreed upon notional principal amount . floating interest rate exposures 2014 floating-to-fixed interest rate swaps are accounted for as cash flow hedges , as are all hedges of forecasted issuances of debt . effectiveness is assessed based on either the perfectly effective hypothetical derivative method or changes in the present value of interest payments on the underlying debt . effective gains and losses deferred to aoci are reclassified into earnings over the life of the associated debt . ineffective gains and losses are recorded as net interest . the amount of hedge ineffectiveness was less than $ 1 million in fiscal 2019 , a $ 2.6 million loss in fiscal 2018 , and less than $ 1 million in fiscal 2017 . fixed interest rate exposures 2014 fixed-to-floating interest rate swaps are accounted for as fair value hedges with effectiveness assessed based on changes in the fair value of the underlying debt and derivatives , using . Question: w h a t i s t h e n e t c h a n g e i n n e t m a r k - t o - m a r k e t v a l u a t i o n o f c e r t a i n c o m m o d i t y p o s i t i o n f r o m 2 0 1 8 t o 2 0 1 9 a s p r e s e n t e d i n t h e t a b l e ?	4,957
16.9%	Given the context, answer the question. Context: the company has also encountered various quality issues on its aircraft carrier construction and overhaul programs and its virginia-class submarine construction program at its newport news location . these primarily involve matters related to filler metal used in pipe welds identified in 2007 , and issues associated with non-nuclear weld inspection and the installation of weapons handling equipment on certain submarines , and certain purchased material quality issues identified in 2009 . the company does not believe that resolution of these issues will have a material effect upon its consolidated financial position , results of operations or cash flows . environmental matters 2014the estimated cost to complete environmental remediation has been accrued where it is probable that the company will incur such costs in the future to address environmental conditions at currently or formerly owned or leased operating facilities , or at sites where it has been named a potentially responsible party ( 201cprp 201d ) by the environmental protection agency , or similarly designated by another environmental agency , and these costs can be estimated by management . these accruals do not include any litigation costs related to environmental matters , nor do they include amounts recorded as asset retirement obligations . to assess the potential impact on the company 2019s consolidated financial statements , management estimates the range of reasonably possible remediation costs that could be incurred by the company , taking into account currently available facts on each site as well as the current state of technology and prior experience in remediating contaminated sites . these estimates are reviewed periodically and adjusted to reflect changes in facts and technical and legal circumstances . management estimates that as of december 31 , 2011 , the probable future costs for environmental remediation is $ 3 million , which is accrued in other current liabilities . factors that could result in changes to the company 2019s estimates include : modification of planned remedial actions , increases or decreases in the estimated time required to remediate , changes to the determination of legally responsible parties , discovery of more extensive contamination than anticipated , changes in laws and regulations affecting remediation requirements , and improvements in remediation technology . should other prps not pay their allocable share of remediation costs , the company may have to incur costs exceeding those already estimated and accrued . in addition , there are certain potential remediation sites where the costs of remediation cannot be reasonably estimated . although management cannot predict whether new information gained as projects progress will materially affect the estimated liability accrued , management does not believe that future remediation expenditures will have a material effect on the company 2019s consolidated financial position , results of operations or cash flows . financial arrangements 2014in the ordinary course of business , hii uses standby letters of credit issued by commercial banks and surety bonds issued by insurance companies principally to support the company 2019s self-insured workers 2019 compensation plans . at december 31 , 2011 , there were $ 121 million of standby letters of credit issued but undrawn and $ 297 million of surety bonds outstanding related to hii . u.s . government claims 2014from time to time , the u.s . government advises the company of claims and penalties concerning certain potential disallowed costs . when such findings are presented , the company and u.s . government representatives engage in discussions to enable hii to evaluate the merits of these claims as well as to assess the amounts being claimed . the company does not believe that the outcome of any such matters will have a material effect on its consolidated financial position , results of operations or cash flows . collective bargaining agreements 2014the company believes that it maintains good relations with its approximately 38000 employees of which approximately 50% ( 50 % ) are covered by a total of 10 collective bargaining agreements . the company expects to renegotiate renewals of each of its collective bargaining agreements between 2013 and 2015 as they approach expiration . collective bargaining agreements generally expire after three to five years and are subject to renegotiation at that time . it is not expected that the results of these negotiations , either individually or in the aggregate , will have a material effect on the company 2019s consolidated results of operations . operating leases 2014rental expense for operating leases was $ 44 million in 2011 , $ 44 million in 2010 , and $ 48 million in 2009 . these amounts are net of immaterial amounts of sublease rental income . minimum rental commitments under long- term non-cancellable operating leases for the next five years and thereafter are : ( $ in millions ) . 2012 \| $ 21 2013 \| 17 2014 \| 15 2015 \| 13 2016 \| 10 thereafter \| 48 total \| $ 124 . Question: w h a t p o r t i o n o f t h e t o t a l r e n t a l c o m m i t m e n t s f o r n o n - c a n c e l l a b l e o p e r a t i n g l e a s e i s d u e i n t h e n e x t 1 2 m o n t h s ?	4,958
19%	Given the context, answer the question. Context: over 1 million customers . edc also provides 2265 mw of installed capacity through its generation facilities in venezuela . the purchase price allocation was as follows ( in millions ) : . purchase price \| $ 1700 less : stockholders' equity of edc \| capital stock \| -508 ( 508 ) paid-in surplus \| -245 ( 245 ) retained earnings \| -1353 ( 1353 ) treasury stock \| 323 adjustment of assets and liabilities to fair value: \| property and equipment \| -1578 ( 1578 ) deferred income tax asset \| 231 employee severance plan \| 157 investment in subsidiaries \| 36 elimination of intangible asset 2013 goodwill \| 7 other net assets \| -51 ( 51 ) goodwill 2013 negative \| $ -1281 ( 1281 ) property and equipment was reduced by the negative goodwill . the cost of the acquisition was allocated on the basis of estimated fair value of the assets acquired and liabilities assumed , primarily based upon an independent appraisal . as of december 31 , 2000 , the severance plan was completed and the workforce was reduced by approximately 2500 people . all of the costs associated with the plan were recorded during 2000 , and all of the cash payments were made in 2000 . in august 2000 , a subsidiary of the company completed the acquisition of a 59% ( 59 % ) equity interest in a hidroelectrica alicura s.a . ( 2018 2018alicura 2019 2019 ) in argentina from southern energy , inc . and its partners . alicura operates a 1000 mw peaking hydro facility located in the province of neuquen , argentina . the purchase price of approximately $ 205 million includes the assumption of existing non-recourse debt . in december 2000 a subsidiary of the company acquired an additional 39% ( 39 % ) ownership interest in alicura , 19.5% ( 19.5 % ) ownership interests each from the federal government of argentina and the province of neuquen , for approximately $ 9 million . at december 31 , 2000 , the company 2019s ownership interest was 98% ( 98 % ) . the employees of alicura own the remaining 2% ( 2 % ) . all of the purchase price was allocated to property , plant and equipment and is being depreciated over the useful life . in october 2000 , a subsidiary of the company completed the acquisition of reliant energy international 2019s 50% ( 50 % ) interest in el salvador energy holdings , s.a . ( 2018 2018eseh 2019 2019 ) that owns three distribution companies in el salvador . the purchase price for this interest in eseh was approximately $ 173 million . the three distribution companies , compania de alumbrado electrico de san salvador , s.a . de c.v. , empresa electrica de oriente , s.a . de c.v . and distribuidora electrica de usulutan , s.a . de c.v . serve 3.5 million people , approximately 60% ( 60 % ) of the population of el salvador , including the capital city of san salvador . a subsidiary of the company had previously acquired a 50% ( 50 % ) interest in eseh through its acquisition of edc . through the purchase of reliant energy international 2019s ownership interest , the company owns a controlling interest in the three distribution companies . the total purchase price for 100% ( 100 % ) of the interest in eseh approximated $ 325 million , of which approximately $ 176 million was allocated to goodwill and is being amortized over 40 years . in december 2000 , the company acquired all of the outstanding shares of kmr power corporation ( 2018 2018kmr 2019 2019 ) , including the buyout of a minority partner in one of kmr 2019s subsidiaries , for approximately $ 64 million and assumed long-term liabilities of approximately $ 245 million . the acquisition was financed through the issuance of approximately 699000 shares of aes common stock and cash . kmr owns a controlling interest in two gas-fired power plants located in cartagena , colombia : a 100% ( 100 % ) interest in the 314 mw termocandelaria power plant and a 66% ( 66 % ) interest in the 100 . Question: w h a t p e r c e n t a g e o f t h e p u r c h a s e p r i c e w a s t r e a s u r y s t o c k ?	4,959
12.8	Given the context, answer the question. Context: zimmer holdings , inc . 2013 form 10-k annual report notes to consolidated financial statements ( continued ) we have four tranches of senior notes outstanding : $ 250 million aggregate principal amount of 1.4 percent notes due november 30 , 2014 , $ 500 million aggregate principal amount of 4.625 percent notes due november 30 , 2019 , $ 300 million aggregate principal amount of 3.375 percent notes due november 30 , 2021 and $ 500 million aggregate principal amount of 5.75 percent notes due november 30 , 2039 . interest on each series is payable on may 30 and november 30 of each year until maturity . the estimated fair value of our senior notes as of december 31 , 2013 , based on quoted prices for the specific securities from transactions in over-the-counter markets ( level 2 ) , was $ 1649.5 million . we may redeem the senior notes at our election in whole or in part at any time prior to maturity at a redemption price equal to the greater of 1 ) 100 percent of the principal amount of the notes being redeemed ; or 2 ) the sum of the present values of the remaining scheduled payments of principal and interest ( not including any portion of such payments of interest accrued as of the date of redemption ) , discounted to the date of redemption on a semi-annual basis at the treasury rate ( as defined in the debt agreement ) , plus 15 basis points in the case of the 2014 notes , 20 basis points in the case of the 2019 notes and 2021 notes , and 25 basis points in the case of the 2039 notes . we would also pay the accrued and unpaid interest on the senior notes to the redemption date . we have entered into interest rate swap agreements which we designated as fair value hedges of underlying fixed- rate obligations on our senior notes due 2019 and 2021 . see note 13 for additional information regarding the interest rate swap agreements . before our senior notes due november 30 , 2014 become payable , we intend to issue new senior notes in order to pay the $ 250 million owed . if we are not able to issue new senior notes , we intend to borrow against our senior credit facility to pay these notes . since we have the ability and intent to refinance these senior notes on a long-term basis with new notes or through our senior credit facility , we have classified these senior notes as long-term debt as of december 31 , 2013 . we also have available uncommitted credit facilities totaling $ 50.7 million . at december 31 , 2013 , the weighted average interest rate for our long-term borrowings was 3.3 percent . at december 31 , 2012 , the weighted average interest rate for short-term and long-term borrowings was 1.1 percent and 3.5 percent , respectively . we paid $ 68.1 million , $ 67.8 million and $ 55.0 million in interest during 2013 , 2012 and 2011 , respectively . 12 . accumulated other comprehensive income oci refers to certain gains and losses that under gaap are included in comprehensive income but are excluded from net earnings as these amounts are initially recorded as an adjustment to stockholders 2019 equity . amounts in oci may be reclassified to net earnings upon the occurrence of certain events . our oci is comprised of foreign currency translation adjustments , unrealized gains and losses on cash flow hedges , unrealized gains and losses on available-for-sale securities , and amortization of prior service costs and unrecognized gains and losses in actuarial assumptions on our defined benefit plans . foreign currency translation adjustments are reclassified to net earnings upon sale or upon a complete or substantially complete liquidation of an investment in a foreign entity . unrealized gains and losses on cash flow hedges are reclassified to net earnings when the hedged item affects net earnings . unrealized gains and losses on available-for-sale securities are reclassified to net earnings if we sell the security before maturity or if the unrealized loss is considered to be other-than-temporary . we typically hold our available-for-sale securities until maturity and are able to realize their amortized cost and therefore we do not have reclassification adjustments to net earnings on these securities . amounts related to defined benefit plans that are in oci are reclassified over the service periods of employees in the plan . the reclassification amounts are allocated to all employees in the plans and therefore the reclassified amounts may become part of inventory to the extent they are considered direct labor costs . see note 14 for more information on our defined benefit plans . the following table shows the changes in the components of oci , net of tax ( in millions ) : foreign currency translation hedges unrealized gains on securities defined benefit . \| foreign currency translation \| cash flow hedges \| unrealizedgains onsecurities \| defined benefit plan items balance december 31 2012 \| $ 445.5 \| $ 4.1 \| $ 0.4 \| $ -106.1 ( 106.1 ) oci before reclassifications \| -44.4 ( 44.4 ) \| 33.4 \| 0.1 \| 30.6 reclassifications \| 2013 \| -4.4 ( 4.4 ) \| 2013 \| 7.9 balance december 31 2013 \| $ 401.1 \| $ 33.1 \| $ 0.5 \| $ -67.6 ( 67.6 ) . Question: w h a t w a s t h e c h a n g e i n i n t e r e s t p a i d b e t w e e n 2 0 1 1 a n d 2 0 1 2 i n m i l l i o n s ?	4,960
-32.06%	Given the context, answer the question. Context: the graph below compares expeditors international of washington , inc.'s cumulative 5-year total shareholder return on common stock with the cumulative total returns of the s&p 500 index , the nasdaq transportation index , and the nasdaq industrial transportation index ( nqusb2770t ) as a replacement for the nasdaq transportation index . the company is making the modification to reference a specific transportation index and to source that data directly from nasdaq . the graph assumes that the value of the investment in our common stock and in each of the indexes ( including reinvestment of dividends ) was $ 100 on 12/31/2012 and tracks it through 12/31/2017 . total return assumes reinvestment of dividends in each of the indices indicated . comparison of 5-year cumulative total return among expeditors international of washington , inc. , the s&p 500 index , the nasdaq industrial transportation index and the nasdaq transportation index. . \| 12/12 \| 12/13 \| 12/14 \| 12/15 \| 12/16 \| 12/17 expeditors international of washington inc . \| $ 100.00 \| $ 113.52 \| $ 116.07 \| $ 119.12 \| $ 142.10 \| $ 176.08 standard and poor's 500 index \| 100.00 \| 132.39 \| 150.51 \| 152.59 \| 170.84 \| 208.14 nasdaq transportation \| 100.00 \| 133.76 \| 187.65 \| 162.30 \| 193.79 \| 248.92 nasdaq industrial transportation ( nqusb2770t ) \| 100.00 \| 141.60 \| 171.91 \| 132.47 \| 171.17 \| 218.34 the stock price performance included in this graph is not necessarily indicative of future stock price performance . item 6 2014 selected financial data financial highlights in thousands , except per share data 2017 2016 2015 2014 2013 revenues ..................................................................... . $ 6920948 6098037 6616632 6564721 6080257 net revenues1 ............................................................... . $ 2319189 2164036 2187777 1981427 1882853 net earnings attributable to shareholders ..................... . $ 489345 430807 457223 376888 348526 diluted earnings attributable to shareholders per share $ 2.69 2.36 2.40 1.92 1.68 basic earnings attributable to shareholders per share.. . $ 2.73 2.38 2.42 1.92 1.69 dividends declared and paid per common share.......... . $ 0.84 0.80 0.72 0.64 0.60 cash used for dividends ............................................... . $ 150495 145123 135673 124634 123292 cash used for share repurchases ................................. . $ 478258 337658 629991 550781 261936 working capital ............................................................. . $ 1448333 1288648 1115136 1285188 1526673 total assets .................................................................. . $ 3117008 2790871 2565577 2870626 2996416 shareholders 2019 equity ..................................................... . $ 1991858 1844638 1691993 1868408 2084783 weighted average diluted shares outstanding .............. . 181666 182704 190223 196768 206895 weighted average basic shares outstanding ................ . 179247 181282 188941 196147 205995 _______________________ 1non-gaap measure calculated as revenues less directly related operating expenses attributable to our principal services . see management's discussion and analysis for a reconciliation of net revenues to revenues . safe harbor for forward-looking statements under private securities litigation reform act of 1995 ; certain cautionary statements this annual report on form 10-k for the fiscal year ended december 31 , 2017 contains 201cforward-looking statements , 201d as defined in section 27a of the securities act of 1933 , as amended , and section 21e of the securities exchange act of 1934 , as amended . from time to time , expeditors or its representatives have made or may make forward-looking statements , orally or in writing . such forward-looking statements may be included in , but not limited to , press releases , presentations , oral statements made with the approval of an authorized executive officer or in various filings made by expeditors with the securities and exchange commission . statements including those preceded by , followed by or that include the words or phrases 201cwill likely result 201d , 201care expected to 201d , "would expect" , "would not expect" , 201cwill continue 201d , 201cis anticipated 201d , 201cestimate 201d , 201cproject 201d , "provisional" , "plan" , "believe" , "probable" , "reasonably possible" , "may" , "could" , "should" , "intends" , "foreseeable future" or similar expressions are intended to identify 201cforward-looking statements 201d within the meaning of the private securities litigation reform act of 1995 . such statements are qualified in their entirety by reference to and are accompanied by the discussion in item 1a of certain important factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from such forward-looking statements . the risks included in item 1a are not exhaustive . furthermore , reference is also made to other sections of this report , which include additional factors that could adversely impact expeditors' business and financial performance . moreover , expeditors operates in a very competitive , complex and rapidly changing global environment . new risk factors emerge from time to time and it is not possible for management to predict all of such risk factors , nor can it assess the impact of all of such risk factors on expeditors' business or the extent to which any factor , or combination of factors , may cause actual results to differ materially from those contained in any forward-looking statements . accordingly , forward-looking statements cannot be relied upon as a guarantee of actual results . shareholders should be aware that while expeditors does , from time to time , communicate with securities analysts , it is against expeditors' policy to disclose to such analysts any material non-public information or other confidential commercial information . accordingly , shareholders should not assume that expeditors agrees with any statement or report issued by any analyst irrespective of the content of such statement or report . furthermore , expeditors has a policy against issuing financial forecasts or projections or confirming the accuracy of forecasts or projections issued by others . accordingly , to the extent that reports issued by securities analysts contain any projections , forecasts or opinions , such reports are not the responsibility of expeditors. . Question: w h a t i s t h e d i f f e r e n c e i n p e r c e n t a g e r e t u r n b e t w e e n e x p e d i t o r s i n t e r n a t i o n a l o f w a s h i n g t o n i n c . a n d t h e s t a n d a r d a n d p o o r ' s 5 0 0 i n d e x f o r t h e f i v e y e a r s e n d e d 1 2 / 1 7 ?	4,961
625	Given the context, answer the question. Context: assumed health care cost trend rates for the u.s . retiree health care benefit plan as of december 31 are as follows: . \| 2017 \| 2016 assumed health care cost trend rate for next year \| 7.50% ( 7.50 % ) \| 6.75% ( 6.75 % ) ultimate trend rate \| 5.00% ( 5.00 % ) \| 5.00% ( 5.00 % ) year in which ultimate trend rate is reached \| 2028 \| 2024 a one percentage point increase or decrease in health care cost trend rates over all future periods would have increased or decreased the accumulated postretirement benefit obligation for the u.s . retiree health care benefit plan as of december 31 , 2017 , by $ 1 million . the service cost and interest cost components of 2017 plan expense would have increased or decreased by less than $ 1 million . deferred compensation arrangements we have a deferred compensation plan that allows u.s . employees whose base salary and management responsibility exceed a certain level to defer receipt of a portion of their cash compensation . payments under this plan are made based on the participant 2019s distribution election and plan balance . participants can earn a return on their deferred compensation based on notional investments in the same investment funds that are offered in our defined contribution plans . as of december 31 , 2017 , our liability to participants of the deferred compensation plans was $ 255 million and is recorded in other long-term liabilities on our consolidated balance sheets . this amount reflects the accumulated participant deferrals and earnings thereon as of that date . as of december 31 , 2017 , we held $ 236 million in mutual funds related to these plans that are recorded in long-term investments on our consolidated balance sheets , and serve as an economic hedge against changes in fair values of our other deferred compensation liabilities . we record changes in the fair value of the liability and the related investment in sg&a as discussed in note 8 . 11 . debt and lines of credit short-term borrowings we maintain a line of credit to support commercial paper borrowings , if any , and to provide additional liquidity through bank loans . as of december 31 , 2017 , we had a variable-rate revolving credit facility from a consortium of investment-grade banks that allows us to borrow up to $ 2 billion until march 2022 . the interest rate on borrowings under this credit facility , if drawn , is indexed to the applicable london interbank offered rate ( libor ) . as of december 31 , 2017 , our credit facility was undrawn and we had no commercial paper outstanding . long-term debt we retired $ 250 million of maturing debt in march 2017 and another $ 375 million in june 2017 . in may 2017 , we issued an aggregate principal amount of $ 600 million of fixed-rate , long-term debt . the offering consisted of the reissuance of $ 300 million of 2.75% ( 2.75 % ) notes due in 2021 at a premium and the issuance of $ 300 million of 2.625% ( 2.625 % ) notes due in 2024 at a discount . we incurred $ 3 million of issuance and other related costs . the proceeds of the offerings were $ 605 million , net of the original issuance discount and premium , and were used for the repayment of maturing debt and general corporate purposes . in november 2017 , we issued a principal amount of $ 500 million of fixed-rate , long-term debt due in 2027 . we incurred $ 3 million of issuance and other related costs . the proceeds of the offering were $ 494 million , net of the original issuance discount , and were used for general corporate purposes . in may 2016 , we issued a principal amount of $ 500 million of fixed-rate , long-term debt due in 2022 . we incurred $ 3 million of issuance and other related costs . the proceeds of the offering were $ 499 million , net of the original issuance discount , and were used toward the repayment of a portion of $ 1.0 billion of maturing debt retired in may 2016 . in may 2015 , we issued a principal amount of $ 500 million of fixed-rate , long-term debt due in 2020 . we incurred $ 3 million of issuance and other related costs . the proceeds of the offering were $ 498 million , net of the original issuance discount , and were used toward the repayment of a portion of the debt that matured in august 2015 . we retired $ 250 million of maturing debt in april 2015 and another $ 750 million in august 2015 . texas instruments 2022 2017 form 10-k 51 . Question: w h a t w a s t h e t o t a l l o n g - t e r m d e b t r e t i r e d i n 2 0 1 7	4,962
3%	Given the context, answer the question. Context: the containerboard group ( a division of tenneco packaging inc. ) notes to combined financial statements ( continued ) april 11 , 1999 5 . pension and other benefit plans ( continued ) the funded status of the group 2019s allocation of defined benefit plans , excluding the retirement plan , reconciles with amounts recognized in the 1998 statements of assets and liabilities and interdivision account as follows ( in thousands ) : actuarial present value at september 30 , 1998 2014 . vested benefit obligation \| $ -98512 ( 98512 ) accumulated benefit obligation \| -108716 ( 108716 ) projected benefit obligation \| $ -108716 ( 108716 ) plan assets at fair value at september 30 1998 \| 146579 unrecognized transition liability \| -1092 ( 1092 ) unrecognized net gain \| -14623 ( 14623 ) unrecognized prior service cost \| 13455 prepaid pension cost at december 31 1998 \| $ 35603 the weighted average discount rate used in determining the actuarial present value of the benefit obligations was 7.00% ( 7.00 % ) for the year ended december 31 , 1998 . the weighted average expected long-term rate of return on plan assets was 10% ( 10 % ) for 1998 . middle management employees participate in a variety of incentive compensation plans . these plans provide for incentive payments based on the achievement of certain targeted operating results and other specific business goals . the targeted operating results are determined each year by senior management of packaging . the amounts charged to expense for these plans were $ 1599000 for the period ended april 11 , 1999 . in june , 1992 , tenneco initiated an employee stock purchase plan ( 2018 2018espp 2019 2019 ) . the plan allows u.s . and canadian employees of the group to purchase tenneco inc . common stock through payroll deductions at a 15% ( 15 % ) discount . each year , an employee in the plan may purchase shares with a discounted value not to exceed $ 21250 . the weighted average fair value of the employee purchase right , which was estimated using the black-scholes option pricing model and the assumptions described below except that the average life of each purchase right was assumed to be 90 days , was $ 6.31 for the period ended december 31 , 1998 . the espp was terminated as of september 30 , 1996 . tenneco adopted a new employee stock purchase plan effective april 1 , 1997 . under the respective espps , tenneco sold 36883 shares to group employees for the period ended april 11 , 1999 . in december , 1996 , tenneco adopted the 1996 stock ownership plan , which permits the granting of a variety of awards , including common stock , restricted stock , performance units , stock appreciation rights , and stock options to officers and employees of tenneco . tenneco can issue up to 17000000 shares of common stock under this plan , which will terminate december 31 , 2001 . the april 11 , 1999 , fair market value of the options granted was calculated using tenneco 2019s stock price at the grant date and multiplying the amount by the historical percentage of past black-scholes pricing values fair value ( approximately 25% ( 25 % ) ) . the fair value of each stock option issued by tenneco to the group in prior periods was estimated on the date of grant using the black-sholes option pricing model using the following ranges of weighted average assumptions for grants during the past three . Question: w h a t i s t h e d i f f e r e n c e b e t w e e n t h e w e i g h t e d a v e r a g e e x p e c t e d l o n g - t e r m r a t e o f r e t u r n o n p l a n a s s e t s f o r 1 9 9 8 a n d t h e w e i g h t e d a v e r a g e d i s c o u n t r a t e u s e d i n d e t e r m i n i n g t h e a c t u a r i a l p r e s e n t v a l u e o f t h e b e n e f i t o b l i g a t i o n s i n 1 9 9 8 ?	4,963
-20.7%	Given the context, answer the question. Context: management 2019s discussion and analysis the table below presents the operating results of our institutional client services segment. . in millions \| year ended december 2012 \| year ended december 2011 \| year ended december 2010 fixed income currency and commodities client execution \| $ 9914 \| $ 9018 \| $ 13707 equities client execution1 \| 3171 \| 3031 \| 3231 commissions and fees \| 3053 \| 3633 \| 3426 securities services \| 1986 \| 1598 \| 1432 total equities \| 8210 \| 8262 \| 8089 total net revenues \| 18124 \| 17280 \| 21796 operating expenses \| 12480 \| 12837 \| 14994 pre-tax earnings \| $ 5644 \| $ 4443 \| $ 6802 1 . includes net revenues related to reinsurance of $ 1.08 billion , $ 880 million and $ 827 million for the years ended december 2012 , december 2011 and december 2010 , respectively . 2012 versus 2011 . net revenues in institutional client services were $ 18.12 billion for 2012 , 5% ( 5 % ) higher than 2011 . net revenues in fixed income , currency and commodities client execution were $ 9.91 billion for 2012 , 10% ( 10 % ) higher than 2011 . these results reflected strong net revenues in mortgages , which were significantly higher compared with 2011 . in addition , net revenues in credit products and interest rate products were solid and higher compared with 2011 . these increases were partially offset by significantly lower net revenues in commodities and slightly lower net revenues in currencies . although broad market concerns persisted during 2012 , fixed income , currency and commodities client execution operated in a generally improved environment characterized by tighter credit spreads and less challenging market-making conditions compared with 2011 . net revenues in equities were $ 8.21 billion for 2012 , essentially unchanged compared with 2011 . net revenues in securities services were significantly higher compared with 2011 , reflecting a gain of approximately $ 500 million on the sale of our hedge fund administration business . in addition , equities client execution net revenues were higher than 2011 , primarily reflecting significantly higher results in cash products , principally due to increased levels of client activity . these increases were offset by lower commissions and fees , reflecting lower market volumes . during 2012 , equities operated in an environment generally characterized by an increase in global equity prices and lower volatility levels . the net loss attributable to the impact of changes in our own credit spreads on borrowings for which the fair value option was elected was $ 714 million ( $ 433 million and $ 281 million related to fixed income , currency and commodities client execution and equities client execution , respectively ) for 2012 , compared with a net gain of $ 596 million ( $ 399 million and $ 197 million related to fixed income , currency and commodities client execution and equities client execution , respectively ) for 2011 . during 2012 , institutional client services operated in an environment generally characterized by continued broad market concerns and uncertainties , although positive developments helped to improve market conditions . these developments included certain central bank actions to ease monetary policy and address funding risks for european financial institutions . in addition , the u.s . economy posted stable to improving economic data , including favorable developments in unemployment and housing . these improvements resulted in tighter credit spreads , higher global equity prices and lower levels of volatility . however , concerns about the outlook for the global economy and continued political uncertainty , particularly the political debate in the united states surrounding the fiscal cliff , generally resulted in client risk aversion and lower activity levels . also , uncertainty over financial regulatory reform persisted . if these concerns and uncertainties continue over the long term , net revenues in fixed income , currency and commodities client execution and equities would likely be negatively impacted . operating expenses were $ 12.48 billion for 2012 , 3% ( 3 % ) lower than 2011 , primarily due to lower brokerage , clearing , exchange and distribution fees , and lower impairment charges , partially offset by higher net provisions for litigation and regulatory proceedings . pre-tax earnings were $ 5.64 billion in 2012 , 27% ( 27 % ) higher than 2011 . 2011 versus 2010 . net revenues in institutional client services were $ 17.28 billion for 2011 , 21% ( 21 % ) lower than 2010 . net revenues in fixed income , currency and commodities client execution were $ 9.02 billion for 2011 , 34% ( 34 % ) lower than 2010 . although activity levels during 2011 were generally consistent with 2010 levels , and results were solid during the first quarter of 2011 , the environment during the remainder of 2011 was characterized by broad market concerns and uncertainty , resulting in volatile markets and significantly wider credit spreads , which contributed to difficult market-making conditions and led to reductions in risk by us and our clients . as a result of these conditions , net revenues across the franchise were lower , including significant declines in mortgages and credit products , compared with 2010 . 54 goldman sachs 2012 annual report . Question: w h a t i s t h e g r o w t h r a t e i n n e t r e v e n u e s i n 2 0 1 1 ?	4,964
2.25%	Given the context, answer the question. Context: results of operations for 2016 include : 1 ) $ 2836 million ( $ 1829 million net-of-tax ) of impairment and related charges primarily to write down the carrying values of the entergy wholesale commodities 2019 palisades , indian point 2 , and indian point 3 plants and related assets to their fair values ; 2 ) a reduction of income tax expense , net of unrecognized tax benefits , of $ 238 million as a result of a change in the tax classification of a legal entity that owned one of the entergy wholesale commodities nuclear power plants ; income tax benefits as a result of the settlement of the 2010-2011 irs audit , including a $ 75 million tax benefit recognized by entergy louisiana related to the treatment of the vidalia purchased power agreement and a $ 54 million net benefit recognized by entergy louisiana related to the treatment of proceeds received in 2010 for the financing of hurricane gustav and hurricane ike storm costs pursuant to louisiana act 55 ; and 3 ) a reduction in expenses of $ 100 million ( $ 64 million net-of-tax ) due to the effects of recording in 2016 the final court decisions in several lawsuits against the doe related to spent nuclear fuel storage costs . see note 14 to the financial statements for further discussion of the impairment and related charges , see note 3 to the financial statements for additional discussion of the income tax items , and see note 8 to the financial statements for discussion of the spent nuclear fuel litigation . net revenue utility following is an analysis of the change in net revenue comparing 2017 to 2016 . amount ( in millions ) . \| amount ( in millions ) 2016 net revenue \| $ 6179 retail electric price \| 91 regulatory credit resulting from reduction of thefederal corporate income tax rate \| 56 grand gulf recovery \| 27 louisiana act 55 financing savings obligation \| 17 volume/weather \| -61 ( 61 ) other \| 9 2017 net revenue \| $ 6318 the retail electric price variance is primarily due to : 2022 the implementation of formula rate plan rates effective with the first billing cycle of january 2017 at entergy arkansas and an increase in base rates effective february 24 , 2016 , each as approved by the apsc . a significant portion of the base rate increase was related to the purchase of power block 2 of the union power station in march 2016 ; 2022 a provision recorded in 2016 related to the settlement of the waterford 3 replacement steam generator prudence review proceeding ; 2022 the implementation of the transmission cost recovery factor rider at entergy texas , effective september 2016 , and an increase in the transmission cost recovery factor rider rate , effective march 2017 , as approved by the puct ; and 2022 an increase in rates at entergy mississippi , as approved by the mpsc , effective with the first billing cycle of july 2016 . see note 2 to the financial statements for further discussion of the rate proceedings and the waterford 3 replacement steam generator prudence review proceeding . see note 14 to the financial statements for discussion of the union power station purchase . entergy corporation and subsidiaries management 2019s financial discussion and analysis . Question: w h a t i s t h e p e r c e n t c h a n g e i n n e t r e v e n u e f r o m 2 0 1 6 t o 2 0 1 7 ?	4,965
