chunk_id
stringlengths 3
9
| chunk
stringlengths 1
100
|
---|---|
55_99
|
"I think it's because rich people want to show off to their friends that they have barami (, social
|
55_100
|
power), that they can afford to hunt because they have so much money."
|
55_101
|
History
|
55_102
|
Paleolithic, Mesolithic and Neolithic stone tools have been found in the Khwae Noi and Khwae Yai
|
55_103
|
River valleys and parts of the sanctuary were inhabited by Neolithic man. For at least 700 years,
|
55_104
|
the Dawna-Tenasserim region has been home to Mon and Karen people, but burial grounds in Thung Yai
|
55_105
|
and Huai Kha Khaeng Wildlife Sanctuary have not been systematically researched.
|
55_106
|
The Thai name "Thung Yai Naresuan" refers to the "big field" (thung yai) or savanna in the centre
|
55_107
|
of the sanctuary, and to King Naresuan, a famous Siamese ruler who supposedly based his army in the
|
55_108
|
area to wage war against Burma sometime during his reign of the Ayutthaya Kingdom from 1590 until
|
55_109
|
his death in 1605.
|
55_110
|
The Karen people who live in the sanctuary call the savanna pia aethala aethea which may be
|
55_111
|
translated as "place of the knowing sage". It refers to the area as a place where ascetic hermits
|
55_112
|
called aethea have lived and meditated and may do so even today. The Karen in Thung Yai regard them
|
55_113
|
as holy men important for their history and identity in Thung Yai and revere them in a specific
|
55_114
|
cult.
|
55_115
|
Historical sources as well as local oral tradition suggest that settlement of Karen people in Thung
|
55_116
|
Yai did not occur before the second half of the 18th century. At that time, due to political and
|
55_117
|
religious persecution in Burma, predominantly Pwo-Karen from the hinterlands of Moulmein and Tavoy
|
55_118
|
migrated into the area northeast of the Three Pagodas Pass, where they received formal settlement
|
55_119
|
rights from the Siamese Governor of Kanchanaburi. Sometime between 1827 and 1839 the Siamese King
|
55_120
|
Rama III established this area as a principality (mueang) and the Karen leader who governed the
|
55_121
|
principality received the Siamese title of nobility Phra Si Suwannakhiri. During the second half of
|
55_122
|
the 19th century, this Karen principality at the Burmese border became particularly important for
|
55_123
|
the Siamese King Rama V (Chulalongkorn) in his negotiations with the British colonial power in
|
55_124
|
Burma regarding the demarcation of their western border with Siam.
|
55_125
|
At the beginning of the 20th century, when the modern Thai nation state was established, the Karen
|
55_126
|
in Thung Yai lost their former status and importance. During the first half of the 20th century,
|
55_127
|
external political influences were minimal in Thung Yai and the Karen communities were highly
|
55_128
|
autonomous regarding their internal affairs. This changed in the second half of the 20th century,
|
55_129
|
when the Thai nation state extended its institutions into the peripheral areas and the Karen
|
55_130
|
re-appeared as chao khao or "hill tribes" on the national political agenda, as forest destroyers
|
55_131
|
and illegal immigrants.
|
55_132
|
Plans to protect the forests and wildlife at the upper Khwae Yai and Khwae Noi river grew in the
|
55_133
|
mid-1960s. Due to strong logging and mining interests in the area, it was not before 1972 that the
|
55_134
|
Huai Kha Khaeng Wildlife Sanctuary could be established, and Thung Yai resistance was even
|
55_135
|
stronger. However, in April 1973 a military helicopter crashed near Thung Yai and revealed an
|
55_136
|
illegal hunting party of senior military officers with family members, businessmen, and a film
|
55_137
|
star, arousing nationwide public outrage which finally led to the fall of the Thanom-Prapas Regime
|
55_138
|
after the uprising of 14 October 1973. After this accident and under a new democratic government,
|
55_139
|
the area finally could be declared a wildlife sanctuary in 1974. After the military had taken power
|
55_140
|
once again in October 1976, many of the activists of the democracy movement fled into peripheral
|
55_141
|
regions of the country and some of them found refuge among the Karen people living in Thung Yai.
|
55_142
|
During the 1960s, not only timber and ore, but also the water of the western forests as
|
55_143
|
hydroelectric power resources became of interest for commercial profit and national development. A
|
55_144
|
system of several big dams was planned to produce electricity for the growing urban centres. On the
|
55_145
|
Khwae Yai River the Si Nakharin Dam was finished in 1980 and the Tha Thung Na Dam in 1981, while
|
55_146
|
the Khao Laem Dam (renamed Vajiralongkorn Dam) on the Khwae Noi River south of Thung Yai was
|
55_147
|
completed in 1984. The Nam Choan Dam, the last of the projected dams, was supposed to flood a
|
55_148
|
forest area of about 223 km2 within the Thung Yai Naresuan Wildlife Sanctuary.
