answer
stringlengths 1
13
| problem
stringlengths 666
16.3k
| __index_level_0__
int64 0
5.98k
|
|---|---|---|
51.15%
|
Given the context, answer the question.
Context: when the likelihood of clawback is considered mathematically improbable . the company records a deferred carried interest liability to the extent it receives cash or capital allocations related to carried interest prior to meeting the revenue recognition criteria . at december 31 , 2017 and 2016 , the company had $ 219 million and $ 152 million , respectively , of deferred carried interest recorded in other liabilities/other liabilities of consolidated vies on the consolidated statements of financial condition . a portion of the deferred carried interest liability will be paid to certain employees . the ultimate timing of the recognition of performance fee revenue , if any , for these products is unknown . the following table presents changes in the deferred carried interest liability ( including the portion related to consolidated vies ) for 2017 and 2016: .
( in millions ) | 2017 | 2016 beginning balance | $ 152 | $ 143 net increase ( decrease ) in unrealized allocations | 75 | 37 performance fee revenue recognized | -21 ( 21 ) | -28 ( 28 ) acquisition | 13 | 2014 ending balance | $ 219 | $ 152
for 2017 , 2016 and 2015 , performance fee revenue ( which included recognized carried interest ) totaled $ 594 million , $ 295 million and $ 621 million , respectively . fees earned for technology and risk management revenue are recorded as services are performed and are generally determined using the value of positions on the aladdin platform or on a fixed-rate basis . for 2017 , 2016 and 2016 , technology and risk management revenue totaled $ 677 million , $ 595 million and $ 528 million , respectively . adjustments to revenue arising from initial estimates recorded historically have been immaterial since the majority of blackrock 2019s investment advisory and administration revenue is calculated based on aum and since the company does not record performance fee revenue until performance thresholds have been exceeded and the likelihood of clawback is mathematically improbable . accounting developments recent accounting pronouncements not yet adopted . revenue from contracts with customers . in may 2014 , the financial accounting standards board ( 201cfasb 201d ) issued accounting standards update ( 201casu 201d ) 2014-09 , revenue from contracts with customers ( 201casu 2014-09 201d ) . asu 2014-09 outlines a single comprehensive model for entities to use in accounting for revenue arising from contracts with customers and supersedes most current revenue recognition guidance , including industry-specific guidance . the guidance also changes the accounting for certain contract costs and revises the criteria for determining if an entity is acting as a principal or agent in certain arrangements . the key changes in the standard that impact the company 2019s revenue recognition relate to the presentation of certain revenue contracts and associated contract costs . the most significant of these changes relates to the presentation of certain distribution costs , which are currently presented net against revenues ( contra-revenue ) and will be presented as an expense on a gross basis . the company adopted asu 2014-09 effective january 1 , 2018 on a full retrospective basis , which will require 2016 and 2017 to be restated in future filings . the cumulative effect adjustment to the 2016 opening retained earnings was not material . the company currently expects the net gross up to revenue to be approximately $ 1 billion with a corresponding gross up to expense for both 2016 and 2017 . consequently , the company expects its gaap operating margin to decline upon adoption due to the gross up of revenue . however , no material impact is expected on the company 2019s as adjusted operating margin . for accounting pronouncements that the company adopted during the year ended december 31 , 2017 and for additional recent accounting pronouncements not yet adopted , see note 2 , significant accounting policies , in the consolidated financial statements contained in part ii , item 8 of this filing . item 7a . quantitative and qualitative disclosures about market risk aum market price risk . blackrock 2019s investment advisory and administration fees are primarily comprised of fees based on a percentage of the value of aum and , in some cases , performance fees expressed as a percentage of the returns realized on aum . at december 31 , 2017 , the majority of the company 2019s investment advisory and administration fees were based on average or period end aum of the applicable investment funds or separate accounts . movements in equity market prices , interest rates/credit spreads , foreign exchange rates or all three could cause the value of aum to decline , which would result in lower investment advisory and administration fees . corporate investments portfolio risks . as a leading investment management firm , blackrock devotes significant resources across all of its operations to identifying , measuring , monitoring , managing and analyzing market and operating risks , including the management and oversight of its own investment portfolio . the board of directors of the company has adopted guidelines for the review of investments to be made by the company , requiring , among other things , that investments be reviewed by certain senior officers of the company , and that certain investments may be referred to the audit committee or the board of directors , depending on the circumstances , for approval . in the normal course of its business , blackrock is exposed to equity market price risk , interest rate/credit spread risk and foreign exchange rate risk associated with its corporate investments . blackrock has investments primarily in sponsored investment products that invest in a variety of asset classes , including real assets , private equity and hedge funds . investments generally are made for co-investment purposes , to establish a performance track record , to hedge exposure to certain deferred compensation plans or for regulatory purposes . currently , the company has a seed capital hedging program in which it enters into swaps to hedge market and interest rate exposure to certain investments . at december 31 , 2017 , the company had outstanding total return swaps with an aggregate notional value of approximately $ 587 million . at december 31 , 2017 , there were no outstanding interest rate swaps. .
Question: w h a t p e r c e n t d i d t h e b a l a n c e i n c r e a s e f r o m t h e b e g i n n i n g o f 2 0 1 6 t o t h e e n d o f 2 0 1 7 ?
| 5,132 |
2.5%
|
Given the context, answer the question.
Context: the goldman sachs group , inc . and subsidiaries management 2019s discussion and analysis scenario analyses . we conduct various scenario analyses including as part of the comprehensive capital analysis and review ( ccar ) and dodd-frank act stress tests ( dfast ) , as well as our resolution and recovery planning . see 201cequity capital management and regulatory capital 2014 equity capital management 201d below for further information about these scenario analyses . these scenarios cover short-term and long-term time horizons using various macroeconomic and firm-specific assumptions , based on a range of economic scenarios . we use these analyses to assist us in developing our longer-term balance sheet management strategy , including the level and composition of assets , funding and equity capital . additionally , these analyses help us develop approaches for maintaining appropriate funding , liquidity and capital across a variety of situations , including a severely stressed environment . balance sheet allocation in addition to preparing our consolidated statements of financial condition in accordance with u.s . gaap , we prepare a balance sheet that generally allocates assets to our businesses , which is a non-gaap presentation and may not be comparable to similar non-gaap presentations used by other companies . we believe that presenting our assets on this basis is meaningful because it is consistent with the way management views and manages risks associated with our assets and better enables investors to assess the liquidity of our assets . the table below presents our balance sheet allocation. .
$ in millions | as of december 2016 | as of december 2015 global core liquid assets ( gcla ) | $ 226066 | $ 199120 other cash | 9088 | 9180 gcla and cash | 235154 | 208300 secured client financing | 199387 | 221325 inventory | 206988 | 208836 secured financing agreements | 65606 | 63495 receivables | 29592 | 39976 institutional client services | 302186 | 312307 public equity | 3224 | 3991 private equity | 18224 | 16985 debt | 21675 | 23216 loans receivable | 49672 | 45407 other | 5162 | 4646 investing & lending | 97957 | 94245 total inventory and relatedassets | 400143 | 406552 other assets | 25481 | 25218 total assets | $ 860165 | $ 861395
the following is a description of the captions in the table above : 2030 global core liquid assets and cash . we maintain liquidity to meet a broad range of potential cash outflows and collateral needs in a stressed environment . see 201cliquidity risk management 201d below for details on the composition and sizing of our 201cglobal core liquid assets 201d ( gcla ) . in addition to our gcla , we maintain other unrestricted operating cash balances , primarily for use in specific currencies , entities , or jurisdictions where we do not have immediate access to parent company liquidity . 2030 secured client financing . we provide collateralized financing for client positions , including margin loans secured by client collateral , securities borrowed , and resale agreements primarily collateralized by government obligations . we segregate cash and securities for regulatory and other purposes related to client activity . securities are segregated from our own inventory as well as from collateral obtained through securities borrowed or resale agreements . our secured client financing arrangements , which are generally short-term , are accounted for at fair value or at amounts that approximate fair value , and include daily margin requirements to mitigate counterparty credit risk . 2030 institutional client services . in institutional client services , we maintain inventory positions to facilitate market making in fixed income , equity , currency and commodity products . additionally , as part of market- making activities , we enter into resale or securities borrowing arrangements to obtain securities or use our own inventory to cover transactions in which we or our clients have sold securities that have not yet been purchased . the receivables in institutional client services primarily relate to securities transactions . 2030 investing & lending . in investing & lending , we make investments and originate loans to provide financing to clients . these investments and loans are typically longer- term in nature . we make investments , directly and indirectly through funds that we manage , in debt securities , loans , public and private equity securities , infrastructure , real estate entities and other investments . we also make unsecured loans to individuals through our online platform . debt includes $ 14.23 billion and $ 17.29 billion as of december 2016 and december 2015 , respectively , of direct loans primarily extended to corporate and private wealth management clients that are accounted for at fair value . loans receivable is comprised of loans held for investment that are accounted for at amortized cost net of allowance for loan losses . see note 9 to the consolidated financial statements for further information about loans receivable . goldman sachs 2016 form 10-k 67 .
Question: w h a t i s t h e d e b t - t o - t o t a l a s s e t r a t i o i n 2 0 1 6 ?
| 5,133 |
1.22
|
Given the context, answer the question.
Context: as described above , the borrowings are extended on a non-recourse basis . as such , there is no credit or market risk exposure to us on the assets , and as a result the terms of the amlf permit exclusion of the assets from regulatory leverage and risk-based capital calculations . the interest rate on the borrowings is set by the federal reserve bank , and we earn net interest revenue by earning a spread on the difference between the yield we earn on the assets and the rate we pay on the borrowings . for 2008 , we earned net interest revenue associated with this facility of approximately $ 68 million . separately , we currently maintain a commercial paper program under which we can issue up to $ 3 billion with original maturities of up to 270 days from the date of issue . at december 31 , 2008 and 2007 , $ 2.59 billion and $ 2.36 billion , respectively , of commercial paper were outstanding . in addition , state street bank currently has board authority to issue bank notes up to an aggregate of $ 5 billion , including up to $ 2.48 billion of senior notes under the fdic 2019s temporary liquidity guarantee program , instituted by the fdic in october 2008 for qualified senior debt issued through june 30 , 2009 , and up to $ 1 billion of subordinated bank notes ( see note 10 ) . at december 31 , 2008 and 2007 , no notes payable were outstanding , and at december 31 , 2008 , all $ 5 billion was available for issuance . state street bank currently maintains a line of credit of cad $ 800 million , or approximately $ 657 million , to support its canadian securities processing operations . the line of credit has no stated termination date and is cancelable by either party with prior notice . at december 31 , 2008 , no balance was due on this line of credit . note 9 . restructuring charges in december 2008 , we implemented a plan to reduce our expenses from operations and support our long- term growth . in connection with this plan , we recorded aggregate restructuring charges of $ 306 million in our consolidated statement of income . the primary component of the plan was an involuntary reduction of approximately 7% ( 7 % ) of our global workforce , which reduction we expect to be substantially completed by the end of the first quarter of 2009 . other components of the plan included costs related to lease and software license terminations , restructuring of agreements with technology providers and other costs . of the aggregate restructuring charges of $ 306 million , $ 243 million related to severance , a portion of which will be paid in a lump sum or over a defined period , and a portion of which will provide related benefits and outplacement services for approximately 2100 employees identified for involuntary termination in connection with the plan ; $ 49 million related to future lease obligations and write-offs of capitalized assets , including $ 23 million for impairment of other intangible assets ; $ 10 million of costs associated with information technology and $ 4 million of other restructuring costs . the severance component included $ 47 million related to accelerated vesting of equity-based compensation . in december 2008 , approximately 620 employees were involuntarily terminated and left state street . the following table presents the activity in the related balance sheet reserve for 2008 . ( in millions ) severance lease and write-offs information technology other total .
( in millions ) | severance | lease and asset write-offs | information technology | other | total initial accrual | $ 250 | $ 42 | $ 10 | $ 4 | $ 306 payments and adjustments | -20 ( 20 ) | -25 ( 25 ) | -10 ( 10 ) | -1 ( 1 ) | -56 ( 56 ) balance at december 31 2008 | $ 230 | $ 17 | 2014 | $ 3 | $ 250
.
Question: w h a t v a l u e o f c a d i s e q u a l t o $ 1 u s d ?
| 5,134 |
116.8
|
Given the context, answer the question.
Context: management 2019s discussion and analysis value of the company 2019s obligation relating to asbestos claims under the ppg settlement arrangement . the legal settlements net of insurance included aftertax charges of $ 80 million for the marvin legal settlement , net of insurance recoveries of $ 11 million , and $ 37 million for the impact of the federal glass class action antitrust legal settlement . results of reportable business segments net sales segment income ( millions ) 2006 2005 2006 2005 .
( millions ) | net sales 2006 | net sales 2005 | net sales 2006 | 2005 industrial coatings | $ 3236 | $ 2921 | $ 349 | $ 284 performance and applied coatings | 3088 | 2668 | 514 | 464 optical and specialty materials | 1001 | 867 | 223 | 158 commodity chemicals | 1483 | 1531 | 285 | 313 glass | 2229 | 2214 | 148 | 123
industrial coatings sales increased $ 315 million or 11% ( 11 % ) in 2006 . sales increased 4% ( 4 % ) due to acquisitions , 4% ( 4 % ) due to increased volumes in the automotive , industrial and packaging coatings operating segments , 2% ( 2 % ) due to higher selling prices , particularly in the industrial and packaging coatings businesses and 1% ( 1 % ) due to the positive effects of foreign currency translation . segment income increased $ 65 million in 2006 . the increase in segment income was primarily due to the impact of increased sales volume , lower overhead and manufacturing costs , and the impact of acquisitions . segment income was reduced by the adverse impact of inflation , which was substantially offset by higher selling prices . performance and applied coatings sales increased $ 420 million or 16% ( 16 % ) in 2006 . sales increased 8% ( 8 % ) due to acquisitions , 4% ( 4 % ) due to higher selling prices in the refinish , aerospace and architectural coatings operating segments , 3% ( 3 % ) due to increased volumes in our aerospace and architectural coatings businesses and 1% ( 1 % ) due to the positive effects of foreign currency translation . segment income increased $ 50 million in 2006 . the increase in segment income was primarily due to the impact of increased sales volume and higher selling prices , which more than offset the impact of inflation . segment income was reduced by increased overhead costs to support growth in our architectural coatings business . optical and specialty materials sales increased $ 134 million or 15% ( 15 % ) in 2006 . sales increased 10% ( 10 % ) due to higher volumes , particularly in optical products and fine chemicals and 5% ( 5 % ) due to acquisitions in our optical products business . segment income increased $ 65 million in 2006 . the absence of the 2005 charge for an asset impairment in our fine chemicals business increased segment income by $ 27 million . the remaining $ 38 million increase in segment income was primarily due to increased volumes , lower manufacturing costs , and the absence of the 2005 hurricane costs of $ 3 million , net of 2006 insurance recoveries , which were only partially offset by increased overhead costs in our optical products business to support growth and the negative impact of inflation . commodity chemicals sales decreased $ 48 million or 3% ( 3 % ) in 2006 . sales decreased 4% ( 4 % ) due to lower chlor-alkali volumes and increased 1% ( 1 % ) due to higher selling prices . segment income decreased $ 28 million in 2006 . the year- over-year decline in segment income was due primarily to lower sales volumes and higher manufacturing costs associated with reduced production levels . the absence of the 2005 charges for direct costs related to hurricanes increased segment income by $ 29 million . the impact of higher selling prices ; lower inflation , primarily natural gas costs , and an insurance recovery of $ 10 million related to the 2005 hurricane losses also increased segment income in 2006 . our fourth-quarter chlor-alkali sales volumes and earnings were negatively impacted by production outages at several customers over the last two months of 2006 . it is uncertain when some of these customers will return to a normal level of production which may impact the sales and earnings of our chlor-alkali business in early 2007 . glass sales increased $ 15 million or 1% ( 1 % ) in 2006 . sales increased 1% ( 1 % ) due to improved volumes resulting from a combination of organic growth and an acquisition . a slight positive impact on sales due to foreign currency translation offset a slight decline in pricing . volumes increased in the performance glazings , automotive replacement glass and services and fiber glass businesses . automotive oem glass volume declined during 2006 . pricing was also up in performance glazings , but declined in the other glass businesses . segment income increased $ 25 million in 2006 . this increase in segment income was primarily the result of higher equity earnings from our asian fiber glass joint ventures , higher royalty income and lower manufacturing and natural gas costs , which more than offset the negative impacts of higher inflation , lower margin mix of sales and reduced selling prices . our fiber glass operating segment made progress during 2006 in achieving our multi-year plan to improve profitability and cash flow . a transformation of our supply chain , which includes production of a more focused product mix at each manufacturing plant , manufacturing cost reduction initiatives and improved equity earnings from our asian joint ventures are the primary focus and represent the critical success factors in this plan . during 2006 , our new joint venture in china started producing high labor content fiber glass reinforcement products , which will allow us to refocus our u.s . production capacity on higher margin , direct process products . the 2006 earnings improvement by our fiber glass operating segment accounted for the bulk of the 2006 improvement in the glass reportable business segment income . 20 2006 ppg annual report and form 10-k 4282_txt .
Question: w h a t w a s t h e v o l u m e i m p a c t o n s a l e s i n t h e i n d u s t r i a l c o a t i n g s s e g m e n t ( m i l l i o n s ) ?
| 5,135 |
341489
|
Given the context, answer the question.
Context: american tower corporation and subsidiaries notes to consolidated financial statements ( 3 ) consists of customer-related intangibles of approximately $ 75.0 million and network location intangibles of approximately $ 72.7 million . the customer-related intangibles and network location intangibles are being amortized on a straight-line basis over periods of up to 20 years . ( 4 ) the company expects that the goodwill recorded will be deductible for tax purposes . the goodwill was allocated to the company 2019s international rental and management segment . on september 12 , 2012 , the company entered into a definitive agreement to purchase up to approximately 348 additional communications sites from telef f3nica mexico . on september 27 , 2012 and december 14 , 2012 , the company completed the purchase of 279 and 2 communications sites , for an aggregate purchase price of $ 63.5 million ( including value added tax of $ 8.8 million ) . the following table summarizes the preliminary allocation of the aggregate purchase consideration paid and the amounts of assets acquired and liabilities assumed based upon their estimated fair value at the date of acquisition ( in thousands ) : preliminary purchase price allocation .
| preliminary purchase price allocation current assets | $ 8763 non-current assets | 2332 property and equipment | 26711 intangible assets ( 1 ) | 21079 other non-current liabilities | -1349 ( 1349 ) fair value of net assets acquired | $ 57536 goodwill ( 2 ) | 5998
( 1 ) consists of customer-related intangibles of approximately $ 10.7 million and network location intangibles of approximately $ 10.4 million . the customer-related intangibles and network location intangibles are being amortized on a straight-line basis over periods of up to 20 years . ( 2 ) the company expects that the goodwill recorded will be deductible for tax purposes . the goodwill was allocated to the company 2019s international rental and management segment . on november 16 , 2012 , the company entered into an agreement to purchase up to 198 additional communications sites from telef f3nica mexico . on december 14 , 2012 , the company completed the purchase of 188 communications sites , for an aggregate purchase price of $ 64.2 million ( including value added tax of $ 8.9 million ) . .
Question: f o r t h e d e c e m b e r 1 4 , 2 0 1 2 p u r c h a s e , w h a t w a s t h e a v e r a g e c o s t o f t h e c o m m u n i c a t i o n s s i t e s a c q u i r e d ?
| 5,136 |
68%
|
Given the context, answer the question.
Context: ) increased net cash flows from receivables from improved days sales outstanding offsetting increased sales levels ; partially offset by reduced cash flows from increases in inventories to build new product lines and support increased sales levels . cash provided by operating activities in 2003 decreased $ 8.4 million from 2002 due primarily to : ) reduced cash inflows from accounts receivable securitization ; and ) reduced cash inflows from increases in inventories partially offset by : ) higher earnings in 2003 before non-cash charges and credits ; ) decreased net cash outflows from accounts and other receivables ; and ) decreased net cash outflows from accounts payable and accrued expenses . net cash used in investing activities in 2004 consisted primarily of the acquisition of pvt and the purchase of ev3 2019s technology of $ 137.7 million , and capital expenditures of $ 42.5 million . net cash used in investing activities in 2003 consisted primarily of the acquisition of jomed , whitland and embol-x , inc . of $ 33.2 million , and capital expenditures of $ 37.9 million . net cash used in financing activities in 2004 consisted primarily of purchases of treasury stock of $ 59.1 million , partially offset by proceeds from stock plans of $ 30.5 million and net proceeds from issuance of long-term debt of $ 7.1 million . cash used in financing activities in 2003 consisted primarily of purchases of treasury stock of $ 49.4 million and net payments on debt of $ 4.0 million , partially offset by proceeds from stock plans of $ 36.6 million . a summary of all of the company 2019s contractual obligations and commercial commitments as of december 31 , 2004 were as follows ( in millions ) : .
contractual obligations | payments due by period total | payments due by period less than 1 year | payments due by period 1-3 years | payments due by period 4-5 years | payments due by period after 5 years long-term debt | $ 267.1 | $ 2014 | $ 2014 | $ 2014 | $ 267.1 interest on long-term debt | 30.9 | 11.2 | 15.4 | 4.3 | 2014 operating leases | 49.8 | 13.1 | 20.4 | 15.2 | 1.1 unconditional purchase obligations ( a ) | 15.1 | 7.5 | 7.6 | 2014 | 2014 contractual development obligations ( b ) | 31.9 | 4.3 | 3.6 | 4.0 | 20.0 total contractual cash obligations | $ 394.8 | $ 36.1 | $ 47.0 | $ 23.5 | $ 288.2
less than after contractual obligations total 1 year 1-3 years 4-5 years 5 years long-term debt *************************** $ 267.1 $ 2014 $ 2014 $ 2014 $ 267.1 interest on long-term debt ****************** 30.9 11.2 15.4 4.3 2014 operating leases*************************** 49.8 13.1 20.4 15.2 1.1 unconditional purchase obligations ( a ) ********* 15.1 7.5 7.6 2014 2014 contractual development obligations ( b ) ******** 31.9 4.3 3.6 4.0 20.0 total contractual cash obligations************* $ 394.8 $ 36.1 $ 47.0 $ 23.5 $ 288.2 ( a ) unconditional purchase obligations consist primarily of minimum purchase commitments of inventory . ( b ) contractual development obligations consist primarily of cash that edwards lifesciences is obligated to pay to unconsolidated affiliates upon their achievement of product development milestones . critical accounting policies and estimates the company 2019s results of operations and financial position are determined based upon the application of the company 2019s accounting policies , as discussed in the notes to the consolidated financial statements . certain of the company 2019s accounting policies represent a selection among acceptable alternatives under generally accepted .
Question: w h a t p e r c e n t o f t o t a l c o n t r a c t u a l c a s h o b l i g a t i o n s i s d u e t o l o n g - t e r m d e b t ?
| 5,137 |
12.0%
|
Given the context, answer the question.
Context: the goldman sachs group , inc . and subsidiaries management 2019s discussion and analysis 2018 versus 2017 . provision for credit losses in the consolidated statements of earnings was $ 674 million for 2018 , compared with $ 657 million for 2017 , as the higher provision for credit losses primarily related to consumer loan growth in 2018 was partially offset by an impairment of approximately $ 130 million on a secured loan in 2017 . 2017 versus 2016 . provision for credit losses in the consolidated statements of earnings was $ 657 million for 2017 , compared with $ 182 million for 2016 , reflecting an increase in impairments , which included an impairment of approximately $ 130 million on a secured loan in 2017 , and higher provision for credit losses primarily related to consumer loan growth . operating expenses our operating expenses are primarily influenced by compensation , headcount and levels of business activity . compensation and benefits includes salaries , discretionary compensation , amortization of equity awards and other items such as benefits . discretionary compensation is significantly impacted by , among other factors , the level of net revenues , overall financial performance , prevailing labor markets , business mix , the structure of our share-based compensation programs and the external environment . in addition , see 201cuse of estimates 201d for further information about expenses that may arise from litigation and regulatory proceedings . the table below presents operating expenses by line item and headcount. .
$ in millions | year ended december 2018 | year ended december 2017 | year ended december 2016 compensation and benefits | $ 12328 | $ 11653 | $ 11448 brokerage clearing exchange and distribution fees | 3200 | 2876 | 2823 market development | 740 | 588 | 457 communications and technology | 1023 | 897 | 809 depreciation and amortization | 1328 | 1152 | 998 occupancy | 809 | 733 | 788 professional fees | 1214 | 1165 | 1081 other expenses | 2819 | 1877 | 1900 total operating expenses | $ 23461 | $ 20941 | $ 20304 headcount atperiod-end | 36600 | 33600 | 32400
in the table above , the following reclassifications have been made to previously reported amounts to conform to the current presentation : 2030 regulatory-related fees that are paid to exchanges are now reported in brokerage , clearing , exchange and distribution fees . previously such amounts were reported in other expenses . 2030 headcount consists of our employees , and excludes consultants and temporary staff previously reported as part of total staff . as a result , expenses related to these consultants and temporary staff are now reported in professional fees . previously such amounts were reported in compensation and benefits expenses . 2018 versus 2017 . operating expenses in the consolidated statements of earnings were $ 23.46 billion for 2018 , 12% ( 12 % ) higher than 2017 . our efficiency ratio ( total operating expenses divided by total net revenues ) for 2018 was 64.1% ( 64.1 % ) , compared with 64.0% ( 64.0 % ) for 2017 . the increase in operating expenses compared with 2017 was primarily due to higher compensation and benefits expenses , reflecting improved operating performance , and significantly higher net provisions for litigation and regulatory proceedings . brokerage , clearing , exchange and distribution fees were also higher , reflecting an increase in activity levels , and technology expenses increased , reflecting higher expenses related to computing services . in addition , expenses related to consolidated investments and our digital lending and deposit platform increased , with the increases primarily in depreciation and amortization expenses , market development expenses and other expenses . the increase compared with 2017 also included $ 297 million related to the recently adopted revenue recognition standard . see note 3 to the consolidated financial statements for further information about asu no . 2014-09 , 201crevenue from contracts with customers ( topic 606 ) . 201d net provisions for litigation and regulatory proceedings for 2018 were $ 844 million compared with $ 188 million for 2017 . 2018 included a $ 132 million charitable contribution to goldman sachs gives , our donor-advised fund . compensation was reduced to fund this charitable contribution to goldman sachs gives . we ask our participating managing directors to make recommendations regarding potential charitable recipients for this contribution . as of december 2018 , headcount increased 9% ( 9 % ) compared with december 2017 , reflecting an increase in technology professionals and investments in new business initiatives . 2017 versus 2016 . operating expenses in the consolidated statements of earnings were $ 20.94 billion for 2017 , 3% ( 3 % ) higher than 2016 . our efficiency ratio for 2017 was 64.0% ( 64.0 % ) compared with 65.9% ( 65.9 % ) for 2016 . the increase in operating expenses compared with 2016 was primarily driven by slightly higher compensation and benefits expenses and our investments to fund growth . higher expenses related to consolidated investments and our digital lending and deposit platform were primarily included in depreciation and amortization expenses , market development expenses and other expenses . in addition , technology expenses increased , reflecting higher expenses related to cloud-based services and software depreciation , and professional fees increased , primarily related to consulting costs . these increases were partially offset by lower net provisions for litigation and regulatory proceedings , and lower occupancy expenses ( primarily related to exit costs in 2016 ) . 54 goldman sachs 2018 form 10-k .
Question: w h a t i s t h e g r o w t h r a t e i n o p e r a t i n g e x p e n s e s i n 2 0 1 8 ?
| 5,138 |
28824
|
Given the context, answer the question.
Context: table of contents certain union-represented american mainline employees are covered by agreements that are not currently amendable . until those agreements become amendable , negotiations for jcbas will be conducted outside the traditional rla bargaining process described above , and , in the meantime , no self-help will be permissible . the piedmont mechanics and stock clerks and the psa dispatchers have agreements that are now amendable and are engaged in traditional rla negotiations . none of the unions representing our employees presently may lawfully engage in concerted refusals to work , such as strikes , slow-downs , sick-outs or other similar activity , against us . nonetheless , there is a risk that disgruntled employees , either with or without union involvement , could engage in one or more concerted refusals to work that could individually or collectively harm the operation of our airline and impair our financial performance . for more discussion , see part i , item 1a . risk factors 2013 201cunion disputes , employee strikes and other labor-related disruptions may adversely affect our operations . 201d aircraft fuel our operations and financial results are significantly affected by the availability and price of jet fuel . based on our 2016 forecasted mainline and regional fuel consumption , we estimate that , as of december 31 , 2015 , a one cent per gallon increase in aviation fuel price would increase our 2016 annual fuel expense by $ 44 million . the following table shows annual aircraft fuel consumption and costs , including taxes , for our mainline operations for 2015 and 2014 ( gallons and aircraft fuel expense in millions ) . year gallons average price per gallon aircraft fuel expense percent of total mainline operating expenses .
year | gallons | average price pergallon | aircraft fuel expense | percent of total mainline operating expenses 2015 | 3611 | $ 1.72 | $ 6226 | 21.6% ( 21.6 % ) 2014 | 3644 | 2.91 | 10592 | 33.2% ( 33.2 % )
total fuel expenses for our wholly-owned and third-party regional carriers operating under capacity purchase agreements of american were $ 1.2 billion and $ 2.0 billion for the years ended december 31 , 2015 and 2014 , respectively . as of december 31 , 2015 , we did not have any fuel hedging contracts outstanding to hedge our fuel consumption . as such , and assuming we do not enter into any future transactions to hedge our fuel consumption , we will continue to be fully exposed to fluctuations in fuel prices . our current policy is not to enter into transactions to hedge our fuel consumption , although we review that policy from time to time based on market conditions and other factors . fuel prices have fluctuated substantially over the past several years . we cannot predict the future availability , price volatility or cost of aircraft fuel . natural disasters , political disruptions or wars involving oil-producing countries , changes in fuel-related governmental policy , the strength of the u.s . dollar against foreign currencies , changes in access to petroleum product pipelines and terminals , speculation in the energy futures markets , changes in aircraft fuel production capacity , environmental concerns and other unpredictable events may result in fuel supply shortages , additional fuel price volatility and cost increases in the future . see part i , item 1a . risk factors 2013 201cour business is dependent on the price and availability of aircraft fuel . continued periods of high volatility in fuel costs , increased fuel prices and significant disruptions in the supply of aircraft fuel could have a significant negative impact on our operating results and liquidity . 201d insurance we maintain insurance of the types that we believe are customary in the airline industry , including insurance for public liability , passenger liability , property damage , and all-risk coverage for damage to our aircraft . principal coverage includes liability for injury to members of the public , including passengers , damage to .
Question: w h a t w a s t o t a l m a i n l i n e o p e r a t i n g e x p e n s e s f o r 2 0 1 5 ?
| 5,139 |
-9.5%
|
Given the context, answer the question.
Context: 2011 compared to 2010 mfc 2019s net sales for 2011 increased $ 533 million , or 8% ( 8 % ) , compared to 2010 . the increase was attributable to higher volume of about $ 420 million on air and missile defense programs ( primarily pac-3 and thaad ) ; and about $ 245 million from fire control systems programs primarily related to the sof clss program , which began late in the third quarter of 2010 . partially offsetting these increases were lower net sales due to decreased volume of approximately $ 75 million primarily from various services programs and approximately $ 20 million from tactical missile programs ( primarily mlrs and jassm ) . mfc 2019s operating profit for 2011 increased $ 96 million , or 10% ( 10 % ) , compared to 2010 . the increase was attributable to higher operating profit of about $ 60 million for air and missile defense programs ( primarily pac-3 and thaad ) as a result of increased volume and retirement of risks ; and approximately $ 25 million for various services programs . adjustments not related to volume , including net profit rate adjustments described above , were approximately $ 35 million higher in 2011 compared to 2010 . backlog backlog increased in 2012 compared to 2011 mainly due to increased orders and lower sales on fire control systems programs ( primarily lantirn ae and sniper ae ) and on various services programs , partially offset by lower orders and higher sales volume on tactical missiles programs . backlog increased in 2011 compared to 2010 primarily due to increased orders on air and missile defense programs ( primarily thaad ) . trends we expect mfc 2019s net sales for 2013 will be comparable with 2012 . we expect low double digit percentage growth in air and missile defense programs , offset by an expected decline in volume on logistics services programs . operating profit and margin are expected to be comparable with 2012 results . mission systems and training our mst business segment provides surface ship and submarine combat systems ; sea and land-based missile defense systems ; radar systems ; mission systems and sensors for rotary and fixed-wing aircraft ; littoral combat ships ; simulation and training services ; unmanned technologies and platforms ; ship systems integration ; and military and commercial training systems . mst 2019s major programs include aegis , mk-41 vertical launching system ( vls ) , tpq-53 radar system , mh-60 , lcs , and ptds . mst 2019s operating results included the following ( in millions ) : .
| 2012 | 2011 | 2010 net sales | $ 7579 | $ 7132 | $ 7443 operating profit | 737 | 645 | 713 operating margins | 9.7% ( 9.7 % ) | 9.0% ( 9.0 % ) | 9.6% ( 9.6 % ) backlog at year-end | 10700 | 10500 | 10600
2012 compared to 2011 mst 2019s net sales for 2012 increased $ 447 million , or 6% ( 6 % ) , compared to 2011 . the increase in net sales for 2012 was attributable to higher volume and risk retirements of approximately $ 395 million from ship and aviation system programs ( primarily ptds ; lcs ; vls ; and mh-60 ) ; about $ 115 million for training and logistics solutions programs primarily due to net sales from sim industries , which was acquired in the fourth quarter of 2011 ; and approximately $ 30 million as a result of increased volume on integrated warfare systems and sensors programs ( primarily aegis ) . partially offsetting the increases were lower net sales of approximately $ 70 million from undersea systems programs due to lower volume on an international combat system program and towed array systems ; and about $ 25 million due to lower volume on various other programs . mst 2019s operating profit for 2012 increased $ 92 million , or 14% ( 14 % ) , compared to 2011 . the increase was attributable to higher operating profit of approximately $ 175 million from ship and aviation system programs , which reflects higher volume and risk retirements on certain programs ( primarily vls ; ptds ; mh-60 ; and lcs ) and reserves of about $ 55 million for contract cost matters on ship and aviation system programs recorded in the fourth quarter of 2011 ( including the terminated presidential helicopter program ) . partially offsetting the increase was lower operating profit of approximately $ 40 million from undersea systems programs due to reduced profit booking rates on certain programs and lower volume on an international combat system program and towed array systems ; and about $ 40 million due to lower volume on various other programs . adjustments not related to volume , including net profit booking rate adjustments and other matters described above , were approximately $ 150 million higher for 2012 compared to 2011. .
Question: w h a t i s t h e g r o w t h r a t e i n o p e r a t i n g p r o f i t f o r m s t i n 2 0 1 1 ?
| 5,140 |
-296.6
|
Given the context, answer the question.
Context: table of contents cdw corporation and subsidiaries method or straight-line method , as applicable . the company classifies deferred financing costs as a direct deduction from the carrying value of the long-term debt liability on the consolidated balance sheets , except for deferred financing costs associated with revolving credit facilities which are presented as an asset , within other assets on the consolidated balance sheets . derivative instruments the company has interest rate cap agreements for the purpose of hedging its exposure to fluctuations in interest rates . the interest rate cap agreements are designated as cash flow hedges of interest rate risk and recorded at fair value in other assets on the consolidated balance sheets . the gain or loss on the derivative instruments is reported as a component of accumulated other comprehensive loss until reclassified to interest expense in the same period the hedge transaction affects earnings . fair value measurements fair value is defined under gaap as the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date . a fair value hierarchy has been established for valuation inputs to prioritize the inputs into three levels based on the extent to which inputs used in measuring fair value are observable in the market . each fair value measurement is reported in one of the three levels which is determined by the lowest level input that is significant to the fair value measurement in its entirety . these levels are : level 1 2013 observable inputs such as quoted prices for identical instruments traded in active markets . level 2 2013 inputs are based on quoted prices for similar instruments in active markets , quoted prices for identical or similar instruments in markets that are not active and model-based valuation techniques for which all significant assumptions are observable in the market or can be corroborated by observable market data for substantially the full term of the assets or liabilities . level 3 2013 inputs are generally unobservable and typically reflect management 2019s estimates of assumptions that market participants would use in pricing the asset or liability . the fair values are therefore determined using model-based techniques that include option pricing models , discounted cash flow models and similar techniques . accumulated other comprehensive loss the components of accumulated other comprehensive loss included in stockholders 2019 equity are as follows: .
( in millions ) | years ended december 31 , 2017 | years ended december 31 , 2016 | years ended december 31 , 2015 foreign currency translation | $ -96.1 ( 96.1 ) | $ -139.6 ( 139.6 ) | $ -61.1 ( 61.1 ) unrealized gain from hedge accounting | 0.2 | 2014 | 2014 accumulated other comprehensive loss | $ -95.9 ( 95.9 ) | $ -139.6 ( 139.6 ) | $ -61.1 ( 61.1 )
revenue recognition the company is a primary distribution channel for a large group of vendors and suppliers , including original equipment manufacturers ( 201coems 201d ) , software publishers , wholesale distributors and cloud providers . the company records revenue from sales transactions when title and risk of loss are passed to the customer , there is persuasive evidence of an arrangement for sale , delivery has occurred and/or services have been rendered , the sales price is fixed or determinable , and collectability is reasonably assured . the company 2019s shipping terms typically specify f.o.b . destination , at which time title and risk of loss have passed to the customer . revenues from the sales of hardware products and software licenses are generally recognized on a gross basis with the selling price to the customer recorded as sales and the acquisition cost of the product recorded as cost of sales . these items can be delivered to customers in a variety of ways , including ( i ) as physical product shipped from the company 2019s warehouse , ( ii ) via drop-shipment by the vendor or supplier , or ( iii ) via electronic delivery for software licenses . at the time of sale , the company records an estimate for sales returns and allowances based on historical experience . the company 2019s vendor partners warrant most of the products the company sells . the company leverages drop-shipment arrangements with many of its vendors and suppliers to deliver products to its customers without having to physically hold the inventory at its warehouses , thereby increasing efficiency and reducing .
Question: w h a t w a s t h e t h r e e y e a r t o t a l a c c u m u l a t e d o t h e r c o m p r e h e n s i v e l o s s i n m i l l i o n s ?
| 5,142 |
14.3%
|
Given the context, answer the question.
Context: adobe systems incorporated notes to consolidated financial statements ( continued ) foreign currency translation we translate assets and liabilities of foreign subsidiaries , whose functional currency is their local currency , at exchange rates in effect at the balance sheet date . we translate revenue and expenses at the monthly average exchange rates . we include accumulated net translation adjustments in stockholders 2019 equity as a component of accumulated other comprehensive income . property and equipment we record property and equipment at cost less accumulated depreciation and amortization . property and equipment are depreciated using the straight-line method over their estimated useful lives ranging from 1 to 5 years for computers and equipment , 1 to 6 years for furniture and fixtures and up to 35 years for buildings . leasehold improvements are amortized using the straight-line method over the lesser of the remaining respective lease term or useful lives . goodwill , purchased intangibles and other long-lived assets we review our goodwill for impairment annually , or more frequently , if facts and circumstances warrant a review . we completed our annual impairment test in the second quarter of fiscal 2009 and determined that there was no impairment . goodwill is assigned to one or more reporting segments on the date of acquisition . we evaluate goodwill for impairment by comparing the fair value of each of our reporting segments to its carrying value , including the associated goodwill . to determine the fair values , we use the market approach based on comparable publicly traded companies in similar lines of businesses and the income approach based on estimated discounted future cash flows . our cash flow assumptions consider historical and forecasted revenue , operating costs and other relevant factors . we amortize intangible assets with finite lives over their estimated useful lives and review them for impairment whenever an impairment indicator exists . we continually monitor events and changes in circumstances that could indicate carrying amounts of our long-lived assets , including our intangible assets may not be recoverable . when such events or changes in circumstances occur , we assess recoverability by determining whether the carrying value of such assets will be recovered through the undiscounted expected future cash flows . if the future undiscounted cash flows are less than the carrying amount of these assets , we recognize an impairment loss based on the excess of the carrying amount over the fair value of the assets . we did not recognize any intangible asset impairment charges in fiscal 2009 , 2008 or 2007 . our intangible assets are amortized over their estimated useful lives of 1 to 13 years as shown in the table below . amortization is based on the pattern in which the economic benefits of the intangible asset will be consumed . weighted average useful life ( years ) .
| weighted average useful life ( years ) purchased technology | 7 localization | 1 trademarks | 7 customer contracts and relationships | 10 other intangibles | 2
software development costs capitalization of software development costs for software to be sold , leased , or otherwise marketed begins upon the establishment of technological feasibility , which is generally the completion of a working prototype that has been certified as having no critical bugs and is a release candidate . amortization begins once the software is ready for its intended use , generally based on the pattern in which the economic benefits will be consumed . to date , software development costs incurred between completion of a working prototype and general availability of the related product have not been material . revenue recognition our revenue is derived from the licensing of software products , consulting , hosting services and maintenance and support . primarily , we recognize revenue when persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists , we have delivered the product or performed the service , the fee is fixed or determinable and collection is probable. .
Question: w h a t i s t h e y e a r l y a m o r t i z a t i o n r a t e r e l a t e d t o t r a d e m a r k s ?
| 5,143 |
13%
|
Given the context, answer the question.
Context: equity method investment earnings we include our share of the earnings of certain affiliates based on our economic ownership interest in the affiliates . significant affiliates include the ardent mills joint venture and affiliates that produce and market potato products for retail and foodservice customers . our share of earnings from our equity method investments was $ 122.1 million ( $ 119.1 million in the commercial foods segment and $ 3.0 million in the consumer foods segment ) and $ 32.5 million ( $ 29.7 million in the commercial foods segment and $ 2.8 million in the consumer foods segment ) in fiscal 2015 and 2014 , respectively . the increase in fiscal 2015 compared to fiscal 2014 reflects the earnings from the ardent mills joint venture as well as higher profits for an international potato joint venture . the earnings from the ardent mills joint venture reflect results for 11 months of operations , as we recognize earnings on a one-month lag , due to differences in fiscal year periods . in fiscal 2014 , earnings also reflected a $ 3.4 million charge reflecting the year-end write-off of actuarial losses in excess of 10% ( 10 % ) of the pension liability for an international potato venture . results of discontinued operations our discontinued operations generated after-tax income of $ 366.6 million and $ 141.4 million in fiscal 2015 and 2014 , respectively . the results of discontinued operations for fiscal 2015 include a pre-tax gain of $ 625.6 million ( $ 379.6 million after-tax ) recognized on the formation of the ardent mills joint venture . the results for fiscal 2014 reflect a pre-tax gain of $ 90.0 million ( $ 55.7 million after-tax ) related to the disposition of three flour milling facilities as part of the ardent mills formation . in fiscal 2014 , we also completed the sale of a small snack business , medallion foods , for $ 32.0 million in cash . we recognized an after-tax loss of $ 3.5 million on the sale of this business in fiscal 2014 . in fiscal 2014 , we recognized an impairment charge related to allocated amounts of goodwill and intangible assets , totaling $ 15.2 million after-tax , in anticipation of this divestiture . we also completed the sale of the assets of the lightlife ae business for $ 54.7 million in cash . we recognized an after-tax gain of $ 19.8 million on the sale of this business in fiscal 2014 . earnings ( loss ) per share diluted loss per share in fiscal 2015 was $ 0.60 , including a loss of $ 1.46 per diluted share from continuing operations and earnings of $ 0.86 per diluted share from discontinued operations . diluted earnings per share in fiscal 2014 were $ 0.70 , including $ 0.37 per diluted share from continuing operations and $ 0.33 per diluted share from discontinued operations . see 201citems impacting comparability 201d above as several significant items affected the comparability of year-over-year results of operations . fiscal 2014 compared to fiscal 2013 net sales ( $ in millions ) reporting segment fiscal 2014 net sales fiscal 2013 net sales .