27.2%	Given the context, answer the question. Context: five-year performance comparison 2013 the following graph provides an indicator of cumulative total shareholder returns for the corporation as compared to the peer group index ( described above ) , the dj trans , and the s&p 500 . the graph assumes that $ 100 was invested in the common stock of union pacific corporation and each index on december 31 , 2011 and that all dividends were reinvested . the information below is historical in nature and is not necessarily indicative of future performance . purchases of equity securities 2013 during 2016 , we repurchased 35686529 shares of our common stock at an average price of $ 88.36 . the following table presents common stock repurchases during each month for the fourth quarter of 2016 : period total number of shares purchased [a] average price paid per share total number of shares purchased as part of a publicly announced plan or program [b] maximum number of shares remaining under the plan or program [b] . period \| total number of shares purchased [a] \| average price paid per share \| total number of shares purchased as part of a publicly announcedplan or program [b] \| maximum number of shares remaining under the plan or program [b] oct . 1 through oct . 31 \| 3501308 \| $ 92.89 \| 3452500 \| 23769426 nov . 1 through nov . 30 \| 2901167 \| 95.68 \| 2876067 \| 20893359 dec . 1 through dec . 31 \| 3296652 \| 104.30 \| 3296100 \| 17597259 total \| 9699127 \| $ 97.60 \| 9624667 \| n/a [a] total number of shares purchased during the quarter includes approximately 74460 shares delivered or attested to upc by employees to pay stock option exercise prices , satisfy excess tax withholding obligations for stock option exercises or vesting of retention units , and pay withholding obligations for vesting of retention shares . [b] effective january 1 , 2014 , our board of directors authorized the repurchase of up to 120 million shares of our common stock by december 31 , 2017 . these repurchases may be made on the open market or through other transactions . our management has sole discretion with respect to determining the timing and amount of these transactions . on november 17 , 2016 , our board of directors approved the early renewal of the share repurchase program , authorizing the repurchase of up to 120 million shares of our common stock by december 31 , 2020 . the new authorization was effective january 1 , 2017 , and replaces the previous authorization , which expired on december 31 , 2016. . Question: d u r i n g 2 0 1 6 w h a t w a s t h e p e r c e n t o f t h e n u m b e r o f s h a r e s b o u g h t i n t h e f o u r t h q u a r t e r	4,966
19.9	Given the context, answer the question. Context: income was due primarily to the adoption of statement of position 03-1 , 201caccounting and reporting by insurance enterprises for certain nontraditional long-duration contracts and for separate accounts 201d ( 201csop 03-1 201d ) , which resulted in $ 1.6 billion of net investment income . 2003 compared to 2002 2014 revenues for the year ended december 31 , 2003 increased $ 2.3 billion over the comparable 2002 period . revenues increased due to earned premium growth within the business insurance , specialty commercial and personal lines segments , primarily as a result of earned pricing increases , higher earned premiums and net investment income in the retail products segment and net realized capital gains in 2003 as compared to net realized capital losses in 2002 . total benefits , claims and expenses increased $ 3.9 billion for the year ended december 31 , 2003 over the comparable prior year period primarily due to the company 2019s $ 2.6 billion asbestos reserve strengthening during the first quarter of 2003 and due to increases in the retail products segment associated with the growth in the individual annuity and institutional investments businesses . the net loss for the year ended december 31 , 2003 was primarily due to the company 2019s first quarter 2003 asbestos reserve strengthening of $ 1.7 billion , after-tax . included in net loss for the year ended december 31 , 2003 are $ 40 of after-tax expense related to the settlement of litigation with bancorp services , llc ( 201cbancorp 201d ) and $ 27 of severance charges , after-tax , in property & casualty . included in net income for the year ended december 31 , 2002 are the $ 8 after-tax benefit recognized by hartford life , inc . ( 201chli 201d ) related to the reduction of hli 2019s reserves associated with september 11 and $ 11 of after-tax expense related to litigation with bancorp . net realized capital gains and losses see 201cinvestment results 201d in the investments section . income taxes the effective tax rate for 2004 , 2003 and 2002 was 15% ( 15 % ) , 83% ( 83 % ) and 6% ( 6 % ) , respectively . the principal causes of the difference between the effective rates and the u.s . statutory rate of 35% ( 35 % ) were tax-exempt interest earned on invested assets , the dividends-received deduction , the tax benefit associated with the settlement of the 1998-2001 irs audit in 2004 and the tax benefit associated with the settlement of the 1996-1997 irs audit in 2002 . income taxes paid ( received ) in 2004 , 2003 and 2002 were $ 32 , ( $ 107 ) and ( $ 102 ) respectively . for additional information , see note 13 of notes to consolidated financial statements . per common share the following table represents earnings per common share data for the past three years: . \| 2004 \| 2003 \| 2002 basic earnings ( loss ) per share \| $ 7.24 \| $ -0.33 ( 0.33 ) \| $ 4.01 diluted earnings ( loss ) per share [1] \| $ 7.12 \| $ -0.33 ( 0.33 ) \| $ 3.97 weighted average common shares outstanding ( basic ) \| 292.3 \| 272.4 \| 249.4 weighted average common shares outstanding and dilutivepotential common shares ( diluted ) [1] \| 297.0 \| 272.4 \| 251.8 [1] as a result of the net loss for the year ended december 31 , 2003 , sfas no . 128 , 201cearnings per share 201d , requires the company to use basic weighted average common shares outstanding in the calculation of the year ended december 31 , 2003 diluted earnings ( loss ) per share , since the inclusion of options of 1.8 would have been antidilutive to the earnings per share calculation . in the absence of the net loss , weighted average common shares outstanding and dilutive potential common shares would have totaled 274.2 . executive overview the company provides investment and retirement products such as variable and fixed annuities , mutual funds and retirement plan services and other institutional products ; individual and corporate owned life insurance ; and , group benefit products , such as group life and group disability insurance . the company derives its revenues principally from : ( a ) fee income , including asset management fees , on separate account and mutual fund assets and mortality and expense fees , as well as cost of insurance charges ; ( b ) net investment income on general account assets ; ( c ) fully insured premiums ; and ( d ) certain other fees . asset management fees and mortality and expense fees are primarily generated from separate account assets , which are deposited with the company through the sale of variable annuity and variable universal life products and from mutual funds . cost of insurance charges are assessed on the net amount at risk for investment-oriented life insurance products . premium revenues are derived primarily from the sale of group life , and group disability and individual term insurance products . the company 2019s expenses essentially consist of interest credited to policyholders on general account liabilities , insurance benefits provided , amortization of the deferred policy acquisition costs , expenses related to the selling and servicing the various products offered by the company , dividends to policyholders , and other general business expenses. . Question: w h a t i s t h e n e t c h a n g e i n t h e n u m b e r o f o u t s t a n d i n g s h a r e s f r o m 2 0 0 3 t o 2 0 0 4 , ( i n m i l l i o n s ) ?	4,967
1.72	Given the context, answer the question. Context: 2018 emerson annual report \| 37 inco me taxes the provision for income taxes is based on pretax income reported in the consolidated statements of earnings and tax rates currently enacted in each jurisdiction . certain income and expense items are recognized in different time periods for financial reporting and income tax filing purposes , and deferred income taxes are provided for the effect of temporary differences . the company also provides for foreign withholding taxes and any applicable u.s . income taxes on earnings intended to be repatriated from non-u.s . locations . no provision has been made for these taxes on approximately $ 3.4 billion of undistributed earnings of non-u.s . subsidiaries as of september 30 , 2018 , as these earnings are considered indefinitely invested or otherwise retained for continuing international operations . recognition of foreign withholding taxes and any applicable u.s . income taxes on undistributed non-u.s . earnings would be triggered by a management decision to repatriate those earnings . determination of the amount of taxes that might be paid on these undistributed earnings if eventually remitted is not practicable . see note 14 . ( 2 ) weighted-average common shares basic earnings per common share consider only the weighted-average of common shares outstanding while diluted earnings per common share also consider the dilutive effects of stock options and incentive shares . an inconsequential number of shares of common stock were excluded from the computation of dilutive earnings per in 2018 as the effect would have been antidilutive , while 4.5 million and 13.3 million shares of common stock were excluded in 2017 and 2016 , respectively . earnings allocated to participating securities were inconsequential for all years presented . reconciliations of weighted-average shares for basic and diluted earnings per common share follow ( shares in millions ) : 2016 2017 2018 . \| 2016 \| 2017 \| 2018 basic shares outstanding \| 644.0 \| 642.1 \| 632.0 dilutive shares \| 2.8 \| 1.3 \| 3.3 diluted shares outstanding \| 646.8 \| 643.4 \| 635.3 ( 3 ) acquisitions and divestitures on july 17 , 2018 , the company completed the acquisition of aventics , a global provider of smart pneumatics technologies that power machine and factory automation applications , for $ 622 , net of cash acquired . this business , which has annual sales of approximately $ 425 , is reported in the industrial solutions product offering in the automation solutions segment . the company recognized goodwill of $ 358 ( $ 20 of which is expected to be tax deductible ) , and identifiable intangible assets of $ 278 , primarily intellectual property and customer relationships with a weighted-average useful life of approximately 12 years . on july 2 , 2018 , the company completed the acquisition of textron 2019s tools and test equipment business for $ 810 , net of cash acquired . this business , with annual sales of approximately $ 470 , is a manufacturer of electrical and utility tools , diagnostics , and test and measurement instruments , and is reported in the tools & home products segment . the company recognized goodwill of $ 374 ( $ 17 of which is expected to be tax deductible ) , and identifiable intangible assets of $ 358 , primarily intellectual property and customer relationships with a weighted-average useful life of approximately 14 years . on december 1 , 2017 , the company acquired paradigm , a provider of software solutions for the oil and gas industry , for $ 505 , net of cash acquired . this business had annual sales of approximately $ 140 and is included in the measurement & analytical instrumentation product offering within automation solutions . the company recognized goodwill of $ 328 ( $ 160 of which is expected to be tax deductible ) , and identifiable intangible assets of $ 238 , primarily intellectual property and customer relationships with a weighted-average useful life of approximately 11 years . during 2018 , the company also acquired four smaller businesses , two in the automation solutions segment and two in the climate technologies segment. . Question: f o r t h e t e x t r o n 2 0 1 9 s t o o l s a n d t e s t e q u i p m e n t b u s i n e s s a c q u i s i t i o n w h a t w a s t h e r a t i o o f p r i c e p a i d t o a n n u a l s a l e s ?	4,968
153.6%	Given the context, answer the question. Context: american tower corporation and subsidiaries notes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) the following table illustrates the effect on net loss and net loss per share if the company had applied the fair value recognition provisions of sfas no . 123 to stock-based compensation . the estimated fair value of each option is calculated using the black-scholes option-pricing model ( in thousands , except per share amounts ) : . \| 2002 \| 2001 \| 2000 net loss as reported \| $ -1141879 ( 1141879 ) \| $ -450094 ( 450094 ) \| $ -194628 ( 194628 ) less : total stock-based employee compensation expense determined under fair value basedmethod for all awards net of related tax effect \| -38126 ( 38126 ) \| -50540 ( 50540 ) \| -51186 ( 51186 ) pro-forma net loss \| $ -1180005 ( 1180005 ) \| $ -500634 ( 500634 ) \| $ -245814 ( 245814 ) basic and diluted net loss per share 2014as reported \| $ -5.84 ( 5.84 ) \| $ -2.35 ( 2.35 ) \| $ -1.15 ( 1.15 ) basic and diluted net loss per share 2014pro-forma \| $ -6.04 ( 6.04 ) \| $ -2.61 ( 2.61 ) \| $ -1.46 ( 1.46 ) fair value of financial instruments 2014as of december 31 , 2002 , the carrying amounts of the company 2019s 5.0% ( 5.0 % ) convertible notes , the 2.25% ( 2.25 % ) convertible notes , the 6.25% ( 6.25 % ) convertible notes and the senior notes were approximately $ 450.0 million , $ 210.9 million , $ 212.7 million and $ 1.0 billion , respectively , and the fair values of such notes were $ 291.4 million , $ 187.2 million , $ 144.4 million and $ 780.0 million , respectively . as of december 31 , 2001 , the carrying amount of the company 2019s 5.0% ( 5.0 % ) convertible notes , the 2.25% ( 2.25 % ) convertible notes , the 6.25% ( 6.25 % ) convertible notes and the senior notes were approximately $ 450.0 million , $ 204.1 million , $ 212.8 million and $ 1.0 billion , respectively , and the fair values of such notes were $ 268.3 million , $ 173.1 million , $ 158.2 million and $ 805.0 million , respectively . fair values were determined based on quoted market prices . the carrying values of all other financial instruments reasonably approximate the related fair values as of december 31 , 2002 and 2001 . retirement plan 2014the company has a 401 ( k ) plan covering substantially all employees who meet certain age and employment requirements . under the plan , the company matches 35% ( 35 % ) of participants 2019 contributions up to a maximum 5% ( 5 % ) of a participant 2019s compensation . the company contributed approximately $ 979000 , $ 1540000 and $ 1593000 to the plan for the years ended december 31 , 2002 , 2001 and 2000 , respectively . recent accounting pronouncements 2014in june 2001 , the fasb issued sfas no . 143 , 201caccounting for asset retirement obligations . 201d this statement establishes accounting standards for the recognition and measurement of liabilities associated with the retirement of tangible long-lived assets and the related asset retirement costs . the requirements of sfas no . 143 are effective for the company as of january 1 , 2003 . the company will adopt this statement in the first quarter of 2003 and does not expect the impact of adopting this statement to have a material impact on its consolidated financial position or results of operations . in august 2001 , the fasb issued sfas no . 144 , 201caccounting for the impairment or disposal of long-lived assets . 201d sfas no . 144 supersedes sfas no . 121 , 201caccounting for the impairment of long-lived assets and for long-lived assets to be disposed of , 201d but retains many of its fundamental provisions . sfas no . 144 also clarifies certain measurement and classification issues from sfas no . 121 . in addition , sfas no . 144 supersedes the accounting and reporting provisions for the disposal of a business segment as found in apb no . 30 , 201creporting the results of operations 2014reporting the effects of disposal of a segment of a business and extraordinary , unusual and infrequently occurring events and transactions 201d . however , sfas no . 144 retains the requirement in apb no . 30 to separately report discontinued operations , and broadens the scope of such requirement to include more types of disposal transactions . the scope of sfas no . 144 excludes goodwill and other intangible assets that are not to be amortized , as the accounting for such items is prescribed by sfas no . 142 . the company implemented sfas no . 144 on january 1 , 2002 . accordingly , all relevant impairment assessments and decisions concerning discontinued operations have been made under this standard in 2002. . Question: b a s e d o n t h e b l a c k - s c h o l e s o p t i o n - p r i c i n g m o d e l w h a t w a s t h e p e r c e n t a g e c h a n g e i n t h e n e t l o s s a s r e p o r t e d f r o m 2 0 0 1 t o 2 0 0 2	4,969
10.14%	Given the context, answer the question. Context: performance graph comparison of five-year cumulative total return the following graph and table compare the cumulative total return on citi 2019s common stock , which is listed on the nyse under the ticker symbol 201cc 201d and held by 81805 common stockholders of record as of january 31 , 2016 , with the cumulative total return of the s&p 500 index and the s&p financial index over the five-year period through december 31 , 2015 . the graph and table assume that $ 100 was invested on december 31 , 2010 in citi 2019s common stock , the s&p 500 index and the s&p financial index , and that all dividends were reinvested . comparison of five-year cumulative total return for the years ended date citi s&p 500 financials . date \| citi \| s&p 500 \| s&p financials 31-dec-2010 \| 100.00 \| 100.00 \| 100.00 30-dec-2011 \| 55.67 \| 102.11 \| 82.94 31-dec-2012 \| 83.81 \| 118.45 \| 106.84 31-dec-2013 \| 110.49 \| 156.82 \| 144.90 31-dec-2014 \| 114.83 \| 178.28 \| 166.93 31-dec-2015 \| 110.14 \| 180.75 \| 164.39 . Question: w h a t w a s t h e p e r c e n t a g e c u m u l a t i v e t o t a l r e t u r n o f c i t i c o m m o n s t o c k f o r t h e f i v e y e a r s e n d e d 3 1 - d e c - 2 0 1 5 ?	4,970
63.9%	Given the context, answer the question. Context: aeronautics our aeronautics business segment is engaged in the research , design , development , manufacture , integration , sustainment , support , and upgrade of advanced military aircraft , including combat and air mobility aircraft , unmanned air vehicles , and related technologies . aeronautics 2019 major programs include the f-35 lightning ii joint strike fighter , c-130 hercules , f-16 fighting falcon , f-22 raptor , and the c-5m super galaxy . aeronautics 2019 operating results included the following ( in millions ) : . \| 2013 \| 2012 \| 2011 net sales \| $ 14123 \| $ 14953 \| $ 14362 operating profit \| 1612 \| 1699 \| 1630 operating margins \| 11.4% ( 11.4 % ) \| 11.4% ( 11.4 % ) \| 11.3% ( 11.3 % ) backlog at year-end \| 28000 \| 30100 \| 30500 2013 compared to 2012 aeronautics 2019 net sales for 2013 decreased $ 830 million , or 6% ( 6 % ) , compared to 2012 . the decrease was primarily attributable to lower net sales of approximately $ 530 million for the f-16 program due to fewer aircraft deliveries ( 13 aircraft delivered in 2013 compared to 37 delivered in 2012 ) partially offset by aircraft configuration mix ; about $ 385 million for the c-130 program due to fewer aircraft deliveries ( 25 aircraft delivered in 2013 compared to 34 in 2012 ) partially offset by increased sustainment activities ; approximately $ 255 million for the f-22 program , which includes about $ 205 million due to decreased production volume as final aircraft deliveries were completed during the second quarter of 2012 and $ 50 million from the favorable resolution of a contractual matter during the second quarter of 2012 ; and about $ 270 million for various other programs ( primarily sustainment activities ) due to decreased volume . the decreases were partially offset by higher net sales of about $ 295 million for f-35 production contracts due to increased production volume and risk retirements ; approximately $ 245 million for the c-5 program due to increased aircraft deliveries ( six aircraft delivered in 2013 compared to four in 2012 ) and other modernization activities ; and about $ 70 million for the f-35 development contract due to increased volume . aeronautics 2019 operating profit for 2013 decreased $ 87 million , or 5% ( 5 % ) , compared to 2012 . the decrease was primarily attributable to lower operating profit of about $ 85 million for the f-22 program , which includes approximately $ 50 million from the favorable resolution of a contractual matter in the second quarter of 2012 and about $ 35 million due to decreased risk retirements and production volume ; approximately $ 70 million for the c-130 program due to lower risk retirements and fewer deliveries partially offset by increased sustainment activities ; about $ 65 million for the c-5 program due to the inception-to-date effect of reducing the profit booking rate in the third quarter of 2013 and lower risk retirements ; approximately $ 35 million for the f-16 program due to fewer aircraft deliveries partially offset by increased sustainment activity and aircraft configuration mix . the decreases were partially offset by higher operating profit of approximately $ 180 million for f-35 production contracts due to increased risk retirements and volume . operating profit was comparable for the f-35 development contract and included adjustments of approximately $ 85 million to reflect the inception-to-date impacts of the downward revisions to the profit booking rate in both 2013 and 2012 . adjustments not related to volume , including net profit booking rate adjustments and other matters , were approximately $ 75 million lower for 2013 compared to 2012 compared to 2011 aeronautics 2019 net sales for 2012 increased $ 591 million , or 4% ( 4 % ) , compared to 2011 . the increase was attributable to higher net sales of approximately $ 745 million from f-35 production contracts principally due to increased production volume ; about $ 285 million from f-16 programs primarily due to higher aircraft deliveries ( 37 f-16 aircraft delivered in 2012 compared to 22 in 2011 ) partially offset by lower volume on sustainment activities due to the completion of modification programs for certain international customers ; and approximately $ 140 million from c-5 programs due to higher aircraft deliveries ( four c-5m aircraft delivered in 2012 compared to two in 2011 ) . partially offsetting the increases were lower net sales of approximately $ 365 million from decreased production volume and lower risk retirements on the f-22 program as final aircraft deliveries were completed in the second quarter of 2012 ; approximately $ 110 million from the f-35 development contract primarily due to the inception-to-date effect of reducing the profit booking rate in the second quarter of 2012 and to a lesser extent lower volume ; and about $ 95 million from a decrease in volume on other sustainment activities partially offset by various other aeronautics programs due to higher volume . net sales for c-130 programs were comparable to 2011 as a decline in sustainment activities largely was offset by increased aircraft deliveries. . Question: a s p a r t o f t h e t o t a l d e c r e a s e o f a e r o n a u t i c s 2 0 1 9 n e t s a l e s f o r 2 0 1 3 w h a t w a s t h e p e r c e n t o f t h e p o t e n t i a l f a c t o r b a s e d o n t h e l o w e r s a l e s o f	4,971
33.3%	Given the context, answer the question. Context: there were no options granted in excess of market value in 2011 , 2010 or 2009 . shares of common stock available during the next year for the granting of options and other awards under the incentive plans were 33775543 at december 31 , 2011 . total shares of pnc common stock authorized for future issuance under equity compensation plans totaled 35304422 shares at december 31 , 2011 , which includes shares available for issuance under the incentive plans and the employee stock purchase plan ( espp ) as described below . during 2011 , we issued 731336 shares from treasury stock in connection with stock option exercise activity . as with past exercise activity , we currently intend to utilize primarily treasury stock for any future stock option exercises . awards granted to non-employee directors in 2011 , 2010 and 2009 include 27090 , 29040 , and 39552 deferred stock units , respectively , awarded under the outside directors deferred stock unit plan . a deferred stock unit is a phantom share of our common stock , which requires liability accounting treatment until such awards are paid to the participants as cash . as there are no vesting or service requirements on these awards , total compensation expense is recognized in full on awarded deferred stock units on the date of grant . incentive/performance unit share awards and restricted stock/unit awards the fair value of nonvested incentive/performance unit share awards and restricted stock/unit awards is initially determined based on prices not less than the market value of our common stock price on the date of grant . the value of certain incentive/ performance unit share awards is subsequently remeasured based on the achievement of one or more financial and other performance goals generally over a three-year period . the personnel and compensation committee of the board of directors approves the final award payout with respect to incentive/performance unit share awards . restricted stock/unit awards have various vesting periods generally ranging from 36 months to 60 months . beginning in 2011 , we incorporated two changes to certain awards under our existing long-term incentive compensation programs . first , for certain grants of incentive performance units , the future payout amount will be subject to a negative annual adjustment if pnc fails to meet certain risk-related performance metrics . this adjustment is in addition to the existing financial performance metrics relative to our peers . these grants have a three-year performance period and are payable in either stock or a combination of stock and cash . second , performance-based restricted share units ( performance rsus ) were granted in 2011 to certain of our executives in lieu of stock options . these performance rsus ( which are payable solely in stock ) have a service condition , an internal risk-related performance condition , and an external market condition . satisfaction of the performance condition is based on four independent one-year performance periods . the weighted-average grant-date fair value of incentive/ performance unit share awards and restricted stock/unit awards granted in 2011 , 2010 and 2009 was $ 63.25 , $ 54.59 and $ 41.16 per share , respectively . we recognize compensation expense for such awards ratably over the corresponding vesting and/or performance periods for each type of program . nonvested incentive/performance unit share awards and restricted stock/unit awards 2013 rollforward shares in thousands nonvested incentive/ performance unit shares weighted- average date fair nonvested restricted stock/ shares weighted- average date fair . shares in thousands december 31 2010 \| nonvested incentive/ performance unit shares 363 \| weighted- average grant date fair value $ 56.40 \| nonvested restricted stock/ unit shares 2250 \| weighted- average grant date fair value $ 49.95 granted \| 623 \| 64.21 \| 1059 \| 62.68 vested \| -156 ( 156 ) \| 59.54 \| -706 ( 706 ) \| 51.27 forfeited \| \| \| -91 ( 91 ) \| 52.24 december 31 2011 \| 830 \| $ 61.68 \| 2512 \| $ 54.87 in the chart above , the unit shares and related weighted- average grant-date fair value of the incentive/performance awards exclude the effect of dividends on the underlying shares , as those dividends will be paid in cash . at december 31 , 2011 , there was $ 61 million of unrecognized deferred compensation expense related to nonvested share- based compensation arrangements granted under the incentive plans . this cost is expected to be recognized as expense over a period of no longer than five years . the total fair value of incentive/performance unit share and restricted stock/unit awards vested during 2011 , 2010 and 2009 was approximately $ 52 million , $ 39 million and $ 47 million , respectively . liability awards we grant annually cash-payable restricted share units to certain executives . the grants were made primarily as part of an annual bonus incentive deferral plan . while there are time- based and service-related vesting criteria , there are no market or performance criteria associated with these awards . compensation expense recognized related to these awards was recorded in prior periods as part of annual cash bonus criteria . as of december 31 , 2011 , there were 753203 of these cash- payable restricted share units outstanding . 174 the pnc financial services group , inc . 2013 form 10-k . Question: w h a t w a s t h e p e r c e n t a g e c h a n g e i n t h e t o t a l f a i r v a l u e o f i n c e n t i v e / p e r f o r m a n c e u n i t s h a r e a n d r e s t r i c t e d s t o c k / u n i t a w a r d s f r o m 2 0 1 0 t o 2 0 1 1 ,	4,972
126	Given the context, answer the question. Context: the aggregate changes in the balance of gross unrecognized tax benefits , which excludes interest and penalties , for 2012 , 2011 , and 2010 , is as follows ( in millions ) : . \| 2012 \| 2011 \| 2010 beginning balance \| $ 1375 \| $ 943 \| $ 971 increases related to tax positions taken during a prior year \| 340 \| 49 \| 61 decreases related to tax positions taken during a prior year \| -107 ( 107 ) \| -39 ( 39 ) \| -224 ( 224 ) increases related to tax positions taken during the current year \| 467 \| 425 \| 240 decreases related to settlements with taxing authorities \| -3 ( 3 ) \| 0 \| -102 ( 102 ) decreases related to expiration of statute of limitations \| -10 ( 10 ) \| -3 ( 3 ) \| -3 ( 3 ) ending balance \| $ 2062 \| $ 1375 \| $ 943 the company includes interest and penalties related to unrecognized tax benefits within the provision for income taxes . as of september 29 , 2012 and september 24 , 2011 , the total amount of gross interest and penalties accrued was $ 401 million and $ 261 million , respectively , which is classified as non-current liabilities in the consolidated balance sheets . in connection with tax matters , the company recognized interest expense in 2012 and 2011 of $ 140 million and $ 14 million , respectively , and in 2010 the company recognized an interest benefit of $ 43 million . the company is subject to taxation and files income tax returns in the u.s . federal jurisdiction and in many state and foreign jurisdictions . for u.s . federal income tax purposes , all years prior to 2004 are closed . the internal revenue service ( the 201cirs 201d ) has completed its field audit of the company 2019s federal income tax returns for the years 2004 through 2006 and proposed certain adjustments . the company has contested certain of these adjustments through the irs appeals office . the irs is currently examining the years 2007 through 2009 . in addition , the company is also subject to audits by state , local and foreign tax authorities . in major states and major foreign jurisdictions , the years subsequent to 1989 and 2002 , respectively , generally remain open and could be subject to examination by the taxing authorities . management believes that an adequate provision has been made for any adjustments that may result from tax examinations . however , the outcome of tax audits cannot be predicted with certainty . if any issues addressed in the company 2019s tax audits are resolved in a manner not consistent with management 2019s expectations , the company could be required to adjust its provision for income tax in the period such resolution occurs . although timing of the resolution and/or closure of audits is not certain , the company believes it is reasonably possible that tax audit resolutions could reduce its unrecognized tax benefits by between $ 120 million and $ 170 million in the next 12 months . note 6 2013 shareholders 2019 equity and share-based compensation preferred stock the company has five million shares of authorized preferred stock , none of which is issued or outstanding . under the terms of the company 2019s restated articles of incorporation , the board of directors is authorized to determine or alter the rights , preferences , privileges and restrictions of the company 2019s authorized but unissued shares of preferred stock . dividend and stock repurchase program in 2012 , the board of directors of the company approved a dividend policy pursuant to which it plans to make , subject to subsequent declaration , quarterly dividends of $ 2.65 per share . on july 24 , 2012 , the board of directors declared a dividend of $ 2.65 per share to shareholders of record as of the close of business on august 13 , 2012 . the company paid $ 2.5 billion in conjunction with this dividend on august 16 , 2012 . no dividends were declared in the first three quarters of 2012 or in 2011 and 2010. . Question: i n c o n n e c t i o n w i t h t a x m a t t e r s , w h a t w a s t h e i n c r e a s e i n r e c o g n i z e d i n t e r e s t e x p e n s e b e t w e e n 2 0 1 2 a n d 2 0 1 1 ?	4,973
-6.1%	Given the context, answer the question. Context: decreased production volume as final aircraft deliveries were completed during the second quarter of 2012 and $ 50 million from the favorable resolution of a contractual matter during the second quarter of 2012 ; and about $ 270 million for various other programs ( primarily sustainment activities ) due to decreased volume . the decreases were partially offset by higher net sales of about $ 295 million for f-35 production contracts due to increased production volume and risk retirements ; approximately $ 245 million for the c-5 program due to increased aircraft deliveries ( six aircraft delivered in 2013 compared to four in 2012 ) and other modernization activities ; and about $ 70 million for the f-35 development contract due to increased volume . aeronautics 2019 operating profit for 2013 decreased $ 87 million , or 5% ( 5 % ) , compared to 2012 . the decrease was primarily attributable to lower operating profit of about $ 85 million for the f-22 program , which includes approximately $ 50 million from the favorable resolution of a contractual matter in the second quarter of 2012 and about $ 35 million due to decreased risk retirements and production volume ; approximately $ 70 million for the c-130 program due to lower risk retirements and fewer deliveries partially offset by increased sustainment activities ; about $ 65 million for the c-5 program due to the inception-to-date effect of reducing the profit booking rate in the third quarter of 2013 and lower risk retirements ; approximately $ 35 million for the f-16 program due to fewer aircraft deliveries partially offset by increased sustainment activity and aircraft configuration mix . the decreases were partially offset by higher operating profit of approximately $ 180 million for f-35 production contracts due to increased risk retirements and volume . operating profit was comparable for the f-35 development contract and included adjustments of approximately $ 85 million to reflect the inception-to-date impacts of the downward revisions to the profit booking rate in both 2013 and 2012 . adjustments not related to volume , including net profit booking rate adjustments and other matters , were approximately $ 75 million lower for 2013 compared to backlog backlog decreased slightly in 2014 compared to 2013 primarily due to lower orders on f-16 and f-22 programs . backlog decreased in 2013 compared to 2012 mainly due to lower orders on f-16 , c-5 and c-130 programs , partially offset by higher orders on the f-35 program . trends we expect aeronautics 2019 2015 net sales to be comparable or slightly behind 2014 due to a decline in f-16 deliveries as well as a decline in f-35 development activity , partially offset by an increase in production contracts . operating profit is also expected to decrease in the low single digit range , due primarily to contract mix , resulting in a slight decrease in operating margins between years . information systems & global solutions our is&gs business segment provides advanced technology systems and expertise , integrated information technology solutions and management services across a broad spectrum of applications for civil , defense , intelligence and other government customers . is&gs has a portfolio of many smaller contracts as compared to our other business segments . is&gs has been impacted by the continued downturn in certain federal agencies 2019 information technology budgets and increased re-competition on existing contracts coupled with the fragmentation of large contracts into multiple smaller contracts that are awarded primarily on the basis of price . is&gs 2019 operating results included the following ( in millions ) : . \| 2014 \| 2013 \| 2012 net sales \| $ 7788 \| $ 8367 \| $ 8846 operating profit \| 699 \| 759 \| 808 operating margins \| 9.0% ( 9.0 % ) \| 9.1% ( 9.1 % ) \| 9.1% ( 9.1 % ) backlog at year-end \| $ 8700 \| $ 8300 \| $ 8700 2014 compared to 2013 is&gs 2019 net sales decreased $ 579 million , or 7% ( 7 % ) , for 2014 compared to 2013 . the decrease was primarily attributable to lower net sales of about $ 645 million for 2014 due to the wind-down or completion of certain programs , driven by reductions in direct warfighter support ( including jieddo and ptds ) and defense budgets tied to command and control programs ; and approximately $ 490 million for 2014 due to a decline in volume for various ongoing programs , which reflects lower funding levels and programs impacted by in-theater force reductions . the decreases were partially offset by higher net sales of about $ 550 million for 2014 due to the start-up of new programs , growth in recently awarded programs and integration of recently acquired companies. . Question: w h a t i s t h e g r o w t h r a t e i n o p e r a t i n g p r o f i t f r o m 2 0 1 2 t o 2 0 1 3 f o r i s & g s ?	4,974