|
55_149
|
A public dispute about the Nam Choan Dam project lasted for more than six years, dominating
|
55_150
|
national politics and public debate in early-1988 before it was shelved in April that year.
|
55_151
|
Pointing to the high value of Thung Yai for nature conservation and biodiversity, dam opponents on
|
55_152
|
the national and international level raised the possibility of declaring the area a world heritage
|
55_153
|
site. This prestigious option would have been lost with a huge dam and reservoir in the middle of
|
55_154
|
the two wildlife sanctuaries most promising to meet the requirements for a global heritage.
|
55_155
|
After the dam project was shelved, the proposal to UNESCO was written by Seub Nakhasathien and
|
55_156
|
another outspoken opponent of the Nam Choan Dam, and, in December 1991, Thung Yai Naresuan together
|
55_157
|
with the adjoining Huai Kha Khaeng Wildlife Sanctuary was declared a Natural World Heritage Site by
|
55_158
|
UNESCO. In the nomination, the "outstanding universal value" of the two sanctuaries is, in first
|
55_159
|
place, justified with their extraordinary high biodiversity due to their unique position at the
|
55_160
|
junction of four biogeographic zones, as well as with its size and "the undisturbed nature of its
|
55_161
|
habitats". The death of Seub Nakhasathien, the forest conservator instrumental in the UNESCO
|
55_162
|
listing who committed suicide in 1990, transformed the status of Thung Yai Naresuan and the
|
55_163
|
adjacent Huay Kha Kaeng Complex into a sacrosanct site and inspired many young persons to become
|
55_164
|
forest patrol staff.
|
55_165
|
Even though the UNESCO nomination explicitly emphasizes the "undisturbed nature" of the area, and
|
55_166
|
notwithstanding scientific studies supporting traditional settlement and use rights of the Karen
|
55_167
|
people in Thung Yai as well as the sustainability of their traditional land use system and their
|
55_168
|
strong intention to remain in their homeland and to protect it, governmental authorities regard the
|
55_169
|
people living in Thung Yai as a threat to the sanctuary and pursue their resettlement.
|
55_170
|
Karen villages in Huai Kha Khaeng were removed when the sanctuary was established in 1972, and in
|
55_171
|
the late-1970s the remaining communities in Huai Kha Khaeng had to leave when the Si Nakharin Dam
|
55_172
|
flooded their settlement areas. During the 1980s and early-1990s, villages of the Hmong ethnic
|
55_173
|
minority group were removed from the Huai Kha Khaeng and Thung Yai Naresuan Wildlife Sanctuaries.
|
55_174
|
The resettlement of the remaining Karen in Thung Yai was announced in the management plan for the
|
55_175
|
sanctuary, drafted in the late-1980s, as well as in the proposal for the world heritage site. But,
|
55_176
|
when the Thai Royal Forest Department tried to remove them in the early-1990s, it had to reverse
|
55_177
|
the resettlement scheme due to strong public criticism. Since then, the authorities have used
|
55_178
|
repression, intimidation, and terror to convince the Karen to leave their homeland "voluntarily",
|
55_179
|
and placed restrictions on their traditional land use system which will inevitably cause its
|
55_180
|
breakdown and deprive the Karen of subsistence.
|
55_181
|
the sanctuary employs about 200 staff to care for more than 1.3 million rai (2,080 km2). The
|
55_182
|
sanctuary is larger than the total area of Bangkok, which is 98,000 rai in size. There are 25
|
55_183
|
ranger stations inside the sanctuary. Each station is assigned three firearms, some inoperable.
|
55_184
|
Sanctuary staff patrol some 12,000 km of forest paths, and another 10,000 km in the adjoining Huai
|
55_185
|
Kha Khaeng sanctuary. The Thailand Development Research Institute (TDRI) calculates that each
|
55_186
|
forest staffer needs to police 2,083 rai (3.3 km2). In Thailand overall there are 443 protected
|
55_187
|
forest zones totalling 66.3 million rai, or 20.68 percent of the country's total area. The
|
55_188
|
government allocates a budget of around 61 baht per rai to manage them.
|
55_189
|
See also
Wildlife of Thailand
Indochina
References
|
55_190
|
External links
Information regarding ethnic minority people living in the sanctuary
|
55_191
|
Pictures from Thung Yai
Yai.org Western Forest Conservation Club
|
55_192
|
World Heritage Sites in Thailand
Wildlife sanctuaries of Thailand
|
55_193
|
Geography of Kanchanaburi province
Geography of Tak province
Protected areas established in 1974
|
55_194
|
1974 establishments in Thailand
Dawna Range
|
56_0
|
Sesame Beginnings is a line of products and a video series, spun off the children's television
|
56_1
|
series Sesame Street. The line is targeted towards infants and their parents, and products are
|
56_2
|
designed to increase family interactivity.
|
56_3
|
Product line
|
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.