( $ in millions ) reporting segment | fiscal 2014 net sales | fiscal 2013 net sales | % ( % ) inc ( dec ) consumer foods | 7315.7 | 7551.4 | ( 3 ) % ( % ) commercial foods | 4332.2 | 4109.7 | 5% ( 5 % ) private brands | 4195.7 | 1808.2 | 132% ( 132 % ) total | $ 15843.6 | $ 13469.3 | 18% ( 18 % )
overall , our net sales increased $ 2.37 billion to $ 15.84 billion in fiscal 2014 compared to fiscal 2013 , primarily related to the acquisition of ralcorp . consumer foods net sales for fiscal 2014 were $ 7.32 billion , a decrease of $ 235.7 million , or 3% ( 3 % ) , compared to fiscal 2013 . results reflected a 3% ( 3 % ) decrease in volume performance and a 1% ( 1 % ) decrease due to the impact of foreign exchange rates , partially offset by a 1% ( 1 % ) increase in price/mix . volume performance from our base businesses for fiscal 2014 was impacted negatively by competitor promotional activity . significant slotting and promotion investments related to new product launches , particularly in the first quarter , also weighed heavily on net sales in fiscal 2014 . in addition , certain shipments planned for the fourth quarter of fiscal 2014 were shifted to the first quarter of fiscal 2015 as a result of change in timing of retailer promotions and this negatively impacted volume performance. .
Question: w h a t p e r c e n t o f n e t s a l e s i n f i s c a l 2 0 1 3 w h e r e d u e t o p r i v a t e b r a n d s ?
| 5,144 |
5.4
|
Given the context, answer the question.
Context: .
contractual obligations | 2015 | 2016 | 2017 | 2018 | 2019 | thereafter | total long-term obligations excluding capital leases | 888810 | 753045 | 700608 | 1787451 | 3159286 | 7188751 | 14477951 cash interest expense | 550000 | 517000 | 485000 | 399000 | 315000 | 654000 | 2920000 capital lease payments ( including interest ) | 15589 | 14049 | 12905 | 12456 | 10760 | 173313 | 239072 total debt service obligations | 1454399 | 1284094 | 1198513 | 2198907 | 3485046 | 8016064 | 17637023 operating lease payments ( 11 ) | 574438 | 553864 | 538405 | 519034 | 502847 | 4214600 | 6903188 other non-current liabilities ( 12 ) ( 13 ) | 11082 | 20480 | 5705 | 13911 | 4186 | 1860071 | 1915435 total | $ 2039919 | $ 1858438 | $ 1742623 | $ 2731852 | $ 3992079 | $ 14090735 | $ 26455646
( 1 ) represents anticipated repayment date ; final legal maturity date is march 15 , 2043 . ( 2 ) represents anticipated repayment date ; final legal maturity date is march 15 , 2048 . ( 3 ) in connection with our acquisition of mipt on october 1 , 2013 , we assumed approximately $ 1.49 billion aggregate principal amount of secured notes , $ 250.0 million of which we repaid in august 2014 . the gtp notes have anticipated repayment dates beginning june 15 , 2016 . ( 4 ) assumed in connection with our acquisition of br towers and denominated in brl . the br towers debenture amortizes through october 2023 . the br towers credit facility amortizes through january 15 , ( 5 ) assumed by us in connection with the unison acquisition , and have anticipated repayment dates of april 15 , 2017 , april 15 , 2020 and april 15 , 2020 , respectively , and a final maturity date of april 15 , 2040 . ( 6 ) denominated in mxn . ( 7 ) denominated in zar and amortizes through march 31 , 2020 . ( 8 ) denominated in cop and amortizes through april 24 , 2021 . ( 9 ) reflects balances owed to our joint venture partners in ghana and uganda . the ghana loan is denominated in ghs and the uganda loan is denominated in usd . ( 10 ) on february 11 , 2015 , we redeemed all of the outstanding 4.625% ( 4.625 % ) notes in accordance with the terms thereof . ( 11 ) includes payments under non-cancellable initial terms , as well as payments for certain renewal periods at our option , which we expect to renew because failure to renew could result in a loss of the applicable communications sites and related revenues from tenant leases . ( 12 ) primarily represents our asset retirement obligations and excludes certain other non-current liabilities included in our consolidated balance sheet , primarily our straight-line rent liability for which cash payments are included in operating lease payments and unearned revenue that is not payable in cash . ( 13 ) excludes $ 26.6 million of liabilities for unrecognized tax positions and $ 24.9 million of accrued income tax related interest and penalties included in our consolidated balance sheet as we are uncertain as to when and if the amounts may be settled . settlement of such amounts could require the use of cash flows generated from operations . we expect the unrecognized tax benefits to change over the next 12 months if certain tax matters ultimately settle with the applicable taxing jurisdiction during this timeframe . however , based on the status of these items and the amount of uncertainty associated with the outcome and timing of audit settlements , we are currently unable to estimate the impact of the amount of such changes , if any , to previously recorded uncertain tax positions . off-balance sheet arrangements . we have no material off-balance sheet arrangements as defined in item 303 ( a ) ( 4 ) ( ii ) of sec regulation s-k . interest rate swap agreements . we have entered into interest rate swap agreements to manage our exposure to variability in interest rates on debt in colombia and south africa . all of our interest rate swap agreements have been designated as cash flow hedges and have an aggregate notional amount of $ 79.9 million , interest rates ranging from 5.74% ( 5.74 % ) to 7.83% ( 7.83 % ) and expiration dates through april 2021 . in february 2014 , we repaid the costa rica loan and subsequently terminated the associated interest rate swap agreements . additionally , in connection with entering into the colombian credit facility in october 2014 , we terminated our pre-existing interest rate .
Question: a s s u m i n g a m i d p o i n t i n t e r e s t r a t e i n t h e r a n g e , w h a t w o u l d b e t h e a n n u a l i n t e r e s t e x p e n s e o n i n t e r e s t r a t e s w a p a g r e e m e n t s b a s e d o n t h e n o t i o n a l a m o u n t s , i n m i l l i o n s ?
| 5,145 |
1914482.2
|
Given the context, answer the question.
Context: the following table summarized the status of the company 2019s non-vested performance share unit awards and changes for the period indicated : weighted- average grant date performance share unit awards shares fair value .
performance share unit awards | year ended december 31 2015 shares | year ended december 31 2015 weighted- average grant date fair value outstanding at january 1, | - | $ - granted | 10705 | 178.84 vested | - | - forfeited | - | - outstanding at december 31, | 10705 | 178.84
19 . segment reporting the u.s . reinsurance operation writes property and casualty reinsurance and specialty lines of business , including marine , aviation , surety and accident and health ( 201ca&h 201d ) business , on both a treaty and facultative basis , through reinsurance brokers , as well as directly with ceding companies primarily within the u.s . the international operation writes non-u.s . property and casualty reinsurance through everest re 2019s branches in canada and singapore and through offices in brazil , miami and new jersey . the bermuda operation provides reinsurance and insurance to worldwide property and casualty markets through brokers and directly with ceding companies from its bermuda office and reinsurance to the united kingdom and european markets through its uk branch and ireland re . the insurance operation writes property and casualty insurance directly and through general agents , brokers and surplus lines brokers within the u.s . and canada . the mt . logan re segment represents business written for the segregated accounts of mt . logan re , which were formed on july 1 , 2013 . the mt . logan re business represents a diversified set of catastrophe exposures , diversified by risk/peril and across different geographical regions globally . these segments , with the exception of mt . logan re , are managed independently , but conform with corporate guidelines with respect to pricing , risk management , control of aggregate catastrophe exposures , capital , investments and support operations . management generally monitors and evaluates the financial performance of these operating segments based upon their underwriting results . the mt . logan re segment is managed independently and seeks to write a diverse portfolio of catastrophe risks for each segregated account to achieve desired risk and return criteria . underwriting results include earned premium less losses and loss adjustment expenses ( 201clae 201d ) incurred , commission and brokerage expenses and other underwriting expenses . we measure our underwriting results using ratios , in particular loss , commission and brokerage and other underwriting expense ratios , which , respectively , divide incurred losses , commissions and brokerage and other underwriting expenses by premiums earned . mt . logan re 2019s business is sourced through operating subsidiaries of the company ; however , the activity is only reflected in the mt . logan re segment . for other inter-affiliate reinsurance , business is generally reported within the segment in which the business was first produced , consistent with how the business is managed . except for mt . logan re , the company does not maintain separate balance sheet data for its operating segments . accordingly , the company does not review and evaluate the financial results of its operating segments based upon balance sheet data. .
Question: a s o f y e a r e n d e d d e c e m b e r 3 1 2 0 1 5 w h a t i s t h e v a l u e o f t h e s h a r e s g r a n t e d
| 5,146 |
34.2%
|
Given the context, answer the question.
Context: value , which may be maturity , the company does not consider these investments to be other-than-temporarily impaired as of december 31 , 2005 and 2004 . gross realized gains and losses for 2005 were $ 15000 and $ 75000 , respectively . gross realized gains and losses for 2004 were $ 628000 and $ 205000 , respectively . gross realized gains for 2003 were $ 1249000 . there were no gross realized losses for 2003 . maturities stated are effective maturities . f . restricted cash at december 31 , 2005 and 2004 , the company held $ 41482000 and $ 49847000 , respectively , in restricted cash . at december 31 , 2005 and 2004 the balance was held in deposit with certain banks predominantly to collateralize conditional stand-by letters of credit in the names of the company's landlords pursuant to certain operating lease agreements . g . property and equipment property and equipment consist of the following at december 31 ( in thousands ) : depreciation expense for the years ended december 31 , 2005 , 2004 and 2003 was $ 26307000 , $ 28353000 and $ 27988000 respectively . in 2005 and 2004 , the company wrote off certain assets that were fully depreciated and no longer utilized . there was no effect on the company's net property and equipment . additionally , the company wrote off or sold certain assets that were not fully depreciated . the net loss on disposal of those assets was $ 344000 for 2005 and $ 43000 for 2004 . h . investments in accordance with the company's policy , as outlined in note b , "accounting policies" the company assessed its investment in altus pharmaceuticals , inc . ( "altus" ) , which it accounts for using the cost method , and determined that there had not been any adjustments to the fair values of that investment which would indicate a decrease in its fair value below the carrying value that would require the company to write down the investment basis of the asset , as of december 31 , 2005 and december 31 , 2004 . the company's cost basis carrying value in its outstanding equity and warrants of altus was $ 18863000 at december 31 , 2005 and 2004. .
| 2005 | 2004 furniture and equipment | $ 98387 | $ 90893 leasehold improvements | 66318 | 65294 computers | 18971 | 18421 software | 18683 | 16411 total property and equipment gross | 202359 | 191019 less accumulated depreciation and amortization | 147826 | 126794 total property and equipment net | $ 54533 | $ 64225
.
Question: w h a t p e r c e n t o f t h e 2 0 0 5 g r o s s t o t a l p r o p e r t y a n d e q u i p m e n t v a l u e i s r e l a t e d t o s o f t w a r e ?
| 5,147 |
36.2%
|
Given the context, answer the question.
Context: mortgage banking activities the company enters into commitments to originate loans whereby the interest rate on the loan is determined prior to funding . these commitments are referred to as interest rate lock commitments ( 201cirlcs 201d ) . irlcs on loans that the company intends to sell are considered to be derivatives and are , therefore , recorded at fair value with changes in fair value recorded in earnings . for purposes of determining fair value , the company estimates the fair value of an irlc based on the estimated fair value of the underlying mortgage loan and the probability that the mortgage loan will fund within the terms of the irlc . the fair value excludes the market value associated with the anticipated sale of servicing rights related to each loan commitment . the fair value of these irlcs was a $ 0.06 million and a $ 0.02 million liability at december 31 , 2007 and 2006 , respectively . the company also designates fair value relationships of closed loans held-for-sale against a combination of mortgage forwards and short treasury positions . short treasury relationships are economic hedges , rather than fair value or cash flow hedges . short treasury positions are marked-to-market , but do not receive hedge accounting treatment under sfas no . 133 , as amended . the mark-to-market of the mortgage forwards is included in the net change of the irlcs and the related hedging instruments . the fair value of the mark-to-market on closed loans was a $ 1.2 thousand and $ 1.7 million asset at december 31 , 2007 and 2006 , respectively . irlcs , as well as closed loans held-for-sale , expose the company to interest rate risk . the company manages this risk by selling mortgages or mortgage-backed securities on a forward basis referred to as forward sale agreements . changes in the fair value of these derivatives are included as gain ( loss ) on loans and securities , net in the consolidated statement of income ( loss ) . the net change in irlcs , closed loans , mortgage forwards and the short treasury positions generated a net loss of $ 2.4 million in 2007 , a net gain of $ 1.6 million in 2006 and a net loss of $ 0.4 million in 2005 . credit risk credit risk is managed by limiting activity to approved counterparties and setting aggregate exposure limits for each approved counterparty . the credit risk , or maximum exposure , which results from interest rate swaps and purchased interest rate options is represented by the fair value of contracts that have unrealized gains at the reporting date . conversely , we have $ 197.5 million of derivative contracts with unrealized losses at december 31 , 2007 . the company pledged approximately $ 87.4 million of its mortgage-backed securities as collateral of derivative contracts . while the company does not expect that any counterparty will fail to perform , the following table shows the maximum exposure associated with each counterparty to interest rate swaps and purchased interest rate options at december 31 , 2007 ( dollars in thousands ) : counterparty credit .
counterparty | credit risk bank of america | $ 48161 lehman brothers | 29136 jp morgan | 18878 union bank of switzerland | 15562 credit suisse first boston | 11047 royal bank of scotland | 6164 morgan stanley | 2215 salomon brothers | 1943 total exposure | $ 133106
.
Question: w h a t w a s t h e p e r c e n t o f t h e c o u n t e r p a r t y c r e d i t r i s k f o r b a n k o f a m e r i c a t o t h e t o t a l c r e d i t r i s k e x p o s u r e
| 5,148 |
0.819
|
Given the context, answer the question.
Context: 17 . leases we lease certain locomotives , freight cars , and other property . the consolidated statements of financial position as of december 31 , 2017 , and 2016 included $ 1635 million , net of $ 953 million of accumulated depreciation , and $ 1997 million , net of $ 1121 million of accumulated depreciation , respectively , for properties held under capital leases . a charge to income resulting from the depreciation for assets held under capital leases is included within depreciation expense in our consolidated statements of income . future minimum lease payments for operating and capital leases with initial or remaining non-cancelable lease terms in excess of one year as of december 31 , 2017 , were as follows : millions operating leases capital leases .
millions | operatingleases | capitalleases 2018 | $ 398 | $ 173 2019 | 359 | 156 2020 | 297 | 164 2021 | 259 | 168 2022 | 221 | 147 later years | 1115 | 271 total minimum lease payments | $ 2649 | $ 1079 amount representing interest | n/a | -187 ( 187 ) present value of minimum lease payments | n/a | $ 892
approximately 97% ( 97 % ) of capital lease payments relate to locomotives . rent expense for operating leases with terms exceeding one month was $ 480 million in 2017 , $ 535 million in 2016 , and $ 590 million in 2015 . when cash rental payments are not made on a straight-line basis , we recognize variable rental expense on a straight-line basis over the lease term . contingent rentals and sub-rentals are not significant . 18 . commitments and contingencies asserted and unasserted claims 2013 various claims and lawsuits are pending against us and certain of our subsidiaries . we cannot fully determine the effect of all asserted and unasserted claims on our consolidated results of operations , financial condition , or liquidity . to the extent possible , we have recorded a liability where asserted and unasserted claims are considered probable and where such claims can be reasonably estimated . we do not expect that any known lawsuits , claims , environmental costs , commitments , contingent liabilities , or guarantees will have a material adverse effect on our consolidated results of operations , financial condition , or liquidity after taking into account liabilities and insurance recoveries previously recorded for these matters . personal injury 2013 the cost of personal injuries to employees and others related to our activities is charged to expense based on estimates of the ultimate cost and number of incidents each year . we use an actuarial analysis to measure the expense and liability , including unasserted claims . the federal employers 2019 liability act ( fela ) governs compensation for work-related accidents . under fela , damages are assessed based on a finding of fault through litigation or out-of-court settlements . we offer a comprehensive variety of services and rehabilitation programs for employees who are injured at work . our personal injury liability is not discounted to present value due to the uncertainty surrounding the timing of future payments . approximately 95% ( 95 % ) of the recorded liability is related to asserted claims and approximately 5% ( 5 % ) is related to unasserted claims at december 31 , 2017 . because of the uncertainty surrounding the ultimate outcome of personal injury claims , it is reasonably possible that future costs to settle these claims may range from approximately $ 285 million to $ 310 million . we record an accrual at the low end of the range as no amount of loss within the range is more probable than any other . estimates can vary over time due to evolving trends in litigation. .
Question: w h a t w a s t h e r a t i o o f t h e n e t p r o p e r t i e s h e l d u n d e r c a p i t a l l e a s e s i n 2 0 1 7 t o 2 0 1 6 \ \ n
| 5,149 |
-3
|
Given the context, answer the question.
Context: ( 2 ) the company has a master netting arrangement by counterparty with respect to derivative contracts . as of october 29 , 2011 and october 30 , 2010 , contracts in a liability position of $ 0.8 million in each year , were netted against contracts in an asset position in the consolidated balance sheets . ( 3 ) equal to the accreted notional value of the debt plus the fair value of the interest rate component of the long- term debt . the fair value of the long-term debt as of october 29 , 2011 and october 30 , 2010 was $ 413.4 million and $ 416.3 million , respectively . the following methods and assumptions were used by the company in estimating its fair value disclosures for financial instruments : cash equivalents and short-term investments 2014 these investments are adjusted to fair value based on quoted market prices or are determined using a yield curve model based on current market rates . deferred compensation plan investments and other investments 2014 the fair value of these mutual fund , money market fund and equity investments are based on quoted market prices . long-term debt 2014 the fair value of long-term debt is based on quotes received from third-party banks . interest rate swap agreements 2014 the fair value of interest rate swap agreements is based on quotes received from third-party banks . these values represent the estimated amount the company would receive or pay to terminate the agreements taking into consideration current interest rates as well as the creditworthiness of the counterparty . forward foreign currency exchange contracts 2014 the estimated fair value of forward foreign currency exchange contracts , which includes derivatives that are accounted for as cash flow hedges and those that are not designated as cash flow hedges , is based on the estimated amount the company would receive if it sold these agreements at the reporting date taking into consideration current interest rates as well as the creditworthiness of the counterparty for assets and the company 2019s creditworthiness for liabilities . contingent consideration 2014 the fair value of contingent consideration was estimated utilizing the income approach and is based upon significant inputs not observable in the market . changes in the fair value of the contingent consideration subsequent to the acquisition date that are primarily driven by assumptions pertaining to the achievement of the defined milestones will be recognized in operating income in the period of the estimated fair value change . the following table summarizes the change in the fair value of the contingent consideration measured using significant unobservable inputs ( level 3 ) for fiscal 2011 : contingent consideration .
| contingent consideration balance as of october 30 2010 | $ 2014 contingent consideration liability recorded | 13790 fair value adjustment | 183 balance as of october 29 2011 | $ 13973
financial instruments not recorded at fair value on a recurring basis on april 4 , 2011 , the company issued $ 375 million aggregate principal amount of 3.0% ( 3.0 % ) senior unsecured notes due april 15 , 2016 ( the 3.0% ( 3.0 % ) notes ) with semi-annual fixed interest payments due on april 15 and october 15 of each year , commencing october 15 , 2011 . the fair value of the 3.0% ( 3.0 % ) notes as of october 29 , 2011 was $ 392.8 million , based on quotes received from third-party banks . analog devices , inc . notes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) .
Question: w h a t i s t h e n e t c h a n g e t h e f a i r v a l u e o f t h e l o n g - t e r m d e b t i n 2 0 1 1 ?
| 5,150 |
13.0
|
Given the context, answer the question.
Context: american tower corporation and subsidiaries notes to consolidated financial statements u.s . acquisitions 2014during the year ended december 31 , 2010 , the company acquired 548 towers through multiple acquisitions in the united states for an aggregate purchase price of $ 329.3 million and contingent consideration of approximately $ 4.6 million . the acquisition of these towers is consistent with the company 2019s strategy to expand in selected geographic areas and have been accounted for as business combinations . the following table summarizes the preliminary allocation of the aggregate purchase consideration paid and the amounts of assets acquired and liabilities assumed based on the estimated fair value of the acquired assets and assumed liabilities at the date of acquisition ( in thousands ) : purchase price allocation .
| purchase price allocation non-current assets | $ 442 property and equipment | 64564 intangible assets ( 1 ) | 260898 current liabilities | -360 ( 360 ) long-term liabilities | -7802 ( 7802 ) fair value of net assets acquired | $ 317742 goodwill ( 2 ) | 16131
( 1 ) consists of customer relationships of approximately $ 205.4 million and network location intangibles of approximately $ 55.5 million . the customer relationships and network location intangibles are being amortized on a straight-line basis over a period of 20 years . ( 2 ) goodwill is expected to be deductible for income tax purposes . the goodwill was allocated to the domestic rental and management segment . the allocation of the purchase price will be finalized upon completion of analyses of the fair value of the assets acquired and liabilities assumed . south africa acquisition 2014on november 4 , 2010 , the company entered into a definitive agreement with cell c ( pty ) limited to purchase up to approximately 1400 existing towers , and up to 1800 additional towers that either are under construction or will be constructed , for an aggregate purchase price of up to approximately $ 430 million . the company anticipates closing the purchase of up to 1400 existing towers during 2011 , subject to customary closing conditions . other transactions coltel transaction 2014on september 3 , 2010 , the company entered into a definitive agreement to purchase the exclusive use rights for towers in colombia from colombia telecomunicaciones s.a . e.s.p . ( 201ccoltel 201d ) until 2023 , when ownership of the towers will transfer to the company at no additional cost . pursuant to that agreement , the company completed the purchase of exclusive use rights for 508 towers for an aggregate purchase price of $ 86.8 million during the year ended december 31 , 2010 . the company expects to complete the purchase of the exclusive use rights for an additional 180 towers by the end of 2011 , subject to customary closing conditions . the transaction has been accounted for as a capital lease , with the aggregated purchase price being allocated to property and equipment and non-current assets . joint venture with mtn group 2014on december 6 , 2010 , the company entered into a definitive agreement with mtn group limited ( 201cmtn group 201d ) to establish a joint venture in ghana ( 201ctowerco ghana 201d ) . towerco ghana , which will be managed by the company , will be owned by a holding company of which a wholly owned american tower subsidiary will hold a 51% ( 51 % ) share and a wholly owned mtn group subsidiary ( 201cmtn ghana 201d ) will hold a 49% ( 49 % ) share . the transaction involves the sale of up to 1876 of mtn ghana 2019s existing sites to .
Question: w h a t i s t h e a n n u a l a m o r t i z a t i o n e x p e n s e r e l a t e d t o c u s t o m e r r e l a t i o n s h i p s a n d n e t w o r k l o c a t i o n i n t a n g i b l e s , i n m i l l i o n s ?
| 5,151 |
-33.1%
|
Given the context, answer the question.
Context: shareholder return performance the line graph below compares the annual percentage change in ball corporation fffds cumulative total shareholder return on its common stock with the cumulative total return of the dow jones containers & packaging index and the s&p composite 500 stock index for the five-year period ended december 31 , 2011 . it assumes $ 100 was invested on december 31 , 2006 , and that all dividends were reinvested . the dow jones containers & packaging index total return has been weighted by market capitalization . total return to stockholders ( assumes $ 100 investment on 12/31/06 ) total return analysis .
| 12/31/2006 | 12/31/2007 | 12/31/2008 | 12/31/2009 | 12/31/2010 | 12/31/2011 ball corporation | $ 100.00 | $ 104.05 | $ 97.04 | $ 121.73 | $ 161.39 | $ 170.70 dj us containers & packaging | $ 100.00 | $ 106.73 | $ 66.91 | $ 93.98 | $ 110.23 | $ 110.39 s&p 500 | $ 100.00 | $ 105.49 | $ 66.46 | $ 84.05 | $ 96.71 | $ 98.75
copyright a9 2012 standard & poor fffds , a division of the mcgraw-hill companies inc . all rights reserved . ( www.researchdatagroup.com/s&p.htm ) copyright a9 2012 dow jones & company . all rights reserved. .
Question: w h a t i s t h e r o i o f a n i n v e s t m e n t i n d j u s c o n t a i n e r s & p a c k a g i n g f r o m 2 0 0 6 t o 2 0 0 8 ?
| 5,152 |
12%
|
Given the context, answer the question.
Context: table of contents ( 2 ) includes capitalized lease obligations of $ 3.2 million and $ 0.1 million as of december 31 , 2015 and 2014 , respectively , which are included in other liabilities on the consolidated balance sheet . ( 3 ) ebitda is defined as consolidated net income before interest expense , income tax expense , depreciation and amortization . adjusted ebitda , which is a measure defined in our credit agreements , means ebitda adjusted for certain items which are described in the table below . we have included a reconciliation of ebitda and adjusted ebitda in the table below . both ebitda and adjusted ebitda are considered non-gaap financial measures . generally , a non-gaap financial measure is a numerical measure of a company 2019s performance , financial position or cash flows that either excludes or includes amounts that are not normally included or excluded in the most directly comparable measure calculated and presented in accordance with gaap . non-gaap measures used by us may differ from similar measures used by other companies , even when similar terms are used to identify such measures . we believe that ebitda and adjusted ebitda provide helpful information with respect to our operating performance and cash flows including our ability to meet our future debt service , capital expenditures and working capital requirements . adjusted ebitda is also the primary measure used in certain key covenants and definitions contained in the credit agreement governing our senior secured term loan facility ( 201cterm loan 201d ) , including the excess cash flow payment provision , the restricted payment covenant and the net leverage ratio . these covenants and definitions are material components of the term loan as they are used in determining the interest rate applicable to the term loan , our ability to make certain investments , incur additional debt , and make restricted payments , such as dividends and share repurchases , as well as whether we are required to make additional principal prepayments on the term loan beyond the quarterly amortization payments . for further details regarding the term loan , see note 8 ( long-term debt ) to the accompanying consolidated financial statements . the following unaudited table sets forth reconciliations of net income to ebitda and ebitda to adjusted ebitda for the periods presented: .
( in millions ) | years ended december 31 , 2015 | years ended december 31 , 2014 | years ended december 31 , 2013 | years ended december 31 , 2012 | years ended december 31 , 2011 net income | $ 403.1 | $ 244.9 | $ 132.8 | $ 119.0 | $ 17.1 depreciation and amortization | 227.4 | 207.9 | 208.2 | 210.2 | 204.9 income tax expense | 243.9 | 142.8 | 62.7 | 67.1 | 11.2 interest expense net | 159.5 | 197.3 | 250.1 | 307.4 | 324.2 ebitda | 1033.9 | 792.9 | 653.8 | 703.7 | 557.4 non-cash equity-based compensation | 31.2 | 16.4 | 8.6 | 22.1 | 19.5 net loss on extinguishment of long-term debt ( a ) | 24.3 | 90.7 | 64.0 | 17.2 | 118.9 loss ( income ) from equity investments ( b ) | 10.1 | -2.2 ( 2.2 ) | -0.6 ( 0.6 ) | -0.3 ( 0.3 ) | -0.1 ( 0.1 ) acquisition and integration expenses ( c ) | 10.2 | 2014 | 2014 | 2014 | 2014 gain on remeasurement of equity investment ( d ) | -98.1 ( 98.1 ) | 2014 | 2014 | 2014 | 2014 other adjustments ( e ) | 6.9 | 9.2 | 82.7 | 23.9 | 21.6 adjusted ebitda ( f ) | $ 1018.5 | $ 907.0 | $ 808.5 | $ 766.6 | $ 717.3
net loss on extinguishment of long-term debt ( a ) 24.3 90.7 64.0 17.2 118.9 loss ( income ) from equity investments ( b ) 10.1 ( 2.2 ) ( 0.6 ) ( 0.3 ) ( 0.1 ) acquisition and integration expenses ( c ) 10.2 2014 2014 2014 2014 gain on remeasurement of equity investment ( d ) ( 98.1 ) 2014 2014 2014 2014 other adjustments ( e ) 6.9 9.2 82.7 23.9 21.6 adjusted ebitda ( f ) $ 1018.5 $ 907.0 $ 808.5 $ 766.6 $ 717.3 ( a ) during the years ended december 31 , 2015 , 2014 , 2013 , 2012 , and 2011 , we recorded net losses on extinguishments of long-term debt . the losses represented the difference between the amount paid upon extinguishment , including call premiums and expenses paid to the debt holders and agents , and the net carrying amount of the extinguished debt , adjusted for a portion of the unamortized deferred financing costs . ( b ) represents our share of net income/loss from our equity investments . our 35% ( 35 % ) share of kelway 2019s net loss includes our 35% ( 35 % ) share of an expense related to certain equity awards granted by one of the sellers to kelway coworkers in july 2015 prior to the acquisition . ( c ) primarily includes expenses related to the acquisition of kelway . ( d ) represents the gain resulting from the remeasurement of our previously held 35% ( 35 % ) equity investment to fair value upon the completion of the acquisition of kelway. .
Question: w h a t w a s t h e 2 0 1 5 r a t e o f i n c r e a s e i n a d j u s t e d e b i t d a ?
| 5,153 |
29.1
|
Given the context, answer the question.
Context: sources of liquidity primary sources of liquidity for citigroup and its principal subsidiaries include : 2022 deposits ; 2022 collateralized financing transactions ; 2022 senior and subordinated debt ; 2022 commercial paper ; 2022 trust preferred and preferred securities ; and 2022 purchased/wholesale funds . citigroup 2019s funding sources are diversified across funding types and geography , a benefit of its global franchise . funding for citigroup and its major operating subsidiaries includes a geographically diverse retail and corporate deposit base of $ 774.2 billion . these deposits are diversified across products and regions , with approximately two-thirds of them outside of the u.s . this diversification provides the company with an important , stable and low-cost source of funding . a significant portion of these deposits has been , and is expected to be , long-term and stable , and are considered to be core . there are qualitative as well as quantitative assessments that determine the company 2019s calculation of core deposits . the first step in this process is a qualitative assessment of the deposits . for example , as a result of the company 2019s qualitative analysis certain deposits with wholesale funding characteristics are excluded from consideration as core . deposits that qualify under the company 2019s qualitative assessments are then subjected to quantitative analysis . excluding the impact of changes in foreign exchange rates and the sale of our retail banking operations in germany during the year ending december 31 , 2008 , the company 2019s deposit base remained stable . on a volume basis , deposit increases were noted in transaction services , u.s . retail banking and smith barney . this was partially offset by the company 2019s decision to reduce deposits considered wholesale funding , consistent with the company 2019s de-leveraging efforts , and declines in international consumer banking and the private bank . citigroup and its subsidiaries have historically had a significant presence in the global capital markets . the company 2019s capital markets funding activities have been primarily undertaken by two legal entities : ( i ) citigroup inc. , which issues long-term debt , medium-term notes , trust preferred securities , and preferred and common stock ; and ( ii ) citigroup funding inc . ( cfi ) , a first-tier subsidiary of citigroup , which issues commercial paper , medium-term notes and structured equity-linked and credit-linked notes , all of which are guaranteed by citigroup . other significant elements of long- term debt on the consolidated balance sheet include collateralized advances from the federal home loan bank system , long-term debt related to the consolidation of icg 2019s structured investment vehicles , asset-backed outstandings , and certain borrowings of foreign subsidiaries . each of citigroup 2019s major operating subsidiaries finances its operations on a basis consistent with its capitalization , regulatory structure and the environment in which it operates . particular attention is paid to those businesses that for tax , sovereign risk , or regulatory reasons cannot be freely and readily funded in the international markets . citigroup 2019s borrowings have historically been diversified by geography , investor , instrument and currency . decisions regarding the ultimate currency and interest rate profile of liquidity generated through these borrowings can be separated from the actual issuance through the use of derivative instruments . citigroup is a provider of liquidity facilities to the commercial paper programs of the two primary credit card securitization trusts with which it transacts . citigroup may also provide other types of support to the trusts . as a result of the recent economic downturn , its impact on the cashflows of the trusts , and in response to credit rating agency reviews of the trusts , the company increased the credit enhancement in the omni trust , and plans to provide additional enhancement to the master trust ( see note 23 to consolidated financial statements on page 175 for a further discussion ) . this support preserves investor sponsorship of our card securitization franchise , an important source of liquidity . banking subsidiaries there are various legal limitations on the ability of citigroup 2019s subsidiary depository institutions to extend credit , pay dividends or otherwise supply funds to citigroup and its non-bank subsidiaries . the approval of the office of the comptroller of the currency , in the case of national banks , or the office of thrift supervision , in the case of federal savings banks , is required if total dividends declared in any calendar year exceed amounts specified by the applicable agency 2019s regulations . state-chartered depository institutions are subject to dividend limitations imposed by applicable state law . in determining the declaration of dividends , each depository institution must also consider its effect on applicable risk-based capital and leverage ratio requirements , as well as policy statements of the federal regulatory agencies that indicate that banking organizations should generally pay dividends out of current operating earnings . non-banking subsidiaries citigroup also receives dividends from its non-bank subsidiaries . these non-bank subsidiaries are generally not subject to regulatory restrictions on dividends . however , as discussed in 201ccapital resources and liquidity 201d on page 94 , the ability of cgmhi to declare dividends can be restricted by capital considerations of its broker-dealer subsidiaries . cgmhi 2019s consolidated balance sheet is liquid , with the vast majority of its assets consisting of marketable securities and collateralized short-term financing agreements arising from securities transactions . cgmhi monitors and evaluates the adequacy of its capital and borrowing base on a daily basis to maintain liquidity and to ensure that its capital base supports the regulatory capital requirements of its subsidiaries . some of citigroup 2019s non-bank subsidiaries , including cgmhi , have credit facilities with citigroup 2019s subsidiary depository institutions , including citibank , n.a . borrowings under these facilities must be secured in accordance with section 23a of the federal reserve act . there are various legal restrictions on the extent to which a bank holding company and certain of its non-bank subsidiaries can borrow or obtain credit from citigroup 2019s subsidiary depository institutions or engage in certain other transactions with them . in general , these restrictions require that transactions be on arm 2019s length terms and be secured by designated amounts of specified collateral . see note 20 to the consolidated financial statements on page 169 . at december 31 , 2008 , long-term debt and commercial paper outstanding for citigroup , cgmhi , cfi and citigroup 2019s subsidiaries were as follows : in billions of dollars citigroup parent company cgmhi ( 2 ) citigroup funding inc . ( 2 ) citigroup subsidiaries long-term debt $ 192.3 $ 20.6 $ 37.4 $ 109.3 ( 1 ) .
in billions of dollars | citigroup parent company | cgmhi ( 2 ) | citigroup funding inc. ( 2 ) | other citigroup subsidiaries | long-term debt | $ 192.3 | $ 20.6 | $ 37.4 | $ 109.3 | -1 ( 1 ) commercial paper | $ 2014 | $ 2014 | $ 28.6 | $ 0.5 |
( 1 ) at december 31 , 2008 , approximately $ 67.4 billion relates to collateralized advances from the federal home loan bank . ( 2 ) citigroup inc . guarantees all of cfi 2019s debt and cgmhi 2019s publicly issued securities. .
Question: w h a t i s t h e t o t a l c o m m e r c i a l p a p e r i n b i l l i o n s o f d o l l a r s f o r c i t i g r o u p , c g m h i , c f i a n d c i t i g r o u p 2 0 1 9 s s u b s i d i a r i e s a t d e c e m b e r 3 1 , 2 0 0 8 ?
| 5,154 |
0.5
|
Given the context, answer the question.
Context: natural gas prices on average were lower in 2009 than in 2008 and in 2007 , with prices in 2008 hitting uniquely high levels . a significant portion of our natural gas production in the lower 48 states of the u.s . is sold at bid-week prices or first-of-month indices relative to our specific producing areas . a large portion of natural gas sales in alaska are subject to term contracts . our other major natural gas-producing regions are europe and equatorial guinea , where large portions of our natural gas sales are also subject to term contracts , making realized prices in these areas less volatile . as we sell larger quantities of natural gas from these regions , to the extent that these fixed prices are lower than prevailing prices , our reported average natural gas prices realizations may be less than benchmark natural gas prices . oil sands mining oil sands mining segment revenues correlate with prevailing market prices for the various qualities of synthetic crude oil and vacuum gas oil we produce . roughly two-thirds of the normal output mix will track movements in wti and one-third will track movements in the canadian heavy sour crude oil marker , primarily western canadian select . output mix can be impacted by operational problems or planned unit outages at the mine or the upgrader . the operating cost structure of the oil sands mining operations is predominantly fixed and therefore many of the costs incurred in times of full operation continue during production downtime . per-unit costs are sensitive to production rates . key variable costs are natural gas and diesel fuel , which track commodity markets such as the canadian aeco natural gas sales index and crude prices respectively . the table below shows average benchmark prices that impact both our revenues and variable costs. .
benchmark | 2009 | 2008 | 2007 wti crude oil ( dollars per barrel ) | $ 62.09 | $ 99.75 | $ 72.41 western canadian select ( dollars per barrel ) ( a ) | $ 52.13 | $ 79.59 | $ 49.60 aeco natural gas sales index ( dollars per mmbtu ) ( b ) | $ 3.49 | $ 7.74 | $ 6.06
western canadian select ( dollars per barrel ) ( a ) $ 52.13 $ 79.59 $ 49.60 aeco natural gas sales index ( dollars per mmbtu ) ( b ) $ 3.49 $ 7.74 $ 6.06 ( a ) monthly pricing based upon average wti adjusted for differentials unique to western canada . ( b ) alberta energy company day ahead index . integrated gas our integrated gas strategy is to link stranded natural gas resources with areas where a supply gap is emerging due to declining production and growing demand . our integrated gas operations include marketing and transportation of products manufactured from natural gas , such as lng and methanol , primarily in west africa , the u.s . and europe . our most significant lng investment is our 60 percent ownership in a production facility in equatorial guinea , which sells lng under a long-term contract at prices tied to henry hub natural gas prices . in 2009 , the gross sales from the plant were 3.9 million metric tonnes , while in 2008 , its first full year of operations , the plant sold 3.4 million metric tonnes . industry estimates of 2009 lng trade are approximately 185 million metric tonnes . more lng production facilities and tankers were under construction in 2009 . as a result of the sharp worldwide economic downturn in 2008 , continued weak economies are expected to lower natural gas consumption in various countries ; therefore , affecting near-term demand for lng . long-term lng supply continues to be in demand as markets seek the benefits of clean burning natural gas . market prices for lng are not reported or posted . in general , lng delivered to the u.s . is tied to henry hub prices and will track with changes in u.s . natural gas prices , while lng sold in europe and asia is indexed to crude oil prices and will track the movement of those prices . we own a 45 percent interest in a methanol plant located in equatorial guinea through our investment in ampco . gross sales of methanol from the plant totaled 960374 metric tonnes in 2009 and 792794 metric tonnes in 2008 . methanol demand has a direct impact on ampco 2019s earnings . because global demand for methanol is rather limited , changes in the supply-demand balance can have a significant impact on sales prices . the 2010 chemical markets associates , inc . estimates world demand for methanol in 2009 was 41 million metric tonnes . our plant capacity is 1.1 million , or about 3 percent of total demand . refining , marketing and transportation rm&t segment income depends largely on our refining and wholesale marketing gross margin , refinery throughputs and retail marketing gross margins for gasoline , distillates and merchandise. .
Question: i n 2 0 0 9 , t h e g r o s s s a l e s f r o m t h e p l a n t w e r e 3 . 9 m i l l i o n m e t r i c t o n n e s . w h a t w a s t h e i n c r e a s e f r o m 2 0 0 8 , i t s f i r s t f u l l y e a r o f o p e r a t i o n s , i n m i l l i o n m e t r i c t o n n e s ? \ \ n
| 5,155 |
44.8
|
Given the context, answer the question.
Context: notes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) owns the remaining 44% ( 44 % ) . we purchased our share of gpap philippines for $ 10.9 million . the purpose of this acquisition was to expand our presence in the asia-pacific market . this business acquisition was not significant to our consolidated financial statements and accordingly , we have not provided pro forma information relating to this acquisition . the following table summarizes the preliminary purchase price allocation ( in thousands ) : .
goodwill | $ 6286 customer-related intangible assets | 3248 contract-based intangible assets | 952 trademark | 224 property and equipment | 300 total assets acquired | 11010 minority interest in equity of subsidiary ( at historical cost ) | -132 ( 132 ) net assets acquired | $ 10878
all of the goodwill associated with the acquisition is non-deductible for tax purposes . the customer-related intangible assets have amortization periods of 11 years . the contract-based intangible assets have amortization periods of 7 years . the trademark has an amortization period of 5 years . money transfer branch locations during 2009 , we completed the second and final series of money transfer branch location acquisitions in the united states as part of an assignment and asset purchase agreement with a privately held company . the purpose of this acquisition was to increase the market presence of our dolex-branded money transfer offering . the purchase price of these acquisitions was $ 787 thousand with $ 739 thousand allocated to goodwill and $ 48 thousand allocated to intangibles . pursuant to our annual impairment test in fiscal 2009 , goodwill and other intangibles related to our money transfer business were deemed impaired . please see note 3 2014impairment charges for further information . this business acquisition was not significant to our consolidated financial statements and accordingly , we have not provided pro forma information relating to this acquisition . fiscal 2008 discover during the year ended may 31 , 2008 , we acquired a portfolio of merchants that process discover transactions and the rights to process discover transactions for our existing and new merchants for $ 6.0 million . the purchase of the portfolio was structured to occur in tranches . during fiscal 2009 , additional tranches were purchased for $ 1.4 million . as a result of this acquisition , we now process discover transactions similarly to how we currently process visa and mastercard transactions . the purpose of this acquisition was to offer merchants a single point of contact for discover , visa and mastercard card processing . the operating results of the acquired portfolio have been included in our consolidated financial statements from the dates of acquisition . the customer-related intangible assets have amortization periods of 10 years . these business acquisitions were not significant to our consolidated financial statements and accordingly , we have not provided pro forma information relating to these acquisitions. .
Question: w h a t i s t h e y e a r l y a m o r t i z a t i o n e x p e n s e r e l a t e d t o t r a d e m a r k , ( i n t h o u s a n d s ) ?
| 5,156 |
$ 62049
|
Given the context, answer the question.
Context: a reconciliation of the beginning and ending amount of unrecognized tax benefits , for the periods indicated , is as follows: .
( dollars in thousands ) | 2010 | 2009 | 2008 balance at january 1 | $ 29010 | $ 34366 | $ 29132 additions based on tax positions related to the current year | 7119 | 6997 | 5234 additions for tax positions of prior years | - | - | - reductions for tax positions of prior years | - | - | - settlements with taxing authorities | -12356 ( 12356 ) | -12353 ( 12353 ) | - lapses of applicable statutes of limitations | - | - | - balance at december 31 | $ 23773 | $ 29010 | $ 34366
the entire amount of the unrecognized tax benefits would affect the effective tax rate if recognized . in 2010 , the company favorably settled a 2003 and 2004 irs audit . the company recorded a net overall tax benefit including accrued interest of $ 25920 thousand . in addition , the company was also able to take down a $ 12356 thousand fin 48 reserve that had been established regarding the 2003 and 2004 irs audit . the company is no longer subject to u.s . federal , state and local or foreign income tax examinations by tax authorities for years before 2007 . the company recognizes accrued interest related to net unrecognized tax benefits and penalties in income taxes . during the years ended december 31 , 2010 , 2009 and 2008 , the company accrued and recognized a net expense ( benefit ) of approximately $ ( 9938 ) thousand , $ 1563 thousand and $ 2446 thousand , respectively , in interest and penalties . included within the 2010 net expense ( benefit ) of $ ( 9938 ) thousand is $ ( 10591 ) thousand of accrued interest related to the 2003 and 2004 irs audit . the company is not aware of any positions for which it is reasonably possible that the total amounts of unrecognized tax benefits will significantly increase or decrease within twelve months of the reporting date . for u.s . income tax purposes the company has foreign tax credit carryforwards of $ 55026 thousand that begin to expire in 2014 . in addition , for u.s . income tax purposes the company has $ 41693 thousand of alternative minimum tax credits that do not expire . management believes that it is more likely than not that the company will realize the benefits of its net deferred tax assets and , accordingly , no valuation allowance has been recorded for the periods presented . tax benefits of $ 629 thousand and $ 1714 thousand related to share-based compensation deductions for stock options exercised in 2010 and 2009 , respectively , are included within additional paid-in capital of the shareholders 2019 equity section of the consolidated balance sheets. .