-55.64%	Given the context, answer the question. Context: performance graph the following graph shows a five-year comparison of the cumulative total return on our common stock , the nasdaq composite index , the s&p 500 index and the s&p 500 information technology index from april 24 , 2009 through april 25 , 2014 . the past performance of our common stock is not indicative of the future performance of our common stock . comparison of 5 year cumulative total return* among netapp , inc. , the nasdaq composite index , the s&p 500 index and the s&p 500 information technology index . \| 4/09 \| 4/10 \| 4/11 \| 4/12 \| 4/13 \| 4/14 netapp inc . \| $ 100.00 \| $ 189.45 \| $ 284.75 \| $ 212.19 \| $ 190.66 \| $ 197.58 nasdaq composite \| 100.00 \| 144.63 \| 170.44 \| 182.57 \| 202.25 \| 253.22 s&p 500 \| 100.00 \| 138.84 \| 162.75 \| 170.49 \| 199.29 \| 240.02 s&p 500 information technology \| 100.00 \| 143.49 \| 162.37 \| 186.06 \| 189.18 \| 236.12 we believe that a number of factors may cause the market price of our common stock to fluctuate significantly . see 201citem 1a . risk factors . 201d sale of unregistered securities . Question: w h a t w a s t h e d i f f e r e n c e i n p e r c e n t a g e c u m u l a t i v e t o t a l r e t u r n f o r t h e f i v e y e a r p e r i o d e n d i n g 4 / 1 4 b e t w e e n n e t a p p i n c . a n d t h e n a s d a q c o m p o s i t e ?	4,975
7288	Given the context, answer the question. Context: mfc 2019s operating profit for 2013 increased $ 175 million , or 14% ( 14 % ) , compared to 2012 . the increase was primarily attributable to higher operating profit of approximately $ 85 million for air and missile defense programs ( thaad and pac-3 ) due to increased risk retirements and volume ; about $ 85 million for fire control programs ( sniper ae , lantirn ae and apache ) due to increased risk retirements and higher volume ; and approximately $ 75 million for tactical missile programs ( hellfire and various programs ) due to increased risk retirements . the increases were partially offset by lower operating profit of about $ 45 million for the resolution of contractual matters in the second quarter of 2012 ; and approximately $ 15 million for various technical services programs due to lower volume partially offset by increased risk retirements . adjustments not related to volume , including net profit booking rate adjustments and other matters , were approximately $ 100 million higher for 2013 compared to 2012 . 2012 compared to 2011 mfc 2019s net sales for 2012 were comparable to 2011 . net sales decreased approximately $ 130 million due to lower volume and risk retirements on various services programs , and about $ 60 million due to lower volume from fire control systems programs ( primarily sniper ae ; lantirn ae ; and apache ) . the decreases largely were offset by higher net sales of approximately $ 95 million due to higher volume from tactical missile programs ( primarily javelin and hellfire ) and approximately $ 80 million for air and missile defense programs ( primarily pac-3 and thaad ) . mfc 2019s operating profit for 2012 increased $ 187 million , or 17% ( 17 % ) , compared to 2011 . the increase was attributable to higher risk retirements and volume of about $ 95 million from tactical missile programs ( primarily javelin and hellfire ) ; increased risk retirements and volume of approximately $ 60 million for air and missile defense programs ( primarily thaad and pac-3 ) ; and about $ 45 million from a resolution of contractual matters . partially offsetting these increases was lower risk retirements and volume on various programs , including $ 25 million for services programs . adjustments not related to volume , including net profit booking rate adjustments and other matters described above , were approximately $ 145 million higher for 2012 compared to 2011 . backlog backlog increased in 2013 compared to 2012 mainly due to higher orders on the thaad program and lower sales volume compared to new orders on certain fire control systems programs in 2013 , partially offset by lower orders on technical services programs and certain tactical missile programs . backlog increased in 2012 compared to 2011 mainly due to increased orders and lower sales on fire control systems programs ( primarily lantirn ae and sniper ae ) and on various services programs , partially offset by lower orders and higher sales volume on tactical missiles programs . trends we expect mfc 2019s net sales to be flat to slightly down in 2014 compared to 2013 , primarily due to a decrease in net sales on technical services programs partially offset by an increase in net sales from missiles and fire control programs . operating profit is expected to decrease in the high single digit percentage range , driven by a reduction in expected risk retirements in 2014 . accordingly , operating profit margin is expected to slightly decline from 2013 . mission systems and training our mst business segment provides ship and submarine mission and combat systems ; mission systems and sensors for rotary and fixed-wing aircraft ; sea and land-based missile defense systems ; radar systems ; littoral combat ships ; simulation and training services ; and unmanned systems and technologies . mst 2019s major programs include aegis combat system ( aegis ) , lcs , mh-60 , tpq-53 radar system , and mk-41 vertical launching system ( vls ) . mst 2019s operating results included the following ( in millions ) : . \| 2013 \| 2012 \| 2011 net sales \| $ 7153 \| $ 7579 \| $ 7132 operating profit \| 905 \| 737 \| 645 operating margins \| 12.7% ( 12.7 % ) \| 9.7% ( 9.7 % ) \| 9.0% ( 9.0 % ) backlog at year-end \| 10800 \| 10700 \| 10500 2013 compared to 2012 mst 2019s net sales for 2013 decreased $ 426 million , or 6% ( 6 % ) , compared to 2012 . the decrease was primarily attributable to lower net sales of approximately $ 275 million for various ship and aviation systems programs due to lower volume . Question: w h a t w e r e a v e r a g e n e t s a l e s f r o m 2 0 1 1 t o 2 0 1 3 f o r m s t i n m i l l i o n s ?	4,976
28.7%	Given the context, answer the question. Context: commodities purchased for use in our supply chain . we manage our exposures through a combination of purchase orders , long-term contracts with suppliers , exchange-traded futures and options , and over-the-counter options and swaps . we offset our exposures based on current and projected market conditions and generally seek to acquire the inputs at as close to our planned cost as possible . we use derivatives to manage our exposure to changes in commodity prices . we do not perform the assessments required to achieve hedge accounting for commodity derivative positions . accordingly , the changes in the values of these derivatives are recorded currently in cost of sales in our consolidated statements of earnings . although we do not meet the criteria for cash flow hedge accounting , we believe that these instruments are effective in achieving our objective of providing certainty in the future price of commodities purchased for use in our supply chain . accordingly , for purposes of measuring segment operating performance these gains and losses are reported in unallocated corporate items outside of segment operating results until such time that the exposure we are managing affects earnings . at that time we reclassify the gain or loss from unallocated corporate items to segment operating profit , allowing our operating segments to realize the economic effects of the derivative without experiencing any resulting mark-to-market volatility , which remains in unallocated corporate items . unallocated corporate items for fiscal 2019 , 2018 and 2017 included: . in millions \| fiscal year 2019 \| fiscal year 2018 \| fiscal year 2017 net gain ( loss ) onmark-to-marketvaluation of commodity positions \| $ -39.0 ( 39.0 ) \| $ 14.3 \| $ -22.0 ( 22.0 ) net loss on commodity positions reclassified from unallocated corporate items to segmentoperating profit \| 10.0 \| 11.3 \| 32.0 netmark-to-marketrevaluation of certain grain inventories \| -7.0 ( 7.0 ) \| 6.5 \| 3.9 netmark-to-marketvaluation of certain commodity positions recognized in unallocated corporate items \| $ -36.0 ( 36.0 ) \| $ 32.1 \| $ 13.9 net mark-to-market valuation of certain commodity positions recognized in unallocated corporate items $ ( 36.0 ) $ 32.1 $ 13.9 as of may 26 , 2019 , the net notional value of commodity derivatives was $ 312.5 million , of which $ 242.9 million related to agricultural inputs and $ 69.6 million related to energy inputs . these contracts relate to inputs that generally will be utilized within the next 12 months . interest rate risk we are exposed to interest rate volatility with regard to future issuances of fixed-rate debt , and existing and future issuances of floating-rate debt . primary exposures include u.s . treasury rates , libor , euribor , and commercial paper rates in the united states and europe . we use interest rate swaps , forward-starting interest rate swaps , and treasury locks to hedge our exposure to interest rate changes , to reduce the volatility of our financing costs , and to achieve a desired proportion of fixed rate versus floating-rate debt , based on current and projected market conditions . generally under these swaps , we agree with a counterparty to exchange the difference between fixed-rate and floating-rate interest amounts based on an agreed upon notional principal amount . floating interest rate exposures 2014 floating-to-fixed interest rate swaps are accounted for as cash flow hedges , as are all hedges of forecasted issuances of debt . effectiveness is assessed based on either the perfectly effective hypothetical derivative method or changes in the present value of interest payments on the underlying debt . effective gains and losses deferred to aoci are reclassified into earnings over the life of the associated debt . ineffective gains and losses are recorded as net interest . the amount of hedge ineffectiveness was less than $ 1 million in fiscal 2019 , a $ 2.6 million loss in fiscal 2018 , and less than $ 1 million in fiscal 2017 . fixed interest rate exposures 2014 fixed-to-floating interest rate swaps are accounted for as fair value hedges with effectiveness assessed based on changes in the fair value of the underlying debt and derivatives , using . Question: w h a t p o r t i o n o f t h e n e t n o t i o n a l v a l u e o f c o m m o d i t y d e r i v a t i v e s i s r e l a t e d t o e n e r g y i n p u t s ?	4,977
37088.9	Given the context, answer the question. Context: unit shipments increased 49% ( 49 % ) to 217.4 million units in 2006 , compared to 146.0 million units in 2005 . the overall increase was driven by increased unit shipments of products for gsm , cdma and 3g technologies , partially offset by decreased unit shipments of products for iden technology . for the full year 2006 , unit shipments by the segment increased in all regions . due to the segment 2019s increase in unit shipments outpacing overall growth in the worldwide handset market , which grew approximately 20% ( 20 % ) in 2006 , the segment believes that it expanded its global handset market share to an estimated 22% ( 22 % ) for the full year 2006 . in 2006 , asp decreased approximately 11% ( 11 % ) compared to 2005 . the overall decrease in asp was driven primarily by changes in the geographic and product-tier mix of sales . by comparison , asp decreased approximately 10% ( 10 % ) in 2005 and increased approximately 15% ( 15 % ) in 2004 . asp is impacted by numerous factors , including product mix , market conditions and competitive product offerings , and asp trends often vary over time . in 2006 , the largest of the segment 2019s end customers ( including sales through distributors ) were china mobile , verizon , sprint nextel , cingular , and t-mobile . these five largest customers accounted for approximately 39% ( 39 % ) of the segment 2019s net sales in 2006 . besides selling directly to carriers and operators , the segment also sold products through a variety of third-party distributors and retailers , which accounted for approximately 38% ( 38 % ) of the segment 2019s net sales . the largest of these distributors was brightstar corporation . although the u.s . market continued to be the segment 2019s largest individual market , many of our customers , and more than 65% ( 65 % ) of the segment 2019s 2006 net sales , were outside the u.s . the largest of these international markets were china , brazil , the united kingdom and mexico . home and networks mobility segment the home and networks mobility segment designs , manufactures , sells , installs and services : ( i ) digital video , internet protocol ( 201cip 201d ) video and broadcast network interactive set-tops ( 201cdigital entertainment devices 201d ) , end-to- end video delivery solutions , broadband access infrastructure systems , and associated data and voice customer premise equipment ( 201cbroadband gateways 201d ) to cable television and telecom service providers ( collectively , referred to as the 201chome business 201d ) , and ( ii ) wireless access systems ( 201cwireless networks 201d ) , including cellular infrastructure systems and wireless broadband systems , to wireless service providers . in 2007 , the segment 2019s net sales represented 27% ( 27 % ) of the company 2019s consolidated net sales , compared to 21% ( 21 % ) in 2006 and 26% ( 26 % ) in 2005 . ( dollars in millions ) 2007 2006 2005 2007 20142006 2006 20142005 years ended december 31 percent change . ( dollars in millions ) \| years ended december 31 2007 \| years ended december 31 2006 \| years ended december 31 2005 \| years ended december 31 2007 20142006 \| 2006 20142005 segment net sales \| $ 10014 \| $ 9164 \| $ 9037 \| 9% ( 9 % ) \| 1% ( 1 % ) operating earnings \| 709 \| 787 \| 1232 \| ( 10 ) % ( % ) \| ( 36 ) % ( % ) segment results 20142007 compared to 2006 in 2007 , the segment 2019s net sales increased 9% ( 9 % ) to $ 10.0 billion , compared to $ 9.2 billion in 2006 . the 9% ( 9 % ) increase in net sales reflects a 27% ( 27 % ) increase in net sales in the home business , partially offset by a 1% ( 1 % ) decrease in net sales of wireless networks . net sales of digital entertainment devices increased approximately 43% ( 43 % ) , reflecting increased demand for digital set-tops , including hd/dvr set-tops and ip set-tops , partially offset by a decline in asp due to a product mix shift towards all-digital set-tops . unit shipments of digital entertainment devices increased 51% ( 51 % ) to 15.2 million units . net sales of broadband gateways increased approximately 6% ( 6 % ) , primarily due to higher net sales of data modems , driven by net sales from the netopia business acquired in february 2007 . net sales of wireless networks decreased 1% ( 1 % ) , primarily driven by lower net sales of iden and cdma infrastructure equipment , partially offset by higher net sales of gsm infrastructure equipment , despite competitive pricing pressure . on a geographic basis , the 9% ( 9 % ) increase in net sales reflects higher net sales in all geographic regions . the increase in net sales in north america was driven primarily by higher sales of digital entertainment devices , partially offset by lower net sales of iden and cdma infrastructure equipment . the increase in net sales in asia was primarily due to higher net sales of gsm infrastructure equipment , partially offset by lower net sales of cdma infrastructure equipment . the increase in net sales in emea was , primarily due to higher net sales of gsm infrastructure equipment , partially offset by lower demand for iden and cdma infrastructure equipment . net sales in north america continue to comprise a significant portion of the segment 2019s business , accounting for 52% ( 52 % ) of the segment 2019s total net sales in 2007 , compared to 56% ( 56 % ) of the segment 2019s total net sales in 2006 . 60 management 2019s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations . Question: i n 2 0 0 7 w h a t w a s t h e c o m p a n y 2 0 1 9 s c o n s o l i d a t e d n e t s a l e s i n m i l l i o n s	4,978
9.8%	Given the context, answer the question. Context: management 2019s discussion and analysis 102 jpmorgan chase & co./2016 annual report derivative contracts in the normal course of business , the firm uses derivative instruments predominantly for market-making activities . derivatives enable customers to manage exposures to fluctuations in interest rates , currencies and other markets . the firm also uses derivative instruments to manage its own credit and other market risk exposure . the nature of the counterparty and the settlement mechanism of the derivative affect the credit risk to which the firm is exposed . for otc derivatives the firm is exposed to the credit risk of the derivative counterparty . for exchange- traded derivatives ( 201cetd 201d ) , such as futures and options and 201ccleared 201d over-the-counter ( 201cotc-cleared 201d ) derivatives , the firm is generally exposed to the credit risk of the relevant ccp . where possible , the firm seeks to mitigate its credit risk exposures arising from derivative transactions through the use of legally enforceable master netting arrangements and collateral agreements . for further discussion of derivative contracts , counterparties and settlement types , see note 6 . the following table summarizes the net derivative receivables for the periods presented . derivative receivables . december 31 ( in millions ) \| 2016 \| 2015 interest rate \| $ 28302 \| $ 26363 credit derivatives \| 1294 \| 1423 foreign exchange \| 23271 \| 17177 equity \| 4939 \| 5529 commodity \| 6272 \| 9185 total net of cash collateral \| 64078 \| 59677 liquid securities and other cash collateral held against derivative receivables ( a ) \| -22705 ( 22705 ) \| -16580 ( 16580 ) total net of all collateral \| $ 41373 \| $ 43097 ( a ) includes collateral related to derivative instruments where an appropriate legal opinion has not been either sought or obtained . derivative receivables reported on the consolidated balance sheets were $ 64.1 billion and $ 59.7 billion at december 31 , 2016 and 2015 , respectively . these amounts represent the fair value of the derivative contracts after giving effect to legally enforceable master netting agreements and cash collateral held by the firm . however , in management 2019s view , the appropriate measure of current credit risk should also take into consideration additional liquid securities ( primarily u.s . government and agency securities and other group of seven nations ( 201cg7 201d ) government bonds ) and other cash collateral held by the firm aggregating $ 22.7 billion and $ 16.6 billion at december 31 , 2016 and 2015 , respectively , that may be used as security when the fair value of the client 2019s exposure is in the firm 2019s favor . the change in derivative receivables was predominantly related to client-driven market-making activities in cib . the increase in derivative receivables reflected the impact of market movements , which increased foreign exchange receivables , partially offset by reduced commodity derivative receivables . in addition to the collateral described in the preceding paragraph , the firm also holds additional collateral ( primarily cash , g7 government securities , other liquid government-agency and guaranteed securities , and corporate debt and equity securities ) delivered by clients at the initiation of transactions , as well as collateral related to contracts that have a non-daily call frequency and collateral that the firm has agreed to return but has not yet settled as of the reporting date . although this collateral does not reduce the balances and is not included in the table above , it is available as security against potential exposure that could arise should the fair value of the client 2019s derivative transactions move in the firm 2019s favor . the derivative receivables fair value , net of all collateral , also does not include other credit enhancements , such as letters of credit . for additional information on the firm 2019s use of collateral agreements , see note 6 . while useful as a current view of credit exposure , the net fair value of the derivative receivables does not capture the potential future variability of that credit exposure . to capture the potential future variability of credit exposure , the firm calculates , on a client-by-client basis , three measures of potential derivatives-related credit loss : peak , derivative risk equivalent ( 201cdre 201d ) , and average exposure ( 201cavg 201d ) . these measures all incorporate netting and collateral benefits , where applicable . peak represents a conservative measure of potential exposure to a counterparty calculated in a manner that is broadly equivalent to a 97.5% ( 97.5 % ) confidence level over the life of the transaction . peak is the primary measure used by the firm for setting of credit limits for derivative transactions , senior management reporting and derivatives exposure management . dre exposure is a measure that expresses the risk of derivative exposure on a basis intended to be equivalent to the risk of loan exposures . dre is a less extreme measure of potential credit loss than peak and is used for aggregating derivative credit risk exposures with loans and other credit risk . finally , avg is a measure of the expected fair value of the firm 2019s derivative receivables at future time periods , including the benefit of collateral . avg exposure over the total life of the derivative contract is used as the primary metric for pricing purposes and is used to calculate credit capital and the cva , as further described below . the three year avg exposure was $ 31.1 billion and $ 32.4 billion at december 31 , 2016 and 2015 , respectively , compared with derivative receivables , net of all collateral , of $ 41.4 billion and $ 43.1 billion at december 31 , 2016 and 2015 , respectively . the fair value of the firm 2019s derivative receivables incorporates an adjustment , the cva , to reflect the credit quality of counterparties . the cva is based on the firm 2019s avg to a counterparty and the counterparty 2019s credit spread in the credit derivatives market . the primary components of changes in cva are credit spreads , new deal activity or unwinds , and changes in the underlying market environment . the firm believes that active risk management is essential to controlling the dynamic credit . Question: c o m m o d i t y d e r i v a t i v e s w e r e h o w m u c h o f t h e 2 0 1 6 t o t a l d e r i v a t i v e s ?	4,979
4	Given the context, answer the question. Context: entergy corporation and subsidiaries notes to financial statements ferc audit report , system energy initially recorded as a net regulatory asset the difference between the recovery of the lease payments and the amounts expensed for interest and depreciation and continues to record this difference as a regulatory asset or liability on an ongoing basis , resulting in a zero net balance for the regulatory asset at the end of the lease term . the amount was a net regulatory asset ( liability ) of ( $ 2.0 ) million and $ 60.6 million as of december 31 , 2011 and 2010 , respectively . as of december 31 , 2011 , system energy had future minimum lease payments ( reflecting an implicit rate of 5.13% ( 5.13 % ) ) , which are recorded as long-term debt as follows : amount ( in thousands ) . \| amount ( in thousands ) 2012 \| $ 49959 2013 \| 50546 2014 \| 51637 2015 \| 52253 2016 \| - years thereafter \| - total \| 204395 less : amount representing interest \| 25611 present value of net minimum lease payments \| $ 178784 . Question: i n h o w m a n y y e a r s w i l l i s t h e c o m p a n y e x p e c t e d t o p a y o f f a l l i t s f u t u r e m i n i m u m l e a s e p a y m e n t s ?	4,980
10.5%	Given the context, answer the question. Context: higher average borrowings . additionally , the recapitalization that occurred late in the first quarter of 2005 resulted in a full year of interest in 2006 as compared to approximately ten months in 2005 . the increase in interest expense in 2005 as compared to 2004 also resulted from the recapitalization in 2005 . income tax expense income tax expense totaled $ 150.2 million , $ 116.1 million and $ 118.3 million for 2006 , 2005 and 2004 , respectively . this resulted in an effective tax rate of 37.2% ( 37.2 % ) , 37.2% ( 37.2 % ) and 37.6% ( 37.6 % ) for 2006 , 2005 and 2004 , respectively . net earnings net earnings totaled $ 259.1 million , $ 196.6 and $ 189.4 million for 2006 , 2005 and 2004 , respectively , or $ 1.37 , $ 1.53 and $ 1.48 per diluted share , respectively . segment results of operations transaction processing services ( in thousands ) . \| 2006 \| 2005 \| 2004 processing and services revenues \| $ 2458777 \| $ 1208430 \| $ 892033 cost of revenues \| 1914148 \| 904124 \| 667078 gross profit \| 544629 \| 304306 \| 224955 selling general and administrative expenses \| 171106 \| 94889 \| 99581 research and development costs \| 70879 \| 85702 \| 54038 operating income \| $ 302644 \| $ 123715 \| $ 71336 revenues for the transaction processing services segment are derived from three main revenue channels ; enterprise solutions , integrated financial solutions and international . revenues from transaction processing services totaled $ 2458.8 million , $ 1208.4 and $ 892.0 million for 2006 , 2005 and 2004 , respectively . the overall segment increase of $ 1250.4 million during 2006 , as compared to 2005 was primarily attributable to the certegy merger which contributed $ 1067.2 million to the overall increase . the majority of the remaining 2006 growth is attributable to organic growth within the historically owned integrated financial solutions and international revenue channels , with international including $ 31.9 million related to the newly formed business process outsourcing operation in brazil . the overall segment increase of $ 316.4 in 2005 as compared to 2004 results from the inclusion of a full year of results for the 2004 acquisitions of aurum , sanchez , kordoba , and intercept , which contributed $ 301.1 million of the increase . cost of revenues for the transaction processing services segment totaled $ 1914.1 million , $ 904.1 million and $ 667.1 million for 2006 , 2005 and 2004 , respectively . the overall segment increase of $ 1010.0 million during 2006 as compared to 2005 was primarily attributable to the certegy merger which contributed $ 848.2 million to the increase . gross profit as a percentage of revenues ( 201cgross margin 201d ) was 22.2% ( 22.2 % ) , 25.2% ( 25.2 % ) and 25.2% ( 25.2 % ) for 2006 , 2005 and 2004 , respectively . the decrease in gross profit in 2006 as compared to 2005 is primarily due to the february 1 , 2006 certegy merger , which businesses typically have lower margins than those of the historically owned fis businesses . incremental intangible asset amortization relating to the certegy merger also contributed to the decrease in gross margin . included in cost of revenues was depreciation and amortization of $ 272.4 million , $ 139.8 million , and $ 94.6 million for 2006 , 2005 and 2004 , respectively . selling , general and administrative expenses totaled $ 171.1 million , $ 94.9 million and $ 99.6 million for 2006 , 2005 and 2004 , respectively . the increase in 2006 compared to 2005 is primarily attributable to the certegy merger which contributed $ 73.7 million to the overall increase of $ 76.2 million . the decrease of $ 4.7 million in 2005 as compared to 2004 is primarily attributable to the effect of acquisition related costs in 2004 . included in selling , general and administrative expenses was depreciation and amortization of $ 11.0 million , $ 9.1 million and $ 2.3 million for 2006 , 2005 and 2004 , respectively. . Question: w h a t i s t h e n e t m a r g i n f o r 2 0 0 6 ?	4,981
13549	Given the context, answer the question. Context: hologic , inc . notes to consolidated financial statements ( continued ) ( in thousands , except per share data ) as part of the purchase price allocation , all intangible assets that were a part of the acquisition were identified and valued . it was determined that only customer relationship , trade name , developed technology and know how and in-process research and development had separately identifiable values . customer relationship represents suros large installed base that are expected to purchase disposable products on a regular basis . trade name represents the suros product names that the company intends to continue to use . developed technology and know how represents currently marketable purchased products that the company continues to resell as well as utilize to enhance and incorporate into the company 2019s existing products . the estimated $ 4900 of purchase price allocated to in-process research and development projects primarily related to suros 2019 disposable products . the projects were at various stages of completion and include next generation handpiece and site marker technologies . the company has continued to work on these projects and they are substantially complete as of september 27 , 2008 . the deferred income tax liability relates to the tax effect of acquired identifiable intangible assets , and fair value adjustments to acquired inventory as such amounts are not deductible for tax purposes , partially offset by acquired net operating loss carry forwards that the company believes are realizable . for all of the acquisitions discussed above , goodwill represents the excess of the purchase price over the net identifiable tangible and intangible assets acquired . the company determined that the acquisition of each aeg , biolucent , r2 and suros resulted in the recognition of goodwill primarily because of synergies unique to the company and the strength of its acquired workforce . supplemental unaudited pro-forma information the following unaudited pro forma information presents the consolidated results of operations of the company , r2 and suros as if the acquisitions had occurred at the beginning of fiscal 2006 , with pro forma adjustments to give effect to amortization of intangible assets , an increase in interest expense on acquisition financing and certain other adjustments together with related tax effects: . \| 2006 net revenue \| $ 524340 net income \| $ 28649 net income per share 2014basic \| $ 0.28 net income per share 2014assuming dilution \| $ 0.17 the $ 15100 charge for purchased research and development that was a direct result of these two transactions is excluded from the unaudited pro forma information above . the unaudited pro forma results are not necessarily indicative of the results that the company would have attained had the acquisitions of both r2 and suros occurred at the beginning of the periods presented . 4 . acquisition of intangible assets on september 29 , 2005 , pursuant to an asset purchase agreement between the company and fischer imaging corporation ( 201cfischer 201d ) , dated june 22 , 2005 , the company acquired the intellectual property and customer lists relating to fischer 2019s mammography business and products for $ 26900 in cash and cancellation of the principal and interest outstanding under a $ 5000 secured loan previously provided by the company to fischer . the aggregate purchase price for the fischer intellectual property and customer lists was approximately $ 33000 , which included approximately $ 1000 related to direct acquisition costs . in accordance with emerging issues task force issue no . 98-3 , determining whether a non-monetary transaction involved receipt of . Question: w h a t w o u l d p r o f o r m a n e t i n c o m e h a v e b e e n i f t h e c h a r g e f o r p u r c h a s e d r e s e a r c h a n d d e v e l o p m e n t h a d b e e n e x p e n s e d ?	4,982
59%	Given the context, answer the question. Context: issuer purchases of equity securities the following table provides information regarding purchases of our common stock that were made by us during the fourth quarter of 2011 . period total number of shares purchased ( 2 ) average price paid per share total number of shares purchased as part of publicly announced plans or programs ( 1 ) maximum dollar value of shares that may yet be purchased under the plans or programs ( 1 ) ( in millions ) . period \| total number of shares purchased ( 2 ) \| average price paid per share \| total number of shares purchased as part ofpublicly announced plans or programs ( 1 ) \| maximum dollar value of shares that may yetbe purchased under the plans or programs ( 1 ) ( in millions ) october 1 2013 october 31 \| 3228557 \| $ 58.52 \| 3227800 \| $ 108 november 1 2013 november 30 \| 1813994 \| $ 66.38 \| 1618110 \| $ 2014 december 1 2013 december 31 \| 475685 \| $ 64.68 \| 2014 \| $ 2014 total \| 5518236 \| $ 61.64 \| 4845910 \| ( 1 ) in may 2010 , our board of directors approved a $ 3.5 billion share repurchase program . we completed this program in the fourth quarter of 2011 . in total , we repurchased 49.2 million common shares for $ 3.5 billion , or $ 71.18 per share , under this program . ( 2 ) during the fourth quarter of 2011 , we repurchased 672326 shares from company employees for the payment of personal income tax withholdings resulting from restricted stock vesting and stock option exercises . such repurchases are in addition to the $ 3.5 billion repurchase program . under the devon energy corporation incentive savings plan ( the 201cplan 201d ) , eligible employees may purchase shares of our common stock through an investment in the devon stock fund ( the 201cstock fund 201d ) , which is administered by an independent trustee , fidelity management trust company . eligible employees purchased approximately 45000 shares of our common stock in 2011 , at then-prevailing stock prices , that they held through their ownership in the stock fund . we acquired the shares of our common stock sold under the plan through open-market purchases . we filed a registration statement on form s-8 on january 26 , 2012 registering any offers and sales of interests in the plan or the stock fund and of the underlying shares of our common stock purchased by plan participants after that date . similarly , under the devon canada corporation savings plan ( the 201ccanadian plan 201d ) , eligible canadian employees may purchase shares of our common stock through an investment in the canadian plan , which is administered by an independent trustee , sun life assurance company of canada . eligible canadian employees purchased approximately 9000 shares of our common stock in 2011 , at then-prevailing stock prices , that they held through their ownership in the canadian plan . we acquired the shares sold under the canadian plan through open-market purchases . these shares and any interest in the canadian plan were offered and sold in reliance on the exemptions for offers and sales of securities made outside of the u.s. , including under regulation s for offers and sales of securities to employees pursuant to an employee benefit plan established and administered in accordance with the law of a country other than the u.s. . Question: w h a t p e r c e n t a g e o f t o t a l s h a r e s r e p u r c h a s e d w e r e p u r c h a s e d i n o c t o b e r ?	4,983
18%	Given the context, answer the question. Context: dollar general corporation and subsidiaries notes to consolidated financial statements ( continued ) 3 . merger ( continued ) merger as a subsidiary of buck . the company 2019s results of operations after july 6 , 2007 include the effects of the merger . the aggregate purchase price was approximately $ 7.1 billion , including direct costs of the merger , and was funded primarily through debt financings as described more fully below in note 7 and cash equity contributions from kkr , gs capital partners vi fund , l.p . and affiliated funds ( affiliates of goldman , sachs & co. ) , and other equity co-investors ( collectively , the 2018 2018investors 2019 2019 of approximately $ 2.8 billion ( 316.2 million shares of new common stock , $ 0.875 par value per share , valued at $ 8.75 per share ) . also in connection with the merger , certain of the company 2019s management employees invested in and were issued new shares , representing less than 1% ( 1 % ) of the outstanding shares , in the company . pursuant to the terms of the merger agreement , the former holders of the predecessor 2019s common stock , par value $ 0.50 per share , received $ 22.00 per share , or approximately $ 6.9 billion , and all such shares were acquired as a result of the merger . as discussed in note 1 , the merger was accounted for as a reverse acquisition in accordance with applicable purchase accounting provisions . because of this accounting treatment , the company 2019s assets and liabilities have properly been accounted for at their estimated fair values as of the merger date . the aggregate purchase price has been allocated to the tangible and intangible assets acquired and liabilities assumed based upon an assessment of their relative fair values as of the merger date . the allocation of the purchase price is as follows ( in thousands ) : . cash and cash equivalents \| $ 349615 short-term investments \| 30906 merchandise inventories \| 1368130 income taxes receivable \| 40199 deferred income taxes \| 57176 prepaid expenses and other current assets \| 63204 property and equipment net \| 1301119 goodwill \| 4338589 intangible assets \| 1396612 other assets net \| 66537 current portion of long-term obligations \| -7088 ( 7088 ) accounts payable \| -585518 ( 585518 ) accrued expenses and other \| -306394 ( 306394 ) income taxes payable \| -84 ( 84 ) long-term obligations \| -267927 ( 267927 ) deferred income taxes \| -540675 ( 540675 ) other liabilities \| -208710 ( 208710 ) total purchase price assigned \| $ 7095691 the purchase price allocation included approximately $ 4.34 billion of goodwill , none of which is expected to be deductible for tax purposes . the goodwill balance at january 30 , 2009 decreased $ 6.3 million from the balance at february 1 , 2008 due to an adjustment to income tax contingencies as further discussed in note 6. . Question: w h a t p e r c e n t a g e o f t h e p u r c h a s e p r i c e w a s h a r d a s s e t s ?	4,984
