text
stringlengths 0
89.3k
|
|---|
5 SLTMPC with Asynchronous Updates
|
Both the proposed filterbased SLTMPC scheme 32
|
and the method presented in 25 are computationally
|
demanding due to the concurrent optimization of nom
|
inal trajectories zvp error dynamics 15 parame
|
terized by error system responses ΦeΦνand distur
|
bance filter ΣΞ and terminal set scaling α This ren
|
ders both methods unsuitable for practical applications
|
with fast sampling times and limited computational re
|
sources To alleviate some of the computational burden
|
11we extend the asynchronous computation scheme intro
|
duced in 28 for the proposed filterbased SLTMPC To
|
reduce the complexity of 32 we remove error dynam
|
ics parameters ΦeΦνΣΞ and terminal scaling α
|
as optimization variables and instead use values that
|
are computed at a lower frequency The asynchronous
|
computation scheme uses this idea to split the opti
|
mization of 32 into two separate processes the pri
|
mary and the secondary process The secondary pro
|
cess computes the error dynamics parameters and the
|
terminal set scaling before passing them to the pri
|
mary process which only optimizes the nominal trajec
|
tories zvp The asynchronous computation scheme
|
therefore enables running the primary process in closed
|
loop with system 1 at a high frequency The compu
|
tationally expensive secondary process then runs con
|
currently at a lower frequency and reduces conservative
|
ness by periodically providing new error dynamics pa
|
rameters and terminal set scalings Apart from limited
|
computational resources practical applications also im
|
pose memory constraints ie we can only store a lim
|
ited number of error dynamics parameters and terminal
|
set scalings which we handle by specific memory update
|
rules Figure 1 provides an overview of this scheme
|
51 Secondary Process Tube Optimization
|
The main objective of the secondary process is to com
|
pute error dynamics parameters ΦeΦνΣΞ and ter
|
minal set scaling α which define the state input and
|
disturbance tubes and the terminal set Therefore we
|
can choose the cost function of the secondary process ac
|
cording to any criterion the tubes and the terminal set
|
should fulfill eg a cost on Φepromotes more aggressive
|
tube controllers thus leading to smaller error bounds on
|
the state trajectories For more details on possible cost
|
functions and their effect on the tubes we refer to 28
|
Section 32 We formulate the secondary process simi
|
larly to 32 but with a modified objective ie
|
min
|
ΦeΦνΣΞα0LΦeΦνΣΞ 42a
|
st 32b 32l 42b
|
where L is the chosen cost function After termination
|
of 42 we use the optimized error system responses Φe
|
Φνto compute the tightened state and input constraints
|
fori 0 Nas
|
ZiX F iΦeViU F iΦν43
|
Additionally we use the optimized disturbance fil
|
terΣΞto compute the disturbance tubes for d
|
1 nDandi 0 N1 as
|
Qd
|
iσi1W F iΨd 44x Primary
|
Process 46
|
Memory M
|
Size MΦxeΦue
|
ΣΞ αSecondary
|
Process 42u
|
Fig 1 Visualization of the asynchronous computation
|
scheme for filterbased SLTMPC the secondary process com
|
putes error system responses ΦeΦν disturbance filter ΣΞ
|
and terminal set scaling α which are then passed to the pri
|
mary process and stored in memory M
|
where
|
FiΨdW i1M
|
j0Ψd
|
ijW
|
and Ψd
|
ijdefined in 18 For iN the disturbance
|
tubes are computed as
|
Qd
|
NσNW F NΨd 45
|
These sets are then passed to the primary pro
|
cess together with the error system responses the
|
disturbance filter and the terminal set scaling as
|
Mnew ZiViQd
|
i αΦeΦνΣΞ Since the mem
|
oryMMmm 0 M1 where we denote the
|
mthmemory entry as Mm is finite we need to define
|
a procedure that updates the memory whenever the
|
secondary process has computed a new Mnew thus ren
|
dering the memory timevarying In case the memory
|
is full the proposed update procedure in Algorithm 1
|
selects a memory slot Mmto store Mnewaccording to a
|
heuristic FMk For example FMk can choose the
|
slot with the least importance to the solution of the
|
primary process or assign a score to each memory slot
|
based on its historical importance and then choose the
|
slot with the lowest score
|
Algorithm 1 Update memory MSecondary Process
|
Input MnewMk1λk1
|
Output Mk
|
1procedure updateMemory Mnew
|
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.