Question: i n t h e 2 0 1 0 , t h e c o m p a n y s e t t l e d a n a u d i t a g r e e m e n t f a v o r a b l e . a s a r e s u l t o f t h i s f a v o r a b l e a g r e e m e n t , w h a t m i g h t t h e b a l a n c e b e o n d e c e m b e r 1 s t ?
| 5,157 |
102%
|
Given the context, answer the question.
Context: hologic , inc . notes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) ( in thousands , except per share data ) future minimum lease payments under all the company 2019s operating leases are approximately as follows: .
fiscal years ending | amount september 24 2005 | $ 4848 september 30 2006 | 4672 september 29 2007 | 3680 september 27 2008 | 3237 september 26 2009 | 3158 thereafter | 40764 total ( not reduced by minimum sublease rentals of $ 165 ) | $ 60359
the company subleases a portion of its bedford facility and has received rental income of $ 277 , $ 410 and $ 682 for fiscal years 2004 , 2003 and 2002 , respectively , which has been recorded as an offset to rent expense in the accompanying statements of income . rental expense , net of sublease income , was approximately $ 4660 , $ 4963 , and $ 2462 for fiscal 2004 , 2003 and 2002 , respectively . 9 . business segments and geographic information the company reports segment information in accordance with sfas no . 131 , disclosures about segments of an enterprise and related information . operating segments are identified as components of an enterprise about which separate , discrete financial information is available for evaluation by the chief operating decision maker , or decision-making group , in making decisions how to allocate resources and assess performance . the company 2019s chief decision-maker , as defined under sfas no . 131 , is the chief executive officer . to date , the company has viewed its operations and manages its business as four principal operating segments : the manufacture and sale of mammography products , osteoporosis assessment products , digital detectors and other products . as a result of the company 2019s implementation of a company wide integrated software application in fiscal 2003 , identifiable assets for the four principal operating segments only consist of inventories , intangible assets , and property and equipment . the company has presented all other assets as corporate assets . prior periods have been restated to conform to this presentation . intersegment sales and transfers are not significant. .
Question: w h a t w a s t h e p e r c e n t a g e c h a n g e i n r e n t a l e x p e n s e b e t w e e n 2 0 0 2 a n d 2 0 0 3 ?
| 5,158 |
3%
|
Given the context, answer the question.
Context: under this line are primarily used by our european subsidiaries to settle intercompany sales and are denominated in the respective local currencies of its european subsidiaries . the line of credit may be canceled by the bank with 30 days notice . at september 27 , 2003 , there were no outstanding borrowings under this line . in september 2001 we obtained a secured loan from wells fargo foothill , inc . the loan agreement with wells fargo foothill , inc . provides for a term loan of approximately $ 2.4 million , which we borrowed at signing , and a revolving line of credit facility . the maximum amount we can borrow under the loan agreement and amendments is $ 20.0 million . the loan agreement and amendments contain financial and other covenants and the actual amount which we can borrow under the line of credit at any time is based upon a formula tied to the amount of our qualifying accounts receivable . in july 2003 we amended this loan agreement primarily to simplify financial covenants and to reduce the fees related to this facility . the term loan accrues interest at prime plus 1.0% ( 1.0 % ) for five years . the line of credit advances accrue interest at prime plus 0.25% ( 0.25 % ) . the line of credit expires in september 2005 . we were in compliance with all covenants as of september 27 , 2003 . in april 2002 , we began an implementation project for an integrated enterprise wide software application . we began operational use of this software application at the bedford , ma and newark , de facilities on november 24 , 2002 , at the danbury , ct facility on february 24 , 2003 and at the brussels , belgium location on october 2 , 2003 . through september 27 , 2003 we have made payments totaling $ 3.4 million for hardware , software and consulting services representing substantially all of our capital commitments related to this implementation project . most of the cost has been capitalized and we began to amortize these costs over their expected useful lives in december 2002 . in september 2002 , we completed a sale/leaseback transaction for our headquarters and manufacturing facility located in bedford , massachusetts and our lorad manufacturing facility in danbury , connecticut . the transaction resulted in net proceeds to us of $ 31.4 million . the new lease for these facilities , including the associated land , has a term of 20 years , with four five-year year renewal terms , which we may exercise at our option . the basic rent for the facilities is $ 3.2 million per year , which is subject to adjustment for increases in the consumer price index . the aggregate total minimum lease payments during the initial 20-year term are $ 62.9 million . in addition , we are required to maintain the facilities during the term of the lease and to pay all taxes , insurance , utilities and other costs associated with those facilities . under the lease , we make customary representations and warranties and agree to certain financial covenants and indemnities . in the event we default on the lease , the landlord may terminate the lease , accelerate payments and collect liquidated damages . the following table summarizes our contractual obligations and commitments as of september 27 , 2003 : payments due by period ( in thousands ) contractual obligations total less than 1 year years thereafter .
contractual obligations | payments due by period ( in thousands ) total | payments due by period ( in thousands ) less than 1 year | payments due by period ( in thousands ) 2-3 years | payments due by period ( in thousands ) 4-5 years | payments due by period ( in thousands ) thereafter long term debt | $ 2030 | $ 480 | $ 1550 | $ 2014 | $ 2014 operating leases | $ 62934 | $ 4371 | $ 8160 | $ 6482 | $ 43921 total contractual cash obligations | $ 64964 | $ 4851 | $ 9710 | $ 6482 | $ 43921
except as set forth above , we do not have any other significant capital commitments . we are working on several projects , with an emphasis on direct radiography plates . we believe that we have sufficient funds in order to fund our expected operations over the next twelve months . recent accounting pronouncements in december 2002 , sfas no . 148 , accounting for stock-based compensation 2013 transition and disclosure was issued . sfas no . 148 amends sfas no . 123 to provide alternative methods of transition to the fair value method of accounting for stock-based employee compensation . in addition , sfas no . 148 amends the disclosure provisions of sfas no . 123 to require disclosure in the summary of significant accounting policies of the effects .
Question: w h a t p e r c e n t a g e o f t o t a l c o n t r a c t u a l o b l i g a t i o n s a n d c o m m i t m e n t s a s o f s e p t e m b e r 2 7 , 2 0 0 3 : p a y m e n t s d u e i s c o m p o s e d o f l o n g t e r m d e b t ?
| 5,159 |
8.5%
|
Given the context, answer the question.
Context: backlog backlog increased in 2015 compared to 2014 primarily due to higher orders on f-35 and c-130 programs . backlog decreased slightly in 2014 compared to 2013 primarily due to lower orders on f-16 and f-22 programs . trends we expect aeronautics 2019 2016 net sales to increase in the mid-single digit percentage range as compared to 2015 due to increased volume on the f-35 and c-130 programs , partially offset by decreased volume on the f-16 program . operating profit is also expected to increase in the low single-digit percentage range , driven by increased volume on the f-35 program offset by contract mix that results in a slight decrease in operating margins between years . information systems & global solutions our is&gs business segment provides advanced technology systems and expertise , integrated information technology solutions and management services across a broad spectrum of applications for civil , defense , intelligence and other government customers . is&gs 2019 technical services business provides a comprehensive portfolio of technical and sustainment services . is&gs has a portfolio of many smaller contracts as compared to our other business segments . is&gs has been impacted by the continued downturn in certain federal agencies 2019 information technology budgets and increased re-competition on existing contracts coupled with the fragmentation of large contracts into multiple smaller contracts that are awarded primarily on the basis of price . is&gs 2019 operating results included the following ( in millions ) : .
| 2015 | 2014 | 2013 net sales | $ 5596 | $ 5654 | $ 6115 operating profit | 508 | 472 | 498 operating margins | 9.1% ( 9.1 % ) | 8.3% ( 8.3 % ) | 8.1% ( 8.1 % ) backlog at year-end | $ 4800 | $ 6000 | $ 6300
2015 compared to 2014 is&gs 2019 net sales decreased $ 58 million , or 1% ( 1 % ) , in 2015 as compared to 2014 . the decrease was attributable to lower net sales of approximately $ 395 million as a result of key program completions , lower customer funding levels and increased competition , coupled with the fragmentation of existing large contracts into multiple smaller contracts that are awarded primarily on the basis of price when re-competed ( including cms-citic ) . these decreases were partially offset by higher net sales of approximately $ 230 million for businesses acquired in 2014 ; and approximately $ 110 million due to the start-up of new programs and growth in recently awarded programs . is&gs 2019 operating profit increased $ 36 million , or 8% ( 8 % ) , in 2015 as compared to 2014 . the increase was attributable to improved program performance and risk retirements , offset by decreased operating profit resulting from the activities mentioned above for net sales . adjustments not related to volume , including net profit booking rate adjustments and other matters , were approximately $ 70 million higher in 2015 compared to 2014 . 2014 compared to 2013 is&gs 2019 net sales decreased $ 461 million , or 8% ( 8 % ) , in 2014 as compared to 2013 . the decrease was primarily attributable to lower net sales of about $ 475 million due to the wind-down or completion of certain programs , driven by reductions in direct warfighter support ( including jieddo ) ; and approximately $ 320 million due to decreased volume in technical services programs reflecting market pressures . the decreases were offset by higher net sales of about $ 330 million due to the start-up of new programs , growth in recently awarded programs and integration of recently acquired companies . is&gs 2019 operating profit decreased $ 26 million , or 5% ( 5 % ) , in 2014 as compared to 2013 . the decrease was primarily attributable to the activities mentioned above for sales , partially offset by severance recoveries related to the restructuring announced in november 2013 of approximately $ 20 million in 2014 . adjustments not related to volume , including net profit booking rate adjustments , were comparable in 2014 and 2013. .
Question: w h a t w a s t h e a v e r a g e o p e r a t i n g m a r g i n s f o r i s & g s f r o m 2 0 1 3 t o 2 0 1 5 ?
| 5,160 |
61.65
|
Given the context, answer the question.
Context: item 11 2014executive compensation we incorporate by reference in this item 11 the information relating to executive and director compensation contained under the headings 201cother information about the board and its committees , 201d 201ccompensation and other benefits 201d and 201creport of the compensation committee 201d from our proxy statement to be delivered in connection with our 2013 annual meeting of shareholders to be held on november 20 , 2013 . item 12 2014security ownership of certain beneficial owners and management and related stockholder matters we incorporate by reference in this item 12 the information relating to ownership of our common stock by certain persons contained under the headings 201ccommon stock ownership of management 201d and 201ccommon stock ownership by certain other persons 201d from our proxy statement to be delivered in connection with our 2013 annual meeting of shareholders to be held on november 20 , 2013 . the following table provides certain information as of may 31 , 2013 concerning the shares of the company 2019s common stock that may be issued under existing equity compensation plans . for more information on these plans , see note 11 to notes to consolidated financial statements . plan category number of securities to be issued upon exercise of outstanding options , warrants and rights weighted- average exercise price of outstanding options , warrants and rights number of securities remaining available for future issuance under equity compensation plans ( excluding securities reflected in column ( a ) ) equity compensation plans approved by security holders : 1765510 $ 34.92 7927210 ( 1 ) equity compensation plans not approved by security holders : 2014 2014 2014 .
plan category | number of securities to be issued upon exercise of outstanding options warrants and rights ( a ) | weighted-average exerciseprice of outstanding options warrants and rights ( b ) | number of securitiesremaining available forfuture issuance under equity compensation plans ( excluding securities reflected in column ( a ) ) ( c ) | equity compensation plans approved by security holders: | 1765510 | $ 34.92 | 7927210 | -1 ( 1 ) equity compensation plans not approved by security holders: | 2014 | 2014 | 2014 | total | 1765510 | $ 34.92 | 7927210 | -1 ( 1 )
( 1 ) also includes shares of common stock available for issuance other than upon the exercise of an option , warrant or right under the global payments inc . 2000 long-term incentive plan , as amended and restated , the global payments inc . amended and restated 2005 incentive plan , amended and restated 2000 non- employee director stock option plan , global payments employee stock purchase plan and the global payments inc . 2011 incentive plan . item 13 2014certain relationships and related transactions , and director independence we incorporate by reference in this item 13 the information regarding certain relationships and related transactions between us and some of our affiliates and the independence of our board of directors contained under the headings 201ccertain relationships and related transactions 201d and 201cother information about the board and its committees 201d from our proxy statement to be delivered in connection with our 2013 annual meeting of shareholders to be held on november 20 , 2013 . item 14 2014principal accounting fees and services we incorporate by reference in this item 14 the information regarding principal accounting fees and services contained under the section ratification of the reappointment of auditors from our proxy statement to be delivered in connection with our 2013 annual meeting of shareholders to be held on november 20 , 2013. .
Question: w h a t i s t h e t o t a l v a l u e o f s e c u r i t i e s a p p r o v e d b y s e c u r i t y h o l d e r s , ( i n m i l l i o n s ) ?
| 5,161 |
20.1%
|
Given the context, answer the question.
Context: part iii item 10 . directors , executive officers and corporate governance for the information required by this item 10 , other than information with respect to our executive officers contained at the end of item 1 of this report , see 201celection of directors , 201d 201cnominees for election to the board of directors , 201d 201ccorporate governance 201d and 201csection 16 ( a ) beneficial ownership reporting compliance , 201d in the proxy statement for our 2015 annual meeting , which information is incorporated herein by reference . the proxy statement for our 2015 annual meeting will be filed within 120 days of the close of our fiscal year . for the information required by this item 10 with respect to our executive officers , see part i of this report on pages 11 - 12 . item 11 . executive compensation for the information required by this item 11 , see 201cexecutive compensation , 201d 201ccompensation committee report on executive compensation 201d and 201ccompensation committee interlocks and insider participation 201d in the proxy statement for our 2015 annual meeting , which information is incorporated herein by reference . item 12 . security ownership of certain beneficial owners and management and related stockholder matters for the information required by this item 12 with respect to beneficial ownership of our common stock , see 201csecurity ownership of certain beneficial owners and management 201d in the proxy statement for our 2015 annual meeting , which information is incorporated herein by reference . the following table sets forth certain information as of december 31 , 2014 regarding our equity plans : plan category number of securities to be issued upon exercise of outstanding options , warrants and rights weighted-average exercise price of outstanding options , warrants and rights number of securities remaining available for future issuance under equity compensation plans ( excluding securities reflected in column ( a ) ( b ) ( c ) equity compensation plans approved by security holders 1233672 $ 75.93 4903018 item 13 . certain relationships and related transactions , and director independence for the information required by this item 13 , see 201ccertain transactions 201d and 201ccorporate governance 201d in the proxy statement for our 2015 annual meeting , which information is incorporated herein by reference . item 14 . principal accounting fees and services for the information required by this item 14 , see 201caudit and non-audit fees 201d and 201cpolicy on audit committee pre- approval of audit and non-audit services of independent registered public accounting firm 201d in the proxy statement for our 2015 annual meeting , which information is incorporated herein by reference. .
plan category | number of securitiesto be issued uponexercise ofoutstanding options warrants and rights ( a ) ( b ) | weighted-averageexercise price ofoutstanding options warrants and rights | number of securitiesremaining available forfuture issuance underequity compensationplans ( excludingsecurities reflected in column ( a ) ) ( c ) equity compensation plans approved by security holders | 1233672 | $ 75.93 | 4903018
part iii item 10 . directors , executive officers and corporate governance for the information required by this item 10 , other than information with respect to our executive officers contained at the end of item 1 of this report , see 201celection of directors , 201d 201cnominees for election to the board of directors , 201d 201ccorporate governance 201d and 201csection 16 ( a ) beneficial ownership reporting compliance , 201d in the proxy statement for our 2015 annual meeting , which information is incorporated herein by reference . the proxy statement for our 2015 annual meeting will be filed within 120 days of the close of our fiscal year . for the information required by this item 10 with respect to our executive officers , see part i of this report on pages 11 - 12 . item 11 . executive compensation for the information required by this item 11 , see 201cexecutive compensation , 201d 201ccompensation committee report on executive compensation 201d and 201ccompensation committee interlocks and insider participation 201d in the proxy statement for our 2015 annual meeting , which information is incorporated herein by reference . item 12 . security ownership of certain beneficial owners and management and related stockholder matters for the information required by this item 12 with respect to beneficial ownership of our common stock , see 201csecurity ownership of certain beneficial owners and management 201d in the proxy statement for our 2015 annual meeting , which information is incorporated herein by reference . the following table sets forth certain information as of december 31 , 2014 regarding our equity plans : plan category number of securities to be issued upon exercise of outstanding options , warrants and rights weighted-average exercise price of outstanding options , warrants and rights number of securities remaining available for future issuance under equity compensation plans ( excluding securities reflected in column ( a ) ( b ) ( c ) equity compensation plans approved by security holders 1233672 $ 75.93 4903018 item 13 . certain relationships and related transactions , and director independence for the information required by this item 13 , see 201ccertain transactions 201d and 201ccorporate governance 201d in the proxy statement for our 2015 annual meeting , which information is incorporated herein by reference . item 14 . principal accounting fees and services for the information required by this item 14 , see 201caudit and non-audit fees 201d and 201cpolicy on audit committee pre- approval of audit and non-audit services of independent registered public accounting firm 201d in the proxy statement for our 2015 annual meeting , which information is incorporated herein by reference. .
Question: w h a t p o r t i o n o f t h e t o t a l n u m b e r o f s e c u r i t i e s a p p r o v e d b y t h e s e c u r i t y h o l d e r s i s i s s u e d ?
| 5,162 |
16959131390.1
|
Given the context, answer the question.
Context: part ii item 5 . market for registrant 2019s common equity , related stockholder matters and issuer purchases of equity securities the following table presents reported quarterly high and low per share sale prices of our class a common stock on the new york stock exchange ( nyse ) for the years 2006 and 2005. .
2006 | high | low quarter ended march 31 | $ 32.68 | $ 26.66 quarter ended june 30 | 35.75 | 27.35 quarter ended september 30 | 36.92 | 29.98 quarter ended december 31 | 38.74 | 35.21 2005 | high | low quarter ended march 31 | $ 19.28 | $ 17.30 quarter ended june 30 | 21.16 | 16.28 quarter ended september 30 | 25.20 | 20.70 quarter ended december 31 | 28.33 | 22.73
on february 22 , 2007 , the closing price of our class a common stock was $ 40.38 per share as reported on the nyse . as of february 22 , 2007 , we had 419988395 outstanding shares of class a common stock and 623 registered holders . in february 2004 , all outstanding shares of our class b common stock were converted into shares of our class a common stock on a one-for-one basis pursuant to the occurrence of the 201cdodge conversion event 201d as defined in our charter . also in february 2004 , all outstanding shares of class c common stock were converted into shares of class a common stock on a one-for-one basis . in august 2005 , we amended and restated our charter to , among other things , eliminate our class b common stock and class c common stock . dividends we have never paid a dividend on any class of our common stock . we anticipate that we may retain future earnings , if any , to fund the development and growth of our business . the indentures governing our 7.50% ( 7.50 % ) senior notes due 2012 ( 7.50% ( 7.50 % ) notes ) and our 7.125% ( 7.125 % ) senior notes due 2012 ( 7.125% ( 7.125 % ) notes ) may prohibit us from paying dividends to our stockholders unless we satisfy certain financial covenants . our credit facilities and the indentures governing the terms of our debt securities contain covenants that may restrict the ability of our subsidiaries from making to us any direct or indirect distribution , dividend or other payment on account of their limited liability company interests , partnership interests , capital stock or other equity interests . under our credit facilities , the borrower subsidiaries may pay cash dividends or make other distributions to us in accordance with the applicable credit facility only if no default exists or would be created thereby . the indenture governing the terms of the ati 7.25% ( 7.25 % ) notes prohibit ati and certain of our other subsidiaries that have guaranteed those notes ( sister guarantors ) from paying dividends and making other payments or distributions to us unless certain financial covenants are satisfied . the indentures governing the terms of our 7.50% ( 7.50 % ) notes and 7.125% ( 7.125 % ) notes also contain certain restrictive covenants , which prohibit the restricted subsidiaries under these indentures from paying dividends and making other payments or distributions to us unless certain financial covenants are satisfied . for more information about the restrictions under our credit facilities and our notes indentures , see item 7 of this annual report under the caption 201cmanagement 2019s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations 2014liquidity and capital resources 2014factors affecting sources of liquidity 201d and note 7 to our consolidated financial statements included in this annual report. .
Question: w h a t w a s t h e m a r k e t c a p i t a l i z a t i o n o n f e b r u a r y 2 2 2 0 0 7
| 5,163 |
18.9%
|
Given the context, answer the question.
Context: long-term product offerings include active and index strategies . our active strategies seek to earn attractive returns in excess of a market benchmark or performance hurdle while maintaining an appropriate risk profile . we offer two types of active strategies : those that rely primarily on fundamental research and those that utilize primarily quantitative models to drive portfolio construction . in contrast , index strategies seek to closely track the returns of a corresponding index , generally by investing in substantially the same underlying securities within the index or in a subset of those securities selected to approximate a similar risk and return profile of the index . index strategies include both our non-etf index products and ishares etfs . although many clients use both active and index strategies , the application of these strategies may differ . for example , clients may use index products to gain exposure to a market or asset class , or may use a combination of index strategies to target active returns . in addition , institutional non-etf index assignments tend to be very large ( multi-billion dollars ) and typically reflect low fee rates . this has the potential to exaggerate the significance of net flows in institutional index products on blackrock 2019s revenues and earnings . equity year-end 2016 equity aum totaled $ 2.657 trillion , reflecting net inflows of $ 51.4 billion . net inflows included $ 74.9 billion into ishares , driven by net inflows into the core ranges and broad developed and emerging market equities . ishares net inflows were partially offset by active and non-etf index net outflows of $ 20.2 billion and $ 3.3 billion , respectively . blackrock 2019s effective fee rates fluctuate due to changes in aum mix . approximately half of blackrock 2019s equity aum is tied to international markets , including emerging markets , which tend to have higher fee rates than u.s . equity strategies . accordingly , fluctuations in international equity markets , which may not consistently move in tandem with u.s . markets , have a greater impact on blackrock 2019s effective equity fee rates and revenues . fixed income fixed income aum ended 2016 at $ 1.572 trillion , reflecting net inflows of $ 120.0 billion . in 2016 , active net inflows of $ 16.6 billion were diversified across fixed income offerings , and included strong inflows from insurance clients . fixed income ishares net inflows of $ 59.9 billion were led by flows into the core ranges , emerging market , high yield and corporate bond funds . non-etf index net inflows of $ 43.4 billion were driven by demand for liability-driven investment solutions . multi-asset blackrock 2019s multi-asset team manages a variety of balanced funds and bespoke mandates for a diversified client base that leverages our broad investment expertise in global equities , bonds , currencies and commodities , and our extensive risk management capabilities . investment solutions might include a combination of long-only portfolios and alternative investments as well as tactical asset allocation overlays . component changes in multi-asset aum for 2016 are presented below . ( in millions ) december 31 , net inflows ( outflows ) market change impact december 31 .
( in millions ) | december 312015 | net inflows ( outflows ) | marketchange | fx impact | december 312016 asset allocation and balanced | $ 185836 | $ -10332 ( 10332 ) | $ 6705 | $ -5534 ( 5534 ) | $ 176675 target date/risk | 125664 | 13500 | 10189 | 79 | 149432 fiduciary | 64433 | 998 | 5585 | -2621 ( 2621 ) | 68395 futureadvisor ( 1 ) | 403 | 61 | 41 | 2014 | 505 total | $ 376336 | $ 4227 | $ 22520 | $ -8076 ( 8076 ) | $ 395007
( 1 ) the futureadvisor amount does not include aum that was held in ishares holdings . multi-asset net inflows reflected ongoing institutional demand for our solutions-based advice with $ 13.2 billion of net inflows coming from institutional clients . defined contribution plans of institutional clients remained a significant driver of flows , and contributed $ 11.3 billion to institutional multi-asset net inflows in 2016 , primarily into target date and target risk product offerings . retail net outflows of $ 9.4 billion were primarily due to outflows from world allocation strategies . the company 2019s multi-asset strategies include the following : 2022 asset allocation and balanced products represented 45% ( 45 % ) of multi-asset aum at year-end . these strategies combine equity , fixed income and alternative components for investors seeking a tailored solution relative to a specific benchmark and within a risk budget . in certain cases , these strategies seek to minimize downside risk through diversification , derivatives strategies and tactical asset allocation decisions . flagship products in this category include our global allocation and multi-asset income fund families . 2022 target date and target risk products grew 11% ( 11 % ) organically in 2016 , with net inflows of $ 13.5 billion . institutional investors represented 94% ( 94 % ) of target date and target risk aum , with defined contribution plans accounting for 88% ( 88 % ) of aum . flows were driven by defined contribution investments in our lifepath and lifepath retirement income ae offerings . lifepath products utilize a proprietary asset allocation model that seeks to balance risk and return over an investment horizon based on the investor 2019s expected retirement timing . 2022 fiduciary management services are complex mandates in which pension plan sponsors or endowments and foundations retain blackrock to assume responsibility for some or all aspects of plan management . these customized services require strong partnership with the clients 2019 investment staff and trustees in order to tailor investment strategies to meet client-specific risk budgets and return objectives. .
Question: w h a t i s t h e p e r c e n t c h a n g e i n t a r g e t d a t e / r i s k f r o m d e c e m b e r 3 1 , 2 0 1 5 t o d e c e m b e r 3 1 , 2 0 1 6 ?
| 5,164 |
25.3%
|
Given the context, answer the question.
Context: part i item 1 entergy corporation , utility operating companies , and system energy entergy new orleans provides electric and gas service in the city of new orleans pursuant to indeterminate permits set forth in city ordinances ( except electric service in algiers , which is provided by entergy louisiana ) . these ordinances contain a continuing option for the city of new orleans to purchase entergy new orleans 2019s electric and gas utility properties . entergy texas holds a certificate of convenience and necessity from the puct to provide electric service to areas within approximately 27 counties in eastern texas , and holds non-exclusive franchises to provide electric service in approximately 68 incorporated municipalities . entergy texas was typically granted 50-year franchises , but recently has been receiving 25-year franchises . entergy texas 2019s electric franchises expire during 2013-2058 . the business of system energy is limited to wholesale power sales . it has no distribution franchises . property and other generation resources generating stations the total capability of the generating stations owned and leased by the utility operating companies and system energy as of december 31 , 2011 , is indicated below: .
company | owned and leased capability mw ( 1 ) total | owned and leased capability mw ( 1 ) gas/oil | owned and leased capability mw ( 1 ) nuclear | owned and leased capability mw ( 1 ) coal | owned and leased capability mw ( 1 ) hydro entergy arkansas | 4774 | 1668 | 1823 | 1209 | 74 entergy gulf states louisiana | 3317 | 1980 | 974 | 363 | - entergy louisiana | 5424 | 4265 | 1159 | - | - entergy mississippi | 3229 | 2809 | - | 420 | - entergy new orleans | 764 | 764 | - | - | - entergy texas | 2538 | 2269 | - | 269 | - system energy | 1071 | - | 1071 | - | - total | 21117 | 13755 | 5027 | 2261 | 74
( 1 ) 201cowned and leased capability 201d is the dependable load carrying capability as demonstrated under actual operating conditions based on the primary fuel ( assuming no curtailments ) that each station was designed to utilize . the entergy system's load and capacity projections are reviewed periodically to assess the need and timing for additional generating capacity and interconnections . these reviews consider existing and projected demand , the availability and price of power , the location of new load , and the economy . summer peak load in the entergy system service territory has averaged 21246 mw from 2002-2011 . in the 2002 time period , the entergy system's long-term capacity resources , allowing for an adequate reserve margin , were approximately 3000 mw less than the total capacity required for peak period demands . in this time period the entergy system met its capacity shortages almost entirely through short-term power purchases in the wholesale spot market . in the fall of 2002 , the entergy system began a program to add new resources to its existing generation portfolio and began a process of issuing requests for proposals ( rfp ) to procure supply-side resources from sources other than the spot market to meet the unique regional needs of the utility operating companies . the entergy system has adopted a long-term resource strategy that calls for the bulk of capacity needs to be met through long-term resources , whether owned or contracted . entergy refers to this strategy as the "portfolio transformation strategy" . over the past nine years , portfolio transformation has resulted in the addition of about 4500 mw of new long-term resources . these figures do not include transactions currently pending as a result of the summer 2009 rfp . when the summer 2009 rfp transactions are included in the entergy system portfolio of long-term resources and adjusting for unit deactivations of older generation , the entergy system is approximately 500 mw short of its projected 2012 peak load plus reserve margin . this remaining need is expected to be met through a nuclear uprate at grand gulf and limited-term resources . the entergy system will continue to access the spot power market to economically .
Question: i n 2 0 1 1 w h a t w a s t h e p e r c e n t o f t h e e n t e r g y a r k a n s a s p r o p e r t y a n d o t h e r g e n e r a t i o n r e s o u r c e s g e n e r a t i n g c a p a c i t y t h a t w a s f r o m c o a l
| 5,165 |
-13.3%
|
Given the context, answer the question.
Context: the following table illustrates the effect that a 10% ( 10 % ) unfavorable or favorable movement in foreign currency exchange rates , relative to the u.s . dollar , would have on the fair value of our forward exchange contracts as of october 30 , 2010 and october 31 , 2009: .
| october 30 2010 | october 31 2009 fair value of forward exchange contracts asset | $ 7256 | $ 8367 fair value of forward exchange contracts after a 10% ( 10 % ) unfavorable movement in foreign currency exchange rates asset | $ 22062 | $ 20132 fair value of forward exchange contracts after a 10% ( 10 % ) favorable movement in foreign currency exchange rates liability | $ -7396 ( 7396 ) | $ -6781 ( 6781 )
fair value of forward exchange contracts after a 10% ( 10 % ) unfavorable movement in foreign currency exchange rates asset . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 22062 $ 20132 fair value of forward exchange contracts after a 10% ( 10 % ) favorable movement in foreign currency exchange rates liability . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ ( 7396 ) $ ( 6781 ) the calculation assumes that each exchange rate would change in the same direction relative to the u.s . dollar . in addition to the direct effects of changes in exchange rates , such changes typically affect the volume of sales or the foreign currency sales price as competitors 2019 products become more or less attractive . our sensitivity analysis of the effects of changes in foreign currency exchange rates does not factor in a potential change in sales levels or local currency selling prices. .
Question: w h a t i s t h e g r o w t h r a t e i n t h e f a i r v a l u e o f f o r w a r d e x c h a n g e c o n t r a c t s a s s e t f r o m 2 0 0 9 t o 2 0 1 0 ?
| 5,166 |
1.96
|
Given the context, answer the question.
Context: management 2019s discussion and analysis jpmorgan chase & co . / 2008 annual report 39 five-year stock performance the following table and graph compare the five-year cumulative total return for jpmorgan chase & co . ( 201cjpmorgan chase 201d or the 201cfirm 201d ) common stock with the cumulative return of the s&p 500 stock index and the s&p financial index . the s&p 500 index is a commonly referenced u.s . equity benchmark consisting of leading companies from different economic sectors . the s&p financial index is an index of 81 financial companies , all of which are within the s&p 500 . the firm is a component of both industry indices . the following table and graph assumes simultaneous investments of $ 100 on december 31 , 2003 , in jpmorgan chase common stock and in each of the above s&p indices . the comparison assumes that all dividends are reinvested . this section of the jpmorgan chase 2019s annual report for the year ended december 31 , 2008 ( 201cannual report 201d ) provides manage- ment 2019s discussion and analysis of the financial condition and results of operations ( 201cmd&a 201d ) of jpmorgan chase . see the glossary of terms on pages 230 2013233 for definitions of terms used throughout this annual report . the md&a included in this annual report con- tains statements that are forward-looking within the meaning of the private securities litigation reform act of 1995 . such statements are based upon the current beliefs and expectations of jpmorgan december 31 .
( in dollars ) | 2003 | 2004 | 2005 | 2006 | 2007 | 2008 jpmorgan chase | $ 100.00 | $ 109.92 | $ 116.02 | $ 145.36 | $ 134.91 | $ 100.54 s&p financial index | 100.00 | 110.89 | 118.07 | 140.73 | 114.51 | 51.17 s&p500 | 100.00 | 110.88 | 116.33 | 134.70 | 142.10 | 89.53
december 31 , ( in dollars ) 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 s&p financial s&p 500jpmorgan chase chase 2019s management and are subject to significant risks and uncer- tainties . these risks and uncertainties could cause jpmorgan chase 2019s results to differ materially from those set forth in such forward-look- ing statements . certain of such risks and uncertainties are described herein ( see forward-looking statements on page 127 of this annual report ) and in the jpmorgan chase annual report on form 10-k for the year ended december 31 , 2008 ( 201c2008 form 10-k 201d ) , in part i , item 1a : risk factors , to which reference is hereby made . introduction jpmorgan chase & co. , a financial holding company incorporated under delaware law in 1968 , is a leading global financial services firm and one of the largest banking institutions in the united states of america ( 201cu.s . 201d ) , with $ 2.2 trillion in assets , $ 166.9 billion in stockholders 2019 equity and operations in more than 60 countries as of december 31 , 2008 . the firm is a leader in investment banking , financial services for consumers and businesses , financial transaction processing and asset management . under the j.p . morgan and chase brands , the firm serves millions of customers in the u.s . and many of the world 2019s most prominent corporate , institutional and government clients . jpmorgan chase 2019s principal bank subsidiaries are jpmorgan chase bank , national association ( 201cjpmorgan chase bank , n.a . 201d ) , a nation- al banking association with branches in 23 states in the u.s. ; and chase bank usa , national association ( 201cchase bank usa , n.a . 201d ) , a national bank that is the firm 2019s credit card issuing bank . jpmorgan chase 2019s principal nonbank subsidiary is j.p . morgan securities inc. , the firm 2019s u.s . investment banking firm . jpmorgan chase 2019s activities are organized , for management reporting purposes , into six business segments , as well as corporate/private equity . the firm 2019s wholesale businesses comprise the investment bank , commercial banking , treasury & securities services and asset management segments . the firm 2019s consumer businesses comprise the retail financial services and card services segments . a description of the firm 2019s business segments , and the products and services they pro- vide to their respective client bases , follows . investment bank j.p . morgan is one of the world 2019s leading investment banks , with deep client relationships and broad product capabilities . the investment bank 2019s clients are corporations , financial institutions , governments and institutional investors . the firm offers a full range of investment banking products and services in all major capital markets , including advising on corporate strategy and structure , cap- ital raising in equity and debt markets , sophisticated risk manage- ment , market-making in cash securities and derivative instruments , prime brokerage and research . the investment bank ( 201cib 201d ) also selectively commits the firm 2019s own capital to principal investing and trading activities . retail financial services retail financial services ( 201crfs 201d ) , which includes the retail banking and consumer lending reporting segments , serves consumers and businesses through personal service at bank branches and through atms , online banking and telephone banking as well as through auto dealerships and school financial aid offices . customers can use more than 5400 bank branches ( third-largest nationally ) and 14500 atms ( second-largest nationally ) as well as online and mobile bank- ing around the clock . more than 21400 branch salespeople assist .
Question: b a s e d o n t h e b e l i e f a n d e x p e c t a t i o n s o f t h e j p m o r g a n c h a s e e x p e c t a t i o n s w h a t w a s t h e r a t i o o f t h e j p m o r g a n c h a s e t o t h e s & p f i n a n c i a l i n d e x p e r f o r m a n c e a t d e c e m b e r 3 1 2 0 0 8
| 5,167 |
129.59%
|
Given the context, answer the question.
Context: 6feb201418202649 performance graph the table below compares the cumulative total shareholder return on our common stock with the cumulative total return of ( i ) the standard & poor 2019s 500 composite stock index ( 2018 2018s&p 500 index 2019 2019 ) , ( ii ) the standard & poor 2019s industrials index ( 2018 2018s&p industrials index 2019 2019 ) and ( iii ) the standard & poor 2019s consumer durables & apparel index ( 2018 2018s&p consumer durables & apparel index 2019 2019 ) , from december 31 , 2008 through december 31 , 2013 , when the closing price of our common stock was $ 22.77 . the graph assumes investments of $ 100 on december 31 , 2008 in our common stock and in each of the three indices and the reinvestment of dividends . $ 350.00 $ 300.00 $ 250.00 $ 200.00 $ 150.00 $ 100.00 $ 50.00 performance graph .
| 2009 | 2010 | 2011 | 2012 | 2013 masco | $ 128.21 | $ 120.32 | $ 102.45 | $ 165.80 | $ 229.59 s&p 500 index | $ 125.92 | $ 144.58 | $ 147.60 | $ 171.04 | $ 225.85 s&p industrials index | $ 120.19 | $ 151.89 | $ 150.97 | $ 173.87 | $ 243.73 s&p consumer durables & apparel index | $ 136.29 | $ 177.91 | $ 191.64 | $ 232.84 | $ 316.28
in july 2007 , our board of directors authorized the purchase of up to 50 million shares of our common stock in open-market transactions or otherwise . at december 31 , 2013 , we had remaining authorization to repurchase up to 22.6 million shares . during the first quarter of 2013 , we repurchased and retired 1.7 million shares of our common stock , for cash aggregating $ 35 million to offset the dilutive impact of the 2013 grant of 1.7 million shares of long-term stock awards . we have not purchased any shares since march 2013. .
Question: w h a t w a s t h e p e r c e n t a g e c u m u l a t i v e t o t a l s h a r e h o l d e r r e t u r n o n m a s c o c o m m o n s t o c k f o r t h e f i v e y e a r p e r i o d e n d e d 2 0 1 3 ?
| 5,168 |
1.66
|
Given the context, answer the question.
Context: the debentures are unsecured , subordinated and junior in right of payment and upon liquidation to all of the company 2019s existing and future senior indebtedness . in addition , the debentures are effectively subordinated to all of the company 2019s subsidiaries 2019 existing and future indebtedness and other liabilities , including obligations to policyholders . the debentures do not limit the company 2019s or the company 2019s subsidiaries 2019 ability to incur additional debt , including debt that ranks senior in right of payment and upon liquidation to the debentures . the debentures rank equally in right of payment and upon liquidation with ( i ) any indebtedness the terms of which provide that such indebtedness ranks equally with the debentures , including guarantees of such indebtedness , ( ii ) the company 2019s existing 8.125% ( 8.125 % ) fixed- to-floating rate junior subordinated debentures due 2068 ( the 201c8.125% ( 201c8.125 % ) debentures 201d ) , ( iii ) the company 2019s income capital obligation notes due 2067 , issuable pursuant to the junior subordinated indenture , dated as of february 12 , 2007 , between the company and wilmington trust company ( the 201cicon securities 201d ) , ( iv ) our trade accounts payable , and ( v ) any of our indebtedness owed to a person who is our subsidiary or employee . long-term debt maturities long-term debt maturities ( at par values ) , as of december 31 , 2013 are summarized as follows: .
2014 | $ 200 2015 | 456 2016 | 275 2017 | 711 2018 | 320 thereafter | 4438
shelf registrations on august 9 , 2013 , the company filed with the securities and exchange commission ( the 201csec 201d ) an automatic shelf registration statement ( registration no . 333-190506 ) for the potential offering and sale of debt and equity securities . the registration statement allows for the following types of securities to be offered : debt securities , junior subordinated debt securities , preferred stock , common stock , depositary shares , warrants , stock purchase contracts , and stock purchase units . in that the hartford is a well-known seasoned issuer , as defined in rule 405 under the securities act of 1933 , the registration statement went effective immediately upon filing and the hartford may offer and sell an unlimited amount of securities under the registration statement during the three-year life of the registration statement . contingent capital facility the company is party to a put option agreement that provides the hartford with the right to require the glen meadow abc trust , a delaware statutory trust , at any time and from time to time , to purchase the hartford 2019s junior subordinated notes in a maximum aggregate principal amount not to exceed $ 500 . under the put option agreement , the hartford will pay the glen meadow abc trust premiums on a periodic basis , calculated with respect to the aggregate principal amount of notes that the hartford had the right to put to the glen meadow abc trust for such period . the hartford has agreed to reimburse the glen meadow abc trust for certain fees and ordinary expenses . the company holds a variable interest in the glen meadow abc trust where the company is not the primary beneficiary . as a result , the company did not consolidate the glen meadow abc trust . as of december 31 , 2013 , the hartford has not exercised its right to require glen meadow abc trust to purchase the notes . as a result , the notes remain a source of capital for the hfsg holding company . revolving credit facilities the company has a senior unsecured revolving credit facility ( the "credit facility" ) that provides for borrowing capacity up to $ 1.75 billion ( which is available in u.s . dollars , and in euro , sterling , canadian dollars and japanese yen ) through january 6 , 2016 . as of december 31 , 2013 , there were no borrowings outstanding under the credit facility . of the total availability under the credit facility , up to $ 250 is available to support letters of credit issued on behalf of the company or subsidiaries of the company . under the credit facility , the company must maintain a minimum level of consolidated net worth of $ 14.9 billion . the definition of consolidated net worth under the terms of the credit facility , excludes aoci and includes the company's outstanding junior subordinated debentures and , if any , perpetual preferred securities , net of discount . in addition , the company 2019s maximum ratio of consolidated total debt to consolidated total capitalization is limited to 35% ( 35 % ) , and the ratio of consolidated total debt of subsidiaries to consolidated total capitalization is limited to 10% ( 10 % ) . as of december 31 , 2013 , the company was in compliance with all financial covenants under the credit facility . table of contents the hartford financial services group , inc . notes to consolidated financial statements ( continued ) 13 . debt ( continued ) .
Question: a s o f d e c e m b e r 3 1 , 2 0 1 3 w h a t w a s t h e r a t i o o f t h e l o n g - t e r m d e b t m a t u r i t i e s d u e i n 2 0 1 5 c o m p a r e d t o 2 0 1 6
| 5,169 |
386
|
Given the context, answer the question.