16.4%	Given the context, answer the question. Context: shareowner return performance graph the following performance graph and related information shall not be deemed 201csoliciting material 201d or to be 201cfiled 201d with the securities and exchange commission , nor shall such information be incorporated by reference into any future filing under the securities act of 1933 or securities exchange act of 1934 , each as amended , except to the extent that the company specifically incorporates such information by reference into such filing . the following graph shows a five-year comparison of cumulative total shareowners 2019 returns for our class b common stock , the s&p 500 index , and the dow jones transportation average . the comparison of the total cumulative return on investment , which is the change in the quarterly stock price plus reinvested dividends for each of the quarterly periods , assumes that $ 100 was invested on december 31 , 2002 in the s&p 500 index , the dow jones transportation average , and the class b common stock of united parcel service , inc . comparison of five year cumulative total return $ 40.00 $ 60.00 $ 80.00 $ 100.00 $ 120.00 $ 140.00 $ 160.00 $ 180.00 $ 200.00 $ 220.00 2002 20072006200520042003 s&p 500 ups dj transport . \| 12/31/02 \| 12/31/03 \| 12/31/04 \| 12/31/05 \| 12/31/06 \| 12/31/07 united parcel service inc . \| $ 100.00 \| $ 119.89 \| $ 139.55 \| $ 124.88 \| $ 127.08 \| $ 122.64 s&p 500 index \| $ 100.00 \| $ 128.68 \| $ 142.68 \| $ 149.69 \| $ 173.33 \| $ 182.85 dow jones transportation average \| $ 100.00 \| $ 131.84 \| $ 168.39 \| $ 188.00 \| $ 206.46 \| $ 209.40 securities authorized for issuance under equity compensation plans the following table provides information as of december 31 , 2007 regarding compensation plans under which our class a common stock is authorized for issuance . these plans do not authorize the issuance of our class b common stock. . Question: w h a t i s t h e r a t e o f r e t u r n o f a n i n v e s t m e n t i n u p s f r o m 2 0 0 3 t o 2 0 0 4 ?	4,985
28.02%	Given the context, answer the question. Context: 14 2018 annual report performance graph the following chart presents a comparison for the five-year period ended june 30 , 2018 , of the market performance of the company 2019s common stock with the s&p 500 index and an index of peer companies selected by the company . historic stock price performance is not necessarily indicative of future stock price performance . comparison of 5 year cumulative total return among jack henry & associates , inc. , the s&p 500 index , and a peer group the following information depicts a line graph with the following values: . \| 2013 \| 2014 \| 2015 \| 2016 \| 2017 \| 2018 jkhy \| 100.00 \| 128.02 \| 141.48 \| 193.46 \| 233.19 \| 296.19 peer group \| 100.00 \| 137.07 \| 171.80 \| 198.44 \| 231.11 \| 297.44 s&p 500 \| 100.00 \| 124.61 \| 133.86 \| 139.20 \| 164.11 \| 187.70 this comparison assumes $ 100 was invested on june 30 , 2013 , and assumes reinvestments of dividends . total returns are calculated according to market capitalization of peer group members at the beginning of each period . peer companies selected are in the business of providing specialized computer software , hardware and related services to financial institutions and other businesses . companies in the peer group are aci worldwide , inc. ; bottomline technology , inc. ; broadridge financial solutions ; cardtronics , inc. ; convergys corp. ; corelogic , inc. ; euronet worldwide , inc. ; fair isaac corp. ; fidelity national information services , inc. ; fiserv , inc. ; global payments , inc. ; moneygram international , inc. ; ss&c technologies holdings , inc. ; total systems services , inc. ; tyler technologies , inc. ; verifone systems , inc. ; and wex , inc . dst systems , inc. , which had previously been part of the peer group , was acquired in 2018 and is no longer a public company . as a result , dst systems , inc . has been removed from the peer group and stock performance graph . the stock performance graph shall not be deemed 201cfiled 201d for purposes of section 18 of the exchange act , or incorporated by reference into any filing of the company under the securities act of 1933 , as amended , or the exchange act , except as shall be expressly set forth by specific reference in such filing. . Question: w h a t w a s t h e p e r c e n t a g e g r o w t h o f t h e j k h y	4,986
16.7%	Given the context, answer the question. Context: adobe systems incorporated notes to consolidated financial statements ( continued ) we review our goodwill for impairment annually , or more frequently , if facts and circumstances warrant a review . we completed our annual impairment test in the second quarter of fiscal 2014 . we elected to use the step 1 quantitative assessment for our reporting units and determined that there was no impairment of goodwill . there is no significant risk of material goodwill impairment in any of our reporting units , based upon the results of our annual goodwill impairment test . we amortize intangible assets with finite lives over their estimated useful lives and review them for impairment whenever an impairment indicator exists . we continually monitor events and changes in circumstances that could indicate carrying amounts of our long-lived assets , including our intangible assets may not be recoverable . when such events or changes in circumstances occur , we assess recoverability by determining whether the carrying value of such assets will be recovered through the undiscounted expected future cash flows . if the future undiscounted cash flows are less than the carrying amount of these assets , we recognize an impairment loss based on any excess of the carrying amount over the fair value of the assets . we did not recognize any intangible asset impairment charges in fiscal 2014 , 2013 or 2012 . our intangible assets are amortized over their estimated useful lives of 1 to 14 years . amortization is based on the pattern in which the economic benefits of the intangible asset will be consumed or on a straight-line basis when the consumption pattern is not apparent . the weighted average useful lives of our intangible assets were as follows : weighted average useful life ( years ) . \| weighted averageuseful life ( years ) purchased technology \| 6 customer contracts and relationships \| 10 trademarks \| 8 acquired rights to use technology \| 8 localization \| 1 other intangibles \| 3 software development costs capitalization of software development costs for software to be sold , leased , or otherwise marketed begins upon the establishment of technological feasibility , which is generally the completion of a working prototype that has been certified as having no critical bugs and is a release candidate . amortization begins once the software is ready for its intended use , generally based on the pattern in which the economic benefits will be consumed . to date , software development costs incurred between completion of a working prototype and general availability of the related product have not been material . internal use software we capitalize costs associated with customized internal-use software systems that have reached the application development stage . such capitalized costs include external direct costs utilized in developing or obtaining the applications and payroll and payroll-related expenses for employees , who are directly associated with the development of the applications . capitalization of such costs begins when the preliminary project stage is complete and ceases at the point in which the project is substantially complete and is ready for its intended purpose . income taxes we use the asset and liability method of accounting for income taxes . under this method , income tax expense is recognized for the amount of taxes payable or refundable for the current year . in addition , deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized for expected future tax consequences of temporary differences between the financial reporting and tax bases of assets and liabilities , and for operating losses and tax credit carryforwards . we record a valuation allowance to reduce deferred tax assets to an amount for which realization is more likely than not . taxes collected from customers we net taxes collected from customers against those remitted to government authorities in our financial statements . accordingly , taxes collected from customers are not reported as revenue. . Question: w h a t i s t h e y e a r l y a m o r t i z a t i o n r a t e r e l a t e d t o t h e p u r c h a s e d t e c h n o l o g y ?	4,987
-1836	Given the context, answer the question. Context: assets measured and recorded at fair value on a non-recurring basis our non-marketable equity securities , equity method investments , and certain non-financial assets , such as intangible assets and property , plant and equipment , are recorded at fair value only if an impairment or observable price adjustment is recognized in the current period . if an impairment or observable price adjustment is recognized on our non-marketable equity securities during the period , we classify these assets as level 3 within the fair value hierarchy based on the nature of the fair value inputs . we classified non-marketable equity securities and non-marketable equity method investments as level 3 . impairments recognized on these investments held as of december 29 , 2018 were $ 416 million ( $ 537 million held as of december 30 , 2017 and $ 153 million held as of december 31 , 2016 ) . financial instruments not recorded at fair value on a recurring basis financial instruments not recorded at fair value on a recurring basis include non-marketable equity securities and equity method investments that have not been remeasured or impaired in the current period , grants receivable , loans receivable , reverse repurchase agreements , and our short-term and long-term debt . prior to the adoption of the new financial instrument standard , our non-marketable cost method investments were disclosed at fair value on a recurring basis . the carrying amount and fair value of our non-marketable cost method investments as of december 30 , 2017 were $ 2.6 billion and $ 3.6 billion , respectively . these measures are classified as level 3 within the fair value hierarchy based on the nature of the fair value inputs . as of december 29 , 2018 , the aggregate carrying value of grants receivable , loans receivable , and reverse repurchase agreements was $ 833 million ( the aggregate carrying amount as of december 30 , 2017 was $ 935 million ) . the estimated fair value of these financial instruments approximates their carrying value and is categorized as level 2 within the fair value hierarchy based on the nature of the fair value inputs . for information related to the fair value of our short-term and long-term debt , see 201cnote 15 : borrowings . 201d note 17 : other comprehensive income ( loss ) the changes in accumulated other comprehensive income ( loss ) by component and related tax effects for each period were as follows : ( in millions ) unrealized holding ( losses ) on available-for -sale equity investments unrealized holding ( losses ) on derivatives actuarial valuation and other pension expenses translation adjustments and other total . ( in millions ) \| unrealized holding gains ( losses ) on available-for-sale equity investments \| unrealized holding gains ( losses ) on derivatives \| actuarial valuation and other pension expenses \| translation adjustments and other \| total december 31 2016 \| $ 2179 \| $ -259 ( 259 ) \| $ -1280 ( 1280 ) \| $ -534 ( 534 ) \| $ 106 other comprehensive income ( loss ) before reclassifications \| 2765 \| 605 \| 275 \| -2 ( 2 ) \| 3643 amounts reclassified out of accumulated other comprehensive income ( loss ) \| -3433 ( 3433 ) \| -69 ( 69 ) \| 103 \| 509 \| -2890 ( 2890 ) tax effects \| 234 \| -171 ( 171 ) \| -61 ( 61 ) \| 1 \| 3 other comprehensive income ( loss ) \| -434 ( 434 ) \| 365 \| 317 \| 508 \| 756 december 30 2017 \| 1745 \| 106 \| -963 ( 963 ) \| -26 ( 26 ) \| 862 impact of change in accounting standards \| -1745 ( 1745 ) \| 24 \| -65 ( 65 ) \| -4 ( 4 ) \| -1790 ( 1790 ) opening balance as of december 31 2017 \| 2014 \| 130 \| -1028 ( 1028 ) \| -30 ( 30 ) \| -928 ( 928 ) other comprehensive income ( loss ) before reclassifications \| 2014 \| -310 ( 310 ) \| 157 \| -16 ( 16 ) \| -169 ( 169 ) amounts reclassified out of accumulated other comprehensive income ( loss ) \| 2014 \| 9 \| 109 \| 8 \| 126 tax effects \| 2014 \| 48 \| -56 ( 56 ) \| 5 \| -3 ( 3 ) other comprehensive income ( loss ) \| 2014 \| -253 ( 253 ) \| 210 \| -3 ( 3 ) \| -46 ( 46 ) december 29 2018 \| $ 2014 \| $ -123 ( 123 ) \| $ -818 ( 818 ) \| $ -33 ( 33 ) \| $ -974 ( 974 ) financial statements notes to financial statements 97 . Question: w h a t i s t h e n e t c h a n g e i n t h e a c c u m u l a t e d o t h e r c o m p r e h e n s i v e i n c o m e d u r i n g 2 0 1 8 ?	4,988
183379	Given the context, answer the question. Context: entergy corporation and subsidiaries notes to financial statements computed on a rolling 12 month basis . as of december 31 , 2008 , entergy louisiana was in compliance with these provisions . as of december 31 , 2008 , entergy louisiana had future minimum lease payments ( reflecting an overall implicit rate of 7.45% ( 7.45 % ) ) in connection with the waterford 3 sale and leaseback transactions , which are recorded as long-term debt , as follows : amount ( in thousands ) . \| amount ( in thousands ) 2009 \| $ 32452 2010 \| 35138 2011 \| 50421 2012 \| 39067 2013 \| 26301 years thereafter \| 137858 total \| 321237 less : amount representing interest \| 73512 present value of net minimum lease payments \| $ 247725 grand gulf lease obligations in december 1988 , in two separate but substantially identical transactions , system energy sold and leased back undivided ownership interests in grand gulf for the aggregate sum of $ 500 million . the interests represent approximately 11.5% ( 11.5 % ) of grand gulf . the leases expire in 2015 . under certain circumstances , system entergy may repurchase the leased interests prior to the end of the term of the leases . at the end of the lease terms , system energy has the option to repurchase the leased interests in grand gulf at fair market value or to renew the leases for either fair market value or , under certain conditions , a fixed rate . in may 2004 , system energy caused the grand gulf lessors to refinance the outstanding bonds that they had issued to finance the purchase of their undivided interest in grand gulf . the refinancing is at a lower interest rate , and system energy's lease payments have been reduced to reflect the lower interest costs . system energy is required to report the sale-leaseback as a financing transaction in its financial statements . for financial reporting purposes , system energy expenses the interest portion of the lease obligation and the plant depreciation . however , operating revenues include the recovery of the lease payments because the transactions are accounted for as a sale and leaseback for ratemaking purposes . consistent with a recommendation contained in a ferc audit report , system energy initially recorded as a net regulatory asset the difference between the recovery of the lease payments and the amounts expensed for interest and depreciation and continues to record this difference as a regulatory asset or liability on an ongoing basis , resulting in a zero net balance for the regulatory asset at the end of the lease term . the amount of this net regulatory asset was $ 19.2 million and $ 36.6 million as of december 31 , 2008 and 2007 , respectively. . Question: n o t i n c l u d i n g y e a r s ' t h e r e a f t e r ' , w h a t i s t h e t o t a l l e a s e p a y m e n t s ? ( i n $ t h o u s a n d s )	4,989
12.4	Given the context, answer the question. Context: management 2019s discussion and analysis j.p . morgan chase & co . 26 j.p . morgan chase & co . / 2003 annual report $ 41.7 billion . nii was reduced by a lower volume of commercial loans and lower spreads on investment securities . as a compo- nent of nii , trading-related net interest income of $ 2.1 billion was up 13% ( 13 % ) from 2002 due to a change in the composition of , and growth in , trading assets . the firm 2019s total average interest-earning assets in 2003 were $ 590 billion , up 6% ( 6 % ) from the prior year . the net interest yield on these assets , on a fully taxable-equivalent basis , was 2.10% ( 2.10 % ) , compared with 2.09% ( 2.09 % ) in the prior year . noninterest expense year ended december 31 . ( in millions ) \| 2003 \| 2002 \| change compensation expense \| $ 11695 \| $ 10983 \| 6% ( 6 % ) occupancy expense \| 1912 \| 1606 \| 19 technology and communications expense \| 2844 \| 2554 \| 11 other expense \| 5137 \| 5111 \| 1 surety settlement and litigation reserve \| 100 \| 1300 \| -92 ( 92 ) merger and restructuring costs \| 2014 \| 1210 \| nm total noninterest expense \| $ 21688 \| $ 22764 \| ( 5 ) % ( % ) technology and communications expense in 2003 , technology and communications expense was 11% ( 11 % ) above the prior-year level . the increase was primarily due to a shift in expenses : costs that were previously associated with compensation and other expenses shifted , upon the commence- ment of the ibm outsourcing agreement , to technology and communications expense . also contributing to the increase were higher costs related to software amortization . for a further dis- cussion of the ibm outsourcing agreement , see support units and corporate on page 44 of this annual report . other expense other expense in 2003 rose slightly from the prior year , reflecting higher outside services . for a table showing the components of other expense , see note 8 on page 96 of this annual report . surety settlement and litigation reserve the firm added $ 100 million to the enron-related litigation reserve in 2003 to supplement a $ 900 million reserve initially recorded in 2002 . the 2002 reserve was established to cover enron-related matters , as well as certain other material litigation , proceedings and investigations in which the firm is involved . in addition , in 2002 the firm recorded a charge of $ 400 million for the settlement of enron-related surety litigation . merger and restructuring costs merger and restructuring costs related to business restructurings announced after january 1 , 2002 , were recorded in their relevant expense categories . in 2002 , merger and restructuring costs of $ 1.2 billion , for programs announced prior to january 1 , 2002 , were viewed by management as nonoperating expenses or 201cspecial items . 201d refer to note 8 on pages 95 201396 of this annual report for a further discussion of merger and restructuring costs and for a summary , by expense category and business segment , of costs incurred in 2003 and 2002 for programs announced after january 1 , 2002 . provision for credit losses the 2003 provision for credit losses was $ 2.8 billion lower than in 2002 , primarily reflecting continued improvement in the quality of the commercial loan portfolio and a higher volume of credit card securitizations . for further information about the provision for credit losses and the firm 2019s management of credit risk , see the dis- cussions of net charge-offs associated with the commercial and consumer loan portfolios and the allowance for credit losses , on pages 63 201365 of this annual report . income tax expense income tax expense was $ 3.3 billion in 2003 , compared with $ 856 million in 2002 . the effective tax rate in 2003 was 33% ( 33 % ) , compared with 34% ( 34 % ) in 2002 . the tax rate decline was principally attributable to changes in the proportion of income subject to state and local taxes . compensation expense compensation expense in 2003 was 6% ( 6 % ) higher than in the prior year . the increase principally reflected higher performance-related incentives , and higher pension and other postretirement benefit costs , primarily as a result of changes in actuarial assumptions . for a detailed discussion of pension and other postretirement benefit costs , see note 6 on pages 89 201393 of this annual report . the increase pertaining to incentives included $ 266 million as a result of adopting sfas 123 , and $ 120 million from the reversal in 2002 of previously accrued expenses for certain forfeitable key employ- ee stock awards , as discussed in note 7 on pages 93 201395 of this annual report . total compensation expense declined as a result of the transfer , beginning april 1 , 2003 , of 2800 employees to ibm in connection with a technology outsourcing agreement . the total number of full-time equivalent employees at december 31 , 2003 was 93453 compared with 94335 at the prior year-end . occupancy expense occupancy expense of $ 1.9 billion rose 19% ( 19 % ) from 2002 . the increase reflected costs of additional leased space in midtown manhattan and in the south and southwest regions of the united states ; higher real estate taxes in new york city ; and the cost of enhanced safety measures . also contributing to the increase were charges for unoccupied excess real estate of $ 270 million ; this compared with $ 120 million in 2002 , mostly in the third quarter of that year. . Question: w h a t w o u l d p r e - t a x i n t e r e s t i n c o m e b e , i n b i l l i o n s , f o r 2 0 0 3 , b a s e d o n t h e r e t u r n o n i n t e r e s t b e a r i n g a s s e t s ?	4,990
68.38	Given the context, answer the question. Context: edwards lifesciences corporation notes to consolidated financial statements ( continued ) 12 . employee benefit plans ( continued ) equity and debt securities are valued at fair value based on quoted market prices reported on the active markets on which the individual securities are traded . the insurance contracts are valued at the cash surrender value of the contracts , which is deemed to approximate its fair value . the following benefit payments , which reflect expected future service , as appropriate , at december 31 , 2014 , are expected to be paid ( in millions ) : . 2015 \| $ 3.7 2016 \| 5.5 2017 \| 4.2 2018 \| 4.2 2019 \| 4.1 2020-2024 \| 32.3 as of december 31 , 2014 , expected employer contributions for 2015 are $ 5.8 million . defined contribution plans the company 2019s employees in the united states and puerto rico are eligible to participate in a qualified 401 ( k ) and 1165 ( e ) plan , respectively . in the united states , participants may contribute up to 25% ( 25 % ) of their eligible compensation ( subject to tax code limitation ) to the plan . edwards lifesciences matches the first 3% ( 3 % ) of the participant 2019s annual eligible compensation contributed to the plan on a dollar-for-dollar basis . edwards lifesciences matches the next 2% ( 2 % ) of the participant 2019s annual eligible compensation to the plan on a 50% ( 50 % ) basis . in puerto rico , participants may contribute up to 25% ( 25 % ) of their annual compensation ( subject to tax code limitation ) to the plan . edwards lifesciences matches the first 4% ( 4 % ) of participant 2019s annual eligible compensation contributed to the plan on a 50% ( 50 % ) basis . the company also provides a 2% ( 2 % ) profit sharing contribution calculated on eligible earnings for each employee . matching contributions relating to edwards lifesciences employees were $ 12.8 million , $ 12.0 million , and $ 10.8 million in 2014 , 2013 , and 2012 , respectively . the company also has nonqualified deferred compensation plans for a select group of employees . the plans provide eligible participants the opportunity to defer eligible compensation to future dates specified by the participant with a return based on investment alternatives selected by the participant . the amount accrued under these nonqualified plans was $ 28.7 million and $ 25.9 million at december 31 , 2014 and 2013 , respectively . 13 . common stock treasury stock in may 2013 , the board of directors approved a stock repurchase program authorizing the company to purchase up to $ 750.0 million of the company 2019s common stock from time to time until december 31 , 2016 . in july 2014 , the board of directors approved a new stock repurchase program providing for an additional $ 750.0 million of repurchases without a specified end date . stock repurchased under these programs will be used to offset obligations under the company 2019s employee stock option programs and reduce the total shares outstanding . during 2014 , 2013 , and 2012 , the company repurchased 4.4 million , 6.8 million , and 4.0 million shares , respectively , at an aggregate cost of $ 300.9 million , $ 497.0 million , and $ 353.2 million , respectively , including shares purchased under the accelerated share repurchase ( 2018 2018asr 2019 2019 ) agreements described below and shares . Question: w h a t w a s t h e a v e r a g e p u r c h a s e p r i c e o f c o m p a n y r e p u r c h a s e d s h a r e s i n 2 0 1 4 ?	4,991
431	Given the context, answer the question. Context: jpmorgan chase & co./2012 annual report 103 2011 compared with 2010 net income was $ 822 million , compared with $ 1.3 billion in the prior year . private equity reported net income of $ 391 million , compared with $ 588 million in the prior year . net revenue was $ 836 million , a decrease of $ 403 million , primarily related to net write-downs on private investments and the absence of prior year gains on sales . noninterest expense was $ 238 million , a decrease of $ 85 million from the prior treasury and cio reported net income of $ 1.3 billion , compared with net income of $ 3.6 billion in the prior year . net revenue was $ 3.2 billion , including $ 1.4 billion of security gains . net interest income in 2011 was lower compared with 2010 , primarily driven by repositioning of the investment securities portfolio and lower funding benefits from financing the portfolio . other corporate reported a net loss of $ 918 million , compared with a net loss of $ 2.9 billion in the prior year . net revenue was $ 103 million , compared with a net loss of $ 467 million in the prior year . noninterest expense was $ 2.9 billion which included $ 3.2 billion of additional litigation reserves , predominantly for mortgage-related matters . noninterest expense in the prior year was $ 5.5 billion which included $ 5.7 billion of additional litigation reserves . treasury and cio overview treasury and cio are predominantly responsible for measuring , monitoring , reporting and managing the firm 2019s liquidity , funding , capital and structural interest rate and foreign exchange risks . the risks managed by treasury and cio arise from the activities undertaken by the firm 2019s four major reportable business segments to serve their respective client bases , which generate both on- and off- balance sheet assets and liabilities . treasury is responsible for , among other functions , funds transfer pricing . funds transfer pricing is used to transfer structural interest rate risk and foreign exchange risk of the firm to treasury and cio and allocate interest income and expense to each business based on market rates . cio , through its management of the investment portfolio , generates net interest income to pay the lines of business market rates . any variance ( whether positive or negative ) between amounts generated by cio through its investment portfolio activities and amounts paid to or received by the lines of business are retained by cio , and are not reflected in line of business segment results . treasury and cio activities operate in support of the overall firm . cio achieves the firm 2019s asset-liability management objectives generally by investing in high-quality securities that are managed for the longer-term as part of the firm 2019s afs investment portfolio . unrealized gains and losses on securities held in the afs portfolio are recorded in other comprehensive income . for further information about securities in the afs portfolio , see note 3 and note 12 on pages 196 2013214 and 244 2013248 , respectively , of this annual report . cio also uses securities that are not classified within the afs portfolio , as well as derivatives , to meet the firm 2019s asset-liability management objectives . securities not classified within the afs portfolio are recorded in trading assets and liabilities ; realized and unrealized gains and losses on such securities are recorded in the principal transactions revenue line in the consolidated statements of income . for further information about securities included in trading assets and liabilities , see note 3 on pages 196 2013214 of this annual report . derivatives used by cio are also classified as trading assets and liabilities . for further information on derivatives , including the classification of realized and unrealized gains and losses , see note 6 on pages 218 2013227 of this annual report . cio 2019s afs portfolio consists of u.s . and non-u.s . government securities , agency and non-agency mortgage-backed securities , other asset-backed securities and corporate and municipal debt securities . treasury 2019s afs portfolio consists of u.s . and non-u.s . government securities and corporate debt securities . at december 31 , 2012 , the total treasury and cio afs portfolios were $ 344.1 billion and $ 21.3 billion , respectively ; the average credit rating of the securities comprising the treasury and cio afs portfolios was aa+ ( based upon external ratings where available and where not available , based primarily upon internal ratings that correspond to ratings as defined by s&p and moody 2019s ) . see note 12 on pages 244 2013248 of this annual report for further information on the details of the firm 2019s afs portfolio . for further information on liquidity and funding risk , see liquidity risk management on pages 127 2013133 of this annual report . for information on interest rate , foreign exchange and other risks , and cio var and the firm 2019s nontrading interest rate-sensitive revenue at risk , see market risk management on pages 163 2013169 of this annual report . selected income statement and balance sheet data as of or for the year ended december 31 , ( in millions ) 2012 2011 2010 securities gains ( a ) $ 2028 $ 1385 $ 2897 investment securities portfolio ( average ) 358029 330885 323673 investment securities portfolio ( period 2013end ) 365421 355605 310801 . as of or for the year ended december 31 ( in millions ) \| 2012 \| 2011 \| 2010 securities gains ( a ) \| $ 2028 \| $ 1385 \| $ 2897 investment securities portfolio ( average ) \| 358029 \| 330885 \| 323673 investment securities portfolio ( period 2013end ) \| 365421 \| 355605 \| 310801 mortgage loans ( average ) \| 10241 \| 13006 \| 9004 mortgage loans ( period-end ) \| 7037 \| 13375 \| 10739 ( a ) reflects repositioning of the investment securities portfolio. . Question: w o u l d w o u l d 2 0 1 1 n e t i n c o m e h a v e b e e n w i t h o u t t h e p r i v a t e e q u i t y s e g m e n t ( i n m i l l i o n s ) ?	4,992
13	Given the context, answer the question. Context: indemnification and repurchase claims are typically settled on an individual loan basis through make-whole payments or loan repurchases ; however , on occasion we may negotiate pooled settlements with investors . in connection with pooled settlements , we typically do not repurchase loans and the consummation of such transactions generally results in us no longer having indemnification and repurchase exposure with the investor in the transaction . for the first and second-lien mortgage balances of unresolved and settled claims contained in the tables below , a significant amount of these claims were associated with sold loans originated through correspondent lender and broker origination channels . in certain instances when indemnification or repurchase claims are settled for these types of sold loans , we have recourse back to the correspondent lenders , brokers and other third-parties ( e.g. , contract underwriting companies , closing agents , appraisers , etc. ) . depending on the underlying reason for the investor claim , we determine our ability to pursue recourse with these parties and file claims with them accordingly . our historical recourse recovery rate has been insignificant as our efforts have been impacted by the inability of such parties to reimburse us for their recourse obligations ( e.g. , their capital availability or whether they remain in business ) or factors that limit our ability to pursue recourse from these parties ( e.g. , contractual loss caps , statutes of limitations ) . origination and sale of residential mortgages is an ongoing business activity , and , accordingly , management continually assesses the need to recognize indemnification and repurchase liabilities pursuant to the associated investor sale agreements . we establish indemnification and repurchase liabilities for estimated losses on sold first and second-lien mortgages for which indemnification is expected to be provided or for loans that are expected to be repurchased . for the first and second- lien mortgage sold portfolio , we have established an indemnification and repurchase liability pursuant to investor sale agreements based on claims made , demand patterns observed to date and/or expected in the future , and our estimate of future claims on a loan by loan basis . to estimate the mortgage repurchase liability arising from breaches of representations and warranties , we consider the following factors : ( i ) borrower performance in our historically sold portfolio ( both actual and estimated future defaults ) , ( ii ) the level of outstanding unresolved repurchase claims , ( iii ) estimated probable future repurchase claims , considering information about file requests , delinquent and liquidated loans , resolved and unresolved mortgage insurance rescission notices and our historical experience with claim rescissions , ( iv ) the potential ability to cure the defects identified in the repurchase claims ( 201crescission rate 201d ) , and ( v ) the estimated severity of loss upon repurchase of the loan or collateral , make-whole settlement , or indemnification . see note 24 commitments and guarantees in the notes to consolidated financial statements in item 8 of this report for additional information . the following tables present the unpaid principal balance of repurchase claims by vintage and total unresolved repurchase claims for the past five quarters . table 28 : analysis of quarterly residential mortgage repurchase claims by vintage dollars in millions december 31 september 30 june 30 march 31 december 31 . dollars in millions \| december 31 2012 \| september 30 2012 \| june 30 2012 \| march 31 2012 \| december 312011 2004 & prior \| $ 11 \| $ 15 \| $ 31 \| $ 10 \| $ 11 2005 \| 8 \| 10 \| 19 \| 12 \| 13 2006 \| 23 \| 30 \| 56 \| 41 \| 28 2007 \| 45 \| 137 \| 182 \| 100 \| 90 2008 \| 7 \| 23 \| 49 \| 17 \| 18 2008 & prior \| 94 \| 215 \| 337 \| 180 \| 160 2009 2013 2012 \| 38 \| 52 \| 42 \| 33 \| 29 total \| $ 132 \| $ 267 \| $ 379 \| $ 213 \| $ 189 fnma fhlmc and gnma % ( % ) \| 94% ( 94 % ) \| 87% ( 87 % ) \| 86% ( 86 % ) \| 88% ( 88 % ) \| 91% ( 91 % ) the pnc financial services group , inc . 2013 form 10-k 79 . Question: f o r 2 0 1 2 q u a r t e r l y r e s i d e n t i a l m o r t g a g e r e p u r c h a s e c l a i m s , w h a t w a s t h e c h a n g e i n m i l l i o n s b e t w e e n o r i g i n a t i o n s f r o m f i r s t a n d s e c o n d q u a r t e r o f 2 0 0 6 ?	4,993
20.93	Given the context, answer the question. Context: common stock from time to time through open market purchases or privately negotiated transactions at prevailing prices as permitted by securities laws and other legal requirements , and subject to stock price , business and market conditions and other factors . we have been funding and expect to continue to fund stock repurchases through a combination of cash on hand and cash generated by operations . in the future , we may also choose to fund our stock repurchase program under our revolving credit facility or future financing transactions . there were no repurchases of our series a and b common stock during the three months ended december 31 , 2013 . the company first announced its stock repurchase program on august 3 , 2010 . stock performance graph the following graph sets forth the cumulative total shareholder return on our series a common stock , series b common stock and series c common stock as compared with the cumulative total return of the companies listed in the standard and poor 2019s 500 stock index ( 201cs&p 500 index 201d ) and a peer group of companies comprised of cbs corporation class b common stock , scripps network interactive , inc. , time warner , inc. , twenty-first century fox , inc . class a common stock ( news corporation class a common stock prior to june 2013 ) , viacom , inc . class b common stock and the walt disney company . the graph assumes $ 100 originally invested on december 31 , 2008 in each of our series a common stock , series b common stock and series c common stock , the s&p 500 index , and the stock of our peer group companies , including reinvestment of dividends , for the years ended december 31 , 2009 , 2010 , 2011 , 2012 and 2013 . december 31 , december 31 , december 31 , december 31 , december 31 , december 31 . \| december 312008 \| december 312009 \| december 312010 \| december 312011 \| december 312012 \| december 312013 disca \| $ 100.00 \| $ 216.60 \| $ 294.49 \| $ 289.34 \| $ 448.31 \| $ 638.56 discb \| $ 100.00 \| $ 207.32 \| $ 287.71 \| $ 277.03 \| $ 416.52 \| $ 602.08 disck \| $ 100.00 \| $ 198.06 \| $ 274.01 \| $ 281.55 \| $ 436.89 \| $ 626.29 s&p 500 \| $ 100.00 \| $ 123.45 \| $ 139.23 \| $ 139.23 \| $ 157.90 \| $ 204.63 peer group \| $ 100.00 \| $ 151.63 \| $ 181.00 \| $ 208.91 \| $ 286.74 \| $ 454.87 equity compensation plan information information regarding securities authorized for issuance under equity compensation plans will be set forth in our definitive proxy statement for our 2014 annual meeting of stockholders under the caption 201csecurities authorized for issuance under equity compensation plans , 201d which is incorporated herein by reference. . Question: w h a t w a s t h e f i v e y e a r a v e r a g e u n c o m p o u n d e d a n n u a l r e t u r n f o r t h e s & p 5 0 0 ?	4,994
