text
stringlengths 0
89.3k
|
|---|
subject to constraints 3and in closedloop with 33
|
is inputtostate stable ISS in Xfeasfor any admissible
|
sequence of combined disturbances η where Xfeasis the
|
set of all initial states xkfor which 32is feasible
|
PROOF Due to Theorem 3 we know that 32 is re
|
cursively feasible for all xk Xfeas Therefore we can
|
prove ISS by showing that the optimal value function
|
of 32 is an ISSLyapunov function in Xfeasaccord
|
ing to Definition 5 3 Lemma B44 Denote 32a as
|
VNxkzv and the optimal value function of 32
|
asV
|
Nxk ie VN evaluated at the optimal solu
|
tionzv Using the candidate sequences ˆzˆvdefined
|
in 37 it follows that
|
V
|
Nxk1V
|
NxkVNxk1 ˆzˆvV
|
Nxk
|
lfˆzNlfz
|
N
|
N1X
|
i0lˆziˆvilz
|
i v
|
i
|
10We then use the candidate sequences 37 and uniform
|
continuity of lf with corresponding Kfunction βf
|
to obtain the upper bound
|
lfˆzNlfz
|
N lfAKfz
|
N Γwklfz
|
N
|
lfAKfz
|
NlfAKfz
|
N
|
lfAKfz
|
Nlfz
|
N
|
lfAKfz
|
NΓwklfAKfz
|
N
|
lfAKfz
|
Nlfz
|
NβfΓwk
|
We rewrite the sum of the cost differences as
|
N1X
|
i0lˆziˆvilz
|
i v
|
i lz
|
0 v
|
0 lˆzN1ˆvN1
|
N1X
|
i1lˆzi1ˆvi1lz
|
i v
|
i
|
and use the candidate sequences 37 and uniform conti
|
nuity of l with βx βu the respective Kfunctions
|
to obtain
|
lˆzi1ˆvi1lz
|
i v
|
ilz
|
iΦe
|
i0wk v
|
iΦν
|
i0wk
|
lz
|
i v
|
i
|
lz
|
iΦe
|
i0wk v
|
iΦν
|
i0wk
|
lz
|
i v
|
iΦν
|
i0wk
|
lz
|
i v
|
iΦν
|
i0wklz
|
i v
|
i
|
βxΦe
|
i0wkβuΦν
|
i0wk
|
Additionally we rewrite
|
lˆzN1ˆvN1 lz
|
NΦe
|
N0wk Kfz
|
NΦν
|
N0wk
|
lz
|
NΦe
|
N0wk Kfz
|
NΦν
|
N0wk
|
lz
|
N Kfz
|
NΦν
|
N0wk
|
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.