Context: interest-earning assets including unearned income in the accretion of fair value adjustments on discounts recognized on acquired or purchased loans is recognized based on the constant effective yield of the financial instrument . the timing and amount of revenue that we recognize in any period is dependent on estimates , judgments , assumptions , and interpretation of contractual terms . changes in these factors can have a significant impact on revenue recognized in any period due to changes in products , market conditions or industry norms . residential and commercial mortgage servicing rights we elect to measure our residential mortgage servicing rights ( msrs ) at fair value . this election was made to be consistent with our risk management strategy to hedge changes in the fair value of these assets as described below . the fair value of residential msrs is estimated by using a cash flow valuation model which calculates the present value of estimated future net servicing cash flows , taking into consideration actual and expected mortgage loan prepayment rates , discount rates , servicing costs , and other economic factors which are determined based on current market conditions . assumptions incorporated into the residential msrs valuation model reflect management 2019s best estimate of factors that a market participant would use in valuing the residential msrs . although sales of residential msrs do occur , residential msrs do not trade in an active market with readily observable prices so the precise terms and conditions of sales are not available . as a benchmark for the reasonableness of its residential msrs fair value , pnc obtains opinions of value from independent parties ( 201cbrokers 201d ) . these brokers provided a range ( +/- 10 bps ) based upon their own discounted cash flow calculations of our portfolio that reflected conditions in the secondary market , and any recently executed servicing transactions . pnc compares its internally-developed residential msrs value to the ranges of values received from the brokers . if our residential msrs fair value falls outside of the brokers 2019 ranges , management will assess whether a valuation adjustment is warranted . for 2011 and 2010 , pnc 2019s residential msrs value has not fallen outside of the brokers 2019 ranges . we consider our residential msrs value to represent a reasonable estimate of fair value . commercial msrs are purchased or originated when loans are sold with servicing retained . commercial msrs do not trade in an active market with readily observable prices so the precise terms and conditions of sales are not available . commercial msrs are initially recorded at fair value and are subsequently accounted for at the lower of amortized cost or fair value . commercial msrs are periodically evaluated for impairment . for purposes of impairment , the commercial mortgage servicing rights are stratified based on asset type , which characterizes the predominant risk of the underlying financial asset . the fair value of commercial msrs is estimated by using an internal valuation model . the model calculates the present value of estimated future net servicing cash flows considering estimates of servicing revenue and costs , discount rates and prepayment speeds . pnc employs risk management strategies designed to protect the value of msrs from changes in interest rates and related market factors . residential msrs values are economically hedged with securities and derivatives , including interest-rate swaps , options , and forward mortgage-backed and futures contracts . as interest rates change , these financial instruments are expected to have changes in fair value negatively correlated to the change in fair value of the hedged residential msrs portfolio . the hedge relationships are actively managed in response to changing market conditions over the life of the residential msrs assets . commercial msrs are economically hedged at a macro level or with specific derivatives to protect against a significant decline in interest rates . selecting appropriate financial instruments to economically hedge residential or commercial msrs requires significant management judgment to assess how mortgage rates and prepayment speeds could affect the future values of msrs . hedging results can frequently be less predictable in the short term , but over longer periods of time are expected to protect the economic value of the msrs . the fair value of residential and commercial msrs and significant inputs to the valuation model as of december 31 , 2011 are shown in the tables below . the expected and actual rates of mortgage loan prepayments are significant factors driving the fair value . management uses a third-party model to estimate future residential loan prepayments and internal proprietary models to estimate future commercial loan prepayments . these models have been refined based on current market conditions . future interest rates are another important factor in the valuation of msrs . management utilizes market implied forward interest rates to estimate the future direction of mortgage and discount rates . the forward rates utilized are derived from the current yield curve for u.s . dollar interest rate swaps and are consistent with pricing of capital markets instruments . changes in the shape and slope of the forward curve in future periods may result in volatility in the fair value estimate . residential mortgage servicing rights dollars in millions december 31 december 31 .
dollars in millions | december 31 2011 | december 312010 fair value | $ 647 | $ 1033 weighted-average life ( in years ) ( a ) | 3.6 | 5.8 weighted-average constant prepayment rate ( a ) | 22.10% ( 22.10 % ) | 12.61% ( 12.61 % ) weighted-average option adjusted spread | 11.77% ( 11.77 % ) | 12.18% ( 12.18 % )
weighted-average constant prepayment rate ( a ) 22.10% ( 22.10 % ) 12.61% ( 12.61 % ) weighted-average option adjusted spread 11.77% ( 11.77 % ) 12.18% ( 12.18 % ) ( a ) changes in weighted-average life and weighted-average constant prepayment rate reflect the cumulative impact of changes in rates , prepayment expectations and model changes . the pnc financial services group , inc . 2013 form 10-k 65 .
Question: w h a t w a s t h e c h a n g e i n f a i r v a l u e r e s i d e n t i a l m o r t g a g e s e r v i c i n g r i g h t s d o l l a r s i n m i l l i o n s b e t w e e n 2 0 2 0 a n d 2 0 1 1 ?
| 5,170 |
8%
|
Given the context, answer the question.
Context: as described above , the borrowings are extended on a non-recourse basis . as such , there is no credit or market risk exposure to us on the assets , and as a result the terms of the amlf permit exclusion of the assets from regulatory leverage and risk-based capital calculations . the interest rate on the borrowings is set by the federal reserve bank , and we earn net interest revenue by earning a spread on the difference between the yield we earn on the assets and the rate we pay on the borrowings . for 2008 , we earned net interest revenue associated with this facility of approximately $ 68 million . separately , we currently maintain a commercial paper program under which we can issue up to $ 3 billion with original maturities of up to 270 days from the date of issue . at december 31 , 2008 and 2007 , $ 2.59 billion and $ 2.36 billion , respectively , of commercial paper were outstanding . in addition , state street bank currently has board authority to issue bank notes up to an aggregate of $ 5 billion , including up to $ 2.48 billion of senior notes under the fdic 2019s temporary liquidity guarantee program , instituted by the fdic in october 2008 for qualified senior debt issued through june 30 , 2009 , and up to $ 1 billion of subordinated bank notes ( see note 10 ) . at december 31 , 2008 and 2007 , no notes payable were outstanding , and at december 31 , 2008 , all $ 5 billion was available for issuance . state street bank currently maintains a line of credit of cad $ 800 million , or approximately $ 657 million , to support its canadian securities processing operations . the line of credit has no stated termination date and is cancelable by either party with prior notice . at december 31 , 2008 , no balance was due on this line of credit . note 9 . restructuring charges in december 2008 , we implemented a plan to reduce our expenses from operations and support our long- term growth . in connection with this plan , we recorded aggregate restructuring charges of $ 306 million in our consolidated statement of income . the primary component of the plan was an involuntary reduction of approximately 7% ( 7 % ) of our global workforce , which reduction we expect to be substantially completed by the end of the first quarter of 2009 . other components of the plan included costs related to lease and software license terminations , restructuring of agreements with technology providers and other costs . of the aggregate restructuring charges of $ 306 million , $ 243 million related to severance , a portion of which will be paid in a lump sum or over a defined period , and a portion of which will provide related benefits and outplacement services for approximately 2100 employees identified for involuntary termination in connection with the plan ; $ 49 million related to future lease obligations and write-offs of capitalized assets , including $ 23 million for impairment of other intangible assets ; $ 10 million of costs associated with information technology and $ 4 million of other restructuring costs . the severance component included $ 47 million related to accelerated vesting of equity-based compensation . in december 2008 , approximately 620 employees were involuntarily terminated and left state street . the following table presents the activity in the related balance sheet reserve for 2008 . ( in millions ) severance lease and write-offs information technology other total .
( in millions ) | severance | lease and asset write-offs | information technology | other | total initial accrual | $ 250 | $ 42 | $ 10 | $ 4 | $ 306 payments and adjustments | -20 ( 20 ) | -25 ( 25 ) | -10 ( 10 ) | -1 ( 1 ) | -56 ( 56 ) balance at december 31 2008 | $ 230 | $ 17 | 2014 | $ 3 | $ 250
.
Question: w h a t p e r c e n t o f s e v e r e n c e w a s p a i d o f f i n 2 0 0 8 ?
| 5,171 |
15.7%
|
Given the context, answer the question.
Context: entergy corporation and subsidiaries notes to financial statements sale and leaseback transactions waterford 3 lease obligations in 1989 , in three separate but substantially identical transactions , entergy louisiana sold and leased back undivided interests in waterford 3 for the aggregate sum of $ 353.6 million . the interests represent approximately 9.3% ( 9.3 % ) of waterford 3 . the leases expire in 2017 . under certain circumstances , entergy louisiana may repurchase the leased interests prior to the end of the term of the leases . at the end of the lease terms , entergy louisiana has the option to repurchase the leased interests in waterford 3 at fair market value or to renew the leases for either fair market value or , under certain conditions , a fixed rate . entergy louisiana issued $ 208.2 million of non-interest bearing first mortgage bonds as collateral for the equity portion of certain amounts payable under the leases . upon the occurrence of certain events , entergy louisiana may be obligated to assume the outstanding bonds used to finance the purchase of the interests in the unit and to pay an amount sufficient to withdraw from the lease transaction . such events include lease events of default , events of loss , deemed loss events , or certain adverse 201cfinancial events . 201d 201cfinancial events 201d include , among other things , failure by entergy louisiana , following the expiration of any applicable grace or cure period , to maintain ( i ) total equity capital ( including preferred membership interests ) at least equal to 30% ( 30 % ) of adjusted capitalization , or ( ii ) a fixed charge coverage ratio of at least 1.50 computed on a rolling 12 month basis . as of december 31 , 2011 , entergy louisiana was in compliance with these provisions . as of december 31 , 2011 , entergy louisiana had future minimum lease payments ( reflecting an overall implicit rate of 7.45% ( 7.45 % ) ) in connection with the waterford 3 sale and leaseback transactions , which are recorded as long-term debt , as follows : amount ( in thousands ) .
| amount ( in thousands ) 2012 | $ 39067 2013 | 26301 2014 | 31036 2015 | 28827 2016 | 16938 years thereafter | 106335 total | 248504 less : amount representing interest | 60249 present value of net minimum lease payments | $ 188255
grand gulf lease obligations in 1988 , in two separate but substantially identical transactions , system energy sold and leased back undivided ownership interests in grand gulf for the aggregate sum of $ 500 million . the interests represent approximately 11.5% ( 11.5 % ) of grand gulf . the leases expire in 2015 . under certain circumstances , system entergy may repurchase the leased interests prior to the end of the term of the leases . at the end of the lease terms , system energy has the option to repurchase the leased interests in grand gulf at fair market value or to renew the leases for either fair market value or , under certain conditions , a fixed rate . system energy is required to report the sale-leaseback as a financing transaction in its financial statements . for financial reporting purposes , system energy expenses the interest portion of the lease obligation and the plant depreciation . however , operating revenues include the recovery of the lease payments because the transactions are accounted for as a sale and leaseback for ratemaking purposes . consistent with a recommendation contained in a .
Question: w h a t p o r t i o n o f t h e t o t a l f u t u r e m i n i m u m l e a s e p a y m e n t s i s d u e w i t h i n 1 2 m o n t h s ?
| 5,172 |
10.7%
|
Given the context, answer the question.
Context: 2010 . on november 1 , 2010 , we redeemed all $ 400 million of our outstanding 6.65% ( 6.65 % ) notes due january 15 , 2011 . the redemption resulted in a $ 5 million early extinguishment charge . receivables securitization facility 2013 at december 31 , 2010 , we have recorded $ 100 million as secured debt under our receivables securitization facility . ( see further discussion of our receivables securitization facility in note 10. ) 15 . variable interest entities we have entered into various lease transactions in which the structure of the leases contain variable interest entities ( vies ) . these vies were created solely for the purpose of doing lease transactions ( principally involving railroad equipment and facilities ) and have no other activities , assets or liabilities outside of the lease transactions . within these lease arrangements , we have the right to purchase some or all of the assets at fixed prices . depending on market conditions , fixed-price purchase options available in the leases could potentially provide benefits to us ; however , these benefits are not expected to be significant . we maintain and operate the assets based on contractual obligations within the lease arrangements , which set specific guidelines consistent within the railroad industry . as such , we have no control over activities that could materially impact the fair value of the leased assets . we do not hold the power to direct the activities of the vies and , therefore , do not control the ongoing activities that have a significant impact on the economic performance of the vies . additionally , we do not have the obligation to absorb losses of the vies or the right to receive benefits of the vies that could potentially be significant to the we are not considered to be the primary beneficiary and do not consolidate these vies because our actions and decisions do not have the most significant effect on the vie 2019s performance and our fixed-price purchase price options are not considered to be potentially significant to the vie 2019s . the future minimum lease payments associated with the vie leases totaled $ 4.2 billion as of december 31 , 2010 . 16 . leases we lease certain locomotives , freight cars , and other property . the consolidated statement of financial position as of december 31 , 2010 and 2009 included $ 2520 million , net of $ 901 million of accumulated depreciation , and $ 2754 million , net of $ 927 million of accumulated depreciation , respectively , for properties held under capital leases . a charge to income resulting from the depreciation for assets held under capital leases is included within depreciation expense in our consolidated statements of income . future minimum lease payments for operating and capital leases with initial or remaining non-cancelable lease terms in excess of one year as of december 31 , 2010 , were as follows : millions operating leases capital leases .
millions | operatingleases | capitalleases 2011 | $ 613 | $ 311 2012 | 526 | 251 2013 | 461 | 253 2014 | 382 | 261 2015 | 340 | 262 later years | 2599 | 1355 total minimum lease payments | $ 4921 | $ 2693 amount representing interest | n/a | -784 ( 784 ) present value of minimum lease payments | n/a | $ 1909
the majority of capital lease payments relate to locomotives . rent expense for operating leases with terms exceeding one month was $ 624 million in 2010 , $ 686 million in 2009 , and $ 747 million in 2008 . when cash rental payments are not made on a straight-line basis , we recognize variable rental expense on a straight-line basis over the lease term . contingent rentals and sub-rentals are not significant. .
Question: i n 2 0 1 0 w h a t w a s t h e p e r c e n t o f t h e t o t a l m i n i m u m l e a s e p a y m e n t s d u e i n 2 0 1 4
| 5,173 |
1.5%
|
Given the context, answer the question.
Context: the following table sets forth the components of foreign currency translation adjustments for fiscal 2012 , 2011 and 2010 ( in thousands ) : .
| 2012 | 2011 | 2010 beginning balance | $ 10580 | $ 7632 | $ 10640 foreign currency translation adjustments | -2225 ( 2225 ) | 5156 | -4144 ( 4144 ) income tax effect relating to translation adjustments forundistributed foreign earnings | 1314 | -2208 ( 2208 ) | 1136 ending balance | $ 9669 | $ 10580 | $ 7632
stock repurchase program to facilitate our stock repurchase program , designed to return value to our stockholders and minimize dilution from stock issuances , we repurchase shares in the open market and also enter into structured repurchase agreements with third-parties . authorization to repurchase shares to cover on-going dilution was not subject to expiration . however , this repurchase program was limited to covering net dilution from stock issuances and was subject to business conditions and cash flow requirements as determined by our board of directors from time to time . during the third quarter of fiscal 2010 , our board of directors approved an amendment to our stock repurchase program authorized in april 2007 from a non-expiring share-based authority to a time-constrained dollar-based authority . as part of this amendment , the board of directors granted authority to repurchase up to $ 1.6 billion in common stock through the end of fiscal 2012 . during the second quarter of fiscal 2012 , we exhausted our $ 1.6 billion authority granted by our board of directors in fiscal in april 2012 , the board of directors approved a new stock repurchase program granting authority to repurchase up to $ 2.0 billion in common stock through the end of fiscal 2015 . the new stock repurchase program approved by our board of directors is similar to our previous $ 1.6 billion stock repurchase program . during fiscal 2012 , 2011 and 2010 , we entered into several structured repurchase agreements with large financial institutions , whereupon we provided the financial institutions with prepayments totaling $ 405.0 million , $ 695.0 million and $ 850 million , respectively . of the $ 405.0 million of prepayments during fiscal 2012 , $ 100.0 million was under the new $ 2.0 billion stock repurchase program and the remaining $ 305.0 million was under our previous $ 1.6 billion authority . of the $ 850.0 million of prepayments during fiscal 2010 , $ 250.0 million was under the stock repurchase program prior to the program amendment in the third quarter of fiscal 2010 and the remaining $ 600.0 million was under the amended $ 1.6 billion time-constrained dollar-based authority . we enter into these agreements in order to take advantage of repurchasing shares at a guaranteed discount to the volume weighted average price ( 201cvwap 201d ) of our common stock over a specified period of time . we only enter into such transactions when the discount that we receive is higher than the foregone return on our cash prepayments to the financial institutions . there were no explicit commissions or fees on these structured repurchases . under the terms of the agreements , there is no requirement for the financial institutions to return any portion of the prepayment to us . the financial institutions agree to deliver shares to us at monthly intervals during the contract term . the parameters used to calculate the number of shares deliverable are : the total notional amount of the contract , the number of trading days in the contract , the number of trading days in the interval and the average vwap of our stock during the interval less the agreed upon discount . during fiscal 2012 , we repurchased approximately 11.5 million shares at an average price of $ 32.29 through structured repurchase agreements entered into during fiscal 2012 . during fiscal 2011 , we repurchased approximately 21.8 million shares at an average price of $ 31.81 through structured repurchase agreements entered into during fiscal 2011 . during fiscal 2010 , we repurchased approximately 31.2 million shares at an average price per share of $ 29.19 through structured repurchase agreements entered into during fiscal 2009 and fiscal 2010 . for fiscal 2012 , 2011 and 2010 , the prepayments were classified as treasury stock on our consolidated balance sheets at the payment date , though only shares physically delivered to us by november 30 , 2012 , december 2 , 2011 and december 3 , 2010 were excluded from the computation of earnings per share . as of november 30 , 2012 , $ 33.0 million of prepayments remained under these agreements . as of december 2 , 2011 and december 3 , 2010 , no prepayments remained under these agreements . table of contents adobe systems incorporated notes to consolidated financial statements ( continued ) .
Question: w h a t i s t h e g r o w t h r a t e i n t h e a v e r a g e p r i c e o f r e p u r c h a s e d s h a r e s f r o m 2 0 1 1 t o 2 0 1 2 ?
| 5,174 |
40%
|
Given the context, answer the question.
Context: news corporation notes to the consolidated financial statements consideration over the fair value of the net tangible and intangible assets acquired was recorded as goodwill . the allocation is as follows ( in millions ) : assets acquired: .
intangible assets | $ 220 goodwill | 115 net liabilities | -50 ( 50 ) total net assets acquired | $ 285
the acquired intangible assets primarily relate to broadcast licenses , which have a fair value of approximately $ 185 million , tradenames , which have a fair value of approximately $ 27 million , and customer relationships with a fair value of approximately $ 8 million . the broadcast licenses and tradenames have indefinite lives and the customer relationships are being amortized over a weighted-average useful life of approximately 6 years . wireless group 2019s results are included within the news and information services segment , and it is considered a separate reporting unit for purposes of the company 2019s annual goodwill impairment review . rea group european business in december 2016 , rea group , in which the company holds a 61.6% ( 61.6 % ) interest , sold its european business for approximately $ 140 million ( approximately 20ac133 million ) in cash , which resulted in a pre-tax gain of $ 107 million for the fiscal year ended june 30 , 2017 . the sale allows rea group to focus on its core businesses in australia and asia . in addition to the acquisitions noted above and the investments referenced in note 6 2014investments , the company used $ 62 million of cash for additional acquisitions during fiscal 2017 , primarily consisting of australian regional media ( 201carm 201d ) . arm 2019s results are included within the news and information services segment . note 5 . restructuring programs the company recorded restructuring charges of $ 92 million , $ 71 million and $ 142 million for the fiscal years ended june 30 , 2019 , 2018 and 2017 , respectively , of which $ 77 million , $ 58 million and $ 133 million related to the news and information services segment , respectively . the restructuring charges recorded in fiscal 2019 , 2018 and 2017 were primarily for employee termination benefits. .
Question: w h a t p e r c e n t o f t o t a l n e t a s s e t s a c q u i r e d w a s g o o d w i l l ?
| 5,175 |
77.95%
|
Given the context, answer the question.
Context: entergy louisiana , llc and subsidiaries management 2019s financial discussion and analysis results of operations net income 2017 compared to 2016 net income decreased $ 305.7 million primarily due to the effect of the enactment of the tax cuts and jobs act , in december 2017 , which resulted in a decrease of $ 182.6 million in net income in 2017 , and the effect of a settlement with the irs related to the 2010-2011 irs audit , which resulted in a $ 136.1 million reduction of income tax expense in 2016 . also contributing to the decrease in net income were higher other operation and maintenance expenses . the decrease was partially offset by higher net revenue and higher other income . see note 3 to the financial statements for discussion of the effects of the tax cuts and jobs act and the irs audit . 2016 compared to 2015 net income increased $ 175.4 million primarily due to the effect of a settlement with the irs related to the 2010-2011 irs audit , which resulted in a $ 136.1 million reduction of income tax expense in 2016 . also contributing to the increase were lower other operation and maintenance expenses , higher net revenue , and higher other income . the increase was partially offset by higher depreciation and amortization expenses , higher interest expense , and higher nuclear refueling outage expenses . see note 3 to the financial statements for discussion of the irs audit . net revenue 2017 compared to 2016 net revenue consists of operating revenues net of : 1 ) fuel , fuel-related expenses , and gas purchased for resale , 2 ) purchased power expenses , and 3 ) other regulatory charges ( credits ) . following is an analysis of the change in net revenue comparing 2017 to 2016 . amount ( in millions ) .
| amount ( in millions ) 2016 net revenue | $ 2438.4 regulatory credit resulting from reduction of thefederal corporate income tax rate | 55.5 retail electric price | 42.8 louisiana act 55 financing savings obligation | 17.2 volume/weather | -12.4 ( 12.4 ) other | 19.0 2017 net revenue | $ 2560.5
the regulatory credit resulting from reduction of the federal corporate income tax rate variance is due to the reduction of the vidalia purchased power agreement regulatory liability by $ 30.5 million and the reduction of the louisiana act 55 financing savings obligation regulatory liabilities by $ 25 million as a result of the enactment of the tax cuts and jobs act , in december 2017 , which lowered the federal corporate income tax rate from 35% ( 35 % ) to 21% ( 21 % ) . the effects of the tax cuts and jobs act are discussed further in note 3 to the financial statements. .
Question: i n 2 0 1 6 , w h a t p e r c e n t o f t h e i n c r e a s e i n n e t i n c o m e i s f r o m t h e d e c r e a s e o f t a x ?
| 5,176 |
8.5%
|
Given the context, answer the question.
Context: measurement point december 31 booking holdings nasdaq composite index s&p 500 rdg internet composite .
measurement pointdecember 31 | booking holdings inc . | nasdaqcomposite index | s&p 500index | rdg internetcomposite 2013 | 100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 2014 | 98.09 | 114.62 | 113.69 | 96.39 2015 | 109.68 | 122.81 | 115.26 | 133.20 2016 | 126.12 | 133.19 | 129.05 | 140.23 2017 | 149.50 | 172.11 | 157.22 | 202.15 2018 | 148.18 | 165.84 | 150.33 | 201.16
.
Question: w h a t w a s t h e p e r c e n t o f g r o w t h o f t h e n a s d a q c o m p o s i t e i n d e x f r o m 2 0 1 5 t o 2 0 1 6
| 5,177 |
6880800
|
Given the context, answer the question.
Context: american tower corporation and subsidiaries notes to consolidated financial statements six-month offering period . the weighted average fair value per share of espp share purchase options during the year ended december 31 , 2014 , 2013 and 2012 was $ 14.83 , $ 13.42 and $ 13.64 , respectively . at december 31 , 2014 , 3.4 million shares remain reserved for future issuance under the plan . key assumptions used to apply the black-scholes pricing model for shares purchased through the espp for the years ended december 31 , are as follows: .
| 2014 | 2013 | 2012 range of risk-free interest rate | 0.06% ( 0.06 % ) 2013 0.11% ( 0.11 % ) | 0.07% ( 0.07 % ) 2013 0.13% ( 0.13 % ) | 0.05% ( 0.05 % ) 2013 0.12% ( 0.12 % ) weighted average risk-free interest rate | 0.09% ( 0.09 % ) | 0.10% ( 0.10 % ) | 0.08% ( 0.08 % ) expected life of shares | 6 months | 6 months | 6 months range of expected volatility of underlying stock price over the option period | 11.29% ( 11.29 % ) 2013 16.59% ( 16.59 % ) | 12.21% ( 12.21 % ) 2013 13.57% ( 13.57 % ) | 33.16% ( 33.16 % ) 2013 33.86% ( 33.86 % ) weighted average expected volatility of underlying stock price | 14.14% ( 14.14 % ) | 12.88% ( 12.88 % ) | 33.54% ( 33.54 % ) expected annual dividend yield | 1.50% ( 1.50 % ) | 1.50% ( 1.50 % ) | 1.50% ( 1.50 % )
16 . equity mandatory convertible preferred stock offering 2014on may 12 , 2014 , the company completed a registered public offering of 6000000 shares of its 5.25% ( 5.25 % ) mandatory convertible preferred stock , series a , par value $ 0.01 per share ( the 201cmandatory convertible preferred stock 201d ) . the net proceeds of the offering were $ 582.9 million after deducting commissions and estimated expenses . the company used the net proceeds from this offering to fund acquisitions , including the acquisition from richland , initially funded by indebtedness incurred under the 2013 credit facility . unless converted earlier , each share of the mandatory convertible preferred stock will automatically convert on may 15 , 2017 , into between 0.9174 and 1.1468 shares of common stock , depending on the applicable market value of the common stock and subject to anti-dilution adjustments . subject to certain restrictions , at any time prior to may 15 , 2017 , holders of the mandatory convertible preferred stock may elect to convert all or a portion of their shares into common stock at the minimum conversion rate then in effect . dividends on shares of mandatory convertible preferred stock are payable on a cumulative basis when , as and if declared by the company 2019s board of directors ( or an authorized committee thereof ) at an annual rate of 5.25% ( 5.25 % ) on the liquidation preference of $ 100.00 per share , on february 15 , may 15 , august 15 and november 15 of each year , commencing on august 15 , 2014 to , and including , may 15 , 2017 . the company may pay dividends in cash or , subject to certain limitations , in shares of common stock or any combination of cash and shares of common stock . the terms of the mandatory convertible preferred stock provide that , unless full cumulative dividends have been paid or set aside for payment on all outstanding mandatory convertible preferred stock for all prior dividend periods , no dividends may be declared or paid on common stock . stock repurchase program 2014in march 2011 , the board of directors approved a stock repurchase program , pursuant to which the company is authorized to purchase up to $ 1.5 billion of common stock ( 201c2011 buyback 201d ) . in september 2013 , the company temporarily suspended repurchases in connection with its acquisition of mipt . under the 2011 buyback , the company is authorized to purchase shares from time to time through open market purchases or privately negotiated transactions at prevailing prices in accordance with securities laws and other legal requirements , and subject to market conditions and other factors . to facilitate repurchases , the company .
Question: a s s u m i n g c o n v e r s i o n a t t h e m a x i m u m s h a r e c o n v e r s i o n r a t e , h o w m a n y c o m m o n s h a r e s w o u l d r e s u l t f r o m a c o n v e r s i o n o f t h e m a n d a t o r y c o n v e r t i b l e p r e f e r r e d s t o c k , s e r i e s a ?
| 5,178 |
49.6%
|
Given the context, answer the question.
Context: cost amount could have a material adverse effect on our business . these changes may include , for example , an increase or reduction in the number of persons enrolled or eligible to enroll due to the federal government 2019s decision to increase or decrease u.s . military presence around the world . in the event government reimbursements were to decline from projected amounts , our failure to reduce the health care costs associated with these programs could have a material adverse effect on our business . during 2004 , we completed a contractual transition of our tricare business . on july 1 , 2004 , our regions 2 and 5 contract servicing approximately 1.1 million tricare members became part of the new north region , which was awarded to another contractor . on august 1 , 2004 , our regions 3 and 4 contract became part of our new south region contract . on november 1 , 2004 , the region 6 contract with approximately 1 million members became part of the south region contract . the members added with the region 6 contract essentially offset the members lost four months earlier with the expiration of our regions 2 and 5 contract . for the year ended december 31 , 2005 , tricare premium revenues were approximately $ 2.4 billion , or 16.9% ( 16.9 % ) of our total premiums and aso fees . part of the tricare transition during 2004 included the carve out of the tricare senior pharmacy and tricare for life program which we previously administered on as aso basis . on june 1 , 2004 and august 1 , 2004 , administrative services under these programs were transferred to another contractor . for the year ended december 31 , 2005 , tricare administrative services fees totaled $ 50.1 million , or 0.4% ( 0.4 % ) of our total premiums and aso fees . our products marketed to commercial segment employers and members consumer-choice products over the last several years , we have developed and offered various commercial products designed to provide options and choices to employers that are annually facing substantial premium increases driven by double-digit medical cost inflation . these consumer-choice products , which can be offered on either a fully insured or aso basis , provided coverage to approximately 371100 members at december 31 , 2005 , representing approximately 11.7% ( 11.7 % ) of our total commercial medical membership as detailed below . consumer-choice membership other commercial membership commercial medical membership .
| consumer-choice membership | other commercial membership | commercial medical membership fully insured | 184000 | 1815800 | 1999800 administrative services only | 187100 | 983900 | 1171000 total commercial medical | 371100 | 2799700 | 3170800
these products are often offered to employer groups as 201cbundles 201d , where the subscribers are offered various hmo and ppo options , with various employer contribution strategies as determined by the employer . paramount to our consumer-choice product strategy , we have developed a group of innovative consumer products , styled as 201csmart 201d products , that we believe will be a long-term solution for employers . we believe this new generation of products provides more ( 1 ) choices for the individual consumer , ( 2 ) transparency of provider costs , and ( 3 ) benefit designs that engage consumers in the costs and effectiveness of health care choices . innovative tools and technology are available to assist consumers with these decisions , including the trade-offs between higher premiums and point-of-service costs at the time consumers choose their plans , and to suggest ways in which the consumers can maximize their individual benefits at the point they use their plans . we believe that when consumers can make informed choices about the cost and effectiveness of their health care , a sustainable long term solution for employers can be realized . smart products , which accounted for approximately 65.1% ( 65.1 % ) of enrollment in all of our consumer-choice plans as of december 31 , 2005 , only are sold to employers who use humana as their sole health insurance carrier. .
Question: w h a t w a s t h e p e r c e n t o f t h e f u l l y i n s u r e d o f t h e c o n s u m e r - c h o i c e m e m b e r s h i p t o t a l
| 5,179 |
20
|
Given the context, answer the question.
Context: jpmorgan chase & co./2017 annual report 115 impact of wrong-way risk , which is broadly defined as the potential for increased correlation between the firm 2019s exposure to a counterparty ( avg ) and the counterparty 2019s credit quality . many factors may influence the nature and magnitude of these correlations over time . to the extent that these correlations are identified , the firm may adjust the cva associated with that counterparty 2019s avg . the firm risk manages exposure to changes in cva by entering into credit derivative transactions , as well as interest rate , foreign exchange , equity and commodity derivative transactions . the accompanying graph shows exposure profiles to the firm 2019s current derivatives portfolio over the next 10 years as calculated by the peak , dre and avg metrics . the three measures generally show that exposure will decline after the first year , if no new trades are added to the portfolio . exposure profile of derivatives measures december 31 , 2017 ( in billions ) the following table summarizes the ratings profile by derivative counterparty of the firm 2019s derivative receivables , including credit derivatives , net of all collateral , at the dates indicated . the ratings scale is based on the firm 2019s internal ratings , which generally correspond to the ratings as assigned by s&p and moody 2019s . ratings profile of derivative receivables .
rating equivalent december 31 ( in millions except ratios ) | rating equivalent exposure net of all collateral | rating equivalent % ( % ) of exposure netof all collateral | exposure net of all collateral | % ( % ) of exposure netof all collateral aaa/aaa to aa-/aa3 | $ 11529 | 29% ( 29 % ) | $ 11449 | 28% ( 28 % ) a+/a1 to a-/a3 | 6919 | 17 | 8505 | 20 bbb+/baa1 to bbb-/baa3 | 13925 | 34 | 13127 | 32 bb+/ba1 to b-/b3 | 7397 | 18 | 7308 | 18 ccc+/caa1 and below | 645 | 2 | 984 | 2 total | $ 40415 | 100% ( 100 % ) | $ 41373 | 100% ( 100 % )
as previously noted , the firm uses collateral agreements to mitigate counterparty credit risk . the percentage of the firm 2019s over-the-counter derivatives transactions subject to collateral agreements 2014 excluding foreign exchange spot trades , which are not typically covered by collateral agreements due to their short maturity and centrally cleared trades that are settled daily 2014 was approximately 90% ( 90 % ) as of december 31 , 2017 , largely unchanged compared with december 31 , 2016 . credit derivatives the firm uses credit derivatives for two primary purposes : first , in its capacity as a market-maker , and second , as an end-user to manage the firm 2019s own credit risk associated with various exposures . for a detailed description of credit derivatives , see credit derivatives in note 5 . credit portfolio management activities included in the firm 2019s end-user activities are credit derivatives used to mitigate the credit risk associated with traditional lending activities ( loans and unfunded commitments ) and derivatives counterparty exposure in the firm 2019s wholesale businesses ( collectively , 201ccredit portfolio management 201d activities ) . information on credit portfolio management activities is provided in the table below . for further information on derivatives used in credit portfolio management activities , see credit derivatives in note 5 . the firm also uses credit derivatives as an end-user to manage other exposures , including credit risk arising from certain securities held in the firm 2019s market-making businesses . these credit derivatives are not included in credit portfolio management activities ; for further information on these credit derivatives as well as credit derivatives used in the firm 2019s capacity as a market-maker in credit derivatives , see credit derivatives in note 5 . 10 years5 years2 years1 year .
Question: f o r 2 0 1 6 , w h a t p e r c e n t a g e o f d e r i v a t i v e r e c e i v a b l e s a r e r a t e d j u n k ?
| 5,180 |
1.03
|
Given the context, answer the question.
Context: american tower corporation and subsidiaries notes to consolidated financial statements ( 3 ) consists of customer-related intangibles of approximately $ 75.0 million and network location intangibles of approximately $ 72.7 million . the customer-related intangibles and network location intangibles are being amortized on a straight-line basis over periods of up to 20 years . ( 4 ) the company expects that the goodwill recorded will be deductible for tax purposes . the goodwill was allocated to the company 2019s international rental and management segment . on september 12 , 2012 , the company entered into a definitive agreement to purchase up to approximately 348 additional communications sites from telef f3nica mexico . on september 27 , 2012 and december 14 , 2012 , the company completed the purchase of 279 and 2 communications sites , for an aggregate purchase price of $ 63.5 million ( including value added tax of $ 8.8 million ) . the following table summarizes the preliminary allocation of the aggregate purchase consideration paid and the amounts of assets acquired and liabilities assumed based upon their estimated fair value at the date of acquisition ( in thousands ) : preliminary purchase price allocation .
| preliminary purchase price allocation current assets | $ 8763 non-current assets | 2332 property and equipment | 26711 intangible assets ( 1 ) | 21079 other non-current liabilities | -1349 ( 1349 ) fair value of net assets acquired | $ 57536 goodwill ( 2 ) | 5998
( 1 ) consists of customer-related intangibles of approximately $ 10.7 million and network location intangibles of approximately $ 10.4 million . the customer-related intangibles and network location intangibles are being amortized on a straight-line basis over periods of up to 20 years . ( 2 ) the company expects that the goodwill recorded will be deductible for tax purposes . the goodwill was allocated to the company 2019s international rental and management segment . on november 16 , 2012 , the company entered into an agreement to purchase up to 198 additional communications sites from telef f3nica mexico . on december 14 , 2012 , the company completed the purchase of 188 communications sites , for an aggregate purchase price of $ 64.2 million ( including value added tax of $ 8.9 million ) . .
Question: w h a t w a s t h e r a t i o o f t h e f a i r a s s e t s a c q u i r e d t o t h e f a i r v a l u e
| 5,182 |
2.85%
|
Given the context, answer the question.
Context: obligations of non-consolidated affiliates , mainly cpw . in addition , off-balance sheet arrangements are generally limited to the future payments under non-cancelable operating leases , which totaled $ 559 million as of may 27 , as of may 27 , 2018 , we had invested in five variable interest entities ( vies ) . none of our vies are material to our results of operations , financial condition , or liquidity as of and for the fiscal year ended may 27 , 2018 . our defined benefit plans in the united states are subject to the requirements of the pension protection act ( ppa ) . in the future , the ppa may require us to make additional contributions to our domestic plans . we do not expect to be required to make any contributions in fiscal 2019 . the following table summarizes our future estimated cash payments under existing contractual obligations , including payments due by period: .
in millions | payments due by fiscal year total | payments due by fiscal year 2019 | payments due by fiscal year 2020 -21 | payments due by fiscal year 2022 -23 | payments due by fiscal year 2024 and thereafter long-term debt ( a ) | $ 14354.0 | $ 1599.8 | $ 3122.6 | $ 2315.5 | $ 7316.1 accrued interest | 107.7 | 107.7 | - | - | - operating leases ( b ) | 559.3 | 137.4 | 208.0 | 122.7 | 91.2 capital leases | 0.5 | 0.3 | 0.2 | - | - purchase obligations ( c ) | 3417.0 | 2646.9 | 728.8 | 39.8 | 1.5 total contractual obligations | 18438.5 | 4492.1 | 4059.6 | 2478.0 | 7408.8 other long-term obligations ( d ) | 1199.0 | - | - | - | - total long-term obligations | $ 19637.5 | $ 4492.1 | $ 4059.6 | $ 2478.0 | $ 7408.8
( a ) amounts represent the expected cash payments of our long-term debt and do not include $ 0.5 million for capital leases or $ 85.7 million for net unamortized debt issuance costs , premiums and discounts , and fair value adjustments . ( b ) operating leases represents the minimum rental commitments under non-cancelable operating leases . ( c ) the majority of the purchase obligations represent commitments for raw material and packaging to be utilized in the normal course of business and for consumer marketing spending commitments that support our brands . for purposes of this table , arrangements are considered purchase obligations if a contract specifies all significant terms , including fixed or minimum quantities to be purchased , a pricing structure , and approximate timing of the transaction . most arrangements are cancelable without a significant penalty and with short notice ( usually 30 days ) . any amounts reflected on the consolidated balance sheets as accounts payable and accrued liabilities are excluded from the table above . ( d ) the fair value of our foreign exchange , equity , commodity , and grain derivative contracts with a payable position to the counterparty was $ 16 million as of may 27 , 2018 , based on fair market values as of that date . future changes in market values will impact the amount of cash ultimately paid or received to settle those instruments in the future . other long-term obligations mainly consist of liabilities for accrued compensation and benefits , including the underfunded status of certain of our defined benefit pension , other postretirement benefit , and postemployment benefit plans , and miscellaneous liabilities . we expect to pay $ 20 million of benefits from our unfunded postemployment benefit plans and $ 18 million of deferred compensation in fiscal 2019 . we are unable to reliably estimate the amount of these payments beyond fiscal 2019 . as of may 27 , 2018 , our total liability for uncertain tax positions and accrued interest and penalties was $ 223.6 million . significant accounting estimates for a complete description of our significant accounting policies , please see note 2 to the consolidated financial statements in item 8 of this report . our significant accounting estimates are those that have a meaningful impact .
Question: w h a t p e r c e n t o f t o t a l l o n g - t e r m o b l i g a t i o n s i s i n c u r r e d b y o p e r a t i n g l e a s e s ?
| 5,183 |
9.4%
|
Given the context, answer the question.
Context: adobe systems incorporated notes to consolidated financial statements ( continued ) accounting for uncertainty in income taxes during fiscal 2014 and 2013 , our aggregate changes in our total gross amount of unrecognized tax benefits are summarized as follows ( in thousands ) : .
| 2014 | 2013 beginning balance | $ 136098 | $ 160468 gross increases in unrecognized tax benefits 2013 prior year tax positions | 144 | 20244 gross increases in unrecognized tax benefits 2013 current year tax positions | 18877 | 16777 settlements with taxing authorities | -995 ( 995 ) | -55851 ( 55851 ) lapse of statute of limitations | -1630 ( 1630 ) | -4066 ( 4066 ) foreign exchange gains and losses | -3646 ( 3646 ) | -1474 ( 1474 ) ending balance | $ 148848 | $ 136098
as of november 28 , 2014 , the combined amount of accrued interest and penalties related to tax positions taken on our tax returns and included in non-current income taxes payable was approximately $ 14.6 million . we file income tax returns in the u.s . on a federal basis and in many u.s . state and foreign jurisdictions . we are subject to the continual examination of our income tax returns by the irs and other domestic and foreign tax authorities . our major tax jurisdictions are ireland , california and the u.s . for ireland , california and the u.s. , the earliest fiscal years open for examination are 2008 , 2008 and 2010 , respectively . we regularly assess the likelihood of outcomes resulting from these examinations to determine the adequacy of our provision for income taxes and have reserved for potential adjustments that may result from the current examinations . we believe such estimates to be reasonable ; however , there can be no assurance that the final determination of any of these examinations will not have an adverse effect on our operating results and financial position . in july 2013 , a u.s . income tax examination covering fiscal 2008 and 2009 was completed . our accrued tax and interest related to these years was $ 48.4 million and was previously reported in long-term income taxes payable . we settled the tax obligation resulting from this examination with cash and income tax assets totaling $ 41.2 million , and the resulting $ 7.2 million income tax benefit was recorded in the third quarter of fiscal 2013 . the timing of the resolution of income tax examinations is highly uncertain as are the amounts and timing of tax payments that are part of any audit settlement process . these events could cause large fluctuations in the balance sheet classification of current and non-current assets and liabilities . we believe that within the next 12 months , it is reasonably possible that either certain audits will conclude or statutes of limitations on certain income tax examination periods will expire , or both . given the uncertainties described above , we can only determine a range of estimated potential decreases in underlying unrecognized tax benefits ranging from $ 0 to approximately $ 5 million . note 10 . restructuring fiscal 2014 restructuring plan in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2014 , in order to better align our global resources for digital media and digital marketing , we initiated a restructuring plan to vacate our research and development facility in china and our sales and marketing facility in russia . this plan consisted of reductions of approximately 350 full-time positions and we recorded restructuring charges of approximately $ 18.8 million related to ongoing termination benefits for the positions eliminated . during fiscal 2015 , we intend to vacate both of these facilities . the amount accrued for the fair value of future contractual obligations under these operating leases was insignificant . other restructuring plans during the past several years , we have implemented other restructuring plans consisting of reductions in workforce and the consolidation of facilities to better align our resources around our business strategies . as of november 28 , 2014 , we considered our other restructuring plans to be substantially complete . we continue to make cash outlays to settle obligations under these plans , however the current impact to our consolidated financial statements is not significant. .
Question: w h a t i s t h e p e r c e n t a g e c h a n g e i n t h e t o t a l g r o s s a m o u n t o f u n r e c o g n i z e d t a x b e n e f i t s f r o m 2 0 1 3 t o 2 0 1 4 ?
| 5,184 |
14.7%
|
Given the context, answer the question.
Context: included in selling , general and administrative expense was rent expense of $ 83.0 million , $ 59.0 million and $ 41.8 million for the years ended december 31 , 2015 , 2014 and 2013 , respectively , under non-cancelable operating lease agreements . included in these amounts was contingent rent expense of $ 11.0 million , $ 11.0 million and $ 7.8 million for the years ended december 31 , 2015 , 2014 and 2013 , respectively . sports marketing and other commitments within the normal course of business , the company enters into contractual commitments in order to promote the company 2019s brand and products . these commitments include sponsorship agreements with teams and athletes on the collegiate and professional levels , official supplier agreements , athletic event sponsorships and other marketing commitments . the following is a schedule of the company 2019s future minimum payments under its sponsorship and other marketing agreements as of december 31 , 2015 , as well as significant sponsorship and other marketing agreements entered into during the period after december 31 , 2015 through the date of this report : ( in thousands ) .
2016 | $ 126488 2017 | 138607 2018 | 137591 2019 | 98486 2020 | 67997 2021 and thereafter | 289374 total future minimum sponsorship and other payments | $ 858543
the amounts listed above are the minimum compensation obligations and guaranteed royalty fees required to be paid under the company 2019s sponsorship and other marketing agreements . the amounts listed above do not include additional performance incentives and product supply obligations provided under certain agreements . it is not possible to determine how much the company will spend on product supply obligations on an annual basis as contracts generally do not stipulate specific cash amounts to be spent on products . the amount of product provided to the sponsorships depends on many factors including general playing conditions , the number of sporting events in which they participate and the company 2019s decisions regarding product and marketing initiatives . in addition , the costs to design , develop , source and purchase the products furnished to the endorsers are incurred over a period of time and are not necessarily tracked separately from similar costs incurred for products sold to customers . in connection with various contracts and agreements , the company has agreed to indemnify counterparties against certain third party claims relating to the infringement of intellectual property rights and other items . generally , such indemnification obligations do not apply in situations in which the counterparties are grossly negligent , engage in willful misconduct , or act in bad faith . based on the company 2019s historical experience and the estimated probability of future loss , the company has determined that the fair value of such indemnifications is not material to its consolidated financial position or results of operations . from time to time , the company is involved in litigation and other proceedings , including matters related to commercial and intellectual property disputes , as well as trade , regulatory and other claims related to its business . the company believes that all current proceedings are routine in nature and incidental to the conduct of its business , and that the ultimate resolution of any such proceedings will not have a material adverse effect on its consolidated financial position , results of operations or cash flows . following the company 2019s announcement of the creation of a new class of common stock , referred to as the class c common stock , par value $ 0.0003 1/3 per share , four purported class action lawsuits were brought .