11530	Given the context, answer the question. Context: 112 / sl green realty corp . 2017 annual report 20 . commitments and contingencies legal proceedings as of december a031 , 2017 , the company and the operating partnership were not involved in any material litigation nor , to management 2019s knowledge , was any material litigation threat- ened against us or our portfolio which if adversely determined could have a material adverse impact on us . environmental matters our management believes that the properties are in compliance in all material respects with applicable federal , state and local ordinances and regulations regarding environmental issues . management is not aware of any environmental liability that it believes would have a materially adverse impact on our financial position , results of operations or cash flows . management is unaware of any instances in which it would incur significant envi- ronmental cost if any of our properties were sold . employment agreements we have entered into employment agreements with certain exec- utives , which expire between december a02018 and february a02020 . the minimum cash-based compensation , including base sal- ary and guaranteed bonus payments , associated with these employment agreements total $ 5.4 a0million for 2018 . in addition these employment agreements provide for deferred compen- sation awards based on our stock price and which were valued at $ 1.6 a0million on the grant date . the value of these awards may change based on fluctuations in our stock price . insurance we maintain 201call-risk 201d property and rental value coverage ( includ- ing coverage regarding the perils of flood , earthquake and terrorism , excluding nuclear , biological , chemical , and radiological terrorism ( 201cnbcr 201d ) ) , within three property insurance programs and liability insurance . separate property and liability coverage may be purchased on a stand-alone basis for certain assets , such as the development of one vanderbilt . additionally , our captive insurance company , belmont insurance company , or belmont , pro- vides coverage for nbcr terrorist acts above a specified trigger , although if belmont is required to pay a claim under our insur- ance policies , we would ultimately record the loss to the extent of belmont 2019s required payment . however , there is no assurance that in the future we will be able to procure coverage at a reasonable cost . further , if we experience losses that are uninsured or that exceed policy limits , we could lose the capital invested in the damaged properties as well as the anticipated future cash flows from those plan trustees adopted a rehabilitation plan consistent with this requirement . no surcharges have been paid to the pension plan as of december a031 , 2017 . for the pension plan years ended june a030 , 2017 , 2016 , and 2015 , the plan received contributions from employers totaling $ 257.8 a0million , $ 249.5 a0million , and $ 221.9 a0million . our contributions to the pension plan represent less than 5.0% ( 5.0 % ) of total contributions to the plan . the health plan was established under the terms of collective bargaining agreements between the union , the realty advisory board on labor relations , inc . and certain other employees . the health plan provides health and other benefits to eligible participants employed in the building service industry who are covered under collective bargaining agreements , or other writ- ten agreements , with the union . the health plan is administered by a board of trustees with equal representation by the employ- ers and the union and operates under employer identification number a013-2928869 . the health plan receives contributions in accordance with collective bargaining agreements or participa- tion agreements . generally , these agreements provide that the employers contribute to the health plan at a fixed rate on behalf of each covered employee . for the health plan years ended , june a030 , 2017 , 2016 , and 2015 , the plan received contributions from employers totaling $ 1.3 a0billion , $ 1.2 a0billion and $ 1.1 a0billion , respectively . our contributions to the health plan represent less than 5.0% ( 5.0 % ) of total contributions to the plan . contributions we made to the multi-employer plans for the years ended december a031 , 2017 , 2016 and 2015 are included in the table below ( in thousands ) : . benefit plan \| 2017 \| 2016 \| 2015 pension plan \| $ 3856 \| $ 3979 \| $ 2732 health plan \| 11426 \| 11530 \| 8736 other plans \| 1463 \| 1583 \| 5716 total plan contributions \| $ 16745 \| $ 17092 \| $ 17184 401 ( k ) plan in august a01997 , we implemented a 401 ( k ) a0savings/retirement plan , or the 401 ( k ) a0plan , to cover eligible employees of ours , and any designated affiliate . the 401 ( k ) a0plan permits eligible employees to defer up to 15% ( 15 % ) of their annual compensation , subject to certain limitations imposed by the code . the employees 2019 elective deferrals are immediately vested and non-forfeitable upon contribution to the 401 ( k ) a0plan . during a02003 , we amended our 401 ( k ) a0plan to pro- vide for discretionary matching contributions only . for 2017 , 2016 and 2015 , a matching contribution equal to 50% ( 50 % ) of the first 6% ( 6 % ) of annual compensation was made . for the year ended december a031 , 2017 , we made a matching contribution of $ 728782 . for the years ended december a031 , 2016 and 2015 , we made matching contribu- tions of $ 566000 and $ 550000 , respectively. . Question: w h a t w e r e t h e g r e a t e s t h e a l t h p l a n c o n t r i b u t i o n s i n t h o u s a n d s ?	4,995
41%	Given the context, answer the question. Context: management 2019s discussion and analysis net revenues in equities were $ 8.26 billion for 2011 , 2% ( 2 % ) higher than 2010 . during 2011 , average volatility levels increased and equity prices in europe and asia declined significantly , particularly during the third quarter . the increase in net revenues reflected higher commissions and fees , primarily due to higher market volumes , particularly during the third quarter of 2011 . in addition , net revenues in securities services increased compared with 2010 , reflecting the impact of higher average customer balances . equities client execution net revenues were lower than 2010 , primarily reflecting significantly lower net revenues in shares . the net gain attributable to the impact of changes in our own credit spreads on borrowings for which the fair value option was elected was $ 596 million ( $ 399 million and $ 197 million related to fixed income , currency and commodities client execution and equities client execution , respectively ) for 2011 , compared with a net gain of $ 198 million ( $ 188 million and $ 10 million related to fixed income , currency and commodities client execution and equities client execution , respectively ) for 2010 . institutional client services operated in an environment generally characterized by increased concerns regarding the weakened state of global economies , including heightened european sovereign debt risk , and its impact on the european banking system and global financial institutions . these conditions also impacted expectations for economic prospects in the united states and were reflected in equity and debt markets more broadly . in addition , the downgrade in credit ratings of the u.s . government and federal agencies and many financial institutions during the second half of 2011 contributed to further uncertainty in the markets . these concerns , as well as other broad market concerns , such as uncertainty over financial regulatory reform , continued to have a negative impact on our net revenues during 2011 . operating expenses were $ 12.84 billion for 2011 , 14% ( 14 % ) lower than 2010 , due to decreased compensation and benefits expenses , primarily resulting from lower net revenues , lower net provisions for litigation and regulatory proceedings ( 2010 included $ 550 million related to a settlement with the sec ) , the impact of the u.k . bank payroll tax during 2010 , as well as an impairment of our nyse dmm rights of $ 305 million during 2010 . these decreases were partially offset by higher brokerage , clearing , exchange and distribution fees , principally reflecting higher transaction volumes in equities . pre-tax earnings were $ 4.44 billion in 2011 , 35% ( 35 % ) lower than 2010 . investing & lending investing & lending includes our investing activities and the origination of loans to provide financing to clients . these investments and loans are typically longer-term in nature . we make investments , directly and indirectly through funds that we manage , in debt securities and loans , public and private equity securities , real estate , consolidated investment entities and power generation facilities . the table below presents the operating results of our investing & lending segment. . in millions \| year ended december 2012 \| year ended december 2011 \| year ended december 2010 icbc \| $ 408 \| $ -517 ( 517 ) \| $ 747 equity securities ( excluding icbc ) \| 2392 \| 1120 \| 2692 debt securities and loans \| 1850 \| 96 \| 2597 other \| 1241 \| 1443 \| 1505 total net revenues \| 5891 \| 2142 \| 7541 operating expenses \| 2666 \| 2673 \| 3361 pre-tax earnings/ ( loss ) \| $ 3225 \| $ -531 ( 531 ) \| $ 4180 2012 versus 2011 . net revenues in investing & lending were $ 5.89 billion and $ 2.14 billion for 2012 and 2011 , respectively . during 2012 , investing & lending net revenues were positively impacted by tighter credit spreads and an increase in global equity prices . results for 2012 included a gain of $ 408 million from our investment in the ordinary shares of icbc , net gains of $ 2.39 billion from other investments in equities , primarily in private equities , net gains and net interest income of $ 1.85 billion from debt securities and loans , and other net revenues of $ 1.24 billion , principally related to our consolidated investment entities . if equity markets decline or credit spreads widen , net revenues in investing & lending would likely be negatively impacted . operating expenses were $ 2.67 billion for 2012 , essentially unchanged compared with 2011 . pre-tax earnings were $ 3.23 billion in 2012 , compared with a pre-tax loss of $ 531 million in 2011 . goldman sachs 2012 annual report 55 . Question: w h a t p e r c e n t a g e o f t o t a l n e t r e v e n u e s i n 2 0 1 2 w h e r e d u e t o e q u i t y s e c u r i t i e s ( e x c l u d i n g i c b c ) r e v e n u e s ?	4,996
24.8	Given the context, answer the question. Context: entergy louisiana , llc and subsidiaries management 2019s financial discussion and analysis entergy louisiana may refinance , redeem , or otherwise retire debt prior to maturity , to the extent market conditions and interest and distribution rates are favorable . all debt and common and preferred membership interest issuances by entergy louisiana require prior regulatory approval . preferred membership interest and debt issuances are also subject to issuance tests set forth in its bond indentures and other agreements . entergy louisiana has sufficient capacity under these tests to meet its foreseeable capital needs . entergy louisiana 2019s receivables from the money pool were as follows as of december 31 for each of the following years. . 2016 \| 2015 \| 2014 \| 2013 ( in thousands ) \| ( in thousands ) \| ( in thousands ) \| ( in thousands ) $ 22503 \| $ 6154 \| $ 2815 \| $ 19573 see note 4 to the financial statements for a description of the money pool . entergy louisiana has a credit facility in the amount of $ 350 million scheduled to expire in august 2021 . the credit facility allows entergy louisiana to issue letters of credit against 50% ( 50 % ) of the borrowing capacity of the facility . as of december 31 , 2016 , there were no cash borrowings and a $ 6.4 million letter of credit outstanding under the credit facility . in addition , entergy louisiana is party to an uncommitted letter of credit facility as a means to post collateral to support its obligations under miso . as of december 31 , 2016 , a $ 5.7 million letter of credit was outstanding under entergy louisiana 2019s uncommitted letter of credit facility . see note 4 to the financial statements for additional discussion of the credit facilities . the entergy louisiana nuclear fuel company variable interest entities have two separate credit facilities , one in the amount of $ 105 million and one in the amount of $ 85 million , both scheduled to expire in may 2019 . as of december 31 , 2016 , $ 3.8 million of letters of credit were outstanding under the credit facility to support a like amount of commercial paper issued by the entergy louisiana waterford 3 nuclear fuel company variable interest entity and there were no cash borrowings outstanding under the credit facility for the entergy louisiana river bend nuclear fuel company variable interest entity . see note 4 to the financial statements for additional discussion of the nuclear fuel company variable interest entity credit facility . entergy louisiana obtained authorizations from the ferc through october 2017 for the following : 2022 short-term borrowings not to exceed an aggregate amount of $ 450 million at any time outstanding ; 2022 long-term borrowings and security issuances ; and 2022 long-term borrowings by its nuclear fuel company variable interest entities . see note 4 to the financial statements for further discussion of entergy louisiana 2019s short-term borrowing limits . hurricane isaac in june 2014 the lpsc voted to approve a series of orders which ( i ) quantified $ 290.8 million of hurricane isaac system restoration costs as prudently incurred ; ( ii ) determined $ 290 million as the level of storm reserves to be re-established ; ( iii ) authorized entergy louisiana to utilize louisiana act 55 financing for hurricane isaac system restoration costs ; and ( iv ) granted other requested relief associated with storm reserves and act 55 financing of hurricane isaac system restoration costs . entergy louisiana committed to pass on to customers a minimum of $ 30.8 million of customer benefits through annual customer credits of approximately $ 6.2 million for five years . approvals for the act 55 financings were obtained from the louisiana utilities restoration corporation and the louisiana state bond commission . see note 2 to the financial statements for a discussion of the august 2014 issuance of bonds under act 55 of the louisiana legislature. . Question: i f t h e e n t e r g y l o u i s i a n a c o m m i t m e n t f o r c u s t o m e r b e n e f i t s w a s l i m i t e d t o f o u r y e a r s , h o w m u c h w o u l d c u s t o m e r s r e c e i v e i n m i l l i o n s ?	4,997
700%	Given the context, answer the question. Context: stockholders 2019 equity derivative instruments activity , net of tax , included in non-owner changes to equity within the consolidated statements of stockholders 2019 equity for the years ended december 31 , 2008 , 2007 and 2006 is as follows: . \| 2008 \| 2007 \| 2006 balance at january 1 \| $ 2014 \| $ 16 \| $ 2 increase ( decrease ) in fair value \| -9 ( 9 ) \| -6 ( 6 ) \| 75 reclassifications to earnings \| 2 \| -10 ( 10 ) \| -61 ( 61 ) balance at december 31 \| $ -7 ( 7 ) \| $ 2014 \| $ 16 net investment in foreign operations hedge at december 31 , 2008 and 2007 , the company did not have any hedges of foreign currency exposure of net investments in foreign operations . investments hedge during the first quarter of 2006 , the company entered into a zero-cost collar derivative ( the 201csprint nextel derivative 201d ) to protect itself economically against price fluctuations in its 37.6 million shares of sprint nextel corporation ( 201csprint nextel 201d ) non-voting common stock . during the second quarter of 2006 , as a result of sprint nextel 2019s spin-off of embarq corporation through a dividend to sprint nextel shareholders , the company received approximately 1.9 million shares of embarq corporation . the floor and ceiling prices of the sprint nextel derivative were adjusted accordingly . the sprint nextel derivative was not designated as a hedge under the provisions of sfas no . 133 , 201caccounting for derivative instruments and hedging activities . 201d accordingly , to reflect the change in fair value of the sprint nextel derivative , the company recorded a net gain of $ 99 million for the year ended december 31 , 2006 , included in other income ( expense ) in the company 2019s consolidated statements of operations . in december 2006 , the sprint nextel derivative was terminated and settled in cash and the 37.6 million shares of sprint nextel were converted to common shares and sold . the company received aggregate cash proceeds of approximately $ 820 million from the settlement of the sprint nextel derivative and the subsequent sale of the 37.6 million sprint nextel shares . the company recognized a loss of $ 126 million in connection with the sale of the remaining shares of sprint nextel common stock . as described above , the company recorded a net gain of $ 99 million in connection with the sprint nextel derivative . fair value of financial instruments the company 2019s financial instruments include cash equivalents , sigma fund investments , short-term investments , accounts receivable , long-term receivables , accounts payable , accrued liabilities , derivatives and other financing commitments . the company 2019s sigma fund , available-for-sale investment portfolios and derivatives are recorded in the company 2019s consolidated balance sheets at fair value . all other financial instruments , with the exception of long-term debt , are carried at cost , which is not materially different than the instruments 2019 fair values . using quoted market prices and market interest rates , the company determined that the fair value of long- term debt at december 31 , 2008 was $ 2.8 billion , compared to a carrying value of $ 4.1 billion . since considerable judgment is required in interpreting market information , the fair value of the long-term debt is not necessarily indicative of the amount which could be realized in a current market exchange . equity price market risk at december 31 , 2008 , the company 2019s available-for-sale equity securities portfolio had an approximate fair market value of $ 128 million , which represented a cost basis of $ 125 million and a net unrealized loss of $ 3 million . these equity securities are held for purposes other than trading . %%transmsg* transmitting job : c49054 pcn : 105000000 *%%pcmsg\|102 \|00022\|yes\|no\|02/23/2009 19:17\|0\|0\|page is valid , no graphics -- color : n\| . Question: w h a t w a s t h e p e r c e n t c h a n g e i n b a l a n c e o f s t o c k h o l d e r e q u i t y f r o m t h e b e g i n n i n g t o t h e e n d o f 2 0 0 6 ?	4,998
4.7%	Given the context, answer the question. Context: westrock company notes to consolidated financial statements fffd ( continued ) at september 30 , 2018 and september 30 , 2017 , gross net operating losses for foreign reporting purposes of approximately $ 698.4 million and $ 673.7 million , respectively , were available for carryforward . a majority of these loss carryforwards generally expire between fiscal 2020 and 2038 , while a portion have an indefinite carryforward . the tax effected values of these net operating losses are $ 185.8 million and $ 182.6 million at september 30 , 2018 and 2017 , respectively , exclusive of valuation allowances of $ 161.5 million and $ 149.6 million at september 30 , 2018 and 2017 , respectively . at september 30 , 2018 and 2017 , we had state tax credit carryforwards of $ 64.8 million and $ 54.4 million , respectively . these state tax credit carryforwards generally expire within 5 to 10 years ; however , certain state credits can be carried forward indefinitely . valuation allowances of $ 56.1 million and $ 47.3 million at september 30 , 2018 and 2017 , respectively , have been provided on these assets . these valuation allowances have been recorded due to uncertainty regarding our ability to generate sufficient taxable income in the appropriate taxing jurisdiction . the following table represents a summary of the valuation allowances against deferred tax assets for fiscal 2018 , 2017 and 2016 ( in millions ) : . \| 2018 \| 2017 \| 2016 balance at beginning of fiscal year \| $ 219.1 \| $ 177.2 \| $ 100.2 increases \| 50.8 \| 54.3 \| 24.8 allowances related to purchase accounting ( 1 ) \| 0.1 \| 12.4 \| 63.0 reductions \| -40.6 ( 40.6 ) \| -24.8 ( 24.8 ) \| -10.8 ( 10.8 ) balance at end of fiscal year \| $ 229.4 \| $ 219.1 \| $ 177.2 ( 1 ) amounts in fiscal 2018 and 2017 relate to the mps acquisition . adjustments in fiscal 2016 relate to the combination and the sp fiber acquisition . consistent with prior years , we consider a portion of our earnings from certain foreign subsidiaries as subject to repatriation and we provide for taxes accordingly . however , we consider the unremitted earnings and all other outside basis differences from all other foreign subsidiaries to be indefinitely reinvested . accordingly , we have not provided for any taxes that would be due . as of september 30 , 2018 , we estimate our outside basis difference in foreign subsidiaries that are considered indefinitely reinvested to be approximately $ 1.5 billion . the components of the outside basis difference are comprised of purchase accounting adjustments , undistributed earnings , and equity components . except for the portion of our earnings from certain foreign subsidiaries where we provided for taxes , we have not provided for any taxes that would be due upon the reversal of the outside basis differences . however , in the event of a distribution in the form of dividends or dispositions of the subsidiaries , we may be subject to incremental u.s . income taxes , subject to an adjustment for foreign tax credits , and withholding taxes or income taxes payable to the foreign jurisdictions . as of september 30 , 2018 , the determination of the amount of unrecognized deferred tax liability related to any remaining undistributed foreign earnings not subject to the transition tax and additional outside basis differences is not practicable. . Question: i n 2 0 1 8 w h a t w a s t h e p e r c e n t a g e c h a n g e i n t h e v a l u a t i o n a l l o w a n c e s a g a i n s t d e f e r r e d t a x a s s e t s	4,999
-586	Given the context, answer the question. Context: note 17 . accumulated other comprehensive losses : pmi's accumulated other comprehensive losses , net of taxes , consisted of the following: . ( losses ) earnings ( in millions ) \| ( losses ) earnings 2014 \| ( losses ) earnings 2013 \| 2012 currency translation adjustments \| $ -3929 ( 3929 ) \| $ -2207 ( 2207 ) \| $ -331 ( 331 ) pension and other benefits \| -3020 ( 3020 ) \| -2046 ( 2046 ) \| -3365 ( 3365 ) derivatives accounted for as hedges \| 123 \| 63 \| 92 total accumulated other comprehensive losses \| $ -6826 ( 6826 ) \| $ -4190 ( 4190 ) \| $ -3604 ( 3604 ) reclassifications from other comprehensive earnings the movements in accumulated other comprehensive losses and the related tax impact , for each of the components above , that are due to current period activity and reclassifications to the income statement are shown on the consolidated statements of comprehensive earnings for the years ended december 31 , 2014 , 2013 , and 2012 . the movement in currency translation adjustments for the year ended december 31 , 2013 , was also impacted by the purchase of the remaining shares of the mexican tobacco business . in addition , $ 5 million and $ 12 million of net currency translation adjustment gains were transferred from other comprehensive earnings to marketing , administration and research costs in the consolidated statements of earnings for the years ended december 31 , 2014 and 2013 , respectively , upon liquidation of a subsidiary . for additional information , see note 13 . benefit plans and note 15 . financial instruments for disclosures related to pmi's pension and other benefits and derivative financial instruments . note 18 . colombian investment and cooperation agreement : on june 19 , 2009 , pmi announced that it had signed an agreement with the republic of colombia , together with the departments of colombia and the capital district of bogota , to promote investment and cooperation with respect to the colombian tobacco market and to fight counterfeit and contraband tobacco products . the investment and cooperation agreement provides $ 200 million in funding to the colombian governments over a 20-year period to address issues of mutual interest , such as combating the illegal cigarette trade , including the threat of counterfeit tobacco products , and increasing the quality and quantity of locally grown tobacco . as a result of the investment and cooperation agreement , pmi recorded a pre-tax charge of $ 135 million in the operating results of the latin america & canada segment during the second quarter of 2009 . at december 31 , 2014 and 2013 , pmi had $ 71 million and $ 74 million , respectively , of discounted liabilities associated with the colombian investment and cooperation agreement . these discounted liabilities are primarily reflected in other long-term liabilities on the consolidated balance sheets and are expected to be paid through 2028 . note 19 . rbh legal settlement : on july 31 , 2008 , rothmans inc . ( "rothmans" ) announced the finalization of a cad 550 million settlement ( or approximately $ 540 million , based on the prevailing exchange rate at that time ) between itself and rothmans , benson & hedges inc . ( "rbh" ) , on the one hand , and the government of canada and all 10 provinces , on the other hand . the settlement resolved the royal canadian mounted police's investigation relating to products exported from canada by rbh during the 1989-1996 period . rothmans' sole holding was a 60% ( 60 % ) interest in rbh . the remaining 40% ( 40 % ) interest in rbh was owned by pmi. . Question: w h a t w a s t h e c h a n g e i n t o t a l a c c u m u l a t e d o t h e r c o m p r e h e n s i v e l o s s e s i n m i l l i o n s f r o m 2 0 1 2 t o 2 0 1 3 ?	5,000
85%	Given the context, answer the question. Context: at december 31 , 2013 , total future minimum commitments under existing non-cancelable operating leases and purchase obligations were as follows: . in millions \| 2014 \| 2015 \| 2016 \| 2017 \| 2018 \| thereafter lease obligations \| $ 171 \| $ 133 \| $ 97 \| $ 74 \| $ 59 \| $ 162 purchase obligations ( a ) \| 3170 \| 770 \| 642 \| 529 \| 453 \| 2404 total \| $ 3341 \| $ 903 \| $ 739 \| $ 603 \| $ 512 \| $ 2566 ( a ) includes $ 3.3 billion relating to fiber supply agreements entered into at the time of the company 2019s 2006 transformation plan forestland sales and in conjunction with the 2008 acquisition of weyerhaeuser company 2019s containerboard , packaging and recycling business . rent expense was $ 215 million , $ 231 million and $ 205 million for 2013 , 2012 and 2011 , respectively . guarantees in connection with sales of businesses , property , equipment , forestlands and other assets , international paper commonly makes representations and warranties relating to such businesses or assets , and may agree to indemnify buyers with respect to tax and environmental liabilities , breaches of representations and warranties , and other matters . where liabilities for such matters are determined to be probable and subject to reasonable estimation , accrued liabilities are recorded at the time of sale as a cost of the transaction . environmental proceedings international paper has been named as a potentially responsible party in environmental remediation actions under various federal and state laws , including the comprehensive environmental response , compensation and liability act ( cercla ) . many of these proceedings involve the cleanup of hazardous substances at large commercial landfills that received waste from many different sources . while joint and several liability is authorized under cercla and equivalent state laws , as a practical matter , liability for cercla cleanups is typically allocated among the many potential responsible parties . remedial costs are recorded in the consolidated financial statements when they become probable and reasonably estimable . international paper has estimated the probable liability associated with these matters to be approximately $ 94 million in the aggregate at december 31 , 2013 . cass lake : one of the matters referenced above is a closed wood treating facility located in cass lake , minnesota . during 2009 , in connection with an environmental site remediation action under cercla , international paper submitted to the epa a site remediation feasibility study . in june 2011 , the epa selected and published a proposed soil remedy at the site with an estimated cost of $ 46 million . the overall remediation reserve for the site is currently $ 51 million to address this selection of an alternative for the soil remediation component of the overall site remedy . in october 2011 , the epa released a public statement indicating that the final soil remedy decision would be delayed . in the unlikely event that the epa changes its proposed soil remedy and approves instead a more expensive clean-up alternative , the remediation costs could be material , and significantly higher than amounts currently recorded . in october 2012 , the natural resource trustees for this site provided notice to international paper and other potentially responsible parties of their intent to perform a natural resource damage assessment . it is premature to predict the outcome of the assessment or to estimate a loss or range of loss , if any , which may be incurred . other : in addition to the above matters , other remediation costs typically associated with the cleanup of hazardous substances at the company 2019s current , closed or formerly-owned facilities , and recorded as liabilities in the balance sheet , totaled approximately $ 42 million at december 31 , 2013 . other than as described above , completion of required remedial actions is not expected to have a material effect on our consolidated financial statements . kalamazoo river : the company is a potentially responsible party with respect to the allied paper , inc./ portage creek/kalamazoo river superfund site ( kalamazoo river superfund site ) in michigan . the epa asserts that the site is contaminated primarily by pcbs as a result of discharges from various paper mills located along the kalamazoo river , including a paper mill formerly owned by st . regis paper company ( st . regis ) . the company is a successor in interest to st . regis . the company has not received any orders from the epa with respect to the site and continues to collect information from the epa and other parties relative to the site to evaluate the extent of its liability , if any , with respect to the site . accordingly , it is premature to estimate a loss or range of loss with respect to this site . also in connection with the kalamazoo river superfund site , the company was named as a defendant by georgia-pacific consumer products lp , fort james corporation and georgia pacific llc in a contribution and cost recovery action for alleged pollution at the site . the suit seeks contribution under cercla for $ 79 million in costs purportedly expended by plaintiffs as of the filing of the complaint and for future remediation costs . the suit alleges that a mill , during the time it was allegedly owned and operated by st . regis , discharged pcb contaminated solids and paper residuals resulting from paper de-inking and recycling . also named as defendants in the suit are ncr corporation and weyerhaeuser company . in mid-2011 , the suit was transferred from the district court for the eastern district of wisconsin to the district court for the western . Question: i n 2 0 1 5 w h a t p e r c e n t a g e o f a t d e c e m b e r 3 1 , 2 0 1 3 , t o t a l f u t u r e m i n i m u m c o m m i t m e n t s u n d e r e x i s t i n g n o n - c a n c e l a b l e o p e r a t i n g l e a s e s a n d p u r c h a s e o b l i g a t i o n s i s d u e t o p u r c h a s e o b l i g a t i o n s ?	5,001
137.8	Given the context, answer the question. Context: hollyfrontier corporation notes to consolidated financial statements continued . \| ( in thousands ) 2018 \| $ 148716 2019 \| 132547 2020 \| 119639 2021 \| 107400 2022 \| 102884 thereafter \| 857454 total \| $ 1468640 transportation and storage costs incurred under these agreements totaled $ 140.5 million , $ 135.1 million and $ 137.7 million for the years ended december 31 , 2017 , 2016 and 2015 , respectively . these amounts do not include contractual commitments under our long-term transportation agreements with hep , as all transactions with hep are eliminated in these consolidated financial statements . we have a crude oil supply contract that requires the supplier to deliver a specified volume of crude oil or pay a shortfall fee for the difference in the actual barrels delivered to us less the specified barrels per the supply contract . for the contract year ended august 31 , 2017 , the actual number of barrels delivered to us was substantially less than the specified barrels , and we recorded a reduction to cost of goods sold and accumulated a shortfall fee receivable of $ 26.0 million during this period . in september 2017 , the supplier notified us they are disputing the shortfall fee owed and in october 2017 notified us of their demand for arbitration . we offset the receivable with payments of invoices for deliveries of crude oil received subsequent to august 31 , 2017 , which is permitted under the supply contract . we believe the disputes and claims made by the supplier are without merit . in march , 2006 , a subsidiary of ours sold the assets of montana refining company under an asset purchase agreement ( 201capa 201d ) . calumet montana refining llc , the current owner of the assets , has submitted requests for reimbursement of approximately $ 20.0 million pursuant to contractual indemnity provisions under the apa for various costs incurred , as well as additional claims related to environmental matters . we have rejected most of the claims for payment , and this matter is scheduled for arbitration beginning in july 2018 . we have accrued the costs we believe are owed pursuant to the apa , and we estimate that any reasonably possible losses beyond the amounts accrued are not material . note 20 : segment information effective fourth quarter of 2017 , we revised our reportable segments to align with certain changes in how our chief operating decision maker manages and allocates resources to our business . accordingly , our tulsa refineries 2019 lubricants operations , previously reported in the refining segment , are now combined with the operations of our petro-canada lubricants business ( acquired february 1 , 2017 ) and reported in the lubricants and specialty products segment . our prior period segment information has been retrospectively adjusted to reflect our current segment presentation . our operations are organized into three reportable segments , refining , lubricants and specialty products and hep . our operations that are not included in the refining , lubricants and specialty products and hep segments are included in corporate and other . intersegment transactions are eliminated in our consolidated financial statements and are included in eliminations . corporate and other and eliminations are aggregated and presented under corporate , other and eliminations column . the refining segment represents the operations of the el dorado , tulsa , navajo , cheyenne and woods cross refineries and hfc asphalt ( aggregated as a reportable segment ) . refining activities involve the purchase and refining of crude oil and wholesale and branded marketing of refined products , such as gasoline , diesel fuel and jet fuel . these petroleum products are primarily marketed in the mid-continent , southwest and rocky mountain regions of the united states . hfc asphalt operates various asphalt terminals in arizona , new mexico and oklahoma. . Question: w h a t w a s t h e a v e r a g e s t o r a g e c o s t s f r o m 2 0 1 5 t o 2 0 1 7 i n m i l l i o n s	5,002