Question: b a s e d o n t h e s c h e d u l e o f t h e c o m p a n y 2 0 1 9 s f u t u r e m i n i m u m p a y m e n t s a s o f d e c e m b e r 3 1 2 0 1 5 w h a t w a s t h e p e r c e n t o f t h e a m o u n t d u e i n 2 0 1 6 t o t h e t o t a l
| 5,185 |
21.6%
|
Given the context, answer the question.
Context: the following details the impairment charge resulting from our review ( in thousands ) : .
| year ended may 31 2009 goodwill | $ 136800 trademark | 10000 other long-lived assets | 864 total | $ 147664
net income attributable to noncontrolling interests , net of tax noncontrolling interest , net of tax increased $ 28.9 million from $ 8.1 million fiscal 2008 . the increase was primarily related to our acquisition of a 51% ( 51 % ) majority interest in hsbc merchant services , llp on june 30 , net income attributable to global payments and diluted earnings per share during fiscal 2009 we reported net income of $ 37.2 million ( $ 0.46 diluted earnings per share ) . liquidity and capital resources a significant portion of our liquidity comes from operating cash flows , which are generally sufficient to fund operations , planned capital expenditures , debt service and various strategic investments in our business . cash flow from operations is used to make planned capital investments in our business , to pursue acquisitions that meet our corporate objectives , to pay dividends , and to pay off debt and repurchase our shares at the discretion of our board of directors . accumulated cash balances are invested in high-quality and marketable short term instruments . our capital plan objectives are to support the company 2019s operational needs and strategic plan for long term growth while maintaining a low cost of capital . lines of credit are used in certain of our markets to fund settlement and as a source of working capital and , along with other bank financing , to fund acquisitions . we regularly evaluate our liquidity and capital position relative to cash requirements , and we may elect to raise additional funds in the future , either through the issuance of debt , equity or otherwise . at may 31 , 2010 , we had cash and cash equivalents totaling $ 769.9 million . of this amount , we consider $ 268.1 million to be available cash , which generally excludes settlement related and merchant reserve cash balances . settlement related cash balances represent surplus funds that we hold on behalf of our member sponsors when the incoming amount from the card networks precedes the member sponsors 2019 funding obligation to the merchant . merchant reserve cash balances represent funds collected from our merchants that serve as collateral ( 201cmerchant reserves 201d ) to minimize contingent liabilities associated with any losses that may occur under the merchant agreement . at may 31 , 2010 , our cash and cash equivalents included $ 199.4 million related to merchant reserves . while this cash is not restricted in its use , we believe that designating this cash to collateralize merchant reserves strengthens our fiduciary standing with our member sponsors and is in accordance with the guidelines set by the card networks . see cash and cash equivalents and settlement processing assets and obligations under note 1 in the notes to the consolidated financial statements for additional details . net cash provided by operating activities increased $ 82.8 million to $ 465.8 million for fiscal 2010 from the prior year . income from continuing operations increased $ 16.0 million and we had cash provided by changes in working capital of $ 60.2 million . the working capital change was primarily due to the change in net settlement processing assets and obligations of $ 80.3 million and the change in accounts receivable of $ 13.4 million , partially offset by the change .
Question: w h a t i s t h e p e r c e n t a g e g r o w t h i n n e t c a s h p r o v i d e d b y o p e r a t i n g a c t i v i t i e s f r o m 2 0 0 9 t o 2 0 1 0 ?
| 5,186 |
79.8%
|
Given the context, answer the question.
Context: table of contents the following table discloses purchases of shares of our common stock made by us or on our behalf during the fourth quarter of 2015 . period total number of shares purchased average price paid per share total number of shares not purchased as part of publicly announced plans or programs ( a ) total number of shares purchased as part of publicly announced plans or programs approximate dollar value of shares that may yet be purchased under the plans or programs ( b ) .
period | total numberof sharespurchased | averageprice paidper share | total number ofshares notpurchased as part ofpublicly announcedplans or programs ( a ) | total number ofshares purchased aspart of publiclyannounced plans orprograms | approximate dollarvalue of shares thatmay yet be purchasedunder the plans orprograms ( b ) october 2015 | 1658771 | $ 62.12 | 842059 | 816712 | $ 2.0 billion november 2015 | 2412467 | $ 71.08 | 212878 | 2199589 | $ 1.8 billion december 2015 | 7008414 | $ 70.31 | 980 | 7007434 | $ 1.3 billion total | 11079652 | $ 69.25 | 1055917 | 10023735 | $ 1.3 billion
( a ) the shares reported in this column represent purchases settled in the fourth quarter of 2015 relating to ( i ) our purchases of shares in open-market transactions to meet our obligations under stock-based compensation plans , and ( ii ) our purchases of shares from our employees and non-employee directors in connection with the exercise of stock options , the vesting of restricted stock , and other stock compensation transactions in accordance with the terms of our stock-based compensation plans . ( b ) on july 13 , 2015 , we announced that our board of directors approved our purchase of $ 2.5 billion of our outstanding common stock ( with no expiration date ) , which was in addition to the remaining amount available under our $ 3 billion program previously authorized . during the third quarter of 2015 , we completed our purchases under the $ 3 billion program . as of december 31 , 2015 , we had $ 1.3 billion remaining available for purchase under the $ 2.5 billion program. .
Question: f o r t h e f o u r t h q u a r t e r e n d e d d e c e m b e r 3 1 2 0 1 5 w h a t w a s t h e p e r c e n t o f t h e t o t a l n u m b e r o f s h a r e s n o t p u r c h a s e d a s p a r t o f p u b l i c l y a n n o u n c e d p l a n s o r p r o g r a m s i n o c t o b e r
| 5,187 |
1.78
|
Given the context, answer the question.
Context: financial assurance we must provide financial assurance to governmental agencies and a variety of other entities under applicable environmental regulations relating to our landfill operations for capping , closure and post-closure costs , and related to our performance under certain collection , landfill and transfer station contracts . we satisfy these financial assurance requirements by providing surety bonds , letters of credit , or insurance policies ( financial assurance instruments ) , or trust deposits , which are included in restricted cash and marketable securities and other assets in our consolidated balance sheets . the amount of the financial assurance requirements for capping , closure and post-closure costs is determined by applicable state environmental regulations . the financial assurance requirements for capping , closure and post-closure costs may be associated with a portion of the landfill or the entire landfill . generally , states require a third-party engineering specialist to determine the estimated capping , closure and post-closure costs that are used to determine the required amount of financial assurance for a landfill . the amount of financial assurance required can , and generally will , differ from the obligation determined and recorded under u.s . gaap . the amount of the financial assurance requirements related to contract performance varies by contract . additionally , we must provide financial assurance for our insurance program and collateral for certain performance obligations . we do not expect a material increase in financial assurance requirements during 2016 , although the mix of financial assurance instruments may change . these financial assurance instruments are issued in the normal course of business and are not considered indebtedness . because we currently have no liability for the financial assurance instruments , they are not reflected in our consolidated balance sheets ; however , we record capping , closure and post-closure liabilities and insurance liabilities as they are incurred . off-balance sheet arrangements we have no off-balance sheet debt or similar obligations , other than operating leases and financial assurances , which are not classified as debt . we have no transactions or obligations with related parties that are not disclosed , consolidated into or reflected in our reported financial position or results of operations . we have not guaranteed any third-party debt . free cash flow we define free cash flow , which is not a measure determined in accordance with u.s . gaap , as cash provided by operating activities less purchases of property and equipment , plus proceeds from sales of property and equipment , as presented in our consolidated statements of cash flows . the following table calculates our free cash flow for the years ended december 31 , 2015 , 2014 and 2013 ( in millions of dollars ) : .
| 2015 | 2014 | 2013 cash provided by operating activities | $ 1679.7 | $ 1529.8 | $ 1548.2 purchases of property and equipment | -945.6 ( 945.6 ) | -862.5 ( 862.5 ) | -880.8 ( 880.8 ) proceeds from sales of property and equipment | 21.2 | 35.7 | 23.9 free cash flow | $ 755.3 | $ 703.0 | $ 691.3
for a discussion of the changes in the components of free cash flow , see our discussion regarding cash flows provided by operating activities and cash flows used in investing activities contained elsewhere in this management 2019s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations. .
Question: i n 2 0 1 5 w h a t w a s t h e r a t i o o f t h e c a s h p r o v i d e d b y o p e r a t i n g a c t i v i t i e s t o t h e p u r c h a s e s o f p r o p e r t y a n d e q u i p m e n t
| 5,188 |
55%
|
Given the context, answer the question.
Context: the aes corporation notes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) december 31 , 2011 , 2010 , and 2009 20 . impairment expense asset impairment asset impairment expense for the year ended december 31 , 2011 consisted of : ( in millions ) .
| 2011 ( in millions ) wind turbines & deposits | $ 116 tisza ii | 52 kelanitissa | 42 other | 15 total | $ 225
wind turbines & deposits 2014during the third quarter of 2011 , the company evaluated the future use of certain wind turbines held in storage pending their installation . due to reduced wind turbine market pricing and advances in turbine technology , the company determined it was more likely than not that the turbines would be sold significantly before the end of their previously estimated useful lives . in addition , the company has concluded that more likely than not non-refundable deposits it had made in prior years to a turbine manufacturer for the purchase of wind turbines are not recoverable . the company determined it was more likely than not that it would not proceed with the purchase of turbines due to the availability of more advanced and lower cost turbines in the market . these developments were more likely than not as of september 30 , 2011 and as a result were considered impairment indicators and the company determined that an impairment had occurred as of september 30 , 2011 as the aggregate carrying amount of $ 161 million of these assets was not recoverable and was reduced to their estimated fair value of $ 45 million determined under the market approach . this resulted in asset impairment expense of $ 116 million . wind generation is reported in the corporate and other segment . in january 2012 , the company forfeited the deposits for which a full impairment charge was recognized in the third quarter of 2011 , and there is no obligation for further payments under the related turbine supply agreement . additionally , the company sold some of the turbines held in storage during the fourth quarter of 2011 and is continuing to evaluate the future use of the turbines held in storage . the company determined it is more likely than not that they will be sold , however they are not being actively marketed for sale at this time as the company is reconsidering the potential use of the turbines in light of recent development activity at one of its advance stage development projects . it is reasonably possible that the turbines could incur further loss in value due to changing market conditions and advances in technology . tisza ii 2014during the fourth quarter of 2011 , tisza ii , a 900 mw gas and oil-fired generation plant in hungary entered into annual negotiations with its offtaker . as a result of these negotiations , as well as the further deterioration of the economic environment in hungary , the company determined that an indicator of impairment existed at december 31 , 2011 . thus , the company performed an asset impairment test and determined that based on the undiscounted cash flow analysis , the carrying amount of tisza ii asset group was not recoverable . the fair value of the asset group was then determined using a discounted cash flow analysis . the carrying value of the tisza ii asset group of $ 94 million exceeded the fair value of $ 42 million resulting in the recognition of asset impairment expense of $ 52 million during the three months ended december 31 , 2011 . tisza ii is reported in the europe generation reportable segment . kelanitissa 2014in 2011 , the company recognized asset impairment expense of $ 42 million for the long-lived assets of kelanitissa , our diesel-fired generation plant in sri lanka . we have continued to evaluate the recoverability of our long-lived assets at kelanitissa as a result of both the existing government regulation which .
Question: d u r i n g 2 0 1 1 , w h a t p e r c e n t o f t h e t i s z a i i a s s e t g r o u p w a s w r i t t e n o f f ?
| 5,189 |
-12.3%
|
Given the context, answer the question.
Context: credit commitments and lines of credit the table below summarizes citigroup 2019s credit commitments as of december 31 , 2010 and december 31 , 2009: .
in millions of dollars | december 31 2010 u.s . | december 31 2010 outside of u.s . | december 31 2010 total | december 31 2009 commercial and similar letters of credit | $ 1544 | $ 7430 | $ 8974 | $ 7211 one- to four-family residential mortgages | 2582 | 398 | 2980 | 1070 revolving open-end loans secured by one- to four-family residential properties | 17986 | 2948 | 20934 | 23916 commercial real estate construction and land development | 1813 | 594 | 2407 | 1704 credit card lines | 573945 | 124728 | 698673 | 785495 commercial and other consumer loan commitments | 124142 | 86262 | 210404 | 257342 total | $ 722012 | $ 222360 | $ 944372 | $ 1076738
the majority of unused commitments are contingent upon customers maintaining specific credit standards . commercial commitments generally have floating interest rates and fixed expiration dates and may require payment of fees . such fees ( net of certain direct costs ) are deferred and , upon exercise of the commitment , amortized over the life of the loan or , if exercise is deemed remote , amortized over the commitment period . commercial and similar letters of credit a commercial letter of credit is an instrument by which citigroup substitutes its credit for that of a customer to enable the customer to finance the purchase of goods or to incur other commitments . citigroup issues a letter on behalf of its client to a supplier and agrees to pay the supplier upon presentation of documentary evidence that the supplier has performed in accordance with the terms of the letter of credit . when a letter of credit is drawn , the customer is then required to reimburse citigroup . one- to four-family residential mortgages a one- to four-family residential mortgage commitment is a written confirmation from citigroup to a seller of a property that the bank will advance the specified sums enabling the buyer to complete the purchase . revolving open-end loans secured by one- to four-family residential properties revolving open-end loans secured by one- to four-family residential properties are essentially home equity lines of credit . a home equity line of credit is a loan secured by a primary residence or second home to the extent of the excess of fair market value over the debt outstanding for the first mortgage . commercial real estate , construction and land development commercial real estate , construction and land development include unused portions of commitments to extend credit for the purpose of financing commercial and multifamily residential properties as well as land development projects . both secured-by-real-estate and unsecured commitments are included in this line , as well as undistributed loan proceeds , where there is an obligation to advance for construction progress payments . however , this line only includes those extensions of credit that , once funded , will be classified as loans on the consolidated balance sheet . credit card lines citigroup provides credit to customers by issuing credit cards . the credit card lines are unconditionally cancelable by the issuer . commercial and other consumer loan commitments commercial and other consumer loan commitments include overdraft and liquidity facilities , as well as commercial commitments to make or purchase loans , to purchase third-party receivables , to provide note issuance or revolving underwriting facilities and to invest in the form of equity . amounts include $ 79 billion and $ 126 billion with an original maturity of less than one year at december 31 , 2010 and december 31 , 2009 , respectively . in addition , included in this line item are highly leveraged financing commitments , which are agreements that provide funding to a borrower with higher levels of debt ( measured by the ratio of debt capital to equity capital of the borrower ) than is generally considered normal for other companies . this type of financing is commonly employed in corporate acquisitions , management buy-outs and similar transactions. .
Question: w h a t w a s t h e p e r c e n t a g e o f t h e c h a n g e i n t h e c r e d i t c o m m i t m e n t s a n d l i n e s o f c r e d i t f o r c i t i g r o u p 2 0 1 9 s f r o m 2 0 0 9 t o 2 0 1 0
| 5,190 |
43
|
Given the context, answer the question.
Context: celanese corporation and subsidiaries notes to consolidated financial statements ( continued ) 2022 amend certain material agreements governing bcp crystal 2019s indebtedness ; 2022 change the business conducted by celanese holdings and its subsidiaries ; and 2022 enter into hedging agreements that restrict dividends from subsidiaries . in addition , the senior credit facilities require bcp crystal to maintain the following financial covenants : a maximum total leverage ratio , a maximum bank debt leverage ratio , a minimum interest coverage ratio and maximum capital expenditures limitation . the maximum consolidated net bank debt to adjusted ebitda ratio , as defined , previously required under the senior credit facilities , was eliminated when the company amended the facilities in january 2005 . as of december 31 , 2005 , the company was in compliance with all of the financial covenants related to its debt agreements . the maturation of the company 2019s debt , including short term borrowings , is as follows : ( in $ millions ) .
| total ( in$ millions ) 2006 | 155 2007 | 29 2008 | 22 2009 | 40 2010 | 28 thereafter ( 1 ) | 3163 total | 3437
( 1 ) includes $ 2 million purchase accounting adjustment to assumed debt . 17 . benefit obligations pension obligations . pension obligations are established for benefits payable in the form of retirement , disability and surviving dependent pensions . the benefits offered vary according to the legal , fiscal and economic conditions of each country . the commitments result from participation in defined contribution and defined benefit plans , primarily in the u.s . benefits are dependent on years of service and the employee 2019s compensation . supplemental retirement benefits provided to certain employees are non-qualified for u.s . tax purposes . separate trusts have been established for some non-qualified plans . defined benefit pension plans exist at certain locations in north america and europe . as of december 31 , 2005 , the company 2019s u.s . qualified pension plan represented greater than 85% ( 85 % ) and 75% ( 75 % ) of celanese 2019s pension plan assets and liabilities , respectively . independent trusts or insurance companies administer the majority of these plans . actuarial valuations for these plans are prepared annually . the company sponsors various defined contribution plans in europe and north america covering certain employees . employees may contribute to these plans and the company will match these contributions in varying amounts . contributions to the defined contribution plans are based on specified percentages of employee contributions and they aggregated $ 12 million for the year ended decem- ber 31 , 2005 , $ 8 million for the nine months ended december 31 , 2004 , $ 3 million for the three months ended march 31 , 2004 and $ 11 million for the year ended december 31 , 2003 . in connection with the acquisition of cag , the purchaser agreed to pre-fund $ 463 million of certain pension obligations . during the nine months ended december 31 , 2004 , $ 409 million was pre-funded to the company 2019s pension plans . the company contributed an additional $ 54 million to the non-qualified pension plan 2019s rabbi trusts in february 2005 . in connection with the company 2019s acquisition of vinamul and acetex , the company assumed certain assets and obligations related to the acquired pension plans . the company recorded liabilities of $ 128 million for these pension plans . total pension assets acquired amounted to $ 85 million. .
Question: w h a t i s t h e n e t l i a b i l i t y f o r p e n s i o n p l a n r e s u l t i n g f r o m a c q u i s i t i o n o f v i n a m u l a n d a c e t e x ?
| 5,191 |
1773.8
|
Given the context, answer the question.
Context: item 1a . risk factors in addition to the other information provided in this report , the following risk factors should be considered when evaluating an investment in our securities . if the circumstances contemplated by the individual risk factors materialize , our business , financial condition and results of operations could be materially and adversely affected and the trading price of our common shares could decline significantly . risks relating to our business fluctuations in the financial markets could result in investment losses . prolonged and severe disruptions in the overall public debt and equity markets , such as occurred during 2008 , could result in significant realized and unrealized losses in our investment portfolio . although financial markets have significantly improved since 2008 , they could deteriorate in the future . there could also be disruption in individual market sectors , such as occurred in the energy sector in recent years . such declines in the financial markets could result in significant realized and unrealized losses on investments and could have a material adverse impact on our results of operations , equity , business and insurer financial strength and debt ratings . our results could be adversely affected by catastrophic events . we are exposed to unpredictable catastrophic events , including weather-related and other natural catastrophes , as well as acts of terrorism . any material reduction in our operating results caused by the occurrence of one or more catastrophes could inhibit our ability to pay dividends or to meet our interest and principal payment obligations . by way of illustration , during the past five calendar years , pre-tax catastrophe losses , net of reinsurance , were as follows: .
calendar year: | pre-tax catastrophe losses ( dollars in millions ) | 2017 | $ 1472.6 2016 | 301.2 2015 | 53.8 2014 | 56.3 2013 | 194.0
our losses from future catastrophic events could exceed our projections . we use projections of possible losses from future catastrophic events of varying types and magnitudes as a strategic underwriting tool . we use these loss projections to estimate our potential catastrophe losses in certain geographic areas and decide on the placement of retrocessional coverage or other actions to limit the extent of potential losses in a given geographic area . these loss projections are approximations , reliant on a mix of quantitative and qualitative processes , and actual losses may exceed the projections by a material amount , resulting in a material adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operations. .
Question: w h a t a r e t h e t o t a l p r e - t a x c a t a s t r o p h e l o s s e s f o r t h e c o m p a n y i n t h e l a s t t w o y e a r s ? \ \ n
| 5,192 |
233
|
Given the context, answer the question.
Context: cash and cash equivalents cash equivalents include highly-liquid investments with a maturity of three months or less when purchased . accounts receivable and allowance for doubtful accounts accounts receivable are carried at the invoiced amounts , less an allowance for doubtful accounts , and generally do not bear interest . the company estimates the balance of allowance for doubtful accounts by analyzing accounts receivable balances by age and applying historical write-off and collection trend rates . the company 2019s estimates include separately providing for customer receivables based on specific circumstances and credit conditions , and when it is deemed probable that the balance is uncollectible . account balances are charged off against the allowance when it is determined the receivable will not be recovered . the company 2019s allowance for doubtful accounts balance also includes an allowance for the expected return of products shipped and credits related to pricing or quantities shipped of $ 14 million , $ 15 million and $ 14 million as of december 31 , 2016 , 2015 , and 2014 , respectively . returns and credit activity is recorded directly to sales as a reduction . the following table summarizes the activity in the allowance for doubtful accounts: .
( millions ) | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 beginning balance | $ 75 | $ 77 | $ 81 bad debt expense | 20 | 26 | 23 write-offs | -25 ( 25 ) | -22 ( 22 ) | -20 ( 20 ) other ( a ) | -2 ( 2 ) | -6 ( 6 ) | -7 ( 7 ) ending balance | $ 68 | $ 75 | $ 77
( a ) other amounts are primarily the effects of changes in currency translations and the impact of allowance for returns and credits . inventory valuations inventories are valued at the lower of cost or market . certain u.s . inventory costs are determined on a last-in , first-out ( 201clifo 201d ) basis . lifo inventories represented 40% ( 40 % ) and 39% ( 39 % ) of consolidated inventories as of december 31 , 2016 and 2015 , respectively . lifo inventories include certain legacy nalco u.s . inventory acquired at fair value as part of the nalco merger . all other inventory costs are determined using either the average cost or first-in , first-out ( 201cfifo 201d ) methods . inventory values at fifo , as shown in note 5 , approximate replacement cost . during 2015 , the company improved and standardized estimates related to its inventory reserves and product costing , resulting in a net pre-tax charge of approximately $ 6 million . separately , the actions resulted in a charge of $ 20.6 million related to inventory reserve calculations , partially offset by a gain of $ 14.5 million related to the capitalization of certain cost components into inventory . during 2016 , the company took additional actions to improve and standardize estimates related to the capitalization of certain cost components into inventory , which resulted in a gain of $ 6.2 million . these items are reflected within special ( gains ) and charges , as discussed in note 3 . property , plant and equipment property , plant and equipment assets are stated at cost . merchandising and customer equipment consists principally of various dispensing systems for the company 2019s cleaning and sanitizing products , dishwashing machines and process control and monitoring equipment . certain dispensing systems capitalized by the company are accounted for on a mass asset basis , whereby equipment is capitalized and depreciated as a group and written off when fully depreciated . the company capitalizes both internal and external costs of development or purchase of computer software for internal use . costs incurred for data conversion , training and maintenance associated with capitalized software are expensed as incurred . expenditures for major renewals and improvements , which significantly extend the useful lives of existing plant and equipment , are capitalized and depreciated . expenditures for repairs and maintenance are charged to expense as incurred . upon retirement or disposition of plant and equipment , the cost and related accumulated depreciation are removed from the accounts and any resulting gain or loss is recognized in income . depreciation is charged to operations using the straight-line method over the assets 2019 estimated useful lives ranging from 5 to 40 years for buildings and leasehold improvements , 3 to 20 years for machinery and equipment , 3 to 15 years for merchandising and customer equipment and 3 to 7 years for capitalized software . the straight-line method of depreciation reflects an appropriate allocation of the cost of the assets to earnings in proportion to the amount of economic benefits obtained by the company in each reporting period . depreciation expense was $ 561 million , $ 560 million and $ 558 million for 2016 , 2015 and 2014 , respectively. .
Question: i n m i l l i o n s f o r 2 0 1 6 , 2 0 1 5 , a n d 2 0 1 4 , w h a t w a s t h e t o t a l b e g i n n i n g b a l a n c e i n a l l o w a n c e f o r d o u b t f u l a c c o u n t s ?
| 5,193 |
7.7%
|
Given the context, answer the question.
Context: backlog applied manufactures systems to meet demand represented by order backlog and customer commitments . backlog consists of : ( 1 ) orders for which written authorizations have been accepted and assigned shipment dates are within the next 12 months , or shipment has occurred but revenue has not been recognized ; and ( 2 ) contractual service revenue and maintenance fees to be earned within the next 12 months . backlog by reportable segment as of october 25 , 2015 and october 26 , 2014 was as follows : 2015 2014 ( in millions , except percentages ) .
| 2015 | 2014 | | ( in millions except percentages ) silicon systems | $ 1720 | 55% ( 55 % ) | $ 1400 | 48% ( 48 % ) applied global services | 812 | 26% ( 26 % ) | 775 | 27% ( 27 % ) display | 525 | 16% ( 16 % ) | 593 | 20% ( 20 % ) energy and environmental solutions | 85 | 3% ( 3 % ) | 149 | 5% ( 5 % ) total | $ 3142 | 100% ( 100 % ) | $ 2917 | 100% ( 100 % )
applied 2019s backlog on any particular date is not necessarily indicative of actual sales for any future periods , due to the potential for customer changes in delivery schedules or order cancellations . customers may delay delivery of products or cancel orders prior to shipment , subject to possible cancellation penalties . delays in delivery schedules or a reduction of backlog during any particular period could have a material adverse effect on applied 2019s business and results of operations . manufacturing , raw materials and supplies applied 2019s manufacturing activities consist primarily of assembly , test and integration of various proprietary and commercial parts , components and subassemblies that are used to manufacture systems . applied has implemented a distributed manufacturing model under which manufacturing and supply chain activities are conducted in various countries , including germany , israel , italy , singapore , taiwan , the united states and other countries in asia . applied uses numerous vendors , including contract manufacturers , to supply parts and assembly services for the manufacture and support of its products , including some systems being completed at customer sites . although applied makes reasonable efforts to assure that parts are available from multiple qualified suppliers , this is not always possible . accordingly , some key parts may be obtained from only a single supplier or a limited group of suppliers . applied seeks to reduce costs and to lower the risks of manufacturing and service interruptions by selecting and qualifying alternate suppliers for key parts ; monitoring the financial condition of key suppliers ; maintaining appropriate inventories of key parts ; qualifying new parts on a timely basis ; and ensuring quality and performance of parts. .
Question: h o w m u c h p e r c e n t a g e h a s b a c k l o g i n c r e a s e d f r o m 2 0 1 4 t o 2 0 1 5
| 5,194 |
1.5
|
Given the context, answer the question.
Context: the segment had operating earnings of $ 709 million in 2007 , compared to operating earnings of $ 787 million in 2006 . the decrease in operating earnings was primarily due to a decrease in gross margin , driven by : ( i ) lower net sales of iden infrastructure equipment , and ( ii ) continued competitive pricing pressure in the market for gsm infrastructure equipment , partially offset by : ( i ) increased net sales of digital entertainment devices , and ( ii ) the reversal of reorganization of business accruals recorded in 2006 relating to employee severance which were no longer needed . sg&a expenses increased primarily due to the expenses from recently acquired businesses , partially offset by savings from cost-reduction initiatives . r&d expenditures decreased primarily due to savings from cost- reduction initiatives , partially offset by expenditures by recently acquired businesses and continued investment in digital entertainment devices and wimax . as a percentage of net sales in 2007 as compared to 2006 , gross margin , sg&a expenses , r&d expenditures and operating margin all decreased . in 2007 , sales to the segment 2019s top five customers represented approximately 43% ( 43 % ) of the segment 2019s net sales . the segment 2019s backlog was $ 2.6 billion at december 31 , 2007 , compared to $ 3.2 billion at december 31 , 2006 . in the home business , demand for the segment 2019s products depends primarily on the level of capital spending by broadband operators for constructing , rebuilding or upgrading their communications systems , and for offering advanced services . during the second quarter of 2007 , the segment began shipping digital set-tops that support the federal communications commission ( 201cfcc 201d ) 2014 mandated separable security requirement . fcc regulations mandating the separation of security functionality from set-tops went into effect on july 1 , 2007 . as a result of these regulations , many cable service providers accelerated their purchases of set-tops in the first half of 2007 . additionally , in 2007 , our digital video customers significantly increased their purchases of the segment 2019s products and services , primarily due to increased demand for digital entertainment devices , particularly hd/dvr devices . during 2007 , the segment completed the acquisitions of : ( i ) netopia , inc. , a broadband equipment provider for dsl customers , which allows for phone , tv and fast internet connections , ( ii ) tut systems , inc. , a leading developer of edge routing and video encoders , ( iii ) modulus video , inc. , a provider of mpeg-4 advanced coding compression systems designed for delivery of high-value video content in ip set-top devices for the digital video , broadcast and satellite marketplaces , ( iv ) terayon communication systems , inc. , a provider of real-time digital video networking applications to cable , satellite and telecommunication service providers worldwide , and ( v ) leapstone systems , inc. , a provider of intelligent multimedia service delivery and content management applications to networks operators . these acquisitions enhance our ability to provide complete end-to-end systems for the delivery of advanced video , voice and data services . in december 2007 , motorola completed the sale of ecc to emerson for $ 346 million in cash . enterprise mobility solutions segment the enterprise mobility solutions segment designs , manufactures , sells , installs and services analog and digital two-way radio , voice and data communications products and systems for private networks , wireless broadband systems and end-to-end enterprise mobility solutions to a wide range of enterprise markets , including government and public safety agencies ( which , together with all sales to distributors of two-way communication products , are referred to as the 201cgovernment and public safety market 201d ) , as well as retail , energy and utilities , transportation , manufacturing , healthcare and other commercial customers ( which , collectively , are referred to as the 201ccommercial enterprise market 201d ) . in 2008 , the segment 2019s net sales represented 27% ( 27 % ) of the company 2019s consolidated net sales , compared to 21% ( 21 % ) in 2007 and 13% ( 13 % ) in 2006 . ( dollars in millions ) 2008 2007 2006 2008 20142007 2007 20142006 years ended december 31 percent change .
( dollars in millions ) | years ended december 31 2008 | years ended december 31 2007 | years ended december 31 2006 | years ended december 31 2008 20142007 | 2007 20142006 segment net sales | $ 8093 | $ 7729 | $ 5400 | 5% ( 5 % ) | 43% ( 43 % ) operating earnings | 1496 | 1213 | 958 | 23% ( 23 % ) | 27% ( 27 % )
segment results 20142008 compared to 2007 in 2008 , the segment 2019s net sales increased 5% ( 5 % ) to $ 8.1 billion , compared to $ 7.7 billion in 2007 . the 5% ( 5 % ) increase in net sales reflects an 8% ( 8 % ) increase in net sales to the government and public safety market , partially offset by a 2% ( 2 % ) decrease in net sales to the commercial enterprise market . the increase in net sales to the government and public safety market was primarily driven by : ( i ) increased net sales outside of north america , and ( ii ) the net sales generated by vertex standard co. , ltd. , a business the company acquired a controlling interest of in january 2008 , partially offset by lower net sales in north america . on a geographic basis , the segment 2019s net sales were higher in emea , asia and latin america and lower in north america . 65management 2019s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations %%transmsg*** transmitting job : c49054 pcn : 068000000 ***%%pcmsg|65 |00024|yes|no|02/24/2009 12:31|0|0|page is valid , no graphics -- color : n| .
Question: w h a t w a s t h e r a t i o o f t h e s e g m e n t n e t s a l e s i n 2 0 0 8 t o 2 0 0 6
| 5,195 |
18.27%
|
Given the context, answer the question.
Context: notes to consolidated financial statements 2013 ( continued ) ( amounts in millions , except per share amounts ) guarantees we have guaranteed certain obligations of our subsidiaries relating principally to operating leases and credit facilities of certain subsidiaries . the amount of parent company guarantees on lease obligations was $ 410.3 and $ 385.1 as of december 31 , 2012 and 2011 , respectively , and the amount of parent company guarantees primarily relating to credit facilities was $ 283.4 and $ 327.5 as of december 31 , 2012 and 2011 , respectively . in the event of non-payment by the applicable subsidiary of the obligations covered by a guarantee , we would be obligated to pay the amounts covered by that guarantee . as of december 31 , 2012 , there were no material assets pledged as security for such parent company guarantees . contingent acquisition obligations the following table details the estimated future contingent acquisition obligations payable in cash as of december 31 .
| 2013 | 2014 | 2015 | 2016 | 2017 | thereafter | total deferred acquisition payments | $ 26.0 | $ 12.4 | $ 9.7 | $ 46.4 | $ 18.9 | $ 2.0 | $ 115.4 redeemable noncontrolling interests and call options with affiliates1 | 20.5 | 43.8 | 32.9 | 5.7 | 2.2 | 10.6 | 115.7 total contingent acquisition payments | 46.5 | 56.2 | 42.6 | 52.1 | 21.1 | 12.6 | 231.1 less : cash compensation expense included above | -0.7 ( 0.7 ) | -0.6 ( 0.6 ) | -0.8 ( 0.8 ) | -0.2 ( 0.2 ) | 0.0 | 0.0 | -2.3 ( 2.3 ) total | $ 45.8 | $ 55.6 | $ 41.8 | $ 51.9 | $ 21.1 | $ 12.6 | $ 228.8
1 we have entered into certain acquisitions that contain both redeemable noncontrolling interests and call options with similar terms and conditions . we have certain redeemable noncontrolling interests that are exercisable at the discretion of the noncontrolling equity owners as of december 31 , 2012 . these estimated payments of $ 16.4 are included within the total payments expected to be made in 2013 , and will continue to be carried forward into 2014 or beyond until exercised or expired . redeemable noncontrolling interests are included in the table at current exercise price payable in cash , not at applicable redemption value in accordance with the authoritative guidance for classification and measurement of redeemable securities . the estimated amounts listed would be paid in the event of exercise at the earliest exercise date . see note 6 for further information relating to the payment structure of our acquisitions . all payments are contingent upon achieving projected operating performance targets and satisfying other conditions specified in the related agreements and are subject to revisions as the earn-out periods progress . legal matters we are involved in various legal proceedings , and subject to investigations , inspections , audits , inquiries and similar actions by governmental authorities , arising in the normal course of business . we evaluate all cases each reporting period and record liabilities for losses from legal proceedings when we determine that it is probable that the outcome in a legal proceeding will be unfavorable and the amount , or potential range , of loss can be reasonably estimated . in certain cases , we cannot reasonably estimate the potential loss because , for example , the litigation is in its early stages . while any outcome related to litigation or such governmental proceedings in which we are involved cannot be predicted with certainty , management believes that the outcome of these matters , individually and in the aggregate , will not have a material adverse effect on our financial condition , results of operations or cash flows . note 15 : recent accounting standards impairment of indefinite-lived intangible assets in july 2012 , the financial accounting standards board ( 201cfasb 201d ) issued amended guidance to simplify impairment testing of indefinite-lived intangible assets other than goodwill . the amended guidance permits an entity to first assess qualitative factors to determine whether it is 201cmore likely than not 201d that the indefinite-lived intangible asset is impaired . if , after assessing qualitative factors , an entity concludes that it is not 201cmore likely than not 201d that the indefinite-lived intangible .
Question: w h a t p e r c e n t a g e o f t o t a l e s t i m a t e d f u t u r e c o n t i n g e n t a c q u i s i t i o n o b l i g a t i o n s p a y a b l e i n c a s h o c c u r r e d i n 2 0 1 5 ?
| 5,196 |
7.8
|
Given the context, answer the question.
Context: item 7a . quantitative and qualitative disclosures about market risk ( amounts in millions ) in the normal course of business , we are exposed to market risks related to interest rates , foreign currency rates and certain balance sheet items . from time to time , we use derivative instruments , pursuant to established guidelines and policies , to manage some portion of these risks . derivative instruments utilized in our hedging activities are viewed as risk management tools and are not used for trading or speculative purposes . interest rates our exposure to market risk for changes in interest rates relates primarily to the fair market value and cash flows of our debt obligations . the majority of our debt ( approximately 93% ( 93 % ) and 89% ( 89 % ) as of december 31 , 2016 and 2015 , respectively ) bears interest at fixed rates . we do have debt with variable interest rates , but a 10% ( 10 % ) increase or decrease in interest rates would not be material to our interest expense or cash flows . the fair market value of our debt is sensitive to changes in interest rates , and the impact of a 10% ( 10 % ) change in interest rates is summarized below . increase/ ( decrease ) in fair market value as of december 31 , 10% ( 10 % ) increase in interest rates 10% ( 10 % ) decrease in interest rates .
as of december 31, | increase/ ( decrease ) in fair market value 10% ( 10 % ) increasein interest rates | increase/ ( decrease ) in fair market value 10% ( 10 % ) decreasein interest rates 2016 | $ -26.3 ( 26.3 ) | $ 26.9 2015 | -33.7 ( 33.7 ) | 34.7
we have used interest rate swaps for risk management purposes to manage our exposure to changes in interest rates . we do not have any interest rate swaps outstanding as of december 31 , 2016 . we had $ 1100.6 of cash , cash equivalents and marketable securities as of december 31 , 2016 that we generally invest in conservative , short-term bank deposits or securities . the interest income generated from these investments is subject to both domestic and foreign interest rate movements . during 2016 and 2015 , we had interest income of $ 20.1 and $ 22.8 , respectively . based on our 2016 results , a 100 basis-point increase or decrease in interest rates would affect our interest income by approximately $ 11.0 , assuming that all cash , cash equivalents and marketable securities are impacted in the same manner and balances remain constant from year-end 2016 levels . foreign currency rates we are subject to translation and transaction risks related to changes in foreign currency exchange rates . since we report revenues and expenses in u.s . dollars , changes in exchange rates may either positively or negatively affect our consolidated revenues and expenses ( as expressed in u.s . dollars ) from foreign operations . the foreign currencies that most impacted our results during 2016 included the british pound sterling and , to a lesser extent , the argentine peso , brazilian real and japanese yen . based on 2016 exchange rates and operating results , if the u.s . dollar were to strengthen or weaken by 10% ( 10 % ) , we currently estimate operating income would decrease or increase approximately 4% ( 4 % ) , assuming that all currencies are impacted in the same manner and our international revenue and expenses remain constant at 2016 levels . the functional currency of our foreign operations is generally their respective local currency . assets and liabilities are translated at the exchange rates in effect at the balance sheet date , and revenues and expenses are translated at the average exchange rates during the period presented . the resulting translation adjustments are recorded as a component of accumulated other comprehensive loss , net of tax , in the stockholders 2019 equity section of our consolidated balance sheets . our foreign subsidiaries generally collect revenues and pay expenses in their functional currency , mitigating transaction risk . however , certain subsidiaries may enter into transactions in currencies other than their functional currency . assets and liabilities denominated in currencies other than the functional currency are susceptible to movements in foreign currency until final settlement . currency transaction gains or losses primarily arising from transactions in currencies other than the functional currency are included in office and general expenses . we regularly review our foreign exchange exposures that may have a material impact on our business and from time to time use foreign currency forward exchange contracts or other derivative financial instruments to hedge the effects of potential adverse fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates arising from these exposures . we do not enter into foreign exchange contracts or other derivatives for speculative purposes. .
Question: w h a t i s t h e d i f f e r e n c e i n t h e d e b t f a i r m a r k e t v a l u e b e t w e e n 2 0 1 5 a n d 2 0 1 6 i f t h e m a r k e t i n t e r e s t r a t e d e c r e a s e s b y 1 0 % ?
| 5,197 |
809.7
|
Given the context, answer the question.
Context: management 2019s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations 82 fifth third bancorp to 100 million shares of its outstanding common stock in the open market or in privately negotiated transactions , and to utilize any derivative or similar instrument to affect share repurchase transactions . this share repurchase authorization replaced the board 2019s previous authorization . on may 21 , 2013 , the bancorp entered into an accelerated share repurchase transaction with a counterparty pursuant to which the bancorp purchased 25035519 shares , or approximately $ 539 million , of its outstanding common stock on may 24 , 2013 . the bancorp repurchased the shares of its common stock as part of its 100 million share repurchase program previously announced on march 19 , 2013 . at settlement of the forward contract on october 1 , 2013 , the bancorp received an additional 4270250 shares which were recorded as an adjustment to the basis in the treasury shares purchased on the acquisition date . on november 13 , 2013 , the bancorp entered into an accelerated share repurchase transaction with a counterparty pursuant to which the bancorp purchased 8538423 shares , or approximately $ 200 million , of its outstanding common stock on november 18 , 2013 . the bancorp repurchased the shares of its common stock as part of its board approved 100 million share repurchase program previously announced on march 19 , 2013 . the bancorp expects the settlement of the transaction to occur on or before february 28 , 2014 . on december 10 , 2013 , the bancorp entered into an accelerated share repurchase transaction with a counterparty pursuant to which the bancorp purchased 19084195 shares , or approximately $ 456 million , of its outstanding common stock on december 13 , 2013 . the bancorp repurchased the shares of its common stock as part of its board approved 100 million share repurchase program previously announced on march 19 , 2013 . the bancorp expects the settlement of the transaction to occur on or before march 26 , 2014 . on january 28 , 2014 , the bancorp entered into an accelerated share repurchase transaction with a counterparty pursuant to which the bancorp purchased 3950705 shares , or approximately $ 99 million , of its outstanding common stock on january 31 , 2014 . the bancorp repurchased the shares of its common stock as part of its board approved 100 million share repurchase program previously announced on march 19 , 2013 . the bancorp expects the settlement of the transaction to occur on or before march 26 , 2014 . table 61 : share repurchases .
for the years ended december 31 | 2013 | 2012 | 2011 shares authorized for repurchase at january 1 | 63046682 | 19201518 | 19201518 additional authorizations ( a ) | 45541057 | 86269178 | - share repurchases ( b ) | -65516126 ( 65516126 ) | -42424014 ( 42424014 ) | - shares authorized for repurchase at december 31 | 43071613 | 63046682 | 19201518 average price paid per share | $ 18.80 | $ 14.82 | n/a
( a ) in march 2013 , the bancorp announced that its board of directors had authorized management to purchase 100 million shares of the bancorp 2019s common stock through the open market or in any private transaction . the authorization does not include specific price targets or an expiration date . this share repurchase authorization replaces the board 2019s previous authorization pursuant to which approximately 54 million shares remained available for repurchase by the bancorp . ( b ) excludes 1863097 , 2059003 and 1164254 shares repurchased during 2013 , 2012 , and 2011 , respectively , in connection with various employee compensation plans . these repurchases are not included in the calculation for average price paid and do not count against the maximum number of shares that may yet be repurchased under the board of directors 2019 authorization . stress tests and ccar the frb issued guidelines known as ccar , which provide a common , conservative approach to ensure bhcs , including the bancorp , hold adequate capital to maintain ready access to funding , continue operations and meet their obligations to creditors and counterparties , and continue to serve as credit intermediaries , even in adverse conditions . the ccar process requires the submission of a comprehensive capital plan that assumes a minimum planning horizon of nine quarters under various economic scenarios . the mandatory elements of the capital plan are an assessment of the expected use and sources of capital over the planning horizon , a description of all planned capital actions over the planning horizon , a discussion of any expected changes to the bancorp 2019s business plan that are likely to have a material impact on its capital adequacy or liquidity , a detailed description of the bancorp 2019s process for assessing capital adequacy and the bancorp 2019s capital policy . the capital plan must reflect the revised capital framework that the frb adopted in connection with the implementation of the basel iii accord , including the framework 2019s minimum regulatory capital ratios and transition arrangements . the frb 2019s review of the capital plan will assess the comprehensiveness of the capital plan , the reasonableness of the assumptions and the analysis underlying the capital plan . additionally , the frb reviews the robustness of the capital adequacy process , the capital policy and the bancorp 2019s ability to maintain capital above the minimum regulatory capital ratios as they transition to basel iii and above a basel i tier 1 common ratio of 5 percent under baseline and stressful conditions throughout a nine- quarter planning horizon . the frb issued stress testing rules that implement section 165 ( i ) ( 1 ) and ( i ) ( 2 ) of the dfa . large bhcs , including the bancorp , are subject to the final stress testing rules . the rules require both supervisory and company-run stress tests , which provide forward- looking information to supervisors to help assess whether institutions have sufficient capital to absorb losses and support operations during adverse economic conditions . in march of 2013 , the frb announced it had completed the 2013 ccar . for bhcs that proposed capital distributions in their plan , the frb either objected to the plan or provided a non- objection whereby the frb concurred with the proposed 2013 capital distributions . the frb indicated to the bancorp that it did not object to the following proposed capital actions for the period beginning april 1 , 2013 and ending march 31 , 2014 : f0b7 increase in the quarterly common stock dividend to $ 0.12 per share ; f0b7 repurchase of up to $ 750 million in trups subject to the determination of a regulatory capital event and replacement with the issuance of a similar amount of tier ii-qualifying subordinated debt ; f0b7 conversion of the $ 398 million in outstanding series g 8.5% ( 8.5 % ) convertible preferred stock into approximately 35.5 million common shares issued to the holders . if this conversion were to occur , the bancorp would intend to repurchase common shares equivalent to those issued in the conversion up to $ 550 million in market value , and issue $ 550 million in preferred stock; .
Question: w h a t i s t h e t o t a l c a s h o u t f l o w s p e n t f o r s h a r e s r e p u r c h a s e d d u r i n g 2 0 1 3 , i n m i l l i o n s ?
| 5,198 |
3524000
|
Given the context, answer the question.
Context: vornado realty trust notes to consolidated financial statements ( continued ) 13 . leases as lessor : we lease space to tenants under operating leases . most of the leases provide for the payment of fixed base rentals payable monthly in advance . office building leases generally require the tenants to reimburse us for operating costs and real estate taxes above their base year costs . shopping center leases provide for the pass-through to tenants the tenants 2019 share of real estate taxes , insurance and maintenance . shopping center leases also provide for the payment by the lessee of additional rent based on a percentage of the tenants 2019 sales . as of december 31 , 2008 , future base rental revenue under non-cancelable operating leases , excluding rents for leases with an original term of less than one year and rents resulting from the exercise of renewal options , is as follows : ( amounts in thousands ) year ending december 31: .
2009 | $ 1792000 2010 | 1732000 2011 | 1576000 2012 | 1417000 2013 | 1300000 thereafter | 7216000
these amounts do not include rentals based on tenants 2019 sales . these percentage rents approximated $ 7322000 , $ 9379000 , and $ 7593000 , for the years ended december 31 , 2008 , 2007 , and 2006 , respectively . none of our tenants accounted for more than 10% ( 10 % ) of total revenues for the years ended december 31 , 2008 , 2007 and former bradlees locations pursuant to the master agreement and guaranty , dated may 1 , 1992 , we are due $ 5000000 per annum of additional rent from stop & shop which was allocated to certain of bradlees former locations . on december 31 , 2002 , prior to the expiration of the leases to which the additional rent was allocated , we reallocated this rent to other former bradlees leases also guaranteed by stop & shop . stop & shop is contesting our right to reallocate and claims that we are no longer entitled to the additional rent . at december 31 , 2008 , we are due an aggregate of $ 30400000 . we believe the additional rent provision of the guaranty expires at the earliest in 2012 and we are vigorously contesting stop & shop 2019s position. .
Question: a s o f d e c e m b e r 3 1 , 2 0 0 8 , f u t u r e b a s e r e n t a l r e v e n u e u n d e r n o n - c a n c e l a b l e o p e r a t i n g l e a s e s , e x c l u d i n g r e n t s f o r l e a s e s w i t h a n o r i g i n a l t e r m o f l e s s t h a n o n e y e a r a n d r e n t s r e s u l t i n g f r o m t h e e x e r c i s e o f r e n e w a l o p t i o n s , t o t a l e d w h a t ( i n t h o u s a n d s ) f o r t h e y e a r s e n d i n g d e c e m b e r 3 1 2 0 0 9 a n d 2 0 1 0 ?
| 5,199 |
755956338
|
Given the context, answer the question.
Context: equity compensation plan information the following table summarizes the equity compensation plan information as of december 31 , 2011 . information is included for equity compensation plans approved by the stockholders and equity compensation plans not approved by the stockholders . number of securities to be issued upon exercise of outstanding options weighted average exercise number of securities remaining available for future issuance ( excluding securities reflected in column ( a ) ) equity compensation plans approved by security holders ( 1 ) 9683058 $ 78.07 7269562 equity compensation plans not approved by security holders ( 2 ) 776360 $ 42.82 .
plan | number of securities tobe issued upon exerciseof outstanding options ( a ) | weightedaverageexerciseprice ( b ) | number of securitiesremaining available forfuture issuance ( excludingsecurities reflected incolumn ( a ) ) ( c ) equity compensation plansapproved by security holders ( 1 ) | 9683058 | $ 78.07 | 7269562 equity compensation plans notapproved by security holders ( 2 ) | 776360 | $ 42.82 | - total | 10459418 | $ 75.46 | 7269562
( 1 ) includes the equity ownership plan , which was approved by the shareholders on may 15 , 1998 , the 2007 equity ownership plan and the 2011 equity ownership plan . the 2007 equity ownership plan was approved by entergy corporation shareholders on may 12 , 2006 , and 7000000 shares of entergy corporation common stock can be issued , with no more than 2000000 shares available for non-option grants . the 2011 equity ownership plan was approved by entergy corporation shareholders on may 6 , 2011 , and 5500000 shares of entergy corporation common stock can be issued from the 2011 equity ownership plan , with no more than 2000000 shares available for incentive stock option grants . the equity ownership plan , the 2007 equity ownership plan and the 2011 equity ownership plan ( the 201cplans 201d ) are administered by the personnel committee of the board of directors ( other than with respect to awards granted to non-employee directors , which awards are administered by the entire board of directors ) . eligibility under the plans is limited to the non-employee directors and to the officers and employees of an entergy system employer and any corporation 80% ( 80 % ) or more of whose stock ( based on voting power ) or value is owned , directly or indirectly , by entergy corporation . the plans provide for the issuance of stock options , restricted shares , equity awards ( units whose value is related to the value of shares of the common stock but do not represent actual shares of common stock ) , performance awards ( performance shares or units valued by reference to shares of common stock or performance units valued by reference to financial measures or property other than common stock ) and other stock-based awards . ( 2 ) entergy has a board-approved stock-based compensation plan . however , effective may 9 , 2003 , the board has directed that no further awards be issued under that plan . item 13 . certain relationships and related transactions and director independence for information regarding certain relationships , related transactions and director independence of entergy corporation , see the proxy statement under the headings 201ccorporate governance - director independence 201d and 201ctransactions with related persons , 201d which information is incorporated herein by reference . since december 31 , 2010 , none of the subsidiaries or any of their affiliates has participated in any transaction involving an amount in excess of $ 120000 in which any director or executive officer of any of the subsidiaries , any nominee for director , or any immediate family member of the foregoing had a material interest as contemplated by item 404 ( a ) of regulation s-k ( 201crelated party transactions 201d ) . entergy corporation 2019s board of directors has adopted written policies and procedures for the review , approval or ratification of related party transactions . under these policies and procedures , the corporate governance committee , or a subcommittee of the board of directors of entergy corporation composed of .
Question: w h a t i s t h e e t o t a l v a l u e o f o u t s t a n d i n g s e c u r i t y o p t i o n s ?
| 5,200 |
9.5%
|
Given the context, answer the question.
Context: table of contents ( 4 ) the decline in cash flows was driven by the timing of inventory purchases at the end of 2014 versus 2013 . in order to manage our working capital and operating cash needs , we monitor our cash conversion cycle , defined as days of sales outstanding in accounts receivable plus days of supply in inventory minus days of purchases outstanding in accounts payable , based on a rolling three-month average . components of our cash conversion cycle are as follows: .
( in days ) | december 31 , 2015 | december 31 , 2014 | december 31 , 2013 days of sales outstanding ( dso ) ( 1 ) | 48 | 42 | 44 days of supply in inventory ( dio ) ( 2 ) | 13 | 13 | 14 days of purchases outstanding ( dpo ) ( 3 ) | -40 ( 40 ) | -34 ( 34 ) | -35 ( 35 ) cash conversion cycle | 21 | 21 | 23
( 1 ) represents the rolling three-month average of the balance of trade accounts receivable , net at the end of the period divided by average daily net sales for the same three-month period . also incorporates components of other miscellaneous receivables . ( 2 ) represents the rolling three-month average of the balance of merchandise inventory at the end of the period divided by average daily cost of goods sold for the same three-month period . ( 3 ) represents the rolling three-month average of the combined balance of accounts payable-trade , excluding cash overdrafts , and accounts payable-inventory financing at the end of the period divided by average daily cost of goods sold for the same three-month period . the cash conversion cycle remained at 21 days at december 31 , 2015 and december 31 , 2014 . the increase in dso was primarily driven by a higher accounts receivable balance at december 31 , 2015 driven by higher public segment sales where customers generally take longer to pay than customers in our corporate segment , slower government payments in certain states due to budget issues and an increase in net sales and related accounts receivable for third-party services such as software assurance and warranties . these services have an unfavorable impact on dso as the receivable is recognized on the balance sheet on a gross basis while the corresponding sales amount in the statement of operations is recorded on a net basis . these services have a favorable impact on dpo as the payable is recognized on the balance sheet without a corresponding cost of sale in the statement of operations because the cost paid to the vendor or third-party service provider is recorded as a reduction to net sales . in addition to the impact of these services on dpo , dpo also increased due to the mix of payables with certain vendors that have longer payment terms . the cash conversion cycle decreased to 21 days at december 31 , 2014 compared to 23 days at december 31 , 2013 , primarily driven by improvement in dso . the decline in dso was primarily driven by improved collections and early payments from certain customers . additionally , the timing of inventory receipts at the end of 2014 had a favorable impact on dio and an unfavorable impact on dpo . investing activities net cash used in investing activities increased $ 189.6 million in 2015 compared to 2014 . the increase was primarily due to the completion of the acquisition of kelway by purchasing the remaining 65% ( 65 % ) of its outstanding common stock on august 1 , 2015 . additionally , capital expenditures increased $ 35.1 million to $ 90.1 million from $ 55.0 million for 2015 and 2014 , respectively , primarily for our new office location and an increase in spending related to improvements to our information technology systems . net cash used in investing activities increased $ 117.7 million in 2014 compared to 2013 . we paid $ 86.8 million in the fourth quarter of 2014 to acquire a 35% ( 35 % ) non-controlling interest in kelway . additionally , capital expenditures increased $ 7.9 million to $ 55.0 million from $ 47.1 million in 2014 and 2013 , respectively , primarily for improvements to our information technology systems during both years . financing activities net cash used in financing activities increased $ 114.5 million in 2015 compared to 2014 . the increase was primarily driven by share repurchases during the year ended december 31 , 2015 which resulted in an increase in cash used for financing activities of $ 241.3 million . for more information on our share repurchase program , see item 5 , 201cmarket for registrant 2019s common equity , related stockholder matters and issuer purchases of equity securities . 201d the increase was partially offset by the changes in accounts payable-inventory financing , which resulted in an increase in cash provided for financing activities of $ 20.4 million , and the net impact of our debt transactions which resulted in cash outflows of $ 7.1 million and $ 145.9 million during the years .
Question: f r o m d e c 3 1 , 2 0 1 3 t o d e c 3 1 , 2 0 1 4 , w h a t w a s t h e p e r c e n t a g e d e c r e a s e i n t h e l e n g t h o f t h e c a s h c o n v e r s i o n c y c l e ?
| 5,201 |
7.5
|
Given the context, answer the question.
Context: the following table shows reporting units with goodwill balances as of december 31 , 2010 , and the excess of fair value as a percentage over allocated book value as of the annual impairment test . in millions of dollars reporting unit ( 1 ) fair value as a % ( % ) of allocated book value goodwill .
reporting unit ( 1 ) | fair value as a % ( % ) of allocated book value | goodwill north america regional consumer banking | 170% ( 170 % ) | $ 2518 emea regional consumer banking | 168 | 338 asia regional consumer banking | 344 | 6045 latin america regional consumer banking | 230 | 1800 securities and banking | 223 | 9259 transaction services | 1716 | 1567 brokerage and asset management | 151 | 65 local consumer lending 2014cards | 121 | 4560
( 1 ) local consumer lending 2014other is excluded from the table as there is no goodwill allocated to it . while no impairment was noted in step one of citigroup 2019s local consumer lending 2014cards reporting unit impairment test at july 1 , 2010 , goodwill present in the reporting unit may be sensitive to further deterioration as the valuation of the reporting unit is particularly dependent upon economic conditions that affect consumer credit risk and behavior . citigroup engaged the services of an independent valuation specialist to assist in the valuation of the reporting unit at july 1 , 2010 , using a combination of the market approach and income approach consistent with the valuation model used in past practice , which considered the impact of the penalty fee provisions associated with the credit card accountability responsibility and disclosure act of 2009 ( card act ) that were implemented during 2010 . under the market approach for valuing this reporting unit , the key assumption is the selected price multiple . the selection of the multiple considers the operating performance and financial condition of the local consumer lending 2014cards operations as compared with those of a group of selected publicly traded guideline companies and a group of selected acquired companies . among other factors , the level and expected growth in return on tangible equity relative to those of the guideline companies and guideline transactions is considered . since the guideline company prices used are on a minority interest basis , the selection of the multiple considers the guideline acquisition prices , which reflect control rights and privileges , in arriving at a multiple that reflects an appropriate control premium . for the local consumer lending 2014cards valuation under the income approach , the assumptions used as the basis for the model include cash flows for the forecasted period , the assumptions embedded in arriving at an estimation of the terminal value and the discount rate . the cash flows for the forecasted period are estimated based on management 2019s most recent projections available as of the testing date , giving consideration to targeted equity capital requirements based on selected public guideline companies for the reporting unit . in arriving at the terminal value for local consumer lending 2014cards , using 2013 as the terminal year , the assumptions used include a long-term growth rate and a price-to-tangible book multiple based on selected public guideline companies for the reporting unit . the discount rate is based on the reporting unit 2019s estimated cost of equity capital computed under the capital asset pricing model . embedded in the key assumptions underlying the valuation model , described above , is the inherent uncertainty regarding the possibility that economic conditions may deteriorate or other events will occur that will impact the business model for local consumer lending 2014cards . while there is inherent uncertainty embedded in the assumptions used in developing management 2019s forecasts , the company utilized a discount rate at july 1 , 2010 that it believes reflects the risk characteristics and uncertainty specific to management 2019s forecasts and assumptions for the local consumer lending 2014cards reporting unit . two primary categories of events exist 2014economic conditions in the u.s . and regulatory actions 2014which , if they were to occur , could negatively affect key assumptions used in the valuation of local consumer lending 2014cards . small deterioration in the assumptions used in the valuations , in particular the discount-rate and growth-rate assumptions used in the net income projections , could significantly affect citigroup 2019s impairment evaluation and , hence , results . if the future were to differ adversely from management 2019s best estimate of key economic assumptions , and associated cash flows were to decrease by a small margin , citi could potentially experience future material impairment charges with respect to $ 4560 million of goodwill remaining in the local consumer lending 2014 cards reporting unit . any such charges , by themselves , would not negatively affect citi 2019s tier 1 and total capital regulatory ratios , tier 1 common ratio , its tangible common equity or citi 2019s liquidity position. .
Question: w h a t i s t h e r a t i o o f t h e g o o d w i l l f o r n o r t h a m e r i c a r e g i o n a l c o n s u m e r b a n k i n g t o e m e a r e g i o n a l c o n s u m e r b a n k i n g
| 5,202 |
-11.8%
|
Given the context, answer the question.
Context: item 7a . quantitative and qualitative disclosures about market risk ( amounts in millions ) in the normal course of business , we are exposed to market risks related to interest rates , foreign currency rates and certain balance sheet items . from time to time , we use derivative instruments , pursuant to established guidelines and policies , to manage some portion of these risks . derivative instruments utilized in our hedging activities are viewed as risk management tools and are not used for trading or speculative purposes . interest rates our exposure to market risk for changes in interest rates relates primarily to the fair market value and cash flows of our debt obligations . the majority of our debt ( approximately 93% ( 93 % ) and 89% ( 89 % ) as of december 31 , 2016 and 2015 , respectively ) bears interest at fixed rates . we do have debt with variable interest rates , but a 10% ( 10 % ) increase or decrease in interest rates would not be material to our interest expense or cash flows . the fair market value of our debt is sensitive to changes in interest rates , and the impact of a 10% ( 10 % ) change in interest rates is summarized below . increase/ ( decrease ) in fair market value as of december 31 , 10% ( 10 % ) increase in interest rates 10% ( 10 % ) decrease in interest rates .
as of december 31, | increase/ ( decrease ) in fair market value 10% ( 10 % ) increasein interest rates | increase/ ( decrease ) in fair market value 10% ( 10 % ) decreasein interest rates 2016 | $ -26.3 ( 26.3 ) | $ 26.9 2015 | -33.7 ( 33.7 ) | 34.7
we have used interest rate swaps for risk management purposes to manage our exposure to changes in interest rates . we do not have any interest rate swaps outstanding as of december 31 , 2016 . we had $ 1100.6 of cash , cash equivalents and marketable securities as of december 31 , 2016 that we generally invest in conservative , short-term bank deposits or securities . the interest income generated from these investments is subject to both domestic and foreign interest rate movements . during 2016 and 2015 , we had interest income of $ 20.1 and $ 22.8 , respectively . based on our 2016 results , a 100 basis-point increase or decrease in interest rates would affect our interest income by approximately $ 11.0 , assuming that all cash , cash equivalents and marketable securities are impacted in the same manner and balances remain constant from year-end 2016 levels . foreign currency rates we are subject to translation and transaction risks related to changes in foreign currency exchange rates . since we report revenues and expenses in u.s . dollars , changes in exchange rates may either positively or negatively affect our consolidated revenues and expenses ( as expressed in u.s . dollars ) from foreign operations . the foreign currencies that most impacted our results during 2016 included the british pound sterling and , to a lesser extent , the argentine peso , brazilian real and japanese yen . based on 2016 exchange rates and operating results , if the u.s . dollar were to strengthen or weaken by 10% ( 10 % ) , we currently estimate operating income would decrease or increase approximately 4% ( 4 % ) , assuming that all currencies are impacted in the same manner and our international revenue and expenses remain constant at 2016 levels . the functional currency of our foreign operations is generally their respective local currency . assets and liabilities are translated at the exchange rates in effect at the balance sheet date , and revenues and expenses are translated at the average exchange rates during the period presented . the resulting translation adjustments are recorded as a component of accumulated other comprehensive loss , net of tax , in the stockholders 2019 equity section of our consolidated balance sheets . our foreign subsidiaries generally collect revenues and pay expenses in their functional currency , mitigating transaction risk . however , certain subsidiaries may enter into transactions in currencies other than their functional currency . assets and liabilities denominated in currencies other than the functional currency are susceptible to movements in foreign currency until final settlement . currency transaction gains or losses primarily arising from transactions in currencies other than the functional currency are included in office and general expenses . we regularly review our foreign exchange exposures that may have a material impact on our business and from time to time use foreign currency forward exchange contracts or other derivative financial instruments to hedge the effects of potential adverse fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates arising from these exposures . we do not enter into foreign exchange contracts or other derivatives for speculative purposes. .
Question: w h a t i s t h e p e r c e n t a g e c h a n g e i n i n t e r e s t i n c o m e f r o m 2 0 1 5 t o 2 0 1 6 ?
| 5,203 |
11%
|
Given the context, answer the question.
Context: the aes corporation notes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) december 31 , 2011 , 2010 , and 2009 ( 1 ) weighted average interest rate at december 31 , 2011 . ( 2 ) the company has interest rate swaps and interest rate option agreements in an aggregate notional principal amount of approximately $ 3.6 billion on non-recourse debt outstanding at december 31 , 2011 . the swap agreements economically change the variable interest rates on the portion of the debt covered by the notional amounts to fixed rates ranging from approximately 1.44% ( 1.44 % ) to 6.98% ( 6.98 % ) . the option agreements fix interest rates within a range from 1.00% ( 1.00 % ) to 7.00% ( 7.00 % ) . the agreements expire at various dates from 2016 through 2028 . ( 3 ) multilateral loans include loans funded and guaranteed by bilaterals , multilaterals , development banks and other similar institutions . ( 4 ) non-recourse debt of $ 704 million and $ 945 million as of december 31 , 2011 and 2010 , respectively , was excluded from non-recourse debt and included in current and long-term liabilities of held for sale and discontinued businesses in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets . non-recourse debt as of december 31 , 2011 is scheduled to reach maturity as set forth in the table below : december 31 , annual maturities ( in millions ) .
december 31, | annual maturities ( in millions ) 2012 | $ 2152 2013 | 1389 2014 | 1697 2015 | 851 2016 | 2301 thereafter | 7698 total non-recourse debt | $ 16088
as of december 31 , 2011 , aes subsidiaries with facilities under construction had a total of approximately $ 1.4 billion of committed but unused credit facilities available to fund construction and other related costs . excluding these facilities under construction , aes subsidiaries had approximately $ 1.2 billion in a number of available but unused committed revolving credit lines to support their working capital , debt service reserves and other business needs . these credit lines can be used in one or more of the following ways : solely for borrowings ; solely for letters of credit ; or a combination of these uses . the weighted average interest rate on borrowings from these facilities was 14.75% ( 14.75 % ) at december 31 , 2011 . on october 3 , 2011 , dolphin subsidiary ii , inc . ( 201cdolphin ii 201d ) , a newly formed , wholly-owned special purpose indirect subsidiary of aes , entered into an indenture ( the 201cindenture 201d ) with wells fargo bank , n.a . ( the 201ctrustee 201d ) as part of its issuance of $ 450 million aggregate principal amount of 6.50% ( 6.50 % ) senior notes due 2016 ( the 201c2016 notes 201d ) and $ 800 million aggregate principal amount of 7.25% ( 7.25 % ) senior notes due 2021 ( the 201c7.25% ( 201c7.25 % ) 2021 notes 201d , together with the 2016 notes , the 201cnotes 201d ) to finance the acquisition ( the 201cacquisition 201d ) of dpl . upon closing of the acquisition on november 28 , 2011 , dolphin ii was merged into dpl with dpl being the surviving entity and obligor . the 2016 notes and the 7.25% ( 7.25 % ) 2021 notes are included under 201cnotes and bonds 201d in the non-recourse detail table above . see note 23 2014acquisitions and dispositions for further information . interest on the 2016 notes and the 7.25% ( 7.25 % ) 2021 notes accrues at a rate of 6.50% ( 6.50 % ) and 7.25% ( 7.25 % ) per year , respectively , and is payable on april 15 and october 15 of each year , beginning april 15 , 2012 . prior to september 15 , 2016 with respect to the 2016 notes and july 15 , 2021 with respect to the 7.25% ( 7.25 % ) 2021 notes , dpl may redeem some or all of the 2016 notes or 7.25% ( 7.25 % ) 2021 notes at par , plus a 201cmake-whole 201d amount set forth in .
Question: w h a t p e r c e n t a g e o f t o t a l n o n - r e c o u r s e d e b t a s o f d e c e m b e r 3 1 , 2 0 1 1 i s d u e i n 2 0 1 4 ?
| 5,204 |
4
|
Given the context, answer the question.
Context: notes to consolidated financial statements note 20 . regulation and capital adequacy the federal reserve board is the primary regulator of group inc. , a bank holding company under the bank holding company act of 1956 ( bhc act ) and a financial holding company under amendments to the bhc act effected by the u.s . gramm-leach-bliley act of 1999 . as a bank holding company , the firm is subject to consolidated regulatory capital requirements that are computed in accordance with the federal reserve board 2019s risk-based capital requirements ( which are based on the 2018basel 1 2019 capital accord of the basel committee ) . these capital requirements are expressed as capital ratios that compare measures of capital to risk-weighted assets ( rwas ) . the firm 2019s u.s . bank depository institution subsidiaries , including gs bank usa , are subject to similar capital requirements . under the federal reserve board 2019s capital adequacy requirements and the regulatory framework for prompt corrective action that is applicable to gs bank usa , the firm and its u.s . bank depository institution subsidiaries must meet specific capital requirements that involve quantitative measures of assets , liabilities and certain off- balance-sheet items as calculated under regulatory reporting practices . the firm and its u.s . bank depository institution subsidiaries 2019 capital amounts , as well as gs bank usa 2019s prompt corrective action classification , are also subject to qualitative judgments by the regulators about components , risk weightings and other factors . many of the firm 2019s subsidiaries , including gs&co . and the firm 2019s other broker-dealer subsidiaries , are subject to separate regulation and capital requirements as described below . group inc . federal reserve board regulations require bank holding companies to maintain a minimum tier 1 capital ratio of 4% ( 4 % ) and a minimum total capital ratio of 8% ( 8 % ) . the required minimum tier 1 capital ratio and total capital ratio in order to be considered a 201cwell-capitalized 201d bank holding company under the federal reserve board guidelines are 6% ( 6 % ) and 10% ( 10 % ) , respectively . bank holding companies may be expected to maintain ratios well above the minimum levels , depending on their particular condition , risk profile and growth plans . the minimum tier 1 leverage ratio is 3% ( 3 % ) for bank holding companies that have received the highest supervisory rating under federal reserve board guidelines or that have implemented the federal reserve board 2019s risk-based capital measure for market risk . other bank holding companies must have a minimum tier 1 leverage ratio of 4% ( 4 % ) . the table below presents information regarding group inc . 2019s regulatory capital ratios. .
$ in millions | as of december 2012 | as of december 2011 tier 1 capital | $ 66977 | $ 63262 tier 2 capital | $ 13429 | $ 13881 total capital | $ 80406 | $ 77143 risk-weighted assets | $ 399928 | $ 457027 tier 1 capital ratio | 16.7% ( 16.7 % ) | 13.8% ( 13.8 % ) total capital ratio | 20.1% ( 20.1 % ) | 16.9% ( 16.9 % ) tier 1 leverage ratio | 7.3% ( 7.3 % ) | 7.0% ( 7.0 % )
rwas under the federal reserve board 2019s risk-based capital requirements are calculated based on the amount of market risk and credit risk . rwas for market risk are determined by reference to the firm 2019s value-at-risk ( var ) model , supplemented by other measures to capture risks not reflected in the firm 2019s var model . credit risk for on- balance sheet assets is based on the balance sheet value . for off-balance sheet exposures , including otc derivatives and commitments , a credit equivalent amount is calculated based on the notional amount of each trade . all such assets and exposures are then assigned a risk weight depending on , among other things , whether the counterparty is a sovereign , bank or a qualifying securities firm or other entity ( or if collateral is held , depending on the nature of the collateral ) . tier 1 leverage ratio is defined as tier 1 capital under basel 1 divided by average adjusted total assets ( which includes adjustments for disallowed goodwill and intangible assets , and the carrying value of equity investments in non-financial companies that are subject to deductions from tier 1 capital ) . 184 goldman sachs 2012 annual report .
Question: f o r f e d e r a l r e s e r v e b o a r d r e g u l a t i o n s r e q u i r i n g b a n k h o l d i n g c o m p a n i e s t o m a i n t a i n a m i n i m u m t i e r 1 c a p i t a l r a t i o , w h a t i s t h e r a n g e o f t h e m i n i m u m t o t a l c a p i t a l r a t i o i n p e r c e n t a g e p o i n t s ? .
| 5,205 |
.02
|
Given the context, answer the question.
Context: consolidated income statement review our consolidated income statement is presented in item 8 of this report . net income for 2012 was $ 3.0 billion compared with $ 3.1 billion for 2011 . revenue growth of 8 percent and a decline in the provision for credit losses were more than offset by a 16 percent increase in noninterest expense in 2012 compared to 2011 . further detail is included in the net interest income , noninterest income , provision for credit losses and noninterest expense portions of this consolidated income statement review . net interest income table 2 : net interest income and net interest margin year ended december 31 dollars in millions 2012 2011 .
year ended december 31dollars in millions | 2012 | 2011 net interest income | $ 9640 | $ 8700 net interest margin | 3.94% ( 3.94 % ) | 3.92% ( 3.92 % )
changes in net interest income and margin result from the interaction of the volume and composition of interest-earning assets and related yields , interest-bearing liabilities and related rates paid , and noninterest-bearing sources of funding . see the statistical information ( unaudited ) 2013 average consolidated balance sheet and net interest analysis and analysis of year-to-year changes in net interest income in item 8 of this report and the discussion of purchase accounting accretion of purchased impaired loans in the consolidated balance sheet review in this item 7 for additional information . the increase in net interest income in 2012 compared with 2011 was primarily due to the impact of the rbc bank ( usa ) acquisition , organic loan growth and lower funding costs . purchase accounting accretion remained stable at $ 1.1 billion in both periods . the net interest margin was 3.94% ( 3.94 % ) for 2012 and 3.92% ( 3.92 % ) for 2011 . the increase in the comparison was primarily due to a decrease in the weighted-average rate accrued on total interest- bearing liabilities of 29 basis points , largely offset by a 21 basis point decrease on the yield on total interest-earning assets . the decrease in the rate on interest-bearing liabilities was primarily due to the runoff of maturing retail certificates of deposit and the redemption of additional trust preferred and hybrid capital securities during 2012 , in addition to an increase in fhlb borrowings and commercial paper as lower-cost funding sources . the decrease in the yield on interest-earning assets was primarily due to lower rates on new loan volume and lower yields on new securities in the current low rate environment . with respect to the first quarter of 2013 , we expect net interest income to decline by two to three percent compared to fourth quarter 2012 net interest income of $ 2.4 billion , due to a decrease in purchase accounting accretion of up to $ 50 to $ 60 million , including lower expected cash recoveries . for the full year 2013 , we expect net interest income to decrease compared with 2012 , assuming an expected decline in purchase accounting accretion of approximately $ 400 million , while core net interest income is expected to increase in the year-over-year comparison . we believe our net interest margin will come under pressure in 2013 , due to the expected decline in purchase accounting accretion and assuming that the current low rate environment continues . noninterest income noninterest income totaled $ 5.9 billion for 2012 and $ 5.6 billion for 2011 . the overall increase in the comparison was primarily due to an increase in residential mortgage loan sales revenue driven by higher loan origination volume , gains on sales of visa class b common shares and higher corporate service fees , largely offset by higher provision for residential mortgage repurchase obligations . asset management revenue , including blackrock , totaled $ 1.2 billion in 2012 compared with $ 1.1 billion in 2011 . this increase was primarily due to higher earnings from our blackrock investment . discretionary assets under management increased to $ 112 billion at december 31 , 2012 compared with $ 107 billion at december 31 , 2011 driven by stronger average equity markets , positive net flows and strong sales performance . for 2012 , consumer services fees were $ 1.1 billion compared with $ 1.2 billion in 2011 . the decline reflected the regulatory impact of lower interchange fees on debit card transactions partially offset by customer growth . as further discussed in the retail banking portion of the business segments review section of this item 7 , the dodd-frank limits on interchange rates were effective october 1 , 2011 and had a negative impact on revenue of approximately $ 314 million in 2012 and $ 75 million in 2011 . this impact was partially offset by higher volumes of merchant , customer credit card and debit card transactions and the impact of the rbc bank ( usa ) acquisition . corporate services revenue increased by $ .3 billion , or 30 percent , to $ 1.2 billion in 2012 compared with $ .9 billion in 2011 due to higher commercial mortgage servicing revenue and higher merger and acquisition advisory fees in 2012 . the major components of corporate services revenue are treasury management revenue , corporate finance fees , including revenue from capital markets-related products and services , and commercial mortgage servicing revenue , including commercial mortgage banking activities . see the product revenue portion of this consolidated income statement review for further detail . the pnc financial services group , inc . 2013 form 10-k 39 .
Question: w h a t w a s t h e c h a n g e i n n e t i n t e r e s t m a r g i n b e t w e e n 2 0 1 2 a n d 2 0 1 1 . ?
| 5,206 |
9459
|
Given the context, answer the question.
Context: kimco realty corporation and subsidiaries notes to consolidated financial statements , continued the company 2019s investments in latin america are made through individual entities which are subject to local taxes . the company assesses each entity to determine if deferred tax assets are more likely than not realizable . this assessment primarily includes an analysis of cumulative earnings and the determination of future earnings to the extent necessary to fully realize the individual deferred tax asset . based on this analysis the company has determined that a full valuation allowance is required for entities which have a three-year cumulative book loss and for which future earnings are not readily determinable . in addition , the company has determined that no valuation allowance is needed for entities that have three-years of cumulative book income and future earnings are anticipated to be sufficient to more likely than not realize their deferred tax assets . at december 31 , 2014 , the company had total deferred tax assets of $ 9.5 million relating to its latin american investments with an aggregate valuation allowance of $ 9.3 million . the company 2019s deferred tax assets in canada result principally from depreciation deducted under gaap that exceed capital cost allowances claimed under canadian tax rules . the deferred tax asset will naturally reverse upon disposition as tax basis will be greater than the basis of the assets under generally accepted accounting principles . as of december 31 , 2014 , the company determined that no valuation allowance was needed against a $ 65.5 million net deferred tax asset within krs . the company based its determination on an analysis of both positive evidence and negative evidence using its judgment as to the relative weight of each . the company believes , when evaluating krs 2019s deferred tax assets , special consideration should be given to the unique relationship between the company as a reit and krs as a taxable reit subsidiary . this relationship exists primarily to protect the reit 2019s qualification under the code by permitting , within certain limits , the reit to engage in certain business activities in which the reit cannot directly participate . as such , the reit controls which and when investments are held in , or distributed or sold from , krs . this relationship distinguishes a reit and taxable reit subsidiary from an enterprise that operates as a single , consolidated corporate taxpayer . the company will continue through this structure to operate certain business activities in krs . the company 2019s analysis of krs 2019s ability to utilize its deferred tax assets includes an estimate of future projected income . to determine future projected income , the company scheduled krs 2019s pre-tax book income and taxable income over a twenty year period taking into account its continuing operations ( 201ccore earnings 201d ) . core earnings consist of estimated net operating income for properties currently in service and generating rental income . major lease turnover is not expected in these properties as these properties were generally constructed and leased within the past seven years . the company can employ strategies to realize krs 2019s deferred tax assets including transferring its property management business or selling certain built-in gain assets . the company 2019s projection of krs 2019s future taxable income over twenty years , utilizing the assumptions above with respect to core earnings , net of related expenses , generates sufficient taxable income to absorb a reversal of the company 2019s deductible temporary differences , including net operating loss carryovers . based on this analysis , the company concluded it is more likely than not that krs 2019s net deferred tax asset of $ 65.5 million ( excluding net deferred tax assets of fnc discussed above ) will be realized and therefore , no valuation allowance is needed at december 31 , 2014 . if future income projections do not occur as forecasted or the company incurs additional impairment losses in excess of the amount core earnings can absorb , the company will reconsider the need for a valuation allowance . provision/ ( benefit ) differ from the amounts computed by applying the statutory federal income tax rate to taxable income before income taxes as follows ( in thousands ) : .
| 2014 | 2013 | 2012 federal provision/ ( benefit ) at statutory tax rate ( 35% ( 35 % ) ) | $ 7762 | $ -1697 ( 1697 ) | $ 2936 state and local provision/ ( benefit ) net of federal benefit | 1304 | -205 ( 205 ) | 230 acquisition of fnc | - | -9126 ( 9126 ) | - other | - | 229 | -25 ( 25 ) total tax provision/ ( benefit ) 2013 u.s . | $ 9066 | $ -10799 ( 10799 ) | $ 3141
.
Question: w h a t w a s t h e c h a n g e i n t h e f e d e r a l p r o v i s i o n / ( b e n e f i t ) f r o m 2 0 1 3 t o 2 0 1 4 i n m i l l i o n s
| 5,207 |
80
|
Given the context, answer the question.
Context: contributions and expected benefit payments the funding of our qualified defined benefit pension plans is determined in accordance with erisa , as amended by the ppa , and in a manner consistent with cas and internal revenue code rules . in 2015 , we made $ 5 million in contributions to our new sikorsky bargained qualified defined benefit pension plan and we plan to make approximately $ 25 million in contributions to this plan in 2016 . the following table presents estimated future benefit payments , which reflect expected future employee service , as of december 31 , 2015 ( in millions ) : .
| 2016 | 2017 | 2018 | 2019 | 2020 | 2021 - 2025 qualified defined benefit pension plans | $ 2160 | $ 2240 | $ 2320 | $ 2410 | $ 2500 | $ 13670 retiree medical and life insurance plans | 190 | 190 | 200 | 200 | 200 | 940
defined contribution plans we maintain a number of defined contribution plans , most with 401 ( k ) features , that cover substantially all of our employees . under the provisions of our 401 ( k ) plans , we match most employees 2019 eligible contributions at rates specified in the plan documents . our contributions were $ 393 million in 2015 , $ 385 million in 2014 and $ 383 million in 2013 , the majority of which were funded in our common stock . our defined contribution plans held approximately 40.0 million and 41.7 million shares of our common stock as of december 31 , 2015 and 2014 . note 12 2013 stockholders 2019 equity at december 31 , 2015 and 2014 , our authorized capital was composed of 1.5 billion shares of common stock and 50 million shares of series preferred stock . of the 305 million shares of common stock issued and outstanding as of december 31 , 2015 , 303 million shares were considered outstanding for balance sheet presentation purposes ; the remaining shares were held in a separate trust . of the 316 million shares of common stock issued and outstanding as of december 31 , 2014 , 314 million shares were considered outstanding for balance sheet presentation purposes ; the remaining shares were held in a separate trust . no shares of preferred stock were issued and outstanding at december 31 , 2015 or 2014 . repurchases of common stock during 2015 , we repurchased 15.2 million shares of our common stock for $ 3.1 billion . during 2014 and 2013 , we paid $ 1.9 billion and $ 1.8 billion to repurchase 11.5 million and 16.2 million shares of our common stock . on september 24 , 2015 , our board of directors approved a $ 3.0 billion increase to our share repurchase program . inclusive of this increase , the total remaining authorization for future common share repurchases under our program was $ 3.6 billion as of december 31 , 2015 . as we repurchase our common shares , we reduce common stock for the $ 1 of par value of the shares repurchased , with the excess purchase price over par value recorded as a reduction of additional paid-in capital . due to the volume of repurchases made under our share repurchase program , additional paid-in capital was reduced to zero , with the remainder of the excess purchase price over par value of $ 2.4 billion and $ 1.1 billion recorded as a reduction of retained earnings in 2015 and 2014 . we paid dividends totaling $ 1.9 billion ( $ 6.15 per share ) in 2015 , $ 1.8 billion ( $ 5.49 per share ) in 2014 and $ 1.5 billion ( $ 4.78 per share ) in 2013 . we have increased our quarterly dividend rate in each of the last three years , including a 10% ( 10 % ) increase in the quarterly dividend rate in the fourth quarter of 2015 . we declared quarterly dividends of $ 1.50 per share during each of the first three quarters of 2015 and $ 1.65 per share during the fourth quarter of 2015 ; $ 1.33 per share during each of the first three quarters of 2014 and $ 1.50 per share during the fourth quarter of 2014 ; and $ 1.15 per share during each of the first three quarters of 2013 and $ 1.33 per share during the fourth quarter of 2013. .
Question: w h a t i s t h e c h a n g e i n m i l l i o n s o f q u a l i f i e d d e f i n e d b e n e f i t p e n s i o n p l a n s e x p e c t e d t o b e p a i d o u t b e t w e e n 2 0 1 7 t o 2 0 1 8 ?
| 5,208 |
4%
|
Given the context, answer the question.
Context: contractual obligations fis 2019 long-term contractual obligations generally include its long-term debt , interest on long-term debt , lease payments on certain of its property and equipment and payments for data processing and maintenance . for more descriptive information regarding the company's long-term debt , see note 13 in the notes to consolidated financial statements . the following table summarizes fis 2019 significant contractual obligations and commitments as of december 31 , 2012 ( in millions ) : less than 1-3 3-5 more than total 1 year years years 5 years .
| total | less than 1 year | 1-3 years | 3-5 years | more than 5 years long-term debt | $ 4385.5 | $ 153.9 | $ 757.1 | $ 2274.5 | $ 1200.0 interest ( 1 ) | 1137.6 | 200.4 | 372.9 | 288.8 | 275.5 operating leases | 226.6 | 55.0 | 96.2 | 46.4 | 29.0 data processing and maintenance | 246.7 | 131.7 | 78.9 | 28.4 | 7.7 other contractual obligations ( 2 ) | 100.7 | 18.8 | 52.0 | 10.6 | 19.3 total | $ 6097.1 | $ 559.8 | $ 1357.1 | $ 2648.7 | $ 1531.5
( 1 ) these calculations assume that : ( a ) applicable margins remain constant ; ( b ) all variable rate debt is priced at the one-month libor rate in effect as of december 31 , 2012 ; ( c ) no new hedging transactions are effected ; ( d ) only mandatory debt repayments are made ; and ( e ) no refinancing occurs at debt maturity . ( 2 ) amount includes the payment for labor claims related to fis' former item processing and remittance operations in brazil ( see note 3 to the consolidated financial statements ) and amounts due to the brazilian venture partner . fis believes that its existing cash balances , cash flows from operations and borrowing programs will provide adequate sources of liquidity and capital resources to meet fis 2019 expected short-term liquidity needs and its long-term needs for the operations of its business , expected capital spending for the next 12 months and the foreseeable future and the satisfaction of these obligations and commitments . off-balance sheet arrangements fis does not have any off-balance sheet arrangements . item 7a . quantitative and qualitative disclosure about market risks market risk we are exposed to market risks primarily from changes in interest rates and foreign currency exchange rates . we use certain derivative financial instruments , including interest rate swaps and foreign currency forward exchange contracts , to manage interest rate and foreign currency risk . we do not use derivatives for trading purposes , to generate income or to engage in speculative activity . interest rate risk in addition to existing cash balances and cash provided by operating activities , we use fixed rate and variable rate debt to finance our operations . we are exposed to interest rate risk on these debt obligations and related interest rate swaps . the notes ( as defined in note 13 to the consolidated financial statements ) represent substantially all of our fixed-rate long-term debt obligations . the carrying value of the notes was $ 1950.0 million as of december 31 , 2012 . the fair value of the notes was approximately $ 2138.2 million as of december 31 , 2012 . the potential reduction in fair value of the notes from a hypothetical 10 percent increase in market interest rates would not be material to the overall fair value of the debt . our floating rate long-term debt obligations principally relate to borrowings under the fis credit agreement ( as also defined in note 13 to the consolidated financial statements ) . an increase of 100 basis points in the libor rate would increase our annual debt service under the fis credit agreement , after we include the impact of our interest rate swaps , by $ 9.3 million ( based on principal amounts outstanding as of december 31 , 2012 ) . we performed the foregoing sensitivity analysis based on the principal amount of our floating rate debt as of december 31 , 2012 , less the principal amount of such debt that was then subject to an interest rate swap converting such debt into fixed rate debt . this sensitivity analysis is based solely on .
Question: w h a t p e r c e n t o f t o t a l c o n t r a c t u a l o b l i g a t i o n s a n d c o m m i t m e n t s a s o f d e c e m b e r 3 1 , 2 0 1 2 a r e d a t a p r o c e s s i n g a n d m a i n t e n a n c e ?
| 5,209 |
8%
|
Given the context, answer the question.