17%	Given the context, answer the question. Context: entering 2006 , industrial packaging earnings are expected to improve significantly in the first quarter compared with the fourth quarter 2005 . average price realizations should continue to benefit from price in- creases announced in late 2005 and early 2006 for linerboard and domestic boxes . containerboard sales volumes are expected to drop slightly in the 2006 first quarter due to fewer shipping days , but growth is antici- pated for u.s . converted products due to stronger de- mand . costs for wood , freight and energy are expected to remain stable during the 2006 first quarter , approach- ing fourth quarter 2005 levels . the continued im- plementation of the new supply chain model at our mills during 2006 will bring additional efficiency improve- ments and cost savings . on a global basis , the european container operating results are expected to improve as a result of targeted market growth and cost reduction ini- tiatives , and we will begin seeing further contributions from our recent moroccan box plant acquisition and from international paper distribution limited . consumer packaging demand and pricing for consumer packaging prod- ucts correlate closely with consumer spending and gen- eral economic activity . in addition to prices and volumes , major factors affecting the profitability of con- sumer packaging are raw material and energy costs , manufacturing efficiency and product mix . consumer packaging 2019s 2005 net sales of $ 2.6 bil- lion were flat compared with 2004 and 5% ( 5 % ) higher com- pared with 2003 . operating profits in 2005 declined 22% ( 22 % ) from 2004 and 31% ( 31 % ) from 2003 as improved price realizations ( $ 46 million ) and favorable operations in the mills and converting operations ( $ 60 million ) could not overcome the impact of cost increases in energy , wood , polyethylene and other raw materials ( $ 120 million ) , lack-of-order downtime ( $ 13 million ) and other costs ( $ 8 million ) . consumer packaging in millions 2005 2004 2003 . in millions \| 2005 \| 2004 \| 2003 sales \| $ 2590 \| $ 2605 \| $ 2465 operating profit \| $ 126 \| $ 161 \| $ 183 bleached board net sales of $ 864 million in 2005 were up from $ 842 million in 2004 and $ 751 million in 2003 . the effects in 2005 of improved average price realizations and mill operating improvements were not enough to offset increased energy , wood , polyethylene and other raw material costs , a slight decrease in volume and increased lack-of-order downtime . bleached board mills took 100000 tons of downtime in 2005 , including 65000 tons of lack-of-order downtime , compared with 40000 tons of downtime in 2004 , none of which was market related . during 2005 , restructuring and manufacturing improvement plans were implemented to reduce costs and improve market alignment . foodservice net sales were $ 437 million in 2005 compared with $ 480 million in 2004 and $ 460 million in 2003 . average sales prices in 2005 were up 3% ( 3 % ) ; how- ever , domestic cup and lid sales volumes were 5% ( 5 % ) lower than in 2004 as a result of a rationalization of our cus- tomer base early in 2005 . operating profits in 2005 in- creased 147% ( 147 % ) compared with 2004 , largely due to the settlement of a lawsuit and a favorable adjustment on the sale of the jackson , tennessee bag plant . excluding unusual items , operating profits were flat as improved price realizations offset increased costs for bleached board and resin . shorewood net sales of $ 691 million in 2005 were essentially flat with net sales in 2004 of $ 687 million , but were up compared with $ 665 million in 2003 . operating profits in 2005 were 17% ( 17 % ) above 2004 levels and about equal to 2003 levels . improved margins resulting from a rationalization of the customer mix and the effects of improved manufacturing operations , including the successful start up of our south korean tobacco operations , more than offset cost increases for board and paper and the impact of unfavorable foreign exchange rates in canada . beverage packaging net sales were $ 597 million in 2005 , $ 595 million in 2004 and $ 589 million in 2003 . average sale price realizations increased 2% ( 2 % ) compared with 2004 , principally the result of the pass-through of higher raw material costs , although the implementation of price increases continues to be impacted by com- petitive pressures . operating profits were down 14% ( 14 % ) compared with 2004 and 19% ( 19 % ) compared with 2003 , due principally to increases in board and resin costs . in 2006 , the bleached board market is expected to remain strong , with sales volumes increasing in the first quarter compared with the fourth quarter of 2005 for both folding carton and cup products . improved price realizations are also expected for bleached board and in our foodservice and beverage packaging businesses , al- though continued high costs for energy , wood and resin will continue to negatively impact earnings . shorewood should continue to benefit from strong asian operations and from targeted sales volume growth in 2006 . capital improvements and operational excellence initiatives undertaken in 2005 should benefit operating results in 2006 for all businesses . distribution our distribution business , principally represented by our xpedx business , markets a diverse array of products and supply chain services to customers in many business segments . customer demand is generally sensitive to changes in general economic conditions , although the . Question: w a s p e r c e n t a g e o f c o n s u m e r p a c k a g i n g s a l e s w a s d u e t o f o o d s e r v i c e n e t s a l e s i n 2 0 0 5 ?	5,003
0.17	Given the context, answer the question. Context: american tower corporation and subsidiaries notes to consolidated financial statements u.s . acquisitions 2014during the year ended december 31 , 2010 , the company acquired 548 towers through multiple acquisitions in the united states for an aggregate purchase price of $ 329.3 million and contingent consideration of approximately $ 4.6 million . the acquisition of these towers is consistent with the company 2019s strategy to expand in selected geographic areas and have been accounted for as business combinations . the following table summarizes the preliminary allocation of the aggregate purchase consideration paid and the amounts of assets acquired and liabilities assumed based on the estimated fair value of the acquired assets and assumed liabilities at the date of acquisition ( in thousands ) : purchase price allocation . \| purchase price allocation non-current assets \| $ 442 property and equipment \| 64564 intangible assets ( 1 ) \| 260898 current liabilities \| -360 ( 360 ) long-term liabilities \| -7802 ( 7802 ) fair value of net assets acquired \| $ 317742 goodwill ( 2 ) \| 16131 ( 1 ) consists of customer relationships of approximately $ 205.4 million and network location intangibles of approximately $ 55.5 million . the customer relationships and network location intangibles are being amortized on a straight-line basis over a period of 20 years . ( 2 ) goodwill is expected to be deductible for income tax purposes . the goodwill was allocated to the domestic rental and management segment . the allocation of the purchase price will be finalized upon completion of analyses of the fair value of the assets acquired and liabilities assumed . south africa acquisition 2014on november 4 , 2010 , the company entered into a definitive agreement with cell c ( pty ) limited to purchase up to approximately 1400 existing towers , and up to 1800 additional towers that either are under construction or will be constructed , for an aggregate purchase price of up to approximately $ 430 million . the company anticipates closing the purchase of up to 1400 existing towers during 2011 , subject to customary closing conditions . other transactions coltel transaction 2014on september 3 , 2010 , the company entered into a definitive agreement to purchase the exclusive use rights for towers in colombia from colombia telecomunicaciones s.a . e.s.p . ( 201ccoltel 201d ) until 2023 , when ownership of the towers will transfer to the company at no additional cost . pursuant to that agreement , the company completed the purchase of exclusive use rights for 508 towers for an aggregate purchase price of $ 86.8 million during the year ended december 31 , 2010 . the company expects to complete the purchase of the exclusive use rights for an additional 180 towers by the end of 2011 , subject to customary closing conditions . the transaction has been accounted for as a capital lease , with the aggregated purchase price being allocated to property and equipment and non-current assets . joint venture with mtn group 2014on december 6 , 2010 , the company entered into a definitive agreement with mtn group limited ( 201cmtn group 201d ) to establish a joint venture in ghana ( 201ctowerco ghana 201d ) . towerco ghana , which will be managed by the company , will be owned by a holding company of which a wholly owned american tower subsidiary will hold a 51% ( 51 % ) share and a wholly owned mtn group subsidiary ( 201cmtn ghana 201d ) will hold a 49% ( 49 % ) share . the transaction involves the sale of up to 1876 of mtn ghana 2019s existing sites to . Question: b a s e d o n t h e a g r e e m e n t w h a t w a s t h e a v e r a g e p r i c e c o m p l e t e d t h e p u r c h a s e o f e x c l u s i v e u s e r i g h t s t o t h e t o w e r s i n 2 0 1 0 i n m i l l i o n s	5,004
1.79	Given the context, answer the question. Context: item a01b . unresolved staff comments e*trade 2018 10-k \| page 24 item a02 . properties a summary of our significant locations at december a031 , 2018 is shown in the following table . square footage amounts are net of space that has been sublet or space that is part of a facility restructuring. . location \| approximate square footage alpharetta georgia \| 236000 jersey city new jersey \| 132000 arlington virginia \| 107000 sandy utah \| 85000 menlo park california \| 63000 denver colorado \| 58000 chicago illinois \| 46000 new york new york \| 31000 all facilities are leased at december a031 , 2018 . all other leased facilities with space of less than 25000 square feet are not listed by location . in addition to the significant facilities above , we also lease all 30 regional financial centers , ranging in space from approximately 2500 to 8000 square feet . item a03 . legal proceedings information in response to this item can be found under the heading litigation matters in note 21 2014 commitments , contingencies and other regulatory matters in this annual report and is incorporated by reference into this item . item 4 . mine safety disclosures not applicable. . Question: w h a t i s t h e r a t i o o f t h e s q u a r e f o o t a g e i n a l p h a r e t t a g e o r g i a t o j e r s e y c i t y n e w j e r s e y a s o f d e c e m b e r 2 0 1 8	5,005
39368	Given the context, answer the question. Context: mastercard incorporated notes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) ( in thousands , except percent and per share data ) equity awards was $ 30333 , $ 20726 and $ 19828 for the years ended december 31 , 2009 , 2008 and 2007 , respectively . the income tax benefit related to options exercised during 2009 was $ 7545 . the additional paid-in capital balance attributed to the equity awards was $ 197350 , $ 135538 and $ 114637 as of december 31 , 2009 , 2008 and 2007 , respectively . on july 18 , 2006 , the company 2019s stockholders approved the mastercard incorporated 2006 non-employee director equity compensation plan ( the 201cdirector plan 201d ) . the director plan provides for awards of deferred stock units ( 201cdsus 201d ) to each director of the company who is not a current employee of the company . there are 100 shares of class a common stock reserved for dsu awards under the director plan . during the years ended december 31 , 2009 , 2008 and 2007 , the company granted 7 dsus , 4 dsus and 8 dsus , respectively . the fair value of the dsus was based on the closing stock price on the new york stock exchange of the company 2019s class a common stock on the date of grant . the weighted average grant-date fair value of dsus granted during the years ended december 31 , 2009 , 2008 and 2007 was $ 168.18 , $ 284.92 and $ 139.27 , respectively . the dsus vested immediately upon grant and will be settled in shares of the company 2019s class a common stock on the fourth anniversary of the date of grant . accordingly , the company recorded general and administrative expense of $ 1151 , $ 1209 and $ 1051 for the dsus for the years ended december 31 , 2009 , 2008 and 2007 , respectively . the total income tax benefit recognized in the income statement for dsus was $ 410 , $ 371 and $ 413 for the years ended december 31 , 2009 , 2008 and 2007 , respectively . note 18 . commitments at december 31 , 2009 , the company had the following future minimum payments due under non-cancelable agreements : capital leases operating leases sponsorship , licensing & . \| total \| capital leases \| operating leases \| sponsorship licensing & other 2010 \| $ 283987 \| $ 7260 \| $ 25978 \| $ 250749 2011 \| 146147 \| 4455 \| 17710 \| 123982 2012 \| 108377 \| 3221 \| 15358 \| 89798 2013 \| 59947 \| 36838 \| 10281 \| 12828 2014 \| 13998 \| 2014 \| 8371 \| 5627 thereafter \| 25579 \| 2014 \| 22859 \| 2720 total \| $ 638035 \| $ 51774 \| $ 100557 \| $ 485704 included in the table above are capital leases with imputed interest expense of $ 7929 and a net present value of minimum lease payments of $ 43845 . in addition , at december 31 , 2009 , $ 63616 of the future minimum payments in the table above for leases , sponsorship , licensing and other agreements was accrued . consolidated rental expense for the company 2019s office space , which is recognized on a straight line basis over the life of the lease , was approximately $ 39586 , $ 42905 and $ 35614 for the years ended december 31 , 2009 , 2008 and 2007 , respectively . consolidated lease expense for automobiles , computer equipment and office equipment was $ 9137 , $ 7694 and $ 7679 for the years ended december 31 , 2009 , 2008 and 2007 , respectively . in january 2003 , mastercard purchased a building in kansas city , missouri for approximately $ 23572 . the building is a co-processing data center which replaced a back-up data center in lake success , new york . during 2003 , mastercard entered into agreements with the city of kansas city for ( i ) the sale-leaseback of the building and related equipment which totaled $ 36382 and ( ii ) the purchase of municipal bonds for the same amount . Question: w h a t w a s t h e a v e r a g e r e n t a l e x p e n s e f r o m 2 0 0 7 t o 2 0 0 9	5,006
106%	Given the context, answer the question. Context: 2022 asset utilization 2013 in response to economic conditions and lower revenue in 2009 , we implemented productivity initiatives to improve efficiency and reduce costs , in addition to adjusting our resources to reflect lower demand . although varying throughout the year , our resource reductions included removing from service approximately 26% ( 26 % ) of our road locomotives and 18% ( 18 % ) of our freight car inventory by year end . we also reduced shift levels at most rail facilities and closed or significantly reduced operations in 30 of our 114 principal rail yards . these demand-driven resource adjustments and our productivity initiatives combined to reduce our workforce by 10% ( 10 % ) . 2022 fuel prices 2013 as the economy worsened during the third and fourth quarters of 2008 , fuel prices dropped dramatically , reaching $ 33.87 per barrel in december 2008 , a near five-year low . throughout 2009 , crude oil prices generally increased , ending the year around $ 80 per barrel . overall , our average fuel price decreased by 44% ( 44 % ) in 2009 , reducing operating expenses by $ 1.3 billion compared to 2008 . we also reduced our consumption rate by 4% ( 4 % ) during the year , saving approximately 40 million gallons of fuel . the use of newer , more fuel efficient locomotives ; increased use of distributed locomotive power ; fuel conservation programs ; and improved network operations and asset utilization all contributed to this improvement . 2022 free cash flow 2013 cash generated by operating activities totaled $ 3.2 billion , yielding free cash flow of $ 515 million in 2009 . free cash flow is defined as cash provided by operating activities , less cash used in investing activities and dividends paid . free cash flow is not considered a financial measure under accounting principles generally accepted in the united states ( gaap ) by sec regulation g and item 10 of sec regulation s-k . we believe free cash flow is important in evaluating our financial performance and measures our ability to generate cash without additional external financings . free cash flow should be considered in addition to , rather than as a substitute for , cash provided by operating activities . the following table reconciles cash provided by operating activities ( gaap measure ) to free cash flow ( non-gaap measure ) : millions of dollars 2009 2008 2007 . millions of dollars \| 2009 \| 2008 \| 2007 cash provided by operating activities \| $ 3234 \| $ 4070 \| $ 3277 cash used in investing activities \| -2175 ( 2175 ) \| -2764 ( 2764 ) \| -2426 ( 2426 ) dividends paid \| -544 ( 544 ) \| -481 ( 481 ) \| -364 ( 364 ) free cash flow \| $ 515 \| $ 825 \| $ 487 2010 outlook 2022 safety 2013 operating a safe railroad benefits our employees , our customers , our shareholders , and the public . we will continue using a multi-faceted approach to safety , utilizing technology , risk assessment , quality control , and training , and by engaging our employees . we will continue implementing total safety culture ( tsc ) throughout our operations . tsc is designed to establish , maintain , reinforce , and promote safe practices among co-workers . this process allows us to identify and implement best practices for employee and operational safety . reducing grade-crossing incidents is a critical aspect of our safety programs , and we will continue our efforts to maintain , upgrade , and close crossings ; install video cameras on locomotives ; and educate the public about crossing safety through our own programs , various industry programs , and other activities . 2022 transportation plan 2013 to build upon our success in recent years , we will continue evaluating traffic flows and network logistic patterns , which can be quite dynamic from year-to-year , to identify additional opportunities to simplify operations , remove network variability and improve network efficiency and asset utilization . we plan to adjust manpower and our locomotive and rail car fleets to . Question: w h a t p e r c e n t o f f r e e c a s h f l o w w a s d i s t r i b u t e d t o s h a r e h o l d e r s i n 2 0 0 9 ?	5,007
8.7%	Given the context, answer the question. Context: 5 . stock based compensation overview maa accounts for its stock based employee compensation plans in accordance with accounting standards governing stock based compensation . these standards require an entity to measure the cost of employee services received in exchange for an award of an equity instrument based on the award's fair value on the grant date and recognize the cost over the period during which the employee is required to provide service in exchange for the award , which is generally the vesting period . any liability awards issued are remeasured at each reporting period . maa 2019s stock compensation plans consist of a number of incentives provided to attract and retain independent directors , executive officers and key employees . incentives are currently granted under the second amended and restated 2013 stock incentive plan , or the stock plan , which was approved at the 2018 annual meeting of maa shareholders . the stock plan allows for the grant of restricted stock and stock options up to 2000000 shares . maa believes that such awards better align the interests of its employees with those of its shareholders . compensation expense is generally recognized for service based restricted stock awards using the straight-line method over the vesting period of the shares regardless of cliff or ratable vesting distinctions . compensation expense for market and performance based restricted stock awards is generally recognized using the accelerated amortization method with each vesting tranche valued as a separate award , with a separate vesting date , consistent with the estimated value of the award at each period end . additionally , compensation expense is adjusted for actual forfeitures for all awards in the period that the award was forfeited . compensation expense for stock options is generally recognized on a straight-line basis over the requisite service period . maa presents stock compensation expense in the consolidated statements of operations in "general and administrative expenses" . total compensation expense under the stock plan was $ 12.9 million , $ 10.8 million and $ 12.2 million for the years ended december 31 , 2018 , 2017 and 2016 , respectively . of these amounts , total compensation expense capitalized was $ 0.5 million , $ 0.2 million and $ 0.7 million for the years ended december 31 , 2018 , 2017 and 2016 , respectively . as of december 31 , 2018 , the total unrecognized compensation expense was $ 13.5 million . this cost is expected to be recognized over the remaining weighted average period of 1.1 years . total cash paid for the settlement of plan shares totaled $ 2.9 million , $ 4.8 million and $ 2.0 million for the years ended december 31 , 2018 , 2017 and 2016 , respectively . information concerning grants under the stock plan is provided below . restricted stock in general , restricted stock is earned based on either a service condition , performance condition , or market condition , or a combination thereof , and generally vests ratably over a period from 1 year to 5 years . service based awards are earned when the employee remains employed over the requisite service period and are valued on the grant date based upon the market price of maa common stock on the date of grant . market based awards are earned when maa reaches a specified stock price or specified return on the stock price ( price appreciation plus dividends ) and are valued on the grant date using a monte carlo simulation . performance based awards are earned when maa reaches certain operational goals such as funds from operations , or ffo , targets and are valued based upon the market price of maa common stock on the date of grant as well as the probability of reaching the stated targets . maa remeasures the fair value of the performance based awards each balance sheet date with adjustments made on a cumulative basis until the award is settled and the final compensation is known . the weighted average grant date fair value per share of restricted stock awards granted during the years ended december 31 , 2018 , 2017 and 2016 , was $ 71.85 , $ 84.53 and $ 73.20 , respectively . the following is a summary of the key assumptions used in the valuation calculations for market based awards granted during the years ended december 31 , 2018 , 2017 and 2016: . \| 2018 \| 2017 \| 2016 risk free rate \| 1.61% ( 1.61 % ) - 2.14% ( 2.14 % ) \| 0.65% ( 0.65 % ) - 1.57% ( 1.57 % ) \| 0.49% ( 0.49 % ) - 1.27% ( 1.27 % ) dividend yield \| 3.884% ( 3.884 % ) \| 3.573% ( 3.573 % ) \| 3.634% ( 3.634 % ) volatility \| 15.05% ( 15.05 % ) - 17.18% ( 17.18 % ) \| 20.43% ( 20.43 % ) - 21.85% ( 21.85 % ) \| 18.41% ( 18.41 % ) - 19.45% ( 19.45 % ) requisite service period \| 3 years \| 3 years \| 3 years the risk free rate was based on a zero coupon risk-free rate . the minimum risk free rate was based on a period of 0.25 years for the years ended december 31 , 2018 , 2017 and 2016 . the maximum risk free rate was based on a period of 3 years for the years ended december 31 , 2018 , 2017 and 2016 . the dividend yield was based on the closing stock price of maa stock on the . Question: w h a t w a s t h e p e r c e n t o f t h e c h a n g e i n t h e i n t h e d i v i d e n d y i e l d f r o m 2 0 1 7 t o 2 0 1 8	5,008
5.8%	Given the context, answer the question. Context: ventas , inc . notes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) applicable indenture . the issuers may also redeem the 2015 senior notes , in whole at any time or in part from time to time , on or after june 1 , 2010 at varying redemption prices set forth in the applicable indenture , plus accrued and unpaid interest thereon to the redemption date . in addition , at any time prior to june 1 , 2008 , the issuers may redeem up to 35% ( 35 % ) of the aggregate principal amount of either or both of the 2010 senior notes and 2015 senior notes with the net cash proceeds from certain equity offerings at redemption prices equal to 106.750% ( 106.750 % ) and 107.125% ( 107.125 % ) , respectively , of the principal amount thereof , plus , in each case , accrued and unpaid interest thereon to the redemption date . the issuers may redeem the 2014 senior notes , in whole at any time or in part from time to time , ( i ) prior to october 15 , 2009 at a redemption price equal to 100% ( 100 % ) of the principal amount thereof , plus a make-whole premium as described in the applicable indenture and ( ii ) on or after october 15 , 2009 at varying redemption prices set forth in the applicable indenture , plus , in each case , accrued and unpaid interest thereon to the redemption date . the issuers may redeem the 2009 senior notes and the 2012 senior notes , in whole at any time or in part from time to time , at a redemption price equal to 100% ( 100 % ) of the principal amount thereof , plus accrued and unpaid interest thereon to the redemption date and a make-whole premium as described in the applicable indenture . if we experience certain kinds of changes of control , the issuers must make an offer to repurchase the senior notes , in whole or in part , at a purchase price in cash equal to 101% ( 101 % ) of the principal amount of the senior notes , plus any accrued and unpaid interest to the date of purchase ; provided , however , that in the event moody 2019s and s&p have confirmed their ratings at ba3 or higher and bb- or higher on the senior notes and certain other conditions are met , this repurchase obligation will not apply . mortgages at december 31 , 2007 , we had outstanding 121 mortgage loans totaling $ 1.57 billion that are collateralized by the underlying assets of the properties . outstanding principal balances on these loans ranged from $ 0.4 million to $ 59.4 million as of december 31 , 2007 . the loans generally bear interest at fixed rates ranging from 5.4% ( 5.4 % ) to 8.5% ( 8.5 % ) per annum , except for 15 loans with outstanding principal balances ranging from $ 0.4 million to $ 32.0 million , which bear interest at the lender 2019s variable rates ranging from 3.4% ( 3.4 % ) to 7.3% ( 7.3 % ) per annum as of december 31 , 2007 . at december 31 , 2007 , the weighted average annual rate on fixed rate debt was 6.5% ( 6.5 % ) and the weighted average annual rate on the variable rate debt was 6.1% ( 6.1 % ) . the loans had a weighted average maturity of 7.0 years as of december 31 , 2007 . sunrise 2019s portion of total debt was $ 157.1 million as of december 31 , scheduled maturities of borrowing arrangements and other provisions as of december 31 , 2007 , our indebtedness had the following maturities ( in thousands ) : . 2008 \| $ 193101 2009 \| 605762 2010 \| 282138 2011 \| 303191 2012 \| 527221 thereafter \| 1436263 total maturities \| 3347676 unamortized fair value adjustment \| 19669 unamortized commission fees and discounts \| -6846 ( 6846 ) senior notes payable and other debt \| $ 3360499 . Question: w h a t w a s t h e p e r c e n t o f t h e m a t u r i t i e s a s o f 2 0 0 8 a s p a r t o f t h e t o t a l m a t u r i t i e s	5,009
9.99	Given the context, answer the question. Context: part ii price range our common stock commenced trading on the nasdaq national market under the symbol 201cmktx 201d on november 5 , 2004 . prior to that date , there was no public market for our common stock . the high and low bid information for our common stock , as reported by nasdaq , was as follows : on march 8 , 2006 , the last reported closing price of our common stock on the nasdaq national market was $ 12.59 . holders there were approximately 114 holders of record of our common stock as of march 8 , 2006 . dividend policy we have not declared or paid any cash dividends on our capital stock since our inception . we intend to retain future earnings to finance the operation and expansion of our business and do not anticipate paying any cash dividends in the foreseeable future . in the event we decide to declare dividends on our common stock in the future , such declaration will be subject to the discretion of our board of directors . our board may take into account such matters as general business conditions , our financial results , capital requirements , contractual , legal , and regulatory restrictions on the payment of dividends by us to our stockholders or by our subsidiaries to us and any such other factors as our board may deem relevant . use of proceeds on november 4 , 2004 , the registration statement relating to our initial public offering ( no . 333-112718 ) was declared effective . we received net proceeds from the sale of the shares of our common stock in the offering of $ 53.9 million , at an initial public offering price of $ 11.00 per share , after deducting underwriting discounts and commissions and estimated offering expenses . except for salaries , and reimbursements for travel expenses and other out-of -pocket costs incurred in the ordinary course of business , none of the proceeds from the offering have been paid by us , directly or indirectly , to any of our directors or officers or any of their associates , or to any persons owning ten percent or more of our outstanding stock or to any of our affiliates . we have invested the proceeds from the offering in cash and cash equivalents and short-term marketable securities . item 5 . market for registrant 2019s common equity , related stockholder matters and issuer purchases of equity securities . \| high \| low november 5 2004 to december 31 2004 \| $ 24.41 \| $ 12.75 january 1 2005 to march 31 2005 \| $ 15.95 \| $ 9.64 april 1 2005 to june 30 2005 \| $ 13.87 \| $ 9.83 july 1 2005 to september 30 2005 \| $ 14.09 \| $ 9.99 october 1 2005 to december 31 2005 \| $ 13.14 \| $ 10.64 . Question: f o r t h e p e r i o d j u l y 1 2 0 0 5 t o s e p t e m b e r 3 0 2 0 0 5 , w h a t w a s t h e l o w e s t s h a r e p r i c e >	5,010
7.3%	Given the context, answer the question. Context: 12 . brokerage receivables and brokerage payables citi has receivables and payables for financial instruments sold to and purchased from brokers , dealers and customers , which arise in the ordinary course of business . citi is exposed to risk of loss from the inability of brokers , dealers or customers to pay for purchases or to deliver the financial instruments sold , in which case citi would have to sell or purchase the financial instruments at prevailing market prices . credit risk is reduced to the extent that an exchange or clearing organization acts as a counterparty to the transaction and replaces the broker , dealer or customer in question . citi seeks to protect itself from the risks associated with customer activities by requiring customers to maintain margin collateral in compliance with regulatory and internal guidelines . margin levels are monitored daily , and customers deposit additional collateral as required . where customers cannot meet collateral requirements , citi may liquidate sufficient underlying financial instruments to bring the customer into compliance with the required margin level . exposure to credit risk is impacted by market volatility , which may impair the ability of clients to satisfy their obligations to citi . credit limits are established and closely monitored for customers and for brokers and dealers engaged in forwards , futures and other transactions deemed to be credit sensitive . brokerage receivables and brokerage payables consisted of the following: . in millions of dollars \| december 31 , 2017 \| december 31 , 2016 receivables from customers \| $ 19215 \| $ 10374 receivables from brokers dealers and clearing organizations \| 19169 \| 18513 total brokerage receivables ( 1 ) \| $ 38384 \| $ 28887 payables to customers \| $ 38741 \| $ 37237 payables to brokers dealers and clearing organizations \| 22601 \| 19915 total brokerage payables ( 1 ) \| $ 61342 \| $ 57152 payables to brokers , dealers and clearing organizations 22601 19915 total brokerage payables ( 1 ) $ 61342 $ 57152 ( 1 ) includes brokerage receivables and payables recorded by citi broker- dealer entities that are accounted for in accordance with the aicpa accounting guide for brokers and dealers in securities as codified in asc 940-320. . Question: w h a t w a s t h e p e r c e n t a g e i n c r e a s e d i n t h e t o t a l b r o k e r a g e p a y a b l e s f r o m 2 0 1 6 t o 2 0 1 7	5,011
0.6	Given the context, answer the question. Context: between the actual return on plan assets compared to the expected return on plan assets ( u.s . pension plans had an actual rate of return of 7.8 percent compared to an expected rate of return of 6.9 percent ) . 2022 2015 net mark-to-market loss of $ 179 million - primarily due to the difference between the actual return on plan assets compared to the expected return on plan assets ( u.s . pension plans had an actual rate of return of ( 2.0 ) percent compared to an expected rate of return of 7.4 percent ) which was partially offset by higher discount rates at the end of 2015 compared to 2014 . the net mark-to-market losses were in the following results of operations line items: . ( millions of dollars ) \| years ended december 31 , 2017 \| years ended december 31 , 2016 \| years ended december 31 , 2015 cost of goods sold \| $ -29 ( 29 ) \| $ 476 \| $ 122 selling general and administrative expenses \| 244 \| 382 \| 18 research and development expenses \| 86 \| 127 \| 39 total \| $ 301 \| $ 985 \| $ 179 effective january 1 , 2018 , we adopted new accounting guidance issued by the fasb related to the presentation of net periodic pension and opeb costs . this guidance requires that an employer disaggregate the service cost component from the other components of net benefit cost . service cost is required to be reported in the same line item or items as other compensation costs arising from services rendered by the pertinent employees during the period . the other components of net benefit cost are required to be reported outside the subtotal for income from operations . as a result , components of pension and opeb costs , other than service costs , will be reclassified from operating costs to other income/expense . this change will be applied retrospectively to prior years . in the fourth quarter of 2017 , the company reviewed and made changes to the mortality assumptions primarily for our u.s . pension plans which resulted in an overall increase in the life expectancy of plan participants . as of december 31 , 2017 these changes resulted in an increase in our liability for postemployment benefits of approximately $ 290 million . in the fourth quarter of 2016 , the company adopted new mortality improvement scales released by the soa for our u.s . pension and opeb plans . as of december 31 , 2016 , this resulted in an increase in our liability for postemployment benefits of approximately $ 200 million . in the first quarter of 2017 , we announced the closure of our gosselies , belgium facility . this announcement impacted certain employees that participated in a defined benefit pension plan and resulted in a curtailment and the recognition of termination benefits . in march 2017 , we recognized a net loss of $ 20 million for the curtailment and termination benefits . in addition , we announced the decision to phase out production at our aurora , illinois , facility , which resulted in termination benefits of $ 9 million for certain hourly employees that participate in our u.s . hourly defined benefit pension plan . beginning in 2016 , we elected to utilize a full yield curve approach in the estimation of service and interest costs by applying the specific spot rates along the yield curve used in the determination of the benefit obligation to the relevant projected cash flows . service and interest costs in 2017 and 2016 were lower by $ 140 million and $ 180 million , respectively , under the new method than they would have been under the previous method . this change had no impact on our year-end defined benefit pension and opeb obligations or our annual net periodic benefit cost as the lower service and interest costs were entirely offset in the actuarial loss ( gain ) reported for the respective year . we expect our total defined benefit pension and opeb expense ( excluding the impact of mark-to-market gains and losses ) to decrease approximately $ 80 million in 2018 . this decrease is primarily due to a higher expected return on plan assets as a result of a higher asset base in 2018 . in general , our strategy for both the u.s . and the non-u.s . pensions includes ongoing alignment of our investments to our liabilities , while reducing risk in our portfolio . for our u.s . pension plans , our year-end 2017 asset allocation was 34 a0percent equities , 62 a0percent fixed income and 4 percent other . our current u.s . pension target asset allocation is 30 percent equities and 70 percent fixed income . the target allocation is revisited periodically to ensure it reflects our overall objectives . the u.s . plans are rebalanced to plus or minus 5 percentage points of the target asset allocation ranges on a monthly basis . the year-end 2017 asset allocation for our non-u.s . pension plans was 40 a0percent equities , 53 a0percent fixed income , 4 a0percent real estate and 3 percent other . the 2017 weighted-average target allocations for our non-u.s . pension plans was 38 a0percent equities , 54 a0percent fixed income , 5 a0percent real estate and 3 a0percent other . the target allocations for each plan vary based upon local statutory requirements , demographics of the plan participants and funded status . the frequency of rebalancing for the non-u.s . plans varies depending on the plan . contributions to our pension and opeb plans were $ 1.6 billion and $ 329 million in 2017 and 2016 , respectively . the 2017 contributions include a $ 1.0 billion discretionary contribution made to our u.s . pension plans in december 2017 . we expect to make approximately $ 365 million of contributions to our pension and opeb plans in 2018 . we believe we have adequate resources to fund both pension and opeb plans . 48 \| 2017 form 10-k . Question: w h a t w e r e m a n d a t o r y c o n t r i b u t i o n s t o o u r p e n s i o n a n d o p e b p l a n s i n b i l l i o n s i n 2 0 1 7 ?	5,012
6.78	Given the context, answer the question. Context: part ii item 5 . market for registrant 2019s common equity and related stockholder matters recent sales of unregistered securities during the fourth quarter of 2003 , aes issued an aggregated of 20.2 million shares of its common stock in exchange for $ 20 million aggregate principal amount of its senior notes . the shares were issued without registration in reliance upon section 3 ( a ) ( 9 ) under the securities act of 1933 . market information our common stock is currently traded on the new york stock exchange ( 2018 2018nyse 2019 2019 ) under the symbol 2018 2018aes . 2019 2019 the following tables set forth the high and low sale prices for our common stock as reported by the nyse for the periods indicated . price range of common stock . 2003 first quarter \| high $ 4.04 \| low $ 2.72 \| 2002 first quarter \| high $ 17.84 \| low $ 4.11 second quarter \| 8.37 \| 3.75 \| second quarter \| 9.17 \| 3.55 third quarter \| 7.70 \| 5.91 \| third quarter \| 4.61 \| 1.56 fourth quarter \| 9.50 \| 7.57 \| fourth quarter \| 3.57 \| 0.95 holders as of march 3 , 2004 , there were 9026 record holders of our common stock , par value $ 0.01 per share . dividends under the terms of our senior secured credit facilities , which we entered into with a commercial bank syndicate , we are not allowed to pay cash dividends . in addition , under the terms of a guaranty we provided to the utility customer in connection with the aes thames project , we are precluded from paying cash dividends on our common stock if we do not meet certain net worth and liquidity tests . our project subsidiaries 2019 ability to declare and pay cash dividends to us is subject to certain limitations contained in the project loans , governmental provisions and other agreements that our project subsidiaries are subject to . see item 12 ( d ) of this form 10-k for information regarding securities authorized for issuance under equity compensation plans. . Question: w h a t w a s t h e d i f f e r e n c e i n t h e l o w p r i c e f o r t h e f i r s t q u a r t e r o f 2 0 0 3 a n d t h e h i g h p r i c e f o r t h e f o u r t h q u a r t e r o f 2 0 0 3 ?	5,013
11.9%	Given the context, answer the question. Context: dividends and distributions we pay regular quarterly dividends to holders of our common stock . on february 16 , 2007 , our board of directors declared the first quarterly installment of our 2007 dividend in the amount of $ 0.475 per share , payable on march 30 , 2007 to stockholders of record on march 20 , 2007 . we expect to distribute 100% ( 100 % ) or more of our taxable net income to our stockholders for 2007 . our board of directors normally makes decisions regarding the frequency and amount of our dividends on a quarterly basis . because the board considers a number of factors when making these decisions , we cannot assure you that we will maintain the policy stated above . please see 201ccautionary statements 201d and the risk factors included in part i , item 1a of this annual report on form 10-k for a description of other factors that may affect our distribution policy . our stockholders may reinvest all or a portion of any cash distribution on their shares of our common stock by participating in our distribution reinvestment and stock purchase plan , subject to the terms of the plan . see 201cnote 15 2014capital stock 201d of the notes to consolidated financial statements included in item 8 of this annual report on form 10-k . director and employee stock sales certain of our directors , executive officers and other employees have adopted and may , from time to time in the future , adopt non-discretionary , written trading plans that comply with rule 10b5-1 under the exchange act , or otherwise monetize their equity-based compensation . securities authorized for issuance under equity compensation plans the following table summarizes information with respect to our equity compensation plans as of december 31 , 2006 : plan category number of securities to be issued upon exercise of outstanding options , warrants and rights weighted average exercise price of outstanding options , warrants and rights number of securities remaining available for future issuance under equity compensation plans ( excluding securities reflected in column ( a ) equity compensation plans approved by stockholders ( 1 ) . . 1118051 $ 24.27 8373727 equity compensation plans not approved by stockholders ( 2 ) . . 18924 n/a 1145354 . plan category \| ( a ) number of securities to be issued upon exercise of outstanding options warrants andrights \| ( b ) weighted average exercise price of outstanding options warrants and rights \| ( c ) number of securities remaining available for future issuance under equity compensation plans ( excluding securities reflected in column ( a ) equity compensation plans approved by stockholders ( 1 ) \| 1118051 \| $ 24.27 \| 8373727 equity compensation plans not approved by stockholders ( 2 ) \| 18924 \| n/a \| 1145354 total \| 1136975 \| $ 24.27 \| 9519081 ( 1 ) these plans consist of ( i ) the 1987 incentive compensation program ( employee plan ) ; ( ii ) the theratx , incorporated 1996 stock option/stock issuance plan ; ( iii ) the 2000 incentive compensation plan ( employee plan ) ( formerly known as the 1997 incentive compensation plan ) ; ( iv ) the 2004 stock plan for directors ( which amended and restated the 2000 stock option plan for directors ( formerly known as the 1997 stock option plan for non-employee directors ) ) ; ( v ) the employee and director stock purchase plan ; ( vi ) the 2006 incentive plan ; and ( vii ) the 2006 stock plan for directors . ( 2 ) these plans consist of ( i ) the common stock purchase plan for directors , under which our non-employee directors may receive common stock in lieu of directors 2019 fees , ( ii ) the nonemployee director deferred stock compensation plan , under which our non-employee directors may receive units convertible on a one-for-one basis into common stock in lieu of director fees , and ( iii ) the executive deferred stock compensation plan , under which our executive officers may receive units convertible on a one-for-one basis into common stock in lieu of compensation. . Question: w h a t i s t h e p e r c e n t a g e o f n u m b e r o f s e c u r i t i e s t o b e i s s u e d u p o n e x e r c i s e o f o u t s t a n d i n g o p t i o n s w a r r a n t s a n d r i g h t s c o m p a r e d t o n u m b e r o f s e c u r i t i e s r e m a i n i n g a v a i l a b l e f o r f u t u r e i s s u a n c e u n d e r e q u i t y c o m p e n s a t i o n p l a n s ?	5,014
4.1%	Given the context, answer the question. Context: results of operations and the estimated fair value of acquired assets and assumed liabilities are recorded in the consolidated financial statements from the date of acquisition . pro forma results of operations for the business combinations completed during fiscal 2016 have not been presented because the effects of these acquisitions , individually and in the aggregate , would not have been material to cadence 2019s financial results . the fair values of acquired intangible assets and assumed liabilities were determined using significant inputs that are not observable in the market . for an additional description of these fair value calculations , see note 16 in the notes to the consolidated financial statements . a trust for the benefit of the children of lip-bu tan , cadence 2019s president , chief executive officer , or ceo , and director , owned less than 2% ( 2 % ) of rocketick technologies ltd. , one of the acquired companies , and mr . tan and his wife serve as co-trustees of the trust and disclaim pecuniary and economic interest in the trust . the board of directors of cadence reviewed the transaction and concluded that it was in the best interests of cadence to proceed with the transaction . mr . tan recused himself from the board of directors 2019 discussion of the valuation of rocketick technologies ltd . and on whether to proceed with the transaction . a financial advisor provided a fairness opinion to cadence in connection with the transaction . 2014 acquisitions during fiscal 2014 , cadence acquired jasper design automation , inc. , or jasper , a privately held provider of formal analysis solutions based in mountain view , california . the acquired technology complements cadence 2019s existing system design and verification platforms . total cash consideration for jasper , after taking into account adjustments for certain costs , and cash held by jasper at closing of $ 28.7 million , was $ 139.4 million . cadence will also make payments to certain employees through the third quarter of fiscal 2017 subject to continued employment and other conditions . cadence also completed two other business combinations during fiscal 2014 for total cash consideration of $ 27.5 million , after taking into account cash acquired of $ 2.1 million . acquisition-related transaction costs transaction costs associated with acquisitions were $ 1.1 million , $ 0.7 million and $ 3.7 million during fiscal 2016 , 2015 and 2014 , respectively . these costs consist of professional fees and administrative costs and were expensed as incurred in cadence 2019s consolidated income statements . note 8 . goodwill and acquired intangibles goodwill the changes in the carrying amount of goodwill during fiscal 2016 and 2015 were as follows : gross carrying amount ( in thousands ) . \| gross carryingamount ( in thousands ) balance as of january 3 2015 \| $ 553767 effect of foreign currency translation \| -1995 ( 1995 ) balance as of january 2 2016 \| 551772 goodwill resulting from acquisitions \| 23579 effect of foreign currency translation \| -2587 ( 2587 ) balance as of december 31 2016 \| $ 572764 cadence completed its annual goodwill impairment test during the third quarter of fiscal 2016 and determined that the fair value of cadence 2019s single reporting unit substantially exceeded the carrying amount of its net assets and that no impairment existed. . Question: w h a t p o r t i o n o f t h e t o t a l c a r r y i n g a m o u n t i s g e n e r a t e d b y t h e g o o d w i l l f r o m a c q u i s i t i o n s ?	5,015
37.5%	Given the context, answer the question. Context: american tower corporation and subsidiaries notes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) 19 . subsequent events 12.25% ( 12.25 % ) senior subordinated discount notes and warrants offering 2014in january 2003 , the company issued 808000 units , each consisting of ( 1 ) $ 1000 principal amount at maturity of the 12.25% ( 12.25 % ) senior subordinated discount notes due 2008 of a wholly owned subsidiary of the company ( ati notes ) and ( 2 ) a warrant to purchase 14.0953 shares of class a common stock of the company , for gross proceeds of $ 420.0 million . the gross offering proceeds were allocated between the ati notes ( $ 367.4 million ) and the fair value of the warrants ( $ 52.6 million ) . net proceeds from the offering aggregated approximately $ 397.0 million and were or will be used for the purposes described below under amended and restated loan agreement . the ati notes accrue no cash interest . instead , the accreted value of each ati note will increase between the date of original issuance and maturity ( august 1 , 2008 ) at a rate of 12.25% ( 12.25 % ) per annum . the 808000 warrants that were issued together with the ati notes each represent the right to purchase 14.0953 shares of class a common stock at $ 0.01 per share . the warrants are exercisable at any time on or after january 29 , 2006 and will expire on august 1 , 2008 . as of the issuance date , the warrants represented approximately 5.5% ( 5.5 % ) of the company 2019s outstanding common stock ( assuming exercise of all warrants ) . the indenture governing the ati notes contains covenants that , among other things , limit the ability of the issuer subsidiary and its guarantors to incur or guarantee additional indebtedness , create liens , pay dividends or make other equity distributions , enter into agreements restricting the restricted subsidiaries 2019 ability to pay dividends , purchase or redeem capital stock , make investments and sell assets or consolidate or merge with or into other companies . the ati notes rank junior in right of payment to all existing and future senior indebtedness , including all indebtedness outstanding under the credit facilities , and are structurally senior in right of payment to all existing and future indebtedness of the company . amended and restated loan agreement 2014on february 21 , 2003 , the company completed an amendment to its credit facilities . the amendment provides for the following : 2022 prepayment of a portion of outstanding term loans . the company agreed to prepay an aggregate of $ 200.0 million of the term loans outstanding under the credit facilities from a portion of the net proceeds of the ati notes offering completed in january 2003 . this prepayment consisted of a $ 125.0 million prepayment of the term loan a and a $ 75.0 million prepayment of the term loan b , each to be applied to reduce future scheduled principal payments . giving effect to the prepayment of $ 200.0 million of term loans under the credit facility and the issuance of the ati notes as discussed above as well as the paydown of debt from net proceeds of the sale of mtn ( $ 24.5 million in february 2003 ) , the company 2019s aggregate principal payments of long- term debt , including capital leases , for the next five years and thereafter are as follows ( in thousands ) : year ending december 31 . 2003 \| $ 268496 2004 \| 131262 2005 \| 195082 2006 \| 538479 2007 \| 1065437 thereafter \| 1408783 total \| $ 3607539 . Question: o f t h e a m o u n t a g r e e d b y t h e c o m p a n y f o r t h e p r e p a y m e n t o n t h e t e r m l o a n s w h a t w a s t h e p e r c e n t a g e f o r t h e t e r m l o a n a	5,016
140.15	Given the context, answer the question. Context: state street bank issuances : state street bank currently has authority to issue up to an aggregate of $ 1 billion of subordinated fixed-rate , floating-rate or zero-coupon bank notes with a maturity of five to fifteen years . with respect to the 5.25% ( 5.25 % ) subordinated bank notes due 2018 , state street bank is required to make semi-annual interest payments on the outstanding principal balance of the notes on april 15 and october 15 of each year , and the notes qualify as tier 2 capital under regulatory capital guidelines . with respect to the 5.30% ( 5.30 % ) subordinated notes due 2016 and the floating-rate subordinated notes due 2015 , state street bank is required to make semi-annual interest payments on the outstanding principal balance of the 5.30% ( 5.30 % ) notes on january 15 and july 15 of each year beginning in july 2006 , and quarterly interest payments on the outstanding principal balance of the floating-rate notes on march 8 , june 8 , september 8 and december 8 of each year beginning in march 2006 . the notes qualify as tier 2 capital under regulatory capital guidelines . note 10 . commitments and contingencies off-balance sheet commitments and contingencies : credit-related financial instruments include indemnified securities financing , unfunded commitments to extend credit or purchase assets and standby letters of credit . the total potential loss on unfunded commitments , standby and commercial letters of credit and securities finance indemnifications is equal to the total contractual amount , which does not consider the value of any collateral . the following is a summary of the contractual amount of credit-related , off-balance sheet financial instruments at december 31 . amounts reported do not reflect participations to unrelated third parties. . ( in millions ) \| 2006 \| 2005 indemnified securities financing \| $ 506032 \| $ 372863 liquidity asset purchase agreements \| 30251 \| 24412 unfunded commitments to extend credit \| 16354 \| 14403 standby letters of credit \| 4926 \| 5027 on behalf of our customers , we lend their securities to creditworthy brokers and other institutions . in certain circumstances , we may indemnify our customers for the fair market value of those securities against a failure of the borrower to return such securities . collateral funds received in connection with our securities finance services are held by us as agent and are not recorded in our consolidated statement of condition . we require the borrowers to provide collateral in an amount equal to or in excess of 100% ( 100 % ) of the fair market value of the securities borrowed . the borrowed securities are revalued daily to determine if additional collateral is necessary . we held , as agent , cash and u.s . government securities totaling $ 527.37 billion and $ 387.22 billion as collateral for indemnified securities on loan at december 31 , 2006 and 2005 , respectively . approximately 81% ( 81 % ) of the unfunded commitments to extend credit and liquidity asset purchase agreements expire within one year from the date of issue . since many of the commitments are expected to expire or renew without being drawn upon , the total commitment amounts do not necessarily represent future cash requirements . in the normal course of business , we provide liquidity and credit enhancements to asset-backed commercial paper programs , or 201cconduits . 201d these conduits are more fully described in note 11 . the commercial paper issuances and commitments of the conduits to provide funding are supported by liquidity asset purchase agreements and backup liquidity lines of credit , the majority of which are provided by us . in addition , we provide direct credit support to the conduits in the form of standby letters of credit . our commitments under liquidity asset purchase agreements and backup lines of credit totaled $ 23.99 billion at december 31 , 2006 , and are included in the preceding table . our commitments under seq 83 copyarea : 38 . x 54 . trimsize : 8.25 x 10.75 typeset state street corporation serverprocess c:\\fc\\delivery_1024177\\2771-1-dm_p.pdf chksum : 0 cycle 1merrill corporation 07-2771-1 thu mar 01 17:10:46 2007 ( v 2.247w--stp1pae18 ) . Question: w h a t i s t h e n e t c h a n g e i n t h e b a l a n c e o f c a s h a n d u . s . g o v e r n m e n t s e c u r i t i e s h e l d a s c o l l a t e r a l f o r i n d e m n i f i e d s e c u r i t i e s o n l o a n s i n 2 0 0 6 ?	5,017
10.1%	Given the context, answer the question. Context: e nt e r g y c o r p o r a t i o n a n d s u b s i d i a r i e s 2 0 0 7 n an increase of $ 16 million in fossil operating costs due to the purchase of the attala plant in january 2006 and the perryville plant coming online in july 2005 ; n an increase of $ 12 million related to storm reserves . this increase does not include costs associated with hurricanes katrina and rita ; and n an increase of $ 12 million due to a return to normal expense patterns in 2006 versus the deferral or capitalization of storm costs in 2005 . other operation and maintenance expenses increased for non- utility nuclear from $ 588 million in 2005 to $ 637 million in 2006 primarily due to the timing of refueling outages , increased benefit and insurance costs , and increased nrc fees . taxes other than income taxes taxes other than income taxes increased for the utility from $ 322 million in 2005 to $ 361 million in 2006 primarily due to an increase in city franchise taxes in arkansas due to a change in 2006 in the accounting for city franchise tax revenues as directed by the apsc . the change results in an increase in taxes other than income taxes with a corresponding increase in rider revenue , resulting in no effect on net income . also contributing to the increase was higher franchise tax expense at entergy gulf states , inc . as a result of higher gross revenues in 2006 and a customer refund in 2005 . other income other income increased for the utility from $ 111 million in 2005 to $ 156 million in 2006 primarily due to carrying charges recorded on storm restoration costs . other income increased for non-utility nuclear primarily due to miscellaneous income of $ 27 million ( $ 16.6 million net-of-tax ) resulting from a reduction in the decommissioning liability for a plant as a result of a revised decommissioning cost study and changes in assumptions regarding the timing of when decommissioning of a plant will begin . other income increased for parent & other primarily due to a gain related to its entergy-koch investment of approximately $ 55 million ( net-of-tax ) in the fourth quarter of 2006 . in 2004 , entergy-koch sold its energy trading and pipeline businesses to third parties . at that time , entergy received $ 862 million of the sales proceeds in the form of a cash distribution by entergy-koch . due to the november 2006 expiration of contingencies on the sale of entergy-koch 2019s trading business , and the corresponding release to entergy-koch of sales proceeds held in escrow , entergy received additional cash distributions of approximately $ 163 million during the fourth quarter of 2006 and recorded a gain of approximately $ 55 million ( net-of-tax ) . entergy expects future cash distributions upon liquidation of the partnership will be less than $ 35 million . interest charges interest charges increased for the utility and parent & other primarily due to additional borrowing to fund the significant storm restoration costs associated with hurricanes katrina and rita . discontinued operations in april 2006 , entergy sold the retail electric portion of the competitive retail services business operating in the electric reliability council of texas ( ercot ) region of texas , and now reports this portion of the business as a discontinued operation . earnings for 2005 were negatively affected by $ 44.8 million ( net-of-tax ) of discontinued operations due to the planned sale . this amount includes a net charge of $ 25.8 million ( net-of-tax ) related to the impairment reserve for the remaining net book value of the competitive retail services business 2019 information technology systems . results for 2006 include an $ 11.1 million gain ( net-of-tax ) on the sale of the retail electric portion of the competitive retail services business operating in the ercot region of texas . income taxes the effective income tax rates for 2006 and 2005 were 27.6% ( 27.6 % ) and 36.6% ( 36.6 % ) , respectively . the lower effective income tax rate in 2006 is primarily due to tax benefits , net of reserves , resulting from the tax capital loss recognized in connection with the liquidation of entergy power international holdings , entergy 2019s holding company for entergy-koch . also contributing to the lower rate for 2006 is an irs audit settlement that allowed entergy to release from its tax reserves all settled issues relating to 1996-1998 audit cycle . see note 3 to the financial statements for a reconciliation of the federal statutory rate of 35.0% ( 35.0 % ) to the effective income tax rates , and for additional discussion regarding income taxes . liquidity and capital resources this section discusses entergy 2019s capital structure , capital spending plans and other uses of capital , sources of capital , and the cash flow activity presented in the cash flow statement . capital structure entergy 2019s capitalization is balanced between equity and debt , as shown in the following table . the increase in the debt to capital percentage from 2006 to 2007 is primarily the result of additional borrowings under entergy corporation 2019s revolving credit facility , along with a decrease in shareholders 2019 equity primarily due to repurchases of common stock . this increase in the debt to capital percentage is in line with entergy 2019s financial and risk management aspirations . the decrease in the debt to capital percentage from 2005 to 2006 is the result of an increase in shareholders 2019 equity , primarily due to an increase in retained earnings , partially offset by repurchases of common stock. . \| 2007 \| 2006 \| 2005 net debt to net capital at the end of the year \| 54.6% ( 54.6 % ) \| 49.4% ( 49.4 % ) \| 51.5% ( 51.5 % ) effect of subtracting cash from debt \| 3.0% ( 3.0 % ) \| 2.9% ( 2.9 % ) \| 1.6% ( 1.6 % ) debt to capital at the end of the year \| 57.6% ( 57.6 % ) \| 52.3% ( 52.3 % ) \| 53.1% ( 53.1 % ) net debt consists of debt less cash and cash equivalents . debt consists of notes payable , capital lease obligations , preferred stock with sinking fund , and long-term debt , including the currently maturing portion . capital consists of debt , shareholders 2019 equity , and preferred stock without sinking fund . net capital consists of capital less cash and cash equivalents . entergy uses the net debt to net capital ratio in analyzing its financial condition and believes it provides useful information to its investors and creditors in evaluating entergy 2019s financial condition . m an ag e ment 2019s f i n anc ial d i scuss ion an d an alys is co n t i n u e d . Question: w h a t i s t h e g r o w t h r a t e o f d e b t t o c a p i t a l r a t i o f r o m 2 0 0 6 t o 2 0 0 7 ?	5,018
16.2%	Given the context, answer the question. Context: the following table displays the expected benefit payments in the years indicated : ( dollars in thousands ) . 2007 \| $ 117 2008 \| 140 2009 \| 203 2010 \| 263 2011 \| 328 next 5 years \| 2731 1 4 . d i v i d e n d r e s t r i c t i o n s a n d s t a t u t o r y f i n a n c i a l i n f o r m a t i o n a . d i v i d e n d r e s t r i c t i o n s under bermuda law , group is prohibited from declaring or paying a dividend if such payment would reduce the realizable value of its assets to an amount less than the aggregate value of its liabilities and its issued share capital and share premium ( addi- tional paid-in capital ) accounts . group 2019s ability to pay dividends and its operating expenses is dependent upon dividends from its subsidiaries . the payment of such dividends by insurer subsidiaries is limited under bermuda law and the laws of the var- ious u.s . states in which group 2019s insurance and reinsurance subsidiaries are domiciled or deemed domiciled . the limitations are generally based upon net income and compliance with applicable policyholders 2019 surplus or minimum solvency margin and liquidity ratio requirements as determined in accordance with the relevant statutory accounting practices . under bermuda law , bermuda re is prohibited from declaring or making payment of a dividend if it fails to meet its minimum solvency margin or minimum liquidity ratio . as a long-term insurer , bermuda re is also unable to declare or pay a dividend to anyone who is not a policyholder unless , after payment of the dividend , the value of the assets in its long-term business fund , as certified by its approved actuary , exceeds its liabilities for long-term business by at least the $ 250000 minimum solvency margin . prior approval of the bermuda monetary authority is required if bermuda re 2019s dividend payments would reduce its prior year-end total statutory capital by 15.0% ( 15.0 % ) or more . delaware law provides that an insurance company which is a member of an insurance holding company system and is domi- ciled in the state shall not pay dividends without giving prior notice to the insurance commissioner of delaware and may not pay dividends without the approval of the insurance commissioner if the value of the proposed dividend , together with all other dividends and distributions made in the preceding twelve months , exceeds the greater of ( 1 ) 10% ( 10 % ) of statutory surplus or ( 2 ) net income , not including realized capital gains , each as reported in the prior year 2019s statutory annual statement . in addition , no dividend may be paid in excess of unassigned earned surplus . at december 31 , 2006 , everest re had $ 270.4 million available for payment of dividends in 2007 without the need for prior regulatory approval . b . s t a t u t o r y f i n a n c i a l i n f o r m a t i o n everest re prepares its statutory financial statements in accordance with accounting practices prescribed or permitted by the national association of insurance commissioners ( 201cnaic 201d ) and the delaware insurance department . prescribed statutory accounting practices are set forth in the naic accounting practices and procedures manual . the capital and statutory surplus of everest re was $ 2704.1 million ( unaudited ) and $ 2327.6 million at december 31 , 2006 and 2005 , respectively . the statutory net income of everest re was $ 298.7 million ( unaudited ) for the year ended december 31 , 2006 , the statutory net loss was $ 26.9 million for the year ended december 31 , 2005 and the statutory net income $ 175.8 million for the year ended december 31 , 2004 . bermuda re prepares its statutory financial statements in conformity with the accounting principles set forth in bermuda in the insurance act 1978 , amendments thereto and related regulations . the statutory capital and surplus of bermuda re was $ 1893.9 million ( unaudited ) and $ 1522.5 million at december 31 , 2006 and 2005 , respectively . the statutory net income of bermuda re was $ 409.8 million ( unaudited ) for the year ended december 31 , 2006 , the statutory net loss was $ 220.5 million for the year ended december 31 , 2005 and the statutory net income was $ 248.7 million for the year ended december 31 , 2004 . 1 5 . c o n t i n g e n c i e s in the ordinary course of business , the company is involved in lawsuits , arbitrations and other formal and informal dispute resolution procedures , the outcomes of which will determine the company 2019s rights and obligations under insurance , reinsur- ance and other contractual agreements . in some disputes , the company seeks to enforce its rights under an agreement or to collect funds owing to it . in other matters , the company is resisting attempts by others to collect funds or enforce alleged rights . these disputes arise from time to time and as they arise are addressed , and ultimately resolved , through both informal and formal means , including negotiated resolution , arbitration and litigation . in all such matters , the company believes that . Question: w h a t i s t h e p e r c e n t a g e c h a n g e i n t h e c a p i t a l a n d s t a t u t o r y s u r p l u s f r o m 2 0 0 5 t o 2 0 0 6 ?	5,019
308%	Given the context, answer the question. Context: item 7 . management 2019s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations results of operations 2013 highmount 2013 ( continued ) highmount 2019s revenues , profitability and future growth depend substantially on natural gas and ngl prices and highmount 2019s ability to increase its natural gas and ngl production . in recent years , there has been significant price volatility in natural gas and ngl prices due to a variety of factors highmount cannot control or predict . these factors , which include weather conditions , political and economic events , and competition from other energy sources , impact supply and demand for natural gas , which determines the pricing . in recent months , natural gas prices decreased significantly due largely to increased onshore natural gas production , plentiful levels of working gas in storage and reduced commercial demand . the increase in the onshore natural gas production was due largely to increased production from 201cunconventional 201d sources of natural gas such as shale gas , coalbed methane , tight sandstones and methane hydrates , made possible in recent years by modern technology in creating extensive artificial fractures around well bores and advances in horizontal drilling technology . other key factors contributing to the softness of natural gas prices likely included a lower level of industrial demand for natural gas , as a result of the ongoing economic downturn , and relatively low crude oil prices . due to industry conditions , in february of 2009 highmount elected to terminate contracts for five drilling rigs at its permian basin property in the sonora , texas area . the estimated fee payable to the rig contractor for exercising this early termination right will be approximately $ 23 million . in light of these developments , highmount will reduce 2009 production volumes through decreased drilling activity . in addition , the price highmount realizes for its gas production is affected by highmount 2019s hedging activities as well as locational differences in market prices . highmount 2019s decision to increase its natural gas production is dependent upon highmount 2019s ability to realize attractive returns on its capital investment program . returns are affected by commodity prices , capital and operating costs . highmount 2019s operating income , which represents revenues less operating expenses , is primarily affected by revenue factors , but is also a function of varying levels of production expenses , production and ad valorem taxes , as well as depreciation , depletion and amortization ( 201cdd&a 201d ) expenses . highmount 2019s production expenses represent all costs incurred to operate and maintain wells and related equipment and facilities . the principal components of highmount 2019s production expenses are , among other things , direct and indirect costs of labor and benefits , repairs and maintenance , materials , supplies and fuel . in general , during 2008 highmount 2019s labor costs increased primarily due to higher salary levels and continued upward pressure on salaries and wages as a result of the increased competition for skilled workers . in response to these market conditions , in 2008 highmount implemented retention programs , including increases in compensation . production expenses during 2008 were also affected by increases in the cost of fuel , materials and supplies . the higher cost environment discussed above continued during all of 2008 . during the fourth quarter of 2008 the price of natural gas declined significantly while operating expenses remained high . this environment of low commodity prices and high operating expenses continued until december of 2008 when highmount began to see evidence of decreasing operating expenses and drilling costs . highmount 2019s production and ad valorem taxes increase primarily when prices of natural gas and ngls increase , but they are also affected by changes in production , as well as appreciated property values . highmount calculates depletion using the units-of-production method , which depletes the capitalized costs and future development costs associated with evaluated properties based on the ratio of production volumes for the current period to total remaining reserve volumes for the evaluated properties . highmount 2019s depletion expense is affected by its capital spending program and projected future development costs , as well as reserve changes resulting from drilling programs , well performance , and revisions due to changing commodity prices . presented below are production and sales statistics related to highmount 2019s operations: . year ended december 31 \| 2008 \| 2007 ( a ) gas production ( bcf ) \| 78.9 \| 34.0 gas sales ( bcf ) \| 72.5 \| 31.4 oil production/sales ( mbbls ) \| 351.3 \| 114.0 ngl production/sales ( mbbls ) \| 3507.4 \| 1512.9 equivalent production ( bcfe ) \| 102.0 \| 43.8 equivalent sales ( bcfe ) \| 95.7 \| 41.2 average realized prices without hedging results: \| \| gas ( per mcf ) \| $ 8.25 \| $ 5.95 ngl ( per bbl ) \| 51.26 \| 51.02 oil ( per bbl ) \| 95.26 \| 83.37 equivalent ( per mcfe ) \| 8.48 \| 6.65 . Question: w h a t i s t h e 2 0 0 8 r a t e o f i n c r e a s e i n o i l p r o d u c t i o n / s a l e s ?	5,020
-1.1%	Given the context, answer the question. Context: note 2 2013 earnings per share the weighted average number of shares outstanding used to compute earnings per common share were as follows ( in millions ) : . \| 2018 \| 2017 \| 2016 weighted average common shares outstanding for basic computations \| 284.5 \| 287.8 \| 299.3 weighted average dilutive effect of equity awards \| 2.3 \| 2.8 \| 3.8 weighted average common shares outstanding for diluted computations \| 286.8 \| 290.6 \| 303.1 we compute basic and diluted earnings per common share by dividing net earnings by the respective weighted average number of common shares outstanding for the periods presented . our calculation of diluted earnings per common share also includes the dilutive effects for the assumed vesting of outstanding restricted stock units ( rsus ) , performance stock units ( psus ) and exercise of outstanding stock options based on the treasury stock method . there were no significant anti-dilutive equity awards for the years ended december 31 , 2018 , 2017 and 2016 . note 3 2013 acquisition and divestitures consolidation of awe management limited on august 24 , 2016 , we increased our ownership interest in the awe joint venture , which operates the united kingdom 2019s nuclear deterrent program , from 33% ( 33 % ) to 51% ( 51 % ) . consequently , we began consolidating awe and our operating results include 100% ( 100 % ) of awe 2019s sales and 51% ( 51 % ) of its operating profit . prior to increasing our ownership interest , we accounted for our investment in awe using the equity method of accounting . under the equity method , we recognized only 33% ( 33 % ) of awe 2019s earnings or losses and no sales . accordingly , prior to august 24 , 2016 , the date we obtained control , we recorded 33% ( 33 % ) of awe 2019s net earnings in our operating results and subsequent to august 24 , 2016 , we recognized 100% ( 100 % ) of awe 2019s sales and 51% ( 51 % ) of its operating profit . we accounted for this transaction as a 201cstep acquisition 201d ( as defined by u.s . gaap ) , which requires us to consolidate and record the assets and liabilities of awe at fair value . accordingly , we recorded intangible assets of $ 243 million related to customer relationships , $ 32 million of net liabilities , and noncontrolling interests of $ 107 million . the intangible assets are being amortized over a period of eight years in accordance with the underlying pattern of economic benefit reflected by the future net cash flows . in 2016 , we recognized a non-cash net gain of $ 104 million associated with obtaining a controlling interest in awe , which consisted of a $ 127 million pretax gain recognized in the operating results of our space business segment and $ 23 million of tax-related items at our corporate office . the gain represented the fair value of our 51% ( 51 % ) interest in awe , less the carrying value of our previously held investment in awe and deferred taxes . the gain was recorded in other income , net on our consolidated statements of earnings . the fair value of awe ( including the intangible assets ) , our controlling interest , and the noncontrolling interests were determined using the income approach . divestiture of the information systems & global solutions business on august 16 , 2016 , we divested our former is&gs business , which merged with leidos , in a reverse morris trust transaction ( the 201ctransaction 201d ) . the transaction was completed in a multi-step process pursuant to which we initially contributed the is&gs business to abacus innovations corporation ( abacus ) , a wholly owned subsidiary of lockheed martin created to facilitate the transaction , and the common stock of abacus was distributed to participating lockheed martin stockholders through an exchange offer . under the terms of the exchange offer , lockheed martin stockholders had the option to exchange shares of lockheed martin common stock for shares of abacus common stock . at the conclusion of the exchange offer , all shares of abacus common stock were exchanged for 9369694 shares of lockheed martin common stock held by lockheed martin stockholders that elected to participate in the exchange . the shares of lockheed martin common stock that were exchanged and accepted were retired , reducing the number of shares of our common stock outstanding by approximately 3% ( 3 % ) . following the exchange offer , abacus merged with a subsidiary of leidos , with abacus continuing as the surviving corporation and a wholly-owned subsidiary of leidos . as part of the merger , each share of abacus common stock was automatically converted into one share of leidos common stock . we did not receive any shares of leidos common stock as part of the transaction and do not hold any shares of leidos or abacus common stock following the transaction . based on an opinion of outside tax counsel , subject to customary qualifications and based on factual representations , the exchange offer and merger will qualify as tax-free transactions to lockheed martin and its stockholders , except to the extent that cash was paid to lockheed martin stockholders in lieu of fractional shares . in connection with the transaction , abacus borrowed an aggregate principal amount of approximately $ 1.84 billion under term loan facilities with third party financial institutions , the proceeds of which were used to make a one-time special cash payment of $ 1.80 billion to lockheed martin and to pay associated borrowing fees and expenses . the entire special cash payment was used to repay debt , pay dividends and repurchase stock during the third and fourth quarters of 2016 . the obligations under the abacus term loan facilities were guaranteed by leidos as part of the transaction. . Question: w h a t i s t h e p e r c e n t a g e c h a n g e i n w e i g h t e d a v e r a g e c o m m o n s h a r e s o u t s t a n d i n g f o r b a s i c c o m p u t a t i o n s f r o m 2 0 1 7 t o 2 0 1 8 ?	5,021