Context: the company is currently under audit by the internal revenue service and other major taxing jurisdictions around the world . it is thus reasonably possible that significant changes in the gross balance of unrecognized tax benefits may occur within the next 12 months , but the company does not expect such audits to result in amounts that would cause a significant change to its effective tax rate , other than the following items . the company is currently at irs appeals for the years 1999 20132002 . one of the issues relates to the timing of the inclusion of interchange fees received by the company relating to credit card purchases by its cardholders . it is reasonably possible that within the next 12 months the company can either reach agreement on this issue at appeals or decide to litigate the issue . this issue is presently being litigated by another company in a united states tax court case . the gross uncertain tax position for this item at december 31 , 2008 is $ 542 million . since this is a temporary difference , the only effect to the company 2019s effective tax rate would be due to net interest and state tax rate differentials . if the reserve were to be released , the tax benefit could be as much as $ 168 million . in addition , the company expects to conclude the irs audit of its u.s . federal consolidated income tax returns for the years 2003 20132005 within the next 12 months . the gross uncertain tax position at december 31 , 2008 for the items expected to be resolved is approximately $ 350 million plus gross interest of $ 70 million . the potential net tax benefit to continuing operations could be approximately $ 325 million . the following are the major tax jurisdictions in which the company and its affiliates operate and the earliest tax year subject to examination: .
jurisdiction | tax year united states | 2003 mexico | 2006 new york state and city | 2005 united kingdom | 2007 germany | 2000 korea | 2005 japan | 2006 brazil | 2004
foreign pretax earnings approximated $ 10.3 billion in 2008 , $ 9.1 billion in 2007 , and $ 13.6 billion in 2006 ( $ 5.1 billion , $ 0.7 billion and $ 0.9 billion of which , respectively , are in discontinued operations ) . as a u.s . corporation , citigroup and its u.s . subsidiaries are subject to u.s . taxation currently on all foreign pretax earnings earned by a foreign branch . pretax earnings of a foreign subsidiary or affiliate are subject to u.s . taxation when effectively repatriated . the company provides income taxes on the undistributed earnings of non-u.s . subsidiaries except to the extent that such earnings are indefinitely invested outside the united states . at december 31 , 2008 , $ 22.8 billion of accumulated undistributed earnings of non-u.s . subsidiaries were indefinitely invested . at the existing u.s . federal income tax rate , additional taxes ( net of u.s . foreign tax credits ) of $ 6.1 billion would have to be provided if such earnings were remitted currently . the current year 2019s effect on the income tax expense from continuing operations is included in the foreign income tax rate differential line in the reconciliation of the federal statutory rate to the company 2019s effective income tax rate on the previous page . income taxes are not provided for on the company 2019s savings bank base year bad debt reserves that arose before 1988 because under current u.s . tax rules such taxes will become payable only to the extent such amounts are distributed in excess of limits prescribed by federal law . at december 31 , 2008 , the amount of the base year reserves totaled approximately $ 358 million ( subject to a tax of $ 125 million ) . the company has no valuation allowance on deferred tax assets at december 31 , 2008 and december 31 , 2007 . at december 31 , 2008 , the company had a u.s . foreign tax-credit carryforward of $ 10.5 billion , $ 0.4 billion whose expiry date is 2016 , $ 5.3 billion whose expiry date is 2017 and $ 4.8 billion whose expiry date is 2018 . the company has a u.s federal consolidated net operating loss ( nol ) carryforward of approximately $ 13 billion whose expiration date is 2028 . the company also has a general business credit carryforward of $ 0.6 billion whose expiration dates are 2027-2028 . the company has state and local net operating loss carryforwards of $ 16.2 billion and $ 4.9 billion in new york state and new york city , respectively . this consists of $ 2.4 billion and $ 1.2 billion , whose expiration date is 2027 and $ 13.8 billion and $ 3.7 billion whose expiration date is 2028 and for which the company has recorded a deferred-tax asset of $ 1.2 billion , along with less significant net operating losses in various other states for which the company has recorded a deferred-tax asset of $ 399 million and which expire between 2012 and 2028 . in addition , the company has recorded deferred-tax assets in apb 23 subsidiaries for foreign net operating loss carryforwards of $ 130 million ( which expires in 2018 ) and $ 101 million ( with no expiration ) . although realization is not assured , the company believes that the realization of the recognized net deferred tax asset of $ 44.5 billion is more likely than not based on expectations as to future taxable income in the jurisdictions in which it operates and available tax planning strategies , as defined in sfas 109 , that could be implemented if necessary to prevent a carryforward from expiring . the company 2019s net deferred tax asset ( dta ) of $ 44.5 billion consists of approximately $ 36.5 billion of net u.s . federal dtas , $ 4 billion of net state dtas and $ 4 billion of net foreign dtas . included in the net federal dta of $ 36.5 billion are deferred tax liabilities of $ 4 billion that will reverse in the relevant carryforward period and may be used to support the dta . the major components of the u.s . federal dta are $ 10.5 billion in foreign tax-credit carryforwards , $ 4.6 billion in a net-operating-loss carryforward , $ 0.6 billion in a general-business-credit carryforward , $ 19.9 billion in net deductions that have not yet been taken on a tax return , and $ 0.9 billion in compensation deductions , which reduced additional paid-in capital in january 2009 and for which sfas 123 ( r ) did not permit any adjustment to such dta at december 31 , 2008 because the related stock compensation was not yet deductible to the company . in general , citigroup would need to generate approximately $ 85 billion of taxable income during the respective carryforward periods to fully realize its federal , state and local dtas. .
Question: w h a t p e r c e n t o f f o r e i g n p r e t a x e a r n i n g s i n 2 0 0 7 w e r e f r o m d i s c o n t i n u e d o p e r a t i o n s ?
| 5,210 |
1.2%
|
Given the context, answer the question.
Context: 10-k altria ar release tuesday , february 27 , 2018 10:00pm andra design llc the relative percentages of operating companies income ( loss ) attributable to each reportable segment and the all other category were as follows: .
| 2017 | 2016 | 2015 smokeable products | 85.8% ( 85.8 % ) | 86.2% ( 86.2 % ) | 87.4% ( 87.4 % ) smokeless products | 13.2 | 13.1 | 12.8 wine | 1.5 | 1.8 | 1.8 all other | -0.5 ( 0.5 ) | -1.1 ( 1.1 ) | -2.0 ( 2.0 ) total | 100.0% ( 100.0 % ) | 100.0% ( 100.0 % ) | 100.0% ( 100.0 % )
for items affecting the comparability of the relative percentages of operating companies income ( loss ) attributable to each reportable segment , see note 15 . narrative description of business portions of the information called for by this item are included in operating results by business segment in item 7 . management 2019s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations of this annual report on form 10-k ( 201citem 7 201d ) . tobacco space altria group , inc . 2019s tobacco operating companies include pm usa , usstc and other subsidiaries of ust , middleton , nu mark and nat sherman . altria group distribution company provides sales and distribution services to altria group , inc . 2019s tobacco operating companies . the products of altria group , inc . 2019s tobacco subsidiaries include smokeable tobacco products , consisting of cigarettes manufactured and sold by pm usa and nat sherman , machine- made large cigars and pipe tobacco manufactured and sold by middleton and premium cigars sold by nat sherman ; smokeless tobacco products manufactured and sold by usstc ; and innovative tobacco products , including e-vapor products manufactured and sold by nu mark . cigarettes : pm usa is the largest cigarette company in the united states . marlboro , the principal cigarette brand of pm usa , has been the largest-selling cigarette brand in the united states for over 40 years . nat sherman sells substantially all of its super premium cigarettes in the united states . total smokeable products segment 2019s cigarettes shipment volume in the united states was 116.6 billion units in 2017 , a decrease of 5.1% ( 5.1 % ) from cigars : middleton is engaged in the manufacture and sale of machine-made large cigars and pipe tobacco . middleton contracts with a third-party importer to supply a majority of its cigars and sells substantially all of its cigars to customers in the united states . black & mild is the principal cigar brand of middleton . nat sherman sources all of its cigars from third-party suppliers and sells substantially all of its cigars to customers in the united states . total smokeable products segment 2019s cigars shipment volume was approximately 1.5 billion units in 2017 , an increase of 9.9% ( 9.9 % ) from 2016 . smokeless tobacco products : usstc is the leading producer and marketer of moist smokeless tobacco ( 201cmst 201d ) products . the smokeless products segment includes the premium brands , copenhagen and skoal , and value brands , red seal and husky . substantially all of the smokeless tobacco products are manufactured and sold to customers in the united states . total smokeless products segment 2019s shipment volume was 841.3 million units in 2017 , a decrease of 1.4% ( 1.4 % ) from 2016 . innovative tobacco products : nu mark participates in the e-vapor category and has developed and commercialized other innovative tobacco products . in addition , nu mark sources the production of its e-vapor products through overseas contract manufacturing arrangements . in 2013 , nu mark introduced markten e-vapor products . in april 2014 , nu mark acquired the e-vapor business of green smoke , inc . and its affiliates ( 201cgreen smoke 201d ) , which began selling e-vapor products in 2009 . in 2017 , altria group , inc . 2019s subsidiaries purchased certain intellectual property related to innovative tobacco products . in december 2013 , altria group , inc . 2019s subsidiaries entered into a series of agreements with philip morris international inc . ( 201cpmi 201d ) pursuant to which altria group , inc . 2019s subsidiaries provide an exclusive license to pmi to sell nu mark 2019s e-vapor products outside the united states , and pmi 2019s subsidiaries provide an exclusive license to altria group , inc . 2019s subsidiaries to sell two of pmi 2019s heated tobacco product platforms in the united states . further , in july 2015 , altria group , inc . announced the expansion of its strategic framework with pmi to include a joint research , development and technology-sharing agreement . under this agreement , altria group , inc . 2019s subsidiaries and pmi will collaborate to develop e-vapor products for commercialization in the united states by altria group , inc . 2019s subsidiaries and in markets outside the united states by pmi . this agreement also provides for exclusive technology cross licenses , technical information sharing and cooperation on scientific assessment , regulatory engagement and approval related to e-vapor products . in the fourth quarter of 2016 , pmi submitted a modified risk tobacco product ( 201cmrtp 201d ) application for an electronically heated tobacco product with the united states food and drug administration 2019s ( 201cfda 201d ) center for tobacco products and filed its corresponding pre-market tobacco product application in the first quarter of 2017 . upon regulatory authorization by the fda , altria group , inc . 2019s subsidiaries will have an exclusive license to sell this heated tobacco product in the united states . distribution , competition and raw materials : altria group , inc . 2019s tobacco subsidiaries sell their tobacco products principally to wholesalers ( including distributors ) , large retail organizations , including chain stores , and the armed services . the market for tobacco products is highly competitive , characterized by brand recognition and loyalty , with product quality , taste , price , product innovation , marketing , packaging and distribution constituting the significant methods of competition . promotional activities include , in certain instances and where permitted by law , allowances , the distribution of incentive items , price promotions , product promotions , coupons and other discounts. .
Question: w h a t i s t h e p e r c e n t c h a n g e i n r e l a t i v e p e r c e n t a g e s o f o p e r a t i n g c o m p a n i e s i n c o m e ( l o s s ) a t t r i b u t a b l e t o s m o k e a b l e p r o d u c t s f r o m 2 0 1 5 t o 2 0 1 6 ?
| 5,211 |
6.1%
|
Given the context, answer the question.
Context: vornado realty trust notes to consolidated financial statements ( continued ) 10 . redeemable noncontrolling interests - continued redeemable noncontrolling interests on our consolidated balance sheets are recorded at the greater of their carrying amount or redemption value at the end of each reporting period . changes in the value from period to period are charged to 201cadditional capital 201d in our consolidated statements of changes in equity . below is a table summarizing the activity of redeemable noncontrolling interests . ( amounts in thousands ) .
balance at december 31 2009 | $ 1251628 net income | 55228 distributions | -53515 ( 53515 ) conversion of class a units into common shares at redemption value | -126764 ( 126764 ) adjustment to carry redeemable class a units at redemption value | 191826 redemption of series d-12 redeemable units | -13000 ( 13000 ) other net | 22571 balance at december 31 2010 | 1327974 net income | 55912 distributions | -50865 ( 50865 ) conversion of class a units into common shares at redemption value | -64830 ( 64830 ) adjustment to carry redeemable class a units at redemption value | -98092 ( 98092 ) redemption of series d-11 redeemable units | -28000 ( 28000 ) other net | 18578 balance at december 31 2011 | $ 1160677
redeemable noncontrolling interests exclude our series g convertible preferred units and series d-13 cumulative redeemable preferred units , as they are accounted for as liabilities in accordance with asc 480 , distinguishing liabilities and equity , because of their possible settlement by issuing a variable number of vornado common shares . accordingly , the fair value of these units is included as a component of 201cother liabilities 201d on our consolidated balance sheets and aggregated $ 54865000 and $ 55097000 as of december 31 , 2011 and 2010 , respectively. .
Question: w h a t w a s t h e p e r c e n t a g e c h a n g e i n t h e r e d e e m a b l e n o n c o n t r o l l i n g i n t e r e s t s f r o m 2 0 0 9 t o 2 0 1 0
| 5,212 |
72%
|
Given the context, answer the question.
Context: contractual obligations fis 2019 long-term contractual obligations generally include its long-term debt , interest on long-term debt , lease payments on certain of its property and equipment and payments for data processing and maintenance . for more descriptive information regarding the company's long-term debt , see note 13 in the notes to consolidated financial statements . the following table summarizes fis 2019 significant contractual obligations and commitments as of december 31 , 2012 ( in millions ) : less than 1-3 3-5 more than total 1 year years years 5 years .
| total | less than 1 year | 1-3 years | 3-5 years | more than 5 years long-term debt | $ 4385.5 | $ 153.9 | $ 757.1 | $ 2274.5 | $ 1200.0 interest ( 1 ) | 1137.6 | 200.4 | 372.9 | 288.8 | 275.5 operating leases | 226.6 | 55.0 | 96.2 | 46.4 | 29.0 data processing and maintenance | 246.7 | 131.7 | 78.9 | 28.4 | 7.7 other contractual obligations ( 2 ) | 100.7 | 18.8 | 52.0 | 10.6 | 19.3 total | $ 6097.1 | $ 559.8 | $ 1357.1 | $ 2648.7 | $ 1531.5
( 1 ) these calculations assume that : ( a ) applicable margins remain constant ; ( b ) all variable rate debt is priced at the one-month libor rate in effect as of december 31 , 2012 ; ( c ) no new hedging transactions are effected ; ( d ) only mandatory debt repayments are made ; and ( e ) no refinancing occurs at debt maturity . ( 2 ) amount includes the payment for labor claims related to fis' former item processing and remittance operations in brazil ( see note 3 to the consolidated financial statements ) and amounts due to the brazilian venture partner . fis believes that its existing cash balances , cash flows from operations and borrowing programs will provide adequate sources of liquidity and capital resources to meet fis 2019 expected short-term liquidity needs and its long-term needs for the operations of its business , expected capital spending for the next 12 months and the foreseeable future and the satisfaction of these obligations and commitments . off-balance sheet arrangements fis does not have any off-balance sheet arrangements . item 7a . quantitative and qualitative disclosure about market risks market risk we are exposed to market risks primarily from changes in interest rates and foreign currency exchange rates . we use certain derivative financial instruments , including interest rate swaps and foreign currency forward exchange contracts , to manage interest rate and foreign currency risk . we do not use derivatives for trading purposes , to generate income or to engage in speculative activity . interest rate risk in addition to existing cash balances and cash provided by operating activities , we use fixed rate and variable rate debt to finance our operations . we are exposed to interest rate risk on these debt obligations and related interest rate swaps . the notes ( as defined in note 13 to the consolidated financial statements ) represent substantially all of our fixed-rate long-term debt obligations . the carrying value of the notes was $ 1950.0 million as of december 31 , 2012 . the fair value of the notes was approximately $ 2138.2 million as of december 31 , 2012 . the potential reduction in fair value of the notes from a hypothetical 10 percent increase in market interest rates would not be material to the overall fair value of the debt . our floating rate long-term debt obligations principally relate to borrowings under the fis credit agreement ( as also defined in note 13 to the consolidated financial statements ) . an increase of 100 basis points in the libor rate would increase our annual debt service under the fis credit agreement , after we include the impact of our interest rate swaps , by $ 9.3 million ( based on principal amounts outstanding as of december 31 , 2012 ) . we performed the foregoing sensitivity analysis based on the principal amount of our floating rate debt as of december 31 , 2012 , less the principal amount of such debt that was then subject to an interest rate swap converting such debt into fixed rate debt . this sensitivity analysis is based solely on .
Question: w h a t p e r c e n t o f t o t a l c o n t r a c t u a l o b l i g a t i o n s a n d c o m m i t m e n t s a s o f d e c e m b e r 3 1 , 2 0 1 2 a r e l o n g - t e r m d e b t ?
| 5,213 |
153.8
|
Given the context, answer the question.
Context: stock options 2005 stock and incentive plan in june 2005 , the stockholders of the company approved the 2005 stock and incentive plan ( the 2005 stock plan ) . upon adoption of the 2005 stock plan , issuance of options under the company 2019s existing 2000 stock plan ceased . additionally , in connection with the acquisition of solexa , the company assumed stock options granted under the 2005 solexa equity incentive plan ( the 2005 solexa equity plan ) . as of december 30 , 2007 , an aggregate of up to 13485619 shares of the company 2019s common stock were reserved for issuance under the 2005 stock plan and the 2005 solexa equity plan . the 2005 stock plan provides for an automatic annual increase in the shares reserved for issuance by the lesser of 5% ( 5 % ) of outstanding shares of the company 2019s common stock on the last day of the immediately preceding fiscal year , 1200000 shares or such lesser amount as determined by the company 2019s board of directors . as of december 30 , 2007 , options to purchase 1834384 shares remained available for future grant under the 2005 stock plan and 2005 solexa equity plan . the company 2019s stock option activity under all stock option plans from january 2 , 2005 through december 30 , 2007 is as follows : options weighted- average exercise price .
| options | weighted- average exercise price outstanding at january 2 2005 | 6205020 | $ 6.99 granted | 2992300 | $ 10.02 exercised | -869925 ( 869925 ) | $ 4.66 cancelled | -1001964 ( 1001964 ) | $ 11.00 outstanding at january 1 2006 | 7325431 | $ 7.96 granted | 2621050 | $ 27.24 exercised | -1273119 ( 1273119 ) | $ 7.28 cancelled | -314242 ( 314242 ) | $ 12.44 outstanding at december 31 2006 | 8359120 | $ 13.94 options assumed through business combination | 1424332 | $ 21.37 granted | 3784508 | $ 40.64 exercised | -2179286 ( 2179286 ) | $ 12.06 cancelled | -964740 ( 964740 ) | $ 22.38 outstanding at december 30 2007 | 10423934 | $ 24.26
illumina , inc . notes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) .
Question: w h a t i s t h e t o t a l v a l u e o f g r a n t e d o p t i o n s i n 2 0 0 7 , i n m i l l i o n s ?
| 5,214 |
4.21
|
Given the context, answer the question.
Context: the following is a reconciliation of the total amounts of unrecognized tax benefits for the year : ( in thousands ) .
unrecognized tax benefit 2014january 1 2008 | $ 7928 ansoft unrecognized tax benefit 2014acquired july 31 2008 | 3525 gross increases 2014tax positions in prior period | 2454 gross decreases 2014tax positions in prior period | -1572 ( 1572 ) gross increases 2014tax positions in current period | 2255 reductions due to a lapse of the applicable statute of limitations | -1598 ( 1598 ) changes due to currency fluctuation | -259 ( 259 ) settlements | -317 ( 317 ) unrecognized tax benefit 2014december 31 2008 | $ 12416
included in the balance of unrecognized tax benefits at december 31 , 2008 are $ 5.6 million of tax benefits that , if recognized , would affect the effective tax rate . also included in the balance of unrecognized tax benefits at december 31 , 2008 are $ 5.0 million of tax benefits that , if recognized , would result in a decrease to goodwill recorded in purchase business combinations , and $ 1.9 million of tax benefits that , if recognized , would result in adjustments to other tax accounts , primarily deferred taxes . the company believes it is reasonably possible that uncertain tax positions of approximately $ 2.6 million as of december 31 , 2008 will be resolved within the next twelve months . the company recognizes interest and penalties related to unrecognized tax benefits as income tax expense . related to the uncertain tax benefits noted above , the company recorded interest of $ 171000 during 2008 . penalties recorded during 2008 were insignificant . in total , as of december 31 , 2008 , the company has recognized a liability for penalties of $ 498000 and interest of $ 1.8 million . the company is subject to taxation in the u.s . and various states and foreign jurisdictions . the company 2019s 2005 through 2008 tax years are open to examination by the internal revenue service . the 2005 and 2006 federal returns are currently under examination . the company also has various foreign subsidiaries with tax filings under examination , as well as numerous foreign and state tax filings subject to examination for various years . 10 . pension and profit-sharing plans the company has 401 ( k ) /profit-sharing plans for all qualifying full-time domestic employees that permit participants to make contributions by salary reduction pursuant to section 401 ( k ) of the internal revenue code . the company makes matching contributions on behalf of each eligible participant in an amount equal to 100% ( 100 % ) of the first 3% ( 3 % ) and an additional 25% ( 25 % ) of the next 5% ( 5 % ) , for a maximum total of 4.25% ( 4.25 % ) of the employee 2019s compensation . the company may make a discretionary profit sharing contribution in the amount of 0% ( 0 % ) to 5% ( 5 % ) based on the participant 2019s eligible compensation , provided the employee is employed at the end of the year and has worked at least 1000 hours . the qualifying domestic employees of the company 2019s ansoft subsidiary , acquired on july 31 , 2008 , also participate in a 401 ( k ) plan . there is no matching employer contribution associated with this plan . the company also maintains various defined contribution pension arrangements for its international employees . expenses related to the company 2019s retirement programs were $ 3.7 million in 2008 , $ 4.7 million in 2007 and $ 4.1 million in 2006 . 11 . non-compete and employment agreements employees of the company have signed agreements under which they have agreed not to disclose trade secrets or confidential information and , where legally permitted , that restrict engagement in or connection with any business that is competitive with the company anywhere in the world while employed by the company ( and .
Question: w h a t w a s t h e a v e r a g e e x p e n s e s r e l a t e d t o t h e c o m p a n y 2 0 1 9 s r e t i r e m e n t p r o g r a m s f r o m 2 0 0 6 t o 2 0 0 8 i n m i l l i o n s
| 5,215 |
10%
|
Given the context, answer the question.
Context: results of operations year ended december 31 , 2006 compared to year ended december 31 , 2005 the historical results of operations of pca for the years ended december 31 , 2006 and 2005 are set forth below : for the year ended december 31 , ( in millions ) 2006 2005 change .
( in millions ) | for the year ended december 31 , 2006 | for the year ended december 31 , 2005 | change net sales | $ 2187.1 | $ 1993.7 | $ 193.4 income from operations | $ 225.9 | $ 116.1 | $ 109.8 interest expense net | -31.2 ( 31.2 ) | -28.1 ( 28.1 ) | -3.1 ( 3.1 ) income before taxes | 194.7 | 88.0 | 106.7 provision for income taxes | -69.7 ( 69.7 ) | -35.4 ( 35.4 ) | -34.3 ( 34.3 ) net income | $ 125.0 | $ 52.6 | $ 72.4
net sales net sales increased by $ 193.4 million , or 9.7% ( 9.7 % ) , for the year ended december 31 , 2006 from the year ended december 31 , 2005 . net sales increased primarily due to increased sales prices and volumes of corrugated products and containerboard compared to 2005 . total corrugated products volume sold increased 0.4% ( 0.4 % ) to 31.3 billion square feet in 2006 compared to 31.2 billion square feet in 2005 . on a comparable shipment-per-workday basis , corrugated products sales volume increased 0.8% ( 0.8 % ) in 2006 from 2005 . shipments-per-workday is calculated by dividing our total corrugated products volume during the year by the number of workdays within the year . the larger percentage increase on a shipment-per-workday basis was due to the fact that 2006 had one less workday ( 249 days ) , those days not falling on a weekend or holiday , than 2005 ( 250 days ) . containerboard sales volume to external domestic and export customers increased 15.6% ( 15.6 % ) to 482000 tons for the year ended december 31 , 2006 from 417000 tons in 2005 . income from operations income from operations increased by $ 109.8 million , or 94.6% ( 94.6 % ) , for the year ended december 31 , 2006 compared to 2005 . included in income from operations for the year ended december 31 , 2005 is income of $ 14.0 million , net of expenses , consisting of two dividends paid to pca by southern timber venture , llc ( stv ) , the timberlands joint venture in which pca owns a 311 20443% ( 20443 % ) ownership interest . excluding the dividends from stv , income from operations increased $ 123.8 million in 2006 compared to 2005 . the $ 123.8 million increase in income from operations was primarily attributable to higher sales prices and volume as well as improved mix of business ( $ 195.6 million ) , partially offset by increased costs related to transportation ( $ 18.9 million ) , energy , primarily purchased fuels and electricity ( $ 18.3 million ) , wage increases for hourly and salaried personnel ( $ 16.9 million ) , medical , pension and other benefit costs ( $ 9.9 million ) , and incentive compensation ( $ 6.5 million ) . gross profit increased $ 137.1 million , or 44.7% ( 44.7 % ) , for the year ended december 31 , 2006 from the year ended december 31 , 2005 . gross profit as a percentage of net sales increased from 15.4% ( 15.4 % ) of net sales in 2005 to 20.3% ( 20.3 % ) of net sales in the current year primarily due to the increased sales prices described previously . selling and administrative expenses increased $ 12.3 million , or 8.4% ( 8.4 % ) , for the year ended december 31 , 2006 from the comparable period in 2005 . the increase was primarily the result of increased salary and .
Question: w h a t w a s t h e o p e r a t i n g i n c o m e m a r g i n f o r 2 0 0 6 ?
| 5,216 |
2.0%
|
Given the context, answer the question.
Context: n o t e s t o c o n s o l i d a t e d f i n a n c i a l s t a t e m e n t s ( c o n t i n u e d ) the realization of this investment gain ( $ 5624 net of the award ) . this award , which will be paid out over a three-year period , is presented as deferred compensation award on the balance sheet . as of december 31 , 2002 , $ 1504 had been paid against this compensation award . 401 ( k ) plan during august 1997 , the company implemented a 401 ( k ) savings/retirement plan ( the 201c401 ( k ) plan 201d ) to cover eligible employees of the company and any designated affiliate . the 401 ( k ) plan permits eligible employees of the company to defer up to 15% ( 15 % ) of their annual compensation , subject to cer- tain limitations imposed by the code . the employees 2019 elec- tive deferrals are immediately vested and non-forfeitable upon contribution to the 401 ( k ) plan . during 2000 , the company amended its 401 ( k ) plan to include a matching contribution , subject to erisa limitations , equal to 50% ( 50 % ) of the first 4% ( 4 % ) of annual compensation deferred by an employee . for the years ended december 31 , 2002 , 2001 and 2000 , the company made matching contributions of $ 140 , $ 116 and $ 54 , respectively . 18 . commitments and contingencies the company and the operating partnership are not presently involved in any material litigation nor , to their knowledge , is any material litigation threatened against them or their properties , other than routine litigation arising in the ordinary course of business . management believes the costs , if any , incurred by the company and the operating partnership related to this litigation will not materially affect the financial position , operating results or liquidity of the company and the operating partnership . on october 24 , 2001 , an accident occurred at 215 park avenue south , a property which the company manages , but does not own . personal injury claims have been filed against the company and others by 11 persons . the company believes that there is sufficient insurance coverage to cover the cost of such claims , as well as any other personal injury or property claims which may arise . the company has entered into employment agreements with certain executives . six executives have employment agreements which expire between november 2003 and december 2007 . the cash based compensation associated with these employment agreements totals approximately $ 2125 for 2003 . during march 1998 , the company acquired an operating sub-leasehold position at 420 lexington avenue . the oper- ating sub-leasehold position requires annual ground lease payments totaling $ 6000 and sub-leasehold position pay- ments totaling $ 1100 ( excluding an operating sub-lease position purchased january 1999 ) . the ground lease and sub-leasehold positions expire 2008 . the company may extend the positions through 2029 at market rents . the property located at 1140 avenue of the americas operates under a net ground lease ( $ 348 annually ) with a term expiration date of 2016 and with an option to renew for an additional 50 years . the property located at 711 third avenue operates under an operating sub-lease which expires in 2083 . under the sub- lease , the company is responsible for ground rent payments of $ 1600 annually which increased to $ 3100 in july 2001 and will continue for the next ten years . the ground rent is reset after year ten based on the estimated fair market value of the property . in april 1988 , the sl green predecessor entered into a lease agreement for property at 673 first avenue in new york city , which has been capitalized for financial statement purposes . land was estimated to be approximately 70% ( 70 % ) of the fair market value of the property . the portion of the lease attributed to land is classified as an operating lease and the remainder as a capital lease . the initial lease term is 49 years with an option for an additional 26 years . beginning in lease years 11 and 25 , the lessor is entitled to additional rent as defined by the lease agreement . the company continues to lease the 673 first avenue prop- erty which has been classified as a capital lease with a cost basis of $ 12208 and cumulative amortization of $ 3579 and $ 3306 at december 31 , 2002 and 2001 , respectively . the fol- lowing is a schedule of future minimum lease payments under capital leases and noncancellable operating leases with initial terms in excess of one year as of december 31 , 2002 . non-cancellable operating december 31 , capital leases leases .
december 31, | capital leases | non-cancellable operating leases 2003 | $ 1290 | $ 11982 2004 | 1290 | 11982 2005 | 1290 | 11982 2006 | 1322 | 11982 2007 | 1416 | 11982 thereafter | 56406 | 296277 total minimum lease payments | 63014 | 356187 less amount representing interest | 47152 | 2014 present value of net minimum lease payments | $ 15862 | $ 356187
19 . financial instruments : derivatives and hedging financial accounting standards board 2019s statement no . 133 , 201caccounting for derivative instruments and hedging activities , 201d ( 201csfas 133 201d ) which became effective january 1 , 2001 requires the company to recognize all derivatives on the balance sheet at fair value . derivatives that are not hedges must be adjusted to fair value through income . if a derivative is a hedge , depending on the nature of the hedge , f i f t y - t w o s l g r e e n r e a l t y c o r p . .
Question: w h a t p e r c e n t o f t h e c a p i t a l l e a s e p a y m e n t s a r e d u e i n 2 0 0 3 ?
| 5,217 |
19
|
Given the context, answer the question.
Context: entergy mississippi , inc . management 2019s financial discussion and analysis entergy mississippi 2019s receivables from or ( payables to ) the money pool were as follows as of december 31 for each of the following years. .
2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 ( in thousands ) | ( in thousands ) | ( in thousands ) | ( in thousands ) $ 10595 | $ 25930 | $ 644 | ( $ 3536 )
see note 4 to the financial statements for a description of the money pool . entergy mississippi has four separate credit facilities in the aggregate amount of $ 102.5 million scheduled to expire may 2017 . no borrowings were outstanding under the credit facilities as of december 31 , 2016 . in addition , entergy mississippi is a party to an uncommitted letter of credit facility as a means to post collateral to support its obligations under miso . as of december 31 , 2016 , a $ 7.1 million letter of credit was outstanding under entergy mississippi 2019s uncommitted letter of credit facility . see note 4 to the financial statements for additional discussion of the credit facilities . entergy mississippi obtained authorizations from the ferc through october 2017 for short-term borrowings not to exceed an aggregate amount of $ 175 million at any time outstanding and long-term borrowings and security issuances . see note 4 to the financial statements for further discussion of entergy mississippi 2019s short-term borrowing limits . state and local rate regulation and fuel-cost recovery the rates that entergy mississippi charges for electricity significantly influence its financial position , results of operations , and liquidity . entergy mississippi is regulated and the rates charged to its customers are determined in regulatory proceedings . a governmental agency , the mpsc , is primarily responsible for approval of the rates charged to customers . formula rate plan in june 2014 , entergy mississippi filed its first general rate case before the mpsc in almost 12 years . the rate filing laid out entergy mississippi 2019s plans for improving reliability , modernizing the grid , maintaining its workforce , stabilizing rates , utilizing new technologies , and attracting new industry to its service territory . entergy mississippi requested a net increase in revenue of $ 49 million for bills rendered during calendar year 2015 , including $ 30 million resulting from new depreciation rates to update the estimated service life of assets . in addition , the filing proposed , among other things : 1 ) realigning cost recovery of the attala and hinds power plant acquisitions from the power management rider to base rates ; 2 ) including certain miso-related revenues and expenses in the power management rider ; 3 ) power management rider changes that reflect the changes in costs and revenues that will accompany entergy mississippi 2019s withdrawal from participation in the system agreement ; and 4 ) a formula rate plan forward test year to allow for known changes in expenses and revenues for the rate effective period . entergy mississippi proposed maintaining the current authorized return on common equity of 10.59% ( 10.59 % ) . in october 2014 , entergy mississippi and the mississippi public utilities staff entered into and filed joint stipulations that addressed the majority of issues in the proceeding . the stipulations provided for : 2022 an approximate $ 16 million net increase in revenues , which reflected an agreed upon 10.07% ( 10.07 % ) return on common equity ; 2022 revision of entergy mississippi 2019s formula rate plan by providing entergy mississippi with the ability to reflect known and measurable changes to historical rate base and certain expense amounts ; resolving uncertainty around and obviating the need for an additional rate filing in connection with entergy mississippi 2019s withdrawal from participation in the system agreement ; updating depreciation rates ; and moving costs associated with the attala and hinds generating plants from the power management rider to base rates; .
Question: t h e c o m p a n y r e q u e s t e d a n e t i n c r e a s e i n r e v e n u e f o r b i l l s r e n d e r e d d u r i n g c a l e n d a r y e a r 2 0 1 5 . w h a t w o u l d t h e i n c r e a s e h a v e b e e n , i n m i l l i o n s , w i t h o u t t h e a m o u n t r e f l a t i n g t o t h e n e w d e p r e c i a t i o n r a t e s ?
| 5,218 |
9500
|
Given the context, answer the question.
Context: related employer payroll tax costs ) . the contributions of these amounts are due by march 15 of the calendar year following the year in which the company realizes the benefits of the deductions . this arrangement has been accounted for as contingent consideration . pre-2009 business combinations were accounted for under a former accounting standard which , among other aspects , precluded the recognition of certain contingent consideration as of the business combination date . instead , under the former accounting standard , contingent consideration is accounted for as additional purchase price ( goodwill ) at the time the contingency is resolved . as of december 31 , 2013 , the company accrued $ 20.9 million related to this arrangement within other current liabilities , as the company realized the tax benefit of the compensation deductions during the 2013 tax year . the company made the related cash contribution during the first quarter of 2014 . 11 . earnings per share the numerator for both basic and diluted earnings per share is net income . the denominator for basic earnings per share is the weighted-average number of common shares outstanding during the period . the 2013 denominator was impacted by the common shares issued during both the ipo and the underwriters' exercise in full of the overallotment option granted to them in connection with the ipo . because such common shares were issued on july 2 , 2013 and july 31 , 2013 , respectively , they are only partially reflected in the 2013 denominator . such shares are fully reflected in the 2014 denominator . see note 9 for additional discussion of the ipo . the dilutive effect of outstanding restricted stock , restricted stock units , stock options , coworker stock purchase plan units and mpk plan units is reflected in the denominator for diluted earnings per share using the treasury stock method . the following is a reconciliation of basic shares to diluted shares: .
( in millions ) | years ended december 31 , 2014 | years ended december 31 , 2013 | years ended december 31 , 2012 weighted-average shares - basic | 170.6 | 156.6 | 145.1 effect of dilutive securities | 2.2 | 2.1 | 0.7 weighted-average shares - diluted | 172.8 | 158.7 | 145.8
there was an insignificant amount of potential common shares excluded from diluted earnings per share for the years ended december 31 , 2014 , 2013 and 2012 , as their inclusion would have had an anti-dilutive effect . 12 . deferred compensation plan on march 10 , 2010 , in connection with the company 2019s purchase of $ 28.5 million principal amount of its outstanding senior subordinated debt , the company established the restricted debt unit plan ( the 201crdu plan 201d ) , an unfunded nonqualified deferred compensation plan . the total number of rdus that could be granted under the rdu plan was 28500 . as of december 31 , 2014 , 28500 rdus were outstanding . rdus vested daily on a pro rata basis over the three-year period from january 1 , 2012 ( or , if later , the date of hire or the date of a subsequent rdu grant ) through december 31 , 2014 . all outstanding rdus were vested as of december 31 , 2014 . participants have no rights to the underlying debt . the total amount of compensation available to be paid under the rdu plan was initially to be based on two components , a principal component and an interest component . the principal component credits the rdu plan with a notional amount equal to the $ 28.5 million face value of the senior subordinated notes ( the "debt pool" ) , together with certain redemption premium equivalents as noted below . the interest component credited the rdu plan with amounts equal to the interest that would have been earned on the debt pool from march 10 , 2010 through maturity on october 12 , 2017 , except as discussed below . interest amounts for 2010 and 2011 were deferred until 2012 , and thereafter , interest amounts were paid to participants semi-annually on the interest payment due dates . the company used a portion of the ipo proceeds together with incremental borrowings to redeem $ 324.0 million of the total senior subordinated notes outstanding on august 1 , 2013 . in connection with the ipo and the partial redemption of the senior subordinated notes , the company amended the rdu plan to increase the retentive value of the plan . in accordance with the original terms of the rdu plan , the principal component of the rdus converted to a cash-denominated pool upon the redemption of the senior subordinated notes . in addition , the company added $ 0.1 table of contents cdw corporation and subsidiaries notes to consolidated financial statements .
Question: f o r r d u s v e s t e d d a i l y o n a p r o r a t a b a s i s o v e r t h e t h r e e - y e a r p e r i o d f r o m j a n u a r y 1 , 2 0 1 2 , w h a t w a s t h e a v e r a g e r d u s v e s t i n g e a c h y e a r t h r o u g h d e c e m b e r 3 1 , 2 0 1 4 ? \ \ n \ \ n [ 1 3 ] : a s o f d e c e m b e r 3 1 , 2 0 1 4 , 2 8 5 0 0 r d u s w e r e o u t s t a n d i n g .
| 5,219 |
-20.6
|
Given the context, answer the question.
Context: entergy gulf states , inc . management's financial discussion and analysis .
| ( in millions ) 2002 net revenue | $ 1130.7 volume/weather | 17.8 fuel write-offs in 2002 | 15.3 net wholesale revenue | 10.2 base rate decreases | -23.3 ( 23.3 ) nisco gain recognized in 2002 | -15.2 ( 15.2 ) rate refund provisions | -11.3 ( 11.3 ) other | -14.1 ( 14.1 ) 2003 net revenue | $ 1110.1
the volume/weather variance was due to higher electric sales volume in the service territory . billed usage increased a total of 517 gwh in the residential and commercial sectors . the increase was partially offset by a decrease in industrial usage of 470 gwh due to the loss of two large industrial customers to cogeneration . the customers accounted for approximately 1% ( 1 % ) of entergy gulf states' net revenue in 2002 . in 2002 , deferred fuel costs of $ 8.9 million related to a texas fuel reconciliation case were written off and $ 6.5 million in expense resulted from an adjustment in the deregulated asset plan percentage as the result of a power uprate at river bend . the increase in net wholesale revenue was primarily due to an increase in sales volume to municipal and co- op customers and also to affiliated systems related to entergy's generation resource planning . the base rate decreases were effective june 2002 and january 2003 , both in the louisiana jurisdiction . the january 2003 base rate decrease of $ 22.1 million had a minimal impact on net income due to a corresponding reduction in nuclear depreciation and decommissioning expenses associated with the change in accounting to reflect an assumed extension of river bend's useful life . in 2002 , a gain of $ 15.2 million was recognized for the louisiana portion of the 1988 nelson units 1 and 2 sale . entergy gulf states received approval from the lpsc to discontinue applying amortization of the gain against recoverable fuel , resulting in the recognition of the deferred gain in income . rate refund provisions caused a decrease in net revenue due to additional provisions recorded in 2003 compared to 2002 for potential rate actions and refunds . gross operating revenues and fuel and purchased power expenses gross operating revenues increased primarily due to an increase of $ 440.2 million in fuel cost recovery revenues as a result of higher fuel rates in both the louisiana and texas jurisdictions . fuel and purchased power expenses increased $ 471.1 million due to an increase in the market prices of natural gas and purchased power . other income statement variances 2004 compared to 2003 other operation and maintenance expenses decreased primarily due to : 2022 voluntary severance program accruals of $ 22.5 million in 2003 ; and 2022 a decrease of $ 4.3 million in nuclear material and labor costs due to reduced staff in 2004. .
Question: w h a t i s t h e n e t c h a n g e i n n e t r e v e n u e d u r i n g 2 0 0 3 f o r e n t e r g y g u l f s t a t e s , i n c . ?
| 5,220 |
719.6
|
Given the context, answer the question.
Context: page 74 notes to five year summary ( a ) includes the effects of items not considered in senior management 2019s assessment of the operating performance of the corporation 2019s business segments ( see the section , 201cresults of operations 201d in management 2019s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations ( md&a ) ) which , on a combined basis , increased earnings from continuing operations before income taxes by $ 173 million , $ 113 million after tax ( $ 0.25 per share ) . ( b ) includes the effects of items not considered in senior management 2019s assessment of the operating performance of the corporation 2019s business segments ( see the section , 201cresults of operations 201d in md&a ) which , on a combined basis , decreased earnings from continuing operations before income taxes by $ 215 million , $ 154 million after tax ( $ 0.34 per share ) . also includes a reduction in income tax expense resulting from the closure of an internal revenue service examination of $ 144 million ( $ 0.32 per share ) . these items reduced earnings by $ 10 million after tax ( $ 0.02 per share ) . ( c ) includes the effects of items not considered in senior management 2019s assessment of the operating performance of the corporation 2019s business segments ( see the section , 201cresults of operations 201d in md&a ) which , on a combined basis , decreased earnings from continuing operations before income taxes by $ 153 million , $ 102 million after tax ( $ 0.22 per share ) . ( d ) includes the effects of items not considered in senior management 2019s assessment of the operating performance of the corporation 2019s business segments which , on a combined basis , decreased earnings from continuing operations before income taxes by $ 1112 million , $ 632 million after tax ( $ 1.40 per share ) . in 2002 , the corporation adopted fas 142 which prohibits the amortization of goodwill . ( e ) includes the effects of items not considered in senior management 2019s assessment of the operating performance of the corporation 2019s business segments which , on a combined basis , decreased earnings from continuing operations before income taxes by $ 973 million , $ 651 million after tax ( $ 1.50 per share ) . also includes a gain from the disposal of a business and charges for the corporation 2019s exit from its global telecommunications services business which is included in discontinued operations and which , on a combined basis , increased the net loss by $ 1 billion ( $ 2.38 per share ) . ( f ) the corporation defines return on invested capital ( roic ) as net income plus after-tax interest expense divided by average invested capital ( stockholders 2019 equity plus debt ) , after adjusting stockholders 2019 equity by adding back the minimum pension liability . the adjustment to add back the minimum pension liability is a revision to our calculation in 2005 , which the corporation believes more closely links roic to management performance . further , the corporation believes that reporting roic provides investors with greater visibility into how effectively lockheed martin uses the capital invested in its operations . the corporation uses roic to evaluate multi-year investment decisions and as a long-term performance measure , and also uses roic as a factor in evaluating management performance under certain incentive compensation plans . roic is not a measure of financial performance under gaap , and may not be defined and calculated by other companies in the same manner . roic should not be considered in isola- tion or as an alternative to net earnings as an indicator of performance . the following calculations of roic reflect the revision to the calculation discussed above for all periods presented . ( in millions ) 2005 2004 2003 2002 2001 .