14%	Given the context, answer the question. Context: the goldman sachs group , inc . and subsidiaries notes to consolidated financial statements commercial lending . the firm 2019s commercial lending commitments are extended to investment-grade and non-investment-grade corporate borrowers . commitments to investment-grade corporate borrowers are principally used for operating liquidity and general corporate purposes . the firm also extends lending commitments in connection with contingent acquisition financing and other types of corporate lending , as well as commercial real estate financing . commitments that are extended for contingent acquisition financing are often intended to be short-term in nature , as borrowers often seek to replace them with other funding sources . sumitomo mitsui financial group , inc . ( smfg ) provides the firm with credit loss protection on certain approved loan commitments ( primarily investment-grade commercial lending commitments ) . the notional amount of such loan commitments was $ 25.70 billion and $ 26.88 billion as of december 2017 and december 2016 , respectively . the credit loss protection on loan commitments provided by smfg is generally limited to 95% ( 95 % ) of the first loss the firm realizes on such commitments , up to a maximum of approximately $ 950 million . in addition , subject to the satisfaction of certain conditions , upon the firm 2019s request , smfg will provide protection for 70% ( 70 % ) of additional losses on such commitments , up to a maximum of $ 1.13 billion , of which $ 550 million and $ 768 million of protection had been provided as of december 2017 and december 2016 , respectively . the firm also uses other financial instruments to mitigate credit risks related to certain commitments not covered by smfg . these instruments primarily include credit default swaps that reference the same or similar underlying instrument or entity , or credit default swaps that reference a market index . warehouse financing . the firm provides financing to clients who warehouse financial assets . these arrangements are secured by the warehoused assets , primarily consisting of retail and corporate loans . contingent and forward starting collateralized agreements / forward starting collateralized financings contingent and forward starting collateralized agreements includes resale and securities borrowing agreements , and forward starting collateralized financings includes repurchase and secured lending agreements that settle at a future date , generally within three business days . the firm also enters into commitments to provide contingent financing to its clients and counterparties through resale agreements . the firm 2019s funding of these commitments depends on the satisfaction of all contractual conditions to the resale agreement and these commitments can expire unused . letters of credit the firm has commitments under letters of credit issued by various banks which the firm provides to counterparties in lieu of securities or cash to satisfy various collateral and margin deposit requirements . investment commitments investment commitments includes commitments to invest in private equity , real estate and other assets directly and through funds that the firm raises and manages . investment commitments included $ 2.09 billion and $ 2.10 billion as of december 2017 and december 2016 , respectively , related to commitments to invest in funds managed by the firm . if these commitments are called , they would be funded at market value on the date of investment . leases the firm has contractual obligations under long-term noncancelable lease agreements for office space expiring on various dates through 2069 . certain agreements are subject to periodic escalation provisions for increases in real estate taxes and other charges . the table below presents future minimum rental payments , net of minimum sublease rentals . $ in millions december 2017 . $ in millions \| as of december 2017 2018 \| $ 299 2019 \| 282 2020 \| 262 2021 \| 205 2022 \| 145 2023 - thereafter \| 771 total \| $ 1964 rent charged to operating expenses was $ 273 million for 2017 , $ 244 million for 2016 and $ 249 million for 2015 . goldman sachs 2017 form 10-k 163 . Question: w h a t p e r c e n t a g e o f f u t u r e m i n i m u m r e n t a l p a y m e n t s a r e d u e i n 2 0 1 9 ?	5,022
10793.5	Given the context, answer the question. Context: the city council 2019s advisors and entergy new orleans . in february 2018 the city council approved the settlement , which deferred cost recovery to the 2018 entergy new orleans rate case , but also stated that an adjustment for 2018-2019 ami costs can be filed in the rate case and that , for all subsequent ami costs , the mechanism to be approved in the 2018 rate case will allow for the timely recovery of such costs . sources of capital entergy new orleans 2019s sources to meet its capital requirements include : 2022 internally generated funds ; 2022 cash on hand ; 2022 debt and preferred membership interest issuances ; and 2022 bank financing under new or existing facilities . entergy new orleans may refinance , redeem , or otherwise retire debt prior to maturity , to the extent market conditions and interest rates are favorable . entergy new orleans 2019s receivables from the money pool were as follows as of december 31 for each of the following years. . 2017 \| 2016 \| 2015 \| 2014 ( in thousands ) \| ( in thousands ) \| ( in thousands ) \| ( in thousands ) $ 12723 \| $ 14215 \| $ 15794 \| $ 442 see note 4 to the financial statements for a description of the money pool . entergy new orleans has a credit facility in the amount of $ 25 million scheduled to expire in november 2018 . the credit facility allows entergy new orleans to issue letters of credit against $ 10 million of the borrowing capacity of the facility . as of december 31 , 2017 , there were no cash borrowings and a $ 0.8 million letter of credit was outstanding under the facility . in addition , entergy new orleans is a party to an uncommitted letter of credit facility as a means to post collateral to support its obligations to miso . a0 as of december 31 , 2017 , a $ 1.4 million letter of credit was outstanding under entergy new orleans 2019s letter of credit a0facility . see note 4 to the financial statements for additional discussion of the credit facilities . entergy new orleans obtained authorization from the ferc through october 2019 for short-term borrowings not to exceed an aggregate amount of $ 150 million at any time outstanding and long-term borrowings and securities issuances . see note 4 to the financial statements for further discussion of entergy new orleans 2019s short-term borrowing limits . the long-term securities issuances of entergy new orleans are limited to amounts authorized not only by the ferc , but also by the city council , and the current city council authorization extends through june 2018 . entergy new orleans , llc and subsidiaries management 2019s financial discussion and analysis state and local rate regulation the rates that entergy new orleans charges for electricity and natural gas significantly influence its financial position , results of operations , and liquidity . entergy new orleans is regulated and the rates charged to its customers are determined in regulatory proceedings . a governmental agency , the city council , is primarily responsible for approval of the rates charged to customers . retail rates see 201calgiers asset transfer 201d below for discussion of the algiers asset transfer . as a provision of the settlement agreement approved by the city council in may 2015 providing for the algiers asset transfer , it was agreed that , with limited exceptions , no action may be taken with respect to entergy new orleans 2019s base rates until rates are implemented . Question: w h a t w a s t h e a v e r a g e e n t e r g y n e w o r l e a n s 2 0 1 9 s r e c e i v a b l e s f r o m t h e m o n e y p o o l f r o m 2 0 1 4 t o 2 0 1 7	5,023
3.3%	Given the context, answer the question. Context: table of contents marketaxess holdings inc . notes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) of this standard had no material effect on the company 2019s consolidated statements of financial condition and consolidated statements of operations . reclassifications certain reclassifications have been made to the prior years 2019 financial statements in order to conform to the current year presentation . such reclassifications had no effect on previously reported net income . on march 5 , 2008 , the company acquired all of the outstanding capital stock of greenline financial technologies , inc . ( 201cgreenline 201d ) , an illinois-based provider of integration , testing and management solutions for fix-related products and services designed to optimize electronic trading of fixed-income , equity and other exchange-based products , and approximately ten percent of the outstanding capital stock of tradehelm , inc. , a delaware corporation that was spun-out from greenline immediately prior to the acquisition . the acquisition of greenline broadens the range of technology services that the company offers to institutional financial markets , provides an expansion of the company 2019s client base , including global exchanges and hedge funds , and further diversifies the company 2019s revenues beyond the core electronic credit trading products . the results of operations of greenline are included in the consolidated financial statements from the date of the acquisition . the aggregate consideration for the greenline acquisition was $ 41.1 million , comprised of $ 34.7 million in cash , 725923 shares of common stock valued at $ 5.8 million and $ 0.6 million of acquisition-related costs . in addition , the sellers were eligible to receive up to an aggregate of $ 3.0 million in cash , subject to greenline attaining certain earn- out targets in 2008 and 2009 . a total of $ 1.4 million was paid to the sellers in 2009 based on the 2008 earn-out target , bringing the aggregate consideration to $ 42.4 million . the 2009 earn-out target was not met . a total of $ 2.0 million of the purchase price , which had been deposited into escrow accounts to satisfy potential indemnity claims , was distributed to the sellers in march 2009 . the shares of common stock issued to each selling shareholder of greenline were released in two equal installments on december 20 , 2008 and december 20 , 2009 , respectively . the value ascribed to the shares was discounted from the market value to reflect the non-marketability of such shares during the restriction period . the purchase price allocation is as follows ( in thousands ) : the amortizable intangibles include $ 3.2 million of acquired technology , $ 3.3 million of customer relationships , $ 1.3 million of non-competition agreements and $ 0.5 million of tradenames . useful lives of ten years and five years have been assigned to the customer relationships intangible and all other amortizable intangibles , respectively . the identifiable intangible assets and goodwill are not deductible for tax purposes . the following unaudited pro forma consolidated financial information reflects the results of operations of the company for the years ended december 31 , 2008 and 2007 , as if the acquisition of greenline had occurred as of the beginning of the period presented , after giving effect to certain purchase accounting adjustments . these pro forma results are not necessarily indicative of what the company 2019s operating results would have been had the acquisition actually taken place as of the beginning of the earliest period presented . the pro forma financial information 3 . acquisitions . cash \| $ 6406 accounts receivable \| 2139 amortizable intangibles \| 8330 goodwill \| 29405 deferred tax assets net \| 3410 other assets including investment in tradehelm \| 1429 accounts payable accrued expenses and deferred revenue \| -8701 ( 8701 ) total purchase price \| $ 42418 . Question: w h a t p e r c e n t a g e o f t h e a g g r e g a t e c o n s i d e r a t i o n f o r t h e g r e e n l i n e a c q u i s i t i o n w a s p a i d t o t h e s e l l e r s i n 2 0 0 9 b a s e d o n t h e 2 0 0 8 e a r n - o u t t a r g e t ?	5,024
46.6%	Given the context, answer the question. Context: visa inc . notes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) september 30 , 2008 ( in millions , except as noted ) require the company to redeem all class c ( series ii ) common stock at any time after december 4 , 2008 . therefore , in march 2008 , the company reclassified all class c ( series ii ) common stock at its then fair value of $ 1.125 billion to temporary equity on the company 2019s consolidated balance sheet with a corresponding reduction in additional paid-in-capital of $ 1.104 billion and accumulated income ( deficit ) of $ 21 million . the company accreted this stock to its redemption price of $ 1.146 billion , adjusted for dividends and certain other adjustments , on a straight-line basis , from march 2008 to october 2008 through accumulated income . see note 4 2014visa europe for a roll-forward of the balance of class c ( series ii ) common stock . the following table sets forth the number of shares of common stock issued and outstanding by class at september 30 , 2008 and the impact of the october 2008 redemptions and subsequent conversion of the remaining outstanding shares of class c ( series iii and series iv ) to class c ( series i ) shares and the number of shares of common stock issued and outstanding after the october 2008 redemptions in total and on as converted basis : shares issued and outstanding september 30 , october 2008 redemptions conversion to class c ( series i ) following immediate conversion to class c ( series i ) converted post october redemptions . shares issued and outstanding \| at september 30 2008 \| october 2008 redemptions \| conversion to class c ( series i ) \| following immediate conversion to class c ( series i ) \| as converted post october 2008 redemptions class a common stock \| 447746261 \| 2014 \| 2014 \| 447746261 \| 447746261 class b common stock ( 1 ) \| 245513385 \| 2014 \| 2014 \| 245513385 \| 175367482 class c ( series i ) common stock \| 124097105 \| 2014 \| 27499203 \| 151596308 \| 151596308 class c ( series ii ) common stock \| 79748857 \| -79748857 ( 79748857 ) \| 2014 \| 2014 \| 2014 class c ( series iii ) common stock \| 62213201 \| -35263585 ( 35263585 ) \| -26949616 ( 26949616 ) \| 2014 \| 2014 class c ( series iv ) common stock \| 549587 \| 2014 \| -549587 ( 549587 ) \| 2014 \| 2014 total shares issued and outstanding \| 959868396 \| -115012442 ( 115012442 ) \| 2014 \| 844855954 \| 774710051 ( 1 ) all voting and dividend payment rights are based on the number of shares held multiplied by the applicable conversion rate in effect on the record date , as discussed below . subsequent to the ipo and as a result of the initial funding of the litigation escrow account , the conversion rate applicable to class b common stock was approximately 0.71 shares of class a common stock for each share of class b common stock . special ipo cash and stock dividends received from cost method investees , net of tax several of the company 2019s cost method investees are also holders of class c ( series i ) common stock and therefore participated in the initial share redemption in march 2008 . certain of these investees elected to declare a special cash dividend to return to their owners on a pro rata basis , the proceeds received as a result of the redemption of a portion of their class c ( series i ) common stock . the dividends represent the return of redemption proceeds . as a result of the company 2019s ownership interest in these cost method investees , the company received approximately $ 21 million of special dividends from these investees during the third fiscal quarter and recorded a receivable of $ 8 million in prepaid and other assets on its consolidated balance sheet at september 30 , 2008 for a dividend declared by these investees during the fourth fiscal quarter . in addition , another investee elected to distribute its entire ownership in the company 2019s class c ( series i ) common stock through the distribution of these shares to its investors on a pro rata basis . as a result , the company received 525443 shares of its own class c ( series i ) common stock during the fourth fiscal quarter and recorded $ 35 million in treasury stock . the value of the treasury stock was calculated based on sales prices of other recent class c ( series i ) stock transactions by other class c . Question: w h a t p o r t i o n o f t h e t o t a l s h a r e s i s s u e d a n d o u t s t a n d i n g a r e c l a s s a c o m m o n s t o c k ?	5,025
46.2%	Given the context, answer the question. Context: notes to consolidated financial statements 2013 ( continued ) ( amounts in millions , except per share amounts ) guarantees we have guaranteed certain obligations of our subsidiaries relating principally to operating leases and credit facilities of certain subsidiaries . the amount of parent company guarantees on lease obligations was $ 857.3 and $ 619.4 as of december 31 , 2016 and 2015 , respectively , and the amount of parent company guarantees primarily relating to credit facilities was $ 395.6 and $ 336.5 as of december 31 , 2016 and 2015 , respectively . in the event of non-payment by the applicable subsidiary of the obligations covered by a guarantee , we would be obligated to pay the amounts covered by that guarantee . as of december 31 , 2016 , there were no material assets pledged as security for such parent company guarantees . contingent acquisition obligations the following table details the estimated future contingent acquisition obligations payable in cash as of december 31 . \| 2017 \| 2018 \| 2019 \| 2020 \| 2021 \| thereafter \| total deferred acquisition payments \| $ 76.9 \| $ 31.6 \| $ 25.1 \| $ 8.9 \| $ 26.9 \| $ 11.4 \| $ 180.8 redeemable noncontrolling interests and call options with affiliates1 \| 34.7 \| 76.5 \| 32.9 \| 3.9 \| 3.1 \| 4.2 \| 155.3 total contingent acquisition payments \| $ 111.6 \| $ 108.1 \| $ 58.0 \| $ 12.8 \| $ 30.0 \| $ 15.6 \| $ 336.1 1 we have entered into certain acquisitions that contain both redeemable noncontrolling interests and call options with similar terms and conditions . the estimated amounts listed would be paid in the event of exercise at the earliest exercise date . we have certain redeemable noncontrolling interests that are exercisable at the discretion of the noncontrolling equity owners as of december 31 , 2016 . these estimated payments of $ 25.9 are included within the total payments expected to be made in 2017 , and will continue to be carried forward into 2018 or beyond until exercised or expired . redeemable noncontrolling interests are included in the table at current exercise price payable in cash , not at applicable redemption value in accordance with the authoritative guidance for classification and measurement of redeemable securities . the majority of these payments are contingent upon achieving projected operating performance targets and satisfying other conditions specified in the related agreements and are subject to revision in accordance with the terms of the respective agreements . see note 4 for further information relating to the payment structure of our acquisitions . legal matters in the normal course of business , we are involved in various legal proceedings , and subject to investigations , inspections , audits , inquiries and similar actions by governmental authorities . the types of allegations that arise in connection with such legal proceedings vary in nature , but can include claims related to contract , employment , tax and intellectual property matters . we evaluate all cases each reporting period and record liabilities for losses from legal proceedings when we determine that it is probable that the outcome in a legal proceeding will be unfavorable and the amount , or potential range , of loss can be reasonably estimated . in certain cases , we cannot reasonably estimate the potential loss because , for example , the litigation is in its early stages . while any outcome related to litigation or such governmental proceedings in which we are involved cannot be predicted with certainty , management believes that the outcome of these matters , individually and in the aggregate , will not have a material adverse effect on our financial condition , results of operations or cash flows . as previously disclosed , on april 10 , 2015 , a federal judge in brazil authorized the search of the records of an agency 2019s offices in s e3o paulo and brasilia , in connection with an ongoing investigation by brazilian authorities involving payments potentially connected to local government contracts . the company had previously investigated the matter and taken a number of remedial and disciplinary actions . the company is in the process of concluding a settlement related to these matters with government agencies . the company confirmed that one of its standalone domestic agencies has been contacted by the department of justice antitrust division for documents regarding video production practices and is cooperating with the government. . Question: w h a t p o r t i o n o f t o t a l c o n t i n g e n t a c q u i s i t i o n p a y m e n t s i s u s e d f o r r e d e e m a b l e n o n c o n t r o l l i n g i n t e r e s t s a n d c a l l o p t i o n s ?	5,026
9	Given the context, answer the question. Context: individual loan before being modified as a tdr in the discounted cash flow analysis in order to determine that specific loan 2019s expected impairment . specifically , a loan that has a more severe delinquency history prior to modification will have a higher future default rate in the discounted cash flow analysis than a loan that was not as severely delinquent . for both of the one- to four-family and home equity loan portfolio segments , the pre- modification delinquency status , the borrower 2019s current credit score and other credit bureau attributes , in addition to each loan 2019s individual default experience and credit characteristics , are incorporated into the calculation of the specific allowance . a specific allowance is established to the extent that the recorded investment exceeds the discounted cash flows of a tdr with a corresponding charge to provision for loan losses . the specific allowance for these individually impaired loans represents the forecasted losses over the estimated remaining life of the loan , including the economic concession to the borrower . effects if actual results differ historic volatility in the credit markets has substantially increased the complexity and uncertainty involved in estimating the losses inherent in the loan portfolio . in the current market it is difficult to estimate how potential changes in the quantitative and qualitative factors , including the impact of home equity lines of credit converting from interest only to amortizing loans or requiring borrowers to repay the loan in full at the end of the draw period , might impact the allowance for loan losses . if our underlying assumptions and judgments prove to be inaccurate , the allowance for loan losses could be insufficient to cover actual losses . we may be required under such circumstances to further increase the provision for loan losses , which could have an adverse effect on the regulatory capital position and results of operations in future periods . during the normal course of conducting examinations , our banking regulators , the occ and federal reserve , continue to review our business and practices . this process is dynamic and ongoing and we cannot be certain that additional changes or actions will not result from their continuing review . valuation of goodwill and other intangible assets description goodwill and other intangible assets are evaluated for impairment on an annual basis as of november 30 and in interim periods when events or changes indicate the carrying value may not be recoverable , such as a significant deterioration in the operating environment or a decision to sell or dispose of a reporting unit . goodwill and other intangible assets net of amortization were $ 1.8 billion and $ 0.2 billion , respectively , at december 31 , 2013 . judgments goodwill is allocated to reporting units , which are components of the business that are one level below operating segments . reporting units are evaluated for impairment individually during the annual assessment . estimating the fair value of reporting units and the assets , liabilities and intangible assets of a reporting unit is a subjective process that involves the use of estimates and judgments , particularly related to cash flows , the appropriate discount rates and an applicable control premium . management judgment is required to assess whether the carrying value of the reporting unit can be supported by the fair value of the individual reporting unit . there are various valuation methodologies , such as the market approach or discounted cash flow methods , that may be used to estimate the fair value of reporting units . in applying these methodologies , we utilize a number of factors , including actual operating results , future business plans , economic projections , and market data . the following table shows the comparative data for the amount of goodwill allocated to our reporting units ( dollars in millions ) : . reporting unit \| december 31 , 2013 \| december 31 , 2012 retail brokerage \| $ 1791.8 \| $ 1791.8 market making \| 2014 \| 142.4 total goodwill \| $ 1791.8 \| $ 1934.2 . Question: a s o f d e c e m b e r 3 1 , 2 0 1 3 w h a t w a s t h e r a t i o o f t h e g o o d w i l l t o t h e o t h e r i n t a n g i b l e a s s e t s n e t o f a m o r t i z a t i o n	5,027
53.1	Given the context, answer the question. Context: system energy resources , inc . management 2019s financial discussion and analysis also in addition to the contractual obligations , system energy has $ 382.3 million of unrecognized tax benefits and interest net of unused tax attributes and payments for which the timing of payments beyond 12 months cannot be reasonably estimated due to uncertainties in the timing of effective settlement of tax positions . see note 3 to the financial statements for additional information regarding unrecognized tax benefits . in addition to routine spending to maintain operations , the planned capital investment estimate includes specific investments and initiatives such as the nuclear fleet operational excellence initiative , as discussed below in 201cnuclear matters , 201d and plant improvements . as a wholly-owned subsidiary , system energy dividends its earnings to entergy corporation at a percentage determined monthly . sources of capital system energy 2019s sources to meet its capital requirements include : 2022 internally generated funds ; 2022 cash on hand ; 2022 debt issuances ; and 2022 bank financing under new or existing facilities . system energy may refinance , redeem , or otherwise retire debt prior to maturity , to the extent market conditions and interest and dividend rates are favorable . all debt and common stock issuances by system energy require prior regulatory approval . debt issuances are also subject to issuance tests set forth in its bond indentures and other agreements . system energy has sufficient capacity under these tests to meet its foreseeable capital needs . system energy 2019s receivables from the money pool were as follows as of december 31 for each of the following years. . 2016 \| 2015 \| 2014 \| 2013 ( in thousands ) \| ( in thousands ) \| ( in thousands ) \| ( in thousands ) $ 33809 \| $ 39926 \| $ 2373 \| $ 9223 see note 4 to the financial statements for a description of the money pool . the system energy nuclear fuel company variable interest entity has a credit facility in the amount of $ 120 million scheduled to expire in may 2019 . as of december 31 , 2016 , $ 66.9 million in letters of credit were outstanding under the credit facility to support a like amount of commercial paper issued by the system energy nuclear fuel company variable interest entity . see note 4 to the financial statements for additional discussion of the variable interest entity credit facility . system energy obtained authorizations from the ferc through october 2017 for the following : 2022 short-term borrowings not to exceed an aggregate amount of $ 200 million at any time outstanding ; 2022 long-term borrowings and security issuances ; and 2022 long-term borrowings by its nuclear fuel company variable interest entity . see note 4 to the financial statements for further discussion of system energy 2019s short-term borrowing limits. . Question: a s o f d e c e m b e r 3 1 , 2 0 1 6 , w h a t i s t h e r e m a i n i n g c a p a c i t y ( i n m i l l i o n s ) f o r t h e c r e d i t f a c i l i t y s c h e d u l e d t o e x p i r e i n m a y 2 0 1 9 ?	5,028
39%	Given the context, answer the question. Context: fortron industries llc . fortron is a leading global producer of pps , sold under the fortron ae brand , which is used in a wide variety of automotive and other applications , especially those requiring heat and/or chemical resistance . fortron's facility is located in wilmington , north carolina . this venture combines the sales , marketing , distribution , compounding and manufacturing expertise of celanese with the pps polymer technology expertise of kureha america inc . cellulose derivatives strategic ventures . our cellulose derivatives ventures generally fund their operations using operating cash flow and pay dividends based on each ventures' performance in the preceding year . in 2014 , 2013 and 2012 , we received cash dividends of $ 115 million , $ 92 million and $ 83 million , respectively . although our ownership interest in each of our cellulose derivatives ventures exceeds 20% ( 20 % ) , we account for these investments using the cost method of accounting because we determined that we cannot exercise significant influence over these entities due to local government investment in and influence over these entities , limitations on our involvement in the day-to-day operations and the present inability of the entities to provide timely financial information prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles in the united states of america ( "us gaap" ) . 2022 other equity method investments infraservs . we hold indirect ownership interests in several german infraserv groups that own and develop industrial parks and provide on-site general and administrative support to tenants . our ownership interest in the equity investments in infraserv affiliates are as follows : as of december 31 , 2014 ( in percentages ) . \| as of december 31 2014 ( in percentages ) infraserv gmbh & co . gendorf kg \| 39 infraserv gmbh & co . hoechst kg \| 32 infraserv gmbh & co . knapsack kg \| 27 research and development our businesses are innovation-oriented and conduct research and development activities to develop new , and optimize existing , production technologies , as well as to develop commercially viable new products and applications . research and development expense was $ 86 million , $ 85 million and $ 104 million for the years ended december 31 , 2014 , 2013 and 2012 , respectively . we consider the amounts spent during each of the last three fiscal years on research and development activities to be sufficient to execute our current strategic initiatives . intellectual property we attach importance to protecting our intellectual property , including safeguarding our confidential information and through our patents , trademarks and copyrights , in order to preserve our investment in research and development , manufacturing and marketing . patents may cover processes , equipment , products , intermediate products and product uses . we also seek to register trademarks as a means of protecting the brand names of our company and products . patents . in most industrial countries , patent protection exists for new substances and formulations , as well as for certain unique applications and production processes . however , we do business in regions of the world where intellectual property protection may be limited and difficult to enforce . confidential information . we maintain stringent information security policies and procedures wherever we do business . such information security policies and procedures include data encryption , controls over the disclosure and safekeeping of confidential information and trade secrets , as well as employee awareness training . trademarks . aoplus ae , aoplus ae2 , aoplus ae3 , ateva ae , avicor ae , britecoat ae , celanese ae , celanex ae , celcon ae , celfx 2122 , celstran ae , celvolit ae , clarifoil ae , duroset ae , ecovae ae , factor ae , fortron ae , gur ae , hostaform ae , impet ae , mowilith ae , nutrinova ae , qorus 2122 , riteflex ae , sunett ae , tcx 2122 , thermx ae , tufcor ae , vantage ae , vantageplus 2122 , vantage ae2 , vectra ae , vinamul ae , vitaldose ae , zenite ae and certain other branded products and services named in this document are registered or reserved trademarks or service marks owned or licensed by celanese . the foregoing is not intended to be an exhaustive or comprehensive list of all registered or reserved trademarks and service marks owned or licensed by celanese . fortron ae is a registered trademark of fortron industries llc. . Question: w h a t w a s t h e p e r c e n t a g e g r o w t h o f t h e c a s h d i v i d e n d s f r o m 2 0 1 2 t o 2 0 1 4	5,029
51.2%	Given the context, answer the question. Context: organizations evaluate whether transactions should be accounted for as acquisitions ( or disposals ) of assets or businesses , with the expectation that fewer will qualify as acquisitions ( or disposals ) of businesses . the asu became effective for us on january 1 , 2018 . these amendments will be applied prospectively from the date of adoption . the effect of asu 2017-01 will be dependent upon the nature of future acquisitions or dispositions that we make , if any . in october 2016 , the fasb issued asu 2016-16 , 201cincome taxes ( topic 740 ) : intra-entity transfers of assets other than inventory . 201d the amendments in this update state that an entity should recognize the income tax consequences of an intra-entity transfer of an asset other than inventory , such as intellectual property and property and equipment , when the transfer occurs . we will adopt asu 2016-16 effective january 1 , 2018 with no expected effect on our consolidated financial statements . in june 2016 , the fasb issued asu 2016-13 , 201cfinancial instruments - credit losses ( topic 326 ) : measurement of credit losses on financial instruments . 201d the amendments in this update change how companies measure and recognize credit impairment for many financial assets . the new expected credit loss model will require companies to immediately recognize an estimate of credit losses expected to occur over the remaining life of the financial assets ( including trade receivables ) that are in the scope of the update . the update also made amendments to the current impairment model for held-to-maturity and available-for-sale debt securities and certain guarantees . the guidance will become effective for us on january 1 , 2020 . early adoption is permitted for periods beginning on or after january 1 , 2019 . we are evaluating the effect of asu 2016-13 on our consolidated financial statements . in january 2016 , the fasb issued asu 2016-01 , 201cfinancial instruments - overall ( subtopic 825-10 ) : recognition and measurement of financial assets and financial liabilities . 201d the amendments in this update address certain aspects of recognition , measurement , presentation and disclosure of financial instruments . the amendments in this update supersede the guidance to classify equity securities with readily determinable fair values into different categories ( that is , trading or available-for-sale ) and require equity securities ( including other ownership interests , such as partnerships , unincorporated joint ventures and limited liability companies ) to be measured at fair value with changes in the fair value recognized through earnings . equity investments that are accounted for under the equity method of accounting or result in consolidation of an investee are not included within the scope of this update . the amendments allow equity investments that do not have readily determinable fair values to be remeasured at fair value either upon the occurrence of an observable price change or upon identification of an impairment . the amendments also require enhanced disclosures about those investments . we will adopt asu 2016-01 effective january 1 , 2018 with no expected effect on our consolidated financial statements . note 2 2014 acquisitions active network we acquired the communities and sports divisions of athlaction topco , llc ( 201cactive network 201d ) on september 1 , 2017 , for total purchase consideration of $ 1.2 billion . active network delivers cloud-based enterprise software , including payment technology solutions , to event organizers in the communities and health and fitness markets . this acquisition aligns with our technology-enabled , software driven strategy and adds an enterprise software business operating in two additional vertical markets that we believe offer attractive growth fundamentals . the following table summarizes the cash and non-cash components of the consideration transferred on september 1 , 2017 ( in thousands ) : . cash consideration paid to active network stockholders \| $ 599497 fair value of global payments common stock issued to active network stockholders \| 572079 total purchase consideration \| $ 1171576 we funded the cash portion of the total purchase consideration primarily by drawing on our revolving credit facility ( described in 201cnote 7 2014 long-term debt and lines of credit 201d ) . the acquisition-date fair value of 72 2013 global payments inc . \| 2017 form 10-k annual report . Question: w h a t p o r t i o n o f t h e t o t a l p u r c h a s e c o n s i d e r a t i o n i s p a i d i n c a s h ?	5,030

Subsets and Splits

No community queries yet

The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.