( in millions ) | 2005 | 2004 | 2003 | 2002 | 2001 net earnings | $ 1825 | $ 1266 | $ 1053 | $ 500 | $ -1046 ( 1046 ) interest expense ( multiplied by 65% ( 65 % ) ) 1 | 241 | 276 | 317 | 378 | 455 return | $ 2066 | $ 1542 | $ 1370 | $ 878 | $ -591 ( 591 ) average debt2 5 | $ 5077 | $ 5932 | $ 6612 | $ 7491 | $ 8782 average equity3 5 | 7590 | 7015 | 6170 | 6853 | 7221 average minimum pension liability3 4 5 | 1545 | 1296 | 1504 | 341 | 6 average invested capital | $ 14212 | $ 14243 | $ 14286 | $ 14685 | $ 16009 return on invested capital | 14.5% ( 14.5 % ) | 10.8% ( 10.8 % ) | 9.6% ( 9.6 % ) | 6.0% ( 6.0 % ) | ( 3.7 ) % ( % )
1 represents after-tax interest expense utilizing the federal statutory rate of 35% ( 35 % ) . 2 debt consists of long-term debt , including current maturities , and short-term borrowings ( if any ) . 3 equity includes non-cash adjustments for other comprehensive losses , primarily for the additional minimum pension liability . 4 minimum pension liability values reflect the cumulative value of entries identified in our statement of stockholders equity under the caption 201cminimum pension liability . 201d the annual minimum pension liability adjustments to equity were : 2001 = ( $ 33 million ) ; 2002 = ( $ 1537 million ) ; 2003 = $ 331 million ; 2004 = ( $ 285 million ) ; 2005 = ( $ 105 million ) . as these entries are recorded in the fourth quarter , the value added back to our average equity in a given year is the cumulative impact of all prior year entries plus 20% ( 20 % ) of the cur- rent year entry value . 5 yearly averages are calculated using balances at the start of the year and at the end of each quarter . lockheed martin corporation .
Question: w h a t w a s t h e a v e r a g e n e t e a r n i n g s i n m i l l i o n s f r o m 2 0 0 1 t o 2 0 0 5 ?
| 5,221 |
50.27%
|
Given the context, answer the question.
Context: in 2016 , arconic also recognized discrete income tax benefits related to the release of valuation allowances on certain net deferred tax assets in russia and canada of $ 19 and $ 20 respectively . after weighing all available evidence , management determined that it was more likely than not that the net income tax benefits associated with the underlying deferred tax assets would be realizable based on historic cumulative income and projected taxable income . arconic also recorded additional valuation allowances in australia of $ 93 related to the separation transaction , in spain of $ 163 related to a tax law change and in luxembourg of $ 280 related to the separation transaction as well as a tax law change . these valuation allowances fully offset current year changes in deferred tax asset balances of each respective jurisdiction , resulting in no net impact to tax expense . the need for a valuation allowance will be reassessed on a continuous basis in future periods by each jurisdiction and , as a result , the allowances may increase or decrease based on changes in facts and circumstances . in 2015 , arconic recognized an additional $ 141 discrete income tax charge for valuation allowances on certain deferred tax assets in iceland and suriname . of this amount , an $ 85 valuation allowance was established on the full value of the deferred tax assets in suriname , which were related mostly to employee benefits and tax loss carryforwards . these deferred tax assets have an expiration period ranging from 2016 to 2022 ( as of december 31 , 2015 ) . the remaining $ 56 charge relates to a valuation allowance established on a portion of the deferred tax assets recorded in iceland . these deferred tax assets have an expiration period ranging from 2017 to 2023 . after weighing all available positive and negative evidence , as described above , management determined that it was no longer more likely than not that arconic will realize the tax benefit of either of these deferred tax assets . this was mainly driven by a decline in the outlook of the primary metals business , combined with prior year cumulative losses and a short expiration period . in december 2011 , one of arconic 2019s former subsidiaries in brazil applied for a tax holiday related to its expanded mining and refining operations . during 2013 , the application was amended and re-filed and , separately , a similar application was filed for another one of arconic 2019s former subsidiaries in brazil . the deadline for the brazilian government to deny the application was july 11 , 2014 . since arconic did not receive notice that its applications were denied , the tax holiday took effect automatically on july 12 , 2014 . as a result , the tax rate applicable to qualified holiday income for these subsidiaries decreased significantly ( from 34% ( 34 % ) to 15.25% ( 15.25 % ) ) , resulting in future cash tax savings over the 10-year holiday period ( retroactively effective as of january 1 , 2013 ) . additionally , a portion of one of the subsidiaries net deferred tax assets that reverses within the holiday period was remeasured at the new tax rate ( the net deferred tax asset of the other subsidiary was not remeasured since it could still be utilized against the subsidiary 2019s future earnings not subject to the tax holiday ) . this remeasurement resulted in a decrease to that subsidiary 2019s net deferred tax assets and a noncash charge to earnings of $ 52 ( $ 31 after noncontrolling interests ) . the following table details the changes in the valuation allowance: .
december 31, | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 balance at beginning of year | $ 1291 | $ 1151 | $ 1252 increase to allowance | 772 | 180 | 102 release of allowance | -209 ( 209 ) | -42 ( 42 ) | -70 ( 70 ) acquisitions and divestitures ( f ) | -1 ( 1 ) | 29 | -36 ( 36 ) tax apportionment tax rate and tax law changes | 106 | -15 ( 15 ) | -67 ( 67 ) foreign currency translation | -19 ( 19 ) | -12 ( 12 ) | -30 ( 30 ) balance at end of year | $ 1940 | $ 1291 | $ 1151
the cumulative amount of arconic 2019s foreign undistributed net earnings for which no deferred taxes have been provided was approximately $ 450 at december 31 , 2016 . arconic has a number of commitments and obligations related to the company 2019s growth strategy in foreign jurisdictions . as such , management has no plans to distribute such earnings in the foreseeable future , and , therefore , has determined it is not practicable to determine the related deferred tax liability. .
Question: w h a t w a s t h e i n c r e a s e i n t h e b a l a n c e a t e n d o f t h e y e a r f r o m 2 0 1 5 t o 2 0 1 6 ?
| 5,222 |
20.1%
|
Given the context, answer the question.
Context: the goldman sachs group , inc . and subsidiaries item 9 . changes in and disagreements with accountants on accounting and financial disclosure there were no changes in or disagreements with accountants on accounting and financial disclosure during the last two years . item 9a . controls and procedures as of the end of the period covered by this report , an evaluation was carried out by goldman sachs 2019 management , with the participation of our chief executive officer and chief financial officer , of the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures ( as defined in rule 13a-15 ( e ) under the exchange act ) . based upon that evaluation , our chief executive officer and chief financial officer concluded that these disclosure controls and procedures were effective as of the end of the period covered by this report . in addition , no change in our internal control over financial reporting ( as defined in rule 13a-15 ( f ) under the exchange act ) occurred during the fourth quarter of our year ended december 31 , 2018 that has materially affected , or is reasonably likely to materially affect , our internal control over financial reporting . management 2019s report on internal control over financial reporting and the report of independent registered public accounting firm are set forth in part ii , item 8 of this form 10-k . item 9b . other information not applicable . part iii item 10 . directors , executive officers and corporate governance information relating to our executive officers is included on page 20 of this form 10-k . information relating to our directors , including our audit committee and audit committee financial experts and the procedures by which shareholders can recommend director nominees , and our executive officers will be in our definitive proxy statement for our 2019 annual meeting of shareholders , which will be filed within 120 days of the end of 2018 ( 2019 proxy statement ) and is incorporated in this form 10-k by reference . information relating to our code of business conduct and ethics , which applies to our senior financial officers , is included in 201cbusiness 2014 available information 201d in part i , item 1 of this form 10-k . item 11 . executive compensation information relating to our executive officer and director compensation and the compensation committee of the board will be in the 2019 proxy statement and is incorporated in this form 10-k by reference . item 12 . security ownership of certain beneficial owners and management and related stockholder matters information relating to security ownership of certain beneficial owners of our common stock and information relating to the security ownership of our management will be in the 2019 proxy statement and is incorporated in this form 10-k by reference . the table below presents information as of december 31 , 2018 regarding securities to be issued pursuant to outstanding restricted stock units ( rsus ) and securities remaining available for issuance under our equity compensation plans that were in effect during 2018 . plan category securities to be issued exercise of outstanding options and rights ( a ) weighted average exercise price of outstanding options ( b ) securities available for future issuance under equity compensation plans ( c ) equity compensation plans approved by security holders 17176475 n/a 68211649 equity compensation plans not approved by security holders 2013 2013 2013 .
plan category | securities to be issued upon exercise of outstanding options and rights ( a ) | weighted average exercise price of outstanding options ( b ) | securities available for future issuance under equity compensation plans ( c ) equity compensation plans approved by security holders | 17176475 | n/a | 68211649 equity compensation plans not approved by securityholders | 2013 | 2013 | 2013 total | 17176475 | | 68211649
in the table above : 2030 securities to be issued upon exercise of outstanding options and rights includes 17176475 shares that may be issued pursuant to outstanding rsus . these awards are subject to vesting and other conditions to the extent set forth in the respective award agreements , and the underlying shares will be delivered net of any required tax withholding . as of december 31 , 2018 , there were no outstanding options . 2030 shares underlying rsus are deliverable without the payment of any consideration , and therefore these awards have not been taken into account in calculating the weighted average exercise price . 196 goldman sachs 2018 form 10-k .
Question: w h a t p o r t i o n o f t h e s e c u r i t i e s a p p r o v e d b y s e c u r i t y h o l d e r s i s t o b e i s s u e d u p o n e x e r c i s e o f o u t s t a n d i n g o p t i o n s a n d r i g h t s ?
| 5,223 |
14.9%
|
Given the context, answer the question.
Context: american tower corporation and subsidiaries notes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) 19 . subsequent events 12.25% ( 12.25 % ) senior subordinated discount notes and warrants offering 2014in january 2003 , the company issued 808000 units , each consisting of ( 1 ) $ 1000 principal amount at maturity of the 12.25% ( 12.25 % ) senior subordinated discount notes due 2008 of a wholly owned subsidiary of the company ( ati notes ) and ( 2 ) a warrant to purchase 14.0953 shares of class a common stock of the company , for gross proceeds of $ 420.0 million . the gross offering proceeds were allocated between the ati notes ( $ 367.4 million ) and the fair value of the warrants ( $ 52.6 million ) . net proceeds from the offering aggregated approximately $ 397.0 million and were or will be used for the purposes described below under amended and restated loan agreement . the ati notes accrue no cash interest . instead , the accreted value of each ati note will increase between the date of original issuance and maturity ( august 1 , 2008 ) at a rate of 12.25% ( 12.25 % ) per annum . the 808000 warrants that were issued together with the ati notes each represent the right to purchase 14.0953 shares of class a common stock at $ 0.01 per share . the warrants are exercisable at any time on or after january 29 , 2006 and will expire on august 1 , 2008 . as of the issuance date , the warrants represented approximately 5.5% ( 5.5 % ) of the company 2019s outstanding common stock ( assuming exercise of all warrants ) . the indenture governing the ati notes contains covenants that , among other things , limit the ability of the issuer subsidiary and its guarantors to incur or guarantee additional indebtedness , create liens , pay dividends or make other equity distributions , enter into agreements restricting the restricted subsidiaries 2019 ability to pay dividends , purchase or redeem capital stock , make investments and sell assets or consolidate or merge with or into other companies . the ati notes rank junior in right of payment to all existing and future senior indebtedness , including all indebtedness outstanding under the credit facilities , and are structurally senior in right of payment to all existing and future indebtedness of the company . amended and restated loan agreement 2014on february 21 , 2003 , the company completed an amendment to its credit facilities . the amendment provides for the following : 2022 prepayment of a portion of outstanding term loans . the company agreed to prepay an aggregate of $ 200.0 million of the term loans outstanding under the credit facilities from a portion of the net proceeds of the ati notes offering completed in january 2003 . this prepayment consisted of a $ 125.0 million prepayment of the term loan a and a $ 75.0 million prepayment of the term loan b , each to be applied to reduce future scheduled principal payments . giving effect to the prepayment of $ 200.0 million of term loans under the credit facility and the issuance of the ati notes as discussed above as well as the paydown of debt from net proceeds of the sale of mtn ( $ 24.5 million in february 2003 ) , the company 2019s aggregate principal payments of long- term debt , including capital leases , for the next five years and thereafter are as follows ( in thousands ) : year ending december 31 .
2003 | $ 268496 2004 | 131262 2005 | 195082 2006 | 538479 2007 | 1065437 thereafter | 1408783 total | $ 3607539
.
Question: w h a t w a s t h e p e r c e n t o f t h e c o m p a n y a g g r e g a t e p r i n c i p a l p a y m e n t s d u e i n 2 0 0 6
| 5,224 |
15
|
Given the context, answer the question.
Context: investment tax credits have been deferred by the regulated utility subsidiaries and are being amortized to income over the average estimated service lives of the related assets . the company recognizes accrued interest and penalties related to tax positions as a component of income tax expense and accounts for sales tax collected from customers and remitted to taxing authorities on a net basis . see note 14 2014income taxes for additional information . allowance for funds used during construction afudc is a non-cash credit to income with a corresponding charge to utility plant that represents the cost of borrowed funds or a return on equity funds devoted to plant under construction . the regulated utility subsidiaries record afudc to the extent permitted by the pucs . the portion of afudc attributable to borrowed funds is shown as a reduction of interest , net on the consolidated statements of operations . any portion of afudc attributable to equity funds would be included in other , net on the consolidated statements of operations . afudc is provided in the following table for the years ended december 31: .
| 2018 | 2017 | 2016 allowance for other funds used during construction | $ 24 | $ 19 | $ 15 allowance for borrowed funds used during construction | 13 | 8 | 6
environmental costs the company 2019s water and wastewater operations and the operations of its market-based businesses are subject to u.s . federal , state , local and foreign requirements relating to environmental protection , and as such , the company periodically becomes subject to environmental claims in the normal course of business . environmental expenditures that relate to current operations or provide a future benefit are expensed or capitalized as appropriate . remediation costs that relate to an existing condition caused by past operations are accrued , on an undiscounted basis , when it is probable that these costs will be incurred and can be reasonably estimated . a conservation agreement entered into by a subsidiary of the company with the national oceanic and atmospheric administration in 2010 and amended in 2017 required the subsidiary to , among other provisions , implement certain measures to protect the steelhead trout and its habitat in the carmel river watershed in the state of california . the subsidiary agreed to pay $ 1 million annually commencing in 2010 with the final payment being made in 2021 . remediation costs accrued amounted to $ 4 million and $ 6 million as of december 31 , 2018 and 2017 , respectively . derivative financial instruments the company uses derivative financial instruments for purposes of hedging exposures to fluctuations in interest rates . these derivative contracts are entered into for periods consistent with the related underlying exposures and do not constitute positions independent of those exposures . the company does not enter into derivative contracts for speculative purposes and does not use leveraged instruments . all derivatives are recognized on the balance sheet at fair value . on the date the derivative contract is entered into , the company may designate the derivative as a hedge of the fair value of a recognized asset or liability ( fair-value hedge ) or a hedge of a forecasted transaction or of the variability of cash flows to be received or paid related to a recognized asset or liability ( cash-flow hedge ) . changes in the fair value of a fair-value hedge , along with the gain or loss on the underlying hedged item , are recorded in current-period earnings . the gains and losses on the effective portion of cash-flow hedges are recorded in other comprehensive income , until earnings are affected by the variability of cash flows . any ineffective portion of designated cash-flow hedges is recognized in current-period earnings. .
Question: w h a t w a s t h e m i n i m u m a l l o w a n c e f o r o t h e r f u n d s u s e d d u r i n g c o n s t r u c t i o n i n t h e t a b l e ?
| 5,225 |
42.7
|
Given the context, answer the question.
Context: liquidity monitoring and measurement stress testing liquidity stress testing is performed for each of citi 2019s major entities , operating subsidiaries and/or countries . stress testing and scenario analyses are intended to quantify the potential impact of an adverse liquidity event on the balance sheet and liquidity position , and to identify viable funding alternatives that can be utilized . these scenarios include assumptions about significant changes in key funding sources , market triggers ( such as credit ratings ) , potential uses of funding and geopolitical and macroeconomic conditions . these conditions include expected and stressed market conditions as well as company-specific events . liquidity stress tests are conducted to ascertain potential mismatches between liquidity sources and uses over a variety of time horizons and over different stressed conditions . liquidity limits are set accordingly . to monitor the liquidity of an entity , these stress tests and potential mismatches are calculated with varying frequencies , with several tests performed daily . given the range of potential stresses , citi maintains contingency funding plans on a consolidated basis and for individual entities . these plans specify a wide range of readily available actions for a variety of adverse market conditions or idiosyncratic stresses . short-term liquidity measurement : liquidity coverage ratio ( lcr ) in addition to internal liquidity stress metrics that citi has developed for a 30-day stress scenario , citi also monitors its liquidity by reference to the lcr , as calculated pursuant to the u.s . lcr rules . generally , the lcr is designed to ensure that banks maintain an adequate level of hqla to meet liquidity needs under an acute 30-day stress scenario . the lcr is calculated by dividing hqla by estimated net outflows over a stressed 30-day period , with the net outflows determined by applying prescribed outflow factors to various categories of liabilities , such as deposits , unsecured and secured wholesale borrowings , unused lending commitments and derivatives- related exposures , partially offset by inflows from assets maturing within 30 days . banks are required to calculate an add-on to address potential maturity mismatches between contractual cash outflows and inflows within the 30-day period in determining the total amount of net outflows . the minimum lcr requirement is 100% ( 100 % ) , effective january 2017 . pursuant to the federal reserve board 2019s final rule regarding lcr disclosures , effective april 1 , 2017 , citi began to disclose lcr in the prescribed format . the table below sets forth the components of citi 2019s lcr calculation and hqla in excess of net outflows for the periods indicated : in billions of dollars dec . 31 , sept . 30 , dec . 31 .
in billions of dollars | dec . 31 2017 | sept . 30 2017 | dec . 31 2016 hqla | $ 446.4 | $ 448.6 | $ 403.7 net outflows | 364.3 | 365.1 | 332.5 lcr | 123% ( 123 % ) | 123% ( 123 % ) | 121% ( 121 % ) hqla in excess of net outflows | $ 82.1 | $ 83.5 | $ 71.3
note : amounts set forth in the table above are presented on an average basis . as set forth in the table above , citi 2019s lcr increased year- over-year , as the increase in the hqla ( as discussed above ) more than offset an increase in modeled net outflows . the increase in modeled net outflows was primarily driven by changes in assumptions , including changes in methodology to better align citi 2019s outflow assumptions with those embedded in its resolution planning . sequentially , citi 2019s lcr remained unchanged . long-term liquidity measurement : net stable funding ratio ( nsfr ) in 2016 , the federal reserve board , the fdic and the occ issued a proposed rule to implement the basel iii nsfr requirement . the u.s.-proposed nsfr is largely consistent with the basel committee 2019s final nsfr rules . in general , the nsfr assesses the availability of a bank 2019s stable funding against a required level . a bank 2019s available stable funding would include portions of equity , deposits and long-term debt , while its required stable funding would be based on the liquidity characteristics of its assets , derivatives and commitments . prescribed factors would be required to be applied to the various categories of asset and liabilities classes . the ratio of available stable funding to required stable funding would be required to be greater than 100% ( 100 % ) . while citi believes that it is compliant with the proposed u.s . nsfr rules as of december 31 , 2017 , it will need to evaluate a final version of the rules , which are expected to be released during 2018 . citi expects that the nsfr final rules implementation period will be communicated along with the final version of the rules. .
Question: w h a t w a s t h e c h a n g e i n b i l l i o n s o f h q l a f r o m d e c . 3 1 , 2 0 1 6 t o d e c . 3 1 , 2 0 1 7 ?
| 5,226 |
-16%
|
Given the context, answer the question.
Context: costs . our 2012 results were lower than 2011 when we realized $ 53.1 million in premium-services margins and our storage and marketing margins consisted of $ 96.0 million from realized seasonal price differentials and marketing optimization activities , and $ 87.7 million of storage demand costs . in addition , we recognized a loss on the change in fair value of our nonqualifiying economic storage hedges of $ 1.0 million in 2012 compared with a gain of $ 8.5 million in 2011 . our premium services were impacted negatively by lower natural gas prices and decreased natural gas price volatility . the impact of our hedge strategies and the inability to hedge seasonal price differentials at levels that were available to us in the prior year significantly reduced our storage margins . we also experienced reduced opportunities to optimize our storage assets , which negatively impacted our marketing margins . we realized a loss in our transportation margins of $ 42.4 million in 2012 compared with a loss of $ 18.8 million in 2011 , due primarily to a $ 29.5 million decrease in transportation hedges . our transportation business continues to be impacted by narrow price location differentials and the inability to hedge at levels that were available to us in prior years . as a result of significant increases in the supply of natural gas , primarily from shale gas production across north america and new pipeline infrastructure projects , location and seasonal price differentials narrowed significantly beginning in 2010 and continuing through 2012 . this market change resulted in our transportation contracts being unprofitable impacting our ability to recover our fixed costs . operating costs decreased due primarily to lower employee-related expenses , which includes the impact of fewer employees . we also recognized an expense of $ 10.3 million related to the impairment of our goodwill in the first quarter 2012 . given the significant decline in natural gas prices and its effect on location and seasonal price differentials , we performed an interim impairment assessment in the first quarter 2012 that reduced our goodwill balance to zero . 2011 vs . 2010 - the factors discussed in energy services 2019 201cnarrative description of the business 201d included in item i , business , of this annual report have led to a significant decrease in net margin , including : 2022 a decrease of $ 65.3 million in transportation margins , net of hedging , due primarily to narrower location price differentials and lower hedge settlements in 2011 ; 2022 a decrease of $ 34.3 million in storage and marketing margins , net of hedging activities , due primarily to the following : 2013 lower realized seasonal storage price differentials ; offset partially by 2013 favorable marketing activity and unrealized fair value changes on nonqualifying economic storage hedges ; 2022 a decrease of $ 7.3 million in premium-services margins , associated primarily with the reduction in the value of the fees collected for these services as a result of low commodity prices and reduced natural gas price volatility in the first quarter 2011 compared with the first quarter 2010 ; and 2022 a decrease of $ 4.3 million in financial trading margins , as low natural gas prices and reduced natural gas price volatility limited our financial trading opportunities . additionally , our 2011 net margin includes $ 91.1 million in adjustments to natural gas inventory reflecting the lower of cost or market value . because of the adjustments to our inventory value , we reclassified $ 91.1 million of deferred gains on associated cash flow hedges into earnings . operating costs decreased due primarily to a decrease in ad valorem taxes . selected operating information - the following table sets forth certain selected operating information for our energy services segment for the periods indicated: .
operating information | years ended december 31 , 2012 | years ended december 31 , 2011 | years ended december 31 , 2010 natural gas marketed ( bcf ) | 709 | 845 | 919 natural gas gross margin ( $ /mcf ) | $ -0.07 ( 0.07 ) | $ 0.06 | $ 0.18 physically settled volumes ( bcf ) | 1433 | 1724 | 1874
natural gas volumes marketed and physically settled volumes decreased in 2012 compared with 2011 due primarily to decreased marketing activities , lower transported volumes and reduced transportation capacity . the decrease in 2011 compared with 2010 was due primarily to lower volumes transported and reduced transportation capacity . transportation capacity in certain markets was not utilized due to the economics of the location price differentials as a result of increased supply of natural gas , primarily from shale production , and increased pipeline capacity as a result of new pipeline construction. .
Question: w h a t w a s t h e p e r c e n t a g e d i f f e r e n c e i n n a t u r a l g a s m a r k e t e d ( b c f ) b e t w e e n 2 0 1 1 a n d 2 0 1 2 ?
| 5,227 |
498.0
|
Given the context, answer the question.
Context: item 12 . security ownership of certain beneficial owners and management and related stockholder matters . the information required by item 12 is included under the heading 201csecurity ownership of management and certain beneficial owners 201d in the 2017 proxy statement , and that information is incorporated by reference in this form 10-k . equity compensation plan information the following table provides information about our equity compensation plans that authorize the issuance of shares of lockheed martin common stock to employees and directors . the information is provided as of december 31 , 2016 . plan category number of securities to be issued exercise of outstanding options , warrants and rights weighted-average exercise price of outstanding options , warrants and rights number of securities remaining available for future issuance under equity compensation ( excluding securities reflected in column ( a ) ) equity compensation plans approved by security holders ( 1 ) 5802673 $ 85.82 6216471 equity compensation plans not approved by security holders ( 2 ) 1082347 2014 2481032 .
plan category | number of securities to beissued upon exercise of outstanding options warrants and rights ( a ) | weighted-average exercise price of outstanding options warrants and rights ( b ) | number of securities remaining availablefor future issuance under equity compensation plans ( excluding securities reflected in column ( a ) ) ( c ) equity compensation plans approved by securityholders ( 1 ) | 5802673 | $ 85.82 | 6216471 equity compensation plans not approved bysecurity holders ( 2 ) | 1082347 | 2014 | 2481032 total | 6885020 | $ 85.82 | 8697503
( 1 ) column ( a ) includes , as of december 31 , 2016 : 1747151 shares that have been granted as restricted stock units ( rsus ) , 936308 shares that could be earned pursuant to grants of performance stock units ( psus ) ( assuming the maximum number of psus are earned and payable at the end of the three-year performance period ) and 2967046 shares granted as options under the lockheed martin corporation 2011 incentive performance award plan ( 2011 ipa plan ) or predecessor plans prior to january 1 , 2013 and 23346 shares granted as options and 128822 stock units payable in stock or cash under the lockheed martin corporation 2009 directors equity plan ( directors equity plan ) or predecessor plans for members ( or former members ) of the board of directors . column ( c ) includes , as of december 31 , 2016 , 5751655 shares available for future issuance under the 2011 ipa plan as options , stock appreciation rights ( sars ) , restricted stock awards ( rsas ) , rsus or psus and 464816 shares available for future issuance under the directors equity plan as stock options and stock units . of the 5751655 shares available for grant under the 2011 ipa plan on december 31 , 2016 , 516653 and 236654 shares are issuable pursuant to grants made on january 26 , 2017 , of rsus and psus ( assuming the maximum number of psus are earned and payable at the end of the three-year performance period ) , respectively . the weighted average price does not take into account shares issued pursuant to rsus or psus . ( 2 ) the shares represent annual incentive bonuses and long-term incentive performance ( ltip ) payments earned and voluntarily deferred by employees . the deferred amounts are payable under the deferred management incentive compensation plan ( dmicp ) . deferred amounts are credited as phantom stock units at the closing price of our stock on the date the deferral is effective . amounts equal to our dividend are credited as stock units at the time we pay a dividend . following termination of employment , a number of shares of stock equal to the number of stock units credited to the employee 2019s dmicp account are distributed to the employee . there is no discount or value transfer on the stock distributed . distributions may be made from newly issued shares or shares purchased on the open market . historically , all distributions have come from shares held in a separate trust and , therefore , do not further dilute our common shares outstanding . as a result , these shares also were not considered in calculating the total weighted average exercise price in the table . because the dmicp shares are outstanding , they should be included in the denominator ( and not the numerator ) of a dilution calculation . item 13 . certain relationships and related transactions and director independence . the information required by this item 13 is included under the captions 201ccorporate governance 2013 related person transaction policy , 201d 201ccorporate governance 2013 certain relationships and related person transactions of directors , executive officers , and 5 percent stockholders , 201d and 201ccorporate governance 2013 director independence 201d in the 2017 proxy statement , and that information is incorporated by reference in this form 10-k . item 14 . principal accountant fees and services . the information required by this item 14 is included under the caption 201cproposal 2 2013 ratification of appointment of independent auditors 201d in the 2017 proxy statement , and that information is incorporated by reference in this form 10-k. .
Question: w h a t i s t h e t o t a l v a l u e o f t h e i s s u e d s e c u r i t i e s a p p r o v e d b y s e c u r i t y h o l d e r s , ( i n m i l l i o n s ) ?
| 5,228 |
87%
|
Given the context, answer the question.
Context: areas exceeding 14.1 million acres ( 5.7 million hectares ) . products and brand designations appearing in italics are trademarks of international paper or a related company . industry segment results industrial packaging demand for industrial packaging products is closely correlated with non-durable industrial goods production , as well as with demand for processed foods , poultry , meat and agricultural products . in addition to prices and volumes , major factors affecting the profitability of industrial packaging are raw material and energy costs , freight costs , manufacturing efficiency and product mix . industrial packaging net sales and operating profits include the results of the temple-inland packaging operations from the date of acquisition in february 2012 and the results of the brazil packaging business from the date of acquisition in january 2013 . in addition , due to the acquisition of a majority share of olmuksa international paper sabanci ambalaj sanayi ve ticaret a.s. , ( now called olmuksan international paper or olmuksan ) net sales for our corrugated packaging business in turkey are included in the business segment totals beginning in the first quarter of 2013 and the operating profits reflect a higher ownership percentage than in previous years . net sales for 2013 increased 12% ( 12 % ) to $ 14.8 billion compared with $ 13.3 billion in 2012 , and 42% ( 42 % ) compared with $ 10.4 billion in 2011 . operating profits were 69% ( 69 % ) higher in 2013 than in 2012 and 57% ( 57 % ) higher than in 2011 . excluding costs associated with the acquisition and integration of temple-inland , the divestiture of three containerboard mills and other special items , operating profits in 2013 were 36% ( 36 % ) higher than in 2012 and 59% ( 59 % ) higher than in 2011 . benefits from the net impact of higher average sales price realizations and an unfavorable mix ( $ 749 million ) were offset by lower sales volumes ( $ 73 million ) , higher operating costs ( $ 64 million ) , higher maintenance outage costs ( $ 16 million ) and higher input costs ( $ 102 million ) . additionally , operating profits in 2013 include costs of $ 62 million associated with the integration of temple-inland , a gain of $ 13 million related to a bargain purchase adjustment on the acquisition of a majority share of our operations in turkey , and a net gain of $ 1 million for other items , while operating profits in 2012 included costs of $ 184 million associated with the acquisition and integration of temple-inland , mill divestiture costs of $ 91 million , costs associated with the restructuring of our european packaging business of $ 17 million and a $ 3 million gain for other items . industrial packaging .
in millions | 2013 | 2012 | 2011 sales | $ 14810 | $ 13280 | $ 10430 operating profit | 1801 | 1066 | 1147
north american industrial packaging net sales were $ 12.5 billion in 2013 compared with $ 11.6 billion in 2012 and $ 8.6 billion in 2011 . operating profits in 2013 were $ 1.8 billion ( both including and excluding costs associated with the integration of temple-inland and other special items ) compared with $ 1.0 billion ( $ 1.3 billion excluding costs associated with the acquisition and integration of temple-inland and mill divestiture costs ) in 2012 and $ 1.1 billion ( both including and excluding costs associated with signing an agreement to acquire temple-inland ) in 2011 . sales volumes decreased in 2013 compared with 2012 reflecting flat demand for boxes and the impact of commercial decisions . average sales price realizations were significantly higher mainly due to the realization of price increases for domestic containerboard and boxes . input costs were higher for wood , energy and recycled fiber . freight costs also increased . planned maintenance downtime costs were higher than in 2012 . manufacturing operating costs decreased , but were offset by inflation and higher overhead and distribution costs . the business took about 850000 tons of total downtime in 2013 of which about 450000 were market- related and 400000 were maintenance downtime . in 2012 , the business took about 945000 tons of total downtime of which about 580000 were market-related and about 365000 were maintenance downtime . operating profits in 2013 included $ 62 million of costs associated with the integration of temple-inland . operating profits in 2012 included $ 184 million of costs associated with the acquisition and integration of temple-inland and $ 91 million of costs associated with the divestiture of three containerboard mills . looking ahead to 2014 , compared with the fourth quarter of 2013 , sales volumes in the first quarter are expected to increase for boxes due to a higher number of shipping days offset by the impact from the severe winter weather events impacting much of the u.s . input costs are expected to be higher for energy , recycled fiber , wood and starch . planned maintenance downtime spending is expected to be about $ 51 million higher with outages scheduled at six mills compared with four mills in the 2013 fourth quarter . manufacturing operating costs are expected to be lower . however , operating profits will be negatively impacted by the adverse winter weather in the first quarter of 2014 . emea industrial packaging net sales in 2013 include the sales of our packaging operations in turkey which are now fully consolidated . net sales were $ 1.3 billion in 2013 compared with $ 1.0 billion in 2012 and $ 1.1 billion in 2011 . operating profits in 2013 were $ 43 million ( $ 32 .
Question: w h a t p e r c e n t a g e o f i n d u s t r i a l p a c k a g i n g s a l e s w h e r e r e p r e s e n t e d b y n o r t h a m e r i c a n i n d u s t r i a l p a c k a g i n g n e t s a l e s i n 2 0 1 2 ?
| 5,229 |
37.6%
|
Given the context, answer the question.
Context: entergy louisiana , llc management's financial discussion and analysis net revenue 2008 compared to 2007 net revenue consists of operating revenues net of : 1 ) fuel , fuel-related expenses , and gas purchased for resale , 2 ) purchased power expenses , and 3 ) other regulatory charges . following is an analysis of the change in net revenue comparing 2008 to 2007 . amount ( in millions ) .
| amount ( in millions ) 2007 net revenue | $ 991.1 retail electric price | -17.1 ( 17.1 ) purchased power capacity | -12.0 ( 12.0 ) net wholesale revenue | -7.4 ( 7.4 ) other | 4.6 2008 net revenue | $ 959.2
the retail electric price variance is primarily due to the cessation of the interim storm recovery through the formula rate plan upon the act 55 financing of storm costs and a credit passed on to customers as a result of the act 55 storm cost financing , partially offset by increases in the formula rate plan effective october 2007 . refer to "hurricane rita and hurricane katrina" and "state and local rate regulation" below for a discussion of the interim recovery of storm costs , the act 55 storm cost financing , and the formula rate plan filing . the purchased power capacity variance is due to the amortization of deferred capacity costs effective september 2007 as a result of the formula rate plan filing in may 2007 . purchased power capacity costs are offset in base revenues due to a base rate increase implemented to recover incremental deferred and ongoing purchased power capacity charges . see "state and local rate regulation" below for a discussion of the formula rate plan filing . the net wholesale revenue variance is primarily due to provisions recorded for potential rate refunds related to the treatment of interruptible load in pricing entergy system affiliate sales . gross operating revenue and , fuel and purchased power expenses gross operating revenues increased primarily due to an increase of $ 364.7 million in fuel cost recovery revenues due to higher fuel rates offset by decreased usage . the increase was partially offset by a decrease of $ 56.8 million in gross wholesale revenue due to a decrease in system agreement rough production cost equalization credits . fuel and purchased power expenses increased primarily due to increases in the average market prices of natural gas and purchased power , partially offset by a decrease in the recovery from customers of deferred fuel costs. .
Question: w h a t p e r c e n t o f t h e c h a n g e i n n e t r e v e n u e b e t w e e n 2 0 0 7 a n d 2 0 0 8 w a s d u e t o p u r c h a s e d p o w e r c a p a c i t y ?
| 5,230 |
385.4
|
Given the context, answer the question.
Context: united kingdom . bermuda re 2019s uk branch conducts business in the uk and is subject to taxation in the uk . bermuda re believes that it has operated and will continue to operate its bermuda operation in a manner which will not cause them to be subject to uk taxation . if bermuda re 2019s bermuda operations were to become subject to uk income tax , there could be a material adverse impact on the company 2019s financial condition , results of operations and cash flow . ireland . holdings ireland and ireland re conduct business in ireland and are subject to taxation in ireland . available information . the company 2019s annual reports on form 10-k , quarterly reports on form 10-q , current reports on form 8- k , proxy statements and amendments to those reports are available free of charge through the company 2019s internet website at http://www.everestre.com as soon as reasonably practicable after such reports are electronically filed with the securities and exchange commission ( the 201csec 201d ) . item 1a . risk factors in addition to the other information provided in this report , the following risk factors should be considered when evaluating an investment in our securities . if the circumstances contemplated by the individual risk factors materialize , our business , financial condition and results of operations could be materially and adversely affected and the trading price of our common shares could decline significantly . risks relating to our business fluctuations in the financial markets could result in investment losses . prolonged and severe disruptions in the public debt and equity markets , such as occurred during 2008 , could result in significant realized and unrealized losses in our investment portfolio . for the year ended december 31 , 2008 , we incurred $ 695.8 million of realized investment gains and $ 310.4 million of unrealized investment losses . although financial markets significantly improved during 2009 and 2010 , they could deteriorate in the future and again result in substantial realized and unrealized losses , which could have a material adverse impact on our results of operations , equity , business and insurer financial strength and debt ratings . our results could be adversely affected by catastrophic events . we are exposed to unpredictable catastrophic events , including weather-related and other natural catastrophes , as well as acts of terrorism . any material reduction in our operating results caused by the occurrence of one or more catastrophes could inhibit our ability to pay dividends or to meet our interest and principal payment obligations . subsequent to april 1 , 2010 , we define a catastrophe as an event that causes a loss on property exposures before reinsurance of at least $ 10.0 million , before corporate level reinsurance and taxes . prior to april 1 , 2010 , we used a threshold of $ 5.0 million . by way of illustration , during the past five calendar years , pre-tax catastrophe losses , net of contract specific reinsurance but before cessions under corporate reinsurance programs , were as follows: .
calendar year: | pre-tax catastrophe losses ( dollars in millions ) | 2010 | $ 571.1 2009 | 67.4 2008 | 364.3 2007 | 160.0 2006 | 287.9
.
Question: w h a t w o u l d b e t h e n e t v a l u e , i n m i l l i o n s o f d o l l a r s , o f i n v e s t m e n t g a i n s i n 2 0 0 8 i f a l l u n r e a l i z e d l o s s e s w e r e r e a l i z e d ?
| 5,231 |
38%
|
Given the context, answer the question.
Context: taxing authorities could challenge our historical and future tax positions . our future effective tax rates could be affected by changes in the mix of earnings in countries with differing statutory rates and changes in tax laws or their interpretation including changes related to tax holidays or tax incentives . our taxes could increase if certain tax holidays or incentives are not renewed upon expiration , or if tax rates or regimes applicable to us in such jurisdictions are otherwise increased . the amount of tax we pay is subject to our interpretation of applicable tax laws in the jurisdictions in which we file . we have taken and will continue to take tax positions based on our interpretation of such tax laws . in particular , we will seek to organize and operate ourselves in such a way that we are and remain tax resident in the united kingdom . additionally , in determining the adequacy of our provision for income taxes , we regularly assess the likelihood of adverse outcomes resulting from tax examinations . while it is often difficult to predict the final outcome or the timing of the resolution of a tax examination , our reserves for uncertain tax benefits reflect the outcome of tax positions that are more likely than not to occur . while we believe that we have complied with all applicable tax laws , there can be no assurance that a taxing authority will not have a different interpretation of the law and assess us with additional taxes . should additional taxes be assessed , this may result in a material adverse effect on our results of operations and financial condition . item 1b . unresolved staff comments we have no unresolved sec staff comments to report . item 2 . properties as of december 31 , 2016 , we owned or leased 126 major manufacturing sites and 15 major technical centers . a manufacturing site may include multiple plants and may be wholly or partially owned or leased . we also have many smaller manufacturing sites , sales offices , warehouses , engineering centers , joint ventures and other investments strategically located throughout the world . we have a presence in 46 countries . the following table shows the regional distribution of our major manufacturing sites by the operating segment that uses such facilities : north america europe , middle east & africa asia pacific south america total .
| north america | europemiddle east& africa | asia pacific | south america | total electrical/electronic architecture | 32 | 34 | 25 | 5 | 96 powertrain systems | 4 | 8 | 5 | 1 | 18 electronics and safety | 3 | 6 | 3 | 2014 | 12 total | 39 | 48 | 33 | 6 | 126
in addition to these manufacturing sites , we had 15 major technical centers : five in north america ; five in europe , middle east and africa ; four in asia pacific ; and one in south america . of our 126 major manufacturing sites and 15 major technical centers , which include facilities owned or leased by our consolidated subsidiaries , 75 are primarily owned and 66 are primarily leased . we frequently review our real estate portfolio and develop footprint strategies to support our customers 2019 global plans , while at the same time supporting our technical needs and controlling operating expenses . we believe our evolving portfolio will meet current and anticipated future needs . item 3 . legal proceedings we are from time to time subject to various actions , claims , suits , government investigations , and other proceedings incidental to our business , including those arising out of alleged defects , breach of contracts , competition and antitrust matters , product warranties , intellectual property matters , personal injury claims and employment-related matters . it is our opinion that the outcome of such matters will not have a material adverse impact on our consolidated financial position , results of operations , or cash flows . with respect to warranty matters , although we cannot ensure that the future costs of warranty claims by customers will not be material , we believe our established reserves are adequate to cover potential warranty settlements . however , the final amounts required to resolve these matters could differ materially from our recorded estimates. .
Question: w h a t p e r c e n t a g e o f m a j o r m a n u f a c t u r i n g s i t e s a r e i n e u r o p e m i d d l e e a s t & a f r i c a ?
| 5,232 |
-4.3
|
Given the context, answer the question.
Context: - the increase in level 3 short-term borrowings and long-term debt of $ 2.8 billion and $ 7.3 billion , respectively , resulted from transfers in of level 2 positions as prices and other valuation inputs became unobservable , plus the additions of new issuances for fair value accounting was elected . items measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis certain assets and liabilities are measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis and therefore are not included in the tables above . these include assets measured at cost that have been written down to fair value during the periods as a result of an impairment . in addition , assets such as loans held for sale that are measured at the lower of cost or market ( locom ) that were recognized at fair value below cost at the end of the period . the company recorded goodwill impairment charges of $ 9.6 billion as of december 31 , 2008 , as determined based on level 3 inputs . the primary cause of goodwill impairment was the overall weak industry outlook and continuing operating losses . these factors contributed to the overall decline in the stock price and the related market capitalization of citigroup . see note 19 , 201cgoodwill and intangible assets 201d on page 166 , for additional information on goodwill impairment . the company performed an impairment analysis of intangible assets related to the old lane multi-strategy hedge fund during the first quarter of 2008 . as a result , a pre-tax write-down of $ 202 million , representing the remaining unamortized balance of the intangible assets , was recorded during the first quarter of 2008 . the measurement of fair value was determined using level 3 input factors along with a discounted cash flow approach . during the fourth quarter of 2008 , the company performed an impairment analysis of japan's nikko asset management fund contracts which represent the rights to manage and collect fees on investor assets and are accounted for as indefinite-lived intangible assets . as a result , an impairment loss of $ 937 million pre-tax was recorded . the related fair value was determined using an income approach which relies on key drivers and future expectations of the business that are considered level 3 input factors . the fair value of loans measured on a locom basis is determined where possible using quoted secondary-market prices . such loans are generally classified in level 2 of the fair-value hierarchy given the level of activity in the market and the frequency of available quotes . if no such quoted price exists , the fair value of a loan is determined using quoted prices for a similar asset or assets , adjusted for the specific attributes of that loan . the following table presents all loans held-for-sale that are carried at locom as of december 31 , 2008 and december 31 , 2007 ( in billions ) : .
| aggregate cost | fair value | level 2 | level 3 december 31 2008 | $ 3.1 | $ 2.1 | $ 0.8 | $ 1.3 december 31 2007 | 33.6 | 31.9 | 5.1 | 26.8
loans held-for-sale that are carried at locom as of december 31 , 2008 significantly declined compared to december 31 , 2007 because most of these loans were either sold or reclassified to held-for-investment category. .
Question: w h a t w a s t h e c h a n g e i n b i l l i o n s o f l o a n s h e l d - f o r - s a l e t h a t a r e c a r r i e d a t l o c o m i n t h e l e v e l 2 c a t e g o r y f r o m 2 0 0 7 t o 2 0 0 8 ?
| 5,233 